ML17158C030
| ML17158C030 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Susquehanna  |
| Issue date: | 12/31/1996 |
| From: | Barclay R, Carson B, Doty R PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17158C031 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9704030247 | |
| Download: ML17158C030 (120) | |
Text
ANNUAL EFFLUENT &
WASTE DISPOSAL REPORT FOR JANUARY - DECEMBER 1996 Pennsylvania Power & Light Company Two North Ninth Street Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101-1179 March 1997 9704030247 970331 PDR ADOCK 05000387 R
SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION ANNUALEFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL REPORT REPORT PERIOD: 01/01/96 - 12/31/96 Prepared by:
R. K. Barclay Health Physicist Reviewed by:
B. H. Carson Health Physicist Approved by:
L R. L.
oty Supervisor - Operations Tec ology Pennsylvania Power & Light Company Two North Ninth Street Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101
,e TABLEOF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1.
Introduction and Supplemental Information 2.
Effluent and Waste Disposal Data
- 3. Meteorological Data and Dispersion Estimates 4.
Dose Measurements and Assessments 13 38 68
- 5. Changes to the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual and the Solid Waste Process Control Program 77 6.
Reports of Exception to the SSES Effluent Monitoring Program 80 7.
Correction to Doses Reported in Previous Semiannual or Annual Effluent and Waste Disposal Report 82 8.
Effluent from Additional Monitored Release Points 84 Appendix A Appendix B Revisions to SSES ODCM Revisions to SSES Solid Waste Process Control Program (NDAP-QA-0646)
LIST OF TABLES PAGE Table 1:
Technical Specification Limits 10 Table 2:
Airborne Effluent-Summation of All Releases Table 3:
Airborne Effluent Table 4:
Waterborne Effluent - Summation of All Releases Table 5:
Waterborne Effluent
, 16 17 20 21 Table 6:
Annual Effluent and Waste Disposal Report Solid Waste and Irradiated Fuel Shipments Table 7-10:
These tables deliberately left blank Table 11:
Solid Radioactive Waste - Class A Incinerated DAW-Strong Tight Container Table 12:
Solid Radioactive Waste - Class A Processed DAW-Strong Tight Container Table 13:
Cartridge Filters - Class A HIC 26 27 28 29 30 Table 14:
Ultrasonic Resin Cleaning Waste - Class A HIC 31 Table 15:
Solid Radioactive Waste - Class A Condensate Demineralizer Radwaste Demineralizer - HIC (Dewatered)
Table 16:
Solid Radioactive Waste - Class A Liquid Radwaste Filter Media - HIC (Dewatered)
Table 17:
Solid Radioactive Waste - Class B RWCU Filter Media - HIC (Dewatered)
Table 18:
Estimated Total Errors Associated with Effluent Measurements Table 19:
Annual Effluent and Waste Disposal Report Data Not Reported in Previous Annual Report 32 33 34 35 37
LIST OF TABLES (cont.)
Table 20:
Meteorological Data Availability Table 21:
Joint Wind Frequency Distribution by Stability Class Table 22:
Average Annual Relative Concentrations PAGE 40 44 54 Table 23:
Table 24:
Site-Specific Parameters Used for Ladtap II
'alculations (Danville Receiver): for 1996 Summary of Maximum Individual Offsite Doses and Dose Commitments to IVlembers of the Public 69 71
'able 25:
Table 26:
Calculated Collective Doses to Members of the Public Within the Riverlands/Information Center Complex Calculated Doses for Individuals and Locations within the SSES Site Boundary and Nearest Dairy 74 75 Table 27:
Calculated Doses from Noble Gases for Locations within the SSES Site Boundary and Nearest Dairy Table 28:
Airborne Particulate Effluent from DAWTrailer Table 29:
Offsite Dose (Residence at 1.1 Miles WSW) Resulting from DAWTrailer Effluent 76 85 85
LIST OF FIGURES PAGE Figure 1:
SSES Airborne Effluent Release Points Figure 2:
SSES Waterborne Effluent Release Pathway Figure 3:
Susquehanna River IVlonthlyAverage Flow Rates Figure 4:
SSES Monthly Liquid Radwaste Discharge Totals Figure 5:
SSES Wind Rose: 10-meter Sensors Figure 6:
SSES Wind Rose: 60-meter Sensors Figure 7:
SSES Pasquill Stability Class Prevalences Figure 8:
Areas Within the SSES Site Boundary for which Dose Calculations are Performed 22 23 41 42 43 73
SECTION 1 INTRODUCTIONAND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
INTRODUCTION The Susquehanna Steam Electric Station (SSES) is located in Salem Township, Luzerne County, Pennsylvania.
It is on the west bank of the Susquehanna River, 8 km northeast of Berwick. The Station consists of two boiling water reactor generating units, each with 1,050 MW net electrical capacity. The reactor and generating units were supplied by General Electric, while the Bechtel Corporation served as architect-engineer and constructor.
Construction of the Station began in the early 1970s.
Fuel load began in Unit 1 in July of 1982.
Initial criticalitywas achieved in the Unit 1 reactor on September 10, 1982. The reactor reached 100'lo power for the first time on February 4, 1983.
Commercial operation of Unit 1 was declared on June 8, 1983.
Initial criticality of Unit 2 occurred on May 8, 1984.
Unit 2 was declared commercial on February 12, 1985.
Airborne eNuents are released from the Susquehanna Station via five rooftop vents on the reactor building (see Figure 1). Each vent is continuously monitored, and a program of periodic sampling and analysis is conducted as specified in the plant Technical Specifications.
Allwaterborne effluents are released in batch mode and are sampled and analyzed prior to release.
Waterborne effluents from the site are released into the cooling tower blowdown line for dilution prior to release to the Susquehanna River (see Figure 2). Blowdown line flow rates are at least 5,000 gpm during periods of liquid radwaste release.
The diluted effluent is introduced to the river by way of a perforated diffuser pipe placed on the river bed. The diffuser serves to rapidly and uniformly mix the station discharge with the main flowof the river.
This report presents a summary of the quantities of radioactive materials which were released from the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station during the period from January 1, 1996 to December 31, 1996.
In addition, this report serves as a medium for notifying the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff of changes to PP&L's Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) and Solid Waste Process Control Program (PCP) and documentation of any exceptions to the SSES effluent monitoring program which must be reported per Technical Specifications 3.3.7.10 and 3.3.7.11.
A section containing corrections to a previously reported dose is also included.
Airborne and waterborne radioactive effluent releases to the environment during the report period were sampled and analyzed in accordance with the requirements of the Technical Specifications.
Allradioactive effluent releases were within the concentration and release limits specified in the Radiological ENuent Technical Specifications (RETS). Calculations and terms utilized in this report are those outlined in the SSES Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM).
2
Section 1 contains supplemental information pertaining to eNuents from the Susquehanna plant.
Included are regulatory limits (Table 1), sampling and analysis methods, and characterization of the number and duration of batch and abnormal releases, ifany.
Section 2 contains effluent and waste disposal data for the report period. Table 2 contains a summation of all airborne releases, grouped into the radionuclide categories of gases, particulates, iodines, and tritium. Average release rates are presented and compared to the applicable limits. Table 3 presents the activity totals of specific radionuclides in airborne effluents.
Waterborne effluents are summarized in Table 4. Average diluted concentrations are presented and compared to the applicable limits. Table 5 presents the release quantities of specific radionuclides in waterborne effluents over the report period.
Figure 3 lists the Susquehanna River monthly average flow rates for 1996 while Figure 4 presents the SSES monthly liquid radwaste discharge totals for 1996.
Tables 6 through 17 present a characterization of the solid radioactive waste shipped offsite during the report period (Tables 7 through 10 are reserved blank in this report).
Included are the volumes and curie contents associated with each type of solid waste.
An estimate of major nuclide composition is presented for each waste type, as well as the number of waste shipments from the site, how they were transported, and their final destination.
Table 18 contains estimates of the errors associated with the measurements involved in quantifying effluents.
Sampling errors, counting errors, and errors associated with determining effluent flow rates and volumes all contribute to the total error of eNuent measurements.
Error estimates are presented for each category of radionuclide detected in airborne and waterborne effluents and solid wastes during the report period.
Table 19 presents effluent data from previous report periods which was not available at preparation time for the associated annual report.
Section 3 of this report contains the meteorological data associated with the year 1996. Availabilitydata for the SSES meteorological data are shown in Table 20.
Meteorological data for the calendar year is presented in the form ofjoint wind frequency distributions by atmospheric stability class.
These distributions are presented in Table 21. Figures 5 and 6 are wind rose plots for the SSES primary meteorological 10-meter and 60-meter sensors, respectively.
Figure 7 presents the relative prevalences of the Pasquill stability classes.
In addition, the meteorological data from the report year were used to generate annual average relative concentrations (X/Qs) and deposition rates (D/Qs). These values are
presented in Table 22, and ar'e required input for use of the GASPAR code for calculation of the doses resulting from airborne releases.
Section 4 of this report contains an assessment of the calculated doses attributed to the reported radiological effluents for the calendar year. The LADTAP II code was used for calculation of doses from waterborne effluents. Table 23 contains site-specific parameters used for LADTAP II calculations for the Danville receiver.
The GASPAR code was used for calculation of doses from airborne effluents. The calculated doses and direct radiation estimates can be used to estimate the doses to maximally exposed members of the public. Table 24 summarizes maximum calculated doses and dose commitments to members of the public from airborne and waterborne effluents and direct radiation. Table 25 presents calculated collective doses to members of the public within the Riverlands/Information Center Complex. Table 26 summarizes the calculated doses for residences and other occupied areas within the SSES site boundary.
Table 27 reports gamma and beta air doses from noble gas effluent for the same locations as Table 26.
Section 5 of this report is reserved for"documentation of changes to the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual and the Solid Waste Process Control Program.
A copy'of changes to the ODCM during the report period is included in Appendix A. A copy of changes to the Solid Waste Process Control Program is included in Appendix B.
Section 6 presents a listing of cases (ifany) in which airborne or waterborne effluent monitoring instrumentation was declared inoperable and was not restored to operability within the time period specified in Technical Specification Table 3.3.7.10-1 or 3.3.7.11-1 Action Statements.
Section 7 contains corrections to doses reported in previous Semi-annual or Annual Effluent and Waste Disposal reports.
Section 8 contains information on effluent (Table 28) and offsite dose (Table 29) from additional monitored release points.
FIGURE 1 SSES AIRBORNE EFFLUENT RELEASE POINTS IT I ACACTDA WILD&0 0IOIAULT VHIT ILLJOICSII ATOISS 110'ILg0CSIS
'T OA II01f 4RAOw 0 WKDwC
~ o%
~~
~
~ ~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~ 'V ~
~ ~
0L 000'4 CCWTADLWILOWC
~ ~
~'
~
o+
~ r OUTTIDCAN NITAKC ATACTDAWELDWO 0XNAUST$T Dma, anlAUCTSLLIAW DILSKLOTIISAATDAWSlOowC 074"Ii LL 0ILLI
- ISS, ALSOCSII IT~Cfll 0OLLDD CSII'TNPf l20~f AT1201f AT l00~f<<IX'WIT I
TUA0IU0
~LHLDNO EXIIAUST
~re.+ Ise+~w+rr UWTI 01 era UNITII
KR RQ I
~ I lp~
fllplllM f
4 d
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION Re ulato Limits Technical Specifications 3/4.11.1 and 3/4.11.2 outline requirements for release of radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents, respectively.
Concentration of radioactive materials released in liquid effluents and dose or dose commitment resultant thereof are limited in unrestricted areas.
Dose and dose rate due to radioactive materials released in gaseous effluents are limited in areas at or beyond the site boundary.
Technical Specification limits are listed in Table 1.
2.
Maximum Permissible Concentrations in Waterborne Effluents The concentrations of radioactive materials in waterborne effluents are limited to the concentrations specified in 10 CFR Part 20 Appendix B Table II, Column 2, for radionuclides other than dissolved or entrained noble gases.
For dissolved or entrained noble gases, the concentrations are limited to the following values, as stated in the applicable Technical Specification:
Nuclide MPC uCi/ml 85mK 85K 87K 88K
"'AI 133mXe 133xe 135mXe 135X 2.0E-04 5.0E-04 4.0E-05 9.0E-05 7.0E-05 5.0E-04 6.0E-04 2.0E-04 2.0E-04 3;
Avera e Ener Based on gaseous effluent releases for the report period average beta energy is 0.322 MeV and average gamma energy is 0.246 MeV.
4.
Measurements and A roximations of Total Radioactivit Analyses of specific radionuclides in effluent samples are used to evaluate the radioactive composition and concentration of effluents.
5.
Methods of uantif in Effluents Fission and Activation Gases:
Gas samples are routinely collected monthly and analyzed with a high resolution (Ge[Li] or HPGE) detector system which incorporates a data reduction program to determine radionuclide composition in terms of specific activity. Data tapes from the continuous vent monitors are used to determine the average concentration of noble gases. The high resolution (Ge[Li] or HPGE) isotopic scan is used to convert the continuous vent monitor activity to actual activity based on the determined nuclide mixture. The vent and sample flowrates are continuously monitored and the average flow rates for each vent are used to calculate the total activity released in a given time period. When the continuous monitors are out of service, manual grab samples are taken from each vent once each eight hours (once each four hours for the standby gas treatment vent).
lodines:
iodine is continuously collected via an isokinetic sampling assembly in each vent. Filters are normally exchanged once per week and analyzed on a high resolution (Ge[Li] or HPGE) system.
The daily average flow rates for the vents and sample pumps are averaged for the duration of the sampling period and a ratio of vent flow rate to sample flow rate is determined.
The ratio is used to determine the total activity of each isotope released during the time period in question.
When the continuous monitors are out of service, iodine is continuously collected on charcoal cartridges attached to air samplers which draw directly from the affected rooftop vent(s) or from alternate sampling ports available on the sample lines.
Particulates:
Particulates are continuously collected via an isokinetic sampling assembly in each vent. Filters are normally exchanged once per week and analyzed on a high resolution (Ge[Li] or HPGE) system.
Flow rate corrections are performed as for iodines. When the continuous vent monitors are out of service, particulates are continuously sampled directly from the affected rooftop vent(s) or from alternate sampling ports available on the sample lines.
Tritium Airborne tritium is collected monthly via bubbler sampler.
The sample is collected for one hour at a flow rate of approximately 1000 cc/min.
Tritium activity in the bubbler sample is determined by liquid scintillation counting. The liquid sample tritium concentration is converted to air concentration by volume proportion, then compared to the Technical Specification Table 4.11.2.1.2-1 Lower Limitof Detection (1 E-6 uCi/cc).
e.
Waterborne fffluents: Each tank of liquid radwaste is sampled and analyzed for principal gamma emitters prior to release.
Each sample tank is recirculated for a sufficient amount of time prior to sampling to ensure that a representative sample is obtained.
Samples are analyzed on a high resolution (Ge[Li] or HPGE) system and release permits are generated based on the values obtained from the isotopic analysis and the most recent values for tritium, gross alpha, iron-55, and strontium-89 and -90. An aliquot based on release volume is saved and added to monthly and quarterly composite containers.
The monthly tritium analysis is done in-house.
The monthly liquid radwaste composite sample is also analyzed offsite for P-32. The quarterly composite is sent to a vendor laboratory for iron-55, strontium-89 and -90, and gross alpha analyses.
The concentration of each radionuclide in each batch is decay corrected from the time of counting to the midpoint of the release period, and is then multiplied by the volume of the batch to determine the total quantity of each nuclide released in each batch.
The isotopic totals for each are summed to determine the total source term for the report period.
TABLE 1 1.
TECHNICALSPECIFICATION LIMITS A.
NOBLE GASES:
1.
s500 mrem - TOTAL BODY
&000 mrem - SKIN annual site total "instantaneous" limits (Tech Spec. 3.11.2.1) 2.
s5 mrad - AIR GAMMA s10 mrad - AIR BETA quarterly air dose limits per reactor u'nit (Tech Spec. 3.11.2.2) 3.
<10 mrad - AIR GAMMA MO mrad - AIR BETA annual air dose limits per reactor unit (Tech Spec. 3.11.2.2)
B.
AIRBORNE l-131,'TRITIUM, PARTICULATES WITH HALF-LIVES> 8 DAYS:
c1 500 mrem - ORGAN (inhalation pathways only) annual site total "instantaneous" limits (Tech Spec. 3.11.2.1) 2.
s7.5 mrem - ORGAN quarterly dose limits per reactor unit (Tech Spec. 3.11.2.3) 3.
s15 mrem - ORGAN annual dose limits per reactor unit (Tech Spec. 3.11.2.3) 10
C.
LI UID EFFLUENTS:
1.
z3 mrem - TOTAL BODY s10 mrem ORGAN quarterly dose limits per SSES site Tech. Spec. 3.1,1.1.2, as interpreted in License Action Request 97-002 2.
<6 mrem - TOTAL BODY
%0 mrem - ORGAN annual dose limits per SSES site Tech.'Spec.
3.11.1.2, as interpreted in License Action Request 97-002 D.
AIRBORNE EFFLUENT: BASES FOR PERCENT OF APPLICABLE TECHNICALSPECIFICATION LIMIT Fission and Activation Gases A derived release rate limit based on the Technical Specification limitof 500 mrem/yr was calculated from the expected mix of noble gas radionuclides presented in Table 4.4 of the SSES Final Environmental Statement (NUREG-0564). The limit is 8.51E+05 uCi/min (1.42E+04 uCi/sec).
Iodine-131 A derived release rate limit based on the Technical Specification limitof 1500 mrem/yr from l-131, tritium and particulates with half-lives greater than 8 days was calculated from the annual release quantity of I-131 provided in Table 4.4 of the SSES Final Environmental Statement (NUREG-0564). The limit is 1.41E+02 uCi/min (2.35E+00 uCi/sec).
Particulates A derived release rate limit based on the Technical Specification limitof 1500 mrem/yr from l-131, tritium and particulates with half-lives greater than 8 days was calculated based on the expected mix of particulate radionuclides presented in Table 4.4 of the SSES Final Environmental Statement (NUREG-0564). The limit is 7.72E+02 uCi/min (1.29E+01 uCi/sec).
Tritium A derived release rate was calculated based on the 10 CFR 20 Appendix B, Table II, Column 1, Maximum Permissible Concentration for tritium (2.0E-07 uCi/cc) to unrestricted areas.
A relative concentration of 4.1E-05 sec/m'as assumed.
The limit is 2.93E+05 uCi/min (4.88E+03 uCi/sec).
11
E..WATERBORNE EFFLUENT: BASES FOR PERCENT OF APPLICABLE TECHNICALSPECIFICATION LIMIT Fission and Activation Products
. Concentrations of fission and activation products in liquid effluent from radwaste effluent are determined for each batch prior to release.
Each isotope concentration is compared to 10CFR20 Appendix 8, Table II, Column 2 Maximum Permissible Concentration Limits such that, with clillution,'he sum of isotope concentrations divided by Maximum Permissible Concentrations must be <1.0.
No Technical Specification limitfor the total concentration of fission and activation products in liquid effluents is applicable for this category.
Tritium Liquid effluent quarterly tritium concentrations are compared to the 10 CFR 20 Appendix B, Table II, Column 2, Maximum Permissible Concentration limit of 3.0E-03 uCi/ml to unrestricted areas.
Dissolved and Entrained Gases Liquid effluent quarterly concentration totals for dissolved and entrained gases are compared to the most restrictive Maximum Permissible Concentration for a noble gas 4.0E-05 uCi/ml (Kr-87) from the SSES Technical Specification Table 3.11.1.1-1.
'12
SECTION 2 EFFLUENTAND WASTE DISPOSAL DATA 13
Airborne Effluents Summaries of the radionuclide total curie activities and average release rates are included in Tables 2 and 3.
- 1. Number of Batch Releases:
- 2. Total Time Period for Batch Release:
- 3. Maximum Time Period for a Batch Release:
- 4. Average Time Period for a Batch Release:
- 5. Minimum Time Period for a Batch Release:
0'A NA NA NA Abnormal Releases
- 1. Number of Releases
- 2. Total ActivityReleased 0
NA If a radionuclide was not detected, zero activity was used for that isotope in dose calculations.
A zero activity indicates that no activity was positively detected in any sample when samples were analyzed with techniques which achieved the required Lower Limits of Detection (LLD)as specified in the SSES Technical Specification Table 4.11.2.1.2-1, Radioactive Gaseous Waste Sampling and Analysis Program.
In all cases, these LLDs were less than the levels required by Technical Specifications.
The following are typical LLDs.
Radionuclide LLD(uCI/cc)
Kr-87 Kr-88 Xe-1 33 Xe-133m Xe-135 Xe-1 35m Xe-138 4.6 E-08 5.3 E-08 5.4 E-08 1.3 E-07 1.5 E-08 5.0E-08 1.2 E-07 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Mo-99 Cs-134 2.9 E-14 2.8 E-14 1.8 E-14 3.8 E-14 4.4 E-14 3.3 E-13 2.4 E-14 14
Radionuclide Cs-137 Ce-141
~ Ce-144 I-131 Sr-89 Sr-90 H-3 Gross Alpha LLD(uCi/cc) 2.1 E-14 1.5 E-14 7.0 E-'14 4.4 E-14 2.0 E-15 3.0 E-16 2.6 E-08 5.0 E-16 15
TABLE2 ANNUALEFFLUENT ANDWASTE DISPOSAL REPORT (1996)
AIRBORNE EFFLUENT - SUMMATIONOF ALLRELEASES A. Fission and Activation Gas Unit First uarter Second uarter Third usrter Fourth uarter Total Release Ci O.OOE+00 1.35E+00 8.10E+00 7.55E+00 Average Release Rate for Period Percent ofTechnical Specification Limit uCi/sec 0.00E+00 1.72E-01 0.00E+00 1.22E-03 1.02E+00 7.23E-03 9.50E-01 6.74E-03 B. Iodines Total 1-131 Average Release Rate for Period Percent ofTechnical Specification Limit Ci uCi/sec 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 O.OOE+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 O.OOE+00 0.00E+00 O.OOE+00 C. Particulate Particulate with Half-Lives > 8 Days'verage Release Rate for Period Percent ofTechnical Specification Limit Gross AlphaRadioactivity'i uCi/sec Ci 4.22E-05 5.37E-06 4.18E-05 5.60E-07 1.92E-05 2.44E-06 1.90E-05 4.85E-07 5.70E-05 7.17E-06 5.58E-05 1.44E-06 6.67E-04 8.39E-05 6.53E-04 1.32E-06 D.
Tritium Total Release Average Release Rate for Period Percent ofTechnical Specification Limit Ci
'.17E+01 3.40E+01 uCi/sec 2.76E+00 4.32E+00 5.63E-02 8.83E-02 1.56E+01 1.96E+00 4.01E%2 1.26E+0 l 1.59E+00 3.23E-02
<<Sr-89, Sr-90 and Gross Alpha values for the fourth quarter 1996 are estimated based on third quarter 1996 sample analyses and fourth quarter 1996 ventilation exhaust rates.
16
TABLE3 ANNUALEFFLUENT AND%ASTE DISPOSAL REPORT (1996)
AIRBORNEEFFLUENT Releases in Continuous Mode Nuclides Released A.- Fission and Activation Gases Kr-85m Xe-133 Xe-135 Total for Period B. Iodines I-131 I-133 I-135 Total for Period C. Particulate Cr-51 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Sr-89'r-90's-134 Cs-137 Ce-141 Ce-144 Total for Period'nit Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci First Quarter 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 O.OOE+00 4.22E-05 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 O.OOE+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 O.OOE+00 0.00E+00 4.22E-05 Second Quarter 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.35E+00 1.35E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.92E-05 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 O.OOE+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 O.OOE+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.92E-05 Third Quarter 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 8.10E+00 8.10E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 2.58E-05 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 3.12E-05 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 5.70E-05 Fourth Quarter 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 7.55E+00 7.55E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 4.61E-04 1.12E-04 0.00E+00 9.39E-05 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 O.OOE+00 6.67E-04
<<Reported values for the fourth quarter 1996 are estimated based on third quarter 1996 sample analyses and fourth quarter 1996 ventilation exhaust rates.
17
Waterborne Eflluents Summaries ofthe radionuclide total curie activities, average diluted concentrations, and percent ofapplicable Technical Specification limits are included in Tables 4 and 5.
Batch Releases~
1.
Number ofBatch Releases 2.
Total Time Period for a Batch Release 3.
Maximum Time Period for a Batch Release 4.
Average Time Period for a Batch Release 5.
Minimum Time Period for a Batch Release 6.
Average Stream Flow During Period of Release ofEffluent into a Flowing Stream 7.
Dilution Flow to Susquehanna River gtr. 1 gtr. 2 Qtr. 3 gtr. 4 26 35 53 41 1.58E+03 2.82E+03 6.61E+03 4.47E+03 8.80E+01 2.85E+02 3.03E+02 2.94E+02 6.08E+01 8.05E+01 1.25E+02 1.09E+02 2.20E+01 1.50E+01 2.50E+01 2.20E+01 1.34E+07 1.22E+07 2.73E+06 1.47E+07 (Susquehannna River Flow Rate) 8.47E+03 8 42E+03 7.80E+03 7.54E+03 Average Cooling Tower Blowdown Flow Rate
'Units oftime and flow are expressed in minutes and gallons per minute (gpm), respectively.
Abnormal Releases 1.
Number ofReleases 2.
Volume Released 3.
Total ActivityReleased 0
N/A N/A 0
N/A N/A Ifa radionuclide was not detected, zero activity was used for that isotope in dose calculations. A zero activity indicates that no activity was positively detected in any sample when samples were analyzed with techniques which achieved the required Lower Limits of Detection (LLD)as specified in the SSES Technical Speciflcation Table 4.11.1.1.1-1, Radioactive Liquid Waste Sampling and Analysis Program.
In all cases, these LLDs were less than the levels required by Technical Specifications.
The following are typical LLDs.
Radionuclide Ci Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Mo-99 I-131 Cs-134 4.5 E-08 5.0 E-08 2.4 E-08 5.4 E-08 4.9 E-08 1.7 E-07 2.0 E-08 2.2 E-08 18
Radionuclide LLD uCi/ml Cs-137 Ce-141 Ce-144 Sr-89 Sr-90 Fe-55 H-3 Gross Alpha 2.6 E-08 3.2 E-08 1.3 E-07 4.0 E-08 4.0 E-09 1.0 E-06 4.6 E-06 3.0 E-08
'I
TABLE4 ANNUALEFFLUENT ANDWASTE DISPOSAL REPORT (1996)
WATERBORNE EFLUENT - SUMMATIONOF ALLRELEASES A.
Fission and Activation Products Unit First Quarter Second
'Quarter Third Quarter
, Fourth Quarter 1.
Total Release (not including Tritium, Gases, Al ha ~
2.
Average Diluted Concentration During Period Ci Ci/ml 5.57E-07 3.59E-08 7.25E-08 2.75E-02 3.20E-03 1.46E-02 1.09E-02 9.09E-08 B.
Tritium 1.
Tdtal Release 2.
Average Diluted Concentration During Period 3.
Percent ofA licable Limit Ci Ci/ml 2.85E+00 5.78E-05 1.93E+00 6.75E+00 1.47E+01 9.27E+00 7.57E-05 7.29E-05 7.71E-05 2.52E+00 2.43E+00 2.57E+00 C.
Dissolved and Entrained Gases 1.
Total Release Average Diluted Concentration During Period Percent ofA licable Limit Ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 pCi/ml 0.00E+00 7.58 E-05 1.32E-04 8.51E-10 6.53E-10 2.13E-05 1.63E-05 1.29E-03 1.07E-08 2.67E-04 D.
Gross Al ha Radioactivit 1.
Total Release Ci 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 E.
Volume ofWaste Released (Prior to Dilution)
Gallons 1.08E+05 2.15E+05 5.11E+05 3.40E+05 Liters 4.10E+05 8.15E+05 1.94E+06 1.29E+06 F.
Volume of Dilution Water Used During Period ofRelease G.
Volume ofDilution Water Used Over Entire Period Gallons 1.30E+07 2.35E+07 5.32E+07 3.17E+07 Liters 4.93E+07 8.91E+07 2.02E+08 1.20E+08 Gallons I. 1 l E+09 1.10E+09 1.03E+09 9.99E+08 Liters 4.30E+09 4.28E+09 4.00E+09 3.87E+09
~Reported values for the fourth quarter 1996 are estimated based on third quarter 1996 sample analyses and fourth quarter 1996 discharge volumes for samples composited in fourth quarter.
Reported values for samples composited in December 1996 are estimated based on November 1996 sample analysis and December 1996 discharge volume.
20
TABLE5 ANNUALEFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL REPORT (1996)
WATERBORNE EFFLUENT Nuclldes Released Unit Releases ln Batch Mode First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter A. Fission and Activation Products F-18 Na-24 P-32'r-51 Fe-55'e-59 Co-58 As-76 Rb-86 Sr-89'r-90'r-92 Nb-95 Mo-99 Tc-99m A -110m 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ce-143 Ce-144 W-I87 Total for Period Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci 0.00E+OO 7.32E46 0.00E+OO O.OOE+00 2.61E42 5.71E44 5.14E46 6.19E47 2.65E44 5.49E44 0.00E+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.00E+00 O.OOE+00 0.00E+OO O.OOE+00 1.93E46 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.00E+00 O.OOE+00 0.00E~
0.00E~
2.75E42 7.90E48 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 8.40E44 2.28E43 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 4.41E45 2.59E45 1.20E47 0.00E+00 0.00Et00 0.00E+00 O.OOE+00 O.ME+00 O.ME+00 O.OOE+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 O.OOE+M 6.33E46 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 3.20E43 0.00E+OO 6.88E47 5.62E43 1.27E44 3.50E43 4.06E43 1.28E45 8.26E45 6.91E44 2.36E44 0.00E+00 1.66E44 O.OOE+OO 0.00E+OO 0.00E+00 O.ME+00 2.05E45 4.16E46 1.81E46 0.00E+00 2.00E45 1.6 IE45 6.23E45 0.00E+00 O.OOE+OO 1.46E42 4.29E48 3.58E46 2.28E44 1.04E43 1.32E43 2.71E43 2.13E46 4.78E44 2.60E43 2.35E43 0.00E+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.00E+00 1.76E46 1.11E46 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 1.81E44 O.OOE+OO 3.80E46 4.76E46 0.00E+00 0.00E~
O.ME+00 1.09E42 B Tritium H-3 Total for Period Ci Cl 2.85E+00 2.85E+00 6.75E+00 6.75E+00 1.47E+O1 1.47K+01 9.27E+00 9.27E+00 C. Dissolved and Entrained Gases ArP I Kr-86m Kr-85 Kr-87 Kr-88 Xe-131m Xe-133m Xe-133 Xe-135m Xe-135 Total for Period Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci 0.00E+OO 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 O.OOE+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+OO O.OOE+00 O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.00E+OO O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO 4.3 I E45 O.OOE+00 3.27E45 7.58E-OS O.OOE+00 0.00E+00 O.OOE+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+M O.ME+00 O.OOE+00 9.14E45 O.OOE+00 4.03E45 1.32E44 O.OOE+00 0.00E+00 1.21E43 0.00E+00 O.OOE+OO 0.00E+00 3.22E45 O.OOE+00 4.30E45 1.29E-O3
'Reported values for the fourth quarter are estimated based on third quarter 1996 sample analyses and fourth quarter 1996 discharge volumes for samples composited in fourth quarter.
Reported values for samples composited in 12/96 are estimated based on 11/96 sample analysis and 12/96 dicharge volume.
21
FIGURE 3 SUSQUEHANNA RIVER MONTHLYAVERAGE FLOW RATES DATA PERIOD: 1996 30 GALLONS PER MINUTE x 1E6 20 15 10 0
J F
M A
M J
J A
S 0
N D
1996 22
FIGURE 4 SSES MONTHLYLIQUID RADWASTE DISCHARGE TOTALS DATA PERIOD: 1996 300 GALLONS X 1E3 250 200 150 100 50 0
J F
M A
M J
J A
S 0
N D
1996 23
SUSQUEHANNA STEAM'ELECTRIC STATION RADIOACTIVEWASTE REPORT ANNALEFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL REPORT SOLID RADIOACTIVEWASTE DATAPERIOD:
J
'ARY 1 1996-DE EMBER 31 1996 PREPARED BY:
. LEWIS -
ALT P
ICIST APPROVED BY:
JAKES DOXSEY - EFFLUENT lg ANAGEMENTSUP V.
REPORT NOTES 1.
Allactivities reported in millicuries (mCi) unless otherwise noted.
2.
Reported activities, as indicated with the (<<) sign, are comprised in whole or part of MDLValues.
3.
No Class C Waste was disposed during this report period.
4.
The number of shipments listed in Table 6 includes only the shipments from SSES to the disposal site.
It does not include shipments made to or from volume reduction vendors.
25
TABLE6 ANNUALEFFLUENT ANDWASTE DISPOSAL REPORT SOLID WASTE AND IRRADIATEDFUEL SHIPMENTS DATAPERIOD: JANUARY 1, 1996 - DECEMBER 31, 1996 A." SOLID WASTE SHIPPED OFFSITE FOR BURIALOR DISPOSAL Number of Shi ments Mode of Trans ortation Destination 17 Truck Barnwell, SC B.
IRRADIATEDFUEL SHIPMENTS Number of Shi ments Mode of Trans ortation Destination None Not Applicable Not Applicable "The number of shipments listed in A include only the shipments from SSES to a disposal site.
It does not include shipments made to or from volume reduction vendors, 26
TABLES 7-10 ARE BLANK; HELD IN RESERVE 27
TABLE 11 CLASS A Ag-Ilpm Am-241 C-14 Cu>-242 Cm-244 Co-58 Co%0 Cr-51 Cs-134 Cs-137 Fc-55 Fc-59 H-3 1-129 1-131 Mn-54 Ni<3 Pu-238 Pu-239il o ~
Pu-241 Sb-124 Sr49 Sr-~)0 Tc-')')
Zu45 Bc<07 Cc-144 Cin-243 K-40 Nb-95 Pb-212 Zr-95 TOTALACT CONTAINER IVITY(Ci)
VOLUME SOURCE OF WASTE:
TYPE OF CONTAINS METHOD OF PROCESS:
ISOTOPES N/A ACTIVITY(mCi)
% OF TOTAL 0.00%
0.00'/o 0.00%
,0.00/o 0.00%
1.08%
3.86%
2.47%
0.00%
0.01%
5 4&%
16.28%
1.73%
P PP%
0.00%
56 40%
'.09%
0.00%
0.00%
0.04%
0.00%
P 00%
0.00%
0.00%
I 15%
P PP%
0.18%
0.00%
0.00%
0.69%
0.00%
0.54%
100.00%
3.112 m3 1.000E44 4 1.000E44 C 1.100E<3 (1.000E44 0.000E+00 4.266E 5.471E+01 9.753 E+00 0.000E+00 5.840E42 2.163 E+01 6.428E+0 1
6.827E+00 O.OOOE+00 1.700E<3 2.227E+02 3.485'
( I.OOOO
( 1.000EC4
~
1.574E<1 0.000E+00 0.000E+00 8.900EA3 1.000EA4 4.531E+00 w 3.000E44 7.043 E< 1 C 1.000E<4 2.300EA3 2.732E+00 1.090EW2 2.)03E+00 0.395 109.900 A3 7jpv
~DD
(<IE-AC /ca INCINERATEDDAW STRONG TIGHTCONTAINER 28
SOURCE OF WASTE TYPE OF CONTAINER:
TABLE 12 CLASS A PROCESSED DAW STRONG TIGHTCONTAINER METHOD OF PROCESS:
ISOTOPES Ag-Ilpm A)u-241 C-14 Cu)-242 Clll-244 Co-58 Co%0 Cr-51 Cs-134 Cs-137 Fc-55 Fc-59 H-3 1-129 1-131 Mu-54 Ni43 Pu-238 Pu-23')
Pu-241 Sb-124 Sr 8~)
Sr-9o Tc-9~)
Zu45 BcCt)7 Cc-l44 Cu)-243 KAU Nb-95 PU-240/Z 1@
Zr-i)5 TOTALACTIVITY(Ci)
CONTAINER VOLUME N/A ACTIVITY(mCi) 0.000E+00 S.0UOE44
< 3.030EA2 1.800E<3 1.000E44 6.826E+00 1.013 E+02 1.52OE+01 O.OOOE+00 4.76IEC I 3.95GE+O1 1.033 E+02
'.025E+01 (4.100EC3 0.00OE+00 3.896E+02 6.823' 4.000EA4 S.UUOE+4 2.885E+ I 0.000 E+00 U.OOUE+Uo 3.6OOE+2
( 7.8OUEA)3
- 8. 152E+00
( I.OOOEA4 1.215E+E)o 1.UUOE+4 7.UOOEA)4 4.2G8E+OO
( I.OUOEA)4 3.291E+00 O.G84 913.900 A3
% OF TOTAL 0.00%
. 0.00%
0.00%
O.Oslo 0.00%
1.00%
14.79%
2.22%
0.00%
0.07%
5 78%
15.09%
I 50%
0.00%
0.00%
56.93o 0.10%
0.00%
0 00%
0.04%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
I'.19%
0.00%
0.18%
P PO%
0.00%
0.62%
0.00%
0.48%
IPP PP%
'5.879 m3 29
TABLE 13 CLASS A SOURCE OF WASTE:
TYPE OF CONTAINER'ETHOD OF PROCESS:
ISOTOPES CAR GE FILTERS HIC DEWATERED ACTIVITY(mCi)
% OF TOTAL IVITY(Ci)
R VOLUME Ag-Ilorn ko-241 C-14 Cot-242 Cm-244 Co-58 C040 Cr-51 Cs-134 Cs-137 Fe-55 Fc-5~)
H-3 1-129 1-131 Mo-54 Ni43 Po-238 Po-23')/2 ec'o-241 Sb-124 Sr49 Sr-UU Tc-~P)
Zo45 Cc-l44 TOTALACT CONTAWE 0.000E+00 0.00%
I 332')
0 00%
0.000E+00(%2. l'<<-3 c4/c Q.OO/o 1.326' 0.00%
1.332E41 0.00%
5.680E+01 0.92%
3.630E+02 5 87%
7.820E+02 12.G5%
0.000E+00 0.00%
4.990E+00 0.08%
3.500E+02 5.66%
9.610E+02 15.55%
U.OOOE+00((1. >>r-~~'Q 0.00%
0.000E+0(f< s.<4 < )Mica)0.00%
0.000E+00 0.00%
3.380E+03 54.69%
O.OUUE+00 0.00%
1.332 EA 1 0.00%
1.332EA1 0.00%
3.GGUE+0 1 0 59%
U.OUUE+00 0.00%
O.UUUE+oo 0.00%
o.oooE+ou O.oo%
O.OOUE+U(((i >>< )iW~)0.00%
i).69OE+U I 1 57%
1.494 E+02 2.40%
G.18U 100.00%
83.Guu f(3 2.3G7 o>3 30'
SOURCE OF WASTE:
TYPE OF CONTAINER:
METHOD OF PROCESS:
ISOTOPES TABLE 14 CLASS A ULTRASONICRESIN CLEAMNGWASTE HIC DEWATERED ACTIVITY(mCi)
% OF TOTAL Ag-Ilpin Am-24 I C-14 Cm-242 Cm-244 Co-58 Co%0 Cr-51 Cs-134 Cs-137 Fc-55 Fc-59 H-3 1-129 1-131 Mn-54 Ni43 PU-238 Pu-239 Pu-241 Sb-124 Sr-8~)
Sr-90 Tc-99 Zn45 Ni-59 Cc-l44 Nb-')5 TOTALA CONTAI CTIVITY(Ci)
NER VOLUME 1.802E+02 1.040EC2 1.085E+02 7.000E<3 1.323 E<2 7.176E+02 1.284E+04 2.133EW3 0.000E+00 2.497E+01 1.118E+04 2.475 E+03 1.789 E+02 0.000 E+00(C 0.000E+Op 3.372E+04 1.988E+02 2.209E2 2.046E+2 4.989 E+OO 5.503E+Ol O.OOOE+OO 5; fc-)'
4.633EA I 7.290E+ I 1.353E+03 2.372E+0 I, 5.363E+oo I.O9OE+O1 65.201 1200.000 A3 0.28%
0.00%
0.17%
P 00%
P.00%
1.10%
19.69%
3.27%
0.00%
0.04%
17.14%
3.80%
0.27%
4cc) 0.00%
0.00%
51.72%
0.30%
0 00%
0.00%
0 01%
0 08%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
2.07%
0.03%
ppl 0.02%
100.00%
33.981 m3 31
TABLE 15 CLASS A SOURCE OF WASTE:
CONDENSATE DEMINERALIZER/
RADWASTEDEMINERALIZER TYPE OF CONTAINER:
METHOD OF PROCESS:
ISOTOPES Ag-Ilpm Anl-241 C-14 Cm-242 Cm-244 Co-58 Cohp Cr-Sl Cs-134 Cs-137 Fe-55 Fe-59 H-3 1-129 1-131 Mn-54 Ni43 Pu-238 Pu-23~)
Pu-24 I Sb-124 Sr-8')
Sr-')0 Tc-i)')
Zn45 Cc-144 Ni-59 TOTALACTIVITY(Ci)
CONTAINER VOLUME DEWATERED ACTIVITY(InCi)
. 0.000E+00 8.034E42 6.922E+01 2.65 IE<1 8.003E%2 3.160E+04 1.377E+05 0.000E+00 0.000E+op 1.746E+oo 2.720E+03 7.030EW2 3.004 E+0 I C 5.740E+00 0.000 E+oo 1.294 E+OS 1.03 IE+03 1.32oE+I I.320E< I 3.425 E+o I O.NIoE+Oo 9.670 E+0 I g 2. 121E+oo S.SGOE+OO 1.789E+04 5.181E~io I 49OE+O2 32o.75<
3G1.200 A3
% OF TOTAL 0.00%
O.SP/o 0 02%
0.00%
0.00%
9 85%
42.93%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0 85%
0.00%
PPI 0.00%
0.00%
40.34%
0.32%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.03%
0.00%
0 00/
5.58%
0.00%
0.05%
IPO PP%
10.228 m3 32
TABLE 16 CLASS A SOURCE OF WASTE:
TYPE OF CONTAINER:
METHOD OF PROCESS:
ISOTOPES DEWATERED ACTIVITY(mCi)
% OF TOTAL LIQUIDRADWASTEFILTERMEDIA Ag-IIpnl An>-241 C-14 Cm-242 Cm-244 Co-58 CMO Cr-51 Cs-134's-137 Fc-55 Fc-59 H-3 1-129 1-131 Mn-54 Ni43 Pu-238 Pu-239 PU-241 Sb-124 Sr 89 Sr-i)0 Tc-99 Zn<5 Ni-5~)
Zr-95 Nb-95 Ni45 Cc-144 Hf-181 TOTALA CONTAI CllVITY(Ci)
NER VOLUME 5.959E+02 2.673EW2 5.054E~
1.283 E<2 2.990EA2 3.355E+03 5.474 E+04 3.795 E+04 0.000E+00 1.615 EW2 4.191E+04 2.498E+04 1.311E+02 0.000E+0 3A 0.000 E+00 1.748 E+05 8.954 E+02 G.817EA2 6 979E<2 2.099E+01 4.928E+02 4.200E+00 4 1.948E+00 1.676 E+0 1 4.903 E+03 2.088 E+02 8.4GOE+01 3.084 E+02 6.5 IOE%5 1.1G6E+01 8.777E+01 345.500 829.600 A3 0.17%
0.00%
P.00%
O.pplo 0.00%
0.97%
15.84%
0 98%
0.00 /o 0.05%
12.13%
7.23%
0.04%
r&<,4/iP 00%
0.00%
50.59%
0.26%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0 14%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
I 42%
0.06%
0.01%
0 P8%
0.00%
0.00%
P P2%
100.00%
23.492 m3 33
Ag-Ilpm Am-241 C-14 Cm-242 Cm-244 Co-58 Co<0 Cr-51 Cs-134 Cs-137 Fe-55 Fe-59 H-3 1-129 1-131 Mn-54 Ni43 Pu-238 Pu-239 Pu-241 Sb-124 Sr-89 Sr-~)U Tc-99 Zn45 Ni-59 Ce-144 TOTALA CONTAI CTIVITY(Ci)
NER VOLUME SOURCE OF WASTE:
TYPE OF CONTAINER:
METHOD OF PROCESS:
ISOTOPES TABLE 17 CLASS B RWCU.FILTERMEDIA DEWATERED ACTIVITY(mCi) 1.026E+04 8.090E42 3.110E+Op 2.760E42 7.880E42 5.090 E+03 5.720E+05 3.600E+02 0.000E+00 1.275E+01 1.702 E+05 1.306E+03 3.620E+01
( 3.240E+00 0.000E+00 7.920E+05 1.087E+04 2.420El 2.430E< 1 7.810E+01 0.000E+00 9.840E+00 1.313E+01 1.781 E+02 8.110E+04 2.024 E+03 4.370EC2 1G45.545 2G4.800 fl3
% OF TOTAL 0 62%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.31%
34 76%
P.02%
P PP%
0.00%
10.34%
0.08%
0.00%
0.00/o 0.00%
48 13%
'.66%
0.00%
0.00%
0 PP%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
4 93%
0.12%
0.00%
100.00%
7.498 m3
I P
TABLE 18 ANNUALEFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL REPORT ESTIMATEDTOTALERRORS ASSOCIATED WITH EFFLUENT MEASUREMENTS DATAPERIOD: January 1, 1996 - December 31, 1996 Measurement Estimated Total Error
- 1. Airborne Effiuents a.
Fission and Activation Gases b.
1-131 c.
Particulates
- d. Tritium 15 9%
13.3%
15.8%
13.6%
2.
Waterborne Effluents a.
Fission and Activation Products
- b. Tritium c.
Dissolved and Entrained Gases d.
Gross Alpha Activity e.
Volume of Waste Released (Prior to Dilution) f.
Volume of Dilution Water Used During Period 50 33%
8.4%
60%
50%
15 0%
3.
Solid Wastes a.
Condensate Demineralizer/
Radwaste Demineralizer (Dewatered - HIC) b.
Liquid Radwaste Filter Media (Dewatered - HIC) c.
RWCU Filter Media (Dewatered - HIC) d.
Ultrasonic Resin Cleaning Waste (Dewatered - HIC) e.
Cartridge Filters (Dewatered - HIC) 15.1%
15.1%
15.1%
25.0%
35
i
Measurement Estimated Total Error 3'.
Solid Wastes (cont.)
f.
Processed DAW (Strong Tight Container) g.
Incinerated DAW (Strong Tight Container) 25 0%
25 0%
36
TABLE19 ANNUALEFFLUENT ANDWASTE DISPOSAL REPORT DATANOT REPORTED IN PREVIOUS ANNUALREPORT NUCLIDECATEGORY UNIT FOURTH QUARTER 1995 A. Airborne Effluents
- 1. Sr-89
- 2. Sr-90 3.
Gross Alpha Ci Ci Ci O.OOE+00 0.00E+00 8.99E-07 B. Waterborne Effluents
- 1. Sr-89 2.
Sr-90 3.
Fe-55 3.
Gross Alpha Ci Ci Ci Ci O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 1.90E-02 O.OOE+00 37
SECTION 3 METEOROLOGICALDATA AND DISPERSION ESTIMATES 38
METEOROLOGY AND DISPERSION DATA Meteorological data have been collected at the Susquehanna SES site since the early 1970s.
At the present time, the meteorological system is based on a 300-foot high tower located approximately 1,000 feet to the southeast of the plant. Wind sensors are mounted at the 10-meter and 60-meter elevations on this tower.
Vertical temperature differential is measured with redundant sensor pairs between the 10m and 60m levels.
Sigma theta (the standard deviation of horizontal wind direction) is calculated from wind direction at both levels.
Dew point and ambient temperature sensors are present at the 10m level. Precipitation is measured at ground level.
A back-up meteorological tower was erected in 1982.
It is a 10-meter tower providing alternate measurements of wind speed, wind direction, and sigma theta.
SSES meteorological data is transmitted to the plant control room, Technical Support Center, and Emergency Operations Facility for emergency response availability. The data is also transmitted via telephone line data-link to the PP8L corporate computer in Allentown.
Dispersion modeling for effluents from normal operation of SSES is done using XOQDOQ, a straight-line air flow Gaussian plume model designed to estimate average relative concentrations.
The model was developed in accordance with Regulatory Guide 1.111.
Calm periods are distributed as the first non-zero wind-speed class in the input joint frequency distribution file.
XOQDOQ uses terrain correction factors to account for the temporal and spatial variations in the airflow in the region, since a straight-line trajectory model assumes that a constant mean wind transports and diffuses effluents in the direction of air flow at the release point within the entire region of interest.
The SSES terrain correction factors were determined by the ratio of the results of the straight-line model to the puff-advection model, and are incorporated into Table 22.
39
TABLE20 ANNUALEFFLUENT ANDWASTE DISPOSAL REPORT METEOROLOGICALDATAAVAILABILITY DATAPERIOD: 1996 PARAMETER PERCENT OF VALIDHOURS DURING PERIOD 1.
Wind speed a.
10-Meter Sensors b.
60-Meter Sensor 97 6%
99.2%
2.
Wind direction a.
10-Meter Sensors b.
60-Meter Sensor 99.7%
98.7%
3.
Indicator of Atmospheric Stability (Primary Tower),
a.
Temperature Differential between 10 and 60 meters (Delta-TA) b.
Temperature Differential between 10 and 60 meters (Delta-TB) c.
Sigma Theta @ 10 Meters d.
Sigma Theta @ 60 Meters g75 96.9%
gg 7%
98.7%
4.
Percent of hours for which valid 10-meter wind speed, 10-meter wind direction, and temperature differential were available.
95 4%
5.
Percent of hours for which valid 60-meter wind speed, 60-meter wind direction, and temperature differential were available.
g65 40
CALM O.O 5
0 5
ss ANNUAL 8572 OBS.
HE'S WIND DIRECTION FREQUENCY (PERCENT)
WM MEAN WIND SPEED
( MI/HR )
SSES Pr imar y Tower 33 ft 1996 Annual Wind Rose 10-METER ANNUALWIND ROSE -1996 41
CALM 0.0 0
0 0
ANNUAL 8665 OBS.
HEHEZI WIND DIRECTION FREQUENCY (PERCENT)
M~ MEAN WIND SPEED
( MX/HR )
SSES Pr imar y Tower 200 1996 Annual Wind Rose 60-METER ANNUAI WIND ROSE - 1996 42
Figure 7 SES PASQUILL STABILITYCLASS PREVALENCES Data Period:
1996 Based on Joint Frequency Distributions at 10 Meters
{8383 Valid Observations)
Neutral.
44.4%
Slightly Unstable 3.9%
Moderately Unstable 2.2%
Very Unstable 2.2%
~
~
~
I I
P P *
\\
Very Stable 5 3%
Slightly Stable 30.8%
Moderately Stable 11 1%
43
Page 1 of 10 TABLE2'f JOlNT WINDFREQUENCY DlSTRIBUTtON BYSTABlLITYCLASS PEKNSTLVANIA POKR 6 LIONT ~ANT (PPSL)
~ Suaqueherne Ste~ Electric Stetlon 2/19/1997 TI% OF OAT:
S)24t 5
PROGRANL JFD VERSION: PC-1.2 1996 Priwry Toeer Deti 33-Foot Level SITE IDENTI F IERl DATA PfRICO ERA)LINEDL 1/ 1/96
~ 12/31/96 STASILITT SASED VINO MEASURED VIND TMRESMOLD JOIKT fREOUENCT SPEED (NPH)
SETVEEN 200.0 ON: DELTA T AT:
33.0 FEET AT:
.50 NPM OISTRISUTION Of VINO SPEED AMD STAll LITT CLASS A
AKD 33.0 FEET DIRECTION IN INRAIS At 33.00 FEEt N
NNE Nf EKE E
VNV NV NNV TOTAL.
CALM
.51 ~ 3.40 3.41 ~ 6.70
- 6. 71-11. 20 11.21.16.60 lb.S1 22.40
>22.40 0
1 5
0 0
2 I
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 3
2 0
0 7
2 3
11 0
0 3
0 0
0 0
0 0
2 1S
'IS" 2
0 0
1 2
0 0
0 0
14 5
0 0
0 0
53 4
0 0
0 0
15 6
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 13 50 92 27 0
0 TO'IAL 1
1 S
1 1
1 2
6 23 37 S3 17 1
0 0
0 182 SIASILITT MSEO VIKD NfA SURE 0 VIMD TKRESNOLD JOIKI FREOUEKCT SPEED IIcPHI OM: DELTA
'I A'I:
33.0 fffl Al:,50 Noe DISIRISUTIOM Of MIND SPEED AKD SETVEEN 200.0 STASILITT CLASS S
Ale 33.0 fEfT DIRECTION IM AXES At 33.00 FEEt Nef Mf ENE E
fSf Sf
$ $ 1 S
SSv S'V VSV V
VKV KV KKV TOTAL CAL+
.5 l ~ 3.40 3.4l. 6.70 b.tt
'l 1,20 1 l. 2 1 lb. SD lb.S'I 22.40
>22.40 0
0 0
0 4
4 0
0 b
l 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 2
3 C
2
)
6 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 14 5
1 0
0 0
0 25 6
41 24 6
14 0
2 0-0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
I 0
0 59 0
0
'101 0
0 23 0
0 2
0 0
0 10'IAL 10 5
0 0
0 3
5 10 21 72 46 6
I 0
0 166 44
I
Page 2 of 10 TABLE21 JOINT WIND FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONBYSTABILITYCLASS PENNSYLVANIA POVER 8 LICNT CON>>ANY IPPSL)
~ SoaOuchare>>s Ste~ Electric Station 2/19/1997 TINE OF OAY:
8:24: 5 PROCRAJI)
JFD VERSION)
PC 1 2 1996 Priaary Tca>>er Data
~
33 ~ Foot level SI'TE IDENTIFIER:
DATA PERICO fxANINED:
1/ 1/96. 12/31/96 ANNUAL STAR! LI TY RASEO MIND NEASUREO VINO THRESHOLD JOINT FREOUENCY SPEED INPH)
ON: DELTA T 8ETVEEN 200.0 AT:
33.0 FEET AT:
50 NPH DIStRIRUTION OF VINO SPEfO ANO STAR ILI TY CLASS C
AND 33,0 FfET NNE NE ENE E
SQJ DIRECtlON IN NCR)RS AT 33.00 FEET SV VSV V
MNV NM NNM TOTAL CALM
.51 ~ 3.40 0
3.41 6.70 0
6.71 11.20 15 11.21 ~ lb.8O 3
16.81 22.40 0
>>22.40 0
2 0
13 15 5
1
'I 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
5 2
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
2 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
I 6
2
'IO I
d 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
26 5
1 0
0 2
1 0
0 0
46 11 3
3 0
47 34 8
7 8
4 10 7
I 0
0 0
2 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
12 0
142 3
145 2
29 0
2 0
0 TOTAL 18 21 lb 6
2 2
9 3
19 35 99 56 20 11 8
5 330 RETMEEN 200.0 STAR!LITT RASEO ON: DELTA I VINO NEASURED Al:
33.0 FEET MIND Taef saoLD ll:
.50 NPH JO)N)
FREOUENCV DISTR)RUT)ON Ol MIND SPEED AND SPEED INON )
NvE NE ENE E
STAR ILITt CLASS 0
AND 33.0 FEET DIRECTION IN Nfl)RS Al 33.00 FEET ESE SE SSE S
SSM SV VSV V
MNV NV NNV TOTAL CAIN
.5) ~ 3.40 3.4). 6.70 6.7) F 11.20 11. 21 1 6. 8C 16.8)
~ 22.40
>>22.40 29 82 97 142 141 '5 11 4
0 0
0 0
115 113 114 33 35 39 9
3 5
0 3
0 0
0 0
78 29 7
1 0
0 70 78 do IIb 100 l04 10 15 49 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
110 13d 26 0
0 99 22 17 9
205 106 45 49 101 107 77 79 16 65 44 ld 0
13 7'
0 0
3 0
7 62 130 27 0
0 0
9 1041 73 1447 129 977 29 233 0
23 0
3 TOTAL 278 283 268 161 157 115
'IOO 193 245 277 421 313 193 155 226 240 3724
Page3of 10 TABLER1 JOINT WINO FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONBYSTABILlTYCLASS PENNSYLVANIA POVER 5 LIGNT CTNN'ANT (PPSL) - Susquehams Ste~ fiectric Ststion 2/19/1997 TIKE OF DAY:
8)24) 5 PROGRAN)
JFD VERSION: PC-\\
2 PAGE 64 1996 Priaary Tcwer Osts 33.foot )eve)
SITE IDENT!FIER:
DATA PER!CO EXANINED:
1/ 1/96 12/31/96
~oo ANNUAL Coo STABILITY SASED MIND MEASURED VINO TNRESNOLD JOINT FREOUENCT SPEED (WPN)
ON: DELTA 1 SETVEEN 200.0 AT:
33.0 FEET A'I:
50 NPN DISTRISUTION OF VIND SPEED AND STAS ILITY CLASS E
ANO 33.0 Ffft OIREC1ION IN )NXNtS AT 33.00 FEET W
NNE NE ENE E
SSM SV VSV V
VNV Nl)
'NKV TOTAL GAL N
,51 ~ 3,CO 23 116 3.4,1-6.70 51 65 6.71.'11.20 6
14 11.21 lb.d0 0
6 lb.6l 22.CO 0
0 F22.40 0
0 217 331 62 27 14 6
3 1
0 1
0 0
220 5
4 1
I 0
128 1'5 0
3 0
0 116 109 135 21 45 72 9
15 17 4
16 20 0
I 0
0 0
0 133 65 55 104 36 30 4
2 0
0 0
0 26
.4 4
4 Co 10 13 19 20 6
2 I
10 5
0 0
0 1
0, 0
0 0
0 0
3 4
1635 20 678 4
156 0
75 0
C 0
0 TOTAL 80 221 296 366 234 144 150 156 244 261 201 96 26 19 24 28 Z581 SlASIL!Tv SASED MIND WIASVRED VIWD TWRESWO<D JOINT FREOVEWCV SPEED Isoe)
Ow: DELTA I SfTVEEW 200,0 A'I:
33.0 fffl Al:
.50 NPw DIS'lRISUT ION Of V)ND SPEED IWD STASILIIY CLASS F
AWD 33.0 FEET DIRECIIOW IW NCA)RS AT 33.00 fEET.
W WWE NE ENE E
SSM SV VSV V
VWV NV NNV I OTAL CALW
.'5 > ~ 3.40
- b. 70 6.71
~ 11.20
- 11. 2 I ~ lb.80 lb.81 ZZ.CC
~ 22 ~ cC 5
Zl 7
0 2
0 0
0 0
0 0
104 399 160 6
34 1
0 0
0 0,
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
49 31 22 25 0
0 1
3 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 24 1
0 0
0 0
0 13 3
1 1
1 2
664 6
1 0
0 2
0 66 I
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 O
.O O
O O
101st 12 30 110 433 161 CO 31 23 28 25 20 4
1 1
3 2
933
Page 4 of 10 TABLE21 JOINT WINDFREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONBYSTABILITYCLASS PENNSTLVANIA PUKE 8 LIONT CTNNtANT (PPAL> - Suaquehama St~ Electric Station 2/19/1997 TI% Of OAT) d)24) 5 PROCRANI JfD VERSION) PC-Ti2 1996 Prlery Totter Data 33-Foot Level SI'TE IDEKTIFIERI DATA PERICO EXANINEDI 1/ 1/96 - 12/31/96 STAR!LITT SASED VINO NEASVRED VINO TNRE5)OLO JOINT fREOUENCT SPEED (let N)
SETVEEN 200.0 ON: DELTA T AT:
33.0 fEET AT:
.50 NPN OISTRISUTION OF VIND SPEED AND STAR I LITT CLASS 0
AND 33.0 fEET DIRECTICat IN INRIRS AT 33.00 FEET It NNE KE ENE E
SSV QI VQI V
VNV NV NNV TOTAL CALN
.5'I ~ 3.40 3.41 6.70 6.71.11.20 11.21 ~ 16.80 16.81 22.40
~22.40 1
5 61 0
2 2
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
261 55 16 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
15 11,4 5
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0.,
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
D 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 422 0
24 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 TOTAL 1
'7 63 277 56 15 1'1 4
5 4
1 2
0 0
1 0
447 STASIL!Tt RASED INt: DELTA VINO NEARED Al:
33.0 VINO 'INRESNOLO ATI
.SO JOINT IREOVENCT OISTRISIJTI SPEED INPN)
STARILITT CLASS ALL AIO 33.0 FEET I
RETVEEN 200.0 fffl NON Ot Of VINO 5PEED ANO DIRECTIINI IN INRIRS AT 33.00 fffl Nf ENE E
SSV QI VQI V
IAIV NV NNlt TOTAL CALN
.Sly 3.40 3.4l
- b. TD 6.71 11.20 11.2'l ~ lb.8O lb.8l 22.40 i22.40 bl 226 157 254 160 82 15 11 0
0 0
0 498 207 57 4
0 0
1105 550 115 47 18 7
4 6
4 1
0 0
273, 228 47 14 26 4
7 0
0 0
0 216 150 37 lb 1
0 257 275 100 287 01 87 27 11 0
0 0
0 181 54 22 14 13 400 170 58 65 83 273 190 97 89 139 43 105 S 7 19 27 0
15 10 0
0 0
0 3
0 0
3 15 3988 93 2466 136 1505 31 387 0
31 0
3 TOTAL 30l 573 766 1246 bl '1 326 405 420 574 660 897 534 247 187 262 275 8383 47
Page 5 of 10 TABLE21 JOlNT WlND FREQVENCY DlSTRIBVTlONBYSTABlLlTYCLASS PENNSYLVANIA POVER 8 LIDNT CNIPANY (PPCL) - Susqvehama Stem Electric Statics 2/19/1997 TI% OF DAY:
dt24t 5
PROCRAIIT JFD VERSION: PC-1.2 1996 Prissry Tower Data 33-Foot Isvei SITE IDENTIFIER:
DATA PERIOD EXAIIINEDT 1/ 1/96 12/31/96 ANNUAL STABILITY BASED ON: DELTA T BETVEEN 200.0 AND 33.0 FEET VINO KEASVRED AT:
33 0 fEEt UIND THREsHDLD Al:,50 NPH TOTAL WISNIER OF OBSERVATIONS:
d784 TOTAL NLSNIER Of VALID OBSERVATIONS:
8383 TOTAL NNNIER Of NISSIND OBSERVATIONS:
401 PERCENT DAIA RECOVERY fOR THIS PERICO:
95.4 X HEAW VIWD SPEED FOR THIS PERIIS):
4,8 NPH KNNIER Of OBSERVATIONS UITH BACCLIP SYABILITYT TOTAL WWBER OF OBSERVATIONS V!TH BACRVP DATA:
0 0
PERCENTACE OCCLNIRENCE Of STABILITY CLASSES A
8 C
D E
F 0
2.17 2.22 3.94 44.42 30.79 11.13 5 33 DISIRIBVTIOW Of VIND OIRECtlOW VS STABILITY w
wwE NE ENE E
EBE sE ssE s
ssv sv vsv
'v UNv Nv Nwv cALH 0
'IOIAL 1
l 7
10
\\8 2'I 278 283 80 221 12
'30 I
7 307
$73 d
1 1
5 0
0 16 6
2 268 161 157 206 368 234 110 433 1dl 63 277 56 766 1246 611 2
6 23 37 0
3 5
10 21 2
0 10 3$
115 100 103 24$
277 144 150 186 244 2dl 40 31 23 28 2$
1$
11 4
5 4
326 405 420 574 660 83 17 1
0 72 46 6
1 99 56 20 11 421 313 193 155 201 96 26 10 20 4
1 1
1 2
0 0
807 534 247 187 0
0 0
0 0
0 8
5 0
226 240 0
24 28 3
3 2
0 0
0 262 2753 48
Page 6 Of 10 TABLE24 JOlNT WlND FREQUENCY DlSTRlBUTlONBYSTABILlTYCLASS PENNSYLVANIA POVER 6 LIGHT ~ANY (PPSL) - Suacluahams St~ E(actr(c Stat(on 2/19/1997 TINE OF DAY:
8:25(33.
PROGRAM:
JFD VERSION(
PC 1.2 PAGE 62 1996 Priary Tooer Data 200.Foot Iee(
SITE IDENTIFIER:
DATA PERIOD EXAMINED:
1/ 1/96 - 12/31/96 STAllLI TY RASED VINO MEASURED VIMD THRESHOI.D JOINT FREOUEKCY SPEED (HPH)
BETIJEE N 200.0 ON: DELTA 'I AT: 200.0 FEET AT:
~ 50 MPH DISTRIBUTION OF MIND SPEED AMD STAR(L'ITY CLASS A
AND 33.0 FEET DIRECTION IN H(RR(s AT200.00 FEET N
NNE NE ENE E
la(V NV NMV TO(A(.
CALM
.51 ~ 3.40 3.41-6.70
- b. 71 ~ 11. 20 11 ~ 21.16.80 16.81 ~ 22.40
~22.40 1
1 3
0 2
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 I
2 0
0 0
0 2
1 0
10 3
0 1
3 14 3
2 0
2 0
0 0
0 0
9 11 2
0 0
0 0
20 30 7
0 0
0 0
46 36 13 0
0 0
0 78 6
13 1
0 0
0 26 0
0 0
0 0
0 2
TOTAL 1
3 6
2 0
1 1
3 16 27 85 35 1
0 0
0 181 S'lASILlit SASED VINO MEASURED VIMD THRESHOLD JOINT FREOUENCY SPf ED (Haa)
Oa: DfLla 1 SETVEEM 200 0 Al; 200.0 FEET Al:
.50 HPH OISTRISUTIOM OF VINO SPEED AND SIAM I LITT CLASS 8
Aje 33.0 Fffl DIR(CT ION IM H(RNS ATZOO.OO FEET a
aaf NE fNE f
EsE sE ssf s
ssv V
le NV NNV TOTAL CALM
.51 ~ 3.40 3.c 1 ~ b. 70 6 ~ 71 11 ~ Zo 11.2l lb.80 16.81 F 22.40 F22.40 0
0 0
2 8
5 2
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 4
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 9
2 0
26 10 2
23 36 5
1 10 0
0 3
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 20 0
bl 0;.
82 0
13 0
6 IOIAL 7
i3 2
o o
o i
c e
21 60 el 8
o o
o i83 49
4
Page 7 of 10 TABLE2C JOlNT WlND FREQUENCY DlSTRlBUTlONBYSTABlLITYCLASS PENNSYLVANIA PISIER 6 LIGHT CA%ANY (PPSL). Susquehams St~ Electric Station 2/19/1997 TINE OF OAY:
8)25)33 PROGRNT)
JFD VERSIINI) PC-1.2 PAGE 1996 Priss)ry Teer Oats 200.foot Level SITE IDENTIF IER:
DATA PfRIIS) EXANIKEDT I/ 1/96 12/31/96 STAS I LI7 Y SASfD MIND HEASURED VIND THRESHOLD JOINT FREQUENCY SPEED IHPH)
SETMfEN 200.0 ON: DELTA T AT: 200.0 FEET Al:,50 NPH DISTRISUTIOH Of MIND SPEED ANO STAR I L IT Y CLASS C
AND 33.0 FEET OIREClloN IN IKRHIS AT200.00 FEET H
NNE NE fNE E
ESE Sf SSE S
MNV NV NNV TOTAL CALH 51 ~ 5.40 3.41 6.70 6.7'I 11.20 11.21 lb.80 lb.81 F 22.40
>22*40 0
1 0
0 2
1 4
6 2
2 6
13 11 0
0 12 2
0 0
0 1
1 0
0 0
D 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 e
1 1
0 0
0 0
0 D
'I 4
12 7
4 1
0 0
0 0
0 18 4
2 0
0 46 24 5
2 5
23 40 20 3
2 e
4 o
o 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
5 0
46 0
141 2
116 2
19 0
2 TO'IAL 20 21 19 2
4 1
4 7
10 29 90 74 32 5
7 4
529 SETMEEN 200.0 STASILITT SASED OH: DELTA 1 UIHD HEASURED Al: too 0 FEET MIKD THRE$ HDLD Al:
~ So NPH JOINT fREOVESCV OISTRISUTIOH Of MIND SPEED ANO SPEED IHPH) a HHE NE ENE f
STARILII'I CLASS D
AND 53,0 FEET DIRECTION IN NXNS AT200.00 ffET ESE SE SSK S
SSM SM MSM V
WV NV NNV TOTAL
.51 ~ 5.40 5.41
- b. 70
- b. 71. 11. 20 1:.Zl lb.60 Ib.d> 22.40 F22.40 15 46 96 St 41 51 102 79 41 Z5 105 llo 83 25
'o 65 45 27 6
5 0
5 1
5 5
0" 0
0 4
0 40 16 6
1 0
25 37 27 56 56 55 74 79 61 7
14 42 0
Zl 0
0 3
45 112 74 58 lb 36 11 7
192 96 26 121 130 70 55 125 84 8
50 42
~
0 12
'l7 5
26 23 77 105 73 86 8
1
,0 0
D 9
491 te 966 116 1266 95 773 lbb 0
39 TOTAL 214 50e 286 151 9e 105 145 186 Zor 286 412 424 248 191 Z20 248 3703 50
Page 8 of 10 TABLE21 JOINT WINDFREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONBYSTABILITYCLASS PENNSYLVANIA POVER 8 LIGHT C(N(PANT (PPSL)
~ ~orna Stem Electr(c Station 2/19/1997 TINE OF DAY(
5(25(33 PROCRAN:
JFD VERS I(N(t PC-1.2 PACE 6C 1996 Prlmry Toeer Oats 200-Foot Level SITE IDENTIFIER(
DATA PERIOD EXANINEO:
1/ 1/96 - 12/31/96 STASILITY RASEO VINO NEAQAIED Vile THRESHOLD JOINT fREOUENCY SPEED (NPH)
RETVEEN 200.0 OH( DELTA T AT: 200.0 FEET AT:
50 NPH OISTRIRUTIOH OF VINO SPEED AND STABILITY CLASS E
AND 33.0 fEET DIRECTION IH H(RJRS AT200.00 FEET NNE KE ENE E
SQI Ql VQI V
VNV NV NNV TOTAL CALH
.51 ~ 3.40 3.C1. 6.70
- b. 71. 11. 20 11.21 ~ lb.50 16.81-22.40
>22.40 29 84 139 59 55 C7 232 114 51 35 30 61 45 12 0
17 13 7
2 0
4 5
2 2
0 2
0 3
0 C2 23 13 3
3 0
42 46 36 38 16 44 12 16 0
16 1
5 67 39 43 23 10 21 49 68 75 3Z 15 5
0 53 16 11 5
4 14 745
'I09 65 16 5
13 5
902 105 50 15 9
23 21 607 33 55 10 1
0 5
262 4
10 10 0
0 0
51 0
0 1
0 0
0 41 TOlAL 106 c00 316 164 106 54 107 165 203 247 307 259 66 23 40 C5 2641 STABILITY RASED VIHD HEASURED VINO THRESHOLD JOINT fREOUEHCT SPEED (HOH)
RETVEEN 200.0 OH: DELTA 1 A'I: 200.0 fEET Al:
.50 NPH DISTRISUTIOH Of VINO SPEED AHO STARILITT CLASS i
AHD 33,0 fEET DIRECTION IH H(LNS AT200.00 FEET SE SSE S
SSV s
HHE NE ENE E
ESE SV VSV V
VNV NV NNV TOTAL CA(H
.51 3.40 3.4l ~ 6.70 6.7'I'll 20 11 ~ 21 ~ lb. 50 lb.51 22.CO
>22.40 9
57
'I05 59 40 30 192 53 12 4
11 15 4
0 0
0 2
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 5
0 0
0 0
3$
26 27 6
1l 12 1
1 4
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 15 21 11 0
0 0,
15 4
1 2
2 36 6
4 4
26 21 1
1 2
0 11 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 2
C23 5
437 1
99 0
14 0
0 0
0 IDIAL 50 266 192 '1 44 29 42 39 43 C7 77 C2 6
7 7
11 973 51
Page S of 10 TABLE21 JOINT WIND FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONBYSTABILITYCLASS PEMMSTLVANTA P(AIER C LICMT URN'ANT (PPEL)
SI)uenas Stm Electric Stat(m 2/19/199T TIIK OF OAT) 8125)33 PROGRAM:
JFD VERSION: PC.1.2 PACE 65
)996 Priaary Toeer Data
~
200.foot Level SITE IDENTIFIER:
DATA PERIOD EXAMINED:
1/ 1/96 12/31/96 STAB I LITT BASED VIND MEASURED VlND THRESHOLD JOINT FREQUENCY SPEED (HPH)
BE)VEEN 200.0 ON: DELTA T AT: 200.0 FEET A'lt
,50 HPH OISTRIBUTIOI Of VINO SPEED ANO STAB)LITT CLASS 0
AND 33.0 fEET DIRECTION IN HCURS AT200.00 fEET N
NNE NE EME E
VNV NV NNV TOTAL CALH
.5 I 3.40 3.41 ~ 6.70 6.71-11.20 1'I.Z I.16.50 16.51-22.40
%22.40 8
33 35 26 23 22 87 59 16 6
T 7
2 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
17 0
0 0
0 9
5 7
8 0
I 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
4 I
I, 1
1 2
152 16 2
1 1
2 1
247 8
5 0
I 0
0 32 0
2 0
0 0
0 2
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
TOTAL 37 127 96 42'9 14 Zl 16 14 15 25 10 2
3 3
3 463 STABILITY BASED OH: DELTA 1
~ ETVEEN 200.0 VIHD HKASURKO At: 200.0 FEEI VINO THRESHOLD AI:
.50 HPH JOINT FRKOUKNCT DISTR)BUT)ON Of VINO SPEED AND SPEED IHRH)
NHK NE ENE E
SIABIL)TT CLASS ALL AND 33.0 fEET DIRECTION IN HQRIS AT200.00 fKKI ESE SE SSE S
SSV NV NNV TOTAL Cat+
.51 3.40 3,41
- b. 70
- 4. 7'I. II,20 I I.ZI lb.6O lb.61 22.40
>22.40 376 227 164 131 620 347 IZZ 75
)50 216 145 36 26 83 67 40 13 7
I
'IO 6
7 7
0 2
0 7
0 116 72 3 ~
9 117 52 95 21 I
119 126
)14 114 131 117 37 52 lb 8
24 117 222 156 95 40 13 111 391 36T 170 20 0
32 20 177 51 277 96 315 119 59 57 15 20 13 41 90 77 5
0 10 41 135 90 I
0' 27 1559 40 2640 14D 2252 102 1327 2 -
305 0
90 TOTAL 435 1'136 917 412 279 232 319 425 499 675 1059 905 363 229 277 311 6473 52
Page 10 of 10 TABLE21 JOINT WIND FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONBYSTABILITYGLASS PENNSYLVANIA POMER 8 LIGNT CO%ANY (PPCL) - Susquehems Stem Electric Ststfon 2/19/1997 TINE OF DAY:
8125t33 PROGRAN:
JFD VERSION: PC.1.2 1996 Prissry Tour Dots 200-Foot level SITE IDENTIFIER:
DATA PERICO EXAHINED 1/ 1/96. 12/31'/96 STARILITY RASED ON: DELTA 1 MIND HEASURED AT: 200.0 fEET MIND THRESIIOLD AT:
.50 NPH ANNUAL BETMEEN 200.0 AND 33.0 FEET TOTAI. 1ARNIER OF OBSERVATIONS:
8784 101AL NLRISER Df VALID 08SERVAT IONS:
8473 TOTAL lnetSER OF HISSING OBSERVATIONS:
311 PERCENI DATA RECOVERY fOR THIS PERICO:
96,5 I HEAN MIND SPEED fOR THIS PERIOD:
7+5 HPH NIPQER Of ORSERVATIONS MITH RACNUP STASILITY:
TOIAL NSNIER Of 08SERVA'IIONS MITH RACRUP DATA:
0 0
PERCENTAGE OCCLRIREKCE Of STASILITY CLASSES A"
8 C
0 E
f G
2.'l4 2.16 3.88 43.70 31.17 11.48 5.46 DISTRIRUTIOH Of MII DIRECTION VS SIASIL)TY t
Ski NE ERE E
SSM SM MSM M
MNV NV NNM CALH A
6 S
7 13 2
c 20 21 Io 0
2>i 306 286 I
106 400 316 50 2bo 192 G
3Y 127 Ob TOTAL 435 1136 917 2
0 0
0 2
4 131 96 164 10b 71 42 29 412 279 1
1 3
16 0
'I 4
6 1
4
'7 10 103 143 1 88 207 84 107 168 203 29 42 39 43 14 21 16 14 232 319 425 499 27 85 21, 60 29 90 286 412 247 307 47 77 18 28 675 1059 35 I
0 0
61 8
0 0
'74 32 5
7 424 248 191 220 259 66 23 40 42 6
7 7
10 2
3 3
905 363 229 277 0
0 0
0 4
0 248 0
45 0
11 0
3 0
311 0
53
Page 1 of 14 TABLE22 AVERAGEANNUALRELATIVECONCENTRATIONS SuequCIIVn %see KlkCTFIC Stot IOI 'NN.LEVEL DELKASE.
1995 ko DECAT, Ikf)KFLKTKD Ca%ECTED Ta IDEN TED%AID KKCINCUIATIaUS)NO KFKCIAL Tfkkblk ADJINTDKNT FACTat ASAIAL AVE%A%K CNI/O IKKC/IIKTfkCato)
DIN)ANCE Ik IIILKK EKCTa
.250
',500
.750 liood I.SO)
?eood Re500 3 000 3.500 4.000 4e500 K
KCM I%V M
IAIV NSI NNL kf fkf
%ft CI kCF 1 ~ 149% 0$
RA&1% 05 4.793E 05 1 lllf04 Se931E OS Zeo?9%
D&
5.IQK 05 2.244E 05 2,604\\.0$
2.75a.0$
2.iiof 0$
IelQCe0$
C.LQE 06 CeSFLK ioi
$.$rlt Ob d.ooifio&
4.049%
Ob 4.~
Od 1.510% 05 5.491%.05 1.450%
OS 9.5%. 06
- 1. 0?2%. 0$
Ted)9% 06 4.39$f 04
~.95OE 06
~.555%-06 3.954%. Dd 1.66of 04 1e$ 4?L ob 1.9CCE-OL
?.?QE Ob 2.305% ed&
5i1 DOE. 06 9.077%. 04 2.145%.0$
9.412%
Ob S e 260%. 06 deoobE Ob C.TTSE. Ob 4 DOLE 0&
5 e 644%. 04 4.4$ ?E Ob
?.?DDE-06 oe?4&f 07
- 4. Q9%. 07
'1.143%
Ob
'1e516E 0&
1,49OE.O& 7.795%
DT Ceor?EM 5.47IS ol 5.251%
Ob le%79%
Ob le?19% 04 4.649%-07 5.9QE.04 3 321%-06 2.141% Ot IeSVR 04 le462%-0$ 4DSdf.ob 5e791%-06 4.3964 Ob 6.19?f-ob 3.51IE-O& Re156% 04 1.5&IS Ob 3.3&of Ob le917E.DL 1?3$ % 06 de&96% 07 5e405E.O& t.lSa Ob l~ 06 9e449% 07 5.396%
Ob 'leR1E-06 1 ~ 195% 06 DA15% 07 5.O)TK 04 li749% 06 1e?1Ã 04 9elda'07
$.91?t Ob ZeIOÃ 06 1.Q4%.06 1,071% 06 3iodoE 06 1 75'IE 04 1 ~ 146% 06 D.SXR Dl le549feob D.?5?t Ol Se5NK ior 4.167% 07 Se562%
07 2.9?OC Dl 1.47%% Dl 1 329feor Sildrt 07 2A44E DF 1.4tIK.DT le090% 07 re&54%.07 3.$Q.07 Ze405%.07 1ALTK 07
'F.944% Dl 4.097%.07 2.4$lf DF le449E 07 Reb?4%47 1e75a DF I~ 07 I 064% 07 deOSM 07 4%1% 07 538% 07 2.54)% 07 Iel&7K-06 Di575%-07 6.707%-ar S.m-OF 3eRTSK 06 R.~ Ot led%.D& lAZZE Ob
'I 106% 06 4.192% 07 6.596%
OF 5.342% 07 4.~ 07 4.414%-07 3.49?E-OF 5.19SE-07 7.34)Ecol S.l?4%.07 4.549%.07 3el42%
OF 6.199f.ol 4.404%-07 5e456% 07 3.254%-07 6.644% 07 S,OSOE 07 4 1$3f 07 Se477%.07, F.DIRK OF S 919% 07 4-Kt OF 4 102% 07
'eSRTK 07 Seotbf 07 4 19&%.DT 5.554% 07 3e)44% 07 2.5?9% Dl ?el?4k 07 1.429% 07 9.$79%-04 T.lao-a 5.772%-04 4.7&rf-a 7.411K Od 5,425%.04 4.343f 04 Se354%
O) 1,113%.07 7.729% a 5,7)?f 04 4.274% IS 1 334% D7 9,725K-od 'F.109E 04 5,216% 04 ANNUAL AVEkACC CNI/O IkfC/JIKTf~ OSKD) kfiklaa S.OOO 7.500 10.DOC DISIANCE Ik NIL%K 1$ ~ 000 RoeOOO 25.000 50.000
$5eooo Coeooo 4$.OOD Soeooo CV VCV I%V k
NCI NE tkf I
Cl CCC C+I/O ICCC/Nf 4.779K Od 3.91)f Ce II999t 04 4.651E 09 2.158%
O'F 9.4kif Dd $,2&2% OD 1.4QE a C.CCDC OF Z.19lt'07 1 ZO?f DF 3.$TISea I.SF9t Ob Te15$ % OF $.9?bf 07 I ~ 11OE 07 Ce519E OF 2.1?/f OF I 145% 07 3 ~ 177% IS 2.694%.0/ 1.$4Zt.07 7 594% Of ?.$ 9$tea
$.ICCC ~ OF I.QO%-07 9.?orf a Se2QK 04 t.Trot or 1.$llf-ol~.Srtt.a 2.79Cf-a 3 154K Or?.I%if Or I ILL% 07 5.1%5% IS
$.495% Ol 1.4/lf.or I ~Dllf 07 S.ol% a 5.0)Cf-or IALS[ Ol 9.495%
Dk 3ASIC a I.lilteol De524% a
$.4$9f 04 Z,dot%ca C.OOIC.a ?.Otkf ~ IS 1.155K-a 4.30lf e00 2.7?)f ~ Ok 1.)$9C a &.455f DO 2.494t ~ 09
$ eCCCC 04 'li314%*ok 7.$7$feo9 5.000%.09 Ce?O&f.a I.CASt a oe?49C.IS Se43?L 09 IIk CXSCD ) Ia fACV kfOS IIT Z.DDSC.09 7.507%.10 3.909felo 1.744Eilo leiilt 09 2.75l$.09 1.342t-09 4.524% lo 1.791% a 4.097%.09 C.TRDE.09 2.$ 01% 09 5.1$ $f Od 1,451% ~ IS I.OSE a 3,44$ te09 I 559%
Od 3.710% 00 ?,051% 09 Fe?0&filo 1 ~ 19&E DD 4.$ 1rf 09 1,955% 09 2.98%filo 1.$kkf.a 4.255%
09 2.0?4%-09 $.201%
10 T.tlof.a 4.017Ee09 2.44?%
09 I e579%eo9 li541tia Teofrf 09 Se$ ?SE-09 1.ZSlfeo9 1 375fea
$.05$E.IS 2.411%
09 le?%4% 09 1.$4?%iIS 4.7$ $C 09 2.61$ Eeo9 1.17M 09 I.CSFT a 7.9?%%-09 C.?k)%-09 Ie971%-09 2.19CE ~ 09 1.15$f 09 5 727% ~ 10 2.?2?filo 1.5?lf 09 F,td?t ~ 10 5.44of 10 9.$ 03E 'll 1 Zbft'09 C.I03/ lo 2.054K-IO 7.415E 11 leCQK 09 '$,21?t 10 2,67% ID 1,060%
10 1.1$9f 10
$. D 1it.10 1,722%.09 Rill?% 09
- 4. DCLC-10 I.&To%elo 2.497%
10 D.?95 K~ 10 7.154K 10
~.2?OK 10 liNE 10 1.??$ f-09
).320%
'lo S.?1?E 11 5.6TDK-11 4.225E'll 7.369K-ll 6.559%
1$
Ie?45% ~ 'lo 1 lllfilo 9.44%
1D 4.61Ãelo 9.34%%
10 4.243%
'lo le739% lo 1eS?a 10 5.71%.11 48%.II I.Z$7%.10 1.074%
10 4.346%.10 3;764%
10 5e37$ % lo Z.9?4%.10 4.495%
10 4 ZSTK 10 3.4$ ?t 10 5,524%
10 4.692%
10 5.774%
10 6.44a 11 5,446%.11 Z.195E-11 1.445%-IS 1.055f 11 dedrdfel?
3.144%.11 2.694%
11 DICKCTIM INDI CITE k
CCV CV VCV NIV 1
kkf kf Kkf f
.$ I 2.$ $0% ~ Ob
'I OCDC Oi 9.0$?t Ob
? ~ 141C 0$
I.DISK.DS
$.515K eoi
$.9btf OC 4.4$ )t 04 Cekc$ t Di S.btif Oi C.DClf O&
7.3$0t Ob 9.?OE 07 4.1?of ior
- 1. Cbbf Oi Seiotf Di 4 e biol e Oi 3.4$bt Ob 1.955 E ~ Ob 2.179%.Oi 1 ~ 495% Di 1 799% oi
? eto9% ~ Ob 1.796%.04 4.649% Dl
$.OCSC 07 2.5 S.CS?t OF 4.5&4%"D>
1 $44Eeo&
4,29$i OC 1 SSIK cot
~./$4%
OF 9.9$a Dr 4.539%
Or
~.9bcc or 1.0$?f cob D.raf 07 4.152%
OF 1e5?rf DF
- l. 791% eoF 4.4$ 5C OT D.Loof-or l.ii)t 04 4 e40$ %.Dl 4.905% ~0/
$.74/f.OF
- c. Fbh"ol
$,1rtteor
~,Okfr OF S.lilt 07 F.SLSt edr le552% ~a I.ooof 07 Z.QLE Dr Se4?LE Or 1e6$ ?%
Dd S.it?E ~ 07 S.tl&EF 07 5.779E-OF 5e?$ 1E DF Se5$ 1% DF 4.1ODE-OF 3 SS?f OF
- 1. ~19E Dl C.llit 04 54 4.145%.04 le032% 07
?.zb?c Dr le lOOK O'7 ZeR22% iol 1.$9ofeor 1.d5bt ~ DF 1e493% 07 I.OC?t 07 1.450% 07 lAS'lf DF 4e 736%.a 2 ed%)%. Ok CEIStkf NOAOAklfC IN kILEN 5'C 4 5 5 ~ 10 10 20 d.oloE 09
?.0$ $ f.od C.659% a IArlfior 4.199E a S.owf-a 5.7Slf Od 5.33IS IS 4 3$$% Dk 3.%%?f a 4 005fea
?*F45% a Ce975%
09 9,554E lo 5e432%
09 9eSQ%.09 Re39$ % 04 5.4?lfiD9
$.474% 09 Se924E.09 5 SSa 09 leo&a 09 4e4QE 09 4e741%eoo Delfa 09 1 e19?%.09 30 40
~ 40 SD 4.?CLK 11 1 )3?E lo 1.)SION 09 le?6?f 09
?Salt-ID
~ e&97%
11 Ie~.ID
$,301% ID ie32?%
10 5 Qbf 1D Ceb?9% i10 li999% 10 4.$ 64%
11
?.141%
'10 4 A91% ~ 10 t.45%% 09 4.99?t-09 oe404%
'lo 7.219% e 1o DA31E 10 1AT9% 09 1 Aolt-09 1 544% 09, 1eCNi 09 Re344%.09
?edda elo
Page 2 of 14 TABLE22 AVERAGEANNUALRELATlVECONCENTRATlONS ESE 0Allt 07 E 755% 07 RE
(.141%
Od 4.06% 07
~RE
(.%9(tf-Ob 4D17% 07 VENT AN) WJILD(HC EARAHCTERS(
RELEASE Hf(OHT (HETER%)
D 1&%7%%
(HfTERR) fXIT VELOCITY (II/SEC )
'1 o100%.07 1 A55E 07
(. 07%%i 07 9.40 ELEVATED HIIKD CXOU LfVKL LKRS THAH
.(XX)
SETuf H
.000 AHD ASOVf (XXI AT TH( AIL%AS( HEI%HI(
VKHT RELKARK IHX)f MINI.%HEED (I%TERR/SEC) 5.94%% S MlE (RI 7,9m 00 4.59%% 00 9.740E-OR 5.405K-(e le%7%% IS 1.541% %
1+901%~00
%.054%-09 3.%47K~
5.8d3% ~09 7.5(9%.10 TAO% 10 t.975%
11 5,5b7E-10 9od95f. 11 1.740%-11 d.75%%
10 T~ 10
>.091%
'I' UIIO %SEED (ICTUSES/SEC)
LRt(ARLK/IClARALCMNT1(NR LKRR THAR
.000
~ (H)0 SKIER
+000 ANI
+000 MOVE
+000 aft. VIN) HEISHT
( KVERK) 10.0 RJ(LD(%4 ICIRHT (lKTllS) dTD RLDR,R(fiCRSAECAREA (M.IRHRO)
%5)$ 0 HEAT KRIS%I(XI RATf (CAL/SEC)
.0 AT THE I%AS(NED MIHO REICHT ( 10,0 I%TERS)I VENT RELEASE IX%I%
VIS) ~KD OOTKRR/SKCI I
RTARLE C(RE)ITI(XIS t
fLfVAIED LEDS THAN 000 000
(
IIIXED gtflgQI
.000 AIR(
~
LEVEL AROVE
~000 55
Page 3 of 14 TABLE22 AVERAGEANNUALRELATIVECONCENTRATIONS KukkMkh<<rs DID Electr tc OTOtten QM-LEVEL %EL%A%%
1996 2<<tbo OAT OKCAT, LMIEFLKTKD ON%ECTED FM Mfa TKOOAIII KECIKCIILATIMVatdo OFKCIAI.
TKERAI% ADASTlOOT FACTMO AOIAIAL AVE%Ada CfI/O I%%CA%Tab C1%401 DIOTAOCE IQ IIILKO
%EOTM
~ ZSO
.$44
~?$ 0 1.000 1 500 2<<000 2.SDD 3.000 3.$ 00 4.NO 4.500
%%III II%M II ION W
%%II kkC Of I
EOE Of
%%C 1.147%-05 4<<041a-44 2.294%-06 1.48CE<<N 7.747E-DT 4.931%-4? 5,433K-OF 2.394%-07 I.?tbf-or 1.529%-07 1.044%-
7 2<<657% 0$ 8.$ 85% Db $.484%.06 3,213%
06 I.diff Ob I,tobt 06 8,$ 70% Dr $.953%<<or 4<<23%% 07 3.248% 07 2 SIR 4.?dbf 45 1 505E 0$ 9 035%.04 $.928% 04 3,290K 06 2<<154% 06 T.%53K 06 1 ~ltif 06 ~,Jbbf O'F 4.S4OE 07 5,189% 0?
I.149%-04 $.48M.0$ 2.135E 0$ I.CSSE.OS 8,346%
06 S.715%
D4 4~ 06 5 151% 06 WSQ 04 1 907L 06 1 5?$ %
5.921%
OS 1.844%.0$ 9,?ESE 06 6.ISN N 3.~~
Z<<127% 06 1.515% 06 'l.NSE Ob 8,004K 0? 6.423% 07 S,ttbf.o?
2.925%
OS 9-267% 06 $.234%.06 33XSE 44 1.898% 06 1 219%.06 ~.5$JE 4? 6<<ZSJE.OF 4<<?ME Or 3.790F DT 5<<102%.
3 ~ IS%'05 1 ~ 019%
OS $.979% Oi 3 ?82% 06 Z.ISO% Db 1.372! 06 9,?SN 4??
246% 07 S,boff 07 4,4?DE 07 3.4QK 2.264% ~ 0$ ?.dbif 04 4.754E 06 3.3?df 06 I.DOSE 06 1 ~ 141% 06 8.489%HP 6.09M-D? 4,509% 07 3.744% 4? 3.1?OE-t.boo%
0$ O.JFIE Db C.FOSK M 2 989%
Ob I.TSCE ob l,toia 06 9,05$ E 47 d.5?DE 07 C,948E-OT 4.457%
OF S.SOTK-2.746E 4$ ~ 922% 06 S<<4doE.06 3.894%
Ob 2.090K Ob 'l<<41bf 06 1.0$ 6E 06?AOOE.O?
S<<843% 07 4.?72%
OF 3<<99M z.ccdf.o$ 8~ 06 4.855% 44 3.046E ob 1.?59%
46 1 175f 04 8,497% 07 6,434% 07 4.963% 47 4 1'l?a-o? 3,481E 07 I.162% ~ OS 3.949E.06 2.2%1%<<46 1.543% 06 8.186% Or 5.$45%.4? 4<<IZN 0? 3<<148%-0? ZA94% 07 t.094% P07 I1. %.
4.659%.44 1-65dt 46 9.22% 07 S.SCJE.OF 2 %45L.O? I<<864% 07 T.lldf Or 9<<4&1% Ob?<<'lot% 08 $.49JE.M 4.474K-ob 4<<srtf -ob t.539%.06 O.bid%-or 5.'Inf-or 2.635%-07 I.bta.or I.MIE-OT 7.?SSE-N
$.?STK-N 4.325%-N S.SDSE-M S.$ 67E ~ Ob 1.941f Db I.ICOE-06 7 413% 07 5.8JIE OT 2 591C-07
'I 635% 07 1.145% 07 7.449% N 5 645%
Ob 4.214F DO 6.489% 44 2.244% 44 1.513% 46 7.944%.07 C.DOOE OT 2,441% 07 1.8?SE 0? 1.522% 07 9.624% 08 7.024% N $.144K N AkaUA Al%AAlk CNI/O IOEC/kfIt% CLSGI)
DISTAOCE Id IIILKO
~IAktka
$.444 T.SOO 10.444 lb.OOO 24.000 2$.040 JO.tXR 35,000 40.004 CS.IRD 50.000 5<<434K 10 1 ~ 138%.D9 3.909E. 09 8<<349%.49 1.484% 09 1,647% ~ 49 1.68$ E.09 2 Obtf 09 2.94CF-D9 2,375%-09
- 2. 272E. 09 3<<DIFF <<09 S. Iddf.lo 3.111%-14 I,DSCE 10 2.422%
10 1
503% 10 9.7$ 5F 11 J.FJJE 10 Z.CZIE 10 Z.Dora<<49 1.339%<<09 3.446E.09 1.6?FE.IS 5,726K-lo 3.112%
10 2<<STDE-10 I.ZDFE 14 4 '19JE ID 2.264%
~ 10 I ~Ittf-49 6 557E 10
'l<<411E-09 $.66%% lo 1,054% 49 4.5?TK 10 9.94$ E 10 $ ~'919K.10 I,TZZC.09 1.0$ 1E 49
'1.9?lf 'lo 1.'lltf 10 bASIE 11 4,$ 59%
11 4.4%OK 11 S.ZSM.II 9<<SME <<11 SA99F.11 b<<072%
11
$.129% II I ~ 003%
10 O.ibtf 11 TASTE 10 d<<296C.IO 7.021%-10
$.9?OE-IO 1 29$ F 10 I 095% ~ 10 4 24?E 11 3<<59?E ~II 9 382%<<I I ~ 7,944% <<11 3<<537%
'to 2 809% ~ 10 2AO'FE.14 2.19?%. IO 3.811%.10 5.'%II% IO 3 127%
14 2 442K 10
$.434% 14 4<<772% 'lo
$ <<869%-11 4.951%
11 I<<8%8%-11 1,594%
11 8.953%<<IZ 7 574% 12 2<<?55%
11 2.309% I'I kkf ttf COC f
CFC Of Sit CNI/0 IOFC/IIET 40 SO lo<<44 24 30 ID ~ 20
%%PC%I OtkkeAOIC5 Ill II!LES C.S 5 10 2 <<'5 b1 ofCI ICa fkDI %III 5'M I 745% Dr C<<'551% Df 8.542%
- 2. 412% <<04 O.FICt 47
- 4. 794%-07 5.445E<<or 4.47DE.07 S.O?2%. 4 7 5.9ibf<<DF
$.441E 07 2.529K 07 F,t4$ C M 4.024E.DD 9.929% M 2.145% <<OF 6 OAF% Dr 2.122E 0?
I 327E 07
'I.SDSf OF 1.432% Or I bblf Or I.FFFK or 1.59bf 07 8.495% 08
" Z.OJTE.N
~.072%.47 I,Oh% ~ Oi 3 ~'571E ~44 O.5JOF ~ 44 l,iobL 04 1.916% 46 t.lbof Ob 1<<b?7%
44 I.TOCE M 2.191%
Db
'I.FOJF 04 O,bttf.4?
J.otdf.or Z.JFJF Db 5<<029%
04
~.99IC Ob Z ~ 151E 0$
1.009E I5 5 ZOOF Oi
$.95 IF M C.OJIt Db C.TKSC Db S.btOC'Ob C<<btbf Ob 2.324% Oi
'9.ZZIE OT lAl/C <<07 8.45$ C 07 1.542% 04 C,ttbf Ob 1.$ 44%.44 8.$ 95F<<OT
47 1.0lra Db 8.408%. 47 c,IIJE 0>
I ~ 3144 ~ OF I.obof or 7.5TZL 07
'$. 2?5% ~ 07 1.585%
Ob
$.244%
D?
3 17?E 47 J.b?ik OT 3.145K.07 J.C59C 07 4.005%-0?
3 A?Ff.07 I ~ Fddf ~ OF 4 ?DIE Od 6.$ 59% IS 1.9llt N 4.29JC-N 1.354% 0?
3 862% M Z.OJOF <<M 3 AbOF<<48 J.MJE N 4<<IQCK 08 J.btSE<<N 3<<742% N 2<<644%<<M 4,748%
09 8.655E 10 3<<025% <<IS D.ODD% IS 2.064% <<M 4851% M 4 719E 09 S<<155% IS 4.845% 49 6<<959% 09 S <<677%-09 4.457K<<09 r.inf.o9 I 099K<<09 1.8$ 4F ID 5.4'17%
14 2.29bt 09
- 4. OSSE<<09
?<<905%
10 S.OTSF 14 7 Orb%
14 I 213% 09 IANE-09 l<<tblf 49 1.20df -IS 2<<065%
09 2 572%<<IO 6.814a-ll l<<565% 14
~.?79%-10 9 S22%.14 1 759%-10 6.568%
11 1<<t??%
10 4<<095%
10 5<<362%
14 4.408%
1D S 775f<<ID 6.?$ %% 14
? 202%
11 kkM kkf Eka C
56 8.595C OO 3.79M<<M 1.91$ F 08 4.lbof 09 1<<911% 49 4.559%
10 2.079% 4/ 9.289F DO 4.97%% 08 1.532E M b.bblt<<fS 2<<3%4%-09 C.A@If.OT 2<<49bt.or 1.12OE 07 3.255% ~ OD 'l.579C N d<<9lbf 09 1.335%<<ob 6.?9M<<DF S.brat 47 'l,407% 07 4.$2if M 1,574%
0%
4.372%.4/ Z.otit Or 1.072E 07 2.877% N I ITSL-M 3<<147% 49 F.bott or 1.29bf 47 F.II%.M Z.lllf-M1,449f 48 3.%35% ts 5.464% ~ 07 1.5$4f OF ~.4$ 1f M 2.974E ~ OO I.ZZ/% DO l,bZFE 09 2.697% ~ 07 I.CCSE ~ OF T.OOOL N 2,5SSE Ob I ~ DFSF M 3<<46CC 09 S.OCif or 2.492L 07 I ~ 09$ E 07 Z.OIOF N 1.590E 08 4.14M 09 5.)OFL Dr 1 ?9M 07 9.$ 49% M Z,OZTE'08 I<<ttbf N 4 JTJF 09 2.962%.07 1.4oif OF 9<<0544 N 3.381K.M 1AOAF M 4.225E.09 1.$ 3SE OF O.tf9l 08 $ <<ZSIC 08 2.$ 41% M 1<<JJOt<<N 7<<195%<<49 5.9524'08 2 DOSE ~ 08 I IICF Od 4.0894 09 2 OCOE 09 I DCOE 09 2 4QE Di 'I IIIE Ob d<<243%
49 2 Srbf 00 l<<ZJSC 09 b<<drbE
'lo 5.592%-08 1.284f NI F.JC?t 49 2<<863% ~IS I.IOZF ~IS $ <<795% ~ 10 C.ICZE M I<<btbC 08 d<<991% 09 3.2/OF 40 I 394%-09 4.%24%
14 Ek CteCDI FM EACe %fate%at
Page 4 of 14 TABLE22 AVERAGEANNUALRELATIVECONCENTRATIONS 1.099j 07 l.b24E.07 1.05RK 07 ESE 0.59KE-07 Z.74ZE-07 SK 1.141E.Ob 3.907K-07 SSK T.E93E Db 4.299j 07 VERI AC) WILD)XI PARAÃETRRST RELEASE NEIRNT (NETERS) 0 IANETER (NETERS)
EXIT V(LCX:Itt (IVSEC )
9 bO
.00
~00 RE%. VINO NKIQIT (ICTERS) 10e0 QJILDINle NKIRRT (lCtERS) b1.3 RLDC.NIR.CRS.SEC.AREA tSO.ICTKRS) f575.0 NEAT EN(SR)IXI RATE (CAL/SEC) o0 At TNE IKARSfD MIND NEISNT ( 10+0 IRTERS)T VENT RELEASE IXOE IIINO SNEEO OETKRSfSKC)
STASLE CW)IT(ITS ELEVATED LESS TNAS 000 WINED KllRSI
.IXX) Ail
.000 CRAB) LEVEL AROVE
~ IX)0 AT TME RELEASE NEICNT!
I VERT RELEASE IREE MIIO KNEED (NETERSMC)
I ELEVATED LEIS 'TNAN
.000 I
N ISED
~III'&
0(e ~
000 I
cmae LEVEL ASOVE
.000 I
II)NO SNEED (~RSISEC) tSSTASLE7XEIITRAL ~IT)(XIS LESS TNAN
.IX6 NEtiKEk
~000 A%
~IXX)
ASOVE
.000 5.77)EW M77E.N I,E44E N 2.72% 09 b.754K.IO 1.544K-IO 2.57IE-IT 7.05EE N 4.334K Im 1.509K N 3,1)7E.09 S,1$ 5E 10 0.7QE.II 1.53)E 11 9AbIE N 5.33)E-N Iofbff N 3.710K 09 d.f95E.TO 1.21%
10 3.39bf.tl
Page 5 of 14 TABLE22 AVERAGEANNUALRELATIVECONCENTRATIONS 8 eyuelises Kteee KIectric Stet(en C81%.LEVEL KKLElKf.
'f006 8<<000 DlY DEClY, 0%0LKTED Ca%ECTED FN CD%1 TEE%AID KKCIECILlTINIIEIKC KFKCIAL TEKRAIIIbILII~KTFaCTNS ARRL'. ATE%aft CNI/O CSECflCTEK C1$KOT DIKTIKCE IK IIILKK KECTa e2SD I
500
.750 1.0%I 1 500 Z.MD
~ R.SM S.IXS 3.500 4<<000 4<<500 5
KQI NJ M%M M
~ SII eef ef tet E
KSE EE SSE I.NTE <<DS SA0$ %-04 2.051%<<oa 1.503K-06 4A00%-07 4.1am-07 Z.atf-m 1.910%<<07 2.517E OS ll.855%-06 4.540%<<06 2.%24%-06 1.592%.06 1.006%<<06 7.011%-07 4.755%~
4.Q5% 05 L<<ST%% 0$ 8.07% 06 S.tltt 06 2 8132 06 1<<800% 06 1<<272%
Ob 0<<062%.07 l<<OSIE<<04 3<<185%.0$
1.909E ~ 0$
1.27%% 0$ 7<<104%.06 4.777%+ 3.54M 04 Z.SINN S.&1DE DS 1 48%E<<05 K.TSZE Da 5,410f Db 2<<%04% 04 1<<Fr%a 06 1<<242% 06 8<<739% IP Z.mt 0$ ~.48$t 06 4<<481K<<06 2<<036%
Ob 1.623% 06 1<<010% 06 7<<011% 07 5.022%
OF 2.002%
0$ Q.SZZE 04 S<<54SE.O& S<<325K 06 I<<821%.06 1 ~1468M 7<<076% 07 $ <<832% 07 2 145f 05 Te180%<<06 4<<ZSCK 06 2 067% 04 1 $43%<<04 0<<865%<<07 6 05M Cl 4 800K 07 2.463%
0$ 7..46C%.06 4.276%
Ob 2.62%% 06 1.400t 06 1.005t 06 l<<4'IRK 07 5<<284% m 2.602%-0$ a.m0E<<06 5.050%<<Da S.alateoa 1.7%4%-06 1.184E<<06 DA42%-m 6.1TSK<<IP 2.5'17%.0$ 7 623% 06 4.310f 06 2.603K.06 1.485%.06 0,799E.07 l<<105f.ol 5<<164%.07 1.101E.OS 3<<611%.06 2<<CITE 0& 1,3$ SE 06 4.08a IP 4A15%.CF 3444% 07 2 5t1%.07 4.412%<<06 1,.SISK Ob 8.234% Dr iA44% Dr %Ala% Dr 1 $51% m 1 maf 07 7 5%1% N i SIDE 06 1.407%<<M 7.693L-IP 4.53TC 07 2 tiiE m l<<339%M 8.~ N 6 1%7% N
$.271%<<06 1<<lrsf <<06 1.01%%-06 6.$ 02%-07 3.tait <<or 1<<0FEK.-m 1~If-m 8.82M-N S.raaf ~ Da 2 044K 06 Iolrtt 06 4.060t 07 S<<474% m 2 ~ 194% 07 1<<527% 07 l<<057% 07 1840E<<07 1 053%<<OF 8.002%-N 3.39% 07 2.534% 07 1<<03% 07 4<<644.OF $.1'12%<<07 4.004%-07 1<<847% 06 l<<492% 06 l<<214% 0&
6MOK.OF $ <<026E 07 4<<035%.07 S.X5$% Ol 2.04SE 07 2~ IP 4.442% 07 3.400% 07 2<<KDTK<<m 3.)rlt m 2,025% CF ZA43% 07 3<<01M m 3<<ldTK 07 2<<609E OF 4<<50m.m 3<<723% 07 3;CTDE 07 3<<010% 07 S.ROSE 07 RA72% OF
'l.046%<<07 1 42SE Ol 1~ 07 5.$0M.M 4A14K.OK 3.575%-08 4.529% 08 3%2% 08 2.$ 25% 08 4.01)E-N 4J7QE-M S.t10E<<N T.Sabf<<08
$.459%-N 3.029%-N AIULNL AVfcacf CNI/O (SEC!I%TEE CHEST Sfislec 5.000 7 $00 10.DN DIKTaeCE Ie IIILKS 15.1IO RD.MO 2$ MO 30<<000 3$ <<000 40<<000 4$ <<000 50<<000 4.50$ L 08 I.sblf 07 3.500%.0r 1.010% 06 3.337%.or 1 080f Ol 2.338K -07 2.0$ 4f 07 2.310% ~ Or t.saLF 0'
l.liar<<DT 1.1&DE.CF t.eacf.a 2<<023L 08 2.5$ &f 08 5.1TIF
~ CUEtOI I WV eef teLf EKE Sf SSE Col/O ISFC/eFTF 2.734K Ob l<<SRTE N 6.747% N 3.4%Of Ob
\\.SR%K Dr 7<<020%-N 4.9blE IP Z.S80E 07 1.4%
Or 7.540K.a 0.444K M S.DOTE.DD I Isif 07 6<<078% M 1.0$ tf.07 S.SSIE.OK 1.522fem 7.4TDF 0%
1.5DLt 07 4 48tt 08 I.Iarr 07 4.?0$f.08
$.0$0f 08 3.614E M 1,440% <<a 7.470%.00 7 Drlf<<09 4 29$ E 00 0.21%%
00 S<<DL&f 00 I last 08 4<<Trit'a CN EACN 0%0%%7 2.859%
09 1<<18n D0 3.020%
10 1<<086%<<10
~.447%
11
$.346%
11 1.011f NI 4.210f<<00 'lA53%<<00 4.740%<<1D t.lait<<10 1.372%
10 2<<144E DK 1<<009K N 4<<2%4% 09 2.350% 09 1<<1%6% 09 7.7TDE 10 d.715E N 2.901% a 0.TDLE 00 5 054% 00 1 820% 00 0.7%n 10 I 021% a 7 $31% 00 1 050% 09 1<<CZIE 09 3<<407%
10 l<<820% 10 1 560K.M 6.750% 00 2.3%5%-09 0<<751E 10 1.413%
10 7.51$ E 11 1.0rbfoa 7.824% 00 Z.titf D0 1.014% 09 2.448%
10 1<<300K<<IO 1Aeaf<<a 4.%5OF.OO 2.150t 09 I,tsit 09 6.561E 10 3.750E 10 I 0$rr a 8 Crit 00 '5<<laTK 09 1<<760E 09 S<<801%<<10 3<<237%
10 1.848& 08 7.762%
09 2.475%.09 l<<41t%.09 4<<127%
10 S.TSTK 10 Z.tltf 08 8.7636 00 2.543%.00 1 324%.00 S.baa 10 3.274%
'ID 1.647E.08 ~.Zaf 00 a.taaf 00 2.1%6% 09 9.54%K 10 $.4%0%
10 2.450t 00 1.254K 00 4.11%E.10 2<<032f.10 1<<084%
10 6.153%
11 1.$ 31% 09 7.$67E<<10 3.023F ID I.lait 10 4A% 11 2<<431E ll 1.8&IF.O0 T.tret<<10 Z,Z20t ~ 10 1.0&bf<<10 S<<626%<<11 1<<71&E 11 2 ~ 10bE 09 8<<510%
10 2.8tlf 10 1 9&5% 10 5.18$ E 1'I 2.012% ll 3.253% ll 2.402%
11 5<<570%
11 4.6272 11 4.247%
10 3.547%
10 4.0$4f 10 3.380%
10 TAHE<<11 d.237%<<11 teissf 11 2.044% ll 5<<354%
11 i<<451K 11 lAKOE 10 I.SSN<<10 1.463%
10 1.213%
10 t<<126%<<10 1 ~ 762%
10 1.4DIE 10 1<<402%
10 2.071%.1D 2 461 ~
10 3.055%
11 Z.Slaf ll 0.812K<<12 D.NZK 12 4AZTK 12 3.82M lt 1AlOE 11 l<<141E<<ll OIRS CTIOI stOt SITE S
csM SVle ec Eef f
<<$ <<I 2<<Obit 06 4.$ 1(f oa 8.0hE a 1.0>FF 01 0.0&st ~ 0&
4.750%
Ob
$ 331% oa 4.QSE Da 4.205%
oa S.zzst oa 4.330%. 06 2.aiE 06 8.2'riE OT 6.024%. 07 l.aaf ~04 Z.Deaf Oa T.)Sit 06 2.027%
Ob
'IAiaf 0&
1,855% ~ Da 1.41tf <<04 1>>SIDE 04 I<<Nlt 06 1*SZDK 06 7<<SHE <<07 2 $05%<<DT
- 2. WE-07
~.05at 07 1.tbrf 04 3<<irlf 06 1.23%%
Ob r.Calf <<Dr 8.0irf Or 4.007t m T.tait m
~.SNE.07 7<<047%.m 3.341% Dr
'I DTSF<<or 1 305F Dr SASDF OT
- 4. ntt <<Or
- 1. ~164.04
~.52%% ~ Dr 3.070F <<OF 4.4%0% 07 S.TDLE Ql 4.0ttC ~ 07 4 llifOF
- 4. 002%. 07 1.00$ f<<07 S.ntf
<<0%
8.154f <<a 1 082f<<07 4<<075% 07 1.225f <<06 4.0/Of.07 Z.alit .
07 2.838%.07 RAitf.IP t<<HTE.CF S.OKTK.07 2A7tf Ol
\\ )TIE<<m 3.508%
08 58 2.947% 08 7 300% M 1<<$ 97% Cl S
068% 07 1.570% 07 0<<802% M 1 ~ 148%. 07 1.053%<<07 1.36M.07 1 304%&7 1 1648 OF d.lTDE N l<<480% N Sf~el RRJC7ARICS Ie RILE%
34 4 5 5<<10 10 RD 4.422% 09 1<<207% N 2.032% N 0 2%2% N 2,45)E N 1,035% N 2.3STK<< 08 2 00TE 08 2<<74IR eM 2.453% N 2.525t M 1,71TE<<08 3.142%.09 Sotadf 10 1.8lr% 00
$.042E<<00 1W1% N S<<07DE.09 2.9%0% 00 3<<2%0% 00
- 5. CZSE << 00 4.315%
00 3.526t 00 S.nit<<OD iADSE D0
- d. $6R%.10 1<<053%
10
)oint 10 1.345%. 00 ZA19%-09 4<<751%
1D 3.$43%<<10 iotlet<<10 7<<144K
'ID
~.Zsa 10 7<<50lt 10 4<<012% 10 1 140% 09 1.433%
10 40 50
')A&5% I'I
~ TA)0% ~ 11
$.032%.10 5<<501% 10 1 010% 10 3.80tf O'I 7.297%
11 te)%<<10 1<<806K-$ 0 2<<44%% 10 2<<054% 10 3.5%5%<<10 S,TTM 11
Page 6 of 14 TABLE22 AVERAGEANNUALRELATIVECONCENTRATIONS ESK 7.70SK 07 2o35TE 07 0.902K OR SK
'i+023K 04
.3 414K 07 M&K07 SSE 1.140K Ob 3.4032 07 1.517E 07 VERT A@I aIILDI>>4 PARAW:TERS)
RELEASE>>K)CRT
( anaa) 9.40 DIAMETER (ICTClS) 00 EXIT VKLOCITT (II/SEC )
N 4.554E (6 2o5$ (K OS
.. 4.109K (S 3314K-(a 7.413K N 4 0772 OS RKV. UIRD RElCÃT QCTEN) 10.0 NJILDII>>
RKISÃT (lETKRS) 4'1,3 SLDS.IllkeCRSoSKCAkKA (SO.ISOTERE) 2575+0
%AT KillSKI& RATE (CAL/SKC)
.0 AT T>>t ICA5LtD UIRO RElCRT ( 10.0 I%TERS)I VnT RELEASE IKSIK UIRO SrEKD (IETtkk/SEC)
STARLE CISSIITIORS ELEVATED LESS TRAS
.ON
.000 I
II)RED
~HIKQI ON ill
.ON CROWD LEVEL ASOVE eON AT T>>K RELKASK IKIRNTI VERI RELEASE WSIK UI5) S>>KED (%TERS/SKC)
UIC) ESSED (I%TERS/SEC)
ISISTuLE/S KUTRAL C(SCI TI(SIS LESS TSAR eON
~KTlCKN
+ON ~
.NO ASOVE
+000 LESS 'T>>AS 000 OCTA SS 000 ASD ASOVK e 000 KLKVATKD IIISKD~ LEVEL 9.042K 09 1 KE 09 boNL-10 7.50k 11 1.34)E-II 1.099K 00 2.0%.09 3.10%- 10 4.051K 11 0 041K-.12 1M%
2.452K 09 3,755K-10 4.737K 11 1.743K-11 59
Page 7 of 14 TABLE22 AVERAGEANNUALRELATIVECONCENTRATIONS 0 IKECTID FSISI SiTE S
SSM SM QQt V
LSW W
Ical I>>
INK SK KSK E
ESL Sf ssf 0I SECT I Ol FKIN CITE Z.X OICLCTID
.S-l
>>aQc SIT(
T.ZIPL.O8 st
'.661K.M 1.967% ~ Oh gav 3.?l?f OS V
1.75tf,.ob I.OSSE Ob gv I,Slaf OS IW 1.401% M T.SXrf M Ief I,P?PK ~ 08 10 20 40 $0 1.322%-09 2.005% N
?.XPOK N 4.463%. 09 1.4'ISE N l,tea% N TASM OP 1.74?t. Dp Z.DZRE N R.S41E.OP XAhaf op Z.IPjfiN
? rozf lo
- 5. 7?Xf.10
~.Pcot~lb ToooSK 09
- 6. 175%.10 9.?44f
'I O
- l. 15 OK.N 2.170%. 09 8.4OIK 'lo
$.9'Ilf~ lo P.Xaaf 10 SAilj.10 1.034K.N I.XOPf OP 1.790t 09 1.2XOL OP
$.90$t lo 2.7lnt lo 3.932K 10 4 792%~10
$.622%-09 S.ROKE.N 4.3NF~N
'l.llrE M S.CXÃ-N
- 3. ZtÃ.OP 4.75M OP 4.5%7% iN 4 rspL 09 d.tPM.09 SooNE~N S.RSR OP Z.DOLE.N 1.434K.N 2.49Jf op 2.4%It N J.a?af
\\0 S.olof 10
- d. 421E.10 1.24M OP 4.945%
1D 3.489%- TO Se565E 10 So366%.10 hA?M lo Solohf 10 1 ~ 14$f-09
~ oobtf 10 2.37R%.10 To522%.10 2+018% 10 R.44?%-10 1.934% 12 3.937% lt s.sap% -1?
4.9356-Tt R.TTXK 12 3.325%
12 5 ~lolE 12
$.507% ~ 'lR 4.637%
12 7.785%
12 TAPZK-TT RECT%
11 4.110K 12 2.236%
1'R 1ohlf-Tt 2.15CK 12 T.tat%
13 1 457%. H S.O56E. 13 3.16%
13 T.?SM 1C 3 7IQE. 14 1 CSOK-13 3ACOE g 3.451%
13 4 Pabf.g 7.05%.g 1>>hof-12 2>>257%.g 7>>12%
1C Cott5% li PoSCTE 14 1.696K 11 2.888%-11 X.r?4E ll T.SCZE-11 2.612%-11 2.347%- TT 3.97%%.11 4.050%
11 3>>444%.11 5.724E-11 P.brlf \\1 P.XZM 11 IDPI%~11 1.013%
'11 1,175%
11 1Allf 11 1.174t 10 1.726%
Io R.ZS'If. Io
- 4. 6OXf-I0 1.7RCL.TO Toto?%
10 2.115%-10 2.1$ 3E-TO 3.044%
1D 3.207%-10 4.725K 10 XA54% 10 9.414% ll
$.145%
11 4A15E 11 TAPPK 11
'3.70M~13
'6.314K F13 1 ASTE 12 1.$ 05% lt 3.864%.13 3.7ZIK 13 6.267%kg T>>mf.lt 1,57DE 12
'1.57XE lt 2.469K. IZ SATZE 12 8.777%.13 C,OTCE g 2>>623%eg 3>>733%eg 2.S22E.DS 1 o638% 'Ob T.OIXK OP S.911E ~ 09 b.Z1OE 09 P.ZXSK OP 60 Suwlofhaea Steaa ELDCtl'IC'Static>>
CRaR L$%L KELK4SE CRKETS fN NSI TRQlN RElRQIAT1I llli>>SOCIAL TElllllNXR1%lT Flat SKLATTVE OEPOSTTTM PKK NTT hkfa pl++ Q hT F)XZD POINS Ir MNJIN KECTOKS DlST1SCKS 18 DILXS
~ ZS
.50,7S 1.M 1.50 RAO t,50 3,00 3,50 4 00 4.50 d>>445K.OS 2.263% M 1. TPM-M 7.1PZE ~ OP 3.396%-09 2-007% 09 lATSE'N 8.TDdf 10 S>>994%-10 4>>437%-10 3.361%-10 9.104f-ob 3.039%
Ob 1.657%
Ob 9.?SM 09 $.071E N 3>>025% 09 2 D11E 09 1&19% 09 8.939% 'lo 6-SS5K 'lo C.MZE 10 1 0066-07'X+437% M To98$ E M 1.219% M bootlf 09 3.583% N RD7% 09 1 605E~N T.TZSE 09 8.314%-10 6.284K-TO 1 49M.CT 3.299% 08 3.289% M Z.l'11E M 1.046% M 6.5% N 4 504%-09 3,019% N R>>099E-09 1>>597%-N 1.246% 09 9.671K-M 3.313%
DS T.~ 08 1 ~ OO4E-OS C,TICE N R,TQg 09 1AOCK 09 1 201% 09 8417%
10 6413%
10 4.MCK 10 S.746E M 1.951E M 1 041E.M d. TTCE 09 3.114%
DP 1AZXE 09 1
144%
OP 4.07%
10 5 764E-10 4>>413%-10 XaaSRE 10 8.396E 08 RASP% 08 1.S5$ E M P.ldlf 09 CAltf 09 2>>TRSK N Taboo% 09 1>>260% N 9>>243%
10 T.OCCE 10 5.4%
10 4AZOE OS ZA$4% M 1A46K M 9,004%-09 4.304% 09 2 592% D9 1.74M 09 1.17% 09 8.195%
1D 6.590f 10!,357K-TO 4.607L 08 Z.bbif ~ 08 1.S15K M 8.79SE.OP 4.617% N RPTSE DP tACPE N T-CCXK N 1 OCSK OP TA80%.10 d>>319% 10 9.7136 08 3.624E M 1.90% M 1.215% 08 5.866f 09 XA7M 09 2 56CE 09 TollSE 09 1>>271%.09 1>>00'lf 09 ~+069% 10 1.345%-07 4.631K-M RAPbf-M l.afhf-of T.araf -N 4.83CE-N 3.37%6-N 2.$%-09 1.756%-09 1A01%-N T.Tiff-N D.lit% OS ) Pacf M 1 $88% M 1.011E.M 4>>901E.09 3o103% 09 2.187% N T.SPM.N 1
ROPE OP 9 7?tf 10 8.109E 10 X.PCIE.M L~ M 6.OOZE.N Xiollf-N1>>Mdf 09 1~V% DP 7.66M 10 S.tblf 10 3.41'lf 'lo 2.954% 10 R.XSZE 10 Xo$004 08 1.127% M $.831% 09 3.29'IE.09 1 SXSK N 8AZ?E 10 $.6XM '10 31856K 10 2>>761%.10 R>>004%
10 lACK 10 4.434% M 1.48?f ~ OS 8.106% 09 4+958% N RMTK 09 TIXTIE 09 bob?5%
'lo Se716%
10 3.803%
10 2.7DM 10 1.9$4f 10 4.863L ob L.TRIK.M9.234K-N S.RCSE-N 2.463K.N 1.494K-N 1.006%-09 6.74M-TO 4.745%-10 3.343%-10 2.371K-TO OISTaKCES 1% IIILES S.oo 7 50 10.00 1$.00 20,00 2$.00 30.M 3$.00 40.00 4$.00 50.00 5
Z.d'rif 10 L.054%-10 5.129%-11 1 ~0$%-11 4.4gK 12 1 425%
12 7.067%
13 2.%% g TA34K 13 1>>NPK 1$ 8>>967%-14 Q>>
3.888K.TO 1.537E-'IO 7.867E-11 Zot22E 11 ~.966E lt X.OOaf lt 1 Dao%~It 4 ZSbf g Ro647%-13 1>>057%
13 bob31f 14 D>>
5.031%
10 R.MTE 10 1.0$ ZE 10 Z.TIIK: ls 1.199f 11 4.465%
12 2.S77E 12 1 252%
12 7 9b4E 13 C.241E 13 3.462% 'g l>>S>>>>
1.004E ~ OP 4.2?7%-10 Z.IX% lo S.SPt TI R.OSM 11 &$37% lt X.ROSE lt 'l ~ 111% 12 So758% g ZADM 1$ 1ATTE g I>>
3.9ohf ~ 10 1.547%
10 7.651% ~ 11 1.83M~11 6.795%~12 'l.dbrf~It 8.464% ~ 13 2.724%>>13 1 Alt%>>1$ 5.639%-14 4,60M.TC WV Z.rbaf 10 1.2CM 10 6.233K.TI T.fhaf ll ?.655%
1Z R.hllf.l? I.CI lt 1.453% g T 534%
14 RAPE 14
'1 965% ~ 14 W
LAST% ~ lD l.coif lo 1.04?% ~ lo 3.?Nf ll '1.2$lf 'll Xoahrf 12 IoSZM~TR XI610f 13 Tab?if 0 7.475%~14 6.1Dlf ta 4.XPTL IO R.obtt 10 T.obhf 10 3 229%
11 1.263% 'll 3A27% lt 2.141%
12 1.123% 12 6.307%
13 X.'lD'lf 13 2.$31% 13 a
$.478%
10 3325% lo lAhlf TD a.ohtf 11 1,797% ll ToaaPK'Tt 3.407%.12 1 ~ 109E 12 5.967E g 2.64% g 2.14ZE g Ill>>K a.air? lo X. Toit 'Io 1.SOIK 10 4.311K ll 1 739f 11 5.831% ~ Tt 3.OCXK lt T.Z?M.lt 7.4ZXE-TX 4.243%
13 SAT%K-TX 9.4ZZL lo 4.$ 79%.10 ZAbrf~ 10 4.603%.11 3.324K-TI P.ioPE ~ 1? a.rctf I? I.PPSE.TZ 1.139% ~ 12 5.792%.13 4>>728%
13 a.Tort lo 3.253K ~ 10 1.983%-10 D.PXSK-Ti 4.353%-1i Z.tllf-11 l.iNP-Tl 4.754%-12 2.7?5%-12 T.CRM-TR T.lhaf-lt C
~
1.9246 ~lo 8.952%
1'I 4.853% ll I.abof 11 T.PXIt lt SAlK lt I 807% 'lt 6 603% 13 '3 708K-'13 'lAZ3K 13 l.l0% 13 ESK I.i?of-lo 4.411E ~ll Z.alhf ll SACPf.lZ 4,2344 12 2.1686 lt 9.4166-13 ZAPPK 13 1.296E 13 5.174%
14 4.2ZCK 14 I.S?sf lo $.??44'll ZAPIE ll Te051%
11 CoNSK 12 1.ZZPE lt $.?OM.IX 1.945%
13 Pooraf
'la 2.C17%
14 T>>972%
14 1 ~ 8$ $K ~ 10 bohOSK ~'ll X.SSZE ~ 11 1.216%
1'I C.hhff 1?
T.SPCE lt 7.414K 13 2.859%.13 Ti588%
13 7.6D9E
'IC d.211%
14 SflaTIVf ofKCITIW PKS VIII affh I~'2) ST OtsallIIIO SKCTMS
%%II%ST SIXJCOASIKS II II!LES I t 3 i i.l 5 ~ 10 20 30 30.40
Page 8 of 14 TABLE22 AVERAGEANNUALRELATIVECONCENTRATIONS SKLEASK KK1kNT (IKTKSS) 9AO DJNCTKS
(%TAS) 00 KNIT VKLIXITT (k/SKC )
.OO ELKVATKO LKSS TNAN IIINKD
~Kna!N SRQJQ LEVEL ASOVK F000
.OM AIe,000
. OOO AT TSK LELKASF NKISXTT VENT kKLKASK INDE IIINO SSKKO (~S/SKC)
SKAG. Illml alert OatNt)
T0.0 SIIILOINC NKICNT (ICTUS)
AID SLOO.llflloCSSoKCeASEA (S0.%TA5) 2575+0 NEAT DII SKID kATE tCALlRC) 0 I
AT TNK ISiCtRRD VINO NEISNT ( TO.O ICTfkS)I l
VENT SKLKASK INSK VINO 0%%0 l%7KkS/SKC)
I CTASLK ~ITIN%
t ELEVATID LESS TSAN
'000 NISKO 05ASXI oIXSI AIO
+000 exam LEVEL @X'000 1IINO SSEKO t%TESS/SKC)
LmSTASLK/NKMTSAL~'tTI~
LESS TIWI Ikk)
SKTKSt
.OM~
000 ARN%
+000 61
Page 9 of 14 TABLE22 AVERAGEANNUALRELATlVECONCENTRAT(ONS SuscPCISIKIC St%a KLSctric ttstiIN.
QNRI)-lEYEL NKLEA5E
'SN
\\
SFKCIFIC FOIWTS OF
)ST%SECT OSELEASE TTFK OF 0 IXKCTIIXI DISTASCE X/0 X/0 X/0 D/0 10 LDCAT)Ol (X)LES)
(XETESS) ISED/CM.SKTES) CSZC/CN<<I%TEE)
(SKC/CLR JOTTER)
<FED Cl<<ICIER)
DD DECAT 2<<260 DAT DECAT 8<<NO DAT DKCAT LASN&ETKD WDEPLKTKD DEPLETED 8
Clif eaaDADT C
slit swwDAkr 5
SITE SIlselkr S
CITE 8XACIARY 5I TE 5~GAST C
Clif SCUIIDAAT 5
SI Ii NQkDAST 5
SITE IXJNOMr slit %Ilier)lkr 5
SITE NIRDMr s
SITE sctlolkr 5
slit Sakolkr 5
Slrf SILNOMr 5
$ !TE CIIrrIMr 5:1F easeaar 5
CITK Soaolkr C
sf5IDCrCE 5
ktsIDErcf 5
kfCIDEIICI kfSIDESCL 5
SE5 ID IrCE
- kFSLDtrQ, 5I5 ID%rcf 5
kfSIDE rCF 5
klcIDfrcf 5
kf5 lbfrCL 5
~I5!DtSCL 5
kf5 ID%ref kf5 ID%5CF 5
kfclrrrct 5
kt5 IOKSCI 5
kf5lrlrCF 5
CAADL~
5 olkDfr clkDFr 4
elks t5 5
CAksfr 5
SASDEr 5
SAADKr C
Clrstr 5
CMrtr 5
SMDEI<<
5 CAADfr 5
CAkstr 4
LAADL~
5 cAADEr CACO% ~
5 Dllkr 8
CCII SII lOV M
MSM 81/
NN 8
rrf rf Erf ESE CE Ssf 5
555I SII le@
r rrE rf fkt C
%5%
sf Ssf 5
fSf Sf 55F 5
SIAI ltd
.34
.42.a 1.22 1.07
.47
.64
.$9
~$9
~79
.7D
<<87
~84
.49
.47
.54 1 <<00
~9C 1.$ 0 1 ~ 10 1.20
<<80
.40 1,$0 1.00 t.30 2.10
- 1. 4C
.'SD
~40
.40 1.10 1.20 I. OO I 10 1<<20
'1.30
<<SO 4.00 3.2C 1.10 2.$ 0 ZAD IAC 2.50
~60
~90 3.90 3AO 2 <<00 549.
470.
1315.
19b$,
1649.
992<<
1037.
951<<
1246.
1'l21<<
1398.
1354.
- 796, 478.
549.
1609 ~
- 1448, 741$.
177D.
1931.
1287.
1287.
Pbb.
ZOOZ.
'I609 5702.
338 I.
77$$.
805.
- 946, 177C.
1931.
- 3059, 1770, 1931.
7092.
'1 287.
W$8.
5151.
1 /ID SFDZ.
3%63 tt)3
- 4024, 1448.
42/7.
4879.
3ZZO.
- b. 922%. 06 1.1$0f 05 8.035K Ob 1.108E 0$
$.98M 06 7 IDM 06 7.120%. 06 4.295%
06 4.780f <<04
$ <<212!
Ob 5.38%-04
- 1. 863% <<04
- 7. 493L ~ 07
- 1. 565E ~ 06 2.499%<<04 3 73SE 04
\\.490% <<06 3.887\\ <<06 3.320%
06 1.2slf 01 4 4924 04 4.9)OF 04
$. 63)E ~ 06 6.152%.04 t.134% 04 3.912% 04 9.%3of or S.229E 07 3.256% ~ 07 1. $40% ~ 04 7./lit Ob I. 74ZE ~ Db I.ZSIL 04 2
SZSE 04
- 2. $)OF ~ Ol I.ZSLL 0$
4.492% 06 2.33)%
04
$.4317 04
- 5. 8$ $ 1
~ 07 5.9)rr.07
$.383%
06 O.S39%
Dr 4.$ 9dt Dr 3.2$ 6C 07 1.090% -07 1.499S
~ 06
'I 017% 06 1.419% 07 6.0$ 1si07
$.788K.06 6<<DISK 06 l.147%<<05 7.994E~ IS 1.099E-OS
$.942% 06 7.074%-06 7.005-06 4.273%<<06 6.757%-06 S. IDPE 06 5.37)E 06 1 <<8S7%. 06 7.672E 07 1.545% 06 2.496K 06 3.732K-06
- 1. 484%.06 3.8bSE.Db 3.289f 06 I 274E 0$
4.654%
Ob
- 4. 894 E. Ob
$.6034 06 4.151% 06 Z. IIIX. 06 3.890E 06 9.733%
07 S.ISIF Dr 3.741K Dr 1.$ 58%.06 Z. )DSE.Db 1.759%
06 I. 275 E ~ Db Z.SIZL'6 2.322%.06 1.274% 0$
4.654%
Ob 7.$ 17% ~ ob
$.603% 06 3.74$ E 07
$.847% 07 3.$ 62% ~ 06 9.733%.07 4.354% Or 3.2llE 07 1 Oslf 07 1AO4% 06 1 015% 04 1.304%<<07 S.951E 07 S.ri$9.04 6.455%-06 1 041f 05 7,114%.04 9.54%-04 S.ZI&.04 6.393% 04 ADA% 06 5<<684% 06 6.120f <<04 4,625%.06 4.817E 06 1.644f 04 6.804% 07 I<<429% N 2.304% 06 3 A%3%~04 1<<303% 06 3AZIE 04 2.812% 06 1.114f <<0$
4,04M 06 4.361% 06 4.992% 06 5.$48E 06 1.829% 04 3A1% 04 D.013% '07 4.30DE.07 2.777E 07 1ADbf 04
- 2. 507%. 06 I.SSOF 06 1.113%
Ob t.ldlE 04 1 948t 04 1,114% 0$
4,04SE 04 Z.IX'b 4.99ZC 06 2.924% 07 4.67$ c or 2.937% 06 8.013f 07
- 3. 567%. 07 2.777%-07 8.806% 08 1.352% 06 8.959% 07 1.087%.D7 4.784%. 07 4<<775% 04 3.999%. N 4<<130% 08 1 ~ 733f OS 1.507% N O.btsf 09 1<<444% N I.OON-N 1 892% 08 2<<246% N 1.723% N 2.8)4% N I<<253% N
$.608K 09
'1.144% 08 1.96SE 08
'5,018% 08 7.192%
OO 1.207% 08 4.019k 09 I <<802%. 08 7.1SSE 09 9.416%.09 TASSE 06 1.542% 08
%DOE 09 1,21$ E*08 3,862%
OO z.srDF. Do 2.134% 09 1.126% 08 2.146% <<08 1 ZOIE N 6.0375 <<OO 7,261%~09 3.934%.09 1,SDZf 08 7 Iat 09 3.969%
09 1.43sf <<N 4.588% -IO I,ZZSE <<09 1<<OZSE-N 3,862% <<09 2.337f 09
- 2. 154K'9 5 629%.10 1.107% N 4.857%-09 4.695%
10 1<<3)9% 09
. 6,575%. 09 62
Page 10 of 14 TABLE22 AVERAGEANNUALRELATIVECONCENTRATIONS S
OAIRT V
8 OAIRT NNV S
OAIRT "
E S
OAIRT ESE 5
OAIRT SE t
SPECIAL LOCATICW VSV 8
SPECIAL LOCATION NE VENT AND SUILO ISO lARANETERST kELEASE NEICNT (NETERS) 9obo OIANETEk (I%TERS)
(RI EXIT VELOCITT (N/SEC ),00 5.00 4i20 4.50 2.7D 2.40 F 50
.70 ELEVATED WIXTD CNQIND LEVEL LESS THAN
+000 SETUEQI
.000 AND
.OOO ANNE Ooo AT TNE RELEASE NLISNIl VES'I ALL%AS% ICE!(
UIND %'EED (NET%AS/SEC)
- 8049, 8740.
7244.
4185.
~0).
1127.
4.51% 07 3.577% 07 4.745E 08 9oSOIE OS 1.518% 07 3 A%7%. 05 5.344E Ob 4 370% 07 3o489EW 4.472% 08 9A18% 08 1.Sob%-07 3ATSE 05 5.329%. Ob 3,354% 07 2.709% 07 3o572E.08 7.dISE-(RI 1~ 07 3.182% 05 4 778% ob
%Etc VIÃ) NEISNT (i%TERS)
To+0 Sl(LOINC NEICNT (WTERS) d1 3 SLOCoNIR.CRSoSECAREl (SO.~)
2575.0 N(AT EN(SR I(NI RATE (CAL/SEC) oo AT TNE WARRED UI NEICIIT ( 10.0 i%TERS)l V%ST RELEASE WSIE
'VI%I %SEED (I%TERS/SEC)
I STARLE C(ke(TIDES I
ELKVAIKD LESS TRAN
~000 NIXED SEnau
.OOO am,000 Ck(SAO LEVEL ASOVE oooo 3.905E-10 8.037%
10 2.351%
10 4.814E 10
~o094%
10
$.294% 08
- 2. 789%~08 VIS) SPEED (I%TERS/SEC)
LSXTASLE/NELITRAL C(SS)ITI(NIS LESS 7NAN 000
~M OOD AND oooo ASOVE,OOO 63
Page 11 of 14 TABLE22 AVERAGEANNUALRELATIVECONCENTRATIONS Attachment 1
1996 Atmospheric Dispersion Estimates for GASPAR Input Selected Locations Sector Direction Location Miles X/0 X/Q Dec X/0 DechDep Deposition 10 SSW Closest Site boundary 0.34 6.922E-06 Max. Site Boundary X/0 0.42 1.150E-05 1.147E-05 6.913E-06 1.061 E-05 6.455E-06 4.130E-OB 3.999E-OB 12 12 12 12 WSW SE WSW WSW WSW NE Max X/0 Residence Max. D/0 Residence Max. D/0 Garden Max D/0 Dairy Tower's Club Riverlands/EIC 1.10 1.284E-OS 0.40 2.711E-06 1.10 1.284E-OS 2.00 5.788E-06 0:50 3.487E-OS 0.70 5.346E-06 1.274E-05 2.708E-06 1.274E-05 5.713E-06 3.476E-05 5.329E-06 1.1 14E-05 2.507E-06 1.1 14E-05 4.775E.06
- 3. 1 82E.05 4.778E.06 1.802E-08 2.146E-08 1.802E-'08
- 6. 575E-09 5.294E-08
- 2. 789E-08 X/0:
X/0 Dec:
X/0 Dec 8 Dep:
Deposition:
RELATIVE CONCENTRATION ISEC/M ) NO DECAY, UNDEPLETED DECAYED {SEC/M ) HALF-LIFE 2.26 DAYS. UNDEPLETED DECAYED AND DEPLETED <SEC/M
) HALF-LIFE 8 DAYS RELATIVE DEPOSITION RATE {1/IVI )
Page 12 of 14 TABLE22 AVERAGEANNUAI RELATIVECONCENTRATIONS 1996 Atmospheric Dispersion Estimates for GASPAR Input Nearest Residence Within 5 Miles of SSES Sector Direction Location Miles X/0 X/Q Dec X/Q Dec&De De osition NNE ENE ESE SE RESIDENCE RESIDENCE RESIDENCE RESIDENCE RESIDENCE RESIDENCE RESIDENCE 1.30 2.134E-06 1.00 3.912E-06 2.30 9.839E-07 2.10 5.229E-07 1.40 3.256E.07 0.50 1.540E-06 0.40 2.71 1E-06 2.1 18E-06 3.890E-06 9.733E-07 5.187E-07 3.241E-07 1.538E-06 2.708E-06 1.829E-06 5.800E-09 3.41 8E-06 1.21 5E-08 8.013E-07 3.862E-09 4.300E-07 2.870E-09 2.777E-07 2.134E-09 1.126E-08 1.406E-06 2.507E.06 2.146E-08 SSE RESIDENCE 0.60 1.762E 06
- 1. 759E.06 1.589E-06 1.291E-08
"'9 10 12 13 14 15 SSW SW WSW W
WNW NW RESIDENCE RESIDENCE RESIDENCE RESIDENCE RESIDENCE RESIDENCE RESIDENCE 1.00 1.490E-06 0.90 3.887E-06 1.50 3.320E-06 1.10 1.284E-OS 1.20 4.692E-06 0.80 4.919E.06 0.80 5.631E-06 1.484E-06 3.868E-06 3.289E-06 1.274E-05 4.654E-06 4.894E-06
- 5. 603E-06 1.303E-06 7.192E-09 3.421E-06 1.207E-08 2.812E-06 6.019E-09 1.114E-05 1.802E-08 4.045E-06 7 185E-09 4.361E-06 9.616E-09 4.992E-06 1.438E-08 16 NNW RESIDENCE 0.60
- 6. 1 52E-06 6.131E-06 5.548E-06
- 1. 842E-08 X/Q:
X/Q Dec:
X/Q Dec & Dep:
Deposition:
RELATIVE CONCENTRATION ISEC/M
) NO DECAY, UNDEPLETED DECAYED (SEC/M
) HALF LIFE 2.26 DAYS. UNDEPLETED DECAYED AND DEPLETED (SEC/M l HALF.LIFE 8 DAYS RELATIVE DEPOSITION RATE I1/M I 65
Page 13 of 14 TABLE22 AVERAGEANNUALRELATIVECONCENTRATIONS 1996 Atmospheric Dispersion Estimates for GASPAR Input Nearest Garden Within 5 Miles of SSES Sector Direction Location Miles X/0 X/Q Dec X/0 Dec8cDe Deposition 2
NNE 3
NE 4
ENE 5
E 6
ESE GARDEN GARDEN GARDEN GARDEN GARDEN GARDEN 3.20 1.10 2.30 2.40 1.40 2.50 5.957E-07 5.847E-07 3.383E-06 3.362E-06 9.839E-07 9.733E-07 4.396E-07 4.356E-07 3.256E-07 3.241E-07 1.090E-07 1.081E-07
" 1.025E-08 3.862E-09 2.332E-09 2.134E-09 5.629E-10 7
SE 8
SSE 9
S GARDEN GARDEN GARDEN 0.60 0.90 1.10 1.281E.06 1.275E-06 1.113E-06 1.499E-06 1.496E-06 1.352'E.06 1.017E-06 1.015E-06 8.959E-07 1.107E-08
- 6. 857E.09 6.037E-09 10 SSW 11 SW GARDEN GARDEN 1.20 1.90 2.528E-06 2.512E-06 2.350E.06 2.322E-06 2.181E-06 1.948E-06 7.261E-09 3.936E-09 13 W
GARDEN 14 WNW GARDEN GARDEN 15 NW 1.20 1.30 0.80 4.692E-06 4.654E-06 2.337E.06 2.317E-06 5.631E.06 5.603E-06 4.045E-06 2.003E-06 4,992E-06 7.1 85E-09 3.969E-09 1.438E-08 16 NNW GARDEN 4.00 3.835E-07 3.745E-07 2.924E.07 6.588E-10 X/Q:
X/0 Dec:
X/0 Dec & Dep:
Deposition:
RELATIVE CONCENTRATION (SEC/M
) NO DECAY. UNDEPLETED DECAYED (SEC/M
) HALF.LIFE 2.26 DAYS. UNDEPLETED DECAYED AND DEPLETED (SEC/M
) HALF.LIFE 8 DAYS RELATIVE DEPOSITION RATE (1/M )
66
Page 14 of 14 TABLE22 AVERAGEANNUALRELATIVECONCENTRATIONS 1996 Atmospheric Dispersion Estimates for GASPAR Input Nearest Dairy Animal Within 5 Miles of SSES Sector Direction Location Miles X/Q X/0 Dec X/0 Dec8cDe Deposition 5
E 6
ESE 7
SE DAIRY DAIRY DAIRY 4.50 2.70 2.60 4.745E-08 9.501E-08 1.518E-07 4.672E-08 9.418E-O&
1.506E-07
S 10 SSW DAIRY DAIRY 12 WSW DAIRY 13 W
DAIRY 3.90 3.00 2.00 5.00 1.419E-07 6.051E-07 5.788E-06 4.518E-07 1.396E-07 5.951 E-07 5.713E-06 4.370E-07 1.087E-07 4.784E-07
- 4. 775E-06 3.336E-07 4.695E-10 1.319E-09 6.575E-09 3.905E-10 16 NNW DAIRY
. 4.20 3.577E.07 3.489E-07
- 2. 709E-07 6.037E-10 0:
X/Q Dec:
X/0 Dec & Dep:
Deposition:
RELATIVE CONCENTRATION (SEC/M ) NO DECAY, UNDEPLETED DECAYED (SEC/M
) HALF-LIFE 2.26 DAYS. UNDEPLETED DECAYED AND DEPLETED (SEC/M ) HALF.LIFE 8 DAYS RELATIVE DEPOSITION RATE (1/M )
67
SECTION 4 DOSE MEASUREMENTS ANDASSESSMENTS 68
Radiolo ical Im act on Man Sampling and analysis of airborne and waterborne effluents were performed in accordance with the frequencies, types of analysis, and Lower Limitof Detection (LLD)outlined in the SSES Technical Specifications.
Radioactive material was detected in some of the airborne and waterborne effluent samples analyzed.
Dose calculations using measured effluent activity levels, meteorological data from the current reporting period and average river flow dilution factors resulted in estimated doses to individuals at levels below 10 CFR 20 and 10 CFR 50, Appendix I limits. Direct radiation resulting from plant operation, as measured by environmental thermoluminescent dosimeters located around the plant contributed a maximum of 3.41E-03 mrem (measured at TLD Location 11S3) at the Protected Area Boundary southwest of the plant. This measurement includes the immersion dose from noble gases.
The maximum organ/total body dose (Table 26) from all airborne effluent is 1.86E-01 mrem. The maximum organ/total body dose from liquid effluent (child bone: Table 24) is 3.78E-01 mrem.
If it is conservatively assumed that a member of the public receives the maximum total body/organ dose from liquid and gaseous combined with the maximum total body dose determined from direct radiation, the result (5.64E-01 mrem) is 2.3% of the 40CFR190 limitof 25 mrem to total body/organ (except thyroid).
Doses to a maximally exposed member of the public from waterborne effluents are calculated for fish ingestion and shoreline exposure at the plant outfall, and drinking water ingestion at Danville, PA. Site specific parameters used in the calculations for the Danville receiver, specific for actual average blowdown and river level in each quarter and the entire year, are shown in Table 23.
'ABLE23 SITE-SPECIFIC PARAMETERS USED FOR LADTAP II CALCULATIONS (DANVILLERECEIVER)
FOR 1996 PARAMETER Cooling Tower Blowdown (CFS)
Average Net River Level (ft)(1)
Dilution Factor at Danville (2)
Transit time to Danville (hr)(2)
ENTIRE YEAR.
17.8 8.2 869.6 16.5 (1)
Net River Level = Depth (ft above MSL)
-483'2)
From ODCM Table 5-4 69
Summaries of maximum individual doses resulting from airborne and waterborne radioactive effluent releases are given in Table 24. Meteorological data from Section 3 were used to calculate the dose from airborne effluents.
Technical Specification 6.9.1.11 requires assessment of radiation doses from radioactive airborne and waterborne effluent to members of the public within the site boundary.
There are no significant exposure pathways from waterborne effluents in these areas.
Onsite doses are assessed relative to offsite dose values and are adjusted for appropriate dispersion and occupancy factors.
Summaries of the calculated maximum doses within the site boundary and selected locations resulting from airborne effluents are presented in Tables 25 through 27.
70
TABLE24
SUMMARY
OF MAXIMUMINDIVIDUALOFFSITE DOSES AND DOSE COMMITMENTSTO MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC DATAPERIOD: 1/1/96 TO 12/31/96
-'EFFLUENT AGE APPLICABLE GROUP ORGAN ESTIMATED MAXIMUM DOSE MREM LOCATION DIST AFFECTED MILES SECTOR PERCENT OF LIMIT LIMIT (MREM)~~
Li uid"'.t tud"'oble Gas N/A AIRDOSE (GAMMA-MRAD CHILD TOTALBODY CHILD BONE 2.05E-02 3.78E-01 1.01E-02 1.10 (3
WSW 0.34 1.89 0.10 20 10 Noble Gas N/A AIRDOSE BETA-MRAD 1.30E-02 1.10 WSW 0.07 20 Iodine ahd Particulates CHILD LUNG 8.75E-02 1.10 WSW 0.58 15
'Estimated dose is based on a site total activity release.
'10 CFR 50, Appendix I limits are in terms of mrad or mrem/reactor-year.
"'Doses from liquid effluent are estimated from fish ingestion and shoreline exposure at the site outfall and from the drinking water pathway at Danville, PA.
AIRBORNE PATHWAYS ANALYZED: 0.40 (SE): PLUME, GROUND, INHALATION;1.10 (WSW)
PLUME, GROUND, VEGETATION, INHALATION;2.00 (WSW) DAIRY: PLUME, GROUND, VEGETATION, COW MILK, INHALATION,042 (SSW) SITE BOUNDARY: PL'UME The maximum calculated dose from all 1996 SSES waterborne effluent (combined pathways) was 3.78E1 mrem (CHILD, BONE).
71
DOSES TO MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WITHINTHE SITE BOUNDARY SSES Technical Specification 6.9.1.11.requires that the Annual Effluent Release Reports include an assessment of the radiation'dose from radioactive effluents to members of the public within the site boundary.
Within the SSES Site Boundary there are several areas frequented by members of the public. The SSES Riverlands Energy Information Center is a representative nearby location visited by members of the public. Doses from airboine effluent are calculated for members of the public for this location. The Riverlands, selected residences within the Site Boundary, and the maximum site boundary location for which dose calculations are performed are shown in Figure 8.
In the area comprising the Riverlands recreation area, which surrounds the Energy Information Center, three pathways of radiation exposure can be identified; plume, ground and inhalation. There are no significant exposure pathways from waterborne effluents in this area.
There are approximately 100,000 visitors to the Riverlands/Information Center complex each year.
For dose calculations, the visitor stays in the area for one hour.
Use of the GASPAR code yields calculated doses for the Riverlands area for the report period. These doses are the total doses at the location from gaseous effluents during the report period.
In order to compute doses to members of the public who stay for only short periods of time, these doses are converted to dose rates which are averages for the entire year. Taking into account the estimated 100,000 person-hours of occupancy, the collective (person-rem) doses shown in Table 25 are calculated.
Table 27 contains beta and gamma air doses from noble gas effluent at the same locations as Table 26, with resulting percent Tech. Spec. limits.
72
FIGURE 8 AREAS WITHINTHE SSES SITE BOUNDARY FOR WHICH DOSE CALCULATIONSARE PERFORMED NNE
~ 4
~
I I
I I
o rrrrrrr~r
~sr~
.I
~ rS
~y~
Ll w
~N SUSQ.
ENEROY I
WFO. CENTER
~ ~Toe l.
I
~r~r ~
ENE W
I few
. I V~
~
~ V
'C 1 ~
~
I ~
ESE I
I l
WSW
'+4L,&Sea awe r~
l I
o I
J I
l I
I I
I s
~I lJ$LT".
'~!)'L' 1
SUSQUHIANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION QTE BOUNPAAY D)STANCES DISTANCES IN FEETl PENNSYLVANtA POWER 4
UGHT LK~
~t4L Iheeslt.INWIT HALLIBVRTON NUS Navart4or 02. 1993 o
Jag 1000 RXO 73
TABLE25 CALCULATEDCOLLECTIVE DOSES TO MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WITHINTHE RIVERLANDS/INFORMATIONCENTER COMPLEX DATAPERIOD: 1/1/96 TO 12/31/96.
EFFLUENT
. AGE GROUP APPLICABLE ORGAN DOSE RATE'REM/HR COLLECTIVE DOSE PERSON-REM NOBLE GAS N/A TOTAL BODY 4.08E-07 4 08E-05 NOBLE GAS N/A SKIN 1.08E-06 1.08E-04 IODINE AND PARTICULATES TEEN LUNG 2.47E-06 2.47E-04 Estimated dose rate is based on annual site total activity release.
PATHWAYS ANALYZED: PLUME, GROUND, INHALATION The maximum calculated dose from all 1996 SSES airborne iodine/particulate/tritium effluent (both units) at this location was 2.16E-02 mrem (TEEN, LUNG); 3.57E-03 mrem total body dose and 9.45E-03 mrem skin dose.
74
TABLE26 CALCULATED,DOSES FOR INDIVIDUALSAND LOCATIONS WITHINTHE SSES SITE BOUNDARYAND NEAREST DAIRY Noble Gases Airborne iodine/Particulate/Tritium Location from SSES 1.10 MILES WSW:
(Max. X/Q Res., Garden) 0.40 MILES SE (Max. D/Q Residence) 0.42 MILES SSW:
(Max. Site Boundary X/Q)
Unit Total Body Dose mrem 1.65E-03 6.67E-03 3.66E-04 1.48E-03 1.55E-03 6.28E-03 Skin Dose mrem 4.36E-03 1.77E-02 9.67E-04 3.92E-03 4.11E-03 1.66E-02 Ground mrem 8.10E-04 1.18E-03 9.65E-04 1.41E-03 Vegetation mrem 6.54E-02 5.41E-02 Cow Milk mrem Inhalation
'rem 2.41E-02 1.77E-02 5.10E-03 4.25E-03 Total
'/o Limit 0.60 0.49 0:04 0.04 Age Group/
Or an Teen/Lung Child/Lung Teen/Lung Teen/Lung 2.00 MILES WSW (Max. D/Q Dairy) 7.19E-04 2.91E-03 1.90E-03 7.70E-03 2.96E-04 2.96E-02 1.21E-02 9.61E-03 4.33E-04 2.45E-02 1.00E-02 8.00E-03 0.34 Child/Lung 0.29 Child/Lung The maximum calculated dose from all 1996 airborne effluent (both units) for all locations, age groups, and pathways was 1.86E-01 mrem from iodine/particulate/tritium.
The maximum calculated plume dose from noble gas effluent (both units) was 8.34E-03 mrem total body and 2.21E-02 mrem skin dose.
The calculated dose from all 1996 airborne effluent (both units) at Maximum D/Q Residence, 0.40 miles SE, was 1.17E-02 mrem to teen lung from iodine/particulate/tritium; 1.85E-03 mrem total body dose and 4.90E-03 mrem skin dose from noble gas effluent.
The calculated dose from all 1996 airborne effluent (both units) at Maximum X/Q Residence and Garden, 1.10 miles WSW, was 1.63E-01 mrem to child lung from iodine/particulate/tritium; 8.34E-03 mrem total body dose and 2.21E-02 mrem skin dose from noble gas effluent.
The calculated dose from all 1996 airborne effluent (both units) at Maximum Site Boundary, 0.42 miles SSW, was 7.85E-03 mrem total body dose and 2.08E-02 mrem skin dose from noble gas effluent.
The calculated dose from,all 1996 airborne effluent (both units) at Maximum Dairy, 2.00 miles WSW, was 9.45E-02 mrem to child lung from iodine/particulate/tritium; 3.64E-03 mrem total body dose and 9.62E-03 mrem skin dose from noble gas effluent.
75
TABLE27 CALCULATEDDOSES FROM NOBLE GASES FOR LOCATIONS WITHINTHE SSES SITE BOUNDARYAND NEAREST DAIRY
- LocatlonfromSSES Unit Gamma AirDose mrad
',.% L'Imit,::
Beta AirDose mrad
% Limit 0.40 MILES SE:
(Max. D/Q Residence) 1.10 MILES WSW:
(Max. D/Q Residence, Garden) 0.42 MILES SSW:
(Max. Site Boundary X/Q) 2.00 MILES WSW:
(Max. D/Q Dairy) 5.54E-04 2.24E-03 2.50E-03 1.01E-02 2.35E-03 9.52E-03 1.09E-03 4.41E-03 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.10 0.02 0.10 0.01 0.04 7.10E-04 2.87E-03 3.20E-03 1.30E-02 3.01E-03 1.22E-02 1.40E-03 5.65-03 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.07 0.02 0.06 0.01 0.03 76
SECTION 5 CHANGES TO THE OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATIONMANUAL AND THE SOLID WASTE PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM 77
. CHANGES TO THE OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATIONMANUAL The SSES ODCM was revised once in 1996. The change in 1996 is designated Revision 6 by the SSES Document Control Center.
In Revision 6, Maximum Dose Factors have been added in Table 4 for Ru-103 and Te-129, in response to CR 95-0743.
Water sampling location 2S7 was added to Table 6 and Figure 5. This location was" created to obtain more representative samples for the REMP program.
Airsampling locations 6G1 and 8G1 were added to Table 6 and Figure 6; locations 12G1 and 7G1 were deleted from Table 6 and Figure 6. Location 12G1 was moved to location 6G1 to improve control characteristics at this location. The air sampling station was moved to location 8G1 to avoid large trees which hindered sampling at 7G1.
A sentence was added to Section A.1.2.1 to restore the context of this paragraph; this change was made in response to Audit 95-114, Observation 7.
This revision did not reduce the accuracy or reliability of dose calculations or setpoint determinations utilizing the methodology and parameters previously approved for the ODCM.
A copy of Revision 6 of the SSES ODCM is included under separate cover in Appendix A.
78
CHANGES TO THE SOLID WASTE PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM NDAP-QA-0646 did not undergo revision during the report period (1996).
PCAFs 1-95-0007 and 1-97-0017 have been incorporated into NDAP-QA-0646, however, not during the report period. These PCAFs do not reduce the overall conformance of the solidified waste program to existing criteria. A copy of SSES Radioactive Waste Process Control Program, NDAP-QA-0646, Revision 4, is included under separate cover as Appendix B.
79
SECTION 6 REPORTS OF EXCEPTION TO THE SSES EFFLUENT MONITORINGPROGRAM 80
REPORTS OF EXCEPTION TO THE SSES EFFLUENT MONITORING PROGRAM One event occurred during the reporting period which is reportable under Technical Specification 3.3.7.11 Action b, with specific reference to Table 3.3.7.11
-1 Action 112.
On August 2, 1996, at 1135, SSES Chemistry was notified by Operations that 'A'SS BUS had tripped at 1105. As a result of this trip, Zone 1 and Zone 3 ventilation was lost and vent stack SPINGs were alarming. At that time, it was assumed that the alarm condition was normal for the loss of ventilation condition, however, at 1300 a second Chemistry technician noticed that alarms had not cleared even though ventilation had been restored.
Technicians then accessed the SPING monitors on el. 818 and confirmed that sample pumps on UI Tb and Ul Rb vent were not functioning.
Continuous sampling was re-established on Ul Tb at 1350 and Ul Rb at 1400.
Particulate, iodine and noble gas samples was taken for both vents in accordance with Chemistry procedures, and no activity was detected.
This event is reportable because continuous ventilation sampling for particulate, iodine and noble gas was not performed for approximately 2-1/2 hours when the'A'SS BUS was lost. Technical Specification 3.3.7.11 Action 112 requires continuous sampling with auxiliary sampling equipment when less than the required number of operable channels are in service.
CR 96-1073 and LER 387/96-008 have been generated for this event.
81
SECTION 7 CORRECTION TO DOSES REPORTED IN PREVIOUS SEMIANNUALOR ANNUALEFFLUENTAND WASTE DISPOSAL REPORT 82
CORRECTIONS TO DOSES REPORTED IN PREVIOUS SEMIANNUALOR ANNUALEFFLUENT ANDWASTE DISPOSAL REPORTS No corrections to previous semiannual or A'nnual Effluent and Waste Disposal Reports are submitted in this period.
83
SECTION 8 EFFLUENT FROM ADDITIONALMONITORED RELEASE POINTS 84
EFFLUENT FROM ADDITIONALMONITORED RELEASE POINTS The Dry Active Waste (DAW)facility is a processing system located in a trailer near the administration building. Since the facility is used to reduce DAWvolume, the trailer atmosphere is sampled routinely for airborne activity. The effluent potential for this system was determined in Safety Evaluation NL-89-002.
It has been classified as an Insignificant Effluent Pathway in the ODCM. In 1996, several air samples taken from the trailer were noted to have Mn-54 and Co-60 above the minimum detectable activity. The following airborne particulate effluent and resulting offsite dose to members of the public at the residence 1.1 miles WSW is reported for the DAWfacility. This effluent and resulting offsite dose is reported supplementary to Tables 3, 4, 24 and 26 since it is minor relative to the quantities reported therein (i.e. not observable at three significant figures):
TABLE28 AIRBORNE PARTICULATE EFFLUENT FROM DAWTRAILER lsoto e Effluent Released Ci Mn-54 3.30E-07 Co-60 1.69E-07 TABLE29 OFFSITE DOSE (RESIDENCE AT 1.1 MILES WSW)
RESULTING FROM DAW TRAILER EFFLUENT EFFLUENT Particulate AGE GROUP Teen APPLICABLE ORGAN ESTIMATED MAXIMUMDOSE MREM 3.09E-06 LIMIT MREM 15 PERCENT OF LIMIT 2.06E-05 85