IR 05000414/1985026

Insp Rept 50-414/85-26 on 850715-19.No Violations or Deviations Identified.Major Areas Inspected:Preoperational Test Procedure Review & Witnessing

ML20133N927
Person / Time
Site:	Catawba
Issue date:	07/30/1985
From:	Jape F, Mathis J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20133N925	List: IR 05000414/1985026 ML20133N923
References
50-414-85-26, NUDOCS 8508140058
Download: ML20133N927 (4)

Text

• '

,

,

UNITED STATES

! [p3 Rtc 'o NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[ j/ n REGION 11 g, /, j 101 MARIETT A STREET, N * -

'g

-

ATLANTA, GEORGI A 30323

,

%, +..../

.

i Report No.: 50-414/85-26 Licensee: Duke Power Company 422 South Church Street Charlotte, NC 28242

'

Docket No.: 50-414 License No: CPPR-117

,

Facility Name: Catawba 2 Inspection onducted: July 15-19, 1985 Inspector: \ [. M At h ~7!3e!StS Date Signed J. LIMathis

~

J Approved by: // *st/

F. Jape, Section Chief (/

' '

Date Signed Engineering Branch Division of Reactor Safety SUMMARY Scope: This routine, unannounced inspection entailed 38 inspector-hours at the i site during normal duty hours, in the areas of preoperational test procedure review and preoperational test witnessin Results: No violations or deviations were identified.

.

,

8500140058 850731 4 PDR ADOCK 0500

_ ___

. .

'

i.

i REPORT DETAILS Persons Contacted Licensee Employees

• J. W. Hampton, Plant Manager

• J. W. Cox, Technical Services Sup *C. L. Hartzell, Compliance Engineer

• P. LeRoy, Licensing Engineer

• R. A. Thronburg, Status & Control / Construction R. Jones, Test Engineer B. Kirk, Engineer T. Bohart, Engineer M. Anderson, Engineer R. Scarborough Engineer

Other licensee employees contacted included construction craftsmen, engineers, technicians, operators, mechanics, security office members, and office personne NRC Resident Inspector

• K. VanDoorn, Resident Inspector

• Attended exit interview Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on July 19, 1985, with those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above. The inspector described the areas inspected and discussed in detail the inspection finding No dissenting comments were received from the license The licensee did not identify as proprietary any of the material provided to or reviewed by the inspector during this inspectio . Licensee Action on Previous Enforcement Matters This subject was not addressed in the inspectio . Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during the inspectio _ _ _ _ - . _ - . - _ . _ _ . . _ - . - _

. .

'

..

,

, Preoperational Test Procedure Review (70300), Unit 2 The inspector reviewed the preoperational (Preop) test procedures listed below to verify that they were consistent with applicable sections of the Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) and Regulatory Guides 1.68 and 1.7 The following procedures were reviewed:

- TP/2/A/1400/01, Nuclear Service Water System Functional Tes TP/2/A/1250/04, Auxiliary Feedwater Functional Tes TP/2/B/1150/04, Pressurizer Relief Tank

,

- TP/2/B/1450/03, Containment Purge Ventilation System Functional Tes TP/2/B/1250/02, Steam Generator Blowdown Functional Tes The procedures were reviewed for the following 1) Conformance to administrative control This included verifying that pertinent prerequisitesare identifie ) Acceptance criteria against which the test will be judged are clearly identified.

} 3) Initial test conditions are specified such as valve line-ups,

'

electrical power and control requirement ) The procedure includes reference to appropriate FSAR sections, T/S,

'

drawings, specification, codes and other requirement ) Procedure provides for independent verification of critical steps or parameter ) Provision is made for recording details of the test including observed deficiencies, their resolution, and retes ,

i Within the areas inspected no violations or deviations were identifie l Preoperational Test Witnet. sing (70315) - Unit 2 The inspector witnessed portions of preop tests TP/2/B/1450/03, Containment Purge Ventilation System Functional Test, (Sections 12.1 and 12.2) and 1 TP/2/B/1250/02, Steam Generator Blowdown Functional Test, (Sections 12.3 and

'

12.5) which verified that interlocks for various system valves functioned i properly and flow verification for A&B trains of containment purge

ventilation system test.

!

,

The test were witnessed to verify the following:

l I

>

i

l

_. - - --- _. , , - _ - . _ - - - _ _ - - _ - _ - .- _ . . - _ - - - - _ _ - -

_

'

. . j

-

. I

!

- Latest revision of the test procedure was available and in use by test personne Test prerequisites were me Proper plant system were in servic The test was perfonned as required by the procedur Test discrepancies were documented for review and resolution.

i

- Adequate coordination existed among personnel involved in the tes Temporary modifications such as Jumpers were installed and tracked in

. accordance with administrative controls.

i No violation or deviations were identified in the areas inspected.

!

.--_,-.-- , -. _ , - - . , , - - - . . - - -, . - . ...-, - ,___...-____

-

_ _ . , , _ , - , , _ _ _ . , , , , _ _ , , _ _ . . _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ , _ . . _ . , _ _ , _ , ,