IR 05000220/1988009
| ML20155F424 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Nine Mile Point  |
| Issue date: | 05/19/1988 |
| From: | Harris R, Kerch H, Mcbrearty R, Olivieri M, Strosnider J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20155F415 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-220-88-09, 50-220-88-9, 50-410-88-09, 50-410-88-9, NUDOCS 8806160387 | |
| Download: ML20155F424 (54) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:_ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ ._.
. , u , s , -- , , i .. - ... , \\ ' '
S . d * !, 'y a
i n w e.
- U.3.NUCLEARREGt/LATORYCOMMISSION '
REGION I
a -[ p\\ {{.
, , a,, n '), '. " \\' N Report'Nos.
50-220/88-09 sN-50-410/88-09 ) 3: . dj ' Docket Nos.
50-220
y 50-410 3j
s A ,, y\\ -
x' ?,' License Nos. OPR-63 ' )1 p% v.
s s NPF-54 '
, Licensee: Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation ' -301 Plainfield Road . . Syracuse, New York 1T212 Facility Name: NineMilePointNuclearStation, Unit [1&2 ' Inspection At: Scriba,NewYork$ ? .- Inspection Conducted: March 7-11, 1988 and April 4-8, 1988 bd [h',/bY haf /A,29W Inspectors: f. A. McBrearty > Redo 7hEngineer ~ (/ da t.e - $
- l k
b M 19.l9 W H. W. Kerch, Senior Reactor Engineer (/ d'at6 80- ') Etad 19. /9W R. H. Harris, NPl~ Technician / Vdate' & 0 S' Ynh. \\ hay l9, jgW Y
i Vdate' - \\ H. A. Oliveri, NDE TechniciaW' O-4i SII4/h ' Approved b : ( >> J. R. Strosnider, Chief, Materials % Processes ' date i ' Section, Engineerirj Branch,, ORS ' , Inspection Summary: Ins ection on March I 11, 1513 and Anvil 4-8,1988 l ' (Report No. 50-226/88;ii9 ' 51,.-410/88-09) \\<A r < ' / Unit 1 > ,, ': i ' Areas Inspected: i> t }' ' ' , 'A routine, unannouncer4 inspection was conducted of the inservice inspection ! ' program rel.ted to the\\1st ten year inspection interval and of augmented
examinations conducted by the licensee..Tj is included ISI related prpcedures, the adequacy bf DCA engineering disposi,tions related to the 1986 refyeling outage, and the licensee's ASME XI modfication, repair and replacement pro-program for portions of the reacto';.thd inc(ude the licensee's erosion-corrosion gram. Other areas which were inspyr 3utiding closed loop cooh ag piping and torus and drywell wall thickness measurements.
' / i/ , , 8806160387 860610
.4 j >* < PDR ADOCK 06060220 ' i Q DCm u ,
,m ..' v a , h - l, +;- <f i > , <l ', I \\ ' t
A, }( ' g.
gl g i-p y, _ g}K . f'.
',;c; l '-
' / , , ' ' ' lI ,( '
'i ,, . n ' Results: Independent measurements performed by th'e inspectors'ir.dicate'd i. hat ' the torus wall has corroded to a thickness at or bplow the minimum specified thickness in some areas.
Licensee trending of the torus wall thickness was def.icient and a concern exists regarding the acceptability of the torus,for , t . return to plant operation.
Regarding the IEI program, two areas reqpiring reshutionexist.
First, a weakness in the review and closecut of 'l31
- '
findingspvas identified in that DCAs did not clearly identify tp ' basis for-i acceptability of compone'its.
Second, the licensee has identif t(:d th'n all required f,irst interval Section XI examinations have not been coinpleted and further P :e'nsee review of the program is in progress. The above three issues ! are'sigtfificant unresolved items, and a meeting was held on April 26 in the.
Region I office to discuss these issues.
The licensee bas been pequested to provide to NRC prior to returning Nine Mile Point Unit 1 to~opelation: (1) justification for return to operation, coMidering the condition of the torus; ~and, (2) confirmation that their review of the closeout of ISI findings and the ' Section XI ext.minations is complete and that these issues have been effectively resolved.- j ll One violation relating to inadequate contractor procedures for identifying grid patterns for thickness measurements was identified, which indicates a weakness in the licensee's review of contractor procedures and inspection results.
The inspectors concluded that the licensee has an adequato program for'the repair and replacement of ASME Section XI items.
N r Unit 2
Areas Inspected: An unannounced inspection was conducted of an aileption f which was received by the NRC which alleged that welds were del /berat31y " omitted from the facility ISI Program because the welds were di'ficult to examine in accordance with SecttbioXI requirements.
.) f p ,
, Results: Based on the areas inspected the inspector cond uded that the welds were included in the facility ISI Program, and that a requet,t was submitted to the NRC.for reifef from perfor ning the code required volumetric examination
t .. from' nne side of the weld.
, t , 2, ,
- ,
Y l' 's j ' J [ < , ! , - e n' " \\
, i , , < z ( <
i , l I E ' . i ) }
\\i > . - - - - - - ) . - l
?Q-g.
,,.f~ ^ - " ^ " ' ^ 77 t' ' +, - s )- . ,p . , . l' . . a,..Min (. Details J' ,. ,re i> -1.0 Persons Contacde'd' ' ~ N1'IgaraMohawkPowerCorporation
- S[,Agarwal,LeadLicensingEi.9neer
.I
- C.;Beckham,' Manager, Operations Quality Assurance tr
- W. Connolly, quah ty Assurance Program Manager
- K. Dahlberg, Site Maintenance. Superintendent
D. Dolney, ISI Supervisor . Unit 2
- j W.<Drews, Technical Superintendent
- ' l. F. Egan, Licensing Engineer - Unit 1 A. Kovak, Q1P-Program Manager
^ -F. Lee, Lead Mechanical Engineer
.L. Ludwig, ISI Specialist F. Newman, Quality Control Supervisor J. Perry, Vice President - Quality Assurance
-
- N Rademacher, Quality Assurance Prngram Manager
-
-
- T. Roman, Station Superintendent - Unit 1
-
- R.'Shelton, ISI & gervisor - Unit 1
- F. Slye, lead Qual Ay, Control Engineer ,*. A. Smith, Lead Mechanical Engineer
K. Thomas, Licensing Engineer ,,
- J. Willi s, General. Superintendent
, A.- Winegard, Quality Assurance Coordinator L. Wolf, Site Licensing Engineer K Zellits;h, Training Superintenden % Gilbert Common Ith I' ,;
K. Green, IJI Spepialist , d ~New York State Public ' service Commission b
- P. Eddy, Site Representative
' oz.
NucIear Energy Service (NES) '
, R. Smith,,4ite Supervisor - Unit 2
!i U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission /
- W. Cook, Senior Resident Inspector
- W. Schmidt, Resident Inspector Denotes those present at the March 11,F1988 exit meeting.
- Denotes those present at the April 8,1988 exit meeting.
-
- ~ Denotes those presr9t'jt both exit meetings.
-
,/ l f ]/ ,j' a > L
, ~i d ! . ->.
. I 2.0 Scope of' Inspection ' q[I Subsequent to the end of the 1986 refueling outage which was the last scheduled outage in the first ten year inspection interval, the licensee identified that various inspections were not completed during the interval as required by the ASME Code, Section XI. Additionally, the NRC identified a number of Deficiency Corrective Action (DCA) reports which were not properly dispositioned and which remained open at the end of the outage in 1986.
During the period from March 7 to 11,-1986, the above mentioned areas were inspected in addition to an allegation regarding recirculation system welds at Unit 2.
During the period from April 4-8, 1988 an , inspection of the'above areas was conducted and, in addition, the following areas were inspected: - Visual examination personnel qualification / certification records Inservice inspection procedures - - -Plant erosion - corrosion program - Closed loop cooling piping erosion monitoring - ' - Torus and drywell shell thickness measurements - Licensee plans to-inspect the RPV beltline region welds
., - Licensee plans to adopt Code Case N-409 f 3.0 Review of Previous Inspection Findings-Unit 1 $ (0 pen) Un esolved Item (50-220/87-21-06): Acceptability of the licensee's
Engineering Staff. disposition of Deficiency Corrective Action Notices (DCA). When Unit I was restarted after the refueling outage in June 1986 there was a larga number of outstanding inservice inspection (ISI) program ,j-DCAs on flaws which required engineering review. These OCAs were not '$~ .dispositioned until September 1987.
The inspectors reviewed the closecut , of a sample of DCAs to assess the acceptability of the licensee's dispositions.
The inspector found that, prior to this inspection, the licensee's Operations QA Department reviewed all ISI generated DCAs to assess the engineering evaluation and the corrective actions.
-The inspectors selected-for review 15 DCAs including some with which the licensee's Operations QA Department identified problems and others with which no problems were identified. DCAs 8, 10, 11, 12, 20, 32, 35, 39, 41, 120, 195, 196, 197, 200, 201 were reviewed by the inspectors.
... . _. _ - . -. . r .
. OCAs 195, 196 and 197 were issued due to rejectable liquid penetrant indications in core spray component support 40-H-16, core spray component support 40-H-52 and core spray weld 87-SW-1, respectively.
These components were accepted by the licensee based on licensee letter No. 16863 which permitted a visual inspection to be done in lieu of the required surface examination, and on a NES Letter dated 6/24/86 whose subject is "Liquid Penetrant Rejects." The NES letter states that the visual examiner was unable to verify that defects were not present in the components.
Operations-QA identified this disposition as a problem prior to the NRC inspection.
DCA No. 120 was issued due tc rejectable penetrant indications in core spray weld 40-SW-39E. The licensee's engineering justification for continued operation with the rejectable condition was based on the premise that because the surface preparation was inadequate for the examination there is no clear indication that an unacceptable flaw exists. Weld 40-SW-39E was included in NR: Violation 50-220/87-21-03, which addressed operation of the plant at power while both Emergency Cooling systems and redundant trains of Core Spray should not have been considered operable per TS 3.2.6.a, from June 21, 1986 until Septernber 8,1987. The inspectors verified that acceptable corrective action was taken during the ongoing refueling outage - the surface properly prepared and a re-examination by the liquid penetrant method revealed no rejectable indications.
DCA No. 41 was issued due to indications reported as a result of a visual examination of valve No. 40-13 in the Core Spray system.
The inspectors' discussions with licensee personnel regarding this item indicates that no rejectable condition exists, but the documentation package does not clearly show that the valve is acceptable.
The licensee stated that a summary will be added to the package to clearly identify that the valve is acceptable.
The dispositions provided in 1986 by Engineering called for the appropriate corrective action for the various DCAs.
The actions were not carried out during the 1986 refueling outage which is part of the reason for the Civil Penalty which was recently issued to the licensee.
The inspectors deter-mined that the proper ;orrective actions were taken during the current (1988) outage, that the items are acceptable, but that the OCA packages do not, in all cases, indicate this.
, Based on the inspectors' review of DCAs the licensee has stated that it l will perform an additional review of all (approximately 175) DCAs related
to the 1986 outage to ascertain that all the packages are complete and contain sufficient information to support the disposition of each item.
This item will remain open pending completion of the licensee's review , and subsequent NRC review of the licensee's actions.
J t -- , . .. -. -. -. -.. - --.-.---. , - - -,, - - -, - - . - -.. - . -.
____.
- - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _. - - e .
. J (0 pen) Unresolved Item (50-220/87-11-02): Feasibility Study for ISI of Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) Beltline welds.
RPV Beltline weld Inservice Inspection (ISI) was discussed with the licensee's staff and file letter 98381 dated November 5, '1987 was also reviewed.
This letter documents the licensee's staff inhouse discussion of the feasibility of ISI of the RPV Beltline welds. During this outage the licensee is performing (for the first time) examinations on accessible RPV welds outside of the Beltline region.
The NRC Jffice of Nuclear Reactor Regulation ((NRR) met with the BWR Owners Group on March 17, 1988 to discuss the generic issue of inspection of BWR pressure vessels and pressure vessel internals. At that meeting representatives from the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) stated that the ultrasonic testing technology for inspecting reactor vessel shell welds is available but that tne robotics system for probe positioning and scanning must be developed.
NRR indicated that generic requirements for complete inspection of the BWR reactor pressure vessel beltline welds may be promulgated.
Industry programs (EPRI and the BWR Owners Group) are in the formulative stage.
Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation is not a member of EPRI although it is a member of the BWR Owners Group. Region I will continue to monitor licensee progress toward implementing an effective reactor vessel beltline weld inspection program.
This inspection item remains open.
4.0 Examinations Not Completed During the First Ten-Year Inspection Interval Unit 1 Subsequent to the end of the 1986 refueling outage which was the last scheduled outage in the first ten year inspection interval the licensee reported that a number of required examinations were not completed. A commitment was made by the licensee that the items would be examined during the 1988 refueling outage. As a result, the licensee requested its ISI vendor, NES, to perform a complete review of the first ten year program to ascertain whether more examinations were not completed.
The licensee reported to the NRC that the NES review identified that additional required examinations were not completed within the interval, l Ouring this inspection the inspectors found that the licensee is now performing its own review to ascertain the magnitude of the missed examinations. Eight licensee personnel have been assigned to the project wurking two shifts a day on a full time basis. The inspectors stated that the inspection of this item would be deferred until the licensee's I review was completed.
This inspection item is unresolved pending completion of the licensee's action and subsequent NRC review.
(50-220/88-09-03).
! I_. _
.. . _ I s .. .
. 5.0 ; Independent Measurements - Unit 1 Th'e NRC inspectors performed independent measurements of the Reactor Building Closed Loop Cooling System Piping wall thickness, Feedwater system piping wall thickness, torus and drywell shell thicknesses, and control rod drive accumulator bottle wall ~ thicknesses.
These measurements were taken using the NOVA 0-100 digital thickness gauge per NRC' Procedure NOE - 11 Revision 0.
5.1 Reactor Building Closed Loop Cooling Piping: Two areas were inspected on the closed loop cooling piping. These areas are referred to in Niagara Mohawk memo 2401J as areas 6 and 7.
Area'6 is on a 3" elbow downstream of block valve 70-124 upstream of drywell air cooler 201-04. Area 7 is on a 3" straight pipe down-stream of drywell air cooler 201-04 and upstream of valve 70-30.
Attachment 1 presents the NRC measured wall thickness data.
During inspection of above items a discrepancy was found-with Nuclear Engineering Services (NES) report Nos. 2434-88A-289 and 2434-88A-288 in that the thickness data for areas 6 and 7 had been reversed.
This indicates poor control over contractor activities, a major deficiency with regard to trending of ISI data and a failure to properly evaluate test results. Additional deficiencies in the licensees trending of ISI data are identified in Section 5.2 regarding the balance of plant erosion-corrosion monitoring program and in Section 5.3 regarding-torus shell thickness measurements.
5.2 Balance of Plant: - Three_ areas included in the licensees balance.of plant erosion-corrosion monitoring program were selected for independent measurements by the NRC inspectors.
The areas. selected are in the feedwater system and 'are identified as grid 6B and 6C with one area on a 2" pipe in between grid 6B and.6C.
The NRC wall thickness data are presented in Attachment 2.
Area 6C is on a 10" schedule 120 elbow with nominal wall thickness of 0.843", and a minimum allowed thickness of 0.737".
The NES measurements of 6C are reported to two decimal places, and in three locations are listed as 0.73".
It cannot be determined from those readings whether or not the minimum wall has been violated.
The NRC readings are all above the minimum allowable thickness, but they represent fewer measurements than were made by NES. Additionally, NES reported the nominal thickness as 1" for area 60. When that is reduced by 12h percent, the minimum allowed thickness is 0.875".
It is not clear at this time whether this is a reporting error or whether the nominal thickness of the elbow is actually 1".
-- . - .. .. _, . - - - . ~
- _. . i
- .
-
. The data were. reviewed by a NES Level III on March 21, 1988 and final acceptance by the ANII was provided by signature on March 22, 1988.
The data further indicated that no licensee engineering disposition was required.
During inspection of two areas "6B" and "6C" the inspectors found that the grid numbering system which was used on the piping was not consistent 1n that the grid was numbered in a clockwise direction at ~ i one end with numbers on the grid lines, and in a counterclockwise direction at the opposite end with numbers between the grid lines.
The licensee uses two generic procedures (NES 80A2433 Revision 3 and CBI SI No I to accomplish the task of taking and recording the ultrasonic thickness measurements. Neither procedure specifies how the grid will be numbered.
The CBI Procedure calls for an "X" to be stamped as a permanent zero "degree" marker, but the relationship is not specified between this mark and in what order thickness measure-ment will be taken on the grid.
Because of the lack of a specified system for taking data, the wall thickness measurements at a given location cannot be correlated from inspection to inspection and effective trending is not possible.
5.3 Torus Shell Teledyne Engineering Services (TES) report TR-6801-2 delineates results from the TES analysis of the torus for minimum required wall thickness,- and found this to be 0.447" at the bottom of the torus.
The Niagara Mohawk ISI Department has taken uitrasonic thickness measurements since 1975, and reported in 1975 that the measured thickness then was between 0.49" and 0.50".
Since 1975, the torus shell thickness has been periodically monitored by the licensee on five 1 square foot areas.
The inside surface of the torus shell presently contains no protection from corrosion, although the licensee stated that it plans to apply a protective coating in 1990, which is when TES predicted that the minimum thickness would be reached.
Four areas were inspected by the NRC on the torus shell.
Three areas were selected from the Niagara Mohawk Unit No. 1 suppression chamber thickness measurement stations identified in traveler No. RXRM-88-001.
The three areas are designated 1 of 5, 2 of 5, and 3 of 5.
The fourth area was selected at random and is located 3' to the left of penetration XS-344 facing the reactor vessel.
The thickness measure-ments were taken through paint.
In addition to the USNRC ultrasonic thickness procedure NDE-11, the licensee's procedure 80A2434 was used.
The minimum wall thickness was established as 0.447 for area number 1 as stated in a Niagara Mohawk internal memo dated January 20, 1988 from L. M. McNeer to A. G. Vierling.
This memo references Teledyne Engineering Services (TES) report TR-6801-2 which contains
' ' .. ' .i '
i . the engineering analysis.of the torus for minimum required wall thickness. A second February 12, 1988 memo from L. M. McNeer to A. G. Vierling on the subject of torus wall thinning contained two recommendations from Teledyne for determining the actual wall thick-ness.
Specifically, the memorandum suggests that a Kraut-Kramer, Branson Model USL-38 ultrasonic instrument be used to acquire the thickness measurements.
This instrument was suggested because it is considered very accurate, providing a 1% error (from reading to true thickness) according to the manufacturer.
It also was suggested that the thickness measurements be reported to 3 decimal places. The second recommendation was to compare the thickness readings (minus 1% error) to the minimum specified wall thickness.
The NRC measured thickness data are presented in Attachment 3.
Based on these data, several a,eas appear to be below or at the minimum specified wall thickness of 0.447".
Those areas appearing to be close to or below minimum wall thickness where reexamined by one nuclear engineering services (NES) technician and one Niagara Mohawk auditor using two different ultrasonic thickness machines.
Both technicians found the suspect readings acceptable but only by.003" . (.450") on grid No. 1 of 5.
If 1% measurement error is applied, the result is measurements below or near minimum wall thickness.
Further-more, an allowance must be provided for continued wall thinning prior to the next inspection.
The January 20, 1988 memo from L. M. McNeer to A. G. Vierling states that the estimated average rate of wall thinning is 0.0033 inch per year.
Applying the estimated 0.0033 inch per year rate of wall thinning to the measured wall thickness and considering measurement error indicates that the minimum specified wall t.ickness could be violated prior to completing another full cycle of operation.
Subsequent to the inspection, the licensee was requested to provide all torus wall thickness measurement data that had been previously taken.
Seven sets of data, dating back to October 1975, were provided. These data were reviewed in the Region I office.
The-licensee also was requested to provide historical trend plots for these data but indicated that such plots did not exist.
Review of the data revealed several inconsistencies.
First, thickness measurements were not consistently taken at the same grid locations from one inspection to the next.
Second, in two years (1984 and 1986) the data were only recorded to two decimal places.
The lack of consistent measurement techniques reduced the effectiveness of the data for the purposes of trending and represents inadequate L control over this special measurement process.
Further, proper ' evaluation of this data would have disclosed the inconsistencies and prompted enrrective action c' .
.
'. 5.4 Drywell Wall Two areas were inspected on the drywell wall in locations approxi-mately opposite the drywell sand cushion. These areas were 4" X 5" grids located approximately 1" from the floor and they were adjacent to main coolant pump 11s.
The thickness taken ranged from a low of.
1.078" and a high of 1.138" (see Attachment 4 for actual thickness).' The licensee did not take thickness readings on the drywell wall.
The uniformity of the thickness readings shows no large degradation, however,.the drawing minimum for the drywell wall is 1.090".
Subsequent to tne inspection, the licensee informed the inspector that the 1.090" dimension included a corrosion allowance. When the corrosion allowance is taken into account, the NRC readings are above the minimum acceptable wall thickness.
This item is unresolved pending licensee documentation and NRC review 50-220/88-09-02.
5.5 Control Rod Drive Accumuistor Bottles Twelve nitrogen tanks and twelve water and nitrogen accumulators were measured for adequate wall thickness.
The operating pressure for the nitrogen tanks is 1750 psi and they have a minimum specified 1/16" wall thickness of.252".
The water and nitrogen accumulator tanks have a minimum specified wall thickness of 0.390".
These accumulators have a coating of nickel and a coating of chrome on the inside surface.
They were also found to be hydrostatically tested every 10 years.
All tank wall thicknesses were found to significantly exceed the specified minimum values.
5.6 Summary of Independent Measurement Activities The inspectors performed independent thickness measurements of the torus shell, closed loop caoling piping', the drywell wall, control rod drive accumulator bottles, and a portion of balance of plant piping which is included in the facility erosion-corrosion monitoring program.
In all cases except the drywell wall and the control rod drive accumulator bottles, where the licensee had not taken measurements, the NRC measurements were taken in the same areas that the licensee had measured.
A major weakness was identified in that torus shell data were not consistently reported or properly evaluated. At times the data were reported to three decimal places and other times two decimal places.
Additionally, the measurements were not taken at the same locations from one inspection to the next.
Reporting errors regarding safety related closed loop cooling piping measurement data were identified in that data for two areas were reversed. Additionally, balance of plant piping measurement data were taken on a grid pattern, but there was no control over grid numbering, or in what order the thickness measurements will be taken on the gri. t ' .... .
. As discussed in Section 5.1, licensee control over contractor activities is weak, and major deficiencies were. identified with regard to the licensee trending of ISI thickness measurement data in that no. procedure was available to control this process.
Failure.to effectively perform testing and properly evaluate the data required to demonstrate that structures, systems and components will perform . satisfactorily in service is a violation of Criterion XI of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 (50-220/88-09-01).
Section 5.2 discusses balance of olant piping measurements. These items are not safety related, be provide further examples of weak licensee control over vendor activities, and its inability to trend and evaluate the data resulting from the measurements.
6.0 Review of Procedures-Unit 1 The procedures listed below were reviewed to verify their technical adequacy and conformance to regulatory and code requirements.
CBI-SI#1 Rev. O, Preparation and Griding for Erosion-corrosion
Inspections
NES - 80A2433 Rev. 3, Ultrasonic examination for the detection of steam erosion NI-ISI-025 Rev. O, Trend Analysis
AP-2.0 Rev. 9, Administrative Procedure
AP-5.0 Rev 10, Procedure for Repair
MI-6.0 Section XI Rev. 1, Maintenance Work Plan
AP-6.0 Rev. 5,. Procedure for modification
With the exception of the asterisk procedures above they were acceptable.
See paragraph 5.2.
7.0 Verification of Qualification for Visual Inspections Personnel-Unit 1 The NRC inspector made a random selection of three visual personnel certification records. These records were reviewed based on ANSI 45.2.6 criteria. All records examined were acceptable per ANSI 45.2.6 criteria.
No violation was identified.
L i L
-. - _ .. .. e , . .12 , . ' '8.0 ASME Code Case N409-Unit 1 A review of Niagara Mohawk letter NMPILO121. dated December 29, 1986-indicated that the licensee intends to make use of code case N409, "Procedure and Personnel Qualification for Ultrasonic Detection and Sizing of IGSCC." During this inspection the licensee indicated that they wish to withdraw this letter'in that they do not intend to use code case N409 at this time.
They will document this ir their response to Generic Letter 88-01.
9.0 Allegation Followup-Unit _2 (Closed) Allegation No. RI-88-A-0009: On January 14, 1988, Region I received an allegation that a weld overlay was welded on the recirculation system outlet nozzle safe end to pipe welds at Nine Mile Point Unit 2 and that a conscious management decision was made not to include this weld in the facility ~ISI program.
The inspector reviewed licensee records regarding welds RCS-FW-A01 and RCS-FW-801, outlet nozzle safe.nd_to pipe welds on the recirculation system at Unit 2.
Based on the inspector's review he determined that: Weld. overlay was applied to the safe end side of each weld to
correct for shrinkage caused by the welding process.
Preservice inspection (ultrasonic examination) was performed from
the pipe side of each weld. No ultrasonic examination was performed from the safe end side for a variety of reasons including poor penetration through the safe end material, sound beam redirection caused by the safe end material, and possibly because of the presence of the weld overlay.
The welds were included in the facility ISI program.
- A request (RR-IWB-6) has been submitted by the licensee to NRR for
relief from performing the code required volumetric examination examination from the safe end side.
The inspector found that weld overlay was applied to the two welds. He further.found that the licensee performed preservice inspection of the welds, included the welds in the facility inservice inspection program, and submitted relief request RR-IWB-6 to the NRC to obtain relief from performing volumetric examination from the safe end side of each weld.
Based on the above this allegation is close *i l .
, .. ,10.
Quality assurance Involvement In ISI Activities-Unit 1 During the period from February 22, 1988 to March 8, 1988 the licensee's - QA. group performed nine (9) surveillances of inservice inspection activi-i - ties of licensee and contractor' personnel.
lhe monitored activities Linclude. leak rate testing, personnel ' certification records of contractor NDE personnel (NES and CE), ISI data review, observation of examinations in progress, review of the NES site QA program, and the ISI department initiation of corrective action for ASME XI deficiencies.
In addition.to reviewing reports of the above mentioned surveillances, the inspector reviewed the requalification evaluation of NES performed by the Procurement-QA Section of the Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation Quality Assurance Department. The survey by Quality Systems, Inc. covered the NES QA Manual 80A9086, Revision 1, dated September 15, 1986, and the 18 criteria _of 10 CFR 50 Appendix 8 and ANSI N 45.2.
No findings were issued as a result of the audit.
The evaluation was based on survey data compiled by ' Quality Systems, Inc. at the NES facility at Danbury, Connecticut from October 28-30, 1986 while under contract to the licensee.
The licensee completed its evaluation on January 6,1987, and notified NES on March 19, 1987, that NES was requalified and retained on the licensee's "Qualified Contractors List".
Surveillance findings were properly documented and corrective action was taken in a timely manner.
No violations were identified.
11.
Unresolved Items-Unit 1 Unresolved items are matters about which more information is required to ascertain whether they are acceptable items, violations, or deviations.
An' unresolved item is discussed in paragraph 5 of this report.
112.
Exit Meeting The inspectors met with licensee representatives (denoted in paragraph 1) on March 11, 1988 and at the conclusion of the inspection on April 8, 1988.
The inspectors summarized the scope and findings of the inspection.
At-no time during the inspection was written material provided by the inspectors to the licensee.
The licensee did not indicate that proprietary information was involved within the scope of this inspectio i ' __ . - _ _ _ PLANT:NINE MILE POINT 1 NRC DATA ATTACHMENT ATTACHMENT 4.L i , , 'ISC: N/A PAGE )OFI i COMP./ SYSTEM: CLOSED LOOP COOLING PIPING PRCCEDURE:80A2474 i
--------------------..----------- -------------
-- ---- A B C D E F G H I J h L l ODEG.
gggf g J800EG.
] l l - A .215 A .223 y
- B .206 B .233 R if - B * I ' c
C
C .205 i ls -
D t D .236 D*
- 90DEG.
270DEG.
g ~ - &'#po,.o s l 000 A
A .226 B .232 B .241 l 3.i gg g g j C
C .227 i I D .223 D .248 A = utmeLG 7o A1AnrJ fl e n o s M r i 180DEG ODEG.
gggj)7 l s l A .226 A .216 _ Frow o - G A B L D
~ N ' l B .236 B .228 2=<p y - c S?4 C .229 % N l a \\3 ~ . D .228 D .221 \\ l - l 90DEG.
270DEG.
- ELE'. VIEJ A .228 A .z14 mmmmm , B .226 B .220 3" p,pg A 42Ed ~7 l C .227 C .224
l D .235 D .215 l
1 l l l l - ! t , ,
WW .
Plant / Unit: N'NC U!I F PONr uNrinNg ULTRASONIC Data Pkg.: 2434 88 A 288 %eML
ISO: S 6 2 ' - 5 'M c -n o - c.c <,c.q EXAMINATION Page 1 ef g o m [a, %,f,r % g Exam item: P!Pc s / PrPF n M -h Com p./Sy s.: CAllB R ATION Loop: u0 Procedure: ROA?434 ~ SHEET R e v./ F.C.: 3/FC 1 A2 Title: UT FX AU - TH!CKNFR9 INSTRUMENT SETTINGS SE ARCH UNIT Callbration Block NMP 1SW 1020 CS Serial # I27276 3784 Serial s LO8554 Ofock Thickness .10 1. 0 '/1.1 2. 0 * * MFG /Model # KKB USK-7 Brand KB-AEROTECH Como. Th.ck ne s s N/A Sweep Lenath 5.28 Frequency 5.0 mHz Block Tomoerature
'F Sween Delev 7.50 Size / Shape .25' ROU ND Como. Temperature
- F Pulso Lenath/ Damp.
FlXED Style /Tupe GAMMA DUFP Thermometer 88 200 Frea.
l B/B Renae .5 Fluture N/A Surf ace CD DEC/ Gate ICF Relect MIN Cable 2X6' SFLF CONTA!N Jacks R/T Couplant Batch 8764 DAC Mode Select LCPG Countant Brand UI TR AGPt il Reflector %FSH Position Coorse Gain 20 l Fine 124 DAC 100% j ng.STFD A o *6 s0 Sean Sena.
80% B R.
9 0 -- '~-
10 sTFD 70 % 10 0 s Calibrstion Checks : Time 80 - N - ~ ,
NrA N/A N/A
N/A N/A N'A initial Callb.
0100 70 - - j Intermediate N/A 60-
N/A NiA N/A Intermediate N/A 50 -
N/A NrA NtA Intermediate N/A 40 - Fin al Calib.
0300 30-CRT Calibrated in Calibration Date 3/9/88 20-1.0* OF DEPTH "" " "}"""""""""""""""""" INSTRUMENT
- ,;,g
, g , LIN E A RITY 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Scan Angle ODEG' f;f,,. b.
Meas. Angle N/A
100
6 so
2
44
40
Mode titG AMPLITUDE LINEARITY
80
8
15 Calibration DEPTH = 4C 80 12 e
4
37
20
80 6
- "
'" ^ =
20 + 12 = (0
60
\\\\ 40 + 6 JExam item l PIPE 5 / PIPE 6 l Remarks ~ 'MAINTAINFD 90% RACK l l Comments / Reasons for incomplete Exams REFLECT 10N ON CCAPCNENT PIPING THCKNC.SS Cl FANFD PlPF WITH DEMIN COWLETED EACH OF FCOR MEASUREfENTS ABOUND THE WATFR AND TRP CIRCUMFERENCE OF EACH PIPE AT 90DEG SPACED.WITH INTERVALS OF 1.0* w Examiner 1: 't )N Level: 1 Date: 3 'l f 6 WR# N/A NCR# N/A ! EDWARD KOZLOWSKI LP/EL 11 TRAVELER 70 88 001 Examiner 2: __ ( Level: __ Date: N/A s/ O LEVEL:[DATE: / N NES REVIEWER: v WELD ACCEPTABLE? ' I Q AlQ C ANil YESjQ NO $/g l E A Nil INOAL P E'/'EW NMPC ENG.
REO.
DISP.VNO h ~ NM .,, a '
.'~hAL ACCEPT ANCE YES {' fdp gr 11 Ali -
1
e
- --
- - - - - - - - .. _ ..Di V '. . . .- . ArracW ' V.. 2' M -bh '2bb ' Dato Pkg.: Plant / Unit:._h).f6f-l _ Page 1 cf ,y,,_ - M2,1 - si3 N c.?>c s-c sin 4 SKETCH . , Eram item: R Fr 5' Pmt 86 iso: l C om p./ Sy s.: 'be Vd e l _ our n ue P oc c/J@ BP'4HEET Fl>A?'434 /f0 Procedure: i Loop: nlA R e v./ F.C.: _ 2r v 5 Fe 2 UT We m'r u wrmu MeMwtr ' Title: ' i o' 90 RPE f 80' 270
!?Plimd PfPf 3 'p,pg g y,y t er vat.VC 70- I M. / @ @ @ @ O @ @ @ r w @ @ @ @. e @ @ @ @ O 90 RPE %_
270 " " * ' " re,ee _ m m - cf Blec@u.s VALdC j 70- 12'4 Fe tek To ,d . 02.
02t CCyecu. Ate Cwt c.k Zot - ocl.
O @ @ @ i @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ " I.M.' E4CH Cf THL fta2 met %Un%TS AecuND ThG Q C'009'Nfi&ENCE k E 2E spWO > . Examiner 1: BL I'M '- L'V'I I' H: 7-9' T Y v!TE d W is 3 7 R T/ Q -- Af THE~ Tbi) Cf THE R PE* y e) EA.W $5 T' cf 17/ICKh666
Ereminer 2: D il.
Level: $ Date: N/A gMP//>' S 6 Mrc ~, I ILCH Qgy fgg f}g[ggjp ' Se6 /. 8 __ $ ~ M LEV Eld /_L_D AT E: NES REVIEWER:_ .1 ANil O A/0C AN!! INITI AL REVIEW: CSNATep5 pays 'l ?$ i dN . *
stor,a T un E dATE
l - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _
, - ' f; . ^ ULTRASONIC Data Pkg.: 2434 08A 289 \\ Plant / Unit: Nw u't F PO'w uNrrONF (SO'* 3-MLt-M e-H W -t w A , EXAMINATION Page _1_ cf A Eram item: FI AOW 7 / FI ROW R Comp./Sg: h m o m (n % ar.neqf7CAllBRATION - Procedure: 80A9434 Loop.
SHEET R e v./ F.C.: 3/FC 1 A9 Title: UT FYAV TH!CKNF99 INSTRUMENT SETTINGS SE ARCH UNIT Calibration Block NVP.1SW 1020 CS Serial # l 27276 37d4 Serial # L08554 Block Thicknes s .101.0*/1.12.0" MFG /Model # KKB USK 7 Brand KB-AEROTECH Como. Thicknese N/A Sweep Lenath 5.28 Frequency 5.0 mHz Block Tomoerature
'F Sweep Delev 7.50 Size / Shape .25' ROU ND Como. Tomoersture
'F Pules Lenath/ Demo.
FDGD Style /T'rpo GAMMA DUFP Thermometer 88-200 _ Frea.
l B/B Renae .5 Fixture N/A Surface , CD DEC/Gete ICTF Relect MIN Cable PY6' SFLF COWA!N Jacks R/T Couplent Batch 8764 DAC Mode Select LCN3 countant Brand t!!TRanci il Coorse Geln 20 I Fine 124 DAC Reflector %FSH Position Sean Sens.
80% B A 100 \\
ng.g7Fp png gn 90 -
in qTFp 70 % 3n_o x "
N/A N/A t!!f Calibration Checks : Time 80 - .m Initial Collb.
0100 70 - ' '- )
N/A N/A N/A Intermediate N/A 60 -
N/A N/A N/A Intermediate N/A 50 - -
NrA yrA yrA Intermediate N/A 40 - Final Callb.
0300 30-CRT Calibrated in Calibration Date 3/9188 20 - 1.0" OF DEPTH 10- "" "" "" "" "" "" "" '"' "" ""
- '**"
'O' INSTRUMENT 0-I 7 8 9 1' O h.6 LIN E ARITY 0 1 2 3 4 Mf _ ODEG Sean Anni *
inn
6
26 .,7, M es s.
Angle N/A _
00
7
90 Mode LCtG AMPLITUDE LINE ARITY
80
8
15 ' " ' * " " -
70
9
11 80 6 =
80 12 =
'"
"#^
60
s\\\\ 40 + 6 = PO 20 + 12 = 80 [ Exam item l ELBOW 7 / ELBOW 8 l Remarks _ _
- MAtNTAINFO Ro% JACK Comments / Reasons for incomplete Exams
- RFFl FCTON ON CCtcONENT PIPING THICKNESS Ct E ANED PIPE WITH OFM!N COWLETED EACH OF FOUR MEASURENENTS AAOUND THE WATFR AND TRP CIRCUMFERENCE OF E ACH ELBOW AT 90 DEG SPACED. WITH INTERVALS OF 1.0" _ <3 l k Level: 1 Date: 3 9-f 8 WRs N/A Examiner 1: / , NCR# N/A EDWARD KOZLOWSCLEVEL 11 /) TRAVELER 70 88 001 l Examiner 2: - Level: __ Date: N/A L EVEL:kD ATE: N M NES REVIEWER: WELD ACCEPTABLE 7 Q A/QC ANil YES NO // ANil INITIAL REVIEW: HMPC ENG, pe ep PCE DISP. REO aM A> MWM.
YES WT40 h/ f%,yl FINAL F.CEPTt NCE: i s.c, ... - < cm NGL *f - , I- _ .. _ L
, , . -n- , thOACW } ,. L7l2m g! j_.--,- b45'4'B3 '50b ~.-- plentlUnit: NYP"I .~ D*\\* Pk9 ; ' iso: 3-M 1 - M M f -M95f-C shT 9 SKETCH Page 1 cf,g_ ' 6ueo* 7. c(pow * 6 Eram item: SHEET F0424ry gm L eterrb tenmyft [70 comp./Sys.: Procedure: Loop: R e v./ F.C.: O \\ re f MIA Title: F P0 m eu Y rd Tdit4; css W AsetousT ' I.
/ 0* 90' Rm 1 00* Elatus 270 carce ?)0106 Elavus scae ELBcw cf s" P*PE Dca% STREAM cf l causa s.a a.k Eut-vy peice ro , \\ VA4vE 70-3c. ' I h h h h !a"BPe.uJAScALLEc, i-Tu Be CuN,esGt
- RCr g pM.D, O
@ @ @ ""- , '3 . @ @ @ @ . 90 RPE A
270
cnee Ceios E l-sow JhliL9 8E%( GLBou) of 3* PtPC Dce64TEEAH er Etu.k.ow $. V ALL'E. 70 - 125 P &to R.
't; - Tu et> \\ - GO '
,- '* ll 3' Parc WM CALLED F:& To EE E wt NCD.
'i ' *,, 05 WT c LC AtJ;.D, i GE(Ao WA4 'a - t.stE.' Uc'h if THE fcad-l l AGMELMEAlls h1unD PC q eca,MFCCEyeE Mtl$PtMEO ( - RT 9&' toJTE&ALS 5TANTi% ' \\ ' 5 A- - L*"I; THG RP of 7tE Pipe ~ ! ' Examiner 1: GJSAD y '~ E ACl4 SGT of THICKA) CSS N//I - Leol: Date: $s dc4pincy5 n/EM /A Mgp Examiner 2: ' f fNCA) TIG P2 W Q ti.
s, NES REVIEWER: _ LEVELkD AT E: 9 N llt AHil ANil INITIAL REVIEW: OA/QC 0 ATE b; f;/;p4q V[
S;GN ATUP E/ OATE
r*'dT * "i UT THICKNESS WEAS Rk'WENT GRID' WiP FOR,, __.
lg r rAcFL - i II k b k Nb EROS 10N CORROSION g g gg i
~ ~ ~ , - i ei
, ' , '
' l . - is , I is s l
13
2 ' ' it 330** %W s l il 3an.
g i.
", N .. ,,
A8 I se i tw .... y l
_ tw tw s %e
, ' 3 1 iw ,, Tw
i 10 ~0 ELB0W s' Y W
. NOTES: ELBOW ORIENTATION f O PLAN O PLAN O O eER ligg.c MSPCCDON D NUWOut , m O NOWpOL WM.L D900($$,813 , N . ) UT D400(SS CAM Na f ^ %
niots3eR,/ttMLS nAtt; '//5 /!Y \\.\\,. O O
o o e v
. a u a c CHECXID: CAtt: T T s s H M I I STMtf POD (T 1 O ELEV [E1IV O O O (~EGD a)A TEfL . UT THICKNESS WEASUREMENT REPCRT
so etS o O ,
O' 30' 60' 90' 120' 150' 180' 210' 240' 270' 300* 330' ' i , sos .wc . 78 1
.9o 7 , tar _VA3
.q nt ,83o .9 17
.9 3 . g; 3 , to3 '
.cn'i' , di3 . 74 2.
,%2 , v4 . 7@'i
, c13 2.
. 7% .779
ci s o .781 776
,9 " X 7t7 .707 X
.9 51 XX .76 .766 X .X
mz X X . 7 7 5< .7c z XX ,isy XX , 771 .75'i X X
'
,970 X )_ CX .772 , 7 'I '6 XX X
,4 7 f X >< X ,7(,8 . 7's Z X X X
,973 X>< XX ,76 7 ,24 3 XXX X
.97o XX X X . 76 't _ 7V4 XIX.X X X n ,91: N / ,774 ,19? N / is , gyu \\ / .752 , ~7 5 3 A / ' ei .qvo N / . 7 ei ,13 f N / ss ,933 A / 742 , 73 4 N / as ,q)y N / , 74o , 7 s' s ' N /
- 7
.wiw N/ .79C ,7C V V pt ,isu /N .79 5 //f /\\ st .9n / \\ , fo z 774 / \\ tr 90] / N . wol 7h / N p c, ,y t *1 _/ \\ . Y i s' . 7 V1 / \\ _n ,w e g / N vi9 -, *s, / N N /
/ ..._- _ w-
_. -- NurMaE / NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UT THICKNESS IAEASU%EMENT GRIO WAP F0" g g A c)4 l ' 6k k k b bI 2' ,j k$ k k k Nb EROSION CORROSION . --
4 ,
le I i
, . ,
4 j is e .
I l
3
g
_ 330' s% 37 l 1: _ 3or w _
e _ n w ? '# '2" =. ,
%e
4 I 2 1 ,y
i h- - l 10 ~0 ELBOW f Y#
. NOTES: ELBOW ORIENTAT10N UMT I
O PLAN O PLAN O O .
UNE NUW8ER lhy.9 NSPEC110N O NUW80t bi3 ' NOWNAL WAR DOCKNESS J'O flow
. UT THCXNESS CACC NCL j sy: dudf,ef f/Aff4J DATE: + O O' N o o c v ..
y
- - -Cxm m.
STAAT PONT 1 H H T T , dELEV O ELEV DA O raoannt . , i UT THICKNESS WEASUREMENT Rf? ORT ' , ' " O' 30' 60' 90* 120' 150' 180' 210' 240' 270' 300' 330'
,833 ,770 781 ,788 '
,4/o 776 l7 73 ,777
. 7 7 5e .767 ,7 N
A.1>_ ,770 748 .273 '
,4 Q]
. 9 </C . 7 7 e> .77s' .77i
,S T / ,77 6 773 .7 k7
.cf5 4 ,77'I . 77 '( .7 99
9 ylf' , ) ? 'l , 7 %~ ,75f '
849 X ,78f , 7'/ 0 Fo ?- X
912 XX 770 7<f3 . yo C >C X
437 X X 7'f i 8 01 . Y/Y XX .
. %2 i XmX ,7'f6 , 7fi , y/6 X X
_9/ Y X .X.X .f/O , y/6 <26 XX X
M30 X X~X , fd., , g/'/ , # 2'1 X X X
,437 X XXX ,F23,cy . 55 3 << XXX X
, ( 7 '? X X XX . v.2 3_,776, . 7 70 aX XJX X . 10 ** ELBOW em
. [NN . g Plant / Unit.
N'NC Mil F potNT UNfT ONF ULTRASONIC Data Pkg.: 2433 8en. 20 - '.n EXAMINATION Page 1 og { is3 1,4 . FFFOWATF A s po Exam item: AAFA6C Comp./Sys.: CAllBRATION . Loop: N/A Procedure: A0 A9 411 SHEET R e v./ F.C. :
Title: llT FXAM. RTFAV F AORION INSTRUMENT S ETTIN G S SEARCH UNIT Calibration Block N M P.1 SW-1020.C S Serial # l212038 Serial # KB1009 Block Thickness .101.0*/1.12.0" MFG.IModel # KKB.USL 38 Brand KB.AEROTECH Como. Thickness 1.0 Sweep Lenath 9.34 Frequency 5 0 mHz Block Temperature
'F Swoeo Delev 7 69 SizelShape 50" ROU ND Como. Temperature
'F Pulse Lenath/ Demo.
MIN Style / Type GAMVA Thermometer KB114 Frea.
I50 Renae .5 Fixture N/A Surf ace Q DEC/Gete im Relect MIN Cable OUA! SPL F CONT.
Jacks T/R Couplant Batch 9784 DM Mode Select DUAL C_; o ola n t Brand UI.TA AGci 0 DAC Reflector %FSH Position - Coorse Gain 40 l Fine I 10 ~
s R O n 7s Scan Sens.
- 90 -
10 60'4 s_o Calibration Checks : Time 80-
3 9o som to_o Initial Calib.
2350 70 -
N/A N/A N/A Intermediate N/A 60 - J',
N/A N/A N/A Intermediate N/A 50 - )
NiA N/A N'A , Intermodlate N/A 40-Final Calib.
0330 30 - CRT Calibrated in Calibration Date :3/12/88 20-2* OF DEPTH "" "" "" "" "" * "" "" "" '"'
' '
- '**"
' " ' ' " INSTRUMEFT
4
8 Scan Angle ODEGREE
.5 j,
% M Meas. Angle N/A - ' "
00
7
20 Mode LOfG.
AMPLITUDE LINEARITY
90
8
ig 80. 5 =
80 12 =
-' ' "
70
g pn to "" '"
60
\\ \\ 40 + 6 =
20 + 12 = 80 l l Exam ite m l AAEA 6C l Remarks
- MAINTAINED 80% RACK Comments / Reasons for incomplete Exams REFL ECTION ON COP.PONENT.
_ Ei.RDW RFmVFD COUPt ANT RFSIDUF CONPLETE ELBOW AREA GC.
WITH OFMIN WATFR AND TSP _ - J2/.dQ W R 8 L/F el: M Date: / Examiner 1: __D A. ANDERSONLEVELiliGSCC NCRa#/F Ctj TRAVELERMEC-83-CN Examiner 2: Level: __ Date: N/A NES REVIEWER:d _[ _ LEVEL: D AT E: 3 $N _ ' ' WELD ACCEPTABLE 7 ANil INITIAL REVIEN.
_ _ _ HMPC ENG.
MLf4-21TJ[ _, DISP. REO.
f hf.th. LF kk" - - _.. 11EL*ii - . -. -
A 7T K P' ' 2.
. ,
' .- Pl.nt/ Unit M.b W l Data Sheet No. MISS -??A -120 UT Thickness Grid Procedure No. 8dA24J3 sj Comp / System.feMk)d
Sheet W Sk boim -hyea f,( Page 2 of E Subject ' 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 wota 29-rw w
JI SO M.5 A V.50 JI. 77. i5.H .2b .7 b 3 .19 a77 ' 7 '1 '79 SL A ;Tl JI.51 $/ $3. f5 6 51 SO 87 -# =2 .pc.il SV .94 59.5b $ 47.15%.55 12,82 94,22 fl to il $3,G.):.92,WSi.55.)/
95.1T.6 N {3 d! So,4c a fo.ic.90.59 i1.Sl K 54.H,59.d4.51.5/.6.R S;.i4 .53.i; iS4 SI 34 J7.51 si Si 34 .t $$.il ,GC,91 ,11.f/,5c.33,il,5{, 91.Si,0,1 i.ll. i/,79,SL 32,5 ; 5i,N.56,55 97 ,SS 51.si.it .9 ) .12
i
,W.fS,M.94,fl 11.'it di,37 6 55 45 h5 ,!!.M # ,7f. ic g2 J3 B f,5s,5W.li ,ii.ni 59 Av.h
.94 A .ll.44.A 41 ? S' 5'.ki 55 35.5E '51.11 Ji l$ il d5 N il.54.55,5S Sb ' 9' A1 0# AC RI fi
3 13.is.h . f3,41 4C.Si.56.id.it.Sl.il N.R 1$,19 FC R Si.53 S.55,5bd5 ' t.f'.il
.92 ,13 r K .Yi 94 A4 il al,* P .56.i4 SZ.si ji ,71,1,11,7f. 91.5L &;,SL.9,Si.55.55,%.H.tc 91,13,% 5Y 8
,9b.Y?. ?'l. f Al. fl,41,it.f7,j] ,i: .$1 3,?f,77 i)),77,% ,fl.52.52 ,%.55 $j ^','id, 9C,il Al .93.W
3 M 95 i+. i 9L ll SZ.if il.i4.5l.I' 5' ?? '71.16 .70 '?i,ll '5L 'U '35 5 Sb.O ' 9' ' i# A' 'If 'A 'i' 11 b,94 d5,ic 99 BC ?.! , 90.4.5A B SI N. 71 3 lW X.N SI Sl.5I 55 N<$b $ -lC i' Al A5 A 17 12 G,11.96.N N.M D,il.!! . i?.54,i/.51 . 71 77,76,X X 2.50, Si N 53 $ A.58.??. ?J St // 'W A1 ,13 5,ib.% if M. ' ' 'Al.A M J' il AI Yt,7I X.N KN 50 ,50 'V N 6l Il
- 51 AI M5.55 M' 'N
di.if 91,16,% M,1t,tl 9.54.il . 51,1v,7i.?f :1 11,7),5c.e.5G.SL.59.St, ',97
,g. it 93,y at.if
J7 NI N. 50 94} $.h.H .S9 JL,5l,3t. '77,1f.13 M.91.5l 1.5 l. b',57-.51 55,59 'M Al SL AJ db,Y)
. 1s Y $1 3 H 34.6.iG ft.n.9.sv.E at, 7).??.7S,n . 75,71, 71.h 29 52-A RT 3 n 3: di F A6 Jf , .5.n ii M.h 31.ii,5).if.B.52.51 2 % 1f,11,1f.71.fi % N.33 % SS.Si D Ao.N Ab df f i
,91 ,
0. fl' .il, $4 . 'l4 5A $5 $5.0 ST.55 AE 'W * IS A' N I ,17 $l '?l '70 'SI 'O 'Y 0 '5 b N0 'O 'W '"
30 Ab. !i #1 09 N5 55.0 'N M A3 55 bl I A lO.II II "I ll 'b'.0 b 5'SI YI A? AI 00 AI
5 55.if 3G M dl.% b.if.5% 3 31.N N <N A lll,1f 3M .S! 3 E N Al b 'M $i.H,97 l %,ib,ia.i4,i4 :ll,fb.57.55.&.ii S Sl Il.11.M,17 l11,13 'll li &l 3 $ Al SI rII,M d; AL.iG
22 ff,13 D.fa.il.% B.il,s1 5.id si Ab fi.71,7f',1T 11 J$.7i . 79.$l >53 3 $4,$.ib.H.A.YL N
. 25,11-di,Il al.ii 9/ 4.s1,6 9 d5 Ji-.It.??, ?S,70,71.N ~20 5 .51,83 5 %.4 JI 6 Jf AL.N
3.il.h,92 ht ai,fi.D .Sc % 45 i3 &L.30.D.14,70, 71 27 % 3,82.% d5#,fI,10 Jf,n to ' 'I3
dl} A!.*. fi :l!.!b 15 4SOM 32 il ?!,76 3 2 71 S N JL M Nib.f' 17 A' 59 'i1 Al
26 Jit,30. it 91. il ;ll.h.55,k y.y$.D,ts.il 7i.7i , 71,R,Je,,Sl. i' B. 56 A 37,fl, $7.6.it fic RI
,1),59,;1,90,11 31,ji s5,10.it,i5 % n. fi,iG,7f.h Jr,$/,52 $?.53 5,HS 17.27.if.0 on' di J? 6 !c,il di # $ 35.is s.91.M.o S.103 3 <?f,9/ 31 R,12.5T SU1 9? J7 ff J7 Af *
and a-w 374 g ,$ eMd L s3 e M w f.E 6
Reviewer 2ito Id d Date 3 /!8% examiner / at&[thf e mscer ii/> _D, t e is, aen e.er.//< # g g ;eg m,,,e e u - - - - _ _ _ ___-__ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ -_ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _____ ____ _ _ _
. A7WH
. . - Pia 11 lt: NINC M't F PO!NT UMT ONC Dm N - 2 6 88037 EXAMINATION Page,,1_ of 1 C o m p./ S y a,- FFFDWATF A / 94 Exam item: BR CAllBRATION Loop. N/A Procedure: ROA9411 SHEET ' Rev.IF.C.: N Title: LIT FYAM - STFAM F AOSiON INSTRUMENT SETTINGS SEARCH UNIT Calibration Block NMP-1SW 1020 CS Serla! # l 211306 Serial # LO8554 Block Thickness .10 1. 0 */1.1 - 2. 0" MFG./Model # KKB USL 38 Brand KB-AEROTECH Como. Thickness .843 Sween Lenath 6.51 Frequency 5.0 MHz Block Temperature
- F Sweep Delav 6.53 Sire / Shape
.25" ROUND Como. Temperature
'F Pulse Lenath/ Demo.
MIN Style /T9pe GAMMA DUFP Thermometer KB 108 ,Fy ea.
l5 Renae .5 Fixture N/A Surface Q DEC/ Gate lm Relect MIN Ceble 2X6' Sct F CONT.
Jacks T8R Couplent Batch 8228 C Mode Select THRJ Coualant Brand ULTRAnCI !1 Reflector %FSH Position Coarse Gain 20 l Fine l 10 DAC 100-
g.STFP 90%
Sean Sena.
N/A 90-
10= STFP 60% in Calibration Checks : Time 80-K
N/A N/A N/A Initial Callb.
1320 70 -
N/A N/A N/A Intermediate N/A 60-i:
N/A N/A N/A intermediate N/A FO-
N/A N/A N/A Intermediate N/A 40" Final Calib.
1500 30-CRT Calibrated in Calibration Date 3/24/88 20-INCHES OF MP a el r cro n Div.
=1 "" "" """""""'""""""E lNSTRUMENT
3 fffffhf8 LINE ARITY
Scan Angle O DEGREES _ _ _ l
100
6
95 M e s s.
Angle N/A l
On
7
90 Mode L.OJ3 AMPLITUDE LINEARITY l
A0
8
1g Ca%raHon M6
M
9
10 80 6 =
80 12 =
- "
'" i
60
NN 40 + 6 =
20 + 12 = 86 l . Remarks [ Exam ite m l6B j RFMOVFD COUPLANT WITH DEM!N Comments / Reasons for Incomplete Exams WATER.
ELBOW tcwrm wicxuc9s e o 71.' EXAMINED GRIDDED AR;A BETWEEN 29-SW 368 AND 29 SW 36C i l Level: 1 Date: 3k4/W MI)ll _ WR# M Examiner 1: MANFRECL GRELL LEVELll NCR# N/A ' l TRAVELER 29EC 88 004 Examiner 2: Level:,__ Date: NA L E V E L M__._D AT E:l2'// N WAu $3/.Mli9 } ' ~ t NES REVIEWER: e WELO. ACCEPTABLE 7 ,. ' YES I NO % OA/OC ANil ANii INITIAL REVIEW: NMPC ENG.
__" J.SiMJ., '{ DISP. REO NO Y f YES
98 slo tt41 Up c CATE ' I i 11EL'ii' - .. . .
' MTKH
- . . , Plant / Unit Sj@ h(LQ *I Data Sheet No. 24/ 33 8I A-F7 UT Thickness Grid Comp / System FEE.W E /2.9 Sheet Procedure No. 80d I'l3 3 Subj ect 114 6 - 6 Mk G b Page 2 of 3 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2
/ DiTs 7i M N N $6 Of 3s.82,82% Jo a7 & 'gf yf.c6 si sfg p' 37~ 37' p .I / So 14 75 m.m9 to w st st 75 m Sy gv B< 0 7L % g 7c 97 p it, n S6 35 - l s e s m u u n o p ss ss a ss ss e e n ss u m ss s, s s, e i .S P %> $1 P et p W 35 70 t5 M p p/ SY 87 p n p y5.t4 sct su / SD v
7 ! 80 t3 9 9 31 s1 72. 3S $5 35 35 p S5 yo pq zi s'4 4 % t7 36 p 3r Go- $5 ts . i /
E0 20 "pb $ %3 24 39 JM MI $$ Is 39 34 E4 El $l 86 90 37.t1 25 % 86,% 39 / to s2 $3 St 99 gb % 17 s7 p 37 70 (L 35 3) 31 Sc 25 p ir? Et ,95 $5,85 85 >
l so 3%s u p s7 w a s.u s n 37,S.a 9 3 n x, p s6 3 p o.s9 i / %I 21 %p .ssp p lro Jo,10.fo;1o T6 35 Es si e ss 76 % %,79 %.1 87,87 s
9190 MAS $~lif752'% $9p5)E N336 39lbs. 85 E1 i / j8'1 ',ihT1 h ho S1 40 9I 9/ .o _ / 19.S$S 3%i30 30.9) 4I,to Sc 30,@ RST $732,25 S 3 #55 93l39 39 p'I 83 s' .1 .2 I/ 8L 37 ts,tt So 30 81
30 to ,10 Se is 83 15J3 p $3 scl 5% S$' 3s 7674 h % ,7 ?? 37 84 83 ?/ 89 .3 s / 26 hs % 30 30 m .90,ql m '!c M (o is 'aq,89 sT57 9'1 g '
\\ f 3C it [I % j0 30 70 gl g j jf,qo g0,qc gggg,g$ 36 35y7 37 31 p ppf g3,33 .4 .5 A $1 ,39 M $5,'l l $1,,l l 91 Sl.43 92 SI di Sl 32 3' % %T7,6 9 73 fff 9f & P , ' ' l / N ?o Ao 10 fll 97. fib,95 39 9 6145 D f2. [1(.i t,92 "67 % 37 77 K7 Y3 Kt 2% M 39,29 .6 ,b W ,17),99 9 31..9,2f)2.91 % % [G @3 $' if 27 33 %,8 / 30,40 hl 92 S'; til D i .7 / flo St
(1/ it O.92.93.6,94 45,95 % 12 41 til ib %)> S4 15 s% B % H $7
/ 31 Sl 3\\ 90 io il
91 !!2 9).i') 99 il il ISO 4I N D SI BI O,76 37,II $6M .8 .% 37 37.E7 g7 37
/ % 40 30 95 93 A4 94 0 .'D 92 92 02. m 90 $1 93 p p 85 St
21 / $C 37 % $9 '13,% 94.O 33.f3 SI 1J 90 9i H 73 fl D$'/7526.?6 g6 g6 33
12 / 16 F5 yE sq $t,1I .4/ #t/,9/ 9/.9/ 90 37 37 p E9 p,% lF) S'l 35 14 W p/ ?9 % I a / 35 34 Eb St SS $i $9 .'tI 9o 90 to p ST 87 fl..ta 73.%'% 93 P T5 M S4 $9 P f 72 %) SL E5 31.3T SI 89 5 9T dd 35 ET.irl 37 st 73 76 '/4 S9 33 if. % f4 fl, $3 / i se as sc.ss.a 5 o zy v7 37 79 n z7 sc n 32 24 sr3 s3.s'; ss s av 29 $9.r9 '4 f ! h fl [>4 P M .$ 6 % 15 N % ,fT $7,% K6 %$ y3 33 $3 % $$ % $7 fl 26 M
'6 ( 17 f EO D j0 JL M M % 36 $ T7.E7 %.O 35 3f 74 D T3 7I % 57 3I $6 35 3 % '8 Re9: vM At 5 .79 87 3LI 3 3 3" 84 39 73 E4.k) 31 b $3 f5I 15 582-El N EI N' N db hb 3I ue re: gt ,
- 9 /
30 3l A $1 53 Q E3 33 96 %5 35 % PW 59 72 D y 6 W y> J+ #5 & 96 37 n n s3 sv z.9 39 39 n a r7 n. s3 p p s3 39 35 25 % a
m m um s.
- io /
si m p si m Date Md 'W INITIAL REVIEW-E= h./g/2,./e Datefhh7 b# ? Reviewer M M / .. . $G CO, _' m , m_ Reviewer Date .2.m uum %di_^- ^ U g' N "" " " C !y7M N MUi FINAL ACCEPTANCE: W44cbL<& _ J/JW97 mx om ) _
' ' A7TA00 . , g
- '
,.., . Plant / Unit MQE HLLE h "I Da ta Sheet No. 2933-874-57 UT Thickness Grid ' Comp / System FEE 0 W A TEA h'} Sheet Procedure No. 804 2433 Subj ec t 1181B 6 AREA 48 Page 3 of '$ 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 l' f,].$ J ' SS' W f 3'[W 64 f G(Gf V cli']l'.V 7'E4',W %i $Y W(LH' $3' E].b l ' fW 15 G
1 / ,
I\\} / 36' ? C' 7}'3l' . SI ff,6} 'SY iY U SI F 6 77' 5I 36' I b' $T id O' W W f 3' LI,N ~ V ) / h 86 }0',7Y 56 'V(pi 'V il* s t' pt" ($ ST ),1 6,cj 7I~ d g1 s$ hy gi, f( Lt gg pf p' ' c
.. ' +
,
- -.. , _ . .... _ .i '
- l/ a ' f l -- - 7, -- .- , , , , .
,
- / !
I
1 ! l ' i i
I.
i ! -
,, I l _ ! } i
' f y
3 ! NI l/ l l ' ,
l I \\l /' l l / A
/ lh
.
/
/ ___.
/
/ o / i
,
l / f a
, i , '
/ '
'
l -' ,
- ANil hlT. AL HEviliW: ' '
NNY.!. $^2 '
_ _..... 65iGNEC 5&t7 '
/ .., ~m -,, , Reviewer _ Date LEV 6 3[J9[f fs' ExaminerMy ! Date3!4[ff b u-LM Reviewer Date Examiner Yins wa
. A77kJ/. 3 c ' USNRC DATA TORUS THICKNESS t1EASURt1ENTS NINE MILE 1 ACTUAL F1EASURt1ENT T1INUS 1% ............ FEATURE VALUE ___ 0.457 y - . i......l' [.'f.
(.f.
'. ~ 44 (. ' .: ' . __ o,992 _:
- - - . . 0.437'""""'"""""""""'"""""'"""""'""""""" SEQUENCE nut 1BER GRID 10F 5 APRIL 1988 l1INIl1Ut1 WALL THICKNESS =.447
. . ., _ _, _ - _, _. _. _ _ -. _. -, _,, _. - -. _ _, _ -, ,-,--m.
.,. - -
- - - - - - - - - . Amn. 3 . ' e NIAGARA MOHAWK DATA - TORUS THICKNESS MEASURt1ENTS NINE MILE 1 l ACTUAL MEASURMENT MINUS 1% ............ FEATURE VALUE - l 0.462 . ' f.......... ?..............,,.............. ' V'..........'
O.457 . ............... ........., 0.447 h . 0.442 - 0.437'""""'""""""'"""'""""""'"""""'"""'""""" SEQUENCE NUMBER . , GRID 10F 5 APRIL 1988 MINIMUM WALL THICKNESS =.447 . l _ _ _ - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - -
. . a ' USNRC DATA TORUS THICKNESS HEASURMENTS NINE MILE 1 ACTUAL MEASlJRNENT MINUS 1% ............ FEATURE VALUE .':*f,;'.'-
'. .- '
, - - ... _ - - 0,447 .:
" - . . ' ' l 0.442 r O.437'"""""'"""""'"""'"""""'""""""'""""'"""" SEQUENCE NUMBER GRID 2 0F 5 APRIL 1988 ' MINIMUM WALL THICKNESS =.447 l
1 i . !
- - -- -
. , ,. . i
g 6xw.q . = ti i NIAGARA MOHAWK DATA ' , - TORUS THICKNESS MEASURMENTS ', . , , NINE HE.E 1 / ' ACTUAL PEASURMENT MINUS 1% " , .- FEATURE VALUE ' s , < 0.462 . ', - - 0.457 t.......... w.
. ' ............, .. '}""""""""""'" l' ' " O.452 r ' . O.447 ? . J, \\ , . ' 0.442 r i ^' > ' ' s 0. 4 3 7 ' " " " "W " ' " " " " " ' " " " " ' " " " " " ' " " " " " ' " " " " i SES.UENCE NUMBER ,' >+ > , , GRID 2 0F 5 APRIL 1988 E MINIMUM WALL THICKNESS =.}'47 I , - x , s a n ) - < / '
, , i, .\\ ( , , , \\ ' ,.g - . > -, f '
e , ' - k l ', , < \\
t e b l . , s' j
V > . -_- ,~-_.,____..__.~._.___.-m.
.. _ _. _ _. _ _ _.,.. _ _ ~. _ _ _ _., _ _. _ _.,,, - ., _. .....__.'y.1 -
- .
_ , , '% ',, An&H. 3 ' - i i USNRC DATA ' . TORUS THICKNESS 11EASURl1ENTS NINE MILE 1 ACTUAL t1EASURt1ENT t11NIJS 1% FEATURE VALUE --- l.
,,l l
'. " " ' .. ' ' ' - .- . , . . . . .. . .. , .. ' ' " .7s O.442 - ' - i e n n n n ni n n n n ni n n u vui n n n ni n n n n ni n n n ni n n n n g,q37 l SEQUENCE ffUMBER GRID 3 0F 5 APRIL 1988 t1INIMUM WALL THICKNESS =.447 ' - - .
l l / l . l ' l , >
- - - . . , 4 77M W. 3 NIAGARA MOHAWK DATA ' ' TORUS THICKNESS MEASURMENTS NINE MILE 1 L ACTUAL MEASlJRMENT MINUS 1% s
<- ,........... I FEATURE VALUE < i - 'sl-0.462 . , c- - . ~ ~ 0.457 g......................:"'"""""..~......................... , ' O.452 .' - 0.447 F ' . 0.442 - g,qg7, n du n in n n n n ni n n n nougu ni n n n n in n n n in n n n n
- ,o ' SEQUENCE NUMBER GRID 3 0F 5 APRIL 1988 MINIMUM WALL THIdKNESS=.447 . l .. I
o ! ~ ' ( , -. .
. \\ l , ,
- _ _ _ _ _ FLN41:NINE MILE POIN1 1 NRC DATA ATTACHMENT ATTACHMENT O.3 150: N/A PAGE OF =~ COMP./ SYSTEM:SUPPREGION CHAMDER PROCEDURE 80A2434 ACTUAL TORUS THICONESS MEARSURMENTS___________________________________________ A D C D E F G H I J K L dRID 1'OF 5 le .453 .447 .449 .450 .440 .449 .450 .458 .445 .449 .449 .450
.451 .449 .450 .450 .451 .453 .451 .455 .457 .450 .450 .450
.450 .451 .450 .451 .451 .450 .449 .449 .448 .449 .450 .451
.449 .450 .449 .451 .451 .449 .450 .450 .449 .449 .448 .449
.448 .449 .451 .448 .450 .451 .449 .449 .448 .450 .451 .450
.448 .450 .451 .449 .451 .450 .449 .450 .450 .449 .450 .452 GRID 2 OF 5
.483 .456 .459 453 .462 .454 .441 .458 .456 .453 .459 .459
.452 .456 .453 .453 .448 .457 .458 .452 .455 .459 .563 .461
.459 .452 .453 .458 .456 .458 .459 .461 .456 .461 .454 .460
.456 .451 .458 .454 .457 .456 .454 .454 .461 .456 .456 .462
.457 . ',5 4 .455 .455 .455 .457 .458 .458 .458 .456 .456 .458
.458 .465 .454 .458 .454 .454 .457 .457 .457 .461 .453.460 ' GRID 3'OF 5
.448 .450 .453 .453 .454 .454 .452 .452 .449 .447 .452 .454
.450 .453 .452 .450 .447 .450 .452 .448 .452 .452 .453 .456
.446 .452 .453 .450 .450 .454 .450 .457 .452 .452 .453 .451
.451 .449 .452 .452 .452 .453 .455 .453 .454 .452 .453 .453
.448 .448 .458 .454 .454 .453 .454 .454 .454 .453 .452 .454 ,
.449 .449 .452 .456 .451 .456 .451 .454 .455 .454 .452 .456 INDEPENDANT MEASURMENT TAKEN 3'FROM PENETRATION XS-3L4 R ADIN S TA EN T ROUG PAIrT _
2
4
6
8
. j .471 .469 .465 .469 .470 .473 .470 .464 .469 ', B .453 .469 .472 .473 .473 .467 .466 .466 .470 C .467 .460 .464 .468 .469 .465 . 466 l. 466 .461 I , a
.~. .- . ATWtt 3 ' ULTRASONIC Data Pkg.: - 2434 88 A.,31 j Plantlunit: NWF M't F PO'NT UNf7 0NF EXAMINATION Page L of gg, j 13 0: "4 Comp !Sye.: TtR1s Exam item: Ttrius j CALIBRATION - Loop: N/A Procedure: acA2434 SHEET Rev./F.C.: 31 F C.112 Title: UT FYAM TWCKNFgs INSTRUM "NT SETT!NOS SEARCH UNIT Callbrallon Bfock NMP ISW 1020.CS Serial s1 213P20 4 Serial s LO8554 Block Thicknees .101.0*/1.12.0* MFO./Model s KKB USL 48 Brand KB-AEROTECH Como. Thickne s s .45' Sween Lenath '6.74 Frequency 5.0 mHz Block Temperature
'F Sween Delev 6.00 Size / Shape 25* ROUND Como. Temperature
'F Pulse LenathlDame.
F1XD Style /T'rpo GAMMA DUFp Thermometer KB114 Frea.
15.0 Renae .50' Fluture N/A Surf ace CD DEC/ Gate IrfF Reject MIN Cable 9YA* RF F. CONT Jacke R&T Countant Batch 8554 DAC Mode Select DUAL countant Bran 1ULTRAG9 ff Coarse Gain 40 l Fine 120 DAC Reflector %FSH Poellion 0-
.30 so 16 Sean sana-9m: RFVAAKS 90-
.soa
8_o Callbration Checke : Time 80-
N/A N/A N/A initial Callb.
1430 70 -
N/A N/A N/A Intermediate N/A 60 -
N/A' N/A N/A -
Intormediate 4/ A 50 -
N/A N/A N/A Int armediate N/A 40 - hel Callb.
1600 30-CRT Calibrated In glbration Date 21988 20 - DES OF DEPTH iiii iiii iiii vie, iiii ii i, iiii iiii iii, iiii Each Major Screen Div. = t o' TRWMT - I dfhh4 h h h h h jo Sean Anale LIN E A RITY
1 100
6 So
J G M e a e.
Anale N/A AMPLITUDE LINE A RITY Mode LD43
no
g so is Calibration THK:KNESS
76 SE
to to 80 6 = ,o 80 12 = eo Scan Area GRD s so no N N 40 + 8 = go 20 + 12 = So l Exam ite m 1TOAUS l Remarke MAINTAINFD Ro% RACK Comments /Reasone for incomplete Exame RFF1 mTION TORUS THICKNESS AREAS 1 THRU S SCANNED GRID APEAS 1 THRU S REFER TO ATTACHED WP AND GROS FOR THK;KNESS READINGS ! Level: Date: .,.? / f-M WRs N/A Examiner 1: /
HARRY HAWKINS UT LEVEL 11 NCRs N/A . TRAVELER RXBM.88 001 Examiner 2: Am.c //u/ Level: ff Date: 2.-/9-M $ GARY JU{42JfT LEVELIT NES REVIEWER: P - ~ ' ' - LEVEL:ED ATE: d.-20,P[( WEL[D ACCEPTA YES NO M4 O A/OC AN1l _,, _,_ ,,_ \\ ..... ?. v. TA :l N: NMPC ENO.
...,s"y .. ~.... _ - _.
DISP. REO.[ - ,. I hfy YESMNO Ig.y. y oe.r E_ . 11 217 -
_ . A TMO),.3 . ' Plant / Unit: A'ia In dr Do wT k / TORUS Data pto.: _ </jf st4 ni Iso: "A THICKNESS Page 5' cr f4.
C3 Exam llem: Toru4 C-e.1/ #/ Comp./Sys.: [000: ^* Precedure: M
Rev./F.C.: 3 / FC - /1 Title: or # min rAickwe u Calibrallon Block: Sre o to e J <e 5fcc36/3 Ortd Area: / c# 5
2
4
6 G max-M max-465 NAx.ws NAx.W5 NAx,n5 NAx. W S _ NIN 4 55 MIN-N5$ NIN=, v g MIN,V57 NIN,457 HIN,4 g? max .'f 6 5 NAx.n s max,v:.s NAx,yc5 NAx, yes MAX =. W 6 H NIN= H58 NIN=,46r NIN,95g NIN.,9 ry MIN =, y Sg MIN =.9cf l NAx=.4% max = NOS NAx= M5 NAx.Y65 NAx=. ws NAx=.s 5 s NIN-.4 55 MIN =,%1 MIN = H 59 NIN=,ygg MIN =. 459 NIN=, /g9 J NAx.v45 NAx.ws NAx.ss nAx ws NAx.W5 max. 9. S NIN=.452 MIN. 432 MIN-462 NIN,452 NIN, yg ? MIN =, v r.2 "^** 405 "^ * ' * 5 " ^ * ' ** E "^ * * * 5 "^*" * ?' 5 "^*' 45 K nlN ,4 5 8 nlN..ugg nlN. 497 nlN,95? MIN.qsg nlN, ygg NAx-465 NAX=,'/0G max,WS NAx W6 NAx,W5 NAx=, FM { NIN-.457 NIN=.46T' NIN=.457 MlW 957 NIN= V57 NIN=.f.51 . i d
1 Level:.LL Date: 2- /9 -W Examiner _ Examiner 2: W# / Level: I T'Date: 2 'N' N 7/ l b N. <- tsyst.xx nArt Jaoff uss neviewsn.
GA/QC ANil aNil (NiTIAL REV;EW: ' i J,1Q..17t M O4TE A il fin.1L ACCEPTANCE:. , / Wd< C/3*/' W I St'3NARl*E " OATE I l _- _ .- . .. .. .
. _ _ _ _ ._.
- . . -.. . ....... .. AirRH 3 .
NN8*5 - TORUD Dets Pkg.: Sv>P EPA- /3 / --- Plant /U;ll: Iso:
- ^
THICKNESS Page 3._. er 2.L.N.us 6n'c/ # / Thru s Exam item: Comp./Sys.: Leop: N/A Precedure: 20 A M 34 Rev./F.C.: 3 / AG. * L 1 Title: UY Eum Th'e k'" s < Calibration Block: 3rm Idede 70c 3/3/ 3 / o '# M " Orid Area:
2
4
6 "^*" Y* 'I "^*" Y3 9 "^*",!//'? "^ *" 4 65 "^*"'"61 "^*"4*51 A HIN-4tg HIN=.13C HIN=,9O .i SJ HIN=.'I Sg MIN =,9$ a HIN=
MAX =,468 HAX=.4bf NAX".468 NAX",748 NAX". $3 NAX=, yf f g MIN =,4/f / NIN=,459 NIN=,ygg NIN=, y 59 NIN= y59 NIN=,y49 NAX= wi5' NAX=,405 NAx=.y45 NAx=,y35 nAx=.yos nAx=.yes g MIN = 9gg NIN=.457 NIN=, ygg MIN =, y gg MIN =.TSg MIN =, 456 NAX.405 MAX.65 NAx=.465 NAx, y/,5 NAx.n 5 max =,yts HIN= H54 MIN =,ugy MIN =. 45y MIN =,yqq NIN=,ygy MIN =,yeq D " ^ * " > V" " ^ * " * "^*" #" " ^ * " ' * E "^*"'.M "^*",*59 NIN= 'f 5b NIN= 4 NIN=,ySo NIN=,yS9 N I N =,' y y NIN= yg9 ' NAX= 461 NAX=.Y!V NAX=.10f NAX=.7/rf NAX=,169 NAX=. Of p MIN = ff59 NIN=.459 NIN=,959 MIN = 15er NIN=,159 NIN=,159 . % , ' . l Level: Date: 2 /9-88 Examiner 1: - , f Examiner 2: W Level: I Date: 2"/ ~ - (/' / . lI LCVELt hk DATE 2-240 - '- - NES REVIEWER.
ANii QA/QC a 3;% , ,
. 1l'.i.iTP R O4 rg 11 FINAL ACCEPTANCE: $ U.2-t/t.*/g f' SIGNATURE # CATE ~ _ --. .. .. _.
.-. - _ _.
, m w.s - pleat /U lt: Al' "~ # U~ P Y Z CCLC %9'; ' U'* WA * '1' ' TORUS Psge of j . THICKNESS g,g, p e$p./Sys.: -rcros ,, , Leop: A'# Preceduce:
- d42 =/J V Rev./F.C.:
RW 3 / f C. / 2 .I Title: oT EMm Th ; c true s s 'j l Calibration 81ocit: MP M". Fec36/3 Brid Area: / o#5
8
10
12 A MAX =,#7 MAX =,%y NAX=,W4 N AX=,15 f NAX=,yfr/ NAX=,yGP NIN=,y/O MIN =,4.0 NIN= u;.p NIN=, zygg N.lN=, 2/g,0 NIN=, Wg NAX=, DJ MAX =. +g NAX=,y;f NAX=,V& MAX =,437 NAX=, y?7 g NIN=,159 NIN=, u39 NIN=. 459 NIN=,159 NIN= 15cr NIN=,uS9 g NAX=,W5 MAX =.W E NAX=, Y4 5 MAX =,Y65 NAX=,f65 NAX=,fa5
MIN =, a g MIN =, 4gg MIN =, y97 NIN=,ygg MIN =, ySg MIN =, 937 NAX,Y$ NAX= Y; 5 max,vis max,ws nAx,165 NAx.W5 g MIN =_954 NIN=,96q MIN =.454 NIN=, 454 NIN=,9 5,/ MIN =,154/ "^*"*5 "^*" *' "^* " VF' "^*" ' YM " ^ * " 1 "' "^*" 12' E NIN=,459 NIN=,4c9 NIN=, y 59 NIN= </ Ser MIN,Y59 NIN= y69 N AX=, W,y NAX=,Wy MAX =, y;,9 NAX= 14f NAX=, %',f NAX= /Ji p MIN =,454 NIN=. u M NIN= y59 NIN= 459 NIN=,y39 NIN=,VS? , l i l ,
. 2-/988 O - - ' Level: Date: I Examiner 1: Examiner 2: M'l <4 Level: N Date: 2-19'N , 7/ LEVEL:TT nATE.1 -204f; -
- ~
NES REVIEWER * I QA/QC A Nil _.._.. -__ -- . A i, ;* NL.',5.'idW: ' i ; ~':]"*-T - [ QArg ',,, 'a.cACCf.?TA A 3: l .
- &I.
I i ' - up.
-- , -. - --.
. Arucn.3 . Plant / Unit: Al M P # L TORUS D:ta pte,: >r u.) M ,1/ ' ISO: "4 THICKNESS page 6 er te Comp./Sys.: b /uS Exam item: Ter43 0'hN # / ' Leop: N /A Procedure: 20 A 14 3 4 Rev./F.C.:
/ R /1 Title: UT Exa>r l'h ie k's N s < Calibration Block: S b LJecl e 80C3hl3 Orld Area: / M 6 '4
8
I
11
l "^*"'5 "^*"*6 "^*"*6 "A*" Y'S "^ *" '/ 'S "^*" > 5 5 G NIN=,45? N.N= -< 5 7 NIN=.957 NIN=,y57 NIN=,95y MIN =,Y57 "^*" * "^ *"'. w s NAX= "45 NAx=. 466 NAX=. Y45 NAX=,"66 H NIN=,d5! NIN= w?? NIN=, V 6f NIN=, ygg MIN =,y{g HIN=,459 l NAx=,MS NAX= y: S NAX=,465 NAX=,165 NAX=,y45'HAX=.1;5 MIN =.459 NIN= ucc NIN= uqq MIN = y 59 NIN= y59 NIN=.<tg7 y'S "^*" "46 "^*">446 "^*" 445 "A*"**5 "^*" E S "^*",&c2 J - NIN= 132 NIN=, asp NIN= NIN =, # 5.2 NIN=,y$] NIN=, v 52 "^ * " * 5 " ^ * " "'S "^*" 5 " ^ * " "' 5 "^*" V35 "^*" 45 K NIN=. ~ 5 ? MIN =, #ff NIN=, y5? NIN=,4 W NIN=,' // 59 NIN=,9g? ( NAX=,135 NAX=, W f NAX= yfi NAX= F45 NAX=,Y65 NAX=. +s s NIN= 15 7 NIN= M' NIN= v g 7 NIN= v57 NIN=,yS7 NIN=.ug-r l ' ! ! .
. //1 Wu - Level: E ate: S-' 9-N ' D Examiner I: Examiner 2: W _ Level: TI Date: 2'/9-N Yl LEVEL. tic nATE d *@ NES REVIEWER- 'i- , A NI,, _,,,,,, ( ! QA/QC
- -
a..;.. u ui.
m . s..-., -.. , . l t
- r 6-.
_ _ c A 77 [
_.
11 T1AC H. 3 ' ..... Plent/U;it: N N P, # / TORU3 Data Pkg.:- WH FN / I / ' ISO: "n THICKNESS Page 7 cf r? Comp./Sys.: Tor u s Exem llem: fo r u < Gr.d Q N /A Procedure: %C A 14 N ' Leop: R ev./F.C.: 3 / F G /,1 Title: (1T Eram 7*h h h e u , Calibration Block:.ST' n A/,4, 20C. 3613 ' e Orid Area: A' o # 'i V \\.l '
2
4
6 "^*" 4 7 "^*" *6 "^*"Y** " ^ * " ' ' " "^*" V8 " A*" YM A NIN= 455 MIN ,15'1 NIN=.4 59 NIN=,4f9 NIN=,4.39 NIN=,y49 g NAX=,46f NAX=,46s NAX=,Of NAX=,'/6f N AX=, y6 T MAX =,16f NIN= ggy HIN=.4_ g HIN=, et 5T MIN =,ySg MIN =,1.57 NIN=, y 5f
g NAX=,4(,f N AX=, W T NAX=,Yff N AX=, yl,7 NAX=,tff NAX=,4/$ NIN=,yqg NIN=,ygg MIN =,95g NIN=, Y SE NIN=,ygg MIN =, 4 g,r
- " V"' "^*" Y# 1 "^*" ## f "^*" f/1 " ^ * " '< y D
"^*" N H "^I N = MIN =,45g M yer NIN=, y67 MIN =,459 N!N=, ygr NIN=,ty E "^*",M "^ * ", M " ^ * " g " ^ * " " " ^ * " " "^*' M
MIN = H56 NIN= ~5( MIN = YJ.t MIN =,4 33 NIN= 'y 58 NIN= t5 MAX = H&7 MAX =M'6 flax =,14? MAX =.$ f NAX=, VM MAX =, YM J p NIN=,4 60 MIN =.4 60 MIN =,uM MIN = $0 MIN =,960 NIN=,PfC . t . . e M -- Level: l-Date: _ A M J f ' Examiner 1: Ad /A Level: U Date: 2 */f*W Eneminer 2: 7/ LEVEL:.IT n ATE c7-M4 C - ^- NES REVIEWER * ' - - QA/QC ANil Af :! iNiiiAL R6,VICW:
[.khh DATE 13 FifML ACfEFTAN E:
b $<'SnW> ~?/E sVVV siGotATuW oAre - -_ - .
m.
v.
.. ... . x.. ., . .... . ATitlCH. 3 . NNP#/ Date M11 M H '
Plent/ Unit: TORUS . _ U p /Sys.: Toro 4 xe llem: fo ru < Grk/ #1 1.sep: N/A Precedure: RO A M?4 Rev./F.C.: 3/ ".C.
i L Title: u ?' Efom f/,/e /e,,e n Sreo We4e Foc34/1 Calibration Block: Orld Arsa: ' Co f 5 *
8
10
12 "' " ^ * " ' * ' ' " ^ * " ' *> # "^*" 9M "^*"' Y ! # - "^*"'*M "^*" ', 4 59 A NIN= NIN=.457 NIN=.159 NIN=,457 NIN=.144 MIN =,v59 g MAX =, M MAX = y.f N A X=, ye.,'l N AX =, '/?f N AX=,v'! M AX =, y'E MIN =. y37 NIN=,4 5p NIN=,457 NIN=,4sg MIN =,e/SP NIN=,45? g NAX=,Wd NAX=,y'y N AX=,1;f N AX=. 97 NAX=,2/JT MAX =, y;f
NIN=, t.5g MIN =,9q,c NIN=, ygy NIN=,4gg MIN =, yg MIN =,#ge NAX=, YST NAX=,2 ; y NAX=. ft.y N A X =, f; y NAX=,y4'/ NAX=. Y Y / g MIN =,y6g MIN =, e/ Se MIN =, y 4? MIN =,15? MIN =.459 MIN =. ~ 57
- "
"^*"' 95.7 "^*"**Y " ^ * " ' * E " ^ * " ', M " ^ * ", * " ^ * ", '" 1 NIN= NIN= 45! NIN= /: r NIN= Mr MIN =,15? MIN =.1g? HAX=, Y M NAX=, YF N AX=, '/4 7 NAX=.y47 MAX =, yt.f NAX=,'/2 p NIN=,19 NIN=, </jo MIN =, e/'.c NIN= 9fC NIN=,'/(0 MIN =, Wd
. i l i l l , i
.
Level: Date: 5' M-M Examiner I: - , Wd Level: E Date: 2'/N' Examiner 2: // LEVEL-MATE. J,2c# II - ' ^ NES REVIEWER-GA/QC ANil. , ,.. g .., .w: - ,
......,. .,g.
.. _....... ,.. ...:.......ac1nn.ue ',h; &'44p& 1V' d t'V' . v, * 6.m. em
_ . l
-..- _.
m _. <.....
- .
. ' ANKH} . Plent/Ucit: NMP #/ TORUS ecto pkg.: "// M4 // .
THICKNESS Page 9 of _Ld_ iso: Comp./Sy s.: To ru _s g,,, gtem: rn eu z G,;) *.2 . Logg: N /A precogere: 8OA1434 l / #d. ~ /> 2 Rev./F.C.Y T Ex* >" 'fh'c kM s 4 - Title: Calibration Block: _S fe o 6 h d e f0 C 36/J erid Area: DfS V
2
4
6 G "^ *" !/43 "^*" # " "^* 13> 5 "^*" Y'S "^*" 7 ' S "^*" 7' 5 MIN = yS9 NIN=,46cf HIN=,4Uf NIN= y39 NIN= ySS NIN=, yg "^*"~!'S "^ *" ' Y ' S "^ *" ' Y' 6 "^*" 1' i H "^*" ///# "^*", Y ; 6 MIN = M59 NIN= vg5 MIN = v 55 MIN = 2/55 NIN= y59 NIN=,ysi l MAX = #6 MAX =.9 5 MAX =.v,5 MAX =.135 N AX=, '/ 45 NAX=, %,6 NIN= M56 NIN=, y cy MIN =,2/ q,- MIN =, ye,g HIN=,45g NIN=,y5< 14/ "^*" 447 "^*""# " ^ *" 55 "^*" Y'T "^*" ' YsJ "^*",'y5f NIN=,'4 5t J MIN = MIN = .'I S$ MIN = y5g HIN=, '< 5f NIN=,4Sg K " ^ * ",* * ! " ^ * ", * '" ^ * ",' 1" " ^ * " " " " ^ * " * ' " A * " ' '"# NIN=,457 NIN= YST MIN =, y fg NIN=, 4 5? MIN = 958 NIN= 95g ( NAX=,'/i6 NAX= #ss N AX=.4 M-NAX= NM MAX = Bff NAX=,46f MIN =.160 H!N=,156 NIN= #66 NIN=.YSF NIN=.$0 MIN =, y:.0 . d e th N %b F o g.: _2 -MW t,y g: Examiner 1: Mm dd _. L.v.i: I T o.t...2-#-PF Ex. min.c 2: V/ I C' - LEVEL T nATE cMOM NES REVIEWER * QA/QC ANil i.t.: n,m w asm.w; - I _ _ _. _ _ ..:a.e om ANil H ML ACCEPTANCE: V.eMA 1/Wer waww am 44 M E" " . __ __ - . - _ _ . . ..
~ . A HAcH 3 _..... . Al M P f / TORUS onta pkg,: afv.fr4 if/ _ Plent/U:ll:
- ^
THICKNESS page n er it 150:
Comp./ Syn.: To r'u s gy,, g g,m fo cu s 6,;,l f), ' ' L*+p: N/A Precedure: BOA 24 74 Rev./F.C.: 9 / R * 11 f Title: ll 1 Fum 1*M k'ne<s ' Calibration Block: $Ie4 Medoe 80CM/3 Orld Area: l'o # 'i "
8
10
12 "^*"*5 " ^ * " " "^*"'"5 " A*" M " ^ * " ' Y' 6 "^ *"' t' 5 G NIN=,059 NIN= vg4 NIN=. ug9 MIN =, 2 5'y HIN=,ygy MIN =,4 5 9 HAx.v3s nAx=, ys 5 NAX=,y,5 NAX=,yp5 MAX =,465 NAX=,1;,6 H tilN= 459 NIN=, y q<j NIN= wS9 NIN=. y $ 9 tilN=, y $9 tilN=, y4 9 l t1AX=,v35 NAX=,1f5 NAX=, y65 NAX=,y6g MAX =,yf5 NAX=,y46 HIN=,ySg NIN=, ! Sy MIN =,y4y MIN =, y gg MIN =,4fgg HIN=, y gg f "^ *" f'J "^ * " YJ "^*"'*'T J "^*", V6J " ^ * ", *# "^*",' Y## tilN=,15 7 NIN= '/ 67 NIN=,V67 tilN= 9$P f11N= f5f tilN=,137 "^*",' M "^*" " "^*" * 3 "^*" *# "^ *" ' W "^*" W K NIN= // ST MIN =,f(f NIN=,y$f NIN=, 9 51 NIN=, // sf NIN=, 457 NAX=,Mf NAX=, yf 9 NAX=.?;f NAX= 'J9 NAX=. YJf NAX=,f4f { MIN =. 6 NIN=, W, NIN=, v;(. MIN = V.{d tilN=, 4/,C NIN=, f'f o . ' r , . . , .]TDate: 2-/'i- ? $ hrhh ~ Level: Examiner 1: _ 2 ~/b Examiner 2: W Level: Date: F/ \\ - - LEVELM DATE MC'-N ' NES REVIEWER-QA/QC AN i l " - - --- -- ~ ~,: j ii c. : s , l -.,,., , i I..a C,7dFh'heb yfy'l>de +i/rf 04TE --
- - - ..a ,~ _ _ . /977tXH 3 Plant /U.ll: NMP# TORU3 Data Pkg.: MI/ r M / F ' '
150: ~4 THICKNESS Page /' cr % . Comp./Sys.: Toeu6 Ex.m item: 7aru 4 4rd #3 toep: N/4 Procedure: EOA1434 - Rev./F.C.: 3 l FC ~ 12 Title: U 7' 86' IA Int s' 6 Sb 44Me DC 7/,/3 Calibration Block: Orid Aros: 3 6 +' 6 V
2
4
6 max.465 max.Y65 N A x.4 5' NAX=.145 MAX =. W 5 NAX=.165 A NIN=. 95/o HIN=,4W NIN=,460 MIN =, yf, e NIN=. 9/.c.
MIN = yy, NAX=.445 NAX=.4GT NAX=. v c3 NAX=. 44V NAX=. YG8 11AX=.4 6 8 g NIN= y59 NIN=.1Si NIN=. 459 NIN=.959 NIN=.yS9 NIN=,459 g MAX =.445 NAX=. W5 NAX=,'M5 NAX=.415 NAX=.16 5 NAX=. W f NIN= 3 gg NIN=.'/ 59 NIN=,439 NIN=,455 MIN =,45f NIN=.459 g NAX=, y (39 NAX=,4(,F M AX=.4 (,7 N AX=,147 NAX=.'/67 NAX=.% 7 NIN=.4(O MIN =.46o MIN =.V 60 NIN=,4to MIN =,y/0 MIN =. H.6 "^** 168 "A*'*?'A "A*"' M "^**** E "^ *', W "^**',4 # NIN=.460 MIN = 460 NIN= ge MIN =,4 r.c NIN= Me MIN =. yt, c
NAX=, *f 67 NAX=.46 f NAX=,4Ff NAX=. YG7 NAX=. W 7 NAX= Ybf p NIN=,V64IreN=.46A MIN =. 4/,2 NIN= 4;.2 NIN=. 46.1 NIN=. ufa . I ! , . l
. ex.mio., i: cx6e *'i 4-E o,t.: u-a t,..i : A ~' 4 4-t...i: rr o.t.:.2-n-se ... io., 2:
NES REVIEWER * C 0- - LEVELM nATE d E0 O QA/QC ANil 75;IE,ht advizw.
.
- h.3 Nti-DATE
. . :1 FINAL ACCEPTANCE: l < 'YW7h
- t/t.' h }'
P;tG N A T'JRE ' OATE
___ _ _ o.
. ... A T1/k H 3 . MM8#I TORUS Octo Pkg.: F&-if4 /1/ P i m l / U ;.ll: . THICKNESS Page >8 of to 15 0: A Comp./Sy s.: To r a 4 Exam llem: 0/C 6cc/ #3 - Leop: NM Procedure: 80 A 14 3 t/ . Rev./F.C.: 3 / FC. - I.1 Title: U T E tam n:E kisne.
Calibration Block: W Wedu M f U, l '? Orld Area: 'h^N '
8
10
12 H AX=. VG 5 NAX=.465 NAX=.465 NAX=, y65 6A'h. Yo s NAX=,4G5 A NIN=. UM NIN=.VM NIN=. y :.c, NI N=, y/,.g', tiiN=, y,c0 MIN =, y(.O g NAX=, fi7 NAX=.4L? MAX =,402 N AX=.Yb? MAX =.YG MAX =.V/f MIN =,459 NIN=. M4 MIN =,yt;9 MIN =,y51 NIN=. y c,4 MIN = v,59 NAX=.W5 M AX =, 4l,5 NAX=,415 M AX =.165 NAX=.1 5 M^x=.146
{ NIN=.459 NIN=,4;9 HIN=. yq9 NIN=,ySy MIN =. Y5y NIN=, v gp NAX=. % 7 NAX=.997 NAX=, y4 7 NAX=. 4 7 NAX=. fj/ NAX=. 6 7 g NIN=. VM NIN=. 4;.0 MIN =,W,o NIN=.No NIN= yg, NIN=, vg o "^*"',4'A "^ * ', 4'd "^*".'Yfo
- I
" A*" *l "^*" # "^**'*8 E MIN = ye.6 NIN= yfo HIN= MIN =.WC NIN=, 4/,C NIN= ,4'.0 NAX=.91 NAX=, Wf NAX=."Gi NAX= #9 NAX=.y6? MAX". fh ? p MIN = 7M NIN= w NIN=, u,',2 NIN=."62 NIN=, 462 NIN=, ^/6.2 . .,
. F ete: l' N-8 O '
- -
Level: D Examiner 1: Examiner 2:
- >
Level:.I 7~ Date: 2'/9' N Y/ LEVELUIE nATE A 104'i '-- NES REVIEWER * - QA/QC ANil , .W1 INiii.5L f?2V:EW; E %iC"E DATE - .' ' fi F:.'.AL ACCEPTANCE: i ANs ' ) C/t s/f $ Cad'eATUns / OATE SS O $ ' . - - -
- ~. .. ~ ,a .~ A ri yH. 3 , t . Plent/U:lt: NNP# f TORUS D:Lo Pkg.: ff f M - 1/ 15 0:
THICKNESS P ege./.J_. er L L ' 73ru 6 Exam item: 7o' ru s 6< d #1 Comp./Sys.: Logg: N JA precedure; To A 14 3 4 Rev./F.C.: 3 / M. * /> 1 _ iltle: UT* Eum Thurness Calibration Block: S Tea de e %oG36/3 , 3M R * Orld Aroe: - i
2
4
6 "^*~i'* " ^ * ~ " ' ' "' ' " ^ * * * * ' ' "^*' 1 #
"^ * ", 4f / (;" ^ * '. 1/. C MIN =,l/ (O HIN=,4iC NIN= NIN= NIN=, 4//,'c NIN=,' Yfd H "^*~ Y 7o "^** 4 7' " ^ * '/7 "^ * " > 'I 'O "^*" Y70 "^*" 476 NIN= N6/ NIN=. 461 MIN = 4//,/ MIN =, y/, / NIN=, if( / NIN=, y(. / l max = # 7/ NAx=.Y 7/ NAx=,4 7/ MAX =, 'f 7/ max =. 4// max =,yf/ M I N =,Li b ). NIN=.4&l NIN=, q(.) MIN =, %:/ NIN=, y/, / NIN=, jf./ NAx,47c nAx,c.; nAx=.47c n sx=,y70 nAx=,47c nAx=,yzo J MIN =,4//o/ MIN =,4!-/ MIN =,si/ MIN =,V'/ NIN=,V;/ NIN= Vs/ K "^ * * '/ 7o nAx=.o7o nAx=. o nAx=,yr0 nAx=,y /o NAx=,vro NIN=, af f,o MIN =,ufC NIN=, v6 j. MIN =,4M MIN =, Vf/) NIN=, 4/f.d , MAX =,470 N Ax=. " 79 NAx=, Y 70 max = 176 NAx, '/ 74 NAx=. Y 70 { MIN =,160 MIN =, %)O MIN =, d/, C NIN=, Vfd MIN =, ylo MIN =, Yld . . . . 8 ate: #' / 988 Examiner I:
~ Level: D Examiner 2: no Level: U Date: 2"/i-N I' / "- LEVELN nATE ASN NES REVIEWER-QA/QC ANil ANU iNFlAL,'lEVIEW: !' ?'4 A Ti *a s DATE Nil FINAL ACCEPTANCE: ' 'M&dd L/tt/pf CIGNATURE ~ OArg .
.,,-- , mm, ,m
.--.w
- ' A TTACH.3 - i .-.. _ , plentfuelt: NNP #f TORUS Page /I,:er im fu /.*/ D ta pt l Iso".
M THICKNESS - et I Comp./Sys.: N' '*u 6 Exam item: N 46 6r-4/ #3.
Leop: N /A Precedure: 30A1434 '
Rev./F.C.: 3 / A C. - / 2 Title:
- T F r <,,, TA /c h'<1e s s Calibration Block:
Me L/Ma c" /oC14/3 Orid Area: Yof5 "
8
10
12 " ^ * ' ' ' " * " ^ * ' * " ^ * ' " " ^ * ' ' 4 'O " ^ * * '#
- 4 7C MIN =, y/, r,'"^I N =, d/ /, /
NINa-,41 O NIN=,'o r.r NIN=,uyC NIN=, vg N , H "^** ) 7# " ^ * ' ' ' 7#' "^*') "^*/ "^*' 17# "^*y'l7C NIN=, /,, / NIN=, u/./ NIN=,"!/ NIN=,dj/ NI N = 9'/,, / NIN= a/. / g NAX=,4 7/ NAX=, 7/ NAX=, s '// NAX=, 4 7/ N A X = <f 7/ NAX=. y 7/ NIN=, v i./ N I N =, y,,. / NIN=, u/, / NIN=, yg/ NIN=, >p. / NIN=,//e./ J NAX=,479 NAX=,1'.i NAX= /,'? N A X =, -/ 70 NAX=, '/70 N AX=, 7'70 111 M =, ','. / NIN=, u / NIM =, W / NIN= y?/ MIM=,'/f/ NIN=./<./ _ MIN = seO NIMa~ t' " ^ * " ' " " " ^ * * * 1 "^*' '7# K "^*',O "^*"',d.- ""*,",',# NIN=, 4'.( MIN =, 4 '.O NIN= 4'c NIN=,V,'o _ , { NAX=, 4 M M A X =, s '., N A X =, 4,'.- NAX=.s?O NAX=.1?' N A X =, 7','.:l NIN=.*?{ NIN= Q: MIN =, 4,/C MIN =,-i.d MIM=,yj,() MI N =, -/.', $ . .
. ' #- Level: [Date: F-6 N o-Examiner 1:. Examiner 2: W/ Level: U Date: 2 */iN 7/ LEVEL.E nATE i2 O N NES REVIEWER- ' "-~ QA/QC ANil
- ,,,...
u. re.:: n.
. 3[22h ~D*1 I / 'n. s.'.N ACCE.PT/,fdCE: l j. 08U Y# b y.n.v n om J .asm uma s.mp ._ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
--- _... ,_ _, _ /$)f Q ), f * l
- - - - - - - - - -... .. _ ~ . c Plant / Unit: Al N P #I TORUS Dets Pk.:- tW &4*d/ ~4 THICKNESS Page er ' 15 0: Exam item: Th r*u < G A/ # V Comp./Sys.: 73 r u 6 - N //I Procedure: EOA 14 '44 . Leop: Rev./F.C.: 3 / KG ' / 2 Title: l/f Em 7bc'knm Calibration Block: 6 De MM4 e 80C 7/o/.3 Orld Area: 'i o f G '# , i
3
5
A M AX=.,% i NAX=,%B NAX=.65 NAX=,155 NAX=, ter M AX=, y6 5 MIN = 4/,r) HIN=, %3 NIN-N55 MIN =,ygg MIN =,95s HIN=,45 g g NAX=.4 67 NAX=, V3 ? MAX =,16f NAX=,14 f MAX =, y6f NAX=,YJi MIN =,456 NIN=,45' NIN=, y 5 '. NIN=,ySJ MIN =, Vfj NIN= y;;. g NAX= 967 NAX=,466 NAX=,vu NAX=,466 NAX=,VM. N AX =, tM-NIN= ,45() NIN=,456 NIN=,9 g4 NIN=,V54 NIN=,95g MIN =, y gf g NAX=,ylf N AX=,yg g NAX=,f4f NAX=,166 NAX=,16/g MAX =,966 HIN= ,4 Sg MIN =, y e r MIN =,9gg NIN=, y 5y MIN =,y57 NIN=, #gg NAx- #65 MAX = W NAX= //61 NAX=.YSV NAX=,YJV MAX =, VM E MIN = 15.) MIN =.45$ NIN=.165 NIN=,V$$ NIN= 45g MIN =,95g NAX= W6 N AX=.'l 6 5 NAX=,v45 NAX= Yf5 NAX=,445 NAX=,y46 p NIN= 4 55 NIN= #56 NIN=,Y$f NIN=, VST MIN =, yS? MIN =,fCI . l l .
. 7-O S Date: Examiner 1: / Level: Examiner 2: Sw Level: U Date: 3 ~/9~ 28 7/ /-
LEVEL TC nATE A-JDY NES REVIEWER * Li --^ '~C--- QA/QC ANil ANlt INITIAL REY:EW: , s:qN \\f1125 OATE Nil FINAL ACCEPTANCE: 8MW L /L C'/[V StGNATURE DATE l l - - - - -- . . _ _ _. .
.w- ,,m, .n, , - - _ _ _ _ - _ - - - _ _ - _ _ , , , A nAdd. 3 l.
Pege LL er u,,'h' JPA -e t/ Plent/ Unit: NMP #I Dele Pkg.: f6 TORUS . % , 15 0: THICKNESS N'44 6n'd #4 ' Toru 6 Exem item: , Comp./sys.: N /4 Procedure: RO A 14 3 4 ' L.,,: Rev,/F.C.: 9 / F C. - /. 2 f' c k aw;< Tltie: UT 22am u Calibration Block:' 50 W<de roc?4 / 3 N of 6 V Orid Area:
8
10
12 NAX=,VM MAX =,Y'S NAX=. Y;5 N AX=, y,; 5 NAX=.$ 6 NAX=, yf 5
NIN=,4J 5 NIN=,oez NIN= up NIN=.VC; NIN=,45g MIN = 455 NAX= YL9 NAX=,ty;,9 N AX=, y29 NAX=,y3f NAX=, Y,;f NAX=,y,:,f g NIN=.</J/, HIN=, u :,, MIN = 0 :; NIN=, y e' MIN =,u56 NIN=, vg3, , C max =,va', NAx=, m NAx=, m nAx=.yg. NAx,fg NAX=.966 NIN=,954 NIN=.15/, NIN=, y y MIN =,4 St. NIN=, ySg', NIN=, a pf, g NAX=, ytf NAX= v3 NAX=,YM-N AX=. VM MAX =, 446 NAX=,9M MIN =,ygg MIN =,9 g MIN =.YS! NIN=, '1 S t MIN =,157 MIN =,yCT
- Y " ^ * " ' * * "^ *" +'41
"^*" V55 "^* " * Y "^*"*V E "^*"', " NIN= MIN =, 955 NIN=,'ySS NIN=,9 59 NIN= 4$$ MIN =.Y5c NAX=. V6E NAX=,95 6 NAX=, 915 NAX=. %6 MAX =, '/4 6 NAX=.'//F p NIN=, Y37 NIN=. &.;o NI N =, . r.
NIN=. Vf0 MIN =,940 MIN =,160 , , e o - d~b Lev.i:.I o.t.: > /9 -Ff Examiner I: 2 Y98[ Examiner 2: d4# tevol: J I Date: V/ b<N - <-- tevet r nArt No* Nes atviewca-QA/QC ANil , ^N t!tur:AL agview, -- A marun= -- _ Nil FiflAL A(,CEPTANCE
pGNATURE m spa ~ ~ m, -- e Je m ammah M. amp _ _ _ _ _ _ _
. ... a w '~ . AYTACH 3
t
NNP#f TORUS Dato pkg : r<m-m // / Plant / Unit: THICKNESS Page '7 er N ~^ 15 0: A ru k Exam item: faras GerN #4 Comp./Sys.: [000: N/A Precedure: 90 A 14 3 4 w Rev./F.C.: 3/ R - 1. 2-Title: UT Exw Th,ehw<s , Calibration Block: 51&o ese/u 20C16/3 Orld Aros: 9 o# 6 " l l
2
4
6 " ^* " N" "^*" 4 65 "^*"' f6 5 "^*" Y6S "^*"'4'S "^*"'4'f G MIM ,454 NIN= 4 52, NIN=, y Q NIN=, yQ MIN =,1/52 NIN=, // 5,Q " "^*" vt,5 nAx.us nAx=, y/ [ NAX=. yf $ MAX =,y65 NAX=.965 H NIN= yQ NIN=.4$1 MIN =.y52 NIN=,45) MIN =,45] NIN=,152 l NAX=,'14/; NAX=.1 h M AX=, 93 MAX =,W(g NAX=. y46 NAX=,ff(p NIN=,4P/ NIN=,y6q NIN=,vgy NIN=,yqy NIN=,ygy MIN =, y g y "^*""'d "^*"' 9' 3 "^ *" i' 3 J "^*" 463' " ^ * ", 4 ' "^*",463 NIN=,4 5y NIN= /54 NIN= s5u NIN= 454 MIN = V5 t. MIN =. y +/ "^*",' W 3 "^* ", t ~ 3 "^*" C "^ * " 5 2 "^*" 46 3 K "^ *", # 3 - MIN = 4E( MIN = 157 NIN= 333 NIN'a y5f NIN=, Y S.T MIN =,yg! ( NAX=,40A NAX=.%) MAX =.4l2 NAX= %2 MAX =,W2 NAX=,1/.,2 NIN= 954 NIN= o S 4 NIN=,4{9 NIN= ~ 5 't MIN = y59 MIN =, '/i'/ . o .
. __ Examiner 1: / ^ - Level: E Date: #- M-M ' Level: I TDate: 3-/ Examiner 2: "d < Y/ LEVEL Til' nATE. A40 ff II ~ ' - - ~ NES REVIEWER-GA/QC ANil - ... - w..%,:sw.
, , -,g , .*;-.. 7- ~ . - .- g, '.f&.i r.".'. ? 00EPTAriOE:fg <!10l$ Y t: 'iv u 4/V DAM a . - - - . .
_, _. m- - -= ' &f**,hj'o'. \\ . , O Al M A #f TORUS Vf r. n/J. /// o.go pgE,:er 1.4 fori 4 Plant / Unit: 150: ~4 THICKNESS T j. page.
g ' , Exam item: 6r4/ ## Comp./Sys.: Tor u 6 ' ' Leop: ^/ / A .- Precedure: M A TV 4 'l 'tev./F.C.: ~3 / FG. - /, J.
' - Title: u r' EA m n,eh g 4
6 64 Gh/ee fdC 36/ f Calibrallon Block: Orld Area: 'i'd 5 "
8
10
12 NAX= Yd NAX=, M MAX =. % NAX=, M MAX =, M MAX =. 9G g , NIN= V52 NIN=,#q2 MIN =, uS2 NIN=.152 NIN= M62 NIN=,952 "^*""'S "^*" "'f "^*"*5 "^*" it 6 "**" M "^*" *f H NIN=. 452 NIN=, v? ) MIN =, /K) MIN =. yg) MIN =, 45.) MIN = 9g) - l NAX=, g NAX=,f66 N AX=, f4 6 H AX =, $'c.6 NAX=. 94 6, NAX=,t/4 NIN=.454 NIN=,uSy HIN=,93y MIN =,.'fg y HIN=,i4V NIN=, yc,9 f "^*" Y'3 " ^ * " 3 "^*" Yd 3 " A * " V'3 "^*"' f#3 "^*",Y'3 J MIN = ty 5y MIN = ury 111N=. 95(! MIN =. -f s a NIN=. y su 11tN= ySy "^*" G "^*" 143 "^*"'VJ "^*" $ 3 K "^*" Y'7 "^*","'3 - NIN'= c;f HIN=,u<r MIN =, 4'fy MIN =,yg? MIN =,95/ NIN=,438 N AX =, 4.'.2 NAX=,y;2 NAX=,g) NAX=.Ya2 NAX=. 452 NAX=,Y62.
{ MIN =. VI'/ NIN=,~fu MIN = v5y MIN =, >$ v NIN=.ySo MIN =,y$4 . l .
. . K Dete: 8-M-N ' Level: Exeminer I: Examiner 2: WS Level: f7~Date: 3 -/b \\ V/ r ) LEVELM DATE.A,20 6 NES REVIEWER- 'l L-- < QA/QC ANil -- ANil INITIAL REVIEW: dFI \\TtIAF ~ DAT Lr A ill F N% ACCEPTANCE; - 1A t/s V yy
monsrune - - -.. - . ._ _
- - ' ' ..... ' . A HMH. 3 ~' Plent/ Unit: MN8#I TORU3 Dcta Pke.:- 16'N 3.P4-/1/ " Iso:
THICKNESS Page /* er !.f.Sru4 S e,c/ # 4 - Comp./Sys.: 7~" o 6 Exam item:. ' T _- Leop: N /A Procedere: Ro A ~14 7 4 l Rev./F.C.: 3 / FL-I 2 '
- 12 Title:
U T Em, TA c k n en G-L Cellbration Block: sreo udee Foc36/3 Orid Area: 5 a s' N , x y ' ...i ( . 4's EL-T
2
4
6 g-T A " ^ * " " '< 5 "^*"M "^ * " ',S i "^ *" Y' E "^ *" 14 5 "^*" Yl * - ..? NIN= ',2 NIN=, w.2 ' 1 NIN= a5? NIN=, 4f.2 NIN=, yc,2 . NIN=
"^*"*1 "^*" D2 "^**'4 " A * " " '4 "^*" " "^***2 ii B
NIN=.w % NIN=,OS9 NIN=
MIN = Y32 NIN=,t62 NIN=, y Q - g NAX=.4: 1 N AX=. v;.2 NAX=
NAX=.145 NAX=,44 5 NAX=.445 NIN=, v5 i NIN=, -f p NIN= c. a MIN =,y36 NIN=, a5(. NIN=,4cf = e ' 'y-D "^ *" * S 'i "^*" # E "^*"*6 " ^ * " "# f "^ *" 2'#f "^*" Y 6 J MIN =, y t, i MIN = y!? MIN = -e' NIN=, y 52 NIN= # 5.) NIN=. ar 3 E E "^*""M "^*" " 5 6 "^ * " "6 "^*", M "^*",' M "^*" M -. NIN=,wc2 NIN='~c2 NIN= ur2 NIN= 442 NIN= 452 NIN= 45) _ - NAX=.'d NAX=,g<.5 "A*" F:s " A*" ~ d "Ax=,w5 NAx=,YE p _ NIN= 450 NIN=,yS2 NIN= ve, NIN= -52 MIN = 45) MIN =,46.2 -- __ l
- $ w _ _ w . y - a r ' . ' E I NI-I 1-/ b N ' Examiner 1: Level: Date: _
Examiner 2: ~5'I Level: J7' Date: O-M I Y/
' __ d! LEVEL: a nATE. 2 -ab,ff NES REVIEVER- - " - - GA/OC ANI1. - - -..-. w.', a... u.,
" ~ M ~ ' _ ~ ' C:i.*::. '. 22.- - ...........,, d T A N C E : M.4N ,.,..,, N - em ~ - = ... - .. _
-- w - 3 iw r. e rcy . . - . .
ATTD/.3 .- . NNM# I . TORUS C'.La Pt g.:, Nd +/ 4 /// Plaet/ Unit: 150: V4 Peso Lo er G.,Ibr45 /;r, #5 THICKNESS Comp./Sys.: Ioru 4 , ' Exem item: . Leop: N /4 Procedure: 20 A 14 3 4 , Rev./F.C.: 3 / A G, * /. 2.
Title:- U T 2 x w T1, ;e.k n e_ s< SrEo Wde R36/a Calibration Block: Orld Area: Eo#5 "
8
10
12 NAX=.c5 NAx=. r> 5 max =."65 N AX=.14 5 MAX =, f45 NAX=. t; 5 A NIN=,4.2 NIN= %2 NIN= s, ') HI N =, 4(,.2 NIN= y/,2 NIN=, v&2 . B "^*" G "^*"* * " ^ * " ' * " ^ * " ' Y'2 "^* " ' Y'1 "^*"'*2 l MIN =,452 NIN= uc2 MIN =.452 MIN = t/(2 MIN =,45.2 NIN=, 4 5) g NAX=, Fvy NAX=,ygg NAX=,13 s NAX=, y;g NAX=, s/g5 NAX=. y;5 MIN =, 2 i/. NIN= y c.f. MIN = ug MIN =,45f NIN=, y Sg MIN =, yrf, g N A X = $ N AX=, vJ ', NAX=. -l 5 NAX=,Vi5 NAX=, %5 NAX=.YM~ I l NIN=, e t,' NIN= sQ NIN=, ty NIN=, 46 ] NIN=,4p MIN =, 45.? """ f's " ^ * ",' V'.i "^*", N 5 "^*", b 6 E "^*" Ya 5 "^*" ";i l l MIN =,ae2 NIN= 4 rr NIN= s/S) MIN = y 52 NIN= 452 MIN = y5a NAX=. W5 NAX= :'. S NAX=.965 MAX =.WS NAX=.145 NAX=. 'N F p NIN= 452 NIN=, a 2 MIN =, - Q NIN= V52 NIN=,152 NIN=, ?Id' . I { I e
. 5 'l -W MI Level: Dete: Examiner 1: ' A ~' 44 Levei: rr oste: 2-m Exemine, 2: 7/ NEs nEviEwEn UM "-~ LEVEL ITC nATE M# ' GA/QC ANil ANil INITIAL. REVIEW;
EP:AiV8E DATE ANil F4NAL ACCEPTANCE: $ JUW~+r.hs- 'l/t </V/ SIGN ATURE ' OATE $$ O N . . .- . -
e- - _n . .... A TI Acd. 5 ' . ..... .. . -....... .. Plent/ Unit: NNP #f IORUS 0;to pkg.: 3 v t*' es 4 /.t e
iso: -4 THICKNESS Pcg3 3' cf.41 ' Comp./Sys.: G r u '9 Exem item: dr44 6 rd # 5 [ggg; N /A Precedure: Z()A 1 4 3 4
Rev./F.C.: 3 / FE~/2
Title:- ur Eum Ne lw < < Calibration Block: 56 k'de 20C36/3 erld Area: 5 e t'R
=__
2
4
6 G max =.m NAx=.w N Ax=. n 5 max =.44f NAX=. y4 5 MAX =.Y.f NIN= Md MIM-.45 L MIN =.Yra MIN =, y 52 NIN=, y Q MIN =. y c;,' MAX = M 51 NAX=, Ysy NAX=,yf9 NAX=,yJ? ttAX=. ?$ $ NAX=. -J 1 H NIN= d56 MIN = FJ; NIN= -$5 NIN= v55 NIN= vg5 NIN= W; g NAX=.%S NAX=.C5 NAX=.y;5 NAX=.V,;c NAX=. YJ S NAX= M NIN=.451 NIN= yey HIN=, 49 NIN=,05) H I N =, y c,, NIN=, v c,, "^*" "78 " ^ * " " ' " ^ * " ' " ' ' ' " A x". 44 5 "A* .Y4 5 "Ax= ug J MIN = %S MIN =,45L MIN = 355 MIN =,4 cie, NIN=, yS5 MIN =. ASS K "^*" $5 "^*"*5 "^*""S "^*""5 "^ * " '8 5 N ^ * " "' E MIN = 4 51 NIM =,*;2 NIN=, u e,, NIN=, 4 52 NIN=, yS2 NIN=,4c2 ( NAX=,W NAx.%5 MAX =."55 NAX= v55 NAX=.455 NAX=.Y6E MIN = g e; 2 NIN= 45A MIN = 452 NIN= v52 NIN=,45J NIN= YQ . l ' l . l . A
- ~ ' Y - N Examiner 1:
Ill Level: Date: - i Examiner 2: "# Level:ff Date: 2 ~/ 7' E 7/ LEVEL.TC nATE d **ff NES REVIEWER- - " - - - ' QA/QC ANil,......-.-. ---7 ..., % r :. ' c. svi Ew i . ,... ;. .,77. -. - , h' lY.M b.P CE: ' QS4h LlW[Y l ( l y,s.g mv ' DATE l l 11r29i "
, - , A77AS. 3 ) . ' - . + . . e9
Plant / Unit: AlNP #f TORUS Data Pte.: 2 W' *A ' -* - "4 THICKNESS page 73 er 33 ISO: 7' ora < 6ete/ # 6 Comp./Sys.: Toru 4 Exam item: Leop: ^' / 4 Precedure: To A 14 74 Rev./F.C.: 3 / p c, - /. 2 Title: ICT Ero. T/,, ihe < <, Calibratton Block: 5feo 14dee foc 36 / 3 Orld Area: 545
8
10
12 "^*"*5 "^*" W 5 "^*" 6 5 "^*" 945 "^*" Y 5 5 "^*" Y; 5 G NIN=,yq NIN= y52 NIN=. v $2 NIN= y6) MIN =,y5) NIN=,y52 H "^*", #59 "^*" 157 "^*" 157 "^*" Y 51 "^ *" * 59 "^ *" 4 5 MlN=, u; NIN= y; g MIN =. ys e, NIN=, ySS NIN=.16c; NIN=, s ;c _ l NAX=,9;,6 NAX". 4';.g NAX=,ygg N AX=, MS NAX=.145 NAX=.y;.5 MIN =, f 62 NIN=,4gy MIN =,vey M I N =, y 5.2 "lN". 45.7 M IN =, 95,7 "A*" Y'5 "^*"*f NAX=. ws NAx=.14 s NAX=. ws NAx=, y4s J MIN =, v$ $ MIN = vcq NIN=, $ 5c NIM = 9 qq NIN=. use; NIN=. 9 % K NAX,ss NAX.=. M MAX = v;5 NAX=,ss NAX= yss nAx=,y;.; NIN=, qu NIN=,4Q HIN=, ucy MIN =,15) NIN=, yC NIN=,uc) NAX=,YJf NAX=, % 5 NAX=. yf.3 NAX= V.'. f NAX=,yjg NAX=. ft.$ [ MIN = ',2 NIN= s!? NIN=,952 NIN= vO MIN =,4C NIN=. 9Q
a
( .
- ate: #-/#'[I
' Examiner i M7 a Level: D I O- / "W Examiner 2: M */ Level: II Date: 7/ m IC < - - - LEVEL TE nATE M0'N NES REVIEWER-GA/0C ANil i .......... . - - - - . -
.___ - ____ _ _ _ ___---- ___ __- -___ _-__-_ _ ___________-__ _____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _. . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _
i o*
o , i . l PLAN 1:NINE MILE POINT 1 NRC DATA ATTACHMENT ATTACHMENT n 4 $4 . l ISO 2-C 15167-C.C: 15166-C PAGEI OFl C*1Mr./GYSTEM:DRYWELL Ol;1ER LINER h P[41C(~ DURE : Gr >A24 34 l ______._____________________________________________________________[ - __ .RIGHT'DOTTdM A B C D
1.038-1.132 1.119 1.113 __ O 1.~138 1.110 1.105 1.101
1.087 1.113 1.105 1.118
1.103 1.127 1.108 1.123
1.113 1.102 1.108 1.123 LEFT DUTTEM , A B C D
1.110 1.113 1.125 1.144 *
1.110 1.081 1.090 1.091
1.110 1.110 1.088 1.123 , , '
1.109 1.090 1.088 1.123
1.096 1.111 1.101 1.112
- =dREA READING WAS TAKEN THRU PAINT l
t ! ! l \\ . e e _ }}