IR 05000414/1985023

Insp Rept 50-414/85-23 on 850624-27.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Preoperational Test Program Review,Including Preoperational Test Procedures,Rcs Hydrostatic Test Results & 10CFR50.55(e)

ML20132E253
Person / Time
Site:	Catawba
Issue date:	07/08/1985
From:	Jape F, Matt Thomas NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20132E245	List: IR 05000414/1985023 ML20132E241
References
50-414-85-23, NUDOCS 8508010754
Download: ML20132E253 (4)

Text

8 UNITED STATES

[$ CEC o NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION yN p REGloN 11 g .. , j 101 MARIETTA STREET. * ,L - t ATLANTA, GEORGI A 30323 i ' %,# oY

.....

Report No.: 50-414/85-23 Licensee: Duke Power Company 422 South Church Street Charlotte, NC 28242 Docket No.: 50-414 License No.: CPPR-117 Facility Name: Catawba Unit 2 Inspection Conducted: June 24-27, 1985 Inspector: hh ~

tw ', , frit.c ]- ff-ff M. Thomis J Date Signed Approved by: M V '

% 7 / b / b^

F. Jape, Section Chief Date Signed Test Programs Section Engineering Branch Division of Reactor Safety SUMMARY Scope: This routine, unannounced inspection involved 31 inspector-hours on site in the areas of overall preoperational test program review, preoperational test procedure review, reactor coolant system hydrostatic test results review, and i 10 CFR 50.55(e) revie Results: No violations or deviations were identified.

i (

8508010754 850711 PDR G

ADOCK 05000414 PDR

,

.s REPORT DETAILS Persons Contacted Licensee Employees G. Cornwell, Construction Associate Engineer - Mechanical

• J. W. Cox, Technical Services Superintendent C. L. Hartzell, Compliance Engineer M. W. Hawes, Performance J. A. Kammer, Performance P. G. LeRoy, Licensing Engineer D. Llewellyn, Construction Mechanical Equipment Engineer F. N. Mack, Project Services Engineer C. E. Muse, Unit 2 Coordinator K. Schmidt, Quality Assurance (QA) Engineer E. G. Williams, QA Technician Other licensee employees contacted included test coordinators, engineers, technicians, operators, and office personne NRC Resident Inspectors P. H. Skinner, Senior Resident Inspector, Operations P. K. VanDoorn, Senior Resident Inspector, Construction

• Attended exit interview Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on June 27, 1985, with those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above. The inspector described the areas inspected and discussed the inspection finding No dissenting comments were received from the licensee. The licensee did not identify as proprietary any of the materials provided to or reviewed by the inspector during this inspectio . Licensee Action on Previous Enforcement Matters This subject was not addressed in the inspectio . Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during the inspectio ._ . .. - . . _

._

.

,~'

i ~

i

!

'

, Independent Inspecti~on Effort (92706)

'

The inspector reviewed the following 10 CFR 50.55(e) report:

(Closed) Significant Deficiency Report SD 414/84-21 dated November 9, 1984,

concerning the potential to overpressurize the component cooling water system should a' tubing failure occur in the reactor coolant pump thermal

- barrier heat exchanger. Westinghouse reported this item to NRC under 10 CFR 21- and the licensee submitted Licensee Event Report (LER) 413/84-14

for Unit The LER was closed in NRC Inspection Report 413/85-10 ,

Significant Deficiency 414/84-21 states that overpressure protection for the surge tanks will be provided by assuring that the vent valve on each surge

~

i l tank remains open. In discussing this item, licensee personnel stated that

'

prior to Unit 2 operation, the vent valves will be opened and the air . supply

,

that operates that valves will be isolated. The valves will be tagged and

'

tracked per the Unit 2 removal and restoration log.

I Within the areas examined, no violations or deviations were identifie . Overall Preoperational Test Program Review (70301)

The inspector reviewed the following documents which contribute to the -

establishment of the Catawba preoperational (preop) test progra FSAR Chapter 14

--

Station Directive 3.2.1, Development and Conduct of the Preoperational Test Program i -

Station Directive 4.2.1, Development, Approval, and Use of Station

. Procedures

.

Specific areas reviewed within the above documents were test program

organization and administration. These were reviewed to verify that:

{

-

Responsibilities of. key personnel in the test program are specified in writing.

l

,

-

Lines of authority and responsibilities of test personnel are i

specified in writin Administrative measures have been established governing the conduct of testing.

-

Formal methods have been established to control scheduling of test activitie Measures for evaluation of test results have been establishe No violations or deviations were identified in the areas inspected.

i i

!

,

, e r + n v - e,- m-

. .~9 3 Preoperational Test Procedure Review (70304, 70338, 70339)

The inspector reviewed the preop test procedures listed below to verify that they were consistent with applicable sections of FSAR Chapters 6, 7, 9, 10, 14, and 15, and Regulatory Guides 1.68 and 1.79. The following procedures were reviewed:

-

TP/2/A/1200/01, Component Cooling Functional Test

-

TP/2/A/1200/03D, Safety Injection Accumulator Functional Test

-

TP/2/A/1250/04, Auxiliary Feedwater Functional Test The procedures were reviewed for conformance to administrative control This included verifying that pertinent prerequisites are identified, initial test conditions are specified, acceptance criteria specified, the required reviews were performed, and management approval was indicate No violations or deviat' ions were identified in the areas inspecte . Reactor Coolant System Hydrostatic Test Results Review (70562)

The inspector reviewed the completed data package for the reactor coolant system (RCS) cold hydrostatic test. The data package was reviewed to verify the following:

-

Test changes were made in accordance with the licensee's administrative control The changes did not change the intent of the tes Water quality was in accordance with the requirements specifie The hydrostatic test pressure was held for the time require The reactor coolant temperature was above the nil ductility transition temperatur Corrective actions have been taken to resolve the deficiencies identified during the hydrostatic tes The test results have been reviewed and approved by the appropriate personne No violations or deviations were identified in the areas inspecte _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - - - _ _ _ _ - _ - - _ - - - . ___ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ - - - - __ _ ___-_________-____-__-__u