ML20099E102

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Minor Mods to Nuclear Power Reactor Event Reporting Requirements
ML20099E102
Person / Time
Site: Surry  Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 07/29/1992
From: Stewart W
VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.)
To:
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
References
FRN-57FR28642, RULE-PR-50 57FR28642-00018, 57FR28642-18, 92-304, NUDOCS 9208100020
Download: ML20099E102 (2)


Text

_

trauvrL Smrar

~ 'l

.' n h 0' ^

Scc 0 Dominwrt ikuleutni

?.

inrutnuok TechnicalGmser.

t senwr nceIusident

4' Gen Allers nrginia 23060 f f & 'l 8012733551

"$Nc"

/8

'92 Atro -4 All :07 (ra!k y :[ w Toi.v MNGMfA POWm 00Chrb % 4'Je.$FJ Ei< A NDi July 29, 1992 Docketing and Service Branch Serial No.: 92-304 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NL&P/RBP Washington, DC 20555 COMMENTS ON PROPOSED REVISION TO 10 CFR 50 MINOR MODIFICATIONS TO NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR EVENT REPORTING REQUIREMENTS Gentlemsn:

In its Federal Register Notice RIN s150-AE12 dated June 26,1992, the NRC issued a proposed rulemaking to amend its regulations to make minor modifications to the current nuclear power reactor event reporting requirements.

The proposed amendments would delete reporting requirements for some events that have been determined to be of little or no safety significance. These proposed amendments would reduce the industry's reporting burden in event review and assessment.

Virginia Power supports the rulemaking as well as NRC's intention to eliminate requirements marginal to safety.

The attached information is submitted.. for consideration in this rulemaking.

. Very truly yours,

\\

W. L. Stewart Attachment L

9208100020 920729 0

PDR PR PDR So 57FR28642

f ATTACHMENT The following are specific comments on the proposed amendments to the regulations.

NRC Notification after State or Lucal Government is Contacted The proposed rule change should be expanded to include a provision which removes NRC notification requirements when a state or local government branch is notified for an event that is not related to nuclear safety. This would reduce duplicative regulatory burden on licensees.

ESF Actuations Not Required to be Reported As stated in the proposed revision, the Commission proposes to make additional relaxations to event reporting by excluding three additional categories of events. The third category listed excludes events from reporting requirements when an invalid actuation, isolation, or realignment of the reactor water clean-up or designated ventilation systems occurs.

Invalid ESF actuations involving other (than the designated) systems would continue to be reportable.

We suggest that the third category of the proposed revision be expanded to exclude all invalid.ESF actuations, isolations, or realignments with the exception of those that affect reactivity or involve starts of major safety-related compor,c.ts M.;. emergency diesel generators, high head safety injection pumps, auxiliary feed pump, etc.),

invalid Signal Definition The definition of an invalid signal should be simplified. The definition provided in the revision is lengthy and could result in an inappropriate interpretation of an invalid actuation signal.

Typographical Correction The word " intentional" in the background section of the proposed rule change is incorrectly spelled as " international." This should be corrected befora the rule change is finally published.

.