ML20138B050

Advises of Analytic Sciences Corp Unsuccessful Offeror Under RFP RS-NMS-81-030 Entitled, Analysis of Safeguards Needs for Transport of High Level Waste

ML20138B050
Person / Time
Issue date:	03/30/1981
From:	Mattia M NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM)
To:	John Miller ANALYTIC SCIENCES CORP.
Shared Package
ML20136E458	List: IA-84-682, Request for Procurement Action NRC-02-81-030,Rev 3,Mod 6, Extending Performance to 861026,to Analysis of Safeguards Needs for Transport of High Level Waste ML20136E451 ML20136E629 ML20136E727 ML20136E735 ML20136E805 ML20136E856 ML20138A351 ML20138A356 ML20138A362 ML20138A367 ML20138A371 ML20138A374 ML20138A383 ML20138A388 ML20138A396 ML20138A418 ML20138A424 ML20138A434 ML20138A453 ML20138A460 ML20138A471 ML20138A482 ML20138A492 ML20138A502 ML20138A508 ML20138A624 ML20138A693 ML20138A711 ML20138A720 ML20138A727 ML20138A760 ML20138A832 ML20138A844 ML20138A854 ML20138A868 ML20138A874 ML20138A888 ML20138A905 ML20138A917 ML20138A922 ML20138A962 ML20138A989 ML20138B003 ML20138B019 ML20138B036 ML20138B050 ML20138B065 ML20138B078 ML20138B094 ... further results
References
FOIA-84-682 NUDOCS 8512120190
Download: ML20138B050 (1)

Text

.

s .' "

• ~

~ U L L NAR 3 o 1991 The Analytic Sciences Corporation One Jacob Way ATTN: Mr. Jacob Miller Reading, MA 01867

Subject:

Request for Proposal (RFP) No. RS-M45-81-030 Entitled.

" Analysis of Safeguards Needs for Transport of High Level Wa ste"

Dear Mr. Miller:

TMs letter is to advise you that your company is an unsuccessful offeror t.nder the subject RFP.

While award hat not yet been made, it has been determined that The Analytic Scienr.es Corporation has been eliminated from any further considetation for contract award based upon a comprehensive review and

, analysis of all proposals received.

Following is a discussion of your proposal's major d4ficiencies as found by the Source Evaluation Panel (SEP). Such discussion is general in nature and should not be construed to be all inclusive with respect to your proposal weaknesses.

The proposal was judged to be weak in its demonstration of experHnce in the physical security safeguards area.

The requirements of tasks 1 and 2 are underestimated in that the output is described as a literature search. The panel felt that more than a screening is required to accomplish these tasks.

There = a lack of firm references to several existing efforts and studies in the requested work areas.

As further negotiations with your firm concerning this procurement are not contemplated, a revision to your proposal will not be considered.

At such time es an award is made under the RFP, you will be advised of the successful offeror and related information.

He appreciate your continued interest in the Commission's programs, as well as the time and effort expended in responding to this RFP.

Sincerely, 8512120190 851112 PDR FOIA MILLAR 84-682 PDR

- .. . . . . . . . . _ _ _ . _ _ .- ._Jiary.Jo.P.attia. Acting Chief

..! ADM:DC I Technical Assistance Contracts Granch l A DM : DC / l"" ' '

' ' TBMMh"

..... ...z My .~. ..

,' Division'of' Contracts "

y

.'.'."*f.. '"'

.i. . .. . .. ....

. ,; ' 3/so /81 {, . . 3/3 781 I  !

l

.[... . . . . . . . . . .. . . . , . y .... . .

.; ,, ,_ e - - -., u ,~ w -, -, . . .