NL-12-2271, Vogtle, Unit 2, SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 6 of 14

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Vogtle, Unit 2, SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 6 of 14
ML12355A039
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 11/26/2012
From: Volodarsky D
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-12-2271 SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver 1.0
Download: ML12355A039 (40)
v • d • e


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of 2 Status. N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Equip. Class 3ýEquipment Description 115- VQC X s1&,55 kJ,en ýtqngj i-q Location: Bldg. (i-i4 I Floor El. I0' Room, Area RK819 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) sttart_ 17 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL, The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] NV of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Y4 NE] UE] N/AE]-1 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YV NE] UE1 N/AE]oxidation?

44.s t e f- anch rrasge rie i's cr1ac fint th conree near te a N N a ObS 0,~~J1 Cwsoav I'/4m Ve Il'A51 53 1" C5oPvRWQ m~Owc -J/ *'segq 1 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YWNEI UE] N/AE]5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) No 41 -c07 ,fk.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? YE] NEI UE] N/Aýj Yý`N[E] IJE]Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. < C-3 >PAGE 171 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. I- I% 0-a3 VA' Equip. Class" 2_____-Equipment Description V 2 ," P6or A I ZAPI)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y1kNr{ UO N/AC YO'N- U- N/AC YR NC UC N/AC YW NO UC-Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

YV NO UC Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) bT 0ý PSiA Rfl- A4&E'A O~Ai-L"'C HrecLiSr(6Iwq),~iV- MS$/~' (6/A456 0 Evaluated by: 2a~e' 4/2{ ,~414v'lv~'b o4f Date: __ .20(< C-4 >PAGE 172 of 433 TACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0P PAGE 173 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 174 of 433 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONOO PAGE 175 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:0 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDeNo. 2-194-t2o -05.A Equip. Class 1 2-.LoJ 4 Val Sw1itI\1 Equipment Description Q-5 VoC~ 5116 a ;LAD)!Location: Bldg. (-1a+ru Floor El. I ff Roo!9,r1Yea Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) 6rUQt -Groorn tqtq-Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments, Anchorage I, Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? YW NEI 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible iranksjn the ncrete near the anchors?5, Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YVNC u-I N/AC]Y NL ULJ N/AC]YO- NEI U-- N!Ap(Y$ND ULE N/AD1 Y 1 Nn- U[:]12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment,<C-3>PAGE 176 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDeNo. ___iption___ class 1 2 Equipment Description 125- VDC Sw.47ed .9!-A91 Interaction Effects 7. Are soit targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YX NC UC N/AO Y NF UiC N/AC Y1W'NC UC N/AC YRNO UMI Other Adverse Conditions I I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y'NC] UC adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary.) Evaluatedby: / Date: 82424,2.~ 2ff Z~~'/L< C-4 >PAGE 177 of 433 AACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0 PAGE 178 of 433 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0 PAGE 179 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: Y ("N )Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No, -/18 0o7- 4V"'17 Equip. Class' /12 11 4 M rls /0 1 1 pR e -P I94 rTE*eA,4T Equipment Description /20 V14C V174t1- 9/s7- ,, Zg2yý. .Location: Bldg. A44X Floor El. ZZo/ Room, Area R1'157.Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) 5Q1,4R46 4P Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdowo of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE) NX of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Y;4 NDI U- N/A-3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YW ND UD N/AD oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yt ND UD N/AD 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YE) NO UOi N/AR (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) VTa 7- I/ -5"0y, S A,/Pt4 6, Based on the above anchorage evaluations. is the anchorage free of Y;K ND UD potentially adverse seismic conditions?,FVAL-",4 reP &Y1.* A% 0o " 44117ZI2 V/p ('WAWl~M~ QUJck) ý106 0VP90 AAX 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. <C-3 >PAGE 180 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Zo ! Equip. Class"/' .4 /,- .J Equipment Description 1 4 doe C.- t/l"T4 .-. i , O- AIS.- 7-6 V 7-/9;Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? NEI UE] N/A0 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles andlighting, YJ N .Ur-- N/AE]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? sc1ýC) a.m(4- VC-m rrd 00 a 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN2(NIN UD N/AE]YP NE! U0]Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YV NE! U[]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment'?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) < C4 >PAGE 181 of 433 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO, SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .00 PAGE 182 of 433 AACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONOO PAGE 183 of 433 ,ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .00 PAGE 184 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: (Q) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 7- 9 -Q !-14 Equip. Class'1/1-Equipment Description /20 V 4C tI./ tA /Z P ,,, A, el. ZP IZ ........ ...Location: Bldg. gl',F'2rol FloorEL. __O_ / Room, Area __,31t Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y&( NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note; This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

[Z0,9P No. X3Nr01olSN. E-4-.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? NEI UO N/AC YYN UC N/AC Y NM Urn N/Ax /6V ,X NO UC N/AC YX NO Un Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. < C-3 >-PAGE 185 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2 -1507 -(I- Equip. Class"-iA-Equipment Description 110Q VAt V PatIl 29Y 3 Interaction Effects 7. Arc soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YK NO U[: N/AE)8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, UCE N/AE)and masomyv block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? ~I* ~oa 3~. Is e. ~ce~4(f ~(r3Cw, 5~4-~.j~3/92-Oi0)

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YUE) U NIAE)Y4NE CLI Other Adverse Conditions
11. H1ave you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YX NO CE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) SEC( .2-If07-Y'3-104-FOP, (1r-A Evaluated by: (rdkv 411kl 4 W0 N-kao 44'4vWp k1o/'s4 Date: 0 /2ijo12, 7c,~t< C-4 >PAGE 186 of 433

  • ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONPO4 PAGE 187 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONOO PAGE 188 of 433 AACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONO.PAGE 189 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status*4)Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2 17 -.3 Y11 Equip. Class 1 2 Equipment Description 11-0 V -6 PQA 4 ')-A-Y'I A Location:

Bldg. FloorEl. _ l____1_ 1ý327 _Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) __.SL'q(tI, Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YC1 N)(of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks te concrete near the anchors?Weto (041C01 V W~~br 4v /qk.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an an~horagc configuration verification is required.)
6. Based. on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y9NE] U0] N/Ar-]Yý(NFl U-] N/At]YtI NEI Ut] N/A Yt] NE] Ut] N/A Y)ý NEI Ut 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix 13: Classes of Equipment. < C-3 >-PAGE 190 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo. 2- 1307 -w3-V I Equip. Class 1: Equipment Description 120 V0t. V1 1 h PquIej 2 Interaction Effects l,,,nteraction 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipiient or structures? YE] NC UN N/A]1 { f~1 )q(Ag *~5'9 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismi it r ti effects?Sv ~ ~ ~ af iL'o et y YgNCI UC N/AC YY( NC UC N/AC YCI NO UC Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y,'NC UC adversely affect the safety finctions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) rc .20 0$-S Fo1~ RPW-A w AX- 9 YC WetcL0S r( ft(), QOP/ M4444 W;1ý1 I n 50tj Evaluated by: Date: g$202 AqAv'ýý /-'4ý 94L.1,10 PAGE 191 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERS1000 PAGE 192 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0 28 201 2 PAGE 193 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0 PAGE 194 of 433 i 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0 PAGE 195 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Sratus:@ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Z-/Yo7T")'.. /'ý Equip. Class" Equipment Description 28O-/--'6 7- 7-'4 MF -Location: Bldg. wrQOI Floor El. /,O Room, Area _ 618 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y-] N%of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YJX NEI U- N/AEJ Y, NEI UE] N/AE]AN] NEI-] N/AD]YE NEI UI YkNEI UlE o2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classs-s of Equipment. -< C.-3>PAGE 196 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. z_-. Z-ZY- 9 Equip. Class'2 4-Equipment Description &ý-1-A7 " Af ZWC--,Qf0 26L/4 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? NC UC- N/A-8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, NC UC1 N/AC and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YM NCO U N/AO YK NCI UC Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y~(NO UC adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

/\Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: __4"OAV4/ Date: -' ./ o Z< C-4 >PAGE 197 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIOV PAGE 198 of 433 OACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCVO61-RPT-02, VERSIONP PAGE 199 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet.1 of 2 Status:(N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo. 2--LPt2-3z-O. Equip. Class1 2 Equipment Description .'r /L. I eimet 6 JtC 0 k 9'A.14h /e~/, 2.4a Location: Bldg. CA Floor El. I P0/ -0"Room, Area k 3.j Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Yff NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on. the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free. of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y) NC UI- N/AO YaiN- UC N/A]Yd NEI UC N/A" Y[f NCE UC N/AO Y 2 NEI U-Enter the equipment class name from Appendix 8: Classes of Equipment. <C-3 >PAGE 200 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2- t1'%g7--t -/0 Equip. Class 1 2 4-LlEquipment Description jv7/t.' X /f'] B2 C 0 ? x I2~~eJ4 ?yI4* =Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yr-! NEI UOI N/AE3 Y ND1 UE- N/Afl YiNEi Ufl N/A[3 YJ N[:1 UE]Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[d NEI UE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) j~-To O$" o~ CIOL 4 , ~ J~j- I '0 -"/ 2"01Z Evaluated by: F$4/. ! AI4/po") o Ig Date: P/2? /l.-<C-4 >PAGE 201 of 433 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .00 PAGE 202 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:9 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Z --1 &1 Equip. Class" 2L (rr~f~~)Equipment Description V. -L f- t L PA/-Location: Bldg. " Floor El. / Room, Area , , Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[[ NE)of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y)NE] UVO N/AC]Y0"NE-] U[E N/AD-YU9/NO- UO N/AE-YI-I NEI" UF-'q N/A[W'YE NO uE A'~Enter the equipinent class naine (rain Appendix 8: Classes eif Eqluipmnent. < C-3 >PAGE 203 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2X1 -IJ L .Equip. Class"2 .Equipment Description 9 2..!dAc.. r.(- AB -9 I(X C 1 ,~A&Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y&//NF' UQI N/AD YJN[1 ur- N/A[3 Y&/NF- UQJ N/AO YimNo Ur Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could U0 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary).a- io-Z7 2-j2 Evaluated by: krjaý V4-b i-'P / WOL~-Date: PAGE 204 of 433 AACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIOONO PAGE 205 of 433 AACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIOPO PAGE 206 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:(O N U Seismic Walkciown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Equip. Class'2 2 v1)Equipment Descriptioil AvxYl v Wa-iP4QJ A Location: Bldg. CO+(. 01 Floor El. 200' Room, Area KA-11 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) A4 WI XOMqe C 0,S1m Thstructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorag9e

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

I,..[2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anch rage free vivisible cracksi cojrrete near the anchors?W-Q 7 ý0 r\, 1 fm5.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% fo.r which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

A.K3IPr~ot -003),Z VR(. 5- -6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? YjIND UI- N/AO Y*/ND UD1 N/A-YD"] ND U- N/AD YfN- UEI N/Ar Yk(N[ TUD 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Clsses of Equipment. <C-3 >PAGE 207 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Equip. Class'2 0o L c ?w 4Equipment Description AuvIijoy q kay pctxq( ft Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? vX NEI UC N/ACA 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y NEI UO N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YW 1 NC UC1 N/ACI Y /NEI uLJ Other Adverse Conditions
11. Hlave you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

YW NO UC Comments (dditional pages may be added. as necessary) r/!ito 4't -~~V-o 4-~4 ~- hw YT "'5iS~b3~Evaluated by:~~!tA/!~&'3/4, Date: L2(4 C-4 >PAGE 208 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 209 of 433 C ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .00 PAGE 210 of 433}}

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=NL-12-2271,_Vogtle,_Unit_2,_SNCV061-RPT-02,_Ver._1.0,_Seismic_Walkdown_Report_for_Resolution_of_Fukushima_Near-Term_Task_Force_Recommendation_2.3:_Seismic,_Part_6_of_14&oldid=908762"