ML20138B078

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Advises That Eta Engineering Inc,Unsuccessful Offeror Under RFP RS-NMS-81-030 Entitled, Analysis of Safeguards Needs for Transport of High Level Waste
ML20138B078
Person / Time
Issue date: 03/30/1981
From: Mattia M
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM)
To: Norco J
ETA ENGINEERING, INC.
Shared Package
ML20136E458 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-84-682 NUDOCS 8512120200
Download: ML20138B078 (2)


Text

_ __ _ __

O

- '1 O

=:

, A . .a . ;*

1  ;

(.- .

4 ha

'4 l

ETA Engineering, Inc.

415 E. Plaza Drive ATTN: Jay E. Horco '.

Westmont, ILL 60559 l Subj ect- Request for Proposal (RFP) No. RS-NMS-81-030. Entitled

" Analysis of Safeguards Needs for Transport of High Level Waste"

Dear Mr. Norco:

This letter is to advise you that your company is an unsuccessful offeror under the subject RFP.

While award has not yet been made, it has been determined that ETA Engineering, Inc. has been eliminated from any further consideration for contract award based upon a comprehensive review and analysis of all proposals received.

Following is a discussion of your proposal's major dificiencies as found by the Source Evaluation Panel (SEP). Such discussion is general in nature and should not be construed to be all inclusive with respect to ycur proposal Weaknesses.

'It was impossible to detemine from the proposal the tasks to which the key personnel would be assigned and the amount of time each will spend on a cpecified task.

There is a lack of icvidence of specific knowledge of the present NRC Lpolicies and procedures within the proposal.

The proposal failed to provide a adequate procedure or methodology by which the tasks would be accomplished. For example, there is no technical approach to accomplish the efforts of Tasks 4 & 5 and rank ordering of material is only briefly implied without the specifics considered necessary by the SEP.

As further negotiations with your firm concerning this procurement are not contemplated, a revision to your proposal will go,t_ be considered.

, At such time as an award is made under the RFP, you will be advised of i

the successful offeror and related infonnation.

~

l

~

. r  ?$k*l020065111a T L #

~,.

T, . . O,. . s. J 1s- 4~- e .

q ETA Engineering Inc. .

We appreciate your continued interest in the Comisssion's progra.ms, as well as the time and effort expended in responding to this RFP.

Sincerely,

)

Mary Jo Mattia, Acting Chief Technical Assistance Contracts Branch Division of Contracts I

l l

=.y ____ _ __. _

'rt' ADM DC,I ADF),QC EBMile. . ... MJMa ttid...

. . . . . .. .. .i.

3#o /81 ;;.

i<

3/ >/81 l . .. .. .. - ' ' . '. ') _ "_: L X '_'; " _ : "

.. _. * *)

l* -- 1. ' i ' .

_