ML20134H867

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Technical Specification Bases 2.0
ML20134H867
Person / Time
Site: Grand Gulf Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 05/12/2020
From: Siva Lingam
NRC/NRR/DORL/LPL4
To:
Lingam S
References
Download: ML20134H867 (10)


Text

Reactor Core SLs B 2.1.1 B 2.0 SAFETY LIMITS (SLs)

B 2.1.1 Reactor Core SLs BASES BACKGROUND GDC 10 (Ref. 1) requires, and SLs ensure, that specified acceptable fuel design limits are not exceeded during steady state operation, normal operational transients, and anticipated operational occurrences (AOOs).

The fuel cladding integrity SL is set such that no significant fuel damage is calculated to occur if the limit is not violated. Because fuel damage is not directly observable, a stepback approach is used to establish an SL, such that the MCPR is not less than the limit specified in Specification 2.1.1.2. MCPR greater than the specified limit represents a conservative margin relative to the conditions required to maintain fuel cladding integrity.

The fuel cladding is one of the physical barriers that separate the radioactive materials from the environs. The integrity of this cladding barrier is related to its relative freedom from perforations or cracking.

Although some corrosion or use related cracking may occur during the life of the cladding, fission product migration from this source is incrementally cumulative and continuously measurable. Fuel cladding perforations, however, can result from thermal stresses, which occur from reactor operation significantly above design conditions.

While fission product migration from cladding perforation is just as measurable as that from use related cracking, the thermally caused cladding perforations signal a threshold beyond which still greater thermal stresses may cause gross, rather than incremental, cladding deterioration. Therefore, the fuel cladding SL is defined with a margin to the conditions that would produce onset of transition boiling (i.e.,

MCPR = 1.00). These conditions represent a significant departure from the condition intended by design for planned operation. This is accomplished by having a Safety Limit Minimum Critical Power Ratio (SLMCPR) design basis, referred to as SLMCPR95/95, which corresponds to a 95% probability at a 95% confidence level (the 95/95 MCPR criterion) that transition boiling will not occur.

(continued)

GRAND GULF B 2.0-1 LBDCR 18129

Reactor Core SLs B 2.1.1 BASES BACKGROUND Operation above the boundary of the nucleate boiling regime (continued) could result in excessive cladding temperature because of the onset of transition boiling and the resultant sharp reduction in heat transfer coefficient. Inside the steam film, high cladding temperatures are reached, and a cladding water (zirconium water) reaction may take place.

This chemical reaction results in oxidation of the fuel cladding to a structurally weaker form. This weaker form may lose its integrity, resulting in an uncontrolled release of activity to the reactor coolant.

APPLICABLE The fuel cladding must not sustain damage as a result of SAFETY ANALYSES normal operation and AOOs. The Tech Spec SL is set generically on a fuel product MCPR correlation basis as the MCPR which corresponds to a 95% probability at a 95% confidence level that transition boiling will not occur, referred to as SLMCPR95/95.

The Reactor Protection System setpoints (LCO 3.3.1.1, "Reactor Protection System (RPS) Instrumentation"), in combination with other LCOs, are designed to prevent any anticipated combination of transient conditions for Reactor Coolant System water level, pressure, and THERMAL POWER level that would result in reaching the MCPR SL.

2.1.1.1 Fuel Cladding Integrity The use of the fuel vendor's critical power correlations is valid for critical power calculations at pressures 685 psig and core flows 10% of rated (Ref. 6, 7, and 8). For operation at low pressures or low flows, the fuel cladding integrity SL is established by a limiting condition on core THERMAL POWER, with the following basis:

Since the pressure drop in the bypass region is essentially all elevation head, the core pressure drop at low power and flow will always be > 4.5 psi. Analyses show that with a bundle flow of 28 x 103 lb/hr, bundle pressure drop is nearly independent of bundle power and has a value of 3.5 psi. Thus the bundle flow with a 4.5 psi driving head will be > 28 x 103 lb/hr. Full scale (continued)

GRAND GULF B 2.0-2 LBDCR 20026

Reactor Core SLs B 2.1.1 BASES APPLICABLE 2.1.1.1 Fuel Cladding Integrity (continued)

SAFETY ANALYSES ATLAS test data taken at pressures from 14.7 psia to 800 psia indicate that the fuel assembly critical power at this flow is approximately 3.35 MWt. With the design peaking factors, this corresponds to a THERMAL POWER > 44.2% RTP. Thus a THERMAL POWER limit of 21.8% RTP [1.2 / (4408 MWt/800 bundles)] for reactor pressure < 685 psig is conservative. Because of the design thermal hydraulic compatibility of the reload fuel designs, this justification and the associated low pressure and low flow limits remain applicable for future cycles of cores containing these fuel designs.

2.1.1.2 MCPR The fuel cladding integrity SL is set such that no significant fuel damage is calculated to occur if the limit is not violated. Since the parameters that results in fuel damage are not directly observable during reactor operation, the thermal and hydraulic conditions that result in the onset of transition boiling have been used to mark the beginning of the region in which fuel damage could occur. Although it is recognized that the onset of transition boiling would not result in damage to BWR fuel rods, the critical power at which boiling transition is calculated to occur has been adopted as a convenient limit. The Technical Specification SL value is dependent on the fuel product line and the corresponding MCPR correlation, which is cycle independent. The value is based on the Critical Power Ratio (CPR) data statistics and a 95% probability with 95%

confidence that rods are not susceptible to boiling transition, reference as MCPR95/95.

The MCPR SL is determined using a statistical model that combines all the uncertainties in operating parameters and the procedure used to calculated critical power. The probability of the occurrence of boiling transition is determined using the approved General Electric Critical Power correlations. Details of the fuel cladding integrity SL calculation are given in Reference 6. Reference 6 also includes a tabulation of the uncertainties used in the determination of the MCPR SL and of the nominal values of the parameters used in the MCPR SL statistical analysis.

The SL is based on GNF2 and GNF 3 fuels. For cores with a single fuel product line, the SLMCPR95/95 is the MCPR95/95 for the fuel type. For cores loaded with a mix of applicable fuel types, the SLMCPR95/95 is based on the largest (i.e., most limiting) of the MCPR values for the fuel product lines that are fresh-or once-burnt at the start of the cycle, (continued)

GRAND GULF B 2.0-3 LBDCR 20026

Reactor Core SLs B 2.1.1 BASES APPLICABLE 2.1.1.3 Reactor Vessel Water Level SAFETY ANALYSES During MODES 1 and 2, the reactor vessel water level is required to be above the top of the active fuel to provide core cooling capability. With fuel in the reactor vessel during periods when the reactor is shut down, consideration must be given to water level requirements due to the effect of decay heat. If the water level should drop below the top of the active irradiated fuel during this period, the ability to remove decay heat is reduced. This reduction in cooling capability could lead to elevated cladding temperatures and clad perforation in the event that the water level becomes less than two-thirds of the core height. The reactor vessel water level SL has been established at the top of the active irradiated fuel to provide a point that can be monitored and to also provide adequate margin for effective action.

SAFETY LIMITS The reactor core SLs are established to protect the integrity of the fuel clad barrier to the release of radioactive materials to the environs. SL 2.1.1.1 and SL 2.1.1.2 ensure that the core operates within the fuel design criteria.

SL 2.1.1.3 ensures that the reactor vessel water level is greater than the top of the active irradiated fuel in order to prevent elevated clad temperatures and resultant clad perforation.

APPLICABILITY SLs 2.1.1.1, 2.1.1.2, and 2.1.1.3 are applicable in all MODES.

(continued)

GRAND GULF B 2.0-4 LBDCR 18129

Reactor Core SLs B 2.1.1 BASES (continued)

REFERENCES  10 CFR 50, Appendix A, GDC 10.

 ANF-524(P)(A), Revision 2, Supplements 1 and 2, November 1990.

 deleted

 10 CFR 50.67, Accident Source Term.@

 deleted

 NEDE-24011-P-A, GESTAR-II (latest approved revision).

 NEDC-33292P, GEXL17 Correlation for GNF2 Fuel (latest

approved revision)

 NEDC-3380P, GEXL21 Correlation for GNF3 Fuel (latest approved

revision)

GRAND GULF B 2.0-6 LBDCR 20026