ML20137J269
| ML20137J269 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak |
| Issue date: | 06/17/1981 |
| From: | Hooton C BROWN & ROOT, INC. (SUBS. OF HALLIBURTON CO.) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17198A292 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-85-59 CCP-47, NUDOCS 8512020576 | |
| Download: ML20137J269 (5) | |
Text
...
s s
C.
6 ARMR
~'
l IND2XED h
BROWN & ROOT, INC.
PROCE'1URE o]fnut CPSES NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE JOB 35-1195 CCP-47 0
6/17/81 1 of 2 TITLE:
ORIGINATOR:
b TO bsO/
REVIEWED BY:
4-/ W /
QA/QC 0 ATE APPROVED BY:,
43rv.. M
[--/4 CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGER CATE 0.1 TABLE OF CONTENTS F
swim
1.0 INTRODUCTION
^g g
1.1 PURPOSE 1.2 SCOPE
~
2.0 PROCEDURE 0.11 ATTACM ENTS l
Rebar Cutting Request Form Example of Comp Q{ g ~
1.0 INTRODUCTION
]
1.1 PURPOSE
~
The purpose of this procedure is to provide a method for con-trolling the requests for cutting of structural reinforcing steel embedded within structural concrete.
1.2 SCOPE The procedure applies to all crafts and/or engineering groups requesting permission to cut structural reinforcing steel.
Reinforcing steel encountered on. core bore requests shall be covered by procedure MCP-13.
2.0 PROCEDURE 2.1 The responsible party will initiate the Rebar Cutting Request (RCR, Attachment 1). The request will specify the location and size of the holes being drilled.
In holes where rebar is encountered, the depth of the hole shall be given. The system turnover number should also be added to assist in establishing priorities. The completed RCR shall be forwarded to the Project Civil Engineer.
s l
{.'
0512020576 851106 I
b DE 9
PDR Q
- - v,
(
Q i
am PROCEDURE EFFECTIVE BROWN & ROOT, INC.
NUMBER REVISION OATE PAGE CPSES
(
JOB 35-1195 CCP-47 0
6/17/81 2 of 2 2.2 The Project Civil Engineer (PCE) or his designee shall maintain a log of rebar cutting requests and shall assign unique numbers to the RCR's..
2.3 The PCE or his designee shall reveiw the RCR to ascertain its correctness, determine the specific reinforcing steel being encountered, review the cutting criteria and rebar maps to determine the acceptability for cutting.
If acceptable for cutting, a Design Change Authorization (DCA) will be issued indicating rebars to be cut. Requests not covered by the cutting criteria or in violation of the cutting criteria will be for-warded to Gibbs & Hill (GaH) for thefi review. Upon receipt of the resolution from G&H, a DCA wi' -
, issued or an alternate
~
solution will be recommended.
2.4 The PCE or his designee will complete the RCR indicating approvals and/or alternate solution and return the RCR to the originator.
2.5 Example of completed request is provided as Attachment 2.
(
O 4
I
(
W
=
.6, a
g.,
9
.g PROCEDURE EFFECTIVE l BROWN & ROOT, INC.
NUMBER REVISION DATE l'
PAGE CPSES
(
~
JOB 35-1195 CCP-47 0
6/17/81 1 of 1 ATTACHMENT 1 REBAR CIITTING REQUEZ NO.
REY.
DATE:
system TW N0VER NO.
CRIGINATING DEPARTMENT:
INITIATED ST:
RESPONSE DATE REQUESTED:
PNOME EIT:
BUILDING:
ELEVATION:
LOCATION:
(APPROKIMATE)
DETAILED SKETCH GIVING EIACT
' LOCATION OF H0LES IK WICH REBAR IS ENCOUNTERED i
(
FOR 1NFORMATl0N ONLy 7
\\
QATE RECEIVED SY CIVIL ENGINEERING:
~
REMARKS:
j i
APPROVED VIA:
(
015 APPROVAL:
W
~
r-C
(
=
PROCEDURE EFFECTIVE BROWN & ROOT, INC.
NUMBER REVISION DATE j
PAGE CPSES f
I JOB 35-1195 l
CCP-47 0
~6/17/81 1 of I
' ATTACHMENT 2 s
w-
'Ir.
SMftRAINRESAACUTTIMEREQUESTNO. M/f 5
sis m IvanovEn No. W - --
I2 *& AEC ORIGINATINd~0EMATMENT:
6NIS IRITIATED BY:
' $ *dat DOC
! [
\\--
mane ErT: 9see BUILDING: _ TEACrtdt. b.D(a N
ELEVATION: IL. 910'-M' gem L LOCATION: Wisf %cf aft NIST' MEW Whu.
k c6 wm1=v
.--s-. m DETAILED SKETOI GIVIMG EIACT LOCATION OF HOLES
- s w w r ic" = u s c",c y V
.7
_ 8" M=:
v
.t\\.-
tow cg
"} w.c w zr/
c
= g..
g o.; Eas, 2,,
o-u"+ k(M
(,,y "$
,g b n seus pr 12,,
g h ere v
V gg, g
'.g
( ). - Dern Ar unocJ
^
i ame ws wm q m,vesr n au e - 3
( eresa.y niie docE, f u-FOR lHRiWMIGH O.rc. uw J
\\uw%
acm.
~
4 cATE RECEIVED BY' CIVIL ENGINEERING: _ f,-3-8J l 8 AA REMARKS:
i
(
2
q I
CCMatlCHE PEAX STEA.8 ELRCTRIC S TATIC;J l
/
INSFECTION REPORT
- er i
su=er j:a *AMH / 9900 I
3
,3::u,r.c
.cu u.c2 r.u no.
srs:t:. v s: w w. u a. i-2 t
t
'T L NO 7
~
~
grgc; ^
Rft?
RLf. Q.C. CC;. 6 RLV. 6 CManGL no.
lalk&s.A C?. Tisi L;Gh?. lCD C. teG.
N sV Q I-Q P-11. 2 - 1[.2 h
7
'h::stenen
~ /
par tas tu Aricn ' O [nsrat.Leicn Q Put Qparits-l
~~
pacrfss ve.:ncu::n in:nenon ipsgry.:::
e::nenp insp.,atsu:.Ts
/
h: ?tc;:en cc:.:st.gTED, aLL /JPucaats sTE.'.ts san 5FA h
[ g.6-s-a. -
o 7C?.r
- [
O e< size:en c::. int:Tzo, unsarsi : Tear irc.:s usito ec.:.v
- $8* "
ITEJ HQ.
G INSFECTION ATTRIEUTES 7
OATI e = py n
n=2 n
- 1. l Drilling l ll l
l l a) Correct size bit used l/l l l
l lb) Hole cleaned after drilling ld l l
l lc) Hole b ).[ X 9 "
lV'l l l
l ld) Hole correct depth l/ l l
l i
2..!Embedment lenzths l l l l
l la) Correct l e n st e h and size bolt nsed M@
l l l l
i j
lb) Correct embedment lenzth obtained D [M l l l l
l 3.
! Table S oaeinst Acceo table
/
lvl l l
h-
/*. ISoalled. Concrete Accentable lM l l
5.
l Hole Spacing as per OI lVI l l
h
- 6. l Bolt Installation l ll l
l la) Bolt double nutted or mandrel used b/d.
l ll l
l lb) Threads not deformed M[M l ll l
l lc) Bolt not benc (J /d l l l l
l Id ) Skeweds less ths t 4*
Al[N l I!
1 lii i
l l-l l 1 l
l IIi i
I I
e n n
- w. e s.,.....,..I s. l.I l
l l
1 U t1 lill Ushgia,3 ;gj] y;jg jg g
I FERM or,. _
l i I I
I N"'ORD ll I l
L.
7.t c a u m =s, sit:s,t :a R~.~l f)yo9 m3'g i
l L
~
l
- g I
tp C S E:
O f
g l8{i g
"i-
/
/
/
/
~
g.
.