|
---|
Category:CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS
MONTHYEARML20062H1911982-08-0303 August 1982 Notifies That Apr 1982 Revision 6 to Spent Fuel Transportation Plan Meets Requirements of 10CFR73.37 & Is Approved.Revised Plan Contains Safeguards Info Which Should Be Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21) ML20148D2261980-07-11011 July 1980 Responds to Util 800417,28 & 0702 Ltrs Re Physical Protection of Irradiated Reactor Fuel in Transit.Approves Revision 3 to Spent Fuel Transportation Plan ML15219A0501980-04-25025 April 1980 Forwards Addl Comments to Gaston County Board of Commissioners' Position Opposing Spent Nuclear Fuel Shipment Through County & Two Proposed Alternate Routes.Author Does Not Oppose Shipment If Adequate Safeguards Are Provided ML20126D2031980-03-20020 March 1980 Favors Transport of Nuclear Waste Through Mount Holly,Nc. Other Dangerous Shipments Routinely Pass Through City ML20126D1991980-03-19019 March 1980 Discusses Gaston County,Nc Resolution Re Transportation of Spent Nuclear Fuel Through County.Requests Opportunity to Present Resolution at NRC 800428 Hearing in Charlotte Nc ML20126D2061980-03-19019 March 1980 Favors Shipment of Nuclear Waste Through Denver,Nc & Storage of Waste at Nearby Nuclear Plant ML20126D2111980-03-18018 March 1980 Opposes Transport of Nuclear Waste Through Mount Holly,Nc. Route Is Extremely Hazardous Due to Presence of high-speed Intersection & Frequency of Accidents ML20126D2151980-03-11011 March 1980 Opposes Transport of Nuclear Waste Through Lincolnton,Nc. Questions Necessity of Transporting Safe Matl from Plant ML20126D2181980-03-0707 March 1980 Notifies That Gaston Taxpayers Association Opposes Transport of Nuclear Waste from Gaston Nc Facility ML20126D1941980-03-0505 March 1980 Protests Proposed Shipment of Nuclear Waste from Facility in Sc to Facility in Nc.Nuclear Plants Should Be Required to Neutralize Radioactive Matl Rather than Transport It ML20126C0591980-03-0404 March 1980 Notifies That Requirement Contained in NRC 790803 & 15 Ltrs Re Withholding Identification of Specific Approved Spent Fuel Routes Is Rescinded.Commission 800229 Order in Response to NRC Petition,Reversed Previous Policy ML20147C8011978-11-30030 November 1978 Confirms Staff'S Request for an Extension of Time to Respond to Interrogs by Carolina Environ Study Grp Propounded 781115 & Request to Produce Served by Cesg on 781116.Staff Responses Will Be Provided by 781229 ML20147G9141978-11-28028 November 1978 Believes NRC Should Have Informed Lg Ervin of the Possibility of Intervention ML20147C2311978-11-27027 November 1978 Discusses 780602 Meeting W/Nrc Re Transp Costs for Shipment of Spent Fuel.Forwards More Accurate Spent Fuel Transp Cost Estimates ML20150E3181978-11-21021 November 1978 Ltr of Concern Re DPC Plan to Transport 420 Loads of Nuc Waste Matl Over Sc Highways.Urges That DPC Not Be Permitted to Transport Its Nuc Waste in Such a Manner ML20150E3131978-11-21021 November 1978 Responds to Re Concern About DPC Proposal to Transport Spent Nuc Fuel from Oconee Nuc Facil Located in Sc for Storage in Spent Fuel Pool at McGuire Nuc Facil, Charlotte,Nc.Issue Will Be Heard Before ASLB ML20147B7641978-11-20020 November 1978 Appl for Extension of Time for Matl Lic SNM-1773 to 781231. Lic Currently Expires on 781231 ML20147C7701978-11-15015 November 1978 Forwards Third Round of Discovery Questions.Observes NRC Has Not Responded to First Set of Interrogs.W/Encl Request to Produce & Cert of Svc ML20153B0471978-11-13013 November 1978 Names of Petitioners Intervening Have Been Placed on Svc List to Receive Copies of Documents Routinely Sent to Pdr. Also Lists & Forwards Documents Sent to PDR Prior to Initiation of Automatic Svc ML20150D4091978-11-0909 November 1978 Forwards List of Documents Filed W/Atomic Safety & Licensing Bd in Proc Dealing W/Amend of Matl Lic SNM-1773 ML20148H1611978-10-26026 October 1978 Forwards Affidavits of J Adams of NRDC & K Bossong of Citizens Energy Proj ML20148C0381978-10-19019 October 1978 Responds to 780919 Request for Addl Info Re Licensing Action.Nrc Info Practices Must Be Met.Notification of All Meetings Will Be Sent ML20062C3261978-10-18018 October 1978 Responds to 781012 NRC Request for Info Re Amend to Lic SNM-1773 for Spent Fuel Shipment to Mcguire.Finds That Reracking Oconee Spent Fuel Pool Is Tech Feasible as a Possible Future Action,But Requests Processing of Appl Now ML20148G7991978-10-18018 October 1978 Forwards Concerns of County Council Re Proposed Transport of Nuc Waste by Duke Pwr Co as Presented at 781017 Pub Meeting. Prefers Nuc Waste to Remain at Present Site Until Final Disposition Plan Made or to Use Alternate Road Route ML20150B5611978-10-16016 October 1978 Opposes Applicant Request to Respond to Intervenor Contentions on Day of Hearing.Procedure Deprives Intervenor of Opportunity to Respond & Opportunity for Due Process ML20148A5761978-10-13013 October 1978 Requests Extension Until 781024 to File Responses to Petitioner Contentions ML20148K2451978-10-12012 October 1978 Requests Addl Info Re Dpc'S Eval of Alternatives to Transp Oconee Spent Fuel to McGuire Site,Specifically on Increase of Storage Capacity at Existing Oconee Basins,Needed for Review of Appl for Amend of Special Nuc Matl Lic SNM-1773 ML20197B1591978-10-11011 October 1978 Objects to Issuance of SNM License to Duke Power Co for Transport of Nuclear Waste Matl from Oconee to Mcguire. Situation Creates Unacceptable Hazard to Residents Due to Inadequate Storage Facilities ML20147D1931978-10-0202 October 1978 NRC Will Respond to First Set of Interrogs on Informal Basis This Week Even Though Carolina Environ Study Group Has Not Yet Been Admitted as a Party to the Spent Fuel Storage Proceeding ML20147D2831978-10-0202 October 1978 Reports NRC Staff Will Consider Comments Made by Carolina Environ Study Group in at Special pre-hearing Conference for 781024 ML20148K8421978-09-23023 September 1978 Requests a Limited Hearing Re Subj Facil.Opposes Granting of Lic.W/Encl Newspaper Article Re Dykes' Attempt to Stop Approval of Lic for Subj Facil ML20148A8271978-09-19019 September 1978 Requests That NRC Supply Each Intervenor W/Copy of Util Application for Amend to SNM License for Spent Fuel Transportation & Storage & All Related Correspondence. Advance Notice of All Meetings & Insp Repts Requested ML20149H3071978-08-0202 August 1978 Forwards Schedule Used by NRC to Insure Timely Review Process.Dates Shown Reflect Best Practical Estimate Which Can Be Made at This Time.Date of Completion & Final Decision on Licensing Action Will Depend on Result of Hearings Held ML20149H8721978-07-21021 July 1978 Forwards Request for Addl Info Re Application for Amend to License SNM-1773 Re Storage of Oconee Spent Fuel at McGuire Facility.Response Requested within 30 Days of Receipt of Ltr ML20149H1011978-05-19019 May 1978 Forwards Request for Addl Info Re Application for Amend to License SNM-1773,including Licensing of Spent Fuel Pool as Isfsi.Meeting W/Util Requested to Resolve Matter.Response to Encl Questions Needed by 780605 ML20147B9001978-04-19019 April 1978 Confirms 780418 Conversation Re Site Visit on 780425-27 by NRC & Contractor Personnel.Areas of Interest to Be Reviewed for Both McGuire & Oconee Sites Are Listed 1982-08-03
[Table view] Category:NRC TO UTILITY
MONTHYEARML20062H1911982-08-0303 August 1982 Notifies That Apr 1982 Revision 6 to Spent Fuel Transportation Plan Meets Requirements of 10CFR73.37 & Is Approved.Revised Plan Contains Safeguards Info Which Should Be Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21) ML20148D2261980-07-11011 July 1980 Responds to Util 800417,28 & 0702 Ltrs Re Physical Protection of Irradiated Reactor Fuel in Transit.Approves Revision 3 to Spent Fuel Transportation Plan ML20126C0591980-03-0404 March 1980 Notifies That Requirement Contained in NRC 790803 & 15 Ltrs Re Withholding Identification of Specific Approved Spent Fuel Routes Is Rescinded.Commission 800229 Order in Response to NRC Petition,Reversed Previous Policy ML20148K2451978-10-12012 October 1978 Requests Addl Info Re Dpc'S Eval of Alternatives to Transp Oconee Spent Fuel to McGuire Site,Specifically on Increase of Storage Capacity at Existing Oconee Basins,Needed for Review of Appl for Amend of Special Nuc Matl Lic SNM-1773 ML20149H8721978-07-21021 July 1978 Forwards Request for Addl Info Re Application for Amend to License SNM-1773 Re Storage of Oconee Spent Fuel at McGuire Facility.Response Requested within 30 Days of Receipt of Ltr ML20147B9001978-04-19019 April 1978 Confirms 780418 Conversation Re Site Visit on 780425-27 by NRC & Contractor Personnel.Areas of Interest to Be Reviewed for Both McGuire & Oconee Sites Are Listed 1982-08-03
[Table view] Category:OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
MONTHYEARML20062H1911982-08-0303 August 1982 Notifies That Apr 1982 Revision 6 to Spent Fuel Transportation Plan Meets Requirements of 10CFR73.37 & Is Approved.Revised Plan Contains Safeguards Info Which Should Be Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21) ML20148D2261980-07-11011 July 1980 Responds to Util 800417,28 & 0702 Ltrs Re Physical Protection of Irradiated Reactor Fuel in Transit.Approves Revision 3 to Spent Fuel Transportation Plan ML20126C0591980-03-0404 March 1980 Notifies That Requirement Contained in NRC 790803 & 15 Ltrs Re Withholding Identification of Specific Approved Spent Fuel Routes Is Rescinded.Commission 800229 Order in Response to NRC Petition,Reversed Previous Policy ML20147C8011978-11-30030 November 1978 Confirms Staff'S Request for an Extension of Time to Respond to Interrogs by Carolina Environ Study Grp Propounded 781115 & Request to Produce Served by Cesg on 781116.Staff Responses Will Be Provided by 781229 ML20150E3131978-11-21021 November 1978 Responds to Re Concern About DPC Proposal to Transport Spent Nuc Fuel from Oconee Nuc Facil Located in Sc for Storage in Spent Fuel Pool at McGuire Nuc Facil, Charlotte,Nc.Issue Will Be Heard Before ASLB ML20153B0471978-11-13013 November 1978 Names of Petitioners Intervening Have Been Placed on Svc List to Receive Copies of Documents Routinely Sent to Pdr. Also Lists & Forwards Documents Sent to PDR Prior to Initiation of Automatic Svc ML20150D4091978-11-0909 November 1978 Forwards List of Documents Filed W/Atomic Safety & Licensing Bd in Proc Dealing W/Amend of Matl Lic SNM-1773 ML20148C0381978-10-19019 October 1978 Responds to 780919 Request for Addl Info Re Licensing Action.Nrc Info Practices Must Be Met.Notification of All Meetings Will Be Sent ML20148K2451978-10-12012 October 1978 Requests Addl Info Re Dpc'S Eval of Alternatives to Transp Oconee Spent Fuel to McGuire Site,Specifically on Increase of Storage Capacity at Existing Oconee Basins,Needed for Review of Appl for Amend of Special Nuc Matl Lic SNM-1773 ML20147D1931978-10-0202 October 1978 NRC Will Respond to First Set of Interrogs on Informal Basis This Week Even Though Carolina Environ Study Group Has Not Yet Been Admitted as a Party to the Spent Fuel Storage Proceeding ML20149H3071978-08-0202 August 1978 Forwards Schedule Used by NRC to Insure Timely Review Process.Dates Shown Reflect Best Practical Estimate Which Can Be Made at This Time.Date of Completion & Final Decision on Licensing Action Will Depend on Result of Hearings Held ML20149H8721978-07-21021 July 1978 Forwards Request for Addl Info Re Application for Amend to License SNM-1773 Re Storage of Oconee Spent Fuel at McGuire Facility.Response Requested within 30 Days of Receipt of Ltr ML20149H1011978-05-19019 May 1978 Forwards Request for Addl Info Re Application for Amend to License SNM-1773,including Licensing of Spent Fuel Pool as Isfsi.Meeting W/Util Requested to Resolve Matter.Response to Encl Questions Needed by 780605 ML20147B9001978-04-19019 April 1978 Confirms 780418 Conversation Re Site Visit on 780425-27 by NRC & Contractor Personnel.Areas of Interest to Be Reviewed for Both McGuire & Oconee Sites Are Listed 1982-08-03
[Table view] |
Text
! O 4 UNITED STATES y *q t NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION h $ WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
's OCT 121978
%...../
Docket 70-2623 SNM-1773 1
Mr. William O. Parker, Vice President Steam Production Department Duke Power Company 422 South Church Street Charlotte, N. C. 28242
Dear Mr. Parker:
The purpose of this letter is to confirm discussions between Mr. Brett Spitalny with members of your staff on October 5,1978, regarding the need for additional information. As a result of our review of your application for the amendment of Special Nuclear Material License SNM-1773, we have found that insufficient infor-mation has been provided to support your evaluation of alternatives to transporting Oconee spent fuel to the McGuire site. Specifically, the staff bclieves that further information is required with support-ing basis with respect to increasing storage capacity at the existing Oconee Nuclear Station basins.
The alternative described in Section 18.4 of the application pro-poses an increase in the capacity of the Oconee Units 1 and 2 storage pool by the use of high density storage racks. In order to accomplish this, it is stated that all fuel would have to be moved elsewhere, the pool drained and decontaminated, existing racks removed, and new racks installed. This statement does not appear to consider other existing and available options.
Since the announcement by the Administration to indefinitely postpone fuel reprocessing, and make an increased effort for the continued on-site storage capabilities of utilities, there have been a significant number of modifications to spent fuel pools, already containing fuel. This has been accomplished by the reracking of the pools in increments contingent upon available space at the time.
7811170067
,e Mr. William 0. Parker OCT l 4 27s For example, the Oconee Units 1 and 2 pool presently contains 165 assemblies and will receive an additional 56 assemblies by November 1,1978, resulting from the refueling of Unit 2. Including an allowance for the " PIE" (Post Irradiation Equipment) in the pool, 24% of the pool remains empty. The Oconee Unit 3 pool presently has room for 94 assemblies without jeopardizing the integrity of the 1/3 core reserve. Transferring assemblies from Oconee 1 and 2 to Oconee 3 will result in an availability of 48% of the pool for modification. Include in the cost benefit aspects of your analysis the considerations of maintaining sufficient spent fuel storage capacity in both Units 1 and 2 and Unit 3 pools to receive a full core load of 177 fuel assemblies.
This type of procedure is being used by other utilities at the present time, and has been proven to be a feasible option for installing higher capacity storage racks.
In light of the schedule being adhered to in support of this project by the staf f, we would appreciate your response to this inquiry by Oc tober 18, 1978. If you cannot meet this schedule, please inform Brett Spitalny of your intentions. In the event that you cannot meet this date, the staff will be prepared to enter the pre-hearing conference with this item as an unresolved issue. However, we will not be prepared to complete our review of your application until this information is received. Attendant delays in the commencement of any hearings will be required.
l Si ncerely , '
~
l Richard W. Starostecki, Chief Fuel Reprocessing and Recycle Branch l
Division of Fuel Cycle and Material Safety