NL-12-2270, SNCV061-RPT-01, Ver 1.0, Vogtle Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic. Part 3 of 20

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
SNCV061-RPT-01, Ver 1.0, Vogtle Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic. Part 3 of 20
ML13003A242
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 11/26/2012
From: Volodarsky D
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-12-2270 SNCV061-RPT-01, Ver 1.0
Download: ML13003A242 (38)
v • d • e


Text

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 States:0 N U Seismic Walkdown Che~cklist (SWC)EquipmentlD No. .-_,____.___-

Equip. Class!2 t ,, Equipment Descr'iption L5i.L OL, Locatioh':

Bldg. _ ,-j! FloorEl. 0*0 C, Room, Area _ _ _ _ _Manufacturer, M'odel,.Etc. (optional but recommended)

M.A, r C*,OvMop4.

Instructions:

forCompleting Checklist This checklist maybed used to document the results of the SeismicWalkdown of an itenr of equipmnente on the SWEL. The. space below each of the folowing questions may beused to record the results ofjudgents and findings.

Additonal space is provided at. the end of this checklist foj documenting other, comments..Anchorage L. Is the anfcodrage configuration verification required (ie,, is the item one YX NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. IS the afichorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. IsLthe anchorage&

free of corrosion that is muteLthan mild surface ,oxidation,?

4. Is the anchorage-free of visibl.e cracks in the concrete near the.anchor'?
5. Is the configurationconsistent with plant documentation?.(Note: Thjh question only applies if the item is one of the 50% fdit I whichlan anchorage configurafion verification is required.)

Y% NO, UO:N1/AO3 YNO VO. N!/AO Y~d NO UOD N/AO1 Y)'NEI UM M/AC]!7ýA X0 0BCc,b5 a irvxt t. 0 6. Based.on the aboveancborage:evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic cobnditions?

Y' LIE]'tiEnter the equipmecnt ejass qane from Appendix B: Classes of E~qiipnet PAGE 76 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0'Sheet 2 of.Seismic.Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment'ID No.. 7," Equip. ClassuYtt 65 ý -Equipment Description

  • ..... .Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby e'quipmernit or structures?

8..Are overh6adequiptiiei-t, distributibnsystenis, ceiling tiles and ligbting,, and masonry, block walls not likely:tiocollapseoioto the equiprnenth.

9. Do attached lines flexibility to avoid damageq ,10. Based6bnthe above seisnic~initeraction evaluations,-is equipmente.free of potentially adverseseismic'interaction effects?Y% NOI ijr, N/AO Yg'NO UO j'N/AE0 YJ9NO UOJN/I Oilier Adverse& C6iditons l. ybiuooked for and found nIho other, seismickconditions that: could YX Nn UF1 adversely affect the, safety functions of the equipment?

ComMents (Additionailpages ma~y be added as necessary)

PEvaluated b~y: .. ~LA~Date:

______ý4'08- zz_02--<-C4 >-PAGE 77 of 668 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION .0 PAGE 78 of 668

  • FTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS

-NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIOON0 I PAGE 79 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Stat~us:Y N. U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No, tl 0 " Equip. Class" 2 2-O (Ii cP Equipment[Ds'cSrlipti0n

________________________

......__Location:

Bldg; C-T0+0 Floor El. 1.20 Room, Area (-I1 .Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) 1!4, ,ta\, i s histruictions for Completing:

Ch&kllst Tuis checklist may' be used to docuient the iesults of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each ofthe 'following questions may be used to record the resulIs, ofjudgments and findings.

Additional spacp ijs provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is thd ari6chorage configurationh vefeification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such, verification)?

  • NEI 2. Is the aiichoiige freeý of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is theanchorage free of cborrosion that is mrere than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in tie concrete near the. anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with p.Iantdo'tirn'intatitii?(Note: This question only appl ies if the item-isone.of the 50!,% for whicch an anchorage configurationi verificton is teqtiird.)

.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchgprage frege of'potentiily-adverse scisr~ (Conditifns.?

Yi7NEI UO N/AIJ YO, NO UE N/AU YN NEO. Un N/A Y4 NE ýUE 12ýEnýtrt quiprnen!tctass name from.APpendix B: Classcsof Fquipment,<Cl3 >PAGE 80 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment

[D No. 0 Equip. C 1ass'2 2 , Equipment Description

&X6'eOV.Interaction Effects.7. Are Soft targets free ffr6 jitfridct by i-hearby.equipmentor stuctures?

8. Are overhead ,quiprnent, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block:walls not'likely'to collapse onto die equipment?

.9. Doattached lifies have adequate flexibility to avoiddamage?

1,0. Based on the above seismic. interaction.evaluations,, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismicnteraciion effects?ONe.ta9 ..... ,UE N/AC3U0. N/AC Y~NCN' UC N/A[C YK'NI-] U -. A OthIer AdverseiConditions 11.- Have you, loo Iked, for and found no other se i..smic co~nditi .ons~that could AI0ln adversely affect tdie s~fe'ty functions, of thejeqtiipmeiit?, Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

E'au".'9~~ by:/ Vi4Vi1AW\S?~

Dl) te: 012-< Cý4->PAGE 81 of 668 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIONPO PAGE 82 of 668 O ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION*O PAGE 83 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Slheet( 1 of2 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklistl (SWC), EquipmenftJDNo.

v- v6, Oo- Q's -..c Equip. Class'0 Enitinment De~cnntion 14 VA ~ ~ ~ -----.........--

-Location" Bldg.. cemp4--mo,-

FloorEl. zzýz. Room,,Area c, Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional'but recommended).

Instr-uctions for Completfig Checklist This checklist may be-used to, document the results of the Seismic Wailkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. T.he space below each of the f6illoing qqugesttions may be used .to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the eind of this ,checklist for documenting other comments.Aficho~rage, Cst~ swc. ~v'1I. is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YD NE of the501% of SWEL items requiring such: yerification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing orloose hardware?;
3. the anchorage free of corrosion that is-more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage fl-ee of visible cracks in the:concrete near the anchors?5. is the anchorage configuration consisient with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the itemJis one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuratiion, verificatibn is required.)
6. Basled on the:above anchorage e.aluatiois, is the anchorage, free-of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE NE7 UEIN/AE YE NEI UEý N/AED YEI NE UE1 NIAE YM Nn N//AE YE NE. UE: 0 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes ofEquipment.

< PAGE 84 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist;(SWC)

Equipment iD No. i -t5o, -i5-Class'2 zq E~quipment .Description -. ..... ........ .....hIteractiont Effects s ' AQ 7, Are, sft targets free friom impact

8. Areoverhead equipment, distribuition systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry' block wall not likely to, collapse onto the'equipment?
9. Doý attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10., Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic, interaction effects?YE NEI UE1 N/AEr-, YEI NEI UE N/AEI'YE] NEI UE- N/AEI ,YE'NE lIE Other Adverse Conditions i 1.- Have-you looked for and founid no other'seisihc conditions that c6uld YDf NEI UIE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments; (Additional pages may be-added as necessary),~ c4 -r%. 4 S6 -T .wu.f4v Kzvvvk- ________ft ~~ ~At'~ LI. ~ F % Wt~C) T&cy- aM~JIN 62~74o~ ~Evaluated by U 'ýWZ6.DPate': ~ ~ z<. CA4 >PAGE 85 of 668

  • ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 UNIT PAGE 86 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 87 of 668 t7ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 I MISSING ~(=:w PAGE 88 of 668 O TACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 89 of 668
  • -ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 iSCREN PAGE 90 of 668 7ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 91 of 668 q1ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 92 of 668 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSI001.0 PAGE 93 of 668

'ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 94 of 668

  • IACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION .0 PAGE 95 of 668 fTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 96 of 668 9r-ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIONIRO PAGE 97 of 668 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 98 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:ýq N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (swc)Equipment ID NO;. 1-.563I-37-oi2 -o, Equip- 7lassa 2'Equip onc .t Desg.iptio, 6: L or' Z 9l -1& f4 " RooP A x ea9 FA )Location: .Bldg. 6OV190 Floor El, Room, Area 14 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optionalbbut recommended)

_(t:FFA7 F 2 6 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklistinay be used to docum rnt the the Seismic Waikd6ohi of an itemn fequipinient onl the SWEL. The space below each.of-the following questions.may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space :is provided.at the end of this checklist'for dcurerifting other comments.Atfdtoratge

1. is the:anchorage configuratio veriefication recuirred(i e,, is the, item one of the 50% of SWELitems requiring such-verification)?

YEJ'No 2- is the anchorage free of beit broken, mhis~ing or loose hardware?3. Isthe. anchorage flee of corrosion that is mdre than mild surface oxidation?

4.Is !thbe ach-or'a$c:

flee ofvisible cs'ack.!:in~taeeonctetei~ar the iaixh6ts?s5. Is theanchoragezconfigura tion consistent'ith plant 4onuentationh?(Note: This question only applies if,the item is one of the. 50% for which an anchorage:configuration verificatiop.

is reqtuired.)

'6. Based on: the above anchorageg evaluations, is the anchorage fIee of potehfily

'adyerse seismic conditiobs?

  1. Y. NEI, UE N/AEl Ylý NED UE N'/AOl YEJ NE UE N/A~YET NE UE NWAANEI EU? :t~Ser the equipment class ~isme fro itm Appendix B: C1at~< of..Equipnv

~t CI>PAGE 99 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2b1of2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EqUipment ID No. 1 .Class-2 17 F-a-15 Equipment bescription

&,YrO I" I>Er FAA)Interaction Effect's 7,..Are soft targetsz.Afee from impact by nearby-equipmenrtor structures?

8' Are overhead.equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,:

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

91 Do attached lines haveadequate flexibility to avoid: damage?10. Based on the aboveseismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free, opfpotentially adverse, seismic interaction effects?YkNE] UE TNIAEI YJN0 UE] N/AO Yg NEI li NI/AE SNEI iE1 Other Adverse Conditions II. HaVe you looked for and found no~bth erseisrmieconditiois that could Yý6 NE'. U adversely affdCt the safety functions Of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may ,Evaluated by:___ _Date: sj:+?~ K .~2*C< -C PAGE 100 of 668 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 101 of 668 tACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIO 9.0 PAGE 102 of 668 t ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIONIRO PAGE 103 of 668 OTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 104 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of12 Status: O:N Q Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentID-No.

`4fý34~ ~/~Equip.

Cflass1 2 ,/0 (40t 1 EquipmnentDesrption (116S 4flm 4-CL.~ I Location:

Bldg. C- oo l. Room, Area A- 6'.Manufacturer,:Model, Etc,. (optional but recomrmnended) instructions for Compleding Checklist This checklist may be used, to docume nt thleresults of fheý!Seisriic Wa ikdo,1n;, of an item ofiequipmnent on the SwEL. spoceeiIw:cdih1tftei4iilwing questions maybe used to record the results ofjuagments and findihgs.

Additional:space-is provided at the endofthis checklist for documentingother comments.Anchorage/

I. Is the anchorage configuration verificationrequi red (6:e., is! the itdin one. YM/NE of the 50% of SWEL -ifems requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of benti, broken, missing or loose hardwarc?13 Is the anchorage free of corrosion ihat is more thanmild surface oxidation?
4. is thie anchorage free of visible cracks in thec.concrete nearthe anchors?Y5 NE UE N/AEZJ Ya2NE1 UE3I N/AU YMINn U[I] N/AU.Yv< NE0 UE \I/AF-5.. BIshe anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?'(Note: This question only appllies 'if the item is one of hieý50,% for WhYiihf an ahchorage verificatio6nis required.)

6.. based on Oh,.above anchoi age evaluations, iIs the anchloage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions 9 YV'Nn UO'-2Enterthe equipment class name from AppendixB:.

C'a-sc" ofEqutipmnt.

< C-3 >PAGE 105 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checkiist, SWC)Equipment .. -O -Equip. Class' / U Equipment Desci-iption 7h ~ i 2 u~~,"iJAC(~~

I ~h4'hi~X Interactidih Effects: 7. Are soft targets! free from impa~t by nearby equipment orstructures?

8. Are overhead'equipment,4distribution systems;, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block Wallli[not likely to collapse ontfo'the equipment?

9., Do attached]lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damange?10., Based on the above seismic interactlion evaluiations, is equipraent free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y!g'N[ U-D N/A[Y2-NE] UO N/AD YM1/ND UD /A Y2'ND UED Other Adv§erse Conditions

!I.>. .Haye you T,!oked forfarid found b6 othe-seismic conditions that.could Y[3NE] !UIE]dVuerse-ly affect thesafety functins of the equipment?

Coin ents;(AdditionaI pagesmay be added as necessary)

A~~f Alto. 1/Evaluated by: 5 /-.e/::74 Dute:__< C4i>PAGE 106 of 668

  • ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION .0 PAGE 107 of 668 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION .0 PAGE 108 of 668 AACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION .0 PAGE 109 of 668 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIO .0 PAGE 110 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Siaftus:($1ý_

N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Eqpi~pment iD No.. --Equip. Classl 2 51 (W4.S)Equipmcnt.Description h .iC~~ j Locatiow:

Bldg. OP4- FloorEl. EL Room, Area : Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to do6ciment the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipmernt bn tffhe SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to.record'ihe'iesults of judgmnents and findings.

Additiohal space is provided at the end of this checklist for documnenting other comneats.q Anehora~e 1. Is theanchorage.

configuration verification required(i.fe.,is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verifidation)?

y NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?13. Is the anchorage:freeo6f corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4'. Is the anchorage free of visible, cracks in the concrete near the anchor?5. Is the anchorage configuration:

consistent with plant documnentation?(Note:' Th isquestion only applies iftIhe item is one of the 50% for Wvhich.4i anidbofage configuration verification is required.)

S10Urn NI/A[r NO UO] N/All Y N.E OF N/Afl 6.: Based on the, above anchorage evqluations, is the anchorage

'fee of pot.entitilly adverse seismic condifiopm?

V/.N-11 urn 12 Enter the &ifii6haent dla~ssname fr6m.iAppenclix B: ClassespfEquiplnenm

<C-3 1 PAGE 111 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdowh Checklist (SWC)Eqii' " " Equip. Class K2 ./ ,4 NS)Bcfuipment Description

~--~~2~~~T~~~~~

2 ~Y, Interaction Effects 7. Are so#f targets free from inpact, by.nearby equipment or stjuctures?

Y*,NO UnN/AO 8. Are.overhead cquipwent, distribution systems;ceiling tiles and lighting; Y NO UC N/AOC and masonry blo.k walls, nut likely to collapse onto the equipmfent?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibibity to avoid -damage?N'O. NC UC Vo NO UO N/4 10. Based-on the above seismic interaction evaluations, i~s'equipnent free ofpotentially adverse seismic interactiori effects?Other'Adverse Conditions, 11. Have~you looked f6r and found ori other seismic conditions that could NC U-17 adversely affect the~safety functions'of the equipment?

Comments' (Additicral page, may be addend*as necessay), E'valuated by:'~'o~>/-C4 C ....... .< C 4: Date: t PAGE 112 of 668 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERS1000 PAGE 113 of 668

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=NL-12-2270,_SNCV061-RPT-01,_Ver_1.0,_Vogtle_Unit_1_Seismic_Walkdown_Report_for_Resolution_of_Fukushima_Near-Term_Task_Force_Recommendation_2.3:_Seismic._Part_3_of_20&oldid=908275"