ML20196E117

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Part 21 Rept Re GE Solenoid Valve Rebuild Kits.Defect Found During Failure to Scram on 860613-28.Util Replaced All 178 Hydraulic Control Unit Scram Solenoid Internals,Plus Two Discharge Vol Solenoid Valve Internals
ML20196E117
Person / Time
Site: Vermont Yankee File:NorthStar Vermont Yankee icon.png
Issue date: 09/16/1986
From: Murphy W
VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER CORP.
To: Murley T
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
References
REF-PT21-86, REF-PT21-88-026-000 FVY-86-83, PT21-88-026-000, PT21-88-26, NUDOCS 8802290045
Download: ML20196E117 (4)


Text

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -

P,- "* .

~VER1 NT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER CORPORATION

. R D 5, Box 169, Ferry Road, Brattleboro, VT 05301 h,86-83 p ENGINEERING OFFICE 1671 WCRCESTER ROAD

+ FRAMINGHAM, MASSACHUSETTS 01701 e

TELEPv40NE E17-4721100 l

September 16, 1986 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Inspection & Enforcement Region I 631 Park Avenut King of Prussia, PA 19406 Attn: Dr. Thomas E. Murley Regional Administrator

Reference:

a) License No. DPR-28 (Docket No. 50-271)

Dear Sir:

Subject:

Notification of Potential Existence of a i Defect in Accordance with 10 CFR 21.21 I In accordance with the provisions of 10CFR21, Section 21, we are hereby notifying you that we have obtained information indicating that a defect may exist with respect to solenoid valve rebuild kits supplied by General Electric Company.

Enclosure I to this letter documents the details of this notification.

Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact us.

Very truly yours, VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER CORPORATION 4+4-~ WM Warren P urphy -

Vice President and l Manager of Operations

/dm 8802290045 060916

  • l PDR ADOCK 050002"/1 - '

S DCD ~ ".

,I

. o ENCLOSURE I COMPANY INFORMING Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corporation THE COMMISSION RD 5, Box 169 Ferry Road Brattleboro, Vermont 05301 FACILITY Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corporation PO Box 157 Governor Hunt Road Vernon, Vermont 05354 FIRM SUPPLYING General Electric Company COMPONENT 175 Curtner Avenue San Jose, California 95125 NATURE OF DEFECT During the 1985-86 refueling outage, all Hydaulic Control Unit (HCU) scram solenoids were rebuilt based on a General Electric recommendation and with rebuild kits supplied by General Electric. It should be noted that the replace-ment parts kits are supplied by ASCO to GE as non-safety commercial grade parts.

Following completion the the solenoid rebuilding, all control rods were single rod scram tested, which revealed that one control rod failed to insert following inspection of the failed HCU and subsequent testing. It was determined that the failure was attributed to a detached core assembly from the solenoid core spring. On additional detached spring was found during additional testing.

There are two solenoids on each HCU arranged in a two-out-of-two logic.

In thi s arrangement, both solenoids must be de-energized to allow the associated control rod to scram. Since the solenoids are a de-energized to scram valve, they are designed such that, when energized, the core assembly is being pulled into the solenoid coil and the core spring is in compression. When de-energized, the solenoid coil loses its attraction to the core assembly which allows the core spring to push the core away from the solenoid coil. This action seals off the supply air and exhausts the valve air which scrams the control rod. However, if the core assembly has become detached from the core spring, no movement of the core assembly will occur when the solenoid is de-energized, which prevents rod movement. Additionally, since the HCU solenoids are arranged in a two-out-of-two logic, if either one of the solenoids f ail, rod insertion is prevented.

DATE ON WHICH OEFECT WAS DETECTED The failure to scram event occurred on June 13-28, 1986. A potential Part 21 Report Evaluation was initiated on July 23, 1986.

NUMBER OF COMPONENTS AT FACILITY Vermont Yankee has 180 of this type of solenoid in use.

1.t .- =A CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

1) ' Vermont Yankee replaced all 178 HCU ' scram solenoid internalsi plus 2 scram-discharge. volume, solenoid valve internals,;with new replacement. kits which were 100% inspected to tolerances specified on manufacturing drawings.,

This inspection was' performed by the Automatic Switch Company ~(ASCO),.the-manuf acturer, aM witnessed.by Vermont Yankee and General Electric.

This inspection found 127 of the 200 kits inspected to be out of manufac-turer's tolerance. However, it-was concluded that-the out-of-spec com-ponents would not . contribute to the' problem nor. were tlwy of any consequence. It should be noted that; Vermont Yankee did not accept any components that were'out of tolerance.

2) A pre-operational functional. test consisting of a full scram air only time testing was performed.
3) All 89 controls rods were successfully single rod scram. tested at tem--

perature and pressure (between 20% and 30% power levels) during startup.

1 )

RELATED ADVICE L Vermont Yankee recommends other BWR operators review in detail RICSIL No. l 008 "Control Rod Drive Scram Anomaly". Utilities'should also initiate inspec-l tion and testing GE replacement Pilot Head Kits No. FV 204-139 for proper ,

spring to core attachment. l During the review and inspection of the above mentioned discrepancies, another problem with the same batch of replacement kits was found. -This problem, however, was not considered to be a safety concern as the problem would i i be discovered during scram time testing and as such was not reportable under j 10CFR21.21. The problem as identified by Vermont Yankee denit with a parts mix- '

up with the core assembly and the Zytel needle which protrudes out the end. The l

) problem was found to be the size of the hole (a standard core assembly for

another type valve) in the core assembly was 1=rger than it should be for this a

valve, thus allowing the Zytel needle to protrude further than it should.

I l This additional protrusion would not allow the valve to exhaust its air, j

upon a scram signal, as rapidly as designed. The valves did work, however, not l within the time allowed by Technical Specifications.

i

It is recommended that utilities inspect for this problem, as well as the spring attachment, in an effort to preclude problems'during startup activities.

l i

s l'

I ,

f l

RECEIVE 0-REG 10!l 1 1938 SEP 22 PH 4: 02

, . n, . . . . . .

3 .:1 t. > 4 .L. s s-

. L- . A t e. st

,gl3' s /t ^ . 8 * '

s 4.'f

, "L,' 3) a + a I '

4 )

4 4 5 .31 + 1

  • 2i
  • '# 'd i n ' ' J J.

6

. > a 6 e k' 1

, (" , .f  % + d y { .I I ,

9 %g -

& g# $

e, i.s ,- wr T 0 4 g s (

b b g I t

is j * * *1 .* , 3 s t . .

1

4) s , j -t ' 91 .*i I * #

+ . i. 4 fs 1 .

  • 's . I J

s l I 4

. g. .k s 4. ,

6-

' l d 4 q i

' k. , p 5 [

8 4

%.- 8 g 4

9 i

  • f s