ML20091F622
Text
.
.g 8d Uf.l T L D $1Aili f,
NUCLEAR REGULATORY C O'.".U SS IO N j
g, REGION lli
/
5 I
799 ROOSEVELT ROAD 8
/
cLEN EU.YN, ILUNOIS 60137 OCT 1 2 1983 N$
MEMORANDUM FOR:
R. F. Warnick, Director, Office of Special Cases FROM:
J. J. Harrison, Chief,Section II - Midland
SUBJECT:
EVALUATION OF CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY'S (CPCO)
CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION PROGRAM The attached evaluation was performed by the NRC staff of CPCO's CCP to reinspect, status, and complete the construction of the Midland Nuclear Plant.
The evaluation included reviewing the program for adequate content, scope and detail. The August 26, 1983, submittal was the final product on which this evaluation was based.
The staff concluded that the CCP is an adequate program to be utilized at the Midland Plant to identify problems, document them, afford corrective action and allow for the plant to be completed in a quality manner.
As you are aware a recent management decision was made to not utilize this evaluation to approve the CCP. The approval mechanism is going to be in the form of " Confirmatory Order".
This evaluation therefore will not make the document route to the Public Document Room.
I do believe that placement of this document in the Region III files is necessary to historically show such an evaluation was accomplished.
J. J. Harrison, Chief Section II - Midland 4
8406020334 840517 POR FOIA
' RICE 84-96 PDR.
, - + - -,-.
4 9
,,,+%
-__,y my
~
STAFF EVALUATION OF CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY'S CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION PROGRAM PROPOSAL TO REINSPECT, STATUS, AND COMPLETE THE CONSTRUCTION OF MIDLAND NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 Purpose and Background The Consumers Power Company (CPCo or licensee) holds Construction Permits No. CPPR-81 (Unit 1) and CPPR-82 (Unit 2) issued by the Atomic Energy Commission in 1972, which authorized construction of the Midland nuclear facility. The Midland nuclear facility is located in Midland, Michigan and consists of two pressurized water reactors of Babcock and Wilcox design and related facilities for use in the commercial generation of electric power.
Since the start of construction, Midland has experienced significant Quality Assurance (QA) problems. Following,the identification of each of these problems, the licensee has taken action to correct the problems and to upgrade the QA program.
In spite of the corrective actions taken, the licensee has continued to experience problems in the implementation of quality in construction.
Corrective actions taken were directed toward each specific problem, and root cause determination and a program to review isolated events for their generic application were ineffective.
Significant construction problems identified to date include:
1973 - cadweld splicing deficiencies 1976 - rebar omissions 1977 - bulge in the Unit 2 Containment Liner Plate 1977 - tendon sheath location errors 1978 - Diesel Generator Building settlement 1980 - Zack Company heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) deficiencies 1980 - reactor pressure vessel anchor stud failures l
1981 - piping suspension system installation deficiencies 1982 - electrical cable misinstallations In 1980 Consumers Power Company (CPCo) reorganized the existing QA department so as to increase the involvement of high level CPCo management in onsite QA activities. The reorganized QA department was given the title of integrated Midland Project Quality Assurance Department (MPQAD). The responsibility for Quality Control (QC) of HVAC work was removed from the HVAC contractor, Zack, and assigned to MPQAD.
L i
j
. In May 1981 the NRC conducted a special indepth team inspection of the Midland f
site to examine the' implementation status and effectiveness of the QA program.
Based on this inspection, Region III concluded that the Midland QA program was acceptable (Inspection Report No. 50-329/81-12; 50-330/81-12).
The special team did, however, identify deficiencies in previous QC inspections of piping supports / restraints and electrical es51e installations.
As a result of staff discussions about the seriousness o,f these findings and of similar indications of deficiencies identified in the Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance (SALP) Report issued in April 1982, a special Midland Section in Region III was formed in July 1982. The Midland Section devoted increased attention to inspection of the Midland facility, including upgrading the constructor's (Bechtel) QC program.
the Bechtel QC organization into the MPQAD.In September 1982, the licensee integrated This reorganization reflected the recommendations of the NRC staff.
As part of this change, the licensee also undertook to retrain and recertify all previously certified Bechtel QC inspectors.
As a result of Region III findings iif significant problems with equipment in the diesel generator building developed from an inspection during the period of October 1982 through January 1983, and the subsequent identification of similar findings ty the licensee in other portions of the plant, the licensee, in December 1982, halted the majority of the safety-related work activities.
l In view of the history of QA problems at the Midland plant and the lack of effectiveness of corrective actions to resolve these problems, the NRC required the licensee to develop a comprehensive program to verify the adequacy of previously installed components and to assure the adequacy of future component installations.
On December 2, 1982, Consumers Power Company verbally proposed the concept of the CCP, followed by a formal submittal on January 10, 1983.
Subsequent to the January 10, 1983 submittal, the NRC requested additional information on March 28., 1983. CPCo provided additional responses on April 6 and 22, 1983.
The CCP underwent revisions and was resubmitted to the NRC on June 3 and 10, 1983.
The NRC issued a final set of comments and questions on the CCP on August 19, 1983.
This was followed by a final resubmittal of the CCP by CPCo on August 26, 1983. This evaluation concludes the NRC staff review of the above documents.
j CCP Overview i
The CCP is CPCo's plan to provide guidance in the planning and management of the construction and quality activities necessary for completion of the construction of the Midland Nuclear Plant.
To date the CCP has undergone several alterations in response to comments from the NRC and members of the public.
As finally revised and submitted on August 26, 1983, the CCP includes:
(1) NRC hold points; (2) the requirement for 100% reinspection of accessible installations; (3) the integration of Bechtel QC with MPQAD; (4) the retraining i
and recertification of QC inspectors; (5) the general training of licensee and contractor personnel in quality requirements for nuclear work, requirements of the CCP, safety orientation, and inspection and work procedures; (6) the l
revision, as necessary, of Project Quality Control Instructions; (7) CCP team training; and (8) an independent third party overview of CCP activities.
3
.=:. -.
)
f
- The CCP is divided i,nto two phases.
Phase 1 is a systematic review of the safety-related systems and areas of the plant.
This review will be carried out on an area-by-area basis and will be done by teams with responsibility for particular systems. The purpose of Phase' l is to provide:
(1) a clear identi-fication of remaining installation work, including any necessary rework, and (2) an up-to-date inspection status to verify the quality of existing work.
Phase 2 will take the results of the Phase 1 review and complete the necessary work or rework.
The teams organized for Phase 1 activities will continue as the responsible organizational units to complete the work in Phase 2.
All new work and rework on pipe hangers and electrical cable will be part of CCP Phase 2.
The CCP is designed to address the generic applicability of the problems
. identified by the NPC's inspection of the diesel generator building.
If other significant problems are identified during the course of the CCP, the CCP will be expanded to track their resolution. The objective of the CCP is to look at the plant hardware and equipment,, identify existing problems, correct all the problems, and complete construction of the plant.
The CCP ~ does not include the remedial soils program, nuclear steam supply system installation, HVAC installations, and the reinspection of pipe hangers and electrical cable. The remedial soils activities are being overviewed by an independent third party and closely inspected by the NRC under the conditions of the Construction Permits which implement the Licensing Board's April 30, 1982 order and a Work Authorizatica Procedure.
The staff does not consider it necessary to require further review of the remedial soils I
activities to be included in the CCP because of separate commitments made to the NRC. Nuclear Steam Supply System (NSSS) installation and HVAC installation were not drawn into question by the diesel generator building inspection due to the fact that the installation and the QC inspection were i
accomplished by organizations other than Bechtel.
The staff has not developed facts to indicate that installation of these systems should be included in the CCP.
Reinspection of the pipe hangers and electrical cable were not included in the l
CCP because that reinspection is being done under a separate commitment to the l
NRC.
See letters from Keppler (NRC) to Cook (CPCo) dated August 30 and September 2, 1982.
Evaluation The NRC staff has conducted an indepth review of each revision of the CCP.
The staff generated comments and questions on each revision, and subsequently, CPCo resolved each issue and resubmitted a final acceptable document.
In addition, the NRC conducted several meetings at the staff working levels to better understand the methodology being utilized in the CCP.
In addition, comments were received from members of the public, intervenors, and a represen-tative of the Government Accountability Project (GAP). These comments were considered by the NRC in their review and evaluation of the CCP.
Public meetings were held in Midland, Michigan on February 8, and August ll,1983.
A meeting was also held with the intervenors, GAP, and members of the Lone Tree Council on August 11, 1983.
In addition, the staff has had meetings or telephone conversations with the intervenors and GAP. All views were given due consideration prior to the NRC's final decision to approve the,C(g[.;,,,
l l
3 i
Summary and Conclusion Based on our review of the program submitted by CPCo, and consideration of comments made b~y members of the public, we conclude that the CCP is an adequate program to provide for the reinspection, statusing, and proper completion of construction of the Midland Nuclear Plant.
t
- G o
e-D y
4
\\*
b@, j0 p urog UNITED STATES
[5Tedj[*q NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o
REGloN IH
$ p( C#/ ' j res 8tOOSEVELT RO AD g
f Ot ~cu.vu.itu~O.s m n APR 3 issi gD=
Docket No. 50-329 Docket No. 50-330 Consumers Power Company ATTN:
Mr. D. L. Quamme Site Manager P. O. Box 1963 Midland, MI 48640 Gentlemen:
The NRC staff.has concluded a review of your letter dated March 27, 1984, requesting NRC concurrence with the release of additional portions of the plant for Construction Completion Program (CCP) Phase 1 Status Assessment and Quality Verification activities.
In regards to your request for addi-tional modules, se have concluded that the following portions of the plant may be released for CCP Phase 1 Status Assessment and Quality Verification activities:
Module Number Description 150, 151 EL. 634' Auxiliary Building 160, 161, 162 El. 646' and 652' Auxiliary Building 320 RB II N. D-Ring 240 EL. 659' Control Tower 330 RB II S. D-Ring 820 Diesel Generator Building This letter, therefore, authorizes Consumers Power Company to proceed with CCP Phase 1 Status Assessment and Quality Verification activities for the above portion of the plant.
Our decision to limit the release of additional portions to those identified above is based on our perception of the progress which you have made in accom-plishing Phase 1 activities for these modules previously released and the continuing deficiencies which have been identified in the areas of team training j
and document control.
Further releases of modules will be based on work accom-plished and the effectiveness of your QA program in dealing with identified deficiencies.
We have reviewed the clarifications to the CCP process as delineated in your 1
letter, including attachments 3, 4, and 5, and concur in the incorp' oration of j
l these clarifications into the CCP process.
Finally, we concur that the disposition of inaccessible items is not a restraint for release into Phase 2.
L i
I, Consumers Power Company 2
Shouldyouhaveanyquestionsregardingthismatter,pleaseconta[tme'at (312) 790-5635.
Sincerely, John J. Harrison, Chief Midland Section
Enclosure:
Ltr dtd 3/27/84 cc w/ enc 1:
DMB/ Document Control Desk (RIDS)
Resident Inspector, RIII The Honorable Charles Bechhoefer, ASLB The Honorable Jerry Harbour, ASLB The Honorable Frederick P. Cowan, ASLB William Paton, ELD Michael Miller Ronald Callen, Michigan Public Service Commission Myron M. Cherry Barbara Stamiris Mary Sinclair Wendell Marshall Colonel Steve J. Gadler (P.E.)
Howard Levin (1 ERA)
Billie P. Garde, Government Accountability Project Lynne Bernabei, Government Accountability Project Stone and Webster Michigan, Inc.
RI(L RII RIII RIII RI.If,RIII g '
RIII gl h<
h, Ryty u 6kP Gafdner/b1 Harris Warnick wis basis K pler 45g 03/30/84 Sjtc/
'3/7py y/ W.
h Contt!mtit y Pom
.. j/ Company tR
~ s
-.e. m,.. n.
o.
Y. arch 27, 1984 Mr John J Harrison, chief Midland Section Region Ill Nuclear Regulatory Cot =issior.
799 toosevelt Road Glen Illyn, IL 60137 HIDLAND ENERCY CnTER CWO 7020 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION PROGRAM IMPLEMD.7ATION ADDITIONAL MODULE RELEASES Pile:
0655 UPT:
99*08 Serial: CSC-7526 The purpose of this letter is to request KRC concurrence with the release of cdditional portions of the plant for Construction Cor.pletion Prog rac (CCP)
Phase 1 Status Assess =,ent and Quality Yarification activities. T'his subject w:o discussed with you, and members of your staff on March 21. 19764.
A copy of the presentation materials used in that discussion is providee in Attach-ment 1.
As discussed in our meeting, additional module releases are necessary ec focilitate a continuation of the logical Status Assessnent ar.d pslity Vorification Program (QVP) process to support Paast 2 reltascs foir vori r.uded to support system turnover milestones and to maintain effective acilization cf the trained and qualified personnel assembled for Status Atr,esiss.ent and OVP.
A listing of additional rMules, for which this re!er.se is req ue st ed. 1E prc,vided in Attach:4nt 2.
n.is listing is in order of pricrity,.sr.d thh i
specific request is for priority nunters 6 through 21.
l In addition, it was noted that cisrifications to certain CCP pronsses are desirable in order to reselve ineffieter. iet vs tava er.cemr.tered vi.ile ;,crfer-sing Status Assess *_ent and QVP or. co=outies and it.sper:f or. Keec rds s.pir.r.in; several a,odules. This is particu:arly true when a cenplete detercination of -
the acceptability'ef the irstallation dannds or, attributes that are eucside the module bou'adary.
Specifically, we request an extension of th.cse cross cver coemiodities into other modules to allow completion of Phase I activities to logical lialts. For Installation Status Assesseent, the extenmies aeou24 include three categories:
3 1.
The completion of all portions of ur.feuely identified and' tracked itens that cress boundaries such as cenduit ar.d f r.cr.rcent ts. tit 4 rut.r..
i 11_, t ID 'l V
(
m.
CCPO$84-0001A-CN02
. m s-a. m a-a.u d.
.a.
- - ~ w -
. ~.
-. -;., -. g.. a.-
m...:.... ~
\\
2.
The coupletion of civil coc=,odities thst fort a sing 1c identifistle unit that cross todules boundaries such as a co=;1ete 11ock vail or structerr.1 steel platform.
r 3.
Functionally interrelated items,that must be verified as a'.whola to assess all applicable attributes such as a pipe, pipe hangers end. associated in-line devices.
Attachments 3, 4 and 5 provide specific definition for each category.
This request for boundary extension applies to both the five (5) modules currently released for Phase 1 activities, and those additional modules requested in this letter, For the Quality Verification Progran (QVP) inspections, this involves allo ing reinspections to follow the scope of the cristir.; ("cid") Int;.t ctio:. Lecords (Ik), in order to reinspect all portions covered by the existin; IL, ever.
though it may extend beyond the boundary of the nodule.
Finally, we request your concurrence with regard to the dispositioning of inaccessible items. As discussed earlier with you, and cc.bers of your staff, we do not consider this dispositioning to be a restraint for release into Phase 2 since 1.
the ite=s are alraady inaccessible, and 2.
supporting data for these verifications will not be available in r_est cases, until we have developed a qualit} history through reinspection of accessible items.
Please contact us should you require additional inforvation in replying to this request.
/ D:.Q/10/ Liv Attachments l
CC 1.JCook, P.idlAnd E*sident Ins;.ec t or DSSood, USERC JCKeppler, Reg.ional Adt.inistrator,1*t on III i
1 l
8 1
CCP033t.-0001A-CN02 v. u.
.. w
=~ ;- vu n.,
,,.a
....,a.,,,..
.,s.n...
c..
...= x - ;- -mi s a -. _ if.___..._ m
_..s
.g,.
Fyn.E EMSE SEQ:BCE
??.IOkliT NUMBER SCP.EDP1.E 1 m ER DESCiIPTIOT 1
360 11 II Outti6t D-Fing*
2 300 Service. Enter Perp Structurs 3
102 East Wing Vall Auxiliary hilding*
a 120 El. 584' Auxiliary Building
, 5 410 E1. 614' Unit 11 Turbine
- RELEASED 6
150 E1. 634' Auxiliary building *
(151 included) 7 160 El. 646' & 652' Auxiliary hilding*
(161 & 162 included) 8 320 RB II N. D-Ling
- 9 240 El 659' Control Iower*
10 330 11 II S. D-Eint*
11 820 Die n 1 Oc.erater L_ildir.i 12 280 E1. E55' Unit 31 Electricti Fenetratic:
13 210 II. 614' control Tovar*
14 250 El. 674.'-6" control Tower
- 15 170 El. 659& 674'-6 Amciliary Building *
(175 included) 16 140 El. 614' Auxiliary building
- 17 230 El. 646' control Tower
- 18 130 599' Auxiliar3 building
- 19 101 Auxiliary building Pipevay and Talve Gallety*-
20 180 Auxiliary W ilding toof*
21 110
-El. 56f' An iliary Builditg*
2L EJLESTOFE 22 266 ~
Ei. '6ES' Cortrol Tower and Eoof 23 310 Ri 11 Tuc1 Fool 24 103 Vert ~ L'ir.i V:.12 25.
290.
Unit I-El. 685' W. Penecratior.
26 220 El. 634' I. abs Control Tonr 27 660 Tank ists.
26 420 Ei. 65 Turb;Lc II.
29 430 E1.'L55' E r'cint Il 31 190
.E1. 695'. and 715 Turbine Il 30 440 Radvaste k ildint 32
'SCO Mis.e=11:v:us itit:rt:re:
35 E50 x
- Et.t.ltt i.:cyr. cr Ct '.. I e ::; ' ; ;;.
34 880 River ir u.ke struct ur.
i 810 Circu;aring%ter L.:ildit.g 35 36
'890 pond 11:r.dovn Structure 37 530 Guar'd Exse 38 570
~ Oily Varte.E=ilding 39 610 E1. 614'0 Turbine 1 40 620
~ II. 6 3t. ' Erbins 1 s
41 630 El. (55' Js.: tine !
42 640
.E1. 695 STurbine I s
(
43 540 C E ~1 O m ide D-ling 44
' 530 stL'I S. L-H n; l
L5-50 PL l ' y J-M:1 x
46 510 RL I }Jel'? col 47 f"
700 Ev: pars:or B ' tiding 48
_710,
Staac Tunnel s:
49
? ?C * ~
Coa. Letura P&ph:euse 0 = Re* quire for Aux. T1ush # 25 '.* tiles tone I:-vision I c
.=..
5 "
Attae're: e 3 t~niquely identified and tracied crestover cc:=odities that cty be status essessed or quality verified as a unit.
C0!OODITY nTD;510 : 1IMIT r.,
Electrical Slots (floor penetration)
Complete uniquely identified unit Cable Tray complete uniquely identified unit Exposed Conduit Co=plete uniquely identified unit Virevay Co=ple te unic,uc3y idec.tified unit E:. bed Conduit /Docttanks T.e.ch tri Trenches Co:plete sniquely ider.tified unic Instrumentation Tubing Con;1ete ise:etric dracing.
(To bt included with nods.le contair. ins instru-
~ent)
Mechanical Equip:4nt The entire piece of equipment as supplied by the equipcent vendor vill be astersed on both rotating and nocrocating equip:,ent, even if field work or asse.bly was' perforned within the co=poner.t or skid.
Equipc<nt Sup;. orts 1.oth ir.t egrt; ar.d r.or.-int reg rt2 er,=; -
ser. su pcrts vill be. sssested t:.
..r. i:
~
entirety, riot including the persa.:.ex.c building fra:e or structure, Sys:itl Locrs & J.irlocks Co ;1ete. c[:: v:.0 ht.rd tre a:4 ftt:_.
j i
e CCP0354-0001A-ch'02 YW $bg MM FM9 W9 6.WD#8%."'
- kM $* M 6
e* *W. Ne $ h y W M% =e 6 ap h= q. w e.'Dg N g.M e.dDSEM.
- d*Me*
n
~'
A t t i c':.. t :.t 4 Uniquely identified cozzodities that fort a single identifiable unit and czy be status assessed or quality verified e a unit.
COMMODIM EI"D:5001; Liv.ti^
structural Traming to and including the next connectio:. or support point Blockwalls both sides of vsll, including sttach-nents and pet.etrations cc end of tt.a epst. (tic-it te ths nc:
s t ruc t s.ra..
supp:rt p :.t.O Structural Concrets Valla both sides of the vall, incit. ding punatrations, up to tbt noduit bper.dr.ry Decontaminable Coatings an'y coatings or. the co:=.odities siwr.
on this extension list Eiscellaneous Q Coatings Any coatings on the cor=:dities sb.t.
on this extension list i
s if I
'x l
y i
l l
s x,._
h 1
se CCP03S4-0001A-CN02 4 y., m __
-3 s
e.
,J.L,
~~
ha
.m Attachu:.t 5 Tusetionally interrelated crossover co=.odities that tzy be stacas. assessed or gus11ty verified as a whole ites.
+
g.
COMMODITT EFTD;E10K LTICT Large Pipe
/,ssess to the point outside the module which represents the bounds.ry of the stress analysis. This vill s.ot exceed the first anchor peint, ie:
- anchor, put;, ti..t. ne:.:. lt, etc.
St..11 Pipe tra e a t c t r.t h= t t cf the ;;.pini t.a.
aber.ru or. the isometric.
Noter QVP or. piping which was accepted on Ph'-1.00 ar.d PF-3. 30 PQC1's must extend to the s,ert " field break," ie:
field weld or flange joint, beyor.d thess lit.it s.
In-Line Cc=:41 ties:
Atsess all of these cocedi'.cies which Flued Essds Tiange Joints are installed vithin the b.:> satries Wild Joints of the piping being assess d (as described above).
Valves (Mechenict1 and L'cided)
Orifice Places Eltetrical, Penetration Asse:bly E.nuf actured ele-ctrical pre-ssure boundary ar.r.cebly ac. a co ;-Iete cuit I
e CC?0%!.-0SSI A-ts02
.- - --- e
-+
W&ogg
3 bb5i2EI3
/
Dean L Quamme
.[]/ o, {cggcy rge g i
LGk sue Manas.r
\\, s.3 /
.. v u ~,,,..
s JRINCIPAL STAFF f
M4:and Pros.ct. Po som issa. Meiano Me 4es4o. (si7 esi.seso p %A
'DPRP D/RA DE j
A/RA DRMSP March 27, 1984 RC QRMA P_A,O SCS /
sw '/ 3 SGA ML a
ENF File Mr John J Harrison, Chief Midland Section, Region III Nuclear Regulatory Commission 799 Roosevelt Road Glen'Ellyn, IL 60137 MIDLAND ENERGY CENTER GWO 7020 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION ADDITIONAL MODULE RELEASES File:
0655 UFI:
99*08 Serial:
CSC-7526 The purpose of this letter is to request NRC concurrence with the release of i
additional portions of the plant for Construction Completion Program (CCP)
Phase 1 Status Assessment and Quality Verification activities. This subject was discussed with you, and members of your staff on March 21, 1984.
A copy of the p;esentation materials used in that discussion is provided in Attach-ment 1.
l As discussed in our meeting, additional module releases are necessary to facilitate a continuation of the logical Status Assessnent and Quality Verification Program (QVP) process to support Phase 2 releases for work needed to support system turnover milestones, and to maintain effective utilization of the trained and qualified personnel assembled for Status Assessment and QVP.
A listing of additional modules, for which. this release is requested, is provided in Attachment 2.
This listing is in order of priority, and this specific request is for priority numbers 6 through 21.
In addition, it was noted that clarifications to certain CCP processes are desirable in order to resolve inefficiencies we have encountered while perfor-ming Status Assessment and QVP on commodities and Inspection Records spanning several modules. This is particularly true when a complete determination of.
the acceptabilitj of the installation depends on attributes that are outside the module boundary.
Specifically, we request an extension of these cross over commodities into other modules to allow completion of Phase 1 activities to logical. limits.
For Installation Status Assessment, the extension would include three categories:
1.
The completion of all portions of uniquely identified and tracked itens that cross boundaries such as conduit and inst.rument tubing runs.
fl.,NfGT'
.r CCP0384-0001A-CN02 MAR 3 01984
2.
The completion of civil commodities that form a single identifiable unit that cross modules boundaries such as a complete block wall or structural steel platform.
3.
Functionally interrelated items,that must be verified as a whole to assess all applicable attributes such as a pipe, pipe hangers and associated in-line devices.
Attachments 3, 4 and 5 provide specific definition for each category.
This request for boundary extension applies to both the five (5) modules currently released for Phase 1 activities, and those additional modules requested in this letter.
For,the Quality Verification Program (QVP) inspections, this involves allowing reinspections to follow the scope of the existing ("old") Inspection Records (IR), in order to reinspect all portions covered by the existing IR, even though it may extend beyond the boundary of the module.
Finally, we request your ancurrence with regard to the dispositioning of inaccessible items.
As discussed earlier with you, and members of your staff, we do not consider this dispositioning to be a restraint for release into Phase 2, since 1.
the items are already inaccessible, and 2.
supporting data for these verifications will not be available, in most cases, until we have developed a quality history through reinspection of accessible items.
Please contact us should you require additional information in replying to this request.
. -d
\\~./
/' DLQ/ BHP /klw g
Attachments s.
-CC RJCook, Midland Resident Inspector DSHood, USNRC JGKeppler, Regional Administrator, Region III CCP0384-0001 A-CN02
PRIORITY KUMBER SCHEDULE NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1,
340 RB II Outsida D-Ring
- 2 800 Service Water Pump Structure 4
3 102 East Wing Wall Auxiliary Building
- 4 120 El. 584' Auxiliary Building 5
410 El. 614' Unit II Turbine
- RELEASED 6
150 El. 634' Auxiliary Building *
(151 included) 7 160 El. 646' & 652' Auxiliary Building *
(161 & 162 included) 8 320 RB II N. D-Ring *
+
9 240 El 659' control. Tower
- 10 330 RB II S. D-Ring
- 11 820 Diesel Gwnerater Building 12 2$k
's1. 659' Unit II Electrical Penetration 13 210 El. 614' Control Tower
- 14 250 El. 674'-6" Control Tower
- 15 170 El. 659' & 674'-6 Auxiliary Building *
(175 included) 1 16 140 El.,614' Auxiliary Building
- 17 230 El. 646' Control Tower
- 18 130 599' Auxiliary Building
- 19 101 Auxiliary Building Pipeway and
~
~
Valve Gallery
- 20 180 Auxiliary Building Roof
- 21 110 El. 568' Auxiliary Building
- 2B MILESTONE 22 260' El. 685' Control Tower and Roof i
23 310 RB II Fuel. Pool 24 103 West Wing Wall 25
-290 Unit I El. 685' W. Penetration 26 220 El. 634' Labs Control Tower 27 860
. Tank Farm
- 28 420 El. 634' Turbine II 29 430 El. 659' Turbine II 30 440 El. 695' an'd 715 Turbine II 31 190 Radwaste Building 32 900 Miscellaneous Structures 33 850 Health Physics Cal. Facility j
34 880 River Intake Structure 35 810 circulating Water Building i
36-890 pond Blowdown Structure 830 Guard House 37 38
,870 Oily Waste Building 610 El. 614' Turbine I 39 40' 620 El. 634' Turbine I 41 630 El. 659' Turbine I
'42 640 El. 695' Turbine I 43
' 540 RB I Outside D-Ring 44 530 RB I S. D-Ring 45-520 RB I N. D-Rin'g 46 510' RB I Fuel Pool l
47
'700 Evaporator Building 48-710 Steam Tunnel 49 720 Con. Return Pumphouse l
- =.R'equire for Aux. Flush - 2B Milestone.
Revision 1 3/27/81 BHPeck
~~
Attachr. ant 3 4
l~niquely identified and tracked crossover commodities that may be status assessed or quality verified as a unit.
COMMODITY EXTENSION LIMIT Electrical Slots (floor penetration)
Complete uniquely identified unit Cable Tray Complete uniquely identified unit Exposed Conduit Complete uniquely identified unit Wireway Complete uniquely identified unit a
Embed Conduit /Ductbanks Each end Trenches Complet~e uniquely identified unit Instrumentation Tubing Complete isometric drawing.
(To be included with module containing instru-ment)
Mechanical Equipment The entire piece of equipment as supplied by the equipment vendor will be assessed.on both rotating and nonrotating equipment, even if field work or assembly was perforced within the component or skid.
Equipment Supports Both integral and non-intregral equip-i ment supports will be assessed in their entirety, not including the permanent building frame or structure.
Special Doors & Airlocks Complete door with hardware and frame 1
O i
I l
\\
CCP0364-0001A-CN02
l..
I'niquely identified commodities that form a single identifiable unit and may I
be status assessed or quality verified as a unit.
COMMODITY EXTENSION LIMIT Structural Framing to and including the next connection or support point Blockwalls Both sides of wall, including attach-ments and penetrations to end of the span (tie-in to the next s tructural support point)
Structural Concrets Walls both sides of the wall, including penetrations, up to the mo.dule boundary Decontaminable Coatings any coatings on the commo&ities shown on this extension list Miscellaneous Q Coatings Any coatinFs on the commodlities shown on this extension list e
D G
e e
4 CCP038'4-0001 A-CN02 9
Attachmsnt 5 s
Functionally interrelated crossover commodities that may be status assessed or quality verified as a whole item.
COMMODITY EXTENSION LIMIT Large Pipe Assess to the point outside the module which represents the boundary of the stress analysis. This will not exceed the first anchor point, ie:
- anchor, pump, tank nozzle, etc.
Small Pipe Assess to the limits of the piping as shown on the isometric.
Note:
QVP on piping which was accepted on PW-1.00 and PF-1.10 PQCI's must extend to the next " field break," ie:
field weld or flange joint, beyond these limits.
In-Line Commodities:
Assess all of these commodities which
' Flued Heads are installed within the boundaries Flange Joints of the piping,being assessed (as Weld Joints described above).
Valves (Mechanical and Welded)
Orifice Plates Electrical Penetration Assembly Manufactured electrical pressure boundary assembly as a complete unit 6
l l
CCP0384-0001A-CN02 9
\\....>
BCC JWCook, P-26-336B SHHowell, M-Il80B TABuczwinski, Midland-207 LGraber, LIS JNLeech, P-24-506
' DFlewis, Bechtel FJLevandoski, B&W GALow, P-12-237A
.DASommers P-14-106 PPSteptoe, IL&B, Chicago DJVandeWalle, P-24-614B BJWalraven, P-24-517 RAVells, Midland FCWilliams, IL&B, Washington, DC DTPerry, Midland NRC Correspondence File, P-24-517 UFI, P-24-511 CMS-Midland JEKarr, Stone & Webster RC DMBudzik, P-24-517A RJErhardt, P-14-113A LSGibson, P-24-618A P-24-505 (Last) a e
9 4
9 9
6 4
W D
8 e
CCP0'384 0001A-CN02
Y, t
2%+x&A s
es
, M^y' CODSumm
'(
/
k Power o- ' o-stir uanager
%d v C0mpBRy r
u m r,,,
u.a.nd Proi.ct ro som isea. M.diend. Mi 4es4o. (sta sat seso March 27, 1984
/PR PC :p;L r; j
v6 A4
[
=
s2; 4:_._;
y n
Mr John J Harrison, Chief i
i
- /.
Midland Section, Region III
$f hil V' C lLI O
Nuclear Regulatory Commission P.
l 799 Roo nvelt Road 9)e 7)n%
1 Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 MIDLAND ENERGY CENTER GWO 7020 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION ADDITIONAL MODULE RELEASES File:
0655 UFI: 99*08 Serial:
CSC-7526 The purpose of this letter is to request NRC concurrence with the release of additional porcions of the plant for Construction Completion Program (CCP)
Phase 1 Status Assessment and Quality Verification activities.
This subject was discussed with you, and umbers of your staff on March 21, 1984.
A copy of the presentation materials used in that discussion is provided in Attach-ment 1.
As discussed in our meeting, additional module releases are necessary to facilitate a continuation of the logical Status Assessment and Quality Verification Program (QVP) process to support Phase 2 releases for work needed to support system turnover milestones, and to maintain effective utilization of the trained and qualified personnel assembled for Status Assessment and QVP. A listing of additional modules, for which this release is requested, is provided in Attachment 2.
This listing is in order of priority, and this specific request is for priority numbers 6 through 21.
l In addition, it was noted that clarifications to certain CCP processes are l
desirable in order to resolve inefficiencies we have encountered while perfor-ming Status Assessment and QVP on commodities and Inspection Records spanning several modules.
This is particularly true when a complete determination of the acceptability.of the installation depends on attributes that are outside the module boundary. Specifically, we request an extension of these cross over commodities into other modules to allow completion of Phase 1 activities to logical limits. For Installation Status Assessment, the extension would include three categories:
1.
The completion of all portions of uniquely identified and tracked items that cross boundaries such as conduit and instrument tubing runs.
e p o l ~h' h;
af
' M,? p fgg4 CCP0384-0001A-CN02
l',
t 2.
The completion of civil commodities that form a single identifiable unit that cross modules boundaries such as a complete block wall or structural steel platform.
3.
Functionally interrelated items that must be verified r a whole to essess all applicable attributes such as a pipe, pipe hangers and associated in-line devices.
Attachments 3, 4 and 5 provide specific definition for each category. This request for boundary extension applies to both the five (5) modules currently released for Phase 1 activities, and those additional modules requested in this letter.
For the Quality Verification Program (QVP) inspections, this involves allowing reinspections to follow the scope of the existing ("old") Inspection Records (IR), in order to reinspect all portions covered by the existing IR, even though it may extend beyond the boundary of the module.
Finally, we request your concurrence with regard to the dispositioning of inaccessible items. As discussed earlier with you, and members of your staff, we do not consider this dispositioning to be a restraint for release into Phase 2, since 1.
the items are already inaccessible, and 2.
supporting data for these verifications will not be available, in most cases, until we have developed a quality history through reinspection of accessible items.
Please contact us should you require additional info'rmation in replying to this request.
((s f-$/' DLQ/ BHP /k1w Attachments CC RJCook, Midland Resident Inspector DSHood, USNRC JGKappler, Regional Administrator, Region III l
CCP0384-0001A-CN02 l
.s Attachmant 1 4
W 7
.l.
PRESENTATION TO NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ON ADDITIONAL MODULE RELEASES f.
t -
CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY MIDLAND PROJECT MARCH 21, 1984 c
s- - - -
,.e
PRESENTATION TO NRC ON ADDITIONAL MODULE RELEASES I.
Introduction - BHPeck II.
Current Status of CCP Phase I Activities a.
Review logic diagram ~- BHPeck b.
Status Assessment - TValenzano Manpower, areas / disciplines being worked, manhours expended, current short-term forecast, training, procedures c.
Quality Verification Program (QVP) - BPalmer Manpower, manhours expended, current short-term forecast, training, procedures III.
Results Achieved to Date a.
Status Assessment - TValenzano 3
Summary statement b.
QVP - BPalmer Summary statement c.
Summary of NCRs written - BPalmer d.
Management Evaluations - BHPeck Describe how Management is overviewing the CCP IV.
Lessons Learned a.
Status Assessment - TMinor Review SAT packages, changes made, difficulties encountered and resolutions recommended.
~
b.
QVP - BPalmer Review QVP packages, changes made, difficulties encountered and resolutions recommended.
V.
Third Party Observations - BHPeck VI.
Additional Module Releases - BHPeck Priority Listing VII.
Summary - BHPeck l
BHPeck 3/14/84 l
r
O h,
e SECTION I INTRODUCTION e
1
j I
1 f
l SECTION II CURRENT STATUS OF CCP PHASE I i
1 mmw
INSTALLATION STATUS ASSESSMENT MANHOURS
- 1ST FIVE MODULES CIVIL MECH' ELECT INSTR TOTAL i
MODULE i
102 1080 5480 1800 180 8540 120 4090 5980 4080 710 14,860 f
340 11,490 4730 2470 990 19,680 i
I 410 20 0
0 0
20 800 750 30 1710 0
2490 i
TOTAL 17,430 16,220 10,060 1880 45,590 i
EXPENDED THRU 3/f.
15,000
- ROUNDED
300_
MODULE 102,120,340, 410,800 INSTALLATION STATUS ASSESSMENT 200 -
MANPOWER CURVE I
ACTUAL
_ PLAN N
I
\\
I s
100_
l g
I
\\
I y
/
g
\\* s BPCO r/
\\
I
\\
Nw_________________
j FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
^
e l
TRAINING I
i j
PHASEI t
APPROX.NO.
APPROX.NO.OF
{
OF PEOPLE PROC., DWG. & SPECS i
i MECHANICAL 100 80 4
I INSTRUMENTATION 10 60 1
ELECTRICAL 90 70 i
i j
l CIVIL 70 70 4
i 1
WELDING 40 40 i
i i
j 310 i
i TOOL BOX REVIEW SESSIONS FOR THE CRAFTS........... 6 I
QVP/SA MANHOURS
- 1ST FIVE MODULES CIVIL MECH.
ELECT.
TOTAL MODULE i
102 5270 8930 7800 22,000 l
l 120 5270 9730 7770 22,770 340 31,170 30,430 7170 68,770 410 3550 2120 8200 10,930 800 880 2270 3930 7080 l
4 i
TOTAL 46,140 53,480 31,930 131,550 EXPENDED THRU 3/9 5300 l
- ROUNDED i
300 MODULE 102,120,340, 410,800 QVP & INSPECTION STATUS ASSESSMENT MANPOWER CURVE i
too _
t
/
\\
l 100 _
f I
441
\\
i MPQAD I
i i
\\
/
EXCLUDES H.R.P.
l g
g p
I k
\\
I m
FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 1
" "1
i MPQAD TRAINING l
TRAINED THRU 3/9 QVP (N-SERIES) 300 4
INSPECTION STATUS 83 i
ASSESSMENT (T-SERIES) l 1
+
i i
1
\\
c:
MPQAD
~
INSPECTOR CERTIFICATION STATUS 4
CERTIFICATION GOAL (ALL WORK):
k(
1 l
1,239 (EST! MATE AS OF 2/22/84) y#
9 I
i TOTAL NO. CERTIFICATIONS ACCOMPLISHED:
1 j
688 (AS OF 2/22/84) i l
% GOAL ACCOMPLISHED = 688 x 100 = 55.5%
1239 I
-l I
QUALITY VERIFICATION PROGRAM (QVP) PROCEDURES i
l i
- ELEVEN ~ PROCEDURES REQUIRED (N-SERIES) '
i l
- ALL REQUIRED PROCEDURES ISSUED i
l INSPECTION STATUS ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES
- FOUR PROCEDURES REQUIRED (T-SERIES) l
- ALL REQUIRED PROCEDURES ISSUED.
l I
e 3
O SECTION III RESULTS ACHIEVED TO DATE e
S
CCP PHASE I PROCESS I
OMMODITY IDENTIFI-CATION COMMODITY LIST & DWG'S OPEN IR'S t
DOCU-MENTATION UNINSPECTED CLOSED STATUS COMMODITIES QVP LATION SA NCR'S &
NCR,S TO GO COMPLETED
)
WORK WORK CWP.
j I
NCR'S [ INSPECTION j
REVISED CONSTR TO GO PUNCHLIST STATUS m
WORK SSESSMEN l
IST f
MODULE RELEASE
'4 OPEN 1R'S l
CLOSED 1R'S 1
w=
INSPECTIONS INITIATED (BY COMMODITY) l COMMODITY FE STATUS ASSESSMENT Mechanical Instrumentation X
Electrical Instrumentation X
Mechanical Equipment (M-485)
X Electrical Equipment (E-62)
X Pipe Supports X
Valves (Welded)
X Valves (Mechanical)
Flued Heads Pipe Welds X
Pipe X
Concrete Pipe Cable Terminations X
Electrical Containment X
Penetration Assemblies Feed-Thru Adapter Modules Batteries / Racks Structural Steel & Framing X
Platform X
Equipment Supports X
Shield Plates
'X Whip Restraints X
Jet Impinsement Barriers X
Fuel Racks Liner Plate X
Liner Plate Attachments X
Special Doors X
Block Waits X
Air Locks Concrete X
l INSPECTIONS INITIATED (CONT.)
(BY COMMODITY)
~
COMMODITY FE STATUS ASSESSMENT Concrete & Masonry Openings X
Decontaminable Coatings on X
Concrete s
Miscellaneous Q. Coatings X
Cable Tray-
- X~
Conduit A
Conduit Supports L
Wireways & Supports Trenches for. Cable Boxes & Supports X
3 Cable Tray Supports
- \\s X
Slots
(
h.
L 6
a s
.t s
f 1
\\,
s, y
's,
j y
u 3
s y
i, L
\\g!
s y
s, g
N
\\'. )(
N * \\. \\
s
't-
's i
p.-
g s
NCit'S IDENTIFIED (184
$/ /g
'= s--
fi l
1 t'
s u
,s 3 T.,
- v. '
x
\\.
\\,
"\\ -
g, 3
3, 4
t
- s
/
)
s; N s s
\\,
't
{*
\\
\\
s
- i. )
. k~
i' r
g,
i i
~
DOCUMENTATION ELEMENTS OF S/A i
[
l e BASE DOCUMENTS t
l DRAWINGS i
4 l
SPECIFICATIONS 2
FIELD PROCEDURES AND INSTRUCTIONS i
1 e COMMODITY LISTS WITH QC MARKUP l
o NCR'S l
e FIELD CHANGE NOTICES AND REQUESTS i
l e CONSTRUCTION PUNCHLISTS l
e UPDATE OF DATA BASE FOR INSTALLATION INSPECTION CREDIT
)
AND IDENTIFICATION OF 'TO GO WORK" i
i e CWP'S i
l
w 9e INSPECTIOhSINITIATED (BY C0!910DIIY)
CO N DITY QVP Mechanical Instrumentation -
X Electrical Instrumentation Mechanical Equipment (M-485) '
X Electrical Equipment (E-62)
Pipe Supports Valves (Welded);
X X
Valve:r (Mechanical)
X Flued Heads X
Pipe Welds X
Pipe
~
Concrete Pipe X
Cable Terminations Electrical Containment Penetration Assemblies Feed-Thru Adapter Modules Batteties/ Racks X
Structural Steel & Framing X
Platfora X
Equipment Supports Shield Plates
^'
X Whip Restraints X
Jet Impinsement Barriers Fuel Racks Liner Plate Liner Plate Attachments.
X Special Doors X
l Block Walls Air Incks X
Concrete l
l t
=
a
QVP COMMODITY X
Concrete & Masonry Openings X
Decontaminable Coatings on Concrete X
Miscellaneous Q Coatings X
Cable Tray X
Conduit X
Conduit Supports X
Wireways & Supports Trenches for Cable X
Boxes & Supports Cable Tray Supports Slots NCR'S IDENTIFIED 133 NCR'S RECV'D BY CONSTR.
86
[
QVP 1
A ' PRODUCT" OF THE QVP PROCESS WILL INCLUDE:
i e COMMODITY LIST, SHOWING OPEN / CLOSED INSPECTION RECORDS e REQUEST FOR VERIFICATION e VERIFICATION INSPECTION RECORD (VIR) i e DISPOSITION OF INACCESSIBLE ITEMS / ATTRIBUTES (DilA) e NONCONFORMANCE REPORT (NCR) 4 i
i
NCR'S REC'D BY CONSTRUCTION THRU 3/9/84
~
S/A QVP DAMAGE 10 31 DIMENSIONS 90 17 i
MATERIAL i
WELDING 25 l
OTHER 59 38 184 86*
4 EXCLUDES: HANGER. VERIFICATION AND CABLE VERIFICATION I
l I
QVP NCR'S
~
i l
TOTAL ISSUED AS OF 3/2/84 =133 BREAKDOWN BY PQCl AND MODULE I
PQClNQ.
TITLE NCR'S ISSUED MODULE 340:
C-1.10 GROUTING + DRY PACKING 2
C-8.50 STEEL COATINGS 18 C-8.51 CONCRETE COATINGS 8
E-5.0 CABLE TERMINATIONS 31
P-1.90 PIPING
_ O_
59 MODULE 800:
i C-1.10 QROUTING + DRY PACKING 4
C-1.40 CONCRETE POST-PLACEMENT 0
E-1.2 CONDUIT / BOX SUPPORTS 1
E-5.0 CABLE TERMINATIONS 37 E-6.0 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT 0
E-6.1 MODS TO ELEC. EQUIP.
O E-6.3 El.ECTRICAL INSTRUMENTS 8
CW-1.00 WELDING + NDE - Q - NON - ASME 8
P-1.90 PIPING 18 PI-1.90 Q PIPING - RELATED INSTRUMENTS O
74
L l
l l
MANAGEMENT EVALUATIONS
'~
MANAGEMENT IS OVERVIEWING THE CCP THROUGH THE FOLLOWING PROCESSES:
l
\\
A.
PERIODIC WRITTEN REPORTS e WEEKLY STATUS ASSESSMENT REPORT TO SITE MANAGER e WEEKLY QVP REPORT TO EXECUTIVE MANAGER - MPQAD e lill-WEEKLY QVP REPORT TO VP - P,E & C e Me AIT1Hd VEPoL7 B.
REGULAR MEETINGS e WEEKLY STATUS' ASSESSMENT /QVP PROGRESS MEETING e BI-WEEKLY QUALITY MEETING C.
MANAGEMENT MEETINGS
- Bi-WEEKLY REVIEWS WITH CPCO PRESIDENT / CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD e MANAGEMENT STATUS MEETING - FEBRUARY 28,1984 e EXECUTIVE REVIEW MEETING - MARCH 2,1984
MANAGEMENT EVALUATIONS (CONT'D) l MANAGEMENT EVALUATIONS HAVE RESULTED IN THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS:
- READINESS STATEMENT FOR TURBINE ROLL MILESTONE e REVIEW OF PLANS TO PROCEED FROM PHASE I TO PHASE 11 e DEVELOPMENT OF A PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL MODULE RELEASES FOR PHASE l e SELECTION OF MODULE 120D AS THE FIRST MODULE (OTHER THAN TURBINE ROLL MODULES)TO-GO TO PHASE ll i
5 e
e e
SECTION IV LESSONS LEARNED 4
t I
(
i n.
~
BECHTEL SELF-APPRAISAL TEAM (SAT)
- CONCEPT INITIATED OCTOBER 1983
- PURPOSE:
TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL ASSURANCE TO BECHTEL MANAGEMENT THAT BECHTEL RESPONSIBILITIES ARE BEING PROPERLY CARRIED OUT
- SAT OPERATIONS:
- PROJECT FIELD ENGINEER (PFE) SELECTS / DIRECTS SAT
- MONITOR STATUS ASSESSMENT TEAMS PROGRESS
- PRIMARILY MODULE 340
SAT. AREAS REVIEWED
-l (AS OF 3/5/84)
- 1. CIVIL / ARCHITECTURAL (COATINGS)
- 2. CIVIL (P!PE WHIP RESTRAINTS)
- 3. ELECTRICAL (TERMINATIONS)
- 4. ELECTRICAL (RACEWAY)
- 5. INSTRUMENTATION
- 6. MECHANICAL (HANGERS)
- 7 MECHANICAL (PIPING)
- 8. WELDING (PIPING AND HANGER
)
l SAT ' OBSERVATIONS FIELD ENGINEERING /MPQAD INTERFACE 4
i i
FORM COMPLETIQN 2
PROCEDURAL RE-EMPHASIS / CLARIFICATIONS 15 PROCESS EFFICIENCY / RECORD RETENTION 3
.,m.
en LESSONS LEARNED -STATUS ASSESSMENT (AS OF 3/5/84) i 5 PROCEDURE CHANGES 11 WRITTEN REMINDERS / CLARIFICATIONS t
i i
i 4
I
l SAT. CONCLUSIONS l
- 1. STATUS ASSESSMENT PROCEEDING SATISFACTORILY
- 2. SITE MANAGEMENT WILL CONTINUE SAT MONITORING OF STATUS ASSESSMENT TEAM ACTIVITIES i
1
1 00 0
1 1
E E
L L
P U
U AA D
D U
P O
O R
M M
EGNA A
H S A
1 E
2
+
G
+
L N
L O
A O
O LF P
O "r
eacrr S
P S
/
E v
H
' i' G
l' Nhl A
S L
R F
E 8
E G
1 C
g EN F
W PA I
L 1
' F pH g
R R[
I O
O O
C O
El L
S N
A d
S.
~
l s
q F
B Y_
W' 2 4
l i
[
D k
E A
4 L
L O
l
/
U2 O
D0 L
P O
S O1 O
M P
S
RECOMMENDED RESOLUTION INCLUDE WITH FUTURE PHASE I MODULE l
RELEASES, AN EXTENSION OF CROSSOVER.
COMMODITIES INTO OTHER MODULES TO l
ALLOW COMPLETION OF PHASE I TO LOGICAL i
l LIMITS.
l l
QVP ASSESSMENT TEAM
- INITIATED DECEMBER 1983
- ESTABLISHED TO ASSESS ADEQUACY OF QVP CONTROLS i
- TEAM COMPOSITION a QUALITY CONTROL VERIFICATlON PROGRAM MGMT GROUP INSPECTION EVALUATION
- QUALITY ADVISORS STAFF PROJECT ASSURANCE ENGINEERING
AREAS REVIEWED i
l
- INSPECTION METHODS AND PROCEDURES
- USE AND CONTROL OF FORMS
- PROGRAM PROCEDURES l
- COMPLIANCE WITH QVP DOCUMENT.
- REPORTS
- COMMUNICATION AND INTERFACES
- CONTROL OF ACTION ITEMS I
QVP ASSESSMENT TEAM RESULTS IN GENERAL ITEMS WERE MINOR AND REQUIRED MINOR PQCl AND PROCEDURAL REVISIONS.
l THE FOLLOWING PROGRAM AREAS WERE ADDRESSED:
CRAFT SUPPORT - SCAFFOLDING, CLEANING, LIGHTING, ACCESS DRAWING DOCUMENT CONTROL - ISSUANCE OF WORK PRINTS TIMELINESS OF OBTAINING DOCUMENTS, FCR INCORPORATION l
MINOR PQCl REVISIONS TO CORRECT INCONSISTANCIES I
- MINOR PROCEDURE REVISIONS TO CLARIFY DATA PROCESSING AND VIR LOGGING, NUMBERING AND PROCESSING INSPECTION EVALUATION PROCEDURES (N-19/M-15) l EFFECTIVITY DATE
l LESSONS LEARNED QVP/SA AS OF 3/9/84 N-SERIES (QVP)
.15 REVISIONS:
e DELETE SAMPLING APPROACH 2
e UPDATE ORGANIZATIONAL TITLES h
e CLARIFICATION OF REQUIREMENTS T-SERIES (STATb8 ASSESSMENT) 5 REVISIONS:
UPDATE ORGANIZATIONAL TITLES REFLECT CHANGES IN SYSTEM CLARIFY REQUIREMENTS
'fil*C 3
~
k QVP ASSESSMENT TEAM CONCLUSIONS i
- 1. QVP PROCESS IS PROCEEDING IN A SATISFACTORY MANNER l
- 2. QVP ASSESSMENT TEAM REVi EWS WILL CONTINUE I
l i
O k
MODULE MODULE 100 102 m eens e m ensma emus emme emme emumme _ amme muse I
I ITEM A ITEM C I
I I
I I
I ITEM B ITEM D g
g
- L_____,
i I INSPECTION l l
{ REPORT XYZ l
NOT RELEA' SED l
MODULE 101 L
l l'
s RELEASED
RECOMMENDED RESOLUTIONS l
- ALLOW REINSPECTION TO FOLLOW SCOPE OF PQCis
- ALLOW REINSPECTION OF MULTIPLE ITEMS WHICH ARE COVERED 'BY ONE 'OLD' IR i
y
-n 9
e h
SECTION V THIRD PARTY OBSERVATIONS e
i 1
1 m m m., - - - ~
._,~--m-
THIRD PARTY OBSERVATIONS
- STATUS ASSESSMENT ACTIVITIES, IN THE PLANT, ARE
{
BEING PERFORMED IN A SATISFACTORY MANNER.
[
- QVP ACTIVITIES ARE ALSO BEING PERFORMED IN A j
SATISFACTORY MANNER. SOME MINOR DEFICIENCIES HAVE BEEN NOTED, BUT THESE ARE NOT CONSIDERED SERIOUS.
l
- CIO HAS SOME CONCERNS REGARDING THE j
INTEGRATION OF STATUS ASSESSMENT AND QVP l
ACTIVITIES. CPCO IS WORKING WITH ClO TO RESOLVE THESE CONCERNS.
- CIO HAS A CONCERN REGARDING THE METHODS TO BE USED TO TIE ALL PHASE I ACTIVITIES TOGETHER PRIOR TO PROCEEDING TO PHASE II. CPCO IS WORKING WITH CIO TO RESOLVE THIS CONCERN.
I e
SECTION VI ADDITIONAL MODULE RELEASES 9
l i
1
[
l l
i l
C
MODULE RELEASE SEQUENCE 1.
340 RB II Outside D-Ring
- 23, 310 RB II Fuel Peo:t l
2.
800 Service Water Structure 24.
103 West Wing Wall 3.
102 East Wing Wall Aux
- 25.
290 Unit I 685' W.
4.
120 584.' Aux
- 26.
220 634' Labs cont:rol Tower 5.
410 614' Unit II Turbine
- A
- 27. '860 Tank Farm i
RELEASED
- 28. 420 634' Turbine I*I 29.
430 659' Turbine I:[
6.
150 634' Aux
- 30, 440 695' & 715 Turlbine II (151 incl) 31.
190 Radwaste Buildiing 7.
160 646' & 652' Aux
- 32.
9'00 Misc Structures 2 (161 &' 162 incl) 33.
850 Health Physics Cal Facility
_n
- 8. (330 RB II N. D-Ring
- 34.
880 River Intake Se.ructure 9.
240 659' Control Tower
- 35 810 Cire Water Buinding 10.
280 659' Unit II Elect Penetration 36.
890 Pond Blowdown Sitructure
=
11.
f3IO7 RB II S. D-Ring
- 37.
830 Guard House i
12.
210 614' Control Tower
- 38 870 Oily Waste Buinding 13.
820 Diesel Generator Bids 39 610 614' Turbine I 14.
250 674'-6" Control Tower
- 40 620 634 Turbine I l
15.
170 659' & 674'-6 Aux
- p 41.
630 659' Turbine I (175 incl) 42.
640 695' Turbine I 0D 16.
I'40 614' Aux
- 43.
540 RB I Outside D--Ring 17.
230 646' Control Tower
- 44.
530 RB I S. D-Ring l
18.
130 599' Aux
- 45.
520 RB I N. D-Ring 19.
101 Aux Bldg Pipeway &
- 46. '510 RB I Fuel Fool j
Valve Gallery
- 47.
700 Evaporator Bui;Lding 20.
180 Aux Building Roof
- 48.
710 Steam Tunnel 21.
110 568' Aux
- 49.
720 Con. Return Pumphouse j
2B MILESTONE 22.
260 685' Control Tower & Roof
- = Require for Aux Flush - 2B Milestone l
PRELIMINARY i
9 5
y -
- v~s g
w*
e e.e w
.e e
+
~ - - - -
T g
i h
i as v
y
's N
{
N l
?
s.
c t
t
- s.,
..,s m, t s
\\
l s.
s s
s
,T s
's s
s
.I, 5
\\
s g
w
\\
-s.
s.
s g
4 x
4 N
i
~
i
'k w
g
\\.'
s s
i
' j s
s g ' 3
, N'1 I f u
s s
SECTION'VII
\\
SUMMARY
b,
)
.w.
t
'M
' s.
(
g s
1 A
(
h.
r
. \\
v s
g.
N-s k
\\. s
.\\
~
\\',. _.
i s-m t
4
.w h
i, e
t N
\\
e k
'm s
f g
b
'% );
s w
s i
4
'~'
\\
g
\\%
%1 g
.s st m'
i I
g '.y t
N.
t 9-t 9
0%
- g. _
)
s g
s I
w x;
'I s
t,
%i (
y..:~<r.
- \\
a (w "' N s s
,1 s f.,
)
'T'g>
s 5
\\
I s
4 g
g'g '.. L s
X
-.,1 \\
3
\\
a _ y;
\\
..w. t k'
,~
-s-
\\,
\\",
\\
3, Ne sNs t-s l
gg%.
(
5 Is
=
w,
g'
_, me* ~ n-r
-.f 54 r
SUMMARY
1.
THE INITIAL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CCP PHASE I HAS PROCEEDED IN A DELIBERATE AND CAUTIOUS MANNER USING SELF-APPRAISAL PROCESSES TO DEVELOP FEEDBACK FROM LESSONS LEARNED.
2.
TO-DATE PHASE I RESULTS FROM BOTH STATUS ASSESSMENT AND QVP HAVE BEEN SATISFACTORY.
3.
REGULAR MANAGEMENT EVALUATIONS OF PHASE I ACTIVITIES HAVE BEEN HELD TO ASSURE THAT PROCESS CONTROLS ARE IN PLACE.
- 4. ADDITIONAL MODULE RELEASES ARE NECESSARY TO:
- FACILITATE A CONTINUATION OF THE LOGICAL STATUS ASSESSMEAT AND QVP PROCESS TO SUPPORT EVENTUAL PHASE 11 RELEASES FOR l.
MILESTONE 2B (AUX FLUSH).
- MAINTAIN THE PLANNED MANPOWER BUILDUP FOR STATUS ASSESSMENT AND QVP.
- 5. RECOMMENDED RESOLUTIONS ON COMMODITIES SPANNING SEVERAL l
MODULES ARE NEEDED TO FACILITATE EFFICIENT COMPLETION OF STATUS ASSESSMENT AND QVP ACTIVITIES.
i l
b
tMACAMDME YEQUENCE
~
~
PRIORITY NUMBER SCHEDULE NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1
340 RB II Outside D-Ring
- 2 800 Service Water Pump Structure 3
102 East Wing Wall Auxiliary Building
- 4 120 EI. 584' Auxiliary Building 1
'S 410 El. 614' Unit II Turbine
- igLEASED 6
150 El. 634' Au)lliary Building *
(151 included) 7 160
- 31. 646' & 652' Auxiliary Building *
'(161 & 162fincluded) 8 320 RB II N. D-Ring
- 9 240 El 659' Control Tower
- 10 330 4B II S. D-Ring
- 11 820 Dtesel Generator Building 12 280 El L 659' Unit II Electrical. Penetration 13 210' El. 614' Control Tower
- 14 250 El. 674'-6" Centrol Tover*
15 170' El. 659' & 674'-6 Auxilfary Building *
(175 in,Elvded) '
16
!40 /
- /El. 614' Au).111ary Building
- 17 230.
7 El. 646'~ Control Tou r*
18 130 ~,/:
/ 599' Auxiliary Building
- 19 101 Auxiliary Buil(lrg Pipswak and Valve Gallery *^
20 180
_ >~~ Auxiliary Building Roof
- 21
~l10 hl. 568 Auxiliary Buf1Iing*
n 2B MILES'f0NE
.ml 22 260 C1, 685' Control Tower and Roof t
RB II Fuel Fool 23' 310 -
24 103 Weat Wing Wall 25 290~
Unit I El.-685' W.:EsuetraI1on
' 26 220 EL 634' Labs Control' Tower-27 860 ff
- Tank Farm 28 420 Elv 634',.Turbina II '
29 430
/m f? E12 659f/ Turbine II 30 440
-El. 6958 ind 715 Turbine II
~"
31 190 g -
'Radwaste Buildinip *-
32 -
900 C' -
-MiscEllaneoits Strug ures '
, 33 850
/' Health Physics, Cal. Facilitya 34
. /
880 h River Inteke'Structu're-
,~ f Circulating 'Wata'r, Build-Mg a 35 810 4 '36 890 pond Blowdown Stru'cturd ; -
37 830 Guard House Z
Clly Wast.y Buildigg > ~
l
-7 38
/'
870
.,.El.614h'TurbineT_,j'I 39 610 j e
/
40 620,/
/efEl.63M' Turbine'I
/
41 I
630 /M El. 659'-Turhir.a L8 "
- 42 640 IE.'.E 695ITurbste I-'
a, 43 i" '+
,f540_,
, y.
RB-I'Ccyside'0-Ring-
- ! 4.4 f 7530
/ ;;. RB I S CD-Ring /P -
t t
l 45 520 '
A RB I N.2
, ' 'Q D Ping f7/RBIFdelPool l
s
,46 <
510 f
1 147%.
710 W 7_.
Evaporator LuildiiQ' 700 j a I48 7 '
frean TunaEl/
- = b; quire for Aux. Plush %i ICeii? Return' Pumph use.
49'
~i 720 2BsH11ectone Revision 1 y
.p/
'<l/ W}/l 3/27/81 y
BHPeck l
s Q
g,..
_, g;=-.
- y. >-
x
.m--
m m.~
t Attachmant 3 Uniquely identified and tracked crossover commodities that may be status assessed or quality verified as a unit.
COMMODITY EXTENSION LIMIT Electrical Slots (floor penetration)
Complete uniquely identified unit Cable Tray Complete uniquely identified unit Exposed Conduit Complete uniquely identified unit Wireway Complete uniquely identified unit Embed Conduit /Ductbanks Each end Trenches Complete uniquely identified unit Instrumentation Tubing Complete isometric drawing.
(To be included with module containing instru-ment)
Mechanical Equipment The entire piece of equipment as supplied by the equipment vendor will be assessed on both rotating and nonrotating equipment, even if field work or assembly was performed within the component or skid.
Equipment Supports Both integral and non-intregral equip-ment supports will be assessed in their entfrety, not including the permanent building frame or structure.
Special Doors & Airlocks Complete door with hardware and frame
.CCP0384-0001A-CN02 c -.--.:.
Attachusnt 4 Uniquely identified commodities that form a single identifiable unit and may be status assessed or quality verified as a unit.
COMMODITY "XTENSION LIMIT i
Structural Framing to and including the next connection or support point Blockwalls Both sides of wall, including attach-ments and penetrations to end of the span (tie-in to the next structural support point)
Structural Concrete Walls both sides of the wall, including penetrations, up to the nodule boundary Decontaminable Coatings any coatings on the c mmodities shown on this extension list Miscellaneous Q Coatings Any coatinFs on the commodities shown on this extension list CCP0384-0001A-CN02 f:
8 e
Attschaznt 5 Functionally interrelated crossover crimodities that may be status assessed or quality verified as a whole item.
COMMODITY EXTENSION LIMIT Large Pipe Assess to the point outside the module which represents the boundary of the stress analysis. This will not axceed the first anchor point, ie:
- anchor, pump, tank nozzle, etc.
Small Pipe Assess to the limits of the piping as shown on the isometric.
Np}3: QVP on piping which was accepted on PW-1.00 and PF-1.10 PQCI's must extend to the next " field break," ie:
field weld or flange joint, beyond these limits.
In-Line Commodities:
Assess all of these commodities which Flued Heads are installed within the boundaries Flange Joints of the piping being assessed (as Weld Joints described above).
Valves (Mechanical and Welded)
Or.ifice Plates Electrical Panetration Assembly Manufactured electrical pressure boundary assembly as a complete unit I
1
.CCP0384-0001A-CN02 l
i _ _.
~
/
BCC JWCook, P-26-336B SHHowell, M-ll80B TABuczwinski, Midland-207 LGraber, LIS JNLeech, P-24-506 DFLewis, Bechtel FJLevandoski, B&W CALow, P-12-237A DASommers, P-14-106 PPSteptoe, IL&B, Chicago DJVandeWalle, P-24-614B BJWalraven, P-24-517 RAWells, Midland FCWilliams, IL&B, Washington, DC DTPerry, Midland NRC Correspondence File, P-24-517 UFI, P-24-511 CMS-Midland JEKarr, Stone & Webster RC DMBudzik, P-24-517A RJErhardt, P-14-113A LSGibson, P-24-618A P-24-505 (Last) t CCP0384-0001A-CN02
+
e--,
- aer v
w w
-, - e
o i C0rtSilmSTS 9 POWBf ggg Jemas W Cook uUSSayG8aj Vice Pressdent - Projects, Engineenng and Construction General offices: 1945 West Pernett Road, Jackson, MI 49201 * (5171 788 0453 November 10, 1983 Harold R Denton, Director FRitCIPAL STAFF
.u Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation RA h"
Division of Licensing J/RA DE US Nuclear Regulatory Commission A/RF JR4SF Washington, DC 20555 40
- 4 ^
>Ao scs t-u v-b MIDLAND ENERGY CENTER b
A MIDLAND DOCKET NOS 50-329, 50-330 SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO GENERIC LEITER 82-33 FILE: B13.3 SERIAL: 26468
REFERENCE:
(1) CPC0 LETTER, SERIAL 21649, DATED APRIL 13, 1983, RESPONSE TO GENERIC LETTER 82-33 (2) CPC0 LETTER, SERIAL 26237, DATED OCTOBER 28, 1983, CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION SCHEDULE This letter provides Revision I to the Midland Emergency Response Capabilities (ERC) Schedule (see attached).
In accordance with our previous commitment, provisions for this schedule revision were documented per Reference 1.
As you may be aware, the impact of the Dow termination and the delays in the approval of the CCP has changed many of the cajor schedule assumptions in the Midland Plant Schedule.
As a result, we are presently re-evaluating that schedule for the completion of Unit 2.
Where possible, we have given dates in the ERC Schedule for information submittal, completion of construction, implementations of procedures and personnel training.
As the schedule for plant completion is established, it may become necessary to adjust these dates.
Wherever completion dates are not given, " prior to fuel load" has been provided.
Within six months following our new schedule announcement, we will submit a subsequent revision to this table modifying any dates as necessary.
L JWC/CLH/mdb CC RJCook, Midland Resident Inspector JGKeppler, Administrator, NRC Region III A
' %r W oc1183-0658a100 q
(k[d
CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY Midland Units 1 and 2 Docket No 50-329, 50-330 Letter Serial 26468 Dated November 10, 1983 At the request of the Commission and pursuant to the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, and the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, as amended and the Commission's Rules and Regulations thereunder, Consumers Power Company submits Revision 1 to the Midland Emergency Response Capabilities (ERC) Schedule.
CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY By
/s/ J W Cook J W Cook, Vice President Projects, Engineering and Construction Sworn and subscribed before me this 14 day of November, 1983
/s/ Barbara P Townsend Notary Public Jackson County, Michigan My Commission Expires seotember 8. 1984 1
-oc1183-0658a100
TABLE 1:
REVISION 1 MIDLAND ERC SCHEDULE J
FORECAST DATE SPDS A.
Safety Analysis Submittal March 1984 B.
System Operational March 1984 C.
Operators Trained Prior to fuel load DCRDR A.
Submittal of Program Plan Completed January 15, 1983 B.
Final Report Describing Completed March 31, 1983 Control Room Improvements C.
Implementation of Prior to fuel load Recommendations R.G. 1.97 A.
Implementation Report February 1984 B.
Implementation of Prior to fuel load Recommendations E0Ps A.
Submittal of Technical June 1984 Guidelines B.
Submittal of Procedures June 1984 Generation Package C.
E0P Implementation Prior to fuel load Integrated Training Plan A.
Training Completion Prior to fuel load
- ERFs A.
Submittal of Plan 1.
NUREG - 0814 Response Completed Feb 19, 1982 2.
Staffing Information Completed Feb 15, 1983
& G0CC Description i
~B.
Completion date for fully functional 1.
TSC Prior to NRC Emergency Planning Appraisal 2.
OSC Prior to NRC Emergency Planning Appraisal 3.
EOF Prior to NRC Emergency Planning Appraisal
- 4.. GOCC Prior to NRC Emergency Planning Appraisal
- Training completion dependent upon final resolution of the SPDS/DCRDR/
EOF's/ Accident Monitoring Instrumentation /ERF submittals
- mi1183-0658b100 '
O 4
U INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM 6 ees.ae fci.21 14S09 SUBJECT CPCo TRAINING DATE October 21, 1983 FROM S. W. Baranow
- RINCIPAL STAFF TO MR. D. QUAMME d go o=47 CC: JCKeppler, Administrator 3/RA DE Region III C/RA CMSF JJHarrison, US NRC O
SGA RCook, US NRC 3
Ao scs t
RBKelly, S&W SGA ML APAmoruso, S&W
- ENF Fi le 4@
C0 Richardson, S&W Subsection 4.2.3 of the Construction Completion Program (CCP) forwarded by the letter of August 26, 1983 to Mr. J. G. Keppler from Mr. J. W. Cook discusses training for each organization, management, and staff level.
The CIO understands that a separate training program exists for CPCo staff members.
An assessmentof that program by the CIO has been planned'.
Preliminary contact with your staff, however, indicates that this training program may not be structured as an auditable activity but setup as more of an informal informational program.
Your comments on this matter would be appreciated.
A ;f T.
S. W. Baranow y
O e
s 4
~
p-c:.c. : n.u t s N
Y NUC.LE Ar. REuult.lvRY CmtMISSION k
[ 8,7 t-nacioN iii
- i j
.br y /,-
s ea s :..,5t vt u a o s.o 5
,- v, cLEN E t L% N. ILUNOl$ E0127
.00T 2 1 G83 Docket No. 50-329 Docket No. 50-330 Consumers Power Company l
ATTN:
Mr. D. L. Quamme Site Manager P. O. Box 1963 Midland, MI 48640
Dear Mr. Quamme:
SUBJECT:
CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION PROGRAM (CCP), NRC HOLD POINT RELEASE The staff has reviewed your letter dated October 20, 1983, re. questing the NRC to release designated areas of the plant to allow Con 2mers Power Company (CPCo) to initiate Phase 1 of the CCP (status assessment and verifica-tion of completed work) for those areas.
As a basis for granting authorization, the staff, as part of its inspection effort, has reviewed / observed the following documents / activities:
(1) the CCP program, (2) CPCo and Bechtel irocedures related to the CCP, (3) the retraining and recertification of QC Inspectors, (4) the training of CCP teams, (5) revised Project Quality Control Instructions (PQCI's), (6) Third Party Program, Stone and Webster Construction Implementation Overview (CIO), (7) CIO implementation, (8) CIO Hold Point usage, (9) CCP Management Reviews, and (10) problem identification and corrective action.
The results of these NRC inspections are documented in the NRC Midland Monthly Inspection Reports.
The staff, based on these reviews, has concluded that CPCo has completed the requirements to enter Phase 1 for the requested areas. This letter, therefore, authorizes CPCo to proceed with Phase 1 activities for the CCP for the'following plant modules:
i 340 - Balance of Unit 2 Containment 102 - Unit 2 Pipeway and Valve Galleries 120 - Elevation 584 Auxiliary Euilding 410 - Elevation 614 Unit 2 Turbin.e Building 800 - Service Water Building O
v/
6 hhw a
,.y-
,,,m,--
--r
,.-- =,
- D. L. Quamme 2
OCT 2 1 1983 Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at (312) 790-5635.
Sincerely,
$ tiff
&AAIl d24)
Q.Q. MAukn J. J. Harrison, Chief Section 2, Midland
Enclosure:
Ltr dtd 10/20/83 cc w/ encl:
DMB/ Document Control Desk (RIDS)
Resident Inspector, RIII The Honorable Charles Bechhoefer, ASLB The Honorable Jerry Harbour, ASLB The Honorable Frederick P. Cowan, ASLB The Honorable Ralph S. Decker, ASLB William Paton, ELD Michael Miller Ronald Callen, Michigan Public Service Commission Myron M. Cherry Barbara Stamiris Mary Sinclair Wendell Marshall Colonel Steve J. Gadler (P.E.)
Howard Levin (TERA)
Billie P. Garde, Government Accountability Project Lynne Bernabei, Government Accountability Project Stone and Webster Michigan, Inc.
James W. Cook, CPCo h
Rfm NW Ga er/ls Harrison Warnick Ipw s Davis K p1pr 10/21/83 pglg3 fa///
// L/
/o[/
j/gy f
/
/PRICIPAL STAFF Consumers v
f'/?l MOD.
lp7/
PCWer l
CDmpany M
W v
Okth No LS
/
I3A L.
U Madsend Propet: Po som tess, Mweene, Me 4es4o. (stn sateeso Er(F File As October 20, 1983 Mr John J Harrison Nuclear Regulatory Commission 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 i
MIDLAND ENERCY CENTER MIDLAND DOCKET NOS 50-329 and 50-330 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION PROGRAM RELEASE OF PHASE 1 ACTIVITIES File: 0655 UFI: 99*08 Serial: CSM-0694
References:
- 1) Letter to Mr J G Keppler dated August 26, 1983 from Mr J W Cook regarding Construction Completion Program
- 2) Letter to Mr J W Cook dated October 6, 1983 from Mr Richard C DeYoung regarding Confirmatory Order for Modification of Construction Permits for the Midland Plant The initiation of status assessment and verification of completed work (Phase 1 of the Construction Completion Program) requires a release from NRC as defined in References 1 and 2.
This is to inform you that Consumers Power Company has completed its preparation and required Management Reviews for Phase 1 and is requesting NRC release to initiate Phase 1 in a portion of the plant defined herein. The Construction Implementation Overview (CIO) has released their hold points on Phase 1 activities.
(See Attachments)
We have planned an initial implementation of Phase 1 that is restricted to specific areas of the plant as defined in Attachment 2.
The initial actisities will be restricted to five modules which represent approximately 10 percent of the total number of modules covered by the CCP. During the initial effort, all team activities and elements of the Quality Verification Program (QVP) will be exercised in a slow, controlled manner.
Frequent internal review and assessment will be carried out to ensure all objectives and commitments of
.the CCP are being met during this initial effort. Full NRC release for Phase 1 will be requested af ter this initial effort has demonstrated effective implementation of the CCP. We are prepared to support any additional reviews above those already conducted on our procedures and training that the NRC may require, u
-2 an T '
Site Manager OCT 21 1983 DLQ/pp
- gf' 3/O LN {
P:gi 2 CC: OL/OM Service List DSHood, US NRC RJCook, Midland Resident Inspector e
e
P ga 3 BCC: SHHowell, P26-336B TABuczwinski, Midland-207 JNLeech, P24-507 DFLewis, Bechtel DJVandeWalle, P24-6145 CALow, P12-237A NRC Correspondence File, P24-517 UFI, P24-517 BJWalraven, P24-517 Hearings File, P24-517 RAWells, Midland RJErhardt, P14-113A Stan Baranow, S&W (CIO)
.\\
tr
=
OM/0L SERVICE LIST Mr Frank J Kelley, Esq Atomic Safety & Licensing Attorney General of the Appeal Board.
i State of Michigan U S Nuclear Regulatory Commission i
l Ms Carole Steinberg, Esq Washington, DC 20555 Assistant Attorney General 1
Environmental Protection Division Mr C R Stephens (3) 720 Law Building Chief, Docketing & Se'rvices Lansing, MI 48913 U S Nuclear Regulatory Commission i
Office of the Secretary Washington, DC 20555 Mr Myron M Cherry, Esq Suite 3700 Ms Mary Sinclair Three First National Plaza 5711 Summerset Street Chicago, IL 60602 Midland, MI 48640 Mr Wendell H Marshall Mr William D Paton, Esq RFD 10 Counsel for the NRC Staff Midland, MI 48640 U S Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 Mr Charles Bechhoefer, Esq Atomic Safety & Licensing Atomic Safety & Licensing Board Panel Board Panel U S Nuclear Regulatory Commission U S Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 Washington, DC 20555 Dr Federick P Cowan Ms Barbara Stamiris 6152 N Verde Trail 5795 North River Road Apt B-125 Rt 3 Boca Raton, FL 33433 Freeland, MI 48623 Mr Fred Williams Mr Jerry Harbour Isham, Linesin & Beale Atomic Safety & Licensing 1120 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 325 Board Panel l
Washington, DC 20036 U S Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 Mr James E Brunner, Esq Mr M i Miller, Esq Consumers Power Company Isham, Lincoln & Beale i
212 West Michigan Avenue Three First National Plaza 3
Jackson, MI 49201 52nd Floor Chicago, Il 60602 i
Mr D F Judd Mr John Demeester, Esq l
Babcock & Wilcox Dow Chemical Building PO Box 1260 Michigan Division Lynchburg, VA 24505 Midland, MI 48640 Mr Steve Gadler, Esq Ms Lynne Bernahei 2120 Carter Avenue Government Accountability Project St Paul, MN 55108 1901 Q Street, NW Washington, DC 20009 T
9/3/83 miO583-0429a100 MIO983-0002A-MP0k ATMg #
IBM 5520 O
CONSUMERS POWER CO~
STONE & WEBSTER MICHIGAN. INC.RECEIVEB P.o. sox 2325 soSTON. M ASSACHUSETTs O2107 Site Mgr.
Midland Project Nr. J. G. Keppler, Administrator, Region III October 12', 1983 Nuclear Regulatory Commission J.0. No.
14509 799 Roosevelt Road NRC File #83-10-12 Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 RE: DOCKET NO. 50-329/330 MIDLAND PLANT - UNITS 1 AND 2 DVERVIEW OF THE CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION PROGRAM The purpose of this letter is to indicate the status of CIO approval of QVP, 2
BHO and Status Assessment.
QVP was conditionally approved by CIO letter, NRC File #83-06-17 dated June 17, 1983. The conditions were satisf, led as reported in weekly reports No's 5 and 6. Status Assessment was conditionally approved by CIO letter, NRC File #83-06-30 dated June 30, 1983 and the conditions were satisfied as reported in weekly report No.12.
BHO and CIO reported 5 observations resulting from the Management Review
{
Comittee meeting on May 18, 1983. These observations were satisfactorily responded to in CPCo letter, Serial CSM-0656 dated July 1,1983. CIO weekly report No. 4 dated July 12, 1983 closes this item.
CIO considers QVP, BHO and Status Assessment ready for implementation.
CIO requires NIRs #002. 003, 004 and 005 to be dispositioned prior to assignment of the referenced 45 MPQAD personnel to QVP. A " Hold Point "
has been established against the use of the 45 personnel to perfom QVP.
CIO report No.16 identifies the review of " Vendor Equipment Program" as a Hold Point to Phase II of CCP.
l Very truly yours, bur)
S. W. Baranow Program Manager SWB/ka cc: JJHarrison, US NRC, Glen Ellyn, IL RCook, US NRC Midland (site)
DBMiller Jr., CPCo Midland (site)
RBKelly, S&W APAmoruso, S&W C0 Richardson, SSW-I
%w-
ATTACHMENT #2 MODULES REQUESTED FOR RELEASE 3,40.- Balance of Unit #2 containment 102 - Unit #2 Pipeway & Valve Galleries 120 - Elevation 584 Auxiliary Building 410 - Elevation 614 Unit #2 Turbine Building 800 - Service Water Building NOTE: Drawings describing the modules are attached.
g h p -J
%u b II l
t
[ M4'l f3'9 gj. 4
>s g
, j;; &
y'l l[f gTlh N!
i
- it rdy l
i g n
3.gf I.N
[r!Ik I Md'El!!
l spi$
Ih E 'I
. l I) 1
%NI' "l'
5
! ! j h lsl iNj f! h ii !!! S 4 j A. L. l y il$i[
IgWi li
" il p Sb L
I i
< "-- @s d
9 T-T e
9 9e
.e s 4-,
.. P{4.
.. g
,,,g..1 J
4
,y-
.v.-
e p
g-
,g i
fh I
'T
. j,/
~
, ysof it,I w
p 9..n n 7
15 ab i
4 hc.
1.
-. -i.
2 1:.3 - 4 < n :- e W Y <.. I 'flV 4 !@
4.
c.sa q'
s
.. 4 v *wryujp
-pE4 y
g 6, j.
, rl' g. g g m--en -
y e{ K_ A N.. -
,?
2.,
g r36--c c mur y,ya
,.gf ;-
a s
c$ ',,
1 g_ J31.
.y -
3,a [ i" 1
~ ~,
i
-g gag R
'8 A
g,
m E
+
g=
f H.
SF 6: 9p 4
3 6(s..
A sy
\\
l~
e c
~
~
i I
I c
j
'I g; s 7
0:
9 A
<\\
(9 e
'h
'I.
I )/
',M. - i g
5
\\
,.I lg4 k
'\\
,l I
~-
L
'w
/
jij q
l s
i N
' '/
p
' y.,
,\\
,. ~ ' -
,,q l1
./
' ~
9
- %)
j ;u
- 4. J. _..'.. !..
.'. D ' '... :. ".::
.L.... . L. J.
.J.. /
- 6 t
\\
-=b='
- )
- o. s i
\\
i i
. +
e o
i 1.46i
!- T
- I j,.
+
ljlh}o[
qlj lllCl:
//' 56 @ 2i.
I!!!!.
M!
I '
I j @
_l limi n
e g!!jl p-t ph
- i. *n.i 3
a r.,
~
l
,,i,e l f,j l
..,i
,i,i h
ii,lli.. l'Il 1
J Ki il u
- m
~.
Q..Qp y. 3 u
o
'y
$s/$
- - - d F E -;p '-.Y.T d EE l
1 l
n!
9 rr o p1 o
{c
.w
-p y s::x.3
't 4
)
9--
M
- e. sI IJ: )
li f.s i_.:_%. L.[: p'.'
51 f
9
'i m - 23 ro I
2 is iS i
N i
l
.,L.,
Y ja 3
tL
- s., ; e; e,/
c=
\\
's
-/,
,i t
4
{c g
o
}3;c s g;d, J
a -
{}
-1di(
e '-
unusumunum t
- ,9 l
Il l li
$.i
,tp l
/
i 3N "3
!N j
lil f
A
!~l e.
~. g* e f.,a i
n t,x.g,s g
- y. saf.
3 7
e gd Q*3 k.)
\\
11~9 E-8, E
, o.,.
c,.
4 II, "1
+A
.f 9d g
,..dE7 i
n A
O
A ah [g~[,,M i 3-lh'3-
+
~
W tj F
1*
i$
$3 l.;a /d,[$ 8 oll<3l/4(G' h
5 1-I sR i
i r
r.
=. -
3-p
. 'e w :!
I, ji, flt
+;g y:.=- D.y
.i n
16 i
-i li
,fg, -.,k {
1 g
h e+N,i e.,*
l gg I
- 3. {g g
h.
r] t=
v
! 9 '-
h M
WEuMWW _._
c
%a g
f 4
E i
- a. 3 '. F.i ' S :
X_
7
.)il
..1 l
p 4..
s n
t
~
1_3_..____
_._g____._..____._..._.____
m --._...
... _,...._. _ g 4-g i i q !i gu E
[
~
t r--
a e
p*
.,il '-
. i g] I ig g
I_ hll!
i i
[
ta
~, d ye:
s, i M
is
~
e.
q o.
yq
}
S
%%@g-
.y I -
4.ij i
- _- [
Tl$
4
~~ @
. = p=
i.7. l
= M ;-
y it
'i;, a i f @f g a
b
!! N h
,11:3 t$^
7 hr-S f-i N
N i R i
i h w L l l i
t.i.
g_ e4-
. 1..
- o
!!InId ld' CO
~li
~
ia tidj% a.7 T
- 4
- b h[ I I
N.. i!-
e 7
n 'I,,.,.g
-yh.d,l[$
I-
+-
- F.A v
i hi i
e 4
- t. ne
!$l g 4
.=. 4
- r nS
,qr s
=
g g:.
li d
I 4
!j
,,o i
T$
},
=
9.
r *. II
' g,,n
.s J il c
8 a
.k-'ill d!
i k,y,,r,31.!t,,,i,1 e!,
. si..
W ty s
m.ty w t
p
.+,
,r,u.
'g:E i
Q
.'jp V ji l
g-E.jitR
.I
[T y %i r,sJ d
~,
u sI, h I, il 1
r,
,a=
I p,,.'
M y;
'ie 1
I,=P ~c%ig*t.
I:n e
u
( c. - -
11:
.. Qi i
- ../
Q [,
f
-f l.
c' e
=
I t
t,l, s Ws. f,.
i.
i ii i
n.,
e a
s.
t e
d
,%(i f't\\ bi kt h
i
- t g,
- -su i e
4 t
k c-1,;
&j. h.
y
=,
I' il..
5
'.l
,L 11 e
1
,,+ e..
p-x c
b
' k: ~
g.~ ~ T% a u.Q
._..>.......n N
-t -
- -i
(,, 7 t
l w i l i i!
%ci g ( fqp, i;jgg--
- j0 4:
5I MN p!
g
, 3{N, jllg'-
.i!
l N,'i d4 D'
l i
i
='
i X-i
~
i
"'y y
ap
.g
- y ~,.
o 4
a.@
m
]:
H 1
g H 8_ -N t'
dbho-.
3,_7 "s
[D<B1,' J t'
I x!%mmonst i
gpyn i
g[., {
F&lN(Q)) h
}l
. mLu f
[f hh
'h 'hli'!,M O.'
f
[5t h',$jg -;r,[ M e -==.= a
- 6. 1 M
4
'1 o
s ij.4.I'j!;,j
)
1 h '
rgsitE 2P J
o 3
, O NI
y 7
m h
s k
M F
y!)
i
' "T t YE, fl%{~illid'! 5 l
-...f 7,3$h
~
.M.
', f "
'3 j
v.
se m
{
, '[.]
-i F
f
.p.i
=
- c. m -
a.
b.
1 M
u i
k Er;'*ck.J(f
- M
' ~?'-
~
3 N,31
![ N 7
\\
/
y l
y M
/
j i'*b...<.Q
/
g N
i
.E 1
4
%,,'h'
-i s
1 n\\
c s
i h
l ih
\\\\
l e n..),,%
..]
\\
S t 4
J,.1
(.
3 N _G 1,
z f
.s s.- _.m.
s 7
.hipyl
?@%
f..
l b
) l8 '
f k Y.
\\
p.
- i % -
_____g;.g:,,3,.<l 4.
,,,. g(
n,..
L s
=.
M 3I
!I'm, 4.
H h jg j..
Oi n g
%ig.:
$h!'l
!i:dl g!
i
~
g gl ll j 8'I t$ l' 6,
[..
-. !il
,l[ 4
' p*
n j ".
,g IE 40 i
l c
Y
. ~
Ms t)
~
t
'," h. j f s h' M ~, 17 N,A Os 5;;is g
{@, a:i.l?..lip 1.b.TNV "e.tt
- g 4
i i
~
,l u
a n
1 a
f fd g
u qq p 2;
kilh ' _. _.11
(
%g/_J@g
- Q l
l[,-
U --W : *r i
pl/
i;pp.g.p
=
p q
db.l j
N
//
i e
1
.c p
a h
./
$n1 1
d 7
- )t 1
!u(
- A.
u s
(f u
4
~
3 IM Q,}
-)
s ea
.r,.'ipa +$3.,d y/M,,1; c
lh
~
D
~
cd i
a i
- Lna.,u uo vi a t e.
,,=n @,4 s a
=
gJ 0
i7) t.,
r 4
}
g.
(
.n n
m
.e g
_i_j un2 i
e
- & T
%-1 bil 'Myh
' s %v 0 7 ne u pfa t
. s.
, il 1
-.b g i
1 ;
f
'f e
._g TW
.a 1
. h %:
L L=
t,
,- h g n
5 GMD cp e
(p
- =.-====- -
.-..w...,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,...,,,;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
a u_
.n.,.. ' A
.e eg _-
_q,
_,,- -- '1e -
} Mi' IW q u.,.La
,[
-.- 4 m-q l.l i
..t y ip-
<a..
l a.
3.
@9p 1
i.
i i Mi$f-11 Im't 'd!'AMl.
u 4 i p!_jn.! !
'5.p.. '.'I I
'O '
I-j;
_i S
.i
- ps
.O l
s p i P
ur l
.p~i
!!4 r
MP i
li li
' ill!
iv -
_.L
.rI ye 4,
$ 8
~~~.
..i e ge e.
e t
6.I.-.wg,J,uT1r
~. L
-n
-a
-a r
c *- 4
~
.m.
i y iy g a nib f
l R $ E $ i @}
SiM..ef
! k. Y3ai;i*f 8
't
~
g J.w.
g ga.., n.-
f y: Ig..
i s.
6>
a men
- I
. 4- -- -
a*
- "E j
. flk.
9" q..,
w
-. g rdl;,,j1; &$. M gi;]id_
t F
$.. C { ':
3-P l
!f.n].gro ! ] i.g.
r--
r
.g eng
.jL;
,ds-
-h Eg;%S. W y*
4 g
'" p e
~
h t__
=
o i' 'y *i!M y";rllfhIM.
y$
t.
n
',i
.:?
$tD. g! 14 i c 3 i[,.'..
i r =-
2 y,Q.I Q,%
h)Smdk_@;y'd.Q
.EgV y4 W ! -i* !
I ' '
'. L-1 k'
g0 ig-71!
.; n,s {
g.t.
r
'o d
I.s
- QMIy X
.m
'+
d, fit -
. mu j.- 5n I :
r i
'$I j
3 v
a xi?j7 li'!.9. -
f, m, 7c]j
,m
'T /
y L. y e
4
\\
lI.
. W....-*-3 4
, sp s.
II k
Q2 f$$ -,-I-
. v.t 2 L
-- m 1
- l 1
d 2:
/,.g --.-,, gts
. - s.@
s 11 i
}l,p l
l 0;}
j 3
i l
,, q i
I I
$3 s-h M
J
. jf
' 1; /
i,l, ! 'J R
e-t
r' g#
$ s jj 70 ' dje%:d'!!Jw g4 a
DEE
~
g1 j, 3 R
v..
e oe
,c 3
a.,.i i
M
'v ' Y,,
E n l l!
h _ll
h blY
-. 6. -...
.e
).
..C..
a m
m
._Tf~ T p!
- msg y--[
y gn
.
l kl1, ' ff,1N ~' Y i !f l il IL l d a I!5 ~ ),, F,;$ 1 l 4-9 a. .p ~ . II. 5i .. gg %l".5%i & l' Ji J..j, e , %..- bi t I? 4 / . -M, =. 1 % q e . "VVV Q 1 [.L.g ~ y p-1 e O 91 w l jy y[I h N \\ 4 'ik 1 4, i 1 ..g I j y b a. f l l i,. - 2, d i h t _.. 1,. O b) 5 f. i s ?; E~e e;- j i >Ilum i I man N ' 4 A,, \\. ,,g,,,, J 5; .m....,.... <a e i '3\\ MM l .J \\ i 4 ' p.. j ill,,, e t}g ig ;,il egg !;fp. 'I " ~ i i 1 1 = [ 00 1 3 1 -. 7. d i ,o, F. &s 4 f 2.. -- oI e Q l n y 4 es .o e e e.g i n g l< { g'E!r,>t < 40 i t g c i k
- .5 {,: :,,2 i
a l o b. ~ %u i 2 b g' [h ' g ']Il 2.' u! ia ,G~ o A, o. e ~. e .it 'l liiti d I X Q C,.sv,y&, re: 3* g -.Q ' ~ i ~ o e a -J. ..*_...I./... I
- 1 8
8 .i. ..... + +. . f e ~ ~ _~' '.T~~*=--~___ f o f f n f n f f = = $4fl jff.i ,,g. l 4 ) --@,,--+ ;!, !8 indI I 3 (* - { b ig-- pj ! 3;I i. l 'l. l iI --+a [ a O.--+ ~ l:' i, i ; : P d ~ a 4 l iI ...i f - @ j 3 ~ g j l w N t Q. [.!hh ~ 4IE v ,a + $,Y. J@ l h' I- -p_ _i-. - .7, s i 1 gj , s I h,*' j{, il,llf.h, :'Cu-5. gT%.k . *,i..! N I g'jk 3 1 s / J' W i l' , y is +.1 s, 1 l 5, nn k
- {
- p.- - J.).!,
4; e, In f ) 3 nt 4n u h 'M j g\\ *[- h@b y [h, I;, y J 3 6 .q 7 e, i .m 1 Ife hp:. v ( - [2y .x 'l l 1 g 7 v ti l j 8 i b e-g, q-.- ; -n ) p is - 3 iHl 8
- _1 w.g 1
e y % w-,-n ' 3+ i i! 4 x R e Qg t ~~~ y vwe t o..mn ~ ~, ~ ~~ ~~- f, bi g i I l ) h_ 4. T-h .s =~ 3 3 o'o e 'e d.- d_. 8!'f,104 'lg e e a fg 4 t e h._ p s_.__ 43, e ,i i!E. r: j-1 m 2-. ' p- ' j r-+. g 1 'da S - i I as s it fl f 2_A Y~ 4 7 _1 < 4ha.! 1 q] {8' o_ @gi,. 8 a: 7 , ~.... 1 4 e e. e o 1
- .._ 7... :..
~ _ L.. ' _,L . ?. .l. _...~.' ,) l I~ .e... ,@Apen..,,. ;. z...,u.g.;, a a. u.... m. m. c- ==c-...... l 4'. ly,W# j'i .Ac u 4p4 1} M' IlL,i is.! !! i jiy q t d
- J
.(41 i d Ipgdsdlj o g i.a.:!!! p ;f i
- t. o.
g hai pA .y-l
- p.it i Y,
r An 1 nu.- ~ g D 17 l f ' ~ r ste!hAn s 1 .i F (,h ~ ~ -} 'a2 Ml I. - i o 'n 1 t 4 n 1 ..,it y o p{I / / ~ i g --- 4.H I _%, g _11 C4 j R $ *@d ~ it i, 'y I p, " '; I .] HI < y ' lh,lg. ')3h [Q$1 -ef s hD .s T-EM
- 1f.i th%
4-2 3 'i i . rc + i '... ~ ' i n .2.__d,. -..p.,,...u..;.M ysm gjii.4-e >j ll b b;-[l-li lla !,) I' 1 I. lf r _L g.. 9 y >.g1_ .. 9 .. x.. ..c
- u. -
r 4 l l l l
- ,l G
e 6 c. o _O O G O 9 G. ' f f ~ 1 . - ~ ~ +. i i 4 ) 1 \\ l s-3 c. 4 4 4 e g l g =- e i i
- J n'
o - ++ +. n __