ML22024A003

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Breakout Questions - Fire Protection Scoping and Screening
ML22024A003
Person / Time
Site: Oconee  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 01/19/2022
From: Angela Wu
NRC/NRR/DNRL/NLRP
To:
Wu A, 301-415-2995
Shared Package
ML22024A002 List:
References
Download: ML22024A003 (2)


Text

1 Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2, and 3 SLRA: Breakout Questions SLRA Section Scoping and Screening:

2.3.3.1.11 Standby Shutdown Facility Fire Protection System 2.3.3.4 Fire Protection Related Systems 2.4 Scoping and Screening Results: Containments, Structures, and Component Supports (only fire barrier portion)

Question Number SLRA Section SLRA Page Background / Issue (As applicable/needed)

Discussion Question / Request 1

Section 2.3.3.4 2-143 Table 2.3.3-4-1 of the SLRA does not include the following fire protection components Station Transformer Fire Suppression System and components fire hose stations, fire hose connections, hose racks standpipe risers nozzles seismic support for standpipes system piping floor drains for removal of fire water structural steel fire proofing dikes for oil spill confinement Verify whether the fire protection components listed are within the scope of SLRA in accordance with 10 CFR 54.4(a) and whether they are subject to an aging management review (AMR) in accordance with 10 CFR 54.21(a)(1). If any of the listed components are not within the scope of SLRA and are not subject to an AMR, the staff requests that the applicant provide justification for the exclusion.

2 Section 2.4.8.2 2-340 Section 2.4.8.2 identified Cork and Armaflex fire barrier structural commodities as being within the scope of SLR and subject to AMR. In addition, Section 2.4.8.2 states that the Cork is covered with a fire-and water-resistant caulking material.

Table 3.5.2-23 cites the Structures Monitoring program for managing loss of NRC approved use of Armaflex in a SER dated August 8, 1978, ADAMS Accession No. ML011980234, (page 4-7).

Cork as a fire barrier material is not discussed in August 1978 SER. Please provide information, including references, that supports the acceptance of the use of Cork

2 sealing of the Cork seismic gap filler material that has a fire barrier intended function. Loss of sealing was the only aging effect identified for this Cork component.

as a fire barrier material at the licensees facility by the NRC and the applicable aging effects associated with the fire barrier function. Please identify the fire-and water-resistant caulking material covering the Cork, where it is addressed in the SLRA, and the applicable aging effects associated with the fire barrier function. In addition, please confirm that all applicable aging effects associated with the fire barrier function is included in SLRA Table 3.5.2-23 for the Cork seismic gap filler material and discuss how the Structures Monitoring program will manage the applicable aging effects associated with the fire barrier function.