ML20138B094

Advises That Advanced Research & Applications Corp, Unsuccessful Offeror Under RFP RS-NMS-81-030 Entitled, Analysis of Safeguards Needs for Transport of High Level Waste

ML20138B094
Person / Time
Issue date:	03/30/1981
From:	Mattia M NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM)
To:	Armistead R ADVANCED RESEARCH & APPLICATIONS CORP.
Shared Package
ML20136E458	List: IA-84-682, Request for Procurement Action NRC-02-81-030,Rev 3,Mod 6, Extending Performance to 861026,to Analysis of Safeguards Needs for Transport of High Level Waste ML20136E451 ML20136E629 ML20136E727 ML20136E735 ML20136E805 ML20136E856 ML20138A351 ML20138A356 ML20138A362 ML20138A367 ML20138A371 ML20138A374 ML20138A383 ML20138A388 ML20138A396 ML20138A418 ML20138A424 ML20138A434 ML20138A453 ML20138A460 ML20138A471 ML20138A482 ML20138A492 ML20138A502 ML20138A508 ML20138A624 ML20138A693 ML20138A711 ML20138A720 ML20138A727 ML20138A760 ML20138A832 ML20138A844 ML20138A854 ML20138A868 ML20138A874 ML20138A888 ML20138A905 ML20138A917 ML20138A922 ML20138A962 ML20138A989 ML20138B003 ML20138B019 ML20138B036 ML20138B050 ML20138B065 ML20138B078 ML20138B094 ... further results
References
FOIA-84-682 NUDOCS 8512120207
Download: ML20138B094 (1)

Text

~

i  :

1  ?~ i

, l y .; i s \

g gar o - isr-MA,R 3 0 1981 1

i Advanced Research and Applications 't Corporation 1223 E. Argues Avenue ATTN: R.A. Armistead , ,

Sunnyvale CA 94086 Shbject: Request for Proposal (RFP) No. RS-mS-81-030 Entitled.

" Analysis of Safeguards Needs for Transport of High I.evel Waste"

/ 1

Dear Mr. Armistead:

This letter is tk advise'ycu that your company is an unsuccessful offeror under, the subject ,RFP.

Etitle award has not yet been made, it has been ddtermined that Advanced Research and Applications Corporation has been eliminated from any~

further consideration for contract award based upon a comprehensive review and analysis of all proposals received.

Following is a discussion of your proposal's major dificiencies as found by the Source Evaluation Panel (SEP). Such discussion is general in nature and should not be construed to be all inclusive with respect to your proposal weaknesses.

Tt.eproposaldasdeterminedtobeweakinitsdemonstrationofexperience in current waste managenent technology and processes and in physical protection saf eguards, for licensed nuclear materials.

' he proposal heavilydaraphased the RFP without adding sufficient new T

material in the technical approach area. The discussion did not lead the SEP to believe that the weapons effects experiences can be applied

' economically!to the needs of the project.

As further negotiatic i with your firm concerning this procurement are not contemplated, a revision to your proposal will not be considered.

At such time as an award is made under the RFP, you will be advised of the successful offeror and related information.

i /

We apprecia'te your continued interest in the Comission's programs, as well as the time and effort expended in responding to this RFP.

Sincerely.

?B51212O207 851112 PDR FOIA MILLAR 84-682 PDR J1ary Jo Eattia.. Acting. Chief _ _ _.._ f _ __

l Technical As'sistance Contracts Branch omcq! ADM:Dg,N ,I, ADy-I I Ma't%.DC

• Division 'of Contracts" " * +

• i

.u. r, .IBU'.'l er:

ve' I 3/so/81 3/g./81

.4 . .. ..... ., .,

l

&[f/

f/

u .s. =; . ; y -  % .il.&- . s&k= J -

~

. . .. .- .-