ML20091P138
| ML20091P138 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Midland |
| Issue date: | 09/08/1983 |
| From: | Vollmer R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Eisenhut D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17198A223 | List:
|
| References | |
| CON-BOX-08, CON-BOX-8, FOIA-84-96 NUDOCS 8406120605 | |
| Download: ML20091P138 (2) | |
Text
.
i i
KICy
UNITED STATES
(
3
/
t o' g.
]!,,,.4 3 g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION t
WASHINGTON. D. C. 20555 (f*.bf. /
SEP 81983 MEMORANDUM FOR: Darrell G. Eisenhut Director Division of Licensing, ONRR FROM.
Richard H. Vollmer, Director Division of Enginecring, ONRR
SUBJECT:
EVALUATION OF LANDSMAN'S CONCERNS REGARDING DIESEL GENERATOR BUILDING AT MIDLAND t
References:
1.
Memo, Eisenhut to Keppler, June 27, 1983 2.
Memo, Vollmer to Eisenhut, July 21, 1983 3; Memo, Landsnan to Warnick, July 19, 1983 Due to schedule conflic'ts between the Diablo Canyon Review and this effort on Midland which affedts the^ personnel from Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL).
DE must reschedule' the completion of the Midland DGB review from September 28 to October 15, 1983. During the month of September, the BNL personnel will partially be comitted to Diablo Canyon reviewing ITR's,. preparing testimony and taking depositions.
If you.do not concur with slipping this effort to accomodate the demands of Diabro Canyon, please advise accordingly.
Enclosed is a revised Work Plan for the completion of the DE evaluation of the Landsman's co6cerns. The ASLB (via OELD) should be advised of the revised schedule' fir completioni 4
i Richard H. Vollmer, Director-Division of Engineering, ONRR
Enclosure:
^
As stated
- )
-ec:
H. Denton J
J. Knight
.,A
% yG. Lear
,g P. Kuo '
1 s
. p N. Romney;
" } i.
C. Tan-E. Acensam V
D. Hood
- <g
+
M
. CONTACT: T..Romney,3 *B N
5GE Q g gk-40-28987 4
.s Y~" ?
/E
' $ 8406120605'840517
-l RICE 84-96 ] _ 'PDR
^
c
.D f.#-.
---s,,
._,..,m m
9 9
ENCLOSURE Midland NPP Diesel Generator Building Review Work Plan j
August 24 - 25, 1983 Task Force - Site Visit - Completed September 8, 1983 Task Force meet with:
F. Rinaldi J. Kane J. Matra G. Harstead Septenber 13,1983(AM)
Task Force meet with R. Landsnan (AnnArbor, Michigan)
September 12 - 13, 1983 Task Force conduct audit of Midland DGB (AnnArbor, Michigan)
October 15, 1983 Issue Report of Findings h
m w
+
o a
5 ' 'GOVERhiMENT ACCOUNTABluTY PROJECT Institute for Policy Studies 1901 Que Street. N.W.. Woshington. D.C. 20009 (202)234 9382 August 19, 1983 Mr. Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulations U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555
Dear Mr. Eisenhut:
On August 10, 1983 you responded to my Aug.
8, 1983 request for information regarding the review group formed to consider the concerns of Mr. Ross Landsman.
On Aug. 11, 1983 during a public meeting on the Construction Completion Plan (CCP) you indicated that a review of the NRR Engineering Division had indicated no support or agreement with Mr. Landsman.
Mrs. Barbara Stamiris, the Citizen Intervenor on the soils settlement ("OM") proceedings inquired specif:.cally i
about Mr. Joe Kane of your office and a consultant, Dr. Sing, of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
You indicated that you were not
- c. ware of whether or not those individuals had been asked or not.
Please inform Mrs. Stamiris and myself of the answer to that question.
More specifically, it is our clear understanding that several m::mbers of the Engineering Staff in both the Region and in headquarters had very strong feelings about the approval of the DGB resolution.
Wa expect your technical review to include the past concerns of both Regional and headquarters engineers.
Furthermore, since the concerns about this issue and its resolution are of interest to Ccngress, the local intervenors and GAP we respectfully request that your office issue an Interim report, allow. time for review end comment by the public, and hold at least one open meeting prior to the issurance of the final report on this subject.
A final concern we wish to raise with your office deals with the background of the individuals you have nominated to complete the review of Dr. Landsman's concerns.
All of the people selected are structural engineers.
Dr. Landsman of course, is a geo-technical engineer.
Clearly, any review team should contain professional-representation from Dr. Landsman's discipline, and suggest that you cppoint an independent geo-technical consultant to review the work of your engineers.
Finally, we concur with Mr. Robert Warnicks suggestion contained in his July 21, 1983 memo to you that "all related correspondence and the resulting report (s) and documentation should be placed. in the public document room and distribution list. "-
N^
h y
r
.-r c.--
,-=.,-,,,~=-n
,}
~
,.g Thank you for your extraordinary promptness to my August 8, 1983 letter, it was a pleasant surprise.
I look forward to an equally pleasant substantive report on the DGB from your office.
J Sincerely, Billie Pirner Garde citizens Clinic Director W9W 1
e ess=
4
p m,
p s* * * %e,'o
}
'+"
UNITED STATES E ',,.- c (,)
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 3
~' /
E WASHINGTON. D. C. 20555 e
August 31, 1983 Docket Nos. 50-289, 275/323, 341, 382, 483, 362, 416 MEMORANDUM FOR: Chairman Palladino Comissioner Gilinsky Comissioner Roberts Comissioner Asselstine Comissioner Bernthal FROM:
Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
SUBJECT:
ORAFT TEST REPORT ON QUALIFICATION TEST PROGRAM OF CLASS lE SOLENOID VALVES (BOARD NOTIFICATION 83-128)
In accordance with the NRC procedures for Board Notification the following information is being transmitted directly to the Comission. The appropriate Boards and parties are being notified by copy of this memorandum. This notification may relate to the following cases which are before the Comission:
TMI-1, Diablo Canyon 1 and 2, Fermi 2, Waterford 3, Callaway 1, Grand Gulf 1, and San Onofre 3.
This attached information discusses the status of the staff's investigation into the reported test failures of ASCO Class lE solenoid valves. These valves are used in most nuclear power plants. The staff will report the resolution of this matter in a future board notification.
+
f' 1
5 I
{
l is f
IMd.'Eis'enKUf.kirector
'~
~
0a Division of Licensing j
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation i
Enclosure:
As stated cc: See next page
- 50c;; ee6v "
SEP191983 1
O
-w
,