ML20112D052
| ML20112D052 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 03/22/1995 |
| From: | Barbour P, Castello T, Evinay A SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20112D021 | List: |
| References | |
| N-4080-027, N-4080-027-R00, N-4080-27, N-4080-27-R, NUDOCS 9606040039 | |
| Download: ML20112D052 (249) | |
Text
i 1 e
l l '
l N-4080-027 Suppl A&B Rev 0: MSLB Containment P/T l
{
9606040039 960529 PDR ADOCK 05000361 P PDR
CALC. NO. PAGE TOTAL NO. OF Southern California Edison Company N-4080-027 ICm e '
(fEEUM.C h O.
N-2 1 PAGES gg, INTERIM CALCULATION BASE CALC. REV. UNIT CCN CONVERSION : CALC.REV.
2&3 CCN NO. CCN- c7., g CHANGE NOTICE (ICCN)/
CALCULATION CHANGE CALCULATION SUBJECT :
NOTICE (CCN) CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB COVER PAGE SUPPLEMENT B ENGINEERING SYSTEM NUMBER / PRIMARY STATION SYSTEM DESIGNATOR Q-CLASS CALCULATION CROSS-lNDEX 1301 / ABB 11 New/ Updated index included CONTROLLED PROGRAM OR PROGRAM / DATABASE NAME (S) b "
- DATABASE ACCORDING TO . ALSO, USTED BELOW VERSION / RELEASE NO.(S)
SO123-XXIV-6.1 1.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF ICCN / CCN: y PROGRAM DATA BASE NE100 (COPATTA) G1 15 Add Supplement B to the base calculation.
Revise sheets 6,7 and 9 through 14 of the base calculation to refer to the Supplement B Results and Conclusions.
Supplement B provides a new Analysis of Record (AOR) for the Containment Building pressure and temperature response to the Design Basis Main Steam Line Break (MSLB) event. Consistent with the licensing basis for SONGS 2 & 3, the new AOR is performed with the containment initial pressure at 14.7 psia. A second analysis is also included which assumes the containnment initial pressure is at the Technical Specification maximum value of 1.5 psig (16.2 psia) to demonstrate that the peak post MSLB pres ure remains below the 60 psig containment design value. The results of this new analysis are applicable to containment functional design as described in Section 6.2 of the UFSAR. The post-MSLB containment PIT response for in-containment equipment qualification (UFSAR Section 3.11) continues to be provided by Supplement A to the base calculation, which includes 8%
condensate revaporization.
Thl) new analysis employs a sligntly lower containment spray flow rate than was used in the base calculation to bound the lowest tpray flow rate expected with 7.5% degraded containment spray pump performance, in addition, the emergency air cooling unit ttart time has been delayed to coincide with the start of full containment spray flow at 50 seconds to provide margin to accomodate futlure changes in ECU startup timing.
The results of the base calculation are obsoleted by this new AOR. However, the base calculation, itself, remains applicable as a detailed source document for the input parameters used in the containment P/T analysis for the design basis MSLB event.
lNITIATING DOCUMENT (DCP, FCN, OTHER) N/A REV. -
- 2. OTHER AFFECTED DOCUMENTS (CHECK AS APPLICABLE FOR CCN ONLY):
JEf' .c4LCULAT/OM CAO$$ MbdX (5)YES Q NO OTHER AFFECTED DOCUMENTS EXIST AND ARE IDENTIFIED ON ATTACHED FORM 26 503.
- 3. APPROVAL : DISCIPLINE / ESC : Nuclear Safety Anal. i ALLEN EVINAY dN h J!l f[
ORIGINATOR (Pnnt name/tratiaVdate) (Signattse/date)' OTHER (Signature /date) l PAUL BARBOUR[f)h/g/W df)% J// f/)[
'~ '
IRE (Print name/irstial/date) G DM(Signature /datej OTHER (Signature /date)
- 4. ASSIGNED SUPPLEMENT ALPHA DESIGNATOR : b / l CONVERSION TO CCN DATE J hl [
YCE CDM - SONGS T tJETFORMFORMSWEDO GENI 1221,00 MDF Ver 00 00 0210/4/940 SCE 26122-1 REV. O 8/94 [
REFERENCE:
SO123-XXIV-7.15]
1 l
i CALCULATION TITLE PAGE ICCN NO./
PREUM. CCN NO. N-2 PAGE 2 OF Cate No. NN CCN CONVERSION:
DCP/FIDCN/ FCN No. & Rev. N/A CCN NO CCN-S@t . CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB - SUPPLEMENT B Sheet B1 og System tlumber/Pnmary Station System Designators 1301 / ABB SONGS Unit 283 Q-Class 11 Tech. Spec. Affecting? O NO @ YES Section No. LCO/SR 3/4.6.1.1,2.3 & Equipment Tag No. N/A B3/4.(p.t.4 W ,G CONTROLLED PROGRAM PROGRAM / DATABASE NAME(S) VERSION / RELEASE NO. (S) i hR M/ DATABASE ALSO, LISTED BELOW l DATABASE Accordng to SO123-XXIV-5.1 NE100 (COPAlTA) G1-15 RECORD OF ISSUES I TOTAL PREPARED APPROVED DESCRIPTION LAST T (Prirt name/irstial/date) (Signature /date)
, 0 ORIGINAL ISSUE 48 *$u'L tos EMJWAY& A Wh& 3ll4/yf B43 b- mA4.uA%# "4d e s/u/sc ORIG. G3' QTtER IRE OM OTFER ORLE GS OTPER tRE DM OT>ER ORIG. Gs OTHER IRE DM OTHER Space for RPE Stamp, identify use of an alternate calc., and notes as applicable, r
4 l
W a
TNs calculation was prepared using Word Perfect 5.1 software as an electronic word processor. The WPS.1 software was not used for any computational portions of the calculation.
This cale. was prepared for the identined DCP/FCN. DCP/FCN completion and ternever acceptance to be vertned by receipt of a memoranduas directing DCN Conversion.
L'pce reempt, this calc. represents the asemat condition. Menne date. by .
scE 281211 REY. 0 854 (REFERENCE so123,KXIV-7.15]
T.UETFORMWORMSWEDO GEPA1211_00 MDF Ver 00 00 019/2/94
CALCULATION CROSS-INDEX ICCN NOJ Mp gg PREUM. CCN NO. PAGE d OF CCN CONVERSION:
Calculation No. N4080-027 - SUPPLEMENT B Sheet No. B-2 CCN NO. CCN- d Calc. rw. INPUTS number and OUTPUTS ooes the out-identify output interface
' P'
- These interfacing calculations and/or documents .
g calc /docums,nt CCN, DCN, provide input to the subject calculation, and if g TCN/Rev., FIDCN, or g
,g _ g revised may require revision of the subject tracking number. .
7 calculation.
Cak:/ Document No. Rw. No. Calc / Document No. Rw. No. YES / NO ,
Calculations: UFSAR, Section 62.1 to Yes SAR23-357 N-4080-027 0 DBCMKra-TR-AA 1 Yes NEDOTRAK Log MB-94404 N-4000-027, Supplement A 0 g M-0014-009 Supplement A 0 SONGS Unit 2 Technical Specifications Amdt 114 Yes NEDOTRAK Log AJB-94-002 g M-0072-036 0 SR 4.6.1.1
,1 I g
N-4000-007 2 LCO 3.6.12 g N-4000403 5 SR 4.6.12 ,
! SR 4.6.1.3 B 3/4.6.1.4 i B 3/4.6.1.6 Unit 2 Operating Uscense & Technical SONGS Unit 3 Technical SpeciHcations Amdt 103 Yes NEDOTRAK Log MB-94 002 Specifications Amdt 114 SR 4.6.1.1 LCO 3.6.12 1 Unit 3 Operating Ucense & Technical SR 4.6.1.2 Specifications Amdt 103 LCO 3.6.1.3 SR 4.6.1.3 83/4.6.1.4 B 3/4.6.1.6 e@
tcE 26 424 REV. 0 7/92 [
REFERENCE:
NES&L 24-7-151
NES&L DEPARTMENT ICCN NOJ CALCULATION SHEET meuu. CCN No. N-2 ,,oe 4 og n CCN CONVERSON Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N-4080-027 Sucolement B CCN No. CCN . d Subject CONTAINM3NT P/T DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. B- 3 REV MIGIMTM MTE IRE MTE REV MIGIMTM MTE IRE MTE AILEN EVINAY 01/27/95 PAUL BARBOUR 02/14/95 I
,d TABLE OF CONTENTS i
t PAGE
! 1.0 PURP0SE................................................... B-4 2.0 RESULTS/ CONCLUSIONS /RECOMMENDATI0NS....................... B-6 1
3.0 ASSUMPTIONS................................................B-19 i
4.0 DESIGN INPUTS..............................................B-20 5.0 METHODOLOGY................................................B-23
6.0 REFERENCES
.................................................B-24 7.0 NOMENCLATURE...............................................B-25 8.0 CALCULATIONS...............................................B-26 9.0 COPATTA INPUT FILES........................................B-29 10.0 SELECTED OUTPUT DATA.......................................B-37 APPENDIX A (C0PATTA Code I/O Fil e Infonnation) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .B-43 c:s wwao
NES&L DEPARTMENT i ICCN NOJ CALCULATION SHEET PREUM. CCN NO. N-2 PAGE [ OF b cCN CONVERSION Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N-4080-027 Sunnlement B CCN NO. M - h Subject CONTAINMENTPfr DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. B- 4 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE. REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE ALLEN EVINAY 01/27/95 PAUL BARBOUR 02/14/95 m
1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 TASK DESCRIPTION The purpose of this Supplement B is to provide a new calculation of the Containment P/T response to the design basis Main Steam Line Break (DB MSLB) event consistent with the Licensing Basis of SONGS Units 2 and 3 (reference 6.2),
where the used (14.7 psia p)re-MSLB in priorinitial UFSAR containment containment pressure functional is the nominal design. atmospheric The results of value this Supplement B will become the Analysis of Record (AOR) for the design basis ,
MSLB as it applies to containment functional design. Supplement B will also serve '
as the A0R for calculation of peak post-MSLB containment pressure with the initial containment pressure at 1.5 psig, documenting the existence of peak pressure margin under maximum containment initial pressure conditions [ Technical Specification maximum value of 16.2 psia (1.5 psig) per LCO 3.6.1.4].
The prior analysis of reference 6.1 will remain valid for the purposes of defining the input modelling for the design basis MSLB containment P/T analysis I for all parameters except those minor changes identified below.
Supplement B incorporates the following changes in the containment heat removal spray system performance parameters:
1.1.1 The containment injection mode spray flow rate is reduced to 1600 gpm, bounding the lowest calculated minimum injection spray flow with 7.5%
degraded containment spray pumps (reference 6.3).
1.1.2 The emergency air cooling unit (ECU) start time is delayed to coincide with the start time of full containment spy flow at 50 seconds. This change will add 35 seconds to the currently calculated post-MSLB start start time for the Ecus without loss of power (reference 6.14) with negligible penalty in containment P/T response and provide margin for the future changes in ECU start time.
The MSLB evaluated in this calculation continues to be the design basis 7.48 ft2 steam line break accident at 102% power with off-site power available and with a loss of one train each of containment emergency air coolers and containment sprays.
Bechtel Standard Computer Code NE100, Release G1-15 (C0PATTA) (reference 6.5),
on the Nuclear Fuels Engineering IBM-RISC workstation system will be used in this calculation to evaluate the containment pressure and temperature transients for the DB MSLB.
1 NES&L DEPARTMENT ICCN NO/
CALCULATION SHEET PREUM. CCN No. N-2 PAGE b OF CCN CONVERSION Project or DCP/MMP _ SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N-4080-027 Sunnianent B CCN No. CCN - 1 Subject CONTAINMENTP/T DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. B- 5 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE ALLEN EVINAY 01/27/95 PAUL BARBOUR 02/14/95 1.2 CRITERIA, CODES and STANDARDS The criteria, Design Basiscodes MSLBand standards (reference 6.1,ap)plicable to the Containment are also generally applicableP/T Analysis for in this analysis. The applicable regulatory design criteria include:
- General Design Criterion (GDC) 16, " Containment Design" l l
' General Design Criterion (GDC) 38, " Containment Heat Removal"
- General Design Criterion (GDC) 50, " Containment Design Basis". l The applicability of these criteria to peak containment pressure and temperature are described in detail in Reference 6.1.
The containment design pressure and temperature are 60 psig and 300 F per the 4 Technical Specifications (references 6.5, 6.6, 6.7 Section 5.2.2) respectively.
ses - ww w
NES&L DEPARTMENT ICCN NOJ l CALCULATION SHEET enEuu. CCN NO. N-2 g,oe 7 Og A CCN CONVERSON Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N ^^^^ a27 Se- 'm B CCN NO. M -
Subject CONTAINMENTPfr DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. B- 6 REV ORIGINATOR DATE lRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE ALLEN EVINAY 01/27/95 PAUL BARBOUR 02/14/95 o
2.0 RESULTS/ CONCLUSIONS AND REC 060tENDATIONS 2.1 RESULTS/ CONCLUSIONS 2.1.1 Initial Containment Pressure 9 0 PSIG Figures 2-1 through 2-7 show the analysis results out to 10,000 seconds, which is well beyond the time of the affected steam generator dry-out and termination of significant mass and energy release into the containment (71.08 seconds). At 10,000 seconds, the containment temperature and pressure are well below the peak values and decreasing. Section 10 contains tabulated conditions to the end of the transient calculation at 1E+4 seconos, at which time the refueling water storage tank would have been depleted and operator action to place RCS on shutdown cooling for decay heat removal would have been underway.
Figure 2-1 presents the containment gauge pressure versus time for the CONTAINMENT P/T DESIGN BASIS MSLB. The plot in Figure 2.1 is generated using the data presented in Section 10.1.
Figure 2-2 presents the sump and vapor temperatures versus time for the CONTAINMENT P/T DESIGN BASIS MSLB. The plots in Figure 2.2 are generated using the data presented in Section 10.1.
Figure 2-3 presents the condensing heat transfer coefficient v.s. time used by the COPATTA Code during the DBMSLB. The plot in Figure 2.3 is generated using the data presented in Section 10.1.
Figure 2-4 presents the inside surface temperature of heat sink 1 (reactor building dome, painted steel liner plate) to represent the maximum post-MSLB temperature of the containment structure. The plot in Figure 2.4 is generated using the data presented in Section 10.1.
Figure 2-5 presents the integrated energy transferred from the containment vapor region by one train of air coolers, two Emergency Cooling Units (2 ECUS) and one train of containment spray as a function of time. The plots in Figure 2.4 are generated using the data presented in Section 10.2. The ECUS transfer vapor energy to the component cooling water system (CCWS) which transports the energy outside the containment. The containment sprays are operating in the injection mode and transfer vapor energy to the containment sump region as hot water.
Figure 2-6 presents the integrated heat transfer of the air coolers and containment sprays. The plots prsented in Figure 2.6 are generated using the data tabulated in Section 10.2 CCE 26426 NEW 490
i
! NES&L DEPARTMENT ICCN NO./
CALCULATION SHEET PREUM. CCN No. N-2 PAGE b OF 2 --
CCN CONVERSION Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N-4080-027 Suecianent B CCN NO. M -
Subject CONTAINMENTP/T DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. B- 7 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE ALLEN EVINAY 01/27/95 PAUL BARBOUR 02/14/95 Figure 2-7 presents the rate of energy transfer from the vapor region by a single train of emergency cooling units (2 ECUS) and by a single train of containment sprays as a function of time. The plots in Figure 2.5 are generated using the data presented in Section 10.2.
Table 2-1 presents the containment P/T Design Basis MSLB accident chronology with Initial Containment Pressure cpi = 14.7 psia (0 psig).
The pressurecalculated and alsopeak pressure less than of 56.6 psig the previously is less identified peakthan the 6058.5 pressure p(sig design psig) in the prior A0R (N-4080-027, reference 6.1). The decrease in the peak pressure is attributed to the change in the initial containment pressure from 1.5 psig to 0 psig.
The calculated peak vapor temperature of 427.7 F is greater than the 300 F design temperature, however the duration of the event is sufficiently brief to prevent heating of the containment structural materials beyond the design limits. The thermal response of the 0.25" thick containment steel liner plate to the MSLB environment shown in figure 2-4 presents a conservative example of the transient heating of the containment structure during the accident. As shown in the figure, the liner plate remains below 250 F during the MSLB event.
The peak vapor temperature is about 7 F greater than the previously identified peak temperature in the prior A0R (N-4080-027, reference 6.1). The increase in the peak temperature is primarily attributed to the lower containment initial ;
pressure (0 psig) compared to that in the prior analysis at 1.5 psig. The lower '
air inventory reduces the total containment heat capacity resulting in a small increase in short-term peak vapor temperature [see BN-TOP-3, Revision 4, Section ,
4.1.2 and Table 15 (reference 6.8)] . The delay in ECU start time from 15 to 50 ,
seconds also adds slightly to the increase in peak vapor temperature as compared i to the prior analysis. I I
I l
1 l
l SCE 26426 6 W90 l
NES&L DEPARTMENT ICCN NOJ CALCULATION SHEET PREUM. CCN NO. N-2 pAoE 9 Or $L CCN CONVERSION Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No, N-4080427 Supplement B CCN NO. CCN - h l Subject CONTAINMENTPfr DESIGN BASE MEr R Sheet No. B- 8 REV ORDOINATOR DATE IRE DATE '
l REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE allen EVINAY 01/27/95 PAUL BARBOUR 02/14/95 l
l l 2.1.2 Initial Containment Pressure 9 1.5 PSIG Table 2-2 presents the CONTAINMENT P/T DESIGN BASIS MSLB accident chronology with Initial Containment Pressure cpi = 16.2 psia.
The calculated peak pressure of 58.7 psig is less than the 60 psig design pressure but slightly greater than the previously identified peak pressure (58.5 psig) in the prior A0R (N-4080-027, reference 6.1). The increase in the peak pressure is attributed to the changes in the CSS flow rate and ECU start delay time.
The calculated peak vapor temperature of 421.6 F is greater than the 30YF design temperature, however the duration of the event is sufficiently short enough to prevent heating of the containment structural materials beyond the design limits.
The peak vapor temperature with the initial containment pressure at 1.5 psig is about 6.1*F lower than for the case with the initial pressure at 0 psig due to i the greater containment heat capacity which exists at the higher initial l containment pressure.
The peak vapor temperature is about 0.6 F greater than the previously identified peak temperature in the prior A0R (N-4080-027, reference 6.1). The slight increase in peak temperature is attributed to the delay in ECU start time from 15 to 50 seconds.
l l
l l
3 SCE 26-426 NEW 4/90
i m ,
9
[
I 5
kk 3 $
I FIGURE 2-1: PRESSURE 5 3I
" 5 4 o !
MSLB 102% POWER 7.48 Ft**2 BREAK AREA l l e g5 y -
70 ,; .
, 33 ,1 1, ; ; , , ,,1!, ; , a g !O g
Max Press = 56.6 psig at 62.3 sec !
!! 3 Cg i 3 60 h j E T, s g 2 O
@ 50 ;
r
[. yg '
s E
=
y
- Ezgml 1 i
a . e o z5
$ /'
/ \\ E ! hI m m 40 "5 m i' e
a :/ N 5 H
s z 30 /. st.s !
m I s 2 2 ,
Ns E z -
5 =
R 20 / s @a 9 H
z /
/ \N '
o ' / i g'5 0 10 /j ;
j
\ g g 5 Q
&x Pg z om k 0 '
3 m 28 1E+00 1E+01 1E+02 1E+03 1E4 k 'S r TIME FOLLOWING BREAK (seconds) ,
I I 5 m o F Q h @
9 m ,
I > 5 11 3 i R I ; S n 8 FIGURE 2-2: TEMPERATURE z -a o MSLB 102% POWER 7.48 FT**2 BREAK AREA .
VAPOR TEMP -- SUMP TEMP
! ! ba!Q 500 , ,
, , iiio i . i , ,,o a 3 !@ g-O Maximum vapor temp: 427.7 F at 50 seconds Maximum sump temp: 266 F at 125 seconds
- l , Cz g
A h%
-l o m
\ g 3 5 f O*
~ 400 -
a p '
Zh b "
E Co m W
3 E '
S g 5 8 gyZ 3 /
/'
. z P $
F / g Q.
y
/ -
N N'm
/ s jg
/
N' 'N g '.-
s
..'- g ez g 200 .s 55 4
om
'. N s 9
\ !
gg 5 l s 98 z oR e 100 +' :
R w za g
1E+00 'd+01 1E+02 1E+03 1E4 , ps g TIME FOLLOWING BREAK (seconds) g a :
P Q E
.= p
g e ,
l b l 5f l 1 R I
FIGURE 2-3: CONDENSING HTC 5 o f
MSLB 102% POWER 7.48 Ft**2 BREAK AREA ll %Q 150 ; ; iiii i ; i ; ;;;,i i i i i i ii., i : : g !5 g Cz 135 Max Uchida HTC = 121.3 BTU /hr-ft**2-F @ 64 sec @ l ,
, = 9 g {"g l
- M 5 C120 !3 q!
^ s j :
! U 5
4 h105 g
/ N .
E
- zl mm I / S g *@E Z 3E H
/ N N
$ # $z m M
f E 75 '
\ l sI 60 7
/ s g
< e 9 45 / -
! Rg b
a 30 -
- ,\ 5 '5 y ,
3 15 '
s !!
0
$ s x 98 1E+00 1E+01 1E+02 1E+03 1E4 [= '9 ,
TIME FOLLOWING BREAK (seconds) 'if b 5 5 D r
a p
=,
g ki 5 kkR I
FIGURE 2-4: LINER PLATE SURFACE TEMP. 5l 88 MSLB 102% POWER 7.48 Ft**2 BREAK AREA-HEAT SINK 1 (LEFT BOUND) l gi 3!
k O
300
- I t iltu I ! t illis i I i t i llll 1 : E 5 !O Maximum liner plate surface temperature: 244 at 150 seconds j kg Q Cz 260 g n U
E g 5 O%
C
- ,/ - N N
i g*oI.Zliys m I; 2 7 ' e g ,
y220 ! l
/ j n.180 / \ '
2 2 11 N
1
\ N 5
!8 p
L
- Ns 36 ,
- E 5
140 ,/ ' a 5 gg 5 z <
100 $ f m = em 1E+00 1E+01 1E+02 TIME FOLLOWING BREAK (seconds) 1E+03 1E4 k
I h ;
a 0 (v P 9 0
- 2 B
l I l$
g 1 R FIGURE 2-5: ENERGY h g MSLB 102% POWER,7.48 FT**2 BREAK AREA E B g$z I
-VAPOR ----- SUMP TOTAL - HEAT SINKS m 1E9 s O E 4 Il $ , & Cz
- N 4 - e
,,,,,,,- ---f
- y 9e 1E8 y
~
~
r""~ 5 o
'..p . .. . s -
~ .. .-
~- -
s
=
,,, z e
g o,a
,4- i; ,. 4.
g a g Zg
'- = gm 3
H 1E7 '
. j /
k s g
= a a
$2w 25 m
m g
/ ,; u m w r /;-
p ,*
' ' i :s 4 1E6 2
g ~,.
tr '.. ,e W
Z ~-
'4 l
m 1ES
~,
e'
, ! 3D EM
- i s
-..- ,. 5 g~g .
1E4 I
l gg Z
g 9 z o e 1E+03 3
- z5 g
1E+00 1E+01 1E+02 1E+03 1E4 z pa g "'
TIME FOLLOWING BREAK (seconds) e _
F Q
__ C v3 F
b y
MI kk
[
i s S 0 i l38U E 3!O' FIGURE 2-6 ENERGY 4 N MSLB 102% POWER,7.48 FT**2 BREAK AREA
- AIR COOLERS ----- CONTAINMENT SPRAY g
8 lf@
g 4 C $
e g c 1E9 i B m g
- 3 9 1E8 I
[ g y
"[ z O.l" wm e o y5 m
a F-1E7 i .....-
y
!: ! =h # m
.f iF m E 1E6
~'
5 2 *
> r. k g
0 1 1ES l u tr m i
! o
@ 1E4 l s ll 5 1 1E+03 = 0'5
! 00 6 1E+02 g z
1E+00 1 E+01 1E+02 1E+03 1E4 g ya TIME FOLLOWING BREAK (seconds) [. 9 ,
z 9
N 5 m
- D i ,
, g
_- E h N
n . ,
>3 I l FIGURE 2-7: VAPOR HEAT REMOVAL RATES ] l g$ DB MSLB 102% POWER-7.48 FT2 BREAK AREA i ! !l0
> E T ' >
AIR MERS (2) ---- CONMNMENWRAYS k1E+03 g0 a cn
! !4, a cm v c-oo O __.,
i g c! 5 u
~o
+ -
!g - z O >$
Zl w ' E 5 1 E+02 --- m
~ _ _ _ _ _ ' ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ' '! l~ ~ $5
~ ___
e E o __ m F -.. : l!n
= m g ,
, -s tr 's W \ s
@ 1E+01 -
--\ l ,g Z Initial containment Pressure = 14.7 psia B z Air Coolers on @ 50 seconds l2 g
z g Sprays on @ 50 seconds g 0% Condensate revaporization M 00 9 F z8 b1E+00 : : : : : :::: : : : : : :::: : : : : : ::: - bi s y a = zB 1E+01 1E+02 1E+03 1E4 i 58 *, 3 TIME FOLLOWING BREAK (seconds) , _ a e-Y Q
~
3 S i E
1 NES&L DEPARTMENT ICCN NOJ , , CALCULATION SHEET PREUM. CCN NO. N-2 PAGE OF ) A CCN CONVERSION Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N-4080-027 Supplement B CCN No. CCN - k Subject CONTAINMENTPfr DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. B- 16 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR l DATE IRE DATE allen EVINAY 01/27/95 PAUL BARBOUR 02/14/95 Table 2-1 CONTAINMENT P/T DESIGN BASIS MSLB EVENT CHRONOLOGY Initial Containment Pressure cpi = 14.7 psia TIME EVENT I (seconds) 0.0 MSLB Occurs i 50 Containment Sprays Start ( Nozzles at Full Discharge Flow ) AND Emergency Fan Coolers Start ( Full capacity) 50 Peak Containment Temperature of 427.7 'F reached 62.2 Peak Containment Pressure of 56.6 psig reached 71.08 End of Blowdown ( Affected Steam Generator ) 175.0 Containment Liner Plate Maximum Temperature of 243.8 F reached 9000.0 Maximum Tech. Spec. Containment Pressure of 1.499 psig s 1.5 psig reached 10,000.0 End of Analysis CCE 2H28 NEW 4/90
NES&L DEPARTMENT I CCN NOJ CALCULATION SHEET PRELIM. CCN No. N-2 pAoE $ or b CCN CONVERSION ' Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N-4086427 E--- '----t B CCN No. CCN - k l l Subject CONTAINMENTP/T DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. B- 17 l REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE ALLEN EVINAY 01/27/95 PAUL BARBOUR 02/14/95 Table 2-2 CONTAINMENT P/T DESIGN BASIS MSLB EVENT CHRONOLOGY Initial Containment Pressure cpi = 16.2 psia TIME EVENT ' (seconds) 0.0 MSLB Occurs I 50.0 Containment Sprays Start ( Nozzles at Full Discharge Flow ) AND Emergency Fan Coolers Start ( Full capacity) 50.0 Peak Containment Temperature of 421.6 'F reached 62.3 Peak Containment Pressure of 58.7 psig reached 71.08 End of Blowdown ( Affected Steam Generator ) 200.0 Containment Liner Plate Maximum Temperature of 242.8 F reached 10,000.0 End of Analysis see m e =
NES&L DEPARTMENT ICCN NOJ CALCULATION SHEET PRELN. CCN No. N-2 pros O opfL CCN CONVERSION Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N-4080-027 Supplement B CCN NO. CCN -h l Subject CONTAINMENT Pfr DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. B.18
- Rtv ORIGI MTOR MTE IRE DATE REV ORIGIMTOR DATE IRE DATE i ALLEN EVINAY 01/27/95 PAUL BARBOUR 02/14/95 l
2.2 RECOMMENDATIONS This Supplement B provides a new analysis of record for the containment pressure and temperature response to the Design Basis MSLB event for containment functional design as reported in Section 6.2 of the UFSAR. The new analysis does not apply to in-containment equipment qualification which is separately addressed l l by Supplement A of the base calculation. Supplement B also provides analysis for i the determination of peak post-MSLB pressure margin starting with the maximum ! initial containment pressure conditions (Technical Specification maximum value of 16.2 psia (1.5 psig per LC0 3.6.1.4)). Section 6.2 of the UFSAR will be revised to replace the detailed results of the old AOR (initial containment pressure at zero psig) with the results of the new A0R for the same initial containment pressure of zero psig. Text will be added to clarify that analyses were also done with the initial containment pressure at 1.5 psig to confirm that the peak post-MSLB pressure remains below the containment design value of 60 psig when the initial pressure is at the Technical Specification maximum LC0 value of 1.5 psig. ! Technical Specification LC0/SRs 3/4.6.1.1, 3/4.6.1.2, and 3/4.6.1.3 will be of 56.6 psig from the new A0R; the value of P t revised to incorporate (one-half P,) will be revise the P,d to 28.3 psig. Technical Specification Basis 3/4.6.1.4 will be revised to identify the peak pressure of 58.7 psig calculated with the initial containment pressure at 1.5 psig, demonstrating compliance with the containment design value of 60 psig. Technical Specification Basis 3/4.6.1.6 will be revised to identify the maximum steam line break containment pressure of 56.6 psig as calculated by the current A0R. The prior containment P/T response analysis contained in N-4080-027 Revision 0, l remains applicable only for the purposes of defining the input modelling for the DB MSLB containment P/T analysis for all parameters except those changes identified in this Supplement B to the calculation. i I i i SCE 26 426 NEW 4/90 l
NES&L DEPARTMENT iCCN NOJ CALCULATION SHEET PRELIM. CCN No. N-2 PAGE b OF CCN CONVERSION Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N-4080 027 Sunnianent B CCN NO. M - Subject CONTALNMENTP/T DESIGN BAS?S MSLB Sheet No. B- 19 l REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE l ALLEN EVINAY 01/27/95 PAUL BARBOUR 02/14/95 { 3.0 ASSUNPTIONS The assumptions used in this calculation are identical to those used in the prior Containment P/T Analysis for Design Basis MSLB (reference 6.1), except where noted. Reference 6.1 remains valid for the purposes of defining the input modelling for the DB MSLB containment P/T analysis for all parameters except those changes identified in this Supplement B to the calculation. The assumptions in reference 6.1 are arranged in groups which parallel the COPATTA Code card series data input. The modifications to reference 6.1 assumptions are listed below. 3.1 CARD SERIES 1 3.1.a ITEM 5: CONTAINMENT INITIAL TEMPERATURE In both the AOR (reference 6.1) and this analysis, the containment initial temperature was assumed to be 120 F. This is the maximum average containment temperature per SONGS Units 2 and 3 Technical Specification LC0 3.6.1.5 (references 6.6 and 6.7). ! 3.1.b ITEM 11: CONTAINMENT HEAT SINK REVAPORIZATION FRACTION l This analysis is performed for Containment P/T Design Basis MSLB Temperature and Pressure profile generation and supports containment functional design and not in-containment equipment qualification. Therefore credit for revaporization of heat sink condensate will not be taken. Supplement Aa to the base calculation contains the MSLB analysis supporting equipment qualification. 3.2 CARD SERIES 5 i l 3.2.a ITEM 3: CONTAINMENT EMERGENCY AIR COOLER START TIME in the A0R (reference 6.1), the containment air cooler start delay time was identified as 15 seconds in the Design Input 4.3.a. In the present analysis the air cooler start time has been increased to 50 seconds to coincide with the containment spray actuation time. The emergency air cooling units have relatively little impact on short-term containment pressure and temperature, and by adding 35 seconds delay to ECU initiation, margin is added to accommodate potential changes in the timing of ECU startup. For example, based on the methodology contained in calculation N-4080-003 (reference 6.15), the 50 second start time ! for the ECUS is equivalent to assuming a 47-second stroke time for the CCW block valves that supply cooling water to the air coolers, if all other parameters affecting ECU start time were to remain unchanged. 4 l SCE 2tN26 NEW 490
l NES&L DEPARTMENT scCN NO./ CALCULATION SHEET PREUM. CCN No. N-2 proe M og A CCN CONVERSION Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N-4080427 Sunalenent B CCN NO. CCN - d Subject CONTAINMENTP/T DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. B- 20 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORM31NATOR DATE IRE DATE ALLEN EVINAY 01/27/95 PAUL BARBOUR 02/14/95 4.0 DESIGN INPUT The design inputs used in this calculation are identical to those used in the prior Containment P/T Analysis for Design Basis MSLB (reference 6.1), except where noted. Reference 6.1 remains valid for the purposes of defining the input modelling for the DB-MSLB containment P/T analysis for all parameters except those changes identified in this Supplement B to the calculation. The assumptions in reference 6.1 are arranged in groups which parallel the COPATTA Code card series data input. The modifications to reference 6.1 assumptions are listed below. 4.1 CARD SERIES 0 The last four zero entries on this card are deleted. The G1-15 (RISC) version of C0PATTA does not utilize these data entry locations. 4.2 CARD SERIES 1
- a. ITEM 2: PROBLEM RUN TIME The appropriate problem run time is 10,000 seconds ( ~2.8 hours ). The pipe break mass and energy release into the containment provided by the Combustion Engineering ( ABB-CE) included on CARD SERIES 301 terminate at 71.08 seconds, when dryout of the affected steam generator is calculated to occur for this Design Basis MSLB event. This run time of 10,000 seconds is well past the end of significant mass and energy release into the containment. Generally a run time of 1000 seconds is adequate to show that the containment pressure and temperature are decreasing rapidly and well below the peak values calculated prior to steam i generator dryout. For this calculation, however, the run time has been extended to 10,000 seconds to be consistent with the prior AOR. The 10,000 second run time also roughly coincides with the time at which the refueling water storage tank would become depleted by the operation of a single spray train. Containment spray would be discontinued when the RWST is empty, since the shutdown heat exchanger, normally used for cooling recirculated spray water from the sump, would be required for shutdown cooling of the RCS.
- b. ITEM 3: INITIAL CONTAINMENT PRESSURE Consistent with the original design basis containment P/T response analysis for MSLB reported in the UFSAR supporting containment functional design (UFSAR Section 6.2), and SONGS Units 2 and 3 licensing basis (reference 6.2), the initial containment pressure will be set to 14.7 psia (0 psig). Sensitivity studies in Bechtel Topical report BN-TOP-3 (reference 6.8) show that the short-term peak vapor temperature increases with decreasing initial containment pressure because lower initial pressure corresponds to a smaller initial air mass in containment and a corresponding smaller containment total heat capacity, sce ma nsw oo
NES&L DEPARTMENT ICCN NOJ CALCULATION SHEET PREUM. CCN No. N-2 pace 14 gE CCN CONVERSION Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N-4080-027 Sunnienunt ]L CCN No. CCN h i Subject CONTAINMENTP/T DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. B- 21 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE ALLEN EVINAY 01/27/95 PAUL BAR80VR 02/14/95 The Supplement B also provides an analysis for the detrmination of peak post-MSLB containment pressure where the initial containment pressure is set at the Technical Specification maximum value of 16.2 psia (1.5 psig per LC0 3.6.1.4). 4.3 CARD SERIES 5 The last two entries on this card (0 and 105) are deleted. The G1-15 (RISC) version of C0PATTA does not utilize these entry locations i 4.3.a ITEM 3: CONTAINMENT EMERGENCY AIR COOLER START TIME In the present analysis, the air cooler start delay time has been increased from 15 seconds to 50 seconds to coincide with the containment spray actuation time. The increase in air cooler start delay time will provide margin to accommodate potential changes in the timing of ECU startup such as an increase in the stroke time of the CCW block valves that isolate the cooling water from the air coolers. 4.4 CARD SERIES 301 No changes are made to card series 301 input which provides the mass flow rate and fluid enthalpy entering the containment from the main steam line break. Tge data is for the Design basis MSLB at 102% power with a break area of 7.48 ft . As documented by CCN 1 to N-4080-004 (reference 6.3) and CCN 1 to N-4080-007 (reference 6.13), single failure of one of the isolation valves (HV8200 and/or HV8201) on the steam line feeding the auxiliary feed water pump turbine could allow cross-flow of steam from the intact steam generator into the containment through the affected steam generator. This cross-flow would come from the 1" diameter bypass lines installed around steam line check valves 1301MU003 and 1301MU005 by MMP 2 & 3 6869.00SM. This potential additional mass and energy input is not included in this new AOR. The referenced CCNs demonstrate that the effect of the cross-flow on short-term peak containment conditions is not significant. The increase in peak pressure and peap temperature due to this potential cross-flow are less than 0.1 psi and 0.3 F, respectively. Similarly, a single failure of the containment isolation valve on instrument air or high/ low nitrogen supply lines to close, coupled with a MSLB-induced failure of one of the supply or distribution lines inside the containment would also lead to additional mass and energy release beyond what is provided by ABB-CE. CCN 2 f to N-4080-007 (reference 6.13) evaluated this single failure and concluded that there would be no significant impact to the short-term peak containment pressure or temperature. Therefore, the mass and energy releases from a failed air or nitrogen line is not included in this Design Basis MSLB A0R. I l
-- )
l
NES&L DEPARTMENT ICCN NO/ CALCULATION SHEET PREUM. CCN No. N-2 pAos MO p A CCN CONVERSION Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N-4080-027 Sunnianent B CCN No. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENTPfr 3ESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. B- 22 REV ORIGINATOR DATE BRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE ALLEN EVINAY 01/27/95 PAUL BARBOUR 02/14/95 l 4.5 CARD SERIES 801 No changes are made to card series 801 input except: a.2(a) Containment Spray Injection Mode Spray Flow Rate The minimum Containment Pump Spray Flow Rate has been changed to 1606 gpm (reference 6.3). In this Supplement B the value has been rounded down to 1600 gpm providing a small margin over the minimum predicted spray flow. Using the same criteria as in the AOR, this value translates to a flow rate of 7.956E+5 lb/hr for 100 F water coming from the RWST. The containment spray flow would be discontinued at about 1E4 seconds, consistent ) with a calculated time to deplete the refueling water storage tank inventory, ' using a single spray train, of about 1.1E4 seconds (reference 6.1, section 4.5.b.1). Following spray termination, containment heat removal is provided by the continued operation of the single train emergency air cooler units (2 ECUS). ' Long-term RCS decay heat removal for the DB MSLB would be provided by placing the RCS on shutdown cooling. 4.6 CARD SERIES 1101 The G1-15 (RISC) version of COPATTA does not have the option of multiple tables ) of ECU performance versus containment temperature for various values of cooling water supply temp)erature. Therefore, following the card series identifier ($ LIST P00L= temperature and ECU heat removal rate. SCE 2N26 NEW 4.90
NES&L DEPARTMENT ICCN NOJ CALCULATION SHEET PRELIM. CCN No. N-2 PAGE OF CCN CONVERSION 1
- Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N-4080-027 Sunnianent B CCN No. CCN .
1 Subject CONTAINMENTP/T DESIGNJAS S MSLB Sheet No. B- 23 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE ALLEN EVINAY 01/27/95 PAUL BARBOUR 02/14/95 1 5.0 METHODOLOGY The MSLB for Eguipment Qualification evaluated in this calculation is the design basis 7.48 ft steam line break accident at 102% power with off-site power available and with a loss of one train each of containment emergency air coolers and containment sprays. The evaluation used the Bechtel COPATTA computer code (reference 6.5) to simulate the containment response to the MSLB. The methodology employed in this calculation is identical to the present AOR (reference 6.1) for the Containment P/T Design Basis MSLB, with the exception that two different pre-MSLB containment pressure conditions are analyzed:
- 1) Initial Containment Pressure of 14.7 psia (reference 6.2) for containment P/T functional design.
- 2) Initial Containment Pressure of 16.2 psia, maximum Technical Specification value, for peak post-MSLB containment pressure margin determination.
Small reductions in containment spray flow have been made to provide some margin with respect to currently calculated minimum values. In addition, the start time of the emergency air cooling units (ECUS) has been arbitrarily delayed to coincide with the start of containment spray to provide future margin on the timing of ECU startup. l
NES&L DEPARTMENT ICCN NOJ CALCULATION SHEET m aN No. N-2 proe M op N CCN CONVERSION Project or DCP/MMP - SONGS UNrrS 2 and 3 Calc No. N-4080427 Sunnlement B CCN No. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENTPfr DESIGN BASIS MSLB Steet No. B- 24 REV ORIGINATOR DATE BRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE ALLEN EVINAY 01/27/95 PAUL BARBOUR 02/14/95
6.0 REFERENCES
6.1 SONGS Units 2&3 Calculation N-4080-027, Revision 0, " Containment P/T Analysis for Design Basis MSLB", January 13, 1994. 6.2 Memo f rom J . L. Rainsberry to A.J. Brough, " Peak Containment Pressure Calculations, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3", May 12, 1994. 6.3 SONGS Units 2&3 Calculation M-0014-009, Revision 0, Supplement A,
" Containment Spray (CSS) In Service Minimum Requirements, July 28, 1994.
6.5 Bechtel Standard Computer Program, NE100, COPATTA, Version G1-15,
" Containment Temperature and Pressure Transient Analysis", User and Theory Manuals.
l 6.6 SONGS Unit 2 Operating License and Technical specifications, up to and including Amendment 114. 6.7 SONGS Unit 3 Operating License and Technical specifications, up to and including Amendment 103. 6.8 Bechtel Topical report BN-TOP-3, Revision 4, " Performance and Sizing of Dry; Pressure Containments", March 1983. 6.12 SONGS Units 2 and 3 Calculation M-0072-036, Revision 0, " Containment Emergency Cooler Performance Verification", December 9,1993. 6.13 SONGS Units 2 and 3 Calculation N-4080-007, Revision 2, " Containment Pressure and Tem April 21,1983 (perature includesfrom CCNsMSLB1 andat2 various
). Power Levels",
6.14 SONGS Units 2&3 Calculation N-4080-027, Revision 0, Supplement A
" Containment P/T Design Basis MSLB For Equipment Qualification",
November 4, 1994. 6.15 SONGS Units 2 and 3 Calculation N-4080-003, Revision 5, " Containment Spray (CSS) and Emergency Cooling Unit (ECU) Actuation Times", December 23, 1993 SCE 26-426 NEW 4/90
NES&L DEPARTMENT ICCN NOJ - CALCULATION SHEET PREUM. CCN No. N-2 PAGE OF CCN CONVEFISION Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N-4080427 Sunnlement B CCN No. CCN - A Subject CONTAINMENTPfr DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. B- 25 REV OR10lNAToR DATE 1RE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE BRE DATE ALLEN EVINAY 01/27/95 PAUL BARBOUR 02/14/95 l l 7.0 NOMENCLATURE , 1 Abbreviations are defined when first used within the body of the text. i l l j i l SCE 2tL426 NEW 490
f NES&L DEPARTMENT ICCN NOJ CALCULATION SHEET rREuu. CCN NO. N2 g ,o , 2 70 , r z. CCN CONVERSION i Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNrrS 2 and 3 Calc No. N-4080-027 Sunnianent B CCN No. CCN d Subject CONTAINMENTPfr DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. B- 26 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE ALLEN EVINAY 01/27/95 PAUL BARBOUR 02/14/95 8.0 CALCULATIONS I 8.1 COPATTA CODE INPUT DATA - Initial Containment Pressure cpi = 14.7 psia l COPATTA input data for the Containment P/T Design Basis MSLB Analysis for uses i the current A0R (reference 6.1) input data with modifications to reflect changes -l in containment spray flow rate (reference 6.3), initial containment pressure and Air Cooler start time to generate containment temperature and pressure profiles l for the containment P/T design basis MSLB. Only the changes to the reference 6.1 l input data will be presented in the following subsections. ! l 8.1.1 TITLE CARD
*DBMSLB 102%P, Pi=14.7, EV=0%, CT=1, TC=50, LOP =0, CS=1600, N-4080-027-SUP-B l
8.1.2 CARD SERIES 0 No changes made to Card Series 0 of reference 6.1 other than the deletion of the last four zero entries on the Bechtel input file as non-applicable to COPATTA l version G1-15. ' 8.1.3 CARD SERIES 1: General Problem Infomation
& LIST P00L=1,1ES,14.7,2.305E6,120,0.6,20,582.945,1,1,0.00,14.7,0,0.50 $END ITEM 2: TNFL = 2E4 seconds (per4.2.a)
ITEM 3: PAIR = 14.7 psia The to 14.7 initial psiacontainment for DB-MSLB for pressure before containment P/Tthe MSLBdesign finctional massUFSAR and energy Section(release is set 6.2), as discussed in the Design Input Item 4.2.b. Card Series input ITEMS 4 through 10 remain unchanged from that of reference 6.1. ITEM 11: EVAP = 0.0 The fraction of heat sink condensate which will be allowed to revaporize is set to 0.0. N0 credit for revaporization will be taken for the purposes of DB MSLB analysis per assumption 3.1.a. l ECE 264 M NEW 4/90
NES&L DEPARTMENT ICCN NOJ CALCULATION SHEET PREUM. CCN No. N-2 pace d op b CCN CONVERSION Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N '^*^ ^27 Sunolement B CCN NO. CW - Subject CONTAINMENTP/T DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. B- 27 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE ALLEN EVINAY 01/27/95 PAUL BARBOUR 02/14/95 m 8.1.4 CARD SERIES 5: Air Cooler Infonnation
$ LIST P00L=5,2,50,1E7,0,0 $END ITEM 3: This item reflect the change of Containment Air Cooler start time from 15 seconds to 50 seconds as discussed in Design Input Item 4.3.a. No other changes have been made to this card data.
8.1.5 CARD SERIES 801: ( Table 9 ) This Card Series reflect the change of Containment Spray System (CSS) Flow Rate from 1612 gpm to 1600 gpm and the termination of containment spray flow at 10,000 seconds.
$ LIST P00L=801, 0, 0, 0, 0, 100, 100, 50, 0, 0, 0, 100, 100, 50, 7.956ES, 0, 0, 100, 100, 1E4, 7.956ES, 0, 0, 100, 100, 1E4, 0.0, 0, 0, 100, 100, 2E7, 0.0, 0, 0, 100, 100 $END 8.1.6 CARD SERIES 1101 Items 2,3 and 4 of reference 6.1 input are deleted as not applicable to the G1-15 (RISC) version of COPATTA.
All other input used in this calculation remain unchanged from that of Reference 6.1, as described in Sections 8.1.1 through 8.1.33, except as changed in the preceding paragraphs. SCE 26426 NEW W90
NES&L DEPARTMENT ICCN NOJ CALCULATION SHEET PREUM. CCN NO. N-2 PAGE OF 2-CCN CONVERSION Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N-4080-027 Sunnianent B CCN NO. CM - Subject - CONTAINMENTPfr DESIGN BASHS MSLB Sheet No. B- 28 REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE ALLEN EVINAY 01/27/95 PAUL BARBOUR 02/14/95 8.2 COPATTA CODE INPUT DATA - Initial Containment Pressure cpi = 16.2 psia Supplement B also provides additional analysis to determine the margin for peak post-MSLB containment pressure under maximum containment initial conditions [ Technical Specification maximum value of 16.2 psia (1.5 psig)pressureper LCO 3.6.1.4]. COPATTA input data for the this case is presented as changes made to the COPATTA input for Containment P/T Design Basis MSLB Analysis and Equipment Qualification, presented in Section 8.1 of this document. 8.2.1 TITLE CARD
*TSMSLB 102%P, Pi=16.2, EV=0%, CT=1, TC=50, LOP =0, CS=1600, N-4080-027-SUP-B 8.2.2 CARD SERIES 0 No changes made to Card Series 0 of reference 6.1 other than the deletion of the last four zero entries on the Bechtel input file as non-applicable to COPATTA version G1-15.
8.2.3 CARD SERIES 1: General Problem Information
& LIST P00L=1,1E5,16.2,2.305E6,120,0.6,20,582.945,1,1,0.00,14.7,0,0.50 $END ITEM 3: PAIR = 16.2 psia The initial containment pressure before the MSLB mass and energy release is set to 16.2 psia for the peak post-MSLB containment pressure analysis, as discussed in the Design Input Item 4.2.b.
SCE 26-420 NEW N90
NES&L DEPARTMENT ICCN NO/ CALCULATION SHEET PREUM. CCN NO. N-2 PAGE 3 OF 2-CCN CONVERSION Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N-4080-027 SunnianentJ_ CCN NO. CCN - h Subject CONTAINMENTP/T DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. B- 29 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE l DATE ALLEN EVINAY 01/27/95 PAUL BARBOUR 02/14/95 9.0 COPATTA INPUT FILES 9.1 DBMSLB cpi = 14.7 psia
*DBMSLB 102S,P, Pi=14.7, EV=0%, CT=1, TC=50, LOP =0, CS=1600, N-4080-027-SUP-B
$ LIST P00L=0,0,1,0,1 $END
$ LIST P00L=1,1ES,14.7,2.305E6,120,0.6,20,582.945,1,1,0.00,14.7,0.5 $END ILIST P00L=2,0,0,0,0,0,120,2E7 $END
$ LIST P00L-3,0,0,0,0,0,2E7,0,0,0,0 $END
$ LIST P00L=4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0 $END
$ LIST P00L=5,2,50,1E7,0,0 $END
$ LIST P00L=6,0,0,0 $END
$ LEAK N0 PEN =0 $END
$ LIST P00L=101, 0, 0, 2E7, 0 $END
$ LIST P00L=201, 0, 0, 2E7, 0 $END
$ LIST P00L=301, 0, 5.145520E7, 1.195589E3, 0.22, 4.869032E7, 1.197482E3, 0.42, 4.622234E7, 1.198466E3, 0.62, 4.405936E7, 1.199410E3, 1.08, 4.003276E7, 1.201595E3, 1.58, 3.688855E7, 1.201757E3, 2.08, 3.445970E7, 1.202018E3, 2.58, 3.326288E7, 1.200986E3, 3.58, 3.152606E7, 1.201058E3, 4.58, 3.028468E7, 1.201655E3, 5.58, 2.940080E7, 1.201123E3, 6.58, 2.874870E7, 1.201126E3, 7.58, 2.706574E7, 1.204404E3, 8.58, 2.468326E7, 1.204367E3, 9.58, 2.294968E7, 1.204238E3, 10.58, 2.160122E7, 1.203908E3, 12.58, 1.943143E7, 1.203195E3, 14.58, 1.765940E7, 1.202277E3, 16.58, 1.637240E7, 1.201556E3, 18.58, 1.544720E7, 1.200963E3, 20.58, 1.473293E7, 1.200422E3, 25.58, 1.327525E7, 1.198820E3, 30.58, 1.221858E7, 1.197825E3, 35.58, 1.146406E7, 1.196753E3, 40.58, 1.059131E7, 1.195307E3, j 45.58, 9.801216E6, 1.194165E3, COE 26 426 NEW 4/90
NES&L DEPARTMENT iccN NOJ CALCULATION SHEET PREUM. CCN NO. N-2 PAGE OF CCN CONVERSION l Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N-4080-027 Sunnlement B CCN NO. CCN - 1 Subject CONTAINMFJTPfr DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. B- 30 i REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE ALLEN EVINAY 01/27/95 PAUL BARBOUR 02/14/95 50.58, 9.132588E6, 1.193086E3, ! 60.58, 8.280324E6, 1.190935E3, 61.08, 7.245576E6, 1.190949E3, 62.08, 5.803344E6, 1.189165E3, 62.58, 3.238704E6, 1.184658E3, 64.58, 3.948840E5, 1.179953E3, 68.58, 1.074240E5, 1.251072E3, 71.08, 0, 0, 2E7, 0, 0 $END l
$ LIST P00L=401, 0, 0, 0, 2E7, 0, 0 $END
$ LIST P00L=501, 0, 0, 0, i 2E7, 0, 0 $END
$ LIST P00L=601, 0, 7.2E4, 7.2E6, 0.05, 7.2E4, 7.2E6, 0.05, 0.0, 0.0, 2E7, 0, 0 $END
$ LIST P00L=701, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2E7, 0, 0, 0 $END
$ LIST P00L=801, 0, 0, 0, 0, 100, 100, 50, 0, 0, 0, 100, 100, 50, 7.956E5, 0, 0, 100, 100, IE4, 7.956E5, 0, 0, 100, 100, IE4, 0.0, 0, 0, 100, 100, 2E7, 0.0, 0, 0, 100, 100 $END
$ LIST P00L=901, 0, 0, 0, 2E7, 0, 0 $END
$ LIST P00L=1001, 0, 100, 2.0, 24, 100, 2.0 $END
$ LIST P00L=1101, 105, 0, 120, 1.670E6, 130, 3.020E6, 140, 4.570E6, 150, 6.320E6,
, 160, 8.270E6, i 170, 1.040E7, 180, 1.273E7, l 190, 1.523E7, SCE 26 426 NEW 4,90
NES&L DEPARTMENT ICCN NO./ CALCULATION SHEET PREUM. CCN NO. N-2 proe M Or M CCN CONVERSION l Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N-4080 027 Supplanent B CCN No. CCN - d Subject CONTAINMENTPfr DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. B- 31 i REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE l ALLEN EVINAY 01/27/95 PAUL BARBOUR 02/14/95 l 200, 1.788E7, 210, 2.068E7, 1 220, 2.361E7, 230, 2.664E7, ) 240, 2.974E7, 250, 3.291E7, 260, 3.611E7, 270, 3.931E7, 280, 4.252E7, 287, 4.474E7, 290, 4.569E7, 300, 4.882E7 $END
$ LIST P00L=1201, 0, 0.729, l 0.1, 0.737, i 0.2, 0.747, !
0.3, 0.757, . 0.4, 0.771, I 0.5, 0.788, 0.6, 0.809, . 0.7, 0.832, I 0.8, 0.863, 0.9, 0.912, 1.0, 0.961, 1.1, 0.983, 1.2, 0.995, 1.3, 1.000 $END
$ LIST P00L=9001, 5, 0.05, 1.0, 5, 10, 0.05, 1.0, 5, 15, 0.05, 1.0, 5, 20, 0.05, 1.0, 5, 100, 0.1, 1.0, 5, 200, 1.0, 5.0, 5, 600, 1.0, 10.0, 5, 800, 2.0, 20.0, 5, 1E3, 5.0, 50.0, 1, 1E4, 50.0, 1000, 2, IE4, 50.0, 500, 2, SE4, 50.0, 5000, 2, 2E5, 50.0, 10000, 2 $END
$ LIST P00L=9999 $END o HS #1 - REACTOR BUILDING DOME
$ LIST P00L=101001, 100, 7, 0, 0, 0, 0, 34693.22 $END
! $ LIST P00L=101101, 5, 0.00075, 3, 0.02158, 1 3, 0.02193, 10, 0.06360, 1 SCE 2tM26 NEW 4/90
NES&L DEPARTMENT ICCN NO/ CALCULATION SHEET PRELIM. CCN NO. N-2 PAGE b OF CCN CONVERSION Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N-4086427 Sunclesnent B CCN No. CCN - b Subject CONTAINMENTP/T DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. B- 32 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE lRE DATE ALLEN EVINAY 01/27/95 PAUL BARBOUR 02/14/95 20, 0.23028, 37, 1.00110, 21, 4.06363 $END
$ LIST P00L=101201, 4, 1, 5, 2, 2, 2, 2 $END
$ LIST P00L=101300, 0, 0 $END
$ LIST P00L=101400, 9, 2, 1, 1 $END
- HS #2 - CYLINDER WALL BETWEEN El. 29'6" AND 112'0"
$ LIST P00L=102001, 100, 7, 0, 0, 0, 0, 38120 $END
$ LIST P00L=102101, 5, 0.00075, 3, 0.02158, 3, 0.02193, 10, 0.06360, 20, 0.14694, 37, 0.917761, 21, 4.35526 $END
$ LIST P00L=102201, 4, 1, 5, 2, 2, 2, 2 $END
$ LIST P00L=102300, 0, 0 $END
$ LIST P00L=102400, 9, 2, 1, 1 $END
- HS #3 - CYLINDER WALL BETWEEN El. 15'0" AND El. 29'6"
$ LIST P00L=103001, 100, 7, 0, 0, 0, 0, 6667.38 $END
$ LIST P00L=103101, 5, 0.00075, 3, 0.02158, 3, 0.02193, 10, 0.06360, 20, 0.14694, 37, 0.917761, 21, 4.35526 $END
$ LIST P00L=103201, 4, 1, 5, 2, 2, 2, 2 $END
$ LIST P00L=103300, 0, 0 $END
$ LIST P00L=103400, 9, 2, 0, 2 $END
- HS #4 - BASEMAT (OTHER THAN REACTOR BASEMAT)
$ LIST P00L=104001, 53, 5, 0, 0, 0, 0, 12800 $END
$ LIST P00L=104101, 3, 0.00067, 7, 0.1, 20, 1.52698, 2, 1.54781, 20, 11.02150 $END
$ LIST P00L=104201, 4, 2, 2, 1, 2 $END
$ LIST P00L=104300, 0, 0 $END
$ LIST P00L=104400, 3, 3, 0, 3 $END
- HS #5 - REACTOR BASEMAT & S.G. PEDESTALS
$ LIST P00L=105001, 70, 4, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1644 $END
$ LIST P00L=105101, 4, 0.00158, 10, 0.1, 30, 2.00, 25, 8.43092 $END
$ LIST P00L=105201, 4, 2, 2, 2 $END
$ LIST P00L=105300, 0, 0 $END
$ LIST P00L=105400, 3, 3, 0, 3 $END
- HS #6 - REACTOR CAVITY WALLS BELOW El. 15'0"
$ LIST P00L=106001, 93, 5, 1, 11.75, 0, 0, 21.5 $END
$ LIST P00L=106101, 5, 11.75192, 7, 11.77292, 30, 13.29923, 30, 19.29923, 20, 25.25192 $END
$ LIST P00L=106201, 4, 2, 2, 2, 2 $END
$ LIST P00L=106300, 0, 0 $END
$ LIST P00L=106400, 3, 3, 0, 3 $END SCE 26 426 NEW Mio
NE%L DEPARTMENT ICCN NOJ CALCULATION SHEET PREUM. CCN No. N-2 PAGE OF CCN CONVERSION Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N-4680-027 Se=I-at B CCN NO. CM . Subject CONTAINMENTP/T DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. B- 33 REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE g ALLEN EVINAY 01/27/95 PAUL BARBOUR 02/14/95
- HS #7 - REACTOR CAVITY WALLS AB0VE El. 15'0"
$ LIST P00L=107001, 68, 5, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2810 $END
$ LIST P00L=107101, 5, 0.00192, 7, 0.02292, 15, 0.40192, 20, 2.00, 20, 4.00192 $END
$ LIST P00L=107201, 4, 2, 2, 2, 2 $END
$ LIST P00L=107300, 0, 0 $END
$ LIST P00L=107400, 9, 2, 0, 2 $END
- HS #8 - LINED REFUELING CANAL WALLS
$ LIST P00L=108001, 86, 6, 0, 0, 0, 0, 9200 $EhD
$ LIST P00L=108101, 5, 0.01563, 20, 0.1, 15, 0.41563, 20, 2.00, 20, 4.01563, 5, 4.01755 $END
$ LIST P00L=108201, 3, 2, 2, 2, 2, 4 $END
$ LIST P00L=108300, 0, 0 $END
$ LIST P00L=108400, 9, 2, 9, 2 $END
- HS #9 - S.G. CMPRTMNT WALLS, UNLINED REFL CNL WALLS /0TH INT WALLS
$ LIST P00L=109001, 78, 4, 0, 0, 0, 0, 41976 $END
$ LIST P00L=109101, 5, 0.00192, 10, 0.04233, 12, 0.1, 50, 1.71876 $END
$ LIST P00L=109201, 4, 2, 2, 2 $END
$ LIST P00L=109300, 0, 0 $END
$ LIST P00L=109400, 9, 2, 0, 2 $END
- HS #10 - FLOOR SLABS (OTHER THAN BASEMATS)
$ LIST P00L=110001, 67, 6, 0, 0, 0, 0, 17474 $END
$ LIST P00L=110101, 3, 0.00014, 5, 0.005348, 20, 0.105348, 15, 0.505348, 20, 1.505348, 3, 1.506015 $END
$ LIST P00L=110201, 4, 1, 2, 2, 2, 4 $END
$ LIST P00L=110300, 0, 0 $END
$ LIST P00L=110400, 9, 2, 9, 2 $END
- HS #11 - LIFTING DEVICES (EXCEPT STAINLESS STEEL PARTS)
$ LIST P00L=111001, 17, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 57286 $END
$ LIST P00L=111101, 6, 0.00125, 10, 0.042917 $END
$ LIST P00L=111201, 4, 1 $END
$ LIST P00L=111300, 0, 0 $END
$ LIST P00L=111400, 9, 2, 0, 2 $END
- HS #12 - MISCELLANEOUS CARBON STEEL - THICKNESS > 2.50 INCHES
$ LIST P00L=112001, 64, 4, 0, 0, 0, 0, 516 $END
$ LIST P00L=112101, 6, 0.0005, 17, 0.084, 15, 0.20, 25, 0.310849 $END
$ LIST P00L=112201, 4, 1, 1, 1 $END
$ LIST P00L=112300, 0, 0 $END
$ LIST P00L=112400, 9, 2, 0, 2 $END
- HS #13 - MISCELLANE0US CARBON STEEL: 1.00"< THICKNESS <2.50"
$ LIST P00L=113001, 32, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 12042 $END SCE 2tN2e NEW 4/90
NES&L DEPARTMENT ICCN NO/ CALCULATION SHGET meuu CCN NO. N.2 ,,oe MO , 4 CCN CONVERSION Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N-4080-027 Seaal-a==* B CCN NO. CCN - h Subject CONTAINMENTPfr DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. B-34 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINAT OR DATE BRE DATE ALLEN EVINAY 01/27/95 PAUL BARBOUR 02/14/95 l
$ LIST P00L=113101, 6, 0.00063, 25, 0.16967 $END
$ LIST P00L=113201, 4, 1 $END
$ LIST P00L=113300, 0, 0 $END
$ LIST P00L=113400, 9, 2, 0, 2 $END l
- HS #14 - MISCELLANE0US CARBON STEEL: 0.50"< THICKNESS <1.00" l
$ LIST P00L=114001, 19, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 64693 $END
$ LIST P00L=114101, 5, 0.000674, 13, 0.038607 $END
$ LIST P00L=114201, 4, 1 $END
$ LIST P00L=114300, 0, 0 $END
$ LIST P00L=114400, 9, 2, 0, 2 $END
- HS #15 - MISCELLANE0US CARBON STEEL: THICKNESS <0.5"
$ LIST P00L=115001, 17, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 98913.6 $END
$ LIST P00L=115101, 6, 0.000606, 10, 0.012833 $END
$ LIST P00L=115201, 4, 1 $END
$ LIST P00L=115300, 0, 0 $END
$ LIST P00L=115400, 9, 2, 0, 2 $END
- HS #16 - ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT
$ LIST P00L=116001, 8, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 37644.5 $END
$ LIST P00L=116101, 7, 0.0054 $END ,
$ LIST F00L=116201, 1 $END !
$ LIST P00L=116300, 0, 0 $END I
$ LIST P00L=116400, 9, 2, 0, 2 $END
- HS #17 - MISCELLANE0US STAINLESS STEEL
$ LIST P00L=117001, 16, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 24048 $END i
$ LIST P00L=117101, 15, 0.01747 $END j
$ LIST P00L=117201, 3 $END I
$ LIST P00L=117300, 0, 0 $END
$ LIST P00L=117400, 9, 2, 0, 2 $END
- HS #18 - UNLINED REFUELING CANAL WALLS 8ELOW El. 63'6"
$ LIST P00L=118001, 48, 4, 0, 0, 0, 0, 3700 $END
$ LIST P00L=118101, 5, 0.00192, 7, 0.02292, 15, 0.40192, 20, 2.00192 $END
$ LIST P00L=118201, 4, 2, 2, 2 $END
$ LIST P00L=118300, 0, 0 $END
$ LIST P00L=118400, 9, 2, 0, 2 $END
- HS #19 - REACTOR BLDG CYLINDER #3: SECTIONS WITH STIFFENERS l
$ LIST P00L=119001, 100, 7, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1590.68 $END i
$ LIST P00L=119101, 5, 0.00075, 20, 0.66742, 3 ,, 0.66777, l 15, 0.70944, 20, 0.79278, 16, 1.44278, 1 20, 4.87885 $END !
1 LIST P00L=119201, 4, 1, 5, 2, 2, 2, 2 $END 3 LIST P00L=119300, 0, 0 $END
$ LIST P00L=119400, 9, 2, 1, 1 $END !
- HS #20 - VENT TUNNELS I
$ LIST P00L=120001, 23, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2827 $END
$ LIST P00L=120101, 10, 0.0005, 12, 0.03175 $END l l
SCE 26426 NEW 490
NES&L DEPARTMENT ICCN NOJ CALCULATION SHEET PREUM. CCN NO. N-2 PAGE b OF , CCN CONVERSION Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N-4084427 Supplement B CCN No. CCN - M ; Subject _CONTAINMENTPfr DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. B- 35 l REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE ALLEN EVINAY 01/27/95 PAUL BARBOUR 02/14/95 e l
$ LIST P00L=120201, 4, 1 $END
$ LIST P00L=120300, 0, 0 $END l
$ LIST P00L=120400, 9, 2, 0, 2 $END
$ LIST P00L=410001, 25, 54, 0.8, 30, 10, 54, 0.1, 20, 0.0174, 0.0103 $END
$ LIST P00L=500000 $END
.cs -sw -
NES&L DEPARTMENT ICCN NOJ CALCULATION SHEET PRELIM. CCN No. N-2 PAGE 7 OFfb CCN CONVERSION Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N-4080 027 Sunnianent B CCN No. CCN b Subject CONTAINMENTPfr )ESIGN BAS S MSLB Sheet No. B- 36 REV ORIGINATOR DATE BRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE ALLEN EVINAY 01/27/95 PAUL BARBOUR 02/14/95 9.2 TSMSLB cpi = 16.2 psia
*DBMSLB 102%P, Pi=16.2, EV=0%, CT=1, TC=50, LOP =0, CS=1600, N-4080-027-SUP-B
$ LIST P00L=0,0,1,0,1 $END
$ LIST P00L=1,1E5,16.2,2.305E6,120,0.6,20,582.945,1,1,0.00,14.7,0.5 $END All other input data is identical to the DBMSLB input data.
1 I l CCE 26426 NEW 4/90
. ~- . - _ - _ _ - . _ _ _ _ . - -- . . .
NES&L DEPARTMENT ICCN NOJ CALCULATION SHEET PREUM. CCN No. N-2 PAGE M OF CCN CONVERSION Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N-4080-027 Sunnianent B CCN NO. CCN - h Subject CONTAINMENTP/T DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. B- 37 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE ALLEN EVINAY 01/27/95 PAUL BARBOUR 02/14/95 o 10.0 SELECTED OUTPUT DATA l The tabulated data presented in Sections 10.1 and 10.2 consists of partial ! output of the COPATTA calculation made for this analysis. 10.1 Table for Figures 2-1, 2-2 and 2-4 l CONTAllMEF.T TIME PRESSURE VAPOR SUMP HEAT SINK 1 LEFT i TEMPERATURE TEMPERATURE BOUNDARY l 1 (SEC) (PSIG) (F) (F) (F) 0 0.0 120.0 120.0 118.4 _5 13.7 289.3 178.8 136.0 10 23.3 349.8 204.3 153.4 15 29.8 378.0 218.9 166.6 20 34.8 394.0 228.4 178.5 25 38.8 404.5 235.4 188.0 30 42.4 412.1 240.8 196.2 35 45.7 417.7 245.1 203.4 40 48.6 422.1 248.8 210.1 45 51.2 425.3 251.9 216.7 50 53.5 427.7 254.7 222.6 55 54.9 418.4 257.2 227.7 60 56.3 409.6 259.3 232.4 l l 62 56.6 406.V 260.1 n/a 65 56.1 398.6 261.2 235.4 70 54.6 385.3 262.6 236.9 SCE 26420 Ew 490 i
NES&L DEPARTMENT icCN NO./
- CALCULATION SHEET PREUM. CCN No. N-2 PAGE OF CCN CONVERSION Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N-4080-027 Sunnianerd B CCN NO. CCN - h 1
i Subject CONTAINMENTP/T 3ESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. B- 38 ! REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE ALLEN EVINAY 01/27/95 PAUL BARBOUR 02/14/95 1 e l CONTAIIMENT i l TIME PRESSURE VAPOR SUMP HEAT SINK 1 LEFT ! TEMPERATURE TEMPERATURE BOUNDARY (SEC) (PSIG) (F) (F) (F) i l 75 53.1 372.0 263.6 238.1 ! 80 51.6 359.0 264.3 239.0 ) 85 50.2 346.3 264.8 239.9 90 49.0 333.9 265.2 240.6 l 95 47.7 321.5 265.5 241.1 100 46.5 309.2 265.7 241.5 4 105 45.4 297.8 265.9 n/a j 110 44.2 285.8 265.9 n/a 120 43.3 267.0 256.0 n/a , 200 37.6 259.7 264.7 243.6 1 300 33.7 253.3 262.1 241.0 400 30.9 248.1 259.4 238.0 600 26.7 239.8 254.2 232.0 800 23.5 232.7 248.9 225.9 j 1000 20.8 226.1 243.6 220.3 2000 13.7 204.7 224.1 204.6 i 4000 6.2 169.4 199.8 172.3 6000 3.0 145.1 182.9 157.8 I 8000 1.8 132.3 170.7 148.3 9000 1.50 128.6 165.9 144.8 1 10000 1.25 125.8 161.7 141.9 , n/a = nct availab e in computer output at the time cited. I SCE 26-420 NEW 00
NES&L DEPARTMENT CCNNOJ CALCULATION SHEET PREUM. CCN No. N-2 PAGE OF CCN CONVERSION Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N 000 027 Sunnianent B CCN NO. CG - h j l Subject CONTAINMENTP/T DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. B- 39 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE j ALLEN EVINAY 01/27/95 PAUL BARBOUR 02/14/95 l 10.2 (continued) Table for FIGURE 2-5 Integrated Energy Transferred from the containment Vapor Region by one Train of Air Coolers, 2 ECUS and one Train of Containment Spray v.s. Time
;2EEP -
INTEGRATED ENERGY TIME STEAM AIR VAPOR SUMP TOTAL HEAT SINKS SEC BTU BTU BTU BTU BTU BTU 1 3.23e+07 1.71e+07 4.93e+07 1.35e+04 4.93e+07 2.22e+04 3 4.26e+07 1.78e+07 6.03e+07 3.40e+04 6.04e+07 2.63e+05 5 6.17e+07 1.88e+07 8.05e+07 1.05e+05 8.06e+07 7.28e+05 10 1.02e+08 2.04e+07 1.23e+08 4.71e+05 1.23e+08 2.79e+06 15 1.31e+08 2.11e+07 1.52e+08 1.05e+06 1.53e+08 5.73e+06 20 1.53e+08 2.15e+07 1.75e+08 1.77e+06 1.76e+08 9.19e+06 25 1.72e+08 2.17e+07 1.94e+08 2.58e+06 1.96e+08 1.29e+07 30 1.88e+08 2.19e+07 2.10e+08 3.44e+06 2.14e+08 1.67e+07 35 2.04e+08 2.21e+07 2.26e+08 4.31e+06 2.30e+08 2.05e+07 40 2.17e+08 2.22e+07 2.39e+08 5.19e+06 2.45e+08 2.42e+07 45 2.30e+08 2.23e+07 2.52e+08 6.08e+06 2.58e+08 2.80e+07 50 2.41e+08 2.23e+07 2.63e+08 6.97e+06 2.70e+08 3.30e+07 55 2.51e+08 2.20e+07 2.73e+08 7.88e+06 2.81e+08 3.52e+07 60 2.61e+08 2.19e+07 2.83e+08 8.77e+06 2.92e+08 3.86e+07 65 2.65e+08 2.16e+07 2.86e+08 9.63e+06 2.96e+08 4.19e+07 70 2.61e+08 2.12e+07 2.83e+08 1.04e+07 2.93e+08 4.49e+07 75 2.58e+08 2.09e+07 2.79e+08 1.12e+07 2.90e+08 4.76e+07 100 2.46e+08 1.93e+07 2.65e+08 1.40e+07 2.79e+08 5.85e+07 200 2.12e+08 1.81e+07 2.31e+08 2.54e+07 2.56e+08 8.11e+07 SCE 26428 NEW 410
l NES&L DEPARTMENT ICCN NO./ CALCULATION SHEET PRELIM. ccN No. N-2 PAGE N O 2-- CCN CONVERSION Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N-4080-027 Seeel==t B CCN No. CCN - h l Subject CONTAINMENTP/T DESIGN BAS S MSLB Sheet No. B- 40 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE BRE DATE I ALLEN EVINAY 01/27/95 PAUL BARBOUR 02/14/95 l INTEGRATED EllERGY Fig 2-5 TIME STEAM AIR VAPOR SUMP TOTAL. HEAT SINKS , SEC BTU BTU BTU BTU BTU BTU
- l
- 300 1.91e+08 1.79e+07 2.09e+08 3.47e+07 2.44e+08 9.30e+07 400 1.76e+08 1.78e+07 1.93e+08 4.25e+07 2.36e+08 1.00e+08 i 600 1.52e+08 1.76e+07 1.70e+08 5.61e+07 2.26e+08 1.10e+08
) i 800 1.34e+08 1.74e+07 1.52e+08 6.79e+07' 2.20e+08 1.16e+08 , 1 l 1000 1.20e+08 1.72e+07 1.37e+08 7.84e+07 2.15e+08 1.20e+08 2000 8.02e+07 1.67e+07 9.69e+07 1.21e+08 2.18e+08 1.21e+08 ! 4000 3.87e+07 1.58e+07 5.45e+07 1.86e+08 2.40e+08 1.'12e+08 ) 6000 2.21e+07 1.52e+07 3.74e+07 2.36e+08 2.74e+08 1.01e+08 , 8000 1.60e+07 1.49e+07 3.08e+07 2.79e+08 3.10e+08 8.96e+07 9000 1.43e+07 1.48e+07 2.90e+07 2.99e+08 3.28e+08 8.47e+07 j 10000 1.29e+07 1.47e+07 2.76e+07 3.19e+08 3.46e+08 8.03e+07 1
NES&L DEPARTMENT ICCN NOJ CALCULATION SHEET enEuu. CCN NO. N.2 ,,oE W0, a,., CCN CONVERSION b 1 Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N-4080-027 Supolanent B CCN NO. CCN l Subject CONTAINMENTP/T DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. B- 41 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE l ALIEN EVINAY 01/27/95 PAUL BARBOUR 02/14/95 l FIGURE 2-6 l Integrated Heat Transfer of the Air Coolers and Containment Sprays l = TIME INTERGRATED ENERGY INTERGRATED ENERGY CONTAIMENT SPRAYS AIR COOLERS (SEC) (BTU) (BTU) 50 2.31e+03 55 3.56e+05 1.19e+05 l 60 7.03e+05 2.38e+05 65 1.04e+06 3.57e+05 70 1.36e+06 4.76e+05 i 75 1.67e+06 5.94e+05 85 2.24e+06 8.24e+05 100 2.99e+06 1.16e+06 150 5.28e+06 2.43e+06 200 6.70e+06 3.24e+06 250 8.44e+06 4.23e+06 300 _ 1.01e+07 5.18e+06 400 1.34e+07 7.02e406 500 1.66e+07 9.12e+06 600 1.95e+07 1.05e+07 800 2.50e+07 1.36e+07 1000 3.00e+07 1.66e+07 2000 5.07e+07 2.88e+07 3000 6.71e+07 3.81e+07 4000 8.01e+07 4.49e+07 i l 6000 9.87e+07 5.34e+07 8000 1.11e+08 5.81e+07 I 10,000 1.20e+08 6.11e+07 ses - ww w
l NES&L DEPARTMENT ICCN NOJ CALCULATION SHEET PREUM. CCN NO. N-2 PAGE 3 OF CCN CON'ERSION Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N-4080-027 SeaalamaneB CCN NO. CCN . Subject CONTAINMENTP/T DESIGN BASIS)fSLB Sheet No. B- 42 i REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE ALLEN EVINAY 01/27/95 PAUL BARBOUR 02/14/95 i o l l FIGURE 2-7 i Rate of Energy Transfer from the Vapor Region by a Single Train of Emergency j Cooling Units (2 ECUS) and by a Single Train of Containment Sprays vs Time ' i i ! ENERGY REMOVAL RATE BY ENERGY REMOVAL RATE BY ! TIME CONTAIMENT SPRAYS TIME CONTAIMENT AIR COOLERS 1 1 secs (btu /hr)xE6 secs (btu /hr)xE6 i i 51.5 258.1 50 82.7 60.0 246.0 60 85.4 99.5 167.3 100 78.6
- 200 126.9 200 72.1 500 110.3 500 61.8 975 85.0 1000 50.9 i 2750 55.7 2500 33.7 5000 33.1 5000 15.0 7750 19.6 7500 7.5
- 10000 15.5 10000 4.4
) a 4 ses a cenzw o o
NES&L DEPARTMENT ICCN NOJ CALCULATION SHEET PRELIM. CCN No. N-2 PAGE OF CCN CONVERSION Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N :^^^ 027 Se-r-!= ^ B CCN NO. CM - Subject CONTAINMENTP/T DESIGN BAS S MSLB Sheet No. B- 43 REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE ALLEN EVINAY 01/27/95 PAUL BARBOUR 02/14/95 i l l APPENDIX A (COPATTA Code I/O File) The COPATTA Code input files are presented in Section 9 of this calculation. The COPATTA Code output files are included on Microfiche. The output file name and date are as follows: FICHE TITLE : DBMSLB J5284 18-Jan-95 JOB TITLE : *DBMSLB 102%P, cpi =14.7, EVAP=0%, CT=1, LOP =0, CS=1600, N-4080-027-SUP-B , RUN DATE : 20-Dec-94 4 LAST SHEET : Page 409 i FICHE TITLE : TSMSLB J5303 18-Jan-95 JOB TITLE : *TSMSLB 102%P, cpi =16.2, EVAP=0%, CT=1, LOP =0, CS=1600, N-4080-027-SUP-B i_
- RUN DATE : 28-Dec-94 LAST SHEET : Page 409 i
1 J d i CE 26426 NEW N90
f NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'cc " " o ' ! Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 PREUM. CCN NO. - Al 2 PAGE OF[2 j Calc. No. .N 4080-027 CCN CONVERSION:d CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB
- Sheet No. 6 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE R j 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 '
V l A.Ever4Av 3 /41 /9.s- P.BAAdewt. 3/sy/tr 8 THis secrics/ RenAceD BY SGc.Tiod 2, Is) Sapfts m6n)T* B { RESULTS/ CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS l 0 i 2.1 RESULTS/ CONCLUSIONS l Figure 2 presents the sump and vapor pressures versus time for the DBA MS The plots in Fi re 2-1 are generated using the data presented in Section 10.1. l Figure 2-2 pre ts the containment gauge pressure versus time for the D MSLB. The l plot in Figure 2-2
- generated using the data presented in Section 10.1.
i i Figure 2-3 presents the ondensing heat transfer coefficient used by e COPATTA Code versus time for the DBA SLB. The plot in Figure 2-3 is gene ed using the data presented in Section 10.1.- i I Figure 2-4 presents the inside su ace temperature of heat mk 1 (reactor building dome) to represent the temperature of the co ent stnicture. e plot in Figure 2-4 is generated } using the data presented in Section 1 1. i Figure 2-5 presents the instantaneous ene vs. e data used by COPA1TA to determine I heat transfer in the DBA MSLB. The plots igure 2-5 are generated using the data ! presented in Section 10.2. Included are: I ! VAPOR ENERGY: Instantaneous team + air e rgy, i SUMP ENERGY: Instan s energy of sum water. l TOTAL ENERGY: Instan s energy inventory, i HEAT SINKS: Instan s energy stored in tures. 1 j Figure 2-6 presents the in ted heat transfer of the air coole and containment sprays. j 'Ihe plots presented in f' re 2-6 are generated using the data in 'on 10.2. Included are: l AIR COO Integrated energy removed by emergency fan lers. CONT.SP : Integrated energy transferred to sump by sprays. l The follow' table presents the accident chronology for the analysis. i i 1 3
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET ' " " ' PRELIM. CCN NO. Nef, % Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 PAGE_ OF_sa Calc. No N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: h CCN NO. CCN - . Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 7 REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 h A. Evm A y 3/11/9Y E13AA6ous_ 3/tvI?y I l TNts T&ur Aub TAALG MEAnceh AYttxT/N Sec. 2 $rAdlGJ 2-/ $ 2-2 tM SWftSM6* TLME (seconds) EVENT l 0
\ 0.0 /
Break occurs ) \ 15
/
Emergency fan coolers start (at futi capacity)/ I
\ 50 Contamment spray nozz.les at fuu discharggow
\ 5C 0 Peak contamment temperature of 4)f *F
\ 62.3 Peak contamment pressure of/8.5 psig N8 End of Blowdop Note that although the peak r temperature of 421 *F is ter than the 300 *F design temperature, the duration of t vent is sufficiently sm
~
o prevent heating of the containment stnictural materials be nd the design * . As indicated by Figure 2-4, the 241 *F peak surface temperature of containme er remains well below 300 *F. Because the liner inside surface (actually laye f organic paint) remains below 300 *F, the containment structure will not exceed design mperatures. { 1 As can be seen from Figures 2-2 and , the peak ressure (58.5 psig) is below the design pressure of 60 psig and the peak te perature of the c ainment structure (241 *F) is below the design temperature of 300 * . Therefore, General Dc ' Criteria 16 and 50 (See Section 1.2) are met. The ge pressure with respect to utside atmosphere at 10,000 seconds is less than 3.0 'g. The pressure remaining after 24 rs is therefore expected to be only a small fracti of the 60 psig design pressure; therefore, requirements of General Design C ' rion 38 (See Section 1.2) are met. i
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET ICCN NO./ PRELIM. CCN No. /d -2. Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 PAGENOF[2 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - . Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 9 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE l IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 h hEtmM 3 lot /Tc RBsuseve 3/r'1I9r 5 rna me, ors. t.1 Aepl A t% 6Y FIGUAG E~S I *' # #' 0 ^' Y 'O O
, , ;- . +
4
- W .
/
E / . M
,I O
" / : + 3
/!
~
w4 .
! 1 s5 !fm :
~j i
- 8 e
~
4 u.L ll - v m 8+ x 4 y
. SN \, :
e W hT.N IE '\
.au
\ .
U T' ~ hf '\s
^
w ~ iW O 3 N3 -
- g.a 'N, : + 0 g .
5 g
. r e a.
g .
$ ~
\
EE - 'l x
\~\
g 4 i p m I \
- e
~
d s bb i
- i
\::
e a l a l i 1 a O O O O O O O O O O to v M N " (=l) SBn1VW3dW31
\
I
= *R j 2 @
- . . n 2 I h ! o o FIGURE 2-2: CONTANENT PRESSURE MSLB 102% POWER, 7.48 FT* BREAK AREA E f I E !.9
$ 2
[z 3F ! )O 70 ; m z h y y Q
- Ma Press = 58.5 psig at 62.3 sec : w & 8 M 4 0 9 r-Q 3 -
m i " E Eko 60 Tn e .-
- {o 3 g # J -j q m
s e a-a E m "Os e 2y 50 - o g m m g
- @ mm
- : ; h a I*
m m 4 If 4 - 3 p 4 jj E SU z F C
> 7 m m
o Z 30 m = r z A
. u 2 P e
, = 0 o
4 20 - 2 5 ,3 an F s e
- : z E" k
V
- k f
* 'o 10 .-
C E E' O - 5 "
)e e on 22 5 zo
/ . . . ..... . . . ......
O . . . ...... . . . ...... . . . . . . . 3 M og g n< 1e 1 1e+OO 1e+01 1e+02 1e+03 1e+04 En 9E P
'l _ m io R I 5 TlivE FOLLOWING BREAK (seconds) Q) 2 o
p l"' o, M o Ib V
) e<m=
!l!;1ii; b, j1 l ;; ; i : . j , !) ' ! { i, S P R u r o E V b j o
j e e c T i' A S. t c t
+- O C o u C O IR O r
w l G D 1_ N1g g h IyO cA i v e I N N T C P r A A F 7dG "ON$ 23wd N.vw 1Hw 4y I 6 V T O N I MC
/ .
u R M M P A A 3 E L _ N O CEN S 1
/i T eOO ...::r . :i .:.:. ..:.:. - . : . G.
Y 2
/ D N
. 1
/
9 3 0 A T P
/
T G US& .
,mO .yx I $0 l 5
r
/
9 E A S LL AD i 3 U
. "eeq pi:h 5 D, = N n A
( d P E P J
. L i TE P t
s B Y I z
- ,WO
. P
)u A
R El l oi S S I 2
& ORA u .
C 2c t t Rt E F 3 NTM E O
- ,OO b R SE N M /
d D E HT n GO . 3 3 1 S G I C E E 1 Y
// /
4 D N a 8 ) Y
/
9
/
9 A T E B c.l T f 4 A N NO .
. i A
( S o O I
. S N U
1 A R M 4 H oO . E E V S L 0 8 B 0-V 2- O 0 G vO . 3 R I 2 7 !' G S" l H I N t A " O mO . o T n O R c c, u N r Cc N eO . . e c D A CC NN .o N e T NC
...:: . :i .:.:. ..:.: - . : - m E
O. ON v. CVE e e C R z NS "S e "O+OO ?+0, ,
. 0+ON e0+OM " gov r r - I S I
- NO e R h :
- E e o e
t e F ynl kdJo3 Zg e 4M $S ^ 8 N 7 1 o
. o D
A T E 1 1 J2 A I ' R
! I l ll1
= x o 5 E : b ." g n !o w 9 9 5 @ FIGURE 2-4: liber PLATE SURFACE TEMP. 3 g !! [ g @g MSLB 102% POWER, 7.48 FT2 BREAK AREA ,E x B j j y IEAT SeM 1 9 m u p LEFT BOLFO s
" ' C a g k o z OM k e 3 i
4 S C" 300 1 8 g >r ?a
'(
.. ... s
~ S w F $ "I Os d5 Maxmsn sete mat.c. temwature: 241 at 150 seconos a RJ "!
=
S
- 260 - & 8 3 o 2HE M o z = tt) m E
k P R I$
= m E 220 a M O @ Em H
S P 3 e . $
=
> z F
- 9 4 -
% m z g = r A N 2 m o 180 -
= 8 x 6 W -
s E m-w s F - t I @'2 r2 140 - t g ne c 9 t 88 z
,00 . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... . . . . . . , . . \. . . S g
!b g ,
+00 1e+01 1e+02 1e+03 E n=
za m 1 _ m ig , A if - 2 TilvE FOLLOWING BREAK (seconds) @ 8 g 9 R O
> s M M
> .<==
l NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET ',c4""%cn uo. a z ,,,og/o,ga. Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - Subject _ CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 13 CEV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R O S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 E y l AEv4AY J/I(/95~ 86946 cot. #f//W I
'THLC VIGUAG (.S R&fLACGb BY' ft(solLG- 2-3~ lA SUPf L6tD&nY h h l i
T i j ... ,.. O 7.. .
- c. . . c. . . ,.. ,... .
g f jl/ : i nm - t -
<g j/ -
w - u i T $\ n ! < - ;s O
+ :
i : . e
/i s ,
! E : - 1 i (3 a
\ ll \\
I i\ \
\
- g m i N
i FS 1
\
\ O Y w Q i
- + <
- t
\ :
e L)
\ \ -
T -
\ \ '
C
\ ' C3 di N' 'N s -
I . \ s a - N. 's -
,_ f._.
3% - 'N- \ O 3
- + 0 03 a
- N s 's s :
O g g - E N$!I l '
\
s N l 1.1-O! -
\ 's s -
- s,- o f I
- - s.,'s,, s N
0 b-CD g s + e s - s. - % ?" 2 3 : I -
s,,x -
N., -
\
O
......t..
m N t..... t.. O
..t......
O t...... . t.....
?@
t M O O O O O O O O"
+ + + + + + + +
,O
- ,G W
W-- O-- ,O
@ W e
(n.LO) ADbiBN3
NES&L DEPARTMENT
- CALCULATION SHEET l' 3"ygc, no. a_z ,,,,3 sa
{ Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN No. CCN - f, Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 14 i REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R l 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 h
/).CWMA v 3/0'/ff P.AM600AL 3/ti/fr S
{ tad Fic oAG tC REAAceh d 'r' ffGURE 2'6 IM Tofft.4md & ~8 0 ' 4 j O
..,,..........c......
g
- n
. r i
4 ! i ,
\\tt -
i 1 '\\, . - s . i 7o ! I
- 1 m 9
\t \ O $
Q-i\
+ ~
d EF : it - ,e y {u. j u; e ;
\\ .
gg - 9 i m
\\ -
l O YI t
\ .
\
. \\ .
}
c-s% S i i O st N o J Q. s O J
- u. g s. -
+ 0 l : si : e u.
a . \\ g . j O,- os i'- W 2
- F e -
\ -
4 1
'ss .
k . 'N s,,' . l s_ 01 (D N u......
'O u...... u......
to 4
- u. . . .
m _\ u.. . . , O i O O O O O O O "
+ + + + + + + +
i @ @ @
,G ,G @
v- - ,- ,- - ,- ,O- ,O-(n.1.8) ADBENS i
**"**"' C.u E C" CxC NO N-4080-027 cCN NOL PAGE TOTAL NO. OF PAGES l INTERIM CALCULATION h .OCN @ N-1 1 Y/
CHANGE NOTICE (ICCN)/ u"" CCN "* l CALCULATION CHANGE NOTICE SASE CALC e 0 2&3 CCN C g (CCN) CALCutAToN SueuECT: Containment P/T Design Basis MSLB for Equipment Qualification - SUPPLEMENT A CAtCuLAToN CRosSwoEx ENOWEERWG SYSTEM NuM8ERMWARY STATON SYSTEM DESGNATOR h/upomoo inominemo g ll O Emoting index is Complete 1301 / ABB CONTROLLED PROGRAM OR PROGRAM / DATABASE NAME(S) VERSON/ RELEASE NO.(S) CATABASE N ACCORDANCE YdTH NES&L 4141 O nSO. uSTEo em
- 1. sRiE, DeScaPTiON or iCCNsCCN G1-15 WPROGRAu a oATAsASE NE100 (COPATTA)
Add Supplement A to the base calculation. Supplement A provides a new Analysis of Record for the Containment Building pressure and temperature reaponse to the Design Basis MSLB event specifically applicable to the evaluation of the environmental qualification of in-containment equipment, important to safety, that must function during and/or following a design basis accident. The analysis results are applicable only to equipment qualification because of the inclusion of 8% condensate revaporization which slightly l lowers the calculated peak containment pressure and vapor temperature below the values l calculated to support containment structural design,and reported in Section 6.2 of the UFSAR. l l WrnATING DOCUMENT (OCP/MMP. FCN. 063 NCRs 9303000103. 93030002-02. 9303000302. and 93030004-02 Rev. -
- 2. OmER AFFECTED DOCuMEN'IS (CHECK AS APPUCABLE FOR CCN ONLY);
See Calc Cross Index
%YES O NO OmER AFFEC'ED DOCUMENTS EXIST ANO ARE CENTIFIED ON ATTACHED FORM 26 501
- 3. APPROVE: DCOPUNE/ ESC: NUCLEAR SAFETY ANALYSIS ALLEN EVINAY 51385 #
l U< h ORGWATOR (Pnnt r PAX ' nAure) OTHER (Sqnature) ( PAUL BARBOUR I IRE (Pnnt nameMa4 PAX 51379 ' f f NES&L 6M (Sqn.Q ll!4 f Deio bf NATOR: ! l 4. ASSONED SUPPLEMENT ALPHA%d w ~vEeSoN 10 CCN DATE i' DE2S4/w v
#8/dSCE Cou-SONGS SCE 26-1221 REV. 9/91
i ICCN NOJ i+1 CALCULATION TITLE PAGE eREuu. CCN NO. pace Aog g CCN CONVERSION: Cric. No. N-4080-027 DCP/MMP/FIDCN/FCN No. & Rev. N/A CCN NO. CCN- 1 Subject Containment Pfr Desien Basis MSLB for Equipment Ouallrication - SUPPLEMENT A Sheet Al System Number / Primary Station System Designator 1301 / ABB SONGS Unit 2&3 Q-Class 11 Tsch. Spec. Affecting? %NO O YES, Section No. N/A Equipment Tag No. N/A CONTROLLED PROGRAM / DATABASE NAME(S) PROGRAM VERSION / RELEASE NO.(S) RA O DATABASE DATABASE IN ACCORDANCE WITH NES&L 41-5-1 NE100 (COPATTA) G115 RECORDS OF ISSUES REV. TOTAL DESCMON PREPARED APPROVED DISC. S (Print name/ initial) (Signature) ORIGINAL ISSUE MO A EN EVINAY _ PAUL BARBO / / _ f4 ORIG. GS Other l IRE DM DATE ORIG. GS Other l lRE DM DATE ORIG. GS Other IRE DM DATE Spice for RPE Stamp, identify use of an amernate calc., and notes as applicable. I i l l This calculation was prepared using Word Perfect 5.1 software as an electric typewriter. The WP5.1 software was not used for any computational
- portions of the calculation.
This cale. was prepared for the identified DCP/MMP. DCP completion and tumover acceptance to be verified by receipt of a memorandum dir$cting DCN Conversion. Upon receipt, this cale, represents the as-built condition. Memo date by SCE 26121-1 REV 9/91
CALCULATION CROSS-INDEX ICCN NOJ PREUM. CCN NO. PAGE 3 OF Y/ CCN CONVERSION: CalCutation No. N-4080-027 - SUPPLEMENT A Sheet No. A2 CCN NO. CCNb l Calc. rev. INPUTS number and OUTPUTS Does the out- , responsible ** These interfacir:g calculations and/or documents calc / document CCN, DCN, supervisor Results and conclusion of the subject WdommM TCN/Rev., FIDCN, or provide input to the subject calculation, and if , initials and calcu ation are used in these interfacing require . revised may require revision of the subject NM date ca wla ns an r uments. calculation. Calc / Document No. Rev.No. Calc / Document No. Rev.No. YES / NO Calculations: UFSAR, Section 3.11.3.12 to Yes SAR 23 341 N-4080-027 0 M-0014-009, Supplement A 0 DBD-SO23-TR-EQ 1 Yes NEDOTRAK Log BC-93479 M4072-036 0 U(Jgf l N-4080 007, inct CCNs 1 & 2 2 Calculation M-DSC-243 0 Yes NEDOTRAK Action l 93030001/3 sub#5 EODPs M37600 Yes NEDOTRAK Log BC-93479 M37601 M37606 M37607 M37608 Unit 2 Operating Uscense & Technical M37609 Specifications Amdt 101 M37610 M37612 Unit 3 Operating Ucense & Technical M37615 Specifications Amdt 90 M37618 M37619 M37620 M37621 M37624 M37629 M37631 Non-Conformance Reports (NCRs) M37635 93030001 3 M37636 93030002 2 M37640 93030003 2 M37641 93030004 2 M37644 M37646 M37703 Mann
.j M37705 uan06 M38279 i' SCE 2e-424 REV. 0 FM
IREFERENCE:
NES&L 24-7-15]
CALCULATION CROSS-INDEX ICCN NO/ PREUM. CCN NO. PAGE 4 OF [_ CCN CONVERSION: Calculation No. N-4080-027 - SUPPLEMENT A Sheet No. A3 CCN NO. CGN-Calc. rev. INPUTS OUTPUTS number and Does the out- , respons b ' These interfacing calculations and/or documents at / document CCN, DCN, ResW M h hs@ ed provide input to the subject calculation, and if TCN/Rev., FIDCN, or
, are hhWW rquire date calculations and/or documents. revision?
calculation. Calc / Document No. Rev.No. Calc / Document No. Rev.No. YES / NO EODPs cont'd M38290 Yes NEDOTRAK Log BC-93479 M38377
/
M38378 t if jI[y4 M38379 M38381 M38382
. M38383 M38384 M38385 M38773 M38785 M38790 M38798 M39079 M40819 M85083 M85091 M85102 l
M85108 ]' SCE 28-424 REV. 0 7/92 [FEFEFENCE: NES&L 24-71S]
NES&L DEPARTMENT ICCN NO./ CALCULATION SHEET eREuu. CCN NO. N. , ,AoE s 0, 4/ CCN CONVERSION Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N-4080-027-Sun-A CCN NO. CCN - 1 Subject CONTAINMENTPfr DESIGN BASIS MSLB FOR EOUIPMENT OUALIFICATION Sheet No. A-4 REV ORIGINATOR l DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE ALLEN EVINAY 11/04/94 PAUL BARBOUR 11/04/94 l TABLE OF CONTENTS ; 1 1 1 PAGE 1.0 PURP0SE................................................... A-5 2.0 RESULTS/ CONCLUSIONS /RECOMMENDATI0NS....................... A-7 3.0 ASSUMPTIONS................................................A-16 4.0 DESIGN INPUTS..............................................A-18 5.0 METH000 LOGY................................................A-21 l
6.0 REFERENCES
.................................................A-22 7.0 NOMENCLATURE...............................................A-24 8.0 CA LC U LAT I ONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-25 9.0 COPATTA INPUT FILES........................................A-27 10.0 SELECTED OUTPUT DATA.......................................A-34 APPENDIX A (C0PATTA Code I/O Fil e Information) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-40 ses - New ma
NES&L DEPARTMENT ICCN NOJ CALCULATION SHEET PRELIM. CCN NO. N-1 PAGE OF / CCN CONVERSION Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N-4080-027-Sun-A CCN Na CCN - 1 Subject CONTAINMENTP/T DESIGN BASIS MSLB FOR EOUIPMENT OUALIFICATION Sheet No. _ A-5 l REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE ALLEN EVINAY 11/04/94 PAUL BARBOUR 11/04/94 e 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 TASK DESCRIPTION The purpose of the Containment P/T Steam Line Break analysis for Equipment Qualification Thennal Analysis performed here is several fold: 1.1.1 Determine the containment tem Basis Main Steam Line Break (MSLB)perature and by event for use pressure response the Nuclear to the Design Engineering Design Organization (NED0) Equipment Qualification (EQ) Group as the bounding containment harsh environment resulting from such a MSLB event. The analysis uses l the input data from the present analysis of record (A0R) Design Basis MSLB (102% Power MSLB, reference 6.1), modified as necessary to include NUREG-0588 (reference 6.9) methodology applicable to equipment qualification at SONGS and also to conform with the Licensing Organization's interpretation of our licensing basis for P/T Analyses (reference 6.14). 1.1.2 Streamline the Containment P/T MSLB Analysis for Equipment Qualification by limiting this analysis to only generating the containment harsh environmental conditions. The Equipment Thermal La analysis contained in the present calculation N-4080-004 (reference 6.4)ghave been largely obsoleted by later analyses (reference 6.10 and 6.11) using more sophisticated equipment modelling. 1.1.3 Create a CCN for the existing Containment MSLB P/T Equipment Qualification calculation, N-4080-004 (reference 6.4) to identify Supplement A to N-4080-027 Rev 0, as containing the current Design Basis MSLB Containment P/T Response A0R for the in-containment equipment qualification environment . 1.1.4 This calculation supplement uses a minimum containment spray flow rate consistent with degraded spray pump performance documented in the calculation M-0014-009 (reference 6.2) and completes NFM action required in the disposition step 2 of NCRs 93030001, 93030002, 93030003 and 93030004, Bechtel Standard Computer Code NE100, Release G1-15 (C0PATTA) (reference 6.5), on the Nuclear Fuels Engineering IBM-RISC workstation system will be used in this calculation to evaluate the containment pressure and temperature transients for the. Equipment Qualification Analysis. ses -w =
NES&L DEPARTMENT ICCN NOJ CALCULATION SHEET PREUM. CCN No. N-1 PAGE 7 OF ' CCN CONVERSION Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N-4080-027-Sun-A CCN No. CCN - 1 Subject CONTAINMENTP/T DESIGN BASIS MSLB FOR EOUIPMENT OUALTICATION Sheet No. A-6 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE ALLEN EVINAY 11/04/94 PAUL BARBOUR 11/04/94 o a 1.2 CRITERIA, CODES and STANDARDS The criteria, codes and standards applicable to the Containment P/T Analysis for Design Basis MSLB (reference 6.1), are also generally applicable in this analysis. The applicable regulatory design criteria include: 4 i
- General Design Criterion (GDC) 16, " Containment Design"
- General Design Criterion (GDC) 38, " Containment Heat Removal" 4
l General Design Criterion (GDC) 50, " Containment Design Basis". i The applicability of these criteria to peak containment pressure and temperature I are described in detail in Reference 6.1. I 1 Additional general criteria applicable to Equipment qualification analysis are contained in 8 10 CFR 50.49, " Environmental qualification of Electric Equipment Important to safety For Nuclear Power Plants"
- NUREG-0588, Revision 1, " Interim Staff Position On Environmental Qualification of Safety-Related Electrical Equipment".
Title 10, CFR 50.49 requires that the time-dependent environmental temperature and pressure at the location of equipment important to safety must be established for the most severe design basis accident during or following which the equipment is required to remain functional. NUREG-0588 provides methodology applicable to the calculation of post accident environmental conditions and the evaluation of equipment thermal response to the post-accident environment. The containment design pressure and temperature are 60 psig and 300 F per the Technical Specifications (references 6.5 and 6.6, Section 5.2.2) respectively. SCE 26-426 PdEW 4/90
1 NES&L DEPARTMENT ICCN NOJ CALCULATION SHEET PREuM. ccN No. N-1 PAGE O OF CCN CONVERSION Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N-4080-027-Suo-A CCN No. CCN - l l Subject CONTAINMENTP/T DESIGN BASIS MSLB IOR EOUIPMENT OUALIFICATION Sheet No. A-7 REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE ALLEN EVINAY 11/04/94 PAUL BARBOUR 11/04/94 1 2.0 RESULTS/ CONCLUSIONS AND REC 00MENDATIONS 2.1 RESULTS/ CONCLUSIONS l Figures 2.1 through 2.5 show the analysis results out to 1000 seconds, which is l l well beyond the time of the affected steam generator dry-out and termination of significant mass and energy release into the containment. At 1000 seconds, the l containment temperature and pressure are well below the peak values and j decreasing. Section 10 contains tabulated conditions to the end of the transient l calculation at 1E+5 seconds. Figure 2.1 presents the sump and vapor temperatures versus time for the CONTAINMENT P/T DESIGN BASIS MSLB FOR EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION. The plots in l Figure 2.1 are generated using the data presented in Section 10.1. Figure 2.2 presents the containment gauge pressure versus time for the CONTAINMENT P/T DESIGN BASIS MSLB FOR EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION. The plot in Figure 2.2 is generated using the data presented in Section 10.1. Figure 2.3 presents the inside surface temperature of heat sink 1 (reactor building dome, painted steel liner plate) to represent the maximum post-MSLB temperature of the containment structure. The plot in Figure 2.3 is generated using the data presented in Section 10.1. Figure 2.4 presents the integrated energy transferred from the containment vapor region by one train of air coolers, two Emergency Cooling Units (2 ECUS) and one train of containment spray as a function of time. The plots in Figure 2.4 are generated using the data presented in Section 10.2. Figure 2.5 presents the rate of energy transfer from the vapor region by a single train of emergency cooling units (2 ECUS) and by a single train of containment sprays as a function of time. The plots in Figure 2.5 are generated using the data presented in Section 10.2. Table 1 presents the CONTAINMENT P/T DESIGN BASIS MSLB FOR EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION accident chronology. The calculated peak vapor temperature of 407.1 F is greater than the 300 F design temperature, however the duration of the event is sufficiently small enough to prevent heating of the containment structural materials beyond the design limits. , The peak vapor temperature is about 1.5 F greater than the previously identified l peak temperature in the prior A0R (N-4080-004, reference 6.4). The increase in the peak temperature is attributed to the reduced ECU heat transfer capacity (M-
- 0072-036, Revision 0, reference 6.12) and the delayed spray start time of 50 t
NES&L DEPARTMENT LCCN NOJ CALCULATION SHEET PREUM. CCN No. N-1 PAGE k OF k/ CCN CONVERSION Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N-4080-027-Suo-A CCN No. CCN - 1 Subject CONTAINMENTP/T DESIGN BASIS MSLB FOR EOUIPMENT OUALIFICATION Sheet No. A-8 REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE ALLEN EVINAY 11/04/94 PAUL BARBOUR 11/04/94 seconds v.s. the prior analysis spray start time of 45 seconds. The containment vapor pressure remains at, or above, 300 F for about 85 seconds (6 see to 91 sec) compared to about 79 seconds (6 secs to 85 secs) in the prior analysis in Reference 6.4. The primary purpose of this calculation is to provide a conservative analysis of the containment pressure-temperature response to the design basis MSLB. The objective is to define containment conditions for post-accident equipment qualification with emphasis on the relatively short time frame when the MSLB harsh environment is more severe than that created by the design basis loss of coolant accident ( LOCA ). In this regard, an analysis duration of 1000 seconds is more than adequate to simulate the desired post-MSLB harsh environment. However, to provide insight into the longer-term post-MSLB containment environment, the analysis has been extended to 100,000 seconds ( - 28 hours). The analysis includes containment spray termination at 10,000 seconds, following refueling water storage tank ( RWST ) inventory depletion. Following termination of containment spray, the vapor temperature rises from 126 F to about 145 F due to the reduction in vapor region energy removal rate. The vapor temperature then resumes a slow downward trend continuing to the end of the analysis run time. At the end of the run ( 1E+5 seconds ), the containment pressure and vapor temperature are about 0.6 psig and 132 F, respectively. The long-term containment cooldown is conservative due to modelling which allows no evaporative l or convective heat transfer between the sump water and the vapor region. Thus, in the absence of continued spray, or sump water recirculation, cooling of the containment sump occurs only through heat convection into the flooded lower 4 concrete. In any event, the longer analysis does demonstrate that the longer-term MSLB environment does remain bounded by the design basis LOCA event as provided in N-4080-026 (reference 6.16) ses -aw ma
I NES&L DEPARTMENT ICCN NOJ CALCULATION SHEET PREUM. CCN No. N-1 PAGE /0 OF CCN CONVERSION 4 Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N-4080-027-Sun-A CCN NO. CCN - 1 Subject CONTAINMENTP/T DESIGN BASIS MSLB FOR EOUIPMENT GUALIFICATION Sheet No. A9 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE ALIEN EVINAY 11/04/94 PAUL BARBOUR 11/04/94 o Table 1 CONTAINMENT P/T DESIGN BASIS MSLB FOR EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION EVENT CHRON0 LOGY l TIME ( seconds ) EVENT O.0 MSLB Occurs l 50 Containment Sprays Start l ( Nozzles at Full Discharge Flow ) l AND Emergency Fan Coolers Start ' ( Full capacity) 50 Peak Containment Temperature of 407.1 F reached 62.2 Peak Containment Pressure of 55.3 psig reached 71.08 End of Blowdown ( Affected Steam Generator ) 175.0 Containment Liner Plate Maximum Temperature of 243.8 F reached 9000.0 Maximum Tech. Spec. Containment Pressure of 1.499 psig s 1.5 psig reached 10000.0 Containment Spray Flow Terminated ContainmentPressure=1.3psig Containment Temperature = 125.8 F l ! ContainmentPressure=0.6psig 100000.0 Containment Vapor Temp = 131.9 F Containment Sump Temp = 159.8 F ECE 2tM26 NEW 490
3 k i I i s ll n a - o O i 8 FIGURE 2-1: TEMPERATURE 4 4 EQ MSLB 102% POWER-7.48 FT2 BREAK AREA 0
> a I 25-2 o
< m r-VAPOR TEMP ----- SUMP TEMP E O 450
!
- 8 9y i Maximum vapor temp:407.1 F at 50 seconds 2 g l
. Maximum sump temp: 265.4 F at 125 seconds r
, 3 With 8% condensate revaporization $ 0 m -M i 400 1 iirai co.iaiome.i r,ess., i4.2 ps,a = g
;zo ;
LL i a m m w
~ 350 m
=
a , 5o e a "3 I g c g, o m
? 300 5 la e a
[ "I ! g a 4 w 250
;.. c - - - - -
. . - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ._g g _g_ _ . _~
o y e 3 r 2 m 200 -------/
/ = != 8 1 30 Ez p -
F y g ge i 150 ......
<=21 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
l 3g " j s Z OO 100 ' ' ' - - - ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' hh ! ! 1E+00 1E+01 TIME FOLLOWING BREAK (seconds) 1E+02 1E+03 3 [ F ki i 5 ::
?
?
l l Q W m ! l > 3 IE I 8 FIGURE 2-2: CONTAINMENT PRESSURE i 8$ jl 60 EQ MSLB 102% POWER-7.48. FT2 BREAK AREA !a l!j 3 0 CD Max Press = 55.3 psig at 62.2 sec l 5 o! o (n With 8% condensate revaporization 3 E $
- Cz 3 5 e E
-'"*'E"'*'"'"*"'"'*""'*""'"
w 50 - - - - -
![5 e' s 3
- s a E 0 z 2 m 40 si 2I"5 x
m w 5 g la y i n 8
;m o m o 30 - - - - - -
F- 5 E
- z g g
$20 z
j ali, -
- 8
" 8 69 p sg F( 10 - - - - -
os z 9 N O ! 5c as 55 a O ' 9 1E+00 1E+01 1E+02
=
fl zB E 1E+03 [m 9 ,
~
TIME FOLLOWING BREAK (seconds) , I 5 r
?
s
a a I >Q Re% aa l FIGURE 2-3: LINER PLATE SURFACE TEMP . ig 8 EQ MSLB 102% POWER-7.48 FT2 BREAK AREA HEAT SINK 1 (LEFT BOUND) it !]$ o 260 u o m m o m iiner pioie sort c. te m per ture: 243.8 v ot iv3 seconos With 8% condensate revapcrization
! 3 4
!0
@ C2 240 - I"itiai containment Pressure = t4.7 psia _ .. .
=
g g gg
^ !" ~
a - ds u 220----
! 5 E m = 3 m @i!s mm ct200 - x ,
2I 3 5 g P 3 s g = a m . g - 3 iE m g 180 -- g g jg , , d ! o_ 160 - - - - s g 9 2 4 i' I
$140---- -
s !e! a 120 - [j l gg
@ 58 100 : : ~ : : ::: : : : : : :::: : : : : : :::
o5 f s
~ 2a 1E+00 1E+01 1E+02 1E+03 [. 9 ,
TIME FOLLOWING BREAK (seconds) , if - N 5 G t a a g i
n . , I *E Il - i , a FIGURE 2-4 INTEGRATED ENERGY ll $ EQ MSLB 102% POWER-7.48 FT2 BREAK AREA 3 3
> B
!O i
3l> d
----- CONTAINMENT SPRAY -- AIR COOLERS r-1E8 With 8% condensate revaporzation 8
g o g g ' Initial Containment Pressure = 14.7 = m
~~',,
,..... g M Air Coolers on @ 50 seconds -
E p 1E7-
~
sgaysoweso uonds ... - T g 5
~
_g
. , a - i
- g E z ol=
! e~.
D F CD 1E6 .-
/ .-
..-' X -- -
2 a l 8&
- c. & m z'=i (n t lf'
- m
> 1ES - !! - -- -
g "z H 0 -l 8 E '/ i w z 1E4 -- - - - l g 3 I* w i g 8 10 E 55 i 1E+03 -- - - m g n a' i a s 00 8 O z l 1E+02 : : : : : : ::: : : : : :::: $ f R 9 - 1E+01 1E+02 1E+03 [w 9 , TIME FOLLOWING BREAK (seconds) ? - E
! R !
v 2 U
.:r $
a = 1 i
>3 s
Ikn a 8 FIGURE 2-5: VAPOR HEAT REMOVAL RATES i l i8 c
=E 1E+03 EQ MSLB 102% POWER-7.48 FT2 BREAK AREA AIR COMERS (2) ---- CONTA!NMENT SPRAYS lg !9{
3 :;8% Condensate revaporization
! ! N @, C2 E
CD Initial containment Pressure = 14.7 psia Air Coolers on @ 50 seconds g d@ ya hy g g w
- Sprays on @ 50 seconds jg Z U c i
- E!
I . zl m h22,3 w p_
' 5 g e m a m
= 3=g m 1E+02 - - -
- - - - --_____~~~~~~~~'~~~c;
- g x _
w 1 g llZ ~
@ 5 $
k z I g 8
$ i g6 .
<C m 5
% 5 8'8 F- e -
m :p i p_ s BB o
<f @ 88 W 1E+01 : : : : : : ::: : : : : : : :: 02 f I R 25 1E+01 1E+02 1E+03 [= 9 ,
~
TIME FOLLOWING BREAK (seconds) , F i
- Ci e a Y
NES&L DEPARTMENT ICCN NO/ CALCULATION SHEET PREUM. CCN NO. N-1 PAGE bF / CCN CONVERSION
- Pro}ect or DCP/MMP SONGS UNrrS 2 and 3 Calc No. N ?"0 027-Sun-A CCN No. CCN - 1 l Subject CONTAINMENTP/T DESIGN B&, SIS MSLB FOR EOUIPMENT OUALIFICATION Sheet No. A-15 4
REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE ALLEN EVINAY 11/04/94 PAUL BAR8OUR 11/04/94 2.2 ) RECOMMENDATIONS l ) This Supplement A provides a new analysis of record for the containment pressure and temperature response to the Design Basis MSLB event for Equipment qualification. This analysis replaces the prior containment P/T response analysis contained in N-4080-004 Rev. 1, (Non-Technical CCN to N-4080-004, Rev.1). l Calculation M-DSC-243 (reference 6.10) should be revised to incorporate the new 4 containment temperature response to the Design basis MSLB and to include thermal- ) lag analysis for those electrical components modelled in reference 6.4 which are still needed to support the SONGS equipment qualification (NED0 TRAK Action Item ! Number 93030001/3, sub# 5 ). 4 l 4 1 4 i l l 1 l t 4 i
)
i SCE 26428 NEW 4/90 i
l NES&L DEPARTMENT ICCN NOJ CALCULATION SHEET eneuu. CCN No. N.i e,oe f 7 0, e CCN COfWERSION Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNTFS 2 and 3 Calc No. N-4080-027-Sun-A CCN No. CCN - 1 Subject CONTAINMENTP/T DESIGN BASIS MSLB FOR EOUIPMENT OUALIFICATION Sheet No. A-16 REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE ALLEN EVINAY 11/04/94 PAUL BARBOUR 11/04/94 3.0 ASSUMPTIONS The assumptions used in this calculation are identical to those used in the Containment P/T Analysis for Design Basis MSLB (reference 6.1), except where noted. Reference 6.1 is the analysis of record (A0R) for the DBA MSLB. The assumptions in reference 6.1 are arranged in groups which parallel the COPATTA Code card series data input. The modifications to reference 6.1 assumptions are
- listed below.
3.1 CARD SERIES 1 l 3.1.a ITEM 05: CONTAINMENT INITIAL TEMPERATURE In both the A0R (reference 6.1) and this analysis, the containment initial temperature was assumed to be 120 F. This is the SONGS Technical Specification maximum containment average temperature. The containment initial temperature profile at full power operating conditions varies from 140 F in the upper dome l to 80 F in the basement region. The initiation of MSLB will almost l instantaneously homogenize the containment temperature and in less than one half ! of one second, the containment average initial temperature will be in the vicinity of 120 F. Henceforth, the use of an initial average temperature of 120 l F is easily justifiable and the results of the calculation are still applicable for the post-accident MSLB containment temperature and pressure profiles. 3.1.b ITEM 11: CONTAINMENT HEAT SINK REVAPORIZATION FRACTION This MSLB analysis is performed for Equipment Qualification Temperature and Pressure profile generation and therefore credit for revaporization of heat sink l condensate will be taken. NUREG-0588 (reference 6.9, Appendix B, Section 1.b) allows for up to 8 percent of the condensate to be transferred to vapor region during the performance equipment qualification analysis. Allowing revaporization of heat sink condensate reduces the containment temperature and pressure relative to zero revaporization. l ! 3.2 CARD SERIES 5 3.2.a ITEM 3: CONTAINMENT EMERGENCY AIR C0OLER START TIME In the A0R (reference 6.1), the containment air cooler start delay time was identified as 15 seconds in the Design Input 4.3.a. In the present analysis the air cooler start time has been increased to 50 seconds to coincide with the containment spray actuation time. The emergency air cooling units have relatively little impact on short-term containment pressure and temperature, and by adding 35 seconds delay to ECU initiation, margin is added to accommodate potential
, changes in the timing of ECU startup. For example, based on the methodology SCE iML426 NEW 4/90
NES&L DEPARTMENT lCCN NOJ CALCULATION SHEET PREUM. CCN No. N-1 PAGE /h OF / CCN CONVERSION Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N 230 027-Sun-A CCil NO. CCN - j Subject _CONTAINMENTP/T DESIGN BASIS MSLB FOR EOUIPMENT OUALIFICATION Sheet No. A-17 REV ORIGINATOR DATE lRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE l g AREN EVINAY 11/04/94 PAUL BARBOUR 11/04/94 i \ l l contained in calculation N-4080-003 (reference 6.15), the 50 second start time for the ECUS is equivalent to assuming a 47-second stroke time for the CCW block , valves that supply cooling water to the air coolers, if all other parameters l affecting ECU start time were to remain unchanged. l l l I l l 1 I l l l t 1 SCE 2tN26 NEW 4/B0
j NES&L DEPARTMENT ICCN NOJ CALCULATION SHEET easuu. CCN NO. N-1 ,Ase is0, vf CCN CONVERSION Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N-4080-027-Sun-A CCN NO. M - l Subject CONTAINMENTP/T DESIGN BASIS MSLB FOR EOUIPMENT OUALIFICATION Sheet No. A-18 REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE ALLEN EVINAY 11/04/94 PAUL BARBOUR 11/04/94 4 4.0 DESIGN INPUT The design inputs used in this calculation are identical to those used in the Containment P/T Analysis for Design Basis MSLB (reference 6.1), except where q noted. Reference 6.1 is the analysis of record for the DBA MSLB. The design inputs in reference 6.1 are arranged in groups which parallel the COPATTA Code card series data input. i 4.1 CARD SERIES 0 1 The last four zero entries on this card are deleted. The G1-15 (RISC) version of ! j COPATTA does not utilize these data entry locations. ; j 4.2 CARD SERIES 1 ' I"
- a. ITEM 2: PROBLEM RUN TIME The problem run time will be set to 1E+5 seconds ( ~28 hours ). The pipe break j mass and energy release into the containment provided by the Combustion Engineering ( ABB-CE) included on CARD SERIES 301 terminated at 71.08 seconds, when dryout of the affected steam generator is calculated to occur for this i 1
Design Basis MSLB event. This run time of 100000 seconds is well past the end of significant mass and energy release into the containment. Generally a run time of 1000 seconds is adequate to show that the containment pressure and temperature are decreasing rapidly and well below the peak values calculated prior to steam generator dryout. For this calculation, however, the run time has been extended to 100,000 seconds to provide insight into the long-term post-MSLB containment depressurization and cooldown to near pre-MSLB conditions.
- b. ITEM 3: INITIAL CONTAINMENT PRESSURE SONGS Units 2 and 3 Technical Specifications limit the containment pressure to between +1.5 psig and -0.3 psig during reactor ' operations (LCO, 3.6.1.4, references 6.6 and 6.7). Leakage of instrument air from valves and controllers cause containment pressure to normally be greater than 0 psig. Of the calculated post-MSLB containment conditions for equipment qualification, the peak va)or temperature is more limiting than the peak pressure. This is due to the fact t1at the calculated peak pressure is less than the design value of 60 psig and the short-tgrm peak vapor temperature typically exceeds the containment design value of 300 F. Based on sensitivity studies reported in the Bechtel Topical Report BN-TOP-3 (reference 6.8), the peak vapor temperature increases with decreasing initial containment pressure. Since the containment pressure is not normally less than atmospheric, an initial containment pressure of 14.7 psia (0 psig) will be used for this analysis.
SCE 26-428 NEW W90
I NES&L DEPARTMENT ICCN NO/ a CALCULATION SHEET PaEuu. Cen No. N., ,,oE S Og y/ CCN CONVERSION i Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N-4084027-Sun-A CCN No. CCN - 1 l Subject CONTAINMENTPfr DESIGN BASIS MSLB FOR EOUIPMENT OUALIFICATION Sheet No. A-19 j REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE A ^" "" Sv'"^' 22' ' '^"' '^"' "" 22' ' d I 4.3 CARD SERIES 5 , 1
- The last two entries on this card ( 0 and 105 ) are deleted. The G1-15 (RISC) i version of C0PATTA does not utilize these entry locations l
4.3.a ITEM 3: CONTAINMENT EMERGENCY AIR C0OLER START TIME I i l In the present analysis, the air cooler start delay time has been increased from 15 seconds to 50 seconds to coincide with the containment spray actuation time. i The increase in air cooler start delay time will provide margin to accommodate potential changes in the timing of ECU startup such as an increase in the stroke time of the CCW block valves that isolate the cooling water from the air coolers. 4.4 CARD SERIES 301 No changes are made to card series 301 input which provides the mass flow rate and fluid enthalpy entering the containment from the main steam line break. Tge data is for the Design basis MSLB at 102% power with a break area of 7.48 ft . As documented by CCN 1 to N-4080-004 (reference 6.3) and CCN 1 to N-4080-007 (reference 6.13), single failure of one of the isolation valves ( HV8200 and/or HV8201 ) on the steam line feeding the auxiliary feed water pump turbine could allow cross-flow of steam from the intact steam generator into the containment through the affected steam generator. This cross-flow would come from the 1" diameter bypass lines installed around steam line check valves 1301MU003 and i 1301MU005 by the MMP 2 & 3 6869.00SM. This potential additional mass and energy I input is not included in this new A0R. The referenced CCNs demonstrate that the I effect of the cross-flow on short-term peak containment conditions is not significant. The increase in peak pressure and pegk temperature due to this i potential cross-flow are less than 0.1 psi and 0.3 F, respectively. Similarly, a single failure of the containment isolation valve on instrument air or high/ low nitrogen supply lines to close, coupled with a MSLB-induced failure of one of the supply or distribution lines inside the containment would also lead to additional mass and energy release beyond what is provided by ABB-CE. CCN 2 to N-4080-007 (reference 6.13) evaluated this single failure and concluded that there would be no significant impact to the short-term peak containment pressure or temperature. Therefore, the mass and energy releases from a failed air or nitrogen line is not included in this new equipment qualification A0R. scoua raw oo
l NES&L DEPARTMENT ICCN NOJ l CALCULATION SHEET PREuM. CCN NO. N-1 PAGE 2[ OF CCN CONVERSION I Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N 0000 027-Sun-A CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENTPfr DESIGN BASIS MRI R FOR EOUIPMENT OUALIFICATION Sheet No. A-20 TEV **tlGINATOR DATE tRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE ALLEN EVINAY 11/04/94 PAUL BARBOUR 11/04/94 4.5 CARD SERIES 801 1 No changes are made to card series 801 input except: ' a.2(a) Containment Spray Injection Mode Spray Flow Rate The minimum Containment Pump Spray Flow Rate has been changed to 1606 gpm (reference 6.2). In this calculation we use a value of 1600 gpm for further conservatism. Using the same criteria as in the A0R, this value translates to a flow rate of 7.956E+5 lb/hr. The containment spray flow is discontinued at 1E4 seconds, consistent with a calculated single spraytime to of train, deplete the refueling about 1.1E4 seconds water storage (reference tank 6.1, inventory, section using)a 4.5.b.1. Following spray termination, containment heat removal is provided by the continued operation of the single train emergency air cooler units ( 2 ECUS ). 4.6 CARD SERIES 1101 The G1-15 (RISC) version of COPATTA does not have the option of multiple tables of ECU performance versus containment temperature for various values of cooling water supply temperature. Therefore, following the card series identifier ( $ LIST P00L=1101 ), the input consists data pairs of containment saturation temperature and ECU heat removal rate. see m usw a
l NES&L DEPARTMENT ICCN NOJ CALCULATION SHEET eREuu. CCN NO. Ni ,,oe n 0, f/ CCN CONVERSION Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N-4080-027-Sun-A CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENTP/T DESIGN BASIS MRB FOR EOUIPMENT OUALIFICATION Sheet No. A-21 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE ALLEN EVINAY 11/04/94 PAUL BARBOUR 11/04/94 i 5.0 METHODOLOGY The MSLB for Eguipment Qualification evaluated in this calculation is the design basis 7.48 ft steam line break accident at 102% power with off-site power available and with a loss of one train each of containment emergency air coolers and containment sprays. The evaluation used the Bechtel COPATTA computer code (reference 6.5) to simulate the containment response to the MSLB. The methodology employed in this calculation is identical to the present A0R (reference 6.1) for the Containment P/T Design Basis MSLB, with the exception that 8 percent condensate revaporization is added to the model to comply with NUREG-0588 design criteria to generate results applicable to equipment qualification evaluations. In addition, the analysis run time is extended to 100,000 seconds ( -28 hours ) to provide insight into the long-term deprssurization and cooldown of containment following the dryout of the affected steam generator and termination of containment spray flow at about 3 hours post-MSLB, when the refueling water storage tank has been exhausted. After spray termination, containment heat removal is provided by the continued operation of the single train emergency air cooler units ( 2 ECUS ). The long-term analysis is conservative since evaporative and convective heat transfer between the containment sump water and the vapor region is not modelled in this analysis. l SCE 2tM26 NEW 4/90
l NES&L DEPARTMENT ICCN NOJ l CALCULATION SHEET PREUM. CCN NO. N-1 PAGE OF CCN CONVERSION Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N-4080-027-Sun-A CCN No. CCN - l Subject CONTAINMENTPfr DESIGN BASIS MSLB FOR EOUIPMENT OUALIFICATION Sheet No. A- 22 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE ' ALLEN EVINAY 11/04/94 PAUL BARBOUR 11/04/94 i
6.0 REFERENCES
6.1 SONGS Units 2&3 Calculation N-4080-027, Revision 0, " Containment P/T Analysis for Design Basis MSLB", January 13, 1994. 6.2 SONGS Units 2&3 Calculation M-0014-009, Revision 0, Supplement A,
" Containment Spray (CSS) In Service Minimum Requirements, July 28, 1994.
6.3 1) NCR 93030001-03
- 2) NCR 93030002-02 j
- 3) NCR 93030003-02
- 4) NCR 93030004-02 6.4 SONGS Units 2&3 Calculation N-4080-004, Revision 1, " Equipment Qualification Thermal Analysis (MSLB), January 6,1978 ( includes CCN 1).
6.5 Bechtel Standard Computer Program, NE100, C0PATTA, Version G1-15,
" Containment Temperature and Pressure Transient Analysis", User and Theory Manuals.
6.6 SONGS Unit 2 Operating License and Technical specifications, up to and including Amendment 101. 6.7 SONGS Unit 3 Operating License and Technical specifications, up to and including Amendment 90. 6.8 Bechtel Topical report BN-TOP-3, Revision 4, "Perfonnance and Sizing of Dry; Pressure Containments", March 1983. 6.3 NUREG-0588, Revision 1, " Interim Staff Position On Environmental Qualification of Safety-Related Electrical Equipment", July 1981. 6.10 SONGS Units 2 and 3 Calculation M-DSC-243, Revision 0, " Thermal Lag Analysis of Electrical Equipment at SONGS 2 & 3 due to MSLB", December 23, 1991. 6.11 SONGS Units 2 and 3 CCN 1 to Calculation M-DSC-243, Revision 0, ! " Thermal Lag Analysis of Electrical Equipment at SONGS 2 & 3 due to MSLB", j January 15, 1992. 6.12 SONGS Units 2 and 3 Calculatior. M-0072-036, Revision 0, " Containment ! Emergency Cooler Performance Verification", December 9,1993. ses m e m w =
NES&L DEPARTMENT ICCN NOJ CALCULATION SHEET PREUM. CCN No. N-1 PAGE W OF CCN CONVERSION Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N-4080-027-Sun-A CCN No. CCN - 1 Subject CONTAINMENTP/T DESIGN BASIS MSLB FOR EOUIPMENT OUALIFICATION Sheet No. A-23 l REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE ALLEN EVINAY 11/04/94 PAUL BARBOUR 11/04/94 1 6.13 SONGS Units 2 and 3 Calculation N-4080-007, Revision 2, " Containment : Pressure and Tem April 21,1983 (perature includes from MSLB CCNs at various 1 and 2 ). Power Levels", 6.14 Memo from J.l . Rainsberry to A.J. Brough, " Peak Containment Pressure l l Calculations, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3",
- May 12, 1994.
6.15 SONGS Units 2 and 3 Calculation N-4080-003, Revision 5, " Containment Spray (CSS) and Emergency Cooling Unit (ECU) Actuation Times", December 23,1993 6.16 SONGS Units 2&3 Calculation N-40806027, Revision 0, " Containment P/T Analysis for Design Basis LOCA", January 28, 1994. l i l l l MNOW
1 NES&L DEPARTMENT IccN NO/ CALCULATION SHEET PREUM. CCN NO. N-1 PAGE 2IOF CCN CONVERSION Project or DCP/MMP SOUGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N ~^ ^27-Suo-A CCN NO. CCN - Subject 10NTAINMENTP/T DESIGN BASIS MSLB FOR EOUIPMENT OUALIFICATION Sheet No. A-24 _MEV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE A ALLEN EVINAY 11/04/94 PAUL BARBOUR 11/04/94 _in i 7.0 NOMENCLATURE Atbreviations are defined when first used within the body of the text. l i l l 9
NES&L DEPARTMENT ICCN NOf CALCULATION SHEET PREUM. CCN NO. N-1 PAGE OF l CCN CONVERSION Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N "S'27-Suo-A CCN No. CCN - 1 Subject 10NTAINMENTP/T DESIGN BASIS MSLB FOR EOUIPMENT OUALIFICATION _ Sheet No. A-25 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE ALLEN EVINAY 11/04/94 PAUL BARBOUR 11/04/94 8.0 CALCULATION 8.1 COPATTA CODE INPUT DATA COPATTA input data for the Containment P/T Design Basis MSLB Analysis for Equipment Qualification uses the Containment P/T Design Basis MSLB Analysis (reference 6.1) input data with modifications to reflect changes in containment spray flow rate (reference 6.2), initial containment pressure and condensate , revaporization fraction to generate containment temperature and pressure profiles ! for the Equipment Qualification Thermal Analysis. Only the changes to the ! reference 6.1 input data will be presented in the following subsections. ' 8.1.1 TITLE CARD l
*EQMSLB 102P, Pi=14.7, EV=8%, CT=1, TC=50, LOP =0, CS=1600, N-4080-027-SUP-A 8.1.2 CARD SERIES 0 No changes made to Card Series 0 of reference 6.1 other than the deletion of the l last four zero entries on the Bechtel input file as non-applicable to COPATTA version G1-15.
8.1.3 CARD SERIES 1: General Problem Information
& LIST P00L=1,1E5,14.7,2.305E6,120,0.6,20,582.945,1,1,0.08,14.7,0,0.50 $END ITEM 2: TNFL = 2E4 seconds (per4.2.a)
ITEM 3: PAIR = 14.7 psia The initial containment pressure before the MSLB mass and energy release is set to 14.7 psia for EQ calculations, as discussed in the Design input Item 4.2.b. Card Series input ITEMS 4 through 10 remain unchanged from that of reference 6.1. ITEM 11: EVAP = 0.08 The fraction of heat sink condensate which will be allowed to revaporize is set to 0.08. Credit for revaporization will be taken for the purposes of EQ analysis per assumption 3.1.a. CCE 26426 NEW 490
l NES&L DEPARTMENT ICCN NOJ i CALCULATION SHEET PREUM. CCN No. N-1 PAGE 87 oF / CCN CONVERSION Project or DCP/MMP _ SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Cale No. N-4080-027-Sun-A CCN No. CCN - 1 l Subject CONTAINMENTP/T DESIGN BASIS MSLB FOR EOUIPMENT OUALIFICATION Sheet No. A-26 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE ALLEN EV!NAY 11/04/94 PAUL BARBOUR 11/04/94 8.1.4 CARD SERIES 5: Air Cooler Infonnation
$ LIST P00L=5,2,50,1E7,0,0 $END ITEM 3: This item reflect the change of Containment Air Cooler start time from 15 seconds to 50 seconds as discussed in Design Input Item 4.3.a. No other changes have been made to this card data.
l 8.1.5 CARD SERIES 801: ( Table 9 ) This Card Series reflect the change of Containment Spray System (CSS) Flow Rate from 1612 gpm to 1600 gpm and the termination of containment spray flow at 10,000 seconds.
$ LIST P00L=801, 0, 0, 0, 0, 100, 100, 50, 0, 0, 0, 100, 100,
, 50, 7.956ES, 0, 0, 100, 100, t IE4, 7.956E5, 0, 0, 100, 100, l 1E4, 0.0, 0, 0, 100, 100, 2E7, 0.0, 0, 0, 100, 100 $END 8.1.6 CARD SERIES 1101 Items 2,3 and 4 of reference 6.1 input are deleted as not applicable to the GI-15 l (RISC) version of C0PATTA. l All other input used in this calculation remain unchanged from that of Reference 6.1, as described in Sections 8.1.1 through 8.1.33, except as changed in the preceding paragraphs. l SCE 26-426 NEW 4,90
NES&L DEPARTMENT ICCN NOJ CALCULATION SHEET PREUM. CCN No. N-1 PAGE 2h OF CCN CONVERSION Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N-4080-027-Suo-A CCN NO. CCN - 1 { Subject CONTAINMENTP/T DESIGN BASIS MSLB FOR EOUIPMENT OUALIFICATION Sheet No. A-27 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE ALLEN EVINAY 11/04/94 PAUL BARBOUR 11/04/94 t 9.0 COPATTA INPUT FILE
*EQMSLB 102P, Pi=14.7, EV=8%, CT=1, TC=50, LOP =0, CS=1600, N-4080-027-SUP-A
$ LIST P00L=0,0,1,0,1 $END
$ LIST P00L=1,1ES,14.7,2.305E6,120,0.6,20,582.945,1,1,0.08,14.7,0.5 $END 4
$ LIST P00L=2,0,0,0,0,0,120,2E7 $END
- $ LIST P00L=3,0,0,0,0,0,2E7,0,0,0,0 $END
$ LIST P00L=4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0 $END
$ LIST P00L=5,2,50,1E7,0,0 $END
! $ LIST P00L=6,0,0,0 $END
- $ LEAK N0 PEN =0 $END
! $ LIST P00L=101, 1 ? 0, 0, i 2E7, 0 $END
$ LIST P00L=201, 0, 0, ,
2E7, 0 $END l
$ LIST P00L=301, i
0, 5.145520E7, 1.195589E3, l j 0.22, 4.869032E7, 1.197482E3, j 0.42, 4.622234E7, 1.198466E3, i 0.62, 4.405936E7, 1.199410E3, 1.08, 4.003276E7, 1.201595E3,
- 1.58, 3.688855E7, 1.201757E3, 2.08, 3.445970E7, 1.202018E3,
- 2.58, 3.326288E7, 1.200986E3, i 3.58, 3.152606E7, 1.201058E3, 4.58, 3.028468E7, 1.201655E3, l 5.58, 2.940080E7, 1.201123E3,
- 6.58, 2.874870E7, 1.201126E3, e 7.58, 2.706574E7, 1.204404E3,
, 8.58, 2.468326E7, 1.204367E3, 9.58, 2.294968E7, 1.204238E3, 10.58, 2.160122E7, 1.203908E3, 12.58, 1.943143E7, 1.203195E3, 14.58, 1.765940E7, 1.202277E3, 16.68, 1.637240E7, 1.201556E3, 18.58, 1.544720E7, 1.200963E3, 20.58, 1.473293E7, 1.200422E3, 25.58, 1.327525E7, 1.198820E3, 30.58, 1.221858E7, 1.197825E3, 35.58, 1.146406E7, 1.196753E3, 40.58, 1.059131E7, 1.195307E3, 45.58, 9.801216E6, 1.194165E3, 50.58, 9.132588E6, 1.193086E3, i SCE 26426 NEW Neo
NES&L DEPARTMENT ICCN NOJ CALCULATION SHEET PRELIM. CCN No. N-1 PAGE N OF / CCN CONVERSION Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N-4080-027-Suo-A CCN No. CCN - 1 4 Subject CONTAINMENTP/T DESIGN BASIS MRB FOR EOUIPMENT OUALIFICATION Sheet No. A- 28
- REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE ALLEN EVINAY 11/04/94 PAUL BARBOUR 11/04/94 i
60.58, 8.280324E6, 1.190935E3, i 61.08, 7.245576E6, 1.190949E3, 62.08, 5.803344E6, 1.189165E3,
- 62.58, 3.238704E6, 1.184658E3,
- 64.58, 3.948840E5, 1.179953E3, 1
68.58, 1.074240ES, 1.251072E3, 71.08, 0, 0,
- 2E7, 0, 0 $END
$ LIST P00L=401, i 0, 0, 0, 2E7, 0, 0 $END
$ LIST P00L=501, 1
0, 0, 0, 2E7, 0, 0 $END
$ LIST P00L=601, 0, 7.2E4, 7.2E6, 0.05, 7.2E4, 7.2E6,
- l. 0.05, 0.0, 0.0, 2E7, 0, 0 $END
$ LIST P00L=701,
- 0, 0, 0, 0, )
l 1 2E7, 0, 0, 0 $END l ! $ LIST P00L=801, 1 0, 0, 0, 0, 100, 100,
- 50, 0, 0, 0, 100, 100, 4
50, 7.956E5, 0, 0, 100, 100, l l 1E4, 7.956E5, 0, 0, 100, 100, ! 1E4, 0.0, 0, 0, 100, 100, l l 2E7, 0.0, 0, 0, 100, 100 $END
- $ LIST P00L=901, 0, 0, 0, 2E7, 0, 0 $END I
$ LIST P00L=1001,
! 0, 100, 2.0, l 24, 100, 2.0 $END
$ LIST P00L=1101, 105, 0, l 120, 1.670E6, i 130, 3.020E6, 140, 4.570E6, 150, 6.320E6, 160, 8.270E6, 170, 1.040E7, 180, 1.273E7, 190, 1.523E7, 200, 1.788E7, SCE StM26 NEW 4/90
NES&L DEPARTMENT ICCN NOJ CALCULATION SHEET PREUM. CCN No. N-1 PAGE 30or D CCN CONVERSION Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N "O 027-Sun-A CCN No. CCN - 1 Subject CONTAINMENTP/T DESIGN BASIS MSLB FOR EOUIPMENT OUALIFICATION Sheet No. A- 29 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE ! DATE ALLEN EVINAY 11/04/94 PAUL BARBOUR 11/04/94 t 210, 2.068E7, 220, 2.361E7, i 230, 2.664E7, ! 240, 2.974E7, l 250, 3.291E7, 260, 3.611E7, 270, 3.931E7, 280, 4.252E7, 287, 4.474E7, 290, 4.569E7, 300, 4.882E7 $END l $ LIST P00L=1201, ! 0, 0.729, 0.1, 0.737, 0.2, 0.747, 0.3, 0.757, i 0.4, 0.771, 0.5, 0.788, 0.6, 0.809, 0.7, 0.832, 0.8, 0.863, 0.9, 0.912, 1.0, 0.961, l 1.1, 0.983, 1.2, 0.995, 1.3, 1.000 $END ' l $ LIST P00L=9001, 5, 0.05, 1.0, 5, 10, 0.05, 1.0, 5, 15, 0.05, 1.0, 5, 20, 0.05, 1.0, 5, l 100, 0.1, 1.0, 5, 200, 1.0, 5.0, 5, 600, 1.0, 10.0, 5, 800, 2.0, 20.0, 5, 1E3, 5.0, 50.0, 1, 1E4, 50.0, 1000, 2, 1E4, 50.0, 500, 2, SE4, 50.0, 5000, 2, 2E5, 50.0, 10000, 2 $END
$ LIST P00L=9999 $END O
HS #1 - REACTOR BUILDING DOME
$ LIST P00L=101001, 100, 7, 0, 0, 0, 0, 34693.22 $END
! $ LIST P00L=101101, 5, 0.00075, 3, 0.02158, ! 3, 0.02193, 10, 0.06360, 20, 0.23028, 37, 1.00110, SCE 25-428 NEW W90
NES&L DEPARTMENT ICCN NOJ CALCULATION SHEET PREUM. CCM NO. N-1 PAGE 3 / OF CCN CONVERSION Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N-4080-027-Sun-A CCN NO. CCN - 1 l l Subject CONTAINMENTP/T DESIGN BASIS MSLB FOR EOUIPMENT OUAL1FICATION Sheet No. A-30 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE ALLEN EVINAY 11/04/94 PAUL BARBOUR 11/04/94 21, 4.06363 $END
$ LIST P00L=101201, 4, 1, 5, 2, 2, 2, 2 $END
$ LIST P00L=101300, 0, 0 $END
$ LIST P00L=101400, 9, 2, 1, 1 $END o HS #2 - CYLINDER WALL BETWEEN El. 29'6" AND 112'0"
$ LIST P00L=102001, 100, 7, 0, 0, 0, 0, 38120 $END i
$ LIST P00L=102101, 5, 0.00075, 3, 0.02158, 3, 0.02193, 10, 0.06360, 20, 0.14694, 37, 0.917761, 21, 4.35526 $END
$ LIST P00L=102201, 4, 1, 5, 2, 2, 2, 2 $END
$ LIST P00L=102300, 0, 0 $END
$ LIST P00L=102400, 9, 2, 1, 1 $END o HS #3 - CYLINDER WALL BETWEEN El. 15'0" AND El. 29'6"
$ LIST P00L=103001, 100, 7, 0, 0, 0, 0, 6667.38 $END
$ LIST P00L=103101, 5, 0.00075, 3, 0.02158, 3, 0.02193, 10, 0.06360, 20, 0.14694, 37, 0.917761, 21, 4.35526 $END
$ LIST P00L=103201, 4, 1, 5, 2, 2, 2, 2 $END
$ LIST P00L=103300, 0, 0 $END
$ LIST P00L=103400, 9, 2, 0, 2 $END o HS #4 - BASEMAT (OTHER THAN REACTOR BASEMAT)
$ LIST P00L=104001, 53, 5, 0, 0, 0, 0, 12800 $END
$ LIST P00L=104101, 3, 0.00067, 7, 0.1, 20, 1.52698, 2, 1.54781, 20, 11.02150 $END
$ LIST P00L=104201, 4, 2, 2, 1, 2 $END
$ LIST P00L=104300, 0, 0 $END
$ LIST P00L=104400, 3, 3, 0, 3 $END o HS #5 - REACTOR BASEMAT & S.G. PEDESTALS
$ LIST P00L=105001, 70, 4, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1644 $END
$ LIST P00L=105101, 4, 0.00158, '10, 0.1, 30, 2.00, 25, 8.43092 $END
$ LIST P00L=105201, 4, 2, 2, 2 $END
$ LIST P00L=105300, 0, 0 $END
$ LIST P00L=105400, 3, 3, 0, 3 $END
- o HS #6 - REACTOR CAVITY WALLS BELOW El. 15'0"
$ LIST P00L=106001, 93, 5, 1, 11.75, 0, 0, 21.5 $END
$ LIST P00L=106101, 5, 11.75192, 7, 11.77292, 30, 13.29923, 30, 19.29923, 20, 25.25192 $END
$ LIST P00L=106201, 4, 2, 2, 2, 2 $END
$ LIST P00L=106300, 0, 0 $END
$ LIST P00L=106400, 3, 3, 0, 3 $END 2 o HS #7 - REACTOR CAVITY WALLS AB0VE El. 15'0" l
SCE 2tM26 NEW 4/90
NES&L DEPARTMENT ICCN NOJ CALCULATION SHEET PREUM. CCN No. N-1 PAGE N OF CCN CONVERSION Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N-4080-027-Sun-A CCN No. CCN - 1 Subject _fSETAINMENTP/T DESIGN BASIS MSLB R)R EOUIPMENT OUALIFICATION Sheet No. A-31 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE BRE DATE ALLEN EVINAY 11/04/94 PAUL BARBOUR 11/04/94
$ LIST P00L=107001, 68, 5, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2810 $END
$ LIST P00L=107101, 5, 0.00192, 7, 0.02292, 15, 0.40192, 20, 2.00, 20, 4.00192 $END
$ LIST P00L=107201, 4, 2, 2, 2, 2 $END
$ LIST P00L=107300, 0, 0 $END
$ LIST P00L=107400, 9, 2, 0, 2 $END
- HS #8 - LINED REFUELING CANAL WALLS
$ LIST P00L=108001, 86, 6, 0, 0, 0, 0, 9200 $END
$ LIST P00L=108101, 5, 0.01563, 20, 0.1, 15, 0.41563, 20, 2.00, 20, 4.01563, 5, 4.01755 $END
$ LIST P00L=108201, 3, 2, 2, 2, 2, 4 $END
$ LIST P00L=108300, 0, 0 $END
$ LIST P00L=108400, 9, 2, 9, 2 $END
- HS #9 - S.G. CMPRTMNT WALLS, UNLINED REFL CNL WALLS /0TH INT WALLS
$ LIST P00L=109001, 78, 4, 0, 0, 0, 0, 41976 $END
$ LIST P00L=109101, 5, 0.00192, 10, 0.04233, 12, 0.1, 50, 1.71876 $END
$ LIST P00L=109201, 4, 2, 2, 2 $END
$ LIST P00L=109300, 0, 0 $END
$ LIST P00L=109400, 9, 2, 0, 2 $END
- HS #10 - FLOOR SLABS (OTHER THAN BASEMATS)
$ LIST P00L=110001, 67, 6, 0, 0, 0, 0, 17474 $END
$ LIST P00L=110101, 3, 0.00014, 5, 0.005348, 20, 0.105348, 15, 0.505348, 20, 1.505348, 3, 1.506015 $END
$ LIST P00L=110201, 4, 1, 2, 2, 2, 4 $END
$ LIST P00L=110300, 0, 0 $END
$ LIST P00L=110400, 9, 2, 9, 2 $END
- HS #11 - LIFTING DEVICES (EXCEPT STAINLc.SS STEEL PARTS)
$ LIST P00L=111001, 17, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 57F86 $END
$ LIST P00L=111101, 6, 0.00125, 10, 0.049917 $END
$ LIST P00L=111201, 4, 1 $END
$ LIST P00L=111300, 0, 0 $END
$ LIST P00L=111400, 9, 2, 0, 2 $END
- HS #12 - MISCELLANE0US CARBON STEEL - THICKNESS > 2.50 INCHES .
'$ LIST P00L=112001, 64, 4, 0, 0, 0, 0, 516 $END !
$ LIST P00L=112101, 6, 0.0005, 17, 0.084, 15, 0.20, 25, 0.310849 $END
$ LIST P00L=112201, 4, 1, 1, 1 $END
$ LIST P00L=112300, 0, 0 $END
$ LIST P00L=112400, 9, 2, 0, 2 $END
- HS #13 - MISCELLANE0US CARBON STEEL: 1.00"< THICKNESS <2.50"
$ LIST P00L=113001, 32, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 12042 $END
$ LIST P00L=113101, 6, 0.00063, 25, 0.16967 $END SCE 26426 NEW Woo
NES&L DEPARTMENT ICCN NOJ CALCULATION SHEET PREUM. CCN NO. N-1 PAGE b oF / i CCN CONVERSION Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N-4080-027-Suo-A CCN NO. CCN - 1 Subject CONTAINMENTPfr DESIGN BASIS MSLB FOR EOUIPMENT OUALIFICATION Sheet No. A-32 l REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE lRE DATE ALLEN EVINAY 11/04/94 PAUL BARBOUR 11/04/94 j l
$ LIST P00L=113201, 4, 1 $END
, $ LIST P00L=113300, 0, 0 $END l $ LIST P00L=113400, 9, 2, 0, 2 $END i
- HS #14 - MISCELLANE0US CARBON STEEL: 0.50"< THICKNESS <1.00" !
$ LIST P00L=114001, 19, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 64693 $END '
$ LIST P00L=114101, 5, 0.000674, 13, 0.038607 $END
$ LIST P00L=114201, 4, 1 $END
$ LIST P00L=114300, 0, 0 $END
$ LIST P00L=114400, 9, 2, 0, 2 $END
- HS #15 - MISCELLANE0US CARBON STEEL: THICKNESS <0.5" l
$ LIST P00L=115001, 17, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 98913.6 $END
$ LIST P00L=115101, 6, 0.000606, 10, 0.012833 $END I
$ LIST P00L=115201, 4, 1 $END
, $ LIST P00L=115300, 0, 0 $END l $ LIST P00L=115400, 9, 2, 0, 2 $END
- HS #16 - ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT
$ LIST P00L=116001, 8, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 37644.5 $END l
$ LIST P00L=116101, 7, 0.0054 $END
$ LIST P00L=116201, 1 $END
$ LIST P00L=116300, 0, 0 $END
$ LIST P00L=116400, 9, 2, 0, 2 $END
- HS #17 - MISCELLANE0US STAINLESS STEEL
$ LIST P00L=117001, 16, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 24048 $END '
$ LIST P00L=117101,15, 0.01747 $END
$ LIST P00L=117201, 3 $END
$ LIST P00L=117300, 0, 0 $END
$ LIST P00L=117400, 9, 2, 0, 2 $END l
- HS #18 - UNLINED REFUELING CANAL WALLS BELOW El. 63'6"
$ LIST P00L=118001, 48, 4, 0, 0, 0, 0, 3700 $END l $ LIST P00L=118101, 5, 0.00192, 7, 0.02292, 15, 0.40192, 20, 2.00192 $END
$ LIST P00L=118201, 4, 2, 2, 2 $END l
$ LIST P00L=118300, 0, 0 $END
$ LIST P00L=118400, 9, 2, 0, 2 $END o HS #19 - REACTOR BLDG CYLINDER #3: SECTIONS WITH STIFFENERS
$ LIST P00L=119001, 100, 7, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1590.68 $END l $ LIST P00L=119101, 5, 0.00075, 20, 0.66742, 3, 0.66777, l 15, 0.70944, 20, 0.79278, 16, 1.44278, l 20, 4.87885 $END l $ LIST P00L=119201, 4, 1, 5, 2, 2, 2, 2 $END l $ LIST P00L=119300, 0, 0 $END
$ LIST P00L=119400, 9, 2, 1, 1 $END
, o HS #20 - VENT TUNNELS
$ LIST P00L=120001, 23, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2827 $END
$ LIST P00L=120101, 10, 0.0005, 12, 0.03175 $END
$ LIST P00L=120201, 4, 1 $END l
SCE 26 428 *.eEW @
- . . - - .- -. . - - _ . . . . ~ _ ._ - - - _ _ _ __- -. _ _ .
NES&L DEPARTMENT ICCN NOJ 1 l CALCULATION SHEET PREUM. CCN No. N-1 PAGE OF cCN CONVERSION Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N 250 027-Sun-A CCN NO. CCN 1 l l Subject CONTAINMENTP/T DESIGN BASIS MSLB FOR EOUIPMENT OUALIFICATION Sheet No. A-33 REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE BRE DATE ALLEN EVINAY 11/04/94 PAUL BARBOUR 11/04/94
$ LIST P00L=120300, 0, 0 $END
$ LIST P00L=120400, 9, 2, 0, 2 $END
$ LIST P00L=410001,
! 25, 54, l 0.8, 30, l 10, 54, l 0.1, 20, l 0.0174, 0.0103 $END l
$ LIST P00L=500000 $END l
l l l t l l l t t l i BCE 26 426 NEW 4/90
I NES&L DEPARTMENT ICCN NOJ CALCULATION SHEET eREuu. CCN NO. N.i ,,oe g o, n l I CCN CONVERSION Project or DCP/MMP SO.NGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N t^*^ 027-Sun-A CCN NO. CCN - 1 Subject CONTAINMENTP/T DESIGN BASIS MSLB FOR EOUIPMENT OUALIFICATION Sheet No. A-34 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE ALLEN EVINAY 11/04/94 PAUL BARBOUR 11/04/94 o 10.0 SELECTED OUTPUT DATA The tabulated data presented in Sections 10.1 and 10.2 consists of partial output of the COPATTA calculation made for this analysis. 10.1 CONTAIMENT CONTAI MENT CONTAINMENT HEAT SINK 1 TIME PRESSURE VAPOR TEMP SUMP TEMP (LEFT BOUND) l (SEC) (PSIG) (F) (F) (F) 0 0.00 120.00 120.00 118.4 1 3.59 179.50 136.10 118.4 I 2 6.50 218.40 151.70 3 9.05 246.80 162.70 4 11.42 269.40 171.40 ' 5 13.67 288.00 178.80 136.0 6 15.81 303.70 185.20 7 17.86 317.20 190.80 8 19.79 328.70 195.'90 9 21.54 338.30 200.30 10 23.13 346.20 204.20 153.4 11 24.59 352.90 207.70 12 25.96 358.70 211.00 13 27.24 363.70 213.80 j 14 28.43 368.00 216.40 15 29.55 371.80 218.70 166.6 ! 16 30.61 375.10 220.90 SCE 26-426 NEW 4/90
NES&L DEPARTMENT ICCN NOJ CALCULATION SHEET PREUM. CCN No. N-1 PAGE OF CCN CONVERSION 4 Project or DCP/MMP SONGS LNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N-4080-027-Sun-A CCN No. CCN - 1 Subject CONTAINMENTP/T DESIGN BASIS MSLB R)R EOUIPMENT OUALIFICATION Sheet No. A-35 REV ORIGINATOR DATE BRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE g ALLEN EVINAY 11/04/94 PAUL BARBOUR 11/04/94 o i )' CONTAIMENT CONTAIMENT CONTAINMENT HEAT SINK 1 TIME PRESSURE VAPOR TEMP SUMP TEMP (LEFT BOUND)
- (SEC) (PSIG) (F) (F) (F)
- 17 31.61 378.10 223.00 18 32.56 380.70 224.90 19 33.47 383.00 226.60 20 34.37 385.14 228.30 178.4 22 36.05 388.86 231.30 24 37.60 391.95 233.90 25 38.34 393.10 235.20 26 39.06 394.37 236.30 28 40.46 396.56 238.50 30 41.80 398.44 240.50 195.9 32 43.07 400.06 242.30 33 43.69 400.80 243.20 34 44.29 401.47 244.00 36 45.47 402.70 245.60 38 46.60 403.76 247.00 l 40 47.68 404.64 248.40 209.9 42 48.71 405.36 249.70 44 49.69 405.95 250.90 45 50.16 406.20 251.50 46 50.63 406.42 252.10 48 51.52 406.78 253.20 )
50 52.38 407.07 254.20 222.2 52 52.93 402.84 255.20 , see -sw a j
l NES&L DEPARTMENT ICCN NOJ l CALCULATION SHEET PRELIM. CCN No. N-1 PAGE OF CCN CONVERSION Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N-4080-027-Suo-A CCN No. CCN . 1 Subject CONTAINMENTP/r DESIGN BASIS MSLB FOR EOUIPMENT OUALIFICATION Sheet No. A-36 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE ALLEN EVINAY 11/04/94 PAUL BARBOUR 11/04/94 o CONTAIMENT CONTAIMENT CONTAINNENT HEAT SINK 1 TIME PRESSURE VAPOR TEMP SUMP TEMP (LEFT BOUND) (SEC) (PSIG) (F) (F) (F) 54 53.46 398.66 256.20 56 53.97 394.58 257.10 58 54.46 390.62 258.00 60 54.93 386.75 258.80 231.8 62 55.27 382.72 259.50 64 54.97 377.40 260.30 66 54.35 371.49 260.90 68 53.71 365.60 261.40 70 53.06 359.64 261.90 236.2 75 51.47 345.04 262.90 80 50.02 331.06 263.60 238.2 l . l 85 48.58 317.22 264.10 l 90 47.21 303.72 264.40 239.6 95 45.89 290.55 264.70 l 100 44.62 277.64 264.90 240.4 ! 105 43.70 269.19 265.00 110 43.22 268.35 265.20 115 42.80 267.75 265.30 120 42.40 267.16 265.40 125 42.01 266.59 265.40 242.5 130 41.64 266.00 265.40 135 41.28 265.51 265.40 140 40.94 264.99 265.40
NES&L DEPARTMENT ICCM NO./ CALCULATION SHEET PREUM. CCN No. N-1 PAGE M OF CCN CONVERSION Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N-4080 427-Suo-A CCN No. CCN . 1 Subject CONTAINMENTPfr DESIGN BASIS MSLB FOR EOUIPMENT OUALIFICATION Sheet No. A-37 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE ALLEN EVINAY 11/04/94 PAUL BARBOUR 11/04/94 1r CONTAIMENT CONTAIMENT CONTAINMENT HEAT SINK 1 TIME PRESSURE VAPOR TEMP SUMP TEMP (LEFT BOUND) (SEC) (PSIG) (F) (F) (F) 145 40.58 264.49 265.30 150 40.28 264.00 265.20 243.5 155 39.97 263.52 265.20 160 39.77 263.22 265.10 165 39.48 262.76 265.00 170 39.19 262.32 264.90 , 175 38.91 261.88 264.80 243.8 180 38.59 261.40 264.70 185 38.37 261.03 264.60 190 38.11 260.62 264.50 195 37.86 260.22 264.40 200 37.61 259.82 264.30 243.6 250 35.44 256.25 263.10 242.4 300 33.76 253.34 261.80 241.1 350 32.23 250.61 260.50 239.6 400 30.90 248.15 259.20 238.1 450 29.70 245.86 258.00 236.5 500 28.69 243.87 256.70 235.0 550 27.68 241.81 255.40 233.5 600 26.72 239.82 254.10 232.0 700 24.99 236.06 251.40 228.8 800 23.52 232.69 248.80 225.9 900 22.12 229.33 246.10 223.1 sce w e m
NES&L DEPARTMENT ICCN NOJ CALCULATION SHEET PREUM. CCN NO. N-1 PAGE OF Y/ CCN CONVERSION Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N-4080427-Sun-A CCN NO. @ - Subject CONTAINMENTP/T DESIGN BASIS MSLB FOR EOUIPMENT OUALDlCATION Sheet No. A-38 REV OR:GINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE ALLEN EVINAY 11/04/94 PAUL BARBOUR 11/04/94 CONTAI MENT CONTAIMENT CONTAINNENT HEAT SINK 1 TIME PRESSURE VAPOR TEMP SUMP TEMP (LEFT BOUND) (SEC) (PSIG) (F) (F) (F) i 1000 20.85 226.13 243.50 220.3 2000 13.76 204.75 224.10 4000 6.19 169.41 199.70 172.3 8000 1.83 132.34 170.70 9000 1.499 128.58 165.90 10000 1.25 125.84 161.70 141.9 15000 1.17 144.67 161.50 20000 0.97 143.49 161.39 140.0 40000 0.79 138.57 160.94 135.9 60000 0.72 135.46 160.52 90000 0.57 132.61 159.94 130.4 1E+5 0.63 131.95 159.75 l i SCE 2tM26 NEW N90
NES&L DEPARTMENT ICCN NOJ CALCULATION SHEET eREuu. CCN No. N., ,Aos 60, w CCN CONVERSION Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. NW27-Sun-A CCN No. CCN - 1 l Subject CONTAINMENTPff DESIGN BASIS MSLB FOR EOUIPMENT OUALIFICATION Sheet No. A-39 , REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE ALLEN EVINAY 11/04/94 PAUL BARBOUR 11/04/94 10.2 i TIME INTEGRATED INTEGRATED i ENERGY REMOVED BY ENERGY REMOVED BY CONTAINMENT SPRAYS CONTAINMENT (a) AIR COOLERS (b) , j secs (btu) (btu) 50 0.0e+00 2.30e+03 51 6.75e+04 2.53e+04 60 6.55e+05 2.36e+05 100 2.70e+06 1.15e+06 200 6.33e+06 3.23e+06 500 1.62e+07 8.77e+06 ; 1000 2.96e+07 1.65e+07 (a) Energy is transferred to containment sump water. (b) Energy is transferred to component cooling water (CCW) system. ENERGY REMOVAL ENERGY REMOVAL RATE BY RATE BY TIME CONTAINMENT TIME CONTAINMENT SPRAYS AIR COOLERS secs (btu /hr)xE6 secs (btu /hr)xE6 51.5 241.5 50 82.7 60.0 227.8 60 85.4 99.5 142.2 100 78.6 200.0 127.0 200 72.1 500.0 110.3 500 61.8 975.0 086.0 1000 50.9 t i SCE 26-426 NEW 4/90
NES&L DEPARTMENT ICCN NOJ i CALCULATION SHEET PRELiu CCN No. N-1 PAGE ! OF ! CCN CONVERSION Project or DCP/MMP SONGS UNITS 2 and 3 Calc No. N-4080 427-Suo-A CCN No. CCN - 1 Subject CONTAINMENTP/T DESIGN BASIS MSLB FOR EOUIPMENT OUALFICATION Sheet No. A-40 ] REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE AI.LEN EVINAY 11/04/94 PAUL BARBOUR 11/04/94 APPENDIX A (COPATTA Code I/O File)
- The COPATTA Code input f'le is presented in Section 9 of this calculation.
The COPATTA Code output file is included on Microfiche. The output file name }! and date are as follows: FICHE TITLE : EQMSLB J6908 02-Nov-94 ~ JOB TITLE : *MSLB 102%P, cpi =14.7, EVAP=8%, CT=1, LOP =0, CS=1600, N-4080-027-SUP-A RUN DATE : 11-02-94 LAST SHEET : Page 387 scE N NEW 00
l CALCULATION TITLE PAGE 'cc" "w PRELIM CCN NO. PAGE OF CCN CONVERSION: Cric. No. N-4080-027 DCP/MMP/FIDCN/FCN No. & Rev. N/A ccN wo.CCN Subject CONTAINMENT PM ANALYSIS FOR DESIG BASIS MSLB Sheet 1 Systrm Number / Primary Station System Designator MT XB1 SONGS Unit M Q-Class II
/.3v/
Tech Spec Affecting? NO X YES, Section No. LCO 3.6.1.1/2/3 & B3.6.1.4/6 Equipment Tag No. N/A , CONTROLLED X PROGRAM PROGRAM / DATABASE NAME(S) VERSION / RELEASE NO(S). ! COMPUTER X ALSo USTED BELOW PROGRAM / DATABASE DATABASE IN ACCoRDANCE WITH NES&L 41-5-1 'COPATTA" MAP-175 Version Gl/14 l RECORD OF ISSUES REV. TOTAL ' SHTS PREPARED APPROVED DESCRIPTION DISC LAST (Print name/ initial) (Signature) SHT. O SEE NOTE 1 BELOW 155 ORIG otheragg/s$ ISSUED FOR USE .. ___. S h
._ _ _ _'*_P en Oliver
, , {.g , _ ,,,,_ ,g "Jc1PRgr'
.-_BPC N 155 IRE D oATE John Elliott 4 .- / ~ /3~ N ORIG other IRE DM DATE ORIG GS Other IRE DM DATE ORIG GS other Spica for RPE stamp, identify use of an alternate calc., and notes as applicable.
Note 1- l The purpose of Revision 0 is as follows: Open Item Reports 92-069, 92-059, 92-057, 92-054, 92-045, and 92-015 indicate discrepancies in Calculation N-4080407 Revisions 0,1 and 2. Revision 0 to this calculation (N-4080-027) will incorporate the recommended changes specified by these Open Item Reports in an effort to improve documentation and accuracy of the MSLB P-T calculation. Disclaimer: This calculation was prepared using Word Perfect 5.1 software. However, WP 5.1 was not used for any computations in the calculation. l l i This ctic, was prepared for the identified DCP/MMP. DCP completion and turnover acceptance to be verified by reciept of a memorandum l dirscting DCN conversion. Upon receipt, this calc. represents the as-built condition. Memo date by I .
CALCULATION CROSS INDEX A
' %"&N No. em e, CCN CONVERSION:
Calculation No. N-4080-027 Sheet No. 2 CCN NO. CCN-INPUTS OUTPUTS Does the Calc. rev. These .mterfacmg calculat. ions and/or number and documents provide input to the subject Rd W Mo'ef b s@ g Ma calculations and/or documents. require revision? calc /doct ment N u vision of e su ca eu a a intials and ------- date Calc / Document No. Rev. No. Cale/ Document No. Rev. No. YES/NO O Calculations Unita 2A3 Updated Final Safety Analysis 9 YES E4Md-MQ j,jg py
. C-257-1.06.01 1 Repat /
k ,d h M4014409 M-0026-001 0 5 Calculation N-4080-007 2 YES NSDolfAk b04 A t N-4080407 2 Calculation N-4080404 I YES M0 ~D ~ M4072436 0 Calculation N-4080405 0
^
YES 8 /'#' N-4080-005 0 c.k.L.. " MC2" ^ ' N-4080402 # ,N 'r2 N-4080403 1 5 DBD-SO23-TR-AA 0 g YES MfhoT/Af gg,9ppop Unit 2 Operating Licerse and Technical Specs Amend.108 DBD-SO23-400 0 YES gg, g g g(,yy
.ct IfO 3.6.1.4 (page 3/4 6-7, Orig issue)
LCO 3.6.1.5 (page 3/4 6-8 Orig issue) SONOS Unit 2 Technical Specifications A.108 YES l ursouCl g g#-f7 p go 44 Sect. 5.2.2 (page 5-1, Amend. (Orig issue) LCO 3.6.1.1 (page 3/4 6-1, Amend. 46) Unit 3 Operating License and Technical Specs Amend. 97 LCO 3.6.1.2 (page 3/4 6-2. Amend. 93) ATB .Q.OO A LCO 3.6.1.4 (page 3/4 6-7, Orig Issue) LCO 3.6.1.3 (page 3/4 6-5, Orig Issue) LCO 3.6.1.5 (page 3/4 6-8, Orig Issue) Section 5.2.2 (page 5-1, Orig issue) B3.6.1.4 (page B3/4 6-2, Amend.16) B3.6.1.6 (page B3/4 6-2 Amend.16) h / ['/#' y Open item Reports 92-015 0 SONGS Unit 3 Technical Specifications A.97 YES 92-045 0 LCO 3.6.1.1 (page 3/4 6-1, Amend. 35) 92-054 0 LCO 3.6.1.2 (page 3/4 6-2, Amend. 83) 92457 0 LCO 3.6.1.3 (page 3/4 6-5. Orig lasue) 92459 0 B3.6.1.4 (page B3/4 6-2, Orig Issue) J 92469 0 B3.6.1.6 (page B3/4 6-2, Orig lasue) Non-Conformance Report (NCRs) 93030001 93030002 93030003 93030004
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" " ' PRELIM. CCN NO. PAGE OF Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CcN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet NO. 3 l REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R i O S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 E y 4 i i I TABLE OF CONTENTS
\
SECTION DESCRIFITON PAGE 1 1 PURPOSE ............................................. 4 2 RESULTS/ CONCLUSIONS AND RECCMMENDATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3 ASSUMPTIONS . . . .....................................15 4 DESIGN INPUT ........................................20 5 hETHODOLOGY .......................................43 6 REFERENCES .........................................44 7 NOMENCLATURE ......................................48 8 CALCULA'I1ON ........................................49 9 COPA'ITA INPUT Frim ................................. 130 10 SELECTED OUTPUT DATA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135 11 MASS AND ENERGY BALANCES ............................ 152 APPENDIX A (COPATTA Code I/O File Information) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" "o ' PREUM. CCN NO. PAGE OF Projtet or DCP/MMP. SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 cCN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 4 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 E 4 l 1 PURPOSE 1.1 TASK DESCRIP'ITON The purpose of this calculation is to evaluate the containment pressure and temperature response to a design basis Main-Steam-Line-Break (MSG) for SONGS Units 2 and 3. The results of this calculation supersede the results of Calculation N-4080-007, " Containment Pressure Temperature from MSG at Various Power Levels", (Reference 6.1.d) with respect qaly to the Design Basis MSG event (7.4765 ft2 MSG @ 102% power with failure of one cooling train). Per the conclusions presented in Calculation N-4080-007, this is the worst
- case MSG, and will envelope all the other break types. The changes in design input and l assumptions used in this calculation will not alter the relative severity of the different break scenarios, and thus the MSG @ 102% power with failure of one cooling train will remain
! the limiting case. Resolution of the following Open Item Reports require the results of this calculation: OIR NO. PROPOSED RESOLUTION 92-015 Correct UFSAR Table 6.2-9 to accurately report the time of occurrence of the peak containment pressure. (Reference 6.9.a). 92-045 Revise the analysis of Calculation N-4080-007 to include the origin of input t parameters or, if a source document can not be found, then justify the rnodeled value. Append copies of computer code input files to this calculation. (Reference 6.9.b). 92-054 Correct UFSAR Table 6.2-9 to accurately report containment pressures, temperatures and times of occurn ace (Reference 6.9.c). 92-057 Revise the analysis of Calculation N-4040-007 to adequately document the peak containment temperatures (Reference 6.9.d). 92-059 Revise the analysis of Calculation N-4080-007 to correct a discrepancy in the RWST volume. Verify that the new results do not modify information l presented in UFSAR section 6.2.1.1.3.1. (Reference 6.9.e) 92-069 Revise the analysis of Calculation N-4080-007 using the Uchida HTC instead of the Modified Tagami HTC (Reference 6.9f). i
- This calculation also addresses the reduced Containment Spray flowrates as described in
- disposition step 2 of NCRs 93030001, 93030002, 93030003, and 93030004.
[ (References 6.16). This calculation incorporates the minimum spray flow identified in Calculation M-0014-009 (Reference 6.1.b).
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'cc"
- PRELIM. CCN NO. PAGE ,_OF__
Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 ccN CONVERSION: CCN No. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. _E__ REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 " 5 The Bechtel Standard Computer Code MAP-175, Release G1-14 (COPA'ITA) (Reference 1 6.5.a) will be used in this calculation to evaluate the pressure-temperature transients. 1.2 CRITERIA, CODES AND STANDARDS The containment structure is to be designed such that it is capable of withstanding the adverse affects of a postulated MSLB. Applicable regulatory design criteria are provided in Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50 (Reference 6.4.a). These criteria include: 1 eGeneral Design Criterion 16, " Containment Design" eGeneral Design Criterion 38, " Containment Heat Removal" eGeneral Design Criterion 50, " Containment Design Basis" General Design Criterion 16 requires that a reactor containment and associated systems shall be provided to establish an essentially leak tight barrier to assure that the containment design ! conditions important to safety are not exceeded for as long as the conditions require. Per Standard Review Plan 6.2.1.1.A (Reference 6.4.c), to satisfy the requirements of this criterion, the calculated containment peak pressure after a MSLB should be less than the design containment peak pressum. General Design Criterion 38 requires that the containment heat removal systems function to rapidly reduce the containment pressure following any LOCA, and maintain the pressure at an acceptably low level. Although not explicitly applied to the case of the MSLB, the requirements of GDC 38 can be considered to be applicable to the containment peak pressum analyses (be it LOCA or MSLB). General Design Criterion 50 requires that the reactor containment structure, including access openings, penetrations, and the containment heat removal system, shall be designed so that the containment structure and its internal components can accommodate, without exceeding the design leakage rate and with sufficient margin, the calculated pressure condition resulting fmm a LOCA. As with Criterion 16, per Star.dard Review Plan 6.2.1.1.A, to satisfy the requirements of Criterion 50, the calculated contamment peak pressure after a LOCA should be less than the design containment peak pressure. Although GDC 50 specifically addresses a LOCA, and not an MSLB, SRP 6.2.1.1.A indicates that the requirements of GDC 50 can be considered to be applicable to the containment peak pressure analyses (be it LOCA, steam or feedwater line break). The containment design pressure is 60 psig and the containment design temperature is 300 F per the Technical Specifications (References 6.3.a and 6.3.b, Section 5.2.2).
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" No ' PREUM. CcN NO. PAGE__ OF__ ! Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN No. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 6 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 ' 2 RESULTS/ CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ! 2.1 RESULTS/ CONCLUSIONS j Figure 2-1 presents the sump and vapor pressures versus time for the DBA MSLB. The i plots in Figure 2-1 a e generated using the data presented in Section 10.1. Figure 2-2 presents the containment gauge pressure versus time for the DBA MSLB. The I plot in Figure 2-2 is generated using the data presented in Section 10.1. Figure 2-3 presents the condensing heat transfer coefficient used by the COPATTA Code versus time for the DBA MSLB. The plot in Figure 2-3 is generated using the data presented in Section 10.1.
)
Figure 2-4 presents the inside surface temperature of heat sirl 1 (reactor building deme) to represent the temperature of the containment structure. The plot in Figure 2-4 is generated using the data presented in Section 10.1. Figure 2-5 presents the instantaneous energy vs. time data used by COPATTA to determine heat transfer in the DBA MSLB. The plots in Figure 2-5 are generated using the data presented in Section 10.2. Included are: VAPOR ENERGY: Instantaneous steam + air energy. SUMP ENERGY: Instantaneous energy of sump water. TOTAL ENERGY: Instantaneous energy inventory. HEAT SINKS: Instantaneous energy stored in structures. Figure 2-6 presents the integrated heat transfer of the air coolers and containment sprays. The plots presented in figure 2-6 are genented using the data in Section 10.2. Included are: AIR COOLERS: Integrated energy removed by emergency fan coolers. CONT. SPRAY: Integrated energy transferred to sump by sprays. The following table presents the accident chronology for the analysis.
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET '
'cc". CCW WO.
PRELIM PAGE OF Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 ccN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 7 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE BRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 5 TIME (seconds) EVENT 0.0 Break occurs
- 15 Emergency fan coolers start (at full capacity)
I 50 Containment spray nozzles at full discharge flow
- 50.0 Peak containment temperature of 421 'F
, 62.3 Peak containment pressure of 58.5 psig 71.08 End of Blowdown Note that although the peak vapor temperature of 421 F is greater than the 300 F design i temperatum, the duration of the event is sufficiently small to prevent heating of the ! containment structural materials beyond the design limits. As indicated by Figure 2-4, the 241 F peak. surface temperature of the containment liner remains well below 300 'F. l Because the liner inside surface (actually a layer of organic paint) remains below 300 *F, the ! containment stmetum will not exceed design temperatures. i l As can be seen from Figures 2-2 and 2-4, the peak pressure (58.5 psig) is below the design pressure of 60 psig and the peak temperature of the containment stmeture (241 *F) is below j the design temperature of 300 'F. Therefore, General Design Criteria 16 and 50 (See Section 1.2) are met. The gauge pressure with respect to the outside atmosphere at 10,000
- seconds is less than 3.0 psig. The pressure remaining after 24 hours is therefore expected to
. be only a small fraction of the 60 psig design pressure; therefore, the requirements of
- General Design Criterion 38 (See Section 1.2) are met.
l i 1 4
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET l
',7l"fgou ,0. ,,, ,_ o ,_
Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 8 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE BRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 h t s 2.2 RECOMMENDATIONS Since this calculation is the new analysis of record for the Design Basis MSLB Pressure Temperature analysis, it should be noted in calculation N-4080-007 (Reference 6.1.d) that the 2 results of the 7.4765 ft MSLB at 102% power with one of two cooling trains available and offsite power available have been superseded by the results of this calculation. 1
m ? E E { @ m o
- 2 !
g a ' R 9 s o o FIGURE 2-1: TEMPERATURE I h
@Eg y i
MSLB 102% POWER, 7.48 FT2 BREAK AREA SLM) VAPOR B [z m T g== m z TEM) TElvP w H o z Om , 3 D E T Cm ' 500
$ M O h
. . . . . ~ . .
. . ...... . . . . . - u a g >f"'a ,
Maximtsn vapor temp: 421 F at 50 seconds !-
> x
= ym Maximum aste terryx 266 F at 125 seconds m G M g
- O @T s- m a "
m u 2y o E 400 - m (/) m g 0 gZ
~
m m W a _ t o @ Om e H J su a
= m
> z F m 9
<C 300 - -
z g = c m
=
o w ' .- Q r m m Q. --,,N o !
,/ -
2 N,N O w /- E w gs p / 's O mO 200 -
/
/ 'x s 5
-f E*
.o .
/ 'N B 8' l 2
no z o 98 9 g g 100 ' '" aE o~ 1e-01 1e+00 1e+01 1e+02 1e+03 1e+04 za ; m I O
- m R i s i TIME FOLLOWING BREAK (seconds) 2 z
O l"
- o m
N CO M 4=<m2
m o d $ 5-m a 2 g a R 9 o o o FIGURE 2-2: CONTAllWENT PRESSURE i j 39 g MSLB 102% POWER, 7.48 FT2 BREAK AREA B [ E> m o g-z 70 . . . . ...., . . . ...... . . . . . . . . , . . . ...... . . . . . . . . e m O
^
m m o z Ozm e , 4 C*
- Max Press = 58.5 psig at 62.3 sec : $ M 0 r- @
B - - " E Eko Ta 60 : - y ? - Hq 8 : : a E
; 5%i m - -
a = o e z~K 50 -
- x (n m m
- : R
=
I5: m 2m W 40 : - C o g ; E - e > e H , T M y z
- : m 9 kz. 30 -
. . =
8: @ - . E m g
- - m O b
q 20 .- S 5 q F - - g Ez g : : - F8 f 8 8' 10 - - z O - - nn
- : o
- 99 9 zo '
. . . . ....t . . . .....I . . . .....I . . . . ....I . . . ....[ OO n<
1e-01 1e+00 1e+01 1e+02 1e+03 1e+04 95 R $ $ TINE FOLLOWING BREAK (seconds) 2
- z l O I
> a l M O em < m z
= ? ? .
E g @ a a
-. g O a .
9 5 z 0 o O FIGURE 2-3: CONDENSING HTC a !-~ ij ga MSLB 102% POWER, 7.48 FT2 BREAK AREA 8 i r > o m z m r z 150 a ;
- ~, - - - ~, - , , . --
2 g M 4 e 0 cMi r- % 135 ** HE * - 0 E EDo '
- - *111.9 BTU /hr-f t -F at 64 s 2
u. e x. -l mo , u_ m < m a i 120 - - a o sm
- a. O" m> i w - -
2 g W 2 -t g h i 105 - 8 ME! 2H s m m - 3 90 - - e a 5 0m i F - -
= > z a q - @ $ 8 s 'z '
75 - - m P O _ _ z i p = r . I 60 - - 2 P 8 U3 O
<C g "
O I 45 - a I g Ez O 30 - - E
" of !
J _ . 9 no z 15 - - g EE 9
- Sy 0
yj ! 1e-01 1e+00 1e+01 1e+02 1e+03 1e+04 5 m i6* , ir a a - TilVE FOLLOWING BREAK (seconds) z I
- o, N
e.<m,
o Q = F 'P E @ w E 2 E o R 9 s 9 o FIGURE 2-4: liter PLATE SURFACE TEMP. ! l @ 9 g MSLB 102% POWER, 7.48 FT2 BREAK AREA B j m
$p T
HEAT SrK 1 F o Oh G. EFT BOtJO) w h a g i z C* 8
- 4 S r- @
300 - - , - - , . . , - -
-l w & g>a 5- # d' Hq Maximtm liner plate surface temperature: 241 F at 150 seconds E a s m z-K b$
260 - - o m (f) m E
. 8 m
16 m w " o @ 2m W 220 - - 4 m 9 H 3 $. = > m z F m P q - z g = m A Q m o
@ 180 - -
m 8 2 8 m . E w ga F 29 U 'E: z 140 - - o
= n2 a
z O 9 g zz m 88 100 of o m 1e+00 1e+01 1e+02 1e+03 zE 9 'N $ i TlhE FOLLOWING BREAK (seconds) 2 ~ z l P M C I
> a l m M 4=s < m =
. . . . - - .~ .. _-. ..
= " ^?
E go @ ' m - a o a R 9
- $ 0 z o n
FIGURE 2-5: EbERGY $ 5 g ag MSLB 102% POWER, 7.48 FT2 BREAK AREA B {y !) VAPOR ----- St.W TOTAL FEAT seus m -4 [Om o f" 7 l D E o z cm
$ M D 0 r- $
1e+09: i
. . .n - - .n - n .
.n -
s u c
> x G>a ym
___ . ,- -- m _, g- - Q - M O >T r:3 m 1e+08 r: " Rl C , -' , if a sm m u 2 E d m o '
- 7 , ,,
2 mg. 1e+07 =
/ /' ' 8 1H
^ J E ./ -- m n, m I-
- ./- ,e R E o
z a-m (D / / iB "* cn d 1e+06 r / / , a > z
/ / W 9
> : e / m z G -
/* ,' = 5:: L E 1e+05 =
./' / , 2 P 8
[.l.] : / / . CD o Z : .' ' 6 W ~
./ / h U mg 1e+04 r ./ /
/ , e an Cz E / g
/
/
/
/ 8 o
Fg
/ = ot
/ n 1e+03 r - / , z z
E .e / 88 P
- f
/ / g zz 1e+02
/' ' " ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' " ' ' ' '"' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
m 1e-01 1e+00 1e+01 1e+02 1e+03 1e+04 n: z i o m , m 5 e r 3 > o TIME FOLLOWING BREAK (seconds) 2
- z l O
- on
> a l M W
*<mm
O n ? ? Q .sr & 8 a w - g n St O 5 0 o
< ~ Z O FIGURE 2-6 MSLB 102% POWER, 7.48 FT2 BREAK AREA EbERGY a l
2 ygg y g ) AIR ---- CMTADOR 2 I 2 O Om COOLERS SPRAY N -i D E z O C *o m o w 4 m rR a = r-1e+09 :
" z
> E>o x ym
- : E q =
_ m
. . m
=
w n p V m n >: , 1e+08 r __ 1 8 g a 2H E
, ~ .---- - " O r x
o (f) zy g 5 1e+07 r ' - 1 m 3 i
', . i e o 5
- 2m I- : ,gf, :
$ a
~
9 H
$ 1e+06 r
-f 1 E
y
,n V
s'
,/g i :
- =
Q m I W z A O E 1e+05 r ,- i 1 5 8 y i l 5 6 g : j l "q Ez 1e+04 r ! , g i ! ! - F5 ,
- ! : 2 8'
! 2 1e+03 [ :
] g yy 5 zo
- =
98 n< 1e+02 om z. 1e+01 1e+02 1e+03 1e+04 _ m r t
.i. o>
m e a - TIME FOLLOWING BREAK (seconds) Z I o O l D a j Y b em < m :o
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET '
'co" ".
PREUM CCN NO. PAGE OF l Projtet or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CcN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 15 ; i REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE R l l 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 h l
- 3 ASSUMPTIONS This section presents the assumptions that are used in this calculation. The assumptions are arranged in groups which parallel the Card Series data input employed by the COPATTA Code (Reference 6.5.a).
) 3.1 CARD SERIES 1 i
- a. ITEM 6: INITIAL CONTAINMENT RELATIVE HUMIDITY The initial relative humidity inside the containment is assumed to be 60 percent. The
- COPATTA Code User's Manual (Reference 6.5.a, page 3-1) states that abnormal termination 1
of the code run has been encountemd when a relative humidity of 0 percent has been used, and recommends that the minimum relative humidity value should be at least 1 percent. 1 Technically, a higher relative humidity will yield a lower peak pressure. However, the i effect is small; per Table 15 of BN-TOP-3 (Reference 6.11) increasing the relative humidity from 1 percent to 100 percent will decrease the containment peak pressure by approximateiy 0.4 psig. Therefore, the effect of increasing the relative humidity from 1 percent to 60 i percent will decrease the contaimnent peak pressure by approximately 0.2 psig. The probability of actually having a low relative humidity of 1 percent in a closed containment j with the reactor at power is remote. Experience indicates that contamments tend to be hot
- and humid, not hot and dry. Therefore, use of a higher relative humidity of 60 percent is realistic,
- b. ITEM 11: CONTAINMENT HEAT SINK REVAPORIZATION FRACTION Since this MSLB analysis is not an equipment qualification analysis, no credit for
] revaporization of the heat sink condensate will be taken. Per the COPATTA Code Theory ! Manual (Reference 6.5.a, Appendix D, Section III.b), when the containment atmosphere is at i or below the saturation tempera:ure, all condensate formed on the heat sinks is transferred i directly to the sump. When the atmosphere is superheated, revaporization allows for the i condensate to be transferred to the vapor region. The introduction of the relatively cold i revaporized water mass to the superheated vapor environment reduces the average energy j concentration in the vapor space, and consequently reducing the containment pressure and temperature. NUREG-0588 (Reference 6.4.b, Appendix B, Section 1.b) allows for up to 8 percent of the condensate to be transferred to the vapor region during the performance of equipment qualification analyses. The assumption that no cump liquid revaporizes is i conservative. 4
l NES&L DEPARTMENT l CALCULATION SHEET '
'cc". CCN NO.
PREUM PAGE oF Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN No. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 16 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 5 t j c. ITEM 12: TOTAL PRESSURE OUTSIDE CONTAINMENT The total pressure outside containment is assumed to be 14.7 psia. SONGS Units 2 and 3 are located at sea level. At this elevation, standard atmospheric pressure is approximately 14.7 psia per Table 3 of the ASHRAE Handbook (Reference 6.13). Per the COPA'ITA Code Theory Manual (Reference 6.5.a), the code uses the outside atmosphere total pressure in evaluating leakage rates between the containment and the outside environment. In this analysis no leakage is postulated and hence no leakage calculations are performed. j Therefore, any outside atmosphere total pressure may be modeled with no adverse impact on the analysis results.
- d. ITEM 13: RELATIVE HUMIDITY OF OUTSIDE ATMOSPHERE i
The relative humidity of the outside atmosphere is assumed to be 50 percent. Per the COPATI'A Code Theory Manual (Reference 6.5.a), the code uses the outside atmosphere relative humidity in evaluating leakage rates between the containment and the outside environment. In this analysis no leakage is postulated and hence no leakage calculations are performed. Therefore, any outside atmosphere relative humidity may be modeled with no adverse impact on the analysis results.
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET Lcc"gicu a, no. ,,,, o, Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CcN CONVERSION: CCN No. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANAL.YSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 17 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 5 3.2 CARD SEPJES 2
- a. ITEM 6: HTC BETWEEN CONTAINMENT ATMOSPHERE AND SUMP LIQUID No heat transfer is being modeled between the sump and the vapor regions of containment; therefore, the total heat transfer coefficient (HTC) for the heat transfer between the liquid (sump) and vapor regions of the containment is assumed to be 0.0 BTU /hr- F. A typical containment atmosphere to sump liquid HTC of 0.0 BTU /hr- F is listed in section 3.3.1 and Table 4 of Bechtel Topical Report BN-TOP-3 (Reference 6.11). Use of this value is also recommended by Bechtel Nuclear Standard N2.3.2 (Reference 6.12, sheet 5).
The COPATTA Code uses the containment atmosphere to sump liquid HTC in evaluating heat transfer between the containment atmosphere and the sump liquid. Use of a smaller HTC is conservative because it will inhibit heat transfer from the containment air to the sump liquid, maximize containment air energy, and consequently yield higher containment pressures and temperatures.
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'ccS " ' PRELIM. CCN NO. PAGE__ OF_ Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 ccN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - ! Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 18 4 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 ' I 4 3.3 CARD SERIES 5 l t a. ITEM 2: NUMBER OF AIR COOLER TRAINS OPERATING , A review of the results presented in Calculation N-4080-007 (Reference 6.1.d) reveals that a l } MSLB induced peak containment pressure and temperature occurs in the event of a failure of I one of the two cooling tnins. The consequences of either a main steam isolation valve l (MSIV) or main feedwater isolation valve (MFWIV) failure were found to be bounded by the consequences of a cooling train failure. Therefore, this MSLB analysis will assume a failure of one of the two containment cooling trains due to a single failure in the power system. As shown on P&ID 40172A-5 (Reference 6.8.a), each tmin has two air coolers. Therefore, only the two air coolers of one train are assumed to be operational in this MSLB analysis. f
- b. ITEM 4: AIR COOLERS' SHUTOFF TIME 4
, The air coolers will be assund to opente for the duration of the accident as modeled in this calculation. As discussed in Design Input Item 4.1, calculations for this analysis will be
- terminated at 10,000 seconds.
5,
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" "o ' PRELIM. CCN NO. PAG E__ OF_ Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: l CCN No. CCN - l Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 19 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 ' l 5 i 3.4 CARD SERIES 1001
- a. ITEMS 3 and 6: TEMPERATURE OF OUTSIDE ATMOSPHERE The outside air temperature at SONGS is assumed to be 100 F. This temperature is conservatively greater than the normal temperatures which are noted in the SONGS Units 2&3 UFSAR (Reference 6.3.c, section 2.3.2.1.2 and Table 2.3-6). Per the UFSAR, San Onofm meteorological data taken during the years 1974 and 1975 may be considend representative of normal conditions at the site. During this two year period, the absolute maximum temperature recorded at the site was 34.3 *C (93.7 F), occurring with an offshore Santa Ana wind on September 23,1975.
Per the COPATTA Code Theory Manual (Reference 6.5.a, section 3.2.3), the Code uses the outside atmosphere temperature in evaluating leakage rates between the containment and the outside environment. Per the COPA'ITA Code User's Manual (Card Series 1001), the Code also uses the outside atmosphere temperature in initializing the outer surface temperature of the containment stmeture, and in evaluating heat transfer between the outer surface of the containment stmeture and the outside environment. In this analysis no leakage to the outside atmosphere is postulated, and hence no leakage calculations are performed. Therefore, heat transfer to the environment dictates the modeling choice. Use of a higher air temperature is conservative because it will reduce heat tmnsfer to the environment. Bechtel Nuclear Standard N2.3.2 (Reference 6.12, sheet 13) states that for a concrete containment strue.ure the effect of heat transfer to the outside air is very small and virtually negligible with respect to the peak containment pressures and temperatures. However, this is true only in the short term following the onset of the accident. Long-term post-accident pressures and temperatures will be slightly maximized by maximizing the ambient temperature of the outside atmosphere,
- b. ITEMS 4 and 7: HTC BETWEEN A HEAT SINK AND OUTSIDE ATMOSPHERE The heat transfer coefficient between a heat sink and the outside atmosphere is assumed to be 2.0 BTU /hr-ft2 *F. Use of this value is recommended in Bechtel Design Standard N2.3.2 (Reference 6.12, page 13).
I \
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET "" > 1 PREUM. CCN NO. PAGE OF Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 20 l REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 l 5 4 DESIGN INPUT i i This section presents the design inputs used in this calculation. The design inputs are arranged in groups which parallel the Card Series data input employed by the COPA'ITA i Code. ' 4.1 CARD SERIES 0
- a. ITEM 2: FLOW PATH THROUGH THE SDCHX In the event of an MSLB, the source of Containment Spray System (CSS) water transfers from the Refueling Water Storage Tank to the containment sump upon receipt of a Recirculation Actuation Signal (RAS). The Shutdown Cooling Heat Exchanger (SDCHX) is used to cool containment sump water before it is recirculated through the CSS.
Calculadons for tnis analysis will be terminated at 10,000 seconds (2.78 hours). As shown in the summary of results, this analysis termination time is sufficient to ensure determination of the peak pressure and tempemture time of occurrence. By this term'mation time the containment pressure and temperature have also mturned to near initial conditions. If a run time in excess of 10,000 seconds were to be modeled, then the model should also reflect the Recirculation Actuation Signal (RAS) generation. Because the RAS is generated subsequent to the analysis termination time, the SDCHX will not be modeled in this MSLB accident evaluation. i I
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'oc" " ' PRELIM. CCN NO. PAGE__ OF__ r Projict or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 ccN CONVERSION: l CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 21 REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 ' r 5 4.2 CARD SERIES 1 l a. ITEM 3: INITIAL CONTAINMENT PRESSURE l The maximum allowable containment pressure is 1.5 psig per U23 Technical Specification Limiting Condition for Operation (LCO) 3.6.1.4 (Reference 6.3.a & b). This is equivalent to a pressure of 16.2 psia (1.5 psig + 14.7 psi). Per the COPATTA Code Theory Manual (Reference 6.5.a, section 3.1.1), the Code uses the initial containment pressure in the determination of the initial mass of air in the containment air space. The effect of varying the initial containment pressure is addressed in Bechtel Topical Report BN-TOP-3 (Reference 6.11, section 4.1.2 cnd Table 15). Based on the data presented in BN-TOP-3, it is concluded that maximizing the initial containment pressure will maximize the peak containment pressure. Consequently, long-term post-accident pmssures l will also be maximized. 1
- b. ITEM 4: CONTAINMENT NET FREE VOLUME The containment net free volume of 2.305e6 cubic ft is determined by Civil Calculation C-257-1.06.01 (Reference 6.1.a, page 7). This volume is conservatively based on a reduction of the containment gross volume by 110 percent of the components volume. This represents a reduction by a margin of 3.0e4 cubic ft to account for components not considered explicitly in the Civil Calculation.
Per the Copatta Code Theory Manual (Reference 6.5.a, section 3.1.1), the Code uses the containment volume in the determination of the initial masses of air and water in the containment air space. Per Bechtel Topical Report BN-TOP-3 (Reference 6.11, section 4.1.1.1), the containment volume is also used in evaluating the containment pressum, volume and energy relationship. Equations presented in Section 4.1.1.1 of BN-TOP-3 show that the containment pressure is inversely proportional to the containment volume. It is for this reason that Section 3.3.1 and Figure 16 of BN-TOP-3 recommend that the minimum containment net free volume should be modeled. Because the ideal gas law states that j pressure is proportional to temperature, minimizing the containment net free volume will also l maximize the peak containment tempenture. Consequently, long-term post-accident l pressures and temperatures will also be maximized. i
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'oc" "o ' PREUM. CCN No. PAGE OF Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSloN: CCN No. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 22
' REV '
ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE BRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 ' 5
- c. ITEM 5: INITIAL CONTAINMENT TEMPERATURE The initial bulk average containment atmosphere temperature is 120 *F. Technical Specification LCO 3.6.1.5 (References 6.3.a & b) indicates that this is the maximum allowable bulk average containment temperature.
Per the COPA'ITA Code Theory Manual (Reference 6.5.a, section 3.1.1), the Code uses the initial containment temperature in the determination of the initial mass of air in the containment air space. Per sections 3.1.2 and A.3 of the COPA'ITA Code Theory Manual, the Code also uses the initial containment temperature in the determination of the initial temperature profiles of those heat sinks in contact with the containment air. The effect of varying the initial containment temperature is addmssed in Bechtel Topical Report BN-TOP-3 (Reference 6.11, section 4.1.2 and Table 15). Based on the data presented, it is concluded that maximizing the initial containment temperature will maximize both the peak containment pressure and temperature. This conclusion is consistent with the fact that maximizing the initial containment temperature will increase the initial heat sink temperatures, thereby minimizing the effectiveness of the larger stmetural heat sinks in removing energy from the containment air space. Consequently, long-term post-accident pressures and temperatures will also be maximized.
- d. ITEM 8: INITIAL AVERAGE REACTOR COOIJuNT TEMPERATURE CE Ietter S-CE-2604 (Reference 6.2.a) provides the mass and energy release data to be modeled for the LOCA and MSLB scenarios. Appendix H to this CE Letter indicates that an initial average (reactor) coolant temperature of 582.945 *F should be modeled in the containment pressure-temperature analyses. This temperature is similar to the 582.1 *F average Reactor Vessel operating temperature specified in the RCS System Description SD-SO23-360 (Reference 6.7.a, section 2.2.1).
This parameter is used to set the initial temperature of all heat conducting region surfaces in contact with the reactor coolant. Since no heat sinks in contact with the reactor coolant are explicitly modeled in this analysis, the average reactor coolant temperature is not actually used in the COPA'ITA calculation. l
1 NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" "o ' PRELIM. CCN NO. PAGE OF Proj:ct or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 23 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 ' 5 l 1 i 4.3 CARD SERIES 5 i i a. ITEM 3: TIME OF AIR COOLER INITIATION ) Sheet 6 of Calculation N-4080-003 (Reference 6.1.h) indicates that the emergency fan coolers I (EFCs) will start 15 seconds after the onset of a MSLB event with offsite power available. t Sheet 6 of the analysis presented in Reference 6.1.h notes that this result is specifically
; applicable to a DBA MSLB (steam line break at 102% power), and the contamment high j pressure setpoint is currently 5 psig. Sheet 24 of Reference 6.1.h gives a time line for
{ emergency fan cooler operation following the DBA MSLB.
! Of note is that the air cooler initiation time modeled in Calculation N-4080-003 is based on j two seconds required for the containment pressure to increase to the containment high I pressure setpoint of 5.0 psig. Per the results of this calculation, the setpoint pressure of 5.0 i psig is reached in less than one second. The difference between the modeled time of 1 J
occurrence and the actual time of occurrence represents an additional one second of margin
- m this analysis.
4 i Another conservatism present in the 15 second EFC start time is the availability of the l component cooling water (CCW) to the fan cooler. Per sheet 21 of Reference 6.1.h, the 4 CCW block valves will be 83% open at the time the EFCs reach full speed (13 seconds), but the air cooler start time is conservatively modeled as the time at which the CCW block
- valves are fully opened. The CCW block valves will be passing nearly full flow to the j emergency fan coolers for two seconds prior to the assumed 15 second start time; therefore,
! an additional safety margin is added by a 15 second EFC start time. ] Delaying the start of the containment air cooler operation conservatively delays the removal j of containment atmosphere energy via the air coolers, thereby maintainmg a larger j containment air energy inventory that will maximize the containment pressures and i temperatures. 1
- b. ITEM 8: TEMPERATURE OF AIR COOLER HEAT EXCHANGER COOLANT The air cooler heat exchanger coolant temperature is 105 F. The maximum inlet temperature of the air cooler HX coolant is no greater than the maximum Component
; Cooling Water System (CCWS) heat exchanger outlet temperature. Per CCWS Design Basis Document DBD-SO23-400 (Reference 6.6.a, Table 0-1) and Calculation M-0026-001 (Reference 6.1.c, page 6), the maximum CCWS heat exchanger outlet temperature is 105 F.
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" " ' PREUM. CCN NO. PAG E__ OF__, Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN No. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 24 l REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 ' S 1 Temperature changes in the uninsulated component cooling water lines between the CCWS heat exchanger outlet and the air coolers are assumed negligible. Maximizing the air cooler coolant temperature minimizes the heat removed from the containment air circulating through the air cooler, thereby yielding a larger containment air energy inventory that will maximize the containment pressures and temperatures.
h NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" " ' PREUM. CCN NO. PAGE OF Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CcN CONVERSION: 1 CCN No. CCN - i Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 25 h i REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 ' f l 1 5 i ! 4.4 CARD SERIES 301 t l Card Series 301 is a table that is used to input blowdown following pipe rupture. It provides
- the water addition rate and the enthalpy of the water at various times. The NSSS vendor determines the mass and energy release data that describes a spectrum of break types and
- break sizes. This " blowdown" data is introduced into the containment air space where it i serves to increase both the containment pressure and temperature. Increasing the total mass
- and energy release will increase the containment pressure and temperature response.
- , The conclusions presented in Calculation N-4080-007 (Reference 6.1.d) indicate that the 2
3 worst case MSLB is a 7.4765 ft break area at 102 percent power, and a failure of a single cooling train with offsite power available. The mass and energy release data for this worst case MSLB is documented in C-E Letter S-CE-4007 (Reference 6.2.b, Appendix A). C-E ! ) Letter S-CE-2604 (Reference 6.2.a) mentions that the availability of offsite power permits I
- continued reactor coolant pump flow. Maintaining reactor coolant pump flow maximizes the rate of primary to secondary heat transfer which maximizes the rate of mass / energy release.
- MSLB mass flow rates in C-E Letter S-CE-4007 are presented in units of pounds per second.
? The water addition rates entered into Card Series 301 are in units of pounds per hour. As j shown in the following table, the Card Series 301 input data were calculated by scaling the l CE break mass flow rates by the conversion factor of 3600 seconds per hour. l MSLB energy flow rates in C-E Ixtter S-CE-4007 are presented in units of Million BTU per j second. The water enthalpies entered into Card Series 301 are in units of BTU per pound. As shown in the following table, the Card Series 301 input data were calculated by dividing the CE energy flow rates by the CE mass flow rates at each time step, and then multiplying 1 by the conversion factor of 1 x 106 BTU per Million BTU. i I i i I i
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'c"" ' PREUM. CCN NO. PAGE oF Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN No. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 26 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 h 4 MAIN STEAM2LINE BREAK MASS AND ENERGY RELEASE DATA * (7.4765 ft break area,102 percent power, cooling train failure) TIME NSSS SUPPLIED DATA DATA CONVERTED FOR CODE USE CS 301, Item 1 (C-E Letter S-CE-4007, Card Series 301, Items 2 & 3 Reference 6.2.b) BREAK MASS BREAK BREAK MASS BREAK BREAK FLOW RATE ENERGY FLOW RATE ENTHALPY ENERGY FLOW RATE FLOW RATE (sec) Obm/sec) (10' BTU /sec) Obm/ hour) (BTU /lbm) (BTU /hr) 0 14293.11 17.088682 5.145520E7 1.195589E3 6.151926E10 0.22 13525.09 16.196053 4.869032E7 1.197482E3 5.830579E10 0.42 12839.54 15.387747 4.622234E7 1.198466E3 5.539589E10 0.62 12238.71 14.679232 4 405936E7 1.199410E3 5.284524E10 1.08 11120.21 13.361993 4.00276E7 1.201595E3 4.810317E10 1.58 10246.82 12.314189 3.688855E7 1.201757E3 4.433108E10 2.08 9572.14 11.505884 3.445970E7 1.202018E3 4.142118E10 2.58 9239.69 11.096741 3.326288E7 1.200986E3 3.994827E10 3.58 8757.24 10.517954 3.152606E7 1.201058E3 3.786463E10 4.58 8412.41 10.108812 3.028468E7 1.201655E3 3.639172E10 5.58 8166.89 9.809439 2.940080E7 1.201123E3 3.531398E10 6.58 7985.75 9.591895 2.874870E7 1.201126E3 3.453082E10 7.58 7518.26 9.055021 2.706574E7 1.204404E3 3.259808E10 8.58 6856.46 8.257692 2.468326E7 1.204367E3 2.972769E10 9.58 6374.91 7.676909 2.294968E7 1.204238E3 2.763687E10 10.58 6000.34 7.223859 2.160122E7 1.203908E3 2.600589E10 12.58 5397.62 6.494388 1.943143E7 1.203195E3 2.337980E10 14.58 4905.39 5.897638 1.765940E7 1.202277E3 2.123150E10 16.58 4547.89 5.464546 1.637240E7 1.201556E3 1.967237E10 18.58 4290.89 5.153199 1.544720E7 1.200963E3 1.855152E10 20.58 4092.48 4.912703 1.473293E7 1.200422E3 1.768573E10
l l NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" " ' PREUM. CCN NO. PAGE OF Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 27 l REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R O S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 1 5 l l l MAIN STEAM LINE BREAK MASS AND ENERGY RELEASE DATA * (7.4765 ft2 break area,102 percent power, cooling train failure) TIME NSSS SUPPLIED DATA DATA CONVERTED FOR CODE USE CS 301, Item 1 (C-E Letter S-CE-4007, Card Series 301, Items 2 & 3 Reference 6.2.b) BREAK MASS BREAK BREAK MASS BREAK BREAK FLOW RATE ENERGY FLOW RATE ENTHALPY ENERGY FLOW RATE FLOW RATE (sec) Obm/sec) (10' BTU /sec) Obm/ hour) (BTU /lbm) (BTU /hr) 25.58 3687.57 4.420734 1.327525E7 1.198820E3 1.591464E10 30.58 3394.05 4.065479 1.221858E7 1.197825E3 1.463572E10 35.58 3184.46 3.811012 1.146406E7 1.196753E3 1.371964E10 40.58 2942.03 3.516629 1.059131E7 1.195307E3 1.265986E10 45.58 2722.56 3.251185 9.801216E6 1.194165E3 1.17M27E10 50.58 2536.83 3.026656 9.132588E6 1.193086E3 1.089596E10 60.58 2300.09 2.739258 8.280324E6 1.190935E3 9.861329E9 61.08 2012.66 2.396976 7.245576E6 1.190949E3 8.629114E9 62.08 1612.M 1.916982 5.803344E6 1.189165E3 6.901135E9 62.58 899.64 1.065766 3.238704E6 1.184658E3 3.836758E9 64.58 109.69 0.129429 3.948840E5 1.179953E3 4.659444E8 68.58 29.84 0.037332 1.074240E5 1.251072E3 1.343952E8 71.08 0 0 0 0 0 2E7 0 0 0 0 0
- a. The mass and energy release rates are assumed to vary linearly between eaCh data point.
l l
i i NES&L DEPARTMENT l CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" "os PRELIM. CCN No. PAGE_ OF__ Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN No. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BrSIS MSLB Sheet No. 28 d ,. REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 E 8 i 1 4.5 l CARD SERIES 801 j j a. INJECTION MODE CHARACTERISTICS The resalts presented in Calculation N-4080-007 indicates that the MSLB induced peak containment pressure and temperatures occur for the circumstance of a failure of one of the two cooling trains. The consequences of either a MSIV or MFWIV failure were found to be bounded by the consequences of a cooling train failure. . a.1 Injection Mode Start Times t a.1.(a) Containment Spray System Injection Mode Start Time
- With offsite power available, the contamment spray is functional within 49 seconds per Calculation N-4080-003 (Reference 6.1.h, sheet 6). To provide margin to address any future
, changes in system performance, this analysis assumes that the time of containment spray I initiation with offsite power available is 50 seconds. Delaying the start of the containment spray system operation conservatively delays the removal of containment atmosphere energy via the CSS, thereby maintainmg a larger containment air energy inventory that will increase the maximum contamment pressure and temperature. l 4 a.l.(b) Safety Injection System Injection Mode Start Time The Safety iniection System (SIS) supplies water to the reactor via pressurized discharge from the Safety Injection Tanks (SITS) as well as via pumped flow from the Refueling Water Storage Tank (RWST) upon receipt of a Safety Injection Actuation Signal (SIAS). Per the ESFAS Syst:m Description (Reference 6.7.d, Section 2.1.2.1.1), a SIAS is generated upon receipt of two out of four low pressurizer pressures or a high containment pressure. Because no mpture of the primary system exists in the MSLB event, the mass of water added to
, the Reactor Coolant System by the Safety Injection System (SIS) is only to compensate for inventory shnnkage due to the rapid cooldown. The effect of the safety injection on the mass
- release into containment is therefore implicitly modeled by Combustion Engineering in C-E i Letter S-CE-4007, and not modeled in this calculation.
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'cc"
- PRELIM. CCN NO. PAGE__ OF _
ProjGct or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 29 REV ORIGINATOR DATE GRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE lDATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 E i 8 a.2 Injection Mode Flow Rates 1 a.2.(a) Containment Jpray System Injection Mode Flow Rate l l A CSS injection mode volumetric flow rate of 1612 gallons / minute will be modeled beginning at l the time that a full flow spray pattern is initiated at the spray nozzles, and continuing until the i recirculation mode begins. This flow rate of 1612 gallons / minute represents the minimum CSS injection mode flow rate, and is calculated in M-0014-009 (Reference 6.1.b). This flow rate is for the conditions of a CSS Pump degradation of 7.5 pement, a containment peak pressum of 60 psig, and a minimum RWST water level of 33.35 feet. Minimizing the CSS injection mode flow rate reduces the amount of spray water available to remove energy from the containment air space, thereby maximizing the containment pressures and temperatures. At an injection mode water temperatum of 100 F (see following discussion), the containment l spray flow rate of 1612 gallons / minute has a specific volume of 0.016130 ft /3pound (Reference 6.14, page 88), and will be modeled in Card Series 801 with a mass flow rate of: l 12 = [(1612 gallons /minum) + (0.016130 ft 3/lbm)] x (0.13368 ft /3gallon) x (60 min / hour) l M = 8.02e5 pounds / hour l l l a.3 Injection Mode Water Temperature / Source i The SIS and CSS initially draw water from the RWST upon receipt of a SIAS, and subsequently from the Containment Sump upon receipt of a Recirculation Actuation Signal (RAS). Technical Specification LCO 3.5.4(c) (References 6. 3.a & b) indicates that the maximum allowable RWST temperature is 100 F. It is assumed that the SIS and CSS flow during the Ipiection Mode is at this maximum allowable RWST temperature of 100 'F. Maximizing the RWST water temperature increases the CSS injection mode water droplet temperature. Increasing'the spray droplet water temperatum reduces the ability of the spray droplets to remove energy from the contamment air space, thereby maximizing the containment pressures and temperatures.
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET '
'c" ". CCN PREUM NO. PAGE___ OF _
Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN No. CCN - Subject._ CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 30 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 ' 5
- b. RECIRCULATION MODE CHARACTERISTICS b.1 Recirculation Mode Start Time The Recirculation Actuation Signal (RAS) is deigned to change suction of the HPSI and CS pumps fmm the RWST to the Containment Emergency Sump when the RWST level is low.
The source of CSS and SIS water transfers from the RWST to the containment sump upon receipt of a RAS. Per the ESFAS System Description (Reference 6.7.d, section 2.1.2.1.7), an RAS is generated upon receipt of two out of four RWST low level signals. During the injection mode the RWST water is discharged in the form of containment spray, safety injection, and charging flow. To determine the time of CSS and SIS recirculation mode initiation it is necessary to quantify the useable RWST water volume, the flow rates exiting the RWST during the injection mode, and the time that these flow rates begin their injection mode discharge. The useful RWST volun.e is modeled as 300,000 gallons. CE Letter S-CE-6814 (Reference 6.2.c) states that the volume mquired for injection is 313,706 gallons when instrument error of the RWST low level setpoint and the RAS setpoint are considemd, and 300,000 gallons when this instmment error is not considered. In this calculation, the RWST volume is minimized to hasten the stait of the recirculation mode. Vasr = 300000 gallons
= [(1612 gpm) x (t - 50 sec) / (60 sec/ min)]
/. t % = 1.12E4 seconds Operation of the High Pressum Safety Injection (HPSI) pumps will also drain the RWST.
During the MSLB event, the RCS is maintained at a pressure that is sufficiently high to preclude the delivery of any HPSI flow into the RCS other than that which is necessary to compensate for RCS shrinkage during cooldown. The RWST inventory used by the SIS for RCS shnnkage compensation is minimal and will not significantly nduce the estimated 11,000 second drain time of the RWST. The time of occurrence of peak containment pressure and temperature is dependent on the start f the CSS injection mode, however the time for CSS recirculation mode initiation will have no n pact on the containment peak pressure or tempera:ure for an MSLB. Since the time for the recirculation mode is greater than the analyses run time, CSS recirculation will not be modeled in this MSLB analysis. l J
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" " ' PRELIM. CCN NO. PAGE O..- Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 ccN CONVERSION: CCN No. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 31 l REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R E O S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 y 4 4.6 CARD SERIES 1101 l a. ITEMS 5 and 6 1 The air coole.r heat removal rate as a function of containment atmosphere saturation temperature is determined in Calculation M-0072-036 (Reference 6.1.e) for the conditions of a CCWS volumetric flow rate at the inlet to a containment emergency air cooler of 2000 gallons / minute at 105 *F, a constant air flow rate through the air cooler of 31000 ft'/ minute, and a water side fouling factor of 5 x 104 The air cooler duty curve determined in Calculation M-0072-036 is plotted and tabulated on sheets 8 and 10 of that calculation. l Th8 air cooler duty curve determined in Calculation M-0072-036 includes performance data for a i superheated containment condition when the containment atmosphere saturation temperature
- exceeds 300 *F (cormsponding to a containment atmosphere saturation pressum of 67 psia).
l The COPATTA Code requires air cooler data for saturated conditions only. Since the l containment peak saturation temperature detennined by previous MSLB P/T is below 300 F, data for conditions above 300 "F is considered irrelevant for this calculation. ! Card Series 1101 is entered in the input data file as shown in the following table. As au initialization point, when the contamment air temperature is equivalent to the CCW temperature l of 105 *F at the inlet to the air cooler, then the air cooler will not remove any heat from the l containment air. 1 l l l 1 l 4
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET """ ' PRELIM. CCN NO. PAGE OF Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 32 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE I4 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 ' 4 CONTAINMENT AIR COOLER ABILITY TO REMOVE AIR ENERGY CONTAINMENT ATMOSPHERE AIR COOLER HEAT SATURATION TEMPERATURE REMOVAL RATE (Calc M-0072-036, pg 10) CONTAINMENT Card Seriec 1101, Item 6 Card Series 1101, Item 5 ATMOSPHERE CONDITIONS (BTU / hour) (*F) 105 0.000 Initial Condition 120 1.670e +06 Saturat3d Condition 130 3.020e + 06 Saturated Condition 140 4.570e +06 Saturated Condition 150 6.320e + 06 Saturated Condition 160 8.270e +06 Saturated Condition 170 1.040e +07 Saturated Condition 180 1.273e +07 Saturated Condition 190 1.523e +07 Saturated Condition 200 1.788e +07 Saturated Condition 210 2.068e +07 Saturated Condition 220 2.361e + 07 Saturated Condition 230 2.664e +07 Saturated Condition 240 2.974e + 07 Saturated Condition 250 3.291e + 07 Saturated Condition 260 3.611e + 07 Saturated Condition 270 3.931e + 07 Saturated Condition 280 4.252e + 07 Saturated Condition 287 4.474e + 07 Saturated Conditions 290 4.569e +07 Saturated Condition 300 4.882e +07 Saturated Condition 2: 320 N/A Superheated Condition
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET ' I
'cc" ".
PREUM CCN NO. PAGE OF ProjIct or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN No. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 33 REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 S 4.7 CARD SERIES 1201
- a. ITEMS 2 and 3 Contamment spray heat transfer efficiency varies as a function of the ratio of water vapor to air i
mass in the contamment atmosphere. Data points listed in the following table are extracted from Bechtel Topical Report BN-TOP-3 (Reference 6.11, Revision 4, Section 3.2.6 and Figure 2). Per BN-TOP-3, this data is for a spray system with a mean spray drop diameter of 1000 microns i and a drop fall height of 20 feet, and is standard "for virtually all PWR containment analyses". l Per the UFSAR (Reference 6.3.c, Section 6.2.2.1.2.2.B), the SONGS Units 2&3 mean spray 3 droplet diameter is about 650 microns. Since efficiency is inversely proportional to the diameter, use of spray heat transfer efficiency data applicable to a larger spray drop diameter is conservative. Decreasing the CSS efficiency reduces the ability of the spray droplets to remove energy from the contamment air space, thereby maximizing the contamment pressures and temperatures. CONTAINMENT SPRAY SYSTEM HEAT TRANSFER EFFICIENCY (mean spray drop diameter of 1000 microns and a drop fall height of 20 feet 4 i STEAM TO AIR MASS RATIO SPRAY EFFICIENCY Card Series 1201, Icem 2 Card Series 1201, Item 3 (unitiess) (percent) 0.0 72.9 0.1 73.7 0.2 74.7 0.3 75.7 0.4 77.1 0.5 78.8 0.6 80.9 0.7 83.2 0.8 86.3 0.9 91.2 1.0 96.1 1.1 98.3 1.2 99.5 1.3 100.0
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'co" " ' PRELIM. CCN NO. PAGE OF Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 34 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 l 4 4.8 HEAT SINK DATA SERIES A fundamental change in this p/t analysis involves the use of the Uchida convenJng hest transfer l correlation. BN-TOP-3 (Reference 6.11) page 3-12 indicates that the condensing ha: transfer correlation used in main steam line break analysis is the Uchida correlation. This modification represents a deviation from the Modified Tagami heat tmnsfer coefficient used in previous MSLB analyses. The COPATI A User's Manual, page 3-55 also indicates that the Uchida HTC is typically used for MSLB analysis. The change from a Modified Tagami HTC to a Uchida HTC is required as one step in the resolution of Open Item Report 92-069 (Reference 6.9.f)
- a. CONTAINMENT LINER / CONCRETE AIR GAP INTERFACE l
In this analysis the effective thickness of the interface (air gap) will be modeled as 0.00035 feet. This value is based on a containment liner to containment concrete mterface conductance of i 50 BTU /hr-ft2 - F, and an air thermal conductivity of 0.0174 BTU /hr-ft "F. l A typical containment liner to containment concrete interface conductance of 50 BTU /hr ft 2_op will be modeled. This conductance of 50 BTU /hr-ft2*F is listed in Bechtel Topical Report BN-TOP-3 (Reference 6.11, Section 3.3.1 and Table 4). Appendix A of BN-TOP-3 (page A-4) indicates that an effective one-dimensional interface conductance of this value will ensure a I conservative estimate of heat transfer to the containment wall. There will be some resistance to heat transfer from the containment atmosphere to the contamment structure at the containment liner-concrete interface due to air gaps or voids between the liner and the concrete. This resistance is accounted for in this interface conductance. Ure. of a smaller interface conductance is conservative because it will inhibit heat transfer from t'm contamment air to the containment concrete walls, maximize containment air energy, and consequently yield higher containment pressures and temperatures. l At a long-term average post-accident containment air temperature of 200 'F, Eneineering Heat
- Transfer (Reference 6.15, Table A-6, page 577) indicates that the air thermal conductivity is O.0174 BTU /hr-ft *F. The thermal conductivity of a material is a measure of the material's j
ability to conduct heat. Minimizing a heat sink's thermal conductivity will inhibit heat transfer from the containment air to the heat sinks. During the early paa of an accident this will maximize contamment air energy, and consequently yield higher containment pressures and temperatures.
NES&L DEPARTMENT i CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" " ' PRELIM. CCN NO. PAGE.__OF__, Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 ccN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. ___35 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 ' 5 Based on a containment liner to containment concrete interface conductance (h) of 50 BTU /hr-ft 2 *F, and an air thermal conductivity (k) of 0.0174 BTU /hr-ft- F, the effective thickness of the interface (air gap) will be: Interface thickness, At = (0.0174 BTU /hr-ft *F) + (50 BTU /hr-ft2 _.p) ! Interface thickness, At = 0.00035 feet
- b. HS #1 - REACTOR BUILDING DOME l The characteristics of the Reactor Building Dome are as determined in Calculation N-4080-002 l
(Refemnce 6.1.g, pages 121 through 125) for Heat Sink 1, except for the thickness of the Containment Liner / Concrete air gap interface. The thickness of the Containment Liner / Concrete air gap interface is modified to address a change in the contamment liner to containment concrete interface conductance, as discussed in Design Input Item 13.a. l t l c. HS //2 - REACTOR BUILDING CYLINDER #1 (ABOVE GRADE, BETWEEN EL. 29'6" ! AND 112'0") The characteristics of the Reactor Building Cylinder #1 (above grade, between plant elevations l 29'6" and 112'0") are as detennined in Calculation N-4080-002 (pages 125 through 128) for Heat Sink 2, except for the thickness of the Containment Liner / Concrete air gap interface. The thickness of the Containment Liner /Cor. crete air gap interface is modified to address a change in the contaimrent liner to contamment concrete interface conductance, as discussed in Design Input Item 13.a.
- d. HS #3 - REACTOR BUILDING CYLINDER #2 (BELOW GRADE, BETWEEN EL.15'0" l AND 29'6")
The characteristics of the Reactor Building Cylinder #2 (below grade, between plant elevations 15'0" and 29'6") are as determined in Calculation N-4080-002 (pages 134 through 136) for Heat Sink 3, except for the thickness of the Containment Liner / Concrete air gap
; interface.
e
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET PRELIM d
'ca ". CCN NO. PAGE OF Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERS!')N:
CCN No. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 36 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 i 5 The thickness of the Contamment Liner / Concrete air gap interface is modified to address a change in the contamment liner to contahment concrete interface conductance, as discussed in Design Input Item 13.a.
- e. HS #4 - BASEMAT (OTHER THAN THE REACTOR BASEMAT) I The characteristics of the Basemat (other than the Reactor Basemat) are as determined in Calculation N-4080-002 (pages 137 through 139) for Heat Sink 4.
- f. HS #5 - REACTOR BASEMAT AND STEAM GENERATOR PEDESTALS The characteristics of the Reactor Basemat and Steam Generator Pedestals are as determined in Calculation N-4080-002 (pages 139 through 141) for Heat Sink 5.
- g. HS #6 - REACTOR CAVITY WALLS BELOW EL.15'0" The characteristics of the Reactor Cavity Walls below plant elevation 15'0" are as determined in Calculation N-4080-002 (pages 142 through 144) for Heat Sink 6.
- h. HS #7 - REACTOR CAVITY WALLS ABOVE EL.15'0" The characteristics of the Reactor Cavity Walls above plant elevation 15'0" are as detennined in Calculation N-4080-002 (pages 144 through 146) for Heat Sink 7.
- i. HS #8 - LINED REFUELING CANAL WALLS The characteristics of the Lined Refueling Canal Walls are as determined in Calculation N-4080-002 (pages 146 through 149) for Heat Sink 8.
- j. HS #9 - STEAM GENERATOR COMPARTMENT WALLS, UNLINED REFUELING CANAL WALLS ABOVE EL. 63'6", AND OTHER INTERIOR WALLS
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" "o ' PREUM. CCN NO. PAGE OF Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 cCN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 37 REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 ' l l The characteristics of the Steam Generator Compartment Walls, Unlined Refueling Canal Walls j above plant elevation 63'6", and Other Interior Walls are as determined in Calculation l N-4080-002 (pages 149 through 152) for Heat Sink 9.
- k. HS #10 - FLOOR SLABS (OTHER THAN BASEMATS)
The characteristics of the Floor Slabs (other than basemats) represent a refinement of the characteristics of determined in Calculation N-4080-002 (pages 152 through 155) for Heat l Sink 10. A review of Calculation N-4080-002 (page 153) indicates that the concrete thickness of the floor slabs is 1.5 feet, and is based on input data provided as Attachment I to Calculation N-4080-002 l (page 327). When the nodalization of the Concrete Region was performed, Calculation i N-4080-002 (page 153) modeled the concrete as Heat Sink 10 Regions 3,4 e.nd 5, with a total concrete thickness of 2.0 feet. To model the cormet concrete thickness requires that the Region 5 thickness be reduced by 0.5 feet.
- 1. HS #11 - LIFTING DEVICES (EXCEPT STAINLESS STEEL PARTS)
The characteristics of the Lifting Devices (except stainless steel parts) are as detennined in Calculation N-4080-005 (Reference 6.1.f, pages 42 through 44) for Heat Sink 10. This heat sink description mpresents a refinement of the characteristics of the Lifting Devices first detennined in Calculation N-4080-002 (pages 156 through 158) for Heat Sink 11. l l
- m. HS #12 - MISCELLANEOUS CARBON STEEL (WITH THICKNESS GREATER THAN 2.50 IN)
- The characteristics of the Miscellaneous Carbon Steel (with thickness greater than 2.50 in) are as detennined in Calculation N-4080-005 (pages 44 through 47) for Heat Sink 11. This heat sink
- description represents a refinement of the characteristics of the Miscellaneous Carbon Steel first determined in Calculation N-4080-002 (pages 158 through 161) for Heat Sink 12.
- n. HS #13 - MISCELLANEOUS CARBON STEEL (WITH THICKNESS BETWEEN 1.00 IN i AND 2.50 IN) l l
i
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET >
'cc" ". CCN No.
PRELIM PAGE _ oF _ Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN No. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. M REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 ' 5 The characteristics of the Miscellaneous Carbon Steel (with thickness between 1.00 in and 2.50 in) are as determined in Calculation N-4080-005 (pages 47 through 50) for Heat Sink 12. l This heat sink description represents a refinement of the characteristics of the Miscellaneous l Carbon Steel first determined in Calculation N-4080-002 (pages 161 through 165) for Heat Sink j 13.
- o. HS #14 - MISCELLANEOUS CARBON STEEL (WITH 'lHICKNESS BET % TEN 0.50 IN AND 1.00 IN) l l The characteristics of the Miscellaneous Carbon Steel (with thickness between 0.50 in and 1.00 in) are as determined in Calculation N-4080-005 (pages 50 through 54) for Heat Sink 13.
This heat sink description represents a refinement of the characteristics of the Miscellaneous ! Carbon Steel first determined in Calculation N-4080-002 (pages 165 through 169) for Heat Sink 14. l
- p. HS #15 - MISCELLANEOUS CARBON STEEL (WITH THICKNESS LESS THAN 0.50 IN)
The characteristk.s of the Miscellaneous Carbon Steel (with thickness less than 0.50 in) are as determined in Calculation N-4080-005 (pages 54 through 59) for Heat Sink 14. This heat sink descriptie.1 mpresents a refinement of the characteristics of the Miscellaneous Carbon Steel first determined in Calculation N-4080002 (pages 169 through 173) for Heat Sink 15.
- q. HS #16 - ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT The characteristics of the Electrical Equipment are as determined in Calculation N-4080-005 (pages 59 through 61) for Heat Sink 15. This heat sink description represents a refinement of the cha:acteristics of the Electrical Steel first determined in Calculation N-4080-002 (pages 174 thmugh 176) for Heat Sink 16.
s , r. HS #17 - MISCELLANEOUS STAINLESS STEEL 1 The characteristics of the Miscellaneous Stainless Steel are as determined in Calculation i N-4080-005 (pages 62 through 65) for Heat Sink 16. This heat sink description represents a refinement of the characteristics of the Miscellaneous Stainless Steel as first determined in Calculation N-4080-002 (pages 176 through 179) for Heat Sink 17. i e
1 NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'c76"lcyno. e, ,,,, o, Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 39 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R i 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 ' 4 i
- s. HS #18 - UNLINED REFUELING CANAL WALLS (BELOW EL. 63'6")
The characteristics of the Unlined Refueling Canal Walls (below plant elevation 63'6") are as deteiinined in Calculation N-4080-002 (pages 180 through 182) for Heat Sink 18.
- t. HS #19 - REACTOR BUILDING CYLINDER #3 (THE CONTAINMENT SECTION WITH EMBEDDED STwnNERS BETWEEN EL. 29'6" AND 112'0")
The characteristics of the Reactor Building Cylinder #3 (the Containment Section with Embedded { Stiffeuers between plant elevations 25'6" and 112'0") are as determined in Calculation l N-4080-002 (pages 183 through 189) for Heat Sink 19, except for the thickness of the J Containment Liner / Concrete air gap int :rface, and except for the thickness of the concrete layer. j The thickness of the Containment Liner / Concrete air gap interface is modified to address a change in the contamment liner to containment concrete interface conductance, as discussed in Design Input Item 13.a. Due to an addition error, Calculation N-4080-002 (page 188) improperly modeled the concrete layer as 3.56524 feet thick. In this analysis the concrete layer will be modeled as 4.21108 feet, corresponding to the average thickness that was actually determin:d in Calculation N-4080-002 (page 186).
- u. HS #20 - VENT TUNNELS The characteristics of the Vent Tunnels are as determined in Calculation N-4080-002 (pages 190 through 192) for Heat Sink 20.
i
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" "os PRELIM. CCN NO. PAGE OF Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 40 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV C RIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 " 4 14 CARD SERIES 410001: MATERIAL PROPERTIES This Card Series provides the thermal conductivity and the volumetric heat capacity of the material used in this analysis. Five materials are utilized by this analysis: Material 1 Cad >on Steel l l Material 2 Concrete Material 3 StainlessSteel Material 4 Organic Paint Coating { Material 5 Air Gap The thermal conductivity of a material is a measure of the material's ability to conduct heat. Minimizing a heat sink's thermal conductivity will inhibit heat transfer from the containment air to the heat sinks. During the early part of an accident this will maximize containment air l energy, and consequently yield higher containment pressures and temperatures. , I l The volumetric heat capacity of a material is a measum of the material's ability to store energy. Minimizing a heat sink's volumetric heat capacity will inhibit heat retention by the heat sink, and l l consequently maximize energy retention within the containment air. This will yield higher ! containment pressures and temperatures. l l
- a. ITEMS 2 and 3: CARBON STEEL A typical Carbon Steel thermal conductivity of 25 BTU /hr-ft *F is listed in Bechtel Topical Report BN-TOP-3 (Reference 6.11, Section 3.3.1 and Table 4). Use of this value is recommended by Bechtel Nuclear Standard N2.3.2 (Reference 6.12, sheet 14).
A typical Carbon Steel Volumetric Heat Capacity of 54 BTU /ft3 - F is listed in Bechtel Topical Report BN-TOP-3 (Section 3.3.1 and Table 4). Use of this value is recommended by Bechtel Nuclear Standard N2.3.2 (sheet 14). i i b. ITEMS 4 and 5: CONCRETE l A typical Concrete thermal conductivity of 0.8 BTU /hr-ft *F is listed in Bechtel Topical Report
- BN-TOP-3 (Reference 6.11, Section 3.3.1 and Table 4). Use of this value is recommended by
- Bechtel Nuclear Standard N2.3.2 (Reference 6.12, sheet 14).
1 l 1
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" "os l PREUM. CCN NO. PAGE__ OF__ Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 ccN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT Pfr ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 41 REV ORIGINATOR DATE BRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 5 l S A typical Concate Volumetric Heat Capacity of 30 BTU /ft - F is listed in Bechtel Topical Repon BN-TOP-3 (Section 3.3.1 and Table 4). Use of this value is recommended by Bechtel Nuclear Standard N2.3.2 (sheet 14).
- c. ITEMS 6 and 7: STAINLESS STEEL A typical Stainless Steel thermal conductivity of 10 BTU /hr-ft
- F is listed in Bechtel Topical Repon BN-TOP-3 (Reference 6.11, Section 3.3.1 and Table 4). This value is typical for Types 304 and 316 austenitic stainless steel used for inside contamment SS piping. Use of a value of 10 BTU /hr-ft *F is recommended by Bechtel Nuclear Standard N2.3.2 (Reference 6.12, sheet 14).
A typical Stainless Steel Volumetric Heat Capa::ity of 54 BTU /ft8 *F is listed in Bechtel Topical Repon BN-TOP-3 (Section 3.3.1 and Table 4). Use of this value is recommended by Bechtel Nuclear Standard N2.3.2 (sheet 14).
- d. ITEMS 8 and 9: ORGANIC PAINT COATING A typical Organic Paint thermal conductivity of 0.1 BTU /hr-ft *F is listed in Bechtel Topical Repon BN-TOP-3 (Reference 6.11, Section 3.3.1 and Table 4). Use of this value is recommended by Bechtel Nuclear Standard N2.3.2 (Reference 6.12, sheet 14).
A typical Organic Paint Volumetric Heat Capacity of 20 BTU /ft' *F is listed in Bechtel Topical Report BN-TOP-3 (Section 3.3.1 and Table 4). Use of this value is recommended by Bechtel Nuclear Standard N2.3.2 (sheet 14).
- e. ITEMS 10 and 11: AIR GAP (@ 200 *F)
At a long-term average post-accident containment air temperature of 200 F, the book Engineering Heat Transfer. by S.T. Hsu, (Reference 6.15, Table A-6, page 577) indicates that the air thermal conductivity is 0.0174 BTU /hr-ft- F. The volumetric heat capacity is equal to the product of the air density (p) and the specific heat of air at constant volume (C,). The air specific heat capacity at constant volume rather than at constant pressure (C,) is employed because the containment air pressure is not constant, it varies greatly during the course of the accident. However, the air volume of the heat sinks is constant. The specific heat of air at constant volume is equal to the product of the specific heat of air at
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'cc " N o ' PREUM. CCN NO. PAGE__ OF__ j Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 42 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE BRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 ' . f 5 i i i constant pressum and the ratio of specific heats (k = C,/C,). At a long-term average post-accident containment air temperature of 200 'F, the book Engineerine Heat Transfer, by j S.T. Hsu, (Table A-6, page 577) indicates that p is equal to 0.060 lbm/ft', and C, is equal to 0.241 BTU /lbm *F. Crane Technical Paper 410 (Reference 6.10, page A-22) indicates that k is i equal to 1.4. Therefore, the air volumetric heat capacity is: i j pC, = (0.060 lbm/ft') x (0.241 BTU /lbm *F) + (1.4) pC, = 0.0103 BTU /ft' *F .i 4 4 f I 1 i i
NES&L DEPARTMENT j CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" Nod PREUM. CCN Wo. PAGE_._ oF _ I Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CoNVERSloN: CCN No. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT PR ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 43 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 ' 5 l l 5 METHODOLOGY The MSLB case evaluated in this calculation is a 7.48 ft2 steam break at 102% power with offsite power available and a loss of one of two cooling trains. The evaluations utilized the l Bechtel COPATTA computer code (Reference 6.5.a) model the contamment response to the MSLB. The COPATTA Code is capable of considering the effects of reactor system blowdown, core decay power energy release, metal-water reaction energy release, and sensible heat release from the reactor system piping. In addition, the Code can consider heat absorption by the containment structure and equipment within the stmeture, and engineered safeguard features including air coolers, containment sprays, and reactor core safety injection. The COPATTA Code calculates conditions in two separate mgions of the contamment: the containment atmosphere (vapor region), and the sump (liquid region). Following completion of the primary system blowdown, the program also calculates conditions in a third region, the water contained in the reactor vessel. The three regions are open systems in a thermodynamic sense since the COPATTA Code permits mass flow across the boundaries of all three mgions. Mass and energy are transferred between the liquid and vapor regions by boiling, condensation, or liquid dropout. Each region is assumed homogeneous, but a temperature difference can exist between regions. Any moisture condensed in the vapor region during a time increment is assumed to fall immediately into the liquid region. Non-condensible gases are included in the vapor region. This analysis with the COPATTA Code is presented in four sections: Section 8.1: COPATTA Code Card Series Input Data Section 8.2: COPATTA Code Input Files Section 8.3: COPATTA Code Output Section 8.4: Mass and Energy Balance s
( i NES&L DEPARTMENT 4 i CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" No ' PRELIM. CCN NO. PAG E__, OF.__ Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN No. CCN - , Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 44 i REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 ' 5 6 REFERENCES J t 6.1 Calculations l i
- a. SONGS Units 2&3 Calculation C-257-1.06.01, Revision 1, " Containment Shell Analysis !
- Containment Passive Heat Sink" (dated 7/28/77).
l l b. SONGS Units 2&3 Calculation M-0014-009, Revision 0, " Containment Spray Pumps In i Service Testing Minimum Requirements" (Mud 3/3/p3) /9,.e j i
- c. SONGS Units 2&3 Calculation M-0026-001, Revision 5, " Component Cooling Water !
Heat Exchangers" (dated 11/15/89). I I
- d. SONGS Units 2&3 Calculation N-4080-007, Revision 2, " Containment Pressure and i
Temperature From MSLB at Various Power Levels" (dated 4/21/83)
- e. SONGS Units 2&3 Calculation M-0072-036, Revision 0, " Containment Emergency Cooler Performance Verification". (a.Al n./p/93) mi.no-9V
- f. SONGS Units 2&3 Calculation N-4080-005, Revision 0, "MSLB Analysis for Envimnmental Qualification". (ddd 3/st/rB) m i-se 94
- g. SONGS Units 2&3 Calculation N-4080-002, Revision 1, " Containment Press.-Temp Transient Analysis" (dated 10/19/76).
- h. SONGS Units 2&3 Calculation N-4080-003, Revision 5, " Containment Spray (CS) and Emergency Fan (EF) Actuation Times" (dated 12/23/93).
6.2 Correspondence
- a. Letter from CE to BPC, S-CE-2604, dated March 1,1976.
(CDM number C76030lG-45-2-4SVT).
- b. Letter from CE to BPC, S-CE-4007, dated June 29,1977.
I * (CDM number C770629G-8-26) I
- c. Letter from CE to BPC, S-CE-6814 dated August 24, 1981.
- (CDM number C810824G).
i
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" "o ' PRELIM. CCN NO. PAGE__ OF_ Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSloN: CCN No. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 45 4 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Olive.- 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 ' 4 6.3 Licensine Documents i
- a. San Onofre Unit 2 Operating License and Technical Specifications, up to and including Amendment 101.
- b. San Onofre Unit 3 Operating License and Technical Specifications, up to and including Amendment 90. -
- c. SONGS 2&3 Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR), up to and including Revision 9.
6.4 Regulatory Documents
- a. 10 CFR Part 50, "" Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities".
Revised as of January 1,1993.
- b. NUREG-0588, Rev 1, " Interim Staff Position on Environmental Qualification of Safety-Related Electrical Equipment".
- c. NUREG-0800, Standard Review Plan 6.2.1.1.A, Revision 2, July 1981. "PWR Dry
- Containments, Including Subatmospheric Containments".
I 6.5 Bechtel Comouter Proerams
- a. Bechtel Standard Computer Program, MAP-175, COPATTA, Version G1-14, j
" Containment Pressure and Temperatum Transient Analysis", User & Theory Manuals.
i a i l
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'cc""o' PRELIM. CCN NO. PAGE OF Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: OCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. , 46 REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R ' j O S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 ' 4 1 6.6 Design Basis Document Recons
- a. DBD-SO23-400, Revision 0, " Component Cooling Water System" (dated 12/27/91).
6.7 System Descriptions
- a. SD-SO23-360, Revision 2, " Reactor Coolant System", i J
6.8 . Drawings
- a. P&ID 40172A, (Rev 7) Containment HVAC System (Emergency)-System No.1501 6.9 Open Item Reports
- a. Open Item Repon 92-015, Accepted 1/15/92.
- b. Open Item Report 92-045, Accepted 2/11/92.
- c. Open Item Repon 92-054, Accepted 2/13/92.
- d. Open Item Repon 92-057, Accepted 2/20/92
- e. Open Item Repon 92-059, Accepted 2/20/92
- f. Open Item Report 92-069, Accepted 2/25/92 6.10 Crane Technical Paper No.410, " Flow of Fluids", Twenty Founh Printing-1988.
6.11 Bechtel Topical Repon BN-TOP-3, Revision 4, " Performance and Sizing of Dry; i Pxssure Containments", dated March 1983. 6.12 Bechtel Nuclear Design Standard N2.3.2, Revision 0, " Containment Analysis, dated July 1975. I
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET ' c" ". PREUM CCN NO. PAGE __ OF_._ Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 cCN CONVERSION: CCN No. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 47 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IHE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 ' 5 l l l 6.13 1989 ASHRAE Handbook of Fundamentals. I-P Edition, published by the American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Engineers, Inc., Atlanta, Georgia, l 1989. l 6.14 ASME Steam Tables, Fifth Edition, published by the American Society of Mechanical i Engineers". ' 6.15 Shao Ti Hsu, Engineering Heat Transfer, published by D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc. of Princeton, New Jersey,1963. 6.16 NCRs 93030001,93030002,93030003, and 93030004. All dated 12/21/93. l l l i l t 1 4 e i f
l NES&L DEPARTMENT l CALCULATION SHEET 7,7l fica no. ,,,, c, Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No, N-4080-027 ccN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 48 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 E 4 7 NOMENCLATURE CCS Containment Cooling System (Containment Air Cooling System) f CCWS Component Cooling Water System CE Combustion Engineering CSAS Contamment Spray Actuation Signal CSS Containment Spray System CVCS Chemical and Volume Control System DESLS Double Ended Suction I2g Slot ESFAS Engineered Safety Features Actuation Signal HPSI High Pressure Safety Injection HTC Heat Transfer Coefficient HVAC Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning LCO Limiting Condition of Operation LOCA Loss of Coolant Accident . LOOP IAss of Offsite Power LPSI Low Pressure Safety Injection MOV Motor Operated Valve NCR Non-Conformance Report NSSS Nuclear Steam Supply System RAS Recirculation Actuation Signal RB Reactor Building RCS Reactor Coolant System RWST Reactor Water Storage Tank SDCHX Shutdown Cooling Heat Exchanger SIAS Safety Injection Actuation Signal SIS Safety Injection System SIT Safety Injection Tank UHS Ultimate Heat Sink
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" " ' PRELIM. CCN No. PAGE _ OF _ Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION- ' CCN No. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 49 1 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE R l 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 ' 4 8 CALCULATION 8.1 COPATTA CODE INPUT DATA l Section 8.1.1 presents the title cced. Sections 8.1.2 through 8.1.25 will provide input data for l the variable data series, while Sectiv.'s 8.1.27 through 8.1.33 will provide input data for the heat sink data series. Section 8.1.26 presen:s the variable end card, and Section 8.1.33 presents the end card. Item I in all Card Series is the Card Series Identifier, i.e. the Card Series number. 8.1.1 TITLE CARD This card must precede each set of base case data. It must contain an asterisk in Column 1, and any combination of numeric and alphanumeric characters in the remaining 79 columns. The information on this card will appear at the top of each page of output for this prime case problem. This calculation evaluates a 7.4765 ft2 MSLB at 102% power, with the containment heat removal' systems affected by a single failure (i.e. only one of two cooling trains is functional) with offsite power available.
- MSLB CASE, 102% POWER, LOSS OF ONE COOLING TRAIN, OFFSITE POWER AVAIL.
I NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET Lccs"ficu
, so. ,,,, og Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CcN CONVERSION:
CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 50 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 h 5 8.1.2 CARD SERIES 0: Option Information Card Series O provides option information, This Card Series is entered in the input data file as:
& LIST POOL =0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0/
The entries in Card Series 0 include: Item 2: IHEAT = 0 A value of 0 indicates that no heat exchanger is modeled for containment spray per Design Input Item 4.1.a. Item 3: NOIT = 1 A value of 0 enables the option to iterate for the estimated time to peak pressure, and a value of I disables the option. Per the COPATTA User's Manual (Reference 6.5.a), iteration is not to be requested unless use of the Tagami heat transfer coefficient (HTC) is specified for the HTC control on Heat Sink Card Series IXX400. As noted in Design Input 4.8, only the Uchida heat transfer coefficient correlation is modeled in an MSLB analysis. Therefore, no iteration for the time to peak pmssure is required. Item 4: NPTOP = 0 A value of 0 mquests a normal set of data at each printout time step. As recommended by sheet 4 of Bechtel Nuclear Standard N2.3.2 (Reference 6.12), a normal set of data should be requested at each printout time step. Item 5: LAST = 1 A value of 1 indicates that this is the last case in a series of COPATTA Code runs. As discussed on page 3-11 of the COPATTA User's Manual (Reference 6.5.a), the option to terminate must equal I because the change case option is not active.
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET '
' c" " .
PREUM CCN NO. PAGE OF Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T , ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 51 REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R l 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 '
~~ l s 1 iten' 6: IUHS_ TYPE = 0 A 'alue of 0 indicates that no Ultimate Heat Sink (UH"' ' to be modeled.
Item 7: IHE_SRC = 0 A value of 0 indicates that the constant temperature and mass flow rate defined in Items 5 and 6 of Card Series 4 will be used for the Shutdown Cooling Heat Exchanger (SDCHX) data. Item 8: IEX_HE_ TYPE = 0 ' This parameter is used to model external heat loads if the value of IHEAT is greater than or equal to four in Item 2 of Card Series 0. In this analysis IHEAT is assigned a value of 2, so any value may be modeled for IEX_HE_ TYPE. Therefore, a value of 0 is arbitrarily chosen to be modeled. Item 9: IHE_UAMOD = 0 A value of 0 indicates that the COPATTA Code should use the SDCHX overall heat transfer coefficient on Item 4 of Card Series 4 as a constant.
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET l' E"u" $CN NO. PAGE_ OF__ Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN No. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 52 REV ORIGINATOR DATE lRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 E S 8.1.3 CARD SERIES 1: General Problem Information Card Series 1 provides general problem information. This Card Series is entered in the input data file as either, for the preliminary run:
& LIST POOL =1,1E4,16.2,2.305E6,120,0.6,20,582.945,1,1,0,14.7,0.50/
The entries in Card Series 1 include: ITEM 2: TFNL = IE4 seconds Calculations for this analysis will be terminated at 10,000 seconds (2.78 hours). As shown in the summary of results, this analysis termination time is sufficient to ensum determination of the peak pressure and temperature time of occurrence. By this termination time the containment pressure and temperature have also returned to near initial conditions. As discussed in Design Input Item 4.5.b, if a run time in excess of 10,000 seconds were to be modeled, then the model should also reflect actuation of the contamment spray recirculation mode (spray water source transferred from the Refueling Water Storage Tank to the containment sump), and the corresponding use of the Shutdown Cooling Heat Exchanger. ITEM 3: PAIR = 16.2 psia The initial pressure inside the Containment prior to the start of the MSLB mass and energy release is 16.2 psia (1.5 psig), as discussed in Design Input Item 4.2.a. ITEM 4: VOL = 2.305E6 ft' The containment net free volume is 2.305E6 ft', as discussed in Design Input Item 4.2.b. ITEM 5: TAIR = 120 "F The contamment atmosphere temperature prior to the start of the MSLB mass and energy release is 120 *F, as discussed in Design Input Item 4.2.c.
NES&L DEPARTMENT i CALCULATION SHEET lR
' 'O%cN No. rAoE_ os_
Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: l CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 53 i REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R , O S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 ' l l ITEM 6: HUM = 0.6 l The relative humidity of the atmosphere inside the Containment prior to the start of the MSG mass and energy release is 60 percent, as discussed in Assumption 3.1.a. ITEM 7: NSL = 20 l As detailed in Section 8.1.27, twenty Heat Sinks are modeled in this calculation. l l l ITEM 8: TBOIL = 582.945 *F ! The temperature of the primary coolant prior to the start of the MSG mass and energy mlease is 582.945 *F, as discussed in Design Input 4.2.d. This value sets the initial temperature of all heat conducting region surfaces in contact with the primary coolant. ITEM 9: TCHECK = 1 second l If the option to iterate for peak pressure is enabled (Item 3 on Card Series 0 is zero), then i the variable TCHECK represents the time in seconds up to which the program will search for a second pressure peak after a first one has been located. The time to a second pressure peak is used to determine the condensation heat transfer coefficient; this quantity is used with the modified Tagami condensing heat transfer coefficient. Per Design Item 4.8, the Uchida value will be used for the heat tansfer coefficient in a MSG. Therefore the option to iterate for peak pressure is disabled (Item 3 on Card Series 0 is one). If the TCHECK variable is not used, Bechtel Nuclear Design Standard N2.3.2 (Reference 6.12, page 5) states that the variable should be assigned a value of I second. ITEM 10: THSDD = 1 second This variable is only used if Tagami condensation heat transfer coefficient (HTC) calculations are modeled. As noted in Design Input 4.8, only the Uchida HTC cormlation is modeled in an MSG analysu. Thenfore, any value may be entered for this variable. In this MSG analysis the variable THSDD is modeled with an arbitrary value of I second.
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'co" " ' ' PRELIM. CCN NO. PAGE oF l Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN No. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 54 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE R 4 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 ' 5 i 1 ITEM 11: EVAP = 0 The fraction of heat condensate which will be allowed to revaporize is zero. No credit for revaporization is taken in this analysis per Assumption 3.1.b. ITEM 12: ENVRNP = 14.7 psia The total pressure outside containment is assumed to be 14.7 psia per Assumption 3.1.c. . l ITEM 13: ENVRH = 0.50 i The relative humidity of the outside atmosphere is assumed to be 50 percent per 1 Assumption 3.1.d.
l NES&L DEPARTMENT i CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" " > l l PRELIM. CCN NO. PAGE__ OF___ j Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: I CCN NO. CCN -- Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 55 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE R I O S. Oliver 12/50/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 h 5 8.1.4 CARD SERIFR 2 : Additional General Problem Information Card Series 2 provides additional general problem information. This Card Series is entered in the input data file as:
& LIST POOL =2,0,0,0,0,0,120,2E7/
The entries in Card Series 2 include: ITEM 2: MWATR = 0 lbs No water is to be introduced as a step input at the time blowdown starts. ITEM 3: UTOT = 0 BTU d The total enthalpy associated with the water entemd as variable MWATR is arbitrarily set to 0 BTU (any value is acceptable since variable MWATR is set to 0 pounds). ITEM 4: MLEFT = 0 lbm l l The variable MLEFT is the number of pounds of water left in the prienary system available j to be evaporated by rea:: tor decay heat (Card Series 101) or metal water reaction heat (Card j Series 201). This parameter is required for a LOCA analysis, not a MSLB analysis. , ITEM 5: REVOL = 0 ft' The reactor volume below the pipe mpture is 0 ft'. This parameter is required for a LOCA l analysis, not a MSLB analysis. 4 j ITEM 6: HAB = 0 BTU /hr *F The total heat transfer coefficient for the heat transfer between liquid (sump) and vapor i regions of the containment is modeled as 0 BTU /hr *F per Assumption 3.2.a. s ITEM 7: TCONT = 120 *F i
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" "o ' PRELIM. CCN No. PAGE_ OF_ Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 ccN CONVERSION: CCN No. CCN - ) Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 56 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R j 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 h 5 If the temperature boundary contml on Heat Sink Card Series IXX400 equals zero, then the variable TCONT is used to define the convective heat tmnsfer coefficient and the bulk temperature to which the heat sink surfaces are exposed. Each of the twenty heat sinks i modeled in this analysis assigns the temperature boundary control on Heat Sink Card Series 1XX400 a value other than zero. Since the variable TCONT is not used, Bechtel Nuclear Standard N2.3.2 (Reference 6.12, page 5) states that any positive value may be modeled. Since the COPATTA Code input files of Calculation N-4080-007 (Reference 6.lj) employed an arbitrary value of 120 "F, this analysis will also model an arbitrary value of 120 *F. ITEM 8: PHELP = 2E7 seconds The time at which mass and energy balance calculations for the water within the reactor vessel will begin is 2E7 seconds. This parameter is required for a LOCA analysis, not a MSLB analysis, therefore any time greater than the analysis run time may be used.
NES&L DEPARTMENT j CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" Mo ' PRELIM. CCM NO. PAGE_ OF_ { Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 cCN CONVERSION: j CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 57 j REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 5 l 8.1.5 CARD SERIES 3: 12akage from Containment ' Card Series 3 allows modeling of the addition and/or deletion of air / steam via containment HVAC operation. No credit is taken for HVAC operation in this MSLB analysis: Therefore, this Card Series is entered in the input data file as:
& LIST POOL =3,0,0,0,0,0,2E7,0,0,0,0/
The entries in Card Series 3 include: ITEM 2: 0 seconds The HVAC start time is 0 seconds. ITEM 3: 0 ft 3/ minute 1 The initial HVAC volume addition rate is 0 ft /S minute. l l l ITEM 4: 0 *F ' s The initial temperature of the air added is 0 F. ITEM 5: O percent The initial relative humidity of the air added is O percent. ITEM 6: 0 ft /$minute The initial HVAC volume removal rate is 0 ft'/ minute.
- ITEM 7
- 2E7 seconds The HVAC stop time is 2E7 seconds. *."his time must be longer than the analysis run time.
i NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET ' " eREun $CN NO. PAGE OF Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN No. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 58 l l l REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 ' 8 ITEM 8: 0 ft'/ minute The final HVAC volume addition rate is O ft'/ minute. I ITEM 9: 0 *F The final tempemture of the air added is 0 *F. ITEM 10: 0 percent The final relative humidity of the air added is O percent. ITEM 11: 0 ft'/ minute The final HVAC volume removal rate is 0 ft'/ minute. e l
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET "MCWIJO. aEu PAGE _ OF _ Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN No. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 59 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 h 5 l 8.1.6 CARD SERIES 4: Heat Exchanger Data Card Series 4 provides for simulation of heat exchangers for long term analysis of the effectiveness of the containment spray and safety injection systems. Card Series 4 also provides for a means of starting the containment spray. The COPATTA Code compares two potential starting times for the contamment spray, and starts the air coolers at the later of the two times. The first time is specified by the first non-zero spray flow entry in Card Series 801, Item 2. The second time, TNOW, is defined as the sum of the time at which the spray initiation signal (Item 12) is reached, and the instrumentation and equipment delay time (Item 13). In this analysis, the desimd containment spray start time is to be the time modeled in Card Series 801. To ensure that the Card Series 801 time is used by the COPATTA Code, the Items 12 and 13 variables are modeled as 0 psia and 0 seconds, respectively. This leads to the calculation of a containment spray start time of 0 seconds for the variable TNOW, and forces the code to employ the larger time specified in Card Series 801. l This Card Series is entered in the input data file as:
& LIST POOL =4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0/
The entries in Card Series 4 include: ITEM 2: IHEX = 0 l A value of 0 indicates that a primary heat exchanger will not be modeled in this analysis. As discussed in Design Input Item 4.1.a, the Shutdown Cooling Heat Exchanger (SDCHX) will l not be modeled in this MSLB analysis. ITEM 3: HEX (1) = 0 ft2 The primary heat exchanger surface area. Since no primary heat exchanger is modeled, a value of zero is used for this variable. ITEM 4: HEX (2) = 0 BTU /hr-ft _op 2 The overall heat exchanger heat transfer coefficient. Since no primary heat exchanger is modeled, a value of zero is used for this variable.
l NES&L DEPARTMENT 1 CALCULATION SHEET ' '
'cc" ". CCN NO.
PREUM PAGE OF Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - ] i Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 60 l l REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 s ITEM 5: HEX (3) = 0 'F 1 The pdmary heat exchanger coolant inlet temperature. Since no primary heat exchanger is modeled, a value of zero is used for this variable. l ITEM 6: HEX (4) = 0 lbm/hr The primary heat exchanger coolant flow rate. Since no primary heat exchanger is modeled, a value of zero is used for this variable. i i 1 ITEM 7: IHIX = 0 A value of 0 indicates that no secondary heat exchanger is modeled in this analysis. l l ITEMS 8 through 11: 0, 0, 0, 0 i i These entries are all zero, since there are no secondary heat exchangers in use. Per the COPATTA Code Users Manual (Reference 6.5.a, page 3-20), if only a primary heat i exchanger is used, zeroes should be input for Items 7 through 11, and 14. 1 l 1 ITEM 12: 0 psia l As discussed in the introduction to this Card Series 4, the containment spray pressure initiation signal is modeled as O psia. ITEM 13: 0 seconds , As discussed in the introduction to this Card Series 4, the instrumentation and equipment delay time after receiving the pressure signal is modeled as 0 seconds. t
.i NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET '
Atu"" $cN No. eAcE___ or_ Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 ccN CONVERSION: 1 1 ccN No. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 61 4 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE lRE DATE R } O S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 3 h s 1 ITEM 14: DMINL = 0 lb/hr l This entry is zero, since there are no secondary heat exchangers in use. Per the COPATTA Code Users Manual (Reference 6.5.a, page 3-20), if only a primary heat
; exchanger is used, zeroes should be input for Items 7 through 11, and 14.
]; l I
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET ' " nEu$cN No. ,,Ao E or Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. Q;! REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 ' 4 8.1.7 CARD SERIES 5: Air CoolerInformation Card Series 5 provides for the selection of the number of containment air coolers operating, and the period of operation. The air cooler heat removal capability curve is read into the problem in Card Series 1101. , The COPA'ITA Code compares two potential starting times for the air coolers, and starts the air coolers at the later of the two times. The first time is specified by Item 3. The second time, TNOW, is defined as the sum of the time at which the air cooler ini tiation signal (Item 5) is reached, and the TDELAY signal processing delay time (Item 6). In this analysis, the desired air cooler stait time is to be the time modeled in Item 3. To ensure that the Item 3 time is used by the COPATTA Code, Items 5 and 6 variables are modeled as 0 psia and 0 seconds, respectively. This leads to the calculation of an air cooler start time of 0 seconds for the variable TNOW, and forces the code to employ the larger time specified in Item 3. Card Series 5 is entered in the input data file as:
& LIST POOL =5,2,15,1E4,0,0,0,105/
The entries in Card Series 5 include: ITEM 2: 2 There are two containment air coolers modeled in tids analysis as discussed in Assumption 3.3.a. ITEM 3: 15 seconds for MSLB with offsite power available. The value represents the air coolers' starting time of 15 seconds as discussed in Design Input Item 4.3.a. ITEM 4: IE4 seconds The shutoff time for the air coolers is modeled as 1E4 seconds. Use of this time will ensure that the containment air coolers will operate for the duration of the accident, as discussed in Assumption 3.3.b.
NES&L DEPARTMENT l CALCULATION SHEET '
'co". CCN NO.
PRELIM PAGE_ OF_ Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 ccN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - , Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 63 l REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 h 5 ITEM 5: O psia As discussed in the introduction to this Card Series 5, the air cooler pressure initiation signal is modeled as O psia. ITEM 6: TDELAY = 0 seconds As discussed in the introduction to this Card Series 5, the instntmentation delay time after receiving the pressure signal is modeled as 0 seconds. l ITEM 7: IAC_SRC = 0 A value of 0 indicates that the air cooler heat exchanger coolant temperature is the constant value given in Item 8 of this Card Series 5. ITEM 8: 105 *F 1 The temperature of the air cooler heat exchanger coolant is 105 "F as discussed in Design Input Item 4.3.b.
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'co" "os PRELIM. CCN NO. PAGE OF Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CcN CONVERSloN: CCN NC. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 64 REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 ' S 8.1.8 CARD SERIES 6: Instantaneous Release of Energy Card Series 6 provides for the instantaneous release of a specified amount of energy (to the containment atmosphere, containment sump, or to the reactor vessel water) at any one time during the accident. However, other than blowdown, no instantaaeous release of energy is modeled in this analysis. Therefore, Card Series 6 is entered in the input data file as:
& LIST POOL-6, 0, 0, 0/
l ITEM 2: TPULSE = 0 seconds l Per the COPATTA Code Users Manual (Reference 6.5.a, page 3-23), zeroes may be input for Items 2 tlnuugh 4 if an instantaneous release of energy is not modeled. ITEM 3: IPULSE = 0 Per the COPATTA Code Users Manual (Reference 6.5.a, page 3-23), zeroes may be input for Items 2 through 4 if an instantaneous release of energy is not modeled. ITEM 4: UPULSE = 0 BTU Per the COPATTA Code Users Manual (Reference 6.5.a, page 3-23), zeroes may be input for Items 2 through 4 if an instantaneous release of energy is not modeled, l l l i i
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'lls$c, ,,, ,,,,_ o,_ Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN No. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 65 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 4 8.1.9 CARD SERIES LEAK: Leakage Paths Between Containment and Outside Atmosphere. No leakage from containment to outside containment is modeled in this analysis. This Card Series is entered in the input data file as:
& LEAK NOPEN=0/
The variable NOPEN is equal to zero because the number of openings in the containment is zero. Per the COPATTA Code Users Manual (Reference 6.5.a, page 3-25), if NOPEN is equal to zero, then the other variables may be omitted from the Card Series LEAK.
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET '
'cc" ". CCN NO.
PQELIM PAGE _ OF _ Project Or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN No. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 66 REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 5 8.1.10 CARD SERIES 101: Reactor Core Decay Power (Table 2) Card Series 101 is a table that is used to input reactor core decay power. This table is used in combination with information provided in Card Series 401 and 701. The reactor core decay power table includes up to 25 sets of the following data entered in columnar form:
- 1. Time (seconds)
- 2. Decay Power Generation rate (BTU /hr)
Reactor core decay heat is not modeled in the COPATTA input for this MSLB analysis. Any core decay heat impacting the containment P/T response to the event has already been included by CE in their calculation of the mass and energy release data which are separately input in Card Series 301 data. Therefore, Card Series 101 shall be entered as:
& LIST POOL =101, 0, 0, 2E7, O/
4
1 NES&L DEPARTMENT l CALCULATION SHEET '
'cc" ".
PREUM CCN NO. PAGE OF Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 cCN CONVERSION: ccN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT Pfr ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 67 REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE DATE 1RE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 " 8.1.11 CARD SERES 201: Reactor Metal-Water Reaction (Table 3) Card Series 201 is a table that is used to input reactor metal-water reaction rate. This table is used in combination with information presented in Card Series 401 and 701. The combined reactor metal-water reaction includes up to 25 sets of the following data, entered in I columnar form:
- 1. time (seconds)
- 2. energy release rate (Btu / hour)
Since reactor metal-water reaction is not modeled in an MSLB analysis, Card Series 201 shall be entered as:
& LIST POOL =201, 0, 0, 2E7, 0/
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" "os PRELIM. CCN No. PAGE.__ oF _ Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN No. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB _ Sheet No. 68 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 5 8.1.12 CARD SERIES 301: Blowdown Following Pipe Rupture (Table 4) Card Series 301 is a table that is used to input blowdown following the pipe rupture. The blowdown table includes up to 200 sets of the following data entered in columnar form:
- 1. time (seconds) !
- 2. water addition rate (pounds / hour) '
- 3. enthalpy of the water being added (BTU / pound)
The input data to be used in Card Series 301 is discussed in Design Input Item 4.4. This Card Series is entered in the input data file as shown below. The mass and energy release rates are assumed to vary linearly between each data point.
& LIST POOL =301, 0, 5.145520E7, 1.195589E3, 0.22, 4.869032E7, 1.197482E3, 0.42, 4.622234E7, 1.198466E3, 0.62, 4.405936E7, 1.199410E3, 1.08, 4.003276E7, 1.201595E3, 1.58, 3.688855E7, 1.201757E3, 2.08, 3.445970E7, 1.202018E3, 2.58, 3.326288E7, 1.200986E3, 3.58, 3.152606E7, 1.201058E3, 4.58, 3.028468E7, 1.201655E3, 5.58, 2.940080E7, 1.201123E3, 6.58, 2.874870E7, 1.201126E3, 7.58, 2.706574E7, 1.204404E3, 8.58, 2.468326E7, 1.204367E3, 9.58, 2.294968E7, 1.204238E3, 10.58, 2.160122E7, 1.203908E3, 12.58, 1.943143E7, 1.203195E2, 14.58, 1.765940E7, 1.202277E3, 16.58, 1.637240E7, 1.201556E3, 18.58, 1.544720E7, 1.200963E3, 20.58, 1.473293E7, 1.200422E3, 25.58, 1.327525E7, 1.198820E3, 30.58, 1.221858E7, 1.197825E3, ]
j 35.58, 1.146406E7, 1.196753E3, 40.58, 1.059131E7, 1.195307E3, 45.58, 9.801216E6, 1.194165E3, 50.58, 9.132588E6, 1.193086E3, 60.58, 8.280324E6, 1.190935E3, 61.08, 7.245576E6, 1.190949E3, 62.08, 5.803344E6, 1.189165E3, 62.58, 3.238704E6, 1.184658E3, 64.58, 3.948840E5, 1.179953E3, 68.58, 1.074240E5, 1.251072E3, 71.08, 0, 0, 2E7, 0, 0/ l
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" "o ' PRELIM. CCN NO. PAGE OF Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N 4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT Pfr ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 69 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 ' 4 8.1.13 CARD SERIES 401: (Table 5) Card Series 401 is a table that is used to describe the energy addition to the reactor vessel water from core decay power (Card Series 101) and any metal-water reaction (Card Series 201). This table designates the fraction of each of these energy sources that is added to the energy inventory in the reactor vessel. This table includes up to 20 sets of the following data entered in columnar form:
- 1. time (seconds)
- 2. decay power multiplier (dimensionless)
- 3. metal-water reaction multiplier (dimensionless)
Since reactor core decay energy and reactor metal-water reaction energy are not modeled in an MSLB analysis, Card Series 401 shall be entemd as: 4
& LIST POOL =401, 0, 0, 0, 2E7, 0, 0/
t
l NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'ocS " ' PREUM. CCN NO. PAGE OF Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN No. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 70 l l REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 h 5 8.1.14 CARD SERIES 501: Blowdown Following Pipe Rupture (Table 4) l l This Card Series is used only if number of points are more than can fit in Card Series 301. I The Card Series 501 table includes up to 200 sets of the following data entered in columnar form: I 4 l
- 1. time (seconds) :
, 2. water addition rate (pounds / hour) l 1 3. energy addition rate (BTU / hour) l Card Series 501 is not needed since Card Series 301 had enough space for all data. l Therefore, Card Series 501 shall be entered as: '
& LIST POOL =501, i o, o, o, 2E7, 0, o/
i a I i 4 4 l n
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET l"S"uf$CN NO. PAGE OF Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 ccN CONVERSION: CCN No. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 71 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE R 0 ' S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 5
)
1 8.1.15 CARD SERIES 601: (Table 7) This Card Series is used to add water and/or energy directly to the containment sump, regardless of the enthalpy of the water being added. This card is generally used to describe the spillage of Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) injection water that overflows the reactor vessel downcomer when the vessel is full. The Card Series 601 table includes up to 80 sets of the following data entered in columnar form:
- 1. time (seconds)
- 2. water addition rate (pounds / hour) '
- 3. energy addition rate (BTU / hour) l Since additional water or energy are not added directly to the containment sump in an MSLB analysis, Card Series 601 shall be entered as:
& LIST POOL-601, 0, 0, 0, 2E7, 0, O/
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET c
'fsl6,"gc,no. ,,,,_ o,_
Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CoNVERSloN: CCN No. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 72 REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 5 8.1.16 CARD SERIES 701: (Table 8) Card Series 701 is a table that is used to describe the energy addition to the containment atmosphere from core decay power (Card Series 101), the metal-water reaction (Card Sedes 201). This table designates the fraction of each of these energy sources that is added to the energy inventory in the contamment atmosphere. Card Series 701 also provides for arbitrary addition of water mass to the contamment atmosphere. This table includes up to 20 sets of the following data entered in columnar form:
- 1. time (seconds)
- 2. decay power multiplier (dimensionless) l
- 3. metal-water reaction multiplier (dimensionless) l
- 4. water addition rate (pounds / hour)
Since reactor core decay energy or reactor metal-water reaction energy are not modeled in an MSLB analysis and no arbitrary addition of water mass was added to the containment atmosphere, Card Series 701 shall be entend as:
& LIST POOL =701, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2E7, 0, 0, 0/
I i l
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" "od PRELIM. CCN No. PAGE OF Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: ) CCN No. CCN - l Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 73
)
REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IME DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 ' 5 8.1.17 CARD SERIES 801: (Table 9) Card Series 801 is a table that provides input of information on the characteristics of the containment spray system, the core safety injection system, and the source of water supply for these systems. The Card Series 801 table includes up to 16 sets of the following data entered in columnar form:
- 1. time (seconds)
- 2. contamment spray flow rate (pounds / hour)
- 3. reactor core safety injection water flow rate (pounds / hour)
- 4. fraction of the safety injection flow poured directly into the contamment sump due to injection into a niptured pipe (dimensionless)
- 5. water temperature of containment spray (*F)
- 6. water temperature of safety injection (*F)
This Card Series is discussed in Design Input Item 4.5. Card Series 801 shall be entered in the input data file as:
& LIST POOL =801, 0, 0, 0, 0, 100, 100, 50, 0, 0, 0, 100, 100, 50, 8.02ES, 0, 0, 100, 100, 2E7, 8.02E5, 0, 0, 100, 100/
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" " ' PRELIM. CCN NO. PAGE_, OF_, Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 74 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE DATE 1RE R 0 S. Oliver ' 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 5 8.1.18 CARD SERIES 901: (Table 10) Card Series 901 provides for the arbitrary addition of air to the containment atmosphere. The arbitrary air addition table includes up to 20 sets of the following data entered in columnar form:
- 1. time (seconds)
- 2. containment air addition rate (pounds / hour)
- 3. temperature of the added air ( F)
Since no arbitrary air addition is modeled in this analysis, Card Series 901 shall be entered as:
& LIST POOL =901, 0, 0, 0, 2E7, 0, O/
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" "o' PRELIM, CCW NO, PAGE___ OF_ l Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: } CCN No. CCN --
- Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet NO. 75 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R O S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 '
- 5 l
l 8.1.19 CARD SERIES 1001: (Table 11) 1 l Card Series 1001 is used to detennine the effect of cyclic outside temperature variations on
- long term post-accident temperature and pressure transients within the containment. The
} time period covered by the data should be from zero to 24 hours. The program will then use the data for succeeding 24 hour periods in very long time problems. The cyclic outside
- tempemtum variation table includes up to 25 sets of data entered in columnar form
- 1. time (seconds)
- 2. temperature of the outside air (*F) 4
- 3. heat transfer coefficient between a heat sink and the outside atmosphere 2
d (BTU /hr-ft *F) l In this MSLB model, no time-dependent atmospheric variations are modeled, and therefore i the same data values are entered at times 0 and 24 hours. Card Series 1001 is entered in the
'r.put data file as:
& LIST POOL =1001, 0, 100, 2.0, 24, 100, 2.0/
The entries in Card Series 1001 include: ITEM 2: 0 hours The initial time in hours. The starting time of the first 24 hour cycle is 0 hours. ITEM 3: 100 *F The outside air temperature at the start of the first 24 hour cycle is assumed to be 100 F as discussed in Assumption 3.4.a. ITEM 4: 2.0 BTU /hr-ft 2 _.p The heat tansfer coefficient between a heat sink and the outside atmosphere at the start of the first 24 hour cycle is assumed to be 2.0 BTU /hr-ft -2 F as discussed in Assumption 3.4.b.
._ . ~ - - .- _- .. _ _- __ _. _ _ _ _ _ . _ .
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET ' c" ' PRELIM. CCN NO. PAGE__ OF_ Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN No. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 76 REV ORIGINATOR DATE GRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 ' s ITEM 5: 24 hours The ending time of the first 24 hour cycle is 24 hours. l l ITEM 6: 100 F i l The outside air temperature at the end of the first 24 hour cycle is assumed to be 100 F ' as discussed in Assumption 3.4.a (same as at the start of the cycle). 1 ITEM 7: 2.0 BTU /hr-ft 2 _op The heat transfer coefficient between a heat sink and the outside atmosphere at the end of the first 24 hour cycle is assumed to be 2.0 BTU /hr-ft 2- F as discussed in Assumption 3.4.b (same as at the start of the cycle). l l l l 1
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'c"" > PREUM. CCN MO. PAGE OF Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTA?NMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 77 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 ' 4 8.1.20 CARD SERIES 1101: (Table 12) As dermed by Item 2 of Card Series 5, two containment air coolers are modeled in this analysis. Card Series 1101 is used to describe the heat removal capability of one air cooler as a function of containment atmosphere saturation temperature. Card Series 1101 provides for a table of tables, each table mpresenting a discrete air cooler coolant temperature. Card Series 1101 is entered in the DBA MSLB input data file as:
& LIST POOL =1101, 1, 21, 105, 105, 0, 120, 1.670E6, 130, 3.020E6, 140, 4.570E6, 150, 6.320E6, 160, 8.270E6, 170, 1.040E7, 180, 1.273E7, 190, 1.523E7, 200, 1.788E7, 210, 2.068E7, 220, 2.361E7, 230, 2.661E7, 240, 2.974E7, 250, 3.291E7, 260, 3.611E7, 2'70, 3.931E7, 280, 4.252E7, 287, 4.474E7, 290, 4.569E7, 300, 4.882E7/
The entries in Card Series 1101 include: ITEM 2: INUM= 1 The value of 1 indicater that only one table of air cooler heat removal capability as a function of containment atmosphere saturation temperature is modeled. Separate tables are required for each air cooler coolant temperature, and this analysis only models a single air cooler coolant temperature.
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" " ' PREUM. CcN No. PAGE _ OF _ Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 ccN CONVERSION: ccN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 78 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 h l 4 i ITEM 3: 21 A value of 21 indicates that there are twenty-one sets of data in the table (Items 5 and 6) describing air cooler heat removal capability as a function of containment atmosphere saturation temperature. ITEM 4: 105 *F The table (Items 5 and 6) describing air cooler heat mmoval capability as a function of containment atmosphere saturation temperature is based on an air cooler inlet temperature of 105 *F, as discussed in Design Input 4.3.b. ITEMS 5 and 6 Containment atmosphere saturation temperature (*F), and Corresponding cooler heat removal rate (BTU / hour) The input data to be used in defining the Items 5 and 6 entries are discussed in Design Input Item 4.6.a. l l l l 1 I i
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET ""
!Eu SCN NO.
f' AGE _ OF_ 1 Pro;ect or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 ccN CONVERSION: l CCN No. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 79 I REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R l 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 ' l 4 8.1.21 CARD SERM 1105: UHS Parameters Card Series 1105 is used to pmvide the Ultimate Heat Sink (UHS) parameters as a function of time. Since no UHS are modeled in this analysis (See Item 6 of Card Series 0), Card Series 1105 is not included in the input file. 8.1.22 CARD SERIES 1106: External Heat Imad/ Sink Card Series 1106 is used to describe the time behavior of an external heat load / sink that is used only when IHEAT Option 5, 6 and 7 is defined for Item 2 of Card Series 0. In this analysis, Item 2 of Card Series 0 is defined as 2, therefom Card Series 1106 is not included in the input file. 8.1.23 CARD SERIES 1110: Heat Transfer Coefficient Multipliers Card Series 1110 describes the time behavior of the overall heat transfer coefficients for the primary and secondary heat exchangers used in the system. These values are multipliers for the values on Items 4 and 9 of Card Series 4, for the primary and secondary heat l exchangers, respectively. In this analysis, no heat exchangers are modeled. The overall SDCHX heat transfer coefficient defined in Item 4 of Card Series 4 is a constant value, therefore Card Series 1110 is not included in the input file. I
i NES&L DEPARTMENT ! CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" "o ' PRELIM. CCN Wo. PAGE _ OF _ Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 80 REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1Rh DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 h 5 8.1.24 CARD SERIES 1201: Table 13 Card Series 1201 provides for variation in the containment spray efficiency as a function of the ratio of water vapor to air mass in the containment atmosphere. The containment spray efficiency table includes up to 40 sets of the following data entered in columnar form:
- 1. (RATIO) the containment steam / air mass ratio (dimensionless)
- 2. (ETANOZ) spray efficiency (fraction) l l
This Card Series is discussed in Design Input Item 4.7.a. Card Series 1201 is entered in the input data file as:
& LIST POOL =1201, 0, 0.729, 0.1, 0.737, 0.2, 0.747, 0.3, 0.757, 0.4, 0.771, 0.5, 0.788, 0.6, 0.809, 0.7, 0.832, 0.8, 0.863, ;
0.9, 0.912, l 1.0, 0.561, 1.1, 0.983, 1.2, 0.995, 1.3, 1.000/
I NES&L DEPARTMENT i CALCULATION SHEET 'ce" "o ' PRELIM. CCN No. PAGE__ OF__ Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 ccN CONVERSION: CCN No. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 81 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATon DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 " 4 8.1.25 CARD SERIES 9001: Table 14 Card Series 9001 is used to specify the calculational time intervals and the data printout intervals. The calc / print time table includes up to 50 sets of the following data entered in columnar form:
- 1. time (seconds)
- 2. calculational interval (seconds)
- 3. energy balance printout interval (seconds)
- 4. heat sink printout frequency (dimensionless)
Card Series 9001 is entered in the input data file as:
& LIST POOL =9001, 5, 0.05, 0.1, 50, 10, 0.05, 0.25, 20, 15, 0.05, 0.50, 10, 20, 0.05, 0.50, 10, 100, 0.1, 1.0, 10, 200, 1.0, 5.0, 10, 400, 1.0, 10.0, 5, 700, 2.0, 20.0, 5, 2E3, 5.0, 50.0, 1, 1E4, 50.0, 500, 2, 1E5, 250, 1E4, 4, 1E6, 500, 1E5, 9, 1E7, 500, SES, 9, 2E7, 500, SE5, 9/
The selection of the time steps is based on the guidance given in Bechtel Nuclear Standard N2.3.2 (Reference 6.12, sheet 14 of 24). This analysis uses a higher calculational frequency to get more accurate output data. As shown in the following tables, for an analysis run time of 10,000 seconds (Card Series 1, Item 2), this data will generate 2070 internal calculation intervals, 2n1 energy balance printouts and 38 heat sink printouts.
l 1 l NES&L DEPARTMENT ' CALCULATION SHEET ' l 'cc" ". CCN NO. PRELIM PAG E_ OF_ Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CcN CONVERSION: CCN No. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 82 ) 1 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 " 5 INTERNAL CALCUIATIONAL FREQUENCY TIME INTERVAL TIME INTERVAL INTERNAL NUMBER OF DURATION CALCULATION INTERNAL (seconds) (seconds) INTERVAL CALCULATIONS (every # seconds) O to 5 5 0.05 100 5 to 10 5 0.05 100 10 to 15 5 0.05 100 15 to 20 5 0.05 100 20 to 100 80 0.1 800 100 to 200 100 1.0 100 200 to 400 200 1.0 200 400 to 700 300 2.0 150 700 to 2E3 1,300 5.0 260 2E3 to 1E4 8,000 50.0 160 Total Number of Calculations: 2070 l l l I i I
NES&L DEPARTMENT I l CALCULATION SHEET ' Reu
'" " $CN NO. l'AG E OF Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION:
CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 83 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 " 5 ENERGY BALANCE PRIN'IDUT FREQUENCY TIME INTERVAL TIME INTERVAL ENERGY BALANCE NUMBER OF DURATION PRINTOUT INTERVAL ENERGY BALANCE (seconds) (seconds) (every # seconds) PRINTOUTS 0 to 5 5 0.10 50 5 to 10 5 0.25 20 10 to 15 5 0.50 10 15 to 20 5 0.50 10 20 to 100 80 1 80 100 to 200 100 5 20 200 to 400 200 10 20 400 to 700 300 20 15 700 to 2E3 1,300 50 26 2E3 to IE4 8,000 500 16 Total Number of Energy Balance Printouts: 267
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'c760
, scu no. ,,,, o, Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 ccN CONVERSION:
CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 84 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 ' 5 HEAT SINK PRIN100T FREQUENCY TIME INTERVAL NUMBER OF HEAT SINK NUMBER OF ENERGY BALANCE PRINTOUT INTERVAL HEAT SINK (seconds) PRINTOUTS (one for every # PRINTOUTS energy printouts) O to 5 50 50 1 S to 10 20 20 1 10 to 15 10 10 1 15 to 20 10 10 1 20 to 100 80 10 8 100 to 200 20 10 2 200 to' 400 20 5 4 400 to 700 15 5 3 700 to 2E3 26 2 13 2E3 to IE4 16 4 4 Total Number of Heat Sink Printouts: 38
NES&L DEPARTMENT l CALCULATION SHEET ' c" " ' PRELIM. CCN NO. PAGE OF Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSloN: CCN NO. CCN - l Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 85 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 ' S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 ? 5 1 l 8.1.26 VARIABLE END CARD This card must follow the group of variable data cards. It contains the following fixed l information in Columns 2 through 17:
& LIST POOL =9999/
i l l i 1 1 l
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" " ' PREUM. CCN NO. PAGE.__ OF _ Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N 4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 86 REV ORIGINATOR DATE lRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 ' 4 I 8.1.27 HEAT SINK DATA SERIES i I The heat sink data series are used to describe the chancteristics of the structural heat sinks. In this analysis twenty heat sinks are modeled (Card Series 1, Item 7). Each heat sink (number XX) is detailed in the COPATTA Code as a set of heat sink data cards. These data cards include: Title Card Card Series 1XX001 Card Series 1XX101 Card Series 1XX201 Card Series IXX300 Card Series 1XX400 Card Series 1XX001 contains general information on the heat sink. Card Series 1XX101 provides information on heat sink mesh point spacing. Card Series 1XX201 specifies the set of material properties for each region of the heat sink. Card Series 1XX300 selects the type and variation in magnitude of the decay power source within the heat sink. Card Series IXX400 is used to select the appropriate boundary conditions for the left and right surfaces of each heat sink. In general, the presence (or increase in size) of a heat sink has two consequences: (1) depressing the peak containment pressure and temperature by absorbing energy released via the break, and (2) extending the duration of above ambient containment pressures and temperatures by releasing energy back into the containment during the latter part of the accident. Beyond these two general consequences, the impact of a change in the modeling of a heat sink (e.g., a change in the heat sink layer thicknesses) is difficult to qualify. i i
1 NES&L DEP ARTMENT i CALCULATION SHEET 'ca "os PREUM. CCN NO. PA G E_._, OF,__ 1 Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: } CCN NO. CCN - . j Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANAL.YSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 87 1 i REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE { REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 ' i 5 1 1 8.1.27.1 HS #1 - Reactor Building Dome The characteristics of the Reactor Building Dome are as determined in Calculation N-4080-002 (Reference 6.1.g, pages 121 through 125) for Heat Sink 1, except for the l thickness of the Containment Liner / Concrete air gap interface. 4 As discussed in Design Input Item 4.8.a, the effective thickness of the interface (air gap) will be 0.00035 feet. With this change, Heat Sink #1 describes the Reactor Building Dome as modeled: Geometry Slab Surface Area 34693.22 ft2 Organic Paint (material 4) thickness-Left 0.00075 ft (= 0.009 in) Boundary Carbon Steel (material 1) Liner thickness 0.02083 ft (= 0.25 in) Air Gap Interface (material 5) thickness 0.00035 ft t Concrete (material 2) thickness-Right Boundary 4.0417 ft (= 48.5 in) i left Boundary condition Exposed to containment atmosphere Right Boundary condition Exposed to outside environment l The effect of the change in the air gap thickness is reflected in Card Series 101101. This Card Series defines the location of the right boundary and nodalization of each region. The ' air gap is the third region of Heat Sink 1. The increase in the modeled air gap thickness from 0.00017 feet to 0.00035 feet requires that the modeled location of the Region 3 right boundary be increased by 0.00018 feet. To maintain the correct thickness of each Region I that follows the air gap region necessitates that the modeled locations of the right boundaries l of these subsequent regions be increased by the same 0.00018 feet. The changes from the ! right boundary locations determined in Calculation N-4080-002 are: Ist Region: no change in the right boundary location 2nd Region: no change in the right boundary location 3rd Region: right boundary shifted from 0.02175 to 0.02193 feet 4th Region: right boundary shifted from 0.06342 to 0.06360 feet 5th Region: right boundary shifted from 0.2301 to 0.23028 feet 6th Region: right boundary shifted from 1.000921 to 1.00110 feet 7th Region: right boundary shifted from 4.06345 to 4.06363 feet
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'c""' PRELIM. CCN NO. PAGE OF Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT PTT ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. S8 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 5 The Card Series set defining Heat Sink 1 is entered in the input data file as:
- HS #1 - REACTOR BUILDING DOME
& LIST POOL-101001, 100, 7, 0, 0, 0, 0, 34693.22/
& LIST POOL =101101, 5, 0.00075, 3, 0.02158, 3, 0.02193, 10, 0.06360, 20, 0.23028, 37, 1.00110, 21, 4.06363/
& LIST POOL =101201, 4, 1, 5, 2, 2, 2, 2/
& LIST POOL =101300, 0, O/
& LIST POOL =101400, 9, 2, 1, 1/
. i As discussed in Design Input 4.8, the heat transfer coefficient control for the left boundary condition (adjacent to the organic paint) is modeled as the Uchida value. This is a condensing steam value dependent on the ratio of water vapor to air used in MSLB analyses. Therefore Item 2 in Card Series 101400 is 9. l I
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" "o ' PREUM. CCN NO. PAGE OF Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CcN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - i Subject CONTAINMENT PTT ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 89 i j REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R l 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 h 5 t 8.1.27.2 HS #2 - Reactor Building Cylinder #1 (above grade, between El. 29'6" and 112'0") a
- The characteristics of the Reactor Building Cylinder #1 (above grade, between plant a elevations 29'6" and 112'0") are as determined in Calculation N-4080-002 (Reference 6.1.g, i
pages 125 through 128) for Heat Sink 2, except for the thickness of the Containment
- Liner / Concrete air gap interface.
As discussed in Design Input Item 4.8.a, the effective thickness of the interface (air gap) will be 0.00035 feet. With this change, Heat Sink #2 describes the Reactor Building Cylinder 1
- as modeled
, Geometry Slab Surface Area 38120 ft2 ] Organic Paint (material 4) thickness-Left 0.00075 ft (= 0.009 in)
- Boundary Carbon Steel (material 1) Liner thickness 0.02083 ft (= 0.25 in)
Air Gap Interface (material 5) thickness 0.00035 ft Concrete (material 2) thickness-Right Boundary 4.33333 ft (= 52 in) Left Boundary condition Exposed to containment atmosphere { Right Bo:mdary cmdition Exposed to outside environment I l The effect of the change in the air gap thickness is reflected in Card Series 102101. This l Card Series defines the location of the right boundary and nodalization of each region. The ! air gap is the third region of Heat Sink 2. The increase in the modeled air gap thickness from 0.00017 feet to 0.00035 feet requires that the modeled location of the Region 3 right boundary be increased by 0.00018 feet. To maintain the correct thickness of each Region that follows the air gap region necessitates that the modeled locations of the right boundaries of these subsequent regions be increased by the same 0.00018 feet. The changes from the right boundary locations determined in Calculation N-4080-002 are: 1st Region: no change in the right boundary location 2nd Region: no change in the right boundary location 3rd Region: right boundary shifted from 0.02175 to 0.02193 feet 4th Region: right boundary shifted from 0.06342 to 0.%360 feet 5th Region: right boundary shifted from 0.14676 to 0.14694 feet 6th Region: right boundary shifted from 0.917581 to 0.917761 feet
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" " ' PRELIM. CCN NO. PAGE OF Project Or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. NO. N-4080-027 ccN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT Pff ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 90 REV ORIGINATOR DATS IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 " S 7th Region: right boundary shifted from 4.35508 to 4.35526 feet The Card Series set defining Heat Sink 2 is entemd in the input data file as:
- HS #2 - CYLINDER WALL BETWEEN El. 29'6" AND 112'0"
& LIST POOL =102001, 100, 7, 0, 0, 0, 0, 38120/
& LIST POOL =102101, 5, 0.00075, 3, 0.02158, 3, 0.02193, 10, 0.06360, 20, 0.14694, 37, 0.917761, 21, 4.35526/
& LIST POOL-102201, 4, 1, 5, 2, 2, 2, 2/
& LIST POOL =102300, 0, 0/
& LIST POOL =102400, 9, 2, 1, 1/
As discussed in Design Input 4.8, the heat transfer coefficient control for the left boundary condition (adjacent to the organic paint) is modeled as the Uchida value. This is a condensing steam value dependent on the ratio of water vapor to air used in MSLP analyses. Therefore Item 2 in Card Series 102400 is 9.
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET ,'cls"nonno. ,,,,, o, 1 i Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 ccN CONVERSION: CCN No. CCN -
- Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. __Q1 i
REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 5 j 8.1.27.3 HS #3 - Reactor Building Cylinder #2 (below grade, between El.15'0" and 29'6") , The characteristics of the Reactor Building Cylinder #2 (below grade, between plant i 1 elevations 15'0" and 29'6") are as determined in Calculation N-4080@2 (Reference 6.1.g, pages 134 through 136) for Heat Sink 3, except for the thickness of the Containment l Liner / Concrete air gap interface. l I ( As discussed in Design Input Item 4.8.a, the effective thickness of the interface (air gap) will l be 0.00035 feet. With this change, Heat Sink #3 describes the Reactor Building Cylinder 2 as modeled:
)
i j Geometry Stab , Surface Area 6667.38 ft2 i Organic Paint (material 4) thickness-Left 0.00075 ft (= 0.009 in) Boundary 4 Carbon Steel (material 1) Liner thickness 0.02083 ft (= 0.25 in) Air Gap Interface (material 5) thickness 0.00035 ft Concrete (material 2) thickness-Right Boundary 4.33333 ft (= 52 in) Left Boundary condition Emosed to containment atmosphere Right Boundary condition Insulated, no heat transfer to the ground outside the lower portion of the Reactor Building Cylinder i Because there is no heat transfer across the right boundary, the bulk temperature control for the right boundary condition is not used by the COPA'ITA Code. Therefore, in this analysis l the bulk temperature control for the right boundary condition is modeled as the containment vapor temperature for convective heat transfer or the saturation temperature at the containment steam partial pressure for condensing heat transfer (i.e., Option 2 for Item 5 of Card Series 1XX400). This differs from the modeling of Calculation N-4080-002, which employed Option 0 for Item 5 of Card Series 1XX400. Since the bulk temperature control for the right boundary condition has no meaning for this Heat Sink, the decision to model Item 5 with Option 2 rather than Option 0 has the beneficial consequence of allowing the use of any positive value to be modeled as the variable TCONT in Item 7 of Card Series 2. The effect of the change in the air gap thickness is reflected in Card Series 103101. This Card Series defines the location of the right boundary and nodalization of each region. The air gap is the third region of Heat Sink 3. The increase in the modeled air gap thickness
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" "o ' PREUM. CCN NO. PAGE OF Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 ccN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 92 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 h i from 0.00017 feet to 0.00035 feet requires that the modeled location of the Region 3 right boundary be increased by 0.00018 feet. To maintain the correct thickness of each Region that follows the air gap region necessitates that the modeled locations of the right boundaries of these subsequent regions be increased by the same 0.00018 feet. The changes from the right boundary locations determined in Calculation N-4080-002 are: 1st Region: no change in the right boundary location 2nd Region: no change in the right boundary location 3rd Region: right boundary shifted from 0.02175 to 0.02193 feet 4th Region: right boundary shifted from 0.%342 to 0.06360 feet 5th Region: right boundary shifted fmm 0.14676 to 0.14694 feet 6th Region: right boundary shifted from 0.917581 to 0.917761 feet 7th Region: right boundary shifted from 4.35508 to 4.35526 feet The Card Series set defining Heat Sink 3 is entered in the input data file as:
- HS #3 - CYLINDER WALL BETWEEN El. 15'0" AND El. 29'6"
& LIST POOL-103001, 100, 7, 0, 0, 0, 0, 6667.38/
& LIST POOL =103101, 5, 0.00075, 3, 0.02158, 3, 0.02193, 10, 0.06360, 20, 0.14694, 37, 0.917761, 21, 4.35526/
& LIST POOL =103201, 4, 1, 5, 2, 2, 2, 2/
& LIST POOL =103300, 0, 0/
& LIST POOL-103400, 9, 2, 0, 2/
l As discussed in Design Input 4.8, the heat transfer coefficient contml for the left boundary l condition (adjacent to the organic paint) is modeled as the Uchida value. This is a
- condensing steam value dependent on the ratio of water vapor to air used in MSLB analyses.
l Therefore Item 2 in Carci Series 103400 is 9. l I j
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET ' c",$cy no. fa,t ,,,, o, Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 ccN CONVERSION: CCN No. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 93 , l 1 REV ORIGINATOR DATE BRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R l 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 I 5 8.1.27.4 HS #4 - Basemat (other than the Reactor Basemat) The characteristics of the Basemat (other than the Reactor Basemat) are as determined in l Calculation N-4080-002 (Reference 6.1.g, pages 137 thmugh 139) for Heat Sink 4. Heat Sink #4 describes the Basemat (other than Reactor Basemat) as modeled: Geometry Slab Surface Area 12800 ft2 ) Organic Paint (material 4) thickness-Left 0.00067 ft (= 0.008 in) Boundary Concrete #1 (material 2) thickness 1.52631 ft Carbon Steel (material 1) Liner thickness 0.02083 ft (= 0.25 in) Concrete #2 (material 2) thickness-Right 9.473685 ft Boundary Left Boundary condition Exposed to containment sump water Right Boundary condition Insulated, no heat transfer to the ground beneath the basemat Due to an addition error, Calculation N-4080-002 (page 138) incorrectly modeled the right boundary coordinate of the second Concrete Region at 11.02105 feet. The determination ci the right boundary coordinate of the second Concrete region was based on the right boundary coordinate of the Carbon Steel Region of 1.54736 feet, rather than the correct coordinate of 1.54781 feet. In this analysis the right boundary coordinate of the second concrete region will be modeled at the correct position of 11.02150 feet: Right Boundary Coordinate of Concmte Region #2 = 1.54781 ft + 9.473685 ft
= 11.02150 feet Because there is no heat transfer across the right boundary, the bulk temperature control for the right boundary condition is not used by the COPATTA Code. Therefore, in this analysis the bulk temperature control for the right boundary condition is modeled as the containment liquid temperatum (i.e., Option 3 for Item 5 of Card Series 1XX400). This differs from the modeling of Calculation N-4080-002, which employed Option 0 for Item 5 of Card Series 1XX400 Since the bulk temperature control for the right boundary condition has no meaning for this Heat Sink, the decision to model Item 5 with Option 3 rather than Option 0 l
l
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET '
' c" ".
Pr.EUM CCid NO. PAGE_ OF__ Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 94 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 ' S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 i 4 l i has the beneficial consequence of allowing the use of any positive value to be modeled as the variable TCONT in Item 7 of Card Series 2. . l The Card Series set defining Heat Sink 4 is entered in the input data file as: I
- HS #4 - BASEMAT (OTHER THAN REACTOR BASEMAT) l l & LIST POOL =104001, 53, 5, 0, 0, 0, 0, 12800/
l & LIST POOL =104101, 3, 0.00067, 7, 0.1, I 20, 1.52698, 2, 1.54781, 20, 11.02150/ i & LIST POOL =104201, 4, 2, 2, 1, 2/ i j & LIST POOL =104300, 0, 0/ l & LIST POOL =104400, 3, 3, 0, 3/ l l l l i l I f L l - N
NES&L DEPARTMENT l l CALCULATION SHEET ICCM NOJ PRELIM. CCN NO. PAGE OF l Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 ccN CONVERSION: CCN No. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 95 REV ORIGINATOR DATE l IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE R l 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 h 5 8.1.27.5 HS #5 - Reactor Basemat and Steam Generator Pedestals The chameteristics of the Reactor Basemat and Steam Generator Pedestals are as determined in Calculation N-4080-002 (Reference 6.1.g, pages 139 through 141) for Heat Sink 5.
.l 1
Heat Sink #5 describes the Reactor Basemat and Steam Generator Pedestals as modeled: l Geometry Slab Surface Area 1644 ft2 Organic Paint (material 4) thickness-Ixft 0.00158 ft l Boundary l Concrete (material 2) thickness-Right Boundary 8.42934 ft i Left Boundary condition Exposed to containment sump water Right Boundary condition Insulated, no heat transfer to the ground beneath the basemat In Calculation N-4080-002 (page 141) the heat transfer coefficient control for the left boundary condition was modeled as Option 11 for Item 2 of Card Series 1XX400. This ! resulted in the use of a user specified heat transfer coefficient entered in Card Series 420001. In Calculation N-4080-002 (page 193) a heat sink to containment sump water heat transfer l coefficient of 0.4 BTU /hr-ft 2*F was specified. This same heat transfer coefficient value is available as Option 3 for Item 2 of Card Series 1XX400. To negate the need for input for Card Series 420001, in this calculation the heat transfer coefficient control for the left boundary condition is modeled as Option 3 for Item 2 of Card Series 1XX400. Because there is no heat transfer across the right boundary, the bulk temperature control for the right boundary condition is not used by the COPA'ITA Code. Therefore, in this analysis the bulk temperature control for the right boundary condition is modeled as the containment l liquid temperature (i.e., Option 3 for Item 5 of Card Series 1XX400). This differs from the modeling of Calculation N-4080-002, which employed Option 0 forItem 5 of Card Series 1XX400. Since the bulk temperature control for the right boundary condition has no meaning for this Heat Sink, the decision to model Item 5 with Option 3 rather than Option 0 has the beneficial consequence of allowing the use of any positive salue to be modeled as the 4 variable TCONT in Item 7 of Card Series 2. l
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET ' " " ' PRELIM. CCN NO. PAG OF Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 ccN CONVERSION: $ CCN No. CCN - 7 Subject CONTAINMENT Pfr ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 96 i
)
- REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R
' E O S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 y l I The Card Series set defining Heat Sink 5 is entered in the input data file as:
- HS #5 - REACTOR BASEMAT & S.G. PEDESTALS
& LIST POOL =105001, 70, 4, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1644/
& LIST POOL =105101, 4, 0.00158, 10, 0.1, 30, 2.00, 25, 8.43092/
& LIST POOL =105201, 4, 2, 2, 2/
l & LIST POOL =105300, 0, 0/
& LIST FOOL =105400, 3, 3, 0, 3/
i i i )
; I 1 l i l e
I I i 1 l i i 1
NES&L DEPARTMENT ; CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" "os PREUM. CCN No. PAGE_ oF__ Project or DCP/MMP. SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CoNVERSloN: CCN No. CCN - l Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 97 I REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 4 8.1.27.6 HS #6 - Reactor Cavity Walls below El.15'0" The characteristics of the Reactor Cavity Walls below plant elevation 15'0" are as determined in Calculation N-4080-002 (Reference 6.1.g, pages 142 through 144) for Heat Sink 6. Heat Sink #6 describes the Reactor Cavity Walls below El.15'0" as modeled: Geometry Cylindrical Inside Radius 11.75 ft Height of Cylinder (wall height) 21.5 ft Surface Area 1590 ft2 Organic Paint (material 4) thickness-Left 0.00192 ft (= 0.023 in) Boundary Concrete (material 2) thickness-Right Boundary 13.5 ft (= 162 in) Left Boundary condition Exposed to containment sump water Right Boundary condition Insulated, no heat transfer to the ground on the opposite side of the walls Due to an addition error, Calculation N-4080-002 (page 143) incorrectly modeled the right boundary coordinate of the Concrete Region at 25.25 feet. The determination of the right boundary coordinate of the Concrete mgion was based on adding the thickness of the Concrete Region to the inside radius of the cylinder model, and neglecting to add the thickness of the Organic Paint Region. In this analysis the right boundary coordinate of the Concrete Region will be modeled at the correct position of 25.25192 feet: Right Boundary Coordinate of Concrete Region = 11.75 ft + 0.00192 ft + 13.5 ft
= 25.25192 feet In Calculation N-4080-002 (page 198) the cylinder height was incorrectly entered into the i COPATTA Code input file as 8.5 feet, rather than the 21.5 feet value calculated on page 143. In this analysis the cylinder height will be modeled as 21.5 feet.
In Calculation N-4080-002 (page 144) the heat transfer coefficient control for the left boundary condition was modeled as Option 11 for Item 2 of Card Series 1XX400. Tids
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET ' " ' PRELIM. CCN No. PAGE_ oF__ Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CoNVERSloN: CCN No. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. _98 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 ' 5 resulted in the use of a user specified heat transfer coefficient entered in Card Series 420001. In Calculation N-4080-002 (page 193) a heat sink to containment sump water heat transfer 2 coefficient of 0.4 BTU /hr-ft _.F was specified. This same heat transfer coefficient value is available as Option 3 for Item 2 of Card Series 1XX400. To negate the need for input for Card Series 420001, in this calculation the heat transfer coefficient contml for the left boundary condition is modeled as Option 3 for Item 2 of Card Series IXX400. Because there is no heat transfer acmss the right boundary, the bulk temperature control for the right boundary condition is not used by the COPATTA Code. Therefore, in this analysis the bulk temperature control for the right boundary condition is modeled as the containment liquid temperatum (i.e., Option 3 for Item 5 of Card Series IXX400). This differs from the modeling of Calculation N-4080-002, which employed Option 0 for Item 5 of Card Series IXX400. Since the bulk temperature contml for the right boundary condition has no meaning for this Heat Sink, the decision to model Item 5 with Option 3 rather than Option 0 has the beneficial consequence of allowing the use of any positive value to be modeled as the variable TCONT in Item 7 of Card Series 2. The Card Series set defining Heat Sink 6 is entered in the input data fd' e as:
- HS #6 - REACTOR CAVITY WALLS BELOW El. 15'0"
& LIST POOL =106001, 93, 5, 1, 11.75, 0, 0, 21.5/
& LIST POOL-106101, 5, 11.75192, 7, 11.77292, 30, 13.29923, 30, 19.29923, 20, 25.25192/
& LIST POOL =106201, 4, 2, 2, 2, 2/
& LIST POOL =106300, 0, 0/
& LIST POOL =106400, 3, 3, 0, 3/
t 1
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'ca "o ' PREUM. CCM No. PAGE__oF__ Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSloN: CCN No. CCN - l Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 99 l REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE R l O S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 h 4 . I I 8.1.27.7 HS #7 - Reactor Cavity Walls above El.15'0" {' The characteristics of the Reactor Cavity Walls above plant elevation 15'0" are as determined in Calculation N-4080-002 (Reference 6.1.g), pages 144 through 146) for Heat Sink 7. Due to heat sink symmetry, only one-half of the heat sink is modeled. The modeled surface i area is the total heat sink surface area, equal to twice the actual surface area of one side of j the heat sink. The modeled thickness of the center concrete ponion is one-half of the actual ; thickness of the center concrete portion of the heat sink. And, the modeled outside boundary l' l 1s the adiabatic (insulated) condition existing at the midplane of the symmetrical heat sink. l l Heat Sink #7 describes the Reactor Cavity Walls above El.15'0" as modeled: Geometry Slab l
- Surface Area 2810 ft2 Organic Paint (material 4) thickness-Left 0.00192 ft (= 0.023 in)
Boundary Concrete (material 2) thickness-Right Boundary 4.00 ft (= 48 in) Ixft Boundary condition Exposed to containment atmosphere
, Right Boundary condition Insulated, no heat transfer is i
modeled across the heat sink l centerline Because there is no heat transfer across the right boundary, the bulk temperature control for the right boundary condition is not used by the COPA'ITA Code. Therefore, in this analysis . the bulk temperature control for the right boundary condition is modeled as the containment 2 vapor temperature for convective heat transfer or the saturation temperature at the
; containment steam panial pressure for condensing heat transfer (i.e., Option 2 for Item 5 of Card Series 1XX400). This differs from the modeling of Calculation N-4080-002, which employed Option 0 for Item 5 of Card Series 1XX400. Since the bulk temperature control for the right boundary condition has no meaning for this Heat Sink, the decision to model Item 5 with Option 2 rather than Option 0 has the beneficial consequence of allowing the use of any positive value to be modeled as the variable TCONT in Item 7 of Card Series 2.
NES&L DEPARTMENT j CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" No ' PREUM. CCN NO. PAG E__, OF__ j Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CoNVERSloN: CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 100 l REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R O S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 h 5 i ! The Card Series set defining Heat Sink 7 is entered in the input data file as:
- HS #7 - REACTOR CAVITY WALLS ABOVE El. 15'0"
, & LIST POOL =107001, 68, 5, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2810/ j & LIST POOL =107101, 5, 0.00192, 7, 0.02292, j 15, 0.40192, 20, 2.00,
- 20, 4.00192/
1 & LIST POOL =107201, 4, 2, 2, 2, 2/
& LIST POOL =107300, 0, 0/
& LIST POOL =107400, 9, 2, 0, 2/
As discussed in Design Input 4.8, the heat transfer coefficient control for the left boundary condition (adjacent to the organic paint) is modeled as the Uchida value. This is a i condensing steam value dependent on the ratio of water vapor to air used in MSLB analyses.
- Therefore Item 2 in Card Series 107400 is 9.
4 1 ~ i I l l
NES&L DEPARTMENT 1 1 CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" " ' PRELIM. CcN NO. PAGE_ _ OF_ Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 ccN CONVERSION: ccN No. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 101 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 ' S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 5 8.1.27.8 HS #8 - Lined Refueling Canal Walls The characteristics of the Lined Refueling Canal Walls are as determined in Calculation N-4080-002 (Reference 6.1.g), pages 146 through 149) for Heat Sink 8. l l Heat Sink #8 describes the Lined Refueling Canal Walls as modeled: Geometry Slab Surface Area 9200 ft2 Stainless Steel (material 3) thickness-Left 0.01563 ft (= 0.1875 in) Boundary
- Concrete (material 2) thickness 4.00 ft (= 48 in)
- Organic Paint (material 4) thickness-Right 0.00192 ft (= 0.023 in)
Boundary j Left Boundary condition Exposed to containment atmosphere j Right Boundary condition Exposed to containment atmosphere The Card Series set defining Heat Sink 8 is entered in the input data file as:
- HS #8 - LINED REFUELING CANAL WALLS l & LIST POOL =108001, 86, 6, 0, 0, 0, 0, 9200/
- & LIST POOL =108101, 5, 0.01563, 20, 0.1, 15, 0.41563, 20, 2.00,
' 20, 4.01563, 5, 4.01755/
& LIST POOL =108201, 3, 2, 2, 2, 2, 4/
. & LIST POOL =108300, 0, 0/
- & LIST POOL =108400, 9, 2, 9, 2/
As discussed in Design Input 4.8, the heat transfer coefficient control for the left and right i boundary conditions are modeled as the Uchida value. This is a condensing steam value dependent on the ratio of water vapor to air used in MSLB analyses. Therefore Items 2 and j 4 in Card Series 108400 are 9. i 1 i
I NES&L DEPARTMENT l CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" " d PRELIM. CCN Mo. PAGE OF l Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 ccN CONVERSION: , CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 102 l REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE HEV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 h 1 S l 8.1.27.9 HS #9 - Steam Generator Companment Walls, Unlined Refueling Canal Walls l above El. 63'6", and Other Interior Walls The characteristics of the Steam Generator Compartment Walls, Unlined Refueling Canal Walls above plant elevation 63'6", and Other Interior Walls are as determined in Calculation l N-4080-002 (Reference 6.1.g), pages 149 through 152) for Heat Sink 9. l Due to heat sink symmetry, only one-half of the heat sink is modeled. The modeled surface area is the total heat sink surface area, equal to twice the actual surface area of one side of l the heat sink. The modeled thickness of the center concrete portion is one-half of the actual l thickness of the center concrete portion of the heat sink. And, the modeled outside boundary is the adiabatic (insulated) condition existing at the midplane of the symmetrical heat sink. Heat Sink #9 describes the Steam Generator Companment Walls, Unlined Refueling Canal l Walls above El. 63'6", and Other Interior Walls as modeled: Geometry Slab Surface Area 41976 ft2 Organic Paint (material 4) thickness-Left 0.00192 ft (= 0.023 in) Boundary Concrete (material 2) thickness-Right Boundary 1.71684 ft Left Boundary condition Exposed to containment atmosphere Right Boundary condition Insulated, no heat tmnsfer across the heat sink centerline Because there is no heat transfer across the right boundary, the bulk temperature control for the right boundary condition is not used by the COPA'ITA Code. Therefore, in this analysis the bulk tempemture control for the right boundary condition is modeled as the containment vapor tempemture for convective heat transfer or the saturation temperature at the containment steam partial pressure for condensing heat transfer (i.e., Option 2 for Item 5 of Card Series IXX400). This differs from the modeling of Calculation N-4080-002, which I employed Option 0 for Item 5 of Card Series 1XX400. Since the bulk temperature control ! for the right boundary condition has no meaning for this Heat Sink, the decision to model Item 5 with Option 2 rather than Option 0 has the beneficial consequence of allowing the use of any positive value to be modeled as the variable TCONT in Item 7 of Card Series 2.
l NES&L DEPARTMENT l CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" "o ' PRELIM, CCN No. PAGE OF Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN No. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 103 1 1 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 h l
- The Card Series set defining Heat Sink 9 is entered in the input data file as
l
- HS #9 - S.G. CMPRTMNT WALLS, UNLINED REFL CNL WALLS /OTH INT WALLS l & LIST POOL =109001, 78, 4, 0, 0, 0, 0, 41976/
& LIST POOL =109101, 5, 0.00192, 10, 0.04233, 12, 0.1, 50, 1.71876/
& LIST POOL =109201, 4, 2, 2, 2/
& LIST POOL =109300, 0, 0/
& LIST POOL-109400, 9, 2, 0, 2/
As discussed in Design Input 4.8, the heat transfer coefficient control for the left boundary condition (adjacent to the organic paint) is modeled as the Uchida value. This is a condensing steam value dependent on the ratio of water vapor to air used in MSLB analyses. Therefore Item 2 in Card Series 109400 is 9. l l l l l l l l l t I
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET '
'cc" ".
PREUM CCN NO. PA G E__ OF__ Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: ! CCN No. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 104 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE lRE DATE R
~
0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 ' 5 l 8.1.27.10 HS #10 - Floor Slabs (other than basemats) The characteristics of the Floor Slabs (other than basemats) represent a refinement of the i characteristics as determined in Calculation N-4080-002 (pages 152 thmugh 155) for Heat Sink 10. Heat Sink #10 describes Floor Slabs (other than basemats) as modeled: Geometry Slab Surface Area 17474 ft2 ! Organic Paint #1 (material 4) thickness-Left 0.00014 ft l Boundary Carbon Steel (material 1) thickness 0.005208 ft (= 0.%25 in) Concrete (material 2) thickness 1.5 ft Organic Paint #2 (material 4) thickness-Right 0.000667 ft (= 0.008 in) Boundary l Left Boundary condition Exposed to containment atmosphere Right Boundary condition Exposed to containment atmpspnere The 17474 square foot surface area of the floor slabs modeled in this analysis is equivalent to l the concrete side surface area given in Calculadon C-257-1.96.01 (Reference 6.1.a, pages 15 I and 26). The same calculation gives a metal decking are of 23,240 square feet (page 26). The higher area is due to the metal decking which is cormgated steel while the smaller area is the area of the concrete slab under it. The smaller area of 17474 square foot will be conservatively used here. Calculation N-4080-002 (Refemnce 6.1.g, page 152) used a value of 17172 square feet and is based on input data provided as Attachment 1 to Calculation N-4080-002 (page 328). This surface area differs from that described in Calculation N-4080-005 (Reference 6.1.f, page 42), which attempted to refine the floor slab heat sink model by increasing the surface area of the floor slab from 17172 to 23240 square feet. Although the area was to be increased, the actual COPATTA Code mns of Calculation N-4080-005 continued to model the original smaller floor slab surface area of 17172 square feet. As discussed in Design Input Item 4.8.k, when the nodalization of the Concrete Region was performed, Calculation N-4080-002 (page 153) modeled the concrete as Heat Sink 10 Regicns 3,4 and 5, with a total concrete thickness of 2.0 feet rather than 1.5 feet. To
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET ,'cc" o, " gcu no. ,,,, o, Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: 1 CCN No. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 105 j._ PEV ORIGINATOR DATE BRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE
" 1RE DATE R E
O S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 y 4 model the correct concrete thickness requires that the Region 5 thickness be reduced by 0.5 feet. This is accomplished by shifting the right boundary of Region 5 to the left by 0.5 feet. As a consequence, the right boundary of Region 6 (the second Organic Paint layer) must also be shifted to the left by 0.5 feet. The changes from the right boundary locations determined ' in Calculation N-4080-002 am: 1st Region: no change in the right boundary location 2nd Region: no change in the right boundary location 4 3rd Region: no change in the right boundary location 4th Region: no change in the right boundary location 5th Region: right boundary shifted from 2.005348 to 1.505348 feet 6th Region: right boundary shifted from 2.006015 to 1.506015 feet The Card Series set defining Heat Sink 10 is entered in the input data file as:
- HS #10 - FLOOR SLABS (OTHER THAN BASEMATS)
& LIST POOL =110001, 67, 6, 0, 0, 0, 0, 17474/
& LIST POOL 110101, 3, 0.00014, 5, 0.005348, 20, 0.105348, 15, 0.505348, 20, .'.505348, 3, 1.506015/
& LIST POOL =110201, 4, 1, 2, 2, 2, 4/
& LIST POOLu110300, 0, 0/
& LIST POOL =110400. 9, 2, 9, 2/
As discussed in Design Input 4.8, the heat transfer coefficient control for the left and right 4
- boundary conditions are modeled as the Uchida value. This is a condensing steam value
, dependent on the ratio of water vapor to air used in MSLB analyses. Therefore Items 2 and 4 in Card Series 110400 are 9. N I i e
-e.
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET "" eREu $CN No. lPAGE oF Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 ccN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT Pfr ANALYSIS FOR DEGION BAS lS MSLB Sheet No. 106 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 h 5 8.1.27.11 HS #11 - Lifting Devices (except stainless steel parts)
'l The characteristics of the Lifting Devices (except stainless steel parts) are as determined m i Calculation N-4080-005 (Reference 6.1.f, pages 42 through 44) for Heat Sink 10. This heat !'
sink description represents a refinement of the characteristics of the Lifting Devices first determined in Calculation N-4080-002 (Reference g.1.g, pages 156 through 158) for Heat Sink 11. ! { Due to heat sink symmetry, only one-half of the heat sink is modeled. The modeled surface area is the total heat sink surface area, equal to twice the actual surface area of one side of the heat sink. The modeled thickness of the center carbon steel portion is one-half of the actual thickness of the center carbon steel portion of the heat sink. And, the modeled outside boundary is the adiabatic (insulated) condition existing at the midplane of the symmetrical heat sink. Heat Sink #11 describes the Lifting Devices (except stainless steel parts) as modeled: l Geometry Slab l Surface Area 57286 ft2 l Organic Paint (material 4) thickness-Left 0.00125 ft (= 0.015 in) l Boundary Carbon Steel (material 1) thickness-Right 0.041667 ft ; Boundary Left Boundary condition Exposed to contamment atmosphere Right Boundary condition Insulated, no heat transfer across the heat sink centerline Because there is no heat transfer across the right boundary, the bulk temperature control for the right boundary condition is not used by the COPATTA Code. Therefore, in this analysis the bulk temperature control for the right boundary condition is modeled as the containment vapor temperature for convective heat transfer or the saturation temperature at the contamment steam partial pressure for condensing heat transfer (i.e., Option 2 for Item 5 of Card Series 1XX400). This differs from the modeling of Calculation N-4080-002, which employed Option 0 for Item 5 of Card Series 1XX400. Since the bulk temperature control for the right boundary condition has no meaning for this Heat Sink, the decision to model Item 5 with Option 2 rather than Option 0 has the beneficial consequence of allowing the use of any positive value to be modeled as the variable TCONT in Item 7 of Card Series 2.
.o
l l NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET '
'co" ".
PREUM CCN NO. PAGE _ OF _ Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 ccN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 107 l Rt"V ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R O S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 5 l 1 1 The Card Series set defining Heat Sink 11 is entered in the input data file as:
- HS #11 - LIFTING DEVICES (EXCEPT STAINLESS STEEL PARTS)
& LIST POOL =111001, 17, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 57286/
& LIST POOL =111101, 6, 0.00125, 10, 0.042917/
& LIST POOL =111201, 4, 1/
& LIST POOL =111300, 0, 0/
& LIST POOL =111400, 9, 2, 0, 2/
As discussed iL Design Input 4.8, the heat transfer coefficient control for the left boundary l condition (adjacent to the organic paint) is modeled as the Uchida value. This is a l condensing steam value dependent on the ratio of water vapor to air used in MSLB analyses. Therefore Item 2 in Card Series 111400 is 9. 1
a 1 NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET '
'cc" ". CCN NO.
PRELIM PAGE_ OF_ ProjIct or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 108 REV ORIGINATOR DATE BRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE R E 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 5 3.1.27.12 HS #12 - Miscellaneous Carbon Steel (with thickness greater than 2.50 in) The characteristics of the Miscellaneous Carbon Steel (with thickness greater than 2.50 in) are as determined in Calculation N-40804)05 (Reference 6.1.f, pages 44 through 47) for Heat Sink 11. This heat sink description represents a refinement of the characteristics of the Miscellaneous Carbon Steel first determined in Calculation N-4080-002 (Reference 6.1.g, pages 58 through 161) for Heat Sink 12. Due to heat sink symmetry, only one-half of the heat sink is modeled. The modeled surface area is the total heat sink surface area, equal to twice the actual surface area of one side of the heat sink. The modeled thickness of the center carbon steel portion is one-half of the actual thickness of the center carbon steel portion of the heat sink. And, the modeled outside boundary is the adiabatic (insulated) condition existing at the midplane of the symmetrical heat sink. Heat Sink #12 describes the Miscellaneous Carbon Steel (with thickness greater than 2.50 in) as modeled: Geometry Slab Surface Area 516 ft2 Organic Paint (material 4) thickness-Left 0.0005 ft (= 0.006 in) Boundary Carbon Steel (material 1) thickness-Right 0.310349 ft Boundary Left Boundary condition Exposed to containment atmosphere Right Boundary condition Insulated, no heat transfer across the heat sirk centerline Calculation N-4080-005 (page 44) calculates a Miscellaneous Carbon Steel surface area of ; 516 square feet. However, due to an apparent transcription error, a surface area of 596 l square feet was modeled in the Calculation N-4080-005 COPATTA Code input files. This calculation will model the calculated area of 516 square feet. Calculation N-4080-005 (page 45) calculates a right boundary coordinate of 0.310849 feet for the Carbon Steel Region. However, for unknown reasons, a right boundary coordinate of 0.34414 feet was modeled in the Calculation N-4080-005 COPATTA Code input files. This ; calculation will model the calculated right boundary coordinate of 0.310849 feet for the Carbon Steel Region.
, NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" " ' PREUM. CCN NO. PAGE OF ! Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 ccN CONVERSION: i ccN No. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BAStP, MSLB Sheet No. 109 REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 ' 5 Because there is no heat transfer across the right boundary, the bulk temperature control for the right boundary condition is not used by the COPA'ITA Code. Therefore, in this analysis the bulk temperature control for the right boundary condition is modeled as the containment vapor tempenture for convective heat transfer or the saturation temperature at the containment steam partial jwssure for condensing heat transfer (i.e., Option 2 for Item 5 of Card Series IXX400). This differs from the modeling of Calculations N-4080-002 and N-4080-005, which employed Option 0 for Item 5 of Card Series 1XX400. Since the bulk temperature control for the right boundary condition has no meaning for this Heat Sink, the decision to model Item 5 with Option 2 rather than Option 0 has the beneficial consequence of allowing the use of any positive value to be modeled as the variable TCONT in Item 7 of Card Series 2. The Card Series set derming Heat Sink 12 is entered in the input data fue as:
- HS #12 - MISCELLANEOUS CARBON STEEL - THICKNESS > 2.50 INCHES
& LIST POOL =112001, 64, 4, 0, 0, 0, 0, 516/
& LIST POOL =112101, 6, 0.0005, 17, 0.084, 15, 0.20, 25, 0.310849/
& LIST POOL =112201, 1/
4, 1, 1, l
& LIST POOL =112300, 0, 0/
& LIST POOL =112400, 9, 2, 0, 2/
As discussed in Design Input 4.8, the heat transfer coefficient control for the left boundary condition (adjacent to the organic paint) is modeled as the Uchida value. This is a condensing steam value dependent on the ratio of water vapor to air used in MSLB analyses. Therefore Item 2 in Card Series 112400 is 9.
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" " ' PREUM. CCN No. PAGE OF Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 110 REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 ' 5 8.1.27.13 HS #13 - Miscellaneous Carbon Steel (with thickness between 1.00 in and 2.50 in) l The characteristics of the Miscellaneous Carbon Steel (with thickness between 1.00 in and 2.50 in) are as determined in Calculation N-4080-005 (Reference 6.1.f, pages 47 through 50) for Heat Sink 12. This heat sink description represents a refinement of the characteristics of the Miscellaneous Carbon Steel first detennined in Calculation N-4080-002 (Reference 6.1.g, pages 161 thmugh 165) for Heat Sink 13. An error was made in Calculation N-4080-005 for Heat Sink 12 on page 48. There are four Safety Injections Tanks and the area of only one tank was modeled by Calculation N-4080-005. Correcting this error will change the surface area for Heat Sink 13 in this l analysis to 12042 square feet and the effective carbon steel thickness to 0.1692 feet. I Due to heat sink symmetry, only one-half of the heat sink is modeled. The modeled surface area is the total heat sink surface area, equal to twice the actual surface area of one side of l the heat sink. The modeled thickness of the center carbon steel portion is one-half of the actual thickness of the center carbon steel portion of the heat sink. And, the modeled outside boundary is the adiabatic (insulated) condition existing at the midplane of the symmetrical heat sink. Heat Sink #13 describes the Miscellaneous Carbon Steel (with thickness between 1.00 in and 2.50 in) as modeled: Geometry Slab Surface Area 12042 ft2 Organic Paint (material 4) thickness-I2ft 0.00063 ft Boundary Carbon Steel (material 1) thickness-Right 0.16924 ft Boundary Left Boundary condition Exposed to containment atmosphere Right Boundary condition Insulated, no heat transfer across the heat sink centerline Because there is no heat transfer across the right boundary, the bulk temperature contml for the right boundary condition is not used by the COPATTA Code. Therefore, in this analysis the bulk temperature control for the right boundary condition is modeled as the containment vapor temperature for convective heat transfer or the saturation temperature at the containment steam partial pressure for condensing heat transfer (i.e., Option 2 for Item 5 of
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET ' '" SCN NO.
!aEu PAGE OF Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units,2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION:
CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 111 REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 l 5 Card Series IXX400). This differs from the modeling of Calculations N-4080-002 and N-4080-005, which employed Option 0 for Item 5 of Card Series IXX400. Since the bulk temperature control for the right boundary condition has no meanmg for this Heat Sink, the decision to model Item 5 with Option 2 rather than Option 0 has the beneficial consequence of allowing the use of any positive value to be modeled as the variable TCONT in Item 7 of Card Series 2. The Card Series set defining Heat Sink 13 is entered in the input data file as:
- HS #13 - MISCELLANEOUS CARBON STEEL: 1.00"< THICKNESS <2.50"
& LIST POOL =113001, 32, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 12042/
& LIST POOL =113101, 6, 0.00063, 25, 0.16967/
& LIST POOL =113201, 4, 1/
& LIST POOL =113300, 0, 0/
& LIST POOL =113400, 9, 2, 0, 2/
As discussed in Design Input 4.8, the heat transfer coefficient control for the left boundary condition (adjacent to the organic paint) is modeled as the Uchida value. This is a condensing steam value dependent on the ratio of water vapor to air used in MSLB analyses. Therefore Item 2 in Card Series 113400 is 9.
I NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET ' g"fgcu yo. ,,o, o, Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN No. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 112 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE D ATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 S l 8.1.27.14 HS #14 - Miscellaneous Cad >on Steel (with thickness between 0.50 in and 1.00 in) The characteristics of the Miscellaneous Carbon Steel (with thickness between 0.50 in and 1.00 in) are as determined in Calculation N-4080-005 (Reference 6.1.f, pages 50 tinuugh 54) for Heat Sink 13. This heat sink description represents a refinement of the characteristics of the Miscellaneous Carbon Steel first determined in Calculation N-4080-002 (Reference 6.1.g, pages 165 through 169) for Heat Sink 14. Due to heat sink symmetry, only one-half of the heat sink is modeled. The modeled surface ama is the total heat sink surface area, equal to twice the actual surface area of one side of the heat sink. The modeled thickness of the center carbon steel portion is one-half of the actual thickness of the center carbon steel portion of the heat sink. And, the modeled outside boundary is the adiabatic (insulated) condition existing at the midplane of the symmetrical heat sink. Heat Sink #14 describes the Miscellaneous Carbon Steel (with thickness between 0.50 in and 1.00 in) as modeled: Geometry Slab Surface Ama 64693 ft2 < Organic Paint (material 4) thickness-Left 0.000674 ft Boundary Carbon Steel (material 1) thickness-Right 0.037933 ft , Boundary l Left Boundary condition Exposed to containment atmosphere Right Boundary condition Insulated, no heat transfer across i the heat sink centerline Because there is no heat transfer across the right boundary, the bulk temperature control for the right boundary condition is not used by the COPA'ITA Code. Therefore, in this analysis the bulk tempenture control for the right boundary condition is modeled as the containment vapor temperature for convective heat transfer or the saturation temperature at the containment steam partial pressure for condensing heat transfer (i.e., Option 2 for Item 5 of Card Series 1XX400). This differs from the modeling of Calculations N-4080-002 and N-4080-005, which employed Option 0 for Item 5 of Card Series IXX400. Since the bulk l temperature control for the right boundary condition has no meaning for this Heat Sink, the decision to model Item 5 with Option 2 rather than Option 0 has the beneficial consequence
i NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" " ' PRELIM, CCN NO. PA G E_ 0F,_, Project or DCP/MMP_ SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN No. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. _13 'L_ l ) REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 " 5 i of allowing the use of any positive value to be modeled as the variable TCONT in Item 7 of , Card Series 2. ] The Card Series set defming Heat Sink 14 is entered in the input data file as: i
- HS #14 - MISCELLANEOUS CARBON STEEL: 0.50"< THICKNESS <1.00"
& LIST POOL =114001, 19, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 64693/
& LIST POOL =114101, 5, 0.000674, 13, 0.038607/
, & LIST POOL =114201, 4, 1/
l & LIST POOL =114300, 0, 0/
& LIST POOL =114400, 9, 2, 0, 2/
As discussed in Design Input 4.8, the heat transfer coefficient contml for the left boundary condition (adjacent to the organic paint) is modeled as the Uchida value. This is a condensing steam value dependent on the ratio of water vapor to air used in MSLB analyses. , Therefore Item 2 in Card Series 114400 is 9. l l l I i l l l l l
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'cc"gc, ,0.
,n, ,,c,_ c,_
Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 cCN CONVERS!ON: CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 114 REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 5 8.1.27.15 HS #15 - Miscellaneous Carbon Steel (with thickness less than 0.50 in) The characteristics of the Miscellaneous Carbon Steel (with thickness less than 0.50 in) are as determined in Calculation N-4080-005 (Reference 6.1.f, pages 54 through 59) for Heat Sink 14. This heat sink description represents a refinement of the characteristics of the Miscellaneous Carbon Steel first determinedin Calculation N-4080-002 (Reference 6.1.g, pages 169 through 173) for Heat Sink 15. Due to heat sink symmetry, only one-half of the heat sink is modeled. The modeled surface area is the total heat sink surface ama, equal to twice the actual surface area of one side of the heat sink. The modeled tidekness of the center carbon steel portion is one-half of the actual tidekness of the center carbon steel portion of the heat sink. And, the modeled outside boundary is the adiabatic (insulated) condition existing at the midplane of the symmetrical heat sink. Heat Sink #15 describes the Miscellaneous Carbon Steel (with thickness less than 0.50 in as modeled: Geometry Slab Surface Area 98913.6 ft2 Organic Paint (material 4) thickness-Left 0.000606 ft Boundary Carbon Steel (material 1) thickness-Right 0.012227 ft Boundary Left Boundary condition Exposed to containment atmosphere Right Boundary condition Insulated, no heat transfer across the heat sink centerline Because there is no heat transfer across the right boundary, the bulk temperature control for the right boundary condition is not used by the COPATTA Code. Themfore, in this analysis the bulk temperatum control for the right boundary condition is modeled as the containment vapor temperature for convective heat transfer or the saturation temperatum at the containment steam partial pressum for condensing heat transfer (i.e., Option 2 for Item 5 of Card Series IXX400). This differs from the modeling of Calculations N-4080-002 and N-4080-005, which employed Option 0 for Item 5 of Card Series 1XX400. Since the bulk temperature control for the right boundary condition has no meaning for this Heat Sink, the decision to modelItem 5 with Option 2 rather than Option 0 has the beneficial consequence
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET '
'cc"".CCMMO.
PRELIM PAGE OF Project Or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN PiO. OCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB __ Sheet No. 115 REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 5 of allowing the use of any positive value to be modeled as the variable TCONT in Item 7 of Card Series 2. The Card Series set defining Heat Sink 15 is entered in the input data fde as:
- HS #15 - MISCELLANEOUS CARBON STEEL: THICKNESS <0.5"
& LIST POOL =115001, 17, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 98913.6/
& LIST POOL =115101, 6, 0.000606, 10, 0.012833/
& LIST POOL-115201, 4, 1/
& LIST POOL =115300, 0, 0/
& LIST POOL =115400, 9, 2, 0, 2/
As discussed in Design Input 4.8, the heat transfer coefficient control for the left boundary condition (adjacent to the organic paint) is modeled as the Uchida value. This is a condensing steam value dependent on the ratio of water vapor to air used in MSLB analyses. Therefore Item 2 in Card Series 115400 is 9.
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET '
'cc" ". CCN NO.
PRELIM PAGE__ OF__ Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN No. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 116 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 S 8.1.27.16 HS #16 - Electrical Equipment The characteristics of the Electrical Equipment are as determined in Calculation N-4080-005 (Reference 6.1.f, pages 59 through 61) for Heat Sink 15. This heat sink description represents a refinement of the characteristics of the Electrical Steel first determined in Calculation N-4080-002 (Reference 6.1.g, pages 174 through 176) for Heat Sink 16. Calculation N-4080-005 (page 61) recommends use of a 37644 square foot surface area. The modeled surface area of 37644.5 square feet possesses the extra significant digit found in an interim calculation step as shown in Calculation N-4080-005 (page 60). Heat Sink #16 describes the Electrical Equipment as modeled: Geometry Slab Surface Area 37644.5 ft2 Carbon Steel (material 1) thickness-Left and 0.0054 ft Right boundaries I2ft Boundary condition Exposed to containment atmosphere Right Boundary condition Insulated, no heat transfer to inside of electrical equipment Because there is no heat transfer across the right boundary, the bulk temperature control for the right boundary condition is not used by the COPA'ITA Code. Therefore, in this analysis the bulk temperature control for the right boundary condition is modeled as the contamment vapor temperature for convective heat transfer or the saturation temperature at the containment steam partial pressure for condensing heat transfer (i.e., Option 2 for Item 5 of Card Series 1XX400). This differs from the modeling of Calculations N-4080-002 and N-4080-005, which employed Option 0 for Item 5 of Card Series 1XX400. Since the bulk temperature control for the right boundary condition has no meaning for this Heat Sink, the decision to model Item 5 with Option 2 rather than Option 0 has the beneficial consequence of allowing the use of any positive value to be modeled as the variable TCONT in Item 7 of Card Series 2.
1 NES&L DEPARTMENT l CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" "o ' PRELIM. CCN NO. PAGE__ OF __ Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - \ Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 117 i l REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE I IRE DATE R E O S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 5 The Card Series set defining Heat Sink 16 is entered in the input data file as:
- HS #16 - ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT
& LIST POOL =116001, 8, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 37644.5/
& LIST POOL =116101, 7, 0.0054/
& LIST POOL =116201, 1/
l
& LIST POOL =116300, 0, 0/ l
& LIST POOL =116400, 9, 2, 0, 2/
l l As discussed in Design Input 4.8, the heat transfer coefficient control for the left boundary l l condition (adjacent to the organic paint) is modeled as the Uchida value. This is a i j condensing steam value dependent on the ratio of water vapor to air used in MSLB analyses. Therefore Item 2 in Card Series 116400 is 9. l ( I
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" "os PREUM. CCN NO. PAGE OF Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN No. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 118 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 ' 5 8.1.27.17 HS #17 - Miscellaneous Stainless Steel The characteristics of the Miscellaneous Stainless Steel are as determined in Calculation N-4080-005 (Reference 6.1.f, pages 62 through 65) for Heat Sink 16. This heat sink description represents a refinement of the characteristics of the Miscellaneous Stainless Steel as first determined in Calculation N-4080-002 (Reference 6.1.g, pages 176 through 179) for Heat Sink 17. Due to heat sink symmetry, only one-half of the heat sink is modeled. The modeled surface area is the total heat sink surface area, equal to twice the actual surface area of one side of the heat sink. The modeled thickness of the center stainless steel portion is one-half of the actual thickness of the center stainless steel portion of the heat sink. And, the modeled outside boundary is the adiabatic (insulated) condition existing at the midplane of the symmetrical heat sink. Heat Sink #17 describes the Miscellaneous Stainless Steel as modeled: Geometry Slab Surface Area 24048 ft2 Stainless Steel (material 3) thickness-Left and 0.01747 ft Right boundaries left Boundary condition Exposed to containment atmosphere Right Boundary condition Insulated, no heat transfer across the heat sink centerline Because there is no heat transfer across the right boundary, the bulk temperature control for the right boundary condition is not used by the COPATTA Code. Therefore, in this analysis the bulk temperature control for the right boundary condition is modeled as the containment vapor temperature for convective heat transfer or the saturation temperature at the contamment steam partial pressure for condensing heat transfer (i.e., Option 2 for Item 5 of Card Series IXX400). This differs from the modeling of Calculations N-4080-002 and N-4080-005, which employed Option 0 for Item 5 of Card Series IXX400. Since the bulk temperature control for the right boundary condition has no meaning for this Heat Sink, the decision to model Item 5 with Option 2 rather than Option 0 has the beneficial consequence of allowing the use of any positive value to be modeled as the variable TCONT in Item 7 of Card Series 2. 4
1 NES&L DEPARTMENT 1
- )
CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" "o ' PREUM. CCN NO. PAGE__ OF_ l ^ Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN No. CCN - 2 Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 119 1 i REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 ' 4 The Card Series set defining Heat Sink 17 is entered in the input data l'de as: 's
- HS #17 - MISCELLANEOUS STAINLESS STEEL
! & LIST POOL-117001, 16, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 24048/ f
& LIST POOL =117101, 15, 0.01747/
& LIST POOL =117201, 3/
& LIST POOL =117300, 0, 0/
4
& LIST POOL =117400, 9, 2, 0, 2/
As discussed in Design Input 4.8, the heat transfer coefficient control for the left boundary condition (adjacent to the organic paint) is modeled as the Uchida value. This is a l ] condensing steam value depenoent on the ratio of water vapor to air used in MSLB analyses.
- Therefore Item 2 in Card Series 117400 is 9.
4 5 l 1 l l l l l l 4 5
I NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" " > PREUM. CCN NO. PAGE_,,OF _ Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 ccN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 120 REV ORIG 8NATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 4 8.1.27,18 HS #18 - Unlined Refueling Canal Walls (below El. 63'6") The chancteristics of the Unlined Refueling Canal Walls (below plant elevation 63'6") are as determined in Calculation N-4080-002 (Reference 6.1.g, pages 180 through 182) for Heat Sink 18. Due to heat sink symmetry, only one-half of the heat sink is modeled. The modeled surface area is the total heat sink surface area, equal to twice the actual surface area of one side of the heat sink. The modeled thickness of the center concrete portion is one-half of the actual thickness of the center concrete ponion of the heat sink. And, the modeled outside boundary is the adiabatic (insulated) condition existing at the midplane of the symmetrical heat sink. Heat Sink #18 describes the Unlined Refueling Canal Walls (below El. 63'6") as modeled: Geometry Slab Surface Area 3700 ft2 Organic Paint (material 4) thickness-Left 0.00192 ft (= 0.023 in) Boundary Concrete (material 2) thickness-Right Boundary 2.0 ft Left Boundary condition Exposed to containment atmosphere Right Boundary condition Insulated, no heat transfer across the heat sink centerline Due to an addition error, Calculation N-4080-002 (page 181) incorrectly modeled the right boundary coordinate of the Concrete Region at 2.00 feet. The determination of the right boundary coordinate of the Concrete region neglected to add the thickness of the Organic Paint Region. In this analysis the right boundary coordinate of the Concrete Region will be modeled at the correct position of 2.00192 feet: Right Boundary Coordinate of Concrete Region = 2.0 ft + 0.00192 ft
= 2.00192 feet i Because there is no heat transfer across the right boundary, the bulk temperature control for the right boundary condition is not used by the COPATTA Code. Therefore, in this analysis the bulk temperature control for the right boundary condition is modeled as the containment i
vapor temperature for convective heat transfer or the saturation temperature at the containment steam partial pressure for condensing heat transfer (i.e., Option 2 for Item 5 of Card Series IXX400). This differs from the modeling of Calculation N-4080-002, which
1 NES&L DEPARTMENT l CALCULATION SHEET '
'cc" ". CCN NO.
PREUM PAGE OF . Proj:ct or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - J [ Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 121 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elin,tt 1/4/94 '
! 5 i employed Option 0 for Item 5 of Card Series IXX400. Since the bulk temperature control for the right boundary condition has no meaning for this Heat Sink, the decision to model l l Item 5 with Option 2 rather than Option 0 has the beneficial consequence of allowing the use of any positive value to be modeled as the variable TCONT in Item 7 of Card Series 2.
- The Card Series set defm' ing Heat Sink 18 is entered in the input data file as
- HS #18 - UNLINED REFUELING CANAL WALLS BELOW El. 63'6" j & LIST POOL =118001, 48, 4, 0, 0, 0, 0, 3700/
l 4
& LIST POOL =118101, 5, 0.00192, 7, 0.02292, i 15, 0.40192, 20, 2.00192/ ;
& LIST POOL =118201, 4, 2, 2, 2/
1 & LIST POOL =118300, 0, 0/ j & LIST POOL =118400, 9, 2, 0, 2/ 4
- As discussed in Design Input 4.8, the heat transfer coefficient control for the left boundary condition (adjacent to the organic paint) is modeled as the Uchida value. This is a condensing steam value dependent on the ratio of water vapor to air used in MSLB analyses. i Therefore Item 2 in Card Series 118400 is 9.
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" " > PRELIM. CCN NO. PAGE OF Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - l Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 122 REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 E 5 8.1.27.19 HS #19 - Reactor Building Cylinder #3 (the Containment Section with Embedded Stiffeners between El. 29'6" and 112'0") The characteristics of the Reactor Building Cylinder #3 (the Containment Section with I Embedded Stiffeners between plant elevations 29'6" and 112'0") are as determined in 1 Calculation N-4080-002 (Reference 6.1.f, pages 183 through 189) for Heat Sink 19, except for the thickness of the Contamment Liner / Concrete air gap interface, and except for the thickness of the concrete layer. I Due to an addition error, Calculation N-4080-002 (page 188) improperly modeled the l concrete layer as 3.56524 feet thick. In this analysis the concrete layer will be modeled as l 4.21108 feet, corresponding to the average thickness that was actually determined in Calculation N-4080-002 (page 186). And, as discussed in Design Input Item 4.8.a, the effective thickness of the interface (air gap) will be 0.00035 feet. With these changes, Heat Sink #19 describes the Reactor Building Cylinder 3 as modeled: Geometry Slab Surface Area 1590.68 ft2 Organic Paint (material 4) thickness-Left 0.00075 ft (= 0.009 in) Boundary Carbon Steel (material 1) Liner thickness ' 0.66667 ft (= 8 in) Air Gap Interface (material 5) thickness 0.00035 ft Concrete (material 2) thickness-Right Boundary 4.21108 ft Left Boundary condition Exposed to containment atmosphere Right Boundary condition Exposed to outside environment The effect of the changes in the air gap thickness is reflected in Card Series 119101. This Card Series defines the location of the right boundary and nodahzation of each region. The air gap is the third region of Heat Sink 19. The increase in the modeled air gap thickness from 0.00017 feet to 0.00035 feet requires that the modeled location of the Region 3 right boundary be increased by 0.00018 feet. To maintain the correct thickness of each Region that follows the air gap region necessitates that the modeled locations of the right boundaries of these subsequent regions be increased by the same 0.00018 feet. Due to an addition error, Calculation N-4080-002 (page 188) incorrectly modeled the right boundary coordinate of the Concrete Region at 4.23283 feet. The detemiination of the right
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" "o ' PRELIM. CCN NO. PAGE OF Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: N CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 123 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 ' 5 boundary coordinate of the Concrete region is based on adding the thickness of the Concrete Region to the thicknesses of the Organic Paint, Carbon Steel and Air Gap Interface regions. The original calculations considered a Carbon Steel thickness of 0.02083 feet rather than the correct thickness of 0.66667 feet. Correcting this error, and adjusting for the change in the Air Gap Interface Region thickness, allows for the calculation of a 7th Region right boundary coordinate of 4.87885 feet: l Right Boundary Coordinate = 0.00075 ft + 0.66667 ft + 0.00035 ft + 4.21108 ft I of Concrete Region = 4.87885 feet The changes from the right boundary locations determined in Calculation N-4080-002 are: 1st Region: no change in the right boundary location 2nd Region: no change in the right boundary location 3rd Region: right boundary shifted from 0.66759 to 0.66777 feet 4th Region: right boundary shifted from 0.70926 to 0.70944 feet 5th Region: right boundary shifted from 0.7926 to 0.79278 feet 6th Region: right boundary shifted from 1.4426 to 1.44278 feet 7th Region: ri ght boundary shifted from 4.23283 to 4.87885 feet 1 i The Card Series set defining Heat Sink 19 is entered in the input data file as.
- HS #19 - REACTOR BLDG CYLINDER #3: SECTIONS WITH STIFFENERS
& LIST POOL =119001, 100, 7, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1590.68/
& LIST POOL =119101, 5, 0.00075, 20, 0.66742, 3, 0.66777, 15, 0.70944, 20, 0.79278, 16, 1.44278, j 20, 4.87885/
& LIST POOL-119201, 4, 1, 5, 2, 2, 2, 2/
& LIST POOL =119300, 0, 0/
j & LIST POOL =119400, 9, 2, 1, 1/ As discussed in Design Input 4.8, the heat transfer coefficient control for the left boundary l condition (adjacent to the organic paint) is modeled as the Uchida value. This is a condensing steam value dependent on the ratio of water vapor to air used in MSLB analyses. Therefore Item 2 in Card Series 119400 is 9. l 1
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" "o ' PRELIM. CCN NO. PAGE__ OF _ Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 cCN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet NO. 124 . REV ORIGINATOR DATE tRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 " 5 8.1.27.20 HS #20 - Vent Tunnels I The characteristics of the Vent Tunnels are as determined in Calculation N-4080-002 (Reference 6.1.g, pages 190 through 192) for Heat Sink 20. Heat Sink #20 describes the Vent Tunnels as modeled: l ) Geometry Slab Surface Area 2827 ft2 Organic Paint (material 4) thickness-Left 0.0005 ft (= 0.006 in) Boundary l ] Carbon Steel (material 1) thickness-Right 0.03125 ft (= 0.375 in) Boundary Left Boundary condition Exposed to containment atmosphere Right Boundary condition Insulated (approximating an infinitely thick tunnel wall) Because there is no heat tansfer across the right boundary, the bulk temperature control for the right boundary condition is not used by the COPATTA Code. Therefore, in this analysis l the bulk temperatum control for the right boundary condition is modeled as the containment i vapor temperature for convective heat transfer or the saturation temperature at the containment steam partial pressure for condensing heat transfer (i.e., Option 2 for Item 5 of Card Series IXX400). This differs from the modeling of Calculation N-4080-002, which i employed Option 0 for Item 5 of Card Series 1XX400. Since the bulk temperature control for the right boundary condition has no meaning for this Heat Sink, the decision to model Item 5 with Option 2 mther than Option 0 has the beneficial consequence of allowing the use l of any positive value to be modeled as the variable TCONT in Item 7 of Card Series 2. 4 l l
% - ..-m* a.a e _ a--+ .h++h' 4 NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" " ' -
PRELIM. CCM NO. PAGE OF Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSloN: CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 125 3 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE lRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 4 The Card Series set defining Heat Sink 20 is entered in the input data file as:
- HS #20 - VENT TUNNELS
& LIST POOL =120001, 23, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2827/
& LIST POOL-120101, 10, 0.0005, 12, 0.03175/
& LIST POOL-120201, 4, 1/
& LIST POOL =120300, 0, 0/
& LIST POOL =120400, 9, 2, 0, 2/
As discussed in Design Input 4.8, the heat transfer coefficient control for the left boundary condition (adjacent to the organic paint) is modeled as the Uchida value. This is a condensing steam value dependent on the ratio of water vapor to air used in MSLB analyses. Therefore Item 2 in Card Series 120400 is 9. l l l l l 1
NES&L DEPARTMENT 3 CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" " ' PRELIM. CCM NO. PAGE _ OF _ Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT Pfr ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 126 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 ' 4 8.1.28 CARD SERIES 410001: Table 15 Card Series 410001 is a table that is used to describe the material properties in the heat sink calculations. The Card Series 410001 table includes the following data entered in columnar form:
- 1. thermal conductivity (BTU /hr-ft *F)
- 2. volumetric heat capacity (BTU /ft$ *F)
& LIST POOL =410001, 25, 54, 0.8, 30, 10, 54, 0.1, 20, 0.0174, 0.0103/
The entries in Card Series 410001 define five materials. These materials include: ITEMS 2 and 3: Material 1 - Carbon Steel Material 1 is defined as Carbon Steel. Per Design Input Item 4.14.a, the thermal conductivity and volumetric heat capacity of Carbon Steel are: k = 25 BTU /hr-ft- F pC, = 54 BTU /ft' *F 4 ITEMS 4 and 5: Material 2 - Concrete Material 2 is defined as Concrete. Per Design Input Item 4.14.b, the thermal conductivity and volumetric heat capacity of Concrete are: k = 0.8 BTU /hr-ft *F pC, = 30 BTU /ft$ *F
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET ICCN NO./ PRELIM. CCN NO. PAG E_. OF,__ Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - I Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 127 1 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R l 0 ' S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 5 1 ITEMS 6 and 7: Material 3 - Stainless Steel l l Material 3 is defined as Stainless Steel. Per Design Input Item 4.14.c, the thermal { conductivity and volumetric heat capacity of Stainless Steel are: k = 10 BTU /hr-ft *F pC, = 54 BTU /ft' *F l ITEMS 8 and 9: Material 4 - Organic Paint Coating l Material 4 is defined as Organic Paint Coating. Per Design Input Item 4.14.d, the thermal conductivity and volumetric heat capacity of Organic Paint Coating are: k = 0.1 BTU /hr-ft- F pC, = 20 BTU /ft3 - F ITEMS 10 and 11: Material 5 - Air Gap (@ 200 *F) Material 5 is defined as the Air Gap Interface between the Containment Building walls and the Carbon Steel Liner, at a containment air temperature of 200 *F. Per Design Input Item 4.14.e, the thermal conductivity and volumetric heat capacity of the Air Gap are: k = 0.0174 BTU /hr-ft *F pC, = 0.0103 BTU /ft'- F i l _ _ _ _ _ - r
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET >
'cc" ". CcN NO.
PRELIM PAGE._ OF_ Proj:ct or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSloN: CCN No. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 128 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 ' S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 5 8.1.29 CARD SERIES 420001: Table 16 Card Series 420001 is used to specify arbitrary constant non-condensing heat transfer coefficients to be assumed at any heat sink surface. This table is required if a heat transfer , coefficient control of 10 to 15 is specified for Items 2 or 4 in Card Series IXX400. In this
! model, heat transfer coefficient controls other than 10 to 15 are specified for Items 2 and 4 in Card Series 1XX400. Therefore, this Card Series is not used.
J. j 8.1.30 CARD SERIES 430001: Table 17 ) Card Series 430001 is used to describe the time-dependent condensing heat transfer coefficients to be assumed at any heat sink surface. This table is required if a heat transfer coefficient control of 5 or 8 is specified for Items 2 or 4 in Card Series 1XX400. In this model, heat transfer coefficient controls other than 5 or 8 are specified for Items 2 and 4 in Card Series 1XX400. Therefore, this Card Series is not used. 8.1.31 CARD SERIES 440001: Table 18
- Card Series 430001 is used to describe an additional set of time-dependent condensing heat transfer coefficients to be assumed at any heat sink surface. This table is mquired if a heat transfer coefficient control of 6 is specified for Items 2 or 4 in Card Series IXX400. In this model, heat transfer coefficient controls other than 6 are specified for Items 2 and 4 in Card
, Series 1XX400. Therefore, this Card Series is not used. 4 8.1.32 CARD SERIES 450001: Table 19 Card Series 450001 is used to describe the temperature-dependent non-condensing heat transfer coefficients to be assumed at any heat sink surface. This table is required if a heat transfer coefficient contml of 7 is specifid for Items 2 or 4 in Card Series 1XX400. In this model, heat transfer coefficient control.c other than 7 are specified for Items 2 and 4 in Card , Series 1XX400. Themfore, this Card Series is not used. I
- l a
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" " ' , PRELIM. CCN NO. PAGE__ OF_ ! Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Cale. No. N-4080-027 CcN CONVERSION: CCN No. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 129 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R j 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 l 5 4 8.1.33 CARD SERIES 500000: End Card
- 1 If heat sink data is used, this card must follow the complete set of base case data. Otherwise
! it may be omitted. In this calculation, heat sink data is used. The card contains the following 4 fixed infonnation in Columns 2 through 19:
& LIST POOL =500000/
I I i
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" "o' PRELIM. CCN NO. PAG E_ OF_ Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 130 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 5 9 COPATTA INPUT FILES INPUT FILE NAAE: MSLB_N01.DAT
*MSLB CASE, 102% POWER, LOSS OF ONE COOLING TRAIN, OFFSITE POWER AVAIL.
& LIST P00L=0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0/
& LIST P00L=1,1E4,16.2,2.305E6,120,0.6,20,582.945,1,1,0,14.7,0.5/
& LIST P00L=2,0,0,0,0,0,120,2E7/ I
& LIST P00L=3,D,0,0,0,0,2E7,0,0,0,0/
& LIST P00L=4,'0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0/ j
& LIST P00L=5,2,15,1E4,0,0,0,105/ '
ELIST P00L=6,0,0,0/
& LEAK NOPEN=0/
& LIST P00L=101, 0, 0, 2E7, 0/
& LIST P00L=201, 0, 0, 2E7, 0/
& LIST P00L=301, 0, 5.145520E7, 1.195589E3, 0.22, 4.869032E7, 1.197482E3, 0.42, 4.622234E7, 1.198466E3, 0.62, 4.405936E7, 1.199410E3, 1.08, 4.003276E7, 1.201595E3, 1.58, 3.688855E7, 1.201757E3, 2.08, 3.445970E7, 1.202018E3, 2.58, 3.326288E7, 1.200986E3, 3.58, 3.152606E7, 1.201058E3, 4.58, 3.028468E7, 1.201655E3, 5.58, 2.940080E7, 1.201123E3, 6.58, 2.874870E7, 1.201126E3, 7.58, 2.706574E7, 1.204404E3, 8.58, 2.468326E7, 1.204367E3, 9.58, 2.294968E7, 1.204238E3, 10.58, 2.160122E7, 1.203908E3, 12.58, 1.943143E7, 1.203195E3, 14.58, 1.765940E7, 1.202277E3, 16.58, 1.637240E7, 1.201556E3, 18.58, 1.544720E7, 1.200963E3, 20.58, 1.473293E7, 1.200422E3, 25.58, 1.327525E7, 1.198820E3, 30.58, 1.221858E7, 1.197825E3, 35.58, 1.146406E7, 1.196753E3, l 40.58, 1.059131E7, 1.195307E3,
! 45.58, 9.801216E6, 1.194165E3, 50.58, 9.132588E6, 1.193086E3, 60.58, 8.280324E6, 1.190935E3, 61.08, 7.245576E6, 1.190949E3, 62.08, 5.803344E6, 1.189165E3, i 62.58, 3.238704E6, 1.184658E3, 64.58, 3.948840ES, 1.179953E3, 68.58, 1.074240ES, 1.251072E3, 71.08, 0, 0, 2E7, 0, 0/ i
& LIST P00L=401, 0, 0, 0, 2E7, 0, 0/
& LIST P00L=501, 0, 0, 0,
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" * ' l PTELIM. CCN NO. PAGE OF ! ! Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 cCN CONVERSION: ccN NO. CCN - ! Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 131 l l l REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R E O S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 y 5 2E7, 0, 0/
& LIST P00L=601, 0, 0, 0, 2E7, 0, 0/
' & LIST P00Ls701, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2E7, 0, 0, 0/
& LIST POOL =801, 0, 0, 0, 0, 100, 100, 50, 0, 0, 0, 100, 100, 50, 8.02E5, 0, 0, 100, 100, l 2E7, 8.02E5, 0, 0, 100, 100/ '
& LIST P00L=901, 0, 0, 0, 2E7, 0, 0/
& LIST P00L=1001, 0, 100, 2.0, i 24, 103, 2.0/ l
& LIST P00L=1101,1,21,105, i 105, 0, 120, 1.670E6, 130, 3.020E6, 140, 4.570E6, 150, 6.320E6, 160, 8.270E6, 170, 1.040E7, 180, 1.273E7, 190, 1.523E7, l 200, 1.788E7, 210, 2.068E7, 220, 2.361E7, 230, 2.664E7, 240, 2.974E7, 250, 3.291E7, 260, 3.611E7, 270, 3.931E7, 280, 4.252E7, 287, 4.474E7, 290, 4.569E7, 300, 4.882E7/
& LIST P00L=1201, 0, 0.729, 0.1, 0.737, 0.2, 0.747, 0.3, 0.757, 0.4, 0.771, 0.5, 0.738, 0.6, 0.809, 0.7, 0.832, 0.8, 0.863, 0.9, 0.912, 1.0, 0.961, 1.1, 0.983, 1.2, 0.995, 1.3, 1.000/
& LIST POOL =9001, 5, 0.05, 0.1, 50, 10, 0.05, 0.25, 20, 15, 0.05, 0.50, 10, 20, 0.05, 0.50, 10, 100, 0.1, 1.0, 10, 200, 1.0, 5.0, 10,
NES&L DEPARTMENT l CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" "o ' PRELIM. CCN NO. ! PAG E.,_., OF.,,,_ l Project or DCP/MMP_ SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 132 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 E 5 400, 1.0, 10.0, 5, 700, 2.0, 20.0, 5, i 2E3, 5.0, 50.0, 1, 1E4, 50.0, 500, 2, 1ES, 250, 1E3, 4, 1E6, 500,- 1E4, 9, 1 i 1E7, 500, 5E4, 9, 2E7, 500, SE4, 9/
& LIST P00L=9999/
- HS #1 - REACTOR BUILDING DOME
& LIST P00L=101001, 100, 7, 0, 0, 0, 0, 34693.22/
& LIST P00L=101101, 5, 0.00075, 3, 0.02158, 3, 0.02193, 10, 0.06360, 20, 0.23028, 37, 1.00110, 21, 4.06363/
& LIST P00L=101201, 4, 1, 5, 2, 2, 2, 2/
& LIST P00L=101300, 0, 0/
& LIST P00L=101400, 9, 2, 1, 1/
- HS #2 - CYLINDER WALL BETWEEN El. 29'6" AND 11280"
& LIST P00L=102001, 100, 7, 0, 0, 0, C, 38120/
& LIST P00L=102101, 5, 0.00075, 3, 0.02158, '
3, 0.02193, 10, 0.06360, 20, 0.14694, 37, 0.917761, 21, 4.35526/
& LIST P00L=102201, 4, 1, 5, 2, 2, 2, 2/ ,
& LIST P00L=102300, 0, 0/
& LIST P00L=102400, 9, 2, 1, 1/ l
- HS #3 - CYLINDER WALL BETWEEN El.15'0" AND El. 29'6"
& LIST P00L=103001, 100, 7, 0, 0, 0, 0, 6667.38/
& LIST P00L=103101, 5, 0.00075, 3, 0.02158, 3, 0.02193, 10, 0.06360, 20, 0.14694, 37, 0.917761, 21, 4.35526/
& LIST P00L=103201, 4, 1, 5, 2, 2, 2, 2/
& LIST POOL =103300, 0, 0/
& LIST P00L=103400, 9, 2, 0, 2/
- HS #4 - BASEMAT (OTHER THAN REACTOR BASEMAT) i
& LIST P00L=104001, 53, 5, 0, 0, 0, 0,12800/ l
& LIST POOL =104101, 3, 0.00067, 7, 0.1, i 20, 1.52698, 2, 1.54781, 20, 11.02150/
& LIST P00L=104201, 4, 2, 2, 1, 2/ 4
& LIST P00L=104300, 0, 0/ i
& LIST P00L=104400, 3, 3, 0, 3/
- HS #5 - REACTOR BASEMAT & S.G. PEDESTALS
& LIST POOL =105001, 70, 4, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1644/
& LIST P00L=105101, 4, 0.00158, 10, 0.1, l 30, 2.00, 25, 8.43092/ l
& LIST POOL =105201, 4, 2, 2, 2/
& LIST P00L=105300, 0, 0/
& LIST POOL =105400, 3, 3, 0, 3/
- HS #6 - REACTOR CAVITY WALLS BELOW El. 15'0"
& LIST POOL =106001, 93, 5, 1, 11.75, 0, 0, 21.5/
& LIST P00L=106101, 5, 11.75192, 7, 11.77292, 30, 13.29923, 30, 19.29923, 20, 25.25192/
& LIST P00L=106201, 4, 2, 2, 2, 2/
l
& LIST P00L=106300, 0, 0/ -
& LIST P00L=106400, 3, 3, 0, 3/
- HS #7 - REACTOR CAVITY WALLS ABOVE El. 15'0"
& LIST P00L=107001, 68, 5, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2810/
& LIST P00L=107101, 5, 0.00192, 7, 0.02292,
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'c"" > PREUM. CCN NO. PAGE _ OF__,, Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. NO. N-4080-027 ccN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 133 t REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 ' 5 l 15, 0.40192, 20, 2.00, j 20, 4.00192/ i
& LIST P00L=107201, 4, 2, 2, 2, 2/
& LIST POOL =107300, 0, 0/
& LIST P00L=107400, 9, 2, 0, 2/
- HS #8 - LINED REFUELING CANAL WALLS
& LIST P00L=108001, 86, 6, 0, 0, 0, 0, 9200/
& LIST P00L=108101, 5, 0.01563, 20, 0.1, 15, 0.41563, 20, 2.00, 20, 4.01563, 5, 4.01755/
& LIST P00L=108201, 3, 2, 2, 2, 2, 4/
& LIST P00L=108300, 0, 0/
l & LIST POOL =108400, 9, 2, 9, 2/
- HS #9 - S.G. CMPRTMNT WALLS, UNLINED REFL CNL WALLS /0TH INT WALLS
& LIST P00L=109001, 78, 4, 0, 0, 0, 0, 41976/
& LIST P00L=109101, 5, 0.00192, 10, 0.04233, 12, 0.1, 50, 1.71876/
& LIST P00L=109201, 4, 2, 2, 2/
& LIST POOL =109300, 0, 0/
& LIST P00L=109400, 9, 2, 0, 2/
- HS #10 - FLOOR SLABS (OTHER THAN BASEMATS)
& LIST P00L=110001, 67, 6, 0, 0, 0, 0,17474/
& LIST P00Ls110101, 3, 0.00014, 5, 0.005348, 20, 0.105348, 15, 0.505348, 20, 1.505348, 3, 1.506015/
& LIST P00L=110201, 4,1, 2, 2, 2, 4/
& LIST POOL =110300, 0, 0/
& LIST P00L=110400, 9, 2, 9, 2/
- HS #11 LIFTING DEVICES (EXCEPT STAINLESS STEEL PARTS)
SLIST P00L=111001,17, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 57286/
& LIST P00L=111101, 6, 0.00125, 10, 0.042917/
& LIST POOL =111201, 4. 1/
& LIST P00L=111300, 0, 0/
& LIST P00L=111400, 9, 2, 0, 2/
- HS #12 - MISCELLANEOUS CARBON STEEL THICKNESS > 2.50 INCHES
& LIST P00L=112001, 64, 4, 0, 0, 0, 0, 516/
& LIST P00L=112101, 6, 0.0005, 17, 0.084, 15, 0.20, 25, 0.310849/
& LIST P00L=112201, 4, 1, 1, 1/
& LIST P00L=112300, 0, 0/
& LIST P00L=112400, 9, 2, 0, 2/
- HS #13 - MISCELLANEOUS CARBON STEEL: 1.00=< THICKNESS <2.50a
& LIST P00L=113001, 32, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 12042/
& LIST P00L=113101, 6, 0.00063, 25, 0.16967/
& LIST P00L=113201, 4, 1/
& LIST P00L=113300, 0, 0/
& LIST POOL =113400, 9, 2, 0, 2/
- HS #14 - MISCELLANEOUS CARBON STEEL: 0.50=< THICKNESS <1.00"
& LIST P00L=114001, 19, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 64693/
& LIST P00L=114101, 5, 0.000674, 13, 0.038607/
& LIST P00L=114201, 4, 1/
& LIST P00L=114300, 0, 0/
& LIST P00L=114400, 9, 2, 0, 2/
- HS #15 - MISCELLANEOUS CARBON STEEL: THICKNESS <0.5=
& LIST P00L=115001, 17, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 98913.6/
& LIST P00L=115101, 6, 0.000606, 10, 0.012833/
4 ELIST P00L=115201, 4, 1/
& LIST P00L=115300, 0, 0/
l & LIST POOL =115400, 9, 2, 0, 2/ i
- HS #16 - ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT
& LIST P00L=116001, 8,1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 37644.5/
& LIST P00L=116101, 7, 0.0054/
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET '
'cc" ". CCN NO.
PRELIM PAGE OF Projtet or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN No. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 134 i REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 4 1 l
& LIST P00L=116201, 1/
& LIST P00L=116300, 0, 0/
& LIST POOL =116400, 9, 2, 0, 2/
- HS #17 - MISCELLANEOUS STAINLESS STEEL
& LIST POOL =117001,16,1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 24048/ j
& LIST POOL =117101, 15, 0.01747/
& LIST P00L=117201, 3/
& LIST P00Ls117300, 0, 0/
& LIST P00L=117400, 9, 2, 0, 2/
- HS #18 + UNLINED REFUELING CANAL WALLS BELOW El. 63'6=
& LIST P00L=118001, 48, 4, 0, 0, 0, 0, 3700/ l
& LIST P00L=118101, 5, 0.00192, 7, 0.02292, 15, 0.40192, 20, 2.00192/
& LIST P00L=118201, 4, 2, 2, 2/
& LIST P00L=118300, 0, 0/
l & LIST P00L=118400, 9, 2, 0, 2/ ) ,
- MS #19 - REACTOR BLDG CYLINDER #3: SECTIONS WITH STIFFENERS j
! & LIST P00L=119001, 100, 7, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1590.68/
& LIST P00L=119101, 5, 0.00075, 20, 0.66742, 3, 0.66777, 15, 0.70944, 20, 0.79278, 16, 1.44278, ;
. 20, 4.87885/ i
& LIST P00L=119201, 4, 1, 5, 2, 2, 2, 2/ )
& LIST P00L=119300, 0, 0/ ]
& LIST P00L=119400, 9, 2, 1, 1/
- HS #20 - VENT TUNNELS
& LIST P00Ls120001, 23, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2827/
& LIST P00L=120101, 10, 0.0005, 12, 0.03175/
& LIST P00L=120201, 4, 1/
& LIST P00L=120300, 0, 0/
& LIST P00L=120400, 9, 2, 0, 2/
& LIST P00L=410001, 25, 54, 0.8, 30, 10, 54, 0.1, 20, 0.0174, 0.0103/
& LIST POOL =500000/
l l
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'cc"o ' PREl.lM. CCN NO. PAGE _ OF _ Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSloN: cCN No. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 135 l l REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 5 r,. 10 SELECTED OUTPUT DATA ) l The tabulated data presented in Sections 10.1 and 10.2 consists of partial output of the l COPATTA code. This data is then used as the input to the plots in Section 2. All values am taken directly fmm output files produced by the COPLOTTA (Ref. 6.5.a pg. E-3) program in conjunction with the COPATTA output file except the gauge pressure with I respect to the outside atmosphere (psig w/r 14.7 psia). The COPATTA output file assumes that the initial containment pressure is the mference pressure for determining gauge pressure. Because this analysis is concerned with the pressure differential acmss the containment l stnicture,1.5 psi is added to the gauge pressure presented in the COPATTA output (psig w/r i 16.2 psia). l 10.1 TIME SUMP TEMP VAPOR TEMP TOTAL GAUGE LEFT UCHIDA (SECONDS) (DEG-F) (DEG-F) PRESSURE PRESSURE BOUNDARY CONDENSING HTC (PSIA) PSIG TEMPERATURE (BTU /FT2-F-HR) ' (W/R 14.7 HS#1 l psla) (DEG-F) l 0.05 -1.0e 07 123.329 16.4013 1.701269 118.3676 7.65926 0.1 -1.0e-07 126.654 16.6006 1.900648 118.3676 8.07424 0.2 -1.De 07 133.06 16.992 2.291994 118.3676 9.24911 0.3 -1.0e-07 139.155 17.3734 2.67341 118.3676 9.77065 0.4 122.262 144.967 17.7452 3.0452 116.3676 10.6752 0,5 125.256 150.503 18.1074 3.40736 118.3676 11.9305 0.6 127.832 155.788 18.4607 3.7607 118.3676 12.0467 0.7 130.22 160.842 18.8057 4.10575 118.3676 13.7865 0.8 132.398 165.692 19.1436 4.44364 118.3676 14.4938 0.9 134.492 170.35 19.4745 4.77447 118.3676 15.0974 1 136.438 174.822 19.7982 5.09819 118.3676 15.6182 1.1 138.237 179.119 20.1149 5.41489 118.3676 16.0718 1.2 139.949 183.255 20.4256 5.72557 118.3676 16.4719 1.3 141.605 187.241 20.7308 6.03076 118.3676 16.8278 1.4 143.226 191.085 21.0305 6.33054 118.3676 17.2929 1.5 144.784 194.791 21.3248 6.62481 118.3676 17.8663 1.6 146.264 196.365 21.6137 6.9137 118.3676 18.3849 1.7 147.686 201.823 21.898 7.19796 118.3676 18.8571 1.8 149.062 205.173 22.178 7.47799 118.3676 19.2894 1.9 150.401 208.42 22.4539 7.75388 118.3676 19.6864
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" "o ' PRELIM. CCN NO. PAGE_,_OF _ Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN No. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 136 REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 5 TIME SUMP TEMr VAPOR TEMP TOTAL GAUGE LEFT UCHIDA (SECONOS) (DEG-F) (DEG-F) PRESSURE PRESSURE BOUNDARY CnNDENSING HTC (PSIA) PSIG TEMPERATURE (BTU /FT2-F-HR) (W/R 14.7 HS#1 psla) (DEG-F) 2 151.692 211.566 22.7255 8.0255 118.3676 20.0522 2.1 152.926 214.616 22.9929 8.29293 118.3676 20.3903 2.2 154.115 217.583 23.2574 8.55742 118.3676 20.7051 2.3 155.266 220.475 23.5195 8.81948 118.3676 20.9996 2.4 156.392 223.296 23.7793 9.07927 118.3676 21.4134 2.5 157.493 226.045 24.0365 9.33651 118.3676 21.8023 2.6 158.553 228.725 24.2913 9.59132 118.3676 22.1681 2.7 159.576 231.346 24.5442 9.84423 118.3676 22.5134 2.8 160.569 2?3.913 24.7955 10.09545 118.3676 22.8399 2.9 161.536 236.428 25.0452 10.34519 118.3676 23.1493 3 162.479 238.89 25.2931 10.59308 118.3676 23.4427 3.1 163.402 241.302 25.5393 10.8393 118.3676 23.7214 3.2 164.307 243.665 25.7839 11.08386 118.3676 23.9864 3.3 165.201 245.984 26.027 11.32699 118.3676 24.3979 3.4 166.086 248.254 26.2682 11.5682 118.3676 24.7988 3.5 166.%3 250.48 26.5078 11.8078 118.3676 25.1812 3.6 167.828 252.661 26.7458 12.0458 118.3676 25.5464 3.7 168.671 254.802 26.9824 12.2824 118.3676 25.8 % 3.8 169.494 256.909 27.218 12.518 118.3676 26.231 3.9 170.3 258.978 27.4522 12.7522 118.3676 26.5524 4 171.09 261.011 27.6852 12.9852 118.3676 26.861 4.1 171.866 263.009 27.917 13.217 118.3676 27.1575 4.2 172.629 264.976 28.1479 13,4479 118.3676 27.4426 4.3 173.379 266.908 28.3773 13.e.773 118.3676 27.717 4.4 174.119 268.809 28.6056 13.9056 118.3676 27.9811 4.5 174.848 270.678 28.8328 14.1328 118.3676 28.2357 4.6 175.568 272.516 29.0587 14.3587 118.3676 28.4811 4.7 176.279 274.324 29.284 14.584 118.3676 28.7182 4.8 176.976 276.106 29.5081 14.8081 118.3676 28.9472 4.9 177.661 277.857 29.7311 15.0311 118.3676 29.3858 5 178.34 279.58 29.9531 15.2531 134.467 29.8756 5.25 180.003 283.769 30.5038 15.8038 134.467 31.0332 5.5 181.623 287.798 31.0489 16.3489 134.467 32.1034 5.75 183.202 291.673 31.5878 16.8878 134.467 33.0962 1
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET '
'cc". CCM NO.
PRELIM PAGE _ OF_,, Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT PA~ ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 137 REV ORIGINATOA DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 h 5 TIME SUMP TEMP VAPOR TFMP TOTAL GAUGE LEFT UCHIDA (SECONDS) (DEG F) (DEC F) PRESSURE PRESSURE BOUNDARY CONDENSING HTC (PSIA) PSIG TEMPERATURE (BTU /FT2-F-NR) (W/R 14.7 HS#1 psla) (DEG-F) 6 184.731 295.414 32.122 17.422 134.467 34.021 6.25 186.201 299.03 32.6522 17.9522 134.467 34.8847 6.5 187.622 302.522 33.1773 18.4773 134.467 35.6932 6.75 188.998 305.897 33.6972 18.9972 134.467 36.4499 7 190.336 309.168 34.21 19.51 134.467 37.2438 7.25 191.646 312.33 34.7142 20.0142 134.467 38.2796 7.5 192.93 315.39 35.2103 20.5103 134.467 39.2477 7.75 194.18 318.343 35.6973 20.9973 134.467 40.1527 8 195.385 321.166 36.1733 21.4733 134.467 40.9962 8.25 1 % .547 323.85 36.6356 21.9356 134.467 41.7833 8.5 197.67 326.407 37.0853 22.3853 134.467 42.5188 8.75 198.755 328.852 37.5235 22.8235 134.467 43.2081 9 199.806 331.198 37.9523 23.2523 134.467 43.8581 9.25 200.825 333.449 38.372 23.672 134.467 44.472 9.5 201.814 335.613 38.7825 24.0825 134.467 45.0522 9.75 202.774 337.701 39.1862 24.4862 134.467 45.6019 10 203.707 339.706 39.5807 24.8807 150.5152 46.2353 10.5 205.52 343.504 40.3475 25.6475 150.5152 48.0698 11 207.262 347.04 41.0863 26.3433 150.5152 49.73 % 11.5 208.921 350.35 41.801 27.101 150.5152 51.2703 12 210.489 353.461 42.4941 27.7941 150.5152 52.6774 12.5 211.974 356.364 43.1615 28.4615 150.5152 53.9735 13 213.384 359.092 43.8071 29.1071 150.5152 55.1722 13.5 214.727 361.661 44.4333 29.7333 150.5152 56.2865 14 216.01 364.082 45.0402 30.3402 150.5152 57.3242 14.5 217.239 366.377 45.6307 30.9307 150.5152 58.2917 15 218.421 368.534 46.7014 31.5014 163.8227 59.1971 15.5 219.584 370.57 46.7556 32.0555 163.8227 60.047 16 220.695 372.501 47.2956 32.5956 163.8227 60.8486 16.5 221.754 374.34 47.8222 33.1222 163.8227 61.6054 17 222.766 376.092 48.3384 33.6384 163.8227 62.3222 l 17.5 223.738 377.784 48.8431 34.1431 163.8227 63.0092 i ! 18 224.675 379.393 49.3369 34.6369 163.8227 64.3464 18.5 225.583 380.932 49.8201 35.1201 163.3227 65.6197
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" "o ' PRELIM. CCN NO. PAGE OF Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 ccN CONVERSION: I CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 138 REV ORIGINATOR DATE !RE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE R E 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 y 5 TIME SUMP TEMP VAPOR TEMP TOTAL GAUGE LEFT UCHIDA (SECONOS) (DEG-F) (DEG-F) PRESSURE PRESSURE BOUNDARY CONDENSING HTC (PSIA) PSIG TEMPERATURE (BTU /FT2-F HR) (W/R 14.7 HS#1 psia) (LEG-F) 19 226.464 382.404 50.2934 35.5934 163.8227 66.8348 19.5 227.319 383.825 50.7586 36.0586 163.8227 67.998 20 228.15 385.179 51.2148 36.5148 174.6759 69.1125 21 229.748 387.75 52.1043 37.4043 174.6759 71.2276 l 22 231.255 390.142 52.9661 38.2661 174.6759 73.1655 23 232.673 392.223 53.7636 39.0636 174.6759 74.%54 24 234.009 394.292 54.5721 39.8721 174.6759 76.6404 25 235.276 3 % .219 55.3554 40.6554 174.6759 78.2016 26 236.482 398.013 56.1143 41.4143 174.6759 79.66 27 237.633 399.702 56.854 42.154 174.6759 81.0319 28 238.735 401.29 57.5755 42.8755 174.6759 82.3258 29 239.787 402.783 58.2793 43.5793 174.6759 83.5478 30 240.788 404.195 58.9661 44.2661 192.9141 84.7033 31 241.744 405.527 59.6363 44.9363 192.9141 85.7976 32 242.662 406.791 60.2935 45.5935 192.9141 86.84 33 243.545 407.992 60.9383 46.2383 192.9141 87.8346 34 244.397 409.133 61.571 46.871 192.9141 88.7846 35 245.219 410.217 62.1917 47.4917 192.9141 89.6925 36 246.015 411.248 62.8005 48.1005 192.9141 90.5605 37 246.784 412.224 63.3 % 3 48.6963 192.9141 91.3895 38 247.525 413.15 63.979 49.279 192.9141 92.1814 39 248.24 414.021 64.5484 49.8484 192.9141 92.9385 40 248.932 414.84 65.1046 50.4046 206.8357 93.6625 41 249.601 415.617 65.6484 50.9484 206.8357 94.3554 42 250.249 416.352 66.1804 51.4804 206.8357 95.0197 43 250.876 417.052 66.7013 52.0013 206.8357 95.657 44 251.484 417.717 67.211 52.511 206.8357 96.2688 45 252.075 418.348 67.7096 53.0096 206.8357 96.8561 46 252.65 418.943 68.197 53.497 206.8357 97.4203 47 253.21 419.506 68.6747 53.9747 206.8357 97. %38 48 253.756 420.041 69.1428 54.4428 206.8357 98.9752 49 254.29 420.545 69.6009 54.9009 206.8357 99.9845 50 254.811 421.024 70.0495 55.3495 218.549 100.957 51 255.321 419.305 70.3583 55.6583 218.549 102.008
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" " ' PRELIM. CCN No. PAGE_ OF ,_ Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 139 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE BRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 ' 5 TIME SUMP TEMP VAPOR TEMP TOTAL GAUGE LEFT UCHIDA (SECONDS) (DEG F) (DEG F) PRESSURE PRESSURE BOUNDARY CONDENSING HTC (PSIA) PSIG TEMPERATURE (BTU /FT2-F-HR) (W/R 14.7 HS#1 psla) (DEG-F) 52 255.816 417.525 70.6546 55.9546 218.549 103.028 53 256.299 415.765 70.9459 56.2459 218.549 104.018 54 256.77 414.02 71.2315 56.5315 218.549 104.979 55 257.229 412.293 71.512 56.812 218.549 105.913 56 257.677 410.587 71.7876 57.0876 218.549 106.821 57 258.115 408.899 72.0584 57.3584 218.549 107.703 58 258.541 407.227 72.324 57.624 218.549 108.561 59 258.958 405.56C 72.5841 57.8841 218.549 109.395 60 259.366 403.929 72.8397 58.1397 228.8108 110.206 61 259.762 402.283 73.0781 58.3781 228.8108 110.976 a 62 260.147 400.462 73.2126 58.5126 228.8108 111.562 j 63 260.517 398.286 73.1564 58.4564 228.8108 111.831 j 64 260.867 395.859 72.9588 58.2588 228.8108 111.866 ! 65 261.197 393.2 % 72.6742 57.9742 228.8108 111.752
- 66 261.507 390.724 72.3741 57.6741 228.8108 111.607 j 67 261.798 388.16 72.073 57.373 228.8108 111.458
~
- 68 262.07 385.597 71.7707 57.0707 228.8108 111.305 69 262.325 383.012 71.4651
{ 56.7651 228.8108 111.149 ! 70 262.564 380.356 71.1533 56.4533 233.5631 110.991 ) 71 262.789 377.713 70.8425 56.1425 233.5631 110.831 l 72 263 375.124 70.5376 55.8376 233.5631 110.672 j 73 263.198 372.544 70.2358 55.5358 233.5631 110.517 74 263.384 369.976 69.9371 55.2371 233.5631 110.365 j 75 263.559 367.413 69.6411 54.9411 233.5631 110.216 76 263.724 364.856 69.3478 54.6478 233.5631 110.071
- 77 263.879 362.311 69.0578 54.3578 233.5631 109.929 78 264.025 359.771 68.7701 54.0701 233.5631 109.79 79 264.162 357.242 68.4852 53.7852 233.5631 109.654 80 264.292 354.72 68.2029 53.5029 235.9147 109.521 81 264.413 352.21 67.9234 53.2234 235.9147 109.391
} 82 264.528 349.706 67.6465 52.9465 235.9147 109.265 83 264.636 347.211 67.3717 52.6717 235.9147 109.141 84 264.737 344.724 67.0994 52.3994 235.9147 109.019 85 264.833 342.246 66.8296 52.1296 235.9147 108.901 4
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" " PRELIM. CCN NO. PAGE OF Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CcN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 140 REV ORIG 4NATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 ' 5 TIME SUMP TEMP VAPOR TEMP TOTAL GAUGE LEFT UCHIDA (SECONDS) (DEG-F) (DEG-F) PRESSURE PRESSURE BOUNDARY CONDENSING HTC (PSIA) PSIG TEMPERATURE (BTU /FT2-F-HR) (W/R 14.7 HS#1 psla) (DEG-F) 86 264.923 339.777 66.5621 51.8621 235.9147 108.785 87.00001 265.007 337.316 66.2 % 9 51.5969 235.9147 108.673 88 265.087 335.017 66.0851 51.3851 235.9147 108.562 89 265.163 332.568 65.8237 51.1237 235.9147 108.454 90 265.233 330.128 65.5644 50.8644 237.6333 108.349 91 265.3 327.691 65.3068 50.6068 237.6333 108.246 92.00001 265.363 325.265 65.0516 50.3516 237.6333 108.145 93 265.421 322.843 64.798 50.0979 237.6333 108.047 94 265.476 320.427 64.5461 49.8461 237.6333 107.952 95 265.527 317.979 64.2839 49.5839 237.6333 107.858 96 265.575 315.577 64.0356 49.3356 237.6333 107.768 97 265.619 313.185 63.7894 49.0894 237.6333 107.679 98 265.661 310.795 63.5444 48.8444 237.6333 107.593 99 265.699 308.417 63.3017 48.6017 237.6333 107.508 100 265.735 306.025 63.0538 48.3538 238.7824 107.426 105 265.872 294.822 61.9142 47.2142 238.7824 107.194 110 265.958 283.128 60.7529 46.0529 238.7824 106.856 115 266.003 272.393 59.6665 44.9665 238.7824 106.563 120 266.032 267.123 58.9567 44.2567 238.7824 105.6 % 125 266.034 266.562 58.5725 43.8725 238.7824 104.797 130 266.013 266.019 58.2038 43.5038 238.7824 103.92 135 265.973 265.493 57.8489 43.1489 238.7824 103.06 140 265.917 264.982 57.5066 42.8066 238.7824 102.217 145 265.849 264.485 57.176 42.476 238.7824 101.391 150 265.769 264 56.8555 42.1555 241.4326 100.588 155 265.679 263.527 56.5446 41.8446 241.4326 99.7883 160 265.584 263.23 56.3501 41.6501 241.4326 99.0251 165 265.484 262.777 56.0557 41.3557 241.4326 98.204 170 265.377 262.333 55.7685 41.0685 241.4326 97.7185 175 265.265 261.898 55.4887 40.7887 241.4326 97.343 180 265.149 261.472 55.216 40.516 241.4326 96.9662 185 265.029 261.054 54.95 40.25 241.4326 96.5938 190 264.905 260.643 54.6903 39.9903 241.4326 96.2254 195 264.779 260.241 54.4369 39.7369 241.4326 95.861
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET '
'co* ". CCM NO.
PR2LilW PAGE OF Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN No. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 141 REV ORIGINATOR DATE BRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 f i TIME SUMP TEMP VAPOR TEMP TOTAL GAUGE LEFT UCHIDA (SECONDS) (DEG-F) (DEG-F) PRESSURE PRESSURE BOUNDARY CONDENSING HTC (PSIA) PSIG TEMPERATURE (BTU /FT2-F-HR) (W/R 14.7 HS#1 psia) (DEG F) 200 264.65 259.845 54.1893 39.4893 241.9631 95.5004 210 264.385 259.074 53.7106 39.0106 241.9631 94.7904 220 264.111 258.33 53.2533 38.5533 241.M31 94.0954 230 263.83 257.612 52.8157 38.1157 241. % 31 93.4144 240 263.544 256.916 52.3963 37.6963 241.9631 92.7467 250 263.256 256.242 51.9936 37.2936 241.2001 92.0912 260 262.%5 255.589 51.6063 36.9063 241.2001 91.4543 270 262.673 254.953 51.2332 36.5332 241.2001 90.822 280 262.389 254.502 50.9702 36.2702 241.2001 90.1887 290 262.098 253.897 50.6201 35.9201 241.2001 89.5724 300 261.806 253.308 50.2815 35.5815 240.0503 88.9708 310 261.512 252.733 49.9542 35.2542 240.0503 88.3715 320 261.217 252.172 49.6368 34.9368 240.0503 87.7787 330 260.922 251.623 49.3289 34.6289 240.0503 87.193 340 260.626 251.086 49.0297 34.3297 240.0503 86.6137 350 260.331 250.56 48.7389 34.0389 238.6837 86.0405 360 260.037 250.045 48.4561 33.7561 238.6837 85.4731 370 259.743 249.541 48.1812 33.4812 238.6837 84.9118 380 259.45 249.047 47.9138 33.2138 238.6837 84.3567 390 259.157 248.563 47.6533 32.9533 238.6837 83.807 400 258.863 248.087 47.3994 32.6994 237.136 83.2626 420 258.268 247.159 46.908 32.208 237.136 82.1913 440 257.666 246.256 46.4357 31.7357 237.136 81.1311 460 257.06 245.375 45.9809 31.2809 237.136 80.0729 480 256.455 244.684 45.6283 30.9283 237.136 79.0063 500 255.847 243.838 45.201 30.501 234.1299 77.9553 520 255.239 243.01 44.7876 30.0876 234.1299 76.9162 540 254.63 242.2 44.3875 29.6875 234.1299 75.8739 560 254.022 241.406 43.9996 29.2996 234.1299 74.8371 580 253.415 240.623 43.6215 28.9215 234.1299 73.7976 600 252.809 239.85 43.2525 28.5525 231.2043 72.7557 620 252.206 239.09 42.8929 28.1929 231.2043 71.7136 , 640 251.604 238.34 42.5425 27.8425 231.2043 70.6714 660 251.005 237.602 42.2007 27.5007 231.2043 69.6284
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" " ' PREUM. CCN NO. PAGE OF i Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 142 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 " 4 TIME SUMP TEMP VAPOR TEMP TOTAL GAUGE LEFT UCHIDA (SECONDS) (DEG-F) (DEG-F) PRESSURE PRESSURE BOUNDARY CONDENSING HTC (PSIA) PSIG TEMPERATURE (BTU /FT2-F-HR) (W/R 14.7 HSW1 psla) (DEG-F) 680 250.409 236.873 41.8671 27.1671 231.20 3 68.5844 700 249.814 236.154 41.541 26.841 228.0915 67.5469 750.0001 248.347 234.391 40.7559 26.0559 226.5721 64.9502 800 246.923 232.846 40.0842 25.3842 225.1947 62.6494 850 245.539 231.16 39.3675 24.6675 223.8459 61.3454 900 244.191 229.51 38.6827 23.9827 222.5382 60.0193 950 242.876 227.893 38.0275 23.3275 221.2714 58.6769 1000 241.595 226.316 37.403 22.703 219.9015 57.3202 1050 240.35 224.778 36.8077 22.1077 218.5336 55.9533 1130 239.132 223.274 36.2384 21.5384 217.1893 54.5785 1150 237.943 221.801 35.693 20.993 215.8755 53.1855 1200 236.788 220.694 35.2359 20.5359 214.6037 51.8467 1250 235.657 219.11 34.7265 20.0265 213.426 50.328 1300 234.555 217.706 34.2373 19.5373 212.2342 48.8724 1350 233.479 216.325 33.7663 19.0663 211. % 05 47.402 1400 232.427 214. % 7 33.3123 18.6123 209.9121 45.9508 1450 231.396 213.624 32.8725 18.1725 208.8205 45.1444 1500 230.387 212.297 32.4462 17.7462 207.7213 44.3234 1550 229.398 210.992 32.0356 17.3356 206.5757 43.4927 1600 228.427 209.709 31.6396 16.93 % 205.4384 42.6519 1650 227.477 208.444 31.2567 16.5567 204.3196 41.7995 1700 226.545 207.308 30.9193 16.2193 203.2474 40.93 1750 225.633 206.068 30.5574 15.8574 202.1972 40.0527 1800 224.737 204.843 30.2069 15.5069 201.16 39.157 1850 223.858 203.634 29.8671 15.1671 200.1397 38.2473 1900 222.993 202.439 29.5373 14.8373 199.14 37.3232 1950 222.143 201.258 29.2175 14.5175 198.1405 36.6098 2000 221.308 200.097 28.9088 14.2088 197.1225 36.0083 2500 213.801 190.458 26.5621 11.8621 197.1225 30.2915 3000 207.362 181.754 24.7231 10.02306 181.1839 26.7457 3500 201.666 173.49 23.2008 8.50083 181.1839 23.6625 4000 196.528 165.723 21.9464 7.24638 169.9794 21.4053 4500 191.848 158.642 20.9355 6.23548 169.9794 19.6263 5000 187.559 152.523 20.1542 5.45418 161.8639 17.8988
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET '
'co" ".
PREUM CCN NO. PAGE _ OF__ Ploit:ct or DCP/MMP_ SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 143 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV -' ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R O S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 E y 5 TIME SUMP TEMP VAPOR TEMP TOTAL GAUGE LEFT UCHIDA (SECONDS) (DEG-F) (DEG-F) PRESSURE PRESSURE BOUNDARY CONDENSING HTC (PSIA) PSIG TEMPERATURE (BTU /FT2-F-HR) (W/R 14.7 HS#1 psia) (DEG-F) 5500 183.616 147.184 19.5358 4.83585 161.8639 16.6032 6000 179.988 142.745 19.0641 4.3641 155.6648 15.7554 6500 176.648 139.006 18.6948 3.99481 155.6648 14.977 7000 173.571 135.898 18.3979 3.69794 150.6964 14.218 7500 170.733 132.916 18.1451 3.44506 150.6964 13.5119 8000 168.113 130.795 17.9567 3.25665 146.6402 12.8586 8500 165.691 129.033 17.7952 3.09517 146.6402 12.217 9000 163.452 127.492 17.6548 2.95485 143.3137 11.5736 9500 161.373 126.109 17.5286 2.82862 143.3137 10.9301 10000 159.437 124.908 17.4264 2.72641 140.5415 10.3544 1
--- -. ..,~..u.- . - - --a . . ~
l NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEE7 'cc" "o ' PRELIM. CCN NO. PAGE OF Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 144 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 S 10.2 TIME STEAM + AIR SUMP TOTAL AIR COOLER CONT. SPRAY HEAT (SECONDS) ENERGY ENERGY ENERGY HT REMOVAL HEAT $1NKS (BTU) (BTU) (BTU) (BTU) TRANSFERRED (BTU) TO SUMP (BTU) 0.05 24175100 0 24175100 0 0 15.6006 0.1 25014300 0 25014300 0 0 64.7074 0.2 26662100 0 26662100 0 0 294.816 0.3 28269200 0 28269200 0 0 693.704 0.4 29835500 73.6082 29835500 0 0 1405.75 0.5 31362100 213.542 31362300 0 0 2755.78 0.6 32852600 429.334 32853000 0 0 4826.49 0.7 34308800 726.789 34309500 0 0 7648.92 0.8 35735600 1104.78 35736700 0 0 11183.1 0.9 37133100 1568.27 37134600 0 0 15423.2 1 38501100 2115.83 38503200 0 0 20353.7 1.1 39839700 2743.12 39842400 0 0 25912 1.2 41154300 3452.43 41157800 0 0 32083.5 1.3 42447300 4246.35 42451600 0 0 38866.8 1.4 43718700 5130.55 43723800 0 0 46272.8 1.5 44968300 6110.33 44974400 0 0 54359.2 1.6 461 % 200 7180.07 46203400 0 0 63078 1.7 47405800 8340.82 47414100 0 0 72412.1 1.8 48598500 9593.98 48608100 0 0 82355.4 J 1.9 49774400 10940.9 49785400 0 0 92902 l 2 50933500 12378.2 50945800 0 0 104033 2.1 52075700 13899.8 5208 % 00 0 0 115699 2.2 53206800 15506.1 53222300- 0 0 127884 2.3 54329100 17198.2 54346300 0 0 140585 2.4 55442500 18984.7 55461500 0 0 153836 2.5 56547100 20867 56568000 0 0 167665 2.6 57642900 22836.1 57665700 0 0 182025 2.7 58731600 24890.4 58756500 0 0 196885 2.8 59813900 27030.7 59841000 0 0 212243 2.9 60889900 29257.7 60919200 0 0 228093 j 3 61959500 31571.8 61991100 0 0 244432 3.1 63022800 33973.6 63056800 0 0 261255 l l
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" ". PREUM CC^ci NO. PAGE__ OF __ i Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN -- Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 145 REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 h 5 1 TIME STEAM + AIR SUMP TOTAL AIR COOLER CONT. SPRAY HEAT ; (SECONDS) ENERGY ENERGY ENERGY HT REMOVAL HEAT SINKS (BTU) (BTU) (BTU) (BTU) TRANSFERRED (BTU) l TO SUMP l (BTU) ! 3.2 64079700 36463.5 64116100 0 0 278557 3.3 65130200 39053.3 65169200 0 0 296386 3.4 66174200 41747.5 66215900 0 0 314789 3.5 67211700 44546 67256300 0 0 333759 1 3.6 68242800 47446.5 68290300 0 0 353283 l 3.7 69268700 50438.2 69319100 0 0 373312 3.8 70290000 53520.3 70343500 0 0 393823 3.9 71306600 56693 71363300 0 0 414812 4 72318500 59956.8 72378500 0 0 436274 4.1 73325800 63311.5 73389100 0 0 458206 4.2 74328500 66757.5 74395200 0 0 480601 4.3 75326400 70294.9 75396700 0 0 503456 4.4 76319800 73923.9 76393800 0 0 526766 4.5 77308600 77644.5 77386200 0 0 550527 4.6 78292700 81457.1 78374200 0 0 574734 4.7 79272900 85360.5 79358300 0 0 599382 4.8 80249700 89347.1 80339000 0 0 624442 4.9 81222900 93433 81316300 0 0 649964 5 82192300 97634 82290000 0 0 676074 5.25 84600000 108629 84708600 0 0 743865 5.5 86984700 120319 87105000 0 0 815127 5.75 89347900 132701 89480600 0 0 889751 6 91693400 145746 91839200 0 0 % 7566 6.25 94021800 159403 94181200 0 0 1048290 6.5 96333100 173669 96506800 0 0 1131840 6.75 98622900 188539 98811500 0 0 1218140 7 100877000 204014 101081000 0 0 1307130 7.25 103094000 220186 103314000 0 0 1399240 7.5 105273000 237061 105510000 0 0 1494540 7.75 107411000 254593 107666000 0 0 1592800 8 109497000 272708 109770000 0 0 1693680 8.25 111530000 291387 111821000 0 0 1797050 8.5 113510000 310609 113821000 0 0 1902770 8.75 115441000 330358 115771000 0 0 2010730
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" "o '
- PRELIM. CCW NO. PAGE__OF _
1 Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - ', Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 146 ] REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE R j 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 E y I i 1 ! TIME STEAM + AIR SUMP TOTAL AIR COOLER CONT. SPRAY HEAT l (SECONDS) ENERGY ENERGY ENERGY HT REMOVAL HEAT SINKS 4 (BTU) (BTU) (BTU) (BTU) TRANSFERRED (BTU) TO SUMP h (BTU)
- 9 117332000 350618 117683000 0 0 2120840 j 9.25 119185000 371376 119556000 0 0 2233000 l
9.5 120998000 392620 121391000 0 { 0 2347140 9.75 122775000 414338 123189000 0 0 2463160 10 124521000 436529 124957000 0 0 2581050 "; 10.5 127918000 482700 128401000 0 0 2824230 3 11 131198000 531198 131729000 0 0 3077050 11.5 134376000 581768 134957000 0 0 3338350 j 12 137453000 634151 138087000 0 0 3606980
- 12.5 140431000 688248 141119000 , 0 0 3882360 13 143316000 743961 144060000 0 0 4163930 j 13.5 146119000 801207 146920000 0 0 4451240 14 148840000 859908 149700000 0 0 4743850 t' 14.5 151481000 919993 152401000 0 0 5041400
) 15 154047000 981554 155029000 815.367 0 5343480 4 15.5 156545000 1045880 157591000 9026.82 0 5649790 16 158983000 1111320 160094000 17335.5 0 5959740 16.5 161363000 1177750 162541000 25731.7 0 6272830 17 163690000 1245130 164935000 34213.6 0 6588840 17.5 165975000 1313420 167288000 42779.9 0 6907590 1 18 168215000 1382890 169598000 51428.8 0 7230250 l l 18.5 170410000 1453690 171864000 60158.6 0 7557600 19 172564000 1525720 174090000 68967.9 0 7889250
- 19.5 174683000 1598940 176282000 77855.2 0 8224880 20 176766000 1673280 178440000 86819.3 0 8564220 i
l 21 180832000 1825250 182657000 104966 0 9253060 22 184780000 1980913 186760000 123394 0 9953310 j 23 188617000 2139630 190756000 142070 0 10662500 24 192345000 2301040 194646000 160983 0 11379000 1 25 195966000 2464970 198431000 180133 0 12102000 26 199483000 2631190 202115000 199513 0 12830400 j 27 202918000 2799460 205718000 219117 0 13563200 28 206276000 2969620 209246000 238940 0 14299600 l - 29 209559000 3141290 212700000 258966 0 15038500 4 a
.-- -n- .- -, ,
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET '
'cc" ". CCN NO.
PRELIM PAGE._, OF__ Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT Pfr ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 147 REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 5 TIME STEAM + AIR SUMP TOTAL AIR COOLER CONT. SPRAY HEAT (SECONDS) ENERGY ENERGY ENERGY HT REMOVAL HEAT SINKS (BTU) (BTU) (BTU) (BTU) TRANSFERRED (BTU) TO SUMP (B'U) 30 212767000 3314200 216082000 279178 0 15778700 31 215905000 3488210 219393000 299572 0 16519900 32 218986000 3663190 222650000 320144 0 17261500 33 222016000 3839070 225855000 340892 0 18003100 34 224994000 4015740 229009000 361812 0 18744400 35 227920000 4193140 232113000 382901 0 19485100 36 230795000 4371170 235166000 404156 0 20225000 37 233614000 4549590 238163000 425565 0 20963300 38 236375000 4728170 241103000 447113 0 21699300 39 239080000 4906840 243987000 468795 0 22432800 40 241728003 5085560 246814000 490611 0 23163600 41 244321000 5264260 249586000 512556 0 23891600 42 246863000 5442890 252306000 534629 0 24616500 43 249355000 5621400 254976000 556826 0 25338300 44 251797000 5799760 257597000 579145 0 26056900 I 45 254190000 5977910 260168000 601585 0 26772200 46 256534000 6155820 262690000 624141 0 27484000 47 258835000 6333460 265169000 646812 0 28192200 48 261094000 6511090 267605000 669597 0 28898000 49 263309000 6688890 269998000 692491 0 29602200 50 265481000 6866780 272348000 715494 0 30304500 51 267627000 7044660 274671000 738595 71196.4 31004300 52 269744000 7222390 276966000 761781 142029 31701100 53 271836000 7399950 279236000 785051 212468 32394800 54 273903000 7577290 281480000 808403 282518 33085100 55 275944000 7754370 283698000 831835 352181 33772000 56 277960000 7931160 285892000 855347 421463 34455400 57 279952000 8107620 288059000 878938 490367 35135200 58 281918000 8283710 290202000 902604 558897 35811400 59 283860000 8459420 292320000 926344 627057 36483800 60 285778000 8634640 294413000 950156 694849 37152300 61 287614000 8809240 296423000 974029 762278 37816400 62 288969000 8982850 297952000 997951 829326 38475100 63 289444000 9154820 298599000 1021900 895938 39126500
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" ' PRELIM CCN NO. PAGE OF i Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 cCN CONVERSION: I CCN NO. CCN - 4 I Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 148 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGlhATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 4 TIME STEAM + AIR SUMP TOTAL AIR COOLER CONT. SPRAY HEAT (SECONOS) ENERGY ENERGY ENERGY HT REMOVAL HEAT SINKS (BTU) (BTU) (BTU) (BTU) TRANSFERRED (BTU) TO SUMP (BTU) 64 289259000 9324320 298583000 1045830 962035 39767800 65 288659000 9490970 298150000 1069720 1027580 40397900 66 287978000 9654610 297633000 1093570 1092550 41016500 67 287288000 9815320 297104000 1117370 1156950 41623700 68 286589000 9973060 2 % 563000 1141110 1220780 42219500 69 285880000 10127500 2 % 008000 1164790 1284030 42804400 70 285161000 10279200 295440000 1188420 1346710 43379000 71 2844*2000 10428200 294870000 1211990 1408790 43943500 72 283732000 10574700 294307000 1235490 1470300 44498300 73 283034000 10718600 293753000 1258940 1531220 45043500 74 282349000 10860200 293209000 1282340 1591580 45579500 75 281674000 10999400 292673000 1305670 1651360 46106500 76 281010000 11136400 292146000 1328950 1710580 46624600 j 77 280357000 11271100 291629000 1352180 1769230 47134200 78 279715000 11403600 291119000 1375350 1827310 47635400 79 279083000 11534100 290617000 1398460 1884830 48128400 80 278462000 11662400 290124000 1421530 1941790 48613400 81 277850000 11788800 289639000 1444540 1998180 49090700 82 277248000 11913200 289161000 1467490 2054020 49560400 83 276655000 12035700 288691000 1490400 2109310 50022600 84 276072000 12156300 288228000 1513260 2164040 50477700 85 275497000 12275100 287772000 1536060 2218210 50925600 86 274932000 12392100 287324000 1558810 2271840 51366600 87.00001 274375000 12507400 286882000 1581520 2324920 51800900 l 88 273826000 12621100 286447000 1604180 2377470 52228900 89 273285000 12733200 286018000 1626800 2429490 52650600 90 272751000 12843700 285595000 1649370 2480970 53066000 91 272225000 12952600 285178000 1671890 2531900 53475200 92.00001 271708000 13059900 284768000 1694360 2582300 53878400 93 271197000 13165700 284363000 1716790 2632150 54275700 94 270694000 13270100 283964000 1739170 2681470 54667100 95 270198000 13372900 283570000 1761510 2730240 55052800 96 269709000 13474400 283183000 1783790 2778480 55432900 j 97 269227000 13574400 282801000 1806040 2826180 55807600 l l 1
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'cc"Nos PRELIM. CCN NO. PAGE__ OF,_ Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: C#N NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 149 REV ORIGINATOR DATE 1RE DATE REV OR101NATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 l
- TIME STEAM + AIR SUMP TOTAL AIR COOLER CONT. SPRAY HEAT (SECONDS) ENERGY ENERGY ENERGY HT REMOVAL HEAT SINKS (BTU) (BTU) (BTU) (BTU) TRANSFERRED (BTU)
TO SUMP (BTU) 98 268751000 13673100 282424000 1828230 2873360 56176900 99 268283000 13770500 282053000 1850390 2920000 56541100 100 267821000 13866500 281687000 1872490 2966110 56900100 l 105 265594000 14328300 279922000 1982510 3190500 58630900 110 263511000 14761200 278272000 2091460 3401930 60248100 115 261557000 15168300 276726000 2199390 3600570 61762200 120 259476000 15794300 275270000 7.306400 3788520 63186400 125 257391000 16494200 273885000 2412810 3974100 64540900 ( 130 255388000 17175100 272563000 2518710 4159070 65832400 135 253460000 17838800 271299000 2624110 4343450 67067300 ! 140 251599000 18486900 270086000 2729030 4527240 68250500 145 249802000 19120400 268922000 2833500 4710430 69385900 150 248059000 19741100 267800000 2937520 4892980 70480000 155 246367000 20349800 266717000 3041110 5074910 71535400 160 244717000 20952200 265669000 3144320 5256300 72555300 165 243115000 21539400 264655000 3247230 5437220 73542800 170 241555000 22117500 263672000 3349740 5617570 74498200 175 240034000 22686300 262721000 3451870 5797350 75423600 180 238551000 23246100 261797000 3553630 5976570 76320600 l 185 237104000 23797400 260902000 3655010 6155260 77190600 190 235692000 24340600 260032000 3756040 6333410 78034600 195 234312000 24876000 259188000 3856720 6511050 78853900 200 232964000 25404000 258368000 3957060 6688170 79649500 j 210 230357000 26438700 256796000 4156740 7040680 81173500 l l 220 227865000 27446000 255311000 4355040 7390920 82611500 230 225479000 28427900 253907000 4551960 7738980 83 % 9900 240 223191000 29386400 252578000 4747580 8084930 85255300 250 220993000 30323300 251317000 4941950 8428870 86473400 260 218878000 31240400 250119000 5135110 8770850 87629800 270 216840000 32138800 248979000 5327100 9110940 8872S300 l 280 214862000 33026300 247888000 5518170 9449580 89780000 l 290 212952000 33893600 246846000 5708270 9786150 90783600 [ 300 211106000 34745400 245851000 5897310 10120600 91740800 l 310 209318000 35582300 244901000 6085340 10453100 92655000
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET '
'c". CCN NO.
PRELIM PAGE OF Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: CCN NO. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 150 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE k 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 S TIME STEAM + AIR SUMP TOTAL AIR W OLER CONT. SPRAY HEAT (SECONDS) ENERGY ENERGY ENERGY HT REM.WAL HEAT SINKS (BTU) (BTU) (BTU) (BTU) TRANSFERRED (BTU) TO SUMP i (BTU) ) 320 207585000 36405700 243991000 6272390 10783600 93529400 330 205902000 37216400 243119000 6458490 11112200 94366700 340 204267000 38015000 ?42282000 6643660 11439000 95169500 350 202676000 388023C3 241479000 6827940 11764000 95940100 360 201128000 39578700 240707000 7011330 12087100 96679900 370 199622000 40344200 239967000 7193760 12408600 97389100 380 198157000 41099500 239256000 7375250 12728400 98069500 390 196729000 41845200 238574000 7555840 13046600 98723100 400 195336000 42581300 237917000 7735530 13362600 99351500 420 192640000 44028000 236668000 8092430 13988300 100547000 440 190047000 45444000 235491000 8446000 14605400 101673000 l 460 187548000 46831700 234380000 8796380 15214300 102737000 480 185122000 48199500 233322000 9144150 15815800 103750000 500 182778000 49539300 232318000 9489050 16409800 104712000 520 180511000 50855600 231366000 9831070 16996400 105624000 540 178313000 52149800 230463000 10170300 17575800 106491000 560 176182000 53423000 229605000 10506800 18148200 107316000 580 174104000 54678000 228782000 10840700 18713900 108108000 600 172074000 55915900 227990000 11172000 19273000 108872000 620 170096000 57136500 227232000 11500500 19825700 109604000 640 168167000 58340400 226507000 11826200 20372100 110306000 660 166284000 59528300 225812000 12149200 20912400 110981000 680 164446000 60700800 225147000 12469500 21446800 111629000 700 162648000 61858900 224507000 12787200 21975400 112254000 750.0001 158318000 64696700 223015000 13571000 23274400 113720000 800 154184000 67468100 221652000 14340700 24546500 115070000 850 150236000 70171900 220408000 15096400 25792600 116316000 900 146460000 72813900 219274000 15838300 27013400 117465000 950 142843000 75398100 218241000 16567400 28209800 118526000 1000 139392000 77925500 217317000 17282800 29383700 119492000 1050 136100000 80400000 216500000 17983800 30537200 120366000 1100 132950000 82825800 215775000 18671100 31671100 121160000 1150 129929000 85206300 215136000 19345300 32786100 121883000 1200 127047000 87524900 214572000 20007000 33882700 122543000
NES&L DEPARTMENT q CALCULATION SHEET 'c"o ' PRELIM. CCN NO. PAGE_._ OF_ , i Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION: J CCN No. CCN - l Subject CONTAINMENT P/7 ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 151 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 s TIME STEAM + AIR SUMP TOTAL AIR COOLER CONT. SPRAY HEAT (SECONDS) ENERGY ENERGY ENERGY HT REMOVAL HEAT SINKS (BTU) (BTU) (BTU) (BTU) TRANSFERRED (BTU) TO SUMP (BTU) 1250 124214000 89850400 214065000 20658300 34963300 123156000 1300 121511000 92115300 213626000 21298300 36026500 123712000 1350 118906000 94344000 213250000 21927500 37073200 124216000 1400 116394000 96538200 212932000 22546200 38103900 124673000 1450 113959000 98701100 212660000 23154900 39118800 125093000 1500 1599000 100834000 212433000 23753500 40118500 125480000 1550 109324000 102935000 212259000 24340800 41103100 125823000 1600 107129000 105006000 212135000 24917000 42073100 126128000 1650 105007000 107049000 212056000 25482800 43029000 126399000 1700 102947000 109067000 212015000 26038900 43971900 126641000 1750 100945000 111062000 212007000 26586000 44902300 126860000 1800 99005400 113031000 212036000 27123700 45819700 127050000 1850 97124600 114976000 212101000 27652400 46724500 127214000 1900 95299400 116899000 212198000 28172400 47616800 127354000 l 1950 93529500 118799000 212328000 28683600 484 % 900 127470000 2000 91819800 120676000 212495000 29185200 49365100 127559000 2500 78724400 138268000 216992000 33820400 57537900 126000000 j 3000 68454600 154504000 222959000 37801700 64851600 123626000 3500 59999000 16 % 50000 229649000 41188700 71387400 121123000 4000 53155500 183835000 236991000 44069500 77214100 118474000 4500 47730200 197170000 244900000 46509200 82398700 115698000 5000 43498500 209771000 253270000 48574200 87016100 112837000 l 5500 40245000 221767000 262012000 50324300 91141800 109919000 ! l 6000 37736000 233257000 270993000 51831200 94856400 107005000 6500 35772200 244338000 280110000 53145700 98222100 104146000 7000 34200500 255095000 289295000 54299100 101299000 101381000 7500 32923400 265579000 298502000 55326000 104131000 98721500 8000 31880000 275829000 307709000 56240600 106755000 % 173900 8500 30988400 285900000 316888000 57054300 109209000 93754000 9000 30189100 295827000 326016000 57787000 111526000 91467400 9500 29467900 305627000 335095000 58448400 113722000 89300700 10000 28881500 315308000 344189000 58988000 115810000 87240100
NES&L 'EFARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET 'cca"os I a PRELIM. CCN NO. PAGE OF l
' Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSION:
CCN No. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 152 1 REV ORIGINATOR DATE BRE DATE REV ORIGINATDR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 h s I 11 MASS AND ENERGY BALANCES ! To ensure the reasonableness of the results, mass and energy balances were performed. The following tables show a mass balance at 102% power with offsite power available and a energy balance at 102% power with offsite power available. A review of these tables indicates that the COPATTA Code mass and energy inventories rarely differ by more than 0.01 percent. This fact verifies that the mass and energy input parameters have been properly conserved within the COPA'ITA Code logic. 1 The data in the energy balance table is part of the data that is presented in Table 6.2-15D of the UFSAR. 1
NES&L DEPARTMENT CALCULATION SHEET ""o' PREUM. CCN No. PAGE OF Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 CCN CONVERSloN: CCN No. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 153 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE BRE DATE R 0 S. OHver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 E 5 MSLB MASS BALANCE AT 102% POWER, OFFSITE POWER AVAILABLE I MASS BALANCE ELAPSED TIME SINCE BREAK (seconds) SON 62* 71* 10,000* I PROGRAM INPUTS
- Initial Water Vapor 6.809092 6.809092 6.809092 6.809092 Initial Air 163.1983 163.1983 163.1983 163.1983 i
l Break Flow (CS 301) 233.393 261.815 263.899 263.899 Ctmt. Spray Flow (CS 801) 0.0 2.67334 4.67834 2216.64 Total Program Input 403.400 434.496 438.585 *2650.546 4 PROGRAM INVENTORY
- Steam 209.460 232.036 230.336 11.9598 Air 163.198 163.198 163.198 163.198 Sump 30.7450 39.2655 45.0539 2475.39 Total Program Inventory 403.403 434.500 438.588 2650.548 Difference In Totals
- with -0.003 -0.004 -0.003 -0.002 respect to Program Inputs I Percent Difference with -0.00074 -0.00092 -0.00068 -0.000075 respect to Program Inputs Notes:
(a) All mass inputs and inventories are presented in 1000 pound increments. (b) The time of 50 seconds corresponds to the establishment of a fully developed containment spray injection phase flowrate of 1612 gallons / minute. (c) The time of 62 seconds corresponds to the nearest output time step for the occurrence of the containment pressure peak of 58[spiat time 62.3 seconds. $ pog (d) The time of 71 seconds corresponds to the nearest output time step for the occurrence of the end of mass release at 71.08 sec. 1 (e) The time of 10,000 seconds corresponds to the end of the code run. e
NES&L DEPARTMENT l CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" " ' PRELIM. CCM NO. PAG E__, oF_, I Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 ccN CONVERSION: l CCN No. CCN - Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 154 REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 5 MSLB ENERGY BALANCE AT 102% POWER, OFFSITE POWER AVAILABLE ENERGY BALANCE ELAPSED TIME SINCE BREAK (seconds) 50* 62(* 71* 10,000'd PROGRAM INPUTS (* Initial Water Vapor / Air 23.3257 23.3257 23.3257 23.3257 Break Flow (CS 301) 280.043 313.921 316.383 316.383 Ctmt. Spray Flow (CS 801) 0 0.181768 0.318094 150.716 Total Program Input 303.369 337.428 340.027 490.425 PROGRAM INVENTORY
- Steam 240.903 264.974 261.082 12.5760 Air 24.5774 23.9952 23.3600 16.3054 Ctmt Atmosphere (Steam + Air) 265.48 288.97 284.44 28.88 Sump 6.86678 8.98285 10.4282 315.308 Structural Heat Sinks 30.3045 38.4751 43.9435 87.2401 Air Cooler 0.715494 0.997951 1.21199 58.9880 Total Program Inventory 303.367 337.425 340.034 490.418 Difference In Totals (o with 0.002 0.003 0.007 0.008 respect to Program Inputs Percent Difference with respect 0.00050 0.00089 0.0021 0.0015 to Program Inputs Notes:
(a) All energy inputs and inventories are presented in one million BTU increments. Reference temperatures for energy inventories are 32 'F for water and steam,0 'R for sir, and 120 'F (initial containment temperature) for structural heat sinks. (b) The time of 50 seconds corresponds to the establishment of a fully developed containment spray injection phase flowrate of 1612 gallons / minute. (c) The time of 62 seconds corresponds to the nearest output time step for the occurrence of the containment pressure peak of 58.5 psi /at time 62.3 seconds. f/J, g.ro-O (d) The time of 71 seconds corresponds to the the nearest output time step for the end of xnass release at 71.08 l sec. I (e) The time of 10,000 seconds corresponds to the end of the code run.
i NES&L DEPARTMENT ' CALCULATION SHEET 'cc" " ' PRELIM. CCW NO. PAGE__ OF _ Project or DCP/MMP SONGS Units 2 & 3 Calc. No. N-4080-027 ccN CONVERSION: f CCN No. CCN - 1 Subject CONTAINMENT P/T ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN BASIS MSLB Sheet No. 155 eV 15T REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE REV ORIGINATOR DATE IRE DATE R 0 S. Oliver 12/30/93 J. Elliott 1/4/94 h 5 i APPENDIX A (COPATTA Code I/O File Information) 1 The COPATTA Code input file is presented in Section 9 (page 130) of this calculation. 7 The COPATTA Code output file is included on Microfiche. The output file name and date are as follows: ! FILE TITLE: MSLB CASE,102% POWER, LOSS OF ONE COOLING TRAIN, l OFFSITE POWER AVAIL. RUNDATE: 11-1-93 END OF RUN: 09:47:46 LAST SHEET: Page 414 l I i i l
- e. _ _}}