IR 05000414/1985057
| ML20138N439 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Catawba  |
| Issue date: | 12/16/1985 |
| From: | Jape F, Matt Thomas NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20138N436 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-414-85-57, NUDOCS 8512240003 | |
| Download: ML20138N439 (5) | |
Text
-
- m pp ggs.
'
-
-
_
'}
g :.
.
,
'
-$
-
4.
'"
WM i
_. -
,
(
' *
, _
g[#gaREcoq(-
.[
- UNITED STATES 7
'
p
-~
-
- NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION -
~
,.
,
,
REGION ll
-
s o.
y.3 ' s-J T-j
.101 MARIETTA STREET, N.W.
~
1 **
'
.-
-
~
p
.
-
+
-......
1. Report No.: ' 50-414/85-57-
Libensee:
7 Duke. Power Company-
~
'
-422 South Church Street'.
. Charlotte, NC 28242-
"~e e:...
_ _
s50-414:=
.. License.No.:
CPPR-117 Docket No.:
_
_
,
_
2. Facility Name: '-Catawba 2
~
-
lInspe$t.ionConducted:. November 12-15,>1985
.
,
1In' spec _ tor:
-
/
/4 f
fi (/ Thomas Date Signed
~/4 /4/3r -
.
-Approved by:
'
,fx. F.:Japff/56ction Chief, Test Program Section Date Signed
Engineering Branch-
.,
J-DivisionLo.f Reactor Safety.
SUMMARY
. Scope:..This.: routine,: unannounced inspection involved 31 inspector-hours at the site; in the areas.'of-loverall-preoperational ~ test. program review,' preoperational
- te;st: procedure: review,andpreoperationaltest. witnessing.
'
iResultsi.No violations or deviations'wereLidentified.
,
/
-I
e4
.a.,
j,
$
-
(
,
.
<
w,%.-
-44.-.
8512240003 851218 ADOCK 050%4}4l, DR
_.
,
<
,
T c
s y
h I
'
..
m.;,
-
,
-
-,
_
,
- fg w+-
-
,
m-y,-
'
.-
- '
'
.
y ky
_
"
$
.
'
~
-
.
..
.
-REPORT DETAILS
_
.
'-
~
.
....
.-
-
- 1.
- Persons Contacted
'
Tj License ~e: Employees
'
?HlfB'.LBarron,'OperationsSuperintendent:-
- ^
.
- C.llp Hartzell,; Compliance Engineer
. R NA.OJones, Performance, Test Engineer
- *P. G. (LeRoy, ; Licensing-Engineer
.
M.fR.- McElwee',; Mechanical. Maintenance Engineer
-
~
- F. :P. Schiffley :II, Licensing Engineer
<' ~ Other41.icensee.~ employees contacted included test. coordinators, engineers,
- technicians,-operators and office personnel.
NRC Resident 1 Inspectors
,
m
'P. i H., Skinner,- Senior-Resident Inspector, Operation's P.yK.-Van ~Doorn,: Senior-Resident inspector, Construction
~
'
- Attended exitiinterview
~'
- 5 2'.
LExit Interview
.:The inspection scope and findings.were summarized on-November 15, 1985, with a
-
- thoseL persons-indicated in paragraph.1. above.
'The1 nspector described the i
-
areas 4 inspected: and discussed the' : inspection ^ findings.
No. dissenting
.
' comments were received from the: licensee,
?The111censee,did.not identify. as proprietary any of the materials provided w
, fto or: reviewed'by the-inspector during this 1.nspection.
.
'
3.
. Licensee Action'on Previous Enforcement Matters-This subject was not addressed in the inspection.
-
,
,
,
T.
Unresolved Items e
Unresolved items were not identifie'd durins the inspection.
-
S
.0verall.Preoperational. Test Program' Review (70301) ~
q s
_. The linsp'ector/ reviewed - the documents listed below which pertain to the
~
Catawba preoperational (preop) test program:
_FSAR Chapter 14
-:
_
-Station Directive 2.3.1, Control of Test and Measuring Equipm' nt
.
e v
+
'l
-
.
--
.
-
- -.. -.
.. ~. - - - - -.. -
- -.
-
i--.-
- - - - -
g
-
,
-
-
-
-
~
,
T',,
> '
j s
g]
<
-
,
- .
e e
"
- 2
<
>
m (
' Station Directive 3.0.1,1 System / Structure Turnover-and Startup Process
.
Station Direct 1.ve 3.0.3, Management of Shutdown' Request
-
'
-
' Station Directive 3.2.1,.~ Development and-Conduct of the Preoperational
'
Test' program
.
.
JStationl Directive 3.3.2, Control-of the Maintenance Program
-
-
'
L'
~ Station 5 Directive 3.3.7,LWork; Request-Preparation
-
~
1 Station Directive 3.11.1,' Housekeeping and Cleanliness in Safety-
-
-
~Related Areas-
^
Station; Directive 4.2.1, Development, Approval, and Use of Station
'
--
Procedures
,
.
15tation DirectiveL4.'4.1, Processing Design'Cnanges
~
-1
- Station Directive 4.4.3,' Temporary Station Modifications
~ '
,
l Station) Directive 4.4.4,. Processing Nuclear Station Modifications-
-
-
' Major areas of _ interest :during this review were test organization; test program administration; design changes and modifications; plant maintenance
.
Jand preventive maintenancenduring preop; testing'; equipment prot'ection and
'
. cleanliness; test and measurement equipment; and training.
Novio1'ations'or deviations were identified in the areas inspected.
"
l:6..
Preoperational Test Procedure' Review (70300, 70306).
,
,
The inspector review' preop-test procedure: TP/2/A/1350/25A, Diesel Generator-
- 2A Blackout.and ! Load Rejection.Preoperational Test, and TP/2/A/1350/258,
-
Diese1' Generator 2B Blackout and Load Rejection Preoperational Test. The
'
itest' procedures were reviewed :to Lverify that they were consistent with
.
- applicable' sections'of FSAR Chapters 8 and 14; the Safety Evaluation Report and its supplements; _ Regulatory Guides' 1.68 and 1.108; and the Technical Specifications.
. The ' procedures: were..also reviewed.for - conformance to administrative
,
L controls..
This included verifying that pertinent. prerequisites.were ;
. identified, initial" test conditions and system status were specified,
"
acceptance ' criteria specified,' the -required reviews were performed, and
- management app.roval was indicated.
.No, violations or deviasions were identified in the areas inspected.
-
>
l
- n d
- -
.
. =.
- --
- -
. -
- --.
.
.
-.
-
.
-.
e
,-
-
u
-
.
-
-
2:
,
,
"
.
~
57.
- Preoperational Test; Procedure Verification'(70311)
- The 41nspector revieNd portions of the' preop. test program as ' described.in
!FSAR Chapter.-14 to'. verify: that. test procedures are being prepared; for the'
Ltests identified as? being required :for fuel load, and, to determine if the Etesting described in Regulatory: Guide 1.68, Revision.2, 'and other applicable -
~
1 Regulatory Guides,'is.beingLfactored into'the licensee's. preop test. program.
-
LThe' licensee o has1 a computer program ; which. tracks ~the - status :of '
-
?
. preop'erational' tests through procedure development,- test performance, and Ltest results approval. J A11' of the p,g tests required for fuel tload have been1 identified and all but a few of the procedures-have been approved.
'No violations' orfdesiations were identifisd in the areas inspected.
^
8.
!P'reoperational-Test Witnessing (70312, 70441)
~
.
.
The Linspector' witnessed portions _ of Sections 13.11 and 13.14 of preop test
' ~ TP/2/A/1100/02A,. Diesel' Generator 2A -Preoperational Functional Test.
Section 13.11' isithe procedure. for the 35 consecutive start verification
_
, tests, which. demonstrate that diesel generator 2A' can. be successfully
'
~
started and loaded"to greater than or: equal to 3500 KW and run' for greater tthan or L equal to 60 minutes.35 consecutive times as per :the criteria specified in Regulatory Guide 1.108.
-
LSection 13.14 is the procedure for _ verifying. the maintenance mode and
~
tarring. device -interlocks operate properly. These interlocks prevent the-diesel from' starting on any start' signal. The test was witnessed to verify
-
.that:
IAppropriat'e revision'of the procedure was available and in use by
-
test personnel'.
Test prerequisites were met.
-
Personnel. involved:in the test were briefed prior to'beginning the
--
test.
Proper plant systems were in_ service.
-
,
_ Special test equipment ' required by the procedure was calibrated
-
and in' service.
- -. -..
~
-
The test was performed in accordance with requirements.
-
Adequate' coordination amnng personnel involved in the test.
-
,
,
,
-
,.
-
. - = -.
&..
- - - - m.
.,
-
.. '.
"
-
s
.
'
-
-
a 4 ' W, ' 33 w-
-
.
.
r;o; gge ; -
- '
- --
_1
-
>
-
~
s'.
_
.;.-.
_.
,
'
.,
Ql
'k :,
>
.
..
- a:
.;Nw' <
, O; f& ' C ' A - '
'
-
-
,
,
'
,
.-s JM f u
4;
'
. - w; -c
. ~
,
- yr,
- > -
6-r
-
,
-
i
- s
-
,
--
, ; ms.~ ~..q
.
.
.
<
'
a: 7y
- ,Testidata were
- collectedJand recorded in' the' proper ' manner
~
- -.
.
.
.
.
,
,
,
,
.
...-
..
.
.
.
..
"
T-1, J Problems: encountered._-during o testing' were properly ' identi fied. and.
.
gp
+1..
,
.
-
-
-
Ldocumented for? evaluation,
. e..
.
.
,
,
"
.+,
.,
r
,
1'
C'-
-NoLviolations or deviations;were: identified!in the' areas inspected.
i-
..
e,.
,.
,
-
.a
,
m.' (,-
c g
e b
.
,_ _ ' "
y
'e,'.Rk'! Yr
'
/
,
- 2:p
_
.',-f
",,'t.
_s
. -
.s
..4/
r
~7,.
A' h. *
~
,
,. _.,.
2--.
~y i,-y,
,
-.' a
.,
.
*..
l'k!
g/W
-
r
L
_(
s
.
_
,)
W
--
.
.# :
-
%.
a
' ' '
_
[+
7,.'
' w g
'
.
,
w y.
.,,
k V:Q l
.
4:.
,
,
,
i r.--
t (
'
I'.
' ' '
,:
g
- 3, g
\\
'N^ * *
'
l
,
f fr_. -.
,
d: h'
7'[ [.
r
+
/
.
.x
.,,
t
"
.y J
+
,
.
$,h',_,
,..y
-
i
~k
.:
-*
.,4
.
-
.
h.t 7 l.
s
, '
,
s
'p$,'
. ~
f y
'
W
.*
%
3-
,
'
$.
-
,
,
- .
i
>t
-
y., c h.
- i k
_'-
,
- . -
- 3
4 t
A
' l' I
.
7: i s +
ii >
f '-y ?.a
'c
.
.y
'
-
.
~
.
'
u t
i.
.
.
..J m.
..
a