|
---|
Category:NOTICE OF VIOLATION OF A REGULATION
MONTHYEARML20196K6531999-06-29029 June 1999 Notice of Violation from NRC OI Investigation Conducted on 980701-1211.Violation Noted:For Approx Four Hours on 980616, with NMP1 at Full Power,Sro Assumed Assistant Shift Supervisor Position,Contrary to TS Requirements ML20196E5351998-11-19019 November 1998 Notice of Violation from Investigation on 980303-0930. Violation Noted:On 971224,individual Left Controls at NMP-2 Unattended for Six Minutes to Go Into Shift Supervisor Ofc, Area Not at Controls as Noted in NMPC UFSAR Figure 13.5-1 ML20248A8001998-05-20020 May 1998 Notice of Violation from Insp on 980406-0409.Violation Noted:During Insp,Inspectors Determined That Licensee Failed to Properly Store,Control & Classify Safeguards Info ML20199B8601998-01-22022 January 1998 Notice of Violation & Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty in Amount of $55,000.Violation Noted:On 970925,package Containing Metal Samples Removed from Unit 1 Emergency Cooling Tube Sheet Was Sent to Listed Company,Not on List ML20198R4391997-11-0505 November 1997 Notice of Violation & Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty in Amount of $50,000.Violations Noted:Listed non-safety Related SSCs Were Not Included in 10CFR50.65 Monitoring Program ML20137U8501997-04-10010 April 1997 Notice of Violation & Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty in Amount of $200,000.Violation Noted:As of 961105,measures Were Not Established to Assure Condition Adverse to Quality Are Promptly Identified & Corrected ML20057G3271993-10-12012 October 1993 Notice of Violation from Insp on 930808-0918.Violation Noted:On 930803,inspector Discovered Individual That Required Escort in Protected Area W/O Escort for Approx 25 Minutes ML20056C1641993-03-23023 March 1993 Notice of Violation from Insp on 930124-0227.Violation Noted:I&C Technicians Performing N1-ISP-032-004 Failed to Correctly Perform Procedural Steps 7.2.1-7.2.5 Resulting in Automatic Reactor Scram Due to False High Neutron Flux ML20155F4171988-06-10010 June 1988 Notice of Violation from Insp on 880404-08.Violation Noted: Site Procedures CBI-SC 1,Rev 0 & NES-8042433,Rev 3 Did Not Establish Adequate Controls Over Nondestructive Testing Process for Making Precision Thickness Measurements ML20211A3971987-02-11011 February 1987 Notice of Violation from Insp on 861117-870104 ML20211A9671987-02-0404 February 1987 Notice of Violation from Insp on 861001-1116.Violations Noted:Source Range Monitor Downscale Rod Block Channels Inoperable During Refueling Mode & Not Placed in Tripped Condition & Failure to Notify NRC of Unplanned Actuation ML20207N4131986-12-23023 December 1986 Notice of Violation from Investigation Rept 1-84-014. Violations Noted:Qa Auditors Subj of Discrimination in That Lead Auditor Status Rescinded on 840405 in Retaliation for Making QA Findings Critical of QA Program IR 05000220/20050221985-07-11011 July 1985 Notice of Violation from Insp on 850621.Violations Noted: Failure to Test or Recertify Radiographer Assistant During 850220-0522 & Failure of Radiation Protection Officer to Perform Unannounced Insps During 840101-850621 ML20062E7971982-07-23023 July 1982 Notice of Violation from Insp on 820615-18 ML20062C9461978-09-26026 September 1978 Notice of Violation from Inspec on 780905-08 1999-06-29
[Table view] Category:TEXT-INSPECTION & AUDIT & I&E CIRCULARS
MONTHYEARPNO-I-99-046, on 991008,NMP,Unit 1 Declared Unusual Event,Due to Carbon Dioxide Discharge in Records Storage Room of Administration Bldg,Which Was Migrating Beyond Confines of Storage Room.Nrc Resident Inspector Staff Responded1999-10-0808 October 1999 PNO-I-99-046:on 991008,NMP,Unit 1 Declared Unusual Event,Due to Carbon Dioxide Discharge in Records Storage Room of Administration Bldg,Which Was Migrating Beyond Confines of Storage Room.Nrc Resident Inspector Staff Responded IR 05000220/19990061999-09-14014 September 1999 Insp Repts 50-220/99-06 & 50-410/99-06 on 990620-0731.NCVs Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Operations,Engineering, Maint & Plant Support ML20196K6531999-06-29029 June 1999 Notice of Violation from NRC OI Investigation Conducted on 980701-1211.Violation Noted:For Approx Four Hours on 980616, with NMP1 at Full Power,Sro Assumed Assistant Shift Supervisor Position,Contrary to TS Requirements IR 05000220/19990041999-06-21021 June 1999 Insp Repts 50-220/99-04 & 50-410/99-04 on 990328-0508.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Operations,Engineering,Maint & Plant Support PNO-I-99-023, on 990411,NMP Performed Insps That Identified Indications of Crack Growth Around Portion of One of Vertical Welds.Repair Mod for Shroud Vertical Welds Is Expected to Take Approx Five Days to Complete1999-05-12012 May 1999 PNO-I-99-023:on 990411,NMP Performed Insps That Identified Indications of Crack Growth Around Portion of One of Vertical Welds.Repair Mod for Shroud Vertical Welds Is Expected to Take Approx Five Days to Complete IR 05000220/19980151998-12-23023 December 1998 Insp Repts 50-220/98-15 & 50-410/98-15 on 980927-1121.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Operations, Engineering,Maint & Plant Support ML20196E5351998-11-19019 November 1998 Notice of Violation from Investigation on 980303-0930. Violation Noted:On 971224,individual Left Controls at NMP-2 Unattended for Six Minutes to Go Into Shift Supervisor Ofc, Area Not at Controls as Noted in NMPC UFSAR Figure 13.5-1 IR 05000220/19980141998-10-26026 October 1998 Insp Repts 50-220/98-14 & 50-410/98-14 on 980816-0926.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Reviews of Licensee Activities in Functional Areas of Operations,Engineering, Maint & Plant Support ML20248A8001998-05-20020 May 1998 Notice of Violation from Insp on 980406-0409.Violation Noted:During Insp,Inspectors Determined That Licensee Failed to Properly Store,Control & Classify Safeguards Info ML20217L9251998-04-28028 April 1998 Insp Repts 50-220/98-08 & 50-410/98-08 on 980406-21. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Security Force Capability to Protect Facility Against Radiological Sabotage & Compliance W/Safeguards Program Commitments ML20199B8601998-01-22022 January 1998 Notice of Violation & Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty in Amount of $55,000.Violation Noted:On 970925,package Containing Metal Samples Removed from Unit 1 Emergency Cooling Tube Sheet Was Sent to Listed Company,Not on List ML20198R4391997-11-0505 November 1997 Notice of Violation & Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty in Amount of $50,000.Violations Noted:Listed non-safety Related SSCs Were Not Included in 10CFR50.65 Monitoring Program ML20137U8501997-04-10010 April 1997 Notice of Violation & Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty in Amount of $200,000.Violation Noted:As of 961105,measures Were Not Established to Assure Condition Adverse to Quality Are Promptly Identified & Corrected IR 05000220/19940011994-01-24024 January 1994 Insp Repts 50-220/94-01 & 50-410/94-01 on 940103-07.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Mgt Support, Protected Area Barriers,Detection Aids & Assessment Aids, & Protected Area & Isolation Zone Lighting IR 05000220/19930221993-12-22022 December 1993 Insp Repts 50-220/93-22 & 50-410/93-22 on 931004-20.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Mov Program Commitments & Enhancments Identified During Team Inspection in June 1992 Were Reviewed for Progress IR 05000220/19930011993-11-12012 November 1993 Insp Repts 50-220/93-01 & 50-410/93-01 on 930919-1030. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Major Components & Sys for Leakage,Alignment,Lubrication,Cooling Water Supply IR 05000220/19930231993-11-0505 November 1993 Insp Repts 50-220/93-23 & 50-410/93-22 on 931012-14.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Mgt Support,Program Plans & Audits,Protected & Vital Area Physical Barriers, Detection & Assessment Aids PNO-I-93-058, on 931027,licensee Discovered Two Broken 100 Milliliter Vials of Yellow Powder (Believed to Be Yellowcake) at Corporate Ofc in Syracuse,Ny.No Personnel Contaminated.State of Ny Notified1993-10-28028 October 1993 PNO-I-93-058:on 931027,licensee Discovered Two Broken 100 Milliliter Vials of Yellow Powder (Believed to Be Yellowcake) at Corporate Ofc in Syracuse,Ny.No Personnel Contaminated.State of Ny Notified IR 05000220/19930241993-10-27027 October 1993 Insp Repts 50-220/93-24 & 50-410/93-23 on 931018-22.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Exams of Procedures, Representative Records,Interviews W/Personnel & Observations by Inspectors IR 05000220/19930191993-10-18018 October 1993 Insp Rept 50-220/93-19 on 930823-27.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Electrical Distribution Sys ML20057G3271993-10-12012 October 1993 Notice of Violation from Insp on 930808-0918.Violation Noted:On 930803,inspector Discovered Individual That Required Escort in Protected Area W/O Escort for Approx 25 Minutes IR 05000220/19930121993-10-0606 October 1993 Insp Repts 50-220/93-12 & 50-410/93-12 on 930615-18 & 0712-14.No Violations Noted.Major Areas inspected:930615-18 Emergency Preparedness Program & 930713 annual,full- Participation Emergency Preparedness Exercise IR 05000220/19930181993-10-0101 October 1993 Insp Repts 50-220/93-18 & 50-410/93-18 on 930808-0918. Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Operations, Maint & Surveillance Activities,Engineering & Plant Support, W/Regard to Radiological & Chemistry Controls & Security IR 05000220/19930131993-09-21021 September 1993 Insp Repts 50-220/93-13 & 50-410/93-13 on 930802-06.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Design Changes & Mods,Installation & Testing of Mods,Interface/Communication, QA & Technical Support,Wrs & LERs IR 05000220/19930151993-09-16016 September 1993 Insp Repts 50-220/93-15 & 50-410/93-15 on 930719-23.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Offsite Power Supply Sources for Plant & to Review Licensees Corrective Action on Previously Identified Insp Findings IR 05000220/19930161993-08-0404 August 1993 Insp Repts 50-220/93-16 & 50-410/93-16 on 930426-30.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Mgt Controls,Audits, Calibration of Effluent & Process Radiation Monitoring Sys, Air Cleaning Sys & Implementation of Previous Programs ML20056C1641993-03-23023 March 1993 Notice of Violation from Insp on 930124-0227.Violation Noted:I&C Technicians Performing N1-ISP-032-004 Failed to Correctly Perform Procedural Steps 7.2.1-7.2.5 Resulting in Automatic Reactor Scram Due to False High Neutron Flux ML20056C1661993-03-12012 March 1993 Insp Repts 50-220/93-01 & 50-410/93-01 on 930124-0227. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Operations, Radiological Controls,Maintenance,Surveillance,Security & Safety Assessment/Quality Verification Activities PNO-I-90-092, on 901010,condensate Spill Occurred in Bldg. Caused by Malfunctioning Valve in Lineup for Transfer of New Resin from Mixing Tank to Condensate Demineralizer Bed. Excess Water Pumped Out sub-basement1990-10-11011 October 1990 PNO-I-90-092:on 901010,condensate Spill Occurred in Bldg. Caused by Malfunctioning Valve in Lineup for Transfer of New Resin from Mixing Tank to Condensate Demineralizer Bed. Excess Water Pumped Out sub-basement PNO-I-90-061, on 900806,plant Operators Manually Scrammed Reactor Due to High Vibration on Main Turbine Bearing.Caused by Blank Flange Left in Oil Supply Line to Bearing.Resident Inspectors Following Licensee Actions1990-08-0707 August 1990 PNO-I-90-061:on 900806,plant Operators Manually Scrammed Reactor Due to High Vibration on Main Turbine Bearing.Caused by Blank Flange Left in Oil Supply Line to Bearing.Resident Inspectors Following Licensee Actions IR 05000220/19890991990-08-0101 August 1990 Final SALP Repts 50-220/89-99 & 50-410/89-99 for Mar 1989 - Feb 1990 PNO-I-90-059, on 900730,plant Shut Down Due to Excessive RCS Leakage.Util Will Repair Plant Electromatic Relief Valves Found to Be Leaking During Startup.State of Ny Has Been Informed1990-07-30030 July 1990 PNO-I-90-059:on 900730,plant Shut Down Due to Excessive RCS Leakage.Util Will Repair Plant Electromatic Relief Valves Found to Be Leaking During Startup.State of Ny Has Been Informed PNO-I-90-057, on 900727,restart Authorized for Facility. Util Agreed to Perform Self Assessments of Performance & Inform NRC Restart Assessment Panel of Self Assessment Results1990-07-27027 July 1990 PNO-I-90-057:on 900727,restart Authorized for Facility. Util Agreed to Perform Self Assessments of Performance & Inform NRC Restart Assessment Panel of Self Assessment Results PNO-I-89-072A, on 890828,augmented Insp Team Exit Meeting Subsequent Press Conference Held at Plant Re Licensee Use of sub-basement for Storage of Solid & Liquid Radwaste.Two Violations Noted1989-08-29029 August 1989 PNO-I-89-072A:on 890828,augmented Insp Team Exit Meeting Subsequent Press Conference Held at Plant Re Licensee Use of sub-basement for Storage of Solid & Liquid Radwaste.Two Violations Noted ML20247D5991989-05-0202 May 1989 Investigation Rept 89-02 Re Misconduct of Ofc of Investigations Deputy Director,Ra Fortuna.Finding of No Misconduct or Dereliction of Duty Recommended IR 05000220/19880301988-11-16016 November 1988 Insp Repts 50-220/88-30 & 50-410/88-29 on 880926-30.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Security Plan & Procedures,Mgt Organization,Audits,Records & Repts,Testing & Maint,Barriers,Security Power Supply & Assessment Aids IR 05000220/19860991988-07-0101 July 1988 Amended SALP Repts 50-220/86-99 & 50-410/87-99 for Nov 1986 - Feb 1988 & Feb 1987 - Feb 1988,respectively. Licensee Has Shown Limited Success W/Initiatives to Improve Previously Identified Weaknesses ML20155F4171988-06-10010 June 1988 Notice of Violation from Insp on 880404-08.Violation Noted: Site Procedures CBI-SC 1,Rev 0 & NES-8042433,Rev 3 Did Not Establish Adequate Controls Over Nondestructive Testing Process for Making Precision Thickness Measurements IR 05000220/19880091988-05-19019 May 1988 Insp Repts 50-220/88-09 & 50-410/88-09 on 880307-11 & 0404- 08.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Inservice Insp Program Re First 10-yr Insp Interval & Augmented Exams Conducted by Licensee,Including Procedures PNO-I-88-010, on 880120,reactor Scrammed from 42% Power Based on Low Reactor Vessel Water Level.Caused by Equipment Operator Error.Nrc Dispatched Augmented Insp Team to Site to Review Generic Safety Implications of Event1988-01-21021 January 1988 PNO-I-88-010:on 880120,reactor Scrammed from 42% Power Based on Low Reactor Vessel Water Level.Caused by Equipment Operator Error.Nrc Dispatched Augmented Insp Team to Site to Review Generic Safety Implications of Event PNO-I-88-009, on 880120,unusual Event Declared as Result of Worker Injured After Stepping Through Hole in Grating Between Reactor Vessel Flange & Refueling Cavity Floor.No Contamination Involved1988-01-21021 January 1988 PNO-I-88-009:on 880120,unusual Event Declared as Result of Worker Injured After Stepping Through Hole in Grating Between Reactor Vessel Flange & Refueling Cavity Floor.No Contamination Involved PNO-I-88-007, on 880115,present Unplanned Outage to Inspect & Repair Feedwater Sys Components & Supports Extended for Approx 3 Wks to Perform Insp of Bushings in Reactor Vessel Flange Which Hold 6-inch Diameter Reactor Vessel Head Studs1988-01-19019 January 1988 PNO-I-88-007:on 880115,present Unplanned Outage to Inspect & Repair Feedwater Sys Components & Supports Extended for Approx 3 Wks to Perform Insp of Bushings in Reactor Vessel Flange Which Hold 6-inch Diameter Reactor Vessel Head Studs PNO-I-87-120, on 871226,reactor Scram Occurred from Approx 25% Power Due to Turbine Trip on Low Condenser Vacuum Caused by Crack in Condenser Pipe Penetration.Pentration Seal Weld Repaired1987-12-29029 December 1987 PNO-I-87-120:on 871226,reactor Scram Occurred from Approx 25% Power Due to Turbine Trip on Low Condenser Vacuum Caused by Crack in Condenser Pipe Penetration.Pentration Seal Weld Repaired PNO-I-87-117, on 871219,reactor Manually Scrammed After Mechanical Vibrations from Turbine Bldg Felt in Control Room.Caused by Feedwater Control Valve Stem Separation from Disc.Outage Dependent on Availability of Repair Parts1987-12-21021 December 1987 PNO-I-87-117:on 871219,reactor Manually Scrammed After Mechanical Vibrations from Turbine Bldg Felt in Control Room.Caused by Feedwater Control Valve Stem Separation from Disc.Outage Dependent on Availability of Repair Parts PNO-I-87-114, on 871207,reactor Scrammed from Approx 96% Power Due to Low Reactor Vessel Water Level.Caused by Malfunction of Feedwater Control Valves 13A & 13B.Preventive & Corrective Maint Underway1987-12-10010 December 1987 PNO-I-87-114:on 871207,reactor Scrammed from Approx 96% Power Due to Low Reactor Vessel Water Level.Caused by Malfunction of Feedwater Control Valves 13A & 13B.Preventive & Corrective Maint Underway IR 05000220/19870221987-12-0909 December 1987 Insp Rept 50-220/87-22 on 871019-23.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Design Change/Mods,Maint & Previously Identified Items PNO-I-87-113, on 871128,condensate Storage Tank Ruptured Spilling Over 260,000 Gallons Nonradioactive Demineralized Water.Caused by Break in Seam Between Tank Sidewall & Floor. Vendor Onsite Inspecting Cause.Plant in Cold Shutdown1987-12-0202 December 1987 PNO-I-87-113:on 871128,condensate Storage Tank Ruptured Spilling Over 260,000 Gallons Nonradioactive Demineralized Water.Caused by Break in Seam Between Tank Sidewall & Floor. Vendor Onsite Inspecting Cause.Plant in Cold Shutdown PNO-I-87-096, on 871016,plant Scrammed on High Neutron Flux from 89% Power During Testing Causing Main Steam Pressure Oscillations Triggering APRM High Flux Scram.Crd Stub Tube Leakage Identified.Hydrostatic Tests Performed1987-10-19019 October 1987 PNO-I-87-096:on 871016,plant Scrammed on High Neutron Flux from 89% Power During Testing Causing Main Steam Pressure Oscillations Triggering APRM High Flux Scram.Crd Stub Tube Leakage Identified.Hydrostatic Tests Performed IR 05000220/19870161987-10-15015 October 1987 Exam Rept 50-220/87-16OL on 870804-06.Exam Results:All Three Senior Reactor Operator Candidates Passed Written & Operating Exams.Exam Key Encl IR 05000410/19870181987-10-0101 October 1987 Requalification & Replacement Exam Rept 50-410/87-18OL on 870707-07.Exam Results:Two of Four Senior Reactor Operator Candidates & Three of Four Reactor Operator Candidates Passed Exam.Exams Encl 1999-09-14
[Table view] |
Text
_ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ . - _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ ,
- }
ENCLOSURE NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND PROPOSED IMPOSITION OF CIVIL PENALTY ,
Niagara Mohawir Power Corporation Docket No. 50-220,50-410 Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station License No. DPR-63, NPF-89 ,
Units 1 and 2 EA 97-530 Duririg an NRC inspection conducted between August 10 and October 4,1997, for which an
~
exit meeting was held on October 17,1997, violations of NRC requirements were identified.
In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," NUREG 1600, the NRC proposes to impose a civil penalty pursuant to Section 234 4 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (Act),42 U.S.C. 2282, and 10 CFR 2.205.
LThe particular violations and associated civil penalty are set forth nelow:
A. I I0 CFR 71.5 reqtres that each licensee who transports radbactive material comph with the applicable DOT regulations containeri in 49 CFR Parts 170-189. 49 CFR 173.441 requires that radiation levels in any normally occupied space of the vehicle not exceed 0.02 milliSieverts per hour (2 mrem /hr).
Contrary to the above, on July 24, 1997, the licensee transported a package '
containing two metal samples from the Unit 1 core shroud, to RWX Technologies, Inc.,
Lynchburg, Virginia, and upon receipt of the package at BWX, the dose rate in the normally occupied section of the vehicle was 2.3 mrem /hr. (01013)
B. 10 CFR 71.5 requires, in part, that each licensee who delivers licensed material to a carrier for transport, comply with the applicable requirements stated in 49 CFR Parts 170-189.
Title 49 CFR 172.203(d)(4) requires that the activity contained in each package of the shipment in terms of the appropriate Si un!ts or in terms of the appropriate Si units-L followed by the customary units shall be included on the shipping papers.
Title 49 CFR 172.204(a) requires, in part, that each person who offers a hazardous
- material for transportation shall certify that the material is offered for transportation in accordance with this subchapter-(manually or mechanically) in the shipping paper-
- coritaining the required shipping description the certificatior contained in paragiaph (a)(1) of this section or the certification (declaration) containing the language contained -
!n paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
Contrary to the above, on September 3,1997, the licensee shipped a cask from Unit ,
2 to Molten Metal Technology, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and 1.n i the cask contained a liner of spent re sins that was different than the liner that
.was intended for shipment as notec on the shipment papers. As a result, the-activity recorded on the shipping papers was not reflective of that contained in the liner as required by 49 CFR 172.203(d)(4); and-t
, ~ 9901290032 990122
=
PDR ADOCK 05000220 G PDR- _ q_
(.
encio.or. 2 r
- 2. licensee personnel failed to carry out procedurally required steps to certify that the shipment was proper in eccordance with 49 CFR 172.204(a). (01023)
C. 10 CFR 71.0(b) states that "the packaging and transport of licensed material are also sut, ject to other parts of this chapter (e.g., Parts 20,21,30,39,40,70, and 73) and to the regul9tions of other ogsncies (e.g., the US Department of Transportation and the US Postal Service) having juri. diction over means of transport. The requirements of this part are in addition to, and not in substitution for other requirements."
Title 10 CFR 30.41 requires that before transferring byproduct material to a specific licensee of the Commission or an Agreement State or to a general licensee who is required to register with the Commission or with an Agreement State prior to receipt of the, byproduct mater:al, the licensee transferring the material shall verify that the transferee's license authorizes the receipt of type, form and quantity of byproduct material to be transferred."
- 1. Contrary to the above, on September 25,1997, the licensee sent a package containing a metal sample removed from a Unit 1 emergency cooling condenser tube sheet, to a BWX Contracts Officer in an administrative office complex in Lynchburg, Virginia, and that office complex was not listed on the material License Certificate for receipt of radioactive shipments. (01033)
- 2. Contrary to the above, on May 24,1995, the licensee sent a source range detector to the General Electric (GE) facility in San Jose, California, and that facility did not have a license to receive radioactive material. (01034)
This is a Severity Level lli Problem (Supplement V).
Civil Penalty - 455,000
~~
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation (Licensee) is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, within 30 days of the date of this Notice of Violation and Proposed imposition of Civil Pennity (Notice). This reply should be clearly marked as a " Reply to a Notice of. Violation" and should include for each alleged violation:
(1) admission or denial of the alleged violetion, (2) the reasons for the violation if admitted, and if denied, the reasons why, (3) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (4) the entractive steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (5) the date when full compliance will be achieved. If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an Order or a Demand for Information may be issued as why the license should not he modified, suspended, or revoked or why such other action as may be proper should not se taken. Consideration may be given to extending the response time for good cause shown. Under the authority of Section 182 of the Act,42 U.S.C. 2232, this response shall be submitted under oath or affirmation.
Within the same time as provided for the response required above under 10 CFR 2.201, the Licensee may pay the civil penalty by letter addressed to the Director, Off!ce of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, with a check, draft, money order, or ele 0tronic transfer payable to the Treasurer of the United States in the amount of the civil penalty proposed a
4
l L
q ,
Enclosure 3
- above, or the cumulativa amount of the civil penalties if more than one civil l penalty is proposed, or may protest imposition of the civil penalty in whole or in part, by a written answer addressed to the Director, Office of Enforcement,- U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Should the Licensee fell to answer within the time specified, an nrder imposing
. the civ!! penalty will be issued. Should the Licensee elect to file an answer in accordance with 10 CFR 2.205 protesting the civil penalty, in whole or in p art, such answer shodd be clearly marked as an " Answer to a Notice of Violation" and may: (1) deny the violat!on(s) listed in this Notice, in whole or in part, (2) deri..,nstrate extenuating circumstances, (3) show error in this Notice, or (4) show other reasons why the penalty should not be imposed, in addition to protecting the civil penalty in whole or in pcrt, such answer may request remission or mitigation of the penalty.
- in requesting mitigation of the proposed penalty, the factors addressed in Section VI.B.2 of the Enforcement Policy should be addressed. Any written answer in accordance with 10 CFR 2.205 should be set forth separately from the statement or explanation in reply pursuant to
.10 CFR 2.201, but may incorporate parts of the 10 CFR 2.201 repay by specific reference (e.g., citing page and paragraph numbers) to avoid repetition. The attention of the Licensee
. is directed to the other. provisions of 10 CFR 2.205, regarding the procedure for imposing a CHI penalty. '
Upon failure to pay any civil penalty due which subsequently has been datermined in accordance with the applicable provisions of 10 CFR 2.205, this matter may be referred to the Attorney General, and the penalty, unless compromised, remitted, or mitigated, may be collected by civil action pursuant to Section 234c of the Act,42 U.S.C. 2282c.
The response noted above (Reply to Not!ce of Violation, letter with payment of civil penalty, and Answer to a Notice of Violation) should be addressed to: James Lieberman, Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, One White Flint North,11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852 2738, with a copy to the Regional Administrmtor, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Pagion I, and a copy to the NRC Resident inspe '. st the facility that is the subject of this Notice.
Because your response will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room (PDR), to the extent '
possible, it should not include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards information so that it can be placed in the PDR without redaction. If personal privacy or proprietary information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, then please provide a bracketed copy of your response that identifies the information that should be protected and a redacted copy of your response that deletes such information if you request withholding of such matnial, you mug specifically identify the portions of your response that you seek to have -
withheld and provide in detail the bases for your claim of withholding (e.g., explain why the disclosure of information will create an unwariar^ ad invasion of personal privacy.or provide <
the information required by 10 CFR 2.790(b) to support a request for withholding confidential commercial or financial information). If safeguards information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, please provide the level of protection described in 10 CFR 73.21.
Dated at King of Prussia, Pennsylvania this 22nd day of January 1998' A