ML20106J962

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Discusses Insp Rept 50-219/73-16 Re Licensee Environ Monitoring Program.No Violations Noted
ML20106J962
Person / Time
Site: Oyster Creek
Issue date: 11/15/1973
From: Gallina C
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To: Stohr J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
Shared Package
ML18039A986 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-95-258 NUDOCS 9604120081
Download: ML20106J962 (2)


See also: IR 05000219/1973016

Text

,

t

4

.

'

NOV 151973

.,

o

J. P. Stohr, Senior, Environmental Protection and Special Programs

[t"

Section, Directorate of Regulatory Operations, Region I

'

>

-

s

INSPECTOR'S EVALUATION

RO INSPECTION REPORT No. 50-219/73-16

JERSEY CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY (JCPL)

OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR STATION (OC)

The above inspection report documents the findings of my review of the

licensee's environmental monitoring program. This inspection was con-

ducted primarily as a follow-up to an earlier inspection (R0 Inspection

-

Report 50-219/73-03) at which time 13 violations were identified. This

current inspection revealed that corrective actions had been taken as

stated by the licensee in his letter dated May 22, 1973.

No new viola-

tions were identified during this inspection.

The inspector noted that although no violations were identified, the

monitoring programs themselves were unchanged and as such, remained

deficient.

The licensee stated that an upgraded environmental program

was scheduled to be included with an upcoming submission of Environmental

4

Technical Specificati - 9 on November 1, 1973. This new environmental

program should be evaluated rather closely to insure that it meets cur-

rent standards.

The major problem identified during this inspection was the supervision

and evaluation being provided by the licensee with respect to the cur-

rent programs existing at the OC site.

If this level of supervision

and evaluation are allowed to continue without change into the upgraded

program, many of the objectives of this program may be negated.

The

individual in charge of the program is extremely conscientious and as

i

such can see that the samples are taken as required. As far as the

evaluation of resultant data, no individual at the site possesses suf-

ficient depth in this area to provide any meaningful evaluation and

from my observations and discussions with licensee personnel, no one

at the corporate level (JCPL or CPU) has shown any concern or interest

in this area.

It appears that although the outer compliance with Technical Specification

has been achieved, at -least for the present, management attitude remains

apathetic.

This attitude may change with the upgraded program but I saw

no evidence of any change at this time. The Station Superintendent and

.

9604120001 960213

PDR

FOIA

DEKOK95-258

PDR

,

,

O

2-

J. P. Stohr

-

Technical Supervisor were both responsive to our ir.quiries but neither

ins the proper background to handle this problem without support from

higher corporate management.

It is recommended that this matter be

reviewed in greater detail subsequent to the sutxnission of the upgraded

program.

//

g

1

, Dr. Charles 0. Gallina

, ~ ) Radiation Specialist

M?)

i

l

}

,

.'

^

'

-

.

}D

&, g

^

-

,/

.

<

. . . . . . *

<m

.

<

.

.

.

Jersey Central Power & Light Company j/fl(

mas

.

MADISON AVENUE AT PUNCH BOWL ROAO + MORRISTOWN, N. J. 07960 * 201539-6111

una e or rua

General

, Pubhc Uteties corporation

_

-

,m. .

November 13, 1973

Mr. A. Giambusso-

Deputy Director for Reactor Projects

Directorate of Licensing

United States Atomic Energy Commission

.

Washington, D. C. 20545

Dear tir. Giambusso:

Subject: Oyster Creek Station

Docket No. 50-219

Hydraulic Shock and Sway Arrestor Failure

This Ictter serves to report a failure of one (1) hydraulic shock

and cete nrrector unit (11SSA) ,on the ste?.m line for isolation condenser !!E01B.

found while per/orming a monthly check of all units in the reactor building

externa), to the drywell, as recorrended by the Plant Operations Review Comnittee.

This event is considered to be nn abnormal occurrence as defined in the Tech-

nical Specifications, paragraphs 1.15D and D.

Notification of this event, as

required by the Technical Specifications, parrsraph 6.6.2.a

was made to AEC

Regicn 1, Directorate of Regulatory Opciations, by telephouc cn Saturday,

Nove:cbcr 3.1973, and by telecopier on Monday, flovember 5,1973.

hhile conducting an inspection of the hydraulic shoch and sway

arrestors (snubbers) located on verious systems in the reactor building, but

outside of the drywell, the accumulator on one unit on the steam lino to the

"B" isolation condenser was fcund to be devoid of fluid.

Additionn11y, another unit on the steam line to the "A" isolation

conden'.er vr.s initially reported to be failed, but further inspection anri eva)-

uation by the mechanical maintenance foreman and the maintenance engineer re-

sulted in the unit being considered to be operable but low in accumulator fluid

' level.

Upon disassembly and inspection of the accumulator installed on 1.he

"B" isolation condenser, th'c spring loaded piston ring was four.d to be fn31cd.

Althcugh no deterioration or other unusual conditiens could be visually determined,

the U-cup on the accunulator piston head apparently was degicded to a point

where it allowed the fluid to leak out.

The unit had not been rebuilt during

either the Spring 1973 Refueling / Turbine Generator Inspection nor during the

September 1973 Snubber /Turbino Control kalve Outage.

S

m a n ,,_

--

.-

.

4

.

.

.

,

'

I t.

Giambusso

-2-

November 13, 1973

Pertinent data is as follows:

Manufacturer:

Bergen Paterson Pipe Support Company

Type:

HSSA-10

Serial No.:

469946

The initial inspection report indicated that one unit on the steam

line for the "A"

isolation condenser and one unit on the "B" isolation condenser

were inoperable.

Consequently, as per the requirements of the Technical Specifi-

cations, paragraph 3.8,0, an orderly plant shutdown was commenced upon notification

of the situation. Meanwhile, an immediate reinspection was made on both snubbers

with results as previously indicated. Nevertheless, preparations for an orderly

shutdown continued until the accumulator for the snubber on the "A"

isolation

condenser could be filled to a satisfactory Icvel. This action was completed by

1845 Friday, November 2, 1973. The load drop which had been started was halted,

and the plant returned to its previous operating level of 595 FMc(g).

Follow-up

action included replacement of the accumulator on the snubber installed on the

"B" isolation condenser steam line, then replacement of the entire snubber unit

on the "A" irutation enndenser steam line, since it had been Icaking. This

19U' iciday evening.

A follow-up check was then

action was com, meter

4

made on Sat urdav evening to insure that no further fluid loss was occurring.

, < ndmeat 67 to the FDSAE details the requirements for at 1 cast one

isolatica c .Genwr to be availablo es a heat sink in the event of a loss of

coolant acH Jent.

Both condenscr* would have been abic to perform this function;

however, had an certhquake occmed which would have required proper functioning

of all instadt

W .w the stean line to the "B" condenser may not have been

abic to withstam the anticipated forces.

Consequently, should a rupture then

have occurred, a relet

af reactor steam to the secondary containuent would have

resulted.

Analysis of this accident has been made assuming a valve closure time

of 60 seconds after the break, and found to be less severe than a rupture of the

main stesn line and subsequent closure of the main steam isolation valves.

The

significance of this event then is the increased probability of stear release

to the secondary containment which, had thht occurred with subsequent unit

'

isolation, then would have resulted in a loss of redundancy of the isolation

condensers to act as a heat sink.

In lieu of waiting an additional month to reinspect snubbers located

in the reactor building, this reinspection will be conducted within the next two

weeks.

Based upon the inspection findings, a determination will be made as to

an acceptable future inspection frequency.

In addition, four snubbers previously not included in the inspection

program, two of which are located on the No. 2 containment spray system and

two on the No. I core spray system, will be inspected promptly and will be in-

cluded in subsequent inspections.

It is further intended that the ethylene propylene seal procurement

effort be continued such that any units rebuilt in the future would contain

seals of this material.

.

D

.

_..

-

. _ _ . . . ._. . . _ . _ . _ . _

_ _ . . _ .

. . . .

..m___

. _ . ~ . . _ _ ._-

,

,

L*-

-

].*

,

.,. '

4

. ,

f,1

- .,

,

t

. .

'

.

. Mr. Giamb'usso.

-3-

-November 13, 1973

  • -

!

Enclosed .are forty (40) copies of this report.

Very truly yours,

,

./

W

)W

Donald-A. Ross

I,

Manager, Nuclear Generating Stations-

DAR:cs

Enclosures

_f

[

cc: : Mr. J. P. O'Reilly, Director -

Directorate of Regulatory Operations, Region I-

,

,

4

e

f

I

a

4

p

5

,

,.

,

- , - - ,

- . - - , ,

,,.,a,r

,.

---

-