ML20114E503
Text
,
gg h4
( -t 5 $ ' ' N-s
(,,.
. ?. o f,
g ysy< M, d
~ d N'
N.
s f - *. 4%.), %.
f h [O2,(9 OC) f!f < =
1 sv.vf
\\
e.e 6
q UNITED STATES ATCWE ENERGY COMMISSION WASH 00eeTON. O.C. 80646 October 19, 1967 I
E Wr. William E. McElvain, President Jersey Central Power and Light Company Ii Medison Avesse at runch nowl Reed f
Morristeve, New Jersey Eser Mr. Mettweiss s
T This will confirs Commissioner Renny's e 11 to you on October 17 and Mr. Price's calle to you and to tir.
(
Tredridge on October 14.
t Coeusission staff met om October 16 with repruentatives of tae General Electrie C, --j ant, Mr. William lowe, r+=les Jersey Central, to discuss information needed to comp 1ste the safety review of your appiteattom.
A letter deoeribieg this information was seat from Dr. Morris Direeter of the Division of teacter Liceestos, to Mr. Legen, Vice President of Jersey Central, on Osteber 16 and wee headed to Mr. Graham, of Cameral Electria, em OsteMar D, b Regalatory staff will Latensity and try to accelerate
(-
its final review to t.be extent possible in the hope that this will poemst final Acat setten in N
':2 rather then Jammery. m Acts has been informed and the tagstator/
staff will disemas the Acat schedule further et the r
sehedsted onettag of the Oyster Crook emboesnittee of L
the ACR8 ee Osteber 20 and with the full Ceemittee on i
Devenber 3.
It is, of eeeree, tse early to assure you that the staff work er the Aca8 work sea be completed in Beeember.
j We have ceasidered the possibility of a two stage revies
[
to consider fuel leading and the conduct of aseestated tests and measuremaats at asar eero power prise to 094530 921012018'1 920520 PDR ORG NRCHIST PDR
.L
k
.a.a... u,..
,yr I
'fi
- ~.
ii
' i p ) e.*
i g
q 1
s 1
N Kr. Villiam 11. >:cc1 wain l
[
coupletion of review of your application for a provisional 1
operating license. We believe that the work required for safety rcview of this first phase vould approximate the We do ununt of work required for full power operation.
not believe that such a two stage process or your alterna-tive proposal for the publication of AEC intent to issue i
a fust loading license before completion of AEC staf f and 1415 review will serve to expedite the review process as ef fectively as the intensified review we have described above.
Mith respect to your alternative proposal, we don't think ve should publish a netice of proposed issuance of a 11-conse before the staf f and the ACRS have completed their i
revieu. Such an approach has a further disadvantage in that the staf f's safety evaluation and the Acts letter would not be avaitable to the public during the notice per iod.
Va racosaise your acute need for additional plant capacity and are doiog whSt we can to expedite review and action on your license application. Our efforts will depend signifi-cantly ra Jersey Centr 61's ability to give us the required information on a tiaaly basis, as explained by Comunissioner Ramey and kr. Frit.a. and discussed in detail in Dr. Morris' ititar to Mr.143An.
Sincarely,
/s/ C. F. Tape ii Acting Chairman l
-