ML20114E999

Forwards Co Insp Rept 50-219/68-05 on 680507-09,0613-14, 0729-30 & 0919-30.Progess Noted,But Problems Remain

ML20114E999
Person / Time
Site:	Oyster Creek
Issue date:	10/03/1968
From:	Oreilley J US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
To:	Boyd R US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
Shared Package
ML093631134	List: ML18010B195 ML20087F806 ML20087F808 ML20087F815 ML20114E363 ML20114E376 ML20114E393 ML20114E412 ML20114E468 ML20114E472 ML20114E487 ML20114E503 ML20114E514 ML20114E518 ML20114E524 ML20114E628 ML20114E678 ML20114E702 ML20114E729 ML20114E765 ML20114E777 ML20114E794 ML20114E836 ML20114E844 ML20114E871 ML20114E876 ML20114E883 ML20114E887 ML20114E896 ML20114E916 ML20114E941 ML20114E963 ML20114E971 ML20114E988 ML20114E999 ML20114F029 ML20114F032 ML20114F049 ML20114F076 ML20114F121 ML20114F142 ML20114F153 ML20114F189 ML20114F202 ML20114F209 ML20114F221 ML20114F260 ML20114F273 ML20114F279 ML20114F282 ... further results
References
NUDOCS 9210120335
Download: ML20114E999 (1)

Text

.

i,

/~',

h, ON %,Mt ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION UNITED STATES A

i

_ J,. j -

W ASH WGTO N. O.C.

M545 i

m

%i,,n. y OCT 3 1966 R. S. Boyd, Assistent Director for Reactor Projects Division of Reactor Licensing (2)

JERSEY CENTLAL POMER A D LIGHT CC3PANY (CYSTER CRE K 1)

DOOKET NO. 50-219 The cnclosed report, directed specifically to the follow-up of the deficiencies detected during Compliance's in-depth quality control task force inspection program at the subject facility (C0 Report dated buy 6,1968), is forwarded for information. The information in the report was obtained during visits to the reactor site on luy 7-9, June 13-14, July 29-30, and September 19-20, IS6S.

While measurable progress has been realized in achieving _*asolutions on many of the identified probica areas, a nucoer of probic=s still remain outstanding. General Electric infor=ed us on October 1,196S,

that final engineering dispositions of outstanding problems will be available to Compliance by Novembc c 1,1968.

It should be noted that CE has conducted a comprehensive program of record inventory and review in an attempt to gain additional assurance regarding the overall quality of the plant.

Although the specific results of this program have not as yet been cada avail ble to Co=pliance, the scope of this program was noted to be extensive, particularly on mechanical syste=s.

In order to evaluate the effectiveness of the C record review program, coupled with information obtained during other phases of our inspection program, Compliance will conduct further in-depth reviews of the isola-tion condenser system and selected portions of the electrical systen.

These reviews will be perfor ed during the week of October 14.

It is l

planned to provide you with significant findings prior to the November l

ACRS. meeting.

l

\\

- O I

P. O'Reilly, ' Chief

\\

$t r Insp g ie.

anrorce=ent scen\\and 9210120335 920520 PDR ORG NRCHIST p3 l

PDR Division of Compliance f

Enclosure:

C0 Report No. 219/68-5

?*

cc w/ enclosure:

E. C. Case, DRS R. W. Kirk =an, CO: I R. U. Smith, CO:V D. J. Skovbolt DRL (3)

J.G.

Davis, CO: II R. T. Carlson, CO:I S. Levine, DRL (6)

B.

H. C rier, CO:III

[LRFiles L. Kornblith, Jr., C0 D.

I. Walker, 00:IV a

.