ML20091N292
| ML20091N292 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Midland |
| Issue date: | 11/09/1982 |
| From: | Lucks A STONE & WEBSTER, INC. |
| To: | Cook R NRC |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17198A223 | List:
|
| References | |
| CON-BOX-10, FOIA-84-96 MPF-7, NUDOCS 8406120261 | |
| Download: ML20091N292 (5) | |
Text
,
3 STONE 6 WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION 245 SUMMER STREET. BOSTON. M ASS ACH U SETTS AOORESS ALL CORRESPONDENCE 70 P.O. BOX 232S. SOSTON. M ASS.
2107 W U, TELEX 84-0001 own NaToucTiON
- 0 "'" " "
" :U"....
- * 'o'.'1 o.
- ".".10"m*~.
7.".'J',".i.." f,**"
United Sates Nuclear Regulatory Co: mission November 9,1982 Midland Site Resident Inspection Office Route 7 J.O.No. 14358 Midland, MI 48640 Ref. MPF-7 Attention Mr. R. Cook RE: DOCKET NO. 50-329/330 MIDLAND PLANT - UNITS 1 AND 2 INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT OF AUXILIARY BUILDING UNDERPINNING REPORT NO. 7 A copy of the Independent Assessment of the Auxiliary Building Under-pinning Weekly Report No. 7 for the period October 31 through November 6, 1982, is enclosed with this letter.
If you have any questions with respect to this report, please contact me at (617) 589-67 A. Ranley Lucks Project Manager Enclosure A SL *nb l
t i
(/
,(
( 0( 1 k G.L 0406120261 840517 PDR FDIA i
RICEB4-96 PDR
T-3 Weekly Report No. 7 October 31 through November 6, 1982 Personnel on Site Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation (SWEC)
W. Kilkor 11/1 - 11/2 A.B. Scott 11/1 - 11/5 Activities Team representatives resolved those observations and questions on procedures still pending from Report No. 5 that were previously submitted to Bechtel.
Inspections were made at the concrete testing facilities on concrete test performed for the determination of strength of concrete for mudmats. Also the training for grout placing for jacking base plates was observed.
Meetings Attended Date Represented Purpose 11/1 Stone & Webster Daily Meeting through Consumers Power 11/5 Bechtel 11/1 Stone & Webster Presentation by Bechtel Consumers Power to Consumers Power Co.
Bechtel of Building Settlement Records.
11/5 Stone & Weoster Review of the Independent Consumers Power Assessment Team qualifications Government Accountability and scope of work,(Meeting Project held at the NRC office in NRC Bethesda, MD.)
Observations The start of the underpinning work has been further delayed pending resolution of the re-certification and settlement items.
t i
.The Assessment Team observation of the grouting training for jacking base i
plates indicated that the grouting produced a homogeneous filling under the plate.
6801 0 0/LouMa.
Project Manager Project Engineer
'O
STONE 6 WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION 245 SUMMER STREET. BOSTON M ASSACHUSETTS ADDRESS ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO P.O. SOX 2325. SOSTON. M ASS. 02107 W U. TELEX 9 4 -000 f oon meinucTioN n
!MN 7 tons
%'Jir*on
- 'u'NE'n*=.
2".'LT*,o,.* '
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission October 27, 1982 Midland Site Resident Inspection Office Route 7 J.O.No. 14358 Midland, MI 48640 Ref. MPR-5 Attention Mr. R. Cook RE: DOCKET NO. 50-329/330 MIDLAND PLANT - UNITS 1 AND 2 INDEPENTENT ASSESSMENT OF AUXILIARY BUILDING UNDERPINNING REPORT NO. 5 A copy of the Independent Assessment of the Auxiliary Building Under-pinning Weekly Report No. 5 for the period October 17 through October 23 1982, is enclosed with this letter.
If you have any questions with respect to this report, please contact me at (617) 589-2067.
A. Stanley Lucks Project Manager Enclosure ASL:nb i
+-
J.0,.,No. 14358 3
. Midland o!, ant
.)
thit's 1 and 2 Independent Assessment Auxiliary Building Underpinning Weekly Report No. 5 I
[
October 17 through October 23, 1982 Personnel on Site l
Rone & Webster Ehgineering Corporation (SWEC)
W.E. Kilker 10/18 - 10/20 P. Barry" 10/18 - 10/22 L.T. Rouen 10/18 - 10/22 B. Holsinger 10/20 - 10/22 A. Scott 10/20 - 10/22 d
Activities The focus of the Assessment Team effort was the disposition of numerous questions that had been raised over the past 3 weeks with respect to the pending underpinning construction specifications, drawings and procedures. To this end, the team members had meetings and discussions with site engineering and construction personnel and resolved the majority of the items. Pending items will be resolved within the next two weeks.
Team Members attended a critique meeting on the placement of rein-forcing and concrete in the mock-up pier. The team was also represented at discussions of recently recorded settlement date.
Meetings Attended i
Date Represented Purpose 10/18 Rone & Webster Daily Meeting j
througn Consumers Power 10/22 Bechtel 10/19 Stone & Webster Settlement j
Consumers Power Monitoring i
Bechtel Records Mergentime 10/19 Stone & Webster Critique of Consumers Power -
Mock-Up Pier-Bechtel Reinforcing Steel Mergentime -
and Concrete Placement t
I 10/20 Stone & Webster
' Discussion of Bechtel Excavation and Mergentime
. Lagging Procedure 10/20 Sone & Webster Training Sessions on Bechtel Excavation and Lagging, -
Hergentime Jacking, and Soil
&abilization a#e.=
.g g
-4
.a.-.
J.O. Noe 14358 m
s Midland '.'lant Units 1 and 2 Independent Assessment Auxiliary Building Underpinning Meetings Attended l
Date Represented Purpose i
10/22 Stone & Webster Resolution of Bechtel Observations and Questions on Con-struction Specifications and Procedures Observations The Assessment Team has completed the review of the reports and construction documents applicable to the initial phase of the underpinning work. Most l
questions have been resolved by discussion with site personnel.
The team will, commencing October 25, scale down it's presence on the site until actual start of construction.
Nonconformance Identification Reports NIR No. 1 - Issued 10/21/82 - The Mergentime Procedure for splicing reinforcing bars did not address a specification requirement.
b eunut b x
@Nm d $. h 4 Proje6t Engineer Project Manager l
l i
t I
}
}
i i
'~
2a m_--_----_-_.___
_x._-.
. p 4
rc;e:- :roce v e 5-2.;
A::a:n en: 1 Fa;:e 1 of 1 i
STONE AN: WEESTER EN3;NEERIN3 CORDURATION NCNCDNrGRv.n CE IDENTIFICATION REPORT DATE OF N?NCON 00.v.ANCE : October 29. 1982 N R NumDer p
IDENTIFICATIOULOCATIO'N OF ITEMS: Technical Specification for Underpinning af Auxilia y Euilding and Feedwater Isolation Valve Pits. and annmetatea m hnn Series Drawings, located at MPQAD and QC.
DESCRIPTION Or NON:0N50W.ANCE: The MPQAD and QC controlled copf en of the deve Specification and Drawins are missing the followins chaw e deements:
QC's -
- 1) Specification Spe.:ification Chaue Netice (SCN)
No. 12002, 12003. and 12004 QC and
- 2) Drawing C1h24 Drawing Change Notice (DCN) No. 7 MPRAD Field Change Request (FCR) - No. Ch7h1 and Chh85.
Ih!TI' OR:
DATE:
PROJECT M W "EMENT CONCURRENCr:
W
<Axpu_l^
. lsu /,. 5. Lur b Barry. Idolsinger October 28.1982 CD:2ECT:vE A;T:0N SY:
(:DENTIEMIIATION TAKINTTUAMCTE'LCIDNT i
Ih!TIATCR CONCURRENCE:
?;00ECT M;NAGEMENT CCNCURRENCE:
DATE:
c 1I358 J.O. No.
1 Midland Plant Units 1 and 2 Independent Assessment Auxiliary Building Underpinning i
STCNE AN: WEEETER ENGINEERING CORPORATION NON;0N:0:N NCE IDENTIFICATION REPORT IU t
DATE 0: NON:0NFORMANCE:
NIE Nu~ber s
!OENTIFICATION/ LOCATION OF ITEMS: Procedupe for Mechanical Sn11 cine of Beinforcement (MCP 16.000; Hov. 3.)
DESCRIPTION OF NONCONFORW.ANCE: Technical Soccification for Underpinning of Auxiliary Buildine and Feed +ater Isolation Valve Pits (nara 11.5.3-r) renuires subcontractor's nrocedure for Mechanical Splicing of Reinforcement to nrovide a_ method of mechanically locking the position splices.
The Morren_ time Procedure does not nrovide_for mnchani cally lockinr_sAlices.
INITIATOR:
DATE:
PROJECT MANAGEMENT CONCURRENCE:
Q.M 4 xm Ws.49<w CORRECTIVE ACTION SY:
(IDENT!FTTA5KmKTIDN"TAKING COUECTIVE AUTON) j 2
l l
l c'
INITIATOR CONCURRENCE:
PROJECT MANAGEMENT CONCURRENCE:
DATE:
$.e -emima me u.
3
7 STONE 6 WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION 245 SUMMER STREET. BOSTON. M ASSACHUSETTS ADDRESS ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO P.O. BOX 2325. BOSTON. M A S S. 02107 W U. TELEX. 94 0001 m
oRM C N.TRUCTION
" L"T, ~.
- "'" u ". '" "
- "'u*,'T7
- ?~'.'0.7.
2"i,^.7. ". 'D C.
W A S MINGTON United States Nuclear Regulatory Comunission Octobe r 18, 1982 Midland Site Resident Inspection Office Route 7 J.O.No. 14358 Midland, MI 48640 Ref. MPR-4 Attention Mr. R. Cook RE : DOCKET NO. 50-329/330 MIDIAND PLANI - UNITS 1 AND 2 INDEPENDERI ASSESSMENT OF AUXILIARY BUILDING UNDERPINNING REPORT NO. 4 A copy of the Independent Assessment of the Auxiliary Building Under-pinning Weekly Report No. 4 for the period October 10 through October 16, 1982, is enclosed with this letter.
If you have any questicas with respect to this report, please contact me at (617) 589-2067.
A. Stanley L ks Project Manager Enclos ure ASL:ck o
l l
l
'[
BX214358-2
J.O. No. 14358 s
Midland Plant Units 1 and 2 Independent Assessment Auxiliary Building Underpinning Weekly Report No. 4 i
i October 10 through October 16, 1982 Personnel on Site Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation (SWEC)
W. E. Kilker 10/12/82-10/15/82 P. Barry, 10/12/82-10/15/82 L. T. Roten 10/11/82-10/15-82 B. Holsinger 10/11/82-10/15/82 l
A. Scott 10/11/82-10/15/82 Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade, & Douglas (PBCD)
J. Ratner 10/11/82-10/15/72 Activities The Assessment Team completed the review of all construction specifications and procedures associated with the initial phases of the underpinning.
Familiarization with the drawings and Quality Assurance / Quality Control procedures continued.
Discussions with site personnel were h eld to resolve questions and observations on the various construction documents.
Tema members read the portions of the NRC's Supp1 mental Safety Evaluation Report No. 2 applicable to the Auxiliary Building Underpinning.
The team members attended the site Soils Training Classes on quality plans, soils work permits and coordination forms.
i Meetirgs Attended Repres ented Pur pose i
10/11/82 Stone ' & Webster Daily Meetings j
through Consuners Power 10/15/82 Bechtel 10/14/82 Stone & Webster Soils Remedial and Consumers Power Training Program 10/15/82 Bechtel Cours es j
Mergentime f
1
~
10/15/82 Stone & Webster weekly Soils Consumers Power Review Meeting Becht el i
Mergentime 4
Observations - None Adf/cLat.
Proj ect Engineer Proj ect Manager l'
i' BX214358-2 L
4.
h
/EBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION 245 SUMMER STREET. BOSTON. M ASSACHU SETTS AmonESs ALL connESPONoENCE TO P.O. BOX 2329. BOSTON. M A S S. 02107 W U. TELEX 94-0001 N w OAR C Ns,muCriON
- = " ' " ' " " *
"l=':,,om.
"'o't,*
- ** *OM*N.
1.".'N," ". o." o E" United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission October 13, 1982 Midland Site Resident Inspection Office Route 7 J.O.No. 14358 Midland, MI 48640 Ref. MPR-3 Attention Mr. R. Cook RE: DOCKET NO. 50-329/330 MIDLAND PLANT - UMITS 1 AND 2 INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT OF AUXILIARY BUILDING UNDERPINNING-REPORT NO. 3 A copy of the Independent Assessment of the Auxiliary Building Underpinning Weekly Report No. 3 for the period October 3 through October 9, 1982, is enclosed with this letter.
If you have any questions with respect to this report, please contact me at (617) 589-2067.
8 A. Stanley Lucks Project Manager Enclosure ASL:mmm I
i i
(CY
v.
's J.O.No. 14358 Midland Plant Units 1 and 2 l
Independent Assessment Auxiliary Building Underpinning Weekly Report No. 3 October 3 through October 9, 1982 Personnel on Site Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation (SWEC)
W. E. Kilker 10/5/82-10/8/82 P. Barry 10/4/82-10/8/82 L. T. Rouen 10/4/82-10/8/82 B. Holsinger 10/5/82-10/8/82 A. Scott 10/4/82-10/8/82 Parsons, Brinkerhoff, Quade, & Douglas (PBQD)
P. Parish 10/4/82-10/8/82 J. Ratner 10/4/82-10/8/82 Activities The start of the underpinning work has been delayed pending the recertification of the Soils Remedial Quality Control inspectors. In the interim, the Assess-ment team members have ecmplated the review of several of the construction specifications and procedures associated with the initial phases of the under-pinning work. Team. member questions or observations have been presented to site personnel for resolution.
Several pf the team members toured the off-site concrete batch plant and received a brief,tng on the plant lay-out and production procedures. A general interest e
tour of'the Auxiliary Building and Reactor Containment Structure was given to all
' of the' team members by site engineers.
x
.~
s v.
Okeerv,3 fops were made of the underpinning contractor performing routine back-
' pacRJys baintenance with sand and excelsior on the access shafts' lagging.
e 4
s
,
- o h4 S.
gr*
4 Tb
- \\
s s.
-a 1
f qr
'g g
h
~
W
%=
gh' a
~
n.
g.
. ~.
i
+
e i
2 g-t Meetings Attended Date Represented Purpose 10/8/82 Stone & Webster Weekly Soils Review Meeting i
Consumers Power Co.
il _
Bechtel Mergentime Ii 10/4/82 Stone & Webster Daily Meeting through Consumers Power Co.
I 10/8/82 Bechtel observations i
Familiarization with the specifications, drawings, and construction procedures associated with the initial phase of construction is generally complete.'
Observations and questiens from the team members on the construction documents have been discussed with site personnel.
W
]
Project' Engineer Project Manager U
i
-l I
i I
t, i
l I
1
q s
9 STONE 6 WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION 245 SuMMen SintET. BOSTON. massa HustTTs Acontes ALL connsepoNotNC TO P.o. sox isaS. So87oN. M.4 SS 019 07 w v.7:Lsx e4 oooi w.au NotewCTI.N
"!:*",::,,.N.
"!*.',*.*N
- .".'M L *,"f,'**
United States Nuclear Regulatory Comnission October 12, 1982 Midland Site Resident Inspection Office Route 7 J.O.No. 14358 Midland, MI 48640 Ref. MPR-2 Attention Mr. R. Cook RE: DOCRET NO. 50-329/3?,0 MIDLAND PLANT - UNITS 1 AND 2 INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT OF AUXILIARY BUILDING UNDERPINNIF.G-REPORT ')O.
2 A copy of the Independent Assessrent of the Auxiliary Building Underpinning Weekly Report No. 2 for the period September 27 through October 3, 1982, is enclosed with this letter.
If voa have any questions with respect to this report, please contact me at (617) 589-2067.
~
N A. Stanley Lucks Project Manager Enclosure
?
ASL:pss T
N
\\
/ *
)
A y
n BX214358-2 (n
Q J ! l!. L
.. ~_
3 3
J.O.No. 14358 Midland P? ant Units 1 and 2 Independent Assessment l
Auxiliary Building Underpinning Weekly Report No. 2 September 27 through October 3, 1982 Personnel on Site Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation (SWEC)
W. E. Kilker 9/27/82-10/1/82 P. Barry 9/27/82-10/1/82 L. T. Rouen 9/27/82-10/1/82 B. Holsinger 9/27/82-10/1/82 A. Scott 9/27/82-10/1/82 A. S. Lucks 9/27/82-9/29/82 Parsons, Brinkeroff, Quade, & Douglas (PBQD)
P. Parish 9/27/82-10/1/82 J. Ratner 9/29/82-10/1/82 Activities The assessment team continued their review of the reports, specifications, drawings and procedures in order to gain familiarity with the initial phases of the pending underpinning work. The review concentrated on issued excavation, lagging, ground stabilization and concrete placement procedures. Discussions to resolve any questions concerning these procedures were held with Bechtel and Consumers Power site personnel. The plant QA program and Quality Control procedures on concrete and reinforcement were reviewed by QA team members.
The Assessment teen and representatives of Consumers Power Company met with NRC representatives. The role of the assessment team and the interaction with the various site groups, and the methods of reporting the team findings were discussed in this meeting.
I Two of the team members attended a public meeting of the NRC and Consumers Power Company.
The discussion focused on the establishment of the Midland l
Plant QA program under Consumers Power Company administration and control and j
the certification of QC inspectors under the Consumers Power Company program.
i 5
t BK214358-2 l
1 i
e.-
s 2
Meetinas Attended Date Represented Purpose 9/28/82 Stone & Webster Introduction of USNRC Consumers Power Co.
and Assessment Team. Discus-U.S. Nuclear Regulatory sion of Assessment Team's Commission role.
9/29/82 St9ne & Webster Public Meeting - Discussion Bechtel of QA Administration and USNRC QC Certification.
Public 9/30/82 Stone & Webster Presentation of Underpinning Consumers Power Co.
model.
Bechtel 10/1/82 Stone & Webster Weekly Soils Review Meeting Consumers Power Co.
Bechtel Mergentime 9/27/82 Stone & Webster Daily Meeting through Consumers Power Co.
10/1/82 Bechtel Observations The Assessment Team has continued to receive cooperation of on-site personnel.
Team members observations, questions or suggestions have been given prompt and complete attention by the appropriate site personnel.
I W12 Gb d
l Project Engineer Project Manager LJ l
l t
l l
i BX214358-2 T
o
a..
m
- ...i'
'i
.q ;,
-e
\\
s 3 r,,. t - 3
.. v
\\
...,r....,
s
.,.,n
.a<.
..e.
sa.
i.
r ' m e '.ir E c gul.,t o r y C a T i s s i co S s p:.:.'-- r
't.
1982
,d F-
"..f F i t e si.it n t Ins pection Of fice
,t e 7 J.C.Nc. : ~ 35 E. 06 Fidland, MI 48640 Fef. MPK-1 Att ention Mr. R. Cook
Dear Sir:
RE : DOCKET No. 50-329/330 MI D' AN T P!.t N! - I N ITS 1 AN D 2 I S. 'E P :
e; :. " 2F FF : NT OF. Al'V il. ' A R. Y Stil! F NG Wi-: F.? :I N.G p -..,:
.r r 3,.-.- f.1,
_s:
y 3..
- J ; r g '-
r ; ',..r n g A a,.y <1 i;,
.:: '.e.
I fer the -
oi
- -c
-r
..ph ?e. 1:i.
s enciesed
.. h :
's r.
- f
,.t '.-., n y ga
-t imr wi t. r o ;+ c t to Sir r e,.' r t, plisse e r. : ;ct me s.: ( N 7'
-t h, 7.
r,-r y t r u'. y yo u: s,
W 1
L e ~b A. S t a nle y Luc Proj ect Manager En cl os ure t
i ASL:ch t
I t
i I.
'f 7 I L/L O//77
-.j
3 j
J. O. ;;o. 1. ~. i8 vi C
..d ri
.it j.
Uni t s !
.eid 2 l
In& pend..nr 4rsowi:vnt Auxiliary 3 ildi ng Urd erpinni ng i
Weekl v R eport No.1 Sept e=ber 19 through 26,t 1982 Tersonnel on Fite 1
Stcne & Webst er Engi neer i ng Corparati on ( SWTC)
W. E. Kilker 9/20/82-9/26/82 P. Barry 9/20/82-9/23/82 L. T. Kouen 9/20/82-9/24/82 B. Hol si nger 9/20/82-9/26/82 l
A. Scott 9/20/82-9/26/82 A. S. Lucks 9/21/82-9/23/82 i
Parsons, Brinker.hoff, Quade, & Douglas (FB00) f P. Parish 9/21/82-9/24/82 J. Rat ner 9 /22 /82-9 /2a /82 i
A c ti vi ti es s
This re turt om:ari nes the fi rs t week of acti vi ties and obs er vati ens of the SWEC i nde pendent arsessment t e am (including the ! ? QC ye r s cen el ).
Th e t e am,
whi ch at the present time cobsists of seven engineers re pres eriting Geotech-nical, Structural, Construction', and Quality Assurance dis ci pli nes, ' arrived at the si te between September 20 and Sept ember 22.
i 1
The ass essment team has estal,lished separate on-site office s pac e and has contracted f or clerical assistance.
Introductions of all team members were made to on-site personnel representing Be cht el Engineering and Con.s tructi on; Cons umers Power C o= pany Qu alit y.
Ass urance and Quality Control; - Wiss, Janney & Elstner (WJ&E) Instrumentation Monitoring; and Mergentice Construction. Tours and bri efings of the various areas and ac ti vi ti es rel at ed to the underpi nning were given throughout the week at the request of the asseerment~ team.
In luded in th es e tours and bri efi ngs were the in place accoss shaf ts and -TIVF superstructure supports, the dee p-s e at ed bench arks and relative motion measurement st ations,- the i
ext ens omet er and strain page instrt:=ent ati on inst all ations, the crack mapp-ing, the WJ&E instru entation monitoring and ?at a ' recording st ation, -the laraing and reinf orcing bar f abri cat i on shops, and the ' mat eri al testing
- l abo rato ry.
- Alse, the ass essment team periodi cally obr erved the work on the mock-up pier (located near the Outage Building) ~ and the ' ja: king stand mock-up (loc at ed adj acent to the l a ggi ng f abri cat i on shop). All lagging and - shoring vere in place on the moc k-up prior to the team's arrival on site, but ebservations
- E121L 35 6. 05
2 9
1
)
' H e of tl.e r ei nf. t m -nt install i m. cond the p'..:.
,t of.
- e i r.
i ?.a 1.g..r h al f o f th e pi e r.
- 71. r < e
.~.1.. r s o f t h e e ~ c ".r..n t
- t. a
-r-red :Le ri er for fi r s t 1.., nd oS. tva r i ons of the i ns t al l at i on.
The Q ali ty Cant rol ntisiti4s
..d.h. rient at i on pre pa red prior to r el('es e f or r i nc e e. e place.ent
-re des cri'ed and/or pr ovi ded as re q2est ed by the t eam ein.be rs.
Daily ne.-tings were held starting Se pt unber 21 between p-rsonnel re presenting the S s s er s :rien t L ' Ara, Scic h t el Engineering and Con s t r uc t i on, and Cons ners 3
Po-e r Ccn.p.ny Engine + ring and Quality Assurance.
These meetings provided a
{
femat for the as s es s e ent team to re ques t i nf orm at i on and cl ari fi cation as I
well as to discuss observations.
l Schers of the team have read the Surn:ary of Soils Kel at-d Isa s P eyrt and a re re viewing applic& ble sp* ci fications. drawings, cc ns tructivn, md reality Cont r ol procedures, i ns t r t= ent moni tori ng proce<!ures, tnd p'
ot Quality Assurance docunents.
An r.s s essment team Proj ect Manual has been prepared that i ricl ud es the Troj ect Organication Qu ality Assurance Plan and re por ti ng and docirnent ati on pro ced ures.
[:e e tin gs I
- Date, K epres ent ed Pur pos e 9/20/82 Stone & Webst er Introduction to 1
Cens.rurs F ever Co.
Site Personnel l
3echt el
!!e r se n t ic e Q/21/S2 Stone &, Webster Daily Meeting thro ch Tarsons 9/25/82 Cons urers Power Co.
?>e cht el i
O.bs er va t i ens The ass essment team received f ull cooperation of on-site pe rsonnel. I nd e pe n-dent of fice space and t elephone ccanunication have been. provided..Constners y
Power Caepany and Ee cht el pe ra.onnel have compli ed wi th team re gaes t s. f or access to existing inst allations, briefings, doctanents, and records.
J 4
r f
e j
F roj ect Engi ne e r Proj ect Mana ger J
.i 4
D 21'.358. 06 s
o
' ^
e a
>g' T
9 s
m,
.., m.,.
a
~
- ~
4 P. !
'"J 4
- T N' t.
h.
nh k
,i q.
~
.+C.J' * 'uW. 3a"+
./.4 p
% DL : '; '-
- b. -
b t
'hr ' -
.k'
,
- f*.-
e,$,(
T
& $,l
?j N.',1?
, f[
- t am Mr Y,, gg jp%:f.?l l.it
. m y y...pg:.1,3,.; fjkQalk ))
~N.
y n.g g y:g. ~.
nw-Ihjkhh h
hh. h 1
? ci.
w a u w w w & ;.' w..':::2 % +n. A:m.\\ny 5 -n.; % w. y? % e.f lLi V l Q.., g~3 p g n
,?.
~.
v ;."
g.;.m. y;-
~ w s
.pi,%yl::.
f W
1
.w%
p
%- ~.
1.s..
.c "... pq
- e rc.
,m,,.
- v. m.,.ii*[Q,4-
- 1...... c
. #.s g.u g a %.ng.
.9 4[f.E', I.
Q % L'..r Q{,(* U,.h,f.! h.. ', [ I 'Q j,y,1,,
r g.
d'*' ' y ;
h7, y.
Q...
2
,..,, ' ' [.4 :,, ' ~
C
+..
x w / ln/ Q Q Ql,J'&l..
O h[3y % Lj..@yk
.,,.,qw'.,. v e, i.9, e.,
.x
.y
- a. 4.3 i,gW.,.. -... N...,.F. f.. 'g+:. f., ".:
g %.
,, g':
g.(,. 5,..
,' ~.t-Q + M
,4
,,.g-4,, e w
1.,
...-.i.i..
-3 7" ', M,.,c
'i.. ::
ir
, y.-
o-2
, i i *. g h. j..
r.
..,,...I as sW. -
.g 4.
W' a,
- 4 ds je '
,9
'[
., q..% e'.
f r..:.,4,
, 'h 4.,,'.c.-....
~'% '
g[ "Q.W'[ h' '
.2'.
s
.,[-
., ' ' '. ' [,,4,g
', ' -'ff.";*,,..
k 1
..[
- _et
?
l' Y ,.
N.
-: 7 '
N.
5.h,.
e w.a +. '
- g...w
.. v. ~ m::
... v.
w.s.. :
-.:.,h,$ # * -
p.".'
. * ~ '
.''.,:jI'.,y'['~
hh id, M
' 'j',.,k,.;
<!.3 I*
h
,g 4 s,..,>.,, m..
1",
p
~ -
y 1j.' O bj &.. c'"3~-.r kl ?,ka.'. il,
,k,..,,, Y [. } h ",',,.,L y. s,
.A
,1.-5,
> [.4
~
g,.
u m n, F :..'-
I.j,.
.f.f. ', - v :..,_..
y.,' j t'l. p wt }.,,
2
.~;. _ ;..,...
- .. w, d. O by y* 4 r=' ?..,. < A. b.. 'fy,..., 4..y : ' i., ;. ~,< 4 Y 1,.
c:'
. ' M a., ;'..;d 'Ls'. 7
- 1.n,,,T a :
"t.
.i -
w
.g.&
y "-
M. ~ p,,,,' w ',,.,, )S M
- e m
, ' 9 -
+&
f' 4'. ~s. -
~
H-s.
~,75.. D'" e$$ '*k, *M ~ ' N.(
+;5
'A Y
M
%$nskN?
t
' c, $w, l*..
' ~
,w
~8
.~,:
- y*
. '., ;; ^ g f.,q u
, ?.
U%.
" Q ?'*.
,j.%s
W,.$ p h M W < *.
.- someM sm I
.g w,N Y2.'M. "' ' ~ N'j(4 5'i db L.
E*
M f.. j,
jk 4 7 e e e. <. p&
n T.. p
.e 2.
N M
- o. :"
R 6
. &* f f.h
%. 41..
M' W4 fww $g..
.W L
. G+i g l w(t. b. g r e
- sfi, QjQ.W@"
m 4
Q p Q it. &.],y p'g.
pty
.o.
..c
.m.
m h
8L.
>m
, & w g g.
a fjg
&&... 4
- a MwaygggQ g
QQ$
j6 LN N
he N
bh l
.. ~
.d !LbA Ab STONE & WEBSTER MICHIGAN, INC.
'.fi
{
, [-
P.O. box 2325. BOSTON. MASSACHUSETTS 02107 n
ca.
Jg Vm
- p I-4-u fin 2
Mr. J. G. Keppler, Administrator, Region III December 5, 1983 Nuclear Regulatory Commission J.0. No. 14509 799 Roosevelt Road-NRC File #83-12-5 Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 RE: DOCKET NO. 50-329/330 MIDLAND PLANT - UNITS 1 AND 2 OVERVIEW 0F THE CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION PROGRAM REPORT NO. 25 A copy of the Construction Implementation Overview Report No. 25 for the period November 28, 1983 through December 2, 1983 is enclosed.
This report includes evaluations of CCP activities, matrices of observations, NIRs, Hold Points and Affidivats and Resumes of newly assigned CIO Personnel.
w S. W. Baranow Program Manager SWB/fs Enclosures cc: JJHarrison, US NRC Glen Ellyn, IL RJCook, US NRC Midland (site)
DLQuamme, CPCo Midland (site)
RAWells, CPCo Midland (site)
RBKelly, S&W APAmoruso, S&W i
i Ul k? )
rIf~'4
\\
DEC 1419a3
~
JOB NO. 14509 MIDLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT REPORT NO. 25 PAGE 2 Meetings November 28 through December 2, 1983 - During this period CIO attended daily meetings with staff management.
Subjects discussed at these meetings were:
A.
Stop Work Orders - Stop Work Orders addressing FRNs and FCNs were discussed daily. The total number of documents involved and their status was presented. End of week approximate figures were that only fifty (50) FCRs and FCNs remain for first review, 5,000 are in document control for review and 400 have been returned from document control for re-review.
It is estimated that 500 of the 5,000 in document review will require re-review.
The schedule of MPQAD and CIO audits and their impact on lifting Stop Work Orders was discussed.
B.
Nonconformance Reports - The details of each NCR were discussed to decide whether the nonconformance was representative of a generic problem. Also discussed were the preventative actions that could be undertaken.
~~
~
~ Two, nonconforming conditions were the subject of extended discussion.
1.
NCRs C00628, C00640 and C00650 referenced.hypassing.QC. Hold Points on PQCI E-5.0 Rev. 13.
2.
MCR C00708 referenced arc strikes on structural members fab-ricated at'the Standish shop.
C.
Training - Sessions'are being scheduled after a recent delay due to Stop Work Order commitments.
D CIO NIRs 006,'007 and 008 were discussed in detail. Re-audits, schedule for attaining compliance and the impact of NIRs on status assessment were topics at several meetings.
D.
Procedure Approval and Issuance - All Procedures required for status i
assessment have been issued. However_ revisions to Procedures present a potential problem due to the high number of revisions and time taken to process revisions.
e e
O*'O
s.
Report No. 2S November 28, 1983 through December 2, 1983 Personnel on Site Stone & Webster Michigan, Inc.
A. Amoruso D. Cooke R. Scallan J. Karr S. Baranow R. Corson J. Seely D. Wells F. Bearham J. Langston W. Taylor L. Van Arsdale J. Barr C. Marrs J. Thompson E. Barccmb R."Carpeggiani D. MacBay R. Butler D. Beauchamp J. Chawla T. Parker N. Weatherall D. Brown A. Smith S. Narayandas T. Baumgartner W. Sienkiewicz i' 8..Kasson Meetings Attended Date Attendees Purcose November 28, 1983 Consumers Power Company Daily Staff through Bechtel Power Company Management Meetings December 2, 1983 Stone & Webster C10 MPQAD November 28, 1983 Consumers Power Company Team Meetings through Bechtel Power Company December 2, 1983 Stone & Webster CIO November 29, 1983 Consumers Power Company
_QVP Status Bechtel Power Company Assessment MPQAD Stone & Webster CIO November 28, 29 MPQAD CIO Sampling of and Stone & Webster CIO FCR/FCNs December 2, 1983 December 2, 1983.
Consumers Power Company Weekly Sub-Contractors Bechtel Power Company Meeting Babcock & Wilcox Zack 1
Owens-Coring Transco, Inc.
Penetration Seals Grinnell l
U.S. Testing 4
Electrical Fire Proofing Stone & Webster CIO 4
2 JOB NO. 14509 MIDLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT REPORT NO. 25 PAGE 3 i
November 28 through December 2,1983 - CIO personnel assigned to respective teams attended meetings for discussions of:
A.
Teams 8 and 18 (a)
Discussions center ipn the up-dating of the team members required training t the in compliance.with the Training Matrix. Up-dating is anticipated to be complete within two weeks. -
B.
Teams 27.and 28 - Discussion items were: Method of communication with project during the Stop Work Order period.
(a)
Verbal communication should be limited.
(b)
Written communication will be generated by the Resident Engineer by issuing a Resident Engineer Memorandum (REM) to Ann Arbor for problem resolutions. Responses from project will be in the form of Design Change Notice (DCN) or a Specification Change Notice (SCN).
(c)
Composite drawings for all penetra'tions should be issued for use in status assessment.
(d)
Team quality representatives are responsible for marking-up l
punchlists to define QC commitments.
C.
Team 5 - For discussions of:
l (a)
Team restructuring by addition of hanger personnel.
(b)
Status assessment training. This training is on-the-job training where Mechanical Field Engineers and Instrumentation Field Engineers perform a mock status assessment of pre-designated components. This mock assessment is then graded by the Lead Field Engineer of the specific disciplines.
This concept and pre-development of checklists has been j
adopted by other Groups and it appears there will be common-l ality in the use of techniques and checklists.
l i
t f
a 8
n m
w w
m JOB NO. 14509 MIDLAND NUCLEAF POWER PLANT.
REPORT NO. 25 PAGE 4 D.
BHO Hanger Team - For discussion of:
(a)
Mock assessment of "in-house" hanger training in pre-operation for status assessment. CIO witnessed mock assessments of hardware and determined that the mock assessment performed was effective and in compliance with CCP requirements.
In-house training on' executing software (i.e., NCRs, CWPs, FCRs and FCNs) is scheduled for week of December 12, 1983.
E.
Team 14 - For discussion of:
(a)
Up-dating of Punchlist is progressing in a satisfactory manner.
(b)
Required reading and training for this team is considered to be 83% completed.
November 29, 1983 - QVP Status Assessment Meeting:
The restraints affecting commencement continue to be the principal item on the agenda. The restraints are the FRN/FCN Stop Work Orders, preparation of'a schedule -
establishment of priority modules and CIO NIRs.
FCR/FCN Meetings - Discussions of:
i (a)
Status of Phase I and II completion.
t
[
(b)
Readiness of the Master Log to concide with the antici-t pated review by CIO of the FCRs/FCNs considered acceptable by both BPCo and CPCo.
(c)
Status and population of FCR/FCNs in the resolution phase.
~
' December 2, 1983 - Subcontractors' Meeting - 9:00 a.m. - Spokesman - BPCo Superintendent.
l l
B & W Construction Company - FCA (field change authorization) work being done. Containment (Unit I) area is being converted 2
into a " controlled access area". Also, B & W are es-tablishing a cleanliness criteria "no eating in these established areas". The "D" rings are a cleanliness con-cern. Formal training is being discussed with MPQAD.
d
? '
i 7
l 4
i JOB NO. 14509 MIDLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT-
}
j REPORT NO. 25 PAGE 5 Zack Company - Perform "8 foot criteria" walkdown will be complete by December 30, 1983. The System Team Supervisor has three j
men from Zack Company working on this hanger walkdown.
Zack training will be complete by December 25, 1983. MPQAD has Zacks Procedure for review, scheduled to be returned to Zack on December 15, 1983. Forty-seven Linear Feet of duct j
h require re-inspection due to the " weld samples" which has a 1
direct effect on the installation ~ quantity curve, Punchlist j
j Summary needs to be re-computed, Bechtel seems'to think j
Quantity / Manhours correlations are incorrect.
i Owens-Coring Fiberglas - BPCo requires that method of providing hydro t
' status and insulation be cleaned up to eliminate confusion.
i I
j i
Owens-Corning reported that the working hours were changed j
to 32 hours3.703704e-4 days <br />0.00889 hours <br />5.291005e-5 weeks <br />1.2176e-5 months <br /> a, week. BPCo advised that this practice may be contrary to the subcontractors working agreement.
t Transco, Inc. - No activities, PenetrationSeals-BPCohadaphoblemwithContractClarificationsand i'
Additions, and asked for more detailed reports on:
- 1) Cancellation Clause, 2) Additional Scope - Conduit.
}
Penetration Seals Company will report before next weeks
~
meeting.
~
j Grinnell Fire Protection System - Grinnell will have by next meeting, j
Engineering reviews of any additional requirements for t
j l
' Sprinkler systems. Grinnell has to.re-submit as-built ~
j drawings, incorporating the remaining Bechtel comments'by December 7, 1983.
l U.S. Testing Company, Inc. - U.S. Testing home office management personnel has supported site activities with'the assignment of a Site Manager. NCR #562 will be cleared up by December 1, 1983, j
six QARs remain open, Numbers 57, 58, 59, 62, 64 and 72.
t j
Electrical Fire Proofing - 8PCo requested a break down of the four types of seals to add to the action' list.
i
~
I
-w.
~#
w s,.,
.g..,
-w_
--4,.s.---,
...w-
-.,o--.
- ~, +.
,v.
p
's
~ ~
JOB NO. 14509 MIDLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT REPORT NO. 25 PAGE 6 ACTIVITIES
~
i 1.
Training Classes CIO attended and evaluated construction training classes on:
(a)
Construction Punchlist FPG-9.900.Rev. 2.
i (b)
Construction Completion Program. '
This presentation was not evaluated by TET. CIO evaluations of the effectiveness of the presentation were considered to be satisfactory. Presentations were in compliance with FPG-2.000 " Training of Constructions Personnel".
Results of the evaluation have been documented on checklist MP-MIS-001E and,are available for review.
- 2., Training Records In response to CIO NIRs 006 and 007 CIO was advised by memorandum on November 30, 1983, that corrective actions were underway to resolve the discrepancies noted on the~NIRs'. CIO performed a review of the original descrepant records on December 3 and December 4,1983, and determined that numerous records still required corrections.
CIO, when notified that all corrections have been completed, will per-form a review of the training records, and if satisfactory, will then perform a sample inspection of the balance of the established lot size.
Sampling will'be done of individual. team training records.
3.
CIO performed a verification of the identifications and tagging of LAQTS bolts of flange connections in the Olesel Generator Building.
CIO OBSERVATIONS
- 031 CIO reviewed the training records of 6 of 45 MPQAD personnel as noted on NIRs 002, 003 and 004 The records reviewed were con-sidered satisfactory and acceptable by CIO. A sample inspection of the training records of the balance of MPQAD personnel (39) is scheduled for completion during the week of December 5,1983.
If this sampling review produces satisfactory results, NIRs 002, j
003 and 004 will be closed out.
4 4
6
+
++
r m
a JOB NO. 14509 MIDLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT REPORT NO. 25 PAGE 7
- 035 Concerning this observation, CIO found no evidence that the require-ment for the galvanic protection of copper pipe was defined 'in either specifications or drawings. The governing document for in-i stallation of the support components is described on an Interoffice Memorandum dated May 4, 1979, from A. J. Boos to Field Engineers and Mechanical Superintendents.
The portion of the instrument air system in consideration is Non-Q and the noted condition was referred to CPCo by CIO for resolution.
The method of promulgating job requirements used (e.g., by Memo-randum) should be reviewed by CPCo to ascertain that requirements t
for Systems are only issued through authorized controlled documents such as specifications and drawings.
f
- 036 Report #24 dated november 29, 1983, states in part "FCNs would no longer be issued for Non-Q items". The observation should be revised to read "FCNs will no longer be issued for Q items and will in the future apply to only Non-Q items.
' GENERAL I
~
An audit was performed by Stone & Webster, Boston, of the CIO program and activities, November 28, 1982 through December 2, 1983. The audit was conducted by Mr. J. Cunningham, Lead Auditor, assisted by Mr. R. Laskey.
The-audit f.indings-will4e issued within 30 days,and will be available for on site reviews.
Signed affidavits and resumes of Stone & Webster personnel assigned to the CIO staff have been transmitted to Mr. J. J. Harrison, US NRC, Glen Ellyn, Illinois.
E. G. Barcomb, Jr., QC Inspection Supervisor T. L. Baumgartner, QA Engineer D. W. Beauchamp Senter QC Inspector i
D. W. Brown, QA Engineer.
l 4
B. Z. Kasson, QA Engineer L. M. Van Arsdale, QC Engineer C. L. Wells, Chief QC Inspection Supervisor-3 l
l
+
.us
~
ST0llE & UEIL'ITEli HICilIliAll, IllC.
I i
C0ilSIltUC1'Inil IH1'l EMElll AIlull UVEllVIEW NIH LUG Sull1ARY NIR HPQAD DATE DATE DATE No.
NCR NO.
SUBJECT of DISP. BY CLOSED REMARKS OAR NO.
ISSUE MPQAD l
NIR issued us closed-no cor-i -
001 N/A Training Records 8/15/83 8/15/83 8/17/83 rective action
~
required 002 QAR Fo ms from both procedures B-3M and
/
RT 00005 B-3M-1 are intemixed in training 10/4/83 10/12/83 records t
003 QAR
. Yearly vision examination was exceeded 10/4/83 10/12/83 RT 00006 l
DJT training records not available in RT 00007 training records. Revision number not 10/4/83 10/12/83 g
listed on OJT Record
~
i i
Memo to CPCo ad-QAR Personnel Certification Foru QA-116-1, vising that NIR'005 RT 00011 Attachment D is unavailable in record.
10/4/83 10/12/83 10/20/83 can be closed out.
005 files i
Records for Level 11 i
certifications have been verified by CIO Discrepancies in three areas of I
006 CongtructionTrainingRecords 10/27/83 1
t t c1 1,..,I In rc 'i. t,; c 4. i i i ',.
j t
I i
l l
S t
E.
i K
R A
l T..
M E
i iV R
i t e
t',
EP E
TS AI I
. V DD C R N E I V 3
O 3
8 8
/
N N
/
4 A OY E
7 1
I R E
U
/
/
GI TA TFS 1
1 l
AH AOS 1
1 iC I
D I
P I
l U
l H ES e
M g
h e
h EG cn l
st E LO ui-a t
T PL rwb - r nf S M touie eeo R
slS g n rm B
I E
I nl ne eny W NN oo
,E G wgc O
I Cft ia.
ndn ssus T
feel o nsqe E C o h m ~e i oaec N U teit i
di O R s
rFc tl ar T T aru u
ie t
S S eoc
.r dvea f
rf ott nehm l
0 T
a rns ol t e
C C
sPenn c
g E
od moo gf n 3
J w r d e Ci ynoi U
'tol g t
ri n
B ceada onwi S
n ei n n z tiea i R F a ai cair n
arvt
,M fa fte sg en4
,f a s
rn ii2 s a r in o
cn rtO tiei ni.oS a
ht aaot s
sdtc p r N c ge ne u
eT anc uvgr r
srii rnt cnmt rv eeis soaner vsrn iieoee ibuo DttCns Fodc O
DN A
QR PC HN 6
O R.
7 8
IO 0
0 NN 0
0
.. - - ~
^
. STONE & WEBSTER MIClllGAN, INC.
MIDLAND NUCLEAR C0 GENERATION PLANT CIO OBSERVATIONS Observation Originating CPCo Response
. Status Close-Out M er Observations Document /Date Document /Date Open/ Closed Document /Date 006 MRC Meeting
- Report No.1 Letter Closed Report No. 5 Program (Training) requires revision to 6/3/83 7/1/83 7/18/83 address how " Trainers" are trained 007 Method of communication / notification with Report No.1 Letter Closed Report No. 4 MPQAD when PQCI's are found to be ambiguous 6/3/83 7/1/83 7/12/83 or do not meet code requirements 008 MRC Meeting 6/1/83 Report No. 2 Letters Closed Report No. 9 Adequacy of drawings (A8) - large I; ore 6/14/83 7/1/83 8/15/a3 pipe hangers 8/9/83 Hold Point Released 8/15/83 009 MRC Meeting 6/1/83 Report No. 2 Letters Closed Report No. 9 Additional verification of equipment 6/14/83 7/1/83 8/15/83 received and installed 8/9/83 (E-2) 010 MRC Meeting 6/1/83 Report No. 2 Letters Closed Report No. 9
)
Material traceability cf installed 6/14/83 7/1/83 8/15/83 hangers (E3) 8/9/83 Hold Point Released 8/15/83 011 MRC Meeting 6/1/83 Report No. 2 Open pending 6/14/83 receipt of (a) discussion of nonconforming items Nutech Pro-with Project Engineering gram (b) has a program beert developed and responsibilities established of personnel assigned to process nonconformances?
NOTE:
llol.! Paint. Ic.:se i
'/ Nh '
to ~. ;-
i
STONE & WEBSTER HICilIGAN, INC.
MIDLAND NUCLEAR C0 GENERATION PLANT CIO OBSERVATIONS Observation Originating CPCo Response
. Status Close-Out Number Observations Document /Date Document /Date Open/ Closed Document /Date 030 Need to review Vendor Equipment Report No. 5 Open Verification Program - MPQAD/SMO 7/18/83 031 NIRs 002, 003, 004 and 005 were issued on Report No. 16 Open J
October 3,1983 for discrepancies observed 10/3/83 in the review of Training Records of 6 of 45 MPQAD personnel.
032' NIR 006 issued on October 27, 1983 to ad-Report No. 20
~
Open dress discrepancies observed during sample 10/31/83 inspectior,of Construction Training Records of Teams 5, 6, 8, 9, 12, 13, 16, 17, 19, 20, 25, 26 (27/28) 29, 30, 31, 32/
33 and BHO staff.
033 NIR 007 issued on November 7, 1983 to Report No. 21 Open
)
~
address discrepancies observed in two 11/08/83 areas during inspection of Construction Training Records for Teams No. 24, field Procurement, Sub-Contractors Management.
Field Engineering Staff, and Construction
. General Services Organization.
- ~
~
STONE & WEBSTER HICllIGAN, INC.
~
MIDLAND HUCLEAR COGENERATION PLANT CIO OBSERVATIONS 4
Observation Originating CPCo Response
. Status Close-Out Nimber Observations Document /Date Doctment/Date Open/ Closed Doctment/Date l
034 NIR 008 issued on November 14, 1983 to Report No. 22 Open i
address five unsatisfactory conditions 11/14/83 observed during the review of 50 training,
levels assignments in the System Team Training Matrix of.the Construction Training Program.
/
'035 CIO observed that dielectric isolation Report No. 22 Open spacers for galvanic protection of copper 11/14/83 pipe to galvanized steel pipe supports were missing in some areas on this system, Small Bore (Instrument Air) KAC Systems, drawing FSK-J-30-0220 Sheet ~ 2 Rev. 7.
03*6 At team meeting of teams 26 and 27 held on Report No. 24 Open November 22, 1983, a decision that FCNs 11/29/83 would no longer be issued for "non-Q" items was discussed. The method for con-trolling changes has not been finalized.
+
)
037 CIO observed that two boards with pro-Report No. 24 Open truding nails lying in Cable Tray 1AKA019 11/29/83 (Q Tray) had punctured the cable jacket
- of a "Q" cable. The cable is Q-chanr.el A.
~480V. MCC. NCR C00925 was issued by MPQAD on November 22, 1983. CIO will track this item to assure that corrective action (repair) has been performed to approved procedures.
. _ _. ~.........
h
$ TONE & WEBSTER HICilIGAN, INC.
j CONSTRUCTI0il IMPLEMENTAT10tl OVERVIEW il0LD POINT LOG StHMARY i
l ORIGINATING CPCo RESPONSE STATUS r CLOSE-0UT I
NO.
SUBJECT DOC /DATE DOC /DATE OPEN/Cl.0 SED DOC /DATE 1
1 i
l 001 Adequacy of drawings A8 - large bore pipe Report No. 6 Letter Closed Report No. 9 l
hangers. C10 established liold Point when MPQAD
' 7/25/63 8/9/83 8/15/83 issued 2 NCRs against the use of red-lined drawings which were volded.by Project Engineering.
,)
1 i
002 Material traceability of installed hangers (E3).
Report No. 6 Letter Closed Report No. 9 CPCo response dated 7/1/8.3 indicated report ort 7/25/83 8/9/83 8/15/83 material traceability was to be issued in a timely manner. Due to uncertainty of when the report would be issued, a Hold Point was established by CIO.
~
003 Has a program been developed and responsibilities Report No. 6 Letter Closed Report No. 9 established for personnel assigned to process 7/25/83 8/9/83 8/15/83 nonconformances?
Has a meeting been held with Project Engineering i
to discuss methodology of processing non-conformances?
g.
$ TONE & WEBSTER MICllIGAN, INC.
CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW Il0LD POINT LOG SUP9tARY ORIGINATING CPCo RESPONSE STATUS CLOSE-0UT NO*
SUBJECT DOC /DATE DOC /DATE OPEN/ CLOSED DOC /DATE 004 Evaluation of Phase I Management Review Report No. 1 Letters Closed CIO Letter to Committee meetings.
6/3/83 7/1/83 J.G. Keppler through 8/9/83 dated 10/12/8:
Letter of 6/30/83
)
~
005 CPCo has committed to develop a Vendor Report No. 18 Open Equipment Verification Program. Program is 10/17/83 required before implementation of Phase II.
006 NIRs 002, 003, 004 and 005 issued October 3 Report No. If Open
>1 1983 to address discrepancies observed during a sample inspection of Training Records of 6 of 45 MPQAD personnel. Corrective action must be completed before any inspections can be; performed by the 45 personnel in question.
007 Evaluation of Management Review of results of Report No. 19 Open Phase I activities. Evaluation of Management 10/24/83 Review Committee plans and procedures for Phase II implementation.
I e.
I i
t t-
.I-.~
l 't 4 ! ;t !
a,e e'
STONE &WEBSTERMICilhGAN,INC.
CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW HOLD POINT LOG SUMARY i
ORIGINATING CPCo RESPONSE STATUS CLOSE-00T NO.
SUBJECT DOC /DATE DOC /DATE OPEN/ CLOSED DOC /DATE 008 NIR 006 has been issued on October 27, 1983 to:
Report No. 20 Open address discrepancies observed during the sample 10/31/83 inspection of 2,054 Construction Training records of 31 spebers of Teams 5, 6, 8, 9, 12 s
13, 16, 17, 19 s20, 25, 26, (27/28), 29, 30, 31, J
(32/33) and BHO staff, t
Corrective action must be completed before any s
walkdown, assessments can be performed by the personnel in question.
yg 009 NIR 007 has been issued on November 7, 1983 to Report No. 21 Open address discrepancies observed during sample 11/7/83 inspection of 834 Construction Training records of 18 members of Team 24 Field Procurement.
Sub-Contractors, Management, F.E. staff and Construction General Serivces Organization.
3, Corrective action must be completed before any
~
~
walkdown, assessments can be perforned by the personnel in question.
e i
me ap g e4-
.-e6,e m.
6Nr*+-h-
- 9e**
e a-ee e4e==
6*==>We e aume m
- wwys 6M ee wm b-e og -gas
,.4
. gig
STONE & WEBSTER MICHIGAN, INC.
I CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW HOLD POINT LOG SUPMARY ORIGINATING CPCo RESPONSE STATUS CLOSE-00T NO.
SUBJECT DOC /DATE DOC /DATE OPEN/ CLOSED DOC /DATE 010 NIR 008 was issued November 14. 1983 to address
. Report No. 22 Open 5 unsatisfactory conditions observed during the 11/14/83 review of 50 training level assignments r.'-
presenting a lot size of 318 assignments oa the System Team Training matrix of the Con-
)
struction Training Program.
Corrective action must be completed before any walkdown, assessments can be performed by the personnel in question.
m m
011 Prior to lifting of Stop Work Orders relating to Report No.23 Open a
the FCR/FCN Review and Resolution Program, CIO 11/21/83 4
has established a Hold Point at the conclusion CV of Phase II activities to evaluate the adequacy e
of W QA0 performance during Phase I and Phase II activities. The Hold Point encompasses all the Stop Work Orders with the exception of Stop Work Order No. FSW-36 which has been lifted by MP0AD.
This Hold Point does not apply to Phase III.
e w.t:.a J.:d
y m
___.____u.
_m...
,u m.m.
STONE & WEBSTER MICHIGAN, INC.
CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW HOLD POINT LOG St# NARY 1
~
ORIGINATING CPCo RESPONSE STATUS CLOSE-0UT NO*
SUBJECT
? DOC /DATE DOC /DATE OPEN/CLDSED DOC /DATE f
010 NIR 008 has been issued on November 14, 1983 to Report No. 22 Open address five unsatisfactory conditions observed 11/14/83 during the review of 50 training level assign-ments representing a lot size 318 assignments in the System Team Tral'ning Matrix of the
,J Construction Training Program.
i Correctives action must be completed before any walkdown, assessments can be perfomed by the personnel involved in these training activities.
011 Prior to start of Phase III activities of Report No. 22 Open FCR/FCN Resolution Program CIO has established 11/14/83 a Hold Point at the conclusion of Phase II activities to evaluate MPQAD performance.
6 f GVIS6N W
..___...i.
8 3
STONE & WEBSTER MICHIGAN, INC.
P.O. Box 2325. BOSTON, massachusetts 02107 Mr. J. G. Koppler, Administrator, Region III November 29, 1983 Nuclear Regulatory Commission J.0. No. 14509 799 Roosevelt Road NRC File #83-11-29 Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 RE: DOCKET NO. 50-329/330 MIDLAND PLANT - UNITS 1 AND 2 OVERVIEW OF THE CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION PROGRAM REPORT NO. 24 A copy of the Construction Implementation Overview Report No. 24 for the period November 21, 1983 through November 23, 1983 is enclosed.
Because of the short work week, (two holidays), CIO activities were some-what limited during this reporting period.
The report includes evaluations of CCP activities and matrices of obser-vations, NIRs and Hold Points.
Very truly yours, v
A
,__.__m.
S. W. Baranow Program Manager SWB/fs
(
Enclosures cc: JJHarrison, US NRC Glen Ellyn, IL RJCook, US NRC Midland (site)
DLQuamme, CPCo Midland (site) l RAWells, CPCo Midland (site)
R8 Kelly, S&W l
APAmoruso, S&W i
-a y ~_ -
'i';
's dN,\\
s
]
\\*
n s
M s,
g#
e4 s.
Report No. 24 s
s (
w c Nvember 21.1983 through November 23, 1983 g-
..~
Personnel on 'Sitg, y 1
Stone & Webster Michigan, Inc. s s
A. A.Nruso D. Cooke J. Seely M
s S.Maranow
, G'.
R. Corson.
W. Taylor
~
J. Barr s
C. Marrs '
- 1. Thompson
-P. Carpeggiani D. MacBay,
S. Narayandas
.J. Chawla.
- T. Parker s
s,'l s W. Sienkfm!cz, '
'v R.'$ callan s
- !ketings Attende'd,h 1
\\
s 4,%(s
=
s
,, s
..m s
1 s
03 A'
" ' ('
Attendees *?
Purpose
~,
November 21, 1983 Consumers F0wer Company Daily Staff s
s
~
and Bechtel Fcw0r company Management Meetings s
"A'ovember 22, 1983
, Stone &Webst{CIO
~ "
. MPQA0 r,
November 21, 1983 Cons $mers _ Power Company Team Meetings b
i-and Bechtel Power-company Tfwember 22, 1983
- --Stone & Websfer CIO
's m.
' '] November 23, 1983
(
Consumers Power Company Team Supervisors Meeting Bechtel PoweriCompany
- S
b Store & Webster CIO
,'\\ s '
~'
's
\\
m
'Meetf rNs ss i
November 21 and 22,1983 -.: '& L CIO,attpn: led daily meetings with staff management and t
supervision.
.M',
Q s
.Subjectsdiscussedatthescs.mectPipsgereasfollows:
C
\\
!s A) Stop Work' NOrder \\f.he sitatus of'umpletion of FCR/FCN review and i
s
',; m,--
tricorporatonintgdesigndqduyents.
s-
,e
' B) Tra[ning-Ste.t(sofRevision2oftheTrainingMatrix, actions. required to mpond to the NIR issued by Stone & Webster CIO, assignment of a i
training coordinator in Ann Arbor.
s a-t.
,'C ) Procr5'dres %- $tatus'of, procedures, major restraints or delays.
a.
n
- 0) NCR - Hop.l'cg'due to p)*lorit'y assigned to FCR/FCN review.
~
s
,.. s s
+
M. ~
D
,g g..
.Q.
?,
e
.As x-('
,(
,m,'*'
p
(
\\
'D, A
.g u,
,w 5...
s
3
^
l i
JOB NO. 14509 MIDLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT REPORT NO. 24 Page 2 i
November 21, through November 23, 1983 - CIO personnel assigned to respective teams, attended team meetings for discussions of:
A)
November 21, 1983 Team 5 - Meeting with Team Supervisor and head Field Engineer' to discuss j
the readiness of the team to start status assessment.
\\
The preparations made by Group III Teams for status assessment consist of:
(a) Preparing mechanical checklists to perform status assess-ments to remain consistent with all teams within the group.
(b) Holding on-the-job training (eight hours) for Instrumentation Engineers.
Other Groups (i.e., I and II) are not preparing for status assess-ment as in Group III.
I B)
November 22, 1983 I
Team 30 - CIO attended an infomal, in-house training session on Sway Struts 1
and Snubbers and Spring Canister. installations. Topics discussed during this session consisted of:
1 (a) Differences of design of manufacturer's equipment.
1
[
(b) Procedural steps for inspection.
l (c)
Identifying inspection techniques.
l (d) Use of specifications and manufacturer's catalogues.
(e) Use of Load Capacity Data' Sheets.
C)
November 22, 1983 l
Teams 26 8 27 - Items discussed at this meeting were:
4 (a) Observation #36 - FCNs would no longer be issued for non-Q ltems.. The method for controlling changes is under discussion and will be described in the near future.
(b) MPQA0 is currently walking down and tagging all Low Alloy-Quenched and Tempered Steel Bolts.(LAQTS) used in Q systems.
c m
7
~
JOB NO.
14509 MIDLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT l
REPORT NO. 24 PAGE 3 The question was raised as to what impact the walkdown would have on Status Assessmcnt. MPQAD advised that there will be no impact en Statusing as the walkdown will con-tinue subsequent to Statusing and all nonconforming bolts will be, identified'.
l A meeting has been scheduled with MPQAD and Area Teams to correlate activities relative to LAQTS. CIO will be in l
attendance at this meeting.
i D)
November 23, 1983
~
Team Supervisors Meeting - Ite'ms discussed were:
(a) Non-Q hangers at the Standish facility are on." Hold" pending approval of the Coating Supplie'r.
(b) Painting of Q interface w' alls in areas requested by CPCo (i.e., Uncontrolled Lab in Turbine Building) is on " Hold" due I
to Stop Work. CPCo will make the determination if these items 'will be Turnover exceptions.
(c) MPQA0 is reviewing-the LAQTS program to detenaine ~1f 'It is
~
limited to Q bolts or is to include non-Q as well. Teams will be advised as to whether the LAQTS program will be separate or will be included in Phase I activities.
ACTIVITIES 1.
Training Records In response to CIO NIRs 002, 003, and 004,'CIO was advised by issuance of i
completed QARs on November 21, 1983, that corrective' actions have been completed.
~
CIO has reviewed-the training > records of the six (6)' personnel addressed in the NIRs and determined.that the correctivo actions were satisfactorily accomplished.
I CIO is preparing a sample plan to review training records of the thirty-nine (39) personnel previously identified in the original lot size of forty-five (45).
/
e f
.m e,
=
?.
ee m
e
3
.~
JOB NO. 14509 MIDLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT REPORT NO. 24 PAGE 4 2.
Preliminary Walkdown CIO completed the assessment of the BHO preliminary walkdown in Module 340 on November 22, 1983. The walkdosn was performed in accordance with CPCo procedure FPH 9.200.Rev. 1 Bulk Hangor Organization Hanger Walkdowns.
The evaluation of the implementation was judged to be satisfactory and in compliance with FPM 9.200, Re'v. 1.
Results of the evaluation have been documented on Checklist MP-MIS-042 Rev. 1 BHO Walkdowns.
CIO OBSERVATIONS
- 35 Report No. 22, dated November 14, 1983, identified missing isolation spaces for galvanic protection of copper pipe to galvanized steel pipe supports.
A follow-up walkdown of this system, line number IYDD-4A was performed on November 21, 1983. The following corrective action had been performed:
1.
Elevation 631'-0" - Tendon Area H5.1 - copper shim stock added as required.
2.
Elevation 640'-0" - Tendon Area H5.1 - copper shim stock added as required.
3.
Elevation 584'-0" - Room 112 - copper shim stock and plastic coated clamp added as required.
4.
Elevation 595'-0". - Room 200 - copper shim stock and plastic coated 4
clamp added as required.
It was determined that these isolation spacers for the galvanic protection were installed in accordance with Bechtel Power Corporation, Interoffice
' Memorandum from A. J. Boos, Dated May4,.1979;
Subject:
Installation of-Supports for Copper Pipe, 0-2264..CIO considers this observation open until a complete walkdown of the system has been accomplished.
- 37 During the walkdown of the system described above, CIO observed.two boards with protruding nails lying in CableTray 1AKA019 (Q Tray). CPCo personnel were advised of this condition. Upon removal of the boards it was observed that a Q cable, 9/C 14 AWG cable jacket was punctured. Cable is Q - channel A, 480 V. MCC.
j An NCR C00925 was issued by MPQAD on November 22, 1983. CIO will track this i
item to assure that corrective action (repair) has been performed to 1
approved procedures.
This observation remains open.
- _ ~
f 3
1 l
JOB NO.
14509 MIDLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT REPORT NO. 24 PAGE 5 s
GENERAL 1.
Resume of Mr. S. Narayandas, Trend Analyst, has been transmitted to l
Mr. J. J. Harrison, US NRC, Glen Ellyn, Illinois.
i d
i 1
i l
I 4
I N
q l
i j
6 d
6 i
. ~~.
l 4
s e
L i
fl' l-L i
4 i
reW?
m
r-p e-1pM-w yq w
y s
- -r-
-ge-e' e
agm
+
b w--
STullE & UEll3TEll iCilitiAll, IllC.
~
C011S1110C11011 IHI'l THEHIAllull UVERviEW HlR I.UG SUFHAlty IN H1'QAD DATE DATE DATE 0.
NCR NO.
SUBJECT OF DISP. BY CLOSED' REMARKS OAR NO.
ISSUE HPQAD NIR issued us i
closed-no cor-01 N/A Training Records 8/15/83 8/15/83 8/17/83 rective action I
required 02 QAR Forms from both procedures B-3M and RT 00005 B-3M-1 are intermixed in training 10/4/83 10/12/83 records 63 QAR Vearly vision examination.was exceeded 10/4/83 10/12/83 RT 00006 t,
DJT training records not available in" RT 00007 training records. Revision number not 10/4/83 10/12/83 g4 listed on DJT Record
)
Memo to CPCo ad-QAR Personnel Certification Fons QA-116-1, vising that NIR-005 RT 00011 ~
Attaciment D is unavailable in record 10/4/83 10/12/83 10/20/83 can be closed out.
N)5 files Records for f.evel II certifications have been verified by CIO i
Discrepancies in three areas of 10/27/83 l
H)6 Construction Training Records 9
[
QCI 15.01 AMiENT 4.3 i
UTUNE & WEUSTEli Cll1 Gall,. IllC.
CullSIRUCllull IHitEMElllAIl0H UVERVIEW NIR LUG SUH4ARY llH HPQAD DATE DATE DATE 10 NCR NO.
SUBJECT OF DISP.
CLOSED REMARKS ISSUE Discrepancies in two areas of Construc-07 tion Training Records for the following 11/7/83 teams No. 24. Field Procurement Sub-Contractors, Management, Field Engi-neering Staff and Construction General Services Organization Five unsatisfactory conditions were 08 observed in training level assignments 11/14/83 during t.he review of the adequqcy of the cons,truction training matrices)
,. 8 1+
I I
l
\\
G t
t I
i l
QCI 15.01
.l ATTACllHENT 3 3 wn 9
$ TONE & WE8 STER MICllIGAN, INC.
CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW Il0LD POINT LOG SIMMARY i
NO.
SUBJECT ORIGINATING CPCo RESPONSE STATUS CLOSE-00T
' DOC /DATE 00C/0 ATE OPEN/ CLOSED 00C/0 ATE
'l 001 Adequacy of drawings A8 - large bore pipe lteport No. 6 Letter Closed Report No. 9 hangers. CIO established llold Point when MPQAD 7/25/83 8/9/83 8/15/83 issued 2 NCRs against the use of red-lined drawings which were volde(by Project Engineering.
002 Material traceability of installed hangers (E3).
Report No. 6 Letter
~ Closed Repcrt No.'9 CPCo response dated 7/1/83 indicated report on 7/25/83 8/9/83 8/15/83 material traceability-was to be issued in a timely manner. Due to uncertainty of when the report would be issued, a Hold Point was established by CIO.
)
003 Has a program been developed and responsibilities Report No. 6 Letter Closed Report No. 9 established for personnel assigned to process 7/25/83 8/9/83 8/15/83 nonconformances?
Has a meeting been held with Project Engineering to discuss methodology of processing non-1 conformances?
9 1
$ TONE & WEBSTER MICHIGAN, INC.
~
CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW i
HOLD POINT LOG
SUMMARY
l l
ORIGINATING CPCo RESPONSE STATUS CLOSE-0UT l
NO*
SUBJECT DOC /DATE DOC /DATE OPEN/ CLOSED DOC /DATE 004 Evaluation of Phase I Management Review Report No. 1 Letters.
' Closed CIO Letter to Committee meetings.
6/3/83 7/1/83 J.G. Keppler through 8/9/83 dated 10/12/8:
l Letter of 6/30/83 e
005 CPCo has committed to develop a Vendor Report No. 18 Open Equipment Verification Program. Program is 10/17/83 required before implementation of Phase II.
006 NIRs 002, 003, 004 and 005 issued October 3 Report No. 1E Open 1983 to address discrepancies observed during a sample inspection of Training Records of 6 of 45 MPQAD personnel. Corrective action must be completed before any inspections can be performed by the 45. personnel in question.
?
007 Evaluation of Management Review of results of Report No. 19 Open Phase I activities. Evaluation of Management 10/24/83 Review Committee plans and procedures for Phase Il implementation.
9
})[
Re-worded
STONE & WEBSTER MIClllGAN, IliC.
CONSTRUCTION, IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW 110LD. POINT LOG
SUMMARY
I ORIGINATING
'CPCo RESPONSE STATUS CLOSE-00T NO.
SUBJECT DOC /DATE DOC /DATE OPEN/ CLOSED DOC /DATE 008 NIR 006 has been issued on October 27, 1983 to Report No. 20 Open address discrepancies observed during the sample 10/31/83 inspection of 2,054 Construction Training i
records of 31 members of Teams 5, 6, 8, 9, 12 -
13,16,17,19,20,25,26,(27/28),29,30,31,
,)
(32/33) and BHO staff.
Corrective action must be completed before any walkdown, assessments can be performed by the personnel in question.
009 NIR 007 tias been issued ~ n November 7,1983 to Report No. 21 Open o
address discrepancies observed during sample 11/7/83 inspection of 834 Construction Training records of 18 members of Team 24, Field Procurement.
Sub-Contractors, Management, F.E. staff,and g
Construction General Serivces Organization.
I Corrective action must be completed before any y
walkdown, assessments can be performed by the personnel in question.
i e
O
%**M--r-s e+me3
,e a
w
,,m.
s STONE & WEBSTER MICilIGAN, IllC.
CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATI0h OVERVIEW HOLD POINT LOG
SUMMARY
~
ORIGINATING CPCo RESPONSE STATUS CLOSE-00T NO*
SUBJECT DOC /DATE DOC /DATE OPEN/ CLOSED DOC /DATE 010 NIR 008 was issued' November 14, 1983 to address Report No. 22 Open 5 unsatisfactory conditions observed during the 11/14/83 review of 50 training level assignments re-presenting a lot size of 318 assignments on the System Team Training matrix of the Con-struction Training Program.
Corrective action must be completed before any walkdown, assessments can be performed by the personnel in question..
.r. g 011 Prior to lifting of Stop Work Orders relating to Report No.23 Open the FCR/FCN Review and Resolution Program, CIO 11/21/83 a
h has established a Hold Point at the conclusion
- /
of Phase II activities to evaluate the adequacy
)
of MPQAD perfonnance during Phase I and Phase II activities. The Hold Point encompasses all the Stop Work Orders with the exception of Stop Work Order No. FSW-36 which has been lifted by-MP0AD.
This Hold Point does not apply to Phase III.
t 3
w 2*
Reworded
.~
STONE & WEBSTER ~ MICllIGAN, INC.
. MIDLAND HUCLEAR COGENERATION PLANT CIO OBSERVATIONS t
Observation Originating CPCo Response
. Status Close-Out Nimiher Observations Document /Date Document /Date Open/ Closed Docisnent/Date 034 NIR 008 issued on Novembe' 14, 1983 to Report No. 22 Open i
address five unsatisfactory conditions 11/14/83 i
observed during the review of 50 training levels assignments in the System Team Training Matrix of the Construction Training Program.
3
'035 CIO observed that dielectric isolation Report No. 22 Open spacers for. galvanic protection of copper 11/14/83 pipe to galvanized steel pipe supports were missing in some areas on this system, Small Bore (Instrument Air) KAC Systems, drawing FSK-J-30-0220 Sheet 2 Rev. 7.
I 036 At team meeting of teams 26 and 27 held on Report No. 24 Open November 22, 1983, a decision that FCNs 11/29/83 would no longer be issued for "non-Q" ltems was discussed. The method for con-trolling changes has not been finalized. -
037 CIO observed that two boards with pro-Report No. 24 Open truding nails lying in Cable Tray IAKA019 '
11/29/83 (Q Tray) had punctured the cable jacket of a "Q" cable. The cable is Q-channel A,
)
480V. MCC. NCR C00925 was issued by MPQAD l
on November 22, 1983. CIO will track this item to assure that corrective action i
1 (repair) has been performed to approved procedures.
STONE & WEBSTER MICHIGAN, INC.
f P.0, Box 2325. BOSTON. MASSACHUSETTS O2107 3
1 TFI~ l?ito g,[
1 Mr. J. G. Keppler, Administrator, Region III November 22, 1983 Nuclear Regulatory Comission J.0. No. 14509 799 Roosevelt Road NRC File #83-11-22 Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 RE: DOCKET NO. 50-329/330 MIDLAND PLANT - UNITS 1 AND 2 OVERVIEW 0F THE CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION PROGRAM REPORT N0. 23 A copy of the Construction Implementation Overview Report No. 23 for the period November 14, 1983 through November 18, 1983 is enclosed.
The report includes evaluations of CCP activities and matrices of Observations, NIRs and Hold Points.
Very truly yours, W
S. W. Baranow Program Manager SW8/ka Enclosure cc: JJHarrison, US NRC Glen Ellyn, IL RJCook, US NRC Midland (site)
DLQuamme, CPCo Midland (site)
RAWells, CPCo Midland (site)
R8 Kelly, S&W APAmoruso, S&W l
, //
,/ ' D[
T NOV28Ign
(
Report No. 23 1
November 14, 1983 through November 18, 1983 Personnel on Site I
j Stone & Webster Michigan, Inc.
l l
A. Amoruso D. Cooke R. Scallan S. Baranow R. Corson J. Seely F. Bearham J. Langston W. Taylor J. Barr C. Marrs J. Thompson
[:
R. Carpeggiani D. MacBay R. Butler J. Chawla
-T. Parker N. Weatherall W. Sienkiewicz A. Smith S. Narayandas l
Meetings Attended Date Attendees Purpose November 14, 1983 Consumers Power Company Daily Staff through Bechtel Power Company Management Meetings November 18, 1983 Stone & Webster CIO MPQAD November 14, 1983 Consumers Power Company Team Meetings through Bechtel Power Company November 18, 1983 Stone & Webster CIO
~-
November 15, 1983 Consumers Power Company QVP Status Bechtel Power Company Assessment MPQAD l
Stone & Webster CIO 1
November 15,16,17, 1983 Consumers Power Company Area Team and Bechtel Power Company System Team
,MPQAD Review Meeting Zack Stone & Webster CIO November 17, 1983 Consumers Power Company Sy' stem Team Bechtel Power Company Staff Meeting MPQAD i
3 Stone 8. Webster CIO November 18, 1983 MPQAD CIO Sampling of Bechtel Power Company FCR/FCNs l
Stone & Webster CIO I
November 18, 1983_
Consumers Power Company Weekly Sub-Contractors Bechtel Power Company Meeting Babcock & Wilcox Zack Owens-Corning Grinnell l'
Stone & Webster CIO
\\
l T ~
1...
~
JOB NO.
14509 MIDLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT REPORT NO. 23 PAGE 2 Meetings November 14, through November 18, 1983 - during this period, CIO attended daily meetings with staff management and supervision.
P Subjects discussed at these meetings were:
(A) Stop Work Orders - percent completion of Phase I and Phase II activities were addressed. In addition, tentative schedules were addressed of work f
in all categories covered by Stop Work Orders,
\\*
(B) NonConfomance Reports - The details of each NCR were discussed to decide whether the nonconformance was representative of a generic problem. Also discussed were the preventative actions that could be undertaken.
(C) Training - Bechtel Power Company advised that a revision to the Training Matrix is in the approval cycleand scheduled for issue in the near future. Due to layoffs andthe availability of in-structors, classes are being re-scheduled for presentation upon completion of the FCR/FCN Review and Resolution Program.
(D) Document Control - a concerted effort is continuing in the re-conciliation of the Design Master Log versus numerous Field Logs.
(E) Procedure approval and Issuance - Bechtel Power Company management requested the latest status of procedure approval and issuance and asked that responsible personnel devote more time in expediting the development, approval and issuance of required procedures.
(F) Project Priorities - The project'has designated the following activities to be priority items:
- 1) the need to be responsive in closing-out CPCo commitments to the US NRC and of identified US NRC open items.
- 2) the need to have all required design documents in place for start of CCP.
I
- 3) activities to' support Phase I'of the CCP
- 4) activities to support the Remedial Soils Program
- 5) dispositions to be provided in a timely manner to expeditiously close out FCR/FCNs that are in the Resolution Phase.
}
f
- 6) completion of the remainder of the design activities.
k'
i I
t i
l JOB NO.
14509 l
MIDLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT REPORT NO. 23 PAGE 3 November 14 through November 18, 1983 - CIO personnel assigned to respective teams, attended team meetings for discussions of:
r i
/.) Team 12 - Raceway Team Organization and responsibilities were established and identified.
- turnoverpackages - 60% were rejected by the Test Engineer for incorrect revisions, illegibility, typing errors. Corrective Action: lead system FEs will submit preliminary turnover packages for review by Test Engineer prior to walkdown.
B) Teams 26, 27, 28 - Punchlist Coordination Meeting. The purpose of this meeting was to standardize the mett.od of assembling and reporting commcdity totals.
C) BHO Team Staff Meeting - introduction of C. Marrs and W. Taylor of'CIO l
to J. Horn (BHO Supt). Discussion focused on l
start of CIO evaluation of the BHO Preliminary Hanger Walkdown. In a discussion with MPQAD, CIO was advised that:
a) 500 large bore pipe. hangers will require
~
~
reinspection due to location changes b) 200 large bore and small bore hangers will be reinspected upon lifting of the Stop Work Orders. CIO shall perfam.a sample inspection i
of these activities i
D) Team 19 - discussion centered on training assignments to Code Level 3. It was strongly emphasized by the team supervisor that. individual members of the' team must periodically meet with the supervisor for review of scheduled reading assignments.
E) Team 6 - discussions focused on establishing priorities'of work activities currently underway and for future work activities of the CCP.
i I
F) Team 23 - items discussed were:
, a) recall of all "old" FCR/FCN foms t
l b) "new" FCR/FCN forms scheduled'for issue week of l
l November 21, 1983
(
c) identification requirements of Q and non-Q items on Punchlists d) team is currently developing guide lines for training and orientation of Field Raceway Engineers in order to "
l' non-Q work.
.s provide uniform input by the Engineers for statusing and for y
JOB NO.
14509 MIDLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT
-REPORT NO. 23 PAGE 4 Team 14 - item's discussed at the weekly meeting:
l a) electrical and mechanical commodity lists which required updating and return on October 24,'1983 has been re-scheduled to November 28, 1983 b) Action items for Ann Arbor:
' l'nstallation of Monitors - cost effectiveness
- demolition of walls in electrical and civil areas for equipment ingress / egress c) Construction Punchlists (Units 1 and 2):
' each system / discipline engineer is responsible for providing-accurate descriptions of punchlist items
- each item will be reviewed by Supervision for accuracy 4
- updated punchlists will be given to the mapper, daily g for input into the computer d) members who will require additional training will be identified on the next revision of the Training Matrix Teams 25, 26, 27, 28 & 29 - items discussed were open NCRs, it was learned that NCRs were being returned from Ann Arbor directly to the Initiator of the NCR, thereby bypassing the normal routing sequence. This is leading to lost or misplaced documents. This problem will be addressed by team representatives.
Discussion of area completion schedules to review short and Icng Term Area Turnover requirements and to establish methods of resolving problems which may impact on Turnover schedules, i
~
'It was discussed that certain areas of high priority to CPCo are found in low priority modules. These areas i
could be deferred or missed. CPCo and BPCo will meet to preclude this from occurring. CIO will be in attendance at this meeting.
9
m JOB NO.
14509 MIDLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT REPORT NO.' 23 l
PAGE 5 November 15, 1983 - QVP Status Assessment Meeting. The major restraint affecting Module 340 continues to be the Stop Work Orders issued on the improper use of FCR/FCNs. A schedule for release of the Stop Wrk Orders i
has not been established.
November 15, 16, 17,'1983 - Area and System Team Meetings. At these meetings, i
the subjects.of importance addressed were:
- status of resolution of restraints
\\
- schedule of resolutions for removing restraints
- effect of the Stop Work Orders on restraints Restraints discussed at weekly meetings are relevant to on-going activities rather than the CCP. Typically they fall into categories such as procurement delays,' dispositions to NCRs, and delays in obtaining design or construction
, details. At each meeting, a review of response status and target dates for removal of restraints is discussed in detail and where necessary, an action is assigned.
November 17, 1983 - ' System Team Staff Meeting. At this meeting Team Supervisors and their assistants discuss items that could result in problems and their effect on Corrective Action.
Discussions centered on:
- improvement of hydrostatic testing
- construction work packages - 11 submitted to Supervision - 0 rejected l
- re-scheduling and concellations of training class November 18, 1983 - FCR/FCN Review and Resolution Program. At this meeting a presentation was given by P. Milano, MPQAD and F. Thomas, BPCo of the functions and purposes of the FCR/FCNs, to CIO personnel. MPQAD and BPCo led CIO personnel step by step from the origin to completion of the FCR/FCNs.
i I
CIO advise MPQAD that a sampling inspection of Phase I " good" FCR/FCNs for the civil and mechanical disciplines was scheduled for November 19, 1983. At the' i
request of R. Wells, CIO delayed the inspections until November 22, 1983 to j.
allow MPQAD to reaudit Phase I activities.
l t
\\
)
JOB NO.
14509 MIDLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT REPORT NO. 23 PAGE 6 l'
November 18, 1983 - Weekly Sub-contractors meeting subjects discussed at this meeting were as follows:
Babcock and Wilcox -NSSS
- 1) B&W submitted training program to CPCo for approval
- 2) B&W will use Bechtel system for evaluation of classroom training
- 3) B&W are in the precess of re-organization of personnel
- 5) All Q-work has stopped pending completion of B&W retraining Zack-HVAC
- 1) Training program submitted to MPQAD for approval
- 2) Dispositioning of NCRs is proceeding on schedule
- 3) Verifying through Walkdowns that NCR reject tags have not been removed from rejected items
- 4) Removal of surplus rental equipment from. job site Owens-Corning
~-
- 1) Owens-Corning to provide new milestone dates for insulation completion l
- 2) Owens-Corning described the on-going method of providing status of.
hydrostatic testing Grinnell
- 1) Approval not received from MPQAD of procedures for the Fire Protection System l
ACTIVITIES i
- 1) Training Records CIO attendedand evaluated on construction presentations of classes on:
- Area Release for Construction FPG 7.500 Rev.1, FIG 7.510 Rev. 0 (This training course was evaluated by TET and was judged as unsatisfactory)
(T
n n
JOB NO.
14509 MIDLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT i
REPORT NO. 23 PAGE 7 1
l
- Area Construction Completion Activities FIG 7.410 Rev. 1 (This training course was evaluated by TET and was considered satisfactory
- Area Status Assessment and Punchlist Development FPG 9.910 Rey (This training course was evaluated by TET and was considered satisfactory)
- BHO Hanger Walkdown FPM 9.200 Rev.
(This class was not evaluated by TET at this prg(i entation).
c
- 2) System Interaction Walkdown of the Auxiliary Building continues in accordance with Mark Technology Corporation (MTC) Procedure WTP-3-Q
" Procedure for Performing Walkdowns of SSIP/S Target's.
Seven (7) interactions were analyzed and documented by Mark Technology Corporation (MTC). CIO witnessed six. (6) interactions.
The evaluation of the implementation of the program was judged to be satisfactory and in compliance with MTC procedure WTP-3-0..The CIO evaluation was performed utilizing Checklist MP-MIS-MJ-002.
- 3) Preliminary Walkdown - CIO performed a verification November 17 and 18,1983, of the Bulk Hanger preliminary walkdown in Module 340. The walkdown was per-fomed in accordance with the requirements of BPCo procedure FPM 9.200, Rev. O " Bulk Hanger Organhation Hanger Walkdowns."
Hanger lists were generated by the Team to identify the present installation and inspection status. This data will be processed by being entered into a computer tracking, Material Labor Control System (MLCS).
The evaluation of the implementation of the program was judged to be satisfactory and in compliance with procedure FPM 9.200, Rev. O. Results of the evaluation have been documented on Checklist MP-MIS-042 BHO Walkdowns.
{
GENERAL
- 1) Mr. R. G. Burns, Assistant Corporate QA Manager was on site November 15 and j
16, 1983 for discussions on procedure development and staffing of CIO personnel.
- 2) The following personnel have been assigned to the CIO staff on November 14, 1983:
Mr. NealWeatherall, Mechanical QA Engineer Mr. Ralph Butler III, Mechanical QA Engineer j
Mr. Srinivasan Narayandas, Trending Analyst i
Signed affidavits with resumes of Mr. Neal Weatherall and Mr. Ralph Butler have been transmitted to Mr. J. J. Harrison, US NRC. Signed affidavit of Mr. Srinivasan Narayandas has also been transmitted. His resume will follow when received.
t k
JOB NO.
14509 i
MIDLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT REPORT NO. 23 PAGE 8
- 3) Protocol Infrc; tion - Copies of the Transcript of the US NRC/Public meeting held on November 10, 1983 were distributed to CPCo and BPCo management, in violation of paragraph 2 of the Protocol.
Mr. J. J. Harrison was advised of this infraction on November 17, 1983 and requested thht a copy of the Transcript be transmitted to his office as required by the Protocol. A copy of the Transcript was presented to Mr. R. Cook, US NRC Senior Inspector (site) on November 18, 1983.
Corrective action was taken by CIO management by reinstructing CIO personnel of the Protocol requirements. A memorandum has been issued to all personnel advising that distribution of documents to CPCo, BPCo and sub-contractors will require management approval.
- 4) Prior to lifting of Stop Work Orders relating to the FCR/FCN Review and Resolution Program, CIO has established a Hold Point at the conclusion of Phase II activities to evaluate the adequacy of MPQAD performance during Phase I and Phase II activities. The Hold Point encompasses all the Stop Work Orders with the exception of Stop Wo' rk Order No. FSW-36 which has been lifted by MPQAD. This Hold Point does not apply to Phase III.
O O
t l
I i
i
'\\
i.,..
ST0llE & HEBSTER HIClllGAll, lilC.
~
MIDLAND NHCLEAR COGENERATION PLANT CIO OBSERVATIONS' Observation Originating CPCo Response
. Status Close-Out Ninher Observations Document /Date Doctment/Date Open/ Closed Document /Date 1
030 Need to review Vendor Equipment Report No. 5
-Open Verification Program - HPQAD/SHO 7/18/83
)
031 NIRs 002, 003, 004 and 005 were issued on Report No. 16 Open October 3, 1983 for discrepancies observed 10/3/83 in the review of Training Records of 6 of 45-4GQAD personnel.
032 NIR 006 issued on October 27, 1983 to ad-Report No. 20 Open dress discrepancies. observed during sample 10/31/83 inspection of Construction Training Records of Teams 5, 6, 8, 9, 12, 13, 16, 17, 19, 20, 25, 26 (27/28) 29,.30, 31, 32/
33 and 8610 staff.
~
033 NIR 007 issued on November 7, 1983 to Report No. 21 Open address discrepancies observed in two areas 11/08/83
}
=
during inspection of Construction Training Records for Teams No. 24 Field Procurement i
Sub-Contractors, Management, Field Eng-ineering Staff, and ' Construction General Services Organization.
d
1 c
STONE & 1-lEDSTER MICllIGAN, INC.
MIDLAND NUCLEAR COGENERATION PLANT CIO OBSERVATIONS Observation Originating CPCo Response
. Status Close-Out Number Observations Document /Date Document /Date Open/ Closed Document /Date 034 NIR 008 issued on November 14, 1983 to Report No. 22 Open address five unsatisfactory conditions 11/14/83 observed during the review of 50 training i levels assignments in the System Team
. Training Matrix of the Construction Training Program.
}
035 CIO observed that dielectric isolation Report No. 22 Open spacers for galvanic protection of copper 11/14/83 pipe to galvanized steel pipe supports were missing in some areas on.this system, Small Bore (Instrument Air) KAC. Systems, drawing FSK-J-30-0220 Sheet 2 Rev. 7.
I i
T Il
{
.r
l
~~
STONE & WEBSTER HICllIGAN, INC.
CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW Il0LD POINT LOG SlMtARY
_m ORIGINATING CPCo RESPONSE STATUS CLOSE-0UT NO*
SUBJECT i
DOC /DATE DOC /DATE OPEN/ CLOSED DOC /DATE
[
001 Adequacy of drawings A8 - large bore pipe Report No. 6 Letter Closed Report.h. 9 hangers. CIO established Hold Point when MPQAD 7/25/83 8/9/83 6/15/83 issued 2 NCRs against the use of red-lined drawings which were volded.by Project Engineering, I
002 Material traceability of installed hangers (E3).
Report No. 6 Letter Closed -
Report No. 9 CPCo response dated 7/1/83 indicated report on 7/25/83 8/9/83 8/15/83 material traceability was to be issued in a timely manner. Due to uncertainty of when the report would be issued, a iloid Point was established by CIO.
')
i 4
003 Has a program been developed and responsibilities Report'No. 6 Letter Closed Report No. 9 established for perscnnel assigned to process 7/25/83 8/9/83 8/15/83 nonconformances?
Has a~ meeting been held with Project Engineering to discuss methodology of processling non-conformances?
J'
,y
$ TONE & WEBSTER MICHIGAN, INC.
CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW Il0LD POINT LOG St# NARY ORIGINATING CPCo RESPONSE STATUS CLOSE-0UT NO*
SUBJECT DOC /DATE DOC /DATE OPEN/ CLOSED DOC /DATE 004 Evaluation of Phase I Management Review Report No. 1 Letters Closed CIO Letter to Committee meet.ings.
6/3/83 7/1/83 J.G. Keppler through 8/9/83 dated 10/12/8:
Letter of 6/30/83
)
005 CPCo'has comitted to develop a Vendor Report No. 18 Open Equipment Verification Program. Program is 10/17/83 required before implementation of Phase II.
~
006 NIRs 002, 003, 004 and Od5 lesued October 3 Report No. 1E Open 1983 to address discrepancies observed during a sample inspection of Training Records of 6 of 45 MPQAD personnel. Corrective action must be completed before any inspections can be performed by the 45 personnel in question.
')
007 Evaluation of Management Review of results of Report No. 19 Open Phase I activities. Evaluation pf Management 10/24/83 Review Committee plans and procedures for Phase II implementation.
I
.s k
Re-worded
STONE & WE8 STER MICHIGAN, INC.
CONSTRUCTION IMFLEMENTATION OVERVIEW HOLD POINT LOG
SUMMARY
ORIGINATING CPCo RESPONSE STATUS CLOSE-00T NO.
SUBJECT.
DOC /DATE DOC /DATE OPEN/ CLOSED DOC /DATE 008
.NIR 006 has been issued on October 27, 1983 to Report No. 20 Open address discrepancies observed during the sample 10/31/83 inspection of 2,054 Construction Training, records of 31 memb rs of Teams 5, 6, 8, 9t 12,
)
13, 16, 17, 19, 20, 25, 26, (27/28), 29, 30, 31, (32/33) and BHO staff.
Corrective action must be completed before any walkdown, assessments can.be performed,by the personnel in question.
. 009 NIR 007 has been issued on November 7,1983 to Report No. 21 Open i
address discrepancies observed during sample.
11/7/83 inspection of 834 Construction Training records of.18 members of Team 24. Field Procurement, Sub-Contractors, Management, F.E. staff and Construction General Serivces Organization.
'i Corrective action must be completed before any I
walkdown, assessments can be performed by the
-personnel in question.
t I
x
a STONE & WEBSTER MICHIGAN, INC.
CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW HOLD POINT LOG SUPMARY
' i~~~
1 ORIGINATING CPCo RESPONSE STATUS CLOSE-00T NO*
SUBJECT DOC /DATE DOC /DATE OPEN/ CLOSED DOC /DATE i
l 010 NIR 008 was issued November 14, 1983 to address Report No. 22 Open 5 unsatisfactory conditions observed during the 11/14/83 l
review of 50 training level assignments re-presenting a lot size of 318 assignments on the System Team Training matrix of the Con-
)
i struction Training. Program.
i Corrective action must be completed before any walkdown, assessments can be performed by the personnel in question.
011 Prior to lifting of Stop Work Orders relating to Report No.23 Open P
the FCR/FCN Review and Resolution Program, CIO 11/21/83 has established a Hold Point at tiie conclusion of Phase II activities to evaluate the adequacy
)
of MPQAD performance during Phase I and Phase II activities. The Hold Point encompasses all the Stop Work Orders with the exception of Stop Work Order No. FSW-36 which has been lifted by MP0AD.
This Hold Point does not apply to Phase III.
/
)
f I
j j
e l
STullB & UEldITElt ic!IltlAll, Illt:.
CollSiltucilull IH1'I rl4Elll Al'Inli UVCilVIEW Hill LUG SU114Alty 13114 H1'QAD DATE DATE DATE HO.
NCil NO.
SUBJECT OF DISP. BY CLOSED REMARKS OAR NO.
ISSUE MPQA0 NIR issued us closed-no cor-001 N/A Training Records 8/15/83 8/15/83 8/17/03 rective action I
required 002 QAR Forms from both procedures B-3M and
)
RT 00005 B-3M-1 are intennixed in training 10/4/83 10/12/83 records 4
003 QAR Yearly vision examination was exceeded 10/4/83 10/12/83 RT 00006 i:
0JT training records not available In" RT 00007 training records. Revision number not 10/4/83 10/12/83 g
listed on OJT Record
~
s J
Memo to CPCo ad-QAR Personnel Certification Form QA-116-1, vising that NIR-005 005 RT 00011 Attachment D is unavailable in record 10/4/83 10/12/83 10/20/83 can be closed out.
files Records for Level 11 certifications have been verified by CIO i
Discrepancies in three areas of 10/27/83 006 Construction Training Records i
QCI 15.01 ATTACilllEllT 4.3 M**
i J
r!
t j
t _..
..=f.
f
- m y..
'o
~
~
y ',,
.s
(.
SIU!It & #EBSTFit'/ < Cil1GAN, I!(C ~
p i
a
+~f C0llSiRUCILUff IMP 1EMElliMION,OKiwLUI ~
+
- r, H!R LOG Sul4%RY'
~ '
s e
_ - y t
1' o
r 5
t*
,l NIH )
HPQAD <*.
E i
DA*il:;
DATE DATE f[
g, NO.
NCR NO.
SUBJECT
' ' CLOSED-
' REMARKS
,/
~
"i 0Fr DISP.
7-k' IS.%6 ' i e'
)'
'i f^
f d
'r Discrepancies in two areas of Paristruc-(
7,
a, OG7
'tien Jraining Records for the fofloWing.
11/7/83 1
i [,/
teams. (.'o. 24, Field Procurenient, Sub- '
/
/. /
f ' contractors, Management, 'Eleid Engi-i' i
//,,'j<,
/
o
?
neering Staff and Constructica General
_~
services organi ntion
/
1
~
6'<'.'.
F5to' unsatisfactory cmd)tions were
'/
008 l
- observed !n training level assignments 11/14/83
)
N 1'
?,'during thaheview of the adequ4cy of the g/
c,onstruction training.matrice,sy e
)
- ,.e t.
y r
i
.g 5
}
r
)
s '
/
S r
}
s i
)
i et e
I e
i e
QCI 15.01 ATTACilHENT 3.3 REV. 1
.f-
'l[a
!cy J _. _r
" \\
Q___
STONE & WEBSTER MICHIGAN, INC.
LZL--l P.O. box 2325, BOSTON. M ASSACHUSETTS O2107 t:-
OtJf g
VfA ic_
43 Thi Wite Mr. J. G. Keppler, Administrator, Region III November 14, 1983 Nuclear Regulatory Commission J. O. No. 14509 799 Roosevelt Road.
NRC File #83-11-14 Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 RE: DOCKET NO. 50-329/330 MIDLAND PLANT - UNITS 1 AND 2 OVERVIEW 0F THE CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION PROGRAM REPORT NO. 22 A copy of the Construction Implementation Overview Report No. 22 for the period November 7, 1983 through November 11, 1983 is enclosed with this report. No Management Review Committee Meetings were held during this reporting period.
Evaluations of CCP activities and matrices of Observations, NIRs and Hold Points are attached.
Very truly yours, S. W. Baranow Program Manager SWB/ka cc: JJHarrison, US NRC Glen Ellyn, IL RCook, US NRC Midland (site)
DQuamme, CPCo Midland (site)
RBKelly, S&W APAmoruso, S&W RGBurns, S&W 19#
NOV 211983
3 t
s
Report No. 22 i
November 7, 1983 through November 11, 1983 Personnel on Site,
Stone & Webster Michigan, Inc.
A. Amoruso
- 0. Cooke.
'R. Scallan S. Baranow R. Corson J. Seely F. Bearham J. Lang3 ton W. Sienkiewicz J. Barr C. Marrs-
-A. Smith R. Carpaggiani D. MacBay W. Taylor J. Chawla T." Parker
- 1. Thompson G. Foley (tenporary)
Meetings Attended Date_
Attende[es
- Purpose November 7, 1983 '
- Const2:lers PowerLCokany ;-
0411y Staff through Bechtel Power Company; Management Meetings November 10, 1983 Stone & Webster CIO l
MPQAD
. a -
November 7. 1983 Consumers Pcwer Company Team Meetings through '
10,-1983,'
Becntel Power Compar,y.
November -
Stone a: Webster 910-November 8, i983 ConstImers Powir' Company QVP Status r
'Bechtel Power. Company Assessment MFOAD e
i Stone.4 Webster CIO s..
. November 6,9,t0,1983 -
Consur.ars Power Company
' Area, Team and Bechtel PoiTer Company Syster.t Team
=
l MP0AD -
Review Meeting Zack
^
. Stone-& Vebster CIO
<Novembe610,1982' US NRC Monthly Meeting Constaaers Poker Company Store & Webstar CIO/ Soils Public.
2
}
i -
~
n
~
j, x1
~
f s.
.. ~
+
g4 Y
^
(
. - s 4
is.
.a r
a f
ls
-f-s-
I -
o O
S
[
l JOB NO. 14509 MIDLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT REPORT NO. 22 i
PAGE 2 p
\\
Meetinos November 7, through November 10, 1983 - during this period, CIO attcnded daily meetings with staff management and staff supervision.
The Stop Work Orders issued by MPQAD continue to be the prime topic of discussion. Also at these meetings, details of current status and proposed actions are described as well as the logistics to resolve the problems in a timely manner.
Subjects discussed at the daily staff management meetings were:
I
- Stop Work Orders
- Status of NCR Dispositions
- Cause of delays in dispositioning/ closing NCRs
- Review of Audit Findings
- Discussions of NRC Concerns
- Document Control Activities
~ -
- Preheat vs L. P. Inspection
~
- Status of procedure approval and Issuance
- Computer down time
- Administrative Activitid
- Manpowerrequirementsandloading
- MPQAD took exception to a root cause and preventative action assigned to them.
NCR # C 00708 addressed an are strike observed on a fabrication produced at the Standish Fabrication Plant.
The arc strike was apparently minute but required some work to ensuhe that.no crack was present.
The disposition included a recommendation that MPQAD inspection personnel
{
receive additional training in the evaluation of arc strikes.
MPQAD took exception to this disposition on the basis that arc strikes are caused by construction personnel and the prevention of arc strikes is a construction responsibility.
m
}
JOB NO. 14509 MIDLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT REPORT N0. 22 O
PAGE 3 November 7, 1983 through November 10, 1983 - CIO personnel assigned to respective teams, attended team meetings for discussions of:
- mock status assessment to begin week of November 14, 1983 I
- review of status of open items
'l-r
- s'tatus of Raceway / Cable packages i
- mock status assessment of Small Bore Pipe Hanger Supports
- installation / inspection of Diesel Generators
- Diesel Generators status and installation problems
^
- red line drawings
- preparation of Commodity lists
- Hanger Reinspection Program November 8,1983 - QVP Status Assessment. At this meeting, the main item of I
discussion was the assignment of key personnel to the' teams that will assess Module 340 and the preparations for this' effort.
~ The' major restraint affecting Module 340 continues to be the Stop Work Orders issued on the improper use of FCRs/FCNs. A schedule for release of the Stop Work Orders has not been established, however, indications are that portions of work may be able to resume before the end of November, 1983.
November 8, 9, 10, 1983 - Area and System Team' Meetings. At these meetings, the subjects of importance addressed were:
- status of resolution of restraints
- schedule of resolutions for removing restraints Restraints discussed at weekly meetings are relevant to on-going.
i acti'fities rather than CCP. Typically they fall into categories i
such as procurement delays, disposition to NCRs, and delays in-l obtaining design or construciton details. At each meeting a-review of response status and target dates for removal of re-straints is discussed in detail and where necessary, an action is assigned.
l
- status of NCRs
N
]
JOB NO. 14509 MIDLAND N0 CLEAR POWER PLANT REPORT NO. 22 Q
PAGE 4 ACTIVITIES 1.
Training Records l
CIO completed a sampling inspection of training procedures to determine the adequacy of the construction training matrix. Three discipline Field Engineers positions were selected for review of their reading assignments. A sample size of 50 procedures representing a lot size of 318 were reviewed by CIO. Considerations were given to those code i
levels of reading Code O through Code 4. In this review, it was de-termined that five areas of discrepancies were evident.
Four of the five discrepancies had a Code level 0 against specific procedures. The CIO review of these procedures indicated that responsibilities were defined which automatically placed the pro-cedure into a Code level 2 or 3 requirement. The fifth discrepancy identified an area of inconsistency:
Discipline engineers, mechanical and instrumentation require Code level 2 whereas discipline eng;r.eers, electrical and welding re-quire Code level 3 for Proceaure FIG 1.400, " Preparation Review and Routing of Field Engineers Reports."
s NIR 008 is being issued to cover these. discrepancies.
2.
System Interaction Walkdown of the Auxiliary Building continues in accordance with Mark Technologies Procedure WTP-3-Q " Procedure for Perfoming Walkdowns of SSIP/S Targets.
20 interactions were analyzed and documented, 6' of which were witnessed tj CIO.
i The CIO evaluation was performed utilizing Attribute Checklist MP-MIS-MJ-022.
3.
FCR/FCNs Stop Work Orders
'j Eighteen FCRs/FCNs selected by CIO for reviews of resolutions were properly a:! dressed and completed. One FCR did not have the required Resident Engineer's signature. This was promptly corrected,
and all 18'FCRs/FCNs more considered satisfactory and acceptable.
Resultsof the evaluation will be documented on Checklist MP-MIS-041,"FCR/
I FCN Review and Resolution Program."
3 1
3 l
I
m 008 NO.
14509 MIDLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT i
REPORT NO. 22 i
PAGE 5
^( )
OBSERVATIONS During a CIO Walkdown of Small Bore (Instrument Air) KAC Systems, drawing FSK-J-30-0220 Sheet 2 Rev. 7, it was observed that dielectric isolation spacers for galvanic protection of copper pipe to galvanized steel pipe supports were missing in some areas of this system. This inconsistency was pointed out to CPCo personnel who will perform the required research and take corrective action.
4 ThisobservationwillbeclassifiedasanOpenItemandwillbetracked j
until all corrective action has been satisfactorily completed.
8 l
GENERAL I
1.
Checklists have been developedto establish the readiness of System, Area and.
BHO teams to perform preliminary walkdowns by System, Discipline and Areas.
2.
Mr. R. B. Kelly, QA VP and Manager, Mr. R.G. Burns Assistant QA Manager and Mr. J. Karr, Project QA Manager were on site November 9,1983.-
\\
3.
In accordance with the latest PQCI Control log dated November 4,1983; 65 PQCIs are listed as active. The status of CIO Checklists for these PQCIs follows:
(a) approved - 37 I
(b) under revision and draft review 28-9 I
i 1
i i
i
4 STONE AND WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QCI 15.01 NONCONFORMANCE' IDENTIFICATION REPORT fttac nt 4.1
(};
PAGE 1 0F 2 DATE OF NONCONFORMANCE:
NIR NUMBER cos IDENTIFICATION / LOCATION OF ITEMS:
SYSTEM TEAM TRAINING MATRIX, REV.1, DATED JULY 20, 1983
, DESCRIPTION OF NONCONFORMANCE:
During the review of the adequacy of the construction training matrices,a sample l
size of 50 training level assignments, representing a lot size of 318 assignments, five unsatisfactory conditions \\were observed'in the training level assignments.
The System Team Training Matrix of the Construction Training Program was utilized to perform the review.
See the attached for unsatisfactory conditions observed. The five unsatisfactory j
conditions reported represents a reject condition for this lot size of 318.
3
/
M INITIATOR PROGRAM MGR L M
-r - '
/[f/g3 8 Mr /#,y DATE DATE CORRECTIVE ACTION BY:
N l
IDENTIFY ORGANIZATION TAKING CORRECTIVE ACTION l
I l
l VERIFICATION SAT UNSAT NEW NIR#
CONCURRENCE
, INITIATOR PROGRAM MGR DATE DATE DATE REMARKS i
i 4
4---
6
l 3
NIR #008 PAGE 2 0F 2
- 1. 'FPG 9.700, " System Team Charter" O'
l FPG 9.700 appears on the " System Team Training Matrix" as a Level "0" t
(no training required) for the system team field engineer, mechanical.
1 Paragraph 5.2.7 of this procedure identifies the job responsibilities i
l and reporting relationships for the system team field engineers. As such, a level of training of "0" (no training) is not satisfactory.
2.
FP0 1.201, "Bechtel Assigned Post Turnover (PTO) Work".
FP0 1.201 appears on the " System Team Training Matrix" as a Level "0" (no training required) forthe system team field engineer, mechanical.
In discussion with the Team #5 supervisor, itwas noted that the Team members do get involved in Post Turnover Work. Because of this involvement by the Team members, a level of training of "0" (no training) is not satisfactory.
3.
FIG 1.400 " Preparation, Review and Routing of Field Engineer's Reports."
\\
FIG 1.400 includes responsibilities for several disciplines,.ie; mechanical, civil, welding, and instrumentation as well as including responsibilities for the electrical discipline. The following conditions were noted as being unsatisfactory; (a) The " System Team TrainingMatrix" under the column entitled " Responsible Discipline" shows this procedure'to be an electrical discipline procedure.
.c n.
~ ^(b) The-" System Team Training Matrix" requires the field engineers of the mechanical and the instrumentation disciplines to receive a level "2" training whereas the field engineersof the electrical and welding disciplines receive a level "3" training. There is an inconsistancy of training levels being assigned.
i l
4.
Specification M-214. " Pip'ing System Erection Fit-up Control Requirements."
l M-214 appears on the " System Team Training Matrix" as a level "0",.(no training required) for the system team field engineer, welding, i
Specification pages 3, 5, 7B and 8 address welding. Also, weld fit-ups arc addressed throughout this specification. As such, a level of training of "0" (no training) is not satisfactory.
5.
Drawing E-039
" Seismic Wireway Supports."
E-039 appears on the " System Team Training Matrix,"'as a level "0" i
(no training required) for the system team field engineer, welding.
l This drawing contains weld sizes and weld symbols for typical wireway I
supports. As such, a level of training of "0" (no training) is not satisfactory.
It is recommended that the disposition to this NIR include a committment to verify the adequacy of all training matrices.-
i
.j I
---m,,
. -... =
~ ~ - - -
t STHilE & WEll3TE. sICIIIGAll, INC.
C0ftSIRUCIlull IH1'l EMElllAIIHit UVEltVIEW 4
Nilt 1.UG Su!41ARY lilll HPQAD DATE DATE DATE NO.
NCR NO.
SUBJECT OF DISP. BY CLOSED REMARKS OAR NO.
ISSUE MPQAD NIR issued us closed-no cor-001 N/A Training Records 8/15/83 8/15/83 8/17/83 rective action required I
002 QAR Fome from both procedures B-3M and
[)
RT 00005 B-3M-1 are intemixed in training 1:/4/83 10/12/83 records 4
003 QAR Yearly vision examination was exceeded 10/4/83 10/12/83 RT 00006 1
OJTtrainingrecordsnotavailableli
-w RT 00007 training records. Revision number not 10/4/83 10/12/83
~
g listed on 0JT Record
~
)
Memo to CPCo ad-QAR Personnel Certification Form QA-116-1, -
vising that NIR-005 RT 00011 is unavailable in record 10/4/83 10/12/83 10/20/83 can be closed out.
005 files Records for Level Il certifications have been verified by CIO Discrepancies in three areas of 006 Construction Training Records 10/27/83 QCI 15.01 ATTACilHENT 4.3 aI n 2
)'
3 3
)
T 1 N S
- 0. E K
lM R
5i1 1 C AM A.
E ITV R
CTE QAR t
D E
EP E
TS AI I
. V DD C R N E I V 3
O 3
8 8
/
N N
/
4 A OY E
7 1
R E
U
/
/
G I
I TA TFS 1
1 l
AM AOS 1
1 i
D I
C.
T F NU
. ES e
M
- g h
EG cn l
st I
lt E LO ui-a t
T PL rwb - r nf S P touie e e o.
R slS g n rm B
I E
I nl ne eny W NN oo
,E G wgc O
Cft ia.
nd n ssus I
T feel o nsqe E C ohmei oaec N U teit i
di O R s
rFc tl ar T T aru u
ie t
S S eoc
.r dvea N
rfott nehm
~
O T
a rns ol t C
C sPenn c
g E
od moo gf n J
wrdeCi ynoi B
tol g t ri n
U ceada onwi S
neinn7 tiea i R F a ai cair n
arvt
,M fa fte sg en4
.f g s rn ii2 s a r in o
cn rtO tiei i}Ini
.oS a
ht aaot s
sdtc p r N c ge ne u
eT anc uvgr r
srii rnt cnmtrv eeis W
soaner vsrn i ieoee ibuo D tt C nS Fodc O
DN A
QR PC HN R.
7 8
IO 0
0 NN 0
0
-- " ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
()
SI0flE & ilEBSTER HIClllGAll, lilC.
I MIDLAND fillCLEAR C0 GENERATION PLANT i
CIO OBSERVATIONS' l
Observation Originating CPCo Response
. Status i
Close-Out innber Observations Document /Date Doctment/Date Open/Close'd Dacinent/Date i
030 Need to review Vendor Equipment Report No. 5 Open Verification Program - MPQAD/SMO 7/18/83
)
031 NI R 2, 003, 004 and 005 were issued on Report No. 16 Open Oct.ober 3, 1983 for discrepancies observed 10/3/83 in the review of Training Records of 6 of 45 MPQAD personnel.
032 NIR 006 issued on October 27, 1983 to ad-Report No. 20 Open dress discrepancies observed during sample 610/31/83 inspection of Construction Training b
Records of Teams 5, 6, 8, 9, 12, 13, 16, 17, 19, 20, 25, 26 (27/28) 29, 30, 31, 32/
33 and B110 staff.
033 NIR 007 issued on V amber 7,1983 to Report No. 21 Open
,)
address discrepancia observed in two areas 11/08/83 during inspection of Construction Training
~
Records for Teams No. 24. Field Procurement i
Sub-Contractors, Management, Field Eng-Ineering Staff, and Construction General Services Organization.
h ST0!!E & 1lEBSTER HIClllGAN, INC.
HIDLAND NUCLEAR COGEllERATION PLAllT CIO OBSERVATI0 tis Observation Originating CPCo Response
. Status Close-Out Number Observations Document /Date Document /Date Open/ Closed Document /Date 034 NIR 008 issued on November 14, 1983 to Report No. 22 Open address five unsatisfactory conditions 11/14/83 observed during the review of 50 training i levels assignments in the System Team Training Matrix of the Construction Training Program.
j b
t.
/
)
si
i
$ TONE & WE8STEk.sICilIGAN, INC.
~
CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW il0LO POINT LOG
SUMMARY
1 4
NO*
SUBJECT ORIGINATING CPCo RESPONSE STATUS CLOSE-0UT DOC /DATE DOC /DATE OPEN/ CLOSED DOC /DATE 001 Adequacy of drawings A8 - large bore pipe Report No. 6 Letter Closed Report No. 9 hangers. CIO established ~ Hold Point when HPQA0 7/25/83 8/9/83 8/15/83
~~'~
issued 2 NCRs against the use of red-lined drawings which were.volded.by Project Engineering.
s
.J 002 Material traceability of installed hangers (E3).
Report No. 6 Letter Closed Report No. 9 CPCo response dated 7/1/83 indicated report on 7/25/83 8/9/83 8/15/83 material traceability was to be issued in a l
timely manner. Due to uncertalaty of when the.
report would be issued, a Hold Point was established by CIO.
1 l
003 lias a program been developed and responsibill'tles Report No. 6 Letter Cloped Report No.'9
~
established for personnel assigned to process 7/25/83 8/9/83 8/15/83 l
nonconformances?
Has a meeting been held with Project Engineering
~
to discuss methodology of processing non-conformances?
l L
i
[
t
y
.,)
$ TONE & WEBSTER MICilIGAN, INC.
. CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW il0LD POINT LOG SUPMARY ORIGINATING CPCo RESPONSE STATUS CLOSE-0UT NO*
SUBJECT DOC /DATE DOC /DATE OPEN/ CLOSED DOC /DATE 004 Evaluation of Phase I Management Review Report No. 1 Letters Closed CIO Letter to Committee meetings.
6/3/83 7/1/83 J.G. Keppler through 8/9/83 dated 10/12/8:
Letter of 6/30/83
)
005 CPCo has conmiitted to develop a Vendor Report No. IfJ Open Equipment Verification Program. Program is 10/17/83 required before implementation of Phase II.
006 NIRs 002, 003, 004 and 005 issued October 3
,': Report No. 10
.Open
)
1983 to address discrepancies observed during a sample inspection of Training Records of 6 of 45 MPQAD personnel. Corrective action must be completed before any inspections can be performed by the 45 personnel in question.
.)
007 Evaluation of Management Review of results of Report No. 19 Open Phase 1 activities. Evaluation of Management 10/24/83 Review Committee plans and procedures for Phase II implementation.
l I
~
I
/
Re-worded l
s
.~._____ _
v
./
STONE & WEBSTER MICilIGAN, INC.
CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW HOLD POINT LOG SIM4ARY ORIGINATING CPCo RESPONSE STATUS CLOSE-00T NO*
SUBJECT-DOC /DATE DOC /DATE OPEN/ CLOSED DOC /DATE i
NIR006hasbeenissuedonOctober27,19h3to
- Report No. 20 Open 008 address discrepancies observed during the sample 10/31/83 inspection of 2,054 Construction Training records of 31 members of Teams 5, 6, 8, 9, 12, s) 13, 16, 17, 19, 20, 25, 26, (27/28), 29, 30, 31, (32/33) and BHO staff.
Corrective action must be' completed before any walkdown, assessments can be performed by the personnel in question.
009 NIR 007 has been issued on November 7,1983 to Report No. 21 Open address discrepancies observed during sample.
11/7/83 inspection of 834 Construction Training records of 18 memi)ers of Team 24, Field Procurement, Sub-Contractors, Management, F.E. staff and Construction General Serivces Organization.
g Corrective action must be complbted before any
)
walkdown, assessments can be performed by the personnel in question.
I
~
e
- ~ -
)
72 STONE & WEBSTER MICHIGAN, INC.
CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW ll0LD POINT LOG SIMIARY i
ORIGINATING CPCo RESPONSE STATUS CLOSE-0UT NO*
SUBJECT DOC /DATE DOC /DATE OPEN/ CLOSED DOC /DATE 010 NIR 008 has been issued on November 14,~1983 to Report No. 22 Open address five uns~atisfactoly conditions observed 11/14/83 during the review of 50 training level assign-ments representing a lot size 318 assignments in the System Team Trai~ning Matrix of the i
1 Construction Training Program.
Correctives action must be completed before any walkdown, assessments can be perfomed by the personnel involved in these training activities.
011 Prior to start of Phase III activities of
, Report No. 22 Open FCR/FCN Resolution Program, CIO has established 11/14/83 a Hold Point at the conclusion of Phase II activities to evaluate MPQAD performance.
I
}
s i
f l
.e I fanmm sw= i STONE & WEBSTER MICHIGAN, INC. V; iAJ -
3/"i l;:
j P.O. Box 2325. BOSTON. M AssAcHuszTTs O2107
-1 L ;q
,l I
i -
^Y
' l_L(
Mr. J. G. Keppler, Administrator, Region III November 8, 1983 Nuclear Regulatory Commission J. O. No. 14509 799 Roosevelt Road.
NRC File #83-11-08 Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 RE: DOCKET NO. 50-329/330 MIDLAND PLANT - UNITS 1 AND 2 OVERVIEW OF THE CONSTRUCTION ON COMPLETION PROGRAM REPORT NO. 21 A copy of the Construction Implementation Overview Report No. 21 for the period October 31, 1983 through November 4, 1983 is enclosed with this report.
No Management Review Committee Meetings were held during this reporting period.
Evaluations of CCP activities including the final report of an allegation of improper welding, and matrices of Open Items, NIRs, and Hold Points, are attached.
Very truly yours, S. W. Baranow Program Manager SWB/ka cc: JJHarrison, US NRC Glen Ellyn, IL RCook, US NRC Midland (site)
DQuamme, CPCo Midland (site)
RBKelly, S&W APAmoruso, S&W RGBurns, S&W NO V 4 ggg3 1
, 4 gg ci c
I I
Report No. 21 i
j October 31, through November 4,1983 i
Personnel on Site Stone & Webster Michigan, Inc.
A. Amoruso D. Cooke R. Scallan S. Baranow R. Corson J. Seely F. Bearham J. Langston W. Sienkiewicz J. Barr C. Marrs A. Smith R. Carpeggiani D. MacBay W. Taylor J. Chawla T. Parhr J. Thompson G. Foley (temporary)
Meetings Attended Date Attendees Purpose November 1,1983 Consumers Power Company Daily Staff through Bechtel Power Company Management Meetings November 4, 1983 Stone & Webster CIO hPQAD November 3, 1983 Consumers Power Company Bi-Weekly Staff Bechtel Power Company and Meetings with Stone & Webster CIO Team Supervisors MPQAD November 1,1983 Consumers Power Company QVP/ Status Stone & Webster CIO Assessment Sechtel Power Company MPQAD November 2, 1983 Consumers Power Company Area Team and and Bechtel Power Company System Team November 3, 1983 Zack Review Meeting MPQAD Stone and Webster CIO
^
November 4,1983 Consumers Power Company Weekly Sub-Contractors Bechtel MTG Zack B&W Stone & Webster CIO 1
JOB NO. 14509 MIDLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT REPORT NO. 21 PAGE 2 November 1, through November 4,1983 - During this period,- CIG-attended daily staff managementmeetings and bi-weekly meetings with staff and team l
supervisors.
l The main focus of attention during the week was the Stop Work Orders issued by MPQAD. At the dailymeetings, details of current status and proposed actions are described as well as the logistics to resolve the problems in a timely manner.
Subjects discussed at the daily staff management meetings were:
t
- Stop Work Orders l
- NCR Dispositions
- Delays in Dispositioning/ Closing NCRs
- Audit Findings
- NRC Concerns
- Document Control
- Training Progress
- Progress with Procedure Issuance
- Major Meetings
- Status of System 38 t
l l
- Other Administrative Activities
- Manpower Loading Subjects discussed at the bi-weekly meetings with staff, team supervisors and support personnel were:
- Training
- Staffing to support Module 340 activities
- Punch List Coding
3 3
JOB NO. 14509 MIDLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT REPORT NO. 21 l
PAGE 3 t
' Meetings 4
November 1, 1983 - QVP/ Status Assessment. At this meeting, the main items discussed were assignments of key people to the teams that will assess 4
Module 340 and prepara.tions for this effort.
The major restraint affecting Module 340 is the Stop W rk Order issued on the o
improper use of FCRs and FCNs. A schedule for releasing the Stop Work Order has not yet been established,but for planning purposes, it was decided to assume that the Stop Work Order will be closed and work released on l
November 30, 1983.
November 2 and 3, 1983 - Area and System Team Review Meetings. At these meetings, an item that is considered to be a restraint is discussed. Action person (s) are i
assigned to pursue the resolutions for removing restraints. Also discussed is the schedule for completing actions assigned to each restraint item and the pro-gress in meeting the schedule.
ACTIVITIES 1.
Training Records CIO completed a sampling inspection of Construction Training Records of _.
8 members of the Field Engineering Staff, 2 members of Area Team Number 24, 5 members of Field Procurement, 4 members of Sub-Contractors, 5 members of Management, and 4 members of the Construction General Serivces Organization.
Eight-hundred thirty-four (834) individual records were reviewed. The number of discrepancies that were noted resulted in a rejection of the j
training records for the 28 people sampled and issuance of NIR 007.
Principal categories of discrepancies were:
(a) course roster not completed properly,(b) training classes not i
documented, (c) reading assignments not documented, and (d) training records not completed consistantly.
NIRs 006 and 007 has been issued as a result of these discrepancies.
2.
Allegation On October 26, 1983 - CIO received an anonymous phone call alleging that welding was being performed, contrary to approved procedures. (See CIO Report No. 20, dated October 31, 1983 for details of the initial investi-gation).
I i
l
~
^
m JOB NO. 14509 4
MIOLAND NilCLEAR POWER PLANT REPORT NO. 21 i
PAGE 4 CIO met with Mr. L. Harrison (BPCo) to complete the investigation into
-r the allegation. A weld was selected at random, joint HBC-4-2-1. CIO reviewed the welding records generated during the initial welding and subsequent repair welding on the joint. The initial welding was performed utilizing approved procedure number PI-A-LH. The weld was completed using procedure P1-A-LH and accepted by BPCo and the Authorized Nucleyr Inspector on August 9,1981. This particular weld later became the sudject of NCR 2781 for being undersized. A repair was made using approved procedure P1-T-B. This repair was inspected.and accepted by BPCo and the Authorized Nuclear Inspector. A review of the code (QW-2.01.3 and QW-202.2) in-dicated that either P1-A-LH or P1-T-B could be used singly or in com-i combination. In addition, BPCo Technical Specification G-27, Subsection Form 84 Mechanical allows the use of either P1-A-LH (SMAW) or PI-T (TIG) for this weld.
In conclusion, CIO has detemined that the allegation was factual with' regard to the weld sequence. As the BPCo procedures utili zed were approved and the intent of ASME code and the Technical Specification were complied with, CIO has detennined.that no non-compliance conditions exist. This closes the CIO investigation of the allegation.
L 2
3.
PQCI Stop Wodt Order l
On November 3,1983-MPQAD issued a Stop Work Order on the use of eight i
Electrical / Instrumentation PQCI's. The PQCI's specified inspection l
requirements for in-process and final inspections of welding, but these requirements were not. consistent.
I I
The potential for this problem was discussed in CIO Weekly Reports numbers b
9, 11 and 18.
4.
FCR/FCN Stop Work Orders On October 22, 1983 - MPQAD issued Stop' Work Orders because of concerns about processing design changes.
l CIO has been attending meetings of the Stop Work Steering Committee and is.
l developing checklists for use in evaluating
-steps taken to resolve l
FCR/FCN discrepancies. Attributes for these checklists are being extracted from.
(a) Flow Chart Plan (d) FID - 2.400 Rev. 4 l
(b) FPD - 1.000 Rev. 16 (e) PEP - 4.62.1 Rev. O (c) FPD - 2.000 Rev. 10 (f) ADP_- 2.12 Rev.'0' l
i
N0B NO. 14509 MIDLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT REPORT NO. 21 PAGE 5 In addition, a sampling of FCR/FCNs will be reviewed to determine the adequacy of corrective actions.
GENERAL
- 1. Signed affidavit and resume of W. C. Taylor, Assistant Superintendent of Field Quality Control, has been transmitted to Mr. J. J. Harrison, US NRC, Glen Ellyn, IL.
\\
- 2. In accordance with the latest PQCI Control Log dated October 26, 1983, 65 PQCIs are listed as active. The status of CIO checklists for these PQCIs follows:
(a) approved - 37 (b) under revision and draft review -28 Zack Training
- 3. In accordance with a pre-established CIO monitoring schedule of Zack activities, CIO performed a review of 36 training records of 2 Field Engineers. Results were determined to be satisfactory and were documented on Checklist MP-MIS-Z-025 which was developed to meet the requirements of Zack MB-F.-16 "0n-going Training" Rev. 1.
This procedure is being revised to include matrices, required reading lists and formalizing training packages.
This revision is currently in review by MPQAD. Upon receipt of the approved version, CIO will develop a new Checklist and repeat the evaluation.
I l
~
' STONE & WEBSTER MIClllGAN, INC.
MIDLAND NUCLEAR COGENERATION PLANT CIO ODSERVATIONS Observation Originating -
CPCo Response
. Status Close-Out Himber Observations gDocument/Date Document /Date Open/ Closed Doctment/Date i
030 Need to review Vendor Equipment
! Report No. 5 Open Verification Program - MPQAD/SMO 7/18/83 r
l l
031 NIRs 002, 003, 004 and 005 were issued on iReport No. 16 Open October 3,1983 for discrepancies observed' i
10/3/83 in the review.of Training Records of 6 of l
45 MPQAD personnel.
032 MIR 006 issued on October 27, 1983 to ad-Report No. 20 Open dress discrepancies observed during sample 10/31/83 inspection of Constraction Training Records of Teams 5, 6, 8, 9, 12, 13, 16, 17, 19, 20, 25, 26 (27/28) 29, 30, 31, 32/
33 and BHO staff.
1 1
i
- - - - - - - - -. - ~ ~ ~ -
~ ~ - - - ~~
~
STDilE & WEll3TEli HICilICAN, INC.
~
CollSIRUCTIDH IHl'l EHiHIAfilN{ UVERVIEW NIR LUG
SUMMARY
NIR HPQAD DATE DATE DATE NO.
NCR NO.
SUBJECT OF DISP. 8Y CLOSED REMARKS 0AR NO.
ISSUE HPQAD NIR issued us closed-no cor-i 001 N/A Training Records 8/15/83 8/15/83 8/17/83 rective action required 002 QAR Foms from both procedures B-3M and RT 00005 8-3M-1 are intemixed in training 10/4/83 10/12/83 records 003 QAR Yearly vision examination was exceeded 10/4/83 10/12/83
-RT 00006 l
OJT training records not available in RT 00007 training records. Revision number not 10/4/83 10/12/83 g
listed on OJT Record
~
.n = :-
)
Memo to CPCo ad-QAR Personnel Certification Fora QA-116-1 vising that NIR-005 RT 00011 is unavailable in record 10/4/83 10/12/83 10/20/83 can be closed out.
005 files Records for Level II certifications have been verified by CIO Discrepancies in three areas of 006 Construction Training Records 10/27/83 e
QCI 15.D1 ATTACllHENT 4.3 C3% 2
)
3 3
T 1 N S
- 0. E K
iM R
5l1 1 C AM A.
E ITV R
CTE QAR D
E ES TO G
W EP E
TS I
AI
. V D 'D C R N E I V O 3
8 N N
/
A OY E
7 G IR E
U
/
I TA TFS 1
l A1 AOS 1
QTP D
I f
I NU H ES e
M g
k EG cn l
E LO ui-a T PL rwb r
S M touie B IR slS g n E
I nl ne W NN oo
,E G O
Cft I
ndn T
feel o E C ohmei N U teit O R s
rFc T T aru u
S S eoc
,r N
rfott O
T a
rns C
C sP e nn E
od moo J
w r d e Ci B
tol g-t U
ceada S
n ei n n z i R F a ai
.M n
sg
,f a fg en4 ii2 s a r cn rtO oS t'g es aa pr c
eT anc
/
r srii cnmtrv e
soaner iieoee D t t C nS O
DN A
QR PC HN R.
7 IO 0
NN 0
,m STONE AND WEBSTER ENGINEERING C0kP0 RATION QCI 15.01 fttac n 4.1 NONCONFORMANCE IDENTIFICATION REPORT Page 1 of 2 DATE OF NONCONFORMANCE:
November 7, 1983 NIR NUMBER 007 IDENTIFICATION / LOCATION OF ITEMS:
i DESCRIPTION OF NONCONFORMANCE:
~
During the review of 834 non-manual Construction Training Records, two areas i
of discrepancies were observed which were not in compliance with'the requirements I
of FPG-2.000 Rev. 5, " Training of Construction Personnel." (The following Teams were evaluated #24, Field Procurement, Sub Contractors, Managements, F.E. Staff, and CGSO.
(See attached for descriptions fo Discrepancies)
NW NSY>':
PROGRAM MGR h-:TA INIEATOR cf DATE Mowrm Arm
- 7. /98_1 DATE 1 CI'2 #
i 1
CORRECTIVE ACTION BY:
f IDENTIFY ORGANIZATION TAKING CORRECTIVE ACTION I
t i
VERIFICATION SAT UNSAT NEW NIR#
CONCURRENCE INITIATOR PROGRAM MGR DATE DATE DATE i
REMARKS
-..w, c-e.e,
n NIR 007 j
- 1) Course Rosters Attachment D to FPG-2000 exhibited one or more of the following discrepancies.
BLOCK NO.
ENTRY REQUIRED ENTRY RECORDED 1
CCP DWG. No. Fig.
~
F No. Course No.
2 (a) Name of lesson Either a, b, or (b) Procedures c missing (c) Revision 6
Location of Session Bechtel In addition some entries were left blank 4
- 2) In addition to these violations, inconsistencies were noted in 6 areas:
(1) Modification to records, some lined through, signed and dated and others simply lined through.
(2) Some entries on course register are completed using pencil while most are in ink.
(3) Difficulty is experienced in determining the accuracy of records where attendance at a course carries credit for several others.,(4) Some entries carried the revision number to procedures and some omitted the revision. (5)
Proper " Course, Roster Form" as listed in Procedure FPG-2.000 were not utilized. (6) Some courses on Rosters contain information not identi-cal to matrix listing.
It is recomended that The dispositis to this NIR include a comitt-
~
~
~
ment to verify training records of each individual prior to status assessment assignment.
0 b
2 1
.--n.
- - ~ - - ~ ~
~~
')
1-i s
STONE & WE85TER HICHIGAN, INC.
~
CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW'
/#
t; -
HOLD POINT LOG StMtARY
/
r
/
3
-g ORIGINATING CPCo RESPONSE STATUS' CLOSE-0UT
'b NO.
SUBJECT "5
DOC /DATE DOC /DATE OPEN/CLOSE3 DOC /DATE
- J
~
~ _
a i
f, : 6 '
001 '
Adequacy of drawings ?.8 - targe bore pipe
- Peport No. 6
. Letter Closed Report No. 9 9'!
hangers. CIO established Hold Point when MPQA0
-7/25/R3 Issued 2 NCRs against the use of red-lined?
- ,8/9/83' 8/15/83 "f'
4 drawings which were volded.by Project
/
Engineering.
]
~
V l
a i
s T
l
.s
,j t'
,g e
102 daterial traceability of installed haagerdE3).
-Seport rio. 6 Letter Closed'
' Report'No.'9, CPCo response dat64 7/1/83-indflated report on 7/25/83 8/9/83 8/15/83 i
7 materlJ1 traceability was to be issued in a j
timely manner. Due to hacertainty of when the report would be issued, a Hold Point.was
./
j
/
r established by CIO.
~
f u
af
( -
~
/ ',
)
/
n 003 Has a program been developed and responsibilities Report No. 6 Letter Closed Report No. 9 established for personnel assigned to process 7/25/83 8/9/83 8/15/83 nonconformances?
~
Has a meeting been held with Prcject Engineering to discuss methodology of processing non-conformances?
t
/
_ - _ _ ~ _.
l t
$ TONE & WEBSTER MIC:lIGAN, INC.
CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW i
110LD POINT LOG Sl# MARY
~
ORIGINATING CPCo RESPONSE STATUS CLOSE-00T
~
NO*
SUBJECT DOC /DATE DOC /DATE OPEN/ CLOSED DOC /DATE C04 Evaluation of Phase I Management Review Report No. 1 Letters Closed CIO Letter to Committee meetings.
6/3/83 7/1/83 J.G. Keppler through 8/9/83 dated 10/12/8:
Letter of 6/30/83
.J 005 CPCo has committed to develop a Vendor Report No. 18 Open Equipment Verification Program. Program is 10/17/83 l
required before implementation of Phase II.
NIRs 002, 003, 004 and 005 issued October 3 Report No. IE Open 006
,t 1983 to address discrepancies observed during a sample ir.spection of Training Records of 6 of 45 MPQAD personnel. Corrective action must i
be completed before any inspections can be performed by the 45 personnel in question.
)
007 EvaluationofManagementRevlegofresultsofl Report No. 19 Open Phase I activities. Evaluation of Management i 10/24/83 Review Committee plans and procedures for Phase II implementation.
,/
i i
i e
k Re-worded j
a
i l-
~
s' STONE & WEBSTER MICillGAN, INC.
CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW s
HOLD POINT LOG
SUMMARY
^
\\
ORIGINATING' CPCo RESPONSE STATUS l
DOC /DATE DOC /DATE OPEN/CLO3ED.
CLOSE-0UT NO*
SUBJECT DOC / DATES
'[
008 NIR 006 has been issued on October 27, 1983 to Report 110. 20 Open address discrepancies observed during the sample 10/31/83 inspection of 2,054 Construction Training!
records of 31 members of Teams 5, 6, 8, 9, 12, g
13,16,17,19,20,25,26,(27/28),29,30,-31, t
i i
(32/33) and BHO staff.
Corrective action must be. completed before any
/l walkdown, assessments can be performed by the I
I s
personnel in question.
~
1 009 NIR 007 has been issued on November 7,1983 to Report No. 21 Open address discrepancies observed during sample 11/7/83 Inspection of 834 Construction Training records of 18 members of Team 24, Field Procurement, s
i Sub-Contractors, Management. F.E. staff and Construction General Serivces Organization.
Corrective action must be completed before any i
walkdown, assessments can be performed by the personnel in question.
4 e
1 I
~l s
STONE & WEBSTER MICHIGAN, INC.
P.O. Box 2325, BOSTON, M AssAcHusETTs 02107 Mr. J. G. Keppler, Administrator, Region III October 31, 1983 Nuclear Regulatory Commission J.0, No. 14509 799 Roosevelt Road NRC File #83-10-31 Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 RE: DOCKET NO. 50-329/330 MIDLAND PLANT - bNITS 1 AND 2 OVERVIEW OF THE CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION PROGRAM REPORT N0. 20 A copy of the Construction Implementation Overview Report No. 20 for the period October 24, 1983 thicugh October 28, 1983 is enclosed with this report. No Management Review Committee meetingswere held during this repo; ting period.
Matrices of Open Items, Hold Points, NIRs and evaluations of CCP activities, as appropriate, are attached. In addition, a report in the investigation of an allegation of improper welding is underway.
Very truly yours, ft:W S. W. Baranow Program Manager SWB/ka cc: JJHarrison, US NRC, Glen Ellyn, IL RCook, US NRC, Midland (Site)
DLQuamme, CPCo, Midland (Site)
RBKelly, S&W APAmoruso, S&W
,?
L
,1 a
- tr 1
m i
Report No. 20 October 24, 1983 through October 28, 1983 t
j Personnel on Site Stone & Webster Michigan, Inc.
A. Amoruso D. Cooke R. Scallan S. Baranow R. Corson J. Seely F. Bearham J. Langston W. Sienkiewicz J. Barr C. Marrs A. Smith R. Carpeggiani D. MacBay J. Thompson i
J. Chawla T. Parker Meetings Attended Date Attendees Purpose October 24, 1983 Consumers Power Company Daily Staff through Bechtel Power Company Management Meetings October 28, 1983 Stone & Webster CIO MPQAD October 24, 1983 Consumers Power Company Bi-Weekly Staff Bechtel Power Company and Meetings with Stone & Webster CIO Team Supervisors MPQAD October 25, 1983 Consumers Power Company QVP/ Status Stone & Webster CIO Assessment Bechtel Power Company MPQAD October 26, 1983 Consumers Power Company Area Team and i
and Bechtel Power Company System Team October 27, 1983 Zack Review Meeting MPQAD Stone and Webster CIO October 27, 1983 Consumers Power Company NRR Meeting Bechtel Zack Stone & Webster CIO I
l October 28, 1983 CPCo NRC BPCo Exit Meeting MPQAD S&W CIO l
f l
1 1
l l
L
JOB NO. 14509 MIDLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT REPORT NO. 20 PAGE 2 October 24, 1983 through October 28, 1983 - during this period, CIO attended daily staff management meetings and bi-weekly meetings with staff and team supervisors.
The main focus of ' attention during the week has been the Stop Work orders issued by MPQAD. At the dailymeetings details of current status and proposed actions are described as well as the logistics to resolve the problems in a timely manner.
Subjects discussed at the daily staff management meetings were:
- Stop Work Orders
- NCR Dispositions
- Delays in Dispositioning/ Closing NCRs
- Audit Findings
- NRC Concerns
- Document Control
- Training Progress
- Progress with Procedure Issuance
- Major Meetings
- Status of System 38
' Other Administrative Activities
' Manpower Loading Subjects discussed at the bi-weekly meetings with staff, team supervisors and support personnel were:
- Training
- Staffing to support Module 340 activities
- Punch List Coding.
. + - - - - ~ -
,...a
~
JOB N0. 14509 MIDLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT REPORT NO. 20 PAGE 3 Meetings October 25, 1983 - QVP/ Status Assessment Meeting. This was the first QVP/ Status Assessment Meeting and it was held under the joint chairmanship of MPQAD (B. Palmer) and BPCo (T. Valenzano). T. Valenzano made a brief statement explainincj the purpose of the meeting. This initial meeting was to explain the format for future meetings.
A two part hand-out was distributed and a brief walk-through of typical i
agenda items was conducted.
B. Palmer stated that all inaccessible items do not have to be completely evaluated for Phcse 1.
The agenda for the upcoming treeting betwecn Mark Technologies (MT) and BPCo was described.
It was stated that MT had some findings against the design of the plant although the exact details were not known.
Training stated that the training of the teams was almost finished.
October 26 and 27,1983 - Area and System Team Review Meetings. At these meetings, any item that is considered to be a restraint is discussed.
Action person (s) are assigned to pursue the resolutions for removing restraints. Also discussed isthe schedule for completing actions assigned to each restraint item and the progress in meeting the schedule.
October 27, 1983 - US NRP Meeting. At this meeting,the agenda items were related to the design cf the HVAC System.
Specific agenda items were:
l
- Material Traceability of Red Head and Hilti Bolts
- Calculations on Prying of Expansion Anchor Bolts
- Review of calculations of Dome Supports
- Discrepancy between drawing and specification on hanger spacing:
drawing revised to reflect as built conditions which comply with l
specification requirements l
No open items were identified by the US N2R
l JOB NO.
14509 MIDLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT l
REPORT NO. 20 PAGE 4 October 28, 1983, US NRC - Exit Meeting. At this meeting the following open HVAC related agenda items were discussed.
- 1) Report RPT 8308 - hardness testing of three A-307 bolts indicated values of 102 and.104 on the Brinnell scale, maximum allowable is 100. The out of specification values were considered acceptable by US NRC.
- 2) Report RPT 8318-8319 - sixty-eight (68) samples of the bronze welding of hangers, supports and duct work weretensile tested, bend tested and m icro-etched. Results of the tests were satisfactory and accepted by the US NRC.
- 3) Of eleven allegations received by the US NRC during 1979, 1980 and 1981, ten were considered to be closed items. The eleventh item is considered satisfactory, however the US NRC has this as an open item for tracking purposes.
ACTIVITIES
- 1. Training Records a) sampling of training records of the Construction Field Engineering Staff and the Construction General Services Organization is continuing during this period.
b) a review of the origin and the adequacy of the Construction Training Matrix is underway.
l c) NIR 006 has been issued October 27, 1983'to address disrepancies observed during the sample inspection of Construction Training i
Records of Teams 5, 6, 8, 9, 12, 13, 16 17, 19, 20, 25, 26, (27/28) 29,30,31,(32/33), BHO Team Staff.
- 2) CIO witnessed the tensile testing of 90 HVAC welded specimens in accordance with Zack Company proposal titled " Program to Evaluate l
Past Welding to Photon Procedures" The tensile testing was performed i
at the CPCo laboratory in Jackson, Michigan and was in accordance with -
{
approved CPCo procedure Number MET-11 " Tension Testing of Weld Assemblies.
Specimen types were:
30 each - sheet to sheet welding 30 each - sheet to structure welding-l 30 each - structure to structure welding
\\ $
3 JOB NO. 14509 MIDLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT REPORT NO. 20 PAGE 5 All results exceeded the calculated in service load values. The results were considered satisfactory and were documented on MP-MIS-Z-039, " Program to Evaluate Past Welding to Photon Procedures."
- 3) Allegation On October 26, 1983 - CIO received an anonymous phone call at 1:10 PM alleging that welding was being performed, contrary t6 authorized procedures.
Specifically the party alleged that: "Bechtel Weld Procedures, PI-T-B and PI-A-LH, were unapproved for the sequence they were being used."
The party stated that there were numerous carbon steel socket welds in the Turbine and Auxiliary Buildings that were originally made using the SMAW (PI-A-LH) process. The welds were undersized and the balance of the weld was made using the TIG (PI-T-A) process.
CIO immediately notified the US NRC (Mr. R. Cook) and CPCo (Mr. B. Peck) of the allegation and advised that an investigation of the allegation would be conducted. CIO conducted its own investigation in the plant area, and the inspection of a weld on line EBD-103 revealed that a weld had originally been made using the SMAW process and a partial weld (probably a repair) had been placed over the original deposited weld filler metal. This observation confirmed that the allegation had merit and should be further investigated.
CIO then notified BPCo (Mr. G. Hierzer) who immediately made Mr. L. Harrison j
(BPCo) available to assist in the investigation.
On October 27 - CIO met with Messrs. L. Harrison and S. Sprague (BPCo). CIO was shown an approved chart that indicated that both weld procedures were authorized for the welds on the EBD system. (NOTE:
It was also detennined that the EBD system was in fact non-Q)
CIO will obtain copies of portions of the ASME III Code applicable to Midland as well as copies of inspection records on a Q system to complete the investigation into the allegation.
The initial finding by CIO is that the welds were made in a sequence i
described by the informant and thatthe sequence is authorized and approved.
It is anticipated that the investigation will be concluded during week i
ending November 4,1983.
l t
i 3
~
JOB NO.
14509 MIDLAND NUCLEAR. POWER PLANT REPORT NO. 20 PAGE 6 i
GENERAL
- 1) Signed affidavits, with copies of resumes ~of the following Stone & Webster personnel have been transmitted to Mr. J. J. Harrison, US NRC, Glen Ellyn, IL.
- Mr. C. A. Marts, Consultant Field Quality Control Divisio.1 reported to job site on October 24, 1983
- Mr. D. M. MacBay, Level II Inspector, Mechanical, reported to job site on October 24, 1983 f
- 2) Copies of revised CIO procedures, instructions are attached for information.
- Project Quality Assurance Plan Rev. 2
- Third Party Construction Implementation Overview Rev. 2 October 26, 1983
- QCI 10.05 Rev. 0 October 14, 1983 CIO Monitoring Inspection
- OCI 15.02 Rev. 0 October 7,1983 Trend Analyses t
9 i
4 6
t f
i i
L
ST0!!E & lil lliTEli HICilitiAll, IllC.
J CollSilluCIIOll IH1'I.EMElllAIInfl UVCityttu i
tillt LUG SUHiAllY N !il HPQAD DATE DATE DATE NO.
NCR HO.
SUBJECT
.of DISP. DY CLOSED REMARKS OAR NO.
Issus MPQAD NIR issued us closed-no cor-001 N/A Training Records 8/15/83 8/15/83 8/17/83 rective action required 002 QAR-
_ Foms from both procedures B-3M and RT 00005 8-3M-1 are intermixed in training 10/4/83 10/12/83 j
records 003 QAR Yearly vision examination was exceeded 10/4/83 10/12/83 RT 00006 DJT training records not available in RT 00007 training records. Revision number not 10/4/83 10/12/83 004 listed on OJT Record Memo to CPCo ad-l QAR
, Personnel Certification Fom QA-116-1 vising that NIR-005 RT 00011 Attachment D is unavailable in record 10/4/83 10/12/83 10/20/83 can be closed out.
005 files Records for Level 11 certifications have 1
been verifl?d by CIO Discrepancies in three areas of 006 Construction Training Records 10/27/83 e
QCI 15.01 ATTACllHEllT 4.3 REV. 2
i
~
$ TONE & WEBSTER MICillGAN, INC.
CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW 110LD POINT LOG
SUMMARY
i ORIGINATING CPCo RESPONSE STATUS CLOSE-0UT NO*
SUBJECT DOC /DATE DOC /DATE OPEN/ CLOSED DOC /DATE 001 Adequacy of drawings A8 - large bore pipe Report No. 6 Letter Closed Report No. 9 hangers. CIO established Hold Point when MPQAD 7/25/83 8/9/83 8/15/83 issued 2 NCRs against the use of red-lined drawlags which were voided.by Project Engine (ring.
,)
002 Material traceability of installed hangers (E3).
Report No. 6 Letter Closed Report MJ. 9 CPCo response dated 7/1/83 indicated report on 7/25/83 8/9/83 8/15/83 material traceability was to be issued in a timely manner. Due to uncertainty of when the report would be issued, a Hold Point was established by C10.
003 Has a program been developed and responsibilities Report No. 6 Letter Closed Report No. 9 estchlished for personnel assigned to process 7/25/83 8/9/83 8/15/83 nonconformances? -
Has a meeting been held with Project Engineering to discuss methodology of processing non-
.conformances?
S
STONE & WEBSTER HICillGAN, INC.
CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW ll0LD POINT LOG
SUMMARY
NO.
. SUBJECT ORIGINATING CPCo RESPONSE STATUS CLOSE-0UT DOC /DATE DOC /DATE OPEN/ CLOSED DOC /DATE 004 Evaluation of Phase I Management Review Report No. 1 Letters Closed CIO Letter Committee meetings.
6/3/83 7/1/83 to J.G.Keppler through 8/9/83 dated 10/12/83 4
Letter of
_)
6/30/83 i
l 005 CPCo has committed to develop a Vendor Report No. 18 Open Equipment Verification Program. Program is 10/17/83 required before implementation of Phase II.
.006 NIRs 002, 003, 004 and 005 issued as a result Report No. 18 Open of sampling inspections of 45 MPQAD Training Records. Corrective action must be completed before any inspections can be performed by the 45 personnel in question.
007 Evaluation of Management Review.of results of Report No. 19 Gpen Phase I activities. Evaluation of Management 10/24/83 Review Committee plans and procedures for Phase II implementation.
q STONE AND WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATI N QCI 15.01 httacMan 4.1 NONCONFORMANCE IDENTIFICATION REPORT PAGE 1 0F 2 lDATEOFNONCONFORMANCE:
NIR NUMBER 006 OCTOBER 27, 1983 IDENTIFICATION / LOCATION OF ITEMS:
BECHTEL DOCUMENT CONTROL CENTER DESCRIPTION OF NONCONFORMANCE:
During the review of.2054 non-manual Construction Training Records, three areas of discrepancies were otiserved which were not in compliance with the requirements of FPG-2.000 Rev. 5. " Training of Construction Personnel." (The following Teams I
were evaluated #5, 6, 8, 9,12,13,16,17,19, 20, 25, 26, (27/28), 29, 30,31, 32/33), CHO Team Staff.
(See attached for descriptions of Discrepancies) ldduM 1ond PROGRAM MGR dad INIIIATOR g
DATE ct]obe 2 B 1993 DATE $ N &b///f CORRECTIVE ACTION BY:
IDENTIFY ORGANIZATION TAKING CORRECTIVE ACTION i
a i
VERIFICATION SAT UNSAT NEW NIR#
CONCURRENCE INITIATOR PROGRAM MGR DATE DATE DATE REMARKS
i NIR 006
- 1) Course Rosters Attachment D to FPG-2.000 exhibited one or more of the following discrepancies.
BLOCK NO.
ENTRY REQUIRED ENTRY RECORDED i
1 CCP DWG. No. FIG. No.
i 2
(a) Name of lesson Either a'.b, or c missing (b) Procedures (c) Revision 6
Location of Session Bechtel 10 (a) Signature Either a or b missing (b) Print Last Name 5
Instructor Name Instructor Department i
i In addition many entries j'
were left blank
- 2) Reading Records Attachment C to FPG-2.000 exhibited one or more of the following discrepancies:
Reading Record
- 1) The department and or assignment lines are illegible or incomplete.
- 2) Assigned reading performed on October 11, 1983 and September 29, 1983 were not documented on Reading Form Attachment C, Rev. 5.
- 3) Team Records and TSR (Training Status Report) show training completed Document Control Files showed no record of training. For example:
NAME TEAM #
TRAINING RE0dIREMENT DISCREPANCY Kranzfelder Management FPD-2.000 Code 2 No Record in File J. Hull 32/33 M-204 Code 5 No Record in File In addition to these violations, inconsistency was noted in 4 areas:
(1) Modification to records, some lined through, signed and dated and others simply lined through. (2) Some entries on course register are completed using pencil while most are in ink. (3) Difficulty is experienced in de-termining the accuracy of records where attendance at a course carries credit for several others.' (4) Some entries carried the revision number to procedures and some omitted the revision. (5) Proper " Course Roster Form as listed in Procedure FPG-2.000 were not utilized. (6) Some courses on Rosters contain information not identical to matrix listing.
It is recommended that the disposition to this NIR include a committment to j
verify training records of each individual prior to status assessment assignment.
j 1
l l
w u.__
q-my y
7-e-m-
i 8
e ta D
t/
ut On
- e em su oc o
l CD de s
o l
sC n
u/
e t n p
ae O
t p S. O ee stna oD p/
4 st en Re m ou Cc Po T
CD N
.A CL l P l
e I
N t
5
,O ga NI nD AT i/
o3 GA tt N8 l R an
/
I i ES ne t8 Cl N im r1 l
e iO gu o/
I i
MGI ic p7 OT ro e
E V
&NO I
EDC lf N 0A TL O
SD tM I
nS M
e/
mD pA iQ s
uP n
qM o
E i
t r
a om v
da r
nr e
eg s
Vo b
r O
wP e
invo ei rt a oc ti f
di er ee NV n
o i
tr 0
a e 3
vb 0
r m e u sN bO d
e
)
n Revision 2 i
Page 1 J.0. No. 14509 Midland Plant Units 1 & 2 l
Consumer Power Company Third Party Construction Implementation Overview PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN Aporovals:
Dates *
$bN M///5 Program Manager Oe/obe--ZM '995 Chief Engineer 8
Engineering Assurance 06 Ts* }st.10. MB 5
/
Hahager
/
Quality Assurance SCOPE This procedure describes the quality assurance plan for activities performed by Stone & Webster Michigan (S&W) for the Consmers Power Company's (CPCo) Midland Plant-Units One and Two.
The work involved in this third party overview is described in applicable CPCo specifications and procedures and shall be accom-plished in the following manner:
a.
Development of an overview program and preparation of a Project Quality Plan.
I b.
Review of the design and construction documents to gain familiarity with the work.
c.
Assessment of the adequacy of technical and related administrative construc-I tion and quality procedures.
I I
d.
Assessment of the degree of compliance with technical and administrative i
construction and quality procedures.
e.
Assessments are made by conducting audits, monitoring (surveillance) inspec-tions, and redundant (sample) inspections, f.
Daily reviews as necessary with-the Owner to obtain any clarifying information and project documents that are needed to carry out this program. The Owner i
and S&W will establish a specific communication plan. at the start of _. the l
work.
l l
g.
Submittal of brief veekly progress reports and a final report to the NRC.with'
+
l l
a copy to CPCo.
I h.
S&W will not be responsible for implementing corrective action, however, their professional opinion may be requested.
^
Revision 2 Page 2 PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS AND ACTIVITIES I.
ORGANIZATION The overall Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation (SWEC) organization is depicted in SWSQAP 1-74A (Section I). A Program Manager will function as the site leader for the third party overview. Project organization is described in the Project Program Plan.
II. QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM The overall SWEC ~ quality assurance program is designed to provide assurance that all SWEC activities are accomplished in a controlled manner.
The SWEC corporate QA program complies with 10CFR50, Appendix B, and NRC Regulatory Guides, and is described in an NRC approved topical report, SWSQAP 1-74A,
" Standard Nuclear Quality Assurance Program."
This quality assurance plan shall be maintained up-to-date to reflect any changes in the scope of S&W work.
This quality assurance plan identifies the procedures which implement the overall QA program as it applies to the S&W scope.
Insof ar as possible, applicable standard SWEC procedures will be used to govern the work. When standard procedures do not fit project circumstances, project procedures will be issued to govern the work. Variances from standard SWEC procedures will be approved according to Quality Standard (QS) 5.1 and Engineering Assurance Procedure (EAP) 5.7.
Personnel performing activities in accordance with this plan requiring quali-fication and certification will be qualified and certified in accordance with Quality Standard 2.12 and Quality Assurance Directive 2.5.
III.
DESIGN CONTROL (Not within the S&W scope) 4 IV.
PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT CONTROL Consulting Services, as required, are procured in accordance with Engineering Assurance Procedures 4.1 and 4.15, which are supplemented by Project Proce-dure (PP) (LATER).
V.
INSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES, AND DRAWINGS S&W procedures, including variances, are prepared and controlled in ac-j cordance with Section II of this QA plan.
(Instructions, drawings and specifications are not within the S&W scope).
VI.
DOCUMENT CONTROL Plans, procedures, instructions, and doctments prepared and implemented by S&W will be controlled per PP (later).
i a
m w
a
O
~
Revision 2 Page 3 VII.
C0fiTROL OF PURCHASED MATERIAL, PARTS, EQUIPMENT, AND SERVICES (Control of Purchased Material, Parts and Equipment - not within the S&W scope).
Control of Services is in accordance with Engineering Assurance Procedure 7.1.
VIII.
IDENTIFICATION AND CONTROL OF MATERIAL, PARTS, AND COMPONENTS (Not within the S&W scope)
IX.
CONTROL OF SPECIAL PROCESS (Not within the S&W scope) l X.
INSPECTION Monitoring inspections are conducted on a surveillance basis to assess on-g/
going CCP activities. Redundant sample inspections are conducted after ac-ceptance of an area, comodity, or product by CPCo as a final assessment measure.
XI.
TEST CONTROL (Not within the S&W scope)
XII.
CONTROL OF MEASURING AND TEST EQUIPMENT (Not within the S&W scope)
XIII.
HANDLING, STORAGE, AND SHIPPING (Not within the S&W scope)
XIV.
INSPECTION, TEST, AND OPERATING STATUS (Not within the S&W scope)
XV.
NONCONFORMING MATERIAL, PARTS, OR COMPONENTS Nonconfomances observed by S&W during monitoring and sample inspections are reported in writing to the NRC with copy to CPCo. These reports will be used in establishing the extent of inspection and adjustments to the extent of inspection by trend analysis.
XVI.
CORRECTIVE ACTION The criteria for the identification of conditions that require review to l'
determine reportability under 10CFR50.55(e) and/or 10CFR21 are defined in I
i QS/EAP-16.2 and QS/EAP-16.3, respectively.
Identified conditions are pro-l l
cessed for review / evaluation in accordance with Project Procedure "Noncon-l formance Identification and Reporting."
l
Revision 2 3
q Page 4 XVII.
QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS 1
S&W General Policy and Procedure for records collection, retention, and turn-l over to Consumers Power Capany are described in QS-17.1, EAP-17.2 and QAD-j 17.1 and as detailed in the scope under itms f. and g.
QAD-17.1 and EAP-17.2 are supplemented by PP (LATER).
j XVIII.
AUDITS fudits of the S&W CIO program are performed in accordance with QS-18.1 and 2
QAD's 18.1 and 18.2.
j i
et i
i i
l
.(
J.0.No. 14509 Date October 26, 1983 Midland Plant Units 1 & 2 Revision p
i THIRD PARTY CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW i
Approval:
u wf Date to/M/?'3 Manager Quality Assurance /
/
sf DateNhh
' Program Manager 1.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE To establish a program whereby Stone & Webster Michigan (S&W) performs in-2 dependent evaluations and verifications of the Consumers Power Company (CPCo)
Construction Completion Program, (CCP) reports progress, observations, and non-confomances to the program; specifically, to verify:
1.1 Management performance is adequate in the following areas:
A.
Establistinent of the Management Review Committee i
B.
Duties and responsibilities of the Review Committee are clearly defined C.
Procedures governing the actions of the Review Committee are in i
place D.
Management reviews are complete, effective, and conducted in ac-cordance with the requirements of the CCP Program 1.2 CCP procedures, instructions, inspection plans, records, and prerequisites for inspections /reinspections have been satisf actorily approved prior to implementation.
i 1.3 Specific CPCo comitments to the NRC are identified to f acilitate track-l ing; dates for compliance (as appropriate) are adequately identified; appropriate action parties are clearly identified; comitted actions have been satisfactorily resolved.
l.4 Procedures, prerequisites, and reinspection attributes in References 2.1, 2.2 and 2.3 have been approved by the Management Review Comittee.
1
)
Revision 2 Page 2 1.5 Personnel assigned to implement the CCP Program have been properly trained, qualified and certified in accordance with the requirements of ANSI-N45.2.6; SNT-TC-1A and MPQAD Procedure B-3M-1, Qualification and Certification of Inspection and Test Personnel.
Construction and craft l
personnel shall be trained to meet the requirements of the Construction Training Procedure FPG-2.000.
I 1.6 The effectiveness of the Quality Verification Program based on witnessing inspections /reinspections of selected caponent installation, fabrication and review of applicable test / inspection reports and records.
1.7 Measures have been developed to ensure that NRC hold points are clearly identified and controls are in evidence to prevent continuance of work pending clearance of the hold points.
n
2.0 REFERENCES
2.1 Quality Verification Program Docunent, April 16, 1983 4
2.2 Construction Completion Program a.
Letters J.W. Cook to the NRC:
January 10, 1983 April 6, 1983 April 22, 1983 I
August 26, 1983 2
2.3 Nonconformance Identification and Reporting Procedure 3.0 ATTACHENTS l
3.1 Evaluation Attribute Checklist i
3.2 Verification Attribute Checklist 3.3 Non:onformance Identification Report 4.0 DEFINITIONS 4.1 Construction Completion Program (CCP)
A program to provide guidance in planning and management of design and quality activities necessary for completion of construction of the plant I
and verification of completed work.
4.2 Quality Verification Program (QVP)
An elenent of the CCP used to confim the quality status of safety related procurement and construction activities completed and inspected by the Engineer-Constructor personnel prior to December 2,'1982.
4.3 Evaluation-Assessment of quality related activities based upon review of procedures, plans, instructions, inspection reports, test results and additional i
consnitments.
. j
-., - - ~,..
a.
~.
l Revision 2 J
Page 3 NOTE I
Documentation resulting from resolution of CPCo consnitments to the NRC and NRC Hold i
j Points shall be 100% reviewed to verify that proper corrective action has been accom-i plished.
4.4 Verification Confirming, substantiating or assuring that CCP and QVP requirements have 2
been implemented and are adequate. Verification actions may include docu-I mentation, hardware and management systems.
NOTE Verification of the CCP and QVP Programs will be accomplished by monitoring and sam-
/
2 i
ple inspections in sufficient detail to en-N l
sure adequate CPCo implementation.
5.0 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 5.1 All personnel assigned quality assurance program evaluation responsibil-ities shall be certified auditors in accordance with ANSI-N45.2.23 and applicable SWEC procedures.
5.2 All personnel assigned construction verification responsibilities shall be certified inspectors in accordance with ANSI-N45.2.6 and applicable SWEC procedures and possess the appropriate - combination of education, ex-perience and training.
5.3 The Third Party Construction Implementation Overview (CIO) program will be structured to determine, by evaluation of predetermined procedures and instructions, the quality practices utilized in the construction of the Midland Plant Units 1, 2, and the effectiveness of those practices.
l 5.4 A site team will be established to monitor the effectiveness of the Con-l struction Completion Program. The team will consist of a Program Manager and two functional groups. - One group will assess the completeness of compliance with procedures and inspection plans being used to complete the work. The other group will review certain aspects of construction activi-I ties which relate to the performance of the Quality Control Inspection Program. These two groups will use special procedures, attribute check-lists, and random sampling techniques to evaluate the following:
A.
Adequacy and implementation of CPCo procedures regarding construc-tion activities, personnel qualification,- training programs, and j
organizational practices.
l B.
Compliance of Construction Completion Program teams to prescribed
. procedures.
l l
m o
w www<-
g
7 Revision 2
'i Page 4 l
C.
Compliance of Midland Project Quality Assurance (MPQAD) personnel to applicable inspection procedures.
D.
Compliance of construction activities, to applicable procedures, t
5.5 The Program Manager shall maintain comunications with the NRC and CPCo Site Manager. Monthly progress meetings shall be held with the NRC and CPCo 2
to discuss progress and report on nonconformance and observations.
5.6 Programatic nonconformances of a serious nature shall be immediately reported to the NRC and CPCo.
6.0 PROCEDURES l
6.1 The following procedures shall be prepared to control the activities of the Construction Implementation Overview (CIO) teams.
A.
Quality Control Instruction 10.01 Construction Implementation Overview Assessment 6.2 The site teams shall develop attribute checklists for each evaluation and verification activity. Attributes shall be selected from the CCP, PQCI's, CPCo comittments to the NRC and other applicable requirements.
6.3 Auditors assigned to c.anduct evaluations shall, utilizing attribute check-lists, verify that acceptable quality practices are evident in the per-formance of each activity.
The results of ec.h evaluation shall be docuented on the attribute check-list to ensure repeatability. Summaries of the results shall be tabulated weekly for presentation to the NRC and CPCo.
6.4 Inspectors assigned to conduct verification shall, utilizing the check-list, monitor the activities of CPCo personnel involved in CCP and QVP activities.
6.5 All systems verified shall be identified and documented to assure repeat-ability.
6.6 Nonconformances identified in conjunction with this vocedure shall be 7
docunented on a Nonconformance Identification Report (NIR) and processed 2
in accordance with Reference 2.3 of this procedure.
4 7.0 REPORTS 7.1 The following reports will be submitted to NRC and CPCo and S&W by the Program Manager.
A.
Weekly Progress Reports B.
Monthly Meeting Reports C.
Final Reports on Construction Completion
,4 y
N Revision 2
. c'
~-
Page 5 7.2 Weekly Progress Reports Weekly Progress Reports will be submitted to tne USNRC and CPCo.
1 l
7.3 Monthly Meeting Report - The Monthly Meeting Report shall consist of the i
minutes of monthly meetings conducted by the USNRC with the public in 2
attendance. Copies of the minutes of the meetings shall be transmitted to the USNRC and CPCo.
7.4 Final Report - A final report will be submitted 30 days af ter completion of the program.
The report will sumarize the S&W assessment.
The final report will be submitted by the Program Manager to the NRC, CPCo and S&W.
e I
i
l T-398 3
' 10.05 0
1[.nn ""'"#"'$.'C. Thompson
~i STONE E WEBSTER DIVisloN LOCATION
. QUALITY APPLICABILITY APPROVE /8Y Af~
'o s/s)43 CONTROL MIDLAND INSTRUCTION Os-4.2 CIO MONITORING INSPECTION i
1.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE To establish a system for planning, conducting and documenting Construction Implementation Overview (CIO) inspections.
This QCI shall be applicable to Babcock Wilcox, NSSS and Zack HVAC activities.
i i
2.0 REFERENCES
2.1 QCI 10.01 - CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW ASSESSMENT 3.0 ATTACHMENTS 3.1 None 4.0 GENERAL b
4.1 The CIO Program shall assure proper implementation of QA/QC programs through systematic evaluations of records, methods, procedures, and acti-vi ti es.
Inspections shall assure conformance of materials, processes and/or services to the requirements specified in engineering, construction 4
and QA/QC docunents and procedures. An inspection checklist, as deli-neated in Reference 2.1, shall be used as the basis for monitoring inspec-tions.
4.2 As a minimun, the monitoring program shall encompass each qualit related activity or each section of the QA program being monitored as indkcated on -
the inspection schedule.
4.3 CIO shall perform all monitoring inspection functions, i.e.,
prepare schedules, inspection checklists; perfonn monitoring inspections and docu-ment results.
4.4 Monitoring inspection results shall be docunented and reported in ac-cordance with Paragraph 5.3.
4.5 Responsibilities-j 4.5.1 The CIO Program Manager is responsible for the implenentation and control of the Monitoring Inspection Program at the construction site.
l 4.5.2 The CIO Program Manager is also responsible for evaluating results j
and effectivity of the program.
i i
1
.)
QCI 10.05
^
Revision 2 of 3 1
1 5.0 PROCEDURE j
5.1 Scheduling i
i 5.1.1 Schedules of monitoring inspection activities shall be based on workload and areas where activities to be monitored are in pro-gress, where known or potential problem areas exist, and where the review of NCRs indicates negative trends.
5.1.2 CIO shall prepare a monitoring schedule on a semi-annual basis and update it to reflect changes when deemed necessary.
i 5.1.3 Additional inspection of products or processes may be performed based on types of activities in progress.. These -inspections are not scheduled but are supplemental to the required inspections.
They shall be documented in accordance with Paragraph 5.3.
5.2 Attribute Checklist 5.2.1 CIO shall prepare attribute checklists for all monitoring inspec-tion activities indicated on the inspection schedule using the i
applicable documents that effect quality, i.e., PQCI's, specifi-cations, codes, contractor QA/QC programs, engineering and con-struction department procedures, etc.
The attribute checklist delineates specific items that require inspection.
J In preparing attribute checklists, the responsible monitoring in-5.2.2
.spector shall interface with the appropriate Babcock & Wilcox/Mid-land Plant Quality Assurance Department (BW/WQAD) inspector as necessary to assure that the pertinent activity will be adequately monitored, i
5.2.3 An attribute checklist will be established as a standard and' define the minimum requirements for the inspection.
The Inspector may add additional attributes as conditions warrant, e.g.,- adverse trends. Attributes that.are not applicable.to a specific inspec-tion shall be identified as N/A and not be deleted.
f 5.2.4 All specifications, procedures, drawings, etc., and revisions l
thereto used during monitoring shall be referenced on the check-list.
5.2.5 The monitoring results shall be transmitted to the NRC and CPCo j
summarizing the results of the inspections.
I 5.2.6 All checklists shall be prepared in accordance with the. require-ments of Reference 2.1.
L l
5.3 - Monitoring Inspection Reporting 5.3.1 The result of scheduled and unscheduled monitoring-inspections shall be documented using the attribute checklist. All results-
- shall be described in sufficient detail to ensure repeatability of '
inspections.
T' N "'*
- 4 4'8 9_e M m
p e
,-w
-ww-p p
3
7 QCI 10.05
_3 Page 3 of 3
)
5.3.2 The attribute checklist shall document all areas, items and de-tails observed.
It shall also identify both satisfactory and unsatisf actory findings.
5.4 Maintenance of Doctsnentation 5.4.1 CIO shall maintain a file of all cmnpleted attribute checklists, and related doctanentation.
i l
I f
i l
4 I
1 1
. - ~. -
., ~,.
6.
b W
=, 4 391 5 m
STONE f. WEDSTER QCI NO.
R E V.
DATE. -
PREPARED BY
N
. i 15.02 0
'/83 g,g, c7;,y,,
DIVISION LOCATION g
gggg QUALITY 4Prticaaitirr areROvEa sY 14a n/mte.r CONTROL MID M S
! ='
W INSTRUCTION N/A SUBJECT TREND ANALYSIS I
1.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE To establish the procedure for evaluation of CIO verification and evaluation results for the purpose of identifying significant and recurring quality problems.
2.0 REFERENCES
- 8 2.1 SWEC Third Party Construction Implementation Overview (CIO).
2.2 SWEC Project Quality Assurance Plan.
2.3 Construction Completion Program.
3.0 ATTACHMENTS 3.1 Quality Trend Report 4.0 CENERAL 4.1 CIO activities are designed to asse.ss the Midland Station QA Program implementation through the performance of evaluations / verifications and the analysis of results.
Analysis will be performed to aetermine effective implementation of the PQCI's and the effectiveness of the CCP teams.
5.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 5.1 Evaluation / Verification Supervision:
5.1.1 Review and approval of CIO attribute Checklists.
5.1.2 Review and evaluation of evaluation / verification results for t
the purpose of identifying significant and recurring quality I
problems.
I i
5.2 Evaluation / Verification Personnel:
5.2.1 Performing and documenting CIO evaluations / verifications.
5.2.2 Updating the CIO Evaluation / Verification Status Log as acci-vities are performed.
i
'hf
.s QCi 45.02 6.0 d' ROCEDURE 6.1 The Evaluation / Verification Supervisors shall review the Evaluation /-
l Verification Status Log on a monthly basis for significant and recurring l
quality problems.
I 6.2 Results of the analysis shall be documented on a monthly Quality Trend Report (QTR) from the Program Manager to the Regional Administrator. The QTR shall contain as a minimum:
6.2.1 A smanary of CIO activities within the month and cumulative.
Checklists Initiated Teams Evaluated 8'
Sampled Lots Passed Sampled Lots Failed NIR's Issued 6.7. :
A detailed breakdown of checklists completed for each team, both for the month and cumulative.
Total Checklists Total Observations Unsatisfactory Observation Sample Lots Rejected Number of NIR's Issued Narrative summary of conclusions based on review of the' activities and the individual unsat observations.
6.2.3 A detailed breakdown of checklists completed for each PQCI, both for the month and cumulative.
i Total Checklists Total Observations Unsatisfactory Observations Sample Lots Rejected 6
Number of NIR's Issued l
Narrative summary of conclusions based on review of the i
activities and the individual unsat observations.
I 6.2.4 Trend charts may be included to graphically display negative l
trends determined either by PQCI or team, as applicable.
s 6.3 Significant problem areas identified in the QTR shall be addressed' by separate memo to CPCo for corrective action.
l l
2 of 2 j
- .y.
9 CIO HONTHLY TREND REPORT
- I.
SUMMARY
PERIOD TOTAL TO DATE 2
A.
Checklists Completed 5.
Teams Assessed 4 :
C.
PQCI s Assessed g]
D.
Passed Lots E.
Failed Lots 4
F.
NIR's Istued t
D O
e-
~
?,. E a e
i w""
.. i i
e i
' t l' s
6
CIO HONTitLY TREND REPORT
)
II.
TEAM ASSESSMENTS TEAM-TOTAL REJECTED TOTAL UNSAT NO.
CHECKLIST LOTS OBSERVATIONS OBSERVATIONS NIR's PERIOD TOTAL PERIOD TOTAL PERIOD TOTAL PERIOD TOTAL PERIOD TOTAL i
i m>
s 5 No. I
- kN' n p: u O
O mgn "w
4 N
J CONCLUSIONS:
i T
4 T -
?
-'~ ~^
~~~
' ' ' ~ ' ~
- e CIO MONTHLY TREND REPORT III.
PQCI ASSESSMENTS i
i l'
TOTAL REJECTED TOTAL UNSAT I
PQCI CllECKLISTS LOTS OBSERVATIONS OBSERVATIONS NIR's NO.
-TITLE PERIOD TOTAL PERIOD TOTAL PERIOD TOTAL PERIOD TOTAL PERIOD TOTAL N
h
}
1, i
s m>c
$. Y..P.
~
2 s
uhV O
O
"'.9 "
"w L
CONCLUSIONS: -
3 li t
t
./
[ ARI.'CIPAL STAF': )
STONE & WEBSTER MICHIGAN, INC.
V, i AA=;
-il _-d
- 1:
P.O. box 2325. BOSTON. M ASSACHUSETTS O2107 S-
~l u.
f D'7' S',
V hT
.aih t3 Mr. J. G. Keppler, Administrator, Region III October 26, 1983 Nuclear Regulatory Commission J.0 No. 14509 799 Roosevelt Road NRC File #83-10-26 Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 RE: DOCKET NO. 50-329/330 MIDLAND PLANT - UNITS 1 AND 2 OVERVIEW 0F THE CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION PROGRAM REPORT NO. 19 A copy of the Construction Implementation Overview Report No.19 for the period October 17, 1983 through October 21, 1983 is enclosed with this report. One Management Review Committee meeting was held during this reporting period.
Evaluations of CCP activities, as appropriate are attached. In addition, matrices of Open Items, Hold Points, and NIRs are attached.
Very ruly yours, N
S. W. Baranow Program Manager SWB/ka cc: JJHarrison, US NRC, Glen Ellyn, IL RCook, US NRC, Midland (Site) j DLQuamme, CPCo', Midland (Site)
RBKelly, S&W APAmoruso, S&W Y
f
- w.,.3w e'.
<t p
9 v -
OCT 311983
m m
~
Report No. 19 l
October 17, 1983 through October 21, 1983 t
i l
Personnel on Site
~
Stone & Webster Michigan, Inc.
A. Amoruso J.-Chawla J. Seely S. Barancw D. Cooke W. Sienkiewicz F. Bearham J. Langston A. Smith J. Barr T. Parker J. Thompson R.Carpeggiani R. Scallan' C. Larsen (temporary)
Meetings Atten'ded Date Attendees Purpose October 19, 1983 Consumers Power Company Readiness for Status Management Review Comittee Assessment Stone & Webster CIO Bechtel Power Company MPQAD October 17, 1983 Consumers Power Company Daily Staff Management through Bechtel Power Company Meetings
- October 21,-1983 Stone & Webster-CIO-MPQAD October 17, 1983 Consumers Power Company Bi-Weekly Staff and and Bechtel Power Company Meetings with Team October 20, 1983 Stone & Webster CIO Supervisors MPQAD i
October 20, 1983 Consumers Power Company b'elding Evaluation Bechtel Power Company Program (HVAC Welds)
Zack' MPQAD i
Stone and Webster CIO October 21, 1983 Consumers Power Company Weekly Sub-Contractor i
Bechtel Meeting i
Zack j
Stone & Webster CIO October 21, 1983 Consumers Power Company Development of a Bechtel Unified Comitment MPQAD Tracking System i
Stone and Webster CIO 6
u
3
.-s I
JOB NO. 14509 MIDLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT REPORT NO. 19 PAGE 2 l
Meetings October 19,'1983 - Management Review Committee Meeting. Agenda items discussed were:
- Identification of civil commodities
- MPQAD inspection / construction interface
\\-
- CCP commitments and status based on the August 26, 1983 letter
- Raceway proposal status 1
CIO is providing details of agenda items under separate cover.
October 17, 1983 through October 21, 1983 - during this period, CIO attended daily staff management meetings and bi-weeklymeetings with staff and team supervisors.
October 20,1983-HVAC Welding Evaluation Program Meeting. Revision I of i
the. Photon procedures were distributed to and reviewed by the attendees.
j Testing parameters, responsibilities and traceability of assigned project numbers to test pieces were discussed. There are approximately 90 welds which were removed from structural supports which were removed from i
structural supports which will be tensile tested at CPuo (Jackson) Laboratory in Jackson, Michigan. CIO has been requested by CPCo to provide surveillance inspection of this testing. To accomplish this task, CIO has developed 1
attribute checklist MP-MIS-Z-039 " Program to Evaluate Past Welding to Photon Procedures:
Subjects discussed at the daily staff management meetings were:
l
- NCR Dispositions
- NCR Causes-
- Delays in dispositioning/ closing NCRs i
j
- Audit Findings l
- Starting Q work i
- NRC Concerns, i
- Document Control
- Stop work orders
- Training Progress g
y,,,w,_
,*.**,**7 g-p-
ar ga w
4' g
y ar-,-u
JOB NO. 14509 MIDLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT REPORT NO. 19 PAGE 3
- Progress with procedure issuance
- Major meetings
- Status of System 38
- Other administrative activities
- Manpower loading
)
Subjects discussed at the bi-weekly meetings with staff, team supervisors and support personnel were:
- Training
- Need for " Hands on" experience with procedures -
N
- Staffing to support Module 340 sctivities
- Delays in document control drawing issue
- Other administrative activities such as overtime October 21, 1983 - Weekly subcontract status meeting. Subjects discussed i
were:
Bechtel Power Company
- Numberof NCRs related to Plant Unit 2 which are to be cleared before j
the end of 1983.
- Traveler status
- Status of Zacks weld tensile testing program
- Cause of increase of Field Change Requests (FCR)
I l
l Zack HVAC l
- Piping Stystem, 2QLC system
- Increase of NCRs related to installation drawings
- MB-FP-16 Training Procedure Transco
- Backup data for restraints noted on punch lists I
- Punch List for Plant Unit 2
JOB NO.
14509 MIDLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT REPORT NO. 19 PAGE 4 ACTIVITIES Training Records The CIO evaluation of sampling inspections performed on approximately 1993 individual training records has been completed and documented on Checklist No. MP-MIS-001E. Records of Teams 5,6,8,9.12,17,20,25,26, (27/28),29,30,31,(32/33 and the HBO Team 32/33 Staff were covered.
NIR.006 will be issued describing the discrepancies identified.
GENERAL The US NRC, Consumers Power Company, and Stone and Webster met on October 13, 1983 to discuss CIO activities. The monthly meeting was open to the public. Minutes of the meeting have been sent to the Region III, NRC and Consumers Power Company.
4 O
sa***
e i
i
%'* eur-n.
dpme.ag.y P
-m-
-~fp-
O
^
STONE AND WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QCI 15.01 fttac nt 4.1 NONCONFORMANCE IDENTIFICATION REPORT PAGE 1 0F 1
~
DATE OF NONCONFORMANCE:
SEPTEMBER 27, 1983 NIR NUMBER 005 IDENTIFICATION / LOCATION OF ITEMS:
MP0AD - RECORDS FILE SECTION i
DESCRIPTION OF NONCONFORMANCE:
A sample inspection of 6 of 45 MPQAD Personnel Training Records revealed that the Personner Certification For>n QA-116-1, Attachment D is not available in i
i
_{
the r tSrd file as required by Procedure B-3M-1.
l PERSONNEL
- 1) 8. E. FREIMARK - 365-64-4818
- 4) D. n. SASKILL
- 278-54-0575
- 2) T. G. NELSON
- 276-56-6857
- 5) 8. D. HINES
- 365-52-6895
- 3) S. REVICH
- 379-84-0876
- 6) J. R. ADOM0WSKI - 368-46-9164
[1)A N, O id.wde_,
PROGRIMiGR
[#r/
INITIAIOR c)
DATE S,o 4,,,L e 7 /9 E3 DATE O -4 M CORRECTIVE ACTION BY:
MPOAD
. IDENTIFY ORGANIZATION TAKING CORRECTIVE ACTION CIO has verified that the correct foms for Level II certification are on file for the 6 MPQAD personnel noted above. This NIR can be considered closed.
l W
i N
t VERIFICATION SATVUNSAT NEW NIR#
~
CONGRRENCE INITIATOR _h M M.i M._.. * =
PROGRAM MGR_M A
._-f N/A DATE
/o-2o-e.3 N
DATE DATE Me #3 REMARKS j
4& -
-m.
,-,e y
STONI? & WEll3TER HICllIGAN, INC.
CONSTRUcIlott IHi>l.EMENI Atlutt UVERVIEW NIR LUG SUH4ARY HIR HPQAD DATE DATE DATE NO.
NCR NO.
SUBJECT OF DISP. BY CLOSED REMARKS OAR NO.
ISSUE MPQAD NIR Tssued us closed-no cor-001 N/A Training Records 8/15/83 8/15/83 8/17/83 rective action required b]O2 QAR Forms frap: both procedures B-3M and RT 00005 B-3M-1 are interalxed in training 10/4/83 10/12/83
' records i
i 003 OAR Yearly vision examination was exceeded 10/4/83 10/12/83 RT 00006 4
OAR DJT training records not available in RT 00007 training records. Revision number not 10/4/83 10/12/83
~
004 listed on OJT Record ~
~
(
Memo to CPCo ad-0AR Personnel Certification Form QA-116-1, vising that NIR-005 RT 00'111 Attachment D is unavailable in record 10/4/83 10/12/83 10/20/83 can be closed out.
005 files Records.for Level II certifications have been verified by CIO ocI 15.01 ATTACllHENT 4.3 REY. 2 e
STONE & WEBSTER HICillGAN, INC.
MIDLAND NUCLEAR C0 GENERATION PLANT CIO OBSERVATIONS Observation Originating CPCo Response '. Status Close-Out Number Observations Document /Date Document /Date Open/ Closed Document /Date i
030 Need to review Vendor Equipment Report No. 5 Open Verification Program - MPQAD/SMO 7/18/83
(
~
9 1
1 i
e 9
O r
G G e op
..,.m
.e--.
...--a.
.-,w, wem..
.,,.m.
STONE & WEBSTER MICilIGAN, INC.
CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW Il0LD POINT LOG SIM4ARY ORIGINATING CPCo RESPONSE STATUS CLOSE-0UT W*
SUBJECT DOC /DATE DOC /DATE OPEN/ CLOSED DOC /DATE 001 Adequacy of drawlags A8 - large bore pipe Report No. 6 Letter Closed Report No. 9 hangers. CIO established Hold Point when MPQAD 7/25/83 8/9/83 8/15/83 issued 2 NCRs against the use of red-lined
(
(frawings which were volded by Project Engineering.
002 Material traceability of installed hangers (E3).
Report No. 6 Letter Closed Report No. 9 CPCo response dated 7/1/83 indicated report on 7/25/83 8/9/83 8/15/83 material traceability was to be issued in a timely manner. Due to uncertainty of when the report would be issued, a Hold Point was established by CIO.
f t
003 Has a program been developed and responsibilities Report No. 6 Letter Closed Report No. 9 established for personnel assigned to process 7/25/83 8/9/83 8/15/83 nonconformances?
Has a meeting been held with Project Engineering to discuss methodology of processing non-confomances?
$ TONE & WEBSTER MICl11GANo INC.
CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW 110LD POINT LOG SlHtARY ORIGINATING CPCo RESPONSE STATUS CLOSE-00T NO*
SUBJECT DOC /DATE DOC /DATE OPEN/ CLOSED DOC /DATE
[
004 CPCo has committed to deve' lop a Vendor Report No. 18 Open Equipment Verification Program. Program is 10/17/83 l
required before implementation of Phase II.
i
(
i 4
005 NIRs 002, 003, 004 and 005 issued as a result Report No. 18 Open of sampling inspections of 45 MPQAD Training 10/17/83 Records. Corrective action must be completed before any inspections can be performed by the 45 personrel in question.
(
~
j t
006 Evaluation of Management Review of results of Report No. 19 Open Phase I activities. Evaluation of Management 10/24/83 Review Connittee plans and procedures for Phase II-implementation.
5
-.L
__...._ u
m r
STONE & WEBSTER MICHIGAN, INC.
P.O. box 2325. BOSTON. massachusetts 02107 Mr. J. G. Keppler, Administrator, Region III October 17, 1983 Nuclear Regulatory Commission J.0. No. 14509 799 Roosevelt Road NRC File #83-10-17 Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 RE: DOCKET NO. 50-329/330 MIDLAND PLANT - UNITS 1 AND 2 OVERVIEW 0F THE CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION PROGRAM REPORT NO. 18 A copy of the Construction Implementation Overview Report No. 18 for period October 10, 1983 through October 14, 1983 is enclosed with this report. There were no scheduled meetings during this reporting period.
Evaluations of the CCP activities, as appropriate, are attached. Also, attached are matrix of open items and the NIR Log Summary.
Very uly yours, k:%Q S.W. Baranow Program Manager Enclosure SWB/ka cc: JJHarrison, US NRC, Glen Ellyn, IL RCook, US NRC Midland (site)
DBMiller Jr., CPCo Midland (site)
RBKelly, S&W APAmoruso, S&W C0 Richardson, S&W l
l 1
L O (5' I / 0
3 Report No. 18 i
i October 10, 1983 through October 14, 1983 i
Personnel on Site Stone & Webster Mich.igan, Inc.
S. Baranow T. Parker J. Barr J. Thompson R. Carpeggiani G. Foley W. Sienkiewicz A. Smith P. Amoruso J. Langston D. Cooke J. Chawla R. Scallan J. Seely F. Bearham Meetings 1.
CIO attended the first of the monthly meetings with the US NRC and the public held in Midland on October 13, 1983. A separate report will be issued in accordance with the protocol agreement of September IS,1983.
2.
During the reporting period, CIO attended meetings conducted by Bechtel Power Company.
A.--The daily staff management meetings are chaired by Mr. G. Hierzer,
^'
8PCo Site Manager and includes Management Representatives frora all BPCo departments, CPCo and MoQAD.
Specific subjects discussed at the meetings were as follows:
- training and training records
- reducing attachments to drawings j
- status of System 38
- NRC audit of Zack design
- complying with NRC requests for documentation and correspondence I
' fit-up inspections of welds B..The bi-weekly staff meetings are chaired by J. Reinsch and includes team leaders and. support personnel from CPCo, BPCo and MPQAD.
l
=
l i
4
3
+
JOB NO. 14509 MIDLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT 8
REPORT NO. 18 PAGE 2 i
f Specific subjects addressed at the meetings included the following:
- area walkdown
- evaluating training
- reorganization of BPCo personnel
(
C. CIO attended a second meeting to discuss a possible response to the NRC audit finding on fit-up inspection of Zack welding. The meeting included representatives of CPCo, BPCo and MPQAD and CIO as observers.
Also, CIO agreed to implement a CPCo request to provide independant third party inspection of weld testing as part of the Weld Justif! cation Program.
D. CIO attended the Groups I and II System Review Meetings. At these meetings the emphasis is on resolving problems and providing solutions to restraints. Also, Bechtel Management reiterated their position that quality requirements have priority over cost and schedule requirements.
E. CIO attended the Bechtel Subcontractors meeting. Thfe meeting is attended by representatives from each of the Subcontractors aLo topics discussed include; Sampling Plans, Tests, NCRs, Training, Documentation and other items pertaining to construction.
ACTIVITIES 1.
Training CIO attended and evaluated a construction training presentation on October 13, 1983.
Training Subject
- Technical Specification for Installation of Field Mounted Instrumentation for Nuclear and General Services (C368-83)
I j
CIO evaluation of the presentation was considered to be satisfactory. The presentation was in compliance with FPG-2.000 " Training of Construction Personnel."
Results of the evaluation have been documented on Checklist MP-MIS-001E and
~
are available for review, t
2 1
l m
JOB NO.
14509 MIDLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT REPORT NO.18 PAGE 3 I
2.
Training Records CIO has completed a sampling inspection of Construction Training Records of 32 members of 15 Teams a'ssigned to perfom status assessment.
Approximately 2,000 individual records were examined to detemine if the requirements of FPG-2.000, " Training of Construction Personnel have been complied with."
. A evaluation of unsatisfactory observations is underway to detemine the degree of non-compliances. Report No. 19 will identify our findings and resolutions.
The results of the evaluation of each Team will be documented on Checklist No. MP-MIS-001E.
fiOLD POINTS 1.
CPCo has committed to' develop a Vendor Equipment Verification Program.
This program must be in place and reviewed by CIO prior to start of Phase II activities.
2.
NIRs 002, 003, 004 and 005 issued as a result of sampling inspections of 45 MPQAD personnel Training Records require corrective actions and resolutions before any inspections can be perfomed by the above.
Initial responses to the NIRs ha; been received by CIO on October 13, 1983 l
and are currently under review.
GENERAL 1.
Report No.11 stated that a CIO concern relative to welding criteria being duplicated in PQCI's was closed.
MPQAD has perfomed another review of their method of operation and I
have elected to change their policy regarding welding inspection.
MPQA0 will revise CW-1.00 to incorporate all existing change notices and et the sama time delete from it all references to electrical and instrument welding.
A new PQCI, EW-1.00, is being generated. This will cover the inspection of all welding on electrical supports and equipment.
Inspection of welding will be deleted from the electrical PQCI's after EW-1.00 is effective.
q
^
JOB NO.
14509 MIDLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT REPORT NO.
18 PAGE 4 i
The inspection criteria for Instrument welding will remain in the Instrument PQCI's.
i This item will not be statused in future reports. CIO will monitor progress on this item when preparing checklists based upon revised PQCI's.
- 2. Copies of new and revised Stone & Webster QCIs are attached for information;
- QCI 2.01 Rev 0, 10/7/83, Orientation Requirements for CIO Personnel
- QCI 7.01 Rev 0, 10/7/83,' Sampling Inspection
- QCI 10.01 Rev 2,10/7/83, Construction Implementation Overview Assessment
- QCI 15.01 Rev. 4, 10/7/83, Nonconfonnance Identification and Reporting i
~
6 e
l i
4 4
+
i c'
Il l
J
.e t
a D
t/
ut On e em su oco l
CD d
e s
o l
sC r,
u/
e t n p
ae O
t p S. O ee stna oD p/
st en Re m ou Cc Po T
CD N
.A CL NP I
e N
t 5
,O ga NI nD AT i/
o3 GA tt N8 I R an
/
HES ne t8 CNN im r1 IEO gu o/
MGI ic p7 0T ro e
E V
&NO I
EDC NN OA TL O
SD tM nS I
M e/
mD pA iQ s
uP n
qM o
E i
t r
a om v
da r
nr u_
e eg s
Vo b
r O
wP e
invo ei rt a oc ti f
dier ee NV no i
tr 0
a e 3
v 0
eM r
s bO W
f i
llll l,
Ifl llll l[
!IT0!!K & UEll:ITEli HICil1 Gall, lilC.
CUllLiltUCilull IMPI EMElil AlIOff UVCatVIEW filR LUG SUH4ARY Illit 11PQAD DATE DATE DATE NO.
NCR NO.
SUBJECT OF DISP.
CLOSED REMARKS ISSUE 001 N/A Training Records 8/15/83 8/15/83 8/17/83 002 Forms from both procedures 8-3M and B-3M-1 are intennixed in training 10/4/83 records 003 Yearly vision examination was exceeded 10/4/83 OJT training records not available in training rece.ds..hvision number not 10/4/83 g
listed on OJf Record
)
Personnel Certification Form QA-116-1, Attachment D is unavailable in record 10/4/83 005 files QCI 15.01 ATTACilMENT 4.3 REV. 2
e e
STCNE & WEBSTER MICHIGAN, INC.
P.O. Box 2325 BOSTON. M AssAcHusETTs 02107 Mr. J. G. Keppler, Administrator, Region III October 11, 1983 Nuclear Regulatory Commission J.0. No. 14509 799 Roosevelt Road NRC File #83-10-11 Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 RE: DOCKET NO. 50-329/330 MIDLAND PLANT - UNITS 1 AND 2 OVERVIEW OF THE CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION PROGRAM REPORT NO. 17 A copy of the Construction Implementation Overview Report No.17 for the October 3, 1983 through October 7, 1983 is enclosed with this report.
There were no scheduled Management CCP meetings during this reporting period. Evaluations of CCP activities are attached.
Very truly yours,
_A_,-,D S. W. Baranow Program Manager Enclosure SWB/ka cc: JJHarrison, US NRC, Glen Ellyn,IL RCook, US NRC Midland (site)
DBMiller Jr., CPCo Midland (site)
RBKelly, S&W APAmoruso, S&W C0 Richardson, S&W
(
?
I cf ?) \\ ] U!a C! h h e
i
)
Report No. 17 October 3,1%3 through October 7,1983 Personnel on Site Stone & Webster Michigan, Inc.
S. Baranow T. P rter J. Barr J. Thompson R. Carpeggiani G. Foley W. Sienkiewicz R. Corson P. Amoruso J. Langston D. Cooke J. Chawla R. Scallan J. Seely Meetings During the reporting period, CIO attended meetings conducted by Bechtel Power Company.
1.
The daily staff management meetings chaired by Mr. C. Hierzer, BPCo Site Manager and includes Management Representatives from all BPCo departments, CPCo and MPQAD.
Specific subjects discussed at the meetings were as follows:
- training and training records
- reducing attachments to drawings
- civil comodities
- NCRs pertaining to drilling pemits
The daily staff meetings are chaired by J. Reinsch and includes team leaders and support personnel from CPCo, BPCo and MPQAD.
Specific subjects addressed at the meetings included the following:
- area walkdown
- evaluating training
- reorganization of BPCo personnel l
l 1
7 JOB NO.
14509 MIDLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT REPORT N0. 17 PAGE 2 3.
CIO attended a meeting to discuss a possible response to the NRC audit finding on fit-up inspection of Zack welding. The meeting included representatives of CPCo, BPCo and MPQAD and CIO as observers.
4.
CIO attended a meeting to evaluate the preparedness of MPQAD and BPCo to proceed with status assessment.
The following subjects were discussed in depth:
- CIO and NRC restraints and Hold Points
- staffing 1
- scheduling and planning
- procedures and training 1
- evaluation of status assessment by BFCo Management At the meeting it was decided that upon NRC approval of Status Assessment, BPCo plans to operate with 11 teams in module 340. These teams will perform status assessment in accordance with established procedures and their progress will be assessed by a BPCo task force.
When confidence is established and any necessary modifications to the program are made, teams will be introduced into additional areas.
CIO considers CCP and Status Assessment ready for innediate implementation with the following exception.
CIO has issued NIRs #002, 003, 004 and 005 referencing discrepancies in training records of 6 MPQAD out of 45 evaluated.
CIO considers that none of the 45 personnel should be assigned to any function associated with CCP.
CIO checklists reference NRC approved of training as a hold point. This approval i
was contained in NRC letter Docket #50-329 and 50-330 and renoves the Hold Point.
CIO will continue to monitor training activities and records and will report on confidence level.
ACTIVITIES 1.
Team Interfaces The CIO inspectors assigned to teams are now taking an active part on the team. CIO members are attending some of the team training sessions as well as team staff meetings and team supervisors meetings. CIO has not yet assigned an inspector to Team 16 (Night Shift) as their current work-load does not warrant it.
I e
.A JOB N0. 14509 MIDLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT REPORT NO. 17 PAGE 3 2.
Training i
CIO attend and or evaluated construction / craft training session l
on October 6, 1983.
Training subjects:
- Construction Completion Program Orientation
?
- Safety Tagging i
C10 evaluation of the presentation was considered to be satisfactory and in compliance with FPG 2.000 " Training Of Construction Personnel."
3.
Open Items July 18, 1983, Report No. 5 (a) CPCo has committed to develop a vendor equipment verification program.,
I CIO has not been provided with the program or scheduled date of issue.
i I
I i
I
J
)
s e
t a
D t/
ut On e em su oco l
CD deso l
sC n
u/
e tn p
ae O
tp S. O
~
ee stna oD p/
st en Re m ou Cc Po T
CD N
.A CL NP I
e N
t 5
,O ga NI nD AT i/
o3 GA tt N8 I R an
/
HES ne t8 i
CNN im r1 IEO gu o/
I E
&NO I
EDC NN OA TL O
SD tM I
nS M
e/
mD pA iQ s
uP n
qM o
E i
t r
a om v
da r
nr e
eg s
Vo b
r O
wP e
i n vo ei rt a oc tI f
dl er ee NY no i
tr a e 3
vb 0
r m 0
e u sN bO
_