NL-12-2271, Vogtle, Unit 2, SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 5 of 14

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Vogtle, Unit 2, SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 5 of 14
ML12355A038
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 11/26/2012
From: Volodarsky D
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-12-2271 SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver 1.0
Download: ML12355A038 (38)
v • d • e


Text

ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION*PAGE 133 of 433 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0 PAGE 134 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0 PAGE 135 of 433 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Sheet I of 2 Status:UY N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentID No. 2-/W-0 b5 o0/ Equip. Class"',Ms

$ r$)wre -EquipmentDescription m1one 0.4,91 Location:

Bldg. -o4"r-o0 FloorEl. Zoo' Room, Area ,"eV'A/1 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

W/rv$'4g -fI@v O .,' " Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO Ng of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage flee of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y4 NO UQ N/AD Y9 NO UE- N/AD YX NEI. UD N/AD YO NE UD N/AJ YV NEI U]Enter the equilinent clas" nanoe from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >-PAGE 136 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentlD.No.

-1(12 57 1"001 Equip. Class -Fquipment Description Rench-,P rocus ,'r Uflh; A (4 1 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y9'NF UOi N/AD YK NO UE N/AD Yg ND1 UD N/AD YiNM UD Other Adverse Conditions 11, Have you looked for and found no othet seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

INO liD Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

No 4416)" coinp"di-.

Evaluated by:~WJiYs 1 Date: 32 .02.)ia-4 Aq~va~ k~oDARk/27 Zoj2.<4 PAGE 137 of 433 9ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 9.PAGE 138 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:Q N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2- L6,5 -535- A(ýA Equip. Class'/(Afvr.Ree Ai7-A'04 Ctwe"V s Equipment Description -O-OZ CVo-%OLt C_ 'C.. 3l 2 A ot3 0-i cc--)Location:

Bldg. C..-V7-'CL FloorEl. 2COi Room, Area 53Z5 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YC NX 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

NEI UC- N/AC#NCI UC- N/AC3UC" N/AC1 YCI NCI UCl N/A)I NC-] UCl Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >PAGE 139 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2- T0'5 ' S5" Equip. Class 1 2 / (,,'ro,,

eNreAl Y)Equipment Description

'a R CA L.--. .C Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?UE N/AD N-] NO UD N/AD Y0 ND UI- N/AD X ND UD Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could NO UV adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y" Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Sr"-E "'c.- V$'z-> o .r-c-oz Evaluated by: ,~ 1'j /-.YMS5 -Do'jrz..........

./!,ThA10, fe~JA/f Date: _ -__ -"___-ý< C4 >PAGE 140 of 433 9 TACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONO.PAGE 141 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of 2 Status(Y_

N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Z'/ " "5 3 -Equip. Class'_________________________________

Equipment Description IY V A r M O7qtArKOk C .Location:

Bldg. A(AI" Floor.El.

ZZWto Room, Area < icl Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

'VtI-4"-NAAAM " UA)r4Jxflft.L Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y) NE]of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild. surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

ZX34CO3-017-2ý

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions'?UE-] NIAE--YXNE] UO N/AO Y NEI] U] N/AE]NO UN i N/AE YYNO UOE 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

-< C-3 >PAGE 142 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Z- 1'OS- 53-,46I Equip. Class" 2 / -1o/a/ L ,[MfJ, IA oaJ -Equipment Description

'4X0 V MAlOI CO-'&flJL 6TAr 2 4/?L Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y NEI U-1 N/A[D 8- Axe overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y NEI U[1 N/AEl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YVNE- UE3 N/AD YYNEI UD Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y'( NI- UD-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Q) 0 ý-;ZF Evaluated by Date: $T~- Z~2t7~Evaluated by Date 5- z< CA4 >" PAGE 143 of 433 O ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIOONO vo LTAGE PAGE 144 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: (V N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)lEquipment ID No. 2/5Lfi ' Equip Class" /*Equipment Description aov V or. e/,-,eoL a7 A 2,a c.Location:

Bldg. ý,"VrWeo Floor El. [80 " Room, Area 89/4?Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] NM of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YX NEI U] N/AD Y, NOU N/AU]4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NO 110 N/IAs W4F1-D6 C0AMAV5!C C77o 7-0 EIWS E49E 5716i5, 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configutation verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YU] NO U1 N0AX X'Y4NEI UD 12 Enter the equipmnent class i~nme fairn Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

-< C-3>PAGE 145 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2 -1,?05 5;5- AOC-- Equip. Class 1 2/Equipment Description

  1. 86 V I" or ek.'A or ,reo ZABC Interaction Effects 7. Arc soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y' No Ut- N/A-8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling files and lighting, YX NC' Uil N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YY NDI U[] N/A[D YWND uNI Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could ND Ut]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

N U Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

,~o At5 Evaluated by: Azvt,-1ý4-

>7'W ,q' vat--,o.4sk1 Date: ~ Gz/< C.4 >PAGE 146 of 433 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0 PAGE 147 of 433 I ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:0 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Z%-/gos3*7-

,3 0 4 Equip. Class" 2 Equipment Description lr&Ot SV 5W -T- &ý_R ZA64 f-Location:

Bldg. d'zOtvRoz Floor El. /80' Room, Area 94'8cf Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist Tius checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y- NA of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4, Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Y96ND UD N/AD YXNDJ UD N/AD YXND UD NIAt Ulc-t-P,5P M-AeC-770A'v To EA44BPPC-P PL,497&-5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YD NDI UD" N/AW Y/ N[-] UD Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes o(Equipment.

< C-33>PAGE 148 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. "/ O5 -:53 "4104 Equip. Class" 2 z2 Equipment Description I(SO t/ Vr 7'64~ 2-4.804 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YY NEI U[:] N/AU 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, NEI UE' N/AC and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

K 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?YX NE UC] N/AU 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free NCI UI-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could NE] UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

I'Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) jo -Date: 6 z4,Y 2/2..2' iz/.<C-4 >PAGE 149 of 433 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIOVO PAGE 150 of 433 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIOONO PAGE 151 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sih +/-1 of2 Status: ý jY U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. '2- 1 5'ý- Class'2 -OT'E.tC.Equipment Description IzvN r- L /.z .

-Location:

Bldg. 00i t_ FloorEl. tORO Room, Area 9-t'2 C Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) K' --Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YX 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the .50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required)Y&N- U- N/AD I ND U- N/A[]N- UD N/ADI Y 1 ND U- N/AD-~g~v1r,&.;2.AJ4C,-3

-Z36- 3 -5 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverseseismic conditions?

Yý(ND]UD 1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment,< C-3 >PAGE 152 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. ' Equip. Class" 2.Equipment Description Interaction Effects 7. Are soil targets free fromtimpact by nearby equipment or structures?

4NEI- U0 N/A[]8, Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, NI-] UEI N/Al]and masonry, block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YX NO UE1 N/AO Y* NO U5 Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could NEI UF1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

/\Comments (Additional pages may be added as.necessary) 1.2* 4..-~.Evaluated by: 'j i-y/ Dc- -zi , Date: ' < C-4 >PAGE 153 of 433 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONP0 PAGE 154 of 433

  • ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0 PAGE 155 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 01irek I .1 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2 --c !.c'- Equip. Class'2/" -Aacr 9 , -2ir(.-Y Equipment Description r-< LSOL4OJ \"-J ..Location:

Bldg. Floor El. 1 ?)0' Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

PE t Cý I-- f-_Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YR NI-of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of Visible cracks in.the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

YNI UI] N/A-Y*N0 UO N/AO]6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y NI] UIO O Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B& Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >PAGE 156 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentID No. 2- 0x -tc- Equip. Class" /6 -M V__Equipment Description R--" Z. L fo .o .,4 f , Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y4 END UD N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, NDI UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y N UD N/AD 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?* NEI UD Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

/Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary).s 2- -t ?k> -G --R.vo i---w. Evaluated by: .. l j\ 0 / 3 -riUS 'i Date: " -<C-4 >-PAGE 157 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS S NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 9 PAGE 158 of 433 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0 t PAGE 159 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:&(D N U Seismic. Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2-Equip. Class_2 ____Equipment Description l/Tr,4 1 ,4C 1f A/ER're, Z>Db/Ir Location:

Bldg. elyre">L FloorEl. /80 / Room, Area ,, .?1 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage.1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required.(i.e., is the item one Y)X Nn of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

YX NEI UD N/A['D 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Yp NEI U- N/ACJ oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yllf ND UD] N/As 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Ykl ND- U-] N/AD'(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required,)A/

4v-HffC .1TFT( /?fdF Cq4I/ET /S F-t*br A7 Ao=guI ¢!oU47Re PR w Q A 9-0= 4 % V1*1c/f 1-1I 944Fr"c'~

/C 6 .Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yb NI U[]potentially adverse seismic conditions?" Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

PAGE 160 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. K."/A7-? Equip. Class-Equipment Description

.l- AC /A/lVt'A 7rA ZPP/Z-4.Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y0 NEI UrI N/A[]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YIV Ni] U0 N/A[]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?,,4- Vr, r "F f4afr-f ct e U/f -0,eU/./ r w4s 9,57,iwA,4r-y-H r 77lfA 15 5dP~fci~Wr Af4' 17 n-,#~ A rCI7 -dX15r5 7--;p~-~~ l.ava equtekibility to avoid damage? VINO UEJ N/A[D 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y,~OF Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could N[3 UD)adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

YX Comments (Additional pages.may be added as necessary)

N1'4 Evaluated by: , i-- 1 ,¢ o 41a"Pu ~ d Date-: g / 4-<C-4 >PAGE 161 of 433 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONPO PAGE 162 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: ON U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Z-1806 "-0 36 rA Equip. Class"-15 Equipment Description

/Z5 tVt't B6#4rrAe y 2-4D /8 Location:

Bldg,!4gF*

1. Floor El. /80 Room, Area Ad_ Z 7 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) eoO ,,4T4r7A'/e5 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Yo NX of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YK NEI UD] N/A[l Y[I NEI U[- N/Al]4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NEI U'- N/A---o,/ ', FC r1o A" r a ^ 4BE7 ýb 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

YDI NDI UD1 N/Ak Ivor jwV7Twf 5 .4 "P I-6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y~NU 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.( C-3 >PAGE 163 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. ZX- "J" C -A-4 i dy4 Equip. Class '15 Equipmecnt Description

/Z6* /10C- 6,4 7745WY 2-40/1?Interaction Efect 7, Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yj NEI UD N/AQ 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yf NO U[O N/Al and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YX NO1 UD N/AD YXNO U[Other Adverse Conditions I 1.. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

YXND u[Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) ofil Evaluated by: 1~4'Av~Pe~-ate:

9 '2e,/aAIS#4 O'l~PAGE 164 of 433 9 TACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONPO i CNQ PAGE 165 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .00 A A PAGE 166 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO, SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 OJlieeL I U1 4 Status:- N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0 -93CPrA Equip. Class" I & (&Heky CAfiql! -Equipment Description Char c 2#-1CA Location:

Bldg. Floor El. 1_01 Room, Area RS2q Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Afi4k Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YV NO of the 50% of SWENL items requiring such verification)?

2, Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?W4 4 eJ40 '5e!5. Is the anchorage configuration.

consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

A-X3-P0 1 -o01 Yo, VCg, -Z,0 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y4' NO U1- N/AO YX NO UO N/AO YO NO UO N/A9 Yt NOC 110 N/AO YN IJoO 12 Enter thme equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

PAGE 167 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. )-IOo AI Equip. Class" 2 16 (&$11f/ ( ý IJeff Equipment Description

.Ck r2)2 CA Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free frorn impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YK NEI UO N/A[]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y NO U- N/Afl and. masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

tv 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the aboveseismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YVNEI U] N/AD YK NEI UO Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y)NO UO adversely affect the safety finctions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

S6( 2- ISOJ -Sý3- 0$6~ Rd. WPr WA-LIYKYCR-[CrU,(r(AA4CU)

Evaluated by:~/j~~Date: 8/ 3j w?8 e~' Zc'/2~-< C-4 )-PAGE 168 of 433 4ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0 PAGE 169 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0 PAGE 170 of 433

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=NL-12-2271,_Vogtle,_Unit_2,_SNCV061-RPT-02,_Ver._1.0,_Seismic_Walkdown_Report_for_Resolution_of_Fukushima_Near-Term_Task_Force_Recommendation_2.3:_Seismic,_Part_5_of_14&oldid=908764"