ML20091M708
Text
As I
- p arg k.
o UNITED STATES pg' g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g
g N
oe REGION 111
/=
G
799 ROOSEVELT ROAD
==
%'V,d GLEN ELLYN,lLLINOIS 60137
/ C(jff April 8, 1983 MEMORANDUM FOR: Jay Harrison, Chief, Office of Special Cases, Section 2 FROM:
R. J. Cook, Senior Resident Inspector, Midland Site
SUBJECT:
QUALITY PROGRAM AND MANUFACTURING DEFICIENCIES FOR VICTOREEN, INC. RADIATION DETECTION INSTRUMENTATION
Reference:
Memorandum from W. B. Grant, Radiation Specialist, to RIII files, dated February 28, 1983 Interim 50.55(e) Report No. 82-09 #3, Quality Program and Manufacturing Deficiencies at Victoreen, Inc.
Mr. Grant's memo referenced above, addresses but does not reflect the unaccep-table actual " hardware" discrepancies in safety related radiation detection instrume.ntation manufactured by Victoreen, Inc., and delivered to the Midland plant. The memo indicates that Mr. Grant received misleading information and does not describe the true situation pertaining to the manufacture of modules of questionable quality for Midland and other plants.
Therefore, this memo and attached supporting information is intended to clarify and accurately describe the condition of the Midland instrumentation and to offer come insight associated with the poor quality modules. Hopefully, this memo will alter Mr. Grant's opinion that "no further action should be taken by Region III".
First, the licensee has made a determination that the events leading to the poorly manufactured modules for the s'afety related radiation detection instrumentation are reportable under the provisions of 10 CFR 50.55 (e)
(Consumers Power Company interim report 82-09 #3, attached).
~
Mr. Grant states that the Victopeen QA Manager said that "no defects report-able under Part 21 were found"..'However, as stated in his memo, Region IV notified Victoreen, Inc. by letter dated January 19, 1983, of two items of noncompliance regarding Part 21 violations. Obviously there is some dis-agreement between the two statements.
Mr. Grant has also stated that Victoreen,
~
- Inc. has revised their " workmanship standards" such that the identified defects similar to those identified' for the Midland equipment would no longer be in nonconformance with their " workmanship standard". Changing the stiandards to a lesser degree of excellence does not guarantee an acceptable product. The original standards were quite acceptable and raflected the state of the art for industrial practices. Therefore, no change was necessary in the workman-l ship standards.
However, compliance to the original standards would have 0406120039 840517 PDR FOIA RICE 84-96 PDR APR 1 1 1983
~
e 2-April 8, 1983
/
'J.
Harricon e
avoided insufficient soldoring, exconsivo soldering, cold solder joints, excessive heat, capacitor body enamel protruding into the plated-through holes, diode bodios partially embedded in solder, flux not cleaned from boards, circuit board delamination (measling), contamination on wire wrap connectors, duplicate serial numbers on like modules, lifted circuit foil,
. excessivo insulation removal from jumper wires, and components not properly attached mechanically.
Approximately 83% of the 877 electronic modules for the Midland plant require some form of rework to rectify the above stated conditions. Changing 'the workmanship standard will not alleviate the dis-crepancios stated above and automatically make acceptable quality from poor quality.
Also, none of the discrepancies cited appear to be mero "documen-tation and procedural problems" as claimed by the Victoroon QA Manager.
It must be noted that as a result of the combined Dochtal Power Corporation and Consumers Power Company audit ef fort which identified the discrepancies, rostrictions were placed on only the inspection and testing and shipping of class lE equipment. Manufacture of modules to the poor quality described was not curtailed, nor could the destination of the nodules being manufac-tured be determined. Only. shipment to the Midland Site was stopped and remains in offect until Victoreen can correct all the audit findings.
The destination of the modules which woro being worked on at the time the dis-crepancion were identified is unknown.
As a partial responso to,the nonconformance written against. the radiation detection instrumentation, the licensoo has stated unat "New boards will be f abricated to replace the deficient ones in the 1E area _onitors at the job site."
Also, "If the boards are reworked, they will be used as spares for use.in Non-Q applications to the extent they are useable."
Based on the above information and that contained in the attached 10 CFR 50.55(e) report, other recipients of the modules manufactured during the period of questionable quality should be notified. Also, there should be no attempt by Rogion III to "close out" this item until such time as Region III has received a final 10 CFR 50.55(e) report portaining to this item.
At such time as this item becomes " closed out" it should be by the direction of the Midland Inspec-tion Site Team and involvo personnel,with electrical and/or instrumentation expertiso.
k
- d.
R.*. Cook Senior Resident Inspector
. Midland Site a
cc w/o attach:
R. Warnick R. Gardner-R. Landsman B. Burge:a
dpnKen%
UNITED STATES pg ; 3 g g p,
,pj c
1%
e NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION A
l E. 9 1
REGloN IV S
'l
$.y 611 RYAN PLAZA DRIVE SUITE 1000 g,, g g ARUNGTON, TEXAS 76011 ma,.
- i MAR 11 1983 C
T':
.=
NL
\\
tl n
,s l
is ; L'.-:J' I f l MEMGRANDUM FOR:
R. F. Warnick, Acting Director, Office of Special Cases, Region III FROM:
Uldis Potapovs, Chief, Vendor Program Branch, Division of Vendor and Technical Programs, Region IV
SUBJECT:
AITS F03040982 - VICT0REEN, INC., DEFECTIVE MODULES FOR RADIATION DETECTION INSTRUMENTATION (VITS82-255)
A Vendor Program Branch (VPB) inspection was performed at the Victoreen Incorporated, Cleveland, Ohio, plant on November 1-5, 1982, which included the subject item in the scope.
The results of the inspection are documented in the attached VPB Inspection Report No. 99900377/82-01.
It was ascertainer'.sy inspection that the Nuclear Quality Assurance Program areas of deficiencies identified by Bechtel and Consumers Power Company were valid.
Two violations and four nonconformances were issued with respect to the program implementation.
However, only 5 of 13 claimed workmanship deficiencies could be substantiated.
The results of this inspection raise concerns pertaining to the adequacy of the previous Bechtel audit and surveillance activities.
This subject will be included in a planned integrated inspection of Bechtel procurement activities which is scheduled to be completed in the second quarter of 1983.
This AITS item has now been closed by the VPB.
Implementation of corrective actions for the nonconformances by Victoreen, Incorporated, will be accomplished during a future inspection.
Should you have any questions or require further information, please contact Mr. L.' Parker _(728-8199) or Mr. I. Barnes (728-8176).
3 l
W Qh& qtn U dis Potapovs, Chief k
Vendor Program Branch j
Attachment:
As Stated cc:
R. L. Baer, IE i
R. F. Heishman, IE
-J.-T.
Collins, RIV R. L. Bangart, RI Q /
QfW
, 4.,:,,::d $
l
I UAN 191983 Dtcket No. 99900377/82-01 Victoreen, Incorporated A Sheller-Globe Corporation Subsidiary ATTN:
Dr. John Ashe President-10101 Woodland Avenue Cleveland, OH 44104 Gentlemen:
This refers to the in'spection conducted by Mr. L. B. Parker of this office on November 1-5, 1982, of your facility in Cleveland, Ohio, associated with the manufacture of radiation monitoring systems and to the discussions of our findings with you and members of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.
This inspection was made as a result of the Consumers Power Company-10 CFR Part 50.55(e) report concerning quality program and manufacturing deficiencies which are applicable to radiation monitoring equipment that has been furnished to the Midland Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2.
i Areas examined and our findings are discussed in the enclosed report.
Within these areas, the inspection consisted of an examination of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observations by the inspector.
During the inspection it was found that the implementation of your QA prograra failed to meet certain NRC requirements.
The' specific findings and-references to the pertinent requirements are idenM fied in the enclosures to thfs letter.
This Notice of Violation is sent to you pursuant to the provisions of Section 206 of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974.
You are required to
}
submit to this office.withir. 30_ days from the date of this letter, -a written.
i statement containing:
(1) a description of steps thatLhave been or will:be taken to correct these items; (2) a description.of steps that have been or will' be taken to prevent recurrence; and (3) the date your corrective ~ actions-and preventive measures were'or will be completed.
Consideration may be.given to extending your response tin.a for a good cause shown.
i.
~
/r
. Q '2}
R& CPS SC:R& CPS BC: R& CPS D Vkh 0:ES RA.
LB er/de 18arnes UPotapovs RLiraifg' art EHJohnson JT 111as
(
.r/gP h)//82 v/83
/ /_ 4 /83-
/ / b /43 g(?[/82 1 i / 'O/82 '
/
(
$d U
,k
.d//hj i
y.o
--a m
m.
I i
Victoreen, Incorporated You are also requested to submit a similar written statement for each item which appears in the enclosed Notice of Nonconformance.
The responses requested by this letter are not subject to the clearance pro-cedures of the Office of Management and Budget as required by the Paperwork Redaction Act of 1980l PL 96-511.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of this letter and the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room.
If this report contains any information that you believe to be exempt from disclosure under 10 CFR 9.5(a)(4), it is necessary that you (a) notify this office by telephone within 10 days from the date of this letter of your intention to file a request for withholding; and (b) submit within 25 days from the date of this letter a written application to this office to withhold such information.
If your receipt of this letter has been delayed such that less than 7 days are available for your review, please notify this office promptly so that a new due date may be established.
Consistent with Section 2.790(b)(1), any such application must be accompanied by an affidavit executed by the owner of the information which identifies the document or part sought to be withheld, and which contains a full statement of the reasons on the basis which it is claimed that the information should be withheld from public disclosure.
This section further requires the statement to address with specificity the considerations listed in 10 CFR 2.790(b)(4).
The information sought i be withheld shall be incorporated as far as possible into a separate part of the affidavit.
If we do not hear from you in this regard within the specified periods noted above, the report will be placed in the Public Document Room.
Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased to discuss them with you.
Sincerely,.
r l
Uldis Potapovs, Chief Vendor Program Branch l
Enclosures:
i 1.
Appendix A - Notice of Violation 2.
Appendix B - Notice of Nonconformance 3.
Appendix C - Inspection Report No. 99900377/82-01 4.
Appendix 0 - Inspection Data Sheets (3 Pages) i bec:
IE Files AE00 NRC:QAB NRC:PUR Reg. Administrators I, II, III, IV, V i
.EHJohnson, RIV RLBangart, RIV
APPENDIX A Victoreen, Incorporated Docket No. 99900377/82-01 NOTICE OF VIOLATION As a result of the inspection conducted on November 1-5, 1982, and in accordance with Section 206 of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974 and its implementing regulation 10 CFR Part 21, the following violations were identified and categorized in accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy (10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C), 47 FR 9987 (March 9, 1982):
A.
Section 21.31 of Title 10, Part 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations dated January 1,1982 states:
Each individual, corporation, partnership or other entity subject to the regulations in this part shall assure that each procurement document for a facility, or a basic. component issued by him, her or it on or after January 6,1978, specifies, when applicable, that the provisions of 10 CFR Part 21 apply.
Contrary to the above, Victoreen, Incorporated (VI) failed to assure that each procurement document specified when the provisions of 10 CFR Part 21 were applicable; e.g., purchase order Nos. 12276 and.12367 for printed circuit boards used in Class 1E modules.
This is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement VII).
B.
Section 21.51(b) of Title 10, Part 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations dated January 1, 1982, states in part:
Each individual, corporation, partnership, or other entity subject to the regulations in this part shall t
prepare records in connection with the designs, manufacture, fabrication, placement, erection, installation, modification, or testing of any facility, basic component supplied for any licensed facility or to be used in any licensed activity sufficient to assure-compliance with the regulations in this part.
Contrary to the above, VI failed to prepare records with respect to evaluation of known workmanship defects in electronic modules that have
'been furnished for use in safety-related circuits.
This is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement VII).
11 '
nn(g iLjv n-v v
l APPENDIX B Victoreen, Incorporated Docket No. 99900377/82-01 NOTICE OF NONCONFORMANCE Based on the results of an NRC inspection conducted on November 1-5, 1982, it appears that certain of your activities were not conducted in accordance with NRC requirements as indicated below:
Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 states:
" Activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures, or drawings, of a type appropriate to the circumstances and shall be accomplished in accordance with these instructions, procedures, or drawings.
Instructions, procedures, or drawings shall include appropriate quantitative or qualitative acceptance criteria for determining that important activities have been satis-factorily accomplished. "
Nonconformances with these requirements are as follows:
A.
Paragraphs 3.2 and 3.2.3 of the Victoreen, Incorporated (VI) Nuclear Quality Assurance Manual (NQAM),Section IV, " Procurement Document Control,"
Revision 7, dated February 24, 1982, states in part, "The Procurement Document must include provisions for the following as applicable:
i Basic Technical Requirements - Identification of drawings including latest revision, specifications... relating to design, fabrication...
~
etc."
Contrary to the above:
(1) VI issued purchase order (PO) No. 12276 on March 29, 1982, for printed circuit boards (drawing No.. 8688-200-11, Revision H) which identified an obsolete manufacturing specification (i.e., No. IP-103) on the PO, and (2) note 2 of drawing No. 8688-200-11, Revision H, also identified the obsolete manufacturing specification No. IP-103.
B.
Paragraph 3.2 of the NQAM,Section XV, " Nonconforming Materials, Parts, l
or Components," Revision 7, dated February 24, 1982, states in part,
" Nonconforming items may be disposed of by acceptance 'as is', by scrapping or repairing the defective item, or by rework to complete or correct to a drawing or specification.
Such measures provide assurance that the item is identified as nonconforming and controlled."
Contrary to the above, VI material inspection report No. 17532, dated August 16, 1982, was improperly dispositioned in that three discrete dispositions were made for the specific material; i.e...two separate
" rework" dispositions and one "use'as-is" disposition.
y, /
,m h A \\
,t ?
~\\
.m.
4
. C.
Paragraph 3.7 of VI Standard Operating Practices (SOP) Procedure No. 510.001, " Procedure for Wave Soldering of Printed Circuit Cards,"
Revision 0, dated March 3, 1980, states, "On a quarterly basis a sample of solder shall be analyzed for contamination and the results of the analysis shall be posted in the proximity of the wave solder machine."
Contrary to the above, the analyses were done less frequently than quarterly.
Analyses were being performed on an approximately semiannual basis beginning February 27, 1980.
D.
Paragraph 3.4 of VI 50P Procedure No. 510.001, Revision 0, dated March 3, 1980, states, " Pre-heaters a'd conveyer speed shall be such that the coraponent side of the circuit board shall reach a temperature of 170* to 190*F prior to entering the wave.
This maybe checked with temperature tabs, sticks, or pyrometer."
Contrary to the above, a Tempilstick for indicating 200*F was used by manufacturing personnel to determine preheat temperature.
t t
~
l l
l l
ORGANIZATION:
VICTOREEN, INCORPORATED CLEVELAND, OHIO REPORT INSPECTION INSPECTION NO.-
99900377/82-01 OATE(S) 11/1-5/82 ON-SITE HOURS: 58 CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS:
Victoreen, Incorporated A Sheller-Globe Corporation Subsidiary ATTN:
Dr. John Ashe, President 10101 Woodland Avenue
. Cleveland, Ohio 44104 ORGANIZATIONAL CONTACT:
Mr. Roger Zimmerman, Quality Assurance Manager TELEPHONE NUMBER:
(216) 795-8200 Ext. 267 PRINCIPAL PRODUCT: Radiation monitoring systems NUCLEAR INDUSTRY ACTIVITY: Radiation monitoring systems, required for Class 1E applications, representing approximately five percent of total production.
ASSIGNED INSPECTOR:
/-6-83 L.13.~ Parker, Reactive and Component Program Date Sectior. (R& CPS)
OTHER INSPECTOR (S): J. Hamilton, R& CPS APPROVED BY:
I 8&w
/- 4-#3 I. Barnes, Chief, R& CPS Date l
INSPECTION BASES AND SCOPE:
A.
BASES:
10 CFR Part 21 and 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix 8.
B.
SCOPE:
This inspection was made as a result of the Consumers Power Company 10 CFR Part 50.55(e) report concerning quality program and manufacturing deficiencies which are applicable to radiation monitoring equipment that has been furnished to the Midland Nuclear Plant.
Additionally, the following (Cont. on next page) l PLANT SITE APPLICABILITY:
Occket Nos. 50-329 and 50-330.
1
; (g Yll
t ORGANIZATION:
VICT0REEN, INCORPORATED CLEVELAND, OHIO m
REPORT INSPECTION NO -
99900377/82-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 2 of 7 SCOPE:
(Cont.) areas were inspected:
(1) status of previous inspection findings, (2) implementation of 10 CFR Part 21, (3) equipment calibration, (4) training, and (5) manufacturing process control.
A.
VIOLATIONS:
1.
Contrary to Section 21.31 of 10 CFR Part 21, Victoreen, Incorporated (VI) failed to assure that each procurement document specified, when applicable, that the provisions of 10 CFR Part 21 apply.
Printed circuit boards were supplied in Class 1E modules, yet the purchase orders (Nos.12276 and 12367) failed to cite 10 CFR Part 21 requirements.
2.
Contrary to Section 21.51(b) of 10 CFR Part 21, VI failed to prepare records with respect to evaluation of known workmanship defects in electronic modules that have been furnished for use in safety related circuits.
B.
NONCONFORMANCES:
1.
Contrary to Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and paragraphs 3.2 and 3.2.3 of the Nuclear Quality Assurance Manual (NQAM),Section IV, Revision 7, dated February 24, 1982:
l a.
VI issued purchase order (PO) No. 12276 on March 29, 1982, for printed circuit boards (drawing No. 8688-200-11, Revision H) which identified an obsolete manufacturing specification (MS)
No. IP-103 on the P0;
~
b.
Note 2 of drawing No. 8688-200-11, Revision H, also identified the MS as the obsolete IP-103.
2.
Contrary to Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and l
i paragraph 3.2 of the NQAM,Section XV, Revision 7, dated February 24, 1982, material inspection report (MIR) No.17532 was improperly dispositioned, in that three discrete dispositions were made for the specific material; i.e., two separate " rework" dispositions and one "use as is" disposition.
l l
3.
Contrary to Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and paragraph 3.7 of the procedure for wave soldering (No. 510.001, Revision 0, dated March 3, 1980), solder bath analysis for contamination was not being conducted on a quarterly basis.
i t
i ORGANIZATION:
VICTOREEN, INCORPORATED CLEVELAND, OHIO REPORT INSPECTION un QQQAA177 /Q9-n1 QFCf fl TC.
DSCP 7 n# 7 4.
Contrary to Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and paragraph 3.4 of the procedure for wave soldering (No. 510.001, Revision 0, dated March 3, 1980), a measuring device to assure circuit board preheat temperature reac.hes 170 to 190*F was not being used.
C.
UNRESOLVED ITEMS:
None D.
STATUS OF PREVIOUS INSPECTION FINDINGS:
1.
(Closed) Deviation A (79-01):
The NQAM did not describe the functions, responsibilities, and authority of senior management personnel whose activities affect quality.
VI issued Revision 6 of the NQAM on March 1, 1980, with an updated organizational chart along with a narrative description of the functions, responsibilities, and authority of senior management personnel whose activities affect quality.
2.
(Closed) Deviation B (79-01):
The VI QA manager was not maintaining audit files.
VI hired a full-time trained auditor for the QA staff, updated all audits and audit files, and revised the audit procedure requirements to identify the responsibility of the QA auditor and to clarify record requirements.
E.
OTHER FINDINGS OR COMMENTS:
1.
NRC Region III Requests:
NRC Region III requested that an inspection be l
performed at VI as a result of the Consumers Power Company (CPCO) 10 CFR Part 50.55(e) report concerning quality program and manufacturing deficiencies which are applicable to radiation monitoring equipment that had been furnished to the Midland Nuclear Plant.
a.
Quality Assurance Program Deficiencies:
Twelve areas of unsatisfactory compliance to Bechtel procurement specifications and implementation were identified during the September 8-10, 1982, audit of VI by Bechtel and CPCO.
The NRC inspection team inspected all of these areas and determined that the findings were valid.
Resolutions for QA program deficiencies were agreed to in an October 4 and 5, 1982, meeting between Bechtel and VI.
l
ORGANIZATION:
VICTOREEN, INCORPORATED CLEVELAND, OHIO REPORT INSPECTION NO.-
99900377/82-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 4 of 7 Completion dates of the resolutions started in October 1982 and ran into November 1982.
Since the changes to the QA program are very recent and some not completed, the program evaluation will be completed during the next inspection.
Nanconformances 8.1 and 8.2 were identified as a result of this item.
VI has rewritten the NQAM and the S0P procedures and has resubmitted them to Bechtel for approval.
The new procedures, where applicable, have begun to be implemented.
b.
R?diation Monitoring System Electronic Module Workmanship Du#!ciencies:
One radiation monitoring system electric module (Class 1E) scheduled for Midland was inspected at VI.
This module 4? a qualification sample selected from the 14 modules manufactured 1.' accordance with Bechtel PO Nos. 7220-J289AC and J244AC.
Twelve of the fourteen modules are at Midland and were recently rejected.
Workmanship Standard No. 1141 7220-J289-83-2 (VI procedure No. 500.002, Revision 0), as imposed by Bechtel, was used for this inspection.
The CPC0 interim 50.55(e) report of October 15, 1982, cited 12 conditions of nonconformance on 4 modules at Midland in the area of soldered connections.
One module was inspected at VI (S/N 102) for similar nonconformances.
A summary of findings is as follows:
Defects Applicable Identified per Total Item Workmanship Std.
Nonconformance Connections Inspected Page No.
- 1. Excess solder 1/1268 Scaler 7220-J289-83-2 8625-100-91 Page 124 (R-111)
- 2. Cap. body protrud-26/33 Memory Exten-7220J289-83-2 ing into plated-sion 862ME-210- Page 83 thru hole 90 (C-1 thru C-26) 1/25 Controller 862C 210-90 (C-10)
1 1
ORGANIZATION:
VICTOREEN, INCORPORATED l' '
CLEVELAND, OHIO l
REPORT INSPECTION No -
99900177/92-01 RESULTS:
DAGF 5 of 7
- 3. Flux not removed 2/1268 Controller 7220-J289-83-2 862C-210-90 Pages 95, 117, (F-4, R-128) and 123
- 4. Wire wrap 12/1268 Scaler 7220-J289-83-2 contamination 862 SF-212-90 Page (none refer-enced)
- 5. Insufficient 9/1268 Controller 7220-J289-83-2 solde- (not 88/1524 Memory Exten-Pages 86 and 112 including sion plated-thru 0/1012 Scaler hole solder 3/336 Buss Extender plugs) 32/492 Thumb Wheel 0/1428 Memory Expansion As shown above, 5 of the 13 claimed nonconformances for solder connection were confirmed to varying degrees on the unit inspected at VI.
Eight claimed nonconformances could not be confirmed; i.e.,
(1) cold solder joints, (2) excessive heat, (3) diode bodies partially embedded in solder, (4) circuit board delamination (measling), (5) duplicate serial numbers on like modules, (6) lifted circuit foil, (7) excessive insulation removal from jumper wires, and (8) components not properly attached mechanically.
VI personnel stated Bechtel was including in the category of insufficient solder all plated-through holes not plugged with solder.
The contractually imposed workmanship standards are confusing concerning the requirement for solder plugged plated-through hole.
On page 86 of the workmanship standard, typical interface connections show plated-through holes without solder plugs; however, page 114 shows plated-through holes with solder plugs and provides acceptance criteria.
Plated-through holes on the module inspected at VI (S/N 102) were not solder plugged.
l Additionally, the following printed wiring board (PWB) assemblies were inspected at VI to the requirements of Workmanship Standards No. 7220-J289-83-2:
(1)-
Three PWB assemblies from a nonserialized Model No. 876A-1 High Range Containment Area Monitor Readout module were inspected.
Three defects were noted:
(1) approximately one-half the epoxy capacitors were inserted into the holes, (2) 12 plated-through holes were not solder plugged, and (3) EE of the component leads did not si.is evidence of solder on the top side of the PWB.
I
l l
ORGANI2ATION:
VICT0REEN, INCORPORATED L-CLEVELAND, OHIO REPORT INSPECTION NO.-
99900377/82-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 6 of 7
{
L (2)
Three Model No. 846-1 area monitor PWBs (serial Nos. 458, 378, and 379) were inspected without disassembly.
These units utilized single sided PW8s.
Only one of the defects cited in the 10 CFR Part 50.55(e) report was discovered on the three PWBs; i.e., excess solder on 10 of the connections located on the bottom side.
However, these units were manu-factured in 1970 prior to the implementation of any workmanship standards.
(3)
Tnree PWBs for Model No. 842 area monitors were inspected.
These PWB assemblies were replacements or spares for area monitors manufactured prior to 1975 and are single sided.
No defects were noted on any of the three PW8s.
(4)
Five Model No. 876A-1 area monitors were inspected.
These units had been inspected by Bechtel personnel and repaired by VI personnel in early September 1982 at VI.
Additional I
solder was added to 85 connections and one panel knob was adjusted.
These repairs were initialed-off by Bechtel and the modules were pl, aced on hold at VI.
2.
Eauipment Calibration:
This area of the inspection consisted of a review of:
(a) four measuring instruments - Veeco MS 170 leak detector, Veeco sensitivity calibrator Type SC-5, Fluke 8050A, and Fiuke 8600A mulitimeters; (b) two secondary standards - 760A meter calibrator and 7552 Type K-2 potentiometer; and (c) calibration repair records and certifications for the above instruments.
Traceability to national stai;dards was satisfactorily demonstrated.
There were no nonconformances or unresolved items identified.
3.
Manufacturina Process Control:
This area of the inspection-consisted of reviewing the wave soldering machine; the applicable shop area; manufacturing procedure No. 510.001, Revision 0 concerning wave soldering; and posted records of analysis of solder bath contamination.
Nonconformances 8.3 and 8.4 were idottified.
i I
l 4.
Trainino:
This area of the inspection was performed by reviewing the-training records for cight manufacturing and quality personnel.
Four manufacturing persons were interviewed to determine their areas of I
responsibility and levels of training.
Additionally, four quality l
assuranca persons that maintained certified training records of QA and l
manufacturing personnel were also examined.
The following was identified:
i i
l
l c
l O'RSAN ZATION:
VICT0REEN, INCORPORATED CLEVELAND, OHIO REPORT INSPECTION un anonnS77 /co.n1 pp<ttt TR.
Dacc 7 nf 7 l
l Three Quality Assurance persons were certified Level 3 per ANSI /ASME l
N45.2.6-1978 by a prior QA manager.
Records were not available at VI to substantiate his qualifications or capabilities to certify to Level 3.
However, the prior QA manager is a 23 year employee of VI and stated he had maintained his QA records with his immediate supervisor, the past president.
The prior QA manager stated that he has not been able to locate his records since the past president retired from the company.
5.
10 CFR Part 21 Implementation:
Posting of the 10 CFR Part 21 implementing procedure and Section 206 of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974 were satisfactory.
Violations A.1 and A.2 were identified as a result of this item.
l l
l i
i i
t.
l PERSONS CONTAti:D
~
)
CTosEE W, IWC.
Dates G V. 1 - F 19 8 2.
cmpany pocker/Recor: No. 999 co 3'77 /6'2.-ol Inscector L.B PAE k'E2 Page l of I
dMEfPlease Print)
TITLE (Please Print)
ORGANIZATICN(PTease Print) iJ04W B.ASHE PEES t DE UT VICTOR 6EM, IWC,
- D.S.
eEEDEe V. R, OPEE ATioM s VI CTo REEM,IUC.
' PETER 3. c.oee tc. Au ACTit0G Q A H AMAGEe Vi c.ToeE so, I MC.
- kENWETH E.sTaffceo x MGs. APFLicATious EUse Vic.To esse. I WC.
i
( EOGEE ZlHHEE M AQ Q A M AMAGEE - FOTUR6 VI CToEEEM,IdC.
keemeTrA Bass Q A SECEETA EY Vi tTo E E EN, IMC, Cneot Looce4 IwousfalAt eEtarions Nse.
t/lcTo GEE N,INc, Tot 1 MILLS Sotosefus TEcy.
Vicroegsw,Iuc.
JOHM NE OoRosT MGA. of IusTRuNaNTArion Ma u o Fecroeroc.
vicyo gggg,ruc.
LGAO IMSPGcTOR CLARA RucV.ER catiesArreu tsp 7.
Vicrogggg* IJic*
STAM k AW EC V.!
GADIATioM SAfgry officgg Vi cro erKM,rWc.
Pc6 AsssNsty Auo Haue RoTH V Asts -
I secosa
.rgew, vicroesso,Iuc.
ESTER C.ElMi WAwo solo Eas us.
VI cro REEN,rNc.
l
, STEVE
- VAToVge, 6LEC.T. TEWH.
VI CTo R EEM,IM c.
}
doHM WEMDT EL EC T. T"EC4.
VICToREE N,I MC.
! FeAME wasEY GumLiry TEsr sure.
Vicroegsp. Inc.
4 l
l t
1 4
1 Q A TTEd DG GS Eureade :~ t Ey IT' InTE2 VIEWS
{
f; l
\\
9 s
t w.
a.
h N.
N I
a s
9 b
b e
r 6
s H
O y
a$E i
a 8
~. %
l 9
re i
{%
44 J
Q 4
s E
i h+ a o N E D
o s
a m
a is N
U l
k Bhw d RT y8 xss d (w y
x s
s s
N d
f I
i
%q.'
v se41 s
G i
I 4 e> a d
s t
f s
O s
'Nhk
'(
N
.U 4
E[Q d45
} '.s U
.li 2
d j 3
5did dy g..%ga3 3
.o s a<
3
=
,a
,r 5
.T 4
~}
- 3 s
3 in T~
x 2
3 3
-3 w
=
m
?
k k 5
a?
2 4
a s<
3 e
v m
1 5
0
\\.
1 h
3 C
a
?
r c
e
~
e 3
7 0,$Y d
-] 'd
- s. a ~.,
f y
]
d j
.a 3
.4 7
j
- 3 ge e
e w
m 11 d
% @$h4 3
4 3 r
a e
d e
Q i k (b
i g
vi 0
ls.
N 48 e
o o
e e 3 4 1
e 4
4 4
m
.a y
y 0
N
~
W k
$ b g& Y T
g' k 3. I Y
h b
s et' k 3
s f s # 3 1 1 s e c
1:
=
w 1
1111 s
h I
h P
l
-S-T Cd i
N 4
I
\\
'2-p i
M M
w u y
{+d de$]d lA V
9 i
9 fM i
W W k M
o r
A3 a
o e
o mo 2
e o
$6 6
0 o
m m
c' m
2 ur h
l k
hI hh k
'h 9.
d' N
l'
,3.9 15 $ #
j 4 sR 74 7 li a w
e
+
Jgg jf, v
i 2aoggg L
G o
I 3Fujrog
,a2 3"
c V
9 a
o 9 0!l 5 do 9
o 5
e
h d
~
P o
7 mw g
.a zN d7 1.
4 j
2 dg e
s 7 4 +)
13
.h h W 1,{15asd n o
aea r
s a
s su b
u s
f, 3
s ~. 7,7 s
g t
e
%q sw s
pa
~
d$
5 G
v I
b d
.h s
y t
-4
?
c'4
{.
b o n
m' 48sE 2
s 9..
j m
n c3 d
e
'U h
'd i
F 6
v 0
V a
7 m'
1 W
N r
i Y.
8 3
~.3 w
L 1 4
1 3
o-cc 1
~.
y
- d 4
q; F
Pn 1.3 uk.;
g
_c>-1
-e F
3 g3 w
1
- 26 E d34 6
i a 4 2
4 5,i f j 1
s3g
-5 g"2 m (3
t1 g
e*W
<t as CQ e-j!
,j o w
a a
E W
k
$ 4 k U
r 2
{
q; I
j l
a e
2
~
g 5
+
4g$$
a g d,
=
1r i
i i
i i
.a gg O
s q
.f' d
p h
D
(
l 05
@ A Ed i
l E
I L
2
- e h
LAP 4
i i
.. Jg;!.i aj a
o 2uo2 n2 F
2 O
O E 5531850 Ej I
A g
g:
E
~
i d
ssa4o%E d.
Q o
a J
u f
e e
2 g
2
- 8 y
s a
s c-G e
o % eeau G
o w ii, sine A
N H
-