ML20091F554
Text
_
COR8 bid 8t3
-,,e,,,,,
PeWer
= = -
Company amenand restsee: PG som test edesayed not meep. S1M eBleeBS
- e Fatmanry 21, 1983 Mr. W. D. shafer, Chief l
Midlard aubi. Section l
U. S. Nucimer llegulatory n==i==itus Region III 799 noosevelt naed Glen Ellyn, II, 60137 MEIJ00 PNX3BCT GIO 7020 3EWISIGIS OF 1HE SOIIS 3GEDIAL IIMPMENT ASSEBIBENT SONE Film: 0486.15 LFI 42*05*22*04 CSC-6564 12*32 l
l assed on our discussions with Mr. Moyne shofer on Fetuussy 14, 1983, please find the attadaad letter from J. A. Mooney to Stone an$ Mabeter regarding revieicne to the Soile Mesadial Independent Assessment Scope. It is our understanding that this revisien will permit IEC Itoglen III to conclude the overall evalue tone and Muhotar as an independent acososce.
D. B. les11=P, Jr.
Site Munoger tayM r
a l
I l
8406020272 840517 i
... s O) Consumett u m ---
POW 8r C0mpBRy
- a-o n.rm w e masas see = sees nem pensa n s.aan i,em assee e ein sesarre a
kbroery 24. i943 1
1 t
i T
i l
ler A 8 Imeks stone and lArbeter Nichtssa, Inc 70 sow 2325 sosten, IIA 02:07 I
Fila 0485.16 sealAs 20498 5
i Se er ter Im cira s in esserdance with Conounere Power company specificetten cc.100, new 1.
" independent Aseeeement of Assitiary Smilding Idaderpinnisis", Seetten 2.1 (3).
l
')
Stone and Webster litc.htgen, ins shalt espond the scope of the indepen edi. m tiei u s.
in.iv.e t e f.iie.in.,
l asses t of sei.
}
i) Provide a tlA overview and eseosoment of the seeign merk j
a h is everview pachases to eeeers accuracy and adegsacy.
I la te insure seafeseance to procedural and yaograuunstic reanutrements.
~
l
- 1) Preside a 44 overview and assessment of the QC inspector reageellf acarlen and certiffsetion piegra..
l
- 3) Provide a 83A everview end seeeeement of the training eendweted for a!! personnel in the eolle remedisi work i
effort.
to (nelisde an seesoament of s!!
I.
- 4) tapand the work contract wnderpinning work op eefety related structures en which endorpinnists work is done while the sentreet vith Stone sad L
lArbster Michigan, Inc to in effect.
...e.,e re.i. n e ii wee.e erfeeu.e is d.tei,.
Vert truly yours.
2 3
0 6 6.A.
b 1
?
l.
a
-,,-.,.,._,aa____,,,,
e~
,,.,_nn,
~
y s.
f" "'%4 UNITED STATES 9
/
?g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
{
1.s (
3 REoloN til 5 'p
'-..,j 799 ROOSEVELT ROAD
- 9. ?, v,. g g oLEN ELLYN, ILUNonS 60137
%.... *e p a 1 8,e,33 I
MEMORANDUM FOR:
R. F. Warnick, Director Office of Special Cases FROM:
W. D. Shafer, Chief, Section 2, Midland i
SUBJECT:
CREDENTIAL CHECKS ON STONE AND WEBSTER PERSONNEL As directed by the Regional Administrator I have conducted a credential check of the key Stone and Webster personnel involved in the third party independent assessment of the Midland soils remedial work. These personnel are:
A. S. Lucks, Project Manager, previously worked on Shoram and North Anna (1976), Boston office W. E. Kilker, Lead /Ceotechnical Engineer, previously worked at Shoram (1976 to present)
L. T. Rouen, QA/QC, previously worked at Shoreham (1973-1975)
- 3. Holsinger QA/QC, previously worked at Nine Mile 2 (1981 to present)
A. Scott, Construction Engineer, previously worked at River Bend (1976 to present)
The credential check consisted of teleconsnunications with the following utility representatives:
-W. Stewart, Vice President, Nuclear Operations. North Anna M. Sheldon, Superintendent of Construction, Nine Mile 2 J. Kelly, Construction QA Manager, Shoreham C. Sorrell, Supervisor Civil Engineering, North Anna W. Spencer, Vice President, Power Station Engineering, North Anna R. Spence, Superintendent, Field Quality Control t
.i.
I t
,f I
{Q % IQ UddLyk I
~~.
R. F. Warnick,
1 8 toq3' During my conversation with these individuals I asked if the utility
~ had experienced any unacceptable performance by the S&W personnel involved in the work at their particular site. In each case they stated that they had no knowledge of any poor performance on the part of the persons they knew.
As a result of these testimonials I have discontinued any further credential checks.
Ih h
W. D. Shafer Chief Section 2 Midland
'1 I
i i
i i
i i
e 0
b.
n.
A g
r.elt 11FAL STAFF l 4lap;.a se M n i
.= t.tod STONE & WEBSTER MICHIGAN, INC.
4/M._l_.y.,-j
~,
7 P.O. box 2325, BOSTON. M AssAcHusETTs 02107 O id
- --'~'
- ,f.' '. _. l. _-). -
$[
l~~}7i'[ M f I
Mr. J. G. Keppler February 15, 1983 Administra.cor, Region III J.O. NO. 14358 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission MPS-9 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 RE: DOCKET NO.
50-329/330 MIDLAND PLANT - UNITS 1 AND 2 INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT OF AUXILIARY BUILDING UNDERPINNING ASSESSMENT OF WORK ON PIERS W12 AND E12 TEAM MEMBER AFFIDAVITS Enclosed with this letter are signed affidavits for the Stone & Webster and Parsons Brinckerhoff Assessment Team members.
If you have any questions with respect to these affidavits please call me at (617) 589-2067.
A.S. Lucks Project Manager ASL:PJC i
i r
i l
.,w<. i q
E n
d l
.'t J
FER 161993 1
)
-w
.m.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING 30ARD In the Mattar of Docket No. 50-329 OM CONSUMERS POWER COF2ANY 50-330 OM (Midland Plant, Unita 1 and 2 Docket No. 50-319 OL 50-330 OL February 14, 1983 AFFIDAVIT OF
/
\\
Mv name is A.S. Lucks I an e'aployed by Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation as Proiect Manager I as currently assigned to the team which is conducting an independent assessment of soils work at the Midland Nuclear Plant site. Prior to being given this assignment, I have never worked on any job or task associated with the Midland Project, or any job or task for or on behalf of Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or the Hergentime Company relating to soils of underpinning.
I have never been employed by Consumera Power Company, Bechtel, or Mergentime Company. I do not own any shares of Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Mergentime stock. Mutual funds or other funds in which I may have a beneficial interest, but over which I have no control, may own shares of Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Mergentime stock, of which I am unaware.
A list of such funds in which I have an interest are attached.
I have no
- relatives which are or t ave been employed by Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Mergentime Company.
[
Sworn and Subscribed Before Me This 14th Day of February 1983 Gl R M Ad 5
Notary Public Suffolk County, Massachusetts I
My Consnission Expires November 8. 1985 Catherine TrabuCCo NOTARY PUBLIC l
For the Commomvealth of Massachusetts My Comminion Empires Nov. 8,1985 I
f f
l 4
I.
6 i
l UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION l
ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of Docket Nc. 50-329 OM CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY 50-330 OM 4
(Midland Plant, Units 1 and 2 Docket No. 50-329 OL 50-330 OL 4
February 14, 1983 AFFIDAVIT OF d.
W-My name is W.E. Kilker I an employed by _ Stone & Webster Fugineering Corporation as Project Engineer 3-I as currently assigned to the team which is conducting an independent l
assessment of soils work.at the Midland Nuclear Plant site. Prior to being given this assignment, I have never worked on any job or task associated with the Midland Project', or any job or task for or on behalf of Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or the Margentina Company relating to soils of underpinning.
4 I have never been employed by Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Margentime Company. I do not own any shares of Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or j
Mergentime stock. h tual funds or other funds in which I any have a beneficial intereet, but over whfch I have no control, any own shares of 2
Consumers Power Company, Ischtel, or Mergentime stock, of which I an unaware.
A list of such funds in which I have an interest are attached. I have no relatives which are or have been amployed by Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Mergencias Company.
1 Sworn and Subscribed Before Me This 14th I'ay' of February 1983 44 %
V 22 t/4(
I 4
Notarf Public Suffolk County, Massachusetts I
Mf Commissica Expires November 8.1985 i
Catherine Trabucco j
NOTARY PU8'.sC
]
For the Commonwealth of Messachusetts My Commission Empires Nov. 8,1985 i
t
,.j 8
1i s
w
-ms
-.d.
g
---w--
y.
p
-r.-y
---iysy-.
e-
,-9 mywee e-g c-e-+---e
-.+.-++ge
---e----wqgy-.w-9w.-ogwm y -4
-, -w-E
~
i l
i IINITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION l
ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of Docket No 50-329 OH CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY 50-330 OH (Midland Plant, Units 1 and 2)
Docket No 50-329 OL 50-330 OL February 11, 1983 AFFIDAVIT 0F
./[Nw V
t My name is >#nyt F &lP/ V. I an employed by s to N r s k ft$5 7f/ 4%~ Wni-b &
aa p iTL wrurik. Mswma
~. -
I as currer.tly assigned to the team which is conducting an independent assessment of soils work at' the Midland Nuclear Plant site. Prior to being
~
given this assignment, I have never worked on any job or task associated with the Midland Project, or any job or task for or on behalf of Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or the Mergentime Company relating to soils or underpinning.
I have never been employed by Consumers Power Company, Eechtel, or Mergentime Company.
I do not own any shares of Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Mergentine stock.
Mutual funds or other funds in which I may have a beneficial interest, but over which I have no control, may own shares of 3
Consumers Power Company, Bechal, or Mergentime stock, of which I as unaware.
A list of such funds in which I have an interest are attached. I have no relatives which are or have been employed by Consumers Power Company, Bechtel,
,l or Mergentine Company.
~
i f
Sworn and Subscribed Before Me This //
Day o d 2
j
'ifrYt1$
1 1>
1A_)
Notary Public
//#
?
i 4 ;; County, Michigan 3
My Commission Expires 3 -t/-d'(o l
l
}
t t
i l
t' I
j af0283-0349a100
~
i i
j UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION i
ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of Docket No 50-329 CH CONSWKM POWER COMPANY 50-330 ON (Midland Plant, Units 1 and 2)
Docket No 50-329 OL 50-330 OL February 11, 1983 AFFIDAVIT OF i
s My name is aA Seatt I an employed by Stone & Webster as rep e.,
I am currently assigned to the team which is conducting an independent assessment of soils work at' the Midland Nuclear Plant site. Prior to being
~
given this assignment, I have never worked on any job or task associated with the Midland Project, or any job or task for or on behalf of Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or the Mergentime Company relating to soils go underpinning.
I have never been employed by Consumers Power Company, Bestsel, or Mergentime
' Company.
I do not own any shares of Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Mergentime stock. Mutual funds or other funds in which I any have a beneficial interest, but over which I have no control, may own shares of Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Mergentime stock, of which I to unaware.
A list of such funds in which I have an interest are attached. I have no relatives which are or have been employed by Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Mergentime Company.
Sworn and Subscribed Before Me This // b ay of M nsud l
Notary Public (/f/
__ County, Michigan My Commission Empi R - t/' [b
.1 I was employed by Bechtel Corporation from March 1951 to July 1968 and fr9m June 1972 to September 1976. g,
6 af0283-0349a100
.-c.
,,,-,_,-____.r.r.,
.._m-_.,. _ _.,,,,_-
,.,m.,
-. _ _ ~,
,,,_._--,__,..-__.-._.y
,,,,.,,e.....__.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY C0f911SSION ATONIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of Docket No 50-329 ON CONSUNERS POWR COMPANY 50-330 ON l
(Midland Plant, Units 1 and 2)
Docket No 50-329 OL 50-330 OL February 11, 1933 AFFIDAVIT OF g n N u / ((t/4 My asse is L a..e. v. p 3 I se employed by Stone and Webster Enre.' Corp.
as n-ur n, i n.,
a,,i
.,r y. Engineer.
I as currently assigned to the tese which is conducting an independent assessment of soils work at' the Midl.'sd Nuclear Plant site. Prior to being siven this assignment, I have sever worked out any job or task associated with the Midland Project, or any job er task for or na behalf of Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or the Merseatise Company relating to soils or underpiaming.
I have never been employed by Consumern Power Company, Bechtel, or Mergentime Company. I do set own any shares of Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Merseatine stock. Mutual'funda or other funds in which I any have a beneficial interest, but ever which I have no control, may own shares of Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Mergentime stock, of which I an unaware.
A list of such funds in which I have an interest are attached. I have no relatives which are or have been employed by Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Mergentime Campany.
Sworn and Subs ribed Rafore Me This /j, af ofh de O
.uYbL/
, Notary Public-v g County, Miehtgen i
My Commission Empi'res J - V-M i
I*
l I
t 1
af0243-0349a100 e
E
.,c.
I '.
l l
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA l
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMIS$10N j
ATOMIC SAFETY ANO LICENSING BOARD in the Matter of Docket No. 50-329 OM COMSUMERS POWER COMPANY 50-330 OM (Midland Plant, Units I and 2)
Docket No. 50-329 OL 50-330 OL February 11, 1983 AFF10AVIT OF ky $
My name is Barr
. Nelsineer.1 employed by Stone & Webster as QA EngineFr l
l am currently assigned to the team which is conducting an Independent assessment of solls work at-the Midland Nuclear Plant site. Prior to being l
given this assignment, I have never worked on any job or task associated with the Midland Project, or any job or task for or on behalf of Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or the Hergentime Company relating to soils or underpinning.
I have never been employed by Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Mergentime Company.
I do not own any shares of Consumers Power Company, techtel, or Mergentime stock. Mutual funds or other funds in which I may have a beneficial Interest, but over which I have no control, may own shares of Consumers Power Company, techtel, or Mergentime stock, of which I am unaware.
j A list of such funds in which I have en Interest are attached.
I have no j
relatives which are or have been employed by Consumers Power Company, techtet, or Mergentime Company.
. #yr yr Sworn and Subscribed tefore Me This d Day of
'.h A m, < a e y 1943 l
O A ti o
'O
? L ALD i
NtaryPublic enamev i N oe68 t
Sn EYeh"es, si., 6*e ammm o a. ama a >IJ l
My Comiaelon tap!res l
F i
r
l TRK IL[ITED STATT.S OF AtfERICA NUCI. EAR REGUI.ATORY C0tefISSION AT0tiIC CARTTT AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of Docket No 50-329 ott CONSUtfElt$ POWER CatfPANY
$0-330 Otf (Hidland Plant, Units 1 and 2)
Docket No 50-329 OL 50-330 OL Tabruary 11 1983 ATTIDAVIT OF My name is Thomas R. Kuesel. I se empIny(d.by Parsons Brinckerhoff Ouade &
as Senior vice President.
Douglas, Inc.
I an entrently assigned to the team which is A-ting an independent assessment of soils work at" the Hidland Nuclear Plaat site. Prior to being given this masignment, I have never worked oc any job or task associated with the Midland Pro.tect, or any job or ta.sk for er on behalf of Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or the Bergesttime Company relating to soils ge underpinning.
I have never been employed by Cassu.ders Power Company, Bechtel", or Hergentime
- Company. I do not own.earf sha:es of Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Hergentime stock. Nataal fusas oc other funds in which I may have a beneficial interest, but over which.I have no control., may own shares of Consumers Powr Company, Bechtel, or Eergenth stock, of dich I an u aware, A list of such funds ia dich T have as faterest 4.re attacb4. I have ra relativea which are or have beee 'employet, Dy consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Mergentime Company.
N
~ s 9 7>
SwornandSubsc5$ed3eforeHeThis/4 Diy of fta JPtf i
h V
h s
~
4echnp;7,".iMama-=
Not Public g-s
}
t;oTARY b- 'J'Y '.p/ -cedham ""* '"" ' ' {m
"? N"I i ommission Zapires
~
, "X
- From 1963 to 1967 I was employed by Parsons Brinckerhoff. Tudor-sechtel, General Engineering Consultants for design and construction management j
of the San Francisco Bay Ari:a Rapid Transit System, in the capacity of Assistant Manager of Engineering.
.,,. ~
_4
-m
\\
m.
\\
y
,, e
_ af.0283-0349a100
'-\\
iN n
.r3
=
ww-m v-v--w y
g-
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGUIATORT CottiISSION AT0t1IC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of Docket No 50-329 ott CONSUtfERS POWER CatfPANY 50-330 Oti (Hidland Plant, !!aits 1 and 2)
Docket No 50-329 OL 50-330 OL February 11, 1983 AFFIDAVITO)F
~W My name is Louis G. Silano I as employed by Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade &
as Techni cal ni rnc*nr vouglas, Inc.
Major Structures I as currently assigned to the team which is conducting an indepadant assessment of soils work at' the Midland Nuclear Plaat site. Prior to being given this assisement I have sever worked on any job or task associated with
~
the Midland Project, or any job or task for or on behm1f of Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or the Bergentime Company relating to soils or underpinning.
I have never been employed by Cossumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Mars==H==
' Cogamy. I do not own any shares of Consumars Power Company, Bechtel, or Mergentime stock. tintual funda or other funda in which I any have a beneficial interest, but. over weich I have no rostrol, any own shares of Consumers Poe+er Company, Eachtel. or Mersentime stock, of.which I an unaware.
A list of such fuds in which I t.are as interest are attachad. I kt,vm no
~'
reiztives which are or have been employed by Constners Pesar Company, Bechtel, i
or Hergentime Company.
! 'l f) 5som and tahset.ibed 5 fore tie This RIdyofh6_.M82 n$
Y Notagy Public
-Jashsea C~ry, Mica 217 a
r m c.c0VD l
My C ssion Expires NO" ".?W'T ] # "
eva....a n u. a io m.:/
cer. w.c.;1. I p... :,..r.a.w. t..u l
j j
a(0283-0349a100 j
~
w UNITZD STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of Docket No 50-329 OM CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY 50-330 OM (Midland Plant, Units 1 and 2)
Docket No 50-329 OL 50-330 OL February 11, 1983 AFFIEAVIT OF 4 A
My name is jk ( 8A/24r#. I an employed by 8erens Mne/p/// CLwed[M4 t
as JL,,1-se 4 --w I am currently assigned to the team which is conducting an independent assessment of soils work at' the Midland Nuclear Plant site. Prior to being
~
given this assignment, I have never worked on any job or task associated with the Midland Project, or any job or task for or on behalf of Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or the Mergentime Company relating to soils or underpinning.
I have never been employed by Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Mergentime Company. I do not own any shares of Consumers Power Comptny, Bechtel, or Mergentime stock. Mutual funds or other funds in which I any have a beneficial interest, but over which I have no centrol, may own shares of Consumers Power Company, Bechtel,, or Mergentime stock, of which I am unaware.
A list of such funds in which I have an interest are attached. I have no relatives which are or have been esployed by Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Merontiac Compauy.
1 Sworn and Subscr edBeforeMeThis[/
Day a ff' L
A i
l Natary Public &v l
R ' n County, Michigan J7-@ [b My Connission s
s af0283-0349a100
~
- l
}
- i i
~
s 9
y
u l
1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGUIATORY COMMISSION ATOMIC SAFETT AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of Docket No 50-329 OM CONSUMERS POWER COMPANT 50-330 OM (Midland Plant, Units 1 and 2)
Docket Nc 50-329 OL 50-330 OL February 11, 1983 AFFIDAVIT OF
/
/
My name is Jerrold Ratner. I an employed by Parsons Brinckerhoff, Quade and Douglas as Manaeer. Construction I as currently assigned to the team which is conducting an independent assessment of soils work at' the Midland Nuclear Plant site. Prior to being
~
given this assignment, I have never worked on any job or task associated with the Midland Project, or any job or task for or on behalf of Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or the Mergentime Company relating to soils or underpinning.
I Lave never been employed by Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Mergentime
~ Company.
I do not own any shares of Consuadra Power Company, Bechtel, or Mergentime. stock. Mutual funds or other funds in which I any have a beneficial interest, but over which I have no control, may own shares of Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Mergentine stock, of which I am unaware.
A list of such funde in which I have an interest are attached. I have no relatives which are or have oeca employed by Cons'mers Power Company, Bechtel, or Mergentine Company.
i Swors and Subseeibed Before Me This /Mb ay o d D
ll oku 00ho Notary Public i
W County, Michigan
.My Commission Erpires 3 M/-[0 t
i l 1
s l-i i
I i
1 af0283-0349a100 1
1.
l-1 UNITED STATES OF A!! ERICA NUCIIAR REGt.uICRT C0tf: FISSION ATCdIC SAITIT AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of Docket No 50-329 ott 00gStM1ts POWER C0tfPANY 50-330 Otf (Hidland Plant Unita 1 and 2)
Docket No 50-329 OL 50-330 OL February 11, 1983 I n[
7
-I AITIDAVIT OF t
u ffy name 1Fincent J. Madi).lI an employed by Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade &
vouglas, Inc.
as. sani nr vnginnov
~
[
I am currently assigned c2 the team which is conducting an indep-A=t assessment of soils work ac' the Midland Nuclear Plant site. Prior to being y.$
~
givest this assignment, I have never worked on any job or task associated with the Midland Project, or any job or task for or on behalf of Consumers Power in Company, Bechtel, or the Mergentime Company relating to soils or underpinning.
4 I have never been employed bT Coasumers Power Company, Bechtel, or begentime 1-
- Company. I do not own any shares of Coastaara Powet Company, Bechtel, or M.
Hergentime' stack. Ifatual funds or other funda in which I may have a i
beneficial interest, but over which I have no control, may own shares of g
Consumers Power Company. Eechtel.. og Mertenti, mat sto.ck,.of.which I am.usaware,.
y A list,of such funds in which I have an interest are attached. I have no relatives which are or have been employed by Consmeers Power Company, Bechtel, g
or Mergentime Company.
S
/ 9 7)
Sworn and subscribed Before He This /4 Day of /*6.1982~
wh M
~
~
NotarfPubEic J::hcr C:
- g. :lidi.a ify h saion Expires wr-r~o I
w. ~.
- n... s...... s.. : x verk r:.31 w M o Qatiri.o n i..o ya a c:u.:y comw.i.a.n Lp..s t.;_4.a w,1 33
~
I i
L af0283-0349a100
=
[
^
$ dols Fite
- ** " 4r UNITED STATES y
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION f') e(g 7,
REGloN 111 5, ' J"#/
E 799 ROOSEVELT RoAo 0, '
oLEN ELLYN, ILLINols 60137 February 15, 1983 MEMORANDUM FOR:
R. F. Warnick, Director, Office of Special Cases THRU:
W. D. Shafe,
, Midland Section FROM:
R. B. Landsman, Reactor Inspector, Midland Section
SUBJECT:
LICENSEE PERFORMANCE ON PIERS 12E and 12W RIII on December 9, 1982, authorized CPCo to initiate work activities I
pertaining to the drift, excavation and installation of Piers 12E and 12W. Subsequent to that authorization the licensee began work on December 13, 1982. Due to the Diescl Generator Building Inspection I have had only enough time to perform five inspections to determine the acceptability of the licensee's work in regards to these piers including removal of fill concrete, shaf t excavation and bracing, bell excavation and bracing, and reinforcing details and proposed concreting activities.
I have identified three concerns since undenpinning work began which have been subsequently corrected or are in the process of being corrected by the licensee. They are:
a) That the craftworkmen were not receiving the required amount of specialized remedial soils underpinning training. The licensee has agreed to expand the scope of craft training, but does not have the details worked out to dace.
b) That the licensee wanted to use a super plasticizer as an additive to the concrete mix in lieu of good concreting practices, i.e.,
coaeolidation by vibration. The licensee after what I consider to be
~
excessivo discussions finally agreed to vibrate all underpinning concrete in accordance with good engineering practice.
l c) That the third party ir. dependent assessment team is not reviewing j
the design docur.er.tn for technical adequacy. They are only doing implenantation review to assure that the design documents are being folloved. From discussions with Stone and Webster personnel, it j
was determined that this important parameter was not included in their contract. The licensee is presently considering including this in the contract documents.
Besides these three concerns no other issues or deviations from regulatory requirements have been identified.
N j
R. B. Landsman ij.
Reactor Inspector 9
Li
'i
TiNOlFAL STf FF l STONE & WEBSTER MICHIGAN, INC. a,s y n A~~rl
')/R i !
s, ti4.
P.O. Box 2325. Boston. MASSACHUSETTS 02107
.w r, t
,t h,wh I
e
..c.
t
,.' ?.hJ If 3-7 i e
iJ i.L l
i I
.4 il I
!E. u (
Mr. J. G. Keppler February 14, 1983 l
Administrator, Region III l
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comunission J.O. No.14358 799 Roosevelt Road MPS-7 Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 RE : DOCKET No. 50-329-330 MIDIAND PIANI - UNITS 1 AND 2 INEPENENT ASSESSENT OF AUXILIARY BUILDING ttiDE RPINNING INDEPENENG & ASSESSENT TEAM Cons umers Power Company Specification CC-100 originally issued on September 20, 1982, sets forth the criteria for independence for the Ass essment Teme.
S tone & Webster Michigan, Inc.,
determined that the Corporation and the indivikal members of the Team satisfy the requirements of the Specification. We have also determined that our subcontrctor, Parsons Brinckerhoff Michigan Inc. seet these requirements as set forth in a letter signed by Thm as '..
Kuessel, Senior Vice President of Parson Brinckerhoff Michigan Inc., dated November 4,1981.
In particular both Corporations satisfy the following criteria:
The Corporaticus or individuals assigned to this work do not have e
any direct previous involvement with Midland activities that they will be reviering.
The Corporations or individuals assigned to this work have not been e
.previously hired by the Owner to perform design, construction, or quality work relative to the soils ressdial program.
e The individuals assigned to this verk have not been previously
.i amployed by the Owner within the last 3 years.
e The inlividuals assigned to this work do not have present hov.sehold members employed by the Owner.
e.
The individuals assigned to. this work do not have any relatives amployed by the Owner in a management capacity, The Corporations and individuals assigned to this work do not con-e trol a significant amount of Owner stock.
i 1
B1214358-4
.FEB151983 u
- 1 m
e t.
O JGK 2
February 14, 1983 Under separate cover we are sending signed affidavits f or each manber of the Assessment Team.
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. A.
Stanley Lucka at (617) 589-2067.
P. A. Wild Vice President Sworn and subscribed to bef ore me on this 14th day of February,1983.
t: $
- D X L taCC Notary Public Suff olk Cossity Messachusetts My Commission Expires November 8,1985.
Catherine Trabucco NOTARY PUBLIC For the Commor: wealth of Massachusetts f4 Commluion Exp;ses Nov. 8,1985 I
t
.I i
i
.l i
l I
l 1
i i
l
\\
.t
'i B1214358-4
.t.
l
l
\\
g.
T l J A p'^ t PA L_STr F F (
$l i
A -((i 7 f) Erin.y 2 Awn
?
STONE & WEBSTER MICHIGAN, INC.
Y-)
LN. D___d al P.O. Box 2325. Boston. MASSACHUSETTS 02107
.[
OEP l
8
.J, Nil l
l y
OL l
lFTLtln g Mr. J. G. Keppler February 14, 1983 Administrator, Region III J.O. No.'14358 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission MPS-8 799 Roosevelt Road Glea Ellyn, IL 60137 RE: DOCKET NO. 50-329/330 MIDLAND PLANT - UNITS 1 AND 2 INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT OF AUXILIARY BUILDING UNDERPINNING ASSESSMENT OF WORK ON PIERS W12 AND E12 As of February 11, 1983 the Stone & Webster - Parsons Brinckerhoff Assessment Team has observed the excavation, placing of reinforcerent, and concreting of underpinning pier W12, and the excavation, and placing of reinforcement for underpinning pier E12. In addition, the Assessment Team has reviewed the drawings, procedures and other documents pertaining to the underpinning work and has observed the performance of the Quality Assurance and Quality Control Organizations during the pro-gress of the work.
During the period that the Assessment Team has been on site, daily meetings have been held with Construction, Gality and Engineering personnel to obtain additional information and discuss observations.
The Assessment Team has issued twenty Weekly Reports to the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Comission. These reports have described the activities of the Assessment Team and summarized their observations and findings.
i The Assessment Team has issued hstotal of five Ncnconformance Identification i
Reports. Four of these Nonconfnrmance Identification Reports have been closed out to the satisfaction of the Assessment Tear..
The remaining open Nonconfdrmance Identifiestion Report was issued on February 10, 1983 and the Assessment Team feels that it can be closed out in the near future without impacting t.he progress of the underpinning.
i The underpinning work is being performed in accordance with the construction and quality procedures. As the work has progressed,the procedures have been modified based upon experience gained during the construction of
.)
piers W12 and E12. The Assesament Team feels that these minor changes
-i are appropriate and will have a positive effect on the quality of the under-
]
pinning work.
-i 1
l i
~ @< <i FEB 1 5 1983 s
i r. 'g 1
D
~
e
'w e
3 m
+ + ". +-
1 2
February 14, 1983 JCK Based upon these observations and findings, the Assessment Team is of the opinion that additional piers could be released for construction. This will benefit the quality of the work by allowing the Contractor to main-tain the experienced labor teams from piers W12 and E12.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (617) 589-2067.
A.S. Lucks Project Manager a
e i
i t
i i
i
)
f' i
i T
)
k i
i
~-
-,-en.-
,n.n..
N e
. I; "
UNITED BYA7ss Wircks NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION KCornell
-e
}
TRehm 3
WASHINGTON,0.c.aoses
/
VStello g ;P/
CMichelson February 1; 1982 RDeYoung casmuaw GCunningham-HDenton ECase
\\
The Honorable John D. Dingell, Chainnan IEisenhut Comittee on Energy and Comnerce 88uckley United States House of Representatives
~
Scavanaugh Wasliington, D.C.
20515 REngelken. RV CA
Dear Hr. Chainnant:
Sev \\
EDO #1109N
'We share the concerns expressed in your November 13, 1981 letter regarding the implication of the recent seismic design errors detected at the Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant. The implication of these errors has been and will be thoughtfully cpnsidered by the Consnission.
' The timing of the detection of these errors, so soon after authorization for low-power operation, was indeed unfortunate and it is quite understandable that the Congress' and the public's perception of our licensing process has been adversely affected.- Had this information been known to us on or prior to September 22; 1981, I am sure that the facility license would not have been. issued.until the questions raised by these disclosures had been resolved.
I
~
Because of these design errors, on November 19, 1981 we suspended Pacific Gas and. Electric Company's (PG&E) license pending satisfactory completion of the following:
6 1.
The conduct of an independent design review program of all l
safety-rel'ated activities performed prior: to June 1,1978 under all seismic-related service contracts used.in the design of
. safety-related structures, systems' and: components.
' 2.
A technical report that. fully assesses:the basic cause of all
~
design errors identified by this program,. the significance of the errors found and their impact on facility design.
PG&E's conclusions of the effectiveness of the de. sign verification 3.
program in assuring the.adequ,acy of facility design.
- 4. -
A schedule for completing any modifications to the facility that are required as a result of the: design verifiertion program.
i in addition, the Comission ordered PG8E!to provide for NRC review and F
approval:
[
i L
I 1.
A description and discussion of the corporate qualifications of the
~
[
company or companies that PG&E would propose to carry out the L
L
(
l y.
- x..
I g
independent design verification. program, including information that demonstrates the independence of these: companies.
2.
A detailed program plan for conducting the design verification-program.
In recognition of the need to assure the credibility '6f the design
' verification program, NRC will decida on the ' acceptability of the companies' proposed by PG&E to conduct this program after providing the Governor of California and Joint Jntervenors in the pending operating licensing proceeding 15 days for comment. A110. the NRC will decide on' the acceptability of the plan proposed by PG&E to conduct thi program, after providing the Governor of California and the Joint Intervenors in the pending operating license proceeding 15 days for comment.
Prior to authorization to proceed with fuel loading the NRC must be satisfied with the results of the seismic: design verification program and with any plant modification resulting from that program that cay be necessary prior to fuel leading. The NRC'may! impose additional requirements prior to fuel loading necessary.to protect health and
~
safety based upon its review of the program or any of the information.
provided by P6&E. This may include some or all of the requirements specified in the letter to PG&E dated November 19, 1981.
Responses to each of the four questions in your letter are enclosed.
~
A decision to permit PG&E to proceed with' fuel loading will not be made until all the actions contained in the Connission's November 19. 1981 Order are fully satisfied.
Sincerely.:
h a^
kp Nunzio J. Palla ino cc: Rep. Carlos Moorhead.
Enclosures
- 1. Connission Order. dated 11/19/81' 2.1.tr from Office of Nuclear Reactor
?-
Regulation, NRC to PG&E: dated 11/19/81 i
- 3. Responses to Questions l
t I
i-e s
t.
.]
.~:
- ?
g
~
RESPONSES TO 0$E5 IONS IN NOVEMBER 13, 1981 LETTER TO -
d CHAIRMAN PALuADINO FROM CONGRESSMEN DINGELL AFD OTTINGERE0miSkNd bmS N
cup Question 1: Please provide, prior to the issuance of the 50.54(f) letter, the definition of the terms (f)d (iv) pendent,""
"inde g-. --.
(.ii) " competent," (iii) " integrity," an
' " complete,-
y v.:
Response
Although one of the options under. consideration 'b'y th'e #
Commissionwasa50.54(f) letter,thecommissiondecidedto J.:.:,.
suspend PG&E's license to 1 bad fuel and condui:t tests up to
'M--
5 percent power by Memorandum.and Order dated November 19, completion of certain actions, 1981, pending satisfactory design' verification program.
including the conduct of a Also, a staff letter of the same.date required PG&E to
'~
carry on oth'er design verifit:ation pr'ograms prior to issuance of any license aut'horizihg operation above 5 i
percent power.
The most important. factor in NRCs evaluation.of the indi-viduals or companies proposed by Paci~fic. Gas and Electric to complete the required design verification program is their competence. This competence must. be based on knowledge and experience in the matt'ers under review. These individuals l
or companies should also be! independent.
Indeoendence means_that the individuals er camaanies selected must he
~ le to provide an ob.iecti_ve, dispassionate techniem1 iuda==at-ab provided soleiv on the basis of technical==Ht.
Indeoendence[
-C also means that the design verification oregrma must he conducted by comoanies or individuals not nravianely inunived
~ ~ -
with the. acti tities at Diablo Canyon that thav will now b_t reviewino.Their integrity must be such that they are regarded as reputable companies or individuait. The word
" complete" applies to the NRC requirement for review of all quality assurance procedures and. controls used by each pit
~
June 1S78. seismic and non-seismig service related contractor
~
and by PGLE with regard to that contract. A comparison of. -
these: procedures and controls with the related criteria of
~
Appendix B to 10 CFR 50 is also re:ivired. Any deficiencias
~
. or weaknesses in the quality: assurance procedures and controls of the contrac';or and PGLE will be investigated in more detail.
In a;di. tion, calculations will be checked in an l
audit program. Numerical calculations for which the original basis cannot be determined will be recalculated to verify the initial design-input.
q i
[
e g
1 6
l l
~
=-
. ~.
Question 2:
'Please provide the crite-ia te 'be used in' assuring that'the proposed audit will be
" independent."
~ ~
Response
The competence of the individuals.or companies is the:most important factor in the selection of an auditor.
Also, the companies or individuaTs may:not have had any" direct'-
previous involvement with'.the activities at.*
Diablo Canyon that they will be rev.iewing..'
In addition, the following factors will be considered in evaluating the question of independence:
1)
Whether th's individuals or companies involved h'ad been previously hired by PG&E.to do similar seismic design work.'
2)
Whether any individual invol.ved had been previou' sly employed, by PG&E (and the nature of the employment).
Wheth' r. the indi'vidual owns or controls l
3) e significant amounts of PG&E stock.
4)
Whether members of.:the present household of individua'1s involved are employed by PG&E.
5)
Whether any relatives are employed by P6&E in.a m,anagement capacity.-
i In addit' ion to the above considerations..the following procedural guidelines will be used to assure independence::
l 1)
An auditable recor/ will be provided of" all copsents on draf t or final reports.
any changes made as a result of such comments..anf the rensnns for such changes; cr the consultant will issue only a final report (without prior licensee comment)..
j 2)
NRC will assume and exercise the respon-sibility for serving the report.on alt parties.
T 4
\\
7
/
___.-______._-_________---___._,__-..----,..e
,-,,-.,-e-%,-_.-,,y
,.--,-----,,,--,..-._--w,,
-y
%,_w.
y3--
i i
?
1.
s..
.y e
In v.iew of the-licenseets past. performance,
. Question 3:
and that of its subcontractors..what procedures will be utilized to ensure that t
there are not conflicts of interests in the performance of an'y required. audits?-
.:..~..-
B.
?
Response:.
We are requiring-that PGAE provide the NRC
~
with a description. and a discuss' ion' of the:
i-corporate qualifications of the companies..
proposed to carry out the various design '
verification programs, including information that demonstrates the ipdependence of these companies.
This information will be provided to the Governor of California and'the Joint I
Intervenors for coinments..
Based upon review.
of the information provided'by P6&E and the comments of the Governor and Joint Intern venor, the NRC will decide on.the accept-of the companies with respect to
.abilit{ independence" and "competeni:e."
their In addition, approval will.not be given by NRC if we determine that a potential conflict of i
interest exists in theiperformance of any required audits that cannot be adaquately addressed by procedural; safeguards l
~
Question 4:
What plans does..the NRC have to ensure that a '
sinrilar situation will'not arise at other i
plants now under const'ruction?
What, if any, additional quality control procedures does the NRC propose to 1nstitute in its inspec-t tion program?-
~
l.
Response
The Commission is developing an action plan I
that will result 1.n improved-NRC review of 1
quality assurance' programs.at. operating nuclear power plants and nuclear power plantf under construction t The details of the actionplanwi],1be(availableinthenear i
future.
+
t j
e 1
4
.i e
l f
l
'/
,..4
_,.--,_,c...,
-,---m..
e e.
LEGAL DEPARTMENT L
aL
.xe-
=-
11." =
J sed L.See.n Deseen
~ ~
-e 0 K Psesrose aene P Desse, Wausan 8 am or Kane P Owftp teamsgu.g Asreeneys G
F bee
'.'l
'.~""n e.
L*A"" *L
~ ^ " * ' * "
u Desus A weeeen.
o a=res oeneau 212 w se useniema Av. ave. J.,* sea ui amot. (si7 7seaso
', e= a ".a=
November 15, 1982 7.,,", U'l"7" Us'n.I'll" PRINC1 PAL STAFF l;'"u.*."" *"*
o.Lvw 3
?A 0f I
%,',,v,,,",,'
D/RA P!F l daa='n EM OP & 1//Ltd I
William D Paton
@%P 4
lPA0 i il Counsel for the NRC Staff DEPsos 13LO i U S Nuclear Regulatory Commission OESTP l
8 I
Washington, DC 20555 ML l
l MIDLAND NUCLEAR C0 GENERATION PLWT MIDLAND DOCKET NOS 50-329, 50-330 STONE & WEBSTER (SCO Recently, questions have been raised concerning the use of the Stone and Webster Company (S&W) to conduct an appraisal of underpinning of the Midland auxiliary building. A public meeting regarding these issues, among others,
,was conducted in Washington on November 5, 1982.
During that meeting, representatives of the NRC Staff asked certain questions touching upon the independence of the Stone and Webster Company. To respond more fully to these questions, Consumers asked Stone & Webster to describe jobs undertaken by S&W on behalf of Consumers Power Ccmpany and to determine S&W's holdings of Consumers' securities. The attached letter is S&W's response to those questions.
According to the attached letter, Stone & Webster has carried out, and is carrying cut, no wcrk for Consumers Power Company in relation to the soils remedial project, other than the present audit. S&W has undertaken two relatively limited assignments not related to soils on behalf of the Midland 4
Proj ect. The letter sl=o indicated, that Store & Webater's or its subsidiaries have no holdings of Consumers Power Company stocks.
I i
{
/1%
.i J$PfCl 1
ames E Brunner O
CC DSHood, NRC Billie Gardie CM/CL Service List l
1 l
i' ' W M 52 itis ~ ~
PDR ADOCK 05000329
.tm^
A PDR
.. ~..
cg 1 O 1g oc1182-0270a100 IJ."; Z'.-Q CHICI?lAL
..... -.. D Mo e n.
s-e-..
y
.e y
,-g,
-w
l 6.
SER7ICZ LIST Piunir J Eellir, Esq Atomic Safety & Licensing Attorner General of the Appest Panel Statecof Miahd===
II S Nuclear Regulatory Coma Carole Steinberg, Esq WashingtozL,. D C 20555 Assistant. Attorney General Environmental Protection Div Mr C H Stephens T20 LaF h4 N 4 " -
Chief, Deca,etins Is Services-r===4=r, Mr h8913 7 S. Ebelear Requistory Comm.
01Tice of the Secretary MrrtzL M Cherry, Esq
' Washingtotr,D C 20555 One IBM Plaza Suits 450I Ms Mary SL"a Chicago, IL 60611 5711 Susinerset. Street 3Haiand, E h86ho Me Wenda11. E Marshall RFD.10' William D Patoe, Esq 3H AT==d,. Mr.h86ho
- Counsel' for the NRC Staff 7 S Nuclear Regulatory Commt.
Charles.Becahoefer,Zsq Washington,D C 20555 Accade Safety & Licensing BoertL Panel Atomic Safety & Licensing U S Nuclear Regulatory Cast BoarcL Panel
"--h4"-con,.D C 20555
'E s r lue eer Regulatory Ccana Washington, D c' 20555 De Frederick.P Covast 6152. I verda Trail,
Barbara.Stamiris Asp 3-125 5795 North River Road.
Boca Racon,. FL 33h33 Rtr 3 Freeland, MI h8623 Jer:7 Earbcur Atomic Safety & Licensing 3o'arti Panel Carroll I Mahaner U.S Nuclear Regulatory Comm 1
3abcock & Wilcox Washington, D C 20555 70 som 1260 l
Lynchburg, 71rginia'2h!05 Ise L 31 shop t
Harmer & Wei::s James E 3 runner,. Esq 172$ "I' Screet, NW #506 Cons'.amers Power Company Wash 1AT,ca, DC 20C06 212 West 3Mahd== Avenr2 l
Jackson, MI k9201 M I Miller, Esq Isham,. Lincoln & 3eale l
Mr D 7 Judd Sree.3stionsi Plaza Embeccic & W11cos.
52nd Flooi-PO Box 2260 Chicago, IL 60603 Ignahburg, VA 2h505 John Demeester, Esq i
Steve Gedler, Est Dow Chemical 31dg 2120 Carter Avenue-3Mah4-=r Division l
St Paul, Mir 55108 Midland, MI kS6ho i
.I g%.
w, s s.
e e-mA
=
-D3=*
P
.,.y.,
w w,
s.-wi.
-vt='".
en< m.scer:ss ces: s-11-e2: 2:zsm si m.aco: := 2 STONE & WEBSTER MICHIGAN. INC.
P.c. som 2325. sesrom. Massac>uscres 02107 November 9, 1982 Mr. John R. Schaub Project Manager Consumers Power Cc=pany 194$ V. Parnall Road Jackson. Michigan 49201 4
Dear Mr. Schaub:
Per your requent to Mr. Carl P. Sundstrom I am enclosing a list i
and description of jobs that Stone & Webster Michigan Inc. has undertaken for Consumers Power Co=pany (CPCo)..
I se also prnviding the results of my investigatinn of our holdings-in C7Co seesrities.
If we can be of further awaintance, pleano call Mr. Carl T.
Sundstrom at (617) 389-2780.
Very truly yours, T
P. A. Wild Vicu Prcnidant i
'I 1-J 5I y
- e p 6 em - Mr.
- Je m
-4 y --
.+4e I
eTRC' X TELEZ':ETt 495; 9-11-32 3:34PM 3
51 M SCC 34:n 3 r
Start Data End Date brit.! 7csersucten p.ev Peron 3/78 12/81 Review Midland Plant ] Int of equipment and E0evitt reevassend spare parts.
RMontross CSleigh 6/78 6/80 Prepare an outage critique report on the KSpencer Palisades Station second outage and provide Planning survort for the September,1979 re-fueling outage.
11/78 6/80 Frecure a mobile Aacurity access module to KSpencer be used for outage work forces at Palisades.
3/82 7/81 Evalui.te and raske reco=endat fun for train-RDoane ing and impicentation of the Midland Site SRowell f.mergency Plan.
- W3eckman Perfor= an independent assesace?ic of con-JCook 9/82 struction activities related to the auxili-J2*. coney ary building and feedvater isolation valve JSchaub Pit remedici.sstk at the.X,Idland Site.
10/82 Provide c=craency planning conwulting aarvices RSinder ann for the Fin Rock Site.
VMiller 10/82 Fcrform vibration analysis on the boiler feed Jrord pump at the J. Ji. Cr.=pbell t; nit 3 and recom-TMehl nend and i=;1 cent corrective ace:ons.
GKeller 10/82 Prcvida st.rvices and saterials to ccordinate TIlvood the 1983/84 Palisades refueling outage.
JSennander i
i' I. I di
- Note - SW did the review but hTTECK vho was already working in Michigan for Detroit ll Edison at the Fermi Station is doing the detailed pistning.
a i
L.
_ =. -
w e
%4m g
,4, E
/
E
3 ERCX TELEOP!ER -195: 9-11-621 3:4 CPM I
-+
51TSeCO24;w 4 1
HOL31SCS CT CFq SLC*3T~~IS l
l l
Stone & Webster, Inc., the parent ro:pany of Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation and ILv subsidiarf ew (including SWEC) havae no holdia3s of CPCo securities. The L ployev Savings Plan of Stone & Webster.
Incorporated and participating subuldiartme is administered by the.nana
.%nhattan Bank, N.A. as trustas. Funds may be invested in the Employaa Banafit Investment Tunds, Equity Fund of the Chase Manhattan Bank which is a commingled fund. Stone & Weber.cr exercises no direct control ovst the investment of such funds.
The Chemical Bank of New York is trustee for the Tsployee Retire-ment FIan of Stone & Webster Inc. and for participating subsidiaries.
Thors are no CPCo securitics held in the plan.
f I.*g e
?
t I
h.
't i
4 s
I l'
i sif 1
it i !!'
'1
- 9
-*hM-*A.$"
nt 4A.-&&
t gg,,
m.
.