ML20235B785

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests Formal Clarification from Containment Sys Branch Re Provisions to 10CFR50,App J.Info Re Clear Definition of What Constitutes Failure Per Provisions of App J Requested by 820106
ML20235B785
Person / Time
Issue date: 12/29/1981
From: Sniezek J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
To: Mattson R
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML16342B348 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-87-121 NUDOCS 8707090198
Download: ML20235B785 (1)


Text

.

1 i;;-

.e.-

. y-

~

DISTRIBUTION IE Files

.IE Rdg Files

.DEC 2 9 8j GJGallagher Rdg Files RRRI Rdg Files RES Rdg Files f,.

^

{J.

, J; 2

.a MEMORANDUM FOR: Roger J. Mattson, Director, Division of Systens Integration, NRR

.c-

. :: ' ? $. a...

+

U

. v v.. '.

J

~ -

ames H. Sniczek, Director, Division of Resident and Regional.

5d{

.., FROM: "..'Ef(i. :

)l Reactor Inspectioix, IE g. :

. 4;,.

i

'e SUBJECTS? -

REQUEST FOR CUJtIFICATION OF PROVISIONS TO 10 CFR 50,.,. "

[-N 5.* * ~.25 APpEHDIX.J.n.:...;3.:fn :

. Lt H yl. %.,.,. t..:i ; y. g. p :b... g G.

D

%.-p-

.vw. -

y....

?

.,M;.y.. y.~ ~ s. 5

~..

- m, e,

m.

.,...,......w.

. ~,....,,

.< @ ;Q :.;%:v.W.;;.J:W #,:.3.r'~ m.; ;8.;G : " - p.+ y n: M.

c' : '.. %*. ;. -

'g-

e. ~

Meetings were held during December 8-10, 1981 to discuss the resolution

. cf a nu:aber of long outstanding action itecs regarding contafrnent integrated Icak rate testing (CILRT). Representatives fro:s Contairraent Systems Branch

-(CSD), the regional offices and Research were present. A detailed sumary

~

.of the results is presently being prepared.

r.

One its, that requires an icraediate clarification, is a clear definition A. of what constitutes a failure per the propistons of Appendix J.-

q.,

3

+-

9.. s, 7.:.,,,;.

..u...

Based on'information provided by the. regional inspectors it has been the

$ practice of certain licensee's to perform type "B" and type "C" local leak-/. '.

Wrate tests, identify the leakage paths, correct the leak to acceptable limits *k.

' / -

~.'but not_ add the leakage "as found" minus "as left" to the overall type "A" CILRT i. quantity. This?.provides a

..cnd,bc.ing rc:;uirec to perfomeans to._thei. licensee to avoid a test failure

. m subsegicnti._CILET_'.s_:r. crc fmquently.

i..

'CSB representatives at the meeting provided their ' understanding of the provisions of Appendix J; that is, the "as found" minus "as left" local leakage quantity is'

~.

of significance and should be added to the overall. CILRT quantity and cc:tpared to the allowable limits. We agree with this position.-

s J~-

9

~,, ; y-We are now requesting a formal clarification from CSB to provide guidance

-l to the regional. inspectors. A number of facilities will be performing the test'in January and in the spring of 1982.

~

We request this information to be provided by January 6,1982. This ratter has been previously discussed with Messrs. W. Butler, J. Shepaker and J. Huang of your staff.

If you have arty questions on this matter, please contact Gene Gallagher of any staff..

~

.L.

~

James H. Snfezek, Director Division of Resident and Regional IE:RRRI:D B70709019s 870701 Reactor Inspection PDR FOIA JHSnierek WILLI AMB7--121 PDR Office of Inspection and Enforeteent jpj jgj l

-CONTACT:

E. J. Callagher, IE IE:ES IE:ES:SC IE: REB:C IE:RRRI:DD A9-24792 EJGallacher:rk-AUDromerick RLBaer FLJordan j