Text

Implementing Procedure, Preparation, Review and Approval
	ML21144A106
Person / Time
Site:	Indian Point
Issue date:	05/10/2021
From:	; Entergy Nuclear Operations
To:	; Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
	EP~21-0007 IP-EP-340, Rev 8, IP-EP-350, Rev 5, IP-EP-410, Rev 16, IP-EP-430, Rev 16, IP-EP-510, Rev 9
	Download: ML21144A106 (174)
	v • d • e

~Entergy ' .

IndianPoin(Energy Center . CONTROLLED DOCUMENT Document Controt ** * . *.TRANSMITTAL .

450 Broa<lway .

Buchanaii, NY 1()511 TO: . DISTRIBUTION DATE: .* 5/10/2621

' FROM: IPEC OOCUIVIEf\lT CONTROL~ ~~D FLOOB ADMIN BLDG .PHONE#:

TRANSMITTAL#: EP~21-0001 The Document(s) identified below ~re forwargec:I for i.ise: .Pl~ase review to verify receipt, inc~rporate the document(s) into your I

. .

controlled document fil~, properly disposition superse~ed, voided, or inactive docqme11t(s).*. . . . . . ,,

t * ,, ,f. .

AfFECTED DOCUMENT: . IPEC EP

D.oc*#. REV# .*TITLE THE:FOLLOWING,PROCEDURE(S) HAS B.EEN REVISED; PLEASE REMOVE.YOUR CURRENT.

--~~()PY AND REPLACE WITH ATTACHED UPDATED REVISION: *.. *. *.*. *. ** * . . .' * .

C;IP-EP~340 *Re.v1s1C>N_a'< *

-'ii ,;-

IP-EP-,350. RE\/ISIO.N . 5** .

IP~EP-41.0 REVIS'ION* 1*6 IP-EP~430 .. REVISlO'N 17 IP-E{P~510* ,REVISION 9.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 5/17/2021 RECEIPT OF THE ABOVE LISTED DQCUrv1ENT(S) IS HEREBYACKNOWLEDGED.

1c'ERTIFY THAT ALL SUPERSEDED, VOID, OR INACTIVE COPIES OF THE ABOVE LISTED DOCUMENT(S) IN MY POSSESSION HAVE BEEN REMOVED FROM USE AND ALL UPDATES HAVE BEEN PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE.WITH EFFECTIVE DATE(S)

(IF APPLICABLE) AS SHOWN ON THE DQCUMENT(S). * - . - *:

AX 1ff .P :

I , /V-- I'-. .

! U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION .

ATTN: DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK 11555 ROCKVILLE PIKE ROCKVILLE, MD 20852 NAME PRINT SIGNATURE DATE COPY LOCATION

IPEC IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE IP-SMM-AD-102 Rev:17 PREPARATION, REVIEW, AND APPROVAL Page 35 of 43 ATTACHMENT 10.2 IPEC PROCEDURE REVIEW AND APPROVAL (Page 1 of 1)

Procedure

Title:

Meteorological Information and Dose Assessment System (MIDAS)

Procedure No* IP-EP-340 Existing Rev* 7 New Rev* 8 ORN/EC No* 21-00118 Procedure Activity: TemE!ora!Y Procedure Change (MARK Applicable) Converted To IPEC, Replaces: (MARK Applicable)

NEW PROCEDURE Unit 1 Procedure No: EDITORIAL Temporary Procedure Change GENERAL REVISION ADVANCE Temporary Procedure Change 0 PARTIAL REVISION Unit 2 Procedure No:

CONDITIONAL Temporary Procedure Change EDITORIAL REVISION Terminating Condition:

Unit 3 Procedure No:

VOID PROCEDURE SUPERSEDED RAPID REVISION Document in Microsoft Word:

VOID DRN/TPC No{s):

Yes No Revision Summary 0 NIA- See Revision Summary page._

Implementation Requirements Implementation Plan? Yes 0 No Formal Training? Yes 0 No Special Handling? Yes 0 No Quality Related? Yes 0 No. If Yes, then ensure the procedure cover page is marked "Quality Related" RPO Dept: Emergency Planning Review and Approval {Per Attachment 10.1 I

1. 0 Technical Reviewer: ~DE!.ar!Ea~G~r!Eat:t.l!_\..~,J!!',~~~'1/S~C2+c--J:.-4..:..-:-td--l!:;.,_~,_~---------

2. Cross-Disciplinary Reviewers:

Dept: _ _ _ _ _ _ Reviewer:------__,~___,-,---,,....,,,.,.-----,-------------

(Print Name/ Signature/ Date)

3. 0 RPO- Responsibilities/Checklist: r::_FrlEau.!n~k.!YM:!.!!it~ch!..!!e;:!11!!.../__,~~:::,...~.L.....4~Uc.!~~~-7--.t.....1.~-/-..£:l!!~--

PAD required and is complete {PAD Approver and Reviewer qualifications have been verified) 0 Previous exclusion from further Ll-100 Review is still valid PAD not required due to type of change as defined in 4.6

4. Non-Intent Determination Complete: - - - - - - - : = - : - , . . . . - : - : - - - . , - , = - - - - , , - - - , - : : , - - - - , - - - - - - - - - -

(Print Name/ Signature/ Date)

NO change of purpose or scope NO change to less restrictive acceptance criteria NO reduction in the level of nuclear safety NO change to steps previously identified as commitment steps NO voiding or canceling of a procedure, unless NO deviation from the Quality Assurance Program Manual requirements are incorporated into another procedure NO change that may result in deviations from Technical or the need for the procedure was eliminated via an Specifications, FSAR, plant design requirements or previously

~

a.lternate process.

~c~mit? #// /

5. 0 On-Shift Shift Manager/CRS:_,_F..:.:ra::.:.n...,k_..,Mo:.:.it""ch.....,e::.:.:11_-_._R,..,_P-=O'---'~'=-:-,-,,..,..-C----,~"'=-="'~-=-~~-,-a----,.,-r//.,._..'/_,_f~P..___~ 1/

(Print Name/ Signature/ Date)

6. User Validation: User:

7. D Special Handling Requirements Understood:._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

Attachment 1 Page 1 of 2 10CFR50.54(Q !(2) Review Procedure/Document Number: IPmEP-340 Revision: 8 Equipment/Facility/Other: Indian Point Energy Center

Title:

Meteorological Information and Dose Assessment System (MIDAS)

Part I. Description of Activity Being Reviewed (event or action, or series of actions that have the potential to affect the emergency plan or have the potential to affect the implementation of the emergency plan):

This procedure was revised to reflect the conditions of the facility which meet the requirement in the Post Unit 3 Shutdown E-Plan (PSEP) as submitted to the NRG per LAR, license #NL-19-001. Please see the attached matrix for the changes that have been made. This procedure will be effective May 17 th , 2021.

Part II. Emergency Plan Sections Reviewed {List all emergency plan sections that were reviewed for this activity by number and title. IF THE ACTIVITY IN ITS ENTIRETY IS AN EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE, EAL CHANGE OR EAL BASIS CHANGE, ENTER THE SCREENING PROCESS. NO 1DCFR50.54(q)(2) DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED.

Part 1

Introduction:

Section A: Purpose Part 2 Planning Standards and Criteria:

Section A: Assignment of Responsibility Section B: Station Emergency Response Organization Section D: Emergency Classification System Section E: Notification Methods and Procedures Section H: Emergency Facilities and Equipment Section I: Accident Assessment Section J: Protective Response Part Ill. Ability to Maintain the Emergency Plan (Answer the following questions related to impact on the ability to maintain the emergency plan):

1. Do any elements of the activity change information contained in the emergency plan (Section 3.0 Step 6)?

YES D NO lg] IF YES, enter screening process for that element

2. Do any elements of the activity change an emergency classification Initiating Condition, Emergency Action Level (EAL), associated EAL note or associated EAL basis information or their underlying calculations or assumptions?

YES D NO lg] IF YES, enter screening process for that element

3. Do any elements of the activity change the process or capability for alerting and notifying the public as described in the FEMA-approved Alert and Notification System design report?

YES D NO lg] IF YES, enter screening process for that element

4. Do any elements of the activity change the Evacuation Time Estimate results or documentation?

YES D NO lg] IF YES, enter screening process for that element

5. Do any elements of the activity change the Onshift Staffing Analysis results or documentation?

YES D NO lg] IF YES, enter screening process for that element EN-EP-305 R00B

Attachment 1 Page 2 of 2 1 0CFR50.54{Q 1(2) Review Procedure/Document Number: IP-EP-340 Revision: 8 Equipment/Facility/Other: Indian Point Energy Center

Title:

Meteorological Information and Dose Assessment System (MIDAS)

Part IV. Maintaining the Emergency Plan Conclusion The questions in Part Ill do not represent the sum total of all conditions that may cause a change to or impact the ability to maintain the emergency plan. Originator and reviewer signatures in Part V document that a review of all elements of the proposed change have been considered for their impact on the ability to maintain the emergency plan and their potential to change the emergency plan.

1. Provide a brief conclusion that describes how the conditions as described in the emergency plan are maintained with this activity.

2. Check the box below when the 10CFR50.54(q)(2) review completes all actions for all elements of the activity- no 10CFR50.54(q)(3) screening or evaluation is required for any element. Otherwise, leave the checkbox blank.

!Zl I have completed a review of this activity in accordance with 10CFR50.54(q)(2) and determined that the effectiveness of the emergency plan is maintained. This activity does not make any changes to the emergency plan. No further actions are required to screen or evaluate this activity under 1 0CFR50.54(q)(3).

Per Post Shutdown Emergency Plan (PSEP), both Unit 2 and Unit 3 will be defueled and will no longer operate. The changes made to this procedure (see attached matrix) reflects the changes made to the document submitted to the NRC (license# NL-19-001) as well as some minor editorial changes. The NRC has approved the Unit 3 PSEP per RA-20-040.

A review of this activity in accordance with 10CFR50.54(q)(2) has been completed and has determined that the effectiveness of the PSEP is maintained. This revision aligns the procedure with the protocols of the post Unit 3 shutdown. None of the changes affect the ability to perform classifications, notifications or PARS. Additionally, it does not affect the activation of the Emergency Response Organization and the planning standard requirements are maintained. The changes made do not require a change to the Emergency Action Level scheme, On-Shift Staffing Study or the PSEP.

No further actions are required to screen or evaluate this activity under 10CFR50.54(q)(3).

Part V. Signatures:

Preparer Name (Print)

Dara Gray (Optional) Reviewer Name (Print) Date:

Reviewer Name (Print) Reviewer Signature Dale:

Timothy Garvey Nuclear EP Project Manager Approver Name (Print)

Emergency Planning Manager or designee EN-EP-3O5 ROOS

IP-EP-340, Meteorological Information and Dose Assessment System (MIDAS)

(Revision 8) Revision Matrix Change Page/Section Previous Version New Version Editorial Effect on 10 CFR 50.47(b)

No. Change Planning Standards or NUREG-0654 program elements? Justify if NO.

1. Cover Page Rev? Revs Yes No- This is an editorial change to the Revision number and effective date.

The meaning or intent of description in the emergency plan, facilities or equipment described in the PSEP or a process described in the PSEP are not affected by this change.

No further evaluation is required for this change.

IP-EP-340, Meteorological Information and Dose Assessment System (MIDAS)

(Revision 8) Revision Matrix_

Change Page/Section Previous Version New Version Editorial Effect on 10 CFR 50.47(b)

No. Change Planning Standards or NUREG-0654 program elements? Justify if NO.

2. Previous Table of Contents 9.2 Flow Charts Deleted previous Attachments 9.2, No No, Deleted attachments which 9.4, 9.5 and 9.6 from Table of no longer are applicable for post-9.4 Quick Guide for MIDAS Contents. shutdown of Unit 2 and 3.

Operation (Plant Vent Quick Dose)

The meaning or intent of Renumbered remaining Attachments description in the emergency 9.5 Quick Guide for MIDAS as:

plan, facilities or equipment Operation (S/G Tube Rupture Quick described in the PSEP or a Dose) 9.1 Event Trees process described in the PSEP 9.6 Quick Guide for MIDAS are not affected by this change.

9.2 Plant & Site Specific Parameters No further evaluation is required Operation (S/G Tube Rupture) for this change.

9.3 Quick Guide for MIDAS Operation (EOF - Auto H) 9.4 Quick Guide for MIDAS Operation (Offsite Users - Auto H) 9.5 Quick Guide for MIDAS Operation (Manual B - no automated data) 9.6 Quick Guide for MIDAS Operation - Multiple Accident (EOF) 9.7 Quick Guide for MIDAS Operation - Multiple Accident (CCR) 9.8 Quick Guide. for MIDAS Part 1 Form Generator Guidance

IP-EP-340, Meteorological Information and Dose Assessment System (MIDAS) 1Revision 8) Revision Matrix Change Page/Section Previous Version New Version Editorial Effect on 10 CFR 50.47(b)

No. Change Planning Standards or NUREG-0654 program elements? Justify if NO.

3. Pg 6 Select Automatic or Manual, or Select Automatic or Manual No No . Deleted simulation mode Section 5.5.8 Simulation which will no longer apply post-shutdown because U2 and U3 simulators which will not be available. The meaning or intent of description in the emergency plan, facilities or equipment described in the PSEP or a process described in the PSEP are not affected by this change.

No further evaluation is required for this change.

4. Pg6 NOTE: Note Deleted No No . Deleted simulation mode Section 5.5.8 Simulation uses automated DRILL which will no longer apply post-data. Simulation should be selected shutdown because U2 and U3 whenever possible during DRILLS simulators which will not be unless it is KNOWN that the available. The meaning or intent automated drill data is wrong, of description in the emergency unavailable, or misleading. plan, facilities or equipment described in the PSEP or a process described in the PSEP are not affected by this change.

No further evaluation is required for this change.

IP-EP-340, Meteorological Information and Dose Assessment System (MIDAS)

(Revision 8) Revision Matrix Change Page/Section Previous Version New Version Editorial Effect on 10 CFR 50.47(b)

No. Change Planning Standards or NUREG-0654 program elements? Justify if NO.

5. Pg 6 5.5.9 Based on the choices of 5.5.9 Based on the choices of No No. Deleted simulation mode Section 5.5.9 CCR/Eo'F and Automatic (Simulator) CCR/EOF and Automatic / Manual which will no longer apply post-

/ Manual the list of available choices the list of available choices in the shutdown because U2 and U3 in the 'Accident Run Menu 'Accident Run Menu Selection' will simulators which will not be Selection' will change. change. available. The meaning or intent of description in the emergency

_plan, facilities or equipment

- described in the PSEP or a process described in the PSEP are not affected by this change.

No further evaluation is required

' " for this change.

6. Pg 7 (Top of page) NOTE: Note deleted No; Deleted simulation mode To the user, Automatic and references which will no longer Simulator processes are the same, apply post-shutdown because U2 only changing the data source for and U3 simulators which will not automatic data collection. Automatic be available. The meaning or and Simulator processes are intent of description in the generally referred to throughout this emergency plan, facilities or procedure as 'Automatic'. equipment described in the PSEP or a process described in the PSEP are not affected by this change. No further evaluation is required for this change.

IP-EP-340, Meteorological Information and Dose Assessment System (MIDAS)

(Revision 8) Revision Matrix Change Page/Section Previous Version New Version Editorial Effect on 10 CFR 50.47(b)

No. Change Planning Standards or NUREG-0654 program 1 elements? Justify if NO.

7. 5.5.11 With 'CCR' selected, only Deleted No. The MIDAS CCR menus Pg 10 the automatic (Menu G & Menu J) or which no longer apply post-Section 5.5.11 manual (Menu A & Menu D) quick shutdown of U2 and U3 were dose projection is available as deleted from the procedure. The described in Section 5.5.12. MIDAS software itself was not changed ..

The meaning or intent of description in the emergency plan, facilities or equipment described in the PSEP or a process described in the PSEP are not affected by this change.

No further evaluation is required for this change.

IP-EP-340, Meteorological Information and Dose Assessment System (MIDAS)

(Revision 8) Revision Matrix Change Page/Section Previous Version New Version Editorial Effect on 10 CFR 50.47(b)

No. Change Planning Standards or NUREG-0654 program elements? Justify if NO.

r

8. Pg7 5.5.12 With 'EOF' selected the 5.5.11 With 'EOF' selected the No No. The MIDAS Automatic 5.5.12 following menus are available: following menus are available: menus which no longer apply Automatic Automatic post-shutdown of U2 and U3

a. Menu G - Auto Quick dose a. Menu H - Auto Enhanced were deleted from the procedure.

projection Plant Vent - this menu dose projection - this menu uses The MIDAS software itself was uses automatically loaded data to automatically loaded data but allows not changed ..

project doses with minimal user the user to select relevant release intervention or input required. points and other parameters

b. Menu H - Auto Enhanced b. Menu K-W - Auto Met Back The meaning or intent of dose projection - this menu uses Calculation - uses manually entered description in the emergency automatically loaded data but allows offsite monitoring centerline plume plan, facilities or equipment the user to select relevant release dose rate readings to estimate the described in the PSEP or a points and other parameters release source term based on process described in the PSEP

- c. Menu I - Auto Met Event automatically collected are not affected by this change.

Tree - uses automatically loaded meteorological data. This menu No further evaluation is required meteorological data but uses a pull option should generally not be used for this change.

down event tree selection process to if plant monitors are available.

determine source term and release c. Menu L - Auto Accum. Dose rates instead of using plant monitor Last 24 Hr - uses the automated data data collected for the last 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months to

d. Menu J - Auto Quick dose summarize the total dose committed projection Steam Generator Tube for that period. This menu option Rupture - this menu uses would not generally be used during automatically loaded data to project the initial protective action phase of doses with minimal user intervention an event or input required. d. - Menu N - Auto Met Isotopic

e. Menu K-W - Auto Met Back Entry - uses automatically collected Calculation - uses manually entered meteorological data and manually offsite monitoring centerline plume entered isotopic release data to dose rate readings to estimate the project dose - requires knowledge of release source term based on release bv isotope, e.o. from an

IP-EP-340, Meteorological Information and Dose Assessment System (MIDAS)

(Revision 8) Revision Matrix Change Page/Section Previous Version New Version Editorial Effect on 10 CFR 50.47(b)

No. Change Planning Standards or NUREG-0654 program elements? Justify if NO.

automatically collected isotopic analysis of effluent stack meteorological data. This menu samples.

option should generally not be used e. Menu Y - Auto All Screens -

if plant monitors are available. is for re-creation of past events and

f. Menu L - Auto Accum. Dose program testing and should not be Last 24 Hr - uses the automated used for emergency response data collected for the last 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months to f. Multiple Accident Run -

summarize the total dose committed Allows for dose calculations for for ttiat period. This menu option accidents occurring simultaneously would not generally be used during at both units. (See Section 5.14 ).

the initial protective action phase of an event

g. Menu N - Auto Met Isotopic Entry - uses automatically collected meteorological data and manually entered isotopic release data to project dose - requires knowledge of release by isotope, e.g. from an isotopic analysis of effluent stack samples.

h. Menu Y - Auto All Screens -

is for re-creation of past events and program testing and should not be used for emergency response.

i. Multiple Accident Run - '

Allows for dose calculations for accidents occurring simultaneously at both units. (See Section 5.14 ).

IP-EP-340, Meteorological Information and Dose Assessment System (MIDAS)

(Revision 8) Revision Matrix Change Page/Section Previous Version New Version Editorial Effect on 10 CFR 50.47(b)

No. Change Planning Standards or NUREG-0654 program elements? Justify if NO.

9. Pg 7 5.5.13 With 'EOF' selected the 5.5.12 With 'EOF' selected the No No. The MIDAS Manual menus 5.5.13 following menus are available: following menus are available: which no longer apply post-Manual Manual shutdown of U2 and U3 were

a. Menu A - Quick dose a. Menu B - Enhanced dose deleted from the procedure. The projection - this menu assumes the projection - this menu prompts the MIDAS software itself was not release is monitored and prompts user for manual input of release changed ..

the user for input of meteorological point, meteorological data, isotopic and radiological data. mix, and effluent monitor readings.

b. Menu B - Enhanced dose The meaning or intent of projection - this menu prompts the b. Menu E-W -Back Dose description in the emergency user for manual input of release Calculation - uses manually entered plan, facilities or equipment point, meteorological data, isotopic offsite monitoring centerline plume described in the PSEP or a mix, and effluent monitor readings. dose rate readings and a pull down process described in the PSEP C. Menu C -Event Tree - this event tree selection process to are not affected by this change.

menu prompts the user for manual determine the isotopic mix to No further evaluation is required input of meteorological data but uses estimate the release source term for this change.

a pull down event tree selection using manually entered .

process to determine source term meteorological data. This menu and release rates instead of using option should generally not be used plant monitor data. if plant monitors are available.

d. Menu D - Quick dose C. Menu F - Auto Accum Dose projection Steam Generator Tube Last 24 Hr - uses the data entered Rupture - this menu assumes the for the last 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months to summarize release is monitored and prompts the total dose committed for that the user for input of meteorological period. This menu option would not and radiological data. generally be used during the initial

e. Menu E-W -Back Dose protective action phase of an event Calculation - uses manually entered d. Menu M - Isotopic Entry -

offslte monitoring centerline plume uses manually entered dose rate readings and a pull down meteorological data and manually event tree selection process to entered isotopic release data to

IP-EP-340, Meteorological Information and Dose Assessment System (MIDAS)

(Revision 8) Revision Matrix Change Page/Section Previous Version New Version Editorial Effect on 10 CFR 50.47(b)

No. Change Planning Standards or NUREG-0654 program elements? Justify if NO.

determine the isotopic mix to project dose - requires knowledge of estimate the release source term release by isotope, e.g. from an using manually entered isotopic analysis of effluent stack meteorological data. This menu samples.

option should generally not be used e. Menu X - Advanced Cales if plant monitors are available. All Screens - is for re-creation of

f. Menu F - Auto Accum Dose past events and program testing and Last 24 Hr - uses the data entered should not be used for emergency for the last 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months to summarize response the total dose committed for that f. Multiple period. This menu option would not Accident Run - Allows for dose generally be used during the initial calculations for accidents protective action phase of an event occurring

g. Menu M - Isotopic Entry - simultaneously at both units. (See uses manually entered Section 5.14).

meteorological data and manually entered isotopic release data to project dose - requires knowledge of release by isotope, e.g. from an isotopic analysis of effluent stack samples.

h. Menu X - Advanced Cales All Screens - is for re-creation of past events and program testing and should not be used for emergency response

i. Multiple Accident Run - Allows for dose calculations for accidents occurring simultaneously at both units. (See Section 5.14).

IP-EP-340, Meteorological Information and Dose Assessment System (MIDAS)

(Revision 8) Revision Matrix Change Page/Section Previous Version New Version Editorial Effect on 10 CFR 50.47(b)

No. Change Planning Standards or NUREG-0654 program elements? Justify if NO.

10. Pg 13 5.6.5 Isotopic Data spreadsheet - 5.6.5 Isotopic Data spreadsheet - No No - This change directs the 5.6.5 includes date and time, and input includes date and time, and input MIDAS operator to a new user fields for the concentrations or fields for the concentrations or aid to facilitate the use of the release rates and flow rates in a release rates and flow rates in a isotopic eritry menus for post-known mix. The sheet contains known mix. The sheet contains shutdown releases from a SFP.

additional input columns to the right additional input columns to the right The meaning or intent of not shown in this screen view. not shown in this screen view.

description in the emergency (NOTE: MIDAS USER AID FOR plan, facilities or equipment SFP RELEASE provides additional described in the PSEP or a details on assessment of spent fuel process described in the PSEP accident releases).

i are not affected by this change.

No further evaluation is required for this change.

IP-EP-340, Meteorological Information and Dose Assessment System (MIDAS)

(Revision 8) Revision Matrix Change Page/Section Previous Version New Version Editorial Effect on 10 CFR 50.47(b)

No. Change Planning Standards or NUREG-0654 program elements? Justify if NO.

11. 5.7 Release Points - There are 5.7 Release Points - There is No No - This change reflects that Pg 15 four release points available in one release point available in MIDAS other previous release points Section 5.7 MIDAS for each unit: (CAEJ, Steam Dump, and Vapor 5.7.1 Release Point 1 - Pint Vnt - 5.7.1 Release Point 1 - Pint Vnt - Containment) are no longer (Plant Vent) (Plant Vent) applicable post-shutdown.

a, represents releases from the a, represents releases from the normal plant ventilation system normal plant ventilation system

b. R-44 and R-27 (Unit 2) b. R-44 and R-27 (Unit 2) The meaning or intent of C. R-14 and R-27 (Unit 3) C. R-27 (Unit 3) description in the emergency

d. stack flow rate required for d. stack flow rate required for plan, facilities or equipment R14 / R44 R44 described in the PSEP or a 5.7.2 Release point 2 - CAEJ - process described in the PSEP (Condenser Air Ejector) are not affected by this change.

a. represents releases from the No further evaluation is required condenser air ejectors / vacuum for this change.

system

b. R-45 (Unit-2}

C. R-15 (Unit 3)

d. offgas flow rate required 5.7.3 Release Point 3 - Stm Dmp

- (Steam Dump)

a. represents releases from atmospheric steam reliefs and dump valves

b. R-28, R-29, R-30, and R-31 (Unit 2)

c. R-62A, R-62B,R-62C, R-62D (Unit 3)

d. estimates of steam flow throuqh the open valves is required

IP-EP-340, Meteorological Information and Dose Assessment System (MIDAS)

(Revision 8) Revision Matrix Change Page/Section Previous Version New Version Editorial Effect on 10 CFR 50.47(b)

No. Change Planning Standards or NUREG-0654 program elements? Justify if NO.

1. Flow instrumentation may not give valid values for atmospheric releases through open ADVs or Safeties

2. Initial flow rates at high temperature and pressure may greatly overestimate the total release if long durations are assumed 5.7.4 Release Point 4 - Vap Cont

- (Vapor Containment)

a. represents releases direct from the containment including damage to containment and containment bypass releases

b. possible unmonitored pathways C. Containment dome monitors R-25, R-26 (Unit 2)

d. Containment dome monitors R-25, R-26 (Unit 3)

e. Estimate of flow rate required

IP-EP-340, Meteorological Information and Dose Assessment System (MIDAS)

(Revision 8) Revision Matrix Change Page/Section Previous Version New Version Editorial Effect on 10 CFR 50.47(b)

No. Change Planning Standards or NUREG-0654 program elements? Justify if NO.

12. Pg 40 Section 9.0 9.1 Event trees 9.1 Event Trees No No. Attachments which no longer Attachments 9.2 Flow charts 9.2 Plant & Site Specific apply post-shutdown of U2 and 9.3 Plant and Site Specific Parameters U3 were deleted and remaining Parameters 9.3 Quick Guide for MIDAS ones were renumbered.

9.4 Quick Guide for MIDAS Operation (EOF -Auto H)

Operation - Auto G: Plant Vent 9.4 Quick Guide for MIDAS Quick Dose (CCR) Operation (Offsite Users - Auto H) The meaning or intent of 9.5 Quick Guide for MIDAS description in the emergency Operation - Auto J: SGTR Quick 9.5 Quick Guide for MIDAS plan, facilities or equipment Dose (CCR) Operation (Manual B - no described in the PSEP or a 9.6 Quick Guide for MIDAS automated data) process described in the PSEP Operation - Auto H: Enhanced Dose 9.6 Quick Guide for MIDAS are not affected by this change.

Projection SGTR (EOF) Operation - Multiple Accident (EOF) No further evaluation is required 9.7 Quick Guide for MIDAS for this change.

Operation - Auto H: Enhanced Dose 9.7 Quick Guide for MIDAS Projection (EOF) Operation - Multiple Accident (CCR) 9.8 Quick Guide for MIDAS 9.8 Quick Guide for MIDAS Part Operation - Auto H: Enhanced Dose 1 Form Generator Projection (offsite) 9.9 Quick Guide for MIDAS Operation - Manual B: Enhanced Dose Projection (EOF) 9.10 Quick Guide for MIDAS Operation - Multiple Accident (EOF) 9.11 Quick Guide for MIDAS Operation - Multiple Accident (CCR) 9.12 Quick Guide for MIDAS Part 1 Form Generator

IP-EP-340, Meteorological Information and Dose Assessment System (MIDAS)

(Revision 8) Revision Matrix Change Page/Section Previous Version New Version Editorial Effect on 10 CFR 50.47(b)

No. Change Planning Standards or NUREG-0654 program elements? Justify if NO.

13. 1.0 Accident type - four choices No No. This change deleted event Attachment 9.1 1.1 Containment release 1.0 Accident type - (one choice trees which no longer apply post-Event Trees 1.2 Steam Generator Tube used post-defueling) shutdown for U2 and U3.

Pg 1 of 1 Rupture 1.1 Spent Fuel Pool release The meaning or intent of 1.3 Containment Bypass 2.0 Core Condition -one set to description in the emergency 1.4 Spent Fuel Pool release spent fuel releases plan, facilities or equipment 2.0 Core Condition - six choices 2.1 For spent fuel pool releases:

described in the PSEP or a in two sets of three - one set applies 2.1.1 Zircaloy Fire in one three to operating core accidents, one set month batch process described in the PSEP to spent fuel 2.1.2 Gap release from one three are not affected by this change.

For containment, month batch No further evaluation is required 2.1 containment bypass, and Steam 2.1.3 Gap release from a full pool for this change.

Generator releases:

2.1.1 Gap release 15-30 min -

represents 5 % core activity release from gap activity with some core damage 2.1.2 In-vessel severe core damage uncover >30 minutes -

represents core melt in vessel 2.1.3 Normal coolant with 100x spike - normal coolant activity with iodines and particulates multiplied by 100 to represent worst case normal trip 2.2 For spent fuel pool releases:

2.2.1 Zircaloy Fire in one three month batch 2.2.2 Gap release from one three month batch 2.2.3 Gap release from a full pool

IP-EP-340, Meteorological Information and Dose Assessment System {MIDAS)

(Revision 8) Revision Matrix Change Page/Section Previous Version New Version Editorial Effect on 10 CFR 50.47(b)

No. Change Planning Standards or NUREG-0654 program elements? Justify if NO.

3.0 Tube Leak Rate - two choices - used for the steam generator tube rupture to identify the RCS to steam side transfer rate 3.1 1 tube at high pressure -

initial condition of a single full tube failure 3.2 Charging pump flow - lower pressure condition assuming equilibrium with one

14. Page 42, Attachment 9.2 No No. Deleted flow charts, which Flow Charts Pages 1 -16 ,

Deleted all flow charts were previously for background Pages 1 through 16 documentation and not intended as procedure steps .. The meaning or intent of description in the emergency plan, facilities or equipment described in the PSEP or a process described in the PSEP are not affected by this change. No further evaluation is required for this change.

IP-EP-340, Meteorological Information and Dose Assessment System (MIDAS)

(Revision 8) Revision Matrix Change Page/Section Previous Version New Version Editorial Effect on 10 CFR 50.47(b)

No. Change Planning Standards or NUREG-0654 program elements? Justify if NO.

15. Attachment 9.3 Listing of rad monitors Deleted rad monitors all except R- No No. Deleted rad monitors no Plant and Site Specific 27, R-44G and R-14G longer apply post-shutdown for Parameters U2 and U3.

Page 1 of 1 The meaning or intent of description in the emergency plan, facilities or equipment described in the PSEP or a process described in the PSEP are not .affected by this *change.

No further evaluation is required for this change.

16. Attachment 9.3 Release Points Both Units: Release Points Both Units: No No. Deleted release points no Plant and Site Specific longer apply post-shutdown for Parameters Point Type II 1 - station Point I Type I U2 and U3.

Page 1 of 1 1 - station vent Ground vent l Ground I The meaning or intent of 2 - condenser offgas Ground description in the emergency 3 - steam dumps Ground plan, facilities or equipment 4 - containment leakage Ground described in the PSEP or a process described in the PSEP are not affected by this change.

No further evaluation is required for this change.

IP-EP-340, Meteorological Information and Dose Assessment System (MIDAS)

(Revision 8) Revision Matrix Change Page/Section Previous Version New Version Editorial Effect on 10 CFR 50.47(b)

No. Change Planning Standards or NUREG-0654 program elements? Justify if NO.

17. Previous pg 59 Entire previous Attachment 9.4 No. Deleted attachment no Attachment 9.4 deleted. longer applies post-shutdown for Quick Guides for MIDAS U2 and U3.

Operation r Page 1 of 2 The meaning or intent of CCR-Auto G description in the emergency (Used for Plant Vent Quick plan, facilities or equipment Dose) described in the PSEP or a process described in the PSEP are not affected by this change.

No further evaluation is required for this change.

18. Previous pg 61 Entire previous Attachment 9.5 No No . No. Deleted attachment no Attachment 9.5 deleted. longer applies post-shutdown for Quick Guides for MIDAS U2 and U3.

Operation Page 1 of 2 The meaning or intent of CCR-Auto J description in the emergency (Used for Steam Generator plan, facilities or equipment Tube Rupture Quick Dose) described in the PSEP or a process described in the PSEP are not affected by this change.

No further evaluation is required for this change.

IP-EP-340, Meteorological Information and Dose Assessment System (MIDAS)

(Revision 8) Revision Matrix Change Page/Section Previous Version New Version Editorial Effect on 10 CFR 50.47(b)

No. Change Planning Standards or NUREG-0654 program elements? Justify if NO.

19. Previous pg 75 Entire previous Attachment 9.6 No No . No. Deleted attachment no Attachment 9.6 deleted. longer applies post-shutdown for Quick Guides for MIDAS U2 and U3.

Operation The meaning or intent of Page 1 of 4 description in the emergency EOF-Auto H plan, facilities or equipment (For Steam Generator described in the PSEP or a Tube Rupture) process described in the PSEP are not affected by this change.

No further evaluation is requi~ed for this change.

20. Previous pg 83 b. IF it is an INITIAL PAR, THEN b. IF it is an INITIAL PAR, THEN No No. A RPSA is not applicable Attachment 9.12 answer whether the criteria for a answer whether the criteria for a under permanent shutdown Quick Guides for MIDAS RPSA have been met. Rapidly Progressing Severe conditions for U2 and U3.

Operation i. RPSA criteria are defined in IP-EP- Accident have been met. NOTE:

The meaning or intent of 410, Attachment 9.1. THIS WILL ALWAYS BE "NO".

Block 4 description in the emergency plan, facilities or equipment described in the PSEP or a process described in the PSEP are not affected by this change.

No further evaluation is required for this change.

Attachment 9.1 Emergency Planning Document Change Checklist Form (Alls ections must be completed, N/A or place a check on the line where applicable)

Section 1 Doc/Proced ure Type:

Administrative EPLAN 0 NIA Doc/Proced ure No: IP-EP-340 Doc/Proced ure

Title:

Meteorological Information and Dose Assessment System (MIDAS)

New revisio n number: 8 Corrective A ction: Yes [8] No O N/A CR#: OL-OLl-2018-00090 CA 19 Effective date: May 17, 2021 Section 2 Ch ange Description

1. Ens ure the following are completed, or are not applicable and are so marked:

a. 50.54q l'8'.I NIA

b. EN-FAP-OM-023 N/A !8J

c. IP-SMM-AD-102 l'8'.I NIA

d. OSRC N/A(gj

e. NRC Transmittal (within 30 days)

N/A (gj

2. List any other documents affected by this change: NIA

3. Transmittals are completed: !8l N/A D Date:4/29/21

4. Ensure the proper revision is active in eB Ref. Lib.: 1'81 NIA 0

5. Approved doc/procedure delivered to Doc. Control for distribution: t8] N/A O Date: 4/29/21

6. Position Binders updated: [81 N/A D Date: 4/29/21

7. Copy of EPOCC placed in EP file: [81 N/A O Date: 4/29/21

8. Supporting documentation is submitted as a general record in eB Ref. Lib.: l'8'.I N/A D Date: 4/29/21

9. Word files are moved from working drafts folder to current revision folder in the EP drive:

0 NIA ~ Date: 5/17/21 Sheet 1 of 1

IPEC NON*QUAL'ffY RELATED Revision 8 EMERGENCY IP-EP-340 PROCEDURE PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE Use Page 1 of 59 ONTROLLED Meteorological Information and Dose Assessment System (MIDAS)

Prepared by: Richard Watts Print Name l1s "f(.1/.zmJ Approval: Frank Mitchell Print Name

~ t/1/jud-l Signature Date Effective Date: May 17, 2021 This procedure excluded from fuiiher U-*100 review IP-EP-340 Rev 8.doc

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED Revision 8 EMERGENCY IP-EP-340 PROCEDURE PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE Use Page ~ of 59 Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose .................................................................................................................. 3 2.0 References ............................................................................................................. 3 3.0 Definitions .............................................................................................................. 3 4.0 Responsibilities ..................................................................................................... 4 5.0 Details ................................................................................................................... 4 6.0 Interfaces .............................................................................................................. 39 7.0 Records ................................................................................................................. 39 8.0I Requirements & Commitment Cross-References .................................................. 39 9.0 Attachments .......................................................................................................... 39 9.1 Event Trees ................................................................................................. 40 9.2 Plant & Site Specific Parameters ................................................................ 41 9.3 Quick Guide for MIDAS Operation (EOF - Auto H) ..................................... 42 9.4 Quick Guide for MIDAS Operation (Offsite Users -Auto H) ........................ 45 9.5 Quick Guide for MIDAS Operation (Manual B - no automated data) .......... 4 7 9.6 Quick Guide for MIDAS Operation - Multiple Accident (EOF) ..................... 49 9.7 Quick Guide for MIDAS Operation - Multiple Accident (CCR) .................. 52 9.8 Quick Guide for MIDAS Part 1 Form Generator Guidance .......................... 55

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED Revision 8 EMERGENCY IP-EP-340 PROCEDURE PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE use Page of 59 1.0 PURPOSE To describe the methods of estimating the whole body and thyroid doses to onsite and offsite persons in the event of potential ot actual accidental release of radioactivity to the environment

2.0 REFERENCES

2.1 MIDAS user manual (ABS Consulting) 2.2 IP-EP-510, Meteorological, Radiological & Plant Data Acquisition System 2.3 IP-EP-410, Protective Action Recommendations 3.0 DEFINITIONS 3.1 MRPDAS - Meteorologlcal, Radiological, and Plant Parameter Data Acquisition System - the system which provides meteorological, Reuter Stokes and certain plant parameter data (VC Temperature, VC Pressure, Plant Vent and VC High Radiation Monitors)

3.2 Total Effective Dose Equivalent (TEDE) - The sum of the Deep Dose Equivalent (ODE) and the Committed Effective Dose Equivalent (CEDE).

3.3 Committed Dose Equivalent Thyroid (COE Thyroid) - The dose equivalent to the thyroid that will be received from an intake of radioiodine by an individual during

. the 50-year period following the intake.

3.4 CEDE - Committed effective dose equivalent is the sum of the products of the weighting factors applicable to each of the body organs or tissues that are irradiated and the committed dose equivalent to these organs or tissues 3.5 Site Boundary - For Dose Assessment and Protective Action Recommendation purposes the Site Boundary is the closest distance at which members of the public would be exposed to a radioactive release. When the plume is traveling toward the water, the distance to the nearest point on the far shore is used.

3.6 MIDAS - Meteorological Information and Dose Assessment System - computer software for determining source term, atmospheric dispersion, and dose consequences

3. 7 Source term - generic term for curies available for release or actually being released. 'Term' in mathematics is any single factor in an equation. Hence

'source term', 'dispersion term', etc are simply portions of the equation for the calculation 3.8 Ground level release - an effluent release point model that assumes that the release point is at ground level, with no accounting for the additional mixing from other release point factors such as height above the ground, plume temperature, and exit velocity

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED Revision 8 EMERGENCY IP-EP-340

--- F-1nJt)ll PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page ~ of 59 3.9 Multiple Accident Run - Allows for dose calculations for accident releases occurring simultaneously from different release locations at one or both units.

4.0 RESPONSIBILITIES Dose Assessment staff in the Control Room (CR) and in the Emergency Operations Facility (EOF) are responsible for assessing actual and potential planned and unplanned radioactive releases to the environment. Attachments at the end of the procedure may be used as a reference when stepping through a MIDAS dose assessment calculation.

NOTE:

When a dose assessment is being performed you may proceed directly to the applicable attachment in the procedure for the type of dose assessment being performed.

5.0 DETAILS 5.1 MIDAS is a menu driven computer system - menus are described below throughout Section 5 5.2 Step by step option selection for each menu are shown in the attachments 5.3 MIDAS uses a segmented plume model with terrain and meteorology specific wind fields. Displayed plumes are EXPECTED to have unusual shapes. (See Section 5.12) 5.4 MIDAS also uses an automated plant data collection system 'NDCIP' which runs in the background on the MIDAS computer 5.5 MIDAS Startup 5.5.1 PC computer system should be running with the program "NDCIP" active NOTE:

NOCIP provides the automated interface between the plant data sources (e.g. Pl computer) and the MIDAS system for automated plant monitor and meteorological data collection and should not be closed by the user.

NOTE:

If NDCIP is not already active in the computer, it will start when MIDAS is started. In this case, there will not be recent history or current automated data available until a data collection cyc,le is completed.

5.5.2 Start MIDAS by 'double-clicking' on the 'MIDAS Accident Cales' icon

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED Revision 8 EMERGENCY IP-EP-340

-~ R11JPr1, PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE Use Page 2 of 59 5.5.3 After a few second delay with a startup screen showing a photograph of the plant, the accident dose startup menu screen will be displayed as shown in Figure 1 below.

Figure 1 Example: MIDAS Startup/ Menu Screen II MIDAS -A.ccident Dose Calcul<1tion - Sheet :rl MlDAS-NlJVersion:1.5. !ti.I T231S D X

'~'". :

.:.,1 ; ,*

.: :: j:

___]~_2_:__lL Delete Selected Rec"P l i<----***-- - ____ - r. -1 ___

Set. 619f16fic Map Defaullt I ..

5.5.4 Ensure "Indian Point' is selected for the Site Selection on the upper left

IPEC* Revision 8 NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-340 EMERGENCY Ei1IPrt PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page § of 59 5.5.5 Select 'Start New Run' for calculations involving an accident at either Unit 2 or Unit 3; or, select "Start Multiple Accident Run for accident releases occurring simultaneously from different release locations at one or both units. (See Section 5.14 ).

a. 'Recap Previous Run' near the bottom left is the alternate button selection for 'Start New Run'

b. 'Recap Previous Run' allows display of previously saved runs from the list at the bottom of the page

c. 'Recap Previous Run' will generally not be needed in the initial phase of dose evaluation but can be used if hard copy printouts of a previous run are needed

., 5.5.6 Select the appropriate Unit (2 or 3) on the upper right

a. If more than one location is experiencing a release, a calculation must be completed for each location.

(ex. Unit 2, Unit 3, Spent Fuel Pool) 5.5. 7 Select your location CCR or EOF 5.5.8 Select Automatic or Manual NOTE:

Automatic should be selected whenever possible unless it is KNOWN that the automated data is wrong, unavailable, or misleading.

NOTE:

Choosing 'Automatic' will force MIDAS to use any of the effluent and radiation monitor data and meteorological data automatically collected from the plant computer system (Pl computers). Manual will cause MIDAS to IGNORE this available data and will REQUIRE the user to obtain and enter this data by hand.

5.5.9 Based on the choices of CCR/EOF and Automatic/ Manual the list of available choices in the 'Accident Run Menu Selection' will change.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED Revision 8 EMERGENCY IP-EP-340

J~tn/Pn, PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page z of 59 5.5.10 The Automatic and Manual*lists represent the same processes but using or not using the automaticafly collected data 5.5.11 With 'EOF' selected the following menus are av.ailable: Automatic

a. Menu H - Auto Enhanced dose projection - this menu uses automatically loaded data but allows the user to select relevant release points and other parameters

b. Menu K-W - Auto Met Back Calculation - uses manually entered offsite monitoring centerline plume dose rate readings to estimate the release source term based on automatically collected meteorological data. This menu option should generally not be used if plant monitors are available.

c. Menu L - Auto Accum. Dose Last 24 Hr- uses the automated data collected for the last 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months to summarize the total dose committed for that period. This menu option would not generally be used during the initial protective action phase of an event

d. Menu N -Auto Met Isotopic Entry- uses automatically collected meteorological data and manually entered isotopic release data to project dose - requires knowledge of release by isotope, e.g. from an isotopic analysis of effluent stack samples.

e. Menu Y - Auto All Screens - is for re-creation of past events and program testing and should not be used for emergency response

f. Multiple Accident Run - Allows for dose calculations for accidents occurring simultaneously at both units. (See Section 5.14).

NOTE:

If the automatic process identifies missing or bad data MIDAS will prompt the user for manual inputs, even in automatic menu modes.

5.5.12 With 'EOF' selected the following menus are available: Manual

a. Menu B - Enhanced dose projection - this menu prompts the user for manual input of release point, meteorological data, isotopic mix, and effluent monitor readings.

b. Menu E-W -Back Dose Calculation - uses manually entered offsite monitoring centerline plume dose rate readings and a pull down event tree selection process to determine the isotopic mix to estimate the release source term using manually entered meteorological data. This menu option should generally not be used if plant monitors are available.

c. Menu F -Auto Accum Dose Last 24 Hr- uses the data entered for the last 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months to summarize the total dose committed for that

IPEC NaN-QUALITY RELATED Revision 8 EMERGENCY IP-EP-340

"~:::, J;:nfPrl PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page ~ of 59 period. This menu option would not generally be used during the initial protective action phase of an event

d. Menu M - Isotopic Entry- uses manually entered meteorological data and manually entered isotopic release data to project dose -

requires knowledge of release by isotope, e.g. from an isotopic analysis of effluent stack samples.

e. Menu X - Advanced Cales All Screens - is for re-creation of past events and program testing and should not be used for emergency response

f. Multiple Accident Run - Allows for dose calculations for accidents occurring simultaneously at both units. (See Section 5.14).

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED Revision 8 EMERGENCY IP-EP-340

-...- r:nJPrf PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page ~ of 59 5.6 MIDAS data input process 5.6.1 MIDAS accumulates automatically collected data or manually input data into spreadsheets. There are two sets of four primary spreadsheets, one set for manually entered data and one set for automatically collected

data.

5.6.2 Meteorological spreadsheet - includes date and time, wind direction, wind speed, delta T (or stability class), and precipitation

a. Make certain that the proper met data is being applied when entering data manually because several sets of meteorological data are available from sensors at different levels on the primary tower and from a backup tower.

b. Because all release points are treated as ground level, the speed and direction values should be from the primary tower 10 meter sensors and the stability should be derived from the 60 - 10 delta T.

c. The meteorological data spreadsheet is shown below in Figure 2 Figure 2 Example: MIDAS Meteorological Data Input Sheet t--11--------

-**14:45.

.....-...-....-._-----l~- ~t ~~ - ----+-------*t* -==~:::::~:=-~

15:30,..._--+----+-----+--I-

' I

======-+--/'?*: '"*,~ 12 123 id !O *--*j

?

,........,.....__ _ _ _ - - - , ; - - - 17 : 15 lfi~~---- --~, -----~--- *-1 '

[' :* :h:~ l ----+****-**--- *i

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED Revision 8 EMERGENCY IP-EP-340

-:::::,- Rrllt::>.tf PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 10 of 59 5.6.3 Radiation Monitor & Flow spreadsheet - includes date and time, and input fields for the plant effluent monitors, flow rates of release points, and the containment dome monitors as shown in Figure 3. The sheet may contain additional input columns to the right not shown in this screen view dependent on the release points selected as active.

a. The content and columns displayed on this sheet are modified based on the selection of the four release points

b. Columns for effluent monitors, dome monitors, flow instruments are selected based on the applicability of each sensor to the selected release points Figure 3 Example: MIDAS Radiation, Effluent Monitor and Flow Data Input Sheet 5.6.4 Mix spreadsheet - includes date and time, and input fields for the ratios of isotopes in a known mix in percent as shown below in Figure 4. The sheet contains additional input columns to the right not shown in this screen view. The sheet will adjust the input percentages to total 100, so mixes do not need to be in percent to be input.

~:=, l?11Jr:1t1 IPEC EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES NON-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE REFERENCE Use IP-EP-340 Page 11 Revision 8 of 59 Figure 4 Example: MIDAS Effluent Isotopic Mix Data Input Sheet cata Sta,1/Cunenl Tafte -

we Staat _______ _

- M~-*--**--********-*******************-"*

--~------.--------*---

SMle to csv 5.6.5 Isotopic Data spreadsheet - includes date and time, and input fields for the concentrations or release rates and flow rates in a known mix. The sheet contains additional input columns to the right not shown in this screen view. (NOTE: MIDAS USER AID FOR SFP RELEASE provides additional details on assessment of spent fuel accident releases).

5.6.5.1 Before entering data, select if data is available in rate or concentration in the selection menu as shown in Figure 5.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED Revision 8 IP-EP-340

-:...- Ft,-T11Prf. EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 12 of 59 Figure 5 Example: MIDAS Effluent Isotopic Sample Data Type Selection Menu Select Method for Entering the Isotopic Value

r. !Enter Isotopic

__,,...........Release.Rate*~

r Enter Isotopic Concentrations a Flow Rate

a. With release rate selected the input process requires release rate in uCi/sec for each isotope as shown in the input sheet in Figure 6 Figure 6 Example: MIDAS Effluent Isotopic Sample Data Release Rate Input Sheet

---1-----------;i-- l 17:00 17 : 15 1 I t I

-~l----+---+-----1---+----+----+----+----!----+---_,_,- -

_ _ _ _,_ Iifil[

- - + - - - - - - - - - t - 1 8 : 00 1------ -------1------- I 1.

1 18 : 15 ---'-----+-------; , !

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-340 Revision 8

~:::z= pr1,11/Mf EMERGENCY PROCEDURE PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE Use Page 13 of 59

b. With release concentration and flow selected the input process requires release rate in uCi/sec for each isotope as shown in the input sheet in Figure 7 Figure 7 Example: MIDAS Effluent Isotopic Sample Data Concentration and Flow Rate Input Sheet

_CD":!.d J_ c~~..J --~*~~,:'1'1~' *..,_ Cttpy _j -** P"1'1J_ j *****-c1ocr _j ,.Pitt?Wttae PlM03:fZW0M

--~ S~to J F~oa~t~~vJ P~~~d0W,: _j ~T!:11 :-~'.~;~~j jtJ :*

NOTE:

The ISOTOPIC DATA sheets are release point specific. If more than one release point is active you MUST enter data on sheets for each release point by clicking on the Release Point button to the left of the "OK" to toggle between release point sheets 5.6.6 Under many circumstances when release points are changed or calculation menu choices are changed MIDAS will provide a prompt to initialize ('New') or retain the old ('Edit Last') data collection spreadsheets as shown in Figure 8

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED Revision 8 EMERGENCY IP-EP-340

- lln/1:,n; PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 14 of 59 Figure 8 Example: MIDAS Spreadsheet Initialization Selection Menu Hl/30/09 04:00

(

5.6.7 The user MUST select 'NEW' when first starting MIDAS, otherwise the spreadsheet dates will be left over from the last time the program was used and WILL cause dose projection errors.

5.6.8 When changing menus or release points, a similar prompt may appear. If the dates of the various sheets shown are not consistent and are not appropriate for the current calculation the user MUST select 'NEW'.

5.6.9 Spreadsheet lines highlighted in the time column with RED are the start time of the release.

5.6.10 Spreadsheet lines highlighted in the time column in LIGHT BLUE are the start time of the dose assessment.

i 5.6.11 Because, for offsite protective action purposes, dose that has already been incurred is not used for protective action decisions, the start of release and start of dose assessment will not be the same except for initial calculations.

5.6.12 Make CERTAIN that the spreadsheets contain data in the highlighted lines. Meteorological data from previous lines is assumed to 'persist' into the current time. Release data does NOT 'persist' and blank lines are interpreted as NO RELEASE.

5.6.13 Buttons on the spreadsheets allow copying lines of data and pasting to new lines, clearing lines of data, and saving and retrieving sheets to/

from Excel readable spreadsheet files.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED Revision 8 IP-EP-340 EMERGENCY PROCEDURE PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 15 of 59 5.7 Release Points -There is one release point available in MIDAS for each unit:

5. 7 .1 Release Point 1 - Pint Vnt - (Plant Vent) a, represents releases from the normal plant ventilation system

b. R-44 and R-27 (Unit 2)

c. R-27 (Unit 3)

d. stack flow rate required for R44

5. 7 .2 The Plant Vent release points are treated as ground level releases

a. application of ground level release point model to station vent will likely cause underestimate of offsite mixing and overestimate of dose consequences of release 5.8 Times and timing in MIDAS 5.8.1 There are several timing concepts important to successful MIDAS dose projections 5.8.2 Meteorological data

a. Always provided in 15 minute average data

b. Averages are CENTERED on the 15 minute clock time e.g. the 1300 average is accumulated from 12:52:30 to 13:07:30

c. Manually entered data COULD be in instantaneous values but may not represent the long term dispersion 5.8.3 Start Date of Exposure -

a. The date and time for the beginning of calculation of dose consequences

b. Because dose already incurred is irrelevant to protective actions, this is typically set to the current time

c. Defaults times will be set to Meteorological times - e.g. HH: 08, HH: 23, HH: 38, HH: 53 5.8.4 Trip/Shutdown

a. The date and time of the plant trip or shutdown

b. Used to decay default and other isotopic information to adjust isotopic mixes and monitor response factors based on mix

c. Should be set once at start of event

d. MIDAS will remember this value

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-340 Revision 8 EMERGENCY PROCEDURE PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 16 of 59 5.8.5 Release time

a. The date and time of the start of the release

b. Different from start of exposure because previous releases are kept track of in MIDAS and doses for the activity already in the environment may be included in the dose assessment

c. Should be set to the earliest time of significant releases - should NOT be the current time except for the first calculation.

d. Should be set once at start of event

e. MIDAS will remember this value 5.8.6 Remaining duration

a. Represents the approximate remaining duration of significant releases

b. Used to 'persist' releases into the future

c. Four hours is the typical default.

5.8. 7 Exposure time to be calculated

a. Specific times that projections will be provided for

b. Provides basis for plume plots, long term projections

c. At least one value should be 4 in order to provide specific projection at the default duration 5.8.8 Daylight savings time

a. MET data is maintained in Eastern Standard Time (EST)

b. The Pl computer tags data strings with eastern daylight time (EDT) when applicable

c. Conflicting times will cause problems with auto data collection

d. MIDAS contains a data file (DST.txt) that tells MIDAS when to assume EDT.

e. This file MUST be maintained annually due to possible changes in EDT/EST changeover as federally mandated

f. MIDAS will subtract 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months from the Pl reported met string during EDT based on the period defined in the DST.txt file.

5.9 Automated Data collection 5.9.1 Automated collection of data is obtained from the EOFPI, U2PI, and U3PI servers.

5.9.2 Short delays are expected between data collection at the source and the

availability of the data in the Pl servers.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED Revision 8 EMERGENCY IP-EP-340

"!:.:..- J?nlP-rr PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 17 of 59 5.9.3 MIDAS delays acquisition of data for about 75 seconds to ensure data is updated. IF data collection is delayed longer than 75 seconds or there are errors in the time in the computers, automatic data collection will fail.

5.9.4 Because the data collection into the Pl computers is dependent on the time and timing of multiple Pl servers as well as other plant computers and data loggers (met towers) bad or old data may be collected due to delays in the data transfer path before MIDAS tries to acquire the data.

5.10 Event Trees 5.10.1 In some events source term may be developed or enhanced by selection of plant conditions from an 'event tree' 5.10.2 The event tree is based on the event trees in the NRG Response Technical Manual but applies only the default noble gas to iodine mixes of 10000:1 or 100:1 in use at IPEC.

5.10.3 As the name suggests, the event tree is a branching process that asks questions based on previous answers 5.10.4 The event tree may have one or two branches after the initial trunk question as shown in the example in Figure 9 below.

Figure 9 Example: MIDAS Event Tree Menu 5.10.5 Each line is based on a pull-down selection list with the next branch typically dependent on the answer to the previous branch.

5.10.6 There are four accident types, three isotopic mixes, and for steam generator releases, two possible flow rates in event tree. The tree selections are shown in detail in Attachment 9.1

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED Revision 8 EMERGENCY IP-EP-340

--- F.tn JM1~ PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page ll of 59 5.10. 7 The event tree selects the isotopic mix and / or the curies available for release by determining core condition, release conditions (flow rates etc) and adjustments for the default Noble Gas to Iodine ratios for each accident type.

5.10.8 For unmonitored releases, the event tree will derive isotopic release rates (mix and magnitude) 5.10.9 For releases with monitor data, the event tree will determine the isotopic mix which is then applied to the total activity applicable for the monitor reading to determine the magnitude of the release 5.10.1 0The selection of release point does NOT limit the event tree menu choices. Therefore the user must ensure that the release point and the accident type in the event tree are consistent. E.g. do not select release point 1 and a steam generator tube failure event tree (more appropriate for release point 3).

('

5.11 MIDAS Main input control page NOTE:

Each time the NEXT arrow is selected, MIDAS will inspect the input parameters to test if there is valid complete data for a successful dose projection and will provide warnings if data is incomplete or invalid. Some of these warnings are informational and some are critical. The warnings messages must be reviewed to determine if they are critical or not.

5.11.1 MIDAS uses a main input control page to sequence the user through the input process. At each step, additional panes are shown as required as described below for individual parameter input 5.11.2 The input control page is divided into four sections horizontally 5.11.3 .The first section allows selection of release points and plume plot display

distance as shown in Figure 1.0. Default for the initial display radius is 16 miles

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED Revision 8 EMERGENCY IP-EP-340

~~ Jtn Jpn., PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE Use Page 19 of 59 Figure 10 Example: MIDAS Main Input Page, first quarter pane section 11 MIDAS - Accicerit Do~ecarcutacion IOCia!I t\inl Un:r 3 Menu: N S.>:eec *2 \:'~1cn:1.5.J6.11l3T5 0 X 5.11.4 CLICK on the NEXT down arrow to continue - the arrow label will change to DONE and will turn green 5.11.5 'Exit' terminates MIDAS and must be clicked TWICE to exit NOTE:

Gray items are not used in the selected menu. Most users will not need these items during emergency response activities 5.11.6 The second quarter pane of the screen inputs exposure start date/time and desired calculation times and is shown in Figure 11 below. At least one of these times should be 4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED Revision 8 EMERGENCY IP-EP-340

~,J?nJPrf, PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 20 of 59 Figure 11 Example: MIDAS Main Input Page, second quarter pane section 5.11. 7 CLICK on the NEXT down arrow to continue 5.11.8 DEPENDING on the initial menu selection, the manual input spreadsheets or the event tree will now be displayed 5.11.9 After completing the spreadsheets or event tree, or if automated data is available, the previous Next down arrow will turn green and be relabeled DONE.

5.11.10 Click boxes are displayed on the right of the third input page section for each spreadsheet used as shown in Figure 12 below.

1. If all boxes are GREEN, MIDAS has determined that the input data is usable for calculations - i.e. there is sufficient valid data for a projection at the current projection time

2. If any box is RED, MIDAS has determined that the data for that input item may not be usable.

3. If any box is RED, click on that box to repeat the input process for that item.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED Revision 8 IP-EP-340

--- r:111,?a EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 21 of 59 Figure 12 Example: MIDAS Main Input Page, third quarter pane section MIO/IS* Ac<id*m Ocoe Cal<ulir.icn ln<li*n Point U,,it 3 Mmu: N She<t V<l'lto,.1.;.15.11231; =, X

.!t::.%,.~~:tJt:;;::,:/..:} '.tit1.i:xc*:-;,,:~.l.t\~1>'.?J. :,.-,i;:.-:~w:.w,;~:-~:.:.r1.11;,~:X&>J:t!l,"'.':.':1::~--::.J*~.;;;..,_r,/: ~S:*~-'~>:f~t.~~ttttW~tiJ::.ittvfrliX.:~-!~~r;;::,,:.t..*.'ti!zt,::_;,,,;*;..<J::;;1art1~'-'/" ::~/4:e.rs::;;;w*:\Y;:.:;.x:t.tt iAWGii--9+

1---.;..:.M*;;.;.;*e"'-e,eiogi<:=*;;.;;;*ol-----1 s;;' Ill 1'1.HT VHT

"*"'"""""' 1,...1

r 121 CAEJ DONE r

r (3f$TIHINE (4JYAPCOlff runll/lrnto .JI rilHltlilll 1 111 i0.25 I (21 1200 (31 [4.00

-* 1*1 [24.00 DON I

,,.,o,.,..,,_, .. , _,,0HOM00o0o .... ,

. , ~

a NEXT I

5.11.11 CLICK on the NEXT down arrow to continue - the arrow label will change to DONE and the arrow will turn green 5.11.12 The final section of the input page allows changing the Trip and Release Start times, as well as the release duration as shown in Figure 13 below.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED Revision 8 EMERGENCY IP-EP-340

-;;,- R111JPrf. PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE Use Page 22 of 59 Figure 13 Example: MIDAS Main Input Page, fourth quarter pane section 11 M!OAS

Accident Dose- Calcuf.ation !mf1~n Petnt llult 3 M-emr: N She!t ,.z Vl!':f'l'.-ic:n:1,5.!6.112315 0 X 5.11.13 Click 'Start Cale'. to continue and start the offsite dose calculations 5.11.14 Calculations may take several seconds and are not complete until the text displays are shown on the right side of the screen view.

5.11.15 MIDAS will complete calculations and show the default results page, a plume plot of the integrated TEDE dose at 4 hour4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months s:

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED Revision 8 EMERGENCY IP-EP-340

"'~ A11JP11, PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 23 of 59 5.12 MIDAS Output 5.12.1 MIDAS will display various plume plots depending on user selected options as shown in Figure 14 below.

Figure 14 Example: MIDAS Plume Plot Output Display Page NOTE:

MIDAS uses site-specific variable wind fields so the plume may not be linear.

NOTE:

MIDAS plot screen can be printed by clicking on the printer icon on the lower right 5.12.2 In addition to the plume plot, various input and calculated parameters are displayed on the right side of the output page.

5.12.3 Numerous plume display options are available by selecting the buttons at the bottom of the frame. Clicking on these buttons activates additional features or toggles display options

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED Revision 8 EMERGENCY IP-EP-340

-~ J~ nJp,-r, 1

PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 24 of 59 NOTE:

Most of the plume display option buttons require clicking on the CONFIRM button on the lower right to redraw the display. The CONFIRM button will blink when required.

5.12.4 POI activates a Point of Interest pointer. Selecting POI and clicking on any point on the active plot will cause a point specific value to be shown on the plume plot.

NOTE:

Changing the plume display by selecting a different plume or zooming the display will clear the points of interest. Two points of interest are shown in the plume plot in Figure 14 above 5.12.5 TEDE will display various options for the Total Effective Dose Equivalent calculation based on the yellow buttons below (see Sections 5.12.6 through 5.12.8) 5.12.6 Integrated dose button toggles between integrated dose and dose rate display 5.12. 7 Exposure 4 hr toggles between the four calculation display times previously input in the second section of the input page 5.12.8 Graphic toggles between graphic on tabular display. Generally the -

graphic display is more useful for emergency response; tabular reports are available elsewhere (see below) 5.12.9 Child Thyroid COE (previously referred to as TODE) will display various options for the thyroid specific organ dose calculation based on the yellow buttons above (see Sections 5.12.6 through 5.12.8) 5.12.10 EDE will display various options for the external photon dose based on the yellow buttons above (see Sections 5.12.6 through 5.12.8) 5.12.11 Field Monitors will display various options for external photon dose rates with overlay projected photon dose and measured dose (or dose rate) at the Reuter Stokes monitors and field monitoring points as shown in Figure 15 below (view zoomed in compared to the view above) 5.12.12 Points with two values are Reuter Stokes locations

a. C - MIDAS calculated value

b. M - Reuter Stokes monitor reported value (in this case M values are zero because the data was not being collected)

c. Calculated values (dose or dose rate) for predefined field monitoring points are shown at the 'circle and plus' crosshairs

i&

='* J?nlPrt IPEC EMERGENCY NON-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-340 Revision 8 PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 25 of 59

. Figure 15 Example: MIDAS Plume Display with Reuter Stokes and Monitoring Location Data 5.12.13 Population Dose will display a plot of integrated population dose 5.12.14 Plume Tracks is a simplified display of the plume. This is useful to highlight the possible meander of the plume. Lateral contours are not shown.

5.12.15 Special Reports will generate text reports of input and output parameters which can be printed and will start the Form 1 input process 5.12.16 Dose Summary provides the simplified dose and release summary including affected sector and affected ERPAs in a single page. This is probably the most useful report a*nd is shown in Figure 16 below.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED Revision 8 EMERGENCY IP-EP-340

--- RnJPrf.. PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 26 of 59 Figure 16 Example: MIDAS Dose Summary Report Dose Assessment Summary Indian Point Station Name: Run Time: 08:07 AM Date: 13-J Current Meteorological Data CurrentActive Release Locations Wind Direction {from): 321 °1 0 Release From Plant Vent D Release From the Air Ejectors Wind Speed {mis): 5.6 D Release From the Main Steam Stability Class: A D Release From the Containmer Remaining Release Duration (hours Current Release Rates Noble Gases {Ci/sec): Particulates {Ci/sec): Radioiodines (Ci/1 j1.0E+031 j 1.0E-011 11.0E-01 j

.-----------r------P'-'e=a=k'-'V,,,_,,a=lu=es=--:';t:\ff!~Ef:~~1%#J~;~~~---

Site Bndry 2 Mites 5 Miles 10 Integrated Dose@

4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months {mrem)

TEDE : ' 6.9E+01 I 2.8E+01 I[~

Thy coE: I 3.5E+o2 1j 1.1E+01 I 1.1E+oo I[~

Current Dose Rate TEDE: I 6.6E+o2 lj 2.4E+01 I

IC (mrem/hr)

ThyCOE : I 6.1 E+01 11 3.0E-tOO 11

11=

Plume may not have arrived yet or has already pa Dispersion (sec/rJ) X/Q: I 1.4E-06 I 7.0E-08 I 3.2E-08 I~

IPEC

"'=-" n~-¥nlt?r.<.

IA NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-340 Revision 8 EMERGENCY PROCEDURE PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE Use Page ll of 59 5.12.17 Ingestion Summary provides information on the dose and concentrations through the ingestion pathways the longer term response.

5.12.18 Met/Rad Summary provides a summary page of the meteorological conditions used and the readings from any radiation or effluent monitors used for the projection 5.12.19 RMP provides a summary report for the calculated values at offsite radiation monitoring points 5.12.20 Projection Summary provides a summary of the dose compared to PAG and dose broken out by pathway 5.12.21 Plume Arrival provides a tabular estimate of the arrival time of the plume at various distances based on assumption of last meteorological data persists 5.12.22 Ingestion Pathway displays a plume of the ingestion pathway concentrations for based on the isotopes and pathways selected using the yellow buttons. below 5.12.23 X/Q (chi over Q) displays various dispersion parameter plots based on the selection from the yellow button below.

5.12.24 XX Miles activates an input box to change the downwind distance limit of.

the calculation. \

a. This actually recalculates the plume, not just resizes the display.

b. This can be *useful to improve the display precision for close in to the plant. *

c. End Run will exit the current calculation.

d. An exit option menu will appear as shown in Figure 17 below Figure 17 Example: MIDAS Exit Option Menu Enter Aun

Title:

l1P09W281729 -

Time Remaining:

r Save Run & Exit r Exit without saving r Save without exiting lr........................ ,..........11 ,...,

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED Revision 8 EMERGENCY IP-EP-340 PROCEDURE PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 28 of 59 NOTE:

Depending on the initial menu choice, not all of these four exit menu choices will be available.

e. Run Next Time Step will rerun the current calculation with new data for a new 15 minute average. If the next 15 minute interval is not yet available, the choice will be red with a count down timer

f. Save run and exit will save all of the parameters for the current run to the computer hard drive in a file based on the name the user enters in the box at the top and then terminate MIDAS.

NOTE:

In order for 'RECAP' in the main startup screen to redisplay runs, the runs MUST have been saved using this process

g. Exit without saving will terminate MIDAS and *not save a RECAP file

h. Save without exit will save the RECAP file and return to the main startup menu 5.13 Using MIDAS results NOTE:

If more than one location is experiencing a release, select New Multiple Accident Run radial button on the initial MIDAS Startup / Menu Screen (described in Section 5.14) and use the combined, Multi-Accident Dose Summary Report to obtain the combined doses before comparing results. (Use the manual Dose Assessment Worksheet as a backup method if needed).

5.13.1 MIDAS results should be compared to existing limits and protective action guidelines to determine appropriate response.

5.13.2 Use EP-41 O to determine protective action recommendations based on MIDAS dose assessment results 5.13.3 Use the PART1 communication system to complete notifications 5.13.4 Release rates calcul_ated by MIDAS that exceed technical specification limits need to be identified in the notifications.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED Revision 8 EMERGENCY IP-EP-340 PROCEDURE PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 29 of 59 5.14 Multiple Accident Run (Simultaneous Release Point Dose Projection from CCR or EOF)

NOTE:

If more than one location is experiencing a release, select New Multiple Accident Run radial button on the initial MIDAS Startup I Menu Screen. This function of MIDAS will allow entry of up to 5 different accident releases occurring simultaneously from Unit 2 and Unit 3.

NOTE:

The Multiple Accident feature of MIDAS can be run from either the CCR or from the EOF in the AUTO or MANUAL mode.

NOTE:

First select either the CCR or the EOF and the AUTO mode. Then select Start New Multiple Accident Run radial button as shown in Figure 18. The instructions which follow are for calculations performed using the AUTO Mode.

~ft

"'~:!:* ~n lPl"f IPEC EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING NON-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-340 Revision 8 PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page .. *'.. 30 of 59 Figure 18 Example: MIDAS Startup/Menu Screen Showing Multiple Accident Run selection Automatic Version

(" EOF

. ........................... -......... , ........ . .' ..... , .... ****---~-* ...... .

nc

(; AUT OMA (' MANUAL r SIMULATION 1

Delete Selected Recap

_,,,,._.._~~.,,...,j" I 5.14.1 Select CCR or EOF and then Automatic radial button, then Start NEW Multiple Accident Run radial button. Then press GREEN "OK" button.

5.14.2 Enter brief run title in GREEN box (22 characters, maximum).

5.14.3 Begin with "Select Accident Run 1" and enter type of calculation to be performed from pull-down selection list and corresponding Unit number.

(The example in Figure 19 is Menu H - Auto Enhanced dose projection).

.-~*

. .,.~ r:1~11 t JPf'f, IPEC EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES NON-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE IP-EP-340 Page 31 Revision 8 of 59 5.14.4 Proceed to "Select Acddent Run 2" and again enter type of calculation from pull-down selection list and corresponding Unit number (see Figure 19) 5.14.5 Enter up to 3 other release locations, type of calculation and corresponding Unit number.

5.14.6 When entries are complete, press the GREEN "OK" button.

Figure 19 Example: MIDAS Multiple Accident Scenario Selection (Automatic Version)

Autom,1ti<> (HAW Data) Scenarios Selected. St1lecl Run Menu and Reactor Unit tor Each

,.,. *,;,,., ** ***** ,,.,, **'"' .,,.,;,, ............. , V******" ,, '*'** *'* ,;-,, ** ,,,,,,-,,.,-,~ ******** *** ***** ..,,, **** .. *..*,o.,,,,,,.,,,..,,,,,,,., *******'*""'" ,,,,. '"'*'*' '* ***********, S** ,,,

§iii!e~t~rl~i:lli'nJll;!~~r:/f,$ jAUTO ENHANCED DOSE PAOJEC110N (MEllU HJ ..:) lu~l 2

!Ur.13 ~] *1 3*11

. . . . . . . . ,; I

- - - - --****** ..............*.. ....... .......... , ........................... j

~,1~)~'.~C:~t~~ 0*'!l'wL~9 3

r-*-~ I iI *****************!. /

- - --*-*-*********:**;;*'.****'.";-*;***-,.,...*----******--**_****-****-***-_***--*-_---_*-_--_*****-*****_****~****--****-****~****_***-*- - - - - *._____,_... . .

1* . ~ ll ,i,.

!1;11:1ll,f#!/f{i;1tJjj,~!if'f\,Pf!tt; - ..:.J

- - - - -*******************-***********-*-***-**-***-*--***** -****************-**************--*-**-**-**----*-----*----***-**-************ ---*******-********1 I 5.14.7 If the message in Figure 20 is displayed, press "YES". (Click GREEN Box).

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED Revision 8 IP-EP-340

.FIi

- * -~"" .P.f'f, EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 32 of 59 Figure 20 Example: MIDAS Multiple Accident - Setting Times for First Release Point (Automatic Version)

* ** *- * *. _.-_!;;:;_~;_is:;;;~th~~ ~4 *~Id __ . *. .-.. h~ur~ J Do You Want to Change the Time of Trip and/or the Start of Release?

l L -*********** ..

5.14.8 Enter the time of reactor trip and start of release for the unit corresponding to Accident Run 1 (Unit 2 or Unit 3) and press "OK". (See Figure 21, which is for the first release point calculation).

Figure 21 Example: MIDAS Multiple Accident - Setting Times (Automatic Version)

Set Start of AeleMe * ** * * --.----*-----* * - ** , ....,,,._ * * ******** *********

E11te1Date: ~~*

Or Erter: [ ] Minute$ Since Trip

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED Revision 8 EMERGENCY IP-EP-340

-~- F:nJP.rr PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 33 of 59 5.14.9 Enter time for start of exposure (See Figure 22 which assumes the current time).

5.14.10 Press "NEXT" down arrow Figure 22 Example: MIDAS Multiple Accident Scenario Selection (Automatic Version)

. . * ":~ii~ 11GiMfliiwt)A

! Meteotologic<il Iv (lJ PLNT VNT p;;i-;,m,,1;., [raw} ::J r 121 CAEJ 1 [JJ STM LINE ,.,, *.. ________.._,...,.. ........._,,_,_,.,._,,.,._,,._....~,*- t 1 (4] VAP CONT [ 08/28/14 07:29.08 f

<"** --~,¥H"'"/,..,,,, ..., .... q-., .... , , ......... '-<'>**-}

5.14.11 Verify that current live met data is being displayed on the Meteorological spreadsheet and press "OK" (see Figure 23).

Figure 23 Example: MIDAS Meteorological Data spreadsheet (Automatic Version)

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED Revision 8 EMERGENCY IP-EP-340

/~}1/Prf PROCEDURE PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 34 of 59 5.14.12 On Radiation Monitor & Flow spreadsheet, verify appropriate monitor reading is displayed. Enter flow rate data if required. (In this case R-27 release rate is from the release point of interest - see Figure 24 ).

Figure 24 Example: MIDAS Rad Monitor & Flow Data spreadsheet (Automatic Version) 5.14.13 On the release mix spreadsheet, select "EVENT TREE", followed by selection of Accident Type and Core Condition from pull-down selection lists.

5.14.14 Press "OK" (see Figure 25).

Figure 25 Example: MIDAS Mix spreadsheet (Automatic Version) r!l'lC3MiM'W f'!GtM@r@M Ill.QI

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-340 Revision 8 EMERGENCY PROCEDURE PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 35 of 59 5.14.15 Press "NEXT" down arrow (see Figure 26)

Figure 26 MIDAS Entry Status Display (Automatic Version) r [31STM LIME r ['I VAP COHT r~

I oe1Ze11 mrn --- i;

~*'-*~-., **-*-~..,-~,ll-~..-_-a.-,,<,.N,. S *

~c1*mm,,:. 1,u 11a 1

~~~~1' 07:23 -***---j

[11 (0.25 )]

121 f2.oo l 13I luo l

. 1,1 {2~.00..... i ...

Exit 5.14.16 If all boxes are green, then select GREEN "Start Calculation" button.

MIDAS will then compute the doses for Accident Run 1 5.14.17 MIDAS will then display a message as shown in Figure 27 Figure 27 Example: Multiple Accident calculation status message Run 1 is Complete, St.art Run 2 (Be sure to dear data used in a previous run if it is net appropriate fot the next run)

OK

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED Revision 8 EMERGENCY IP-EP-340

c::z:" F,'nl,m PROCEDURE PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 36 of 59 5.14.18 After pressing "OK", then MIDAS will prompt for release and mix input for Accident Run 2 as was done for the previous Accident Run.

5.14.19 Enter appropriate rad monitor/flow and nuclide mix inputs.

5.14.20 Enter the appropriate time of shutdown and start of release for the affected unit if different for the previous Accident Run.

5.14.21 If all boxes are green, then select GREEN "Start Calculation" button.

MIDAS will then compute the doses for Accident Run 2 5.14.22 MIDAS will then generate a combined plume map for the multiple releases as shown in Figure 28 Figure 28 Example: Multiple Accident Combined Plume Map i!.~=:::*l.~J<'H>?.,W.~*~ ,.li;(~~ S.:,t.,..~~1-':; '>: . :.t:*'*='.\(~::'~*:;*:,,,:,*.., ~-:;*' i: :,~> ~-;,.*:* ~: ~;: ::~: .~.:. -~::? ! . .,.,* ;~':' :"<'-;

,;;!;;;;.~~~~;~~~~

;~;;~f;;;; . ~ * ~s~~~;;*'."::

l t* Jl1lllMf~lltOT.&lli.,,t:ffil~-*tWt.a.1t*Jjr.(C1f1**PK,

-~~r,~'1~ 3.,'!'+"'tll:1.li'

!hwMC.---.r..,.... *_..*t*<111:1-*l'fu'II' :tl;.'t-~A~!!

"""'f,_.,.,,,,..t,,...i,~*~~~,:,0:,-

..... \o."";floo.'t-lH**,--0......,..~'?1'f.l1J

!lf<,~1/H:!t!J

~=in~*:J'J!!

~*.....~*.:r.. t!;

~---=-"'!*:r:i~t

. !::~.._~;.~-i"u':'-N~~

""': """~---=t~r..\k:, ~.,."i*;.-

l"*K* "".~ f :,-..t! t ~~--.l!< Ji)*~..,J:

f'M""ll-r!lf~l"Ak.,,_.,.

"'--M{II~ ... ~ tll~.:t!

~.we ~--~1, =.:~

~~M,..U-1!,~ ,:. ..~

-~:.t t...r~.i 'l~*

t-~t"!i'f}-'P"$. !!J..~*

4~~/* .. .. i;-- ... *1;.....;.~~

-~ ~ 1~*::!"'"""

5.14.23 To obtain the combined NYS Part 2 Form and Dose Summary Report, select "Special Reports", "Dose Summary" and then press "Confirm".

The combined Dose Summary Report is shown in Figure 29.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED Revision 8 IP-EP-340 EMERGENCY

-- F/nJPn PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 37 of 59 Figure 29 Example: Multiple Accident Combined Dose Summary Report (Unit 2 Plant Vent and Unit 3 SGTR)

MulU

Accld<ml Dose Assessment Summary lfldtan ?ofnt S.udcm Hnine: Run lime. 09:01 PU DIile~ 2.f.lhtg-14 C uucn1 I.At1rearnJogli:tll O!lle Cunen1Acar<<1 Rolmse Loczr1ton>>

V'llnd lroctbn !1roml: l-~~~-] 0 Rekudefwn1PIM\rVarn 1-Vrnd Spead (mf!}: r=!-~ 0 D Rl'l-ea:t,eFromthoAIIfiedon Reklasufroo, lhe Main Stean Une!

SlrbilkyCll!H: ~ Rde~~f1omt~Co11U1inrneml Am!Slling Rcile.'.Ho Du,adon fhourst: ~

Hobie G,ue* (Cif1oc): P&1ticuL1res {Cilsecl; R;xtloiodlnes fCJJ,~):

j1JE*O-tj jUE+9lj jUf*D11

~------"'1~Si1P ...._~....._.u.,.-,._:f~-~;~f:--~

Bndry 1 Uilfl 5 Miles 10 Mliet hitegruted Oo,o@

4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months (mremJ 11'0E, r-s21!l~qi:;s,:1fil!ilt.t~1?0.*:1r~~-~J 'I Thy(Df: L~?~-t"7;J!ih"l':P1ijkt>1,!o"J)_4J~1;]

Currool 001,rfbte-lmremlhrl TEDE: j21E*D~ II UE * *1 I

I 5.14.24 Results of the combined Dose Summary Report can be manually transferred to a blank NYS RECS Part 2 report, if required.

5.14.25 To review computed doses from individual release points, press the ORANGE "Review Multi Accident" button and select each release location (Accident Run) of interest. A plume map will be generated, and a separate Dose Summary Report may be selected for display. (See Figures 30 and 31 ).

Figure 30 Example: Multiple Accident Combined Map (Unit 2 Plant Vent and Unit 3 SGTR)

~:~=~; 1,n,:,*rs.,~-~:-,;.,~>hw-*u, ".:*,*:*-:,,:::*:;.,-,,-,*, _::*: ,*-:*-*-;*.*-~-::--.<: * *, .. *,<.,-*. '* ....:**._-.:** *** ~~:~~~;~~;~~-~~*-c::2?;-:;:;*J~~;~~;I:£;7::,iil r* S1j_,.. . . .l ... lffllt"".-Af-ln!ffiJoJI - .,_,._...,......,.;..,,..., -

' ,_ ~ ..-,_ ~~~ !~!;~;..:

- t .. .- ... '-"'*>'ll.-':'-~1 ... \1.

.... ~1.:-t": , ... ....,.~, :;:

~;!:~

a ....._,,:a.\f

11:-..1,.,,,,

"--,..._.,a._.~..1~C!I

~'!'i"'-~r.-.:>> l.;llt.lll l'll,lll!OQ"ll'I, .. r,tJl!,l"I-J 0 .. <l'I h*l'Cf'4t*-

~

!*,,t!

.,it W-.4 H

....._~,*m-

....,, l-wr_. It 11:.-is

~ t - , ,.. ~ ,.~

~.-~*"rt~=:

= :1,;::. ==

}* ,.:1..;.,1

,~ ::: ::,

~

~~Lt~

~; ~1~ *.t-: ~riff~*

Ll't: a:~~g ~l~

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED Revision 8 IP-EP-340 EMERGENCY

-=- F}1/t:lf'f. PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE Use Page 38 of 59 Figure 31 Example: Multiple Accident Combined Map (Unit 2 Plant Vent and Unit 3 SGTR)

NOTE:

The computed TEDE and Child Thyroid COE results from individual accident release points from Unit 2 and Unit 3 will be differ slightly from combined results since the release points are physically separated. This difference becomes smaller at longer distances from the site.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-340 Revision 8 EMERGENCY PROCEDURE PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 39 of 59 6.0 INTERFACES 6.1 IP-EP-310, Dose Assessment 6.2 IP-EP-240, Security 6.3 IP-EP-410, Protective Action Recommendations 7.0 RECORDS All logs, completed forms, and other records generated during an actual emergency SHALL be considered quality records and maintained for the life of the plant.

8.0 REQUIREMENTS AND COMMITMENT CROSS-REFERENCE None 9.0 ATTACHMENTS 9.1 Event trees 9.2 Plant and Site Specific Parameters 9.3 Quick Guide for MIDAS Operation -Auto H: Enhanced Dose Projection (EOF) 9.4 Quick Guide for MIDAS Operation -Auto H: Enhanced Dose Projection (offsite) 9.5 Quick Guide for MIDAS Operation - Manual B: Enhanced Dose Projection (EOF) 9.6 Quick Guide for MIDAS Operation - Multiple Accident (EOF) 9.7 '

Quick Guide for MIDAS Operation- Multiple Accident (CCR) 9.8 Quick Guide for MIDAS Operation - Part 1 Generator Guidance

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED Revision 8 IP-EP-340 EMERGENCY PROCEDURE PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE Use Page 40 of 59 Attachment 9.1 Event Trees Page 1 of 1 1.0 Accident type - (one choice used post-defueling) 1.1 Spent Fuel Pool release 2.0 Core Condition -one set to spent fuel releases 2.1 For spent fuel pool releases:

2.1.1 Zircaloy Fire in one three month batch 2.1.2 Gap release from one three month batch 2.1.3 Gap release from a full pool

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED Revision 8 EMERGENCY IP-EP-340

~ }1..t1#,1r.t: PROCEDURE PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 41 of 59 Attachment 9.2 Plant and Site Specific Parameters Page 1 of 1 Radiation monitors, flow data, and conversion factors Unit 2 Monitor Units Conversion Range Range Flow Flow Flow hi low hi units lo R-44G uCi/cc 1 1.00E-06 1 CFM 0 200000 R-27 uCi/sec 1 1 1.00E+13 CFM 0 200000 Unit 3 Monitor Units Conversion Range Range Flow Flow Flow hi low hi units lo R-14G uCi/cc 1 1.00E-06 0.1 CFM 0 150000 R-27 uCi/sec 1 1.10E+01 1.00E+13 CFM 0 150000 Met data Data Release Speed Direction Stability precipitation priority point class Primary Ground SPD 10 DIR10 OT 60-10 Rain1 Release Points - both units I Point

- station vent I Type Ground

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED Revision 8 EMERGENCY IP-EP-340 PROCEDURE PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE Use Page Attachment 9.3 Quick Guides for MIDAS Operation Page 1 of 3 EOF-Auto H

1) Start MIDAS by clicking on the "MIDAS Accident Cales" ICON

2) MIDAS Accident Dose Calculation menu will display after a few seconds

3) Select/verify the correct UNIT, upper right

4) Select EOF

5) Select Automatic

6) Using the 'Accident Run Menu Selection' section Select: "AUTO ENHANCED DOSE PROJECTION (MENU H)"

7) Click green OK button, bottom right

8) IF the time of reac~or trip is greater than 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months , THEN MIDAS will prompt the user to set the time of trip and time of release start. This is usually encountered on the initial run during an event. -

9) MIDAS will begin to step through a four-part input panel, beginning with a release point prompt. Turn on or off release points by clicking in the check boxes.

10) Click the gray NEXT down arrow button. It will turn green.

11) The next section of the input panel will display the current met time as the start of exposure, and four time periods for displaying results. Unless there is a particular reason to change them, leave these values as MIDAS assigns them. Click the GRAY DOWN ARROW to continue. It will turn green.

12) The FIRST time a calculation is run for the event, there may be several 'initialization' prompts. Select YES to initialize the data, collection sheets if prompted.

13) MIDAS will display a 'Meteorological Edit' Spreadsheet. DATA should be automatically populated. Click on green OK button.

14) IF data is NOT present, THEN type in current displayed data from met tower display.

IF data was changed, THEN click green YES on 'data collection values control form'

15) If a warning message is displayed that there is at least one good monitor, but NO data is available for release a point, this is because there is data missing for EITHER the station vent or condenser offgas. Select OK to continue.

16) MIDAS will display a 'Rad Monitor & Flow Data Edit' sheet. DATA should be automatically populated. In Unit 2 enter station vent flow rate. This value is not automated. Click the green OK button.

- I

IPEC

-__, r1'tnlP-rf. EMERGENCY PLAN NON-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-340 Revision 8 IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 43 of 59 Attachment 9.3 Quick Guides for MIDAS Operation Page 2 of 3 EOF -Auto H

17) IF data is NOT present, THEN type in current displayed data from control room indications, MRPDAS or other data source. IF data was changed, THEN click green YES on 'data collection values control form'

18) MIDAS will display a 'Mix Edit' sheet. DATA in the mix sheet is not automatically populated.

19) Type in current available mix data or use the EVENT TREE button to define the mix.

Click the green OK button

20) The third section of the input panel will display.

21) IF the 'MET STATUS', 'RM/F STATUS', and 'MIX STATUS' buttons are green, MIDAS has accepted all input as valid. Click on the gray NEXT arrow. It will turn green.

22) IF any of the 'MET STATUS', 'RM/F STATUS', and 'MIX STATUS' buttons are red, MIDAS has determined that there is incomplete or invalid data for that input. Click on the red button to review or modify the input. MIDAS will NOT proceed to dose calculation of any of these buttons are still red.

23) The fourth part of the input panel will display. Date Time of trip is normally set once at the beginning of the event to the actual trip time. Start date of release should be set to the time when actual plant release began. Remaining duration should default to 4, or should be changed if there is good information on the expected duration until termination of the release.

24) Click the green START CALC button.

25) A map of a plume plot will be displayed. There are many possible combinations of -

information that could be displayed. Check the YELLOW boxes at the bottom to verify what information is being displayed and click these buttons to change the display.

26) IF a different display is needed/ desired, click purple CONFIRM button bottom right after changing yellow button selections

27) Click GRAY "SPECIAL REPORTS" button. It will turn green and the button below it will turn yellow.

28) Click the yellow button below SPECIAL REPORTS unless/until it reads "Dose Summary". Click purple CONFIRM button.

29) A Part 2 input form will be displayed. Fill in ALL yellow areas of the form and click OK.

30) Obtain the Emergency Director's approval of the Part 2.

31) The Part 2 can be emailed and/or faxed to locations by clicking the "Fax NYS Form" and "Email NYS Form" buttons at the top of the page. The forms can also be printed.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED Revision 8 EMERGENCY IP-EP-340 PROCEDURE PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE Use Page 44 of 59 Attachment 9.3 Quick Guides for MIDAS Operation Page 3 of 3 EOF-Auto H

32) Click on the window "X", upper right, the MIDAS dose summary will be shown. Click on the window "X" to close the summary.

33) On the MIDAS plume display page, click "END RUN" bottom left, to terminate this run.

This will allow closing MIDAS or running another calculation.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED Revision 8 EMERGENCY IP-EP-340 PROCEDURE PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE Use Page 45 of 59 Attachment 9.4 Quick Guides for MIDAS Operation Page 1 of 2 Offsite users -Auto H

/

1) Log into the Entergy Citrix Server process and connect to the MIDAS server.

2) Start MIDAS by clicking on the "MIDAS Accident Cales" ICON

3) MIDAS Accident Dose Calculation menu will display after a few seconds

. 4) Select/verify the correct UNIT, upper right

5) Select EOF

6) Select Automatic J

7) Using the 'Accident Run Menu Selection' section Select: "AUTO ENHANCED DOSE PROJECTION (MENU H)"

8) Click green OK button, bottom right

9) MIDAS will begin to step through a four-part input panel, beginning with a release point prompt. Turn on or off release points by clicking in the check boxes.

10) Click the NEXT down arrow button. It will turn green.

11) The next section of the input panel will display the current met time as the start of exposure, and for time periods for displaying results. Unless there is a particular reason to, leave these values as MIDAS assigns them. Click the GRAY DOWN ARROW to continue. It will turn green.

12) The FIRST time a calculation is run for the event, there may be several 'initialization' prompts. Select YES to initialize the data collection sheets if prompted.

13) MIDAS will display a 'Meteorological Edit' Spreadsheet. DATA should be automatically populated. Click on green OK button.

14) If data is NOT present, type in current displayed data from met tower display. IF data was changed click green YES on 'data collection values control form'

15) MIDAS will display a 'Rad Monitor & Flow Data Edit' sheet. DATA should be automatically populated. In Unit 2 enter station vent flow rate. This value is not automated. Click on green OK button.

16) If data is NOT present, type in current displayed data from control room indications, MRPDAS or other data source. IF data was changed click green YES on 'data collection values control form'

17) IF a warning message is displayed that there is only good data for one release point, this is because there is data missing for at least ONE of the release points selected earlier. Select YES to continue, NO to review rad monitor and flow data.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED Revision 8 EMERGENCY IP-EP-340

-* l~,1 /t:Jrt. PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE Use Page 46 of 59

. Attachment 9.4 Quick Guides for MIDAS Operation Page 2 of 2 Offsite users -Auto H

18) MIDAS will display a 'Mix Edit' sheet. DATA in the mix sheet is not automatically populated.

19) Type in current available mix data or use the EVENT TREE button to define the mix.

Press the green OK button

20) The third section of the input panel will display.

21) IF the 'MET STATUS', 'RM/F STATUS', and 'MIX STATUS' buttons are green, MIDAS has accepted all input as valid. Click on the gray NEXT arrow.

22) IF any of the 'MET STATUS', 'RM/F STATUS', and 'MIX STATUS' buttons are red, MIDAS has determined that there is incomplete or invalid data for that input. Click on the red button to review or modify the input. MIDAS will not proceed to dose projection

( if any of these buttons are red.

23) The fourth part of the input panel will display. Date Time of trip is normally set once at the beginning of the event to the actual trip time. Start date of release should be set to the time when actual plant release began. Remaining duratiojn should default to 4, or should be changed if there is good information on the expected duration until termination of the release.

24) Click the green START CALC button.

25) A map of a plume plot will be displayed. There are many possible combinations of information that could be displayed. Check the YELLOW boxes at the bottom to verify what information is being displayed and click these buttons to change the display.

26) IF a different display is needed/ desired, click purple CONFIRM button bottom right after changing yellow button selections

27) Click GRAY "SPECIAL REPORTS" button. It will turn green and the button below it will turn yellow.

28) Click the yellow button below SPECIAL REPORTS unless/until it reads "Dose Summary". Click purple CONFIRM button.

29) The MIDAS dose summary will be shown. Click on the window "X" to close the summary.

30) On the MIDAS plume display page, click "END RUN" bottom left, to terminate this run.

This will allow closing MIDAS or running another calculation.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED Revision 8 IP-EP-340 EMERGENCY PROCEDURE PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 47 of 59 Attachment 9.5

Quick Guides for MIDAS Operation Page 1 of 2 MANUALB-noau~ma~dda~

1) IF connecting from Offsite, Log into the Entergy Citrix Server process and connect to the MIDAS server.

2) Start MIDAS by clicking on the "MIDAS Accident Cales" ICON

3) MIDAS Accident Dose Calculation menu will display after a few seconds

4) Select/verify the correct UNIT, upper right

5) Select EOF

6) Select MANUAL

7) Using the 'Accident Run Menu Selection' section Select: "MANUAL ENHANCED DOSE PROJECTION (MENU B)"

8) Click green OK button, bottom right

9) MIDAS will begin to step through a four-part input panel, beginning with a release point prompt. Turn on or off release points by clicking in the check boxes.

10) Click the NEXT down arrow button

11) The next section of the input panel will display the current met time as the sta,:t of exposure, and for time periods for displaying results. Unless there is a particular reason to, leave these values as MIDAS assigns them. Click the GRAY DOWN ARROW to continue.

12) The FIRST time a calculation is run for the event, there may be several 'initialization' prompts. Select YES to initialize the data collection sheets if prompted.

13) MIDAS will display a 'Meteorological Edit' Spreadsheet. DATA WILL NOT be automatically populated. Enter met data and click on the green OK button.

14) MIDAS will display a 'Rad Monitor & Flow Data Edit' sheet. DATA WILL NOT be automatically populated.

15) Type in current displayed data from control room indications, MRPDAS or other data source and click on the green OK button

16) IF a warning message is displayed that there is only good data for one release point, this is because there is data missing for at least ONE of the release points selected earlier. Select YES to continue, NO to review rad monitor and flow data.

17) MIDAS will display a 'Mix Edit' sheet. DATA in the mix sheet is not automatically populated.

18) Type in current available mix data or use the EVENT TREE button to define the mix.

Press the green OK button

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED Revision 8 EMERGENCY IP-EP-340 PROCEDURE PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page Attachment 9.5 Quick Guides for MIDAS Operation Page 2 of 2 Manual B - no automated data

19) The third section of the input panel will display.

20) IF the 'MET STATUS', 'RM/F STATUS', and 'MIX STATUS' buttons are green, MIDAS has accepted all input as valid. Click on the gray NEXT arrow.

21) IF any of the 'MET STATUS', 'RM/F STATUS', and 'MIX STATUS' buttons are red, MIDAS has determined that there is incomplete or invalid data for that input Click on the red button to review or modify the input. MIDAS will not proceed to dose projection if any of these buttons are red.

22) The fourth part of the input panel will display. Date Time of trip is normally set once at the beginning of the event to the actual trip time. Start date of release should be set to the time when actual plant release began. Remaining duration should default to 4, or should be changed if there is good information on the expected duration until termination of the release.

23) Click the green START CALC button.

24) A map of a plume plot will be displayed. There are many possible combinations of information that could be displayed. Check the YELLOW boxes at the bottom to verify what information is being displayed and click these buttons to change the display.

25) IF a different display is needed/ desired, click purple CONFIRM button bottom right after changing yellow button selections

26) Click GRAY "SPECIAL REPORTS" button. It will turn green and the button below it will turn yellow.

27) Click the yellow button below SPECIAL REPORTS unless/until it reads "Dose Summary". Click purple CONFIRM button.

a

28) IF connected to MIDAS Server from OFFSITE, The MIDAS dose summary will be shown. Click on the window "X" to close the summary.

29) IF using an ENTERGY MIDAS computer, A Part 1 input from will be displayed. Fill In ALL yellow areas of the form and click OK

30) A part1 and part 2 form will be displayed. Click on the arrow buttons top left to toggle between the part 1 and part 2

31) The part1 and part 2 can be printed or faxed.

32) Click on the window "X", upper right, the MIDAS dose summary will be shown. Click on the window "X" to close the summary.

33) On the MIDAS plume display page, click "END RUN" bottom left, to terminate this run.

This will allow closing MIDAS or running another calculation.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED Revision 8 EMERGENCY IP-EP-340 PROCEDURE PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 49 of 59 Attachment 9.6 Quick Guides for MIDAS Operation Page 1 of 3 EOF Multiple-Accident - AUTO NOTE:

If more than one location is experiencing a release, select New Multiple Accident Run radial button on the initial MIDAS Startup/ Menu Screen. This function of MIDAS will allow entry of up to 5 different accident releases occurring simultaneously from Unit 2 a"nd Unit 3.

NOTE:

This Multiple Accident feature of MIDAS can be run from either the CCR or from the EOF in the AUTO or MANUAL mode. The instructions which follow are for calculations performed using the AUTO Mode.

1) Select EOF

2) Select "AUTOMATIC" radial button.

3) Select "Start New Multiple Accident Run" radial button. (The Unit No. does not need to be selected at this point). Then press GREEN "OK" button.

4) When scenario selection screen is displayed, enter brief run title in GREEN box (22 characters, maximum).

5) Begin with "Select Accident Run 1" and enter type of calculation to be performed from pull-down selection list and corresponding Unit number. (e.g., Use Menu H -Auto Enhanced dose projection). The table below can be used to track the different runs.

6) Proceed to "Select Accident Run 2" and again enter type of calculation from pull-down selection list and corresponding Unit number.

7) Enter up to 3 other release locations, type of calculation and corresponding Unit number.

Type of Release Unit Accident Run 1 Accident Run 2 Accident Run 3 Accident Run 4 Accident Run 5

8) When entries are complete, press the GREEN "OK" button.

9) If message prompt for changing the time of trip and/or release is displayed, press "YES". (Click GREEN Box).

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED Revision 8 EMERGENCY IP-EP-340

-=- f'<iTJ

....IPrt.

' ..., PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 50 of 59 Attachment 9.6 Quick Guides for MIDAS Operation Page 2 of 3 EOF Multiple-Accident - AUTO

10) Enter the time of reactor trip and start of release for the unit corresponding to Accident Run 1 (Unit 2 or Unit 3) and press "OK".

11) Press the "NEXT" down arrow.

12) Press the "NEXT" down arrow.

13) Verify that current live met data is being displayed on the Meteorological spreadsheet and press "OK".

14) On Radiation Monitor & Flow spreadsheet, verify appropriate monitor reading is displayed. Enter flow rate data if required. Press "OK"

15) IF this is the first run for this unit, THEN select "New" on the Spreadsheet Control popup.

16) IF this is a subsequent for the accident run, THEN select "Edit Last" on the Spreadsheet Control popup.

17) On Mix Edit spreadsheet, select "EVENT TREE", followed by selection of Accident Type AND Core Condition from pull-down selection lists .

. 18) Press "OK".

19) Press "NEXT" down arrow.

20) If all required boxes are green, then select GREEN "Start Cale" button. MIDAS will then compute the doses for Accident Run 1.

21) MIDAS will then display a message that the first run is complete, Start Run 2. Press "OK".

NOTE:

For runs 2-5, within the initial assessment, the Spreadsheet Control popup that appears is for that specific run and new should be selected becaus~\ this is the first run for the accident on the specific unit.

22) After pressing "OK", then MIDAS will prompt for release and mix input for Accident Run 2 as was done for the previous Accident Run.

23) Enter appropriate rad monitor/flow and nuclide mix inputs.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED Revision 8 EMERGENCY IP-EP-340

--- l~ nlt?r.t 1

PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 51 of 59 Attachment 9.6 Quick Guides for MIDAS Operation Page 3 of 3 .

EOF Multiple-Accident - AUTO

24) Press "NEXT' down arrow.

25) IF the time of trip and start of release for this run is different from the previous run, THEN enter the appropriate time of shutdown and start of release for the affected unit

26) IF all boxes are green, THEN select GREEN "Start Cale" button. MIDAS will then compute the doses for Accident Run 2

27) MIDAS will then generate a combined plume map for the multiple releases.

28) Click gray "SPECIAL REPORTS" button. It will turn green and the button below it will turn yellow.

29) The default label for the yellow button is "Dose Summary". IF the button reads something different from Dose Summary, THEN click the yellow button below SPECIAL REPORTS until it reads "Dose Summary". Click purple CONFIRM button.

30) Select NYS RECS Part 2 report radial button, complete yellow areas and press "OK".

31) Check contents of generated Part 2 report, print out, have report approved and then send by fax and e-mail.

32) Press top "X" button in upper right-hand portion of screen.to display combined Dose Summary Report.

33) Results of the combined Dose Summary Report should be manually transferred to a blank NYS RECS Part 2 report, if required.

NOTE:

The computed TEDE and Child Thyroid CDE results from individual accident-release points from Unit 2 and Unit 3 will differ slightly from combined results since the release points are physically separated. This difference becomes smaller at longer distances from the site.

34) To review computed doses from individual release points, press the ORANGE "Review Multi Accident" button and select each release location (Accident Run) of interest. A plume map will be generated, and a separate Dose Summary Report may be selected for display.

35) To terminate Multiple Accident Run, press top "X" button in upper right-hand portion of screen and select "Terminate Multiple Accident Run". The run will be automatically saved.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-340 Revision 8 EMERGENCY PROCEDURE PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 52 of 59 Attachment 9. 7 Quick Guides for MIDAS Operation Page 1 of 3 CCR Multiple-Accident - AUTO NOTE:

If more than one location is experiencing a release, Multiple Accident will allow entry of up to 5 different accident releases occurring simultaneously from Unit 2 and Unit 3.

NOTE:

The Multiple Accident feature of Mi DAS can be run from either the CCR or from the*EOF in the AUTO or MANUAL mode. The instructions which follow are for calculations performed using the AUTO Mode.

1) Open the MIDAS Software with the MIDAS Accident Cales Icon.

2) Select CCR

3) Select "AUTOMATIC" radial button.

4) Select "Start New Multiple Accident Run" radial button. (The Unit No. does not need to be selected at this point).

5) Press GREEN "OK" button.

6) When the scenario selection screen(Multiple Accident Calculation Selections} is displayed, enter a brief run title in the GREEN box on the right (22 characters, maximum).

7) Begin with "Select Accident Run 1" and enter type of calculation to be performed from pull-down selection list and corresponding Unit number. (e.g., Use Menu G -Auto Quick Dose Plant Vent).

8) Proceed to "Select Accident Run 2" and again enter type of calculation from pull-down selection list and corresponding Unit number. Repeat this process for up to 3 other release locations. Use the table below to track calculations for each accident run:

Type of Release Unit Accident Run 1 I

Accident Run 2 Accident Run 3 Accident Run 4 Accident Run 5

9) When entries are complete, press the GREEN "OK" button.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-340 Revision 8 EMERGENCY PROCEDURE PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 53 of 59 Attachment 9. 7 Quick Guides for MIDAS Operation Page 2 of 3 CCR Multiple-Accident - AUTO NOTE:

If you enter or change data in a spreadsheet, then a popup may appear asking if you would like to keep the changes that were made. Click the Green YES button to keep the data to be used in future calculations.

10) Verify that current live met data is being displayed on the Meteorological Edit spreadsheet OR IF data is not present THEN, enter current met data.

11 ) Press "OK".

NOTE:

A warning message may be displayed that there is at least one good monitor, but NO data is available for a release point, this is because there is d_ata missing for EITHER the station vent or condenser offgas. IF this message is displayed, THEN select OK to continue.

12) On Radiation M9nitor & Flow spreadsheet, verify appropriate monitor reading is displayed. Enter' flow rate data if required. Press "OK"

13) A popup stating that the run is complete will appear. Click the green OK button to start the next accident run.

14) On Radiation Monitor & Flow spreadsheet, verify appropriate radiation monitor reading

_ is displayed. Enter flow rate data if required. Press "OK"

15) Press the Gray "NEXT" button on the MIDAS screen.

16) Repeat steps 11-13 for Accident runs 3-5 as required. Once all data has been entered for all runs, MIDAS will then generate a combined plume map for the multiple re leas.es.

17} Click GRAY "SPECIAL REPORTS" button. It will turn green and the button below it will turn yellow.

18) The default label for the yellow button is "Dose Summary". IF the button reads something different from Dose Summary, THEN click the yellow button below SPECIAL REPORTS until it reads "Dose Summary". Click purple CONFIRM button.

19) Select "Part 2 Form Only" report radio button

20) A Part 2 input form will be displayed. Fill in appropriate areas of the form. Yellow highlighted areas are REQUIRED.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED Revision 8 EMERGENCY IP-EP-340 PROCEDURE PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page Attachment 9.7 Quick Guides for MIDAS Operation Page 3 of 3 CCR Multiple-Accident - AUTO

21) Click OK to generate a PDF for Emergency Director approval.

22) The Part 2 can be faxed and .or emailed to locations by clicking the "Fax NYS Form" and "Email NYS Form" buttons at the top of the pages as directed by the Emergency Director.

23) Press top "X" button in upper right-hand portion of screen to display combined Dose Summary Report. Press the "X" on the Dose Summary Report to return to the map.

NOTE:

The computed TEDE and Child Thyroid COE results from individual accident release points from Unit 2 and Unit 3 will differ slightly from combined results since the release points are physically separated. This difference becomes smaller at longer distances from the site.

24) To review computed doses from individual release points, press the ORANGE "Review Multi Accident" button and select each release location (Accident Run) of interest. A plume map will be generated, and a separate Dos<:! Summary Report may be selected for display.

25) To terminate Multiple Accident Run, press top "X" button in upper right-hand portion of screen and select "Terminate Multiple Accident Run". The run will be automatically saved.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED Revision 8 EMERGENCY IP-EP-340 F:n1Pr1. PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 55 of 59 Attachment 9.8 Quick Guides for MIDAS Operation Page 1 of 5 Part 1 Generator Guidance NOTE:

This guide is intended to be used as needed when generating a NYS Part 1 Form. It does not need to be followed step by step, but referenced as needed to gain understanding of the operation of the Part 1 form generator.

'r::,;i~llirtk?t"~e~,.~~~fyti;Nt(i,~,;~*;,i¥~t;\:,:.:::,,'./*t*.*,*:><::,;;~;~, .* *.*;:. **. *.,*.**.**'.*e:**"'.?:;,;:,;cr:*. *.:?c;J;,:x,, i0f!:tk:1Xii\W,i::1;i0:W;

~--.l I Th,s i's ~r . . *. .. ' ;:}At r IPEC Sl'Ji Raocior Steitus Reactot SbtMOMI Dow l i Nolitkoffod; f". Unit 2 UftlU f . .. . . . . .:] f1V09/17 jii:21 .

'-----1/2 *~ !Enienniquo noiffcfttion MJMbel I:"' U11in UftiU f ,,:] !12/0!lfl 7 fii22 ..... l

.----1.

2

~ _ _,* *~

I E~ I; * ~iii'* **

Thi11 EmtmJell<.y CfnnitiatlJon dudmad on: . 12J0 9f1 7 !l6:Z2 t lu!~ipalod RslttaH durnlion (l hou, r* Rol@oiut du,111,on >t hour , }'"111fg1t~~~l,D~s.~i~~!'~I1 l . .. . L"?~~~E.~:~~~.~ '".J J*

i*

r**-*=d~~- . . . *. . .. . ............. *f

?:l ra;;;;---.

2cl3-~;ict1.-pie~.*J beuwa~s *-,i!Jt edue;* oi'~"r;,;~-i;;s~ ~T~~;;,,;-~;;;~;,;;,;;;cti~~~-.~

.---11 * -fv.o,O.,~...

3 .. C' No Rehtl'l'$0 (U /: Rah!,~ to~'?!phe~ ~f £llld~iva ~11.tcri~: dua ~ltMs (.tfl.u~~~~ E~;r,rt,: = .. - y * :;~

'----'I W, . . Atrllosphiffe I _:j 'f

~ r.* No Ftctleese II) t AelftHet io Walat of Rlldlolidiw Mct&riula duo fa the Clastified Evant: i

.----1 4

'----'I it i~ thls ~ iNrrw. PAR?

~ Walti t\\ ltai, M Rclpidly Progn,ui11g Sawrli Actld-ettl?f:itiii f!'.1~11

*** t.im 'ek*X * .* ** **.* **. *

i,~- "';,PAA &;~g;d,;i~~~-iii; ,;,1 ;,;~,-1r:iiii tiitf l l

1 I

E*PAAbetomiiiiatton* :: *. ::* *.*:* ::::::.:.:: *: ************ ****** ******* * ******* *** ,f

. . - - - 1 :~ <- Evacvate ud implame11t Kl PIM ha the 2 rntla tttlffl!s Md 2 to S mites doWM!ftnd si!dorr. (default) *f.

.___s_-'l;;I ~:~ EVUCllallt on~ illlpla~nt Kl ~Oft fl>,J~." ? mil* ,o.~, tmd i kl 10 ~!Pl d~nd **-=t,Qf* Ir

~. , Do Not E~and PAR for Clilffllnt condiliort*

~--*-*** ***** .... --,--~~---***-~ ..................... ......... ._,,*... , .............. ,..,.................... ,.... ~.****'************

l

- - - - ?f,-,*

~* Prevwu& P~ tnchldae ~pfovneMO!ion of KJ PIM * . . ** l Ji SetaC;' Ackffl10HI a~ Pr1W1ousty Affmud fYACUATION,2-5 miluecion , . . , .* , l

.----,I t,I ~,,.LJ __LJ ,.<<2.J _LJ *-Ll ~..LJ -..1,.J ~-LJ ...LJ _11J _JL.J ..UJ ~.J.U _liJ "JlJ _l!J t 6 SolectAddffioMI orPtovio11sfy Affected. EVACUATION ,MO mile sectors . K

-*'*-J °' ' ~-1......j J ...1t _....i..J ., l " l "" ' 7 I

1. "' I

~..a_, ......lLl .....!.,..J -..L..l -1..J ...l!l..1 .J.LJ ..JL .....L....l -ULJ _jj--' -h..J I l ,,. I 3 ! . ' *: i ." * .._.,

I*

lili!t1~ Mdm~nol Of Pntviou,ty Affvdod SHE;LTER<>IN-PI.Aet' M mile Hdots . . f*

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ t SefedAddttitffllll orPruvio111lyM1t1Md SHt:.lTEA*IN~ Hlrnile 1ttdot1 . . I'

_J_j _Lf ....LJ ,-LJ ~.LJ J.J _]_J J.J _lLJ ....!LI _u_J -11.J ....uJ: _J.i.J ..JLI Ji..J :i;

w01tt0toiog1i:dt'o~**.:*.*,.:: .:.,:;;:~;;~:. :.:.:. :. *:.:*.::: . ***::*.::.***.*********:*. . ::.*.:*,::.:**:. ::.:::*.*****::**:=.:.:.::.*.::.:*:....... :.::.::.:*:::::::*::::;::::* . .*:.:::... ::;::..*:.**:*:*.**~,.

7 Willd Di<<et:6o11 j Eftl~r Wind Oiredon Wffld Spat,d (I'll/$) jEn18t Wi~d Speed hibillt)r Chat ~ft!or Sta~ Clfts* ~' .1

.: :.: **:* :. :::::.::.::.".:--;:*:*:.:*'.:.-.: ::.. . . . . ....... . . . ............ :.. -:**:**::. :...........i: . . . . . . . *. *:* . . . . . . .:.* .: .: *.*: .:: *:::*::*:* :* *:. *: :.*. :. **..... *.. i:*::. . :*.:.:**:**:: *.-.::::. ::::*::: ::*:.::*.:*.:::**.:****:: *.: **::. ;:* :*;*::,::.;:.::...::*.:::. ,::.** ***:.: .*:: .:.:.:*.***::::..:.:..r RitpUfilld' By; fii'ter C~ui;-,,;;; Nu,e lit Telepl!One Number; {Ent.r number .c lac:etlon . ;

8 r No.App~

. IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-340 Revision 8 EMERGENCY PROCEDURE PLAN**

IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 56 of 59 Attachment 9.8 Quick Guides for MIDAS Operation Page 2 of 5 Part 1 Generator Guidance NOTE:

To the extent possible, the Part 1 form is intended to be filled out from top to bottom and left to right. Once the initial Part 1 form is generated, the form generator may be left open to complete subsequent Part 1 forms without filling out the entire form again. If the user has any questions in correctly revising an open Part 1 form, it is recommended that the user exit from the Part 1 form generator and begin a new form.

1. Block #1 Guidance:

a. Enter whether the event is an:

i. Actual Emergency ii. Exercise iii. Emergency Termination

1. Selection of Emergency Termination will generate a popup with wording that will be added to the EAL description field of the form.

This wording can be edited based on the event

b. Enter the location that is affected by the event

c. Enter the status of Unit 2 and Unit 3.

i. If a unit is shutdown, enter the time of shutdown.

1. This time will not change throughout the event.

2. IF the Unit is shut down, THEN Inform the Dose Assessor of the time of shut down.

d. Enter a number for the Notification #. The initial notification will be #1 and each follow-up notification will be a sequential whole number (1, 2, 3, etc.).

2. Block #2 Guidance:

a. Enter the EAL number exactly as written on the EAL Chart.

i. The Emergency Classification will automatically populate based on the EAL.

ii. The Brief Event Description will populate with a generic pre-determined non-technical description for that EAL.

'b. Enter the Declaration Time.

i. This time will not change on follow-up notifications.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED Revision 8 EMERGENCY IP-EP-340 PROCEDURE PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 57 of 59 Attachment 9.8 Quick Guides for MIDAS Operation Page 3 of 5 Part 1 Generator Guidance NOTE:

The Part 1 generator initially defaults to an assumed atmospheric release. If there is "No Release to Atmosphere" selected in Block 3, then the following selections for release duration do not apply and will not be displayed.

c. IF a General Emergency EAL has been entered, and IF a release to the atmosphere is occurring, THEN select whether the release is:

i. Anticipated Release duration <1 hour.

1. This selection should only be made if it is known that the release will be stopped within an hour of the release start time (e.g.,

controlled short-term VC purge related to or required by the event, or the source of the release is known and release termination is imminent).

2. This selection will ONLY enable a Shelter-in-Place Protective Action Recommendation (PAR) to be generated.

ii. Release duration >1 hour.

1. This selection should be made if the release duration is unknown.

2. This selection will enable evacuation PARs to be generated.

NOTE:

In Block 3 , IF a General Emergency is declared AND IF no release is selected, THEN the Part 1 generator will not prompt for a selection of any of the choices below.

3. Block #3 Guidance:

a. Select whether or not there is a release to atmosphere due to the classified event.

i. IF a release has been selected THEN the following options will be available:

1. Release ABOVE federally approved operating Limits

2. Release BELOW federally approved operating Limits

3. Unmonitored release requiring further evaluation

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-340 Revision 8 EMERGENCY PROCEDURE PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 58 of 59 Attachment 9.8 Quick Guides for MIDAS Operation Page 4 of 5 Part 1 Generator Guidance

b. Select whether or not there is a release to water due to the classified event.

i. IF a release has been selected THEN the following options will be available:

1. Release ABOVE federally approved operating Limits

2. Release BELOW federally approved operating Limits

3. Unmonitored release requiring further evaluation

4. Block #4 Guidance:

a. Answer whether this is an INITIAL PAR

i. An initial PAR is the first PAR of the event.

ii. This option is the only time that a Rapidly Progressing Severe Accident (RPSA) selection is available.

b. IF it is an INITIAL PAR, THEN answer whether the criteria for a Rapidly Progressing Severe Accident have been met. NOTE: THIS WILL ALWAYS BE "NO".

c. If this is not the first PAR, select whether the PAR has changed since the last report.

i. If the PAR has not changed, it will not allow additional sectors to be added based on new metrological data.

ii. If the PAR has changed, it will automatically add new additional sectors based on new metrological data and the user will input previously affected sectors under Block 6.

5. Block #5 Guidance:

a. Select the PAR based on IP-EP-410. Some selections will not be available based on the selections that were previously made.

b. Sectors are automatically selected based on the Wind Speed, Direction, and Stability Class.

c. The Selection "Do Not Expand PAR for current conditions" does not update the PAR selection with the new Met Conditions. Use only if met conditions have changed but new downwind sectors are not affected by PARs.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED Revision 8 EMERGENCY IP-EP-340 PROCEDURE PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page. 59 of 59 Attachment 9.8 Quick Guides for MIDAS Operation Page 5 of 5 Part 1 Generator Guidance

6. Block #6 Guidance:

a. For notifications that are not the first PAR of the event, select the sectors that previously had a protective action associated with them.

7. Block #7 Guidance:

a. Enter Meteorological Data (i.e., Direction, Speed, Stability Class).

8. Block #8 Guidance:

b. "Reported By" is the Communicator

c. The telephone number is a number that Offsite Response Organizations (ORO) can call.

d. "Yes, Emergency Director has Approved this report" must be selected to fax and email the Part 1 form to OROs.

e. Enter the Emergency Director's (ED) name

f. Select OK to generate a PDF of the Part 1 form NOTE:

CAREFULLY CHECK the PDF printout to make sure that all times, event status, release status, new and previous PARs and affected sectors/distances and meteorological data are correct for current conditions. IF they are not, THEN exit from the Part 1 generator and be in a new Part 1 form.

9. Once approved by the ED, the form can be faxed and emailed to OROs by selecting the Fax and Email buttons.

IPEC IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE IP-SMM-AD-102 Rev: 17 PREPARATION, REVIEW, AND APPROVAL Page 35 of 43 ATTACHMENT 10.2 IPEC PROCEDURE REVIEW AND APPROVAL (Page 1 of 1)

Procedure

Title:

Emergency Contamination Control Procedure No. IP-EP-350 Existing Rev: 4 New Rev: 5 pRN/EC No: DRN-21-00129 Procedure Activit~ Converted To IPEC, Replaces: TemQoraD! Procedure Change (MARK Applicable) (MARK Applicable)

NEW PROCEDURE Unit 1 Procedure No. EDITORIAL Temporary Procedure Change GENERAL REVISION ADVANCE Temporary Procedure Change 00 PARTIAL REVISION 0 EDITORIAL REVISION Unit 2 Procedure No: D CONDITIONAL Temporary Procedure Change 0 VOID PROCEDURE Terminating Condition:

0 SUPERSEDED Unit 3 Procedure No:

Document in Microsoft Word:

D RAPID REVISION 0 VOID DRNffPC No(s):

Yes No Revision Summary NIA- see Revision Summary page. - Procedure was revised to reflect Post U3 Shutdown

~

Implementation Requirements Implementation Plan? 0 Yes IBJ No Formal Training? 0 Yes OONo Special Handling? Yes IEJNo Quality Related? D Yes lliJ No If Yes, then ensure the procedure cover page Is marked "O\'jititY Related" RPO Dept: Emergency Planning Writer: (Print Name/Ext/Sign): Rebecca Martin x7106/~~1/2-0.~-

Review and Approval (Per Attachment 10.1, IPEC Review And Approval Requirements)

1. Technical Reviewer: Gr~;. r..,_i 1

~/4,.,a £, If1/D / '1/2f"'/41"tt (Print Na el Sign6ture/ Date)

.:t /

2. Cross-Disciplinary Reviewers:

Dept: Reviewer:

Print Name/ Signature/ Date)

Dept: Reviewer:

Print Name/ Signature/ Date)

RPO- Responslbilities/Checklist: Frank J Mitchell/

(Print Name/ Signature/ Date)

PAD required and is complete (PAD Approver and Reviewer qualifications have been verified)

IBJ Previous exclusion from further ll-100 Review is still valid PAD not required due to type of change as defined in 4.6

4. D Non-Intent Determination Complete:

(Print Name/ Signature/ Date)

NO change of purpose or scope NO change to less restrictive acceptance criteria NO reduction in the level of nuclear safety ~ change to steps previously identified as commitment steps NO voiding or canceling of a procedure, unless requirem NO deviation from the Quality Assurance Program Manual are incorporated into another procedure or the need fort NO change that may result in deviations from Technical Specifica

"' F7

5. !ii procedure was eliminated FSAR, plant design requirements, On-Shift Shift Manager/CR$: (RPO per SMM-AD-102)- Frank J. Mitchell/~ "#~

(Print Name/ Signature/ Date) 3///~/

6. User Validation: User:

7, D Special Handling Requirements Understood:

Print Name/ Signature/ Date)

Attachment 1

Page 1 of 2 10CFR50.54(Q 1(2) Review Procedure/Document Number: IP-EP-350 Revision: 5 Equipment/Facility/Other: Indian Point Energy Center

Title:

Emergency Contamination Control Part I. Description of Activity Being Reviewed (event or action, or series of actions that have the potential to affect the emergency plan or have the potential to affect the implementation of the emergency plan):

Procedure was revised to reflect the requirements in the Post Unit 3 Shutdown Eplan (PSEP), as submitted to the NRC per LAR, license #NL-19-001, Attachment 8 Emergency Response Organizaiton Task Analysis.

Replaced EOF Manager with Radiological Assessment Coordinator

Replace OSC Rad/Chem Coordinator with Radiological Coordinator

Removed Chem Techs (RP Techs were already performing same tasks)

Replaced Work Control Coordinator with OSC Manager Procedure will be effective on May 17, 2021.

Part II. Emergency Plan Sections Reviewed (List all emergency plan sections that were reviewed for this activity by number and title. IF THE ACTIVITY IN ITS ENTIRETY IS AN EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE, EAL CHANGE OR EAL BASIS CHANGE, ENTER THE SCREENING PROCESS. NO 10CFR50.54(q)(2) DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED.

Part 2 Planning Standards and Criteria:

Section A: Assignment of Responsibility ;

Section B: Station Emergency Response Organization Section I: Accident Assessment Section J: Protective Response

/

Section K: Radiological Exposure Control I Part Ill. Ability to Maintain the Emergency Plan (Answer the following questions related to impact on the ability to maintain the emergency plan):

1. Do any elements of the activity change information contained In the emergency plan (Section 3.0 Step 6)?

YES O NO 181 IF YES, enter screening process for that element

2. Do any elements of the activity change an emergency classification Initiating Condition, Emergency Action Level (EAL), associated EAL note or associated EAL basis information or their underlying calculations or assumptions?

YES O NO 181 IF YES, enter screening process for that element

3. Do any elements of the activity change the process or capability for alerting and notifying the public as described in the FEMA-approved Alert and Notification System design report?

YES D NO (81 IF YES, enter screening process for that element

4. Do any elements of the activity change the Evacuation Time Estimate results or documentation?

YES D NO [8} IF YES, enter screening process for that element

5. Do any elements of the activity change the Onshift Staffing Analysis results or documentation?

YES D NO 181 IF YES, enter screening process for that element EN-EP-305 ROOS

Attachment 1 Page 2 of 2 10CFR50.54(Q 1(2) Review Procedure/Document Number: IP-EP-350 Revision: 5 Equipment/Facility/Other: Indian Point Energy Center

Title:

Emergency Contamination Control Part IV. Maintaining the Emergency Plan Conclusion The questions in Part Ill do not represent the sum .

total of all conditions that may cause a change to or Impact the ability to maintain the emergency plan. Originator and reviewer signatures in Part V document that a review of all elements of the proposed change have been considered for their impact on the ability to maintain the emergency plan and their potential to change the emergency plan.

1. Provide a brief conclusion that describes how the conditions as described in the emergency plan are maintained with this activity.

2. Check the box below when the 10CFR50.54(q)(2) review completes all actions for all elements of the activity- no 10CFR50.54(q){3) screening or evaluation is required for any element. Otherwise, leave the checkbox blank.

18'1 I have completed a review of this activity In accordance with 10CFR50.54(q){2) and determined that the effectiveness of the emergency plan is maintained. This activity does not make any changes to the emergency plan. No further actions are required to screen or evaluate this activity under 10CFR50.54(qX3~

Per Post Shutdown Emergency Plan (PSEP), both Unit 3 and Unit 2 will be at shut down. The changes made to this procedure reflects this requirement of the Post Unit 3 Shutdown Eplan, as submitted to the NRC (license# NL-19-001) and ERO positions and tasks were adjusted to reflect , ERO Task Analysis. This activity does not make any changes to personnel or facility monitoring or decontamination as required by the IPEC Emergency Plan. The NRC has approved the PSEP per RA-20-040:

A review of this activity in accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(q)(2) has been completed and determined that the effectiveness of the PSEP is maintained. This revision aligns the procedure with the protocols of the post Unit 3 shutdown. None of the changes affect the ability to perform classifications, notifications, or PARs, it does not affect activation or staffing of the ERO as described in the Unit 3 PSEP, and all planning standard requirements are maintained. The changes made do not require a change to the Emergency Action Level scheme, On-shift Staffing study or the PSEP.

No further actions are required to screen or evaluate this activity under 10 CFR 50.54(q)(3).

Part V. Signatures:

Preparer Name (Print) Preparer Signature Date:

Rebecca A. Martin

~etllt"' QI%~ 11/11/2020 (Optional) Reviewer Name (Print) Reviewer Signature Date:

Reviewer Name (Print) Reviewer Signature Date:

Timothy Garvey Nuclear EP Project Manager Re!ceu,. 0 JYt--~ f;, TlA td!.tlJ~ 4/14/21 Approved via Telecom Approver Name (Print)

Frank Mitchell Emergency Planning Manager or designee EN-EP-305 ROOS

Attachment 9.1 Emergency Planning Document Change Checklist Form (All sections must be completed, NIA or place a check on the line where applicable)

Section 1 Doc/Procedure Type:

Administrative Implementing ~ EPLAN n NIA Doc/Procedure No: IP-EP-350 Doc/Procedure

Title:

Emergency Contamination Control New revision number: 5 Corrective Action: Yes~ No NIA CR#: OL-OLl-2018-00090 CA 19 Effective date: May 17, 2021 Section 2 Change Description

1. Ensure the following are completed, or are not applicable and are so marked:

a. 50.54q NIA

b. EN-FAP-OM-023 N/A[gj

c. IP-SMM-AD-102 NIA

d. OSRC N/A [8J

e. NRC Transmittal N/A[8J (within 30 days)

2. List any other documents affected by this change: N/A

3. Transmittals are completed: t8] N/A D Date:4/29/21

4. Ensure the proper revision is active in eB Ref. Lib.: [gj N/A D

5. Approved doc/procedure delivered to Doc. Control for distribution: [8J N/A D Date: 4/29/21

6. Position Binders updated: {gJ N/A D Date: 4/29/21

7. Copy of EPDCC placed in EP file: [gj N/A O Date: 4/29/21

8. Supporting documentation is submitted as a general record in eB Ref. Lib.: ~ NIA D Date: 4/29/21

9. Word files are moved from working drafts folder to current revision folder in the EP drive:

0 N/A ~ Date: 5/17/21 Sheet 1 of 1

t~ IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATEO IP-EP-350 Revision 5 Mf::.!! hi1lergy~, EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 1 of 25 CONiROLlEO

,.'11 Emergency Contamination Control Prepared by: Rebecca A. Martin Print Name

~Od'O~ Signature Date Approval: Frank J. Mitchell ~/

Print Name Effective Date: May 17, 2021 IP-EP-350 (Cont. Control) Rev 5.doc

~

~1* IPEC NON*QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-350 Revision 5

~ !nlergy~, EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES 25 REFERENCE USE Page i of Table of Contents 1.0 PURPOSE ............ '" ..................................................................................,, .............. ,. .................,.*.......... 3

2.0 REFERENCES

....;............................................................................................, ........................................ 3 3.0 DEFlNiT!ONS ..............................................................................,............................................................. 3 4.0 RESPONSIBILITIES ....................................,, .....................................................................,..................... 3 5.0 DETAILS ...........................................................................,. ...... ,..................... ,., ..,,. .................................... 3 5.1 MoNrrOR rOR CONTAMINAT!ONPROCEDURE SECTION......................................................,. .......... .u ..... 3 5.2 Use FRISKER ..............................................................,......................................................................... 4 5.3 PERSONNEL COI\JTAMINAT!ON ............................., ....... m .. ****m .. ** ....... ******* .... ***.. ** .. ** .. ******** .. ** .. ************4 6.0 INTERFACES ...............................................,......................................,... ,, ................................................ 4

.7.0 RECORDS ............................................................-..............................................................................,,,, .. 4 .*

8.0 REQUIREMENTS AND COMMITMENT CROSS-REFERENCE ......................... , ....*........... ;........ .4 9.0 ATTACHfv1ENTS ..................... ;................... ., ......................................;... .,., .. ;., ... .,...................*................. ,.. 4 9.1 PERSONNEL DECONTAMINATtON .............. ,,, ....................................... .,,, ............................................... 6 9.2 OECONTAM!NAT!ON OF VEM!CLE AND EQUlPMENT OUTSIDE THE PROTECTED AREA ............................... 8 9,3 OSC RAD PROTECTION TECHNICIAN CHECKUST ......... *'. ;..............................................11 9.4 TSC RADIOLOGICAL COORDlNATOR CHECKUST ......................... ,......................... : ... ,. .. ,15 9.5 EOF RAD PROTECTlON MONITOR CHECKLIST ... .,,. .................*. ;... , ..... ,. ....................; ....21 9.6 EOF DOSE ASSESSOR CHECKLIST........................ ,......................................................25

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-350 Revision 5

-- Jfr1lergy,3/;

EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE JMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE .. Page ~ of 25 Emergency Contamination C~ntrol 1.0 PURPOSE To describe the methods used for the control ofradiological contamination, decontamination activities and the release of vehicles, equipment and personnel during a declared emergency;*

2.0 * *REFERENCES 2.1 ... 10CFR20.2003, "Limits.for Discharge into a.SanitarySewage System"*

2.2. ** EN-RP-104, "Personnel Contamination Events" 3.0 ** DEFINITIONS

. 3.1 .. Clean - Contamination levels are LESS THAN 100 CPM above background.*

3.2

Low Level Contamination - Contamination levels are GREATER THAN 100 CPM above background and less than 1O,QOO CPM *

. 3.3 High Level Contamination - Contamination levels are GREATER THAN**

. 10,000 CPM above background* * * ** *

. 4.0 RESPONSIBILITIES

4 ..1 is

. The Radiological Assessment Coordinator responsible for the decision tci . . I.

release radiologically contaminated personnel, equipment and/or vehicles from ..

. the Owner Controlled Areawithout being.radiologically monitored when* *

** otheiwise required.

. 4.2 . *. The Radiation Protection personnel are resp~nsibleJor the determination of personnel contamination levels, supervise and assist with decontamination and

.* release of personnel as described in Attachments 9:3 and 9.5. * . .

. 4.3 .. The Radiological Assessment Coordinato~ is responsible for ensuring that thi$ .*

.* .* proceoure is followed to ensure contamination controls are established for the EOF and Security personnel working outside the Protected Area. Additional

Rad Protection (OSC, other plants) may be requested to support surveying the * **

, site* and the monitoring of personnel and vehicles;. * **

I *.

4..4 * .*. The Radiological Coordinator is responsible* for the acti6rts as des.cribed in:.

Attachment 9.4.*. * * * ** *

4.5 * , The EOF Dose Assess<;>r Is responsible for the actions

Attachment 9.6.: .

as described in 5.0 . . DETAILS

5.1 . MONITOR personnel for contamination at the following intervals:

. IPEC . NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-350

Revision 5 .

~ Hnlergycr EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE Use

Page ! of 25 5.1.1 When leaving areas of the plant that are suspected to be contaminated; 5.1.2 When leaving the Protected Area and portal monitors alarm; 5.1.3 When in assembly areas (if suspected to be contaminated);

. 5.2 Using a frisker with a HP-210 G.M. tube or equivalent to check the individuals,.

determine the contamination category:

5.2. t When contamination levels are LESS THAN 100 CPM above *

background, the person is considered clean.

.. 5.2.2 When contarninati.on levels are GREATER THAN 100 CPM above background and less than 10,000 CPM, it is considered Low-Level Contamination 5.2:3 When contaminaUon levels areGREATER THAN 10,000 CPM above ..

background, it is considered High;.Level Contamination.

5.3 *.*

MAINTAIN records of personnelmonitoring on For~ EP-61; Decontamination

.. Survey Sheet if contaminated personnel are discovered.. *

- : 5.3.1 Use Attachment 9.1 fo~ Pe~onnel Decontamination * .* *

.* . 504 . MAINTAIN records of vehicle monitoring on Form EP:..62, Vehicle . .

.**

Contamination Check if contaminated vehicles or equipment is discovered/

. . . . .* 5.4.1 Use Attachment 9.2: for vehicle and equipment decontamination outside .

. . the protected area. .. .. . . . . ..

< .. 6.0 * . INTERFACES.

6.1

EN-EP'."609-DP, Emergency Operations Facility 7~O * .RECORDS ..

7 .1 * ..... All forms and iogs generated during the proc~ss of identification of

contamination or the decontamination of personnel, vehicles or equipment shali be maintained. * * *

8.0 REQUIREMENTS AND COMMITMENT cRoss-REFERENce

NL081-157;.C35.

9.0.. ATTACHMENTS

*. 9.1 * *** Personnel Decontamination

9.2 .*

Decontamination of Vehicle an.d Equipment Outside the Protected Area

9.3 OSC RAD Protection Technician Checkiist

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-350 Revision 5 EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page * .§ of 25 9.0 . ATTACHMENTS (cont.)

9.4 9.5 TSC Radiological Coordinator Checklist EOF Rad Protection Monitor Checklist I

9.6 EOF Dose Assessor Checklist

IPECSITE NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-350 Revision 5 EMERGENCY PROCEDURE PLAN IMPLEMENTING REFERENCE USE . Page * §. of . 25 PROCEDURE Attachment 9.1.

Personnel Decontamination Sheet 1 of 2

.* - 1.0

While in the Protected Area PERFORM decontamination in accordance with Radiation Protection Section Procedure for "Personnel Decontamination" 1.1 Report any positive indications to the Radiological Coordinatorin the Technical Support Center. * *

.* 2.0

While outside of the Protected Area conduct decontamination at the EOF 2.1

For Low-level contamination, set up the EOF shower area in accordance with the EOF Decontamination Diagram. For High-level contamination use .

the decontamination equipment inside the kit located in the Offsite *

--- __ Monitoring Equipment closet in the EOF. Follow the instructions inside the kit. It rTlay become necessary to get additional water or fluid to .flush during decontamination. The bottle inside the kit is limited in size: -

2.2 ***-_ Segregate the contaminated individual to an area that has beeh - * **

. designated with signs, barricades as needed and Step-Off Pads __ *-

2.3 Check each piece of clothing as it is removed and segregate as to -

whether it is contaminated or not contaminated. Contaminated clothing. _

should beplacedin plastic bags that may be obtained from the storeroom

~~. . . . .

2.4 - Recheck individual ~fter clothing is removed. IF contamination is d~tected .

record readings on Form EP"61, THEN have the individual shower and record as-found data. *

2.5 Repeat if necessary to reduce contamination to less than 100 CPM above*

background.* * *

2~6> IF any individuals are exposed to contamination or airborne activities, . _.

THEN consult with the Radiological Assessment Coordinator the n~ed for --

radiological evaluations and monitoring (Bioassay, whole body counts, **

~~) . . .

2. 7 _. . If the individual rem~ins contaminated after 3 showers, consult with.the -

Radiological Assessment Coordinator. * * **

2.8 Provide *individual with coveralls if clothing was contaminated .

, .2.9 . Report the* res~lts *of decontamination tci the Rad:iok:,glcal Asse:ss~ent ..

Coordinator. *

2.10 * . Provide all records to the Radiological A*ssessment Coordinator upon completion of personnel* decontamination effort.

IPECStTE NON-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-350 Revision 5

. EMERGEN(;Y PLAN . '

. IMPLEMENTING .

*. PROCEDURE ..

. REFERENCE USE Page z of 25

- .. Attachment 9.1

Personnel. Decontamination

. Sheet 2of 2

.EOF .Dec~ntamination Diagram* ...

File Room East Parking Lot

.EOF Haliway.

.*:P!rtv Entrance.

IPECSITE NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-350 Revision 5 EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE Use Page Attachment 9.2 Decontamination of Vehicle and Equipment Outside the Protected Area Sheet 1 of 3 1.0* CHECK for removable (loose) contamination. Use survey instrument WITH.*

either a gauze pad OR paper disks.

1.1

ESTABLISH background in the area to be less then 300 counts per minute.

1.2 USING a gauze- pad, wipe the major accessible surface areas of an item ..

Read background, the. pad_ AND- background again WITH the survey*

. instrument. The* contamination is LESS THAN detectable IF the reading for the pad is equal OR LESS THAN both background readings AND 300 cpm. Record the* results for loose contamination on FORM. EP-62;

1.3 USING a paper disk, wipe 100 cm2 of EACH representative accessible

. - surface of an itent .. Read background,. the disks AND background again

... WITH the survey instrument Subtract the lowest background reading from the readir1g for the disk. Record results GREATER THAN _100 cpm '

. on FORM EP;.62.

2.0

CHECK for fixed contamination by moving the survey instrument: Closely AND.

slowly *over the accessible surfaces.* Record the results: for fixed contamination **

on FORM EP-62. .* . .

3.0 Items which DO NOT satisfy ALL the foUo~ing criteria may. leave the site only

WITH the approvedof the EOF Manager.

3.1 Loose contamination is LESS THAN . detectable as described 1.0 in a background limited to 300 cpm; **

in Section * **

3.2

Fixed contamination is LESS THAN 100 cpm*as described in Section 2.0 a

in background limited to 300 cpm.

4~0 : POSITION the vehicle close to the corner water run-off opening. This shall allow

the c:ontamlnation to run*:off into a sman* depression where it shall be co.ntained. *

AND conc~ntrated by.the land contour.

5.0. . USING hoses hooked up to the nearest water outlet; fire hydrant o'R utilizintra .

Fire Department pumper,: wash the vehicle with detergent AND water. The detergent may be obtained from th.e Warehouse. Some minor scrubbing may

enhance .the decontamination effort. Precautions should also be taken to prevent any cross contami_nation of vehicles, equipment or people.

IPECSITE NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-350 Revision 5 EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE Use Page ~ of 25 Attachment 9.2 Decontamination of Vehicle and Equipment Outside the Protected Area Sheet 2 of 3 5.1 IF the vehicle is still contaminated, THEN rewash AND recheck UNTIL vehicle satisfies criteria of Section 3. Any contamination checks should be done a dry surfaces.

5.2 RECORD ALL contamination checks AND washes along with the vehicle license plate number on FORM EP-62.

Vehicles that DO NOT satisfy the criteria of Section 3 are NOT allowed to leave the site without approval of the EOF Manager.

REPORT results of vehicle checks AND decontamination to the Radiological Assessment Coordinator upon completion.

TURN-IN ALL completed FORMS to the Radiological Assessment Coordinator for filing.

IPECSITE .** NON~QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-350 Revision 5 EMERGENCY PLAN.

IMPLEMENTING .

.PROCEDURE* .

REFERENCE Use Page 10 of 25

. . .. *** . . .. . . . .

Attachment.9.2 . ...

Decontamination of Vellicle and* Equipment Outside the Protected Area Vehicle Decontamination Area Diagram

** Sheet 3. of 3

t.

.I . .

..I

.. Security Kenney Laiie . . I*! : . -__., .,.,. - * : 1 *

~ .

. I "',

Main

-*-*-**---.. - ,------------~-~.*~ *~1------------~-

..----,----, .~ .

C) .

Entrance

. Fire

., Warehouse I .**~ . Hydrant *..* *

...._______.*. ~

I * ** Warehouse I

.~ ~ - Prior to Decon Vehiple FlowPath.** ---***After.:oeconVehicl~ Flow.Path.

IPECSITE

NON*QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-350 Revision 5 EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE Page 11

of 25 Attachment 9 .3 OSC Rad Protection Technician Checklist Page 1 of 4 1.0 Initial Responsibility/Activity

NOTES 1.1. As*sume the position of OSC Rad Protection

Technician A. Enter tlie OSC using one of the proximity Accountability

Card Readers. . . .. .

B. Sign in at the facility organization chart.

c: Report to and receive direction from the TSC .

Radiological Coordinator.

D. Verify Equipmentis in calibration. **.* . ..* .*. .. .

l E. As directed by the TSC Radiological Coordinator:.

. . .' ~ .

1. Perform a habitability survey of the TSC/OSC and . .

CCR's and set up radiological controls for the .

TSC/OSC as shown on sheet 6 of this Checklist. *

2.

Establish the ~apability for 111onitoring of lodin~.

should it become necessary. * .*. . . * . . ..

3. Verify Survey Meter operability by getting a > 1 mr/hr .

reading with.the op~nwindow using a 5µ Ci Cs ~137.

source NOTE:

AMS SHALL be started during TSC/OSC activation F: *set up and operate the AMS~4 utilizing skill of the craft*

and procedure EN-RP-:-310 * * * * *

.

G; Periodically check readings ofAMS-4 and ensure proper.

instrument operation. * **

.. J.

IF th.ere is a release, .THEN monit~r the* AMS4 to *. :

identify any' increase In the radiological levels in the, TSC/OSC. . ..

IPECSITE NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-350 Revision 5 EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE

REFERENCE USE . Page 12 of ~

Attachment 9 .3.

OSC Rad Protection Technician Checklist Page 2 of 4

. Initial Responsibility/Activity (cont.) NOTES

2. Follow directions in Section F of this checklist to ..

maintain AMS-4 operations.

H. Sample Count Using the MS-2/SPA-3 utilizing skill ofthe

craft and procedure HP-9.021. *

1. Sample Count Using the E~140N OR RM-14/HP-210 _

I utilizing skill of the craft and procedure EN-RP-302 and record results on form EP;.16.

J. Perform background and source checks approximately every hour OR as specified by the TSC Radiological Coordinator (frequency may be adjusted, either more or .* ..... :

less ofter,; in consideration of current radiological ..

conditions)'. . . - - - . . .

K.

Using the readings from the AMS-4 Monitor and the noble gas-to-iodine ratio from Chernistry, determine the iodine activity. ** * * *

1. IF. iodine activity is determined to be greater than ..

.. 1X10~1 micro curies/cubic centimeter by any of the * *

above methods, THEN notify the TSC Radiological*

Coordinator.. . . .. ..

L Establish contamination controls for the TSC/OSC*if

necessary._*.

2.0 *.. Continuous Responsibility/Activity

. 2.1 : . Establish.and Maintain radiologica1*controls . . .

. A. As directed by the TSC Radlologica_l Coordinator, .I :_

. - perform periodic radiological monitoring particularly when* *

a release of radioactlve*material into plant environments is.in progress or suspected. * .. -1

IPEC SITE NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-350 Revision 5.

EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE* .. REFERENCE USE Page 13 of ll Attachment 9.3 .

OSC Rad Protection Technician Checklist Page 3 of4 Continuous Responsibility/Activity (cont.) ***NOTES B. This should .be done approximately once every 60 minutes or when conditions havelikely worsened or when directed to by the TSC Radiological Coordinator.

2.2 Inform the TSC Radiological* Coordinator or another coordinator when .temporarily leaving. the work area.

L A. IF you are leaving.the TSC/OSC Complex (the restroom is within complex) THEN: . . . .

1. Inform the Security Coordinator (for accountability

. ' purposes)

2. Inform the Security Coordinator whenyou return;.* .*. **

B.. Upon return, obtain a briefing froni the TSC Radiological *

1*

Coordjnator on any events; which have occurred while away.!

2.3 **.. Escort as directed, any team being sent i~to an area where any of the following .conditions exist:

II A. Radiological conditions are J~known. Surveys or ARMs .

.. may be used to predict radiological conditions.

8. Radiation fields inexcess of 1*R/hr are expected.

of C .. In the event any release of radioactivity to the

.* environment.

2.4 . Assist with the decontamination efforts of personnel; equipment, and c>nsite areas as appropriate. * *

3.0. .

Closeout Responsibility/Activity 3.. 1 IF radiological. conditions allow, THEN as directed by the*

- Radiological Coordinator:: *

A. Retum emergency equipment.to proper storage areas.

and re.stock *supplies as needed .. * * * **

IPEC SITE NON*QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-350 Revision 5

--* l!..i1lergy~ EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE Use Page 14 of 25 Attachment 9.3 OSC Rad Protection Technician Checklist Page 4 of 4 A C i~ci B ,

A : **-'1 -

,~.,.~,.,.: .<,'3/4<""'L, ,.... *,.,, ,

E N

osc R C

TSC p

* )yl ...

A Computer Room A

TSC/OSC Access Points to be posted:

If Hallway Contamination< 1000 dpm/ 100 sq. cm lf Hanway Contamination> 1000 dpm/ 100 sq. cm A. Entry/Exit A. No Entry. Exit Only B. No Entry/No Exit 8. Entry to TSC/OSC. No Exit. While Step Off Pad and Frisk Shoes before stepping here C. No Entry/No Exit C. No Entry/No EXit D. Equipment cablnets. Place s:gn at top of stairway D. Equipment cabinets. Place sign at top of stahway.

No Entry/No Exit without permission from RAD Coordinator. No Entry/No Exit without permission from RAD E. Air Monitoring Equipment Coordinator E. Air Monitoring Equipment

IPECSITE NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-350 Revision 5 EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING .

PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE Page Attachment 9.4 TSC Radiological Coordinator Checklist*

Page 1 of 6

1~O Initial Responsibility/Activity NOTES A. Determine if any personnel are currently.in the field as.

follows: * * ** *

Entergy-lPEC web site

Applications drop down menu

Sentinel

.* Fleet Production Reports *.

Indian Point

RCACurrently Logged In*

If not in Crystal Report printable PDF format, then .

convert to such and PRINT : '

/ : ,*

8. Obtain a copy of current employee exposure for use in ALARA considerations when assigning OSC team

members as follows: ** *

Use Item 2. instructions above for Sentinel access

. Select Daily. Margin List by Department..

. .*

Select the key departments needed (e.g., Operations; *

RP, Rad-waste, C!1em., FIN, MNTS, Mech-'-1, * .

Security) * *

Drop* Down Menu *

- Select Last Name, OK .

If not in Crystal Report printable PDF format, convert **

to such and PRINT . .. .

C.. Request the Control Room to align* the OSC/TSC

. _ventilation system.fofincldent operation per procedure, if

~~~~--* ' . '

D. IF necess*ary ,THEN direct a Rad Protection Technician to perform a habitability_ survey of the OSC/TSC.and .Control

Rooms and verify that radiological controls are set up as shown on Sheet 6 of this Checklist for the TSC/OSC.. .. ..

IPEC SITE NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-350 Revision 5

EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE Use Page

. Attachment 9.4 TSC Radiological Coordinator Checklist.

Page 2 of 6 Initial Responsibility/Activity (cont.) NOTES E. Establish the capability for monitoring of Iodine, should it

.. become necessary; Have a Rad Protection Tech set up the AMS-4. . . .

F. *Establish Habitability and Contamination controls for the *

CR if necessary; At a minimum verify habitability in the Control Rooms and TSC/OSC and re-verify approximately every 60 minutes or when conditions have likely worsened. * * *

NOTE:

Ensure Habitability and Contamination Controls are

implemented when a Radiological Release occurs G. IF. dosimetry is necessary and.individuals have not been *. *

.* previously issued dosimetry THEN assign a person(s) to

... go to HP-1 or HP~3 as appropriate to obtain dosimetry .

(DRD's/DLR's) to be issued to them, .

H; Assign Personnel to the following positions:

. '1 ; . OSC/TSC Rad Protection Monitor: ..

2. Protected Area Monitoring Team, IF requested by the ..

ro~ . . ..

3. EOF RP Monitor, as so0n as RP tech minimum *

staffing has been satisfied. * . . . . ..

*4. Rad Waste Personnel to. report to the EOF to support

any decontamination efforts, IF requested by the EOF.

5. RP Monitor to Assembly Areas to verify habitability if a radiological release has occurred. Monitor will need to bring frisker and survey meter. *

6. Technicians to take samples and report results as

f

.. . requested. . .* ... . . : . *. . .. * ..

I. Obtain keys from Unit 2 controlpoint for the lock box on *

the side of the OSC radiological equipment supply lockers. Check all instruments for operability and inventory any locker which has a broken seat

IPEC SITE NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-350 Revision 5 EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE Use Page 17. of 25 Attachment 9.4 TSC Radiological Coordinator Checklist Page 3 of 6 Initial Responsibility/Activity (cont.) NOTES J. Obtain requested Chemistry sample, and report the results to the OSC Manager.

2.0 Continuous Responsibility/Activity 2.1 Direct Radiation Protection Technicians in the following activities:

A. Assign qualified RP Technicians to conduct emergency

response support activities.

B. Use Emergency Team Briefing Form (EP::38) to prepare and document team assignments. Ensure each team dispatched has a copy of the Emergency Team Briefing Form.

C. Assign personnel to conduct in-plant radiological surveys and take chemistry samples as required supporting ERO activities.

D. Assign RP Technicians to accompany Teams requiring radiological support.

E. Prepare or have prepared the ERWP (EP-40). Review and approve the prepared form and then use or have it used.

F. Participate in Team briefings to ensure team members properly understand the assigned task. Briefings SHOULD be clear, concise, accurate, and prompt based**

upon the hazard(s) to be encountered.

G. Use the ERWP (Form EP-40) to discuss dose limits, surveys to be performed, expected and maximum dose

. rates and stay Umes. Advise team members to * *

. immediately contact or return to the OSC when dose rates or stay times approach the established limits.

. H~ Discuss dosimetry requirements. Coordinate with EPM .

8ny radiation exposure limit extensions necessary; l

IPECSITE NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-350 Revision 5

.~* l:!.i,1,~,gy EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE Use Page 18 of 25 Attachment 9.4 TSC Radiological Coordinator Checklist Page 4 of 6 Continuous Responsibility/Activity (cont.) . NOTES I. Discuss protective clothing and respiratory protection requirements.

J. **.Discuss travel route requirements and ifthere.are any releases in progress. *

K. Advise team members on monitoring and *.

. decontamination procedures following mission .

completion. *

L. Advise tea*m how they will be notified of changing conditions or classifications. Direct radiological control personnel to read dosimetry for personnel whose.

exposure limits are approached *

M. Participate ih OSC team post job debriefings, if needed. **.

*** N. Maintain communication capability (i.e. phone, radio}and - **

.. 1** .. :.:

Work with the OSC Manager while the team is in the field . .

I to answer any questions that may arise concerning. the . .

- - task,.

I 1,.

.0. Assistthe OSC Manager in pla~~ingandpreparingfor

..

any Radiological or Chemistry work activities needed to return the plant to a safe condition. **

P.

Verify the OSC Manager is tracking individual *exposure data in WebEOC or Individual Exposure Tracking Log l

(Form EP-29). * * **

Q. RP Tech escorts are required for any team being sent ... * * -

into an area where any of the following conditions exist * *.

1. Radiological conditions are unknown,* Surveys or

. ARMs may be used to predict radiological conditions. **

. 2. Radiation . . .

field. in excess of. 1 R/hr are expected .. . *

. 3. In the event of any release of radioactivity to the * *

. environment

IPEC SITE NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-350 Revision 5 EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE . Page Attachment 9.4

TSC Radiological Coordinator Checklist Page 5 of 6

Continuous Responsibility/Activity (cont.) NOTES R. Coordinate with the OSC Manager for tasks involving injured personnel or search and rescue activities.

1. IF potentially contaminated or highly exposed personnel require offsite medical facility attention, . .

THEN support transport with Operations and Security.

S. Frequently brief the OSC Manager on assigned task

- status_ and the results* reported by RP Technicians

T.

Maintain an adequate reserve of personnel in the OSC RP pool by requesting additional resources from.the OSC ..

Manager as necessary.

. . ~. . *..

U. Coordinate with the EOF Technical Advisor to obtain *

. equipment and materials not available onsite or through previously arranged agreements.

V;. Direct decontamination of personnel, equipment and

areas inside the Protected Area .. * * * ** .. * * . . . **..... .

W. If respirators are needed they can be obtained at the .* *.. .

. ** normal issue point location. * . . . ... *

2~2 ** IF there are contaminated injured perso_nnel: THEN

- ** :perform the foUowing: .* . . .

A. Provide radiological supportfor the assessment; .

treatment, and transportation of contaminated injured personnel.

B. Monitor patients on-site for contamination and decontaminate 8$ appropriate.

IPECSITE NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-350 Revision 5 EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE * **Page 20 of n

. Attachment 9 .4 ....

TSC Radiological Coordinator Checklist I Page 6 of 6

A A

N-R C

E TSC. p M

TSC/OSC Access Points to be posted: .** .

If Hallway Contamination < 1000 dp~/ 100 sq. cm .. *. * . If Hallway Contamination > 1000 dpm/ 100 sq ..

cm A. Entry/Exit * *

A. No Entry. Exit Only B. No Entry/No Exit B. Entry to TSC!OSC, No Exit. White Step Off Pad and *...

.*. . '. Frisk Shoes before stepping here .. * * *

C. No Entry/No Exit . . . C. No Enlry/No Exit . . .

D. Equipment cabinets. Place sign at top of stairway.* at D. Equipment cabinets. Place sign top ofstairway; No Entry/No Exit without permission from RAD Coordinator.

No Entry/No Exltwithout permission from RAD*. *

e. Air Monitoring Equlpm~t

Coordinator ,. *.* * **

I:, Air Monitoring Equipment .

IPECSITE NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-350 Revision 5 *

- ..11

-3/4 / / /

agy;,;

1 .

EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE Use Page ll of ~

Attachment 9 .5 EOF Rad Protection Monitor Checklist Page 1 of 4 '

1.0 . Initial Respons'ibility/Activity NOTES

. 1.1 Assume the position of EOF. Rad Protection Monitor A. Sign in on the EOF Check Point Sign-In Log (Form EP ALL). . ..

8. Report to* and receive direction from the EOF

Radiological Assessment Coordinator.

C.. Verify Equipment is in Galibration.

D, As directed by the EOF Dose assessor or the EOF. * *

*Radiological Assessment Coordinator. .* . .. .. .

of

.1. Perform a habitability survey the EOF and ICP: and set up radiological controls as shown on sheet 4 of

this Checklist. . . . . .. . . . . ..

2.. Establish the capability for monitoring of Iodine,*.****

~hould it becorne necessary*. .

NOTE AMS SHALL be started. during ..

EOF. activation.

E. Set up* and operate the AMS-4 utilizing skill of the craft *

and procedure EN-RP"."310. . . . . . ..

. i=. Periodically check readings of AMS-4 and ensure proper

.* instrument operation. *

1. IF there is a release, THEN monitor the AMS-4 to *

. identify any increase in. the radiological levels in the EOF. . .

of

2. Follow directions in Section E this. checklist to

. maintain AMS-4 operations.. .. . .

G. Sample Count Using the MS-2/SPA-3 utilizing skill of the

craft and procedure HP-9.021.

H; Sample Count Using the.Model 177 OR RM.;14/HP-210 utilizing skill of the craft and procedure EN-RP-302 and record results on form EP-16.

IPECSITE NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-350 Revision 5

. -- Enlc!rgy~ EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE ..

22 REFERENCE Use Page* of 25 Attachment 9.5 EOF Rad Protection Monitor Checklist Page 2 of4 Initial Responsibility/Activity (cont.) NOTES I.

Perform background and source checks approximately every . hour OR . as specified by the

Radiological *

Assessment Coordinator or Dose Assessor {frequency may be adjusted, either more or. less often; in consideration of current radiological conditions).

. . . I J. Using the readings from the AMS-4 Monitor and the

*. *noble gas,..to-iodine ratio from Chemistry,.determine the

- iodine activity.

1. IF iodine activity is determined to be greater than 1X10*7 micro curies/cubic centimeter by ~ny of the above methods, THEN notify the EOF Dose Assessor .

or the EOF Radiological Assessment Coordinator. *.*

K If directed by the EOFRadiologicalAssessment *** *

- . Coordinator or Dose Assessor then conducf .

decontamination of vehicles and personnel using IP-EP- .

350. . .. .....

2.0 . Continuous Responsibility/Activity 2.1 Establish and Maintain radiological habitability .

. A. As. directed by the EOF Dose Assessor or the EOF .

Radiological Assessment Coordinator, perform periodic radiological monitoring particularly when a release of * ** ** **

radioactive material into plant environments is in . *.* *

progress or suspected *

IPECSITE NON*QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-350 Revision 5 EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE Page 23 .of ~

Attachment 9 .5 EOF Rad Protection Monitor Checklist Page 3 of 4 Continuous Responsibility/Activity (cont.) NOTES

1. If there has been a Radiological Release outside of

. the Protected Area then set up the EOF as follows

when directed by the Dose Assessor: .

a .. Set up stanchions, rope barricades and friskers at both ends of the main hallway. *** *

b. Set Frisker alarm to (2) times background.

c. Set upSOP's at both entrances. *

d. Place a waste receptacle near the SOP location.

e. Post door to warehouse, exterior door (from NEM

offices) and Equipme11t Room door as No Entry, No

_ Exit; as appmpriate.: __ . __ *.* _ _. *- ._ _ __ .. . *-- j -. .

B. Periodically verify habitability in the EOF. This should be I

- done approximately once every 60. minutes or when . i ..

. conditions have likely worsened or when directed to by the

I .

EOF Dose Assessor or the EOF Radiological Assessment.* I .

Coordinator.* ** * * *.* 1*

2.2* . .1. Inform the EOF Radiological.Assessment Coordinator ..

- .when temporarily leaving the work area.

_. ... __ . _ * . __

A. IF you are leaving the EOF Complex (the restroom is within

complex) THEN: . . __ . * . *

1. Inform the EOF Radiological Assessment Coordinator

(for accountability purposes) * * * ! .*

* *

1

2. Inform the EOF Radiological Assessment Coordinator when you return.

B. Upon return, obtain a briefing from the EOF Dose Assessor or the EOF. Radiological Assessment Coordinator on any *

events, which have occurred while away:*

2.3. < Assist with the decontamination efforts of personnel, equipment and onsite areas as appropriate. * *

/

t& IPECSITE NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-350 Revision 5

'i-~ l!..i1l<~rgy. EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE Use Page 24 of 25 Attachment 9.5 EOF Rad Protection Monitor Checklist Page 4 of 4 ICP Main Room locker Room A Eplan office JCP Briefmg Room Bathroom B

EOF If there is indication of contamination outside of the PA then the EOF Complex may be set up to restrict access as outlined above:

If Hallway contamination <1000 dpm/100cm2 A - No Entry/ No Exit. Note: this may also include one or two doors to the EOF Equipment Room, as appropriate.

B - Entry/ Exit.to EOF Complex. Set up white SOP, with Frisker and trash receptacle available.

NOTE: Depending on placement of SOP, may also need to post the door to the Equipment Room as No Entry/No Exit.

IPEC SITE. NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-350 Revision 5 EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE

. IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE Use Page Attachment 9.6

EOF Dose Assessor Checklist Page 1 of 1 1.0 . Initial Responsibility/Activity .... NOTES .

1.1 .

Confer with the Radiological Assessment Coordinator on the need to set up EOF Radiological Controls. If needed request a Radiation Protection Technician from .

the osc~ Have the *Radiation Protection Tech set up the E,OF hallway as follows: .. .

A Set up stanchions, rope barricad~s. and friskers at both ends of the main hallway. * *

8. 'Set frisker alarm to two (2) times ~ackground. ** *

C. Set up Step off Pads (SOPs) at both entrances.

D. Place a wast~

receptacle near the SOP location.

' *E. Post door to warehouse & exterior doors (from NEM * *

'offices and Equipment Room) as NO ENTRY,:f\Jo EXIT..

IPEC IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE IP-SMM-AD-102 Rev:17 PREPARATION, REVIEW, AND APPROVAL Page 35 of 43 ATTACHMENT 10.2 IPEC PROCEDURE REVIEW AND APPROVAL (Page 1 of 1)

Procedure

Title:

Protective Action Recommendations Procedure No* IP-EP-410 Existing Rev* 15 New Rev* 16 ORN/EC No* 21-00119 Procedure Activitl Tempora~ Procedure Change (MARK Applicable) D Converted To IPEC, Replaces: (MARK Applicable) 0 NEW PROCEDURE Unit 1 Procedure No: D EDITORIAL Temporary Procedure Change GENERAL REVISION ADVANCE Temporary Procedure Change

@ PARTIAL REVISION Unit 2 Procedure No:

D CONDITIONAL Temporary Procedure Change EDITORIAL REVISION Terminating Condition:

Unit 3 Procedure No:

VOID PROCEDURE SUPERSEDED RAPID REVISION Document in Microsoft Word:

VOID DRN/TPC No(s):

D Yes D No Revision Summary @ NIA - See Revision Summary page .*

Implementation Requirements Implementation Plan? Yes 0 No Formal Training? Yes 0 No Special Handling? Yes @ No Quality Related? Yes 0 No. If Yes, then ensure the procedure cover page is marked "Quality Related" RPO Dept: Emergency Planning Review and Approval (Per Attachment 10.1 IPEC Review and Approval Requirements)

1. @ Technical Reviewer: Craig Delamater/ ~ tJ/i1/:Jc d--/ 1 (Print"Name/ Signature/ Date)

2. Cross-Disciplinary Reviewers:

Dept: _ _ _ _ _ _ Reviewer: _ _ _ _ _ ____,,,.......,..___,--,-----,,-----------------

(Print Name/ Signature/ Date)

Dept: _ _ _ _ _ _ Reviewer: ---------,-,.......,..---,--,-----,c-=----=------------

~t)ame'._;~~ure/ Date) 3.@ RPO- Responsibilities/Checklist: -'--F'""ra"'"'n'-'-k-'--'-M=it=c=he=l"---1/--=~--=--,---c--,,........~"--,,-~~t.-4.~'--""".-C....,--'----,,------,0,__,1/;,__,___7,___,/4

.......=...,-/'---_

(Print Name/ Signature/ Date) 7-/-

PAD required and is complete (PAD Approver and Reviewer qualifications have been verified)

@ Previous exclusion from further Ll-100 Review is still valid PAD not required due to type of change as defined in 4.6

4. Non-Intent Determination Complete: -------=--=----=-....,..,=-----,,---:-=,......,..~----------

(Print Name/ Signature/ Date)

NO change of purpose or scope NO change to less restrictive acceptance criteria NO reduction in the level of nuclear safety NO change to steps previously identified as commitment steps NO voiding or canceling of a procedure, unless NO deviation from the Quality Assurance Program Manual requirements are incorporated into another procedure NO change that may result in deviations from Technical or the need for the procedure was eliminated via an Specifications, FSAR, plant design requirements or previously alternate process. m~~mitments.

5. D On-Shift Shift Manager/CRS:..!.F.!.!ra:!.!.nmk~M~it~cwhei<!ill!..:-~RllP~O"--~~!:::=;:___,...,.......____,~.!!:..L--C,,t!!t,.d!~~=::;&J.-~+-..:...t'+-...:;._-

(Print Name/ Signature/ Date)

6. User Validation: User:

7. D Special Handling Requirements Understood: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

Attachment 1 Page 1 of 2 1 0CFRS0.54 Q 2 Review Procedure/Document Number: IP-EP-410 Revision: 16 Equipment/Facility/Other: Indian Point Energy Center

Title:

Protective Action Recommendations Part I. Description of Activity Being Reviewed (event or action, or series of actions that have the potential to affect the emergency plan or have the potential to affect the implementation of the emergency plan):

This procedure was revised to reflect the condition of the facility to meet the requirement in the Post Unit 3 Shutdown E-Plan (PSEP) as submitted to the NRC per LAR, license #NL-19-001. Please see the attached matrix for the changes that have been made. This procedure will be effective May 17 th , 2021.

Part II. Emergency Plan Sections Reviewed (List all emergency plan sections that were reviewed for this activity by number and title. IF THE ACTIVITY IN ITS ENTIRETY IS AN EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE, EAL CHANGE OR EAL BASIS CHANGE, ENTER THE SCREENING PROCESS. NO 10CFR50.54(q)(2) DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED.

Part 1

Introduction:

Section A: Purpose Part 2 Planning Standards and Criteria:

Section A: Assignment of Responsibility Section B: Station Emergency Response Organization Section D: Emergency Classification System Section H: Emergency Facilities and Equipment Section I: Accident Assessment Section J: Protective Response Part Ill. Ability to Maintain the Emergency Plan (Answer the following questions related to impact on the ability to maintain the emergency plan):

1. Do any elements of the activity change information contained in the emergency plan (Section 3.0 Step 6)?

YES D NO 12;] IF YES, enter screening process for that element

2. Do any elements of the activity change an emergency classification Initiating Condition, Emergency Action Level (EAL), associated EAL note or associated EAL basis information or their underlying calculations or assumptions?

YES D NO 12;] IF YES, enter screening process for that element

3. Do any elements of the activity change the process or capability for alerting and notifying the public as described in the FEMA-approved Alert and Notification System design report?

YES D NO ~ IF YES, enter screening process for that element

4. Do any elements of the activity change the Evacuation Time Estimate results or documentation?

YES D NO lR] IF YES, enter screening process for that element

5. Do any elements of the activity change the Onshift Staffing Analysis results or documentation?

YES D NO lR! IF YES, enter screening process for that element EN-EP-3O5 ROOS

Attachment 1 Page 2 of 2 10CFR50.54(Q 1(2) Review Procedure/Document Number: IP-EP-410 Revision: 16 Equipment/Facility/Other: Indian Point Energy Center

Title:

Protective Action Recommendations Part IV. Maintaining the Emergency Plan Conclusion The questions in Part Ill do not represent the sum total of all conditions that may cause a change to or impact the ability to maintain the emergency plan. Originator and reviewer signatures in Part V document that a review of all elements of the proposed change have been considered for their impact on the ability to maintain the emergency plan and their potential to change the emergency plan.

1. Provide a brief conclusion that describes how the conditions as described in the emergency plan are maintained with this activity.

2. Check the box below when the 10CFR50.54(q)(2) review completes all actions for all elements of the activity- no 10CFR50.54(q)(3) screening or evaluation is required for any element. Otherwise, leave the checkbox blank.

[8] I have completed a review of this activity in accordance with 10CFR50.54(q)(2) and determined that the effectiveness of the emergency plan is maintained. This activity does not make any changes to the emergency plan. No further actions are required to screen or evaluate this activity under 10CFR50.54(q)(3).

Per Post Shutdown Emergency Plan (PSEP), both Unit 2 and Unit 3 will be defueled and will no longer operate. The changes made to this procedure (specifically, deletion of the Rapidly Progressing Severe Accident - see attached matrix) reflects the changes made to the document submitted to the NRG (license# NL-19-001) as well as some minor or editorial changes. The NRG has approved the Unit 3 PSEP per RA-20-040.

A review of this activity in accordance with 10CFR50.54(q)(2) has been completed and has determined that the effectiveness of the PSEP is maintained. This revision aligns the procedure with the protocols of the post Unit 3 shutdown. None of the changes affect the ability to perform classifications, notifications or PARS. Additionally, it does not affect the activation of the Emergency Response Organization and the planning standard requirements are maintained. The changes made do not require a change to the Emergency Action Level scheme, On-Shift Staffing Study or the PSEP.

No further actions are required to screen or evaluate this activity under 10CFR50.54(q)(3).

Part V. Signatures:

Preparer Name (Print)

Dara Gray (Optional) Reviewer Name (Print)

Reviewer Name (Print) Reviewer Signature Date:

Timothy Garvey Nuclear EP Project Manager Approver Name (Print)

Emergency Planning Manager or designee EN-EP-3O5 ROOS

IP-EP-410, Protective Action Recommendations (Revision 16) Revision Matrix Change Page/Section Previous Version New Version Editorial Effect on 10 CFR 50.47{b)

No. Change Planning Standards or NUREG-0654 program elements? Justify if NO.

1. Cover Page Rev 15 Rev 16 Yes No- This is an editorial change to the Revision number and effective date.

The meaning or intent of description in the emergency plan, facilities or equipment described in the approved Post-Shutdown Emergency Plan (PSEP) or a process described in the PSEP are not affected by this change. No further evaluation is required for this change.

IP-EP-410, Protective Action Recommendations (Revision 16) Revision Matrix Change Page/Section Previous Version New Version Editorial Effect on 10 CFR 50.47(b)

No. Change Planning Standards or NUREG-0654 program

- elements? Justify if NO.

2. No No- The Rapidly Progressing FLOWCHART FOR GENERAL ,,

., *. :!:;.=~:~~':~**-. . m f ::~~~\::~.~!i:'..,i' 1..-u.-....,.,; .. ,.~.,,.1,1w11 -~

=.

tlv.<1,,00.,0~.~*><::.1.

,. '><*=*'--"iJ

1~.,..~:,~*m,,:~ it l;D rt1 ;:i.:,.a ~:*!

Severe Accident (RPSA) decision leg of the PAR flowchart (on left side)

EMERGENCY ** ~-c*tl>tt

. **-.\~'.'"**~H~~I, :, .1.~.,.,,.,,.,,,,.,.,,11,n:>=,.t.,l.l~ >H-*l'!"'it J.<S:,,~:il:" ~-*,t*~ D..1>.!*.U ;~;:-

was removed. The RPSA sequence PROTECTIVE t Ill) in a General Emergency is not ACTION '~a1l1'0Clt1 ....;~-..,,

RECOMMENDA- 1**::~;:t' applicable to a plant in which the TIONS "***--1* 1,0 reactor has been defueled. Per

'*-**- **--**-*-* * ~S-"?!:'.P3/4r,,r,r.;:2 NUREG-0654-REP-1, Rev. 1, Attachment 9.1 t, ;1,,;,,;~J &.~\"'.3-.~.{:¢! ?,J t;:;*;_ t;:. l,\;;<""~';.,'V ~,.:.;a Supplement 3, an RPSA potential Sheet 1 of 2 exists when a large radioactive source term is released into containment, containment loss

- - - - r*** :.***_*.*.*.1, ...

conditions exist and there is a potential for a rapid release resulting

-* *-.s**;,.n.-**,,

~ , .. .

in site boundary doses exceeding EPA Protective Action Guides. (Ref.

Supplement 3, page A-3: .A rapidly

w-t;rt,:;"t<ln'!=>>F;tcfi:\*Uotll-t* progressing severe incident is a General l.'.<,tt':i:...:a~!

Emergency (GE) with rapid loss of containment integrity (emergency action levels indicate containment barrier loss)

~=*m.dWJ.t:>.l)X:0.,'"""'4><"'*otil

~""""J ............,...ii !~a>/io i

and loss of ability to cool the core. This

.:,,,.-~-4 ..,..,.,

s,....~,..~"'~u,; path is used for scenarios in which

.W.e~*T"0-**1[l!<!>JOo*<o*U~

containment integrity can be determined as bypassed or immediately Jost during a GE with core damage. If this scenario cannot be immediately confirmed, assume it is not taking place and answer "no" to this decision block. These

-A~<:~t..~~*:1.1:*:J:::-

~/,:, ... ,:, ~

Ii::~*:*.~ M,-~-,~, ~;,,;,.

conditions can no longer exist after a reactor has been defueled. Any protective actions (shelter-in-place or evacuation) that could be required for a GE would be addressed by other a licable ortions of the

IP-EP-410, Protective Action Recommendations (Revision 16) Revision Matrix Change Page/Section Previous Version New Version Editorial Effect on 10 CFR 50.47(b)

No. Change Planning Standards or NUREG-0654 program elements? Justify if NO.

procedure flowchart for protection of the general public.

The meaning or intent of description in the emergency plan, facilities or equipment described in the approved Post-Shutdown Emergency Plan (PSEP) or a process described in the PSEP are.not affected by this change. No further evaluation is required for this change.

3. FLOWCHART No FOR GENERAL No - See Change #2 above.

NOTE 1: Rapidly Progressing Previous NOTE 1 removed.

EMERGENCY RPSA conditions no longer apply Severe Accident IF:

PROTECTIVE after defueling.

ACTION RECOMMENDA-

First PAR after GE declared TIONS AND, The meaning or intent of description

Containment Loss Conditions (Table F-1) in the emergency plan, facilities or Attachment 9.1 AND EITHER: equipment described in the approved Sheet 2 of 2 Post-Shutdown Emergency Plan

Containment Rad Monitors R-25 or R-26 > (PSEP) or a process described in the 68 R/hr PSEP are not affected by this OR, change. No further evaluation is required for this change.

Conditions for EALs AG1 .1, AG1 .2 or AG1 .3 have been met.

If these criteria cannot be immediately confirmed, assume a RPSA is NOT occurring.

IP-EP-410, Protective Action Recommendations (Revision 16) Revision Matrix Change Page/Section Previous Version New Version Editorial Effect on 10 CFR 50.47(b)

No. Change Planning Standards or NUREG-0654 program elements? Justify if NO.

4. FLOWCHART FOR GENERAL Previous Notes 2,3,4 and 5 Previous Notes 2, 3, 4 and 5 now renumbered Yes EMERGENCY No - The previous notes 2-5 PROTECTIVE as Notes 1,2,3 and 4 were renumbered as Notes 1-4 ACTION RECOMMENDA- due to the removal or previous

! TIONS Note 1 (describing the RPSA).

Attachment 9.1 No other wording changes were Sheet 2 of 2 made in the remaining notes.

The meaning or intent of description in the emergency plan, facilities or equipment described in the approved Post-Shutdown Emergency Plan (PSEP) or a process described in the PSEP are not affected by this change. No further evaluation is required for this change.

5. FLOWCHART No - This is an editorial change FOR GENERAL Two blocks in flow chart state: Wording in same blocks now state: Yes made to conform to the revised EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE notes numbering.

ACTION "Continue assessment of event as per "Continue assessment of event per Notes 1, 2 RECOMMENDA- Attachment 9.1 Notes 2, 3 and 4" and 3" TIONS The meaning or intent of description Bottom block states: in the emergency plan, facilities or Attachment 9.1 equipment described in the approved Bottom block states:

Sheet 1 of 2 Post-Shutdown Emergency Plan "See Note 5" (PSEP) or a process described in the "See Note 4" PSEP are not affected by this change. No further evaluation is required for this change.

Attachment 9.1 Emergen cy Planning Document Change Checklist Form (All sections mu st be completed, NIA or place a check on the line where applicable)

Section 1 Doc/Procedure Type:

Administrative EPLAN 0 NIA Doc/Procedure No: IP-EP-410 Doc/Procedure

Title:

Protective Action Recommendations New revision number: 16 Corrective Action: Yes~ No O N/A O CR#: OL-OLl-2018-00090 CA 19 Effective date: May 17, 2021 Section 2 Change Descript ion

1. Ensure the followi ng are completed, or are not applicable and are so marked:

a. 50.54q NIA

b. EN-FAP-OM-023 N/A~

C. IP-SMM- AD-102 NIA

d. OSRC N/Afg]

e. NRCTransmittal N/A t8J (within 30 days)

2. List any other documents affected by this change: NIA

3. Transmittals are c ompleted: t8J N/A D Date:4/29/21

4. Ensure the proper revision is active in eB Ref. Lib.: t8l N/A D

5. Approved doc/procedure delivered to Doc. Control for distribution: [81 N/A D Date: 4/29/21

6. Position Binders updated: t8J N/A D Date: 4/29/21

7. Copy of EPDCC placed in EP file: t8J N/A O Date: 4/29/21

8. Supporting docu mentation is submitted as a general record in eB Ref. Lib.: [gJ N/A D Date: 4/29/21

9. Word files are moved from working drafts folder to current revision folder in the EP drive:

0 NIA t8J Date: 5/17/21 Sheet 1 of 1

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-410 Revision 16

--** J?nler.oy,

,,4 b ,,, EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 1 of ~

Protective Action Recommendations Prepared by: Dara Gray Print Name Approval: Frank J. Mitchell Print Name Effective Date: May 17, 2021 This procedure excluded from further Ll-100 review IP-EP-410 (PAR) Revision 16.doc

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-410 Revision 16

,. Entergy.,, EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page of 6 .1Q.

Table of Contents 1.0 PURPOSE ........................................................................................................................................3

2.0 REFERENCES

................................................................................................................................. 3 3.0 DEFINITIONS ................................................................................................................................... 3 4.0 RESPONSIBILITIES ........................................................................................................................ 3 5.0 DETAILS .......................................................................................................................................... 3 5.1 NUE, ALERT, SITE AREA EMERGENCY ....................................................................................... 3 5.2 GENERAL EMERGENCY ............................................................................................................. 3 6.0 INTERFACES ...................................................................................................................................4 7.0 RECORDS .......................................................................................................................................4 8.0 REQUIREMENTS AND COMMITMENT CROSS-REFERENCE ....................................................4 9.0 ATTACHMENTS ............................................ ,................................................................................. 4 9.1 FLOWCHART FOR GENERAL EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE ACTION RECOMMENDATIONS ................... 5 9.2 MIDAS STABILITY CATEGORY- DOWNWIND KEYHOLE SECTOR CORRELATION TABLE .................. 7 9.3 EPA PROTECTIVE ACTION GUIDELINES ...................................................................................... 8 9.4 OVERLAY SELECTION FLOW CHART (FOR MANUAL PLUME VISUALIZATION) ................................. 9 9.5 WIND FIELD ORIENTATION - MIDAS vs. PLUME OVERLAYS ......................................... 10

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-410 Revision 16

-- llntergy,,, EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page ~ of 10 PROTECTIVE ACTION RECOMMENDATIONS 1.0 PURPOSE To prescribe the responsibilities and methods for determining recommended protective actions for New York State and County authorities.

2.0 REFERENCES

EPA Protective Action Guidelines 3.0 DEFINITIONS Protective Action Recommendations (PARs) - Specific recommendations made by the Emergency Director to offsite authorities in accordance with Emergency Plan procedures based on Protection Action Guidelines.

4.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 4.1 The Shift Manager is responsible for evaluating accident conditions, classifying the accident, and recommending protective actions to offsite authorities during the initial phases of the accident. The Emergency Director assumes these responsibilities when he takes control of the emergency response from the- Shift Manager. The Radiological Assessment Coordinator will assist the Emergency Director with protective action recommendations.

4.2 The decision to initiate any protective actions is solely the responsibility of offsite authorities.

5.0 DETAILS 5.1 NUE, Alert, Site Area Emergency:

5.1.1 Do not recommend protective actions be taken.

5.2 General Emergency 5.2.1 The initial protective action recommendation should be made within 15 minutes of the GENERAL EMERGENCY declaration.

5.2.2 Protective Action Recommendations (PARs) shall be made in accordance with Attachment 9.1. Downwind Sectors are identified on Attachment 9.2.

The MIDAS dose assessment program uses the logic from Attachment 9.1 and 9.2 to determine PARs and affected downwind sectors. Impacted sectors include both land and water areas out to the distances included in the PAR.

5.2.3 The Acetate Isopleth Overlays may be used with the map table to visualize the plume. If the Isopleth Overlays are used, then use Attachment 9.4 to support isopleth selection and placement on the map table.

5.2.4 The initial PAR shall be made* in the first GENERAL EMERGENCY notification to the State/Counties. All subsequent, Part I notifications shall include the* latest PAR.

~E'nlergyf1, IPEC EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING NON-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-410 Revision 16 PROCEDURES Page REFERENCE USE ~ of 10 5.2.5 Re-evaluate the PARs based'on the following:

Changes in Wind Direction or Speed

Dose Calculations

Field Team Data

EPA PAGs -Attachment 9.3

Plant Conditions 5.2.6 IF conditions are present that require a revision to the current PAR, THEN the revised PAR must be determined within 15 minutes of those conditions being apparent.

5.2.7 -IF a decision to revise the PAR has been made, .....,;;..;;.=a..a.

THEN offsite notification sthall I

be completed within 15 minutes of the revised PAR determination. I 5.2.8 As protective action recommendations change, ensure appropriate steps are taken to protect the onsite population.

5.2.9 IF an EPA PAG is exceeded or expected to be exceeded beyond 10 miles THEN consider the need for PARs beyond 10 miles and discuss possible actions with State/Counties. Send Field Teams to confirm projections.

6.0 INTERFACES 6.1 Evacuation Time Estimates "'

6.2 IP-EP-310, Dose Assessment 6.3 State of New York Kl Policy Paper 6.4 IP-ER-420, Use of Potassium Iodide by Indian Point Personnel during an Emergency 7.0 RECORDS NONE 8.0 REQUIREMENTS AND COMMITMENT CROSS-REFERENCE NONE 9.0 ATTACHMENTS

9.1 Flowchart for General Emergency Protective Action Recommendations 9.2 MIDAS Stability Category - Downwind Keyhole Sector Correlation Table 9.3 EPA Protective Action Guidelines 9.4 Overlay Selection Flow Chart (For Manual Plume Visualization) 9.5 Wind Field Orientation - MIDAS vs. Plume Overlays

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-410

1?

,~ ;,;lllergy,,, EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE Revision 16 IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page § of 10 Attachment 9 .1 FLOWCHART FOR GENERAL EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE ACTION RECOMMENDATIONS (Sheet 1 of 2)

General Emergency Declared YES

Recommend SHELTER-IN-PLACE and Implement Kl Plan for 2-Mile Radius and 2-5 Mile Downwind Sectors

See Attachment 9.2

Advise Remainder of EPZ to Monitor EAS.

Recommend EVACUATION and Implement Kl Plan for 2-Mile Radius and 2-5 Mile Downwind Sectors

See Attachment 9.2

Advise Remainder of EPZ to Monitor EAS Continue Assessment of Event per Notes 1, 2 and 3 NO Continue Assessment of Event Per Notes 1, 2 and 3 No Change to PAR YES

Hetammend EVACUATION and Implement Kl Plan for 2*Mlle Radius and 2-10 Mlle Downwind Sectors

See Attachment 9.2

Advise* Remainder of EPZ. to Monitor EAS

See Note 4

~B'nlc::rgy~,

IPEC EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES NaN-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE IP-EP-410 Page §.

Revision 16 of 10 Attachment 9.1 FLOWCHART FOR GENERAL" EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE ACTION RECOMMENDATIONS Sheet 2 of 2 NOTE 1: Event Assessment Criteria: NOTE 3: IF Recommended Sectors Change, TI:!fili:

Wind Direction/Speed

Add new sectors to new PAR.

Dose Calculations

DO NOT subtract any sector in which actions have o Field Team Data been previously recommended.

EPA PAGs (Attachment 9.3)

Plant Conditions NOTE 2: PAR Expansion Criteria: NOTE 4: IF PA Gs Exceeded > 10 Miles:

IF meteorological conditions change and IF an EPA PAG is exceeded or expected to be result in other sector(s)/area(s) being exceeded beyond 10 miles THEN consider the impacted after initial PAR, expand the initial need for PARs beyond 10 miles and discuss PAR to include new sector(s)/area(s) ONLY possible ,actions with State/Counties.

IF:

Plant conditions are unknown or continue to be unstable (mitigating actions not started or not successful) or degrading OR,

EPA PAGs are projected or measured to be exceeded in the new sector(s)/area(s).

For Wind Shifts:

Only expand the PAR to include the sector(s)/area(s) impacted by the in-transit wind shift if dose assessment projects the EPA PAGs will be exceeded in the in-transit sector(s)/area(s ).

~,J.,,1ergyb IPEC EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING NON-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-410 Revision 16 PROCEDURES REFERENCE Use 1 Page r of 10 Attachment 9.2 MIDAS STABILITY CATEGORY DOWNWIND KEYHOLE SECTOR CORRELATION TABLE Sheet 1 of 1 TABLE I - MIDAS Up-Valley Plumes Up-Valley Plumes (wind speed ~ 4 m/sec and wind direction from 102°-209°)

Pasquill Stability Categories Sectors affected A,B 16, 1,2,3,4 C,D,E,F,G 16, 1,2,3 TABLE II - MIDAS Down-Valley Plumes Down-Valley Plumes (wind speed ~ 4 m/sec and wind direction from 349°-101 °)

Pasquill Stability Categories Sectors affected A,B 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 C, D, E, F,G 7, 8,9, 10 TABLE Ill - MIDAS Cross-Valley Plumes Cross-Valley (wind speed> 4 m/sec OR wind direction from 210°-348°}

Wind Direction Center Pasquill Stability Categories A & B Pasquill Stability Categories C-G From (deg) Sector No. Sectors affected Sectors affected 169 - 190 1N 15, 16, 1,2,3 16, 1,2 191 - 213 2NNE 16, 1,2,3,4 1, 2, 3 214 - 235 3 NE 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 2, 3,4 236 -258 4ENE 2,3,4,5,6 3,4,5 259- 280 SE 3,4,5,6, 7 4,5,6 281 - 303 6 ESE 4,5,6, 7,8 5,6, 7 304- 325 7SE 5,6, 7,8,9 6, 7,8 326 - 348 8SSE 6, 7, 8,9, 10 7, 8, 9 349-010 9S 7,8,9, 10, 11 8, 9, 10 011-033 10SSW 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 9, 10, 11 034-055 11 SW 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 10, 11, 12 056 - 078 12WSW 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 11, 12, 13 079 - 100 13W 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 12, 13, 14 101 -123 14WNW 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 13, 14, 15 124 -145 15NW 13, 14, 15, 16, 1 14, 15, 16 146 - 1'68 16 NNW 14, 15, 16, 1, 2 15, 16, 1

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-410 Revision 16

~ Ei1ler.oy.,

.J ,, e, ~* EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page §_ of 10 Attachment 9.3 EPA PROTECTIVE ACTION GUIDELINES Sheet 1 of 1 Recommended protective actions to reduce whole body and thyroid dose from exposure to a gaseous plume.

PROJECTED DOSE (REM)

TO THE POPULATION RECOMMENDED ACTIONS (a) COMMENTS Whole Body (TEDE) < 1 No planned actions. (b) Previously recommended State may issue an advisory to protective actions may be Thyroid (COE) <5 seek shelter and await further reconsidered or terminated.

instructions.

Monitor environmental radiation levels Whole Body (TEDE) > 1 Evacuate unless constraints make it If constraints exist, special impractical; then shelter. Monitor consideration should be given environmental radiation levels. for evacuation of children and Thyroid (COE) Control access. pregnant women.

GUIDANCE ON DOSE LIMITS FOR WORKERS PERFORMING EMERGENCY SERVICES (REM)

Whole Body (TEDE):

10 Protecting valuable property Lower dose not practicable.

25 Lifesaving or protection of large populations Lower dose not practicable.

> 25 Lifesaving or protection of large population Only on a voluntary basis to persons fully aware of the risks involved.

TEDE- Total Effective Dose Equivalent: Sum of external effective dose equivalent and committed effective dose equivalent to non-pregnant adults from exposure and intake during an emergency situation. Workers performing services during emergencies should limit dose to the lens of the eye to three times the listed value and doses to any organ (including skin and body extremities) to ten times the listed value.

COE- Committed dose equivalent (to the Thyroid).

(a) These actions are recommended for planning purposes. Protective action decisions at the time of the incident must take existing conditions into consideration.

{b) At the time of the incident, officials may implement low-impact protective actions in keeping with the principle of maintaining radiation exposures as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA)

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-410 Revision 16

~*.:* Bnle,;_~y,,. EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 10

!! of Attachment 9.4 OVERLAY SELECTION FLOW CHART {FOR MANUAL PLUME VISUALIZATION)

Sheet 1 of 1 I OBTAIN METEOROLOGICAL DATA I

I I RECORD WIND DIRECTION I I

I RECORD WIND SPEED I I

I RECORD PASQUILL STABILITY CLASS I

I I

WIND SPEED _s 4 mis WIND SPEED > 4 m/s -

I I WIND DIRECTION WIND DIRECTION WIND DIRECTION 340° - 101 ° 102 ° - 209° 210 ° - 339 ° I I USE DOWN VALLEY USE CROSS VALLEY OVERLAY GROUND OR USE UP VALLEY OVERLAY OVERLAY GROUND OR GROUND OR ELEV.

ELEV. ELEV.

(Yellow)

{Blue) (Red)

I I PLACE OVERLAY OVER ALIGN OVERLAY ALONG PLANT ORIENTATION POINT (ll WIND DIRECTION

1. Plant Orientation Point:

a. Using down valley overlay (Blue) align horizontal axis on 90° - 270° line with plume extending south.

b. Using up valley overlay (Yellow) align horizontal axis on 90° - 270° line with plume extending north.

IPj:C NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-410 Revision 16

-- l_,1iller.oy.

b ,,, EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE Use Page 10 of 10 Attachment 9.5 WIND FIELD ORIENTATION MIDAS vs. PLUME OVERLAYS Sheet 1 of 1 NOTE:

The wind field orientation differs between MIDAS (Att. 9.2) and the Plume Overlays (Att. 9.4) at certain wind speeds.

Based on the recommendations of consulting meteorologists, the origin of the up and down valley flow for low wind speeds (.::: 4 m/s) was changed to the center of the Hudson River (the plume overlays isopleth's origin was the super heater stack.) This is more representative of the true met expectations.

The origin change results in the down-valley plume range going from 340° - 101 ° to 349° -

101 ° for MIDAS.

As a result, the cross valley plume goes from 210° - 339° to 210° - 348° for MIDAS.

/

IPEC IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE IP-SMM~AD-102 Rev: 17 PREPARATION, REVIEW, AND APPROVAL Page 35 of 43 ATTACHMENT 10.2 IPEC PROCEDURE REVIEW AND APPROVAL (Page 1 of 1)

Procedure

Title:

Site Assembly, Accountability & Relocation Of Personnel Offsite

... , .~. r*--------------*

Procedure No. IP-EP-430 Existing Rev: 16 New Rev: 17 ORN/EC No:

Procedure Activit)l D Converted To IPEC, Replaces: TemeoraD£ Procedure Change (MARK Applicable) {MARK Applicable)

NEW PROCEDURE Unit 1 Procedure No. EDITORIAL Temporary Procedure Change GENERAL REVISION D ADVANCE Temporary Procedure Change

~ PARTIAL REVISION EDITORIAL REVISION Unit 2 Procedure No: D CONDITIONAL Temporary Procedure Change VOID PROCEDURE Terminating Condition:

SUPERSEDED Unit 3 Procedure No:

Document in Microsoft Word:

RAPID REVISION D VOID DRN/TPC No(s}:

D Yes D No Revision SummaD£ D N/A- see Revision Summary page. - Procedure was revised to reflect Post U3 Shutdown Eplan.

Implementation Regui rements Implementation Plan? Yes 00 No Formal Training? D Yes l!JNo Special Handling? Yes IIDNo Quality Related? D Yes !ID No If Yes, then ensure the procedure cover page is marked "Quality Related" RPO Dept: Emergency Planning Writer: (Print Name/Ext/Sign):~R=e=b=ec-c.._a.....M

.....a__rt__in....x

.....7....,1-=0-=6/_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

Review and Approval (Per Attachment 10.1, IPEC Review And Approval Requirements)

1. Technical Reviewer: /4s d£)

2. Cross-Disciplinary Reviewers:

Dept: Reviewer:

Print Name/ Signature{ Date)

Dept: Reviewer:

3. [ill RPO- Responsibilities/Checklist: Frank J Mitchell/

(Print Name{ Signature/ Date)

D PAD required and is complete (PAD Approver and Reviewer qualifications have been verified)

!ID Previous exclusion from further Ll-100 Review is still valid PAD not required due to type of change as defined in 4.6

4. D Non-Intent Determination Complete:

(Print Name/ Signature/ Date)

NO change of purpose or scope NO change to less restrictive acceptance criteria NO reduction In the level of nuclear safety NO change to steps previously identified as commitment steps

~ voiding or canceling of a procedure, unless requlrem t:IQ deviation from the Quality Assurance Program Manual are incorporated into another procedure or the need fort NO change that may result in deviations from Technical Speciflca procedure was eliminated FSAR, plant design requi~~*

5. !ID On-Shift Shift Manager/CRS: (RPO per SMM-AD-102)- Frank J, Mitchell/ ~~

(Print Name/ Signature{ Date)

6. User Validation: User:

7. Special Handling Requirements Understood:

Print Name/ Signature/ Date)

Attachment 1 Page 1 of 2 10CFR50.54(Q i(2) Review Procedure/Document Number: IP-EP-430 Revision: 17 Equipment/Facility/Other: Indian Point Energy Center

Title:

Site Assembly, Accountability & Relocation of Personnel Offslte Part I. Description of Activity Being Reviewed (event or aqtion, or series of actions that have the potential to affect the emergency plan or have the potential to affect the implementation of the emergency plan):

Replaced TSC Manager with EPM, EOF Manager with EOF Tech Advisor, and POM with Shift Manager and removed references to any facility support staff as reflected in the requirements in the Post Unit 3 Shutdown Eplan (PSEP), as submitted to the NRC per LAR, license #NL-19-001, Attachment 8 Emergency Response Organizaiton Task Analysis.

Procedure will be effective on May 17, 2021.

Part II. Emergency Plan Sections Reviewed (List all emergency plan sections that were reviewed for this activity by number and title. IF THE ACTIVITY IN ITS ENTIRETY IS AN EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE, EAL CHANGE OR EAL BASIS CHANGE, ENTER THE SCREENING PROCESS. NO 10CFR50.54(q)(2) DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED.

Part 2 Planning Standards and Criteria:

Section A: Assignment of Responsibility Section B: Station Emergency Response Organization Section H: Emergency Facilities and Equipment Section J: Protective Response Section K: Radiological Exposure Control Part Ill. Ability to Maintain the Emergency Plan (Answer the following questions related to impact on the ability to maintain the emergency plan):

1. Do any elements of the activity change information contained in the emergency plan (Section 3.0 Step 6)?

YES D NO 181 IF YES, enter screening process for that element

2. Do any elements of the activity change an emergency classification Initiating Condition, Emergency Action Level (EAL), associated EAL note or associated EAL basis information or their underlying calculations or assumptions?

YES D NO 181 IF YES, enter screening process for that element

3. Do any elements of the activity change the process or capability for alerting and notifying the public as described in the FEMA-approved Alert and Notification System design report?

YES D NO 181 IF YES, enter screening process for that element

4. Do any elements of the activity change the Evacuation Time Estimate results or documentation?

YES D NO 181 IF YES, enter screening process for that element ,

5. Do any elements of the activity change the Onshift Staffing Analysis results or documentation?

YES D NO (gi IF YES, enter screening process for that element EN-EP-305 R008

Attachment 1 Page 2 of 2 10CFR50.54(Q 1(2) Review Procedure/Document Number: IP-EP-430 Revision: 17 Equipment/Facility/Other: Indian Point Energy Center

Title:

Site Assembly, Accountability & Relocation of Personnel Offsite Part IV. Maintaining the Emergency Plan Conclusion The questions in Part Ill do not represent the sum total of all conditions that may cause a change to or impact the ability to maintain the emergency plan. Originator and reviewer signatures in Part V document that a review of all elements of the proposed change have been considered for their impact on the ability to maintain the emergency plan and their potential to change the emergency plan.

1. Provide a brief conclusion that describes how the conditions as described in the emergency plan are maintained with this activity.

2. Check the box below when the 10CFR50.54(q)(2) review completes all actions for all elements of the activity - no 10CFR50.54(q)(3) screening or evaluation is required for any element. Otherwise, leave the checkbox blank.

IZl I have completed a review of this activity in accordance with 10CFR50.54(q)(2) and determined that the effectiveness of the emergency plan is maintained. This activity does not make any changes to the emergency plan. No further actions are required to screen or evaluate this activity under 10CFR50.54(q)(3).

Per Post Shutdown Emergency Plan (PSEP), both Unit 3 and Unit 2 will be at shut down. The changes made to this procedure reflects this requirement of the Post Unit 3 Shutdown Eplan, as submitted to the NRC (license # NL-19-001) and ERO task for the TSC Manager was re-assigned to the EPM, POM was re-assigned to the Shift Manager, and EOF Manager was re-assigned to the EOF Technical Advisor to reflect Attachment 8, ERO Task Analysis. The NRC has approved the PSEP per RA-20-040.

A review of this activity in accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(q)(2) has been completed and determined that the effectiveness of the PSEP is maintained. This revision aligns the procedure with the protocols of the post Unit 3 shutdown. None of the changes affect the ability to perform accountability, assembly or relocation of personnel, it does not affect activation or staffing of the ERO as described in the Unit 3 PSEP, and all planning standard requirements are maintained.

The changes made do not require a change to the Emergency Action Level scheme, On-shift Staffing study or the PSEP.

No further actions are required to screen or evaluate this activity under 10 CFR 50.54(q)(3).

Part V. Signatures:

Preparer Name (Print) Preparer Signature Date:

Rehirr~ () rn~

Rebecca A. Martin 10/26/2020

{Optional) Reviewer Name (Print) Reviewer Signature Date:

Reviewer Name (Print) Reviewer Signature Date:

~ " O.. ~ -br'1tft-- G11r~

Timothy Garvey 10/26/2020 Nuclear EP Project Manager Approved per Telecom Approver Name (Print) Approver Signature Frank Mitchell Emergency Planning Manager or designee ~fol~

EN-EP-305 ROOS

Attachment 9.1 Emergency Planning Document Change Checklist Form (All sections must be completed, N/A or place a check on the line where applicable)

Section 1 Doc/Procedure Type:

Administrative lmplementinQ ~ EPLAN N/An Doc/Procedure No: IP-EP-430 Doc/Procedure

Title:

Site Assembly, Accountability & Relocation of Personnel Offsite New revision number: 17 Corrective Action: Yes [8J No NIA CR#: OL-OLl-2018-00090 CA 19 Effective date: May 17, 2021 Section 2 Change Description

1. Ensure the following are completed, or are not applicable and are so marked:

a. 50.54q {g] NIA

b. EN-FAP-OM-023 N/A[g]

c. IP-SMM-AD-102 f2J NIA

d. OSRC N/A!ZI

e. NRC Transmittal (within 30 days)

N/A [g]

2. List any other documents affected by this change: N/A

3. Transmittals are completed: {g] N/A D Date:4/29/21

4. Ensure the proper revision is active in eB Ref. Lib.: [8] NIA 0

5. Approved doc/procedure delivered to Doc. Control for distribution: {g] N/A O Date: 4/29/21

6. Position Binders updated: [gl N/A D Date: 4/29/21

7. Copy of EPDCC placed in EP file: lZ! N/A O Date: 4/29/21

8. Supporting documentation Is submitted as a general record in eB Ref. Lib.: [gl NIA O Date: 4/29/21

9. Word files are moved from working drafts folder to current revision folder in the EP drive:

N/A [gl Date: 5/17/21 Sheet 1 of 1

~ IP-EP-430 Revision 17 IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED

~ J~i1lergy, EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES 27 REFERENCE USE Page 1 of CONTROLLED Site Assembly, Accountability & Relocation of Personnel Offsite Prepared by: Rebecca A. Martin Q~(t,*QM~ .41\5\~, *.

Approval:

Print Name

Frank J. Mitchell Print Name

,u~. rk~,

. Signature Date Effective Date: May 17, 2021 This procedr1re excluded from further u~*100 reviews

/P-EP-430 (Site Assembly, Accountability & Relocation of Personnel Offsite)Rev 17.doc

t'.:~!!. IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-430 Revision 17

~~~~1*1

-- !nlergy,, EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES Page g of REFERENCE USE ll Table of Contents

1.0 PURPOSE ............................ ,................................................................. ,, ......... ,......... 3 2.0 REFEREl\lCES ............................. ,. ... ., ........................................................................ 3 3.0 DEFINITIONS ........................................................... ,................................................. 3 4.0 RESPONSIBILITIES ........................................,. ............................................ ., ........... 4 6.0 INTERFACES ............................................................................................................. 5 7~O RECORDS """" "'"'"' "~,( ., .... "' . .,~ . ,. . .... __., , - ..... ,. ......... **"' ..... ~ ........ . ,~ . 1 .... i<i Ir,\*!,~'""'""'" ......................... ,.~* ............ "" .. .,.~ ..... i ........ " .................. 6 8.0 REQUIREMENTS AND COMMITMENT Cross~Reference ......................................... 6 9.0 ATTACHMENTS ......................................................................................................... 6 9.1 SHIFT MANAGER (ED) ACCOUNTAB(UTYIPERSONNEL RELOCATION CHECKLIST ............. 7 9.2 LEAD ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICER (LAO) CHECKLlST ................ ., .............................. 12 R3 MANUAL ACCOUNTABILITY CHECK.UST ...................... ,. ......................... ,, ................. 16 9.4 EOF TECHNICAL ADVISOR CHECKUST 9 .5 TSC SECURITY COORDINATOR CHECKLIST ...................................... , * " .......22 9.6 OSC MANAGER CHECKUST .................... , ...............* , ...* , .*...................... ,.24 9.7 IPECASSEMBLY AREAS & RELOCATIOt'-J ROUTES.,., ******.......*..**...** , ..*.*.*..*.*..... 26 9.8 DtRECT!ONS TO WESTCHESTER COUNTY fl RE TRAfNlNG CENTER. ***. , ...**.*.*..*..****.**.27

IPEC* NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-430 Revision 17

, l!illergy,.. EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE.*

IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES Page of 27 REFERENCE USE l Site Assembly, Accountability & Relocation of Personnel Offsite

1.0 PURPOSE *

- *

1.1 *.. To provide the method*arid procedures used to initi~lly accounffor individuals within the Protected Area when accountability is required or caUed for and for

*. maintaining personnel accountability throughout the event.: *** *

1.2 *. To provide guidance for Search and Rescue. *. **

. 2.0. REFERENCES**

. .. 2.1 ..Indian Point Energy Center Err1ergency Plan 3.0 DEFINITIONS .

3; t< Accountability-e accounting for (knowing the location of) all personnel Within the *****

Protected Area OR knowing they are Within the Protected Area but missing ....

3.2 .** Assembl~ - relocation of all pe.-sonnel,: in the owner controlled: area (OCA), to

.. pre-de~ignated locations (assernbty areas). Essential personnel report to their

.

assigned Emergency Response Facilities (ERF) and not1'."essential personnel report to either Generation Support Building (GSB) or Energy Education Center *

. . ... : (EEC).. ... . .. . . ... . .. . . ...... . . ... . ... . . .

- - . 3~3 . Asse~bly Areas - designated areaSwhere all personnel will assemble when.* .

.**.requested.These areas includetheTSC/OSCComplex;the Central Control.

Room (CCR - Unit 2 or Unit 3) and the Emergency Operations Facility for .. *.

essential personnel and the EEC and the GSB for non-essentials. (The Indian .

Point Training Center (I PTC) will be.used for overflow of non.:.essentials during .

outages.) * * * * * * * * *** * ** * *

3.4 . ** Continuing Ac~ountability - maintaining accountability within the ProtectedArea, *.*

*after initial accountability is cornplete * ** **** * ** ** ** * *** * ** * *****

.... : 3.5:.:

Essenti.~I Perso*n~el ** indi~iduals assigned .to the Emerger.1cy Response *:

<:. : .. * :*orga.nlzation (ERO) a~d/orNRc*.personnel;: This: includes: : .* * **

:* : 3.5. t *.All members of the on-.shift watc.h 3;5.2 .All CCR ERO staff members . ,.

. 3.5.3; AH .members ofthe Se~urity Force .

. ..: 3.5.4 *All EOF/TSC/bSC ERO stat members . . . .

- 3.5.6: *Ail.Entergy Mechanics; Eiectridans, l&C Technicians, Chemistry:. .

Technicians, Rad Protection Technicians and Non-Shift Operators within

the Protected Area. *

IPEC

NON*QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-430

Revision 17

.*

c:;;_.. l!ill<!rgY,;, EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES 27 REFERENCE USE . Page ! of 3.6 Initial Accountability- the determination. of who is accounted for within 30

..

minutes for events classified at the Site Area Emergency, General Emergency or

.. when Accountability is requested. . - . .

3. 7 _Non-essential personnel - ail other personnel not assigned responsibilities in the .

. : ERO~ This include$ all supplemental personnel, visitors and OCA badged * . : *

- - personnel * * *

.. 3;8

Relocation of Personnel Offsite - releasing ofall non-essential p~rsorihel from * **

the site: * ** * *

3.9 Search and Rescu~ - activiUes undertaken immediately after personnel are :

... *** deemed <lmissing" in order to determine their location .. * * *

4.0 .. RESPONSIBILITIES 4.1 Each Unit's Control Room is respotisible for sounding the Site Assembly Alarm,: -

to initiate the accountability process, atth~ Site Area Emergency, General :

* .Emerg¢ncy, or.at the discretion oUhe .Shift Manager or,, if in place,the * *

Emerg*ency. Plant Manager

. . (EPM).

* . ***** 4.2 * ... Security Shift Supervisor or designee are the initial Lead Accduntability ()fficers * *

.** :responsible for conducting the per~onnel accountability process. and reporting **

..

the results to. the Shift Manager or, ifin place, the TSC Security Coordinator.

- **. The TSC Security Coordinator designates an LAO ifnotpreviously designated;

* *. 4.3 **. Assembly Area Coordinat~rs and *TSG Security Coordinator(s) are responsible **

..*. -*for communicating with the LAO reg carding the status of personnel in the . . .* . .**

. .Assembly Area, maintaining assembled personnel within the /\ssembly Area and

- .*****providing i.nformat1on to personnel assembled regarding the event. * * * **

AA . Security is responsible for accounting for Security personnel, :and unlocking the

- .Indian Point Training Center (IPTC) when needed, during off-hours. ** *

... * .* 4.5 ** .. Non-Essential personnel and Contractors, who are inside the protected area, are responsible for reporting to the GSB or EEC, when an Alert has been declared *

. >or when Emergency Response Facilities (ERFs) have been activ~ted . .'.

4.6 ..

Emergency Response Organiz~tlon (ER.O)Js* responsible for using proximity '. :, : * : .*

card* readers and/or reporting .to the ERF individual .assigned the responsibility..

for accountability upon arrival.at the .ERF. * * ** - * *

~A -**. IPEC NON*QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-430. Revision 17

~l!i1lergy" EMERGENCY PLAN .PROCEDURE

. IMPLEMENTING . .. .

PROCEDURES. .

. .. REFERENCE USE Page §.- of 27 5.0 -* DETAILS .

5.1 *** At the ALERT Emergency, or higher, or when direct~d,REPORT fo you~ * .. ....

Emergency Response Facility, the Generation Support Building or the Energy. *

Education* Center. * * *

at 5.2 .**. Accountability will be initiated the Site Area or General Ernerg*e~cy_or i~ may )

- be directed at any other time deemed nE1cessary, atthe direction ofthe Shift * ** *** * .** ---

Manciger (SM),. Emergency Plant Manager (EPM)or Emergency Director . . .

(ED). *.**. __ .*

_* Ac:countability may be suspended or delayed bylhe!.SM,: EPM, or ED if the

* , nfovement oflarge numbers of personnel to an Assernbly ArE!a potentially places **

- . >them inmore danger thanleaving them in place. Examples include: . ;.

5.3:t Severe weather ce>nditioi1s onsit~ _ _ _ .**

5.3.2 Joxic gases. in Protected Area egress areas

... - 5.3.3* A Security ~venfis in progress*****

.. * ,5.3A A radiological release which w~Lldplace non~essential personneLin / *-*

danger in.route to'OR while at the EEC and/or GSB. --*

.** 5 .3.s*** Arn1ed intruders are* present within th.e: .Prot3ctedArea, .near the Security*

command Posti the EEC or the G_SB> * * * * * * * * * *

~ The SM (Emer~ency Director) shall follow the instru~tion~ outlined in Attachrn~rit ..*

9A; "Shift M~nager (ED)Accountability Checklis,f'. * * * **

LeadAccountabiUty Officer (LAO)shall follow the instructiol'ls outlinedin . ..

-***

AttachmentR2, "Lead Accountability OfficerChecklist" andAttachment9:3,.*..

"Man*ualAccountabUity" (if required). * * * ** * * * * * * * *

.. A~signed Facility Accountability p~rsonnel shail follow the i~struction~ outHned fn *.

theirfacility position specific check,U~t~ .*

.IP-EP-115, Emergency Planning Forms ... *.. , .

6.2 . IP-EP;.210, Ceritral Control Room ..

6.3 IP-EP;.240,-.Security 6A IP-EP-350; Emergency Contamination Control .

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-430 Revision 17

~ /!,i1lergy~, . EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING

PROCEDURES . REFERENCE USE * *

Page § of 27 7.0 RECORDS Any logs or forms completed by members ofthe ERO during an actual declared emergency are permanent quality records. * * *

8.0 REQUIREMENTS AND COMMITMENT CROSS-REFERENCE

a.1 * ..* NURgG 0t354 section J.5 9.0 *

ATTACHMENTS. . : ,,,.*_ : ' . . . * ,*;* . . ... * .. , . . . . . --- ."' . *. . .

- . 9.1

Shift Manager (ED) AccountabiUty/Personnel Relocation Checklist

*** *9.2 * ** .Lead /\ccountability Officer Checklist 9;3.

Manual Accountability Checklist * *.

9.4 *. EOF. Technical Advisor Checklist

. 9.5 TSC Security Co°:rdinator Checklist ... i .

9.6

OSC Man~ger (:;hecklist 9.7 . .

IPEbA~sembly Area &*Rel~c~tioh Routes.

. 9.8 .. Pirectio_ris to \J\/estchesterCounty Fire Tra.ining 9enter ....... .

IPECSITE NON-QUALITY RELATED

IP-EP-430 Revlslon.17 EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING ..

i)ROCEDURE

REFERENCE USE Page ! of Attachment 9: 1

Shift Manager (ED) Accountability/Personnel Relocation Checklist *

. Sheet 1 of 5 * *

1.0 . Initial Assembly and Accountability . . . . Notes 1.1. IF there is a potential threat to personnel safety while**

conducting initial assembly and accountability due to severe .

weather, toxic gas, radiological relE3ase or security event THEN

proceed to Step 3.0, ."Suspension of Initial Assembly and Accountability

.* 1.2 Personnel Assembly and Accountability I*

' A .. Upon declaration of an Alert classification, the Site Assembly..

..*. *. Alc1rms (Unit2 and Unit 3) are sounded and an . . . **

- *: annoi.mcement is made over the PAdirecting assembly of non-essential personnel per Form EP~3A, Control Room . . . .

. Shift Managflr/Emerger1cy Director Checklist(s).This is done ** *

- ***** ... ** for personnel assembly ONLY:

B. ** Upon declaration of a Site Area Emergency; General .. ..* *.. *** *

. *

Emergency orifa decision ismadetoinitiateaccountability, *** * * *

* ****the Site Assembly Alarms (Unit 2 and Unit 3) are sounded ..

.**

and an announcement. is made over the PA directing * : *... .***:** . *

assembly ofnoh-essential personnel p*er Form EP-3S or 3G; *,.

Control Room Shift Manager/Emergency Director . .

Checklist(s). This is done for personnel assembly AND *

accountability. * .. . * . . . . * * .. *.. . .. .* .. :* ..... * * . * * .... * *

C. I~ either case, Control Ro6rfrpersonnel (CCR Staff, NPO's, * ..<

. * ** *. Watch Rad Protection and.Chemistry Technicians) SHOULD*

- assemble in the CCR.: * ** *** * * * ** .** * * *

.. D. AU off-watch qualified operate~ are to report to the osc~. '

1.3 *.. A-:count .f~r Control Room Personnel ** . ... *. . . . :* .*. . ..

A.. :Once accountability has been called for, all Control RQom .

*staff must be accounted for. *: *.* *:. . .. .

s*; :Use Fcirm EP-47, Accountabnlty Rost~r anci' develop a: Ust *of * *

~II watch individ.uals assigned to tasks ..in the.field that have .

.* *riot re*ported tothe CCR.* . . .. . .. . * .

. C. Deliver the Accountability Ro~ter to the Lead Accountability

. . Officer.** .

IPECSITE NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-430 . Revision 17

. EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE .

REFERENCE USE . Page . §. . of 27 Attachment 9.1

. Shift Manager (ED) Accountability/Personnel Relocation Checklist

*

Sheet 2 of 5 **

1.4 Identify and Locate Missing Personnel . *. * * * *. . **

Notes A !Ethe osc has notyet been activated AND the LAO reports . .

thaf individuals are missing THEN direct the LAO to initiate se~rch and rescue activities to locate missing persons within the Protected Area in accordance with Attachment 9.2; LAO

- * .. Checklist. ** - * ,

.B. IF .the osc is8cti'vated, direct the Osc Manager to initiate .*.

. *search and rescue activities ..

.2.0 **. Continuing Accountability

* ** Unless otherwise directed by the Em~rgen~y Director, *** *. **

continuing accountability shall be maintained once initial

accountability is completed. * . * . ** . . ... * *** ***. **.** * ......

...

3.0 * .. Suspension of Initial Assembly and AccountabiUty .*

. 3~1 *. *. Consider susperiding initial assembly and accountabiUty if ******* ** .

any of the following c:onditions are met: * * ***

A; Severe weather conditions are present onsiteL :

B. Alarge amount of toxic gashas been released within Or n~ar

. the PrqtectedArea .. ** ** .

- C, Aradiological release which would place non~esse11tial *

. . personnel in danger in route to OR while at the Energy * .

. **** *** Education Center (EEC) and/or the GeneratioitSupport * >.*

... J3uilding (GSB} (Indian PointTraining Center (IPTC) if****

used). * * * *

*.D. Armed intruders are present within the Protected Area, near

: the Protected Area Access Facility (PAAF) orin near the

EEC and/orGSB.* (IPTC if used.}

or

'e. :Any other bondition which in the opiniori of the: Shift Manager:

a (Emergency Director) wouid be threat to the movem*ent of

... personnel to th.e EEC..and/or.GSB. (IPTC if Used.). .

IPECSITE NON-QUALITY RELATED *

IP-EP-430 Revision 17 EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING

PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE Page i . of . !!

. Attachment 9.1

. Shift Manager (ED) AccountabUity/Personnel Relocation Checklist

Sheet . :

3 of 5 . .

3.2. IF initjal personnel.assembly and accountability Is. *

suspended THEN: ** * *

A Instruct NOT to. so~nd the As~embly Alarm or make *an.

. announcement for non-esseritial personneUo report to the

EEC/GSB.. . . . . ..

i: IF there is a condition identified that places onsite personnel .<.

in danger THEN .take immediate actions to warn and protect

- - . ** personnel::

. *t~. Send Security, Operations and/or Rad Pro person~el to evacuate areas of most risk; - *-

.*.* 2> Call for outside rescue assistance: (Fire; Hazmat Teams *.

etc.) * * * * * * ** *

l 1

* * . 3. *Ch~ose *an Assembly Area within the Prote~ted Area and

- hav~ nonftessential persom'lel assemble at chosen .. *. *> **

..

location .. *PA announcemelitancf teams dispatched to .. ***

. . .

alert personnel to c;1ssemble should be used to riotify *** .

* * , persoririeL **** . * *.* *. .*** ... . .** .. ** *... * - **

. a. For potential . .

airborne attacks - . . . I

. ** - Evacuation of persorinelfr6m target .

* * ** buildings (including security personnel) *

: Site evacuation by opening (while .* . _.

. .. continuing to defend) security gates *

Dispersal of operators *. * . . .* . .. .

* * .Sheltering of personnel in structures away *

. from potential site targets . . . . .** ._ -*

**Arrangements for accounting for personnel

after the attack * * * * ** - ' - - **

.*. >4'. *.: Retum to StEtp.1.2 when condiUohs aUow fOU ' .

>.accountability to be* performed. * * ** I 4.0 . .Suspension of Continuing Atcountab.ility . ** .. *:. *

.. 4.1 '!f ifis determined that planfconditions warrant *suspension of

continuing accountability THEN the Emergency Director shall.

confer w*ith the Shift Manager to ensure plant conditions will not :.

degrade to a point that accountability would be required ag*ain.

. 4.2. . The. Emergency Director shall notify the .LAO *and *EPM of the

decision arid the reasons suppqrting'thatdecision.; * *

IPECSITE - NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-430 Revision 17 EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE.

REFERENCE USE Page - 10 of 27 Attachment 9.1 Shift Manager (ED) Accountability/Personnel Relocation Checklist -

Sheet 4 of 5 *

-Notes 4;3 Ensure a formal ailnouncement'is made to both Unit 2 and Unit -

3 that accountability is no longer required. Log the time decisio*n is made. - -- - -

5.0 Relocation of Personnel Offsite (Site Evacuation) 5.1.- The Emergency Director shall direct the EOF Technical Advisor -

to review the currenfand second shift staffing requirements* for ERO positions stationed within the Protected Area. *- *

- *

A Contact the EPM to assess current ar,id future staffing requirements; -_- __ _ _ * **

_* _ _

B. Determine if additional personnel should be.added.t~ the ---- __ *.

ERO BEFORE personnel are dismissed fromthesite;_

C. _Once initial accountability is. complete and EITHER: -

_* Second shift staffing" requirements have been identified OR *-__ .- _

--_-_ *-- there. are habitability concerns with the EEC or GSB (I PTC if * - *

- used) THEN consider releasing all non-essential personnel

- .. - from the site. * - - - --- *:* _ *-. --* - - -- --- *: ****- _ -- **-* -* _.- -** -_ . *

5.2 -Contact the Westchester County EOC ~nd inform them ofthe -

impending release of non-e.ssential personnel from the site_; ** **

all 5.3 * . Release non-essential personnel from the site by directing -

the LAO to contactthe EEC and GSB Assembly Areas and **:*

--- .. -* coordinate the release of personriel.frorn the site.,(Have LAO ..

- *_ --_contact IPTC if used.) * . ..

5.4 [lirect the Security Shift Supervisor/LAO to initiate security - a

sweep ofthe owner Controlled Area per IP-EP~240, Security; 5.5 . * .IF there has been .a radiQlogical.release of.a magnitude tliat:

_ ;iquires declaration of a SAE *or GE, THEN,-:* * .

-- -1*

. A .. Direct the Radiologicai"Assessment Coorcl.lnatorto have a

_ _ _ :raridom su*rvey of personal vehicles orisite* performed t<l :. -

deterriiine if they are contaminated * *

IPECSITE NON*QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-430 Revision 17

-- Hnlergy~, EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE Use Page 11 of 27 Attachment 9.1 Shift Manager (ED) Accountability/Personnel Relocation Checklist Sheet 5 of 5 Notes B. IF vehicles are found to be contaminated, THEN make arrangements for other vehicles to evacuate personnel from the site C. Direct Security to do a sweep of site areas inside the Owner Controlled Area and inform personnel to report to the Emergency Operation Facility (EOF).

D. Relocate personnel from EEC and GSB (IPTC if used) to the EOF to be checked for contamination prior to release.

IPECSITE NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-430 Revision 17

- bi1/ergy>J/, EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE Page ll of 27 Attachment 9.2 Lead Accountability Officer (LAO) Checklist Sheet 1 of 4 Notes 1.0 Personnel Assembly Upon notification of an Alert or higher emergency classification, or upon hearing the Site Assembly Alarm, perform the following actions:

A. VERIFY there are no alarms associated with any Accountability Card Readers. IF any Accountability Card Reader is in alarm, THEN notify the TSC and OSC and request manual accountability to be completed per Attachment 9.3, Manual Accountability and obtain copy of current visitor log.

B. Active Emergency Accountability in the ARINC security computer.

Select "Controls"

Select "Initiate Emergency"

Select "OK" to Activate Emergency Accountability.

Acknowledge Alarm by selecting clear C. VERIFY the phones and fax machines are functional.

D. ENSURE personnel staffing the EOF are pe_rmitted to exit the Protected Area without delay.

E. Contact the Assembly Area Coordinator in both the EEC and GSB (IPTC if used). Provide updates regarding personnel status, plant status and radiological conditions.

2.0 Perform Accountability NOTE:

Within 30 minutes of SAE or GE declaration OR Accountability being requested, the list of missing persons SHALL be communicated (faxed if a large list) to the Shift Manager (Control Room) if the TSC is NOT operational OR communicated (faxed if a large list) to the TSC Security Coordinator if the TSC IS operational.

A. At a Site Area Emergency or higher classification, or when accountability is called for, accountability will be performed by generating a report of individuals inside the protected area that are "Not in Account" within 30 minutes of the declaration of the event or when requested.

B. Use Checklist below to complete Accountability.

.IPECSITE NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-430 Revision 17 EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE

REFERENC"E USE

Page ll of 27 Attachment 9.2 .*

Lead Accountability Officer (LAO) Checklist *

Sheet26f4

Action Accountability Completed by (LAO):

. Com leted**

IF NOT already completed, THEN VERIFY there are no alarms associated with any Accountability Card Readers. IF any Accountability Card Reader is in alarm,*

THEN notify the TSC and OSC and request manual accountability to be *

completed per Attachment 9.3, Manual Accountability a*nd obtain copy of current visitor lo .. * * *

.Select "Controls" . .

*Select "Initiate Emergency" . . . * .* * * *

.*.**. * *Select "OK" to Activate Emergency Accountability.

Acknowled e Alarm b selectiri clear .

Record the time an SAE or GE wasdE3clared Q!tAccountability was requested. ** .* ( .*.*..* ') *... ,

V~~;o~~~-PAAF-03 and/or C/\M-PAAF:-02andobserveactivity for exiting .... *...*.. CJ.**~*-* .

l-'----------------'-------'-------------:-'-----'-'---,--------'---'-------'----'-1 ' ' ***.* ' ' ' ' ' '

When activity level atPAAF exit turnstiles has decreased, but no later than 15 *.*.* ** . ** * .

or minutes after an SAE GEwas declared ORAccoµntability was requ~ste<:l, ** * * * * * .*

GENERATE an "All Personnel Not in Account" re ort * ** * * * * * **** * *. * * * *. *

.Select"Reports" . . .

. Select Report Interface * *** . ** * *. ***

0

* * *

Select"Auto Reports" (double click) * * . .

. Select"Emergency Accountability" (double click) **********

Select rint icon . . .

Using the list, account for Security force members by crossing them off the list Theremainin names are considered to be missin ersons: . ..

IF there are any persons not accounted for hi the protected area, THEN communicate the names of missing persons (fax if a large list) to the TSC .

Security Coordinatofduring on-hours or the Shift Managers (Control Room) durin *off-hours. ** * * * *

Log the t,lme accountability is c6mpl~te ( )

Sus ens/on/Deactivation of Accountabillt When notified that accountability will be suspendedi deactivate emergency accountabilit in the ARINC s stem.*. *

Select :*controls"

Select "Initiate. Emergency' . .

Select "OK" to deactivate Emergency Accountability

. Acknowled e Alarm b selectin clear *

IPECSITE NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-430 Revision 17

EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING

PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE Page 14 of ll Attachment 9.2 Lead Accountability Officer (LAO) Checklist

Sheet 3 of 4 * *

. 3.0 Perform Search and Rescue for Missing Personnel ..

. * *.* A; Attempt to contact missing individuals via the f~Uowing

. methods in parallel: * * *

. 1. *Public Address System - If there ar~ severai individuals* .

missing use more than one call back number

. 2. Call assembly areas (EEC; GSB and IPTC) to see if*

individual is present * . .. .. . . *

*** 3. Call Emergency Response Facilities to see if individual is present . . .* . ..... * *. . ..

4; Review security records for individual's last known ** .

location .. * . *** *.. . .

. ** 5. Contact Supervisors and/or Co:-W6rk~rsfor individual;s .

last known locatio0 * .. .. . .. . ** . ... .

6. Try calling office and home phon~ numbers,. Telephone* .* .. *

numbers for all ERO* personnel are. iocated iri. the *

Emergency Telephone Directory: . .. * * * ** *

7. Run a new report of individuals within the P~otected Area and verify unaccounted for individuals have not left the *

.. .* Protected Area. . . . . . .. .. *.. . : ... . *** *

.. *. * * *. a.* JF the individual(s) isnot located*thr~ugh the above *.****

- methods, THEN determine the number of Search and a

. . . . Rescue teams needed to conduct. sea.rch the . . of

** Protected Area. Send securitYofficers tcdhe osc to be

dispatched, as parf of the team. *.

. *:. 1; Contact the EPM and request that the OSC dispatch **

Search and Rescue teams. * . .. . .

*

2.

Provide the names and last known location* of the missing **

. individuals> * . . ... . . .. .

3. INFORM the Emergency PlantManager (EPM)(via the TSC Security Coordinator) during on-hours or the Shift ** *

Managers (Control Room) during off-hours when/if the .

. missing person(s) has/have been found'.

IPECSITE NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-430 Revision 17 EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE Page 15 of 27 Attachment 9.2 Lead Accountability Officer (LAO) Checklist Sheet 4of 4 Notes 4.0 Release of Non-Essential Personnel Offslte 4.1 When directed by the EOF Technical Advisor or Emergency Director support the release of non-essential personnel from the Site:

A. Advise Security and the Assembly Area Coordinators of the impending release of non-essential personnel.

I B. Provide Security and the Assembly Area Coordinators route(s) to take when leaving the Site.

NOTE:

Personnel will be released based upon the decision and priorities of the Emergency Director. The Westchester County Emergency I Operations Center will be contacted and informed of the release of site personnel prior to commencing that activity, if at all possible.

4.2 Inform the EPM of the decision to release non-essential personnel to ensure that the TSC and OSC are staffed.

4.3 Coordinate the release of personnel with the Emergency Director.

I 4.4 Monitor the progress for the personnel released from the Station through communications with Security personnel at the Station exits.

4.5 Inform the Emergency Director when it is apparent that all released individuals have left the Site.

IPECSITE NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-430 Revision 17

-- l!i1l<!rgy~ EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE Page 16 of ll Attachment 9.3.

Manual Accountability Checklist Sheet 1 of 1 Notes The following steps SHALL be followed only if the Accountability Card readers are inoperable and manual accountability has been called for.

1.0 Assigned Facility Accountability Personnel or Designee:

1.1 Using Form EP-47, Accountability Roster, generate a list of individuals that are in your facility. Include any individuals that may be out in the field as long as their location is known. (i.e.,

repair and corrective action.team members).

1.2 Provide the list generated in section 1.1 to the LAO. This can be completed by either faxing (if 2 pages or less) or hand deliver the lists (if 3 or more pages) to assist the LAO in removing the names from the Onsite Accountability Report.

2.0 Lead Accountability Officer (LAO) 2.1 Print a report of all personnel'not in account from the ARINC system.

2.2 Obtain the Accountability Roster from each facility, when they are completed.

2.3 If the PAAF exit turnstiles are not working, obtain a list from*

Security of all personnel that have exited the protected area access facility (PAAF).

2.4 Using the report from step 2.1, account for all individuals that are provided on the Accountability Rosters from each facility and the PAAF (from step 2.3). If assistance is needed please inform OSC Manager.

2.5 Determine who is still on that list by name and accountability is completed.

2.6 Log the time accountability is complete 2.7 Return to Attachment 9.2, LAO Checklist and continue from step 3.0 to locate missing individuals.

IPECSITE NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-430 Revision 17

~ H11lergy1 _ EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE Page 17 of 27 Attachment 9.4 EOF Technical Advisor Checklist Sheet 1 of 5 J

Notes 1.0 Personnel Accountability:

1.1 Evaluate the need to release all Non- Essential Personnel and recommend release to ED if conditions warrant.

A. Check with the EPM on conditions within the Protected Area and the Radiological Assessment Coordinator on conditions outside the Protected Area.

8. Check with ICP for any security conditions.

ii C. Release of non-essential personnel should occur at an ALERT, if radiological plume direction does not preclude.

II I.

NOTE IF the emergency is classified as a Site Area Emergency or higher verify accountability is completed within 30 minutes of the declaration of the event. Authorize search & rescue for any missing persons. Consider having Security establish security controls for the EOF.

D. IF additional personnel are required to staff the EOF, THEN:

1. IF it is during normal working hours, THEN call or assign someone to call the Assembly Coordinator in the Energy Education Center or the Generation Support Building for additional personnel.

2. !Ethe needed Individuals are NOT available onsite, THEN call or assign someone to call individuals at home using the Emergency Telephone Directory.

E. If conditions exist at a Site Area Emergency OR General Emergency that could warrant release THEN cori$ider release of non-essential personnel from site.

IPECSITE.. **

NoN,-QUALITY RELATED* . *iP-EP-430. Revision 17

-- E11/ergy,;: EMERGENCY PLAN

PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE . REFERENCE USE : . Page . *.1! . of 27 .

Attachment 9.4 *

-* EOF Technical Advisor Checklist

. Sheet 2 of 5 *

Notes .

.. F~

Ensure:westchester EOC is notified vi~ the_ Offsite . *.

_*** Communicator.

... : . G/ Oi~cuss tfre release 0(11on-essential' personneLwith ,ICP and State Police to .verify there is no restriction for releasing personneL . -*. . .. .. . -.

1.2 *** Relocation of ttie EOF to* the AEOF A~* IF plantorradioio.gical conditions *warrar1t THEN _perform an:.

- .: organized rel<>cation_of _the EOf to t~e AEOF:;*> :> .

. 1. Discuss relocation With the:Radiological Assessm~rit.

. Coo.rdih~tor.... * - - . . ..... . . ..

2~ Discuss relocation:with the-lCP>:*. ,:_:_.: >*

.* **-3.. Cdnsider-*radiologic~I exposures listed hthe. .

_ Radiological.Assessment Coordinator checklist; actual i * * :-ar,dforecasted rrieteorologfoal condi~ion~/ '. >_ .* . ....

NOTE Relocation may be performed at rates below those listed in the Radiological Assessment Coordinator Checklist based on plant conditions and response needs.

. 8. !.E tinit\{pem,its THEN"tiave *a relief shift report°ic> th*e AEOF-

.. *_ . and perform tumover prior to evacuation of EOF. Have the *

.relief team tiegirt set up_ ofthe AEOF. Direct them* t<> set up *** *** *. -*

- - _the facility in ac_cordance with procedure IP-EP-:-251, 1

.Attachment 9A, AEOFSetup Checklist. -

. C. Determine the speed at which the relocation of personnel

should occur giving consideration to the following items: _-*

1 ( The. impact of immediate relocation vs. projects in*

progress.

2. Current radiological conditions within the EOF and the Plant.

3. Radiological conditions en route.

4: The adequacy of response from the alternate location ..

IPECSITE NON-QUALITY RELATED**. IP-EP~430 Revision 17 H11lergy,,_ EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE ..

Pag~ 19 of ll Attachment 9.4

. EOF Technical Advisor Checklist l Sheet3 of 5 .

. . . . . . ... . : *: ' .* Notes o: *Coordinator.determine With the assistance of the Radiological Assessment if contamination controls are

needed when leaving the EOF. ..

Items to. consider:

1: *Are personnel going to become contaminated.reaching their vehicles? **

_2. Are personnel going to become coritaminated in route to -

theAEOF? . ....

- 3: .What steps *ar~ needed t~ prevent contamination of the :.

AEOF? . . -* . . . . .. ..

-* 4'. **1Ftime allows THEN consid~r arranging for a bus to --

relocate personnel. (this will minimize movement of **

potentially contaminated vehicles outside the:

Emergency Planning Zone),

E~: Direct the Radiologicai Asse~sment: Coordinatorto:.****

1; Determine radiological controls needed to safely **_

transfer personnel to the AEOF'.. ..... .. ... . ..

2 . . Consider contamination control measures needed to

- *-. prevent contamination of AEOF. ' * .... **-* : * .*. * *- *

3. IF EOF Staff members are or will be potentially * ..

* *contaminated . . . .

THEN: * * .* : ** ** * *

a. Send personnel to the Westchester County Fire .* . ....... .

- - Training Center for monitoring and decontamination. _*'--

. * (Attachment 9.8 of this procedure contains directions ,

to the Fire Training Center;) . _ *.* . -** _ -.. ,.. ,. : .....

b.. Inform Westchester County of decision to have *

*. tridian:Point eRO members decontamin.ated at*

. J",raining* Ceriter and arrange for expeditious .

-. processing of personnel.: . . .* . .

4; . ,lndividua1s:*should be. decontam.lnated prior to:arriVai at AEOF; . . . . . .... *. *. . ....

I

IPEC SITE NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-430 Revision 17 EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE

~EFERENCE USE f'age 20 of. gz Attachment 9.4

. EOF Technical Advisor Checklist Sheet 4 of 5 J

Notes* *.

5. Transfer offsite radiological assessmentresponsibilities: * ** ***

a. To a qualified Radiological Assessment

. Coordinator located at the AEOF **

.. b; Back to the Control Room

. F.. Direct the EOF staff to relocate.to the AEOF a$ follows:

1. Make and distribute copies of Attachment 9.5 of procedure IP"'.EP-251, Directions to the AEOF, to EOF Staff members, Federal, State and Local

*****representatives in the EOF; as n~cess~ry; *.*. ... * .**

2.. Direct EOF Staff to wear their ID badges eriroute to the *.

.** .... AEOF c1nd show them* to authorities if. necessary to .*

transitthrough evacuated areas .... ** .. .. .. .. . ...

. 3.. IF it Was determined that confamination controls are .

. ne.eded. THEN brief EOF Staff members to go to ttie *.

Westchester Fire Training Center for decontamination ....

. * .*AND.inform the AEOF staff of the required* actions:

4. IF between7 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday thmugh Friday,* .

. . THEN responding emergency pt;rsonnel should enter ****

through.the main.entrance to 60 Merritt Blvd, Fishkill,*

. NY.,. . .

5. IF it is during non-working hours THEN responding emergency personnel should.enter **

through the si.de door.

IPECSITE NoN~QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-430 Revision 17

.. EMERGENCY PLAN . PROCEDURE.**.

. IMPLEMENTING *.

PROCEDURE . .*.

REFERENCE Use. . Page , 21 of 27

Attachment9.4 * *

. EOFTechnical Advisor Checklist.

.. Sheet 5 of 5

' .* G: IF communications systems are' still functional THEN '

notify the following locations that the EOF is being *

.** *** relocated to the AEOF: ** * * * ** * ** ** *

. 1. Offsite authorities verifying they have the

*.

telephone numbers they cart use to maintain

' ... .* communications. '' ' ' . . ' . ' .

2i The Joint .. . :

Information Center ** ...

3. The TachniCal SupportCenter **.*.

The.

Op~rcatior,al Support Center> *. ****.

- 5;* The Control Room< *

.* ***6: The Corporat8: Duty M~nager : *.**..

7:.ThelCP*** ..

H: C~orcHnate evacu~ti~n of the EOFwith.the ED c:1nd ****.*.

. th.e EPM, transferring E[) responsibilitie.s back to the Shift Manager if another ED cannot assume .

responsibilitiesiitthe AEOF; * *** ** *... .*. **********. *

- - R.~qu~st that the EPM and Shift Manager ~~~ounce.

' *the decision to evacuate and ensure relief shift is _** *

- ** made aw~re of re-locatiort' ** *** ** ** * * ** *

,Inform the Shift MariagJr, EPM and osc Ma hager of the relief time and direct fo. inform

- - - - ERO memb~rs priorto theirrelease; * . .

.* **2. **Have.theifstaffscoritac:t re.liefper~onnelwho.are.not

: ** curr8:.?~ly onsit~., * *** * * ** * ** * *

I' ,'

IPECSITE . NON-QUALITY RELATED . IP-EP*430 Revision 17

-- hi1lergyff EMERGENCY PLAN. PROCEDURE*

I IMPLEMENTING *

. PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE Page 22 *

of 27

. . .. Attachment 9:5

TSC Security Coordinator c*hecklist

Sheet 1 of 2 * *

Notes

. 1.0 . . Personnel Accountability: .

- A. The Lea9 Accountability Officer(LAO) will generate the*

list of missing persons. This list will be provided to tile

Emergency Plant Manager, Shift Manager, and/or TSC

. *Security Coordinator.

NOTE During plant shutdowns, when there may be large numbers of workers onsite and within the radiological control areas, a Radiation Protection computer printout may be used to assist in locating missing personnel within the radiological control area after accountability is completed .

.* 1. :IF there ~re indM~u~I~ who ~re missing Tl-l~N: '. * *.*

*****. (a) . Review Accountability Rosters (Form EP-47) used. to >

* .

identify ERO members experiencing difficulty using the

proximity card readers and remove them from the * *

Missing Persons List. * *: * ** ****** * * . *** * . . ** *

. (b) . Obtain the Radiatiorl Protection Computer Printout of

individuals within the Radiological Control Area. ..

- - - (c) ** Check off names of possible* missing individuals who* * ...

have left the Protected Are8 to narrow the list of actual

. *missing persons arid review RP computer printoutfor *

. . . any missing individuals within the Radiological Control 1 .**

- - Area.****. *** . . . ... . I

.(d). Inform the EPM immediately of any personnel . .. * .!.

. . . .. . . discovered missing during accountability process*; ***: * .

.*f :As:sist' OSC Staff iri maintaining accountability of all OSC. '.: *

per$Qnnel through the use of st~tus boards, team . . * : .

assignmen.ts,. Individual ExposureTtacking Log (Form EP~:::

6-J\LL) and E.Ro Tracking Log (Form EP:.42).

i.

~

";:'~' /1..i1Jergy.,

IPECSITE EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE NON-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-430 Revision 17 REFERENCE USE Page 23 of ll Attachment 9.5 TSC Security Coordinator Checklist Sheet 2 of 2 Notes 1.1 Maintain Continuing Accountability A. Use Onsite ERO Shift Rosters (Form EP-43) to list individuals currently on the first shift in the TSC and OSC.

B. Request EOF TA to identify the current EOF personnel.

C. Work with the EPM and OSC Manager to identify personnel to fill second shift and ensure all needed positions are identified and establish time second shift is to be called in.

D. Use ETD to identify and contact individuals to fill positions on second shift. Use additional staff to assist in notifications.

E. Inform the EPM and OSC Manager when notifications are completed.and if there are any problems filling required positions.

tllJA IPECSITE NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-430 Revision 17 l*i1ler.to,0 y,~:

IJ~~',I _.,

EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE Page 24 of n Attachment 9.6 OSC Manager Checklist Sheet 1 of 2 Notes 1.0 Initial Accountability CAUTION:

IF an emergency classification is entered due to a security condition, THEN evacuation and accountability may put personnel at risk. Therefore, in these situations, evacuation and accountability will be suspended until directed by Security and cleared through the Incident Commander.

A. IF the event has been classified as a Site Area Emergency or General Emergency AND initial accountability has not been performed THEN direct accountability to be performed in accordance with Section 2.3 of this checklist.

B. Verify that the following core staffing is available before declaring OSC staffed:

(a) OSC Manager C. Staff the OSC using Form EP-10-ALL, "Filling an ERO Vacancy During Facility Activation/Operation".

IF additional personnel are required THEN:

1. IF it is during normal working hours THEN call or assign someone to call the Assembly Area for needed personnel.

2. IF needed individuals are not available onsite THEN assign someone to call individuals at home using the Emergency Telephone Directory (ETD).

- 1/4~F

~

l1 o

_.. *"' (: 'bY1*

IPECSITE EMERGENCY PLAN NON-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-430 Revision 17 IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE Page 25 of 27 Attachment 9.6 OSC Manager Checklist Sheet 2 of 2 Notes D. Designate two individuals to act as Assembly Area Coordinators (AAC). Assign one to report to the Energy Education Center {EEC) the other one to the Generation Support Building (GSB) and have them follow guidance provided on the Assembly Area Coordinator Instructions (Form EP-45), if necessary.

E. IF addition personnel are onsite, THEN assess the need to staff the back-up assembly area at the Indian Point Training Center (IPTC). Designate an

individual to report to the IPTC and have them follow guidance provided on Assembly Area Coordinator Instructions (Form EP-45).

1. Inforrn other AACs that the I PTC is being utilized and to direct overflow of non-essentials to the IPTC.

2. IF additional personnel are required to meet staffing needs (Normal staffing per Form EP-43, or special requirements as needed) THEN call or assign someone to call the Assembly Areas or individuals at home (using the Emergency Telephone Directory) for additional personnel.

~Enlergycy, IPEC SITE EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING NaN-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-430 Revision 17 PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE Page 26 of 27 ATTACHMENT 9.7 IPEC Assembly Area & Relocation Routes Sheet 1 of 1 IND!AN POINT ENERGY CENTER

.4.1.J(RNA.T( ROzyrc .

R~Ql-li,o::. s~~.uMt-, 8orrh,i; R<tihtO~I?

\

IPECSITE NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-430 Revision 17 EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE Page 27 of lZ, Attachment 9.8 Directions to Westchester County Fire Training Center Sheet 1 of 1 Route 9 South to Route 9A South Take 9A South approximately 12 miles - past Westchester County Police Headquarters.

Stay on 9A to Dana Road (road past "Topps")

Make a LEFT onto Dana Road.

Fire Training Center is 2nd driveway on RIGHT.

IPEC IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE IP-SMM-AD-102 Rev: 17 PREPARATION, REVIEW, AND APPROVAL Page 35 of 43 ATTACHMENT 10.2 IPEC PROCEDURE REVIEW AND APPROVAL (Page 1 of 1)

Procedure

Title:

Meteorological, Radiological & Plant Data Acquisition System Procedure No. IP-EP-510 Existing Rev: 8 New Rev: 9 ORN/EC No: DRN-21-00130 Procedure Activitll Converted To IPEC, Replaces: Tem1;1oraot Procedure Change (MARK Applicable) (MARK Applicable)

D NEW PROCEDURE Unit 1 Procedure No. EDITORIAL Temporary Procedure Change GENERAL REVISION D ADVANCE Temporary Procedure Change

~ PARTIAL REVISION 0 EDITORIAL REVISION Unit 2 Procedure No: 0 CONDITIONAL Temporary Procedure Change 0 VOID PROCEDURE Terminating Condition:

SUPERSEDED Unit 3 Procedure No:

Document in Microsoft Word:

D RAPID REVISION D VOID DRNrTPC No(s):

0 Yes D No Revision Summaot N/A - see Revision Summary page. - Procedure was revised to reflect Post U3 Shutdown Eplan. See attached matrix for changes Implementation Requirements Implementation Plan? 0 Yes @ No Formal Training? D Yes ~No Special Handling? Yes IR!No Quality Related? D Yes 0 No If Yes, then ensure the procedure cover page is marked "Q RPO Dept: Emergency Planning Writer: (Print Name/ExtJSign):lR~et!;lbe~c~c;gaj\Milla:[rtli!inLx~7~1Q0§J6/~~ru~~~~:....-

Review and Approval (Per Attachment 1O.1, IPEC Review And Approval Requirements)

1. D Technical Reviewer: C,-4 ;. /*~ l'.1<6

2. Cross-Disciplinary Reviewers:

Dept: Reviewer:

Print Name/ Signature/ Date)

Dept: Reviewer:

3. 00 RPO- Responsibilities/Checklist:

{Print Name/ Signature/ Date)

PAD required and is complete (PAD Approver and Reviewer qualifications have been verified)

[&) Previous exclusion from further Ll-100 Review is still valid PAD not required due to type of change as defined in 4.6

4. D Non-Intent Determination Complete:

(Print Name/ Signature/ Date)

NQ change of purpose or scope NO change to less restrictive acceptance criteria NO reduction in the level of nuclear safety NO change to steps previously identified as commitment steps NO voiding or canceling of a procedure, unless requirem NQ deviation from the Quality Assurance Program Manual are incorporated into another procedure or the need fort liQ change that may result in deviations from Technical S ecifica procedure was eliminated FSAR, plant design requi n3/4/ ~

5. [El On-Shift Shift Manager/CRS: (RPO per SMM-AO-102)- Frank J. Mitchell/ /'/ ~

(Print Name/ Signature/ Date)

6. D User Validation: User:

7. O Special Handling Requirements Understood:

Print Name/ Signature/ Date)

Attachment 1 Page 1 of 2 10CFR50.54{Q (2) Review Procedure/Document Number: IP-EP-510 Revision: 9 Equipment/Facility/Other: Indian Point Energy Center

Title:

Meteorological, Radiological, & Plant Data Acquisition System Part I. Description of Activity Being Reviewed (event or action, or series of actions that have the potential to affect the emergency plan or have the potential to affect the implementation of the emergency plan):

Procedure was revised, to reflect the requirement in the Post Unit 3 Shutdown Eplan (PSEP), as submitted to the NRC per LAR, license #NL-19-001. See attached matrix for changes made. Procedure will be effective on May 17, 2021.

Part II. Emergency Plan Sections Reviewed (List all emergency plan sections that were reviewed for this activity by number and title. IF THE ACTIVITY IN ITS ENTIRETY IS AN EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE, EAL CHANGE OR EAL BASIS CHANGE, ENTER THE SCREENING PROCESS. NO 10CFR50.54(q)(2) DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED.

Part 1

Introduction:

Section A: Purpose Part 2 Planning Standards and Criteria:

Section A: Assignment of Responsibility Section B: Station Emergency Response Organization Section H: Emergency Facilities and Equipment Section I: Accident Assessment Section J: Protective Response

\

Part Ill. Ability to Maintain the Emergency Plan (Answer the following questions related to impact on the ability to maintain the emergency plan):

1. Do al_!l elements of the activity change information contained in the emergency plan {Section 3.0 Step 6)?

YES D NO 181 IF YES, enter screening process for that element

\

2. Do any elements of the activity change an emergency classification initiating Condition, Emergency Action level (EAL}, associated EAL note or associated EAL basis information or their underlying calculations or assumptions?

YES D NO 181 u= YES, enter screening process for that element

3. Do any elements of the activity change the process or capability for alerting and notifying the public as described in the FEMA-approved Alert and Notification System design report?

YES D NO 181 IF YES, enter screening process for that element

4. Do any elements of the activity change the Evacuation Time Estimate results or documentation?

YES D NO 181 IF YES, enter screening process for that element

5. Do any elements of the activity change the Onshift Staffing An-alysis results or documentation?

YES D NO 181 IF YES, enter screening process for that element EN-EP-3O5 ROOS

Attachment 1 Page 2 of 2 10CFR50.54(Q 1(2) Review ,£.'r.,

.... lf.V'.'.**

q Procedure/Document Number: IP-EP-510 Revision: -- ....

Equipment/Facility/Other: Indian Point Energy Center

Title:

Meteorological, Radiological, & Plant Data Acquisition System Part IV. Maintaining the Emergency Plan Conclusion The ques1ions in Part Ill do not represent the sum total of all conditions that may cause a change to or impact the ability to maintain the emergency plan. Originator and reviewer signatures in Part V document that a review of all elements of the proposed change have been considered for their impact on the ability to maintain the emergency plan and their potential to change the emergency plan.

1. Provide a brief conclusion that describes how the conditions as described in the emergency plan are maintained with this activity.

2. Check the box below when the 10CFR50.54(q)(2) review completes all actions for all elements of the activity- no 10CFR50.54(q)(3) screening or evaluation is required for any element. Otherwise, leave the checkbox blank.

[8:11 have completed a review of this activity in accordance with 10CFR50.54{q)(2} and determined that the effectiveness of the emergency plan is maintained. This activity does not make any changes to the emergency plan. No further actions are required to screen or evaluate this activity under 10CFR50.54(q)(3).

Per Post Shutdown* Emergency Plan (PSEP), both Unit 2 and Unit 3 will be at shut down. The changes made to this procedure (see attached matrix) reflects this requirement of the Post Unit 3 Shutdown Eplan, as submitted to the NRC (license# NL-19-001 ). The NRC has approved the PSEP per RA-20-040.

A review of this activity in accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(q)(2) has been completed and determined that the effectiveness of the PSEP is maintained. This revision aligns the procedure with the protocols of the post Unit 2 shutdown. None of the changes affect the ability to peliorm classifications, notifications, or PARs, it does not affect activation or staffing of the ERO, and all planning standard requirements are maintained. The changes made do not require a change to the Emergency Action Level scheme, On-shift Staffing study or the PSEP.

No further actions are required to screen or evaluate this activity under 10 CFR 50.54(q){3).

Part V. Signatures:

Preparer Name (Print) Date:

Rebecca A. Martin (Optional) Reviewer Name (Print)

~-~;:QJ~~'

Reviewer Signature 1017/2020 Date:

Reviewer Name (Print) Reviewer Signature Date:

Timothy Garvey Nuclear EP Project Manager 1~,h---y lb{\"),~

Approver Name (Print)

Frank Mitchell Emergency Planning Manager or deslgnee fe"tQ/4 D~/s4J I

EN-EP-305 ROOS

IP-EP-51 O Revision Decom X REVISION MATRIX

'>>.,. **""'--"'"'-*~,,w,~.v, *"

Change Page/Section Previous Version New Version Editorial Effect on 10 CFR 50.47{b)

No. Change Planning Standards or NU REG-0654 program elements? Justify if NO.

1. Page 3 Section 3.0 N N this section discusses Meteorological, Radiological &

Meteorological, Radiological & Plant definition of MRPDAS. Removed Plant Data Acquisition System Data Acquisition System (MRPDAS) - R25/26, VC Pressure and VC (MRPDAS) - system that system that provides meteorological, Temperature from examples provides meteorological, radiological and certain plant parameter since they will not be needed radiological and certain plant data i.e.: R-27 after post shut down. Definition parameter data i.e.: R-27, was not changed, Intent was not I R25/26, VC Pressure and VC changed.

Temoerature

2. Page 5 Section 5.1.2 5.1.2.1 EOF/AEOF: Call either Unit 3 or N N - this section discusses a 5.1.2.1 EOF/AEOF: Cail Unit 3 Unit 2 CR, identify yourself and ask for back-up method to the primary CR, identify yourself and ask for the 1Om met tower elevation wind speed, system to obtain 1Om MET data.

the 10m met tower elevation wind wind direction and Pasquill Category. No changes are made other than speed, wind direction and CCRs may not be readily available. if they try to contact Unit 2 or Unit Pasquill Category. Unit 2 CR may 3 CCR for data, they may not be also be called; however, they available with limit resources as may not be readily available.

per Post Shutdown Emergency Plan, which was approved by the NRC per RA-20-040.

3. Page 5 Section 5. 1.2 5.1.2.2 CR: Obtain data from MRPDAS N N - this section discusses a CR: Obtain data from MRPDAS using a personal computer {see 5.1.1.2) back-up method to the primary using a personal computer (see or call the other unit's Control Room for system to obtain 10m MET data.

5.1.1.2) or call the other unit's MET data. CCR may not be readily No changes are made other than Control Room for MET data. Unit available. if they try to contact the opposite 2 may not be readily available.

Unit for data, they may not be available with limit resources as per Post Shutdown Emergency Plan, which was approved by the NRC per RA-20-040.

Page 1 of1

Attachment 9.1 Emergency Planning Document Change Checklist Form (All sections must be completed, NIA or place a check on the line where applicable)

Section 1 Doc/Procedure Type:

Administr~,tiveQ___,_.~llJlplerr:ienting t8} EP,LAN ~ 0_,_

Doc/Procedure No: IP-EP-510 Doc/Procedure

Title:

Meteorological, Radiological & Plant Data Acquisition System

"'""-"""---=,* '"""---*""'" """*""'

New revision number: 9 Corrective Action: -Yes ~c, No N7A CR#: OL-OLl-2018-00090 CA 19 May 17, 2021 *-

Effective date:

Section 2 Change Description

1. Ensure the following are completed, or are not applicable and are so marked:

a. 50.54q t2J NIA

b. EN-FAP-OM-023 D N/Al8]

c. IP-SMM- AD-102 t2J N/AO

d. OSRC D N/A{gj

e. NRC Transmittal (within 30 days)

N/A [81

2. List any other documents affected by this change: NIA

3. Transmittals are completed: 18} NIA D Date:4/29/21

4. Ensure the proper revision is active in eB Ref. lib.; !81 NIA D

5. Approved doc/procedure delivered to Doc. Control for distribution: 18} N/A O Date: 4/29/21

6. Position Binders updated: (gJ N/A O Date: 4/29/21

7. Copy of EPDCC placed in EP file: 0 NIA O Date: 4/29/21

8. Supporting documentation is submitted as a general record in eB Ref. Lib.: 181 N/A O Date: 4/29/21

9. Word files are moved from working drafts folder to current revision folder in the EP drive:

0 N/A 181 Date: 5/17/21 Sheet 1 of 1

IPEC NON-QUALITY IP-EP-510 Revision 9 EMERGENCY PLAN

-- H11t,?rgy?C IMPLEMENTING RELATED PROCEDURE PROCEDURES REFERENCE Use Page 1 of 9 CONTROLLED Meteorological, Radiological

& Plant Data Acquisition System Prepared by: Rebecca A. Martin

<<e~et~(\~ '-th~\ a-,

Print Name Signature Date Approval: Frank J. Mitchell Print Name

,f{__f#~

Signature

& Date*

Effective Date: May 17, 2021 IP-EP-510(MRPDAS) Rev 9.doc

IPEC NoN..QUALITY IP-EP-510 Revision 9 EMERGENCY PLAN

~ l!..'11lergy~ iMPLEMENTlNG RELATED PROCEDURE PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 2 ot 9 Table of Contents 4.0 ReSPONSIBfLITIES...................................................., ............................................ 3 5.1 Obtaining Meteorological Data ..................................................................... 4 5.2 Obtaining Reuter Stokes and SelE!cted P!ant Parameter Data ..................... 5 8.0 REQUfREMENTS ANO COMM1TMENT CROSS-REFERENCE ............................ 6 9.0 ATTACHMENTS

9.1 Example

MRPDAS Meteorofoglcat Data Report ......................................... 7 9.2 Pasqum Category vs. Temperature Change Between 60m and 10m ........... s*

9.3 Estimation of Pasqum Category ................................................................... 9

IPEC NON-QUALITY IP-EP-510 Revision 9 EMERGENCY PLAN

-- J1.,'11J,1rgy. IMPLEMENTING RELATED PROCEDURE PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 3 of 9 Meteorological, Radiological & Plant Data Acquisition System 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 This procedure describes the methods available to obtain meteorological, Reuter Stokes and selected plant parameter data in the Control Rooms (CRs),

the Emergency Operating Facility (EOF) and/or the Alternate Emergency Operating Facility (AEOF).

2.0 REFERENCES

NONE 3.0 DEFINITIONS Meteorological, Radiological & Plant Data Acquisition System (MRPDAS) - system that provides meteorological, radiological and certain plant parameter data i.e.: R-27.

4.0 RESPONSIBILITIES The Unit 2 and Unit 3 Control Room, and the EOF Radiological Assessors are responsible for the implementation of this procedure.

IPEC NON-QUALITY IP-EP-510 Revision 9 EMERGENCY PLAN

- l!'nlergy., IMPLEMENTING RELATED PROCEDURE PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 4 of 9 5.0 DETAILS

5.1 Obtaining Meteorological Data:

5.1.1

Primary Methods:

5.1.1.1 Control Room (CR}:

a.. Usethe 10m elevation meteorological tower display.

panel to obtain wind speed, wind direction and Pasquill Category; .* *

5.1.1.2 Emergency Operations Facility{EOF}/Alternate EOF(AEOF): * * *

a. Use MRPDAS to access the information-from the 10m met tower elevation -wind speed, wind direction *.

and Pasquill Category. * * * *

b.

From the IPEC SharepointVVebsite, pulldol/\tn the Applications menu. . . .

c; ,. Click.the MRPDAS:icont6accessthe MRPDAS : *. ', .**. *.* *., * . *

. program (Plant screen appears)..*. * .* .

. *. d.

Selectone of.the following from left_colurnn under **

.* **_** "Entergy IPEC": "Drill Data. or"Live Data".

' e. Select - "Common" - "Meteorological Data"

Select - "Primary MET Display" *

f ..... Read the reports from the display; or click the printer * ..

. icon displayed in the top left corner of the Primary .

MET Display screen. Ciick "Print" button in the "Print"*

window.

g.

Obtain the latestmeasured METdata every 15 min. ***

and obtain: weather forecast from MRPDAS and/or-~ ..

Weather Bureau.

1.. Update the.MET Data Status Board to display.

- . -. the correct data; ..

. 2. .. Notify the Radiological Assessment Coordinator Of any significant changes to the MET data..

h;

n, exit MRPDAS; click on the x on the browser. I, . .

IPEC NON-QUALITY IP-EP-510 Revision 9 EMERGENCY PLAN RELATED PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page* 5 of 9 5.1.2 _ Back-up methods:

5.1.2.1 EOF/AEOF: can either Unit 3 or Unit 2 CR, identify yourself ...

and ask for the 10m met tower elevation wind speed, wind **

direction and Pasquill Category. CCRs may not be readily _ J available.** * * *

_ 5. t.2.2 CR: Obtain data from MRPDAS using a personal computer

- (see.5.1.1.2) or call the other unit's Control Room for MET*

. data. CCRmay not be readily avai_lable.. * *

I

- _-- 5.1.2;3 - Obtain data from Offsite Weather Services a;. Use th~ Emergency Telephone .Directory to locate the ...

-* offsite weather services phone numbers: . * *

. .*. b.. AccuWeather - u~e .personal computer to log on to . .

.. offsite weather services web. Select AccuWE!ather: *_* -* *-* *

www .accLiweather;com .and enter "Buchanan, NY" or * *

-*1110511" in Search Bar and click "ENTER"~ - .

. c. ** National Weather Service (NvVS) - select Nationa( - .

Weather Service: - www.weather.gov * .* and -.- en~er .

"Buchanan, NYI' or"10511" for "Local Forecast, City; *-. *..

. St". Clickl'GO'\ - . .. - .

-*

s: 1.2.4 *_ Use Attachment 9.2 to estimate Pasquill .Category by using_

the temperature change between 60 m and_ 1O m; * * * *

. 5.1.2.5 Use Attachment 9.3 to. estimate Pas.quill categories based .

. on weather conditions Jn case the met* tower data *. is

unavailable. : *.

5.2 Obtaininq Reuter Stokes and Selected Plarit Parameter Data *.

.. 5.2~ 1 _From the: IPEC Sharepoint Website:,

pull down the Applications menu;_

.: 5:2.2 iDouble-cli~k the MRPOA$ icon to access the MRPDAS prog:ram(Plarit *: * .*.

:

screen appears). * *

5.2.i Select.one of the following-from left column under "Entergy IPEC": *iDriH

: Data" or ~Live Data". * * * ** ** * * ** *

5.2A Select ."Common".

5.2.5 . Select "Reuter .

Stokes D~tai*

and "5 Mile Radius Map".

IPEC NON*QUALITY IP-EP-510 Revision 9 EMERGENCY PLAN

"=-- l!.i,tergy., IMPLEMENTING RELATED PROCEDURE PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 6 of 9 5.2.6 Select "Data Summary Report" (see Attachment 9.1 for example report) under "Common" or other Plant Parameter reports under "Unit 2" or "Unit 3".

6.0 INTERFACES IP-EP-310, Dose Assessment.

7.0 RECORDS NONE 8.0 REQUIREMENTS AND COMMITMENT CROSS-REFERENCE NONE 9.0 ATTACHMENTS

9.1 EXAMPLE

MRPDAS METEOROLOGICAL DATA REPORT 9.2 PASQUILL CATEGORY VS TEMPERATURE CHANGE BETWEEN 60m AND10m 9.3 ESTIMATION OF PASQUILL CATEGORY

IPEC NON-QUALITY IP-EP-510 Revision 9 EMERGENCY PLAN

l!..i1lergy,. IMPLEMENTING RELATED PROCEDURE PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 7 of 9 Attachment 9.1 EXAMPLE: MRPDAS METEOROLOGICAL DATA REPORT Sheet 1 of 1 NOTE:

All "9s" in a data field indicates the data was not collected.

- - DAILY

SUMMARY

REPORT***

"** DATE: 05/29/2002 07:10 **"

TIME "** MET TOWER DATA (M/S,DEG FROM,F) ***

HRMN (EST) SPD10M SPD60M DIR10M DIR60M DT60 DT122 PC 0700 2.2 3.3 2 15 -1.2 -2.1 D

- - UNIT #2 PLANT PARAMETER DATA*-*

vc vc vc vc vc VENT P948A P948B T1203 R-25 R-26 R-27

{PSIG) (PSIG) (F) (R/HR} (R/HR) (UCI/SEC}

-.2 .0 1.02E+02 <=1.00E+OO <=1.00E+00 2.53E+02

0 UNIT #3 PLANT PARAMETER DATA-**

CONT CONT DOME RAD VENT (PSIG} (F) (R/HR) (UCI/SEC) 94 <=1.0E+00 1.0E+01

- - ATMOSPHERIC DISPERSION***

SITE BOUNDARY DIST= .6 MILES 2 MILES 5 MILES 10 MILES XU/Q XU/Q XU/Q XU/Q

{1/M2) (1/M2) (1/M2) (1/M2) 1.0E-04 1.9E-05 5.1E-06 2.1E-06

.... OFFSITE MONITOR DATA *.,.

MON NO 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 SECTOR N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE RAD{MR/HR) 3.4E-03 6.9E-03 6.BE-03 7.0E-03 6.3E-03 7.3E-03 7.9E-03 7.4E-03 MON NO 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 SECTOR s SSW SW WSW w WNW NW NNW RAD(MRHR) 8.SE-03 6.0E-03 5.9E-03 8.5E-03 1.1E-02 6.5E-03 7 .0E-03 8.4E-03

- - METEOROLOGICAL FORECAST tt*

HOUR SPEED(MPH) DIRECTION (FROM) RAIN STABILITY 17 0 5.8 130 YES

*-D 180 4.9 50 YES D 190 4.5 30 YES 0 20 0 4.0 0 YES D 21 0 3.6 350 NO D 22 0 3.6 340 NO 0

IPEC NON-QUALITY IP-EP-510 Revision 9 EMERGENCY PLAN RELATED PROCEDURE

-- l!.'ult!fBY,,, IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE Use Page 8 of 9 Attachment 9.2 PASQUILL CATEGORY

~

TEMPERATURE CHANGE BETWEEN 60m AND 10m Sheet 1 of 1 PASQUILL TEMPERATURE CATEGORY CHANGE (OF)

A <-1.74

B .:.1.14 to <-1.56 C -1.56 to< -1.37 D -1.37 to <-0.46 E -0.46 to <+1.37 F +1.37 to ~+3.66 G >+3.66

IPEC NON-QUALITY IP-EP-510 Revision 9 EMERGENCY PLAN

-- l~i,lerg~. IMPLEMENTING RELATED PROCEDURE PROCEDURES -

REFERENCE USE Page 9 of 9 Attachment 9.3 ESTIMATION OF PASQUILL CATEGORY Sheet 1 of 1 Use this attachment to determine the Pasquill Category in the absence of both measured vertical temperature differences AND the standard deviation (sigma theta) for horizontal wind direction. _

DEFINITION OF PASQUILL STABILITY CATEGORY PASQUILL CATEGORY STABILITY CONDITIONS A Extremely unstable B Moderately unstable c* Slightly unstable D Neutral E Slightly stable F Moderately stable ij G Extremely stable L.

Pasquill category can be estimated by observing or estimating the time of day, solar radiation, cloudiness, and wind speed.

KEY TO STABILITY CATEGORIES Surface Wind DAYTIME NIGHT Speed (m/s)

Incoming Solar Radiation Cloudiness (lnsolatlon)

Thinly Clear Partly Overcast Clear to Overcast or Sky Cloudy Partly Cloudy

>4/8 Low Cloud

<2 A A-8 B E-F G 2-3 A-8 B C E F 4-5 B B~C C D E 5-6 C C-D D D D

>6 C D D D D General Definitions

1. Daytime is considered as one hour after sunrise to one hour before sunset.

2. (a) Clear sky less than 20 percent cloud cover.

(b) Partly cloudy - 20 to 80 percent cloud cover.

(c) Overcast - 80 to 100 percent cloud cover.

ML21144A106

Text

Title:

Title:

Introduction:

Title:

Title:

2.0 REFERENCES

Title:

Title:

Title:

Title:

Title:

2.0 REFERENCES

Title:

Title:

Introduction:

Title:

Title:

2.0 REFERENCES

2.0 REFERENCES

Title:

Title:

Title:

Title:

Title:

Title:

Introduction:

Title:

Title:

9.1 Example

2.0 REFERENCES

9.1 EXAMPLE

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

Search