ML20137K052
Text
_
F
(
gip n**c,f*g u
UNITED STATES
- he 9,
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
's :
WASHINGTON, o. C. 20555
\\.'... + [{
g Occket No.: 50-445 and 50-446 JAN 2 41995 MEMORANDUM FOR: Hazel I. Smith Technical and Operations Support Branch Planning and Program Analysis Staff, NRR.
FROM:
Vincent S. Noonan, Project Director Comanche Peak Task-Force Division of Licensing, NRR
SUBJECT:
F01A-84-778 The subject of FOIA-84-778 is being-investigated through allegations raised in this area by the Comanche Peak (CP) Technical Review Team (TRT) Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QA/QC) group. I forwarded the request to Mr. H.
Livermore, Team Leader QA/QC, CP TRT, for review.
Mr. H. Livermore has informed me that our review of allegations related to the subject request is still on going and the information is premature for disclosure. Therefore, I have deter-mined that we cannot release the information we hold on this subject at this time (referencing exemption 7(a) and 5 of the FGIA Act). Enclosed is a list of documents which Mr. H. Livermore's QA/QC group holds which are not releasable at this time. The applicable exemption is identified after each document being withheld. Task force members are on notice by copy of this memorandum that the nonreleasable material is to remain in their working files in the event there is an appeal request or an adjudicatory action. Also listed are documents already in the PDR on this subject which we are considering and documents which already exist in the public domain. Where we were unable to provide an accession number for those documents in the PDR, we enclose the document.
~
Please note that when this information becomes eligible for release, some of the requested information, if released, could be used to trace the identity of allegers who have requested confidentiality.
/
/
J
. Noo n, Project Director omanche eak Division of Licensing -
cci H. Livermore T. Curry
Enclosure:
As stated 0512030107 851106 PDR FOIA PDR GARDE 85-59
r e
Ohnnerd $
hodb C 3 n M COnok iC.A k OeAse WA w utbThocwmc.n-t s M
Thu. 1E a A.
Withheld Documents 1.
10/24/75
.TUEC Drawing 2323-51-0560 and design charge documents (approximately 80 pages). (ex. 7(a.')
2.
11/4/77 TUEC Drawing WFB-00831 (14 pages). (ex. 7(a))
3.
Approximately 237 liner inspection travelers (approximately 948 pages). (ex. 7(a))
4.
3/17/83 Nonconformance Report (NCR) 83-00795 (7 pages). (ex. 7(a))
5.
8/29/84 Memo to B. Scott from J. K. (unable to read) transmitting 26 Unit 2 Brown & Root inspection travelers signed by alleger (A-3). (ex. 7(a))
6.
8/31/84 Memo to B. Scott from J. K. (unable to read) transmitting 17 travellers signed by F. Evans (approximately 68 pages).
(ex. 7(a))
7.
9/13/84 Computer printout of records signed by alleger A-3 (41 pages).
(ex. 7(a))
8.
1/10/84 Procedure QI-QP-11.14-6, Revision 6 (7 pages). (ex. 7(a))
9.
8/23/83 Procedure QI-QP-11.14-6, Revision 5 (6 pages). (ex. 7(a))
10.
6/17/83 Procedure QI-QP-11.14-6, Revision 4 (6 pages). (ex. 7(a))
11.
3/25/83 Procedure QI-QP-11.14-6, Revision 3 (7 pages).-(ex. 7(a))
12.
3/9/83 Procedure QI-QP-11.14-6, Revision 2 (7 pages). (ex. 7(a))
13.
9/8/82 Procedure QI-QP-11.14-6,-Revision 1 (7 pages). (ex. 7(a))
14.
3/26/83 Procedure QI-QP-11.14-6, Revision 0 (4 pages). (ex. 7(a))
~
15.
12/26/79 Procedure QI-QAP-11.1-4, Revision 0 (7 pages). (ex. 7(a))
16.
8/24/78 Procedure QI-QAP-10.1-4, Revision 0 (3 pages). (ex. 7(a))
17.
1/5/84 Brown & Root Specification CCP-38, Revision 4 and revision pages (19 pages). (ex. 7(a))
18.
5/11/79 Gibbs & Hill Specification 2323-55-18, Revision 3 (33 pages).
(ex. 7(a))
19.
8/28/84 Draft Safety Evaluation for Allegation AQ-55 and AQ-78, 9/17/84 Revisions 2 and 3 (39 pages). (ex. 5) 1
f,-
,s
~.
20.
Undated Comanche Peak (CP) Allegations Chart, pages 2, 4, 8, and 9, summarizing allegations and, source documents. (ex. 5) 21.
3/7/84 Office of Investigation Report No.84-006, Interview of A11eger (A-4) (72 pages). (ex. 5) 22.
Undated Affidavit of Alleger (A-3) (3 pages). (ex. 5) l 23.
Undated Interview of A11eger (A-3) pages 60-89. (ex. 5) 24.
1/10/79 Interoffice memo IM 16606 to delete CP-QCI-2.11-1 from QC manual (1 page). (ex. 7(a))
25.
1/9/78 Instruction CP-CQI-2.11-1,. Revision 0 (7 pages). (ex. 7(a))
26.
Undated Technical Review Team (TRT) Action Plan (1 page). (ex. 5) 27.
3/28/83 Pressure Test Data Sheet Spent Fuel Pool (1 page). (ex. 7(a))
28.
Undated Log book of weld list for transfer canal gate frame welds (2 pages). (ex. 7(a))
29.
-10/14/77 Drawings WRB-105559, 2323-SI-0560 plus 22 DCS's, WRB-00831 (7 pages). (ex. 7(a))
30.
7/16/84 Draft Safety Evaluation for Allegation AQ-78 (17 pages). (ex. 5) 31.
Undated TRT members. rough notes (21 pages). (ex. 5) 32.
9/22/83 Procedure CP-CPM 6.3, Revision 10 (8 pages). (ex. 7(a))
33..
10/5/84 Note to R. Bargart (NRC) from S. Treby (NRC) re: Reopening of Inspection Report 79-15 dated July 2, 1984 (29 pages).
(ex. 5) 34.
5/11/79 Gibbs & Hill Specification 2323-55-18 paragraph 8.1 (33 pages).
(ex. 7(a))
Bostrom-Bergen Metal Product drawing job #2401, sheet 38, 35.
7/14/77 Code 7 (1 page). (ex. 7(a))
36.
6/11/84 Technical Review Team (TRT)' Approach to Resolution (3 pages).
(ex. 5).
37.
7/14/77 Drawing Bostrom-Bergen 2401A (2 pages). (ex. 7(a))
38.
6/3/83 Nonconformance Reports M-767, M-6574, M6573 (3 pages)'.
j (ex. 7(a))
39.
10/9/84 Draft Safety Evaluation Report for Allegations AQ-55 and AQ-78, Revision 5 (19 pages). (ex. 5) 40.
9/17/84 Interview with Witness "Y" by R. C. Tang, T. Curry, H. Livermore (22 pages). (ex. 5) 2
)
i x
F.
~
o 41.
Undated A11eger A-5 interview pages 19-23. (cx. 5) 42.
3/27/83 Memo to J. George (TUGCO) from C. Randall re: Travelers (2 pages). (ex. 7(a))
43.
Undated TRT members field notes (2 pages). (ex. 5) 44.
Undated
. Draft letter to M. Spence (TUGCO) from T. Ippolito (NRC)
~
re: Travelers (2 pages)..(ex. 5) 45.
Revision pages to construction procedure number 35-1195-CCP-38 (12 pages). (ex. 7(a))
46.
9/13/84 Computer printout of jobs inspected by F. Evans (3 pages).
(ex. 7(a))
47.
1/5/84 Procedure CCP-38, Revision 4, page 4 of 19. (ex. 7(a))
48.
8/23/84 TRT members field notes for AQ-55 (1 page). (ex. 5) 49.
8/23/84 Interoffice Memo for Distribution (TUGCO) from J. Duncan and M. Werner re: Stainless steel liner travellers (3 pages). (ex. 7(a))
50.
10/21/77 Procedure CCP-38 pages 6 and 16,. Revision 1 (2 pages).
(ex. 7(a))
51.
9/11/84 TUGC0 memo TUQ-2340 on stainicss steel liner travellers (4 pages). (ex. 7(a))
52.
8/23/84 TRT members field notes (4 pages). (ex. 5) 53.
8/28/84 Draft Safety Evaluation Report for AQ-78 Draft 1 (11 pages).
(ex. 5) 54.
Undated Personal notes on GAP information (1 page). (ex. 5)
Located in the Public Document Room Under Comanche Peak Docket Nos. 50-445 and 50-446
' 1.
9/10-9/21/84 Deposition of T. Brandt (12 pages).
2.
9/27/84 CASE filing to ASLB re: CASE's Evidence of A Quality Control Breakdown (90 pages).
3.
10/16/84 Letter to ASLB transmitting 10/3/84 deposition of T. Brandt (124 pages). (Accessio~n number 8410170157)
Available in a Public Library 1.
9/14/84 Newspaper article Dallas Times Herald.
2.
9/13-14/84 Fort Worth Star-Telegram Article.
3
~=
r o
Document Name:
FILE LIST 1/30/85 Contention 5 Par.el Background Reading
~
1.
Case Proposed Findings on Intimidation - 9/4/84 2.
Applicants Proposed Findings on Intimidation - 9/4/84 3.
SIT Report - 2/15/83 4.
Order Subsequent to the Prehearing Conference of 4/30/80 - 6/16/80 5.
LBP Memorandum Reopening Discovery; Misleading Statement 12/18/84 6.
Letter to M.D. Spence, TUGC0 re: Comanche Peak Special Review Team Report 7.
CYGNA 3 scope 8.-
SER CPSES Units 1 & 2 50-445/446 - 12/1/84 (CYGNA phas'es I. II) 9.
NRC Staff Comments on Supplement to Applicants Plan to Respond to Memorandum and Order Quality Assurance for Design - 4/6/84
- 10. NRC Staff Comments on Applicant's Plan to Respond to Memorandum and Order (Quality Assurance for Design) - 3/9/84
- 11. ASLB - Supplement to Applicant's Plan ttr Respond to Memorandum and Order (Quality Assurance for Design) - 3/14/84
- 12. ASLB-Applicant's Plun to Respond to Memorandum and Order (Quality Assurance for Design) 2/3/84
- 13. Letter to: TUEC (Spence) Reply to 50-445 (84-32) 50-446 (84-11), from:
Hunter
- 14. Letter to: TUGC0 - R.J. Gary, from:
Insp.50-445-83-18, 50-446-83 4/11/84DeYoung(RE: CAT)
Construction Appraisal
- 15. Transcript - Hearing Board's Acceptance of Applicant's Plan - 4/27/84
- 16. CYGNA Briefing Summary - 12/84
- 17. Memorandum - (Clarification of Open Issues)
- 3/16/84
- 18. Evaluation of CYGNA's Comanche Peak Independent Assessinent Program (Phase 3) g e
1
- 20. SALP Report - 1/31/83
- 21. SALP Report - 5/30/84
- 22. EGAG Intimidiation Report - 9/84 hg i
l 23 '. TRT QA/QC Letter to TUGC0 1/8/85
- 24. TRT Draft Electrical SSER's 25.
50.55(e)ReportItems 26 Applicant Organization Charts 27.
TRT Electrical / Civil, Structural, Test Findings Letter. to TUGC0 (9/13/84) 28.
TRT Coatings, Misc. Letter to TUGC011/29/84
- 29. Draft SSER on CYGNA Phases 1, 2, 3
- 30. NDT Inspection Report 7/11/83 31.
Letter from CYGNA to V. Noonan 1/18/85 Open Items
- 32..OI Report 4-84-6 on Intimidation 3/7/84 33.
Letter from CYGNA to J. ' George 1/18/85
- 34. Staff Exhibit 180
- 35. SALP 4/82 36.
! :p;.u.un 20 25
- 37. Exhibits 181, 182, 185, 188, 192, 194, 196 38.
Staff's Proposea Findings 2/24/83 g
9 e
1
........m.-M.
- * * ' - * * * * * * " " ' ~~"'** * ' ' ' ~ "
' ~ "
c.-
s
- ,3. ' >
'(
'1
.t.
I illc(., t wi.
/
Iil il
- /1/t.t.
C e t t gory * !! f.t tr.i on o r.( Liet i Md:.4 Ail e ca t iti'. f. *.
Dt sc ript icir.
Rt f erc e.t v A:ticr By __
m.
AC-C':
liC'r (-!:-005F3. Rcir.f orcirgh 5crerate L a r.goves t i yk e
Steel.rissirig fror. the
. Attechre.t
. 4.
. w.,.
lir.it I cortr.inrer.1 wail Elev. 6: 0 ' - f.,
~ -
/
~ /.: - E E INK C-Eil, 4t.-79 ba-s Page X)Y:1-41 L a'. gov:53.1 e n....
oritted fror will in of CASE it tier
- c. i t :.. r.
~
excess letdev.m heat u;.,.,, n.. g e)(I a r.gt roo'
%.4 i.,3 r AC-5E I;CP C-1314 6 EC A-5050 Pao (.m II-44 Lirgewski d b...g,,
57-!5 ccwcis were ber.t of CA5L le.ter g ;s, a rt t' IC *5 dowcis broken off at Cor.crtte AC-5E CASE states the chove Page xxYll-di Langowski m,,,
examples cf orittec rebar of CASE. letter.
are only a sarpling of such deletions. They appear 1.o have a ger.eral con: err, that no analyses were pe rf orn ed-justifyint thest oniss iot:5.
AC-E9 CASE also disct,sses the Page )XYli-4E Larem ski s crissicm. of shear tie of CASE le.ter rtirforceret.t at the intersectier of the dor.m
... b p, w.
arc' well in the Ur.it 2
\\
,: 4....,,
containr.e.t. The,s cite m....
this as another exarple cf OA.'OC failure.
A' -6 ;
in the discussior, of the Page XXYll 47 L2rgowisli' ellegatier.(AC-3E)about of CASE lttter r.issing shear tie re-inforcenent in Unit 1, CASE coes nct accept the ccnclusion that the alleger was prctably referring tc the above mentioned incident f"
7--
h it. Urit 2.
~
ofsst
.s
/11epetier:
Mt II - 2/1/bb
.p.
Ce tty iy si9 (cric rt te Vr.idt Allisttie-f. :.
[,c s c r i pt i e r-kof ore u At t ier. By A'. - 6 '.
F'c.c6 ege f ror J. Ellis Pt.illc of received 12 1/6:
D(vers ie,
x.*
, pr,
AC - C.'
5pe:iiit t ret ler.s v iti.
Transcrir.
Phillec:/
i,g J '
4 cc N rett ( d oc ur.t r,ta t i er, pp. 1 C -i t 9 Devers pr;.1ded curiti; r:eeting) s' O,',".+,
d
e, I'leget ic. -
DCI11 - ?/1/H 1
.s.
Ca.er.t ry *?D C ruc Ling of Cor.c rete III(Cetio" f.'.
DC.c t i; titir Fef e rer.ct Ac tior F.y Al-!C 15 therc i potentici tic Page DVll 44 Prilieo/
e in t,c ts.ee. ICF C-CC9 and of CA.5E letter Devers I.CF C-i.'04 with the b6se-r.e t c ra c t ir. L'riit I ?
A;-6?
6 tnt i.1 crec6 iri; cf coricrete 159 (11rie 2C, uf Philleo/.
pace 159 thru DEvers lirie 11 of pagt p, s '.
100)
.( e c:-
c AC-64
~ Crac t it. the baserat 148-16(
Philleo/
(Al-44; (doc urer.ta ti er, Levers _. d',y.,
0gc "I
provicec~ durinc rnettir,c)
,y 4
l
7, tili gat io a D'i ;i - ?/1/t '
5 CPtegory *21 Scht idt Herrt r let ti';
.' A' l e;6 t i o'; iPs.
btscriptior h 'ert :(
Attier By IC-Ci Why wcs some concrcte that Trn scri;. pp.
Philleo/ s s was conritted to bc
&{ (li t 4-5)
Devers e
retested not?
In 4 h, a
6 particular Reactor al
' d
cavity well.
A:-CC CASE questiers validity of Trens:ript pc.
Philleo/
5:hridt henner tests 101 (lir.e 12' Devers. s'
'1. Schmidt harrer testing Fage 3 c CASE
~
CASE wants to kncw:
letter (1) Under whose directiori
~
teststare concutted (2)Creder,tialsanc ability of ir.dividuals performing tests (3) Involvement of NRC in testir.g
?
r--
Alleretier.s DCPI) - ill/ti
-5 Category C Drsign and Ar.alysis Allegation fio.
Desc ription ktierence A: tier. By AC-6P In Der:ege Study Prc.gran Trenscript we a 2 to 1 (rise tc pg. 110 (lines rue.) prcjectile range 23 thru 24)
/
cc.n5 ide rc c 5 6 5 J'N /5.4.
7 AC-70 Che:1. if Gibbt & Hill usec Transcript a 1.E factor it. all static pr. 115-119 load celculations (if net why didt:'t Cygr.a notice
{7[,,d,[J*p"$ d in their review)
AC-72 Checi if in containnent Transcript allowable stresses go pp. 119-12?
beyond field for cable tray suppcrts.
(TV used a generic design with allowable stresses for
.the auxiliary t'uilding contrar r:ents.)y to FSAR com.it-(Cygra did not address)
6 l ' ', e :. t u i -
b '. I I )
I [i
. [,.
Category *2(5t 1s r :c Lt; A '. '. e s a t i c r-fc.
bt sc ription h '( ryg A: ; i c,'
ly I.( -( 7 At a doorway bctweer the 1rt' n itt
, ipr Li rv, Cor.tcinr'4 rt and Safegou c's pg. 11' tii'r 12
// vY.y[,
t.cildir,9 no gar exists.
t t.ru M:
tt( tiuildirigs are
[fgt
- f..
integrally attached t...r..
e
~_
t 'let t it.r :.
K!II - I'/l/bb i
7 I
Ce ts ;.: ry r;; Ct '.: rt it Crive r Allt u t ion No.
De r ri r t ic r.
Refers u Action By AC-52 f.' E (-52L.
h g D.11-42 Phillet./
r-1r e tt adatt Ctr.:n t(
Cif C / f * ". e : u r Dev(rs CC,v( r (v(r reb?r g $p:.. * *
!SI. -
6-
.. 1.. < ' ',
e e
4 w
All ece t i r.t :
Mi ii - 2/1/t.'
-1 Late;: cry
- D Lot.: rete Strerigtt Al i(ga *. i t. f :
De s c ri pt i er.
Referet.te A:tior By i
M. - H k* c rt we? 250' psi Trat.st ript Prillec/
c e f.c re tt u se c'.
pg. 93 (lines bevcr5 4 thru E)
A(-71 Cr4: 1 if when LF used T ra ns c r ipt Phiilee/
'I' ' ";,
S DL psi cor. crete pp. E7, 91 be ve rt.
stre'.cth r h did it.c c'iiy!is refiert H 00 psi or 4000 psi A C.-7(
Lfre Eichr. erd inserts Trarscript Phi 11 eof irsteiled ir. 25C: psi pg. 10E (lines Devers '
co-crcie 9 thru 15)
\\
m
A11 erat wr-
^
Isu'li - F/1/f!
9 Cettcory 42t h!ue Related to 10 CFE 55c
'i<se: wi. fio.
Descriptier Reference Actior By
-t RCh ar. a 10 CFL L'.55(e)
Tr6 r.s c rip:
L6 r.goves k i/
4,,,
that TU dic rot repert.
Pg. 135 Devers (lriematior. tre isr.ittt d Gagl arce to L. St.ao)
- 5....
e
m-h 4
4 9
'T-) UL "< a k p..a4 3,g gg A +75I.x-y, 7 ~a; u p,m N,
tuu g
Ly
. at
+ c A' ~ X T% kw p, M/h rah p4 y 4 jf. 6 Lp. A i [
/
""4 iC
~I 7
l l
t I
i
(
i l
I i
-+f' gs
-*e T-e W-9--
- ' tie:
a%-
4-T--ut-
---T-T--
--+-'*-'De
--T t"
-=r s'-'
e
--"T--
=Pv+-
T N
27ry--tur--
<p.=^-g L-=
g.-
-+e4--Pe
-- = = - - +
s
~
9o v h $ -]<.l3 t.'
(,9
- 2 YGK T ~Gh J s
pw ?,
M Check if wtAr,TV attached Trariscri t
[
t their catilf. trays to the pg. 124 support and structural steel, they drilled a hole through the fitnge of the channti which reduces the sectior raedules which has riot been accour.ted for in calculations. Check serie of the CEtle tray supports in the field.
/
/
[;gd [.,Yf,,,);[ijt[
(Cygna did not address)
At-74 Liner Plate Transcript pg.
7
(,,
ff(
_y,
S
re-4 9
e
(" M p
- g. A =
MO" Ly khly lBr(
Ac-79
% (Jw i
LLJ Cf y
F
.t g,
m
,s, 4 A.hg' +d h~sdd.1 L g..y
') 'g. 4,[6 fr-h a
n l~b,L/sn.,..,q
.f.4. Jo v.. 9 tdM l
p a si sir -sp-kg l
t 1, c.t Y (,m cl. Ne u k
'% U612s..fb,
?
I is:w p n tz A
&c. < a < u rL).
-).,
f' l-
\\
f.R.!s:.J L,Tu.sp 7 f
kn' % &J cp%
pt h,3 c.J p-tL L-Ly. A /.7 A,,y,(
I 9
\\
\\,
l7 g k/$
h MM
(
f~ kl i
b y
Tq.u-J c.y,L, At
~ ~l.
L,,;.J -
C:n-.- &f b's, LA ~
lLp&(s, c
\\
'-lW f&
)
y n,c +
u l
%m b,Il
.7 M. m /14(-
E-law.
shmk 79
'b 5,PM " "%
'GlBL
% Fs h D bi d a s G..,.L.,J..
A L c ~
J,,-
- c. ~ # y ; l,.g., '
)
ic., 4 A % L.- t-ha b ce
,