ML20203P575

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Radiological Environ Monitoring Program,1985 Annual Rept
ML20203P575
Person / Time
Site: Susquehanna  Talen Energy icon.png
Issue date: 12/31/1985
From:
TELEDYNE ISOTOPES
To:
Shared Package
ML17146A364 List:
References
NUDOCS 8605070482
Download: ML20203P575 (138)


Text

.

DOCKET No.: 50-387 l 50-388 l l l SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION  !

i

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM UNITS 1 AND 2 4 1985 ANNUAL REPORT FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE No. NPF-14 AND 22 PREPARED FOR PENNSYLVANIA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY i

BY l

TELEDYNE lSOTOPES 50 VAN BUREN AVENUE i

WESTWOOD, NEW JERSEY 07675 1

APRll 1986 l

"elF1888R8e8888s7 R PDR

(:

t- Docket-No.: 50-387 50-388 i

i l

T l SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION I

Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program

) Units 1 and 2-

-1 1985 ANNUAL REPORT L

i.

3 FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE No. NPF-14 AND 22 Prepared for a .

PENNSYLVANIA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY i

+

By l

i TELEDYNE IS0 TOPES i 50 Van Buren Avenue Westwood, New Jersey 07675 i

(

i April 1986 l

l

( l I

g

TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Page I. Introduction I-l A. Site and Station Description I-l B. Objectives and Overview of the I-2 Susquehanna SES Monitoring Program II. Program Description 11-1 III. Sampling Methods and Procedures III-l

! A. Direct Radiation III-l B. Surface Water III-2 C. Drinking Water III-2 D. Algae III-3 E. Fish III-4 F. Shoreline Sediment III-4 G. Ground (Well) Water III-4 H. Airborne Particulates/ Air Iodine-131/

Precipitation III-5 I. Milk / Pasture Grass III-6 J. Vegetation, Top and Bottom Soil III-6 K. Food Products-Fruits, Vegetables and Honey, Game, Poultry and Eggs III-7 IV. Summary and Discussion of 1985 IV-1 Analytical Results A. Direct Radiation IV-2 B. Surface Water IV-3 C. Drinking Water IV-5 D. Algae IV-6 E. Fish IV-8 F. Shoreline Sediment IV-9 G. Ground (Well) Water IV-11 H. Air Particulates/ Air Iodine-131/

Precipitation IV-12 I. Milk / Pasture Grass IV-14 J. Vegetation, Top and Bottom Soil IV-15 K. Food Products-Fruits, Vegetables and Honey,

, Game, Poultry and Eggs .

IV-17 l L. Calculated Dose to the Maximally Exposed l Individual-Surf ace Water, Sediment IV-19

[

i

l l

l TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont.)

Section Title g V. Deviations from the Program- V-1 VI. Program Changes VI-l VII. Land Use Census VII VIII.- Conclusions VIII-1 IX. Summary Table IX-1 X. References X-1

~

XI. Data Tables XI-l XII. Trending Figures XII-1 Appendix A. USEPA Intercomparison Program Results~ A Appendix B. Summary of Analytical Methods. B-1 Appendix C Data Reporting Conventions C-1 ii

LIST OF TABLES i

Table Numbers Title. Page 1 Annual Analytical Schedule for the Susquehanna SES Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program 1985 11-2 i

2 Sample Locations and Media for the Susquehanna SES Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program 1985 11-5

^

3 Summary of Data for the SSES Operational Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program 1985 IX-1 4 Nearest Gardens, Residences and Dairy Animals in each of the 16 Meteorological Sectors within a 5-Mile Radius of the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station,1985 VII-2 5 Direct Radiation - Thermoluminescent Dosimetry Results XI-l J

6 Gross Alpha, Gross Beta, Tritium, Iodine-131 and Gamma Spectrometry of Water (Surf ace and Drinking) XI-4 7 Gamma Spectrometry of Algae XI-9 8 Gross Beta and Gamma Spectrometry of Fish XI-10

, 9 Gross Alpha, Gross Beta and Gamma Spectrometry of Shoreline Sediment XI-ll 10 Gross Alpha, Gross Beta, Tritium and Gamma Spectrometry l in Ground (Well) Water XI-12 11 Analytical Data for Air Particulate Filters and Charcoal Cartridges XI-15 l 12 Gross Alpha and Gamma Spectrometry of Composited 1 Air Particulates XI-17 l

13 Gross Alpha, Gross Beta, Tritium and Gamma Spectrometry in Precipitation XI-19 iii

- . _ . . - .. ,- , . ~ . . _ . ,. - - -

LIST OF TABLES Table Numbers Title Page 14 Gross Beta Minus-K40, Iodine-131 and Gamma Spectrometry of Milk XI-20 15 Gamma Spectrometry of Pasture Grass XI-24 16 Gamma Spectrometry of Soil and Vegetation XI-25 17 Gamma Spectrometry of Food Products (Fruits, Vegetables and Honey) XI-26 18 Gamma Spectrometry of Game, Poultry and Eggs XI-28 19 Typical Lower Limits of Detection of Nuclides Searched for but not found by Gamma Spectrometry in the Vicinity of Susqubhanna Steam Electric,1985 XI-29 iv

t LIST OF FIGURES

( Figure Numbers TITLE Page l-1 On-Site Environmental Sampling 11-11

. Locations-Susquehanna SES 1

-2 Off-Site Environmental Sampling 11-12 Locations-Susquehanna SES t T 3 Average Ambient Radiation Levels in the XII-1 Vicinity of the Susquehanna SES -

1973 through 1985 4 Gross Beta Activity in Air Particulates' XII-2 in the Vicinity of the Susquehanna SES - 1985 i

3 5 Gross Beta Activity in Air Particulates in XII-3 l the Vicinity of the Susquehanna SES - _

1973 through 1985 6 Average Concentrations of Tritium in XII-4 Surface Water in the Vicinity of the Susquehanna SES - 1973 through 1985 i

i i

v

. _ _ , . , . - -_ . _. .-.. . _ . _ _ _ _ - , , , . _ . , , _ . . . . _ , , , . . . _ _ . . ~ . . . . . . , , , _ . . ,

i l

1. INTRODUCTION i

t 1

I l

I. INTRODUCTION The preoperational radiological environmental monitoring program-

(REMP) for Pennsylvania Power and Light Company (PP&L) at the Susquehanna ,

Steam Electric Station (SSES) was conducted from April 1972 to September 1982. On September 10, 1982, Unit #1 became critical, thereby initating the'.

l operational phase of the program. The preoperational phase of the program, as well as the initial phase of the operational program (September 10, 1982 through June 1983) was conducted by Radiation Management Corporation (RMC).

NUS Corporation conducted the REMP from June 1983 until August 1984 when [

i Teledyne Isotopes (TI) took over the operational-REMP. The analytical j program is now being conducted by Teledyne Isotopes under contract ~with

! Pennsylvania Power and Light Company. The sample collection portion of the program was conducted by Ichthyological Associates until June 1985 when l Ecology III assumed responsibility at the Susquehanna SES Biological Labora-

. tory essentially utilizing the same staff.

l This report covers the period January 02, 1985 through-January 07,-

1986. Teledyne Isotopes performed all the analyses including the Quality Control and the Quality Assurance Program. Data from programs conducted in -

prior years have been presented in a series of annual reports. (1-13, 21) l A. Site and Station Description Susquehanna SES contains 2 BWR generating units, each with a-capacity of about 1050 MWe. Unit'#1 achieved initial criticality on September 10, 1982. Unit #2 achieved initial criticality on May 8,--1984. The site'is located on an approximately 1300 acre tract along the Susquehanna River,-five miles northeast of Berwick in Salem Township, Luzerne County, Pennsylvania. -

I-1

. . = - . - - - - . - _ - - . ~ . . . . . . . . - . - - , - - - -- , - , , , - - - - .. = ., .:

f ,

i F

f The area surrounding the' site can generally be characterized as rural, I

with forest and agric'ultural lands predominating. More specific information on the demography, hydrology, meteorology and land use characteristics of the local area may be found in the Environmental Report (14), the Final Safety Analysis Report (15) and the Final Environmental Statement (16) i

)

l

~l for Susquehanna SES.

l

8. Objectives and Overview of Susquehanna SES Monitoring Program i

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC) regulations require that nuclear power plants be designed, constructed, and operated to keep i

levels of radioactive material in effluents to unrestricted areas as low as

! reasonably achievable ( ALARA) (10 CFR 50.34 and 10 CFR 20.1c). To ensure that these criteria are met' each license authorizing reactor operation includes technical specifications (10CFR 50.36a) governing the release of 1

radioactive effluents.

In-plant monitoring will be used to ensure that these predetermined release limits are not exceeded. However, as a precaution against unexpected and undefined processes which might. allow undue accumulation of radioactivity i

in any sector of man's environment, a program for monitoring the plant environs is also included in the Susquehanna technical specifications. -

! (  ;

{ The ' regulations governing the quantities of radioactivity in reactor effluents allow nuclear power plants to contribute, at most, only a few percent increase above normal background radioactivity. Background levels at any one location are not constant but vary with time as they are influenced

~

4 by external events such as cosmic ray bombardment, weapons test' fallout, and '

1

. I-2 L .;

.L seasonal variations. These levels also can vary spatially within'relatively ,

short distances reflecting variations in geological composition and other l factors. Because of these spatial and temporal variations, the radiological i

surveys of the plant environs are divided into preoperational and operational ,

phases. The preoperational phase of the program of sampling and measuring radioactivity in various media permits a characterization of the radiation levels and concentrations prevailing prior to plant operation along with an s indication of the degree of natural variation to be expected. The opera-tional phase of the program obtains data which, when considered along with the data obtained in the preoperational phase, assist in the evaluation

\

of the radiological impact of plant operation.

The objectives of the operational Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program are: j

1. To identify, measure and evaluate existing radionuclides in the environs of the Susquehanna SES site and fluctuations in radioactivity levels which may occur. ,
2. To determine whether any significant increase occurs in the' -

concentration of radionuclides in critical pathways. ."e r .

3. To detect changes in ambient radiation levels. "
4. ,To verify that Susquehanna SES operations have no detrimental effects on the health and safety of the public or on the environment.
5. To fulfill the obligaties f the Radiological Environmental Monitoring section or nie t chnical specifications for Susquehanna SES.

Sampling locations were selected on the basis of local ecology, meteor-ology, physical characteristics of the region, and demographic and land use features of the site vicinity. The REMP was designed on the basis of the '

6 USNRC Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position on radiological s ,

? .

=

I-3 '

a:

si

,r-- - - , . _

. _ , _.. - _ c . . . ~ . . . - . - ._ . . . . -

A F

environmental monitoring as revised in Revision 1, November 1979.(17)

PP&L expanded the basic program to aid in the characterization of area radiation levels and Susquehanna SES impact.

In 1985 the radiological monitoring program included the measurement of ambient gamma radiation by thermoluminescent dosimetry;.the determination of gamma emitter.9, gross alpha, and gross beta in' shoreline sediments; the determination of gamma emitters and gross beta in fish; the determination of

,,,,,- gross beta, gross alpha,'and gamma emitters in airborne particulates; the measurement of airborne iodinc-131; the measurement of gross beta, gross alpha, gamma emitters, iodine-131, and tritium in water; the measurement of i -

k gross beta, gross alpha, gamma emitters, and tritium in precipitation; the measurement of iodine-131, gross beta minus potassium-40 and gamma emitters in cow milk and iodine-131 in goat milk; the determination of gamma emitters in game, poultry, eggs, and various fruits and vegetables; the determination of gamma emitters in algne; the determination of gamma emitters in pasture l

\

, grass; and, the determination of gamma emitters in soil and vegetation.

I i

, u.'

l I-4 I

,-. . " ,4 _ ., .. , .- _ ., . , , , . , - - . ,,, ._ ~-

II. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION II. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION One-hundred and thirty-nine (139) locations were included in the Susquehanna SES monitoring program for 1985. Environmental sampling locations were divided into two classes, indicator and control. Indicator samples I

i are those collected at locations which are expected to manifest station effects, if any exist, and were selected on the basis of distance from the site, topography, hydrology, meteorology, demography, and drainage charac-teristica. Control samples are collected at locations which are believed will be unaffected by station operation. These provide a bacis on which to evaluate fluctuations in radioactivity at indicator locatiors in relation to natural phenomena and fallout. The number and locations of monitoring points were determined by considering the locations where the highest off-site environmental concentrations have been predicted from plant effluent source terms, site hydrology, and site meteorological conditions. Other factors considered were applicable regulations, population distribution, ease of access to sampling stations, security and future program integrity.

The operational environmental radiological program for Susquehanna SES is summarized in Table 1. Table 2 describes sample locations, associated

media, and approximate distance and direction from the site. Figures 1 and 2 i

illustrate the locations of sampling stations relative to Susquehanna SES.

In addition to the described analytical program, a milk animal, vege-table garden, and residence survey was performed in 1985. This survey located the nearest milk animal, garden and residence in each sector (out to 5 miles) and will be updated annually. These land use parameters are used in the assessment of potential radiological doses to individuals.and populations of the stated regions.

II-1

_ . _ _ - - , _ . _ , _ __. - , . . - . . - , . ._ _ _, _ ~ _

TABLE 1 (Page 1 of 3)

Annual Analytical Schedule for the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station (PP&L)

Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - 1985 No. of Sample Analysis Media Locations Freq. (1 ) Required Anal. Freq.(2)

Airborne 11 W Gross Beta (3) W Particulates Gross Alpha QC (AP) Gamma Spec QC Airborne 11 W I-131 W Iodine (C)

Sediment 6 SA Gross Alpha SA (SH) Gross Beta SA Gamma Spec SA Fish 3 SA Gross Beta- SA (FI) Gamma Spec SA (on edible' portion)

Surfa e 9 MC or M Gross Alpha M Waterl4) Gross Beta M (WT) I-131 M Gamma Spec M Tritium M r

Well (ground) Water 8 M Gross Alpha M (WG) Gross Beta M.

Gamma Spec M Tritium M e

Drink {ng 2 MC Gross Alpha M Water 51 Gross Beta M'

, (PW) I-131 M Gamma Spec .M Tritium 'M Rain Nater 10 QC Gross Alpha Q (WP) Gross Beta Q Gamma Spec Q r Tritium Q Note: See footnotes at end of table.

II-2

.- u -- -m-. .o-- ,, , . , .y-.- - , ,wv. i=

TABLE 1 (Page 2 of 3)

Annual Analytical Schedule for the

( Susquehanna Steam Electric Station (PP&L) i Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - 1985 No. of Sample Analysis Media Locations Freq. (1 ) Required Anal. Freq.(2)

Cow Milk 8 M or SM(6) Gross Beta-K-40 SM or M (M) I-131 SM or M i Gamma Spec SM or M Goat Milk (7) 1 Q I-131 Q (M)

Food Products 6 A Gamma Spec A 4 (FD,FL,FV,FP,FR)

Various Fruits and Vegetables Game 5 A Gamma Spec A (AG,AS,AW,AN)

Meat, Poultry, 2 A Gamma Spec A and Eggs i (ME,PO,E)

I l Pasture Grass (8) 2 M Gamma Spec M j (FM)

Soil 10 A Gamma Spec A (S)

I Vegetation 10 A Gamma Spec A (VT)

Direct 66-73 Q TLD Q Radiation (TQ)

Algae 6 M Gamma Spec SM,M or BM (VA)

Note: See footnotes at end of table.

II-3

TABLE 1 (Page 3 of 3)

Annual Analytical Schedule for the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station (PP&L)

Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - 1985

1. W = weekly, M = monthly, SM = semi-monthly, Q = quarterly, QC = quarterly composite, SA = semi-annual, A = annual, MC = monthly composite.
2. Codes are the same as for sample frequency.
3. If the gross beta activity is greater than 10 (ten) times the yearly mean of the control sample, gamma analysis should be performed on the individual filter. Perform the gross beta analysis 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> or more following filter change to allow for radon and thoron daughter decay.
4. Stations 656 and 657 are sampled weekly to assure automatic composite sampler operation which is time proportional. Stations 555 and 655 are grab sampled weekly. Individual composites of the weekly samples are made on a monthly basis (MC) and analyzed.
5. Stations 12H2 RAW and 12H2 TREATED are sampled weekly. Individual composites of the weekly samples are made on a monthly basis (MC) and analyzed. 12H2 Raw is a time proportional automatic composite sampler.

12H2 Treated is a daily grab sample.

6. Stations 12B2, SE1, 13E3 and 10G1 are analyzed semi-monthly from April through October.
7. Goat milk at station 8D1 j if available yis analyzed quarterly for I-131 only.
8. Pasture grass is sampled and analyzed for gamma at station 801 during the quarters goat milk is not available.

II-4

Table 2 (Page 1 of 6)

Sample Locations and Media for the SSES Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program 1985 Location Description l Sample Types Code IND(2) 0.9-1.4 mile ESE, At or below Discharge Structure FI 1S(3) 0.3-0.6 mile N, Sybert's Hill Area AS 152 0.3 mile N, Perimeter Fence TQ l

0.3-1.0 mile NNE, Sybert's Hill Area 2S(3) AS 252 0.9 mile NNE, Energy Information Center AP,C,TQ,WP 253 0.2 mile NNE, Perimeter Fence TQ 254 0.9 mile NNE, Energy Information Center S,VT 256 0.9 mile NNE, Energy Information Center WG i 35(3) 0.5-0.7 mile NE, Sybert's Hill / Recreation Area AG 3S3 0.9 mile NE, Recreational Area TQ 354 0.3 mile NE, Perimeter Fence 10 355 0.9 mile NE, Riverlands facility WG 451 1.0 mile ENE, Susquehanna River Flood Plain TO 452 0.5 mile ENE, Site - Peach Stand WG 453 0.2 mile ENE, Perimeter Fence TQ 454 0.5 mile ENE, Training Center WG

, 5S(3) 0.5-0.8 mile E, Recreation Area AG l SS1 0.8 mile E, North of Biological Laboratory TQ 554 0.8 mile E, West of Biological Laboratory AP,C,TQ,WP

555 0.8 mile E, West of Biological Laboratory S,VT l 557 0.3 mile E, Perimeter Fence TQ SS8 0.8 mile E, Area under power line WT 6S4 0.2 mile ESE, Perimeter Fence TQ 6S5 0.9 mile ESE, Outfall Area WT 6S6 0.8 mile ESE, River water intake line WT i 6S7 0.4 mile ESE, Cooling tower blowdown discharge line WT 7S1/6S8 0.2 mile ESE,12 KV Pole No 44316/N34036 (4) TQ 7S3/6S9 0.2 mile ESE, Perimeter Fence (4) TQ 7S5 0.4 mile SE, Southeast Garden -FD 756 0.2 mile SE, Perimeter Fence (4) TQ 8S2 0.2 mile SSE, Perimeter Fence TQ 952 0.2 mile 5, Security Fence TQ Note

See footnotes at end of table.II-5

Table 2 (Page 2 of 6)

Sample Locations and Media for the SSES Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program 1985 Location Description l Sample Typeo Code 10S1 0.4 mile SSW, Perimeter Fence TQ 10S2 0.2 mile SSW, Security Fence (4) TQ 1152 0.4 mile SW, Colomb House AP,C,TQ,WP 1153 0.3 mile SW, Security Fence TQ 1154 0.4 mile SW, Golomb House S,VT 1155 0,5 mile SW, EOF Building WG 1156 0.5 mile SW, SW Garden FD,TQ 12S3 0.4 mile WSW, Perimeter fence TQ 1352 0.4 mile W, Perimeter fence TQ 1354 0.4 mile W, Security Fence, (4 ) TQ 13S$ 0.4 mile W, Security Fence, (4) TQ 1455 0.5 mile WNW, Site Boundary Pole No. 43996/N34230 TQ 14S6 0.7 mile WNW, Site Pole No. 43869/N34174 (4) TQ 15S(3) 0.4-0.9 mile NW, Sybert's Hill Area AS 15S4 0.6 mile NW, Transmission Corridor AP,C,TQ,WP,S,VT 1555 0.4 mile NW, Perimeter fence (4) TQ 1651 0.3 mile NNW, Perimeter Fence TQ 15S3/1652 0.3 mile NNW, Perimeter Fence (4) TQ LTAW NE to ESE, on site, Lake Took-A-While F1 LTAW 0.8 mile NE, Lake Took-A-While WT,SH 1A1 0.6 mile N, Thomas Residence (4) TQ AG3 0.8 mile E. above River Water Intake - ourface VA AG5 0.8 mile E. above River Water Intake - bottom VA 6A3 0.6 mile ESE, State Police TQ 6A4 0.6 mile ESE, Bell Bend Pole No. 44462/N33984 TQ AG4 0.9 mile ESE, below discharge diffuser - surface VA AG6 0.9 mile ESE, below discharge diffuser - bottom VA 7A1 0.4 mile SE, Kline Residence TQ 7A2 0.6 mile SE, Bell Bend Pole No. 44437/N33887 (4) TQ 8A2 0.9 mile SSE, Bell Bend Pole No. 44395/N33679 (4) TQ Note: See footnotes at end of table.

II-6

[- Table 2-(Page 3 of 6)

Sample Locations and Media for' the SSES Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program 1985 Location Description Sample Types Code l 15A1 0.9 mile NW, Serafin Farm FM l

15A3 0.9 mile NW, Serafin Farm TQ j 15A4 0.9 mile NW, Serafin Farm WG i 16A(3) 0.3-1.0 NNW, Sybert's Hill Area AG,AS i 16A2 0.8 mile NNW, Rupinski Farm TQ

\

) 2B(3) 1.6 miles NNE, Gould Island SH I 283 1.3 miles NNE, Luzerne Outerwear TU l 7B(3) 1.2 miles SE, Bell Bend SH 782 1.5 miles SE, Heller's Orchard FR,FH 783 1.7 miles SE, Council Cup TQ 882 1.4 miles SSE, Lawall Residence Tu

- 981 1.3 miles S, Transmission Line East of Route 11 AP,C,TQ,WP

982 1.3 miles S, Transmission Line East of Route 11 S,VI 1082 2.0 miles SSW, Algatt Residenc4 Tu 1083 1.7 miles SSW, General Tank and Equipment Co. Tu

! 1281 1.3 miles WSW, Kisner Farm E,FR,PU 1282 1.7 miles WSW, Shultz Farm M l 12B3 2.0 miles WSW, Young Farm M 1284 1.7 miles WSW, Shultz Farm TQ 1681 1.6 miles NNW, Walton Power Line Tu 6C1 2.7 miles ESE, Foyer Farm M 11C(3) 2.6 miles SW, Hess Island SH I

1D2 4.0 miles N, Near bbeanaqua Substation AP,C,TQ,WP i 1D3 3.9 miles N, Near Fbcanaqua substation WT l 1D4 4.0 miles N,-Near Mocanaqua Substation S,VT l

3D1 3.4 miles NE, Pond Hill AP,C,TQ,hP 1

3D2 3.4 miles NE, Pond Hill S,VT 1

e l

Note: See footnotes at end of table.

l II-7

- . ~ - - - . ..

i:

1-i-

. Table 2 (Page 4 of 6) 1

Sample Locations and Media for the SSES Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program 1985 i

l Location Description l Sample-Types Code

'BD1 3.2 miles SSE, Poltrock Farm M,FM i 8D2 4.0 miles SSE, Howry Residence TQ 8D3 4.0 miles SSE, Mowry -Residence (4) TQ j 9D1 3.6 miles S, Smith Farm TQ i 10D1 3.0 miles SSW, Ross Ryman Farm M l 10D2 3.0 miles SSW, Ross Ryman Farm TQ i 1101 3.3 miles SW, Zehner Farm FR,FD 1

j 12D2 3.7 miles WSW, Dagostin Farm M 12D3 3.7 miles WSW, Dagostin Residence TQ l

( 1E1 4.5 miles N, Lane Residence TQ

! 4E1 4.8 miles ENE, Pole No. 46422/N35197 TQ

]

SE1 4.5 miles E, Bloss Farm M 4 SE2 4.5 miles E, Bloss Farm TQ i

, 6E1 4.7 miles ESE, St. James Church TQ l

i 7E1 4.2 miles SE, Harwood Trans. Line Pole No. 2 TQ 11E1 4.7 miles SW, Jacobsen Residence TQ' f 12E1 4.7 miles WSW, Berwick Hospital AP,C,TQ,WP j 12E2 4.7 miles WSW, Berwick Hospital 5,VT

12E4 4.7 miles WSW, Berwick Hospital WG i

i 13E3 5.0 miles W, Dent Farm M i 13E4 4.1 miles W, Kessler Farm TQ~

j 14E1 4.1 miles WNW, Canouse Farm TQ i

2F(3) 6.4 miles NNE, Between Shickshinny and former State Hospital SH l 2F1 5.9. miles NNE, St. Adalberts Cemetery TQ i i

I 3F1 9.1 miles NE, Valania Residence TQ I

Note: See footnotes at end of table.

11 !

l -, -,. . - , - - - . . .

Tcbla 2 (Pegs 5 of 6)

Sample Locations and Media for the SSES Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program 1985 l

Location Description Sample Types Code 7F1 9.0 miles SE, Conyngham School TQ 12F(3) 6.9 miles WSW, Old Berwick Test Track SH 12F1 5.3 miles WSW, Berwick Bridge WT 12F2 5.2 miles WSW, Berwick Substation TQ

+

12F3 5.2 miles WSW, Berwick Water Co. WG 15F1 5.4 miles NW, Zawatski Farm TQ 16F1 7.8 miles NNW, Hidlay Residence TQ AG1 15 miles NE, above WB STP VA i

AG2 14 miles NE, below WB STP VA 3G3 16 miles NE, WB Horton St. Substation TQ 3G4 17 miles NE, WB Service Center TQ 4G1 14 miles ENE, Mountain Top - Ind. Park TQ 7G1 14 miles SE, Hazelton Chem Lab AP,C,TQ,WP,VT,5 10G1 14 miles SSW, Davis Farm M 12G1 15 miles WSW, PP&L Service Center Bloomsburg AP,C,TQ,WP 12G2 17 miles WSW, U.S. Radium Site Bloomsburg WT 12G3 15 miles WSW, PP&L Service Center Bloomsburg S,VT 12G4 10 miles WSW, Kinery/Naus Residence TQ 2H(3) 30 miles NNE, Near Falls, PA FI 2H1 21 miles NNE, Yalicks Produce Stand FD 7H1 47 miles SE, PP&L roof, Allentown AP,C,TQ 12H1 26 miles WSW, Merck Co. WT 12H2 RAW 26 miles WSW, Danville Water Company PW 12H2 TREATED 26 miles WSW, Danville Water Company PW (1) All distances measured from stand-by gas treatment vent at 44200/N34117 (PA Grid System)

(2) No actual location is indicated since fish are sampled over an area which extends through 3 sectors (5,6 and 7) near the outfall area.

(3) Station code is omitted because no permanent locations exist;~ samples are taken based on availability.

(4) See section VI Program Changes 11-9

Table 2 (Page 6 of 6)

Sample locations and Media for the SSES Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program 1985 Location Codes:

The location codes are based on direction and distance from the site. The first two numbers represent each of the 16 angular sectors of 22-1/2 degrees centered about the reactor site. Sector one is divided evenly by the north axis and other sectors are numbered in a clockwise direction; i.e., 2=NNE, 3=NE, 4=ENE, etc. The next digit is a letter which represents the radial dis-tance from the station:

S = Site (1) location E = 4-5 miles off-site A = 0-1 miles of f-site F = 5-10 miles of f-site B = 1-2 miles of f-site G = 10-20 miles of f-site C = 2-3 miles of f-site H = >20 miles of f-site D = 3-4 miles of f-site The last number is the station numerical designation within each sector and zone; e.g., 1, 2, 3, ..........

Sample Type Codes AG = Animals / Game (Deer) FI = Fish AN = Animals FM = Feed and forage - Milk Producers AS = Animals / Squirrel (pasture grass)

AP = Air Particulate Filters ME = Meat AW = Animals / Wildlife M = Milk C = Charcoal Filters PO = Poultry E = Eggs PW = Potable Water FD = food / Garden Crops S = Soil FH = Food / Garden Crops - Honey SH = Sediment / Shoreline (0-4' of water)

FL = food / Garden Crops - Green Leafy 10 = T LD Vegetables (cabbage, lettuce, VI = Vegetation - Terrestrial spinach, swiss chard, etc.) VA = Vegation - Aquatic FP = Food /larden Crops - Potatoes WG = Water - Ground (Well)

FR = Food / Garden Crops - Fruit WP = Water - Precipitation (spples, strawberries, melons) WT = Water - Surface FV = Food / Garden Crops - Vegetables (sweet corn, green beans, tomatoes, squash)

(1) Site is defined as that area within PP&L's property boundary.

11-10

y , v. . : ...

MAP F-1 n s

,u

' J.

ON SITE ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLING l ,' , ..

LOCATIONS - SUSQUEHANNA SES . I l l

\ ...

Q ..,

! '. $ ',';, ~.

s ' ...* *.

l, ...

  • 1 ..
i. .

16 ',:. ' , ' ,,

h E ',2s6 i 2s2

'l:- .

i 3 15 , i g '.. .

1, *.: og

' * . . tt) .

. . .;g,-

I '/4' .' , ' ,

14 .:

tssa s6st ,

', 2- *st . . . ;< . - ,

ts1 2s3 3ss 8

.- l - '..

,o . " -

t353 s2

  • 43 '

4s2s  % ,

las6 '

tas ' -

ass . 's4.551' 5 .- i.- i .f ' .1 i a ss5  :..

/ '

  • 5 13s2 e.1355 '

. J. . . l 13 >

1356 -

63 . , /si o,, ,.,

~

, s' 6ss 256 ssi g 12si *

,s2 es2 45

, s.-  : .f .

ios2 , , , ., ;

gtiss l 1\s5 l'**.**

to 1 ,' ',

s j ,; ,

t ) I l

I 0 ',, * **. , ..NO . .

R e r e *.

11 > &

,', 7 ~. .;. .'=.

. y. - )

> i

);8

~

10 .

9

. ' ,' . ! .f ,

/ * * .o

/ . ' * . , , * .*

l

',s

. . .:.' :i..  ;:- :.' -

p .* 8

.'::;ii::

1,: :.-

,* .h : .s 11-11

MAP F 2 SITE ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLING LOCATIONS ~ SUSQUEHANNA SES gggy

?h t A 'Afrom/agggy "'- /

y f

's, H- f

}

site) "A-

,j I' ,a .

' NANfgCog o j

.\

-r 3E4 Ili *1. f rom st,,;

r

/

g 4

,y h

'Y Qs e 16FI js '

4.1IH #f, frma ef te )

W (14 et, g,,, ,gg, y t ',,'. , ~ ' ' *

.'y h q --

e #[e# e ,p n

0" -.

,' , ',l ,. s  %,

n f

_:e od . .- . .-

'f

'1

- +

.w .r- M' "h f-~ ,, .. ' 2r2 i

..C_ ig __

gl, Q'

V j ', -

i-c.i~,,far?lc j ,.--

. "2 - ^

o .-

,-- -- ',i r ,' ! .,. l m- L, L

  • f n

Ica f og ,

t . , , ,, ,

x ss .-.

~

ons

.,,. - i J

ml -.~.=. -

'- ' . - \

C4 v / -

($ ,, ..

m* -

w" h g

,Y,. \ ,

/, ~

e 4t g

  • r 4

o' s

/ i..' i, .^

  • 'st s

{

.sa: u D.

=

t p /,

'\

f .

L l hN ." ,

'3 n,. ...

~(-Y l i ' ,," ' a.

'* , -:%' ^ -

sgl, -' ,

{;/a, z ,,

' f,, / ,

. '~

o 3lg ... &. ' ,,

, ' a r,. -

~._..-

5 ? ,~ n, ,h .a w. 5~h.' h, m< v , . . . -, 1

- 6 '..

'~ ,.-,

.3

/

'~"e r

w ',

/ * ~.

$g 3g '

.s.. '+ o s

,s' ,' ,

wa g; , ,n ,

,' ,{?[$~J, , , , u..: ' &<'-

wo EM C y,e., .- /.,,,

, - ;g (N of "' 80) .,

cut 9 08

  • 7 I

* ' -> ii i. '

A i, 7 " '~** -- ,~,s. '

i

' -glUg*

so 6 ,

  • .- 7-

'. -~ ,f  !GI

. . ' "' se 9 9,)

e'

~.

p-

~# -

SOGA

* k , , , e' -

~ . . . . ~ . . . . , _,..-

11-12

l l

i l

l i ll. SAMPLING MLill0DS AND PROCEDURES 4

I a

i

.4 9

4 i

O

III. SAMPLING METHODS AND PROCEDURES To derive meaningful and useful data from the radiological environmental monitoring program, sampling methods and procedures are required which will i

provide samples representative of potential pathways of the area.

A. Direct Radiation i

Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) were used to determine the direct (ambient) radiation levels at seventy-three (73) monitoring points as j described in Tables 1 and 2. Sampling locations were chosen according to the criteria given in the USNRC Branch Technical Position on Radiological f Monitoring (Revision 1, November 1979).(17) 1 The area around the station was divided into 16 radial sectors of 22 1/2 degrees each. TLDs were placed in all sectors. The TLDs were placed at locations designed to take advantage of local meteorologic and topographic characteristics and population distribution characteristics. There were seven (7) control locations: 3G3, 3G4, 4G1, 7G1, 7H1, 12G1, and 12G4.

4 In 1985 direct radiation measurements were made using Panasonic UD-801 i

thermolumenscent dosimeters (TLDs) consisting of calcium sulfate doped with

)

i thulium (CaSO4:TM). The dosimeters were exchanged on a quarterly basis.

Element correction factors were determined for each dosimeter by exposure to an accurately known radiation field from a calibrated Cs-137 source.

1 l

i

)

! III-1 l

,n - , _., - , , ------. ,n.- - - - ,n..- , e - - - -- - - - w,,--~~,-v .7-y,-.,,,...e, ,. - - . , - s , - - - ,,r ,n. , - - .

e-3 , .- ~-

I B. Surfacs Water i

i Surface water was sampled at nine locations from the Susquehanna River i

and other surrounding bodies of water. Time proportional automatic composite l

samples were collected monthly at 12H1 ' (Merck Company). Monthly samples

! were also composited from weekly grab samples at location 558 (under the power line) and location 655 (outfall area). Monthly grab samples were

-l collected at location 1D3 (Hocanequa Substation), location 12F1 -(Berw'ick 1

i Bridge), location 12G2 (between Bloomsburg and Berwick), and Lake Took-A-While (LTAW). Monthly surface water samples were analyzed for gross alpha, j gross beta, gamma emitters, iodine-131 and tritium. Stations SS8, 6S6 a

and 1D3, were the control stations.

2 Time proportional automatic composite water samplers were installed in i 1983 at the river water intake (6S6) and the cooling tower blowdown discharge "

line (657). These samples are collected at least weekly. Monthly composites

! of weekly samples were analyzed for gross alpha, gross beta,. iodine-131, I

, gamma emitters and tritium. Locations SS8 and 6S5 provide alternate data for 1

l locations 656 and 6S7, respecitvely, in the event that the automatic samplers i

malfunction.

2 C. Drinking Water Drinking water was sampled by means of a time proportional automatic composite sampler on a weekly basis from station 12H2 RAW. A~ daily grab -

sample was taken at 12H2 TREATED and composited into a weekly sample.

1 i

. These stations are located at the Danville Water Company (drinking i

i water supply closest to Susquehanna SES which could be affected by plant i discharge). 12H2 RAW is taken from the Susquehanna river intake structure j while 12H2 TREATED is drawn from the supply line after processing. Monthly >

composites of the 12H2 RAW and 12H2 TREATED samples were analyzed for gross-alpha, gross beta, gamma emitters, iodine-131 and tritium.

III-2 4

_ _ _ . _ _ _ - _ . _ ~. - _ _ -. _ _- _ _ _ _ _ .-._.

D. Algae l

l Susquehanna River algae collections were set up at six locations l

! beginning in May 1984 as a special study (not required by technical specifications) to locate the source of iodine-131 upstream of the Susquehanna SES as postulated earlier (11 ). Surface samplers were located i

above (AG-1) and below (AG-2) the Wilkes-Barre sewage treatment plant, above (AG-3) the Susquehanna SES river water intake structure, and below (AG-4)

< the cooling tower blowdown discharge diffuser. Bottom samplers were located above ( AG-5) the intake structure and below ( AG-6) the discharge diffuser.

I i

j Locations AG1, AG2, AG3 and AG5 serve as controls. for indicator locations AG4 and AG6. Dry monthly samples were analyzed by gamma spectrometry.

1 l

l J

l 1

4 t

I 4

l t

! III-3

. +, - ,,r.... ,,-,e,n-, en-- >,--r w--- e -m - - -+-v., y em- --- - , . ~ ,-r,, -- - c-n-, e-en--- --~- ---- --. ..m- r- nn-y

E. Fish Fish sampling was conducted in the spring (May) and the fall (October) at three locations for this program. Downstream of the Susquehanna SES on the Susquehanna River was selected as an indicator location (IND), and on upstream location was chosen as a control location (2H). Fish samples were also taken from Lake Took-A-While (LTAW), an indicator station.

Available edible species were filleted at the time of collection. The edible portsans were packed in dry ice and shipped to the laboratory for analysis by gamma spectrometry and for gross beta.

F. Shoreline Sediment Shoreline sediment (0 to 4 ft. of water) samples were collected in May and November at six locations in the Susquehanna River. These were Bell Bend (78), near Hess Island (11C), the old Berwick test track (12F), near Gould Island (28), between Shickshinny and the former State Hospital (2F) and Lake Took-A-While (LTAW). Samples were analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides, gross alpha and gross beta. The control locations are 2B and 2F.

G. Ground (Well) Water Eight wells: the Energy Information Center (256), the Riverlands Facility (3S5), the Peach Stand (452), the Training Center (4S4), the EOF Building (1155), the Serafin Farm (15A4), the Berwick Hospital (12EA) and the Berwick Water Company (12F3), a control station, were sampled monthly.

Gross alpha, gross beta, gamma and tritium analyses were performed on the monthly samples.

III-4

H. Airborne Particulates/ Air Iodine-131/ Precipitation Airborne patnways were examined by analyzing air particulates, air iodine and precipitation. Air particulates were collected on Gelman type-A/E, glass fiber filters with low-volume air samplers. Air iodine was collected 1

on one-inch-deep Science Applications, Inc. charcoal cartridges. Air sample volumes were measured with temperature-compensated dry-gas meters.

The samplers were run continuously and the filters and charcoal car-tridges exchanged weekly. The elapsed time of sampling was recorded on an elapsed-time meter. The initial and final volumes as registered on the dry gas meter, were recorded by the sample collector.

Atmospheric pathway samples were collected at eleven locations; the Information Center (2S2), the Biological Laboratory (SS4), the Colomb House (1152), the north transmission line (1554), the transmission 'ine east of route 11 (901), the Mocanaqua Substation (102), near Pond Hill (3D1), the Berwick Hospital (12E1), the Hazelton Chemistry Lab (7G1), at the Bloomsburg Service Center (12G1) and the PP&L roof in Allentown (7H1). The last three locations, 7G1, 12G1, and 7H1'were the controls. Air filters weru analyzed weekly for gross beta, then composited quarterly and analyzed for gross alpha and gamma emitters. Air iodine was collected on a charcoal cartridge in series with the air particulate filter at all locations. The charcoal cartridges are warranted to have an ef ficiency of removal of elemental iodine of 99". The charcoal cartridges were analyzed weekly for iodine-131.

Precipitation samples were collected at least monthly from locations 252, SS4, 1152, 1554, 981, 102, 3DI, 12E1, 7G1 (control) and 12G1 (control),

composited quarterly and analyzed for gross alpha, gross beta, tritium and gamma emitters.

III-5

I. Milk / Pasture Grass Cow milk samples were collected monthly from eight locations; 12B2, 12B3, 6C1, 1001, 1202, SE1, 13E3 and 10G1 (control). Samples were collected semi-monthly from April through October from locations 1282, SE1,13E3, and 10G1. Each monthly and semi-monthly sample was analyzed for gross beta minus potassium-40, iodine-131 and gamma emitters.

Goat milk sampling was scheduled at one location (8D1) on a quarterly basis. However, sampling was discontinued in May when goat milk was no longer available. Goat milk, if available, was analyzed for iodine-131 only.

f Pasture grass was collected monthly at the farm closest to the site (15A1). Pasture grass samples from location 801 were scheduled for collec-tion during quarters when the goat milk was unavailable. However, location 901 was discontinued in May when goat milk was no longer available. Each sample was analyzed by gamma spectrometry.

J. Vegetation, lop and Bottom Soil ihree samples, one vegetation, one top soil and one bottom soil were taken at ten stations: 254, 555, 1154, 1554, 9B2, 104, 302, 12E2 and 7G1, 12G3 (controls). These samples were taken in August by compositing twelve plugs at each location. The top soil consists of the first 2 inches of soil l

and the bottom soil is from the depth of 2 to 6 inches. All samples were analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides.

III-6

K. Food Products fruits and Vegetables Gamma spectrometry was used to analyze various types of food products collected from farms or gardens within the vicinity of Susquehanna SES.

These included the following: apples, honey, corn, cabbage, lettuce, potatoes, spinach, string beans, tomatoes, endive, red beets, and swiss chard. Indicator locations that were sampled were 1101, 7S5, 7B2, 1156 and 1281. The control location sampled was 2H1.

Meat Meat samples consisting of eqqu, chicken end duck were collected from local farms at indicator locations 12111 and IhD1. The edible portion was analyzed for gamma emitters.

4 Game Two deer samples and three composite squirrel sample 5were collected in the fall and the flesh was analyzed for gamma emitters. The deer samples were collected from indicator stations 3S and SS while the squirrel samples were collected from indicator stations 155, 1S and 2S.

i I

III-7

IV.

SUMMARY

AND DISCUSSION OF 1985 ANALYIICAL HESULTS mumu m . . ... .

I IV.

SUMMARY

AND DISCUSSION OF 1985 ANALYTICAL RESULTS The analytical methods used by Teledyne Isotopes meet the lower limit of detection (LLD) requirements set forth in the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Technical Specifications. The procedures, specifications and an explanation of the analytical calculation methods used in the laboratory for these analyses are summarized in Apendix B. Data from the radiological analyses of environmental media collected are tabulated and discussed below.

Radiological analyses of environmental media characteristically approach and frequently fall below the limits of state-of-the-art measurement methods.

(18) For the gamma spectrometric results listed in this report only those radionuclides positively detected are listed in the tables. A positively detected radionuclide is one in which the activity is greater than a critical value. The critical value is defined as LLD/2. (22) However, due to the presence of the natural Ra-226 and Th-228 decay chains in background gamma spectrometric results, the critical value for reporting Ra-226 and Th-228 is LLD. Typical LLD's of selected nuclides searched for by gamma spectrometry are listed in Table 19.

For analyses other than gamma spectrometry, "LT" is used in the data ,

i tables where activity was not positively detected. The use of "LT" in the {

data tables is the equivalent of the less than symbol (<). The number

[

following "LT" is a result of calculation as defined in Appendix B and Appendix C.

Tables 5 through 18 give the radioanalytical results for individual samples. A statist :al summary of the results based only on positively detected activities appears in Table 3.

IV-1 <

1

____ J

i All 125 surface water samples were analyzed for tritium. The results are contained in Table 6.

Of the 42 control surface water samples analyzed, 32 had detectable tritium ranging from 64 to 180 pCi/ liter. The average of all positive i

results was 112 pCi/ liter. Excluding station 6S7, the discharge line, there l were 70 indicator surface water samples _ analyzed. Of these, 58 had positive activity ranginq from 66 to 390 pCi/ liter, with an average of 141 pCi/ liter.

These numbers are within the range of data reported during the preoperational period.

]

The indicator station 657 was analyzed 13 times and contained tritium i i

activity in all 13 namplen. The range of activity was 110 to 2600 pCi/ liter with an average of 595 pCi/ lit er. The presence of increased tritium in the

?

plant discharge 1 inn in attributed io plant operations. The concentrations '

are well below U.S. NHC non-rnuline reporting limits. The calculated dose to the maximally exposed individual in presented below in section IV-L.

i All 125 surface water samples were analyzed for gamma emitting radio-nuclides. lhe resultn are presented in Table 6.

Using gamma spectrometry, naturally occurring potassium-40 was detected in 15 of the 125 samples at concentrations ranging from 17 to 230 pCi/ liter. Thorium-228 was detected in one sample with a concentration of 27 pCi/ liter. The man-made radionuclide cesium-137 was detected in 1 of 42 control samples at a concentration of 4 pCi/ liter. . Cesium-137 was detected in 2 of 83 indicator samples at a mean concentration of 4.6 pCi/ liter, lhe presence of Co-137 in these samples is attributed to global '

! fallout from previous atmospheric weapons testing.

IV-4 t 1

i l

IV.

SUMMARY

AND DISCUSSION OF 1985 ANALYTICAL RESULTS The analytical methods used by Teledyne Isotopes meet the Jower limit of detection (LLD) requirements set forth in the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Technical Specifications. The procedures, specifications and an explanation of the analytical calculation methods used in the laboratory for these analyses are summarized in Apendix B. Data from the radiological analyses of environmentel media collected are tabulated and discussed below, f

1 Radiological analyses of environmental media characteristically approach and frequently fall below the limits of state-of-the-art measurement methods.

(18) For the gamma spectrometric results listed in this report only those radionuclides positively detected are listed in the tables. A positively detected radionuclide is one in which the activity is greater than a critical value. The critical value is defined as LLD/2. (22) However, due to the presence of the natural Ra-226 and Th-228 decay chains in background gamma spectrometric results, the critical value for reporting Ra-226 and Th-228 is LLD. Typical LLD's of selected nuclides searched for by gamma spectrometry are listed in Table 19.

! For analyses other than gamma spectrometry, "LT" is used in the data tables where activity was not positively detected. The use of "LT" in the data tables is the equivalent of the less than symbol (<). The number  ;

following "LT" is a result of calculation as defined in Appendix B and I Appendix C.

Tcbles 5 through 18 give the radioanalytical results for individual I

samples. A statistical summary of the results based only on positively detected activities appears in Table 3.

IV-1

A. Direct Radiation Environmental radiation exposure rates determined by thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD's) are given in Table 5. The mean quarterly value for each of 76 locations is reported in this table. (Due to the deviations and program changes there were 66 to 73 locations per quarter). A description of the TLD system used by PP&L is contained in Appendix B of this report.

1 A statistical summary of the .1985 data is included in Table 3. Indi-

! 5 vidual measurement of external radiation levels in the environs of the Susquehanna SES site ranged from 0.16 to 0.28 mR/ day. The average for all t

indicator locations, 0.20 +- 0.02 mR/ day, was virtually identical to the i

average for the control locations, 0.19 +- 0.03, and was also virtually

.idbntical, 0.20 +- 0.02, if the Allentown location was excluded from the

! control average.

Oakley (19) calculates an ionizing radiation dose equivalent of 82 mrem / year for the Wilkes-Barre area. Since Oakley's values represent averages covering wide geographical areas, the measured ambient radiation average of 73 mR/ year for the immediate locale of Susquehanna SES is consistent with Dakley's observations. Significant variations occur between geographical areas as a result of geological composition and altitude differences. Temporal variations result from changes in cosmic ray intensitty, local human activities and factors such as ground cover and soil moisture.

I 1

IV-2

~

I 4

B. Surface Water Surface water was sampled from nine (9) locations including three control locations. Samples were analyzed for gross alpha, gross beta, iodine-131, tritium and gamma emitting radionuclides. The results are listed in Table 6.

Of the 83 indicator surface water samples analyzed, 9 had detectable .

gross alpha activity ranging from 1.3 to 2.4 pCi/ liter. Gross alpha was detected in 2 of 42 control samples at a concentration ranging from 1.1 to 1.9 pCi/ liter. These values are within the range for previously reported surface water samples.

A total of 125 surface water samples were analyzed for gross beta ,

activity. Groas beta was detected in 82 of 83 indicator locations at concen-trations ranging from 1.4 to 15 pCi/ liter. Of the 42 control surface water +

samples, 40 had detectable gross beta activity ranging from 1.4 to 6.7 pCi/ liter. These values are within the ranges reported in preoperational data.

A to' a1 of 125 surface water samples were analyzed for iodine-131. Of the 42 ce ntrol surface water samples analyzed, 5 had detectable activity, i ranging f rom 0.12 to 0.40 pCi/ liter. Of the 83 indicator surface water samples ar alyzed, 7 had detectable activity, ranging from 0.12 to 0.42 e

pCi/ liter.

The presence of iodine-131 in the control location samples, and the general distribution of the observed activities indicates that the presence of this isotope is not plant relsted. Similar activity lesels were reported in preoperational data. Alternatesourcesofconcentrationsinsurfacewater are medical uses in the area. '

IV-3 -

F

~

A1I125surfacewatersampleswereanalyzedfortritium. The results are contained in Table 6.

Of the 42 control surface water samples analyzed, 32 had detectable tritium ranging from 64 to 180 pCi/ liter.

The average of all positive results was 112 pCi/ liter. Excluding station 6S7, the discharge line, there were 70 indicator surface water samples analyzed. Of these, 58 had positive i 4

activity ranginq 't rom 66 to 390 pCi/ liter, with an average of 141 pCi/ liter.

These numbers are within the range of data reported during the preoperational period.

The indicator station 657 was analyzed 13 times and contained tritium act ivity> in all 13 samples, lhe range of activity was 110 to 2600 pCi/ liter with an average of 595 pCi/ liter. The presence of increased tritium in the plant discharge line is att ributed to plant operations. The concentrations are well below U.S. NHC non-routine reporting limits. .The calculated dose to the maximally exposed individual is presented below in section IV-L.

All 125 surf ace water samples were analyzed for gamma emitting radio-nuclides. The results are presented in Table 6.

4 Using gamma spectrometry, naturally occurring potassium-40 was detected-in 15 of the 125 samples at concentrations ranging from 17 to 230

pCi/ liter. Thorium-228 was detected in one sample with a concentration of 27 pCi/ liter. The man-made radionuclide cesium-137 was detected in 1 of 42 control samples at a concentration of 4 pCi/ liter. Cesium-137 was detected in 2 of 83 indicator samples at a mean. concentration of 4.6 pCi/ liter. The presence of Cs-137 in these samples is attributed to global fallout from previous atmospheric weapons testing..

^

IV-4 a j i

. . a ,

The man made radionuclides of Cr-51, Mn-54, Co-60 and Zn-65 were detected in indicator surface water samples as follows: Chromium-51 was seen in one sample at a concentration of 98 pCi/ liter, manganese-54 was detected in two samples at a mean concentration of 4.6 pCi/ liter, cobalt-60 was identified twice at an average concentration of 4.3 pCi/ liter and Zn-65 i was detected once at a level of 4.6 pCi/ liter. All of these positive

, results were found at the 6S7 sample station. This station is the composite sampler located on the discharge line of Susquehanna SES. These positive 1

values are attributed to the operation of Susquehanna SES. The calculated dose to the maximally exposed individual is presented below in section IV-L.

i C. Drinking Water 1

A total of 26 drinking water samples were taken at the Danville Water Company (12H2). Drinking water for Danville is taken from the Susquehanna River and is the closest to Susquehanna SES which could be affected by plant discharge. These samples were analyzed for gross alpha, gross beta, iodine-131, tritium and gamma emitting radionuclides.

l The results are presented in Table 6. . As there are no public upstream

! drinking water facilities, the results of the analysis of the indicator drinking water should be compared to the control surface water samples.

The results of gross alpha and gross beta analyses are shown in Table

6. Alpha activity appeared in 4 of 26 samples with a mean of 1.2 pCi/ liter l and a range of 1.1 to 1.3 pCi/ liter. Positive beta activity was detected in l

l all of the samples with a mean concentration of 2.4 pC1/ liter and a range of i

1.5 to 3.4 pCi/ liter.

IV-5

Tritium was detected in 15 of 26 samples. The average concentration 4

was 102 pCi/ liter and the range was 59 to 150 pCi/ liter.

No iodine-131 was detected in any sample.

lhe results of the gamma spectrometry analysis are also shown in Table 6. Naturally occurring potassium-40 was detected in 4 of 26 samples with a range of 25 to 78 pCi/ liter The fallout radionuclide l

cesium-137 was detected once at a concentration of 2.9 pCi/ liter.

1 I Activity seen in drinking water was no different than those I l concentrations noted for the surface water control stations. Also, all concentrations are within the range of preoperational data.

There is no indication of the presence of any radionuclide in these drinking water samples attributed to the operation of Susquehanna SES.  ;

D.' Algae i

A total of 32 algae samples were collected for analysis during the program year. Stations AG1, AG2, AG3 and AGS are upstream and are considered control stations for Susquehanna SES. AG4 and AG6 are indicator stations.

1 All samples were analyzed by gamma spectrometry. Results of gamma spectro-metric analyses of these samples are contained in Table 7.

, The naturally occurring radionuclide Radium-226 was found in 5 of .32 -

, samples. Thorium-228, a naturally occurring radioisotope, was found in 18 of 32 samples. The observed values for both Ra-226 and Th-228 were within the expected range of normal distribution.

1 IV-6 i

Cesium-137 was detected in 3 of the 19 control samples at an average activity of 0.22 pCi/g (dry). Cesium-137 was detected in 5 of 13 indicator samples at an average activity of 0.22 pCi/g (dry). Since it is present in global fallout, the occasional detection of cesium-137 in the environmental media is not unusual.

Indine-131 was found to be present in 11 of the 19 control samples and 5 of the 13 indicator stations with the average concentrations of 1.82 and 0.55 pCi/g (dry) respectively.

The presence of iodine-131 in the control locations and the general distribution of the observed activities indicates that the presence of this isotope is not plant related. Alternate sources of concentrations in algae are medical uses in the area. This data is consistent with iodine-131 levels which are reported in the surface water tablce of this report.

The man-made radioisotopes of Mn-54, Co-58 and Co-60 were detected in downstream algae samples. Manganese-54 was seen in 2 of 13 indicator samples at a concentration of 0.55 pCi/g (dry). Cobalt-58 was detected once at a level of 0.43 pCi/g (dry) and cobalt-60 was found in 2 of the 13 ,

t indicator samples at levels of 0.25 and 0.74 pCi/g (dry). These activities substantiate values already seen in surface water samples and are therefore attributed to the operation of SSES. The Mn-54 and Co-60 detected in the algae sample collected on 07/08/85 were also seen in the 657 composite water sample collected on the same day. The Co-58 detected in the algae, however, was not seen in the corresponding 657 composite water sample. The ratio of Co-58 to Co-60 (0.43/0.74) seen in the 07/08/85 algae sample was used to predict. the concentration of Co-58 used in the dose to man from water calculations presented below in section IV-L.

IV-7

E. Fish Fish samples were collected during May and October from three locations.

Smallmouth 8 ass, Walleye and Channel Catfish were collected at both the indicator and control locations in May. White Sucker, Walleye and Channel Catfish were collected at both locations in October. In May and October Largemouth Bass and Channel Catfish were collecter, at Lake Took-A-While. A total of 17 samples were analyzed, 7 from the indicator location, 6 from the control location and 4 from Lake Took-A-While.

The results of gross beta analyses of fish samples collected during 1985 are presented in Table 8. All 17 samples had detectable gross beta activity ranging from 3.0 to 7.9 pCi/g (wet) with a mean for all stations of 6.0 pCi/g (wet). This is probably due to naturally occurring potassium-40 which is a beta emitter. The range of gross beta activity was not signif-icantly different from ranges reported during the previous year.

The results of gamma spectrometric analyses of fish samples collected during 1985 are presented in Table 8. As expected, naturally occurring K-40 was the major detectable activity in the edible portions of the fish and was found in all 17 samples. Cesium-137 was the only man-made isotope detected in fish. Cesium-137 was detected in 2 of the 6 control samples and ranged from 0.007 to 0.012 pCi/g (wet). Cesium-137 was also detected in one indicator sample at a level of 0.013 pC1/g (wet) and in one sample from Lake Took-A-While at a level of 0.009 pCi/g (wet). The Cs-137 concentrations are consistent with preoperatinal and control data and concentrations expected from atmospheric weapons testing.

There were no detectable levels of radioactivity in fish due to the operation of Susquehanna SES during the period of this report.

IV-8

F. Shoreline Sediment Sediment samples were collected twice during this program year. Six locations were sampled, including three indicator, two control locations and Lake Took-A-While. All samples were analyzed by gamma spectrometry, gross.

alpha and gross beta. A statistical summary of the analytical'results including the average, fraction of detectables, and range of radionuclide concentrations is shown in Table 3, section IX.

i The results of the analysis of sediment samples for gross alpha activity are listed in Table 9. Detectable activity was observed in 8 of 11 samples 4

from the indicator locations. The range of observed activity was 5.6 to 17 pCi/g (dry). Detectable activity was observed in all four samples from the control locaticn. The range of observed activity was 7.6 to 16 pCi/g (dry).

I The data from indicator locations are consistent with preoperational and control data.

1 The results of the analysis of sediment samples for gross beta activity are listed in Table 9. All 15 sediment samples had detectable activity with a mean of 16.7 pCi/g (dry). The mean for the 11 indicator stations is 25.6 pCi/g (dry) and the mean for the 4 control stations is 29.5 pCi/g (dry).

The range of the indicator stations is 15 to 39 pCi/g (dry) and the range of the control stations is 23 to 35 pCi/g (dry). The results from the indicator locations are consistent with the results from the control locations and with data reported in previous years. The gross beta results can be attributed to naturally occurring radium, thorium and potassium-40 contained in the sediment.

LIV-9

A number of naturally crcurring radioisotopes were detected in these samples. Potassium-40 was detected in all samples, ranging from 7.7 to 19 pCi/g (dry). Beryllium-7 was detected in 8 of 15 samples, ranging from 0.30 to 1.7 pCi/g (dry). Radium-226 was found to be present in 14 of 15 samples and Thorium-228 was found in all 15 samples.

The man-made isotope Cesium-137 was detected in 12 of 15 samples.

Cesium-137 was detected in 3 of 4 control samples and ranged from U.18 to 0.25 pCi/g (dry). Cesium-137 was also detected in 9 of 11 indicator loca-tions at concentrations ranging from 0.04 to 0.36 pCi/g (dry). Since the data from indicator locations are consistent with preoperational and control data and the presence of Cs-137 can be explained by previous atmospheric weapons testing, it is felt that the Cs-137 is not from the operation of SSES.

Detectable levels of Mn~54, C0-511 and Co-60 were observed in sediment from some indicator locations. The presence of these radioisotopes is consistent with the data reported from surface water and can be attributed to the operation of SSES. Manganese-54 was found in 3 of 11 indicator samples at concentrations ranging from 0.03 to U.73 pCi/g (dry). Cobalt-58 and cobalt-60 were each detected once at levels of 0.15 and 0.42 pCi/g (dry), respectively. The calculated dose to the maximally exposed individual from these gamma emitting radionuclides is presented below in sect ion IV-L.

IV-10

G. Ground (Well) Water A total of 102 ground (well) water samples were collected during this program period. These samples were analyzed for gross alpha and gross beta, l tritium and gamma emitting radionuclides. The results are presented in l

Table 10.

Of the 89 indicator ground water samples, 8 had detectable gross alpha activity, ranging from 0.69 to 5.0 pCi/ liter. No detectable alpha activity was seen in the control samples. These data are within the range of pre-operational data.

Gross beta activity was detected in 54 of the 89 indicator samples. The range of concentration was 0.86 to 5.7 pCi/ liter. Of the 13 control ground water samples analyzed,12 had detectable gross beta activity, ranging from 0.79 to 3.3 pCi/ liter. These values are within the ranges of preoperational data.

Tritium activity was found in 71 of 89 indicator well water samples.

The average concentration was 116 pCi/ liter and the range was 60 to 280 pCi/ liter. Of the 13 control well water samples analyzed,12 had tritium activity with a mean concentration of 109 pCi/ liter. The range was 78 to 230 pCi/ liter. All tritium levels are within the range noted in preopera-tional reports.

Gamma spectrometric analyses of the well water samples revealed the typical concentrations of naturally occurring radionuclides. Potassium-40 was detected in 13 of the indicator samples and 1 of the control samples.

Thorium-228 was detected in one indicator sample. The fallout radionuclide cesium-137 was detected twice with an average concentration of 4.3 pCi/ liter.

l Due to the above observations, it is concluded that operation of l Susquehanna SES has not resulted in a detectable increase of radioactivity i

in ground (well) water. IV-ll

1 H. Air Particulates/ Air Iodine-131/ Precipitation Air Particulate Air filters were collected weekly from 11 locations. Each weekly filter was analyzed for gross beta activity. Quarterly composites were analyzed for gamma emitting radionuclides and for gross alpha activity.

Results of gross beta analyses on air particulate filters are given in Table 11. The mean gross beta activity for all stations was 16.3

~

and the range of gross beta ctivity was 3.3 to 36.0 E-03 pCi/m 3 . Figure 4 illustrates the variation of beta activity in airborne particulates over the program year. Comparison of this data with that of previous years shows no-significant difference in activity. Figure 5 shows the data 'from the current reporting period in the context of reported measurements for the program over the period 1973 through 1985.

Results of gross alpha analyses on air particulate filters are given I .

in Table 12. The mean gross alpha activity for all stations was 3.9 E-03 pCi/m3 and the range of gross alpha activity was 0.9 to S.8 E-03 pCi/m3 .

The average activity in the sample from the indicator' locations was 4.0 E-03 pCi/m3 . The average activity in the sample froin the control locations 3

was 3.6 E-03 pCi/m . All gross alpha activity measured on air particulate-filters in this program year falls within the range of preoperational data.

IV-12

Air filters from each location were composited quarterly and analyzed by gamma spectrometry. A total of 44 composited samples were analyzed and the results are presented in Table 12. Several naturally occurring radio-nuclides were detected on these filters. Cosmogenic bery111um-7 was detected in all samples with a range of activity from 53 to 95 E-03 pCi/m3.

Potassium-40 was detected in 25 of 44 samples with a mean activity of 4.2 E-03 pCi/m3 The only man-made radionuclide detected was the fallout radionuclide cesium-137 which was detected on 2 of 12 control samples with a mean of 0.2 E-03 pC1/m3. Cesium-137 was measured on one of 32 indicator locations at a level of 0.3 E-03 pC1/m3.

Due to the above observations, it is concluded that operation of Susquehanna SES has not resulted in a detectable increase of particulate activity in the environment.

Air Iodine Results of airborne iodine-131 analyses on charcoal cartridges are presented in Table 11. Iodine-131 was not detected in any of the samples.

t Precipitation Precipitation was composited to quarterly samples from eight indicator and two control locations. Samples were analyzed for gross alpha, gross 4

beta, tritium and gamma activity.

The results of gross alpha and gross beta are shown in Table 13. Alpha was detected in one indicator sample at a level of 0.61 pCi/ liter.and in one control sample at a concentration of 0.93 pCi/ liter. Beta activity was observed in all samples. The average activity in .the samples from the indicator and control stations were 2.5 and 3.4 pCi/ liter, respectively.

IV-13 l

i

-vv -

1 The results of the gamma spectrometry analysis are shown in Table 13.

Cosmogenic beryllium-7 was detected in 19 of 44 samples. The range of beryllium -7 activity was 24 to 110 pCi/ liter. Potassium-40 was detected in 5 of 44 samples with a mean activity of 31 pCi/ liter. The naturally occurring radioisotope of thorium-228 was detected in 4 samples.' The range o' thorium-228 concentration was 8.9 to 29 pCi/ liter. The fallout radionuclide l cesium-137 was detected in one indicator sample at a concentration of 3.4 pCi/ liter.

Results of the analyses for tritium are contained in Table 13. ,

Tritium was detected in 6 of 9 analyses of samples from control locations and in 30 of 35 analyses of samples from the indicator locations. The inean concentration of tritium detected at the control locations was 114 pCi/ liter and at the indicator location the mean concentration was 116 pCi/ liter.

These results are typical for environmental samples and are within the ranges previously reported in Susquehanna SES annual reports.

Due to the above observations, it is concluded that operation of Susquehanna SES has not resulted in a detectable increase of radioactivity in precipitation in the environment.

'l

1. Milk / Pasture Grass Milk Monthly and semimonthly milk samples were analyzed for iodine-131 by radiochemical methods and for other gamma emitting radionuclides by gamma

{ spectrometry. All samples were also analyzed for beta activity after potassium had been chemically extracted. Some samples with high beta activity were analyzed for strontium 89 and 90 activity. The results of all i ~

analyses are shown in Table 14.

IV-14

No iodine-131 was detected in any milk samples.

Using gamma spectrometry, naturally occurring potassium-40 was detected in all samples. The man-made radionuclide cesium-137 was detected in 3 of 22 control samples and 2 of 122 indicator samples. The mean concentration of Cs-137 was 4.4 pCi/ liter for the control samples and 4.8 pCi/ liter for the indicator samples. The presence of Cs-137 in these samples is attributed to global fallout from previous atmospheric weapons testing.

The analysis of gross beta following chemical extraction of potassium is shown in Table 14. The control samples exhibited beta activity in all 22

{

samples. The mean activity was 9.1 pCi/ liter and the range was 5.3 to 16 pCi/ liter. For the indicator samples beta activity was detected in 110 of the 122 samples. The average concentration was 7.3 pCi/ liter with a range of 2.5 to 26 pCi/ liter. Of the 144 total samples, one control and seven indicator samples had beta activity higher than 14 pCi/ liter. Five of these eight samples were analyzed for Strontium-89 and Strontium-90 activity.

Strontium-89 was not detected in any sample. Strontium-90 was found ~in the control sample at a concentration of 6.9 pCi/ liter and in the four indicator samples analyzed at a mean concentration of 7 pCi/ liter. These values are within the ranges reported in preoperational data. The presence of Sr-90 in these samples is attributed to global fallout from previous atmospheric weapons testing. .

From the observations presented, there is no indication of the presence of any radionuclide in milk attributed to the operation of Susquehanna SES.

i IV-15 i,

l

Pasture Grass A total of 14 pasture grass samples were collected for analysis during this program year. Samples were collected monthly except when the ground was covered by snow and ice. All samples were analyzed by gsmma spectrometry. Results of gamma spectrometric analyses of these samples are contained in Table 15.

Cosmogenic beryllium-7, which exists due to its deposition as stratospheric fallout, was found in all 14 samples. Potassium-40, a naturally occurring isotope, was also found in all the samples. Table 3 contains the summarized average, fraction of detectable, and range of radionuclide concentrations. The observed values for both beryllium-7 and potassium-40 were within the expected range of normal distribution.

There is no indication of the presence of any radionuclide in grass attributed to the operation of Susquehanna SES.

J. Vegetation, Top and Bottom Soil A total of 30 vegetation and soil samples were collected for analysis during this program year. These samples consisted of 10 vegetation,10 from the top two inches of soil and 10 from the bottom soil (2-6 inches deep).

The results of the gsama spectrometric analysis are presented in Table 16.

Cesium-137 was present in 20 of 20 soil samples and in none of the vegetation samples.

Radium-226 was found to be present in 16 of 20 of the soil samples and none of the vegetation camples. Radium-226 is a naturally. occurring isotope and was observed within the expected range of normal distribution.

IV-16

Thorium-228 was found to be present in all of the 20 soil samples and none of the vegetation samples. Thorium-228 is a naturally occurring isotope and was observed to be within the expected range of normal distribution.

Cosmogenic beryllium-7 was found in all ten of the vegetation samples but none of the soil samples. Potassium-40, as expected because it is a l

l naturally occurring isotope, was found to be present in all of the soil and vegetation samples. The observed values were within the expected range of normal distribution.

There is no indication of the presence of any radionuclide in these vegetation and soil samples attributed to the operation of Susquehanna SES.

K. Food Products A total of 50 fruit, vegetable and food product samples and 8 game, poultry and egg samples were collected for analysis during this program year. Samples were collected as available during the harvest season. All samples were analyzed by gamme spectrometry.

Fruits, Vegetables and Honey A total of 50 edible food samples were collected from various gardens over the period June through October. These samples consisted of cabbage, lettuce, swiss chard, beans, corn, potatoes, apples, spinach, tomatoes, strawberries and honey. Results of gamma spectrometric analyses of food samples are contained in Table 17.

IV-17

Cesium-137 was detected in 3 of 50 food samples at an average activity of 0.02 pCi/g (wet). The single sample of honey contained 0.03 pCi/g of Cs-137. This data is consistent with data obtained from prior years. Since i

it is present in global fallout, the occasional detection of Cs-137 in environmental media is not unusual. No other man-made nuclides were detected 1

in any of the 50 samples.

Cosmogenic bery111um-7, which exists due to its deposition as stratospheric fallout, was found in 19 of the 50 samples. Potassium-40, a naturally occurring isotope, was found in all the samples. Table 3 contains the summarized average, fraction of detectables and range of radionuclide concentrations.

There is no indication of the presence of any radionuclide in food products attributed to the operation of Susquehanna SES.

Game, Poultry and Eggs In addition to the samples discussed above, a total of 8 non-vegetable food product samples were collected for analysis during this program-year.

These included squirrel, deer, duck, poultry and eggs. All. samples were analyzed by gamma spectrometry. Results are contained in Table 18.

Potassium-40, a naturally occurring isotope, was found in all the

! samples at its expected ranges of activity. Table 3 contains the summarized average, fraction of detectables, and range of radionuclide concentrations.

IV-18

As expected, the sample of squirrel meat contained high levels of cesium-137 relative to all other types of food products sampled. These elevated activities have been reported previously in the annual reports on the Susquthanna SES REMP and in other sources. (19) Cesium-137 was detected in all squirrel meat samples at an average activity of 2.6 pCi/g (wet). This is consistent with previously reported values. Since it is present in global fallout, the occasional detection of cesium-137 in environmental media is not unusual. The comparatively high levels in squirrel meat apparently result from high concentration factors in the components of the squirrel's diet. Detectable levels of cesium-137 were found in the deer samples, at the mecn level of 0.23 pCi/g (wet). No other man-made nuclides were detected in any of the samples of food product analyzed.

There is no indication of the presence of any radionuclide in these food products attributed to the operation of Susquehanna SES.

L. CALCULATED DOSE TO THE MAXIMALLY EXPOSED INDIVIDUAL As shown from the discussion above the only radioactivity detected in the environment from the operation of Susquehanna SES was in the surface water pathway. Specifically, slight amounts of radioactivity were detected in the composite sampler on the station discharge line (6S7), in some algae samples collected from the Susquehanna river downstream of the discharge and in some sediment samples collected from the Susquehanna river downstream of the plant. To judge the impact of these observations the hypothetical dose to the maximally exposed individual is calculated from both surface water and sediment. Iy_19

Surface Water The dose contribution received by the hypothetical maximally exposed individual from the radioactivity found in the surface water samples was determined using the methodology in the Susquehanna SES Offsite Dose Calcu-lation Manual (ODCM). (25) To use the methodology expressed in the ODCM, the total activity released must be estimated. As all positively detected surface water radioactivity attributed to Susquehanna SES operation was found in the discharge line composite sampler (6S7), the total activity of H-3, Cr-51, Mn-54, Co-58, Co-60, and Zn-65 released was estimated by multiplying the mean detected concentrations by the total volume of water that passed through the discharge line during the one year reporting period.

The total amount of water was estimated by assuming a discharge rate of 10,000 gallons per minute for the entire year. The mean or average concentrations of Cr-51, Mn-54, Co-60 and Zn-65 are found in Table 3.

The net mean activity of H-3 was determined by subtracting the average surface water control value (113 pCi/ liter) from the average value of the discharge line (595 pCi/ liter). The mean activity of Co-58 released was estimated by multiplying the Co-60 activity by the Co-58/Co-60 ratio found in the indicator algae samples. The hypothetical maximally exposed individual is a child. The whole body was the organ that had the highest percent of the applicable limit. The total whole body dose is conservatively calculated to be 0.00534 mrem or 0.089% of the 6 mrem limit (as expressed in 10CFR 50 Appendix 1) and an even smaller percentage of the normally occurring ingestion dose from background radioactivity.

1 i

IV-20

Shoreline Sediment A hypothetical dose to a person from the radioactivity found in the shoreline sediment was calculated usino the methodology found in Regulatory Guide 1.109. The assumption was made that the individual was exposed to 1

shoreline sediment containing Mn-54, Co-58 and Co-60 at the mean detected concentrations as listed in Table 3 for 67 hours7.75463e-4 days <br />0.0186 hours <br />1.107804e-4 weeks <br />2.54935e-5 months <br /> per year. A shore-width factor of 0.2 was used to describe the geometry of the exposure. The whole body was the organ that had the highest percent of the applicable limit.

The hypothetical total whole body dose is conservatively calculated to be 0.00526 mrem or 0.088% of the 6 mrem limit (as expressed in 10CFR 50 Appendix I). The hypothetical skin dose was 0.00636 mrem. These values are well below the expected dose from exposure to naturally occurring radioactive materials.

IV- 21

l V. DEVIATIONS FROM THE PROGRAM

DEVIATIONS FROM THE PROGRAM 1985 The required analysis sensitivities were met throughout the year. The program sampling schedule was adhered to, except as discussed below.

TLDs at locations 7F1 and 14S6 were vandalized during the year. The poles and TLDs were destroyed at locations 1A1, 6A3 and 8D2. These devia-tions are noted in Table 5. See PROGRAM CHANGES for new locations for 6A3 and BD2. The entire residence was razed at location 1A1. It was decided that the TLD located nearby at 16A2 was adequate for monitoring in this community.

The time proportional surface water automatic composite samplers at locations 6S6, 6S7 and 12H2 RAW malfunctioned infrequently during the year.

These deviations are noted in Table 6. Corrective actions were completed prior to the end of the next sampling period. These samplers are not flow proportional.

The pump for ground (well) water location AS2 was temporarily out of service in November. Location 3SS is closed down seasonally from November through April. These deviations are noted in Table 10.

Various air samplers malfunctioned infrequently during the year.

These deviations are noted in Table 11. Corrective actions were completed prior to the end of the next sampling period.

V-1

I VI. PROGRAM CHANGES 4

-- m -. -.. -

j PROGRAM CHANGES - 1985 Changes to the REMP were made in 1985 to provide more uniformity in the analysis performed. These changes are noted.

1. Surface Water - Iodine-131 analysis at locations 6S6 and 657 was changed from weekly to monthly.
2. Drinking Water - Iodine-131 analysis at locations 12H2 Raw and 12H2 Trented was changed from weekly to monthly.

! Various sampling locations were added, deleted, moved or given a new l code as noted below.

1. Surface Water - Locations 105 and 13E1 were discontinued from the sampling program. Location 1DS was a redundant up-river location which is sufficiently monitored by locations 1D3, SS8 and 6S6.

Location 13E1 is not a good indicator location as it is beyond the influence of any aquatic discharge from the plant.

2. Drinking Water - L( ,:ation 12F3 treated was deleted. The ground (well) water location 12F3 was retained to monitor 8erwick water.
3. Milk - The goat mili< location 8D1 was discontinued after the goat milking operation was discontinued in May.
4. Pasture Grass - Location 8D1 was discontinued after the goat milking operation was discontinued in May.
5. TLDs - Location 1 A1, 8D2 and 6A3 were destroyed during the second, second and fourth quarters, respectively. New nearby locations were begun the fourth quarter for 8D2 at 8D3 and for 6A3 at 6A4.

- After a careful review of aerial photos and site survey maps, it was discovered that three TLDs were actually located in adjoining sectors. Location 7S1 became 658, location 753 became 659 and location 15S3 became 16S2 beginning the third quarter.

- Location 7S1/658 is a 12KV pole no. 44316/N34036, not a 230KV Tower.

- Two new locations were added at the third quarter due to the above code changes. They are locations 7S6 and 15S5.

- Six new locations were added during the third and fourth quarters to better characterize the radiation environment.

These locations are 10S2, 13S4, 1355 (third quarter) and 1456, 7A2, 8A2 (fourth quarter).

L

- Location 12G4 became the Naus residence in August.

VI-1 l

s 4

f VII. LAND USE CENSUS i

r VII. LAND USE CENSUS The USNRC Branch Technical Position on "An Acceptable Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program" (November 1979, Revision 1), states that "a census shall be conducted annually during the growing season to determine the location of the nearest milk animal and nearest garden greater than 50 square meters (500 sq. ft.) producing broad leaf vegetation in each of the 16 meteorological sectors within a distance of 8 km (5 miles)." To comply with this requirement, a land-use survey was conducted for the Susquehanna SES during the period June 26, 1985 through August 8, 1985. The closest garden (greater than 50 square meters, producing broad leaf vegetation) and l

residence in each radial sector was determined and all dairy animals within five (5) miles were identified.

Table 4 lists the nearest dairy animals, the nearest garden and residence in each sector identified during the survey. These land-use parameters are used in the assessment of potential radiological doses to individuals and populations of the stated regions.

VII-1

TABLE 4 (Page 1 of 2)

Nearest residence, garden, and dairy animal in each of the 16 meteorological sectors within a 5-mile radius of the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, 1985.

Sector Direction Nearest Residence Nearest Garden Nearest Dairy Animal Name Distance Name Distance Name Distance 1 N --

1.33 mi --

1.62 mi --

>5.0 mi 2 NNE --

0.93 mi --

1.10 mi --

>5.0 mi f 3 NE- -- 2.33 mi --

2.33 mi --

>5.0 mi ru 4 ENE -- 2.12 mi --

2.28 mi 2.7 mi 5 E --

1.40 mi --

1.40 mi -- 4.5 mi 6 ESE --

0.54 mi --

2.05 mi -- 2.4 mi 7 SE 0.38 mi 0.57 mi .-- 2.6 mi 8 SSE --

0.66 mi -. 0.66 mi -. 3.5 mi 9 S . --

1.10 mi --

1.10 mi --

2.4 mi

TABLE 4 (Page 2 of 2 Sector Direction Nearest Residence Nearest Garden Nearest Dairy Animal Name Distance Name Distance Name Distance 10 SSW 1.24 mi 1.24 mi --

3.0 mi 11 SW 1.48 mi --

1.48 mi --

>5.0 mi 5

12 WSW 1.16 mi 1.16 mi 1.7 mi 13 W --

0.76 mi 1.47 mi --

5.0 mi 4

14 WNW 0.71 mi 0.71 mi 1.8 mi-15 NW 0.86 mi --

1.90 mi --

>5.0 mi ,

16 NNW 0.65 mi 2.33 mi --

4.2 mi

.M a - - A , uv

.\'

i N .

T VIII. CONCLUSIONS i

l i

)

'l3 VIII. CONCLUSIONS Results of the 1985 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program for ' .

the Susquehanna SES Nuclear Station have been presented. Generally, the results were as expected for normal environmental samples. Naturally cccurring activity was observed in the usual sample media at the expected t '

magnitude. .

t A few man-made isotopes, in particular cesium-137, were also observed in a variety of sample types. These were also generally present at the ,

anticipated concentrations and are attributable to long-term fallout from 1

atmospheric nuclear weapons tests. A recurring detection of low levels of /

! I-131 in surface water samples was noted. The absence of.recent atmospheric j

testing rules out fallout as a source because of the short half-life of this

/

isotope. However, the pattern of detection is such that plant operations are not implicated. ,

j The program detected plant related radioactivity at very low levels

in the composite sampler on the station discharge line, in some downstream J

algae samples and in some downstream sediment samples. These results support the results reported in the Semiannual Effluent and Waste Disposal reports for Susquehanna SES for 1985. (23 and 24)

The resulting cohaervatively calculated radiation doses to a hypothet-

~

1 .

j ically exposed individual were 5.3 E-3 mrem whole body from the surface water p

I pathway and 5.3 E-3 mrem from the shoreline sediment. These doses are insignificant as they are only a small fraction of observed variation in local natural background. The calculated doses are well below 10 CFR 50 s

Appendix I design objectives and will not result in observable. effects on j, n 1 l the ecosystem or the public. - - ,

l VIII-I ,

l ,

x r

i

. - . -. - - , . , . - r ._, . ~ ....s . . J

k

-,e e .%.z

?s n h

4 s, g 4

W,.

j';

, 'V IX.

SUMMARY

TABLE i

)

4 4

9 k

3d

+

=

4

/

m, f

+L A

W

TABLE 3

SUMMARY

OF DATA FOR THE SSES OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM - 1985 Name of Facility: Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Location of Facility: Luzerne County, Pennsylvania Reporting Period: 2 January 1985 to January 7, 1986 (Page 1 of 12)

ANALYSI5 AND LOWER LIMll . RUMutR OF ,

MEDIUM OR PATHWAY TOTAL NUMBER OF ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUTINE'.

SAMPLED OF ANALYSES DETECTION MEAN (f) NAML MEAN(f)(2) '

.MEAN(f)(2) REPORTED (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) PERFORMED (LLD) (1) (RANGE) DISTANCE AND DIRECTION (RANGE) (RANGE) MEASUREMENTS Direct Radiation TLD. M9 -

0.20(241/241) Station 952 0.26(8/8) 0.19(28/28) O.

mR/ day (0.16-0.28) 0.2 miles 5 (0.25-0.28) (0.12-0.23) gtation1153 3 miles SW Fish ' Gamma Soec 17 7

(pCi/kg (wet)) K-40 -

3650(11/11)

(3000-4500)

Station 2H 30 miles NNE 3720(6/6)

(3400-3900) 3720(6/6)

(3400-3900) 0 Cs-134 130 LLD LLD Cs-137 150 11(2/11) 5tation IND 13(1/7) 9.5(2/6) 0 (9-13) 0.9-1.4 miles ESE -

(7-12)

-Co-58 130 LLD LLD Co-60 130 LLD LLD

.Fe-59' 260 LLD LLD Mn-54 130 LLD LLD Zn-65 260 LLD LLD Gross Beta 17 -

5640(11/11) Station 2ii 6770(6/6) 6770(6/6) 0 (3000-7800) 30 miles NNE (5600-7900) (5600-7900)

Note: - See footnotes at end of table.

I

3 TABLE 3

SUMMARY

OF DATA FOR THE SSES OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM - 1985 Name of Facility: Susquehanna Stean Electric Station Location of Facility: Luzerne County, Pennsylvania Reporting Period: 2 January 1985 to January 7, 1986 (Page 2 of 12)

ANALYSIS AND LOWER LIMIT MEDIUM OR PATHWAY NUMBER OF TOTAL NUMBER OF ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUTINE SAMPLED OF ANALYSES DETECTION ME AN ( f ) NAME MEAN(f)(2) MEAN(f (2) REPORTED (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) PERFORMED (LLD) (1) (RANGE) DISTANCE AND DIRECTION (RANGE) (RANGE MEASUREMEhTS Sediment Gamma Spec 15 (pC1/kg (dry)) K-40 -

13200(11/11) Station 78 17300(3/3) 12500(4/4) 0 (7700-19000) 1.2 miles SE (17000-18000) (9100-15000)

Be-7 -

990(5/11) Section 78 1080(3/3) 750(3/4) 0 (300-1700) 1.2 miles SE (700-1700) (330-960)

~

Cs-137 180 150(9/11) Station 78 Y 290(3/3) 210(3/4) 0 N (40-380) 1.2 miles SE (220-380) (180-250)

  • -54 -

290(3/11) Station 12F 380(2/2) LLD' O (30-730) 6.9 miles WSW (30-730)

Ra-226 -

1900(10/11) Station 78 2600(3/3) 2100(4/4) 0 (1200-2800) 1.2 miles SE (2400-2800) (1700-2800)

Co-60 -

420(1/11) Station 12F 420(1/2) LLD 0 On Site ENE -

Th-228 -

1290(11/11) Station 7B 1800(3/3) 1400(4/4) 0 (720-2000) 1.2 miles SE 1500-2000 (1100-1600)

Gross Alpha 15 11050(8/11) Station 7B 15300(3/3) 12400(4/4) 0 (5600-17000) 1.2 miles SE (14000-17000) 7600-16000 Gross Beta 15 25600(11/11) Station 78 32300(3/3) 29500(4/4) 0 (15000-39000) 1.2 elles SE (20000-39000) (23000-35000)

Co-58 150(1/11) Station 12F 150(1/2) LLD 0 On Site ENE -

Note: See footnotes at end of table.

TABLE 3

SUMMARY

OF DATA FOR THE SSES OPERATIC %AL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM - 1985 Name of Facility: Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Location of Facility: Luzerne County, Pennsylvania Reporting Period: 2 January 1985 to January 7, 1986 (Page 3 of 12)

ANALYSIS AND LOWER LIMIT NUMBER OF MEDIUM OR PATHWAY TOTAL NUMBER OF ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUTINE SAMPLED OF ANALYSES DETECTION ME AN ( f) NAME MEAN(f)(2) MEAN(f)(2) REPORTED (UNIT OF ME ASUREMENT) PERFORMED (LLD) (1) (RANGE) DISTANCE AND DIRECTION (RANGE) (RANGE) MEASUREMENTS Surface Water Gamma Spec 125 (pC1/t) Ba-140 60 LLD LLD 0 Co-58 15 LLD LLD Co-60 15 4.3(2/83) Station 657 4.3(2/13) LLD 0 (2.4-6.1) Discharge (2.4-6.1)

Cr-51 -

98(1/83) Station 657 98(1/13) LLD 0 Discharge -

Cs-134 15 LLD LLD 7

w Cs-137 18 4.6(2/83) Station LTAW 0.8 miles NE 4.6(2/14) 4.0(1/42) 0 (3.1-6.1) (3.1-6.1) -

Fe-59 30 LLD LLD K-40 -

57(10/83) Station 12H1 93(3/13) 49(5/42) 0 (17-230) 26 miles WSW (24-230) (23-98)

LA-140 15 LLD LLD Pb-54 15 4.6(1/83) Station 657 4.6(2/13) LLD 0 (1.6-7.5) Discharge (1.6-7.5)

Th-228 -

27(1/83) Station LTAW 27(1/14) LLD 0 0.8 miles NE -

Nb-95 15 LLD LLD

.Zn-65 30 4.6(1/83) Station 657 4.6(1/13) LLD Discharne -

Zr-95 30 LLD LLD l-131 125 2 0.22(7/83) . Station 655 0.29(2/10) 0.24(5/42) 0 (0.12-0.42) 0.9 miles ESE (0.16-0.42) (0.12-0.40)

Gross Alpha 125 2 1.8(10/83) Station 12G2 2.4(2/14) 1.5(2/42) 0 (1.3-2.4) 17 miles WSW (2.4) (1.1-1.9)

Gross Beta .125 4 4.4(82/83) Station 657 8.6(13/13) 2.9(40/42) 0 Note (1.4-15) Discharge (3.5-12) (1.4-6.7)

Sea footnotes at end of table *Tritiun 125 2000 220(71/83) Station 657 594(13/13) 112(32/42) 0 (66-2600) Discharge (110-2600) .(64-180)

~ --. _ , .- . .- - . . .~ _.- _ - _ - - - - _ . . _ . .-

TA8LE 3

SUMMARY

OF DATA FOR THE SSES OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM - 1985 -

Name of Facility: Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Location of Facility: Luzerne County, Pennsylvania Reporting Period: 2 January 1985 to January 7, 1986 (Page 4 of 12)

ANALYSIb AND LOWLR LIMII NUMULH OF ~~

MEDIUM OR PATHWAY TOTAL NUMBER OF ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUTINE SAMPLED OF ANALYSES DETECTION MEAN (f) NAML MEAN(f)(2) MEAN(f)(2) REPORTED (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) PERFORMED (LLD) (1) (RANGE) DISTANCE AND DIRECTION (RANGE) (RANGE) MEASUREMENTS.

1 Well Water G ama Spec 102 (pCi/f) Ba-140 60 LLD LLD 0 Co-58 15 LLD LLD Co-60 15 LLD LLD Cs-134 15 LLD LLD Cs-137 18 4.3(2/89) Station 256 4.9(1/14) LLD 0

_ (3.6-4.9) 0.9 miles NNE -

x i -Fe-59 30 LLD LLD K-40 -

33(13/89) Station 12F3 71(1/13) 71(1/13) 0 (22-51) 5.2 miles WSW - -

La-140 15 LLD LLD Mn-54 15 LLD LLD Nb-95 15 LLD LLD Zn-65 30 LLD LLD Zr-95 30 LLD LLD Th-228 -

25(1/89) Station 256 25(1/14) LLD 0 0.9 miles NNE -

Gross Alpha 102 -

-1.9(8/89) Station 452 4.2(2/14) LLD 0 (0.69-5.0) 0.5 miles ENE (3.5-5.0)

Gross Beta 102 -

2.2(54/89) Station 15A4 4.l(13/13) 1.8(12-13) 0 (0.86-5.7) 0.9 miles NW (2.2-5.7) (0.79-3.3)

Tritium 102 2000 116(7/189) Station 452 . 125(10/14) 109(12/13)- 0 (60-280) 0.5 miles ENE (60-240) (78-230)

Note: See footnotes at end of table.

TABLE 3

SUMMARY

OF DATA FOR THE SSES OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM - 1985 Name of Facility: Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Location of Facility: Luzerne County, Pennsylvania Reporting Period: 2 January 1985 to January 7,1986 (Page 5 of 12)

ANALYSI5 AND LOhtR LIMII NUMtstR OF MEDIUM OR PATHWAY TOTAL NUMBER OF ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUTINE SAMPLED OF ANALYSES DETECTION MEAN (f) NAME MEAN(f)(2) MEAN(f)(2) REPORTED (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) PERFORMED (LLD) (1) (RANGE) DISTANCE AND DIRECTION (RANGE) (RANGE) MEASUREMENTS Potable Water Garuna Spec 26 (pCi/f) Ba-140 60 LLD Only Indicator 0 Stations sampled Co-58 15 LLD for this Co-60 15 LLD Cs-134 15 LLD Cs-137 18 2.9(1/26) Station 12H2 Treated 2.9(1/13) 0 26 miles WSW Fe-59 30 LLD x

& K-40 -

43(4/26) Station 12H2 Raw 78(1/13) 0 (25-78) 26 miles WSW -

La-140 15 LLD Mn-54 15 LLD Nb-95 15 LLD Zn-65 30 LLD j Zr-95 30 LLD I-131 26 1.0 LLD Gross Alpha 26 -

1.2(4/26) Station 12H2 Raw 1.2(3/13) 0 (1.1-1.3) 26 miles WSW (1.1-1.3)

Gross Beta 26 -

2.4(26/26) Station 12H2 Raw 2.5(14/13) 0 (1.5-3.4) 26 miles WSW (1.8-3.4)

Tritium 26 2000 102(15/26) Station 12H2 Raw 104(7-13) 0 (59-150)- 26 miles WSW (59-130)

Control drinkiaq water stations are the sane as the surf ace water control stations. This is because there are no public upstream drinking water facilities.

Note: See footnotes at end of table.

TABLE 3

SUMMARY

OF DATA FOR THE SSES OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM - 1985 Name of Facility: Susquehanna Stean Electric Station Location of Facility: Luzerne County, Pennsylvania Reporting Period: 2 January 1985 to January 7,1986 (Page 6 of 12)

ANALYSI5 AND LOWER LIMIT NUMtSLK OF MEDIUM OR PATHWAY TOTAL NUMBER OF ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATIO*i NONROUTINE SAMPLED OF ANALYSES DETECTION MLAN (f) NAML MLAN(f)(2) MEAN(f)(2) REPORTED (UNIT OF EASUREMENT) PERFORMED (LLD) (1) (RANGE) DISTANCE AND DIRECTION (RANGE) (RANGE) MEASUREMENTS Precipit ation Gross Alpha 44 -

0.61(1/35) Station 7G1 0.93(1/5) 0.93(1/9) 0 (pC1/t) - 14 miles SE Gross Beta 44 -

2.5(35/35) itation 12G1 3.4(4/4) 3.4(9/9) 0 (1.3-4.8) 1.5 miles WSW (2.5-4.3) (1.6-7.3)

Trit he 44 2000 116(30/35) Station 1152 150(4/4) 114(6/9) 0 (53-210) 0.4 miles SW (120-180) (82-180)

Ganma Spec 44 Be-7 -

47(15/35) Station 102 110(1/4) 52(4/9) 0 (24-110) 4 miles N -

(37-70)

Ba-140 60 LLD LLD Co-58 15 LLD LLD Co-60 15 LLD LLD Cs-134 15 LLD LLD Cs-137 18 3.4(1/35) Station 1152 3.4(1/4) LLD 0 0.4 miles SW -

Te-59 30 LLD LLD K-40 -

22(3/35) Station 7G1 48(1/5) 45(2/9) 0 (21-23) 14 miles SE -

(41-48)

La-140 15 LLD LLD Mb-95 15 LLD LLD Zn-65 30 LLD LLD Zr-95 30 LLD LLD Ph-54 15 LLD LLD Th-228 -

20(4/35 Station 981 29(1/5) LLD 0 (8.9 29 1.3 elles S Note: See footnotes at end of table.

TABLE 3

SUMMARY

OF DATA FOR THE SSES OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM -

Name of Ft.cility: Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Locatioa of Facility: Luzerne County, Pennsylvania Reporting Period: 2 January 1985 to January 7, 1986 (Page 7 of 12)

ANALYSIS AND LUWLR LIMll w MEDIUM OR PATHWAY TOTAL NUMBER OF NUMULR Ut ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN SAMPLED OF ANALYSES DETECTION CONTROL LOCATION NONROUTINE MLAN (f) NAML MEAN(f)(2)

(UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) PERFORMED (LLD) (1) (RANGE)

MEAN(f)(2). REPORTED DISTANCE AND DIRECTION (RANGE) (RANGE) MEASUREMENTS Air Particulates Gamma Spec 44 (E-03 pCi/m3)' Be-7 -

76(32/32) Station 554 82(4/4) 68(12/12) 0 (61-95) 0.8 miles E (65-53) (53-88)

Cs-134 50 LLD LLD i

Cs-137 60 0.27(1/32) Station 2S2 0.27(1/32) 0.19(2/12) 0 0.9 miles NNE (0.15-0.22)

K-40 -

4.4(19/32) Station 252 5.6(2/4) 3.5(6/12) 0

. (1.5-11) 0.9 miles NNE (2.6-8.6) (2.5-5.1)

, - Gross Alpha 44 -

4.0(32/32) 7 (2.5-5.8)

Station 12G1 15 miles WSW 4.3(4/4)

(3.1-5.0) 3.6(12/12) 0 N (0.9-5.0)

Gross Beta 565 10 16.3(409/409) Station 7H1 16.8(53/53) 16.3(156/156) 0 (7.6-32.0) 47 miles SE -(3.3-30.0) (3.3-36.0)

Air lodine I-131 565 0.07 LLD (pCi/m3) LLD 0 Milk l-131 144 1.0 LLD (pCi/f) LLD 0 Gross Beta 144 -

7.3(110/122) Station 1283 Minus K-40 14.6(13/13) 9.2(22/22) O (2.5-26) 2 miles WSW (6.1-26) (5.3-14)

Ganna Spec 144 Ba-140 15 LLD LLD 0 K-40 -

1350(122/122) Station 13E3 1430(23/23) 1320(22/22) 0 (1070-1630) 5 miles W (1270-1590) (1120-1460)

Cs-134 15 LLD LLD Cs-137 18 4.8(2/122) Station 1001 4.9(1/23) 4.4(3/22) 0 (4.7-4.9) 3 miles SSW -

(3.3-5.4)

La-140 -

LLD LLD Note: See footnotes at end of table.

TABLE 3

SUMMARY

OF DATA FOR TFE SSES OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM - 1985 Name of Facility: Susquehanna Stearn Electric Station Location of Facility: Luzerne County, Pennsylvania Reporting Period: 2 January 1985 to January 7, 1986 (Page 8 of 12)

ANALYSIS AND LOWER LIMIT NUMBER OF-MEDIUM OR PATHWAY TOTAL NUMBER OF ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUTINE SAMPLED OF ANALYSES DETECTION MEAN (f) NAME MEAN(f)(2) MEAN(f)(2) REPORTED (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) PERFORME0 (LLD) (1) (RANGE) DISTANCE AND DIRECTION (RANGE) (RANGE) MEASUREMENTS Pasture Grass Gamma Spec 14 (pct /kg (wet)) Cs-137 80 LLD Only Indicator stations sanpled for this K-40 -

6700(14/14) Station 15A1 0 7050(13/13)

(1700-30000) 0.9 miles NW (1700-30000) x g Be-7 -

4300(14/14) Section 801 7100(1/1) 0-(260-21000) 3.2 miles SSE -

Ba-140 -

LLD Co-58 -

LLD Co-60 - LLD Cs-134 60 LLD Fe-59 - LLD I-131 60 LLD La-140 - LLD Nb-95 -

LLD

! -Mn-54 -

LLD Zn-65 -

LLD Zr-95 -

LLD Note: See footnotes at end of table.

_.m-._._..m ___.._ _ __ , _ _ _ _ . . _ . _ _ ~ _.___._.______m .___-__ _

i i

TABLE 3

SUMMARY

OF DATA FOR THE SSES OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM - 1985 i

j Name of Facility: Susquehanna Steam Electric. Station Location of Facility: Luzerne County, Pennsylvania Reporting Period: 2 January 1985 to January 7,1986 .

j (Page 9 of 12)

ANALYSI5 AND LOWER LIMll .

NUntstM OF MEDIUM OR PATHWAY TOTAL NUMBER OF ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUTINE SAMPLED OF ANALYSES DETECTION MLAN (f) NAMt MLAN(f)(2) MEAN(f)(2) REPORTED (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) PERFORMED (LLD) (1) (RANGE) DISTANCE AND DIRECTION (RANGE) (RANGE) MEASUREMENTS 1

l Food Products Gamma Spec 50 (pCi/kg (wet)) Station 7B2 Cs-137 80 20(3/45) 34(1/3) LLD 0 (10-34) 1.5 miles SE -

K-40 -

4000(44/45) Station 12B1 9300 (1/1) 2800(5/5) 0 (1000-9300) 1.3 miles WSW -

(1500-3900)

Y

  • Be-7 -

290(19/45) Section 782 630(1/3) LLD 0 I

(120-630) 1.5 miles SE -

Ba-140 - LLD LLD

! Co-58 - LLD' LLD Co-60 - LLD LLD Cs-134 60 LLD LLD-

.i Fe-59 -

LLD LLD I-131 60 LLD LLD i La-140 - LLD LLD Nb-95 - LLD LLD Mn-54 -

LLD LLD Zn-65 -

LLD LLD Zr-95 - LLD LLD:-

i Note: See footnotes at end of table.

i p . _ . . . , . , , - - , -, __ _ --

_.. - . . . _ . _ _ _ _._ . _ _ _ . - m , .

TABLE 3 SufmARY OF DATA FOR THE SSES OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM - 1985 Name of Facility: Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Location of Facility: Luzerne County, Pennsylvania

' Reporting Period: 2 January 1985 to January 7, 1986 (Page 10 of 12)

ANALY515 AND LOWER LIMIT NUMt5LK OF MEDIUM OR PATHWAY TOTAL NUMBER OF ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUTINE SAMPLED OF ANALYSES DETECTION MEAN (f) NAME MEAN(f)(2) MEAN(f)(2) REPORTED (LLD) (1) (RANGE) DISTANCE AND DIRECTION (RANGE) (RANGE) MEASUREMENTS (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) . PERFORMED Algae Gamma Spec 32 (pCi/kg (dry)) K-40 -

12100(13/13) Station AG4 157000(6/6) 10600(19/19) 'O (7500-21000) 0.9 miles ESE (13000-21000) (1500-17000)

Cs-137 -

220(5/13) Station AG4 280(3/6) 220(3/19) 0 (120-430) 0.9 miles ESE (140-430) '(190-250) 1-131 -

550(5/13) Section AG2 7000(2/3) 1800(11/19) 0 (270-890) 14 miles NE (2100-12000) (190-12000)

Be-7 -

5200 (11/13) Station AG2 9300(3/3) 6600(17/19) 0 5 (680-10000) 14 miles ne (3800-13000) (700-13000)

Mn-54 -

550(2/13) Station AG4 690(1/6) LLD 0 (400-690) 0.9 miles ESE -

Co-58 -

- 430(1/13) Section AG4 430(1/6) LLD 0

- 0.9 miles ESE -

4 Co-60 -

490(2/13) Station AG4 740(1/6) LLD' O 2 (250-740) 0.9 miles ESE -

Ra-226 -

3200(1/13) Station AG6 3200(1/7)- 6300(4/19) 0 0.9 miles ESE -

(3300-9500)

Th-228 -

880(10/13) Station AG3 1600(3/6) 1150(8/19) 0 (570-1300 0.8 miles E (1100-2000) (620-2000)

~

-Note: See footnotes at end of table.

i 4

i-i

TABLE 3 Suf91ARY OF DATA FOR THE SSES OPERATIOrtAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM - 1985 Name of Facility: Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Location of Facility: Luzerne County, Pennsylvania Reporting Period: 2 January 1985 to January 7, 1986 (Page 11 of 12)

ANALY515 AND LOWER LIMII NURutN OF MEDIUM OR MTHWAY TOTAL NUMBER OF ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUTINE SAMPLED OF ANALYSES DETECTION MLAN (f) NAME MEAN(f)(2) MEAN(f)(2) REPORTED (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) PERFORMED (LLD) (1) (RANGE) DISTANCE AND DIRECTION (RANGE)- (RANGE) MEASUREMENTS Game, Poultry and Gama Spec 8 Eggs . Cs-137 80 1600(5/8) Station 155 3900(1/1) Only Indicator 0 (pCi/kg (wet)) (170-3900) 0.5-0.8 miles E -

locations sampled for this medium.

K-40 -

2800(8/8) Statton 25 3800(1/1) 0 (1100-3800) 0.3-1.0 miles NNE Ba-140 LLO f -

U Co-58 -

LLD Co-60 - LLD Cs-134 60 LLO Fe-59 - LLD I-131 60 LLD l

l La-140 -

LLD Mn-54 - LLD Nb-95 - LLD Zn-65 - LLD Zr-95 -

LLD Note: See footnotes at end cf table.

TABLE 3

SUMMARY

OF DATA FOR THE SSES OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM - 1985 Name of Facility: Susquehanna Steam Electric Station  !

Location of Facility: Luzerne County, Pennsylvania

.s.

Reporting Period: 2 January 1985 to January 7. 1986 i (Page 12 of 12) -1 ANALYbl5 AND LOWER LIMIT l' NUMBLR OF MEDIUM OR PATHWAY TOTAL. NUMBER OF ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUTINE~

SAMPLED OF ANALYSES DETECTION MLAN (f) NAML NAN (f)(2) MEAN(f)(2) REPORTED (UNIT OF ME ASUREMENT) PERFORMED (LLD) (1) (RANGE) DISTANCE AND DIRECTION (RANGE) (RANGE) MEASUREMENTS Soil and Vegetation Gamma Spec . 30 (pti/kg (dry)) Cs-137 -

350(16/24) Station 7G1 1950(2/3) 1050(4/6) 0 (100-950) 14 miles SE (1700-2200) (110-2200)

K-40 .- 16000(24/24) Station 302 y 23700(3/3) 17000(6/6)

(7400-50000) 3.4 miles NE (10000-50000) (8400-30000)

N 84-226. -

(2500(12/24) Statton 3D2 5700(2/3) 2000(4/6)

(1400-7700) 3.4 miles NE (3600-7700) (1700-2300)

Th-228 1260(16/24) Station 302 3250(2/3) 1180(4/6)

(570-4300) -3.4 miles NE .(2200-4300) (1100-1300)

Be-7 .- 4100(8/24) Station 12G3 10000(1/3). 9950(2/6)

(1200-7200) 15 miles WSW -

(9900-10000)

.(1) 'LLO is lower limit of detection as defined and required in PPat Technical Specifications. Typical LLD values can be found in tahle 19 in this report.

(?) (f) is the ratio of positive results to the number of samples analyzed for the parameter of interest. Means are of positive results only.

Also given are the minimum and maximum values of detectable activity during the reporting period (RANGE).

.S L.

h X. REFERENCES

X. REFERENCES

1. Radiation Management Corporation, "Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program, Report #1 (April - December 1972)" RMC-TR-73-14, July 1973.
2. Radiation Management Corporation, "Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Preoperational Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program 1973," RMC-TR-74-07, May 1974.
3. Radiation Management Corporation, "Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Preoperational Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program,1974 Annual Report," RMC-TR-75-07, April 1975.
4. Radiation Management Corporation, "Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program,1975 Annual Report," RMC-TR-76-05, May 1976.
5. Radiation Management Corporation, "Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program,1976 Annual Report," RMC-TR-77-04, March 1977.
6. Radiation Management Corporation, "Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program,1977 Annual Report," RMC-TR-78-01, May 1978.
7. Radiation Management Corporation, "Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program,1978 Annual Report," RMC-TR-79-01, April 1979.
8. Radiation Management Corporation, "Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program,1979 Annual Report," RMC-TR-80-01, March 1980.
9. Radiation Management Corporation, "Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program,1980 Annual Report," RMC-TR-81-02, July 1981.

X-1

X. REFERENCES (continued)

10. Radiation Management Corporation, "Susquehanna Steam Electric.

Station, Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program,1981 Annual Report," RMC-TR-82-03, July 1982.

11. Radiation Management Corporation, "Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program,1982 Preoperational Report," RMC-TR-83-01, April 1983.
12. Radiation Management Corporation, "Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program,1982 Operational Report." RMC-TR-83-02, April 1983.
13. NUS Corporation, "Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program,1983 Annual Report," NUS-4516 March 1984.
14. Pennsylvania Power and Light Company, "Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Environmental Report, Operating License Stage,"

May 1978.

15. Pennsylvania Power and Light Company, "Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Final Safety Analysis Report," 1978,
16. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, " Final Environmental Statement Related to the Operation of Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2,"

Docket Nos. 50-387 and 50-388, June 1981.

17. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "An Acceptable Radio-logical Environmental Monitoring Frogram," Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position, November 1979, Revision 1.
18. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, " Environ-mental Radiation Measurement," NCRP Report No. 50, Washington, D.C.,

December 27, 1976,

19. Oakley, D.C., " Natural Radiation Exposure in the United States,"

ORP/SID 72-1 Office of Radiation Programs, U.S. Environmental Protec-tion Agency, Washington, D.C., June 1972.

X-2

X. REFERENCES (continued)

20. Denham, D.H. , Roberts, M.C. , Novitsky, W.M. , Testa, E.D. , "Investiga-tion of Elevated Cesium-137 Concentrations in Small Game in Luzerne County, Pennsylvania." Proceedings of Papers presented at Health Physics Society Tenth Midyear Topical Symposium, October 11-13, 1976, pgs 271-279.
21. Teledyne isotopes, "Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program,1984 Annual Report," April 1985.
22. Currie L.A., " Lower Limit of Detection: Definition and Elaboration of a Proposed Position for Radiological Effluent and Environmental Measurements," NUREG/CR-4007, September 1984,
23. Pennsylvania Power and Light Company, "Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Semi-annual Effluent Waste Disposal Report, Data Period:

January - June 1985," August 1986.

24. Pennsylvania Power and Light Company, "Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Semi-annual Effluent Waste Disposal Report, Data Period:

July - December 1985," February 1986.

25. Pennsylvania Power and Light Company, "Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Offsite Dose Calculation Manual," Docket nos. 50-387 and 50-388. November 22, 1985.
26. Pennsylvania Power and Light Company Technical Specifications Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units no. I and 2; Docket no.

50-387 and 50-388 Appendix A to License no. NPF-14, July 82 and NPF-22, March 84.

X-3

- 4  % 4 ,., 4 - ..,A

- m - e - a

  • 6 i

XI. DATA TABLES 1

i 1

(

l iI b

4 t

t i

l l

1 d

TABLE 5 (Page 1 of 3)

DIRECT RADIATION - THERM 0 LUMINESCENT D0SIMETRY (12) RESULTS SSES 1985 (All results are in mR/ day i 2s)

LOCATION QUARTER 1 QUARTER 2 QUARTER 3 QUARTER 4 01/02/85 04/01/85 07/01/85 10/01/85 to to to to 04/04/85 07/03/85 10/03/85 01/03/86 IS2 0.20 1 0.01 0.20 1 0.01 0.20 1 0.02 0.21 i 0.01 1A1 0.19 1 0.00 Station Destroyed Station Destroyed Station Destroyed 102 0.20 1 0.01 0.21 i 0.02 0.19 i 0.00 0.20 i 0.02 1El 0.13 0.01 0.18 1 0.04 0.17 i 0.01 0.17 1 0.01 4

252 0.18 i 0.01 0.17 1 0.01 0.18 i 0.02 0.17 1 0.00(4) 2S3 0.19 1 0.01 0.20 i 0.01 0.24 i 0.03 0.20 1 0.01 283 0.19 1 0.01 0.19 i 0.02 0.19 i 0.02 0.20 i 0.02 2F1 0.19 i 0.01 0.19 1 0.02 0.20 1 0.05 0.19 1 0.02 3S3 0.17 i 0.01 0.16 i 0.01 0.19 1 0.06 0.18 1 0.02 354 0.19 i 0.01 0.18 i 0.02 0.20 1 0.02 0.18 1 0.01 3D1 0.22 1 0.00 0.22 1 0.02 0.22 1 0.02 0.21 1 0.00 3F1 0.18 i 0.01 0.19 1 0.01 0.18 1 0.02(5) 0.17 i 0.01 3G3 0.21 i 0.02 0.20 1 0.01 0.20 i 0.02 0.21 i 0.01 3G4 0.20 i 0.01 0.2010.00(4) 0.18 i 0.01 0.19 1 0.01 451 0.16 i 0.00 0.16 1 0.01 0.15 i 0.00(4) 0.16 i 0.01 453 0.21 1 0.01 0.19 i 0.02 0.21 i 0.00 0.21 1 0.01 4E1 0.19 i 0.02 0.20 1 0.01 0.19 i 0.00(4) 0.19 1 0.01 4G1 0.20 i 0.01 0.23 i 0.02(4) 0.21 i 0.00 0.22 i 0.01 551 0.16 1 0.00 0.16 1 0.02 0.16 1 0.01 0.16 1 0.01 SS4 0.18 i 0.00 0.21 1 0.09 0.19 i 0.01 0.18 i 0.01 SS7 0.19 i 0.02 0.18 1 0.01 0.17 i 0.02 0.18 1 0.01 SE2 0.20 i 0.02 0.21 i 0.02 0.20 i 0.01(4) 0.19 i 0.01  !

654 0.23 i 0.01 0.22 i 0.02 0.24 i 0.04(5) 0.22 1 0.01 6A3 0.21 1 0.01 0.20 1 0.01(4) 0.21 i 0.01 0.20 2 0.00(3) 6A4 0.21 i 0.02(3) 6El 0.22 i 0.01 0.22 i 0.02(4) 0.22 1 0.01 0.22 1 0.02 7S1/6S8 0.18 i 0.01 0.17 1 0.00 0.18 i 0.03(8) 0.18 i 0.00 <

7S3/6S9 0.21 i 0.01 0.21 i 0.00 0.22 i 0.04(9) 0.20 1 0.01 7S6(11) 0.20 1 0.04 0.19 1 0.01 7Al 0.18 1 0.02 0.18 i 0.01 0.19 i 0.00 0.19 i 0.01 7A2(10) 0.20 1 0.01 783 0.20 i 0.03 0.18 i 0.01 0.21 i 0.03 0.22 i 0.07 7El 0.21 1 0.02 0.20 i 0.02 0.21 1 0.00 0.21 1 0.01 See foot notes at end of table XI-1

TABLE 5 (Page 2 of 3)

DIRECT RADIATION - THERM 0 LUMINESCENT 00SIMETRY (12) RESULTS SSES 1985 (All results are in mR/ day i 2s)

LOCATION QUARTER 1 QUARTER 2 QUARTER 3 QUARTER 4 01/02/85 04/01/85 07/01/85 10/01/85 to to to to 04/04/85 07/03/85 10/03/85 01/03/86 7F1 0.18 0.00 (2) (2) (2) 7G1 0.20 1 0.02 0.21 i 0.02 0.20 1 0.01 0.20 i 0.01 852 0.20 1 0.02 0.20 t 0.00 0.21 1 0.01 0.20 1 0.02 8A2(10) 0.20 1 0.04 882 0.19 1 0.00 0.18 i 0.00 0.20 1 0.01 0.18 i 0.01 802 0.18 1 0.01 (1) (1) l 803(10) 0.19 i 0.01(13) l 952 0.25 1 0.02 0.26 i 0.01 0.25 i 0.02 0.28 1 0.01 l 9B1 0.17 i 0.01 0.20 1 0.05 0.20 i 0.06 0.20 1 0.00(4) 901 0.19 i 0.01 0.19 i 0.00 0.19 i 0.01 0.20 1 0.02 1051 0.19 i 0.01 0.19 i 0.03 0.18 i 0.02 0.19 1 0.01 1052(11) 0.25 i 0.00 0.24 0.03 1082 0.16 0.01 0.18 i 0.06 0.15 i 0.02 0.15 1 0.02 1083 0.17 i 0.00 0.17 1 0.04 0.16 1 0.01 0.16 0.01 1002 0.19 1 0.02 0.19 1 0.01 0.20 1 0.02 0.18 0.02 1152 0.17 i 0.00 0.17 i 0.02 0.16 1 0.01 0.17 i 0.00 1153 0.26 i 0.01 0.27 i 0.01 0.25 0.01 0.26 1 0.01 1156 0.17 i 0.00 0.17 1 0.01 0.18 1 0.02 0.17 1 0.01 11El 0.17 i 0.01 0.17 i 0.02 0.16 1 0.01 0.17 i 0.01 1253 0.23 i 0.01 0.23 1 0.01 0.23 1 0.01 0.24 1 0.01 1284 0.18 1 0.01 0.18 1 0.00 0.20 t 0.03 0.18 1 1.01 1203 0.21 1 0.01 0.22 1 0.03 0.20 1 0.01 0.20 i u.01 12E1 0.19 i 0.03 0.19 1 0.01 0.19 1 0.01 0.19 0.01 12F2 0.20 i 0.01 0.21 1 0.02 0.21 1 0.05 0.20 1 0.01 12G1 0.16 i 0.01 0.16 i 0.02 0.15 i 0.01 0.16 0.01 12G4 0.20 1 0.01 0.19 1 0.02 0.20 1 0.01 0.20 1 0.01 1352 0.20 1 0.01 0.24 1 0.01 0.21 1 0.03 0.21 1 0.01 13S4(11) 0.26 1 0.02 0.25 1 0.01 1355(11) 0.25 i 0.01 0.24 i 0.01 13E4 0.21 1 0.02 0.20 0.00 0.19 i 0.01 0.21 1 0.01 1455 0.23 i 0.01 0.22 1 0.02 0.22 1 0.02 0.22 1 0.01 1456(10) (2) 14E1 0.20 1 0.01 0.21 1 0.03 0.21 1 0.01 0.19 i 0.01 1553/1652 0.22 1 0.03 0.22 1 0.01 0.2410.05(7) 0.21 1 0.02 1554 0.17 1 0.01 0.17 i 0.00 0.19 i 0.03(5) 0.17 1 0.01 1555(11) 0.21 i 0.01 0.22 i 0.03 15A3 0.20 1 0.01 0.20 i 0.02 0.19 i 0.01 0.20 1 0.02 See foot notes at end of table XI-2

TABLE 5 (Page 3 of 3)

DIRECT RADIATION - THERM 0 LUMINESCENT DOSIMETRY (12) RESULTS SSES 1985 (All results are in mR/ day i 2s)

LOCATION QUARTER 1 QUARTER 2 QUARTER 3 QUARTER 4 01/02/85 04/01/85 .07/01/85 10/01/85 to to to to 04/04/85 07/03/85 10/03/85 01/03/86 15F1 0.20 1 0.01 0.22 1 0.01(4) 0.20 i 0.01 0.28 1 0.00(4) 16S1 0.21 i 0.02 0.20 i 0.01 0.21 1 0.01 0.21 i 0.02 16A2 0.17 i 0.02 0.20 1 0.05 0.17 1 0.01 0.17 i 0.00 1681 0.17 i 0.02 0.20 1 0.00(4) 0.18 i 0.03 0.17 1 0.02 16F1 0.20 i 0.01 0.20 1 0.01 0.20 1 0.01 0.23 i 0.02 7H1 0.13 1 0.00 0.13 1 0.00 0.12 1 0.01 0.12 1 0.00 Average (6) 0.19 i 0.04 0.20 1 0.05 0.20 i 0.05 0.20 1 0.06 (1) TLD and location destroyed; replaced by station 8D3.

(2) TLD Vandalized (3) Location 6A3 moved to 6A4 on 11/12/85.

(4) Mean is average of 2 TLD elements.

(5) Mean is average of 3 TLD elements.

(6) Errors of row averages are two standard deviations calculated from the mean of each.

(7) Location code was changed to 16S2 July 1985.

(8) location code was changed to 6S8 July 1985.

(9) location code was changed to 659 July 1985.

(10) New location in October 1985 (11) New location in July 1985 (12) Errors for individual measurements are two standard deviations of +$e average of four readings per station.

(13) TLD vandalized in October; reinstalled 10/15/85 XI-3

.. - __ __ . _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . - _ _ . _ - _ . _ . _ _ - _ m _ _ _ _- _. . .

i TAPLE 6 (Page 1 of 5)

GROSS ALPHA GROSS BETA. TRITILN 10 DINE-131 AND GAMA* SPECTROMETRY OF WATER (SURFACE AND DRINKING)

SSES 1985 (Resuits in pCi/l t 2 s)

LOCATION COLLECTION PERIOD Gr-Alpha Gr-Beta H-3 I-131(3) K-40 Ra-226 Th-228 Cs-137 Other 656 01/07/85-02/11/85 LT 2 2.7 t 1.2 140 t 40 558 01/14/85-02/11/85 LT 2 3.7

  • 1.2 110 50 103 01/08/85 LT 1 3.2 2 0.9 89 i 40 657 01/07/85-02/11/85(5a) LT 2 9.7 2 1.8 320 2 40 655 01/14/85-02/11/85 LT 2 3.0 t 1.2 LT 50 78264 Cr-51 98 i bu 12F1 01/08/85 LT 1 1.8 2 0.7 81241 12G2 01/08/85 LT 2 4.2 1 1.0 160 30 12H1 01/07/85-02/11/85 LT 2 15 12 89 t 46 25221 LTAW 01/08/85 LT 2 3.9 t 1.0 130 t 40 3.1 2 2.5

. LTAW Oup. 01/08/85 LT 2 4.2 2 1.1 140 t 40 12H2 R(1) 01/07/85-02/11/85(6a) LT 1 2.0 2 0.8 130 t 40

12H2 T.(1) 01/07/85-02/11/85 LT 1 2.2 2 0.8 130 t 40 I 'x 656 02/11/85-03/11/85 LT 1 2.4 0.8 140 2 50 LT 0.5(2) 23125 7 558 02/19/85-03/11/85 LT 0.9 3.2 2 0.8 150 i 50 LT 0.5(2) 98 t 68

~* ID3 02/12/85 LT 2 3.2 i 1.3 100 t 40 657 02/11/85-03/11/85 . LT 2 6.8

  • 1.2 110 t 40 LT 0.5(2) 655 02/19/85-03/11/85 LT 1 3.0 0.8 LT 50 LT 0.4(2) 12F1 02/12/85 LT 2 3.8 t 1.3 74 i 41 1262 02/12/85 LT 2 10 t2 190 t 40

-12H1 02/11/85-03/11/85 LT 1 2.8 2 0.8 90 t 44 230 t 50 4 LT 0.2(2)

LTAW 02/12/85 LT 2 5.8 i 1.5 99 t 40 6.1 i 3.8 12F1 Split 02/12/85 LT 2 2.9 2 1.2  % t 38 12H2 R 02/11/85-03/11/85 LT 1 2.8 2 0.8 110 t 40 LT 0.5(2) 78258 12H2 T 02/11/85-03/11/85 LT 1 2.4 i 0.8 150 40 LT 0.5(2) 656 03/11/85-04/08/85 LT 0.8 6.7 t 1.0 110 t 50 558 03/18/85-04/08/85 LT 0.9 2.0 t 0.8 99 i 40 LT 0.2(2) 62 i 37 1D3 03/12/85 LT 1 4.3 2 0.9 84 i 48 LT 0.2(2) 657 03/11/85-04/08/85 LT 1 4.1 2 0.9 380 t 50 655 03/18/85-04/08/85 LT 0.9 2.2 t 0.8 LT 50 12F1 03/12/85 LT 0.9 3.6 i 0.8 110 t 40 LT 0.2(2) 1262 03/12/85 '2.4 i 1.5 6.2 t 1.1 - 140 t 50 LT 0.3(2) 38 i 33 12H1 03/11/85-04/08/85 LT 1 1.5 t 0.7 120 2 50 LTAW 03/12/85 . LT 'l 4.3 2 1.0 140 t 40 LT 0.2(21 12G2 Split 03/12/85 2.4 t 1.5 7.3 i 1.1 -180 2 40 LT0.2(2?

12H2 R 03/11/85-04/08/85 LT 0.9 1.9 2 0.7 68 2 31 12H2 T 03/11/85-04/08/85 LT 1 1.8 i 0.7 100 t 40 l

, See fodtnotes at end of table.

TABLE 6 (Page 2 of 5)

GROSS ALPHA, GROSS BETA. TRITIUM, 100!NE-131 AND GAMMA

  • SPECTRUMETRY OF WATER (SURFACE AND DRINK!hG)

SSES 1985 (Results in pCi/l 1 2 s)

LOCATION COLLECTION PERIOD Gr-Alpha Gr-Beta H-3 1-131(3) K-40 Ra-226 Th-228 Cs-137 other 656 04/08/85-05/13/85 LT I 1.4 i C.8 120 2 50 34 2 23 558 04/15/85-05/13/85 LT 1 1.4 2 0.8 100 t 40 4.0 1 3.6' ID3 04/09/85 LT 2 1.7 i 0.7 80245 657 04/08/85-05/13/85 LT 2 3.5 t 1.0 370 2 50 44226 655 04/15/85-05/13/85 LT 1 1.5 2 0.8 150 2 50 12F1 04/09/85 LT 1 1.8 2 0.7 120 2 40 12G2 04/09/85 LT 0.8 1.4 2 0.7 120 t 40 17 1 19 12H1 04/08/85-05/13/85 LT 1 LT 1 120 2 40 LTAW 04/09/85 LT 2 4.5 2 1.1 230 t LJ 558 Dup. 04/15/85-05/13/85 LT 1 LT 1 94 i 43 12G2 Split 04/09/85 LT 0.8 2.3 2 0.8 120 2 40 12H1 Split 04/08/85-05/13/85 LT 1 1.8 2 0.8 100 t 50 12H2 R 04/08/85-05/13/85 LT 2 3.4 2 1.0 LT 70 12H2 T 04/08/85-05/13/85 LT 1 2.3

  • 0.9 59 2 36 37 t 29 x

7 656 05/13/85-06/10/85 LT 1 2.3

  • 0.8 150 t 50 29 22 ui 558 05/20/85-06/10/85 LT 1 2.6 t 0.9 .150t 50 103 05/14/85 LT 2 LT l- 120 2 40 657 05/13/85-06/10/85 2.2 2 2.1 1222 1900 t 100 Co-60 6. I' 1 2.0 Mn-54 7.5 1 2.0 655 05/20/85-06/10/85 LT 1 2.6 t 0.8 140 t 70 12F1 05/14/85 LT 2 2.3 2 0.9 90 t 42 j 12G2 05/14/85 LT 2 2.1 2 0.8 120 t 40 0.12 2 0.06 12H1 05/13/85-06/10/85 LT 1 1.8 z 0.8 380 t 60 ~

LTAW 05/14/85 LT 2 3.4 t 1.0 89233 655 Dup. 05/20/85-06/10/85 LT 1 2.5 t 0.8 66 i 29 12H2 R 05/13/85-06/10/85 LT 1 2.3 t 0.8 110 t 40 12H2 T 05/13/85-06/10/85 LT 1 2.3 2 0.8 LT 60 656 06/10/85-07/08/85(4b) LT 2 2.2 2 1.0 140 t 40 558 06/18/85-07/08/85 LT 2 1.6 2 1.0 99 t 31 103 06/11/85 LT 1 3.1 t 0.9 120 2 30 657 06/10/85-07/08/85 LT 1 4.7 2 1.4 670 60 Co-60 2.4 i 1.3.

Mn-54 1.6 2 1.7 655 06/18/85-07/08/85 LT 2 2.2 t 1.0 120 t 50 12F1 06/11/85 LT 1 3.3 1 0.9 130 t 70 12G2 06/11/85 LT 1 3.2 t 0.9 390 t 70 12H1 06/10/85-07/08/85 LT 2 .2.9 2 0.9 - 120 t 40 24 2 21 LTAW. 06/11/85 LT 2 3.3 2 0.9 290 t 60 558 Dup. 06/18/85-07/08/85 . LT 2 2.4 i 1.0 120 2 40 12H2 R 06/10/85-07/08/85 LT I 1.8 t 0.9 120 t 40 12H2 T 06/10/85-07/08/85 LT 0.9 1.5 t 0.8 75232 See footnotes at end of table. - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _-

TABLE 6 (Page 3 of 5)

GROSS ALPHA, GROSS BETA. TRITitH,100!NE-131 AND GAMMA

  • SPECTROMETRY OF WATER (SURFACE AND DRINKING)

SSES 1985 (Results in pC1/2 i 2 s)

LOCATION COLLECTION PERIOD Gr-Alpha Gr-Beta N-3 I-131(3) K-40 Ra-226 Th-228 Cs-137 Other 656 07/08/85-08/12/85(4c) LT 2 2.2 2 0.9 140 1 60 558 07/15/85-08/12/S5 LT 1 3.4 0.9 140 t 80 103 07/09/85 LT 2 1.7 t 1.0 130 t 40 LT 0.2 657 07/08/85-08/12/85 LT 3 9.2 1 1.6 420 t 120 655 07/15/85-08/12/85 LT 1 2.7 t 0.9 270 t 80 12F1 07/09/85 LT 2 3.3 t 1.0 84 t 39 J 12G2 07/09/85 LT 2 3.4 t 1.0 200 i 40 l 12H1 07/08/85-08/12/85 LT 1 3.2 2 0.9 150 t 70 l LTAW 07/09/85 LT 2 2.7 1 1.1 160 t 70 '

655 Dup. 07/15/85-08/12/85 LT 1 2.9 2 0.9 240 t 70 12H2 R 07/08/85-08/12/85(6b) 1.3 2 0.6 2.5 t 1.0 130 2 80 12H2 T 07/08/85-08/12/85 LT 0.7 2.8 1.1 130 t 60 32127 656 08/12/85-09/09/85(4a) LT 1 3.0 1 0.9 LT 90 d' 558 08/19/85-09/09/85 1.1 i 1.1 2.1 2 0.8 LT 100 0.16 2 0.08

  • 103 08/13/85 LT 2 3.7 i 1.0 180 t 80 657 08/12/85-09/09/85(5b) 2.1 2 1.4 12 22 230 t 120 0.25 t 0.10 Zn-65 4.6 1 2.8 655 08/19/85-09/09/85 LT 1 3.5 i 1.0 LT 100 36 i 23 12F1 08/13/85 LT 1 4.4 2 1.0 210 2 70 12G2 08/13/85 LT 1 4.2 t 1.0 140 1 70 12H1 08/12/85-09/09/85 LT 1 2.9 2 0.9 LT 100 LTAW 08/13/85 LT 2 5.0 t 1.1 340 t 110 558 Dup. 08/19/85-09/09/85 1.9 t 1.4 5.8 t 1.1 LT 100 0.12 1 0.07 12H2 R 08/12/85-09/09/85 1.2 i 1.1 2.5 0.9 LT 100 12H2 T 08/12/85-09/09/85 LT 1 3.1 1 0.9 LT 100 12H2 R Split 08/12/85-09/09/85 LT 1 2.8 2 0.9 LT 100 656 09/09/85-10/07/85 LT I 4.1 1 1.0 93 t 47 558 09/16/85-10/07/85 LT 0.9 2.1 i 0.7 LT 90 103 09/10/85 LT 1 3.7 2 1.0 110 t 60 0.36 2 0.07 657 09/09/85-10/07/85(Sc) 1.6 t 1.3 12 t2 140 t 40 655 09/16/85-10/07/85 LT 1 7.2 1 1.2 120 t 40 12F1 09/10/85 LT 1 4.0 1.0 140 t 80 0.18 2 0.08 12G2 09/10/85 LT 1 3.721.0 120 t 70 12H1 09/09/85-10/07/85 1.3 1 1.1 3.4 t 0.9 92 i 51 l LTAW 09/10/85 1.4 i 1.3 4.8 t 1.1 150 t 50 LTAW Split 09/10/85 LT 1 2.8 1.0 140 t 70 655 Dup. 09/16/85-10/07/85 LT 1 4.1 t 1.0 85152 655 Split 09/16/85-10/07/85 LT 2 5.2 1 1.0 LT 20 12H2 R 09/09/85-10/07/85 1.1 i 1.0 2.7 t 0.8 LT 100 12H2 T 09/09/85-10/07/85 LT 1 3.4 2 0.9 LT 100 12H2 T Split 09/09/85-10/07/85 1.1 1.1 2.8 2 0.8 LT 100 25 t 24 2.9
  • 2.7 See footnotes at end of table.

TABLE 6 (Page 4 of 5)

GROSS ALPHA. GROSS BETA, TRITIUM. IODINE-131 AND GAMMA

  • SPECTROMETRY OF WATER (SURFACE AND DRINKING)

SSES 1985 (Results in pCi/l 2 2 s)

LOCATION COLLECTION PERIO0 Gr-Alpha Gr-Beta H-3 1-131(3) K-40 Ra-226 Th-228 Cs-137 Uther 656 10/07/85-II/II/85(4d) LT 2 2.0 2 0.9 98245 S'3 10/14/85-11/11/85 LT 2 3.1 2 1.0 85 i 40 103 10/08/85 LT 1 3.6 t 0.9 LT 80 657 10/07/85-ll/ll/85(5d) LT 2 7.9 2 1.3 110 t 50 0.26 i 0.09 655 10/14/85-11/11/85 LT 2 2.9 2 0.9 LT 70 0.16 1 0.10 12F1 10/08/85 1.6 2 1.2 3.0 t 0.8 76 i 42 12G2 10/08/85 LT 1 3.1 t 0.8 78240

  • 2H1 10/07/85-11/11/85 LT 2 2.3 2 0.9 79 i 42 LTAW 10/08/85 1.5 t 1.3 5.1 1 1.0 140 t 40 656 Split 10/07/85-11/11/85 LT 2 2.4 t 0.9 LT 80 12H2 R 10/07/75-11/11/85 LT 2 2.4 2 0.9 LT 70 12H2 T 10/07/85-11/11/85 LT 2 1.7 2 0.9 95 t 49 35656 11/11/85-12/09/85 LT 1 2.1 t 0.7 64240

'd 8 558 11/18/85-12/09/85 LT 1 4.5 t 0.9 LT 50 ID3 11/12/85 LT 2 2.6 t 1.0 LT 80 0.15 1 0.08 657 II/II/85-12/09/85(Se) LT 2 10 t1 240 t 30 655 11/18/85-12/09/85 LT 0.9 2.9 2 0.7 74 2 44 12F1 11/12/85 LT 1 3.8 i 0.9 LT 70 12G2 11/12/85 LT 2 2.6 i 0.9 120 t 50 0.21 0.10 12H1 11/11/85-12/09/85 LT 1 2.9 i 0.8 95 t 36 LTAW 11/12/85 LT 2 3.9 1 1.0 100 t 50 27 1 8 558 Split 11/18/85-12/09/85 LT 0.9 3.6 i 0.8 LT 50 657 Split II/ll/85-12/09/85(Se) LT 2 9.8 i 1.5 240 2 50 12H2 R 11/11/85-12/09/85 LT 0.9 2.1 2 0.7 LT 60 12H2 T 11/11/85-12/09/85 LT 1 2.3 2 0.7 LT 60 656 12/09/85-01/06/86 LT 1 2.6 2 0.8 81 i 39 558 12/16/85-01/06/86 LT 0.9 2.5 t 0.8 LT 70 0.4010.08 103 12/10/85 LT 1 1.6 1 0.7 76237 657 12/09/85-01/06/86(5f) LT 2 9.7 t 1.5 2600 2 100 655 12/16/85-01/06/86 LT 1 2.9 t 0.8 LT 70 0.42 1 0.11 12F1 12/10/85 LT 0.9 1.9 2 0.7 77 i 39 41 t 36 12G2 12/10/85 LT 0.9 2.6 i 0.7 LT 70 37 i 30 12H1 12/09/85-01/06/86 LT 0.4 2.6 2 0.6 LT 60 LTAW 12/10/85 LT 1 2.6 2 0.8 83 i 42 103 Split 12/10/85 LT 0.9 1.5 2 0.6 LT 60 12H2 R 12/09/85-01/06/86 LT 1 3.0 1 0.9 59237 12H2 T 12/09/85-01/06/86 LT 1 2.7 t 0.8 69 t 40 See footnotes at end of table.

TABLE 6 (Page 5 of 5)

GROSS ALPHA, GROSS BETA, TRIT!UM,10 DINE-131 AND GAMMA

  • SPECTROMETRY OF WATER (SURFACE AND ORINKING)

SSES 1985 (Results in pCi/f i 2 s)

Footnotes (1) 12H2R and 12H2T - Drinking Water - Nearest supply downstream of plant discharge.

(2) Used 22 instead of 4f. Lower sensitivity due to reduced sample volune.

(3) 1-131 determined by radiochemical methods. See appendix B-5. All values are less than 0.1 pCi/f unless noted.

(4) location 656 deviations:

a.) Sampler malfunctioned (overflowed) 08/29/85 and 09/03/85 b.) Sampler malfunctioned (overflowed) 07/08/85 c.) Sampler malfunctioned (overflowed) 08/02/85 d.) Sampler malfunctioned (overflowed) 10/14/85, 10/21/85, 11/04/85 and 11/11/85.

x (* 11/14/85 spring installed on solenoid to mitigate the above malfunctions) 7 (5) Location 657 deviations:

00 a.) Water line froze 01/21/85-01/24/85

  • b.) : Sampler pump out of service 08/14/85-08/15/85 c.) Sampler out of service 09/23/85-09/25/85 for drain line modifications (Rad Waste discharge terminated dvring outage); overflowed 09/26/85 d.) Sampler malfunctioned (overflowed) 10/28/85 e.) Sampler out of service 11/21/85 due to construction activities. (Rad Waste discharge terminated during outage.)

f.) Sampler out of service 12/13/85-12/19/85 and 01/01/86-01/02/86 due to construction activities; hew punp installed 12/19/85.

(6) Location 12H2R deviations:

a.) Water line frozen 01/21/85-01/22/85 b.) No water to sampler 08/05/85-08/08/85

  • Only gamma emitters detected are reported; typical LLD values are found on Table 19.

- . _ , _ =_ - ~ = _ _ _- _. ._ -.-.

. . _ . . . _ - . - _ _ - - - - _= =-.,a4 - - " " + - " " *

/

s TABLE 7 GAPNA* SPECTROMETRY OF ALGAE SSES 1985 (Results in Units of pCi/g (Dry) t 2 s)I LOCATION COLLECTION Be-7 K-40 Ph-54 Co-58 Co-60 1-131 Cs-137 Ra-226 Th-228 PERIOD AG-3 04/11/85-05/13/85 9.3 2 2.4 14 t3 0.63 t 0.45 ~~

AG-4 04/11/85-05/13/85 7.0 t 2.1 13 *3 0.37 t 0.37 AG-5 04/12/85-05/13/85 3.3 i 0.9 8.6 i 1.5 0.27 t 0.18 AG-6 04/12/85-05/13/85 2.9 2 0.8 8.9' t 1.4 0.98 2 0.13 0.33 t 0.16 1.3 2 0.1 AG-3 (a) . - -

, - ~~

AG-4 05/13/85-06/10/85 10.0t 2.1 15 t2 AG-5 05/13/85-06/10/85 2.1 2 0.7 9.1 t 1.4 0.43 i 0.13 .- '.

AG-6 05/13/85-06/10/85 2.2 i 0.6 7.7 2 1.3 0.40 i 0.09 0.68 0.Ib 0.25 i 0.39 0.16 2 0.07 0.96 t 0.15 AG-3 06/21/85-07/08/85 11.0t 2 17 23 "a AG-4 06/10/85-07/08/85 8.9 t 1.8 21 t3 0.69 0.24 0.43 2 0.22 0.74 t 0.30

, A6-5 06/10/85-07/08/85 0.972 0.44 9.8 t 1.3 0.97

  • u.27' i-^

AG-6 06/10/85-07/08/85 1.5's 0.8 12 t2 0.12 t 0.10 0.79 2 0.09 3.2 k 1.5 _.0.63 t 0.10 AG-1 07/26/85-08/13/85 s- '

l.5 t 1.4 AG-2 07/26/E5-08/13/85 _,11 22 5.0 1.6

[$AG-3 07/08/85-08/12/85 13 t2 14 t3 7.7 2 3.8 i AG-4 0.38 i 0.28 0.19 2 0.17 1.6 t 0.4 07/08/85-08/12/85 7.9 2 1.0 13 t2 0.27 1 0.15 0.14 i 0.10 i

"3 AG-5 07/08/85-08/12/85 1.5 t 0.8 7.3 i 1.5 0.59 t 0.10 AG-6 07/08/85-08/12/85 0.682 0.50 7.5 t 1.1 0.63 2 0.07 AG-1 08/13/85-09/09/85 9.6 t 1.7 13 23 0.85 i 0.36 AG-2 08/13/85-09/09/85 13 11 14 t2 AG-3 2.1 t 0.3 0.25 1 0.13 08/12/85-09/09/85 10 22 15 i3 1.4 i 0.5 AG-4 08/12/85-09/09/85 8.2 2 1.5 17 - t 3 0.89 1 0.03 0.57 2 0.11 AG-5 08/12/85-09/09/85 0.70t 0.54 8.1 t 1.1 0.19 2 0.13 3.3 2 1.2 0.62 1 0.08 AG-6 08/12/85-03/09/85 9.9 2 1.6 AG-1 (b)

AG-2 (b)

AG-3 09/09/85-10/07/85 3.6 t 1.4 16 i2 0.40 1 0.23 2.0 2 0.3 AG-4 (b)

AG-5 09/09/85-10/07/85 7.8 2 1.4 4.6 2 1.5 1.4

  • 0.1 AG-6 09/09/85-10/07/85 8.9 i 9.6

- 1.0 2 0.2 AG 7.9 2 2.5 10/09/85-11/11/85 14 t3 AG-2 10/09/85-11/11/85 3.8 t 1.3 6.4 2 2.7 12 21 AG-3 10/07/85-11/11/85 5.7 i 1.5 12 12 1.3

  • 0.3 0.22 2 0.16 1.1 2 0.3 AG-4 10/09/85-11/11/85 6.6 1 1.8 15 t3 0.89 1 0.29 0.26 1 0.17 1.3 't 0.3 AG-5 10/07/85-11/14/85 6.2 t 1.8 8.8 i 3.9 0.49 1 0.36 9.5 1 3.9 AG-6 10/07/85-11/14/85 1.2 t 0.6 8.311.1 0.84 t 0.09 Vandalized 1 Hi@ Water Only gamma emitters detected are reported; typical LLD values can be found on Table 19.

TABLE 8 GROSS BETA AND GAMMA

  • SPECTROMETRY OF FISH SSES 1985 (Results in pCi/g (wet) i 2 s)

' ~

COLLECTION j AC'L E TYPE LOCATION DATE Gr 8 eta K-40 Cs-137 Ra-226 Th-228 Small Mouth Bass 2H 05/09/85 7.9 1 0.3 3.8 i 0.4 Walleye 2H 05/09/85 7.3 i 0.2 3.9 i 0.4 Channel Catfish 2H 05/10/85 5.9 i 0.2 3.5 t 0.4 0.012 t 0.010 Small Mouth Bass IND 05/07/85 5.3 0.1 3.1 1 0.3 Walleye IND 05/07/85 6.3 1 0.2 4.5 t 0.5 0.013 t 0.009 Channel Catfish IND 05/11/85 5.6 i 0.2 3.0 t 0.3 Large Mouth Bass LTAW 04/30/85 4.7 2 0.1 3.7 i 0.4 x Channel Catfish LTAW 04/30/85 5.5 t 0.2 3.8 i 0.4 T

E$ White Sucker 2H 10/10/85 6.8 i 0.2 3.9 2 0.4 Walleye 2H 10/10/85 5.6 2 0.1 3.8 i 0.4 0.007 1 0.006 Channel Catfish 2H 10/11/85 7.1 i 0.2 3.4 i 0.3 White Sucker IND 10/16/85 7.8 0.2 4.3 t 0.4 Walleye IND 10/19/85 5.8 t 0.1 4.0 0.4 Channel Catfish IND 10/24/85 6.1 1 0.2 3.2 t 0.3 Channel Catfish (Dup) IND 10/24/85 5.8

  • 0.1 3.3 2 0.3 Large Mouth Bass LTAW 10/14/85 3.0 t 0.1 3.1 t 0.3 0.009 i 0.006 Channel Catfish LTAW 10/14/85 6.1 0.1 4.2 i 0.4 l

E

  • Only gamms emitters detected are reported; typical LLD values are found on Table 19.

t k

s 4

\

~ ,

~

1 TABLE 9 GROSS ALPHA, 6R0!S BETA AND GAMMA

  • SPECTROMETRY OF SEDIMENT SHORELINE SSES 1985 (Results in Units of pC1/g (dry) 2 2 s)

COLLECTION LOCATION 0 ATE Gr-Alpha Gr-Beta Be-7 K-40 Mn-54 Co-60 Cs-137 Ra-226 Th-128 OTHER 28 05/31/85 13 i 6 27 2 3 12 i 1 1.7 i 0.7 1.6 t 0.2 2F 05/31/85 lb t 6 23 t 2 0.33 1 0.17 9.12 0.9 0.18 1 0.02 1.8 1 0.4 1.1 1 0.1 78 ! 05/31/85 17 t 6 20 t 2 0.70 t 0.42 1712 < 0.27 i 0.06 _ '2.7 1 0.8 1.8 t 0.2

, 11C +

05/31/85 6.62 4.4 21 i 2 10 t 1 0.10 t 0.05 0.14 1 0.05 1.9 2 0.7 0.992 0.1 x 12F 05/31/85 14 i 6 2223 1.4 1 0.3 1211 0.7310.07 0.42 1 0.04 0.13 t 0.03 2.3 t 0.5 1.4 t 0.1 0.15 t 0.03 Co-S8 LTAW' 05/31/85 7.61 4.8 30 t 3 13 t 1 0.08

  • 0.03 1.8
  • 0.6 1.3 t 0.1 78-Duplicate 05/31/85 14 i 6 39 i 3 0.8320.43 17 t 2 0.22 i 0.05 2.4 i 0.8 'l.5 2 0.2 2B 11/06/85 7.61 5.1 3313 0.96 t 0.39 14 i 1 0.25 i 0.03 2.1 1 0.7 1.5 t 0.2 2F 11/05/85 1326 35 i 3 0.96 2 0.45 1512 0.19 1 0.04 2.8 t 0.7 1.4 i 0.1 78 11/06/85 15 t 6 38 i 3 1.7 2 0.4 18 t 2 0.38 2 0.05 2.8 0.7 2.0 t 0.2 llc 11/05/85 LT 5. 17 t 2 7.7t 0.8 0.04 1 0.03 1.2 1 0.5 0.7 0.07 12f 11/05/85 LT 5. 1712 0.30 2 0.25 8.8t 0.9 0.03 2 0.02 0.06 1 0.03 1.2 2 0.5 0.80t 0.08 LTAW 11/05/85 8.6f 5.3 32 i 3 15 t 2 1.5 2 0.2 11C Split 11/05/85 LT 5. 15 t 2 8.01 0.8 0.06 2 0.03 1.3 2 0.4 0.722 0.07 LTAW Split 11/05/85 5.6t 4.7 31 1 3 19 2 2 1.5 1 0.5 1.4 i U.1
  • Only gama emitters detected are reported; typical LLO values are found on table 19.

table 10 (Page 1 of 3)

GROSS ALPHA, GROSS BETA. TRITIUM AND GAMMA

  • SPECTROMETRY IN GROUND (WELL) WATER SSES 1985 (Results in pCi/f t 2 s)

LOCATION COLLECTION DATE Gr-Alpha Gr-Beta Tritium K-40 Ra-226 Th-228 L5-137 12F3 01/08/85 LT 2 2.1 t 1.2 94 38 i 256 01/08/85 LT 1 LT 1 130 t 40  !

355 (1) 452 01/08/85 LT I 1.9 i 0.8 79 2 31 454 01/08/85 LT 2 LT 1 88

  • 44 1155 01/08/85 LT 2 LT 1 88 i 41 15A4 01/08/85 LT 0.9 5.7 t 0.9 LT 40 12E4 01/08/85 LT 0.8 1.1 2 0.6 100 t 40 256 Split 01/08/85 LT 1 LT 1 98 2 40 32 2 30 12F3 02/12/85 LT 2 1.6 2 0.9 120 t 40 256 02/12/85 LT 0.9 LT 0.9 87 1 41 355 (1) x 452 02/12/85 LT 2 LT 1 140 1 40 3.6 t 3.2

-< 454 02/12/85 LT 2 2.4 1 0.9 89 2 34 L 1155 02/12/85 LT 2 LT 1 110

  • 40 na 15A4 02/12/85 LT 0.9 3.4 t 0.8 86 1 38 12E4 02/12/85 LT 0.8 1.4 i 0.6 130 40 452 Split 02/12/85 LT 2 LT 1 140 t 40 26 t 30 12F3 03/12/85 LT 2 1.4 2 0.8 110 2 40 256 03/12/85 LT 0.7 LT 0.8 170 t 70 355 (1) 452 03/12/85 LT 2 2.2 t 1.0 82 t 41 454 03/12/85 LT 1 LT 1 97241 1155 03/12/85' LT 2 1.5 t 0.9 97 2 42 15A4 03/12/85 LT 0.6 4.1 i 0.8 120 2 40 51 t 27 12E4 03/12/85 LT 0.6 1.3 t 0.6 110 t 40 LT 1 LT 1 '

454 Split 03/12/85 97 i 35 12F3 04/09/85 LT 0.5 0.95 1 0.57 82 t' 48 71 i 24 256 04/09/85 (T 0.6- LT 0.9 96 2 33 355 (1) 452 04/09/85 LT 0.5 LT 0.8 160 t 40 454 04/09/85 LT 1 LT 1 110 t 40 43249 1155 04/09/85 LT 2 LT 1 90 t 43 15A4 04/09/85 0.69~t 0.60 4.3 i 0.8 140 t 50 12E4 04/09/85 LT 0.5 LT 0.8 LT 60

-1155 Split 04/09/85 LT 2 LT 1 87 i 49 S22 footnotes at end of table.

l TABLE 10 (Page 2 of 3)

GROSS ALPHA. GROSS BETA. TRITIUM AND GAMMA

  • SPECTROMETRY IN GROUND (WELL) WATER SSES 1985 (Results in pCi/l i 2 s)

LOCATION COLLECTION DATE Gr-Alpha Gr-Beta Tritium K-40 R a-2 26 Th-228 Cs-137 12F3 05/14/85 LT 2 3.3 2 1.0 78 t 42 256 05/14/85 LT 0.7 LT 0.8 160 1 40 30 1 24 355 05/14/85 LT 0.9 1.1 t 0.6 130 i 40 452 05/14/85 LT 2 LT 1 150 40 4S4 05/14/85 LT 1 1.2 i 0.6 130 t 50 1155 05/14/85 LT 2 LT 1 110 t 40 15A4 05/14/85 LT 0.6 4.5 t 0.8 73 t 31 12E4 05/14/85 0.74 0.59 1.6 1 0.6 LT 80

'15A4 Split 05/14/85 LT 0.6 5.1 t 0.9 100 t 40 31 t 26 12F3 06/11/85 LT 2 2.8 t 1.0 88 t 33 ,

>< 256 06/11/85 LT 0.8 LT 0.8 120 t 50 i* 355 06/11/85 LT 1 1.1 2 0.7 180 2 50

>= 452 06/11/85 LT 2 1.2 t 0.8 110 1 70

'd LT 1 454 06/11/85 2.0 2 0.8 95 t 43 1155 06/11/85 LT 2 LT 1 79 i 33 15A4 06/11/85 LT 0.7 4.8 t 0.8 92 1 48 39

  • 37 12E4 C6/11/85 LT 0.7 1.7 i 0.6 LT 100 12E4 Split 06/11/85 LT 0.7 1.4 1 0.6 82 t 47 12F3 07/09/85 LT 2 LT 1 93 53

'256 07/09/85 LT 0.7 LT 0.9 LT 70 355 07/09/85 LT 0.9 LT 1 120 t 40 452 :07/09/85 LT 2 LT 1 LT 70 23 2 23 454 C7/09/85 LT 0.9 1.5 1 0.8 93 1 44 1155 07/09/85 LT 1 LT 1 LT 80 15A4 07/09/85 LT 0.5 2.2 i 0.7 95143 12E4 07/09/85 LT 0.7 1.4 t 0.7 82 2 46 452 Split 07/09/85 LT 0.8 LT 1 83 2 45 12F3 09/13/85 LT 2 1.5 t 0.9 230 i 100 256 03/13/85 LT 0.8 1.4 1 0.6 140 i 80 355 08/13/85 LT 0.7 1.0 t 0.6 LT 100 452 03/13/85 LT 2 1.5 0.9 240 t 80 454 03/13/85 LT 0.9 1.5 t 0.7 260 2 90 1155, 03/13/85- LT 2 LT 1 280 70 15A4 08/13/85 LT 0.6 3.1 t 0.7 170 1 80 12E4 08/13/85 LT 0.7 0.86 t 0.56 190 t 90 12F3 Split 0a/13/85. LT 2 1.8 t 0.9 LT 100 523 footnotes at erd of table, s

~ . - .- - . . . - . = . _ _ - - . - . - - - - . .

TABLE 10 (Page 3 of 3)

GROSS ALPHA, GROSS BETA. TRITIUM AND GAMMA

  • SPECTROMETRY IN GROUNO (WELL) WATER SSES 1985 4

(Results in pC1/2 1 2 5)

LOCATION COLLECTION DATE Gr-Alpha Gr-Beta Tritium K-40 Ra-226 Th-228 C5-137 12F3 C9/10/85 LT 2 1.5 t 0.9 94 i 42 256 09/10/05 1.1 t 0.9 1.3 2 0.7 LT 60.

355 (9/10/85 LT 1 2.4 1 0.8 LT 70 452 09/10/85 5.0 2 3.0 2.4 i 1.1 110 2 4U 454 09/10/85 LT 1 2.0 i 0.8 150 t 40 1155 104/10/85 LT 2 LT 1 130 2 50 15A4 ~ C9/10/85 LT 0.7 3.8 2 0.8 62 1 31 22 2 25 12E4 C9/10/85 1.3 t 1.0 1.1 2 0.7 74 t 45 355 Split c'9/10/85 1.4 t. 1. 2 2.7 1 0.9 87 2 43 t 12F3 10/08/85 LT 2 1.7 2 0.9 110 t 40 256 .

10/08/85 LT 0.8 1.1 1 0.7 130 t 40 4.9 1 2.6 355 10/08/85. LT 0.9 1.4 1 0.7 97

  • 38 452 10/08/85 LT 2 LT 1 160 t 40 39 1 34

>< . 4 5 4 10/08/85 LT.1 1.4 2 0.7 120 40

~~ 1155 10/08/85 LT 2 LT 1 110 t 40

  • 1: 15A4 10/011/85 LT 0.6 4.0 t 0.8 110 t 40
    • - 12E4 10/08/85 LT 1 1.1 1 0.7 100 2 40 34 i 27 256 Split 10/08/85 LT 0.8 LT 0.9 110 t 50 12F3 11/12/85 LT 2 1.8 1 0.9 110 2 40 256 11/12/85 L T .1 1.1 2 0.7- 84 2 45 25 t 4 3S5 (1).

452 11/21/85 (2) .3.4 2 2.4 2.9 1 0.9 LT 81 34 i 28 454- .11/12/85 LT 1 1.8 i 0.8 81 i 46 1155 11/12/85 LT 2 LT 1 LT 70 15A4. 11/12/85 'LT 0.8 3.7 t 0.8 LT-70 12E4 11/12/85 1.3 2 1.1 1.8 2 0.8 84 t 45 LT 70 454 Split 11/12/85 LT 1 1.5 t 0.7 12F3 12/10/85 LT 0.7 0.79 t 0.54 98 2 40 256 12/10/85 LT 1 1. I ' t 0.6 LT 60 355 (1) 452 12/10/85 LT 2 1.'7 2 0.9 60 2 33 454 12/10/85 LT l~ 2.3 2 0.8 74 t 31 1155 12/10/85 LT 2 LT 1 LT 80

.1544 12/10/85 LT 0.8 5.3 2 0.9 LT 60

~ 12E4 12/10/85 .LT 1 1.7 t 0.7 .79 1 33 28 t.23 1155 Split 12/10/85 LT 2 LT 1 LT 50

!- . *- Only gamma emitters" detected are reported; typical LLD values are.found on lable 19.

(1) Closed for Season (November-April)  ;

(2)- Pump temporarily out;of service

TABLE 11 ANALYTICAL DATA FOR AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS AND CHARC0AL CARTRIDGE 5*

SSES 1985 (Page 1 of 2)

(Gross Beta results in E-03 pCl/m3 1 2 s)

M01TH COLLECTION PER!00 252 554 1152 1554 981 102 301 12El 7G1 12G1 7H1(1)

J tn. 01/08/85 to 01/15/85 13.0t2.0 14.0t2.0 16.022.0 15.0t2.0 14.0t2.0 13.0t2.0 14.022.0 14.012.0 17.023.0 13.022.0 15.012.0 01/15/85 to 01/22/85 19.012.0 19.0t2.0 20.0t2.0 20.012.0 20.012.0 19.012.0 20.012.0 21.022.0 24.023.0(3) 21.022.0 16.012.0 01/22/85 to 01/29/85 16.0t2.0 16.0t2.0 18.0t2.0 15.012.0 16.0t2.0 (2) 15.0t2.0 18.022.0 16.012.0 16.012.0 15.022.0 01/29/85 to 02/05/85 18.0t2.0 18.012.0 21.012.0 19.012.0 20.0t2.0 (2) 18.0t2.0 19.012.0 15.012.0 20.0t2.0 17.012.0 Fib. 02/05/85 to 02/12/85 19.012.0 21.012.0 21.012.0 19.012.0 22.0t2.0 22.0t2.0 23.012.0 22.022.0 21.022.0 21.022.0 25.0t2.0 02/12/85 to 02/19/85 23.022.0 23.012.0 22.022 0 19.0t2.0 22.022.0 21.022.0 21.022.0 22.022.0 36.014.0 21.012.0 20.012.0 02/19/85 to 02/26/85 12.0t2.0 15.022.0 14.012. t, 14.0t2.0 18.022.0 30.015.0 16.022.0 15.0 2.0 20.013.0 15.022.0 14.0i2.0 1 02/26/85 to 03/05/85 20.0t2.0 17.0t2.0 18.0t2.0 (2) 17.0t2.0 (2) 28.023.0 17.022.0 28.0t3.0 16.012.0 14.022.0 Mar. 03/05/85 to 03/12/85 20.0t2.0 15.0t2.0 19.0t2.0 15.022.0 16.022.0 17.0t2.0 17.0t2.0 18.022.0 16.012.0 16.0t2.0 21.022.0 03/12/85 to 03/19/85 11.0t2.0 12.0t2.0 12.0t2.0 12.0t2.0 11.0t2.0 12.022.0 13.022.0 13.022.0 12.012.0 11.0 2.0 15.022.0 03/19/85 to 03/26/85. 14.0t2.0 14.0t2.0 13.0t2.0 14.0t2.0 ll.0t2.0 12.012.0 13.022.0 14.022.0 14.022.0 11.012.0 17.022.0 03/26/85 to 04/02/85 8.9tl.9 9.9tl.8 9.311.8 8.4tl.7 9.021.7 8.221.8 10.012.0 8.621.8 8.4tl.7 9.8tl.9 13.022.0 i

- Apr. 04/02/85 to 04/09/85

  • 17.0t2.0 13.0t2.0 12.0t2.0 13.022.0 16.022.0 12.022.0 13.022.0 12.0t2.0 11.022.0 13.022.0 11.022.0 04/09/85 to 04/16/85 19.0t2.0 19.0t2.0 18.0t2.0 18.0t2.0 18.0t2.0 18.0t2.0 19.012.0 18.022.0 18.022.0 20.012.0 19.0t3.0 04/16/85 to 04/23/85 20.0t2.0 19.0t2.0 20.022.0 20.0t2.0 20.015.0 17.0t2.0 19.012.0 20.015.0(4) 17.0t2.0 22.0t2.0 17.0t2.0 04/23/85 to 04/30/85 12.0t2.0 12.022.0 13.022.0 11.0t2.0 10.0t2.0 11.012.0 11.012.0 14.012.0(5) 13.022.0 13.0t2.0 14.022.0

.May 04/30/85 to 05/07/85 14.0t2.0 16.0t2.0 12.012.0 16.012.0 15.0t2.0 15.0t2.0 15.022.0 16.022.0 12.022.0 14.022.0 16.022.0 05/07/85 to 05/14/85 13.0t2.0 17.012.0 18.0 2.0 13.012.0 14.0t2.0 15.022.0 13.022.0 15.0 2.0 15.022.0 16.022.0 18.0t2.0 05/14/85 to 05/21/85 8.6tl.6 10.0t1.0 11.012.0 9.421.6 8.3tl.5 9.821.5 10.021.0 8.2tl.5 8.7tl.5 9.621.6 12.021.0 05/21/85 to 05/28/85 16.0t2.0 16.0t2.0 16.0t2.0 15.012.0 15.012.0 14.022.0 16.012.0 13.022.0 15.022.0 16.022.0 18.022.0 Jun. 05/28/85 to 06/04/85 13.012.0 14.0t2.0 12.0t2.0 14.0 2.0 13.022.0 13.022.0 12.0t2. 15.0i2.0 14.022.0 17.0t2.0 16.022.0 06/04/85 to 06/11/85 12.0t2.0 12.0tl.0 13.0t2.0 ll.0t2.0 11.022.0 10.0t2.0 10.0t2.0 ll.0t2.0 12.022.0 9.911.5 12.0t2.0 06/11/85 to 06/18/85 11.0t2.0 10.0t2.0 ll.0t2.0 11.0i2.0 10.0t2.0 12.0t2.0 11.012.0 (2) 11.012.0 9.4tl.8 13.012.0 06/18/85 to 06/25/85 15.012.0 16.0t2.0 15.0 2.0 13.0t2.0 13.022.0 17.022.0 14.0 2.0 15.022.0 15.022.0 16.ut2.0 12.022.0 06/25/85 to 07/02/85 8.4tl.5 10.0 2.0 9.5tl.5 8.221.6 9.221.6 9.7tl.8 7.6il.5 9.412.4(6) 8.211.6 9.521.7 11.022.0 Jul. 07/02/85 to 07/09/85 22.0t2.0 17.0t2.0 17.0t2.0 16.012.0 15.012.0(7) 14.022.0 14.0t2.0 17.022.0 20.012.0 15.012.0 19.022.0 07/09/85 to 07/16/85 18.0t2.0 17.0t2.0 17.0t2.0 17.022.0 17.022.0(8) 18.012.0 16.022.0 18.012.0 18.022.0 17.0t2.0 18.012.0 07/16/85 to 07/23/85 14.0t2'0

. 20.0t2.0 21.0t2.0 17.022.0 21.0i2.0 23.0t2.0 17.022.0 19.022.0 18.022.0 22.012.0 17.022.0 07/23/85 to 07/30/85 15.0t2.0 14.012.0 16.0t2.0 16.0t2.0 15.0t2.0 14.0t2.0 13.0 2.0 13.022.0 13.022.0 14.022.0 14.0t2.0

  • All Iodine-131 results were found to be LT LLD; typical LLD's are found on Table 19.

See footnotes at end of table

TABLL 11 ANALYTICAL DATA FOR AIR PARTICUL ATE FILTERS AND CHARCOAL CARTHIOULS*

SSES 1985 (Page 2 of 2)

(Gross Beta results in E-03 pCi/m3 1 2 s)

MONTH COLLECTION PERIOD 252 554 1152 1554 981 ID2 3D1 12El 7G1 12G1 7Hl(1)

Aug. 07/30/85 to 08/06/85 14.0t2.0 14.012.0 12.012.0 14.012.0 13.012.0 15.0t2.0 (2) 14.011.0 12.0t2.0 15.022.0 13.022.0 08/06/85 to 08/13/85 18.0t2.0 15.012.0 19.012.0 17.0t2.0 19.012.0 17.0t2.0 16.012.0 19.022.0 16.012.0 20.012.0 3.311.5 08/13/85 to 08/20/85 17.012.0 21.012.0 21.012.0 20.0t 2.0 23.0t3.0 20.023.0 21.022.0 21.022.0 19.012.0 18.012.0 22.012.0 08/20/85 to 08/27/85 14.012.0 19.012.0 15.012.0 14.022.0 17.022.0 14.0t2.0 14.012.0 16.0t2.0 15.012.0 16.012.0 20.012.0 5;p. 08/27/85 to 09/03/85 20.0t2.0 20.0t2.0 21.012.0 21.0t2.0 20.022.0 16.022.0 19.012.0 21.0t2.0 21.012.0 19.012.0 22.022.0 09/03/85 to 09/10/85 25.012.0 22.022.0 22.0t2.0 23.0t2.0 21.022.0 21.023.0 21.0t2.0 21.0t2.0 22.012.0 22.012.0 27.022.0 09/10/85 to 09/17/85 13.022.0 12.012.0 12.012.0 13.0t2.0 12.012.0 12.012.0 11.0t2-0

. 11.012.0 11.0t2.0 12.012.0 14.012.0 09/17/85 to 09/24/85 31.0t3.0 29.022.0 32.013.0 26.0t2.0 27.012.0 31.013.0 27.013.0 32.013.0 23.012.0 29.022.0 30.022.0 09/24/85 to 10/01/85 16.0t2.0 17.022.0 15.012.0 15.012.0 15.022.0 14.0t2.0 15.022.0 16.012.0 16.012.0 15.012.0 16.012.0 U Oct. 10/01/85 to 10/08/85 15.0t2.0 14.012.0 15.012.0 14.0t2.0 14.012.0 16.022.0 13.012.0 15.022.0 13.012.0 14.022.0 14.012.0

,L 10/08/85 to 10/15/85 20.0t2.0 17.0t2.0 16.012.0 18.0t2.0 18.012.0 18.0t2.0 18.012.0 lb.022.0 16.0t2.0 18.0t2.0 17.012.0 cn 10/15/85 to 10/22/85 19.0t2.0 18.0t2.0 17.0t2.0 17.0 2.0 19.022.0 18.012.0 18.022.0 15.022.0 17.012.0 17.012.0 21.022.0 10/22/85 to 10/29/85 12.0t2.0 11.012.0 11.0t2.0 13.0t2.0 12.012.0 12.022.0 13.0t2.0 11.022.0 10.012.0 13.022.0 13.0i2.0 Nov. 10/29/85 to 11/05/85 11.012.0 8.111.5 9.611.8 11.0t2.0 10.012.0 12.012.0 9.511.8 10.0t2.0 8.911.8 11.012.0 9.721.8 11/05/85 to 11/11/85 9.912.1 11.022.0 12.0t2.0 12.012.0 11.022.0 11.012.0 11.022.0 12.0t2.0 11.022.0 10.022.0 12.021.0 11/11/85 to 11/18/85 13.022.0 12.0t2.0 11.012.0 11.0t2.0 12.012.0 10.0i2.0 11.0t2.0 10.012.0 12.012.0 10.022.0 13.012.0 11/18/85 to 11f25/85 25.012.0 22.022.0 25.0t2.0 21.0t3.0(9) 22.012.0 26.0t2.0 23.012.0 23.012.0 20.012.0 24.012.0 17.012.0 11/25/85 to 12/02/85 13.0t2.0 13.012.0 11.0t2.0 12.022.0 12.0t2.0 13.022.0 11.012.0 13.022.0 11.012.0 9.721.7 13.012.0 Dec. 12/02/85 to 12/09/85 23.0t2.0 23.0t2.0 24.0t2.0 22.012.0 24.012.0 23.012.0 23.012.0 22.012.0 19.014.0(10)21.012.0 24.022.0 12/09/85 to 12/16/85 28.0t2.0 26.012.0 26.0t2.0 26.0t2.0 29.022.0 28.012.0 28.013.0 28.022.0 24.Gt2.0 26.0t2.0 30.013.0 12/16/85 to 12/23/85 e 21.012.0 23.0t2.0 23.0t2.0 22.012.0 22.0t2.0 25.022.0 21.012.0 22.022.0 22.022.0 21.022.0 29.0t3.0 12/23/85 to 12/30/85 l 19.0t2.0 17.0t2.0 16.0t2.0 15.0t2.0 17.022.0 18.0t2.0 15.012.0 14.012.0 14.022.0 15.022.0 16.012.0 12/30/85 to 01/07/86 (2) 16.012.0 17.0t2.0 19.012.0 18.012.0 20.022.0 18.012.0 17.022.0 15.022.0 19.022.0 19.012.0

  • All lodine-131 results were found to be <LLD; typical LLD's are found on Table 19.

(1) Collection periods for 7H1 are the same as above except (3) Start date 01/17/85 (7) Stop date 07/10/85 for 07/30-08/07, 08/07-08/13. 09/24-10/02,10/02-10/08, (4) Stop date 04/18/85 (8) Start date 07/10/85 11/05-11/12, 11/12-11/19, 11/19-11/25. (5) Stop date 04/24/85 (9) Stop date 11/23/85 (2) Unacceptable sample due to s mpler malfunction. (6) Stop date 06/30/85 (10) Stop date 12/05/85

TABLE 12 (Page 1 of 2)

GROSS ALPHA AND GAMMA

  • SPECTROMETRY OF COMPOSITED AIR PARTICULATES SSES 1985 (Results in E-03 pC1/m3 t 2 s)

LOCATION COLLECTION FERIOD Gr-Alpha Be-7 K-40 Cs-137 Ra-226 Th-228 FIRST QUARTER 7G1 01/08/85 to 04/09/85 4.5 t 0.6 73 t 7 4.0

  • 2.7 12G1 01/08/85 to 04/09/85 4.8 t 0.5 71 i 7 7H1 01/08/85 to 04/19/85 0.9 i 0.2 69 i 7 554 01/08/85 to 04/J9/85 4.7 1 0.7 86 i 9 5.3 1 2.8 1152 01/08/85 to 04/09/85 5.8 1 0.7 76 _8 7.9 i 4.3

>< 981 01/08/85 to 04/09/85 4.7 i 0.5 67 i 7

- 12El 01/08/85 to 04/09/85 4.7 i 0.5 75 t 8 2.9 2 2.4 j, 252 01/08/85 to 04/09/85 5.3 i 0.6 73 i 7

-4 1554 01/08/85 to 04/09/85 4.9 i 0.5 74 i 7 ID2 01/08/85 to 04/09/85 5.5 1 0.6 95 t10 301 01/08/85 to 04/09/85 5.0 t 0.5 81 i 8 4.5

  • 4.7 SECOND QUARTER 7G1 04/09/85 to 07/09/85 3.3 1 0.4 88 2 9 3.1 1 2.3 0.22 i 0.19 12G1 04/09/85 to 07/09/85 3.1 i 0.4- 70 t 7 7H1 04/09/85 to 07/09/85 3.4 1 0.5 80 t 8 2.5 2.0 554 04/09/85 to 07/09/85 3.5 i 0.5 85 i 9 1152 04/09/85 to.07/09/85 2.7 1 0.4 '89 i 9 981 34/09/85 to 07/10/85 3.1 i 0.4 92 i 9 12E1 04/09/85'to 07/09/85- 3.2 2 0.5 65 t 7 252 04/09/85 to 07/09/85 3.6 0.5 84 i 8 1554 04/09/85 to 07/09/85 2.5 1 0.4 76 i 8 2.4 i 1.9 102 04/09/85 to 07/09/85 3.3 1 0.5 77 i 8 3.2 i 1.4 3D1 -04/09/85 to 07/09/85 2.7 1 0.4 73 i 7 1.5 i 1.6 See footnotes at end of table

TABLE 12 (Page 2 of 2)

GROSS ALPHA AND GAMMA

  • SPECTROMETRY OF COMPOSITED A!R PARTICULATES SSES 1985 (Results in E-03 pC1/m3 t 2 s)

LOCATION COLLECTION PERIOD Gr-Alpha 8e-7 Cs-137 K-40 Ra-226 Th-228 THIRD QUARTER 7G1 07/09/85 to 10/08/85 3.8 i 0.5 67 i 7 12G1 07/09/85 to 10/08/85 4.2 2 0.5 58 i 6 3.5 i 1.5 7H1 07/09/85 to 10/08/85 3.8 t 0.4 67 1 7 554 07/09/85 to 10/08/85 2.6 1 0.3 76 i 8 3.5 1 2.5 1152 07/09/85 to 10/08/85 3.1 1 0.4 78 i 8 3.3 t 2.2 981 07/10/85 to 10/08/85 3.5 t 0.4 80 t 8 4.8 2 1.9 12El 07/09/85 to 10/08/85 3.8 1 0.4 76 i 8 3.5 t 3.6 252 07/09/85 to 10/08/85 3.2 i 0.4 85 t 9 8.6 2 3.7 1554 07/09/85 to 10/08/85 3.2 1 0.4 81 i 8 l' ID2 07/09/85 to 10/08/85 3.3 t 0.5 72 i 7 3.5 1 2.8 g; 3D1 07/09/85 to 10/08/85 3.5 t 0.4 80 1 8 4.5 t 3.8 FOURTH QUARTER 7G1 10/08/85 to 01/07/86 3.3 1 0.5 53 t 5 2.9 i 2.0 12G1 10/08/85 to 01/07/86 5.0 t 0.6 62 t 6 0.15 1 0.15 7H1 10/08/85 to 01/07/86 2.6 i 0.4 69 i 7 5.1 1 2.4 554 10/08/85 to 01/07/86 4.4 t 0.5 65 t 7 1152 10/08/85 to 01/07/86 4.9 t 0.5 73 t 7 981 10/08/85 to 01/07/86 4.8 i 0.5 71 1 7 12El 10/08/85 to 01/07/86 4.2 t 0.5 61 1 6 3. 7 i 4. 2 252 10/08/85 to 01/07/86 3.9 i 0.5 70 t 7 2.6 t 3.0 1554 0.27 i 0.25 10/08/85 to 01/07/86 4.8 i 0.6 71 i 7 4.3 2 2.0 102 10/08/85 to 01/07/86 4.0 t 0.5 65 2 7 3.6 i 2.3 3D1 10/08/85 to 01/07/86 4.6 t 0.5 66 t 7 11.0 t 5.0 Only gamma emitters detected are reported; typical LLD values can be found on Table 19.

TABLE 13 GROSS ALPHA, GROSS BETA, TRITIUM AND GAMMA

  • SPECTROMETRY OF PRECIPITATION SSES 1985 (Results in pCi/l 2 2 sigma)

LOCATION COLLECTION PER100 Gr-Alpha Gr-Beta H-3 Be-7 K-40 Ra-226 Th-228 C5-137 7G1 01/08/35-04/09/85 0.93 2 0.57 7.3 i 0.9 83 i 37 64 i 26 48 1 31 12G1 01/08/85-04/09/85 LT 0.5 4.3 t 0.6 LT 70 70 t 25 252 01/08/85-04/09/85 LT 0.5 3.9 i 0.7 110 t 40 55239 554 01/08/85-04/09/85 LT 0.6 3.9 i 0.7 69 i 31 63 i 24 1152 01/08/85-04/09/85 LT 0.5 1.6 i 0.6 160 t 40 26225 1554 01/08/85-01/09/85 LT 0.4 4.8 i 0.8 100 1 40 52 t 27 21 t 24 981 01/08/85-04/09/85 LT 0.4 3.7 t 0.7 82 i 29 66236 1D2 01/08/85-04/09/85 LT 0.4 3.4 t 0.7 140 t 40 110 1 40 3D1 .01/08/85-04/09/85 LT 0.4 2.8 1 0.6 100 i 40 56 i 46 12El 01/08/85-04/09/85 LT 0.4 4.2 i 0.7 LT 50 46 t 29 981 Split 01/08/85-04/09/85 LT 0.4 3.8 t 0.7 96 t 42 42133 7G1' 04/09/85-07/09/85 LT 0.5 2.8 1 0.7 130 t 50 12G1 04/09/85-07/09/85 LT 0.5 4.2 t 0.8 180 t 40 37233 252 04/09/85-07/09/85 LT 0.5 2.6 i 0.7 130 1 40 28 1 25 554 04/09/85-07/09/85 LT 0.5 2.9 i 0.7 210 t 50 1152 04/09/85-07/09/85 LT 0.5 1.3 t 0.6 180 t 40 3.4 2 3.7 1554 04/09/85-07/09/85 LT 0.5 3.5 t 0.7 100 t 40 39 i 26 981 04/09/85-07/09/85 LT 0.5 1.8 0.6 160 t 40 ID2 04/09/85-07/09/85 LT 0.5 2.6 i 0.7 140 i 50 x.301

.- 04/09/85-07/09/85 LT 0.5 1.6 i 0.6 120 t 40 31 i 25 L 12El - 04/09/85-07/09/85 LT 0.5 1.9 2 0.6 140 i 40 e 554 Split 04/09/85-07/09/85 LT 0.5 2.5 t 0.7 200 t 50 7G1 07/09/85-10/08/85 LT 0.5 1.6 i 0.6 100 t 40 12G1 07/09/85-10/08/85 LT 0.5 2.5 t 0.6 110 i 40 41 i 27 252 07/09/85-10/08/85 0.61 1 0.41 3.4 i 0.7 120 1 40 554 07/09/85-10/08/85- LT 0.5 1.6 i 0.6 100 t 40 1152 '07/09/85-10/08/85 LT 0.5 2.2 t 0.6 140 t 50 1554 07/09/85-10/08/85 LT 0.5 1.9 i 0.6 120 t 50 9B1 07/09/85-10/08/85 LT 0.5 1.7 t 0.6 83 48

-102 07/09/85-10/08/85 LT 0.5 3.0 t 0.7 110 t 50 1

3D1 07/09/85-10/08/85 LT 0.5 1.8 2 0.6 88 t 47 12El~ 07/09/85-10/08/85 LT 0.5 1.9 2 0.6 79 i 41 7G1 Split 07/09/85-10/08/85 LT 0.5 2.0 t 0.6 82249 3D1 Split 07/09/85-10/08/85 LT 0.5 2.5 t 0.6 85 t 38 7CI 10/08/85-01/07/86 LT 0.4 2.8 t 0.6 LT 70 12G1 10/08/85-01/07/86 LT 0.5 2.7 t 0.6 LT 60 37 t 21 252 10/08/85-01/07/86 LT 0.4 1.7 t 0.6 LT 70 37122 16 t6 554 10/08/85-01/07/86 LT 0.4 1.7 2 0.6 LT 60 24121 21 i 22 1152 10/08/85-01/07/86 LT 0.4 2.3 i 0.6 120 1 40 23 t 19 1554 10/08/85-01/07/86 LT 0.4 1.9 t 0.6 LT 50 26 t 22 8.9 2 3.2 981 10/08/85-01/07/86 LT 0.4 2.3 t 0.6 53133 29 i8 ID2 10/08/85-01/07/86 LT 0.4 1.6 t 0.6 LT 60 27 i8 301 . 10/08/85-01/07/86 LT 0.4 1.3 t 0.5 72 2 31 12E1 10/08/85-01/07/86 LT 0.4 2.3 1 0.6- 55 t 34

  • . Only gana emitters detected are reported; typical LLD values are found on Table 19.

TABLE 14 (Page 1 of 4)

GROSS BETA MINUS K-40 10 DINE-131 AND GAMMA

  • SPECTROMETRY'0F MILK SSES 1985 j (Results in pCl/l i 2 s)

COLLECTION Gr-Beta LOCATION DATE Minus K-40 1-131(1) K-40 Cs-137 Ra-226 Th-228 10G1 :01/07/85 12 2 2 1300 t 130 1282 01/07/85 LT 3 1430 t 140 SE1- '01/07/85 11 2 2 LT 0.2 1190 t 120 13E3 01/07/85 4.71.2.0 1590 t 160 1283 01/07/85 16 i 2 1390 t 140 4.7 i 3.7

- 6Cl - .01/07/85 8.9t 2.2 LT 0.2 1300 i 130 1001- 01/08/85 10 t 2 1350 t 140 1202 01/07/85 4.7 2 2.1 1340 i 130 1202 Dup. 01/07/85 4.3 2 2.1 1340 t 130 10G1 02/11/85 12 t 2 1260 i 130 3.3 1 3.4 12B2 02/12/85 5.It 1.6 1350 t 140 SE1 02/11/85' 8.Si 1.7 1260-t'130 13E3 02/11/85 6.0i 1.6 1360 t 140

~1283 02/11/85 16 t 2 1290 t 130 6C1 02/11/85 8.Si 1.7 1310 t 130 10D1 02/12/85 6.2t 1.6 1260 t 130 1202 02/12/85 11 i 2 1230 t 130-

'd ' SE1 Dup. . 02/11/85 9.Si 1.8 1270 1360 t 140 130 4 SE1 Split 03/11/85 7.72 1.8 1290 t 130 10G1- 03/11/85. 14 i 2 1282 03/11/85 3.9t 1.5 1430 i 140 SE1 03/11/85 11 i 2 1350 t 140 13E3' 03/11/85 6.4* 1.5 LT 0.2 1450 t 150 12B3' 03/11/85 13 t 2 LT 0.3 1340

  • 130 6Cl- 03/11/85 7.92 1.7 LT 0.2 1260 t 130 10D1 03/12/85 8.It 1.6' LT 0.2 1500 t 150 12D2 03/12/85 4.0t 1.4 LT 0.2 1420 t 140  %

-13E3 Dup.- 03/11/85 4.It 1.4 LT 0.2 1300 t.130 13E3 Split 03/11/85. 5.72 1.5 LT 0.2- 1570 t 160-10G1- 04/08/85 12 1 2 1370 t 140 1282 04/08/85 '3.6 t 1.9 1330 t 130

-SE1 ~04/08/85 7.0 t 2.1 1310 t 130 713E3 04/08/85 4.6 i 2.0 1520 t 150

.12B3(2a)' '.04/08/85 26 *3 1310 t 130 6C1 04/08/85 3.9 t'l.7 1500 t 150 1001 04/09/85 '12 i 3 1360 t 140 1202 .04/09/85  : 3.5 t 1.8 1190 t 120 10G1 Dup. 04/08/85 7.3 t 2.1 1340 i 130

~10G1 Split 04/08/85 7.4 i 2.2- 1390 t 140 See' footnotes at end.of table

,~. .. .. - - -. . ..

TABLE 14 (Page 2 of 4)

GROSS BETA MINUS K-40, 10 DINE-131 AND GAMMA

  • SPECTROMETRY OF MILK SSES 1985 (Results in pCi/f t 2 s)

COLLECTION Gr-Beta LOCATION DATE Minus K-40 K-40 Cs-137 Ra-226 Th-228 10G1 04/22/85 8.8t 2.0 1410 t 140 12B2 04/22/85 7.01 2.1 1380 t 140 SE1 04/22/85 3.4t 1.9 1340 t 130 13E3 04/22/85 5.3t 2.0 1560 t 160 '

10G1 05/13/85 9.82 1.9 1390 t 140 12B2 05/13/85. 3.0t 1.3 1480 i 150

- SE1 05/13/85 7.1 1.8 1390 t 140

- 13E3 05/13/85 3.6t 1.5 1290 t 130

'1283 05/13/85 14 i 2 1360 t 140 6Cl 05/13/85 13 t 2 1410 t 140 1001 05/14/85 6.22 1.5 1250 t 130 1202 05/13/85 3.St 1.4 1300 t 130 1282 Dup. 05/13/85 2.52 1.5 1360 t 140 1283 Split 05/13/85 15 t 2 1450 t 150 i 10G1 05/28/85 11 t 2 1380 t 140 1282- 05/28/85 LT 3 1390 t 140

SE1 05/28/85 9.2t 2.2 1270 i 130 x

m 13E3 05/28/85 4.52 2.1 1500 1 150 M

10G1 '06/10/85 7.9t 2.1 1290 i 130 12B2- 06/10/85 4.41 1.9 1410 t 140 SEl. 06/10/85 4.9t 1.9 1350 t 140 13E3 '06/10/85 7.2t 2.2 1270 t 130 4

1283 (2b) 06/10/85 20 t 3. 1330 t 130

+

6C1 L06/10/85 7.7* 2.1 1200't 120 10D1 06/10/85 5.82 2.0 1330 t 130 12D2 06/10/85 3.41 2.0 1350 t 140 SE1 Oup. 06/10/85 4.51-2.0 1310 t 130 6C1 Split 06/10/85 6.42.2.0 1360 t 140

-10G1 06/24/85 _10

  • 2 1290 i 130

'1282 06/24/85 LT 2 1320 t 130 SE1 06/24/85 7.2t 1.6 1380 140 13E3' 06/24/85 5.7t 1.5 1500 t 150 1061 07/08/85 7.7t 2.1 1120 t 110 1282 07/08/85 LT 3 1360 140 SE1 07/08/85 5.lt 1.8 1390 t 140 13E3 07/09/85 ~5.Si 2.0 1410 1 140

1283 07/08/85 11 i 2 1370 2 140

~6Cl- 07/08/85 4.3t 1.7 .1230 t 120 1001 07/08/85 8.It 2.3 1510 t 150 12D2 07/08/85 3.92 2.1 1250 i 120 13E3 Dup. 07/09/85 5.lt 2.0 1500 t 150 #

l See' footnotes at end of-table 1

- . - , w , . - -. , r- . , -

TABLE 14 (Page 3 of 4)

GROSS BETA MINUS K-40, 10 DINE-131 AND GAMMA

  • SPECTRUMETRY Of MILK SSES 1985 (Results in pCi/f 2 2 s)

LULLLLi10N Gr-Beta LOCATION DATE Minus K-40 K-40 Cs-137 Ra-226 Th-223 10G1 07/22/85 8.0t 1.7 1250 2 130 12B2 07/22/85 5.12 1.7 1460 t 150 SE1 07/22/85 6.92 1.8 1330 130 13E3 07/22/85 3.52 1.3 1510 t 150 10G1 (2c) 08/12/85 16 t 2 1370 t 140 5.4 t 3.3 l 12B2 08/12/85 5.3t 2.1 1480 t 150 l SE1 08/12/85 4.8t 2.0 1250 t 130 l l 13E3 08/12/85 5.3t 2.2 1400 i 140 l

! 1283 (2d) 08/12/85 15 t 2 1330 t 130 6Cl- (2e) - 08/12/85 16 t 2 1330 130 1001 08/13/85 6.9t 2.0 1630 t 160 1202 08/12/85 LT 3 1240 t 120

>c 1282 Dup. 08/12/85 LT 3 1250 t 130

/3 10G1 08/27/85 7.4t 2.0 1360 t 140 no 1282 08/27/85 3.It 2.0 1470 t 150 SE1 08/26/85 11 t 2 1180 t 120 13E3 08/26/85. 7.22 2.0 1320 t 130 10G1 09/09/85 5.8i 2.0 1460 t 150 4.6 1 3.0 1282 09/09/85 5.4t 1.9 1240 t 120 l

SE1 09/09/85 6.7t 2.1 1300 t 130 13E3 .09/09/85 4.7t 1.9 1440 t 140 1283 09/09/85 - 13 t 2 1230 i 120 6Cl 09/09/85 6.0t 2.0 1310 t 130 1001. 09/09/85- 6.St 2.1 1320 t 130 12D2 09/09/85 LT 3 1160 t 120 12D2 Spilt 09/09/85 LT 3 1480 t 150 10G1 09/23/85 11 i 2 1300 2 130 1282 09/23/85 5.12 2.0 1430 i 140 SE1 09/23/85 9.82 2.1 1480 150 13E3 09/23/85 5.82 1.9 1490 t 150 SE1 Split' 09/23/85 6.82 2.1 .1470 t 150 10G1 10/07/85 7.5t 2.1 1350 t 130 1282 10/07/85- 3.3t 1.8 1360 i 140 SE1 10/07/85 5.3t 2.0 1190 t 120 13E3 10/07/85 6.It 2.0 1500 t 150 12B3 10/07/85 12 i 2 1070 t 110-6C1 10/07/85 4.22 1.9- 1310 t'130 10DI- 10/08/85 11 t 2 1360 t 140 1202 10/07/85 LT 3 1120 i 110 6Cl Split 10/07/85 LT.3. 1330 t 130 See footnotes at end'of table.

a

i TABLE 14 (Page 4 of 4)

GROSS BETA MINUS K-40 100!NE-131 AND GAMMA

  • SPECTROMETRY 0F MILK SSES 1985 (Results in pCi/t i 2 s)

LOLLLCTION. Gr-Beta LOCATION DATE Minus K-40 K-40 Cs-137 Ra-226 Th-228 10G1 10/22/85 5.31 2.1 1400 t 140 1282 10/21/85 4.12 2.3 1300 t 130

.5El 10/21/85 6.21 2.2 1280 t 130 13E3 10/21/85 LT 3 1330 t 130 1282 Split 10/21/85 LT 3 1240 t 120 19G1 11/11/85 6.2t 2.0 1260 t 130 12t2 11/11/85 5.3i 2.0 1410 t 140 l >c SE1 11/11/85 11 i 2 1260 t 130

[- q* 13E3 11/11/85 5.81 2.3 1490 t 150 no 1283 11/11/85 11 2 2 1300 t 130 00 6Cl 11/11/85 6.72.2.0 1230 t 120 1001 11/12/85 9.It 2.1 1250 t 130 4.9 2 3.3 L 1202 11/12/85 4.81 2.2 1280 i 130 l

13E3 Split 11/11/85 5.lt 1.9 1310 t 130 10D1: Split '11/11/85 5.41 1.9 1120 t 110 10G1 12/09/85 7.91 2.3 1340 t 130 1282 12/09/85 3.9t 1.9 1560 t 140 SE1 12/09/85 10 1 2 1280 i 130 13E3 12/09/85 5.11 2.3 1380 i 140 1283 12/09/85 8.3t 2.2 1330 t 130' 6C1 12/09/85 6.7t 2.1 1320 t 130 1001 12/10/85 4.4t 1.9 1400 1 140 12D2 12/10/85 4.4t 2.0 1370.1 140 10G1 Split 12/09/85 7.7t 2.1 1170 t 120

  • .Only gamma emitters detected are reported; typical LLD values can be found on Table a9.

Note No goat milk was available from location 801 in. March for quarterly collection. Whers goat- died in May location was discontinued.

(1) Iodine was determined by radiochemical methods. See Appendix B-5. All values are less than 0.1 pC1/K unless noted.

(2)- Sr-89 and Sr-90 analyses were performed; results were as follows:

( a) .Sr-89 = LT 6; Sr-90 = 1.6 t 0.6 (b) Sr-89 = LT 5; Sr-90 = 9.9 t 0.8 (c) Sr-89 = LT 7; Sr-90 = 6.9 i 1.1 (d) Sr-89 = LT 7; Sr-90 = 11 1 1 (e) Sr-89 = LT 5; Sr-90 = 5.5 1 0.8

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ ___ a

.. . _ . _ _ . ._ . . . . . . . - _ . - - . . . _ . . _ _ _ ._m_ m . _ _ . . _

l TABLE 15 l

l GAMMA

  • SPECTROMEIRY OF PASTURE GRASS l SSES 1985 (Results in pCi/g (wet) i 2 s)
LOCATION COLLECTION OATE Be-7 K-40 Ra-226 Th-228 l

15A1 01/08/85 6.1 t 0.6 5.9 2 0.6 15A1 02/12/85 1.9 t 0.2 2.0 t 0.2 15Al 03/12/85 8.8 1 0.9 1.7 2 0.4 l 801 (1) 03/12/85 7.1 2 0.7 2.1 0.4

'15Al 04/09/85' 21 2 2 6.1 i 0.6 15Al 05/14/85 0.55 t 0.10 6.9 2 0.7 l ><

7 15A1 Ouplicate 05/14/85 2.4 t 0.7 30 i 3 ro d*

15Al' 06/11/85 0.26 i 0.17 6.0 i 0.6 i 15Al 07/09/85 0.87

  • 0.17 8.5 i 0.9 15A1 08/13/85 0.57 t 0.28 6.5 t 0.7-15Al 09/10/85 - 0.98 i 0.17 3.3 i 0.3 I .15A1 10/08/85 1.3 2 0.1 7.0 t 0.7 15Al 11/12/85 1.7 t 0.2 2.9 2 0.3 15A1 12/10/85 6.7 i 0.7 4.8 t 0.5 Only gamma emitters detected are reported; typical LLO values are found on Table 19.

(1) Location deleted after goat milk operation was discontinued in May 1985.

l . l g . - _ _ _ - - -

I TABLE 16 GAMMA

  • SPECTROMETRY OF SOIL AND VEGETATION SSES 1985 (Results in pC1/g (dry) i 2 s)

COLLECTION LOCATION DATE Be 7 K-40 Cs-137 Ra-226 Th.228 Other 50ll 254 Bot. 08/19/85 8.8 2 0.9 0.18 1 0.05 1.1 i 0.1 254 Top 08/19/85 9.3 2 0.9 0.12 i 0.05 1.7 i 0.8 0.94 1 0.09 555 Bot. 08/19/85 9.7 t 1.0 0.27 i 0.06 1.8 i 0.8 1.1 t 0.1 555 Top 08/19/85 9.6 i 1.0 0.29 i 0.04 2.0 2 0.6 1.1 0.1 1154 Bot. 08/21/85 10 i 1 0.10 t 0.04 0.64 2 0.06 1154 Top 08/21/85 12 2 1 0.14 1 0.03 1.4 1 0.5 0.80 i 0.08 1554 Bot. 08/21/85 10

  • 1 0.16
  • 0.06 2.4 i 0.8 1.3 t 0.1 1554 Top 08/21/85 14 i 1 0.12 1 0.05 2.1 i 0.9 1.0 t 0.1 9B2 Bot. 08/21/85 9.5 t 1.0 0.30
  • 0.04 1.4 t 0.5 0.68 i 0.07 9B2 Top 08/21/85 10 t 1 0.43 t 0.04 0.57 t 0.06 104 Bot. 08/19/85 9.6 i 1.0 0.78 i 0.08 1.5 i 0.2 104 Top 08/19/85 7.4 2 0.9 0.69 t 0.08 2.9 i 1.0 1.3 i 0.1 b

302 Bot. 08/19/85 11 i 1 0.53 1 0.07 7.7 2 1.7 4.3 0.4 3D2 Top 08/19/85 10 t 1 0.95 t 0.10 3.6 i 1.0 2.2

  • 0.2 12E2 Bot. 08/19/85 10 t 1 0.23 t 0.05 1.8 i 0.7 0.87 1 0.09 12E2 Top 08/19/85 9.8 t 1.0 0.23 i 0.04 1.6 t 0.5 0.68 t 0.07 7GI Bot. 08/21/85 8.7 i 0.9 1.7 1 0.2 1.7 i 0.6 1.3 i 0.1 7G1 Top 08/21/85 8.4 1 0.8 2.2 i 0.2 2.3 2 0.8 1.2 1 0.1 12G3 Bot. 08/19/85 12 1 1 0.11 t 0.03 1.8 t 0.6 1.1 1 0.1 12G3 Top 08/19/85 12 1 1 0.18 t 0.05 2.2 1 0.9 1.1 2 0.1 VEGETATION / TERRESTRIAL 254 08/19/85 2.6 t 0.9 42
  • 4 555 08/19/85 4.5 t 1.1 39 i 4 1154 08/21/85 1.7 2 0.4 13 1 1 1554 08/21/85 6.7 t 1.3 21 t 2 982 08/21/85- 7.2 1 0.7 14 i 1 ID4 08/19/85 2.4 t 0.6 25 t 3 302 08/19/85 6.6 i 1.1 50 t 5 12E2 08/19/85 1.2 1 0.5 21 1 2 7GI 08/21/85 9.9 i 1.0 32 1 3 12G3 08/19/85 10 t 1 30 i 3
  • Only gamma emitters detected are reported; typical LLD values are found on Table 19.

TABLE 17 (Page 1 of 2)

GAMMA

  • SPECTROMETRY OF FOOD PRODUCTS (Fruits, Vegetables and Honey)

SSES 1985 (Results in pCi/g (wet) i 2 5)

K-40 Cs-137 Ha-226 Th-228

^ LOCATION (1) COLLECTION DATE Be-7 I

.1156 Spinach-BD 05/28/85 6.1 t 0.6 05/28/85 0.17 i 0.08 3.1 i 0.3 1156 Lettuce-BS 06/09/85 1.5 t.0.2 2H1 Strawberries 1.7 i 0.2 1101 Strawberries 06/10/85 755 Spinach - BD 06/18/85' O.12 t 0.13 8.2 t 0.8 06/18/85 0.23 i 0.11 4.6 1 0.5 755 Lettuce - 85 6.4 i 0.6 755 Swiss Chard - FH 06/18/85 7.2 i 0.7 0.010 t 0.011

'1156 Spinach - BD 06/18/85 0.22 i 0.10 .

06/18/85 3.9 t 0.4 1156 Lettuce - BS 0.14 f.0.ll 6.3 2 0.6

'1156 Swiss Chard - FH 06/18/85 07/08/85 0.32 i 0.13 5.9 i 0.6

' R$ 1156 Curled Endive 3.2.t 0.3 e 11S6 Lettuce - PH 07/08/85 07/08/85 0.29 t 0.10 5.9 t 0.6

. @R 755 Curled Endive 0.29 i 0.09 3.9 i 0.4 755 . Lettuce - PH 07/08/85 07/16/85 2.4 1 0.2 755 Green Bean - LT 4.1 t 0.4 755 Detroit Red Beet 07/16/85 07/16/85 2.7 t.0.3 1156 Green Bean - LT 3.6 t 0.4 1156 Detroit Red Beet 07/16/85 2.5 2.0.3 755 Oak Leaf Lettuce- 07/16/85 0.24 t 0.10 2.5 t 0.3 1156 Dak Leaf Lettuce 07/16/85 0.14 i 0.11 1156 Prize Cabbage .07/22/85 2.8 2 0.4 755 -Prize Cabbage: 07/22/85 2.1 i 0.3 2H1 Cabbage' . 08/13/85 3.7 2 0.4 08/13/85 2.9 t 0.3

.1101 Green Beans 2.0 t 0.2 1101 Sweet Corn 08/13/85 08/13/85 1.7 t 0.2 2H1 Green Beans 30t 0.3 2H1. Sweet Corn 08/13/85 2.7 i 0.3 1101 Cabbage .

08/19/85 08/13/85 2.0 t 0.2 1156 Sweet Corn - BS 2.9 t 0.3 1156 Tomatoe - BB '08/13/85 2.7 i 0.3 755 Sweet Corn - BS 08/13/85 08/13/85 2.1 t 0.2 755 Tomatoe - BB See footnotes attend of table.

c TABLE 17 (Page 2 of 2)

GAMMA

  • SPECTROMETRY OF FOOD PRODUCTS (Fruits, Vegetables and Honey)

SSES 1985 (Results in pCi/g (wet) i 2 s)

LOCATION (1) COLLECTION DATE Be-7 K-40 Cs-137 Re=I26 Th-228 1101 Potatoes 09/10/85 3.1 2 0.3 2H1 Potatoes 09/10/85 3.9 t 0.4 1101 Tomatoes 09/10/85 1.9 t 0.2 1101 Tomatoes. Dup. 09/10/85 2.4 i 0.2 755 Curled Endive 09/10/85 0.46 i 0.13 4.8 t 0.5 755 Swiss Chard - FH 09/10/85 0.19 2 0.08 3.1 i 0.3 1156 Curled Endive 09/10/85 0.29 t 0.12 3.7 t 0.4 1156 Swiss Chard - FH. 09/10/85 0.31 t 0.09 4.0 1 0.4 755 Potatoe - KB 09/10/85 5.1 t 0.5 1156 Potatoe - KB 09/10/85 4.0 t 0.4 35 1156 Spinach-BD 10/08/85 0.58 i 0.10 8.6 2 0.9 0.017 i 0.010

/, '1156 Lettuce-BS 10/08/85 0.32 i 0.09 4.0 t 0.4-

%a 755 Spinach-BD 10/08/85 0.32 2 0.13 8.4 t 0.8 755 Lettuce-BS 10/08/85 0.34 i 0.08- 4.6 t 0.5 782 Cortland Apples 10/08/85 0.63 i 0.12 782. Macintosh Apples 10/08/85 1.0 t 0.1 i 1281 Macintosh Apples 10/09/85 9.3 t 0.9 782 Honey 10/08/85 1.6 t 0.2 0.034 2 0.008

  • Only gamma emitters detected are reported; typical LLD values are found on table 19.

(1). Variety codes for stations 755 and 1156 are as follows: Lettuce-85 = Black-seeded Simpson. Spinach-BD = Winter Bloomsdale, Swiss. Chard-FH = Ford hook, Lettuce-PH = Prizehead, Green Bean-LT = Long Tender. Tomatoe-BB = Big Boy, Pot atoe-KB = Kennebec 9

TABLE 18 GAMMA

  • SPECTROMETRY OF GAME P0ULTRY AND EGGS SSES 1985 (Results in pCi/g (wet) 2 2 s)

LOCATION COLLECTION DATE K-40 Ls-137 Th-228 Eggs 1281 09/09/85 1.1 i 0.1 Chicken 1281 09/09/85 2.6 i 0.3 Duck 10D1 09/09/85 2.9 2 0.3 Deer 35 11/15/85 2.7 i 0.3 0.17 i 0.02 Deer 55 11/15/85 2.9 i 0.3 0.29 2 0.03 4 Squirrel 155 10/19/85 3.5 2 0.4 3.9 : 0.4 co Squirrel 15 10/19/85 3.0 t 0.3 2.0 t 0.2 Squirrel 25 10/19/85 3.8 i 0.4 1.9 i 0.2

  • Only gamma emitters detected are reported; typical LLD values are found on Table 19.

l l

l

TABLE 19 TYPICAL

  • LOWER LIMITS OF DETECTION OF NUCLIDES SEARCHED FOR BUT NOT FOUND BY GAMMA SPECTROMETRY IN THE VICINITY OF SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, 1985 NUCLIDE FISH (pCi/g wet) b (pCl/g dry)

SURFACE WATER GROUND WATER POTABLE WATER RAIN WATER (pCi/f) (pCi/f) (pCi/f) (pCi/f)

Mn-54 .018 .068 6.4 5.6 6.4 5.0 Co-58 .022 .078 6.5 6.2 6.5 5.4 fe-59 .051 .21 11 11 14 11 Co-60 .018 .071 6.4 6.1 6.4 5.6 Zn-65 .040 .16 12 13 10 11 Zr-95 .050 .16 14 12 14 11 Nb-95 .031 .088 7.4 6.9 7.2 5.9 l-131** .61 .97 0.28 24 0.34 2b Cs-134 .020 .084 6.8 6.2 7.5 5.9 Cs-137 .020 .082 6.6 6.3 7.0 6.0 Ba-140 .39 .77 33 34 33 33 La-140 .11 .42 11 11 11 12 M

L bAMt. VUULINT NUCLIDE AIR PARTICULATES MILK PASTURE GRASS (10-3 pCi/m3) (pCi/f)

FRUITS /VEG. ALGAE AND E6GS 50ll (pCi/g wet) (pCi/g wet) (pCf/g dry) (pCi/g wet) (pCl/g dry)

Mn-54 0.46 7.1 .051 .023 .33 .026 .097 Co-58 0.52 7.2 .060 .022 .32 .037 .10 Fe-59 0.68 15 .15 .051 .74 .090 .30 Co-60 0.52 13 .056 .024 .41 .023 .098 Zn-65 1.1 19 .11 .052 .77 .055 .20 Zr-95 1.0 17 .15 .052 .69 .078 Nb-95 0.56 .25 7.9 .065 .027 .33 .043 .11 1-131** 3.3 0.16 .20 .056 .59 2.8 .73 Cs-134 0.49 8.2 .054 .025 .38 .026 .10 Cs-137 0.48 7.9 .059 .025 40 .026 .12 Ba-140 3.9 31 .17 .086 1.1 .94 .85 L a-140 2.0 10 .063 .037 .59 .33 .32

  • Typical refers to mean plus two standard deviations.

lodine-131 in surf ace water, potable water and milk is determined by radiochemical methods. See appendix B-5.

---um h

XII. TRENDING FIGURES

0

-~

5 8

~ 9 1

5

( 4 8

8 9

1 A v 9

1 3

7 A 3 8

9 9

1

!I u 1 S

E

" 2 S N 8 9

S 1 F .l!' I!:;: -i , i' O

1 Y 8 T 9 I _ 1 N .l i

!lil:! i]  !.

I l C

I

- 0 V

E H

i V 8 9

1 T lly-li- ,iI 9

iM N _

_ 7 I 9 1

S ljii!

L .l iI II E

n V 8 E 7 L F 9 N

O

  • l .! / 1 I

T A

I D

A R

i l ,

V; 7 7

9 1

8 T 7 N

E I

B M

A f'

. V 9 1

5 7

E 9 1

G A

R E 4 V 7 A 9 1

3

- 7 9

1 d

0 9 8 , " " 4

+ . 1 3 2 0 N E OI U

T L A

R T

A V z! l ! eI D

N S EE L C L L NP E OM G CAS A E R C L AL RA E

V A l E

VF A0 i

Il l

r v C E

A /

D 5

8 x \ V 9 O 1 N S -

E S

S

\ T C

o F O O

Y T t I A P E

N I

C I ,

Yi S

V v

l E G H U T, ' A N

I i i \

~

S L 4

E T

U5 J

E R

A L 8 U U i i y

G I

F C

I N 9 T U R J1 A

P R

I A

V

/ a Y

A N

1 h

N I

Y -

T - R I

V P I

A T

C y A

A R T ~ A E M B \ t \ \

i!

S il S

O l

v B R E u

G F

~ N

/ A J

a-0f

- 0 0 0 0 5

- + 0 0

0 5

0 1

  • 1 N E 1 O U

%1 3 8! ?W I

T L A A R V T D N L E

C L N E C C C A E R C

R E

V A =E E

V A

i

5 8

9 P l r

g 5 8

9 1

1 4 8

I 9

! 1 I

3 7

9 3 1

8 S 9 o 1 E

S S

F O

Y L-p 2 8

9 1

T I

N g l\ v 1 I j:, 8 C

I rI j ,

9 1

V 1ff' E,

H s 0 8

T N

I Jy 9 1

5 E

R S

E T

rmY- 9 7

9 U A 1 G L I

F U C \ 8 m

I q T g n 7 R , u~ 9 o 1 A i h P ,t '

R

, 7 I \ 7 A \ '

9 1

N Y~

I n

1 g 8

Y T

I V

W -

7 9

1 I

T C

A

,5 i  %

g "

m O m 5 7

9 A f ',

L 1

T l1 E J B

i t1 g 4 S  % 7 S " (\ 9 1

O n ,

R iiLr G

W 3 7

s

  • 9 1

o 0 0 0 0 e

- - 0 0

0 5

0 1

5 1 N E 1 O U I

T A

R L

A V

Lfz 3S$ W T D N S L EE L CL NP E OM G C A A S R E E '

C L AL RA V

A 57" E

VF A0

ll l v

I_. _

. 5 5 8 8 g 9 9 1 1

x

!, Ii 4

3 7

\ 8 9

9 1

,y' T

\ 1 S , 1 3

E k 8 S

S ..

s'_ 9 1

F i I O . -

2

- 8 Y

T 9 I " 1 t Y N i I

C 1 I 8 V - 9 h

1 E

H 1j!f!II IiI  !

T 0

N y 8 I 9 R

E l4_ ;

! N  !

1 6

T A - _ _

9 7

W 9 E _. .

R 1 U E _

G C I A tI

- . l4' , , '

_ F F 8 R n 7 U _.

- 9 S

N i

_ - 1i , l!'  ! < 1 1

I .-

_ 7 3 , 7 H 9 1

F iI ' s e O

6 S 7 N \

O n 9 1

I T ,I l lv A

R 5 T

N E

C f 7 9

1 N

O C

E

' 4 7

9 G

A R

E

" 1 3

V A

V 7 9

g

% 1 0 O 0 0 0 0 0

  1. - 0 0

O O

0 0

0 5

0 1

5 1 N

O E

U 0 5 1 1

I T

A R

L A

V L)  ?" .

w T D N S E E L CL L NP E OM G CA A S R E

C L AL RA E

V A x[b E

VF A0

6 C

APPENDIX A US EPA INTERCOMPARISON PROGRAM RESULTS h-

APPENDIX A US EPA INTERCOMPARIS0N PROGRAM RESULTS

1. Introduction The quality assurance program of the Radiological Laboratory of Teledyne Isotopes (TI) is briefly describ2d in this appendix.

Information on each incoming sample is entered in a permanent log book. A sample number is assigned to each sample at the time of receipt. --

This sample number uniquely identifies each sample.

Laboratory counting instruments are calibrated, using radionuclide standards obtained from the National Bureau of Standards, the EPA, and reliable commercial suppliers, such as Amersham-Searle. Calibration of counting instruments is maintained by regular counting of radioactive reference sources. Background counting rates are measured regularly on all counting instruments. Additional performance checks for the ganna-ray scintillation spectrometer include regular checks and adjustment, when necessary, of energy calibration.

Blank, spiked (known quantities of radioactivity added), and replicate samples are processed periodically to determine analytical precision and l accuracy.

2. Laboratory Analyses for Quality Assurance Teledyne Isotopes participates in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Radioactivity Intercomparison Studies (Cross-check) Program. The TI results of analyses performed on samples and the known values are listed in Table A-1.

A-1

p TABLE A-1 ,

INTER-LABORATORY COMPARISONS. 1985 TELEDYNE ISOTOPES Pa9e 1 of 5 -

Teledyne All Participants Collectton Isotopes Results(b) Mean i2 s.d.

Date Media Nuclide EPA-Results(a)

Gross Alpha 35. t 15.2 22. t 4.6 28. t 7.

04/20/84 Water (Sample A) -

Gross Beta 147, t 12.4 117. t 17.3 (p) 04/20/84 Water

18. 7.5 24. 7.

(Sample B) Sr-89 23. t 8.7 t t Sr-90 26. t 2.6 22. i 3.5 (h) 25. 4.

Co-60 30. t 8.7 29. t 6.2 30. 1 4.

Cs-134 30. t 8.7 29. t 4.6 29. t 4.

Cs-137 26. t 8.7 29. t 6.0 26. t 3.

> 07/20/84 Water Gross Alpha 6. t 8.7 3.8 2 2.4 (k) no (k) Gross Beta 13. i 8.7 11.3 1 3.5 (k) 07/27/84 Food Sr-89 25.0 1 8.7 17. i 9. (k)

(c)(k) Sr-90 20.0 2 2.6 20. t 9. (k) 1-131 39.0 t 10.4 19. t 3.5 (k)

Cs-137 25.0 t 8.7 26. i 11.

K 2605.0 t226.0 3027. 21183.

Gross Alpha 15. 8.7 15. t 1.7 16. t 6.

11/23/84 Air Filter t

54. 3.5 56. t 12.

Gross Beta 52. t 8.7 i -

Sr-90 21. t 2.6 23. t 3.0 21. t 6.

Cs-137 10. t 8.7 9. t 4.6 11. t 6.

Ra-226 8.6 1 2.2 9.3 1 1.8 8.0 t 3.0 12/21/84 Water 1.1 1.3 (e) 3.8 2.0 Ra-228 4.1 1 L.T. 2 Water Sr-89 3. 8.7 L.T. 3. 6. t 3.

01/04/85 30.

t

29. i 10.5 28. 6.

Sr-90 t 2.6 t Gross Alpha 5. 8.7 5. t O. 5. t 4.

01/18/85 Water t 8.7 15.3 i 1.7 17. 3.

Gross Beta 15. t t Food Sr-89 34.0 t 8.7 17.0 t 0.0 (d) 24.8 t 20.1 01/25/85 26.0 t 2.6 22.0 t 6.0 30.1 2 17.8 (c) Sr-90 1-131 35.0 10.4 26.3 2 6.2 35.5 2 10.8 Cs-137 29.0 t 8.7 31.0 1 10.4 31.4 i 8.2 K 1382.0 2207.9 1393.0 t 96.4 1379.1 2290.1

TABLE A-1 INTER-LABORATORY COMPARISONS. 1985 TELEDYNE ISOTOPES Page 2 of 5 Collection Teledyne All Participants Date Media Nuclide EPA-Results(a) !sotopes Results(b) Mean t 2 s.d.

02/02/85 Water H-3 3796. 1634, 3933. 2174 3916. 2744.

02/08/85 Water Cr-51 48. t 8.7 L.T. 57. 47. t 18.

Co-60 20, 8.7 19. t 6. 19. i 6.

Zn-65 55. t 8.7 57. t 6. 56. i 12.

Ru-106 25. t 8.7 L.T. 40. 25. t 14.

Cs-134 35. t 8.7 37. i 12. 33. t 8.

Cs-137 25. t 8.7 31. i 5. 25. t 6.

03/01/85 Milk I-131 9. i 1.6 8.0 1 3.0 8. t 4.

03/15/85 Water Ra-226 5.0 t 1.3 5.9 t 2.1 4.9 1 0.7

> Ra-228 9.0 i 2.3 5.1 i 1.8 (e) 8.4 t 1.8 O

03/29/85 Air Filter Gross Alpha 10.0 t 6.7 10.3 i 1.7 10.7 1 4.8 Gross 8 eta 36.0 t 8.7 36.7 i 7.5 38.3 1 11.2 Sr-90 15.0 t 2.6 14.7 i 1.7 15. i 3.6 Cs-137 6.0 t 8.7 6.0 1 0.0 6.8 2 3.3 04/05/85 Water I-131 7.5 i 1.3 6.7 t 1.7 6.96 i 1.34 y

1 04/12/85 Water H-3 3559. t630. 3367. t963. 3534 tS36. .

04/19/85 . Water Gross Alpha 32.0 t 8.7 25.33 1 1.74 (f) 30.61 2 19.91 (Sample A) Ra-226 4.1 1 1.0 3.66 t 0.90 3.99 i '2.64 Ra-228 6.2 i 1.6 6.13.t 0.69 6.15 1 4.26 7

U 7.0 i 10.4 6.67 1 1.74 s 7.58 2 4.46 04/19/85 Water Gross Beta 72.0 t 8.7 92.33 i 9.63 (g) 69.98 2 19.18 (Sample B) Sr-89 10.0 t 8.7 10.0 2 0.0 9.71 2 7.78

' Sr-90 15.0't 2.6 13.33 2 3.45 14.37 t 3.98 s' .Co-60 15.0 i 8.7 20.0 t 5.2 15.59 2 5.46 Cs-134 15.0 t 8.7 14.66 i 3.45 14.63 i 5.90 Cs-137 12.0 1 8.7 16.33 i 9.6J 13.16 t 4.96 n

05/10/85 Water Sr-89 39.0 2 8.7 35.66't 9.15 36.16 i"16.74 Sr-90 15.0 t 2.6 .12.66 2 1.74-(h)

'" A.

13.53 i 1.16

a.

. % g, . v x 4 q

TABLE A-1 'Y E '

~4,. _

-ax .

INTER-LABORATORY COMPARISONS, 1985 TELE 0VNE ISOTOPES Page 3 of 5 Collection Teledyne All Participants Oate Media Nuclide EPA-Results(a) Isotopes Results(b) Mean i 2 s.d.

05/24/85 Water Gross Alpha 12.0 2 8.7 12.00 t 5.19 10.50 t 6.40s Gross Beta 11.0 t 8.7 12.66 t 1.74 12.46 2 6.28' 06/07/85 Water Ce-51 44.0 t 8.7 L.T. 53.3 47.81 t 21.38 Co - 60 14.0 t 8.7 15.66 1 3.45 15.02 1 5.34 Zn-65 47.0 t 8.7 48.33 t 7.53 49.26 t 12.34.

Ra-106 62.0 t 8.7 53.67 i 9.63 (1) 58.42 t 24.10 ,

Cs-134 8.7 7.5b

~

35.0 t 33.0 t 13.08 33.31 i C$-13/ 20.0 i 8.7 23.33 i 6.24 21.23 2 5.78 06/14/85 . Water H-3 2416.0 1608.0 2366.66 1346.38 2399.15 2622.92 06/21/85 Water R.-226 3.1 i 0.7 3.86

  • 0.18 (j) 3.13 2 1.14 Ra-228 4.2 i 1.0 -3.66 1 2.01 4.15 i 2.02

'?

a 06/28/85 Milk Sr-89 11.00 t 8.66 11.66 1 3.45 9.82 i 4.60 Sr-90 11.00 t 2.60 10.00 t 0.0 10.11 2 4.10 1-131 11.00 t 10.39 9.00 t 3.00 11.74 1 4.92 Cn-137 11.00 t 8.66 11.00 t 7.92 11.62 i '3.46 K 1525.00 t131.63 1540.0 i103.92 1523.52 2234.44 07/19/85 Water Gross Alpha 11.0 t 8.7 5.67 t 1.74 9.10 i .5.74 Gross 8 eta 8.0 t 8.7 4.33 1 1.74 8.88 t 6.40 07/26/85 Food Sr-89 33.00 t 8.66 25.33 i 6.24 (1) 24.66 i 11.54 (c) Sr-90 26.00 t 2.60 28.33 i 4.56 (1) 26.77 t 11.18 I-131 35.00 i 10.39 37.33

  • 4.56 37.13 1 9.58 Cs,-137 29.00 t 8.66 31.00 1 3.00 .30.74 2 6.06 K 1514.00 1131.63 1633.33 2153.96 (m) 1500.08 2240.34 08/09/85 Water I-131 33,00 10.39 36.66 i 4.56 31.86 2 7.74 08/16/85 Water H-3 4480.00t776.00 4433.3 2458.25 4421.91 2681.48 08/30/85 Air. Filter Gross Alpha 13.00 t 8.66 12.66 t 1.74 12.98 i 5.04 Gross Beta 44.00 t 8.66 43.00 t 9.00 47.48 t 12.58

~Sr-90 18.00 1 2.60 20.00 t 3.00 (n) 17.73 1 4.00 Cs-137 8.00 t 8.66 10.00 t 3.00 9.42 i 4.06-

1 TABLE A-1 INTER-LABORATORY COMPARISONS, 1985 TELE 0YNE ISOTOPES Page 4 of 5

' Collection Teledyne All Participants Date Media Nuclide EPA-Results(a) Isotopes Results(b) Mean t 2 s.d.

09/06/85 Water Sr-89 20.00 8.66 18.33 t 4.56 18.80 t 9.66 Sr-90 7.00 i 2.60 6.00 t 0.00 6.94 1 2.52 09/13/85 Water Ra-226 8.90 2 2.32' 9.23 2 1.47 8.44 2 2.96 Ra-228 4.60 t 1.20 4.03 1 0.60 4.47 i 2.30 09/20/85 Water Gross Alpha 8.00 t 8.66 3.33 1 1.74 7.62 i 4.36 Gross Beta 8.00 t 8.66 4.00 t 0.00 8.39 t 4.28 10/04/85 Water Cr-51 21.00 i 8.66 L.T. 63. 24.37 t 22.82 Co-60 20.00 t 8.66 17.66 i 9.63 19.73 i 4.30

}" Zn-65 19.00 2 8.66 25.33 i 7.53 (o) 20.30 i 6.90 on Ru-106 20.00 t 8.66 L.T. 37. 23.00 t 14.52 Cs-134 20.00 t 8.66 18.33 2 9.15 18.62 1 4.66 Cs-137 20.00 t 8.66 22.33 2 3.45 20.33 t 4.02 10/11/85 Water H-3 1974.00 tS97.56 2133.33 t624.48 1984.23 1400.06 NOTES:

( a) EPA Results-Expected laboratory precision (3 sigma). Units are pCi/f for water, urine, and stik except K is in mg/f. Units.are total pC1 for air particulate filters.

(b) Teledyne Results - Average i three sigma. Units are pCi/A for water, urine, and milk except K is in mg/2. Units are total pCi for air particulate filters.

(c). Units for food analysis are pCi/kg except K which is in mg/kg.

(d) The results from.the EPA were received on August 09, 1985 for the analysis completed in April. The EPA had difficulty determining the correct results for this sample. It was difficult to scavenge and the -

results were reported as a courtesy although they were considered suspect because of the difficulty of analyzing a synthetic food sample.

(e) A new chemistry was tried ta4 did not give good results. A further refinement of the chemistry is planned.

(f) The proportional counters are calibrated for. alpha efficiency with Am-241. Low energy alpha emitters are included in the spike; however, no correction for efficiency was made.

(g) The proportional counters are calibrated for beta efficiency with Cs-137. The efficiency correction applied for the low energy beta emitters overcompensated because the aNount of the low energy emitters was small compared with the high energy emitters.

TABLE A-1 INTER-LABORATORY COMPARISONS, 1985 TELEDYNE ISOTOPES Page 5 of 5 Collection Teledyne All Participants Oate- Media Nuclide EPA-Results(a) Isotopes Results(b) Mean i 2 5.d.

Notes (Cont.)

(h) The low Sr-90 results were caused by erroneously high Sr-89 yields because of trace calcium and barium in the precipitated mount. Experiments will be conducted to eliminate this problem.

^

(1) The three results were 50, 55 and 56 pC1/f. The one low result of 50 caused the average to be below the two sigma normalized deviation from the known.

(j) A new NBS traceable standard was prepared to check the efficiency calibration of the ZS coated alpha counters used to count Ra-226.

2 '

(k) Results were not released to Teledyne Isotopes. l En l (1) The results'for these samples showed high variability with some results near the spike value.

In the future samples will be counted longer and sooner after milk time to reduce the amount of ingrowth correction of Sr-90 into Sr-89.

(m) The weight of the sample analyzed will be controlled more carefully since the density may vary from sample to sample.

(n) The reported results were 21, 20 and 19. If the counting error (t 1.0) is taken into consideration, these results would have been within the.two sigma normalized deviation from the known, i

(o) The reported results were 23, 25 and 28. The one high result of 28 caused the average to be above the 2 sigma normalized deviation from the known.

l ' (p) There was a significant difference between the known value and the grand average, therefore, the. EPA l

deleted the results from-the final report.

(q) Low results were caused by a misunderstanding of the dilution instructions by the analyst. Samples l were-diluted by 2.

l

m

_ m um --- -

i APPENDIX B

SUMMARY

OF ANALYTICAL METHODS i

APPENDIX B

SUMMARY

OF ANALYTICAL METHODS The following section contains a description of the analytical laboratory procedures along with an explanation of the analytical calculation methods used by Teledyne Isotopes for sample analysis. These are considered proprietary and are published for informational purposes only.

A further discussion on data reporting conventions can be found in Appendix C.

t B-1

TLD MEASUREMENTS During the four quarters of 1985, a PP&L dosimetry system was used which consists of a Panasonic UD-710 reader and UD-801 badges. The UD-801 badges have two elements of lithium borate (Cu) and two elements of calcium sulfate (Tm). Only the calcium sulfate (Tm) elemento are used for environ-mental measurements. This phosphor was chosen for its characteristic high light output, minimal thermally induced signal loss (fading) and negligible self-dosing.

In handling, the badges are kept clean, and the element phosphors are not touched. The badges are stored and transported in plastic bags or other containers.

Before going to the field, the dosimeters are read twice (separated by one hour) in which the second reading is used as an inherent (background) reading for each element. After the inherent read, the badges are placed in sealed plastic bags (to aid in preventing moisture contacting the TLDs)'

labeled with the sampling location and taken immediately out to the field.

Upon removal from the field, the TLDs are inspected for any damage and readout immediately. In-transit TLDs are not used because of the short time period between the inherent reading and field placement.

l An element correction factor has been calculated for each element, and the reader is calibrated using a cesium-137 source.

l B-2

DETERMINATION OF GROSS ALPHA AND/0R GROSS BETA ACTIVITY IN WATER SAMPLES, AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS, COMPOSITED AIR.

PARTICULATE FILTERS OR SEDIMENTS TELEDYNE IS0 TOPES This describes the process used to measure the overall alpha and/or beta radioactivity of water sanples, air particulate filters, composited air particulate filters or sediments without identifying the radioactive species present. No chenical separation techniques are involved. One liter of the water sample is evaporated on a hot plate. The evaporated sample is rinsed into a 2-inch diameter stainless steel planchet which is stamped with a concentric ring pattern to distribute residue evenly. Final evaporation to dryness takes place under. heat lamps. Residue mass is determined by weighing the planchet before and after mounting the sample. In the case of an air particulate sample, the filter is mounted directly on a 2-inch stainless steel planchet. Composited air filter sample' a leached with nitric acid to bring the deposit into solution. The so' . ion is filtered and a aliquot is evaporated and then mounted on a 2-inch stainless steel planchet. Sediment samples are dried and a 1 gram aliquot is mounted directly on a 2-inch stainless steel planchet, i

The planchets are then counted for alpha and/or beta activity in a low-background gas flow proportional counter. Calculation of activity includes an empirical self-absorption correction curve hich allow for the change in-effective counting efficiency caused by the residue mass. Self absorption is not considered in the case of air particulate filters because of the impracticality of accurately weighing the deposit and because the penetration depth of the deposit into the filter is unknown.

B-3 L-

Alpha /B2ta (Cont.)

CALCULATION OF THE SAMPLE ACTIVITY OR OF THE LLD N - S em N+S It It Net pCi on collection date = At unit volume or wt. 2.22 (v) (E J

  • Z 22 (v) (6) net activity counting error where: N = total counts from sample (counts)

At = counting time for sample (min)

S = background rate of counter (cpm) l 2.22=

v(w)= volume or weight of sample analyzed I

efficiency of the counter

{=

em = multiples of counting error For gross alpha and gross beta calculations set y = 1 and DF = 1. .

I A detection limit (MDL) or "less than" (LT) value is reported if no activity is found. If the net activity, as calculated above, is less than or is equal l

to a predetermined multiple (crm) of the background counting error, then the LT value is reported. A sigma multiple (em) of 4.66 is used for calculation of the LT value unless the customer requests another value such as 2.83.

Thus LT = rm S It

! 2.22 (v) (E) (y) (DF)

B-4 I

DETERMINATION OF I-131 IN MILK AND WATER SAMPLES BY RADI0 CHEMISTRY AND LIQUID PHASE BY ANALYSIS TELEDYNE ISOTOPES This describes the radiochemical methods for determining I-131 activity in milk and water samples by coincidence counting in the liquid phase.

Four liters of sample are first equilibrated with stable iodide carrier. A batch treatment with anion exchange resin is used to remove iodide from the sample. The iodine is then stripped fran the resin with sodium hypochlorite solution, is reduced with hydroxylamine hydrochloride, and is extracted into carbon tetrachloride as free iodine. It is then back-extracted as iodide into sodium bisulfite solution. I The iodide sample solution is oxidized to the free state using nan 02 reagent and is extracted several times into a total of 15 ml of toluene. A 200 p1 aliquot is taken for' determining chemical yield by spectrophotometer. A decolorizing agent (2-methyl-2-butene) is added to the toluene-iodine solution to form an inert molecule and to minimize liquid scintillation quenching. A toluene-based liquid scintillation counting solution is added to the sample, which is then analyzed by a beta-gated gamma-coincidence counting system.

B-5

I-131(Cent.)

i CALCULATION OF THE SAMPLE ACTIVITY OR OF THE MOL The Sample Activity and the 2-sigma Counting Error are Calculated as Follows:

N -

S 2 N +B E D E Net pCi on collection date = 1 t.t liter 2.22(v)(y)(DF)({} 2.22 (v)(y)(DF)(E) t -

net activity counting error where: N = total counts from sample (counts)

At = counting time for sample (min)

S = background rate of counter (cpm) 2.22 = dpm PCT t

v = voltane of sample analyzed (liters) y = chemical yield of the mount or sample counted DF = decay factor from the collection to the mid count time f = efficiency of the counter for I-131 Note: Efficiency is determined by counting an I-131 standard.

Consequently, the branching intensity (abundance) of the I-131 gamma does not appear in the above equation.

Calculation of the MDL If the net activity (previously defined) is equal to or is less than a specified multiple of the background counting error, the activity on the collection date is below the limits of detection and is called "less than" (L.T.) or " minimum detectable level" (MDL).

The L.T. value can be specified by stating only the counting error at a predetermined multiple (rm) of the one sigma sta-tistics. A sigma multiple (am) of 4.65 is used for calculation of the L.T. values unless another multiple such as 2.83 is specified.

thus L.T. =

(z.zz(v)(y)(ut)tg)

B-6

. . - ~ _ _ _ - _ _ ._ .--

i DETERMINATION OF TRITIUM BY GAS COUNTING l TELEDYNE ISOTOPES j >

A 2~ml aliquot is reduced into hydrogen gas and collected in an activated I charcoal trap. The hydrogen is then transferred into a previously evacuated one liter proportional counter. Non tritiated hydrogen and ultra-high purity i-methane is added and then counted. Backgrounds and standards are counted in i

the same gas mixture as the samples, i

Calculation of the sample activity or the MDL:

1 3.234x(TV)N x Vg ~(CPM)g - BKG iem hG2 +(TB2 i Net pCi =

CPMN*Y s '

unit vol.

i l

where:(TV)N =

the tritium units of the standard VN

=

voline of the standard used to calibrate the efficiency of the detector - in psia V

S

=

volume of the sample loaded into the detector - in psia (CPM)N = the cpm activity of the standard of volume VN (CPM)G = the gross activity of the sample of volume V3 and the detector background BKG =

the background of the detector in cpm 3.234 = conversion factor changing TU to pC/E At = counting time for the sample vm = multiple of the counting error eG = standard deviation of the gross activity of the sample and the detector background, in cpm 78 =

standard deviation of the backgroun'd,.in cpm B-7

l Tritium (cont.)

If the net activity (CPM)g - BKG is equal to or is less than twice the counting error, the activity on the collection date is below the limits of detection and is called "less than" (L.T.) or " minimum detectable level" (MOL).

2 2 thus L.T. = ? x 3.234 x (TV)N X VNX #G +#6 (CPM)N X Vs where: 'G =

standard deviation of the gross activity of the sample and the detector background, in cpm

  1. =

S standard deviation of the background, in cpm s

B-8

DETERMINATION OF GAMMA EMITTING RADI0IS0 TOPES TELEDYNE ISOTOPES Gamma emitting radioisotopes are determined with the use of a lithium-drifted germaniun (Ge(Li)) and high purity germanium detectors with high resolution spectrometry in specific media, for example, air particulate filters, charcoal filters, milk, water, vegetation, soil / sediments, biological medi a, etc. Each sample to be assayed is prepared and counted in standard geometries such as one liter wrap-around Marinelli containers, 300 mt or 150 mt bottles, or two-inch filter paper source geometries.

1 Samples are counted on large (>55 cc volume) Ge(Li) detectors connected to Nuclear Data 6620 data acquisition and computation systems. All resultant spectra are stored on magnetic tape.

The analysis of each sample consists of calculating the specific activities of all detected radionuclides or the detection limits from a standard list of nuclides. The Ge(Li) systems are calibrated for each standard geometry using certified radionuclide standards traceable to the National Bureau of Standards.

CALCULATION OF THE SAMPLE ACTIVITY AND COUNTING ERROR N -

S 2 N +S Net pCi/vol or mass =

i V 2.22 (v)(E)(BI)(DF)(At) 2.22 (v)(E)(BI)(DF)(At)

~- -

net activity counting error B-9 u

Gamma Cont.

where: N = area, in counts, of a spectral region containing a gamma emission of the nuclide of interest Note: if the detector exhibits a peak in this region when counting a blank (ie. from natural background) then (BB)(At) is subtracted from N before using the above equation. BB is the count rate of the blank, cpm, in the background peak.

B = background counts in the region of interest, calculated by fitting a straight line across the region connecting the two adjacent regions.

At = counting interval of sample, minutes 2.22 = dpm/pCi y = volune or mass of sample analysed

= efficiency of counter at the energy region of interest BI = branching intensity of the nuclide at the gamma emission energy under consideration DF = decay factor from sample collection time to midpoint of the counting interval CALCULATION OF MINIMUM DETECTABLE LEVEL (MDL) 4.66 / N MDL pCi/vol or mass = V 2.22 (v)(E)(BI)(DF)(At)

The width of the spectral band around the emission energy is calculated differently from the case of an identified peak, so that the value of N used in the two equations may differ.

A detection limit (MDL) or "less than" (LT) value is reported if no activity is found. If no spectral lines are identified at the energies appropriate to a nuclide, the LT value is calculated by the above equation.

If spectral lines are identified but the 2 sigma error in the first equation is greater than 60% of the net activity, then a LT value is also assigned by the second equation.

The analyst's judgement is excercised in the decision to report an activity or an MDL. The agreement between various spectral lines of the same nuclide, and possible interference from other nuclides, are considered in this decision.

B-10

APPENDIX C DATA REPORTING CONVENTIONS

APPENDIX C DATA REPORTING CONVENTIONS The results from Teledyne Isotopes analyses are reported to two significant figures. Errors are reported to the same decimal place as the result. If the error has no digit before the third figure in the result, the error.is rounded up to the second significant figure, if the error is less than 10% of the result, an error of 10% of the result is reported. Detection limits are rounded to one significant figure.

In the tables presenting analytical measurements, the caiculated value is reported with the counting error of 2 standard deviations (2s) derived from a statistical analysis of both the sample and background count rates.

The precision of the results is influenced by the size of the sample, the background count rate, and the method used to round off the value obtained to reflect its degree of significance. For the results of gamma spectrometric analysis, the precision is also influenced by the composition and concentra--

tions of the radionuclides in the sample, the size of the sample, and the assumptions used in selecting the radionuclides to be quantitatively deter-I mined. The 2s error for the net counting rate is-- ')

Rs Rb

-+ --

2s = M st tb l

where Rs = sample counting rate Rb = background counting rate ts = sample counting time tb = background counting time C-1

Results. reported as less than (LT) are below the lower limit of detec-tion (LLD). The LLD is defined as the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that will yield a net count (above system background) with a 95 percent probability of detection and with only a 5 percent prob-ability of f alsely concluding that a blank observation represents a "real" sign al .

For a measurement system that may include radiochemical separation--

4.66sb LLD =

(E)(V)(2.22)(Y) (exp(- A 6t))

where LLD = lower limit of detection, as defined above, in pCi per unit mass or volume sb = standard deviation of the background counting rate or of the counting rate of a blank sample, as appropriate, in counts per minute E = counting efficiency in counts per disintegration V = sample size in units of mass or volume 2.22 = number of disintegrations per minute per picocurie Y = fractional radiochemical yield, when applicable

! A = radioactive-decay constant for the particular radionuclide j in units of reciprocal time At = elapsed time between sample collection and counting C-2 r -i

The folowing are d:finitions of statistical terms used in analyses and reporting of environmental-monitoring results:

1. Mean(or average or arithmetic mean) A measure of the central value of a set; the sum of all values in a set divided by the number of values in that set. The mean is expressed as follows: I X = (X1+X2 + ...Xn)/n = Xi /n i=1
2. Precision The reproducibility of measurements within a set; the scatter or dispersion of a set about its central value.
3. Measures of precision with a set
a. Standard deviation The precision with which the values of a set are measured; the square root of the value yielded by division i of the sum of squares of deviations of individual values from the mean by one less than the number of values in the set. The standt.rd deviation, s, is expressed as follows:

n s= E (Xj - X)2 /(n-1) i=i The standard deviation has the same units as the result. It becomes a more reliable expression of precision as n becomes larger. When the measurements are independent and normally distributed, the most useful statistics are the mean for the central value and the standard deviation for the dispersion,

b. Relative standard deviation The standard deviation expressed as a fraction of the mean, x/Y. It is sometimes multiplied by 100 and expressed as a precentage,
c. RE.3e, The difference in magnitude between the highest and the lowest values in a set. Instead of a single value, the actual limits (i.e., minimum value/ maximum value) are sometimes expressed.

C-3

._.