|
|---|
Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML18152B4451999-08-17017 August 1999
Comment on Draft Rg DG-4006, Demonstrating Compliance with Radiological Criterial for License Termination.
ML20148M6511997-06-18018 June 1997
Comment Opposing Proposed Suppl to Bulletin 96-001 That Would Request Licensees to Take Action to Ensure Continued Operability of Control Rods
L-95-045, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 51 Re Decommissioning of Nuclear Power Reactors1995-10-19019 October 1995
Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 51 Re Decommissioning of Nuclear Power Reactors
ML18153A7581995-09-0101 September 1995
Comment Supporting Review of Revised NRC SALP Program
ML18153A7301995-04-28028 April 1995
Comment Supporting Proposed GL Re Pressure Locking & Thermal Binding of safety-related power-operated Gate Valves
ML20080M1121995-02-27027 February 1995
Comment Re Proposed Suppl 5 to GL 88-20 IPEEE for Severe Accident Vulnerabilities. Proposed GL Suppl Should Indicate That Licensees Can Use Llnl Hazard Results of NUREG-1488 Re Revised Hazard Estimates Instead of NUREG/CR-5250
ML20076H9641994-10-11011 October 1994
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule Re Pilot Program for NRC Recognition of Good Performance by Npps.Encourages NRC to Consider Comments Submitted by Nuclear Energy Institute on Behalf of Nuclear Power Industry
ML20073M0751994-09-23023 September 1994
Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR30,40,70 & 72 Re Clarification of Decommissioning Funding Requirements. Permitting Access to Funds Only on Semiannual Basis Seems Unnecessarily Restrictive
ML20069L5291994-06-13013 June 1994
Comment Supporting Proposed Rulemaking 50-60 Re Petition for Rulemaking & Changes to 10CFR50.54
ML20029D8251994-04-29029 April 1994
Comment Supporting Elimination of Proposed 5-yr Implementation Schedule & Believes That Current Programs Adequate to Maintain Containment Integrity
ML20069G6771993-12-30030 December 1993
Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-59 Requesting Change to 10CFR26.80,10CFR50.54(p)(3),10CFR50.54(t) & 10CFR73.55(g)(4)
ML20046D0381993-07-26026 July 1993
Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR170 & 171, FY91 & 92 Proposed Rule Implementing Us Court of Appeals Decision & Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery,FY93. Supports Rule
ML20045D8031993-06-14014 June 1993
Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 54, FSAR Submittals. Endorses Change in Regulation to Eliminate Confusion Re Two Refs to Existing Reporting Requirement
ML20044G1971993-05-24024 May 1993
Comment Supporting Draft Insp Procedure Re Commercial Grade Procurement & Dedication
ML20044E5721993-05-19019 May 1993
Comment Supporting Proposed Generic Ltr for Relocation of TS Tables on Instrument Response Time Limits
ML20044D3271993-05-0707 May 1993
Comment Opposing Proposed GL Availability & Adequacy of Design Bases Info
ML20125B6141992-12-0303 December 1992
Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50,app a Re GDC-2 & 10CFR50.49 Re Environ Qualification of Electric Equipment Important to Safety for Nuclear Power Plants
ML20099E1021992-07-29029 July 1992
Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Minor Mods to Nuclear Power Reactor Event Reporting Requirements
ML20095J6881992-04-23023 April 1992
Comment Opposing Draft Reg Guide DG-1022, Emergency Planning & Preparedness for Nuclear Power Plants
ML20077R5161991-08-14014 August 1991
Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-20-20 Re Reduced Total Effective Dose Equivalent to Individual Members of Public from 0.5 Rem (5 Msv) to 0.1 Rem (1 Msv)
ML20058D4751990-10-19019 October 1990
Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal
ML20235N8531989-02-14014 February 1989
Comment Supporting Chapter 1 Re Policy Statement on Exemptions Below Regulatory Concern.Policy Development for Criteria for Release of Radioactive Matl Needed for Development of Consistent Waste Mgt Practices
ML20235P3311989-02-0808 February 1989
Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors at Nuclear Power Plants
ML20205Q1501988-10-28028 October 1988
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re NUREG-1317, Regulatory Options for Nuclear Plant License Renewal. Safety Sys Functional Insps & Configuration Mgt Programs Support Renewal Basis as Opposed to Relicensing Process
ML20150A9001988-07-0404 July 1988
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re leak-before-break Technology.Further Use of Subj Technology for ECCS Would Reduce Safety Assurances & Safety Benefits.Experience Shows That pipe-thinning Progresses Faster than Expected
ML20150F1391988-07-0202 July 1988
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Expansion of Applicability of Leak Before Break Technology to Functional & Performance Requirements for ECCS & Environ Qualification
ML20150B0001988-07-0101 July 1988
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re leak-before-break (LBB) Technology.Pipes Do Not Always Leak Before Breaking. NRC Has Accepted Faulty Assumptions as Facts Reaching Conclusion That LBB Eliminates Need for Insp.Addl Info Encl
ML20150A9051988-06-30030 June 1988
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re leak-before-break Technology for safety-related Equipment.Nrc Reliance on leak-before-break Is Irrational Response to Very Real Safety Problem.Nrc Should Implement Mandatory Piping Insp
ML20236P5851987-11-0909 November 1987
Transcript of 871109 Briefing in Washington,Dc Re Facility Steam Generator Tube Rupture Event.Pp 1-56.Supporting Documentation Encl
ML20235S9381987-09-25025 September 1987
Comments on Draft NUREG-1150, Reactor Risk Ref Document. Results Are More Pessimistic than Results Obtained Under Idcor Program.Comment on NUREG-4550 Encl
ML20212E1661987-02-25025 February 1987
Transcript of 870225 Briefing in Washington,Dc Re Facility Incident.Pp 1-82.Viewgraphs Encl
ML20151B4271987-02-24024 February 1987
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensing of Nuclear Power Plants Where State &/Or Local Govts Decline to Cooperate in Offsite Emergency Planning
ML20138N5311985-11-0101 November 1985
Memorandum & Order Affirming ASLB 850903 Initial Decision Authorizing Director of NRR to Issue License Amend for North Anna to Permit Receipt & Storage of 500 Spent Fuel Assemblies from Surry Power Station.Served on 851101
ML20133K6801985-10-18018 October 1985
Forwards Notice of Withdrawal of Appearance in Proceeding. Requests Svc List Be Revised to Include Client Under Listed Address.W/O Encl
ML20133K7171985-10-18018 October 1985
Notice of Withdrawal of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20138A9521985-10-0909 October 1985
Notice of Withdrawal of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20133F4241985-10-0909 October 1985
Order Stating That ASLB 850903 Initial Decision Authorizing NRR to Amend OL to Permit Receipt & Storage of Spent Fuel Should Not Be Deemed Final,Pending Further Order. Served on 851009
ML20134N6981985-09-0303 September 1985
Initial Decision LBP-85-34 Authorizing NRR to Issue Amends to Licenses NPF-4 & NPF-7 to Permit Receipt & Storage of 500 Spent Fuel Assemblies from Surry.Initial Decision Effective Immediately.Served on 850904
ML20134N4381985-09-0303 September 1985
Order Granting Licensee 850621 Request to Correct Transcript.Proposed Transcript Corrections & Certificate of Svc Encl.Served on 850904
ML20129K1251985-07-18018 July 1985
Brief in Support of NRC 850718 Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law in Form of Initial Decision Authorizing Issuance of Amend to Licenses NPF-4 & NPF-7 to Permit Receipt & Storage of 500 Spent Fuel Assemblies
ML20129K1281985-07-18018 July 1985
Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law in Form of Initial Decision Authorizing NRR to Issue Amend to Licenses NPF-4 & NPF-7 to Permit Receipt & Storage of 500 Spent Fuel Assemblies
ML20129F8231985-07-12012 July 1985
Reply Opposing Concerned Citizens of Louisa County post- Hearing Brief.Licensee Proposed Findings of Sabotage & Human Error Not Addressed.Challenge of NRC EIS Conclusion Unnecessary.Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20209F0021985-07-0808 July 1985
Post-hearing Brief Re Issues Raised at ASLB 850521 & 22 Evidentiary Hearings.Nrc Required by NEPA to Evaluate Alternative of Constructing & Operating Dry Cask Storage Facility,But Failed to Perform Even Cursory Review
ML20128H0791985-07-0808 July 1985
Order Granting Concerned Citizens of Louisa County 850627 Motion for 7-day Extension Until 850708 to File Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law.Served on 850708
ML20209F2041985-07-0808 July 1985
Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law Re Application for Amend to Ol,Authorizing Licensee to Ship 500 Spent Nuclear Fuel Assemblies from Surry Power Station to North Anna Station.Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20128G9471985-06-27027 June 1985
Motion for Extension of 850701 Deadline to File Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law.Addl Wk Required Due to Addl Legal Duties.Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20127F0451985-06-21021 June 1985
Post-hearing Brief Requesting Board Find in Util Favor Re Proposed OL Amend Authorizing Receipt & Storage of Up to 500 Spent Nuclear Fuel Assemblies.No Basis from Sabotage or Human Error Considerations for Denying Proposed Amend
ML20127F0511985-06-21021 June 1985
Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law Re Util 820713 Application to Amend Ol,Authorizing Receipt & Storage of Up to 500 Spent Nuclear Fuel Assemblies.Unsigned,Undated Order & Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20128A7731985-05-22022 May 1985
Transcript of 850522 Hearing in Charlottesville,Va.Pp 313-364.Supporting Documentation Encl
ML20125C3191985-05-21021 May 1985
Staff Exhibit S-2,consisting of Undated Safety Evaluation Re Increasing Spent Fuel Storage Capacity.Proposed Mods to Spent Fuel Pool & Transshipment/Storage of Spent Fuel Acceptable
1999-08-17
[Table view]
Category:PUBLIC COMMENTS ON PROPOSED RULES & PETITIONS FOR
MONTHYEARML18152B4451999-08-17017 August 1999
Comment on Draft Rg DG-4006, Demonstrating Compliance with Radiological Criterial for License Termination.
ML20148M6511997-06-18018 June 1997
Comment Opposing Proposed Suppl to Bulletin 96-001 That Would Request Licensees to Take Action to Ensure Continued Operability of Control Rods
L-95-045, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 51 Re Decommissioning of Nuclear Power Reactors1995-10-19019 October 1995
Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 51 Re Decommissioning of Nuclear Power Reactors
ML18153A7581995-09-0101 September 1995
Comment Supporting Review of Revised NRC SALP Program
ML18153A7301995-04-28028 April 1995
Comment Supporting Proposed GL Re Pressure Locking & Thermal Binding of safety-related power-operated Gate Valves
ML20080M1121995-02-27027 February 1995
Comment Re Proposed Suppl 5 to GL 88-20 IPEEE for Severe Accident Vulnerabilities. Proposed GL Suppl Should Indicate That Licensees Can Use Llnl Hazard Results of NUREG-1488 Re Revised Hazard Estimates Instead of NUREG/CR-5250
ML20076H9641994-10-11011 October 1994
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule Re Pilot Program for NRC Recognition of Good Performance by Npps.Encourages NRC to Consider Comments Submitted by Nuclear Energy Institute on Behalf of Nuclear Power Industry
ML20073M0751994-09-23023 September 1994
Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR30,40,70 & 72 Re Clarification of Decommissioning Funding Requirements. Permitting Access to Funds Only on Semiannual Basis Seems Unnecessarily Restrictive
ML20069L5291994-06-13013 June 1994
Comment Supporting Proposed Rulemaking 50-60 Re Petition for Rulemaking & Changes to 10CFR50.54
ML20029D8251994-04-29029 April 1994
Comment Supporting Elimination of Proposed 5-yr Implementation Schedule & Believes That Current Programs Adequate to Maintain Containment Integrity
ML20046D0381993-07-26026 July 1993
Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR170 & 171, FY91 & 92 Proposed Rule Implementing Us Court of Appeals Decision & Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery,FY93. Supports Rule
ML20045D8031993-06-14014 June 1993
Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 54, FSAR Submittals. Endorses Change in Regulation to Eliminate Confusion Re Two Refs to Existing Reporting Requirement
ML20044G1971993-05-24024 May 1993
Comment Supporting Draft Insp Procedure Re Commercial Grade Procurement & Dedication
ML20044E5721993-05-19019 May 1993
Comment Supporting Proposed Generic Ltr for Relocation of TS Tables on Instrument Response Time Limits
ML20044D3271993-05-0707 May 1993
Comment Opposing Proposed GL Availability & Adequacy of Design Bases Info
ML20099E1021992-07-29029 July 1992
Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Minor Mods to Nuclear Power Reactor Event Reporting Requirements
ML20095J6881992-04-23023 April 1992
Comment Opposing Draft Reg Guide DG-1022, Emergency Planning & Preparedness for Nuclear Power Plants
ML20077R5161991-08-14014 August 1991
Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-20-20 Re Reduced Total Effective Dose Equivalent to Individual Members of Public from 0.5 Rem (5 Msv) to 0.1 Rem (1 Msv)
ML20058D4751990-10-19019 October 1990
Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal
ML20235N8531989-02-14014 February 1989
Comment Supporting Chapter 1 Re Policy Statement on Exemptions Below Regulatory Concern.Policy Development for Criteria for Release of Radioactive Matl Needed for Development of Consistent Waste Mgt Practices
ML20235P3311989-02-0808 February 1989
Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors at Nuclear Power Plants
ML20205Q1501988-10-28028 October 1988
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re NUREG-1317, Regulatory Options for Nuclear Plant License Renewal. Safety Sys Functional Insps & Configuration Mgt Programs Support Renewal Basis as Opposed to Relicensing Process
ML20150A9001988-07-0404 July 1988
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re leak-before-break Technology.Further Use of Subj Technology for ECCS Would Reduce Safety Assurances & Safety Benefits.Experience Shows That pipe-thinning Progresses Faster than Expected
ML20150F1391988-07-0202 July 1988
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Expansion of Applicability of Leak Before Break Technology to Functional & Performance Requirements for ECCS & Environ Qualification
ML20150B0001988-07-0101 July 1988
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re leak-before-break (LBB) Technology.Pipes Do Not Always Leak Before Breaking. NRC Has Accepted Faulty Assumptions as Facts Reaching Conclusion That LBB Eliminates Need for Insp.Addl Info Encl
ML20150A9051988-06-30030 June 1988
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re leak-before-break Technology for safety-related Equipment.Nrc Reliance on leak-before-break Is Irrational Response to Very Real Safety Problem.Nrc Should Implement Mandatory Piping Insp
ML20235S9381987-09-25025 September 1987
Comments on Draft NUREG-1150, Reactor Risk Ref Document. Results Are More Pessimistic than Results Obtained Under Idcor Program.Comment on NUREG-4550 Encl
ML20151B4271987-02-24024 February 1987
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensing of Nuclear Power Plants Where State &/Or Local Govts Decline to Cooperate in Offsite Emergency Planning
1999-08-17
[Table view] |
Text
_ - . _ _ ___ . . .
N$ W ?>Wnirunn nmtaunt I
%DQ s
au.nu. u,,aaw i Cwelsue i g77c JLe V/TD !
I t'
93 m 21 N055 VIRGINIA POWC*t May 19, 1993 Chief, Rules Review and Directives Branch Serial No.93-305 .!~
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NL&P/RBP .
Washington, D. C. 20555 Gentlemen: ;
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWE1 COMPANY ,
COMMENTS ON PROPOSED GENERIC LETTER FOR '
HELOCATION OF THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION TABLES ON i INSTRUMENT RESPONSE TIME LIMITS .
Virginia Power has reviewed the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC's) Federal ,
Register notice dated April 7,1993 which procosed to issue a generic letter providing j guidance for the voluntary relocation of tables for instrument response time limits from Technical Specifications to the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR). ,
Relocating the tables for reactor trip system and engineered safety feature actuation !
system instrument response times from the Technical Specifications to the UFSAR will ;
not alter these surveillance requirements. However, the proposed change will allow the licensee to administratively control changes to response time limits in accordance ,
with 10 CFR 50.59 without the need to process a license amendment request. I We endorse the proposed generic letter and believe that the proposed change will l result in an improved usage of Technical Specification. The NRC staff should be !
commended for the proposed generic letter as it provides both a human factors j improvement to Technical Specifications while also providing a reduction in regulatory i requirements that are burdensome and unnecessary. ,
Very truly yours, l l
MAQ l
M. L. Bowling, Manager l Nuclear Licensing and Programs i g52 175 930529 50 SBFR18228 ppg 1 i
_ .____. .. _
