Semantic search
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Issue date | Title | Topic | |
---|---|---|---|
ML18152B445 | 17 August 1999 | Comment on Draft Rg DG-4006, Demonstrating Compliance with Radiological Criterial for License Termination. | |
ML20148M651 | 18 June 1997 | Comment Opposing Proposed Suppl to Bulletin 96-001 That Would Request Licensees to Take Action to Ensure Continued Operability of Control Rods | Shutdown Margin |
L-95-045, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 51 Re Decommissioning of Nuclear Power Reactors | 19 October 1995 | Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 51 Re Decommissioning of Nuclear Power Reactors | |
ML18153A758 | 1 September 1995 | Comment Supporting Review of Revised NRC SALP Program | Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance |
ML18153A730 | 28 April 1995 | Comment Supporting Proposed GL Re Pressure Locking & Thermal Binding of safety-related power-operated Gate Valves | Stroke time Backfit |
ML20080M112 | 27 February 1995 | Comment Re Proposed Suppl 5 to GL 88-20 IPEEE for Severe Accident Vulnerabilities. Proposed GL Suppl Should Indicate That Licensees Can Use Llnl Hazard Results of NUREG-1488 Re Revised Hazard Estimates Instead of NUREG/CR-5250 | |
ML20076H964 | 11 October 1994 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rule Re Pilot Program for NRC Recognition of Good Performance by Npps.Encourages NRC to Consider Comments Submitted by Nuclear Energy Institute on Behalf of Nuclear Power Industry | |
ML20073M075 | 23 September 1994 | Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR30,40,70 & 72 Re Clarification of Decommissioning Funding Requirements. Permitting Access to Funds Only on Semiannual Basis Seems Unnecessarily Restrictive | |
ML20069L529 | 13 June 1994 | Comment Supporting Proposed Rulemaking 50-60 Re Petition for Rulemaking & Changes to 10CFR50.54 | |
ML20029D825 | 29 April 1994 | Comment Supporting Elimination of Proposed 5-yr Implementation Schedule & Believes That Current Programs Adequate to Maintain Containment Integrity | VT-2 |
ML20069G677 | 30 December 1993 | Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-59 Requesting Change to 10CFR26.80,10CFR50.54(p)(3),10CFR50.54(t) & 10CFR73.55(g)(4) | Fitness for Duty Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance Safeguards Contingency Plan |
ML20046D038 | 26 July 1993 | Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR170 & 171, FY91 & 92 Proposed Rule Implementing Us Court of Appeals Decision & Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery,FY93. Supports Rule | |
ML20045D803 | 14 June 1993 | Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 54, FSAR Submittals. Endorses Change in Regulation to Eliminate Confusion Re Two Refs to Existing Reporting Requirement | |
ML20044G197 | 24 May 1993 | Comment Supporting Draft Insp Procedure Re Commercial Grade Procurement & Dedication | |
ML20044E572 | 19 May 1993 | Comment Supporting Proposed Generic Ltr for Relocation of TS Tables on Instrument Response Time Limits | |
ML20044D327 | 7 May 1993 | Comment Opposing Proposed GL Availability & Adequacy of Design Bases Info | |
ML20125B614 | 3 December 1992 | Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50,app a Re GDC-2 & 10CFR50.49 Re Environ Qualification of Electric Equipment Important to Safety for Nuclear Power Plants | Safe Shutdown Tornado Missile Design basis earthquake Exemption Request |
ML20099E102 | 29 July 1992 | Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Minor Mods to Nuclear Power Reactor Event Reporting Requirements | |
ML20095J688 | 23 April 1992 | Comment Opposing Draft Reg Guide DG-1022, Emergency Planning & Preparedness for Nuclear Power Plants | |
ML20077R516 | 14 August 1991 | Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-20-20 Re Reduced Total Effective Dose Equivalent to Individual Members of Public from 0.5 Rem (5 Msv) to 0.1 Rem (1 Msv) | |
ML20058D475 | 19 October 1990 | Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal | License Renewal |
ML20011E486 | 7 February 1990 | Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR71 Re Compatibility of Pu Air Transport Regulations W/Iaea Stds.Supports EEI-UWASTE/NUMARC Comments to Be Provided to NRC by 900209 | |
ML20248D283 | 28 September 1989 | Notice of Appearance.* Advises That Author Will Enter Appearance in Proceeding on Behalf of Nrc.W/Certificate of Svc | |
ML20247Q266 | 26 September 1989 | Establishment of Aslb.* Board Will Comprise of Mb Margulies, Chairman & Oh Paris & Fj Shon,Members.W/Certificate of Svc. Served on 890926 | |
B13367, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR30,40,50,60,70,72 & 150 Re Preserving Free Flow of Info to Commission.Nrc Made Wise Choice to Not Impose Any Obligation on Private Parties to Include Affirmative Statement in Employment Agreements | 20 September 1989 | Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR30,40,50,60,70,72 & 150 Re Preserving Free Flow of Info to Commission.Nrc Made Wise Choice to Not Impose Any Obligation on Private Parties to Include Affirmative Statement in Employment Agreements | |
ML20248C875 | 13 September 1989 | Response to Order Modifying Licenses & Order to Show Cause Why Licenses Should Not Be Revoked.* Requests Hearing on Issues,Including Funds for Equipment.Supporting Info Encl | Safe Shutdown Incorporated by reference Exemption Request Affidavit |
ML20246C714 | 18 August 1989 | Order to Show Cause Why CPs CPEP-1 & CPEP-2 Should Not Be Revoked & Requiring Licensee to Notify Commission at Least 30 Days Before Taking Possession of Any Classified Equipment | |
ML20245G072 | 3 August 1989 | Comment on Draft Reg Guide, Assuring Availability of Funds for Decommissioning Nuclear Reactors. Recommends That NRC Recommendation on Trust Agreement Wording Be Deleted or NRC Should Grandfather Existing Trusts Such as for Plants | |
ML20248B620 | 2 August 1989 | Comments on Draft Reg Guide, Assuring Availability of Funds for Decommissioning Nuclear Reactors. NRC Should Permit Use of Potential Tax Refund as Source of Decommissioning Funds | |
ELV-00674, Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50,72 & 170 Re Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel in NRC-Approved Storage Casks at Nuclear Power Reactor Sites. 10CFR72.6(c) Should Be Revised to Provide for Storage W/O ISFSI Requirement | 7 July 1989 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50,72 & 170 Re Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel in NRC-Approved Storage Casks at Nuclear Power Reactor Sites. 10CFR72.6(c) Should Be Revised to Provide for Storage W/O ISFSI Requirement | |
ML20246K480 | 5 July 1989 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components | |
ELV-00679, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components. Agrees W/Numarc Comments Provided to NRC on 890626 | 5 July 1989 | Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components. Agrees W/Numarc Comments Provided to NRC on 890626 | |
ML20246D881 | 30 June 1989 | Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components | |
ML20245D248 | 16 June 1989 | Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR50,72 & 170 Re Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel in NRC-Approved Storage Casks at Nuclear Power Reactor Sites. NRC Must Consider Provision in Rule to Permit Indiscriminate Storage of Spent Fuel at Reactors | |
ML20246Q297 | 15 May 1989 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants | |
ML20245J019 | 14 April 1989 | Comment Re Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants | |
ML20244B324 | 10 April 1989 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants | |
ML20247A297 | 4 April 1989 | Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants | |
ML20246M277 | 20 March 1989 | Decision.* Affirms Board Decision LBP-89-05 Granting CP & OL to Licensee.Certificate of Svc Encl.Served on 890321 | |
ML20236B464 | 8 March 1989 | Comments on Proposed Rev 3 to Reg Guide 1.9, Selection, Design,Qualification,Testing & Reliability of Diesel Generator Units Used as Onsite Electric Power Sys at Nuclear Power Plants. Reg Guide Does Not Provide Flexibility | Probabilistic Risk Assessment Overspeed trip |
ML20246N947 | 8 March 1989 | Comment on Proposed Rev 3 to Reg Guide 1.9 Re Selection Design,Qualification,Testing & Reliability of Diesel Generator Units Used as Onsite Electric Power Sys at Nuclear Power Plants | Probabilistic Risk Assessment Overspeed trip |
B13113, Comment on Proposed Rev 3 to Reg Guide 1.9, Selection, Design,Qualification,Testing & Reliability of Diesel Generator Units.... Util Recommends Rule Be Revised to Incorporate Addl Flexibility in Considering Age of Diesel | 8 March 1989 | Comment on Proposed Rev 3 to Reg Guide 1.9, Selection, Design,Qualification,Testing & Reliability of Diesel Generator Units.... Util Recommends Rule Be Revised to Incorporate Addl Flexibility in Considering Age of Diesel | Probabilistic Risk Assessment Overspeed trip |
B13136, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Proposed Rule on Maint Will Not Improve Maint in Plants Nor Improve Safety or Reliability of Plants.Proposed Rule Much Too Vague | 27 February 1989 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Proposed Rule on Maint Will Not Improve Maint in Plants Nor Improve Safety or Reliability of Plants.Proposed Rule Much Too Vague | Backfit |
JPN-89-008, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants | 27 February 1989 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants | Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance Exemption Request Backfit |
ML20235V854 | 27 February 1989 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. Util Committed to Goal of Achieving Improved Reliability & Safety Through Better Maint | Backfit |
ML20235T358 | 27 February 1989 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Util Endorses Comments Filed by NUMARC & Nuclear Util Backfitting & Reform Group.Rule Fails to Provide Basis for Determining Effective Maint Program | Backfit |
ML20235T186 | 24 February 1989 | Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants, Extension of NRC Authority to BOP Portion of Plant & Misapplication of Adequate Protection Std of Backfit Rule | Backfit |
ML20235T739 | 23 February 1989 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors at Nuclear Power Plants | |
ML20235N853 | 14 February 1989 | Comment Supporting Chapter 1 Re Policy Statement on Exemptions Below Regulatory Concern.Policy Development for Criteria for Release of Radioactive Matl Needed for Development of Consistent Waste Mgt Practices | |
ML20235P331 | 8 February 1989 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors at Nuclear Power Plants |