IR 05000414/1985057

Insp Rept 50-414/85-57 on 851112-15.No Violation or Deviation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Overall Preoperational Test Program Review,Preoperational Test Procedure Review & Preoperational Test Witnessing

ML20138N439
Person / Time
Site:	Catawba
Issue date:	12/16/1985
From:	Jape F, Matt Thomas NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20138N436	List: IR 05000414/1985057 ML20138N432
References
50-414-85-57, NUDOCS 8512240003
Download: ML20138N439 (5)

Text

pp gg ' -

_

- - m g :.

'} .

,

'

WM i

, _ _. - ,

( ' * '"

-$ - '

p .[ - UNITED STATES 7

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION -

-~

g[#gaREcoq(-

~

, ,. , ;

s REGION ll -

y .3 ' s-J T -j .101 MARIETTA STREET, ~

.' ATI.ANTA, GEORGIA 30323

'

~

.- -

1 **

p

+ - ..... . .

-

1. Report No.: ' 50-414/85-57-4 Libensee: 7 Duke. Power Company- ~

-422 South Church Street'. '

"~e

. Charlotte, NC 28242-e:. .. _ __ _ _

,

Docket No.: s50-414:= .. License.No.: CPPR-117 2. Facility Name: '-Catawba 2 ~

-

,

lInspe$t.ionConducted: . November 12-15,>1985 .

1In' spec _ tor: -

/ /4 f fi (/ Thomas

'

Date Signed

.

-Approved by: ~/4 /4/3r -

,fx. F.:Japff/56ction Chief, Test Program Section Date Signed Engineering Branch- .,

J-DivisionLo.f Reactor Safet SUMMARY

. Scope: . .This.: routine,: unannounced inspection involved 31 inspector-hours at the site; in the areas.'of-loverall- preoperational ~ test. program review,' preoperational

te;st: procedure: review,andpreoperationaltest. witnessin '

iResultsi .No violations or deviations'wereLidentifie *

,

/

3 -I e4 .a., j,

$ -

(

,

.

<

3 w,%.- -44.-.

8512240003 851218 4 DR ADOCK 050%4}4l,

,

, <

T c s y

'

h I

.. m .; , - -

-,

, ,

_

m

- - fg w+-

y,- - ,

y

.

' '

- '

_

.-

"

ky .

$

'

~

-

. . . .

-REPORT DETAILS

_ .

'-

~

. . . . . -

.-

'

: Persons Contacted j

T License ~e: Employees

^ ?HlfB'.LBarron,'OperationsSuperintendent:-

.

'

C.llp Hartzell,; Compliance Engineer

. *R NA.OJones, Performance, Test Engineer

*P. G. (LeRoy, ; Licensing- Engineer

. M.fR.- McElwee',; Mechanical. Maintenance Engineer

• F. :P. Schiffley :II, Licensing Engineer

~

-

<' ~ Other41.icensee .~ employees contacted included test. coordinators, engineers,

technicians,-operators and office personne NRC Resident 1 Inspectors

,

m 'P. i H., Skinner,- Senior- Resident Inspector, Operation's P.yK.-Van ~Doorn,: Senior-Resident inspector, Construction

~ '

~'

• Attended exitiinterview 1 - 5 2'. LExit Interview

.:Thea inspection scope and findings.were summarized on-November 15, 1985, with

-

thoseL persons- indicated in paragraph .1. above. 'The1i nspector described the

-

areas 4 inspected: and discussed the' : inspection ^ findings. No . dissenting

. ' comments were received from the: licensee, w ?The111censee ,did .not identify. as proprietary any of the materials provided

.

, fto or: reviewed'by the-inspector during this 1.nspectio ' . Licensee Action'on Previous Enforcement Matters

,

,

-This subject was not addressed in the inspectio , Unresolved Items e

Unresolved items were not identifie'd durins the inspectio S q .0verall .Preoperational. Test Program' Review (70301) ~

_ . The linsp'ector/ reviewed - the documents listed below which pertain to the

~

s Catawba preoperational (preop) test program:

-: _FSAR Chapter 14

_

.

-Station Directive 2.3.1, Control of Test and Measuring Equipm'e nt v

+ 'l __ _ _ - _ _ . -- . - - - . . - . ..~.-----..-_--. - _i--.-_ - - - - - _

g - , - - -

-

~

,

T',, > ' j s g] <

-

,

.

e "

e

<

>

2 m

( .

' Station Directive 3.0.1,1 System / Structure Turnover-and Startup Process

-

Station Direct 1.ve 3.0.3, Management of Shutdown' Request

'

-

' Station Directive 3.2.1,.~ Development and-Conduct of the Preoperational Test' program

'

.

.

-

JStationl Directive 3.3.2, Control-of the Maintenance Program

-

'

-

L' ~ Station 5 Directive 3.3.7,LWork; Request-Preparation

~

-

1 Station Directive 3.11.1,' Housekeeping and Cleanliness in Safety-

~Related Areas-

^

-

--

'

Station; Directive 4.2.1, Development, Approval, and Use of Station

,

Procedures

.

~

15tation DirectiveL4.'4.1, Processing Design'Cnanges-1 : Station Directive 4.4.3,' Temporary Station Modifications

~ '

-

,

-

l Station) Directive 4.4.4,. Processing Nuclear Station Modifications-

' Major areas of _ interest :during this review were test organization; test program administration; design changes and modifications; plant maintenance

. Jand preventive maintenancenduring preop; testing'; equipment prot'ection and

'

. cleanliness; test and measurement equipment; and trainin "

Novio1'ations'or deviations were identified in the areas inspecte *

,

l:6. . Preoperational Test Procedure' Review (70300, 70306). ,

The inspector review' preop-test procedure: TP/2/A/1350/25A, Diesel Generator-

2A Blackout .and ! Load Rejection .Preoperational Test, and TP/2/A/1350/258,

-

Diese1' Generator 2B Blackout and Load Rejection Preoperational Test. The

'

itest' procedures were reviewed :to Lverify that they were consistent with .

applicable' sections'of FSAR Chapters 8 and 14; the Safety Evaluation Report and its supplements; _ Regulatory Guides' 1.68 and 1.108; and the Technical Specification , . The ' procedures: were..also reviewed .for - conformance to administrative L

"

controls.. This included verifying that pertinent. prerequisites .were ;

. identified, initial" test conditions and system status were specified, acceptance ' criteria specified,' the -required reviews were performed, and

- management app.roval was indicate .No, violations or deviasions were identified in the areas inspecte >

l :n d . =._ _- --

e ,-

-

u .

-

-

- 2: ,

,

"

.

~

5 :Preoperational Test; Procedure Verification'(70311)

The 41nspector revieNd portions of the' preop . test program as ' described .in

!FSAR Chapter.-14 to'. verify: that. test procedures are being prepared; for the'

Ltests identified as? being required :for fuel load, and, to determine if the Etesting described in Regulatory: Guide 1.68, Revision .2, 'and other applicable -

~

1 Regulatory Guides,'is.beingLfactored into'the licensee's. preop test. progra LThe' licensee o has1 a computer program ; which . tracks ~the - status :of '

-

? . preop'erational' tests through procedure development,- test performance, and Ltest results approval. J A11' of the p,g tests required for fuel tload have been1 identified and all but a few of the procedures-have been approve 'No violations' orfdesiations were identifisd in the areas inspecte ^ ~

. !P'reoperational-Test Witnessing (70312, 70441) .

The Linspector' witnessed portions _ of Sections 13.11 and 13.14 of preop test

' ~ TP/2/A/1100/02A,. Diesel' Generator 2A -Preoperational Functional Tes Section 13.11' isithe procedure. for the 35 consecutive start verification

_

'

, tests, which . demonstrate that diesel generator 2A' can. be successfully

~

started and loaded"to greater than or: equal to 3500 KW and run' for greater tthan or L equal to 60 minutes .35 consecutive times as per :the criteria specified in Regulatory Guide 1.10 LSection 13.14 is the procedure for _ verifying . the maintenance mode and

~

tarring. device -interlocks operate properly. These interlocks prevent the-diesel from' starting on any start' signal. The test was witnessed to verify

-

.that:

-

IAppropriat'e revision'of the procedure was available and in use by test personnel'.

-

Test prerequisites were me Personnel. involved:in the test were briefed prior to'beginning the tes Proper plant systems were in_ service.

,

-

_ Special test equipment ' required by the procedure was calibrated and in' servic . - . .

~

-

-

The test was performed in accordance with requirement , ,

-

Adequate' coordination amnng personnel involved in the tes ,

-

,.

- - - - ., - . . ' .

.

&.. a 4 ' W , ' 33

'

- -

w- -

.

"

-

s

.

r;o;

, .;.-.

gge ; - .,

' - -- _1 -

>

s'. -

_

~

'

Ql 'k

, >

.

'

..

,

a: ,

'

-

-

.;Nw' < , O; f& ' C ' A - ' ,

.-s JM f

'

u 4;

. - w; -c . ~ ,

yr , - > - 6- r -

,

- i

s --

-

,

, ; ms .~ ~ . .q . . . <

'

a: 7y

~

- -.

,Testidata were

collectedJand recorded in' the' proper ' manner

.

. .

.

, ,

, , . . .-

. .

.

. .

T-1,

" . . .

gp

.

+ , . J Problems: encountered._-during o testing' were properly ' identi fied. and . -

1 .

- -

Ldocumented for? evaluation,

. .

"

, ,

1'

3 i- .. .+ , 4

., r

,

e,.

C'- -

-NoLviolations or deviations;were: identified!in the' areas inspecte ,

, .

.a e

,

.

m.' (,- c g

b

,_ _ ' "

'

y

'e,'.Rk'! Yr *

/

,

- 2:p

_s

_

.',-f ",,' . - 7

.s

~7,.

..4/ r

~

A' h. * , . _ . ,.

~y

,

i,-y, 2--.

, - .' a . , .

*..  ; 4 l'k!

g/W #

r -

L

_(

s . _

,) W --

. .# : -

%.

a

' ' '

_

7,.'

[+

.

'

, 5 ' w g w . , , k V:Q l ,

.

,

4: .

,

i r.--

t

'

( I'.

' ' ' ,: g

• 3, g 7

\

'

l'N^f * * ,

fr_ . - . 7 ,

d: h' + /

7'[ [ .

r

. ,, t

.

.x

"

.y J

+ ,

4 .

,..y $,h',_,

-

i

~k

.:

-* -

.,4

.

.

s

, '

h'p$,' .t 7 ,

s

. ~

f y

'

W

.*

% 4 3- ,

'

$. -

, ,

.

i >t -

y ., c i k _'-

,

. -

4 * 1 3 7 4 t A

' l' I

.

7: i s +

ii >

f '-y ?.a 3

'c .

.y '

.

-

1 .

u_

~

i :__.____________.____

'

___._.J_m.__._.___ ____a