ML20138A388
Text
. _ _ - . . _
O C~
OCT 21 19g3 EMORANDUM FOR: Edward L. Halman, Director I Division of Contracts THRU: Kellogg V. Morton, Chief Technical Contracts Branch FROM: Barbara J. Jessup Technical Contracts Branch
SUBJECT:
REVISED MILESTONE SCHEDULE FOR RES-83-169 The subject revision is necessitated due to a request from the project officer on July 22, 1983 to suspend further contractual actions until further notice.
Due to a change in priorities, the focus of the Statement of Work was revised and forwarded to the Technical Contracts Branch on September 2,1983. A revised milestone schedule is enclosed for your review.
.Originalefaned by Barbara Jessup Contract Negotiator Technical Contracts Branch Division of Contracts
Enclosure:
'~
As stated i
t 0512120009 051112 n,tetral sfrned by PDR FOIA MI LLAR 84-602 PDR _ , __ . _ _ _ _ _
l ..ADM:DC:TCB. ].. 3 .b .. .f i
-1Baessup:ps.,.... .!..
g.io/. /83 J, i
' ' [7
-- ~ ~-
m , _. m m , m ,m . . _ .
_I'_N,ele
.,,,a
.;,1 '
fer RFPA No. R//.//9 .
, . g, * (. .-.I y -
. Revision # cv Je /jfhR TITLE tt 's,2 m '
2,, f ' d 's . ,,,, , y' N g~
- /
Nig;tiator w
Iwb_ny _
MILESTONES PROJECTED DATE ACTUAL DATE
- 1. Initial Division of Contracts Contact with Program Office
. 4'</SG
- 2. Receipt of RFPA in DC
?Y rs~c
- 3. Milestone Chart Completion u !' ?H n
- 4. Statement of Work Agreed Upon // '
SJj */a,
- 5. CBD Synopsis Mailed '
l
// //fj'r 3
- 6. Special Approvals i /
(Specify)
- 7. RFP issued Io/."7/AS / t li r I.'.
- 8. R:ceipt of Proposal / / '
. ll/ MAS :
- 9. Evaluation Report issued / j. /
///e}l13
- 10. Audit Report Requested / '/
///9/d S
.11. Audit Information Received I /
- 12. Nrgotiations Completed
///f3/63
/ /
///.% /$.0
- 13. Revised Offer Received ~/ '
~
14.- Preaward Approvals (Specify)
- 15. Centract Mailed for ~ ~ ' ' '"
Contractor Sionature Ik
~
- 4. . .
,.- .. ,~ ,
%. ed MILESTONES PROJECTED DATE AC10AL DATE s
- 16. Contract Execution / .-
Distribution '
/.2hb/f3
- 17. CBD Award Notification ' ' '
/4/6As
- 18. Post Award Orientation Panel Chairman ih h< ! I' '
SEP Me:nbers 1
Contract Negotiator /2 jiuj (,,g x
y y 4
N t
e 86 9
e t
'l
R _ ,-
m - .
b.d1El:ENT Of liO! -PTR50tlAL SERV) .,5
- 1. I:ature of ' fork .
y, J uwte-- % datami<< 4tu sa~u. %~
W sooWo? %&
09 6@ whw Ed.
- 2. Factors Relevant to Personal /flon-Personal Services are as follows:
- a. Does the contractor have specialized knowledge or equipment which is unavailable to the Government?
Yes / . tio '
C. t-IfecQ'ey (If yes, exp ain. % ~b w tofr,w,,u w4f cf s
,1 hds ntiW"*'Yd dp4 '' " ),,
- b. Will this requirement circumvent personnel hire ceiling? ,
Yes tio j _
- c. Does this service call for the exercise of personal juden.ent and discretion on behalf of the Government?
Yes tio ,
(If yes, explain.)
- d. Are the services to be performed continuing, short term, or intermittent?
. ShvP t .
- e. 1:111 the Government specify the qualification of, or reserve the right to approve, individual contractor ecployees?
Yes tio / *
(If yes, explain.)
- f. Will the Government assign tasks to and prepare work schedules for contractor employees?
Yes tio / .
(If yes, explain.)
- g. 1:111 the Government retain the right to supervise the stork of the contractor employees, either directly or indirectly?
Yes ,
tio . . _ _ _
(If yes, explain.)
gs
+ . . .
- h. k'ill the Governr.icnt reserve the rioht to supervise or control the
. method in which the contractor performs the service, the nucher of
- par,pic he will employ, the specifit duties of the individual employees, and sic.ilar details?
Yes No _
(If yes, explain.')
- i. Will the Government review perforn.ance by each individual employee, as opposed to reviewing a final product on an overall basis after completion of the work? .
Yes No _
(If yes, to what extent?)
- j. Will the Government retain the right to have contractor employees .
removed from the job for reasons other than misconduct or security?
Yes No (If yes, explain.)
- k. Will the service be properly defined as an end product?
Yes No
- 1. Will the contractor undertake a specific task or project tr.at is definable at the time of inception, at some point during performance, or will it be defined on a day-to-day basis? 1sPhnWe. GJ hImL o@-
(,seze hn.
- m. Will payc.e'nt be fnr results accomplished or solely according to time uortsd? Q (g s k lig Q
- n. Will the Government furnish the office or working space, facilities, equipment, and supplies necessary for contract performance? ,
Yes No (If yes, explain.) .
- o. . Will Government employees be used interchangeably with contractor personnel to perform the same function?
Yes No , _ , , _
(If yes, to what e. stent?)
- p. Will contractor enployees be integrated into the Government's organizational structure?
Yes _ No _ ,
(If yes, to what er. tent?)
u___..___._____-_..___ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _
, > ?k ........n h d ro .. .._ swuvn . A t. w _.. .._.... d 2-
, 'iAPE ,_Andr,q.a. L_Jarpold _ . ... ,___
e TilLE ,J_rolecManas_er o
DETERiittiAT10N OF !!0.'!-PER50f!At SERVICES I hereby determine the requirement set forth in Paragraph 1 above involves services that are non. personal in nature. ,
c
)C p Date hi- '
. ) b b Contracting Of ficer thMr -
4 h
s 6
L I
j 1
e s e e 9
. _ _ - _ _ _ - - - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - - - - _ _ >