ML20091F431
| ML20091F431 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Midland |
| Issue date: | 03/21/1984 |
| From: | Lucks A STONE & WEBSTER, INC. |
| To: | Cook R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17198A223 | List:
|
| References | |
| CON-BOX-06, CON-BOX-6, FOIA-84-96 MPF-78, NUDOCS 8406020164 | |
| Download: ML20091F431 (15) | |
Text
__ _ _. _
e e
1 s.
o p;ainctPAL STAFF STOf4E & WEBSTER MICHIGAN, INC.
)a[
3 U5F
\\
?
(jp;,
P.O. Box 2325. BOSTON M ASSACHUSETTs O2107 ac M
i...
no 5CS v Cf QA-AL f-.
t jF i _le,/mW United States Nuclear Regulatory Comission March 21, 1984 Midland Site Resident Office Route 7, J. O. No. 14358 Midland, Michigan Ref. MPF 78 Attention: Mr. R.
Cook DOCKET NO. 50-339/330 MIDLAND PLANT UNITS 1 & 2 INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT OF UNDERPINNING REPORT NO. 78 A copy of the Independent Assessment of Underpinning Weekly Report No. 78 for the period of March 1,1984 through March 17,1984 is enclosed with this letter. Included as attachments are the minutes ~ -~~' --
of the daily meeting held during the week between members of the Assessment Team and Site Engineering, Construction, and Quality Assurance personnel.
If you have any questions with respect to this report please contact me at (617) 589-2067.
),.... j e N '-
!S A.
Stanley ' Lucks Project Manager Enclosures ASL/pd 1
i l
l l-B406020164 840517 PDR FOIA PDR RICE 84-96 APR b 13#-
I
J. O. No. 14358 Midland Plant Units 1 & 2 Independent Assessment of Underpinning Weekly Report No. 78 March 11, 1984 through March 17, 1984 Personnel on Site Stone & Webster Michigan, Inc.
P.
Majeski 3/13 - 3/17 D.
Benvie 3/12 - 3/16 R.
Lykens 3/13 - 3/17 W.
Kilker 3/11 - 3/13 D.
Zito 3/11 - 3/16 L.
Rouen 3/11 - 3/13 Parsons Brinckerhoff Michigan, Inc.
J.
Oliveira 3/13 - 3/17 B.
Metros 3/11 - 3/13 Meetings Atter&d Date Represented Purpose -
3/12 - 3/16 Stone & Webster Daily Assessment Bechtel Team Meeting Consumers Power Parsons 3/13 Consumers Power Inter-organizational Bechtel Meetirg MPQAD Stone & Webster 3/16 Consumers Power Project Soils Bechtel Meetirs MPQAD Stone & Webster Underpinning and Remedial Soils - Construction Pier Kc-4: Placement of reinforcing steel and concrete was completed.
Pier W-16: Bell excavation was completed and bell support was installed.
Piers CT-1/12: Bell excavation and support was completed. Bell reinforcing steel and concrete was placed.
Pier Kc-9: Bearing plates are being installed.
Pier E-16: Bell excavation was completed and bell support was installed.
Access shaft Level "C" Wales: Templat'es to be used for fabrication of plates are being made.
SWPS: Installation of the first level wales for the soldier pile wall is in progress.
I i
e
2 J. O. No. 14358 Midland Plant Units 1 & 2 Independent Assessment of Underpinning
_ Assessment Team Observations - Construction in each grillage was observed by the Assessment T ve capacity load the underpinning subcontractor reviewed the methodol Prior to jackir4 of the jacking operation with the craftsmen, MPQAD ogy and objectives,
resident geotechnical and structural engineers.
i
, field engineers and the appropriate forum to answer any questions thus ensuring a thThis discu understanding of the entire jacking operation by all organizati The se orough involved.
at each grillage,quence of load application for the three sets of jacks ons each load increment conformed with procedural requireme geotechnical engineers, the underpinning subcon ural and instrumentation contractor.
of data was expedient and accurate, allowing immediate evalu e
building and pier movement as jacking progressed on of was met at both grillages prior to locking off and deactivati jacks.
Acceptance criteria ng the with the jacking operations at the EN8 grillages o anizations involved and knowledgeable manner allowing the jacking for reserv drated in an loading to be completed satisfactorily.
e capacity to the underpinning operations in the Auxiliary Build s of utmost importance planning and cocedination enabled the Contractor to adva ng. Good prior reinforcing steel installationconcrete placement on short notice whe nce a scheduled expeditious completion of these critical piers.This is jus a
e a ed to assure used demonstrated a good knowledge of proper technique for thi i
concrete placement.
The construction methods s difficult Concrete was placed for the Kc-4 pier this week conformed with applicable proceduresco-ordinated and the activitie
, MPQAD and US Testing ment of the pier concrete was proper. Key items noted during the place-Concrete consolidation and in process testing were p n y equipment.
with applicable procedures.
were maintained at the placement area ensuring an uninter t -
It is the opinion of the Assessment Team that placement pe operation.
conforned with applicable procedures resulting in a satisfact of concrete underpinning is being applied at the SWPS.The Assessme ory installation.
i Prior to drilling holes fore Auxiliary Building 4
removed in the area of the planned installation to allo rete is first layer of reinforcing steel.
pping of the steel and expedite the bolt installation.for the bolt arrangeme ng of reinforcing I
i V
i I
3 J. O. No. 14358 Midland Plant Units 1 & 2 Independent Assessment of Underpinning 4
Assessment Team Observations - QA/QC
-j Compressive strength testing of pier Kc-9 concrete cylinders at the US Testing on site laboratory was overviewed by the Assessment Team.
Additionally, qualifications of the inspector. perform 11ng the testing i
and certification of the compression machine were reviewed. Testing i
attributes considered include proper capping and moistening of concrete specimens, rate of loading, and concentric application of load.
Compression stength testing observed by the Assessment Team conformed with procedural requirements and certifications of the inspector and i-the compression machine were found to be acceptable.
[
The Assessment Team reviewed two work area controlled document stations for proper posting of attachments. One deficiency was found at each station. As a result NIR # 23 was issued.
The Assessment Team reviewed 300 Inspection Reports for completeness and proper certifications of inspectors. These reports covered inspections
[ '
and the inspectors certified.
of twelve construction activities. All reports were found to'be complete Work Activity Packages No new work Activity Package overviews were reviewed during the past week.
Nonconfomance Identification Reports The following Nonconformance Reports (NIRs) remain open or have been closed
{
during the past week.
NIR No.
Description Status (Opened)(Closed) 22 1
Resident Engineering 2/21/84 Document Control Stations r
23 Subcontractor work-3/13/84 Print Station i
Open Items Items discussed during meetings are categorized as follows:
OPEN ITDS - An item for which an action is required. The item will remain open until the required action has been taken. Tracking is required.
CLOSED ITEM - An item, usually brought forward by the Assessment Team that
-is discussed and adequately responded to. No tracking is required.
3 i
INFORMATION ITEM - An item, brought forurei to provide general background information regarding work, such as work status or an upcoming design change.
No tracking is required.
/~
OPINION ITEM - An opinion or suggestion, given by the Assessment Team expressing an alternate construction orquality assurance technique. The opinion or suggestion is given as a possible alternate that. may facilitate i
an operation.
i-i e
-yw-w,-.y ra--
e w
e-.-w,g--
-men--
--.-.-e e.p-p 3.sg yg
,w--**
- wr 9Ww-
N-T 4W-"*PTN-iW W
'"W'-T-'
ut"W-
+-
g rwwy
4 J.O. No. 14358 Midland Plant Units 1 & 2 Independent Assessment of Underpinning CLOSES ITEM -XX-XX - This notation. identifies an action that closes a previously identified open item. Tracking of the item stops.
The following is a listing of all Open items from the Daily Meeting Notes with Bechtel and the text of the Weekly. Reports. Carry-over items from past weeks which have been Closed this week are also listed.
Item No.
Description Closure 64-7 QAP Review Program Open 64-10 Trend Analysis Open 71-17 Computerized Civil Open Drawing Register 71-29 Use of " Retired" FCRs Open 74-21 US Testing Corrective open Action 74-25 Expansion Anchors Open 75-9 RE Document Control Open 76-14 Lateral 11ellpoints at 78-10 CT 1/12 77 4 Tracking of Attachments 78-2 to Design Documents 77-12 FCR Processing Task Force Open 77-13 Drawing Attachment Stamp Open 77-29 QE Monitoring Activities Open 78-22 Concrete Truck Inspection Open shb 01.
N f
- k. I bd J.
resa l
Project Engineer Pro;ect Managet I
I I
+
Notes of Daily Meeting Independent Assessment of Underpinning Midland Plant, Units 1 & 2 Consumers Power Company Held at Midland Site Midland, Michigan March 12, 1984 Present For:
Consumers Power Bechtel MPQAD Stone & Webster G.
Murray J.
Fisher J.
McMaster W.
Kilker E.
Cviki R.
Sevo L.
Rouen J.
Gaydos D.
Zito D.
Benvie Parsons Brinckerhoff B.
Metros PURPOSE This meeting is held each day to discuss items regarding the Independent Soils Assessment at the Midland Plant, Units 1 & 2.
DISCUSSION Status Items Item 78 Auxiliary Building Underpinning Activities.
Excavation of the tells for piers CT-1/12 is in progress.
Installation of the bell mudmat for pier Kc-4 has been completed.
i Installation of the pier Kc-9 upper leveling plate has been completed.
Excavation of the pier W-16 bell is in progress.
Installation of bell bracing and placement of the bell mudmat for pier E-16 has been completed.
Drilling for installation of a wellpoint in the E-16 drift to dewater the soil in the vicinity of the E-17 pier has begun.
(INFORMATION ITEM)
Item 78 Tracking of Attachments to Design Documents.
l-In response to an Assessment Team question concerning the track 1rg of attachments to design documents, E.
Cviki provided the Assessment Team i
with a copy of the Project Engineering Procedure, PEP 4.46.1.
This procedure is used in the preparation. review, approval and control of engineering drawings. (CLOSES ITEM 77-4) l l
l l
l
~
'n-
[j ?
~ ;;,3 r
= _.
1-Notes of Daily Meeting Independent Assessment of Underpinning Midland Plant, Units 1 & 2 Constaners Power Company Held at Midland Site Midland, Michigan March 12, 1984 New Items Item 78 Document Review at Work Stations.
L.
Rouen stated that during a review of controlled drawings at two work area stations,one deficiency was noted at each area. The first deficiency was a missing DCN to a drawing while the other involved a missing FCR._ In both cases neither of the change documents were attached to the drawing nor were the documents identified in the block stamp en the front of the drawing. The Assessment Team requested FSO to detemine why the documents were not attached or identified on the drawings.
J.
Fisher will respond. (OPEN ITEM)
Item 78 FSO Controlled Document Review.
J.
Fisher stated that a monthly review of FSO controlled documents will be conducted by FSO on March 17 and 18. (INFORMATION ITEM)
Response Items No response items were addressed.
.I l
1 i
'^
'm_-
j_,[
s*-
r v
Notes of Daily Meeting Independent Assessment of Underrinning Midland Plant, Units 1 & 2 Consumers Power Company Held at Midland Site Midland, Michigan March 13, 1984 Present For:
Consumers Power Bechtel MPQAD Stone & Webster l
G.
Murray J.
Fisher W.
Kilker R.
Wieland E.
Cvikl L.
Rouen J.
Gaydos D.
Benvie Parsons Brinckerhoff B.
Metros PURPOSE This meeting is held each day to discuss-items rega~rding the Independent Soils Assessment at the Midland Plant, Units 1 & 2 DISCUSSION Status Items Item 78 Auxiliary Building Underpinning Activities.
Installation of the bell support plates has been completed in' piers CT-1/12.
Reinforcing steel installation has began'in piers Kc-4.
Bell support channels have been set and the bell mudmat was placed for pier-W-16.
O All rock bolts for the east level "C" wales have been grouted into place.
(INFORMATION ITEN)
Item 78 Dewatering Control Tower Area.
J.
Fisher reported that. installation of the lateral wellooints in the UATs 1
to remove the perched groundwater beneath the Control Tower continues.
i
.I of the four lateral drains have been advanced between 28 and 38 ft. into Three.
the backfill beneath the Control Tower. Drilling through fill concrete directly adjacent to the west UAT is in progress for the fourth lateral j
drain. (INFORMATION ITEN)
Item 78 NIR # 22 - Resident Ehgineering Document Control Review.
E.
Cvikl stated that in conjunction with the Resident Engineering response 4
to the QAR concerning NIR # 22, MPQAD has requested Ergineering to assess the impact, if any, of missing attachments to drawings on work being performed by Resident Ehgineering.
(NIR # 22 remains OPEN) (INFORMATION ITEM) i i
1 I
4 l
- y:
Notes of Daily Meeting Independent Assessment of Underpinning Midland Plant, Units 1 & 2 Consumers Power Company Held at Midland Site Midland, Michigan March 13, 1984 New Items Item 78 Use of Injected Foam For Filling 'Ibbular Iagging Internal Voids.
J.
Fisher stated that the underpinning subcontractor has proposed the use of injected foam to fill the internal voids of tubular steel lagging in designated areas of the SWPS and Auxiliary Building. A demonstration on the use of injected foam will be given today by the underpinning subcontractor. (INFORMATION ITEM)
Response Items Item 78 Document Review at Work Stations.
J.
Fisher concurred that the two n.issing attachments noted during a review of controlled documents by the Asses,sment Team were inadvertently not attached or identified on the drawingo.
W.
Kilker reported that NIR # 23 has been issued as a result of the dissing attachments. (CLOSES ITEM 78-3)
(NIR# 23 will be tracked separately)
Item 78 Lateral Wellpoints at piers CT-1/12.
In response to the Assessment Teams request to review the operation of i
lateral welipoints installed in CT-1/12, J.
Fisher stated that the Resident Geotechnical Ehgineer and the underpinning subcontractor had determined that the system was functioning adequately at the time and therefore no adjustments were warranted.
B.
Metros questioned who would monitor the operation of the lateral wellpoints that are being installed in the UATs and what type of monitoring will be performed.
J.
Fisher will i
respond. (CIDSES ITEM 76-14) (OPEN ITEM) l t
i i
f
J Notes of Daily Meeting Independent Assessment of Underpinning Midland Plant, Units 1 & 2 Consumers Power Company Held at Midland Site Midland, Michigan March 14, 1984 Present For:
-Consumers Power Bechtel MPQAD Stone & Webster 4
G.
Murray J.
Fisher R.
Sevo R.
Lykens R.
Wieland
- E.
Cviki P.
Majeski J.
Gaydos D.
Zito D.
Benvie Parsons Brinckerhoff Part time.
J.
Oliveira PURPOSE This meeting is held each day to discuss items regarding the Independent Soils Assessment at the Midland Plant, Units 1 & 2.
DISCUSSION Status Items Item 78 Auxiliary Building Underpinning Activities.
The mudmats for piers CT1 and CT12 will be placed today.
The two horizontal drains on the east side of the control tower have been advanced to 28 and 33 feet. The drains on the west side have been advanced to 33 and 38 feet.
J.
Fisher indicated that Road Map meetings for installation of reinforcing steel in CT 1/12 are scheduled for 3/15 and 3/16.
(INFORMATION ITEM)
New Items Item 78 FCR Processing Task Force.
J.
Fisher indicated that the kick off meeting for a task force to evaluate ways to facilitate processing of FCRs will be held tomorrow. Methods to i
facilitate NCR processing, which is considered to be less critical with j
respect to schedule impacts, will be begun at a later date. (Item 77-12 remains OPDi) (INFORMATION ITEM) -
Response Items
'l i
There were no response items discussed.
r'
-i
('
i-
?
Notes of Daily Meeting Independent Assessment of Underpinning Midland Plant, Units 1 & 2 Consumers Power Company Held at Midland Site Midland, Michigan
&rch 15, 1984 Present For:
Consumers Power Bechtel MPQAD Stone & Webster G.
Murray J.
Fisher R.
Sevo R.
Lykens E.
Cvik1 J.
Mc& ster P.
&jeksi J.
Gaydos D.
Benvie J.
Blanchard Parsons Brinckerhoff J.
Oliveira PURPOSE This meeting is held each day to discuss ite=s regarding the Independent Soils Assessment at the Midland Plant,-Units 1 '. 2.
DISCUSSION Status Items Item 78 Auxiliary Building Underpinning Activities.
The mudmats for piers CTI and CT12 were placed yesterday. Placement of bell reinforcing steel will begin today.
The horizontal drain installation was completed yesterday on the east side of the control tower. The drain installation on the west side is expected to be cor:pleted today.
(INFORMATION ITEM)
New Items Item 78 Rejacking of W-8 Grillage.
D.
Benvie asked if the W-8 Grillage is to be rejacked.
E.
Cviki responded that rejacking is expected to start today after lock off of the E-8 Grillage which was rejacked yesterday. (INFORMATION ITEM)
Item 78 NIR # 23, Document Review at Work Stations.
J.
McMaster indicated that a QAR has been issued to initiate response to NIR # 23. (INFORMATION ITEM)
Item 78 Review of Weekly Report No. 77.
The text of Weekly Report No. 77 was reviewed. It was determined that all open items had been previously identified. (CLOSED ITEM) i
1 l
l l
l Notes of Daily Meeting-Independent Assessment of Underpinning Midland Plant, Units 1 & 2 Consumers Power Company i
Held at Midland Site P.idland, Michigan
'4trch 15, 1984 Response Item Item 78 Lateral Wellpoint at CT 1/12.
In response to the Assessment Team question concerning responsibility for dewatering well performance (Item 78-10),
J.
Fisher indicated that the responsibility to develop dewatering methods lies with the subcontractor, but is subject to RGE approval. Monitoring of the fbnctioning and effectiveness of the dewatering system is the joint responsibility of the subcontractor and the RGE. (CLOSES ITEM 78-10) i l
F t
O Notes of Daily Meeting Independent Assessment of Underpinning Midland Plant, Units 1 & 2 Consumers Power Company Held at Midland Site Midland, Michigan Nrch 16, 1984 Present For:
Consumers Power Bechtel MPQAD Stone & Webster G.
Nrray J.
Fisher R.
Sevo R.
Lykens J.
Mooney J.
Gaydos J.
McMaster P.
Majeski J.
Schaub D.
Benvie R.
Wieland Parsons Brinckerhoff None PURPOSE This meeting is held each daylo discuss items regarding the Independent
~
Soils Assessment at the Midland Plant, Units 1 &'2.
DISCUSSION Status Items Item 78 Auxiliary Building Underpinning Activities.
The reinforcing steel in the bells of CT1 and CT12 is being installed.
Placement of concrete in the bells of CT-1 and CT-12 is planned for today and tomorrow respectively.
The rejacking of the W-8 grillage is scheduled for today.
The installation of the horizontal drains beneath the Control Tower is complete. It is anticipated that pumping will start soon.
(INFORMATION ITEM)
Item 78 QAP Review Program.
1 J.
Fisher indicated that the full committee is planning to meet today to finalize its recommendations to management. (INFORMATION ITEM)
Item 78 FCR Processing.
J.
Fisher indicated that Field Engineers and Resident Engineers are going on an overtime schedule to reduce the number of outstanding FCR's.
I (INFORMATION ITEM)
Item 78 NIR # 23, Document Review at Work Stations.
F30's response to the QAR regarding deficiencies in attachments to drawings at work stations will be transmitted to MPQAD today. (INFORMATION IiEM)
I 1
l i
j l
(
Notes of Daily Meeting Independent Assessment of Underpinning Midland Plant, Units 1 & 2 Consumers Power Company Held at Midland Site Midland, Michigan March 16, 1984 New Items Item 78 Concrete Truck Inspection.
D.
Zito reported that he noted several pieces of hardened concrete were removed by the laborers from the grate at the concrete pump during placement of the concrete for Kc-4 Apparently these pieces of concrete were an accumulation from the mixing blades of either the truck or the batch plant. The Assessment Team does not have a concern about the quality of the concrete placed in Kc-4
- However, this incident may be an indication that improvements in the periodic inspection program for the concrete trucks or batch plant are required.
D.
Zito requested a copy of the procedures for the inspection program.>
(OPEN ITEN)
Response Items No response items were discussed.
4 i
t I
_u
Notes of Daily Meeting Independent Assessment of Underpirming Midland Plant, Units 1 & 2 Consumers Power Company Held at Midland Site Midland, Michigan March 12, 1984 1
Present For:
Consumers Power Bechtel MPQAD Stone & Webster G.
Marray J.
Fisher J.
McMaster W.
Kilker E.
Cvikl R.
Sevo L.
Rouen J.
Gaydos D.
Zito D.
Benvie Parsons Brinckerhoff B.
Metros i
PURPOSE This meeting is held each day to discuss items regarding the Independent i
Soils Assessment at the Midland Plant, Units 1 & 2.
DISCUSSION Status Items Item 78 Auxiliary Building Underpinning Activities.
Excavation of the bells for piers CT-1/12 is in progress.
Installation of the bell mudmat for pier Kc D has been completed.
Installation of the pier Kc-9 upper leveling plate has been completed.
i Excavation of the pier W-16 bell is in progress.
Installation of bell bracing and placement of the bell mudmat for pier E-16 has been completed.
Drilling for installation of a wellpoint in the E-16 drift to dewater the soil in the vicinity of the E-17 pier has begun.
(INFORMATION ITEM) l l
Item 78 Tracking of Attachments to Design Documents.
In response to an Assessment Team question concerning the tracking of
(
attachments to design documents, E.
Cvikl provided the Assessment Team with a copy of the Project Engineering Procedure, PEP 4.46.1.
This 1
procedure is used in the preoaration. review, approval and control of
{
engineering drawings. (CLOSES ITEM 77-4) l
\\
I 1
.i f
i I
t
?
~
L' 1;
Mj
e
't s FRI)CfDit. t~n g -
STONE & WEBSTER MICHIGAN. INCI.a u n.g s. "----
t vfu
- 5 P.O. Box 2325. BOSTON, M AssAcHussTTs O2107
[/ee Naf
'h d us. ~. m Mr. J. J. Harrison March 27, 1984 Nuclear Regulatory Commission J.0, No.
14509 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 DOCKET NO. 50-329/330 MONTHLY THIRD PARTY ASSESSMENT MEETING MIDLAND NUCLEAR COGENERATION PLANT The protocol governing communications for the Remedial Soils and Construction Completion Programs at the Midland Plant, specifies a monthly meeting to discuss third party assessment activities and assigns preparation of the minutes of those meetings to Stone & Webster.
Enclosed are minutes of the meeting held on March 8, 1984, hZe <er OH A. P. Amoruso A. S. Lucks Project Manager Project Manager CIO
' Underpinning and Remedial Soils Enclosures cc: JWCook, CPCo DLQuamme, CPCo JAMooney, CPCo RAWells, CPCo
%4 I
t u
6
+=
6
+
s.
D
~
~
Tbc
[.
/
MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF MARCH 1984 STATUS OF INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT CF UNDERPINNING AND REMEDIAL SOILS WORK PURPOSE The purpose of the public meeting was to report the status of the Stone &
Webster Assessment Team activities and observations regarding underpinning and remedial soils work.
SUMMARY
Mr. Lucks opened the meeting by stating that F. Majeski would present a suussary of the Assessment Team activities and observations.
This summary covers weeks 72 through 75 which corresponds to January 29, 1984, through February 25, 1984.
F. Majeski began the summary with the status of underpinning work at the auxiliary building.
Four piers are currently under construction at both the ease and west sides.
During the last month activites have included excavation, lagging, and concreting.
At the service water pump structure lagging have been installed'to a depth of approximately four feet in the area of underpinning.
Wale seats and BD1-14358-28 1
~.
%=
s valts are being installed at the east end of the structure and on the east side of the north wall.
The next area addressed was a summary of Assessment Team activities. These activities were 4
o Resident Engineering Document Control o
Underpinning Construction i
Field Document Control Upgrading o
U.S. Testing Upgrading o
Crack Monitoring o
Welding Procedures o
Work. Activity Packages On February 17 and 18, the Assessment Team reviewed Resident Engineering's controlled documents to determine whether:
1 o
Attachments to Resident Engineering ' documents were being posted properly.
i o
Lessons learned from Phase III reviews of Field Document Control are being applied to Residenc Engineering Documents.
~
The Assessment Team reviewed the attachments to Resident Engineering copies of Civil (Soils)
Drawings and specifications.
The associated 3D1-14358-28 2
-n -
5, e
y 4
t N
- )
u-s.--
~
corre,spondence a5d applicable procedures are being reviewed, and the i
Resident Engineering staff was interviewed.
, s
- These reviews 'teve resulted in two findings..The first finding identifies discrepencias in the posting of attachments to drawings and specifications which resul'ted in the issue of NIR 22.
The second finding indicates a need for better response by Engineering to communications between Engineering and Construction concerning potential problems.
Copies of correspondence between Site Management and Engineering, indicating the need for attention to these document control problems, were received one month before the discrspencies in NIR 22 were found by the Assessment Teem.
borreceive actions, that are being taken to address the discrepancies include, a review an'd upgrading of documents where necessary, and revision of document control procedures.
The Assessment Team will continue to review document control procedures and overviei the Resident Engineering corrective actions.
u The Assessment Tsam's endnd activity concerned underpinning construction.
N
.Specifically) the team observed c temical grout installation, installation of wale seats and vales in the strvice water pump structure, also the installation of drif t steel, lagging and backpacking.
All observed work was performed in a. satisfactory manner and according to construction procedures.
W i
s BD1-14358-28 3,
\\
a r.
s s
g
,4 y
, s#
S The third Assessment Team activity was an overview of QA/QC functions.
This activity included, a review of inspector certifications and closed inspection reports for completeness, review of the stick files of Field 4
Document Control and MPQAD for proper posting of attachments, an evaluation of QC performance demonstrations, and a review of the training of crafts people. These observed functions were performed according to the project 4
i requirements.
The fourth Assessment Team activity concerned the upgrading of Field Decument Control. The Assessment Team has continued to review the progress 4
in this area.
The Field Soils Organization (FS0) has recently assumed responsibility for the document control of both underpinning subcontractors.
The Assessment Team will continue to monitor the activities in this area.
The fifth Assessment Team activity addressed the upgrading of U.S. Testing.
U.S. Testing continues.to make improvements in preparing work instructions, and the cross-training of technician and the laboratory chief.
The Assessment Team is satisfied with the progress made in the past month, i
An overview of crack mapping was the sixth Assessment activity covered in this suussary.
Weekly Report 74 stated that 25 Nonconformance Reports i
(NCRs) were written against crack mapping activities over the period of a few weeks. An Assessment Team review of these NCRs tevealed that they were minor in nature and did not invalidate the data nor did they indicate incomplete mapping of the cracks.
The fact that MPQAD uncovered these deficiencies indicates that the inspection process is functioning properly.
4 BD1-14358-28 4
P The Assessment Team considers Engineering's response to preclude recurrence to be appropriate and will continue to overview the crack mapping activities including those of MPQAD.
For the seventh activity, the Assessment Team completed a review of the welding procedures.
All Assessment Team comments have been incorporated i
into the welding procedure and NIR 21 was closed. An FSO welding engineer conducted a field evaluation of past welding to ensure that no welds had been made under conditions of severe external shrinkage restraint.
No welds of this type were found.
An overview by the Assessment Team confirmed this finding and this item is also closed.
The final Assessment Team activity was an overview of five work activity packages (WAPs). All of these overviews are complete. They are:
o WAP 58 - Brackets and Struts at E/W-10, Struts at E/W-11 and Mass Excavation of Zones Y/Z - 3 WAP 74 - Auxiliary Building Slab Support Brackets at El 614 o
5 I
WAP 75 - Concrete Encasement of Concrete Stress Meters for SWPS o
}
i I
o WAP 77 - SWPS Install Phase II A/B Solder Beams WAP 80 - Auxiliary Turbine Building Vertical Movement Monitoring o
l i
I This concluded the summary of Assessment Team activities.
l I
1 I
BD1-14358-28 5
^
1 e'r
[
Mr. Majeski then summarized the status of the Nonconformance Identification Reports (NIRs) that were active during the past month:
o NIR 20 which - concerned the calibration of concrete admixture dispensers was closed.
o NIR 21 which concerned the weld tech sheets for the subcontractors welding procedures was closed as discussed above in the sumary of activities.
s o
NIR 22 concerns discrepences in posting attachments to Resident Engineering drawings and specifications.
This NIR remains open until the corrective actions that were discussed in the summary of activities have be'en satisfactory completed.
~
Mr. Majeski concluded his presentation by stating that there are currently ten open items from the daily meetings that require action prior to closure.
Mr. Lucks stated that there were no open Action Items for Stone & Webster or Consumers Power from the last meeting and indicated that Mr. J. Mooney of Consumers Power would give a presentation on the Quality Action Point i
(QAP) program.
~
I Mr. Mooney indicated that the QAP program was initiated to evaluate and, if-necessary, improve precedures and documentation that support construction.
,j The program consists of a QAP Committee (chartered in September of 1983) i l
1 BD1-14358-28 6
n
~
O and a QAP Subcommittee.
The intent was to pick a representative construction activity (system installation) and have the Subcommittee review the support documentation along with the associated procedures to evaluate the efficiency of the implementation.
J l
The Committee was responsible for determining the system to be reviewed, the guidelines of the review, the members of the Subcommittee, and overviewing of the Subcommittee activities.
The Subcommittee was responsible for conducting and documenting the review, evaluating the i
j results, and submitting recommendations for improvements.
i After reviewing three construction processes under this program, the Subcommittee came to the following general conclusions:
1 l'
1.
Design documents were adequate l
2.
Associated procedures are comprehensive 3.
Inspections were appropriate The Subcommittees' recommendations included guidelines and philosophy for developing future procedures and PQCIs.
These conclusions and recommendations are still to be reviewed and approved by the full 1
l committes. This concluded J. Mooney's presentation.
l.
'l 4
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
~
i The NRC asked several questions concerning items included in Weekly Reports l
.j 72 through 75.
}
l' 'i BD1-14358 7 L
N l
r
I s
1.
The Assessment Team observatien on page 2 of Weekly Report 72 l
i concerns the policy for retiring documents and mentions that it was determined upon lifting the Stop Work Order that a procedure was needed to ensure proper implementation of retired attachments.
Why is this procedure needed af ter the extensive corrective actions were completed to lif t the Stop Work Order?
It has been determined that there is a need that was highlighted by the duration of the Stop Work Order, to use one time deviations for periods longer than the 30 day period given in the original procedure. An interim method to allow retired documents to stay with the appropriate drawings longer than 30 days if necessary has been developed.
This interim method has been and will be in effect until the procedure is issued.
2.
Page 3 of Weekly Report 72 indicates a lack of progress in the QAP program.
Would Stone & Webster explain the details behind this statement? The Assessment Team had been concerned about the 4
apparent lack of progress with the QAP program. However, it was later determined that key members of the Subcommitted had been involved with the corrective action for the Stop Work Order and i
the crack mapping program, activities which took priority. Based upon recent activities, the Assessment Team is now satisfied with
[
progress on the QAP program.
, {
3.
For item 72-12, what is the background for issuing NIR 217 Weld l
l qualification forms had not been filled out properly.
These f
discrepancies did not effect the actual qualification of the weld BD1-14358-28 8
)
,y
-g
,&.y,,_-.,..w,
__%w.,,,s-_,..
-,-y, 4i_.,..
and had no impact on hardware, but was a matter of providing the correct information on the form.
4 4.
The NRC asked frr more specifics concensing AWSD 11-80 where the preheat requirements tie into welding under conditions of severe external shrinkage.
Consumers Power indicated that they would provide those specifics.
5.
Concerning item 72-17, does Consumers Power intend to turn the work on the Borated Water Storage Tank foundations back to Construction, according to the philosophy agreed upon for major i
activitics? Consumers Power was asked to consider this.
6.
Item 72-16 discusses deleting the "AR" stamp from the appropriate document when work is completed on a active retired FCR.
Does this mean that the appropriate document will have no indication on it that there is an ass.ociated retired FCR7 "AR" designation is replaced with an "R"
designation so there will be i
l identification of an associated retired document.
[
7.
When Stone & Webster indicates in the last line of the opening l
paragraph on page 3 of Weekly Report 73, that the contractor has established appropriate measures and controls to ensure that the documents are handled properly, was that in reference to, Field Document Control? Yes.
f l-1 l
BDI-14358-28 9
-m e
~
n-s
--o w>-wr
6 8.
Page 4 of Weekly Report 73 indicates NIR 21 was closed. Where is this addressed in this report?
Stone & Webster indicated that J
the details of the closure were distributed separately, and discussed in item 74-2 of Weekly Report 74.
1 9.
Regarding Item 73-2, that requests clarification on whether vendor documents and FSK drawings will be listed on the drawing register. The NRC was of the opinion that those documents were already on the drawing rer,ister.
Stone & Webster indicated that the request.for_ clarificat.bn resulted from a review of the new computerized drawing register intended under System 38.
The documents in question are on the existing drawing register which will be replaced by the computerized system.
The computerized system will also include vendor documents and FSK drawings.
- 10. The last sentence on page 2 paragraph 3 of Weekly Report 74 discusses a need for a more coordinated effort between FSO and MPQAD to ensure that differences in interpretation of design 4
requirements are resolved in a more timely manner.
Can Stone &
l Webster elaborate on this? Stone & Webster observed a situation f
where differences in interpretation of a change to a drawing for i
f a drif t invert delayed a concrete pour from Friday to Monday while FSO and MPQAD resol'ed the problem. This concern is minor.
v Consumers Power indicated that it was a conscious decipion to delay the pour until Monday.
The difference in interpretation was resolved quite quickly.
BD1-14358-28 10
11.
Page 3 of Weekly Report 74 addresses 25 NCRs written against the crack mapping program. The NRC is surprised at the magnitude of the number of NCRs being written after the improvements that have been instituted in the tregram.
SWEC stated that the NCR discrepancies were minor and repetitive in nature and did not invalidate the data.
The nature of these NCRs indicate a very effective MPQAD review.
Consumers Power stated that, with the recent changes, the crack mapping program is very adequate, but QAR 141 has been issued to track and address the problems that remain.
A two team approach to crack mapping is now in effect and the subcontractor is assigning a full-tima QA engineer to this work.
~
12.
For item 74-8 would someone explain what Walderate is? Walderate is a bonding agent used in concrete patching or grouting installations.
- 13. Was item 74-10, an NCR concerning the identification of non-Q material, a material identification problem with the vendor?
Yes.
(
- 14. What are the circumstances of Item 74-12 concerning incomplete l
penetration of Hilti bolts?
Consumers Power stated that, on a specific occasion, one out of six bolts did not meet the penetration requirements.
Engineerin evaluation cone'luded that the remaining five were adequate and accepted the condition.
BD1-14358-28 11 k
1 15.
Are the 15 NCRs mentioned in Item 74-15 included in the 4 -
'previously discussed 25 NCRs against crack mapping? Yes.
i 16.
In Item 74-17, what type of misunderstanding existed between MPQAD and the FS0?
This was the same item discussed above in i
Item 10. Consumers Power indicated that some details of a design change needed to be interpreted because there were no specific i
requirements or standards addressing them.
The discussion between MPQAD and the FSO centered on this interpretation. Stone
& Webster stated that the Assessment Team's concern was that the resolution of this type of problem should be deferred to Engineering as soon as it is recognized, to preclude delays.
17.
Item 74-20 states that a system for tracking renewal of certification for quality related equipment is in effect.
Is this system new?
If so, what occurred prior to this?
The Assessment Team was concerned about the possibility of renewal of equipment certification causing a work delay.
The question was I
intended to verify that tracking was occurring for all quality related equipment. There is an existing certification system.
l l
18.
Item 74-23 states that the U.S. Testing Manual is being reviewed by Project Engineering and. an issue date is forecast. Has MPQAD t.
reviewed the manual for quality impact?
Yes.
Has the. manual I
been issued?
Yes.
The manual was also reviewed by the Assessment Team and found to be satisfactory.
l BD1-14358-28 12 i
3
~
l 19.
Item 74-25 -concerns the loosening of washers on expansion anchors.
Is this generic or an isolated issue? Consumers Power stated that this was an open item still under evaluation.
To date it has occurred with washers on drift sets against very i
rough concrete.
J 20.
The last paragraph on page 2 of Weekly Report 75 cites discrepencies in the documents controlled by Resident Engineering Document Control Stations.
After all the corrective action to the FSO Document Control System initiated during the Stop Work
?
Order, why do these discrepencies exist?
The Assessment Team indicated that the Stop Work Order dealt with whether the register controlling the FSO stations reflected additions to the change documents that were made by Engineering. This problem did not exist with respect to the Resident Engineering register.
Consumers Power indicated that control of Resident Engineering documents was in Ann Arbor and outside the scope of the Stop Work Order. QAR 137 has been issued to resolve these issues and all documents are being checked. Is anyone sure that the drawings in I
Ann Arbor are satisfactory? That will not be resolved until QAR l
137 is closed and MPQAD has completed checking the documents.
I The NRC expects an update on the action taken to resolve this l
1 issue and its impact.
l l
l l
~
l i
r l
)
i
(
BD1-14358-28 13 t
j*
t
l 21.
In the third paragraph on Page 3 of Weekly Report 75 it is mentioned that a presentation on the importance of the system used to control field documents.
Was this a " toolbox" meeting?
It was a presentation to the craftsmen by the subcontractors' I
field engineer during a Quality Awarness Session.
o
- 22. Why does NIR 20 on the bottom of page 3 of Weekly Report 75 state i
that it's closed and the last sheet of the report says it's open?
The daily meeting takes place in the morning and this NIR aust
{
have been closed late in the day on.the Friday of this report.
The details of the closure will be on Weekly Report 76.
i.
- 23. Item 75-5 discusses two procedures for a. Consumers Pwer trend analysis program.
Isn't there a program in effect now?
- Yes, f
l the current program is manual.
This item addresses converting J
the manual system to a computerized system.
24.
Has Consumers Power responded to Item 75-157, Consumers Power I
i stated that they had responded.
The Assessment Team indicated j
i i
that the response had not been evaluated yet, and that N1R 22 was still open. The NRC stated that they would review the details of
\\
the response during the normal course of NIR resolution.
e l
l
]
Required Action l
I
(
i No open action items are required for the Assessment Team from this l
i j
j meeting.
t BD1-14358-28 14 O
9 6
-p
.--.,n n-,-
,~,,,-.-+-,.r
,,,.a
,-e
-.-,- ---- --....- ~
The following item remains open for Consurmers Power Co.from the February meeting:
1.
The NRC and Consumers Power Co. will confer on the crack mapping survey data presented during February.
4 l
i i
1 1
i BD1-14358-28 15
l MINUTES OF THE MEETING ON MARCH 8, 1984 STATUS OF CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW (CIO) PROGRAM 1
Puroose To discuss Third Party Overview activities of Stone & Webster (S&W) and problems encountered regarding the Construction Completion Program (CCP) 1 j
during February 1984.
i.
j Summary Mr. A. P. Amoruso, Project Manager for the CIO Program, presented a summary j
of Program activities for February 1984. The following topics were covered:
f
- Assessment Activities Opportunities to assess the Construction Completion Program (CCP) in-creased during February due to the lifting of the remaining restraints l
of stop-work orders that had been issued because of concerns about field i
change and document control problems. Status assessment and quality l
verification inspection activities of the CCP increased during the month j
in accordance with controls established by Consumers Power Company. These 1
l activities received the principal focus of the CIO. Other activities that f
were assessed included document control corrective measures, the Midland Project Quality Assurance Department (MPQAD) audit program, training l
presentations, and training records. Summaries of these activities follow:
- Status Assessment and Quality Verification Inspections. Statusing and 1
verification inspections in the five modules of Unit 2 that had been t
i released were checked. These checks found that procedures and instructions
{
were being complied with, documents in use agreed with master registers, I
and personnel carrying out the work had been properly trained. No CIO l
I nonconformances were identified.
4 i
L
. u 1
Minutes of Meeting PAGE 2
- Document Control Corrective Measures. To verify the adequacy of steps taken to correct document control problems, Lhe f *.ld Doc.waent Cuntrol Center (FDCC), the Field Document Distribution List (FDDL), and activities in the field were checked. Approximately 4000 documents issued from the FDCC were reviewed. No major discrepancies were noted. Minor discrepancies, such as illegibility, clipped re-productions, and assembly errors, were detected in less than 1%
of the documents. The FDDL was checked, and a couple of discrepancies were identified. These discrepancies were a work print request that was not reflected in the FDDL and documents that were distributed but not requested. Documents being used in the field for statusing and quality verift:ation inspections were routinely checked for correctness. No discrepancies were found.
- MPQAD Audit Program. Site auditing activities were evaluated. Several discrepancies were identified in audits that had been performed prior to the establishment of a distinct audit group in the MPQAD organization in June 1983. These discrepancies included using correction fluid on a report instead of lining out and inserting corrections, documenting non-conformances detected during an audit as observations instead of by Audit Finding Reports, and closing out an audit before a recomended procedural revision had been made. Also, the need to review past I
audits to assure adequacy, proper closecut, and identification of i
applicable criteria from 10CFR50, Appendix B, was addressed. Since June 1983, audits have been conducted thoroughly and orderly. Several recommendations for improving the program were provided. These rec-i ommendatior.s covered the definition of responsibilities, procedural i
l l
controls for tracking and statusing findings, training certifications, and auditor records.
I i
Minutes of Meeting PAGE 3
- Training Presentations. Two training presentations for non-manual construction personnel and one for MPQAD personnel were evaluated.
I These presentations followed lesson plans and met training objectives.
- Training Records. Some 2000 training records, representing some 115 construction people, were inspected by sampling. The most significant discrepancy found was missing revision numbers on documents listed on-j the training sheets for one person. Training records for some 650 MPQAD people were also inspected by sampling. Minor discrepancies j
were noted in less than 1% of records checked. These discrepancies included 11 legibility of signatures and missing signature dates.
In programs outside the CCP, but being monitored by the CIO, assessment activities during the month focused on the Spatial System Interaction i
i Program (SSIP). The analyses of 39 interactions were witnessed. These analyses were found to be following governing procedures. Activity level i
in the Nuclear Steam Supply System (NSSS) and Heating, Ventilation, and 1
l Air Conditioning Program (HVAC) was low during the month but is expected to increase in March.
CIO Items, Nonconformances, and Hold Points Ten CIO items were identified during February. These items follow:
i
- Request for the plan of action to resolve procurement control deft-i i
ciencies identified in an MPQAD audit.
- Request for copies of audit reports addressing Criterion XVIII,10CFR50, j
Appendix B.
- Request for a list of CCP teams and associated scopes of wo k and schedules.
- Request for the quality assurance program, procedures, and target list j
i used by Mark Technologies Corporation for the Spatial System Interaction Program.
Minutes of Meeting PAGE 4
- Request for clarification of training requirements for CCP teams 4
conducting status assessment of raceways.
- Request for information on how source documents listed in lesson plans are updated.
- Recommendation that instructors continue to be evaluated no later than the first training class taught on a subject.
- Review of past audits to assure applicable criteria from 10CFR50, Appendix B,are addressed.
- Review of audits performed prior to June 1983 to assure that adequacy and closeout requirements are met.
- Recommendations to improve the audit program.
l Nine items were closed during February. The three items addressing administrative problems with training records were closed af ter the problems were corrected.
i The request to ascertain that controlled documents were used to perform safety i
j related work was closed after the policy governing that subject was repromulgated and problems identified during the field change resolution program were corrected.
The item addressing the need to ensure that documents were processed through the field change resolution program before being used for diesel generator work was closed upon completion of the resolution program before diesel generator work be-4 gan. The request for controls for checklists that did not contain all attributes of governing procedures was closed when a policy statement was issued requiring that all checklists contain all attributes of governing procedures. The item pro-l viding recommendations to improve the status assessment and work print program was closed after the recommendations were adopted. The item addressing the need for
~
formal direction on processing Q Interface construction work packages was closed after the meaning of the Q Interface term was promulgated. The request for the quality assurance program, procedures, and target list used by Mark Technologies t
Corporation was closed when the material was provided.
i 4
1
i Minutes of Meeting PAGE 5 4
Five nonconformances identified by the CIO Program were open at the end of February. These nonconformances follow:
1 Transmittals for safety related vendor documents not being sent as i
equired to MPQAD and the Project Suppifer Quality Representative.
j Corrections to an audit report made by correction fluid.
Nonconformances detected during an audit classified as observations in-4 i
stead of by audit finding reports.
Corrective action for an audit finding not accomplished before closing the audit.
FDDL not updated after processing a work print request. Unsolicited drawings received by one station.
)
Six nonconformances were verified corrected and closed during February. Two of the nonconformances involved administrative discrepancies in training records of CCP team members, one involved level of training discrepancies in the con-struction team training matrix, and three involved document control discrepancies.
Three Hold Points established by the CIO Program were open at the end of February.
i These Hold Points follow:
'l Development of a vendor equipment verification program before the start of Phase II of the CCP.
I Evaluation of the management review of the results of Phase I activities l
before the start of Phase II of the CCP.
Reinstatement of the requirement to certify the accuracy of thermocouples and extension wires-for post weld, heat treatment before using the thermocouples.
i Four Hold Points were released during February. Three of the Hold Points involved
]
training records and the training matrix.:The fourth Hold Point involved the completion of the field change resolution program.
i I
4
---v
--,w~.
,%~y,%-,w,
,.w,
, -y-e g e-+
r
-y
+e..-
f
-,w e-
~
y,.
w a
Minutes of Meeting PAGE 6
- Highlights of February The principal effort of the CIO Program during February was monitoring status assessment and sampling verification inspections of Phase 1 of the CCP. Mr. J. E. Karr, CIO Site Program Manager, presented a summary of this effort. The following main topics were covered:
4
- Status Assessment i
Five modules of Unit 2 have been released for status assessment. These areas are Module 340, the area outside the D-ring in the reactor building; Module 120, elevation 584 of the auxiliary building; Module 410, 4
elevation 614 of the turbine building; Module 102, the east pipeway of the auxiliary building; and Module 800, the service water pump structure.
A summary of activities in the modules follows:
- Module 340. All of the principal disciplines are engaged in i
statusing. These disciplines are architectural, civil, controls, electrical, instrumentation, and nechanical. Assessment is about 9% complete.
I
' Module 120. Architectural, civil, electrical, instrumentation, and mechanical disciplines are engaged in statusing. Assessment is 18%
complete.
j
- Module 410. The only safety related item identified in this area is an equipment pedestal. A closed inspection report exists for the item, i
l Therefore, status assessment is not required.
l
- Module 102. Electrical, instrumentation, and mechanical disciplines are engaged in statusing. Assessment is 11% complete.
- Module 800. Civil, electrical, and mechanical disciplines are engaged in statusing. Assessment is less than 1% complete.
l l
l h
1 l-i
e Minutes of Meeting PAGE 7 s
- Verification Inspections Inspections have not started in three of the five modules released for verification. These areas are Modules 102, 120, and 410. In-4 i
spections in Module 340 are about 1 % complete and in Module 800 i
less than 1% complete.
1
- Findinos No CIO nonconformances have been identified in the status and verification activities accomplished to date.
- Miscellaneous Items 4
- CIO Staff The CIO staff increased to 33 during February in preparation for the projected workload in March.
- Concerns of Consumers Power Company Employees
- A Consumers employee contacted a member of the CIO team and expressed d
his opinion that a supervisor was in trouble with upper management t
because the supervisor insisted on maintaining a firm position on quality assurance 'oncerns. The supervisor was contacted. He said that similar statements had come from those working for him, but upper management had not expressed any dissatisfaction with his work.
- A Consumers employee contacted a member of the CIO team and stated that he thought work prints were being received that should not have been issued because the prints were on exception lists. A check of the
- )
prints that the person was concerned about determined that the documents had been removed from exception lists before being distributed.
Questions and Answers
- Mr. 8. L. Burgess, NRC, asked if the CIO would be looking at several f
hangers which were installed as Q f tems in Module 410 but are not now listed as Q items.
i 8,
j, 4.
J f
i l
m
Minutes of Meeting PAGE 8 Mr. Karr stated the CIO was aware of the hangers. The hangers are in an area that will not be released for work for about six weeks. A decision on whether the hangers will be included in status assessment is expected before release of that area.
- Mr. J. J. Harrison, NRC, asked for additional information on the potential problem in the Spatial System Interaction Program.regarding the amount of detail provided in the target If st for appurtenances, boundaries, and plant locations. This item was mentioned in the CIO Weekly Report, t
Mr. Karr stated that the initial target list that was reviewed did not appear to have sufficient detail to develop envelopes that would be adequate for identifying all interactions. Subsequent discussions and a more detailed target list have resolved this concern.
/
j Mr. Harrison asked if the type of things identified would impact
(
interactions that had been completed perviously.
Mr. Karr stated there would be no impact.
- Mr. Harrison asked if the CCP could be impacted during the six to nine mor.ths needed to consolidate commitments made to the NRC on a single computerized list.
Mr. D. L. Quame, CPCo, stated that commitments ara now on several lists and are being consolidated on one list for easier management i
h control. Comitments are being tracked during the consolidation.
- Mr. Harrison stated that the NRC staff has reviewed resumes and affidavits furnished for CIO people. The }eview included checks for independence and technict.1 adequacy. The review found the documents to be in order.
i a
s
Minutes of Meeting PAGE 9
- Mr. Harrison asked about the resolution of the CIO item concerning the classification of field changes attached to uncontrolled specifications maintained at the CPCo document control center.
Mr. R. A. Wells, CPCo, stated that the problem involved erroneously marking uncontrolled documents as controlled and then being uncertain on how to correct the error. The problem is be'ing resolved by removing the uncontrolled documents, which are not needed, from the control center. Then, all documents at the center will be controlled and handled in accordance with established practices.
- Mr. Harrison asked for background on the statement in a CIO Weekly Report that site audits had been fractionalized.
Mr. Karr stated that before June 1983, audits were performed by in-dividuals selected from the quality assurance organization to perform specific audits. The individuals had other primary :esponsibilities.
This type of arrangement could not be easily controlled. In June 1983, a distinct site audit group was established which eliminated the previous problems.
Mr. Harrison asked if any case was found where an individual audited the function that the individual was responsible for.
I Mr. Karr stated that none had been found.
Mr. Bwgess asked if the people used for those earlier audits were certified and if the certifications were documented.
t Mr. Karr stated that no cases were found of certifications not being documented. However, the whole life of the-projact was not Shecked.
- Mr. Harrison asked for additional information on the change in the i
number of PQCIs which would contain welding criteria for electrical applications. The change was mentio'ied in a CIO Weekly Report.
4 i
4 I
W
.. _ - ~
Minutes of Meeting PAGE 10 4
T Mr. Wells stated that welding criteria would now appear in two PQCis instead of one as previously planned. This would allow the criteria i
to be removed from all electrical PQCIs.
i
- Mr. Harrison asked what the responses would be to the three CIO non-l l
conformances addressing discrepancies in the site audit program.
I Mr. Wells stated that the current practice is not to use correction l
fluid. The use of correction fluid noted by one of the CIO non-conformances occurred in 1982 and appeared to be an isolated
]
situation that did not cause a quality problem. The CIO non-confortnance on the improper documentation of nonconformances i
identified during audits was apparently caused by the judgment call of the audit team leader at the time. The team leader apparently 4
thought that the items were better classified as observations than 4
j nonconformances. This audit occurred in 1981. Present practices would
(
j avoid similar situations. The CIO nonconformance on the closure of an j
audit before recommended corrective action was accomplished appears to j
be a situation in which the action had been implemented but not doc-3 l
{
.umented at the time of closure. The audit occurred in 1981.
5
- Mr. Harrison asked if the use of interoffice memorandums and TWXs l
in resolving field changes to documents was a part of the field I
change review process.
j Mr. Wells stated that he thought interoffice comunications became a part of the review if documents referenced such communications.
i Mr. Harrison asked Consumers Power Company to look into how 4
l i
interoffice communications were reviewed during the field change f
resolution program.
(
4' i
l e
.-,-,-,-c.._--
,~,-,.,.,n.
~
Minutes of Meeting PAGE 11
- Mr. Harrison asked if the requirement for checklists to contain all attributes of governing documents had been proceduralized. He also asked what method is used to ensure that qhecklists agree with the latest document revisions.
Mr. Quamme stated that written instructions have been given to Bechtel.
Mr. Harrison asked that Consumers Power Company address the status of proceduralizing checklist requirements at the April meeting.
- Mr. Harrison asked how changes to reference documents for lesson plans are incorporated in training. He also asked how instructors are evaluated.
Mr. Wells stated that changes to reference documents are reviewed for significance. If the validity of training is affected, lesson plans are changed accordingly. Supervisors initially evaluate instructors
~
on their ability to teach. Afterwards, instructors are evaluated by students.
Mr. Harrison asked that the practices for incorporating changes to reference documents in training programs and for evaluating instructors
^
be maintained as action items.
- Mr. Harrison asked if the public had any questions. The following l
items were discussed:
- NRC audit of crack mapping.
- Activities outside the CCP but within the CIO scope.
- Vendor equipment verification program.
- Procedures for handling concerns of site people.
1
l Minutes of Meeting PAGE 12 Action Items
- CPCo Discuss how interoffice comunications were reviewed during the field change resolution program.
- Discuss the status of proceduralizing checklist requirements at the April meeting.
I
- Discuss the practices for incorporating changes to reference documents in training programs and for evaluating instructors.
1 1
p q
0 l
i 6
i l
l 6
L
. j' 1
1
o STONE & WEBSTER MICHIGAN, INC.
_T ;]IPAL STAFF P.O. Box 2325. BOSTON. M AssAcHussTTs 02107
,11gff 9 s
- W o--m CUf3 2J sc, v
_ L1 M t.
A 13 n
. H l* f%V Mr. J. G. Keppler, Administrator, Region I!!
March 9, 1984 Nuclear Regulatory Commission 799 Roosevelt Road J.O. No. 14509 Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 SWM-051 Occket No. 50-329/330 CIO Weekly Report No. 38 Construction Implementation Overview Midland Nuclear Power Plant The Construction Implementation Overview (CIO) Weekly Report Number 38, for the period February 27, 1984 through March 2,1984, is enclosed.
This report includes a summary of CIO activities for the week and open Items, NIRs, and Hold Points.
J. E. Karr CIO Program Manager Enclosures JEK:NL cc:
JJHarrison, US NRC Glen Ellyn, IL RJCook, US NRC Midland (site)
DLQuamme, CPCo Midland (site)
RAWells,CPC0 Midland (site)
R8 Kelly,SWEC RG8 urns SWEC APAmoruso, SWEC Public Document Room MR19 W
~
o
g. k s
w s
\\
Stone & ' Webster Michigan. Inc.
CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW m
- CIO 4 WEEKl.Y REPORT s
NUNDEA'38 -
PERIOD - February 27. 1984 through March 2. 1984
~.,
4.
-i K
+ +.
4
., s
~
}
s f
Contents Page f
+
i
!. Overvlew.........................................
I
!!. Activity Swmary................................
2 l
!!!. Activity Detailsf........d.....................
2 2
IV. Genera 1...............'..........................
5 V.
Attachmen Q....T.~...".'...........................
5 s
A.
CIO Item Su mery I.
Hold Putnt Sum ery t
- c., Nonconforwance Identification, Wort (N!R) Summary 4
D.
MeetinQ Sumery 7;
., ~
u.
, g 4 8
I d
L,
'r L
p x,
3 t
- a #i*
'g af 4
s k
4 s
/
L
%m
- *?
h
CIO REPORT NUMBER 38
!. OVERVIEW During this reporting period, Status Assessment (5/A) and Quality Verification Program (QVP) activities continued.
Work remained at approximately the same level as in the previous period.
In Module 340 (Reactor Building), S/A was ongoing in the civil, electrical, mechanical and instrumentation and controls disciplines.
QVP activity encompassed the architectural, electrical and mechanical disciplines.
In Module 102 (East Pipeway to Elevation 430), S/A was in progress for the j
electrical and mechanical disciplines.- QVP activity has not been initiated in this module.
In Module 120 (Auxiliar Building Elevation 544), S/A was ongoing in the y
civil, electrical, mechanical and instrumentation and control disciplines.
There was no QVP activity in this module.
In Module 400 (Service Water Pump House), 5/A was ongoing in the mechanical and' electrical disciplines. QVP activity was in progress for the civil and l
electrical disciplines, i
CIO continued to monitor the performance of both S/A and QVP activities.
" Both activities continue to be performed in a satisfactory manner.
i Other CIO activities during this period included:
l
' Field Document Control Center (FOCC) Monitoring
- Training Record Review j
- Training Program Evaluation
[
}
I 4
m
=
c
.s Paga 2 of 5 0
='
- Trathing Matrix Evaluation 4
.m
- Review of Concern Expressed to CIO by CPCo Employee
- Attendance at Various Site Meetings
- CIO Actions to Close Open~ Items and NIR's as Responses are Received ACTIVITY
SUMMARY
v A.
CCP Activity Monitoring
(
B.
FDCC Monitoring C.
Training Record Review D.
Training Program Evaluation E.
Training Matrix Evaluation F.
Review of CPCo Employee Concern ACTIVITY DETAILS (Paragraphs Correspond to Items in Section II)
A.
CIO activity relative to S/A and QVP consisted of the overview of work being performed in ' allbactive modules.
During this period, CIO reviewed personnel qualifications, Shecked documents in use, witnessed work in progress and, reviewed. the resultant documentation.
CIO also selected several NCR's generated by MPQAD during QVP and verified the ecnditions reported.
All work and documentation observed by CIO during this reporting period was found to be satisfactc y.
l B.
CIO continued monitoring FDCC progress relative to the reestablishment of additional Field Document Control Stations. One new station (to be designated as Station 501) in the Radwaste Building was being prepared t
for operation in the near future.
CIO will conduct a sample inspection of this station prior to its being ~placed in cperation.
I CIO also reviewed FDCC progress in clearing documents which were i
~,
e
.a
9 Page 3 of 5 4
included on " exception lists" during the FCR/FCN resolution program.
Of approximately 200 documents on exception lists when the mechanical discipline stop work order was lifted, eight are remaining.
Seven of these are the subject of QAR's and one proposed disposition has been rejected by BPCo and must be reprocessed.
All other documents have been cleared.
.p C.
CIO conducted a sampling inspection of. BPCo non-manual training records.
Five hundred and fifty three records were reviewed which represented 55 personnel.
The records were satisfactory and in
[
compliance with FPG-2.000 (Pe:
Checklists numbered MP-MIS-034E, 038 and 039).
CIO conducted a sampling inspection of MPQAD training records.
There were 553 attributes checked which represented a total of 656 personnel.
The records were satisfactory and in compliance with Procedure B-3M-1 (Re: CheckIistliamberNP-MIS-018E-0009).
4 D.
CIO attended and evaluated the following training classes:
INSTAL.LATION AND TESTING OF EXPANSION ANCHOR BOLTS (PQCI C-1.50)
The training was conductad in an effective manner and in i
accordance with Procedures B-2M, B-3M and B-3M1 (Re: Checklist Number MP-MIS-008E-0001).
CIO also conducted a partial review of Zack ongoing training.
It became evident during the initial phases of the review that insufficient activity had taken -place since implementing ~ the revised program.t'o permit a complete. evaluation.
CIO discontinued our activity and rescheduled it for a later date.
t L
2 3
Paga 4 of 5 D
As a result of the partial review, several recommendations were made relative to clarification of job descriptions versus training requirements, listings of required training classes, identification of trained personnel and updating of training certifications. Zack indicated that these would be incorporated in their procedures and formally notified BPCo of this (Re: Zack letter Zs-1092 of March 6, 1984).
No further activity by CIO is considered necessary on these recommendations at this time.
CIO will check on the status of the items during future reviews of Zed t-eiaias c
E.
CIO review of Revision 3 to the training matrix for BPCo non-manual personnel continued during this reporting period and will be completed next week. To date, no problems have been identified.
F.
During this reporting period, CIO was approached by a CPCo employee who expressed cuncern that pressure was t'eing applied to e
CPCo supervisor by management in order to cause a less "hard-nosed" approach to identifying and rescIving quality assurance concerns.. CIO infomed both the NRC and CPCo management of the expressed concern.
CIO followed up,on the concern with personnel at the management, i
supervisory and working levels within CPCo and found no evidence of pressure to dilute the quality assurance effort.
In a telephone conversation with the supervisor in question, CIO was informed that, although similar reports had been received from others, the individual had not received such pressure from management and, because of this, would feel uncomfortable in discussing the situation further with CIO.
j CIO has,.therefore, closed the matter and informed the involved i
.b=..
\\
Paga 5 of 5 parties of our action and our conclusion that no problem exists.
GENERAL A.
CIO reviewed the BPCo practice of conducting S/A without prior cleaning of w: Ids. This practice was determined to be acceptable for S/A activity. Upon further review, CIO also determined th'at, for QVP activity, welds were being cleaned to allow MPQAD inspection to take place.
This closes the item reported in Attachment D to CIO Report Number 36.
B.
CIO reviewed the Zack weld coupon examination criteria reported in CIO Report Number 36, Attachment D.
The report indicated that weld coupons for welder qualification were to be visually inspected only as opposed to bend testing.
Our review disclosed that the coupons were for sheet metal welds.
These qualification welds are performed in accordance with the requirements of AWS D-9.1 which specifies visual examinction only, CIO considers the practice to be acceptable and considers this item closed.
C.
CIO staffing remained at 33 during this reporting period.
ATTACHMENTS A. - CIO Item Summary B. - CIO Hold Point Summary i
C. - CIO NIR Sumary s
O. - Meeting Sumary l
l l
4
- w v
7 e
=w
STONE & WEBSTER MICilIGAN, INC.
NOTES:
1.
( identifies changes from previous report CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW 2.
Closed items will be identifled in the report for the MIDLAND NUCLEAR COGENERATION PLANT
. week of closure and dropped from further reporting CIO ITEM SIM4ARY Classifi-No.
Descriptico Open CPCo Response Closed Rmads cation Document /Date Document /Date Document /Date 030 Tracked Need to review Vendor Equipment Report No. 5 Action Verification Program - HPQAD/SMO 7/18/83 034 Tracked NIR 008 issued on November 10, 1933 Report No. 22 Action to address upgrading five training.
11/14/83 level codes in the System Team Training Matrix.
035 Tracked CIO observed that dielectric iso-
' Report No.22 CPCo Trans-Item Notifi-QAR RA-00062 Action lation spacers for galvanic pro-11/14/83 mittal CSC-7267 cation Report issued to j-tection of copper pipe to galvanized 2/14/84 2/28/84 investigate y
steel pipe supports were missing in use of memos some areas on the Small Bore (Instru-to direct work.
ment Air) KAC System, drawing FSK-J-l 30-0220 Sheet 2. Rev. 7.
~
>r s
037 Tracked CIO observed that twa boards with Report No. 24 Partial response N$
Action protruding nails lying in Cable Tray 11/29/83 (CSC 7244 dated %
IAKA019 (Q. Tray) had punctured the 1/27/84) acc@ted g, cable jacket of a "Q" cable. The via CIO letter se cable is Q-Channel A. 480V, MCC.
SWMCP-024 dated "E NCR 000925 was issued by MPQAD on 2/3/84. Closure "A November 22, 1983. CIO will track pending cable
/ z this item to assure that corrective repair during N-action (repair) has been performed to CCP Phase II.
w approved procedures.
CIO ITEM S!M4ARY - CONTINUATION SilEET Classifi-Open CPCo Response Closed No.
cation Description Document /Date Document /Date Document /Date Remarks 043 Tracked CIO Phase III evaluation of archi-Item Notifi-Item Notifi-Ref. CPCo Action tectural/ civil document control cation Report cation Report letter measures resulted in f'adings listed 1/6/84 1/17/84 CSM-0719, in the Item Notification (similar 1/16/84 conditions are identified in HPQAD MQAR-DAT-1). CIO requests CPCo's plan for addressing the problems -
noted and for implementing and verifying corrective action on both MQAR-DAT-1 and this item.
I 046 Tracked CIO requests placement on distribu-Item Notiff-Item Notifi-Partial CPCo Infor-tion for documentatica and procedures cation Report cation Report response -
mation pertinent to the NRC Project Conmiit-1/18/84 2/8/84 Implementation ment Tracking Program, advance notice to take 8 to of related meeting and a schedule 12 months.
which addresses completion of these events.
048 Tracked Corrective action needed to rectify Item Notifi-Item Notifi-BPCo response Action an inconsistency between anchor cation Report cation Report via letter bolt specifications C-305 and C-306.
1/18/84 2/7/84 BCCC-8987, dated 2/6/84.
3 CIO awaiting SCN 14001 to gg Spec C-306.
g*
049 Tracked A CIO review of document control Item Notiff-Item Notifi-CIO awaiting Infor-methods resulted in the following cation Report cation Report completion of p,g mation observations: (1) Some uncontrolled 1/26/84 2/3/84 CPCo correc-o specs contaired controlled copies of tive action.
U FCRs, FCNs and SCNs; (2) Controlled z
documents are being " oecontrolled't P
via a line out method which is not 1
w t
proceduralized ; 6nd 1
.:a CIO ITEM SUHHARY - CONTINUATION SilEET Classift-Open CPCo Response Closed No.
cation Description Document /Date Document /Date Document /Date Remarks 049 (Con't)
(3) CPCo DCC personnel are unaware of the Bechtel Ann Arbor method of Identifying document transmittals as either controlled or uncontrolled 051 Track'ed CIO requests to be informed of meet-Item Notiff-Action ings regarding the proposed plan cation Report of action to address deficiencies 2/3/84 identified in MPQAD Audit Report No.
MSA-83-7 as well as a copy of the proposed plan one week prior to its implementation.
052 Tracked CIO requests copies of audit Item Notifi-Infor-reports for audits performed cation Report nation by the NRC, CPCo and BPCo of 2/3/84 site activities / organizations which addressed Criteria XVIII of 10CFR50 Appendix 8.
053 Tracked As described in Section 4.2 of the Item Notifi-Action CCP, CIO requests that CPCo provide cation Report a listing of all status assessment 2/16/84 teams. the respective teams' scope 2-r and their working schedule.
{g 054 Tracked CIO requests to'be put on controlled Item Notifi-Item Notifi-Item Notifi-Information b
Infor-distribution for the following Mark cation Report cation Report cation Report copies of
@F mation Technologies documents: QA Manual, 2/16/84 2/28/84 2/29/84 referenced E
i Quality Plan, Procedures Target documents
("2" 3 List and all walkdown Summaries, accepted by z
CIO.
P
{
S t
. ~ _ - -
CIO ITEM SIMIARY - CONTINUATION SilEET Classift-Open CPCo Response Closed No.
cation Description Document /Date Document /Date Document /Date Remarks 055 Tracked Clarification is rcquired regarding item Notifi-Infor-training requirements for area tean cation Report nation
- 23/24 personnel performing status 2/17/84 assessment of raceway completion.
056 Tracked During a training evaluation for item Notifi-Item Notifi-Infor-PQCl C-1.50 CIO observed discrepan-cation Report cation Report
/
mation cles in the lesson plan.
CIO 2/17/84 2/29/84
's requests a review to determine what impact these items have on the training provided. C,IO further requests information on how MPQAD assures that document changes are referenced on th: lesson plan.
057 Tracked CIO recommends that trainer evalua-Ites Notifi-Item Notifi-Item Notifi-Recommen-tion be performed no later than cation Report cation Report cation Report dation that trainer's first training class 2/17/84 2/29/84 3/2/84
\\'
taught, since this evaluation is used in approving the trainer to Instruct.
058 Tracked CPCo should review past audits to Item Notifi-Infor-assure that applicable 10CFR50, cation Report 3;jE mation Appendix B criteria were adequately 2/18/84 addressed.
ggt
- cy a
059 Tracked CPCo should review audits performed item Notifi-kj[
Infor-prior to June 1983 to assure ade-cation Report 3, q '
mation quacy of auditing, proper close 2/18/84 r+
out, 10CFR50 Appendix B compliance, and objective evidence as to ade-g quacy of the audits, g;
A 4
1 I
CIO ITEM StH1ARY - CONTitlUATION SilEET Classiff-Open CPCo Response Closed No.
cation Description Document /Date Document /Date Doctment/Date Remarks I
060 Tracked CIO provides a series of recommend-Item Notifi-Recommen-ations in the following categories:
cation Report
(
dation
- 1) Management involvement: 2) Track-2/17/84 ing Audits / Audit Findings; and 3) s Audit Personnel Training and Certiff cate Records.
061 Tracked CIO recommends that the receipt Item Notifi-Recommen-acknowledgement c6py of the Dechtel cation Report y
dation transmittal form be revised to 3/2/84 g
provide for a signature /date by the recipient.
i O R-aj 9G 8m ne E
h STONE & WEBSTER MICHIGAN, INC.
NOTES:
- 1. % identifies changes from previous report CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW
- 2. Closed llold Points will be identified in the Report for MIDLAND NUCLEAR C0 GENERATION PLANT the week of closure and dropped from further reporting
.CIO Il0LD POINT
SUMMARY
Established CPCo Response Lifted No.
Description Remarks Document /Date Document /Date Document /Date 005 CPCo has committedio develop a Vendor Report No. 18 Equipment Verification Program. Program 10/17/83 is required before implementation of Phase II.
007 Evaluation of Management Review of Report No. 19 results of Phase I activities. Evalua-10/26/83 tion is required before implementation of Phase II.
010 NIR 008 has been issued on November Report No. 22 10, 1983 to address upgrading five 11/14/83 items in the System Team Training Matrix of the Construction Training Program.
Corrective action must be completed before any walkdown assessments can be performed by the personnel involved in these training activities.
,g ee
-015 CIO has requested that the requirements Hold Point E ?e for the exclusive use of chroncl-alumel Notification SG thermocouples and extension wires for Report 2/1/84 S:o PWHT and certification of the accuracy 50 of the thermocouples via a C of C be co8 reinstated in PQCI PW-1.00.
Release is
[
contingent upon CIO review and acceptance f
of the calibration certification.
)
M
_.. \\,
STONE & WEBSTER HICillGAN INC.
NOTES:
1.
(Identifieschangesfrompreviousreport CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW 2.
Closed NIRs will be identified in the report for the MIDLAND NUCLEAR C0 GENERATION PLANT week of closure and dropped from further reporting fl0flCONFORMANCE IDENTIFICATION REPORT
SUMMARY
No.
Description
' Issue Date Response Date Closure Date Remarks 008
-Need to upgrpde five training level codes 11/10/83 02/29/84 Response via in the Syst;em Team Training Matrix.
QAR RT-00021 (p
014 As documented'on CIO Evaluation No. MP-MIS-01/27/84 074-0001, FPD 1.000 requirement that a copy of all transmittals for "Q" listed items be transmitted to MPQAD and the Project Supplier Quality Representative was not being satisfied 015 In violation of PSPG-7.1, correction fluid 02/17/84 was used on MPQAD Audit Report No. M01-346-02.
016 Contrary to their NPQAD Procedure F-1M deft-02/17/84 nitions, '"nonconformances" were docimented as " observations" in Audit No. M01-346-02.
017 The recommended correctlye action for Audit 02/17/84 finding 01F, Audit No. M01-346-02 was not Implemented, yet the audit was closed out.
018 In violation of FPG-2.000, Rev. 7. reading 02/21/84 02/24/84 02/27/84 Response via gg record entries for one individual omitted QAR RT-00029
- m revision numbers for all documents listed y
on the forms.
g, a=
l 019 As documented on CIO Evaluation No. MP-MIS-02/29/84-
"E 082-0001, several discrepancies were "A
identified on the FDDL.
l g
1
lii I
~
~
F%G E2?+ E M R
/N N2e!~"
=
s k
rame R
e t
a D
e r
T u
E s
E o
H l
S C
NO I
e T
t A
a U
D N
I e
T s
N n
O o
C ps e
R YRA 4
e M
t 4
t a
8 S
D
/2 T
e 0
R u
/
O s
3 P
s 0
E I
R N
e O
I TA C
S I
I en F
M gi I
n T
Pad N
Mhe ED
.Cn g
I oni Nos E
i C
nt y N
oul A
ibr M
n tie R
o arp O
uto i
F t
l sr N
p ai p O
vD i
C r
E t0 N
c 5o0 O
s O2n0 N
e I
D Cfe1 O
or-I n
eZ C
otwP u
F dos e
mf t4ro n
o e
,F n m1 o
u0ti c0st o0ea d
ul 2qo s8ei A0Rv 0
o 2
N 0
~
o STONE & WEBSTER MICilIGAN, INC.
CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW MIDLAND NUCLEAR C0 GENERATION PLANT WEEKLY MEETING SlMtARY Date Attendees Discussion Topic CIO Comments Feb. 27 HRP Meeting MPQAD Discussed status of Hanger Reinspection No CIO concerns identified.
1984 CIC Program and indicated potential start date for this program of 3-7-84.
Feb. 28, Area Team CPCo
- 1) Emphasized need for continuing effort No CIO concerns identified.
Feb. 29, Staff Mtgs.
MPQAD to keep training up to date.
ch 2, 2)Discussedtqams'statusofwork.
1984
- 3) Indicated the need to research potential problem areas prior to start of activity in order to prevent problems.
Feb. 29 Tea,a 4eet.ings CPCo
- 1) Discussed training requirements.
No CIO concerns identified.
ch 1, AD
- 2) Discussed use of MLCS System.
9 March 2, CIO
- 3) NCR's should have proposed dispositions 1984 when written.
- 4) May establish new Group IV for non-Q work.
~
- 5) Renewal of status assessment prints.
gg
- 6) Team 19 is preparing for an ASME survey of diesel generator work.
g<
$5 av Feb. 29, Area CCP CPCo Discussed necessary work and schedules to No CIO concerns identified. N 1984 Meeting MPQAD support turbine roll.
BPCo 2o CIO M
Ib. ' '
a*
N*
. -.,.,~.1_..
_L_.._..
WEEKLY MEETING SUPHARY - CONTINUATION SilEET
~
Date 9
Attendees Discussion Topic CIO Comments Feb. 29 B&W HRP BPCo Met with BPCo to outline CIO involvement in No CIO concerns identified.
1984 CIO B&W Hanger Reinspection Program.
i March 2, Project CPCo Discussed updated punchlist sumary, No CIO concerns identified.
1984 Quantification MPQAD restraints and reviewed computer data Meeting BPCo reports.
"10 e
v 2%
9G b
Ee l
I g
'hys/cW STONE & WEBSTER MICHIGAN, INC.
P.'O. Box 2325. BOSTON. MASSACHUSETTS 02107 j J/RA DE
'/Rh R. 5 H
>c ai-i~
HA0 SCS V 6
%A
!L lh ENF Fite p
/
Mr. J. G. Keppler, Administrator, Region III March 16, 1984 Nuclear Regulatory Commission 799 Roosevelt Road J.O. No. 14509 Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 SWM-053 Docket No. 50-329/330 CIO Weekly Report No. 39 Construction Implementation Overview Midland Nuclear Power Plant The Construction Implementation Overview (CIO) Weekly Report Number 39,
~'
for the period March 5, 1984 through March 9, 1984, is enclosed.
This report includes a summary of CIO activ4tles for the week and open Items, NIRs, and Hold Points.
- f.
J. E. Karr CIO Program Manager Enclosures JEX:NL cc:
DLQuamme, CPCo Midland (site)
NIReichel, CPCo Midland (site)
RAWells, CPCo Midland (site)
JJHarrison, US NRC Glen Ellyn, IL RJCook, US NRC Midland (site)
Public Document Room l
l
, MAR 2 2 9M n n r i
action (repair) has been performed CCP Phase 11.
N2 to approved procedures.
,$. g 5
s i
"a E
l CIO ITEM SUP94ARY - CONTINUATION SHEET Classift-Open CPCo Response Closed No.
cation Description Document /Date Document /Date Document /Date Remarks 043 Tracked CIO Phase III evaluation of archt-Item Notifi-Item Hotifi-Ref. CPCo Action tectural/ civil document control cation Report cation Report letter measures resulted in findings listed 1/6/84 1/17/84 CSM-0719, in the Ites Notification (similar conditions are identified in MPQAD 1/16/84 MQAR-DAT-1). C10 requests CPCo's plan for addressing the problems noted and for implementing and I
verifying corrective action on both MQAR-DAT-1 and this item.
046 Tracked CIO requests placement on distribu-Item Notifi-Item Hotifi-Partial CPCo infor-tion for documentation and procedures cation Report cation Report response -
nation pertinent to the NRC Project Commit-1/18/84 2/8/84 Implementation ment Tracking Program, advance notice to take 8 to of related meetino and a schedule 12 months.
which addresses c6mpletion of these events.
048 Tracked Corrective action needed to rectify item Notifi-Item Notifi-Item Notifi-SCN 14001 to Action an inconsistency between anchor cation Report cation Report cation Report Spec C-306
/
bolt specifications C-305 and C-306.
1/18/84 2/7/84 3/5/84 received by N
CIO to close this item.
NN 049 Tracked A CIO review of document control item Notifi-Item Notifi-CIO awaiting k$-
Infor-methods resulted in the following cation Report cation Report completion of P
mation observations:
(1) Some uncontrolled 1/26/84 2/3/84 CPCo correc-
@y specs contained controlled copies of Live action.
9 FCRs, FCNs and SCNs; (2) Controlled documents aca being decontrolled"
>g a
via a line-cut method ehich is not z
proceduralized ; and P
S
CIO ITEH SIMIARY - CONTINUATION SilEET a.
Classifi-Open CPCo Response Closed No.
cation Description Document /Date Docianent/Date Document /Date Remarks 4
049 (Con't)
(3) CPCo DCC personnel are unaware of the Bechtel Ann Arbor method of Identifying document transmittals as either cos trolled or uncontrolled 051 Track'ed CIO requests to be informed of meet-Item Notifi-Action ings regarding the proposed plan cation Report of action to address deficiencies 2/3/84 identified in MPQAD Audit Report No.
MSA-83-7 as well as a copy of the proposed plan one week prior to its implementation.
052 Tracked CIO requests copies of audit Item Notifi-Infor-reports for audits performed cation Report nation by the NRC CPCo and BPCo of 2/3/84 site activities / organizations which addressed Criteria XVIII of 10CFR50 Appendix 8.
053 Tracked As described in Section 4.2 of the Item Notiff-Action CCP, CIO requests that CPCo provide cation Report a listing of all status assessment 2/16/84 teams, the respective team's scope and their working schedule.
< n.
055 Tracked-Clarification is required regarding Item Notiff-g 9l.
Infor-training requirements for area team cation Report eq mation
- 23/24 personnel performing status 2/17/84 3m l
assessment of raceway completion.
Eg l
A l
?
w e
CIO ITEM St# MAR 7 - CONTINUATION SHEE1 Classift-Open CPCo Response Closed No..
cation Description Document /Date Document /Date Document /Date Remarks 056 Tracked During a training evaluation for Ites Notifi-Ites Notifi-Infor-PQCI C-1.50, CIO observed discrep-cation Report cation Report nation ancies in the lesson plan. CIO.
2/17/84 2/29/84 requests a review to determine what impact these items have on the training provided. CIO further requests information on how MPQAD assures that document changes are referenced on the lesson plan.
058 Tracked CPCoshouldreviewbastauditsto Item Notifi-Infor-assure that applica le 10CFR50, cation Report motion Appendix 8 criteria were adequately 2/18/84 addressed.
059 Tracked CPCo should review audits performed item Notifi-Infor-prior to June 1983 to assure adequacy cation Report nation of auditing, prcper closeout,10CFR50 2/18/84 Appendix B compliance, and objective evidence as to afequacy of the audits 060 Tracked C10 provides a Ferias of recosimen-Iten Notifi-Recommen-dations in the following categories:
cation Report dation
- 1) Management Ir.volvement; 2) Track-2/17/84
>r
-ing Audits / Audit Findings; and 3)
- 2 Audit Personnel Training and Certif-M C-b"R icate Records.
n F
a
?
a 4, \\j,
?
/
j s
/,
t i
CIO ITEM SupMARY.- CONT,INUAT100 SHEET i
j Classifi-Open #
CPCo Response Closed r
No.
cation DescrIpttoe. '
Document /Date Document /Date Document /Date Remarks
, t:
061l ' Tracked CIO recommeMs; tri.st the receipt Item Notiff-Aeccamen-acknowledgement copy; of the Bechtel cation, Report dation transmittal form be revised to pro-3/2/8R r
vide for a signature /date lay the.
/
t
.s
,I
'/'
recipient.
/
- l j
}
j.,
l
~ _]ll
~
1 l
052 Tracked CI3 has deteneined that status Item Notifi-
' CKo has re-
' /i
/
Action assessmert is being performed on 3catJon Report quested BPCo 3
. c, r'pe supports by persormel uho have 3/6/84 (Ref. CSC-7424
~
nut completed required training. All dated 3/7/84) personnel 1 performing hanger support
/
/
to perfcra,-
i status assessment should be checked f
correct.tve
. \\
G to assure.they'are properly qualifled k
rest,ond by II
action ani Any previous supports that were-i s
2 assessed by unquallfled personnelf w
3/12/84.
js should be reassessed.
7 e
i i
064 Tracked CIO recommends laplementation of item Notifi-y Rectemen-W Q4D plan to consolidate welding cation Report g
dation inspection requirements for electri-3/16/84 cal /instrumeltation equipment and supports into PQCI's CW-1.00 and i
EW-1.00.
M C*
GC
! al-I "E
i N
b
[
.---.~
I-STONE 8 WE85TER MICHIGAN, INC.
NOTES:
- 1. Q identifies changes from previous report CONSTRUCTION IWLEENTATION OVERVIEW
- 2. Closed Hold Points will be identified in the Report for f
MIDLAND NUCLEAR COGENERATION PLANT the ueek of closure and dropped from further reporting i
CIO HOLD POINT SimM4RY i
Established CPCo Response Lifted
[
10 0.
Detcription Document /Date Doctament/Date Document /Date gg, t
005 CPCo has committedto develop a Vendor Report No. 18 Equipoent Verification Program. Program 10/17/83 t
is required before implementation of Phase !I.
007 Evaluation of Management Review of Report No. 19 results of Phase I activities. Evalua-10/26/83 i
tion is required before implemi:ntation of Phase 11.
010 NIR 000 has been issued on November Report No. 22
- 10. 1983 to address upgrading five 11/14/83 items in the System Team Training Matrix of the Construction Training Program.
l Corrective action must be completed before any ualkdoun assessments can be i
performed by the personnel involved in j
these training activities.
i 015 CIO has requested that the requirements lloid Point g g, for the exclusive use of chromel-alsanel Notification gg thermocouples and extension wires for Report 2/1/84 nq PWHT and certification of the accuracy 5
i of the thermocouples via a C of C be Mi reinstated in POCI PW-1.00.
Release is g
contingent upon CIO review and acceptance of the calibration certification.
g
+
c-
.~_
a
. -.. u -
- _ =, -.
r STONE 1 WEBSTER MICHIGAN, INC.
NOTES:
1.
( Identifies clianges from previous report CONSTRUCTION IWLEMENTATION OVERVIEW 2.
Closed NIRs will be identil' led in the report for the MIDLAlm NUCLEAR C0 GENERATION PLANT week of closure and dropped from further reporting NONCONFORMANCE IDENTIFICATION REPORT SIM4ARY s
- 8-Description Issue Date Response Date Closure Date Remarks 008 Need to upgrade five training level codes 11/10/83 02/29/84 Response via j;
in the System Team Training Matrix.
QAR RT,00021 014 As documented on CIO Evaluation No. MP-MIS-01/27/84 4
074-0001, FPD 1.000 requirement that a copy
/
of all transmittals for "Q". listed items be transmitted ta MPQAD and the Project Supplier Quality Representative was not being satisfied 015 In violation of PSPG-7.1, correction fluid 02/17/84 was used on MPQAD Audit Report No. M01-346-02.
I Contrary to their MPQA0 Proc' dure F-1H deft-02/17/84 l
016 e
i.
nitions, "nonconformances" were documented as " observations" in Audit No. M01-346-02.
l
- 017 The recommended corrective action for Audit 02/17/84 i
finding 01F, %dit No. M01-346-02 was not laplemented, yet the audit was closed out.
019 As documented on CIO Evaluation No. MP-MIS-02/29/84
\\
D82-0001, several. discrepancies were identi-
>r fled on the FDDL.
i EC 020 As documented on CIO Evaluation No. MP-MIS-03/02/84 ix 082-0001, 4 out of 25 Distribution Change i
Request Forms were not properly signed in "E
j violation of FPZ-1.000.
N 5
o
}
STONE 8 WEBSTER MICHIGAN, INC.
CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW MIDLAND NUCLEAR C0 GENERATION PLANT WEEKLY MEETING SUMARY
~
Date "9
Attendees Discussion Topic CIO Comments March 5, NRC Commit-CPCo Discussed status and progres s of NRC Commit-No CIO concerns identified
-1984 ments CIO ment List Program t
March 6, Area Team CPCo
- 1) Continued emphasis on training No CIO concerns identified 1984 Staff Meeting AD
- [
- 2) Discussed turbine roll support CIO
- 3) Assignment of personnel t3 S/A is Lead Field Engineer responsibility
- 4) Zack_& B&W can do Q work and teams can g
work in support of these
- 5) CPCo is going to propose ;o the NRC t' hat additional modules be released for CCP Phase I activity i
4 March 7, Team Meetings CPCo
- 1) Turbine roll support No CIO concerns identified rch 8, D
- 2) S/A progress March 9, CIO
- 3) Training of team personnel IE
~
- 4) Control Room Team will be assigned to 3,
Group II and become Team 95 gi
- a. 3
- 5) Team 18 will be working non-Q only OG
- 6) Release of additional modules for CCP Phas~e !
"E, r
o i
- 7) Keep MLCS up to date l
5
s WEEKLY MEETING SUPMARY - CONTINUATION SHEET Date "9
Attendees Discussion Topic CIO Comments March 7, Diesel CPCo
- 1) CPCo presented program for continuation No CIO concerns identified 1984 Generator BPCo of work on diesel generators Meeting NRC CIO
}
March 7 SSIP Meeting CPCo Discussed SSI Program and Procedures CIO to follow-up with reques1 i-1984 MTC for clarification of proce-CIO dures to MTC via CPCo March 7, B&W Overview B&W CIO reviews.d with B&W the overview activities No CIO concerns identified 1984 CIO we anticipate relative to the B&W Hanger Reinspection Program j -
March 9 QVP Assess-MPQAD
- 1) Computer input and microfilming No CIO concerns identified i
1984 ment CIO
- 2) Trend codes for coatings
- 3) Progress of QVP activity 1
-m 3
W b
an8 o,
s,-
t
&ndk PRINCIPAL STAFF
]
A STONE & WEBSTER MICHIGAN. INCAA'i4W ?c?
D/Ph u
P.O. Box 2325. Boston. MASSACHUSETTS 02107 RA S
df pao scs s SGA 73L gNr File A Mr. J. G. Keppler, Administrator, Region III March 26, 1984 Nuclear Regulatory Commission 799 Roosevelt Road J.0. No. 14509 Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 SWM-063 Docket No. 50-329/330 CIO Weekly Report No. 40 Construction Implementation Overview Midland Nuclear Pnwer Plant The Construction Implementation Overview (CIO) Weekly Report Number 40, for the period March 12, 1984 through March 16, 1984, is enclosed.
This report includes a summary of CIO activities for the week and open Items, NIRs, and Hold Points.
d "J. E. Karr CIO Program Manager Enclosures JEK:NL cc:
DLQuamme, CPCo Midland (site)
NIReichel, CPCo Midland (site)
RAWells, CPCo Midland (site)
JJHarrison, US NRC Glen Ellyn, IL RJCook, US NRC Midland (site)
Public Document Room l
l l
b,a $ 3 UN
4
- Stone & Webster Michigan. Inc.
CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW
- CIO -
WEEKLY REPORT NUM8ER 40 PERIOD - March 12, 1984 through March 16, 1984 Contents Page I.
0verview.........................................
1 II. Activity Summary................................
2 III. Activity Details................................
2 IV.
General.........................................
7 V.
Attachments.....................................
7 i
A.
CIO Item Summary B.
Hold Point Summary C.
Nonconformance Identification Report (NIR) Summary 4
1 D.
Meeting Summary I
.l VI. Exhibits i
l 1.
CCP Phase.I Activity l
- 4 b:N
- t eK 'f er.e-e---
wWg*%P-
%e] e*
- '*4-*f+MM
=$
- M alpNW *
>M-*-'W' W M *+
Na"*
^e
\\
CIO REPORT NUMBER 40 I. OVERVIEW During this reporting period, Status Assessment (S/A) and Quality Verification Program (QVP) activities continued. Additionally, activity in the area of the Hanger Reinspection Program (HRP) was initiated.
Overall activity levels were increased from previous reporting periods.
This was due to the assignment of additional personnel and to the NRC release of additional modules for Phase I activity as identified in CIO Report Number 39.
It is noted that this additional release by the NRC covers only portions of each released module.
The release specifically 1
identifies the systems which are necessary to support the turbine roll milestone of CPCo.
Exhibit 1 to this report identifies the modules currently released by the NRC and the S/A, QVP and HRP activity in each for this reporting period.
Th.e principal CIO activity during this period was the ongoing assessment of Construction Completion Program (CCP) Phase I activities.
Overall, CCP activity continues to be performed in an acceptable manner.
Some i
i deficiencies were observeJ, however, and these are described in Section III, following.
l During this reporting period, CIO also completed, continued, or initiated assessments of additional CPCo activity and the activities of Zack and B&W.
I These are described in the following sections of this report.
i F
I i
l 4
- I
Page 2 of 7 II. ACTIVITY
SUMMARY
l A.
CCP Activity Monitoring B.
B&W ASME Program Activity Evaluation C.
Evaluation of BPCo Site Auditing Activities D.
Document Control Assessments E.
Training Program Evaluation F.
Review of Zack Welder Qualification Procedure G.
Attendance at Various Site Meetings H.
CIO Action to Close Out Open Items and NIR's as Responses are Received III. ACTIVITY DETAILS (Paragraphs Correspond to Items in Section II) l A.
CIO overviewed the CCP Phase I activities underway in each active module during this reporting period.
CIO reviewed personnel
[
qualifications, checked documents in use, witnessed work in progress and reviewed resultant documentation.
CIO also overviewed the r,
dispositioning of NCR's by BPCo Field Engineers in Module 800.
For the majority of work reviewed by CIO, all activities were performed j
satisfactorily and in accordance with procedures.
CIO did, however, identify one deficiency.
In one case, S/Awasbeingperformedusin[
,. ;r documents that were not marked " Status Assessment Print" or with an expiration date.
These documents were being used as reference _,
drawings and were stamped " Uncontrolled not to be used for J
Construction". This was identified as CIO Item Number 063.
On March 13, 1984, CIO met with CPCo, MPQAD and BPCo personnel j
relative to CCP progress and status.
CPCo presented the current I
f
-l I
' j i * )
4
Pag 2 3 of 7 status of CCP Phase I activity and reviewed with CIO their intent to request NRC release of additional modules for CCP Phase I activity in the near future.
The CPCo presentation was essentially the same as that intended for use in a meeting with the NRC.
During the discussion which followed, CIO identified the following relative to CCP Phase I activity and the eventual transition to CCP Phase II.
Insofar as field activities are concerned, CCP activity (S/A and QVP) is proceeding sery_ wall-With the exception of m[nor deviations (as identified in this and previous CIO reports), the program is considered satisfactory in all respects.
CIO is concerned that the program integration necessary to identify the full scope of work required, status progress and report on completion, does not appear to be functioning well at this time. Although the point of transition to Phase II has not yet been reached, CI0's assessment is that integration should be an ongoing effort if problems are to be avoided in the future.
CIO foresees difficulty in maintaining the administrative work load imposed by the current trainir.g program.
CIO is still identifying inconsistencies in the site document control program implementation.
These have been minor and isolated instances but, with increased work loads, more attention will have to be directed to this area if satisfactory performance
Page 4 of 7 4
is to be maintained.
A further meeting was held between CIO and CPCc, MPQAD and BPCo on the above issues on March 15, 1984.
Additional infonnation was provided and discussed by each organization.
CIO concerns remained the same.
CPCo indicated that they will continue to work to resolve issues raised by CIO.
B.
During this period, CIO initiated an evaluation of the B&W Quality Assurance Program with particular emphasis on contemplated work under I
the jurisdiction of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,Section III.
The initial assessment work included a review of the Final-Safety Analysis Report, B&W Program manuals and procedures and implementation documentation.
The below listed issues have been identified to date which reoutre further information to resolve or identify as CIO Items /NIR's.
CIO will pursue-these in the next reporting period.
Procedures in the QC Manual were missing pages (four. procedures of eleven reviewed).
i l
One NDE procedure appears to be unapproved by the Authorized Nuclear Inspector (ANI).
i BPCo is not on B&W's approved ASME supplier's list but is providing material.
i
]
BPCo Certificates of Compliance provided to B&W appear deficient
.f t
s 3
Paga 5 of 7 In at least five instances.
Current welding undercut requirements appear to conflict with specified codes and the FSAR.
Uncertified torque paint may have been used on "Q" bolts.
BPCo material withdrawal requests provided to B&W appear to be corrected improperly.
C.
CIO conducted an evaluation of BPCo site auditing activities during this reporting period.
Within the assigned scope of work for BPCo site personnel, the audit program is functioning adequately and in accordance with procedures (Re: Ch'ecklist MP-MIS-088-0001).
Some attributes listed in CI0's evaluation checklist were not verifiable i
during this evaluation since they were the responsibility of BPCo's Ann Arbor or San Francisco office.
These will be considered for inclusion in future CIO assessments.
D.
During CIO overview of QVP activities in Module 340, two drawings were found on a pipe whip restraint.
These were not controlled or stamped as Status Assessment Prints or Work Prints.
Field Document Control was notified and the prints were removed.
CIO has not identified the user of the documents to date or the reason they were in the field.
This issue will be followed up by CIO next week.
CIO conducted an assessment of Zack document control procedures and l
practices.
CIO found the procedures and practices to be acceptable
=
w
Page 6 of 7 with one exception which was identified as CIO Item Number 065.
This item identifies a discrepancy in Zack Procedure MB-FP-7C.
The procedure references the SCN (Specification Change Notice) as the document used to notify Zack of addenda retirement information.
The correct document is a SCCN (Subcontractor Change Notice).
CIO continued the review of document control concerns presented to CIO by a CPCo employee.
This activity should be completed prior to March 30, 1984.
E.
CIO attended and evaluated the following training class:
Issuing, Verifying and Documenting Terminations and Termination Reworks (FPE-9.200)
The training was conducted in an effective manner and in A
accordance with Procedure FPG-2.000 (Re: Checklist Number MP-MIS-035E-0019)
F.
CIO reviewed Zack Welder Qualification Procedure MB-FP-18 during an ongoing assessment of Zack welding. The procedure was acceptable with the exception that the method for updating welder qualifications was not specified. This was issued as CIO Item Number 066.
G.
Meetings attended by CIO are summarized in Attachment D.
H.
Activity relative to CIO Items, Hold Points and NIR's is sunmarized in Attachments A, B and C respect'ively.
5 i
l I
I
1 I
Page 7 of 7
~t IV. GENERAL A..
CIO staffing remained at 33 during this reporting period.
V.
ATTACHMENTS A. - CIO Item Sumary B. - CIO Hold Point Sumary C. - CIO NIR Sumary D. - Meeting Summary S
4 I
i 4
i -
h l
?
~
( identifies changes from previous report STONE & WEBSTER MICHIGAN, INC.
NOTES:
1.
CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW 2.
Clo' sed items will be identified in the report for the MIDLAND NUCLEAR C0 GENERATION PLANT
' week of closure and dropped from further repcrting
~
CIO ITEM Sl99tARY x
-2 Classifi-Open CPCo Response Closed
. go,
Description Ree d s cation Document /Date Document /Date Document /Date t
G30 Tracked Need to review Vendor Equipment Report No. 5 Action Verification Program - MPQAD/SMO 7/18/83 034 Tracked NIR 008 issued on November 10, 1983 Report No. 22 N/A Item Notifi-Item closed y
Action to address upgrading five training 11/14/83 cation Report subsequent to g
. level codes in the System Team 3/12/84 NIR closure.
Training Matrix.
1 037 Tracked CIO observed that two boards with Report No. 24 Partial respons(
Action protruding nails lying in Cable Tray 11/29/83 (CSC 7244 dated 1AKA019 (Q Tray) had punctured the 1/27/84) acceptai cable jacket of a "Q" cable.- The via CIO letter cable is Q-Channel A. 480V, MCC.
SWMCP-024 dated NCR 000925 was issued by MPQAD on 2/3/84. Closure November 22, 1983. CIO will track pending cable this ites to assure that corrective repair during action (repair) has been performed CCP Phase 11.
N to approved procedures.
p; 5 i*
aF "g
- A i
E M.-
_m CIO ITEM Sup9tARY - CONTINUATION SilEET Classiff-Open CPCo Response Closed No.
cation Description Document /Date Document /Date Document /Date Remarks 043 Tracked CIO Phase. III evaluation of archi-Ites Notift-Ites Notifi-Ref. CPCo
-Action.
tectural/ civil document control cation Report cation Report letter measures resulted in findings listed 1/6/84 1/17/84 CSM-0719, in the Ites Notification (similar 1/16/84 conditions are identified in MPQAD MQAR-DAT-1). CIO requests CPCo's plan for addressing the problems noted and for implementing and verifying corrective action on both f4AR-DAT-1 and this item.
046 Tracked CIO requests placement on distribu-Item Notifi-Item Notifi-Partial CPCo
~
.Infor-tion for docimientation and proce-cation Report cation Report response -
mation dures pertinent to the NRC Project 1/18/84 2/8/84 Implementation Commitment Tracking Program, advance to take 8 to notice of related meeting and a 12 months.
schedule which addresses completion of these events.
/N N
049 Tracked A CIO review of document control item Notifi-Item Notifi-CIO awaiting R5 Infor-methods resulted in the following cation Report cation Report completion of
!"'g<
mation
- observations: (1) Some uncontrolled 1/26/84 2/3/84 CPCo correc-
. specs contained controlled copies of Live action.
'+E FCRs, FCNs and SCNs; (2) Controlled
>g documents are being " decontrolled" via a line-out method which is not P
proceduralized ; and
.o
CIO ITEM SIMiARY - CONTINUATION SHEET Classifi-Open CPCo Response Closed No.
cation Description Document /Date Document /Date Document /Date Remarks 056 Tracked During a training evaluation for item Notifi-Item Notifi-Infor-PQCI C-1.50, CIO observed discrep-cation Report cation Report nation ancies in the le. son plan. CIO.
2/17/84 2/29/84 requests a review to determine what impact these items have on the training provided. CIO further requests information on how MPQAD assures that document changes are referenced on the lesson plan.
058 Tracked CPCo should review past audits to item Notifi-Ites Notifi-Infor-assure that applicable 10CFR50, cation Report cation Report nation Appendix 8 criteria were adequately 2/18/84 3/13/84 addressed.
059 Tracked CPCo should review audits performed Ites Notifi-Item Notiff-Infor-prior to June 1983 to assure adequacy cation Report cation Report
/
mation of auditing, proper closecut,10CFR50 2/18/84 3/13/84
\\
Appendix B compliance, and objective evidence as to adequacy of the audits 060 Tracked CI0 provides a series of recannen-Item Notifi-Item Notiff-Recommen-dations in the following categories:
cation Report cat lionReport dation
- 1) Management Involvement; 2) Track-2/17/84 3/13/84 ing Audits / Audit Findings; and 3)
- jf Audit Personnel Training and Certif-O?e icate Records.
97 4m ae F
4
~-...
4
~
4 CIO ITEM SUf94ARY - CONTINUATION SHEET 1
i Classiff-Open CPCo Response Closed 1
No.
cation Description Document /Date Document /Date Document /Date Remarks
~
061 Tracked CIO recommends that the receipt Item Notifi-Recommen-acknowledgement copy of the Bechtel cation Report dation transmittai form be revised to pro-3/2/84 l
vide for a signature /date by the recipient.
062 Tracked CIO has determined that status Item Notifi-CPCo has re-Action assessment is being performed on cation Report quested BPCo pipe supports by personnel who have 3/6/84 (Ref. CSC-7424 4
1 not completed required training. All dated 3/7/84) l-personnel perfonning hanger support to perform
~ status. assessment should be checked corrective to assure they are properly qualified action and Any previous supports that were respond by 4
assessed by unqualified personnel 3/12/84.
should be reassessed.
i 063 Tracked During a review of referenced draw-Item Notifi-Action ings being used for status assess-cation Report
/
ment, CIO identified a number of 3/15/84 N
drawing identification and revision control discrepancies.
.t l
064 Tracked CIO recommends implementation of Item Notifi-N Recommen-MPQAD plan to consolidate welding cation Report g5 dation inspection requirements for electri-3/16/84 w
. cal / instrumentation equipment and lg supports into PQCI's CW-1.00 and q
EW-1.00.
>g I
h
CIO ITEM StM4ARY - CONTINUATION SHEET Classifi-Open CPCo Response Closed No.
cation Description Document /Date Document /Date Document /Date Remarks 065 Tracked CIO recommends that Zack Procedure item Notifi-Infor-MB-FP-7C be revised to reflect the cation Report nation BPCo requirement that notification 3/16/84 of addenda retirement information for BPCo documents is provided via a Subcontractor _ Change Notice (SCCN).
(
066 Tracked CIO recommends that Zack revise Item Notift-Infor-either Procedure MP-FP-18 or Pro-cation Report mation cedure MP-FP-23 in order that the 3/16/84 method used to update the welder qualification matrix be properly addressed.
5.
C#
4 h~
! E' n
" ?.
i!F m
=_
STONE & WEBSTER MICHIGAN, INC.
NOTES:
- 1. d identifies changes from previous report CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW
- 2. Closed lloid Points will be identified in the Report for MIDLAND NUCLEAR COGENERATION PLANT the week of closure and dropped from further reporting CIO HOLD POINT SIM1ARY Established CPCo Respouse Lifted No.
Description R
s Document /Date Document /Date Document /Date 005 CPCo has committed to develop a Vendor Report No. 18 Equipment Verification Program. Program 10/17/83 is required before implementation of Phase II.
i 007 Evaluation of Management Review of Report No. 19 results of Phase I activities. Evalua-10/26/83 tion is required before implementation of Phase II.
010 NIR 008 has been issued on November Report No. 22 N/A,
Hold Point Hold Point closed
(
10, 1983 to address upgrading five 11/14/83 Notif' cation subsequent to Items in the System Team Training Report 3/12/84 NIR closure.
Matrix of the Construction Training Program.
Corrective action must be completed before any walkdown assessments can l'e performed by the personnel involved in these training activities.
015 CIO has requested that the requirements lloid Point Hold Point g
for the exclusive use of chromel-alumel Notification Notification c.
i thermocouples and extension wires for Report 2/1/84 Report 2/'0/84
- 5 PWtif and certification of the accuracy i*
of the thermocouples via a C of C be
@F reinstated in PQCI PW-1.00.
Release is "E
contingent upon CIO review and acceptance "3
of the calibration certification.
g l
t
...--=-.
STONE 4 WEBSTER MICilIGAN, INC.
NOTES:
1.
(Identifieschangesfrompreviousreport CONSTRUCTION INLEMENTATION OVERVIEW 2.
Closed HIRs will be identified in the report for the i
MIOLAND NUCLEAR COGENERATION PLANT week of closure and dropped from further reporting HDHCONFORMANCE IDENTIFICATION REPORT
SUMMARY
No.
Description Issue Date Response Date Closure Date Remarks 008 Need to upgrade five training level codes 11/10/83 02/29/84 03/12/84 Reference completed !
in the System Team Training Matrix.
checklist MP-MIS-
\\
045E-0002 and NIR 014 As documented on CIO Evaluation No. MP-MIS-01/27/84 021.
074-0001, FP0 1.000 requirement that a copy of all transmittals for "Q" listed items be transmitted to MPQA0 and the Project Supplier Quality Representative was not being satisfied 015 In violation of PSPG-7.1, correction fluid 02/17/84 was used on MPQAD Audit Report No. M01-346-02.
~
016 Contrary to their W QA0 Procedure F-1M deft-02/17/84 nitions. "nonconformances" were documented as " observations" in Audit No. M01-346-02.
017 The recommended corrective action for Audit 02/17/84 finding 01F, Audit No. M01-346-02 was not Implemented, yet the audit was closed out.
019
'As documented on CIO Evaluation No. MP-MIS-02/29/84 082-0001, several discrepancies were identi-3, fled on the FDDL.
gg 020 AsdocumentedonCiOEvaluationNo.MP-MIS-03/02/84 082-0001, 4 out of 25 Distribution change gg Request Forms were not properly signed in q
violation of FPZ-1.000.
n3 5
l
.1
. ~
~< -
w
,,-n..
,._n-n..
CIO NONCONFORMANCE IDENTIFICATION REPORT SUPMARY - CONTINUATION SHEET No.
Description -
Issue Date Response Date Closure Date Remarks-021 During a resampling/ evaluation of the 03/12/84 Corrective action
,s Construction Training Matrix in conjunction was initiated at the (
with the closure of NIR 008, two nonconfor-time of the evalua-mances were identified regarding requirements tion in the form of for training to 8PCo field procedures.
changes to the appro-priate matrices.
3G Ee
-z ng E
J
~
s.- _. -.
STONE & WEBSTER MICHIGAN, INC.
CONSTRUCTION IW LEMENTATION OVERVIEW MIDUUm IWCLEAR COGEKRATION PLANT WEEELY M ETING SIMIARY
[
Date Attendees Discussion Topic CIO Comments i
N rch 12 MtC Meeting NRC
- 1) NRC was concerned that different revisions Documents are attachments to 1984 with CIO CIO of documents in a package had the same SAP prints and can properly SAP date.
have different revisions.
No problem identified.
M rch 13 Construction CPCo
- 1) Discussed general status of construction No CIO concerns identified.
1984 Status BPCo Meeting _
B&W CIO l
N rch 13 Area Team CPCo
- 1) Status Assessment scheduled to be complete No CIO concerns identified.
1984 Staff Meeting MPQAD by 3/23/84 to support turblee roll C
- 2) Discussed diesel generator rk l
- 3) Emphasized need to update Mf.CS l
- 4) Discussed work required to support sub-l contractor in Control Room i
(
N rch 13 CCP General CPCo
- 1) Discussed CPCo plans for nea r term presen-CIO identified concerns Ry l
1984 Coordination WQAD tation to NRC on CCP status relative to integration of gg.
""II"9 CCP Phase I results into a gq
- 2) Reviewed presentation to be made to the 10 NRC in the near future on CPCo proposal master list of plant status g,
l for release of additional modules for and work to go.
gg l
CCP Phase I.
og
WEEKLY MEETING StM4ARY - CONTINUATION SHEET Date 9
Attendees Discussicn Topic CIO Comments March 13 Group Staff CPCo
- 1) Discussed CIO NIR 021 (Training Matrix)
No CIO concerns identified.
March 14 Meetings
- 2) Status Assessment can begin in Control March 16 CIO Room in two weeks if Module 240 is released 1984
- 3) Emphasized training requirements
- 4) MLCS must be kept up to date
- 5) May get more modules released soon March 13 HRP Action CPCo 1)DiscussedHRPstatusinMoEules102and120 No CIO concerns identified.
1W Items Meeting
- 2) Working to finalize baseline number of hangers
- 3) Thirty nine people are qualified for hanger reinspection March 14, Team Meetings CPCo
- 1) Need to support non-Q work with team No CIO concerns identified.
and MPQAD personnel h 15,
- 2) Ensure files contain no unstamped "infor-mation only" drawings
- 3) Status of teams' activities for S/A and turbine roll support
- 4) Stressed update of MLCS y
S) Reviewed results of self appraisal teams Ny
]
- 7) MPQAD inspections are to be requested 9
using CWP's
m.
WEEKLY MEETING SIMtARY - CONTINUATION SHEET
,"9 Date Attendees Discuss' ion Topic CIO Comments March 16, QVP Status MPQAD
- 1) QVP progress No CIO concerns identified.
1984 Meeting CIO
- 2) Document Control is now publishing two register updates each day
- 3) Deviation Request processing is taking too long l
i March 16, Subcontracts CPCo B&W - Will have four inspectors; two are No CIO concerns identified.
1984 Meeting BPCo presently qualified Zack-ScheduledcompletionofControlRoom k
CIO is 5/1 M i
4 I
uM
!=
A8 c'$
CCP PHASE I ACTIVITY xh t
~
March 12 - March 16,1984 9
MODULE S/A QVP HRP 102 Hangers Mechanical Instrumentation Mechanical East Pipeway to I&C Mechanical Hangers Elevation 630 Electrical 120 Mechanical I&C Mechanical Hangers Auxiliary Building Electrical Elevation 584 180 Mechanical Mechanical Auxiliary Building Elevation 704 & above 200 Control Tower &
Electrical Architectural Penetratiens Arcnitecturai 340 Whip Restraints Electrical Mechanical Civil Reactor Building I&C Mechanical 4
Electrical Instrumentation j
410 Turbine Building Elevation 614 1
420 l
Turbine BuiIding Elevation 634 430 Turbine Building Elevation 659 l
620 Turbine Building Elevation 634 l
630
~
Turbine Building Elevation 659 800 Service Water Electrical Mechanical Pump House Whip Restraints Instrumentation
- Released for partial systems only l
q
-w-
--mme-v-
---e---+99-s
&w
---r
--em,-
wy-d--
t 9-p----w-w9---
9 ------ -- -
me,,-p----
y.-
--"Ct**-
r-'s---*-*---F1'v' W
STONE & WEBSTER MICHIGAN, INC.l'PRWCIPAL STAFF 4A 1Acw, IDPRP P.O. Box 2325. BOSTON, M AsSACHUSETTs 02107 9/RA DE Y!R A
- R:.1s F FC C'RMA kQ SCS v
~f3
((jA Nil
' F_
Filo d,,p Mr. J. G. Keppler, Administrator, Region III March 29, 1984 Nuclear Regulatory Commission 799 Roosevelt Road J.0. No. 14509 Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 SWM-064 Docket No. 50-329/330 CIO Weekly Report No. 41 Construction Implementation Overview Midland Nuclear Power Plant h Cunnrdction Implementation Overview (CIO) Weekly Report Number 41, f
for the period March 19, 1984 through March 23, 1984, is enclosed.
This report includes a summary of CIO activities for the week and open Items, NIRs, and Hold Points.
M 4
J. E. Karr CIO Program Manaaer Enclosures JEX:NL CC:
DLQuamme, CPCo Midland (site)
NIReichel, CPCo Midland (site)
RAWells, CPCo Midland (site)
JJHarrison, US NRC Glen Ellyn, IL i
RJCook, US NRC Midland (site) l Public Document Room l
j I
g& - k1$3}Y 3
Stone & Webster Michigan, Inc.
CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW
- CIO -
WEEKLY REPORT NUMBER 41 PERIOD - March 19, 1984 through March 23, 1984 i
5 1
Contents Page J
I.
0verview........................................
1
}
II. Act iv i ty Summa ry................................ 2 i
III. Activity Details................................
2 IV. Genera 1.........................................
6 V.
Attachments.............................,.......
6 t
A.
CIO Item Summary i
l B.
Hold Point Summary i
i C.
Nonconformance Identification Report (NIR) Summary D.
Meeting Summary VI. Exhibits 1.
CCP Phase I Activity i
i i 400-001A m
~
,.7 4
j
+
j, I
CIO REPORT NUMBER 41
~
p.
OVERVIEW-During this reporting period Status Assessment (S/A). Quality Verification Program (QVP) and Henger Reinspection Program (HRP) activities continued.
^
Activity ' levels continue to increase steadily as personnel are added and i
i the number of modules and commodities being statused or verified increases.
t l
Exhibit 1 to,this report identiffAs the modules presently available for Construction Completton Program (CCP) Phase I activity and the ongoing i
{
work, by discipline, fea S/A, QVP and HRP during this reporting period.
]
It should be noted that tte HRP referenced above is, programmatically, not a part of-the CCP.
Howa w r, for purposes of CIO reporting, HAP activities been and will continue to be reported under the general topic of the have j
CCP.
This is to provide a clear understanding of the full scope of
?
activity underway in the plant at a given time and should provide a more
~
complete presentation' of the results of CIO assessments than would be j
available if this item were addressed separately.
I The principal effort of CIO cont'inues to be the ongoing assessment of CCP
}
' - j Phase ! activity. Aside from CIO Item Number 063 (see CIO Report Number 40) field activity continues in a satisfactory manner and in ~accordance with I
procedures.
CIO is continuing to follow the program integration activity
- 1 for CCP which will be discussed further in Section !!! of this report.
i 1
In addition to CCP related assessments, during this reporting period CIO devoted significant time to the continuing evaluation of document control, M
3
(
.. ~
t 400-001A
. N
- ('
.)
f s '
~.-
~,
- -.. ~ -.
+
Page 2 of 6 the activities of Zack and 84W and to the SSI Program of Mark Technologies Corporation (MTC). These..as well as other CIO activities which required a h
lower level of effort, are summarized in Section !! below and details are provided in Section !!!.
1 l~
!!. ACTIVITY SIMIARY A.
CCP Activity Monitoring l
}
8.
Document Control Assessments 1
C.
Training Program Evaluation i
D.
Diesel Generator Program Follow-up p
l E.
Zack Weld Evaluation
).
F.
SpatialSystemsInteractionProgram($(IP) Review i
G.
84W ASME Program Assessment i
H.
NRC Commitment List Follow-up Attendance at Various Site Meetings J.
CIO Action to Close Out Items and N!R's as Responses are Received
!!!. ACTIVITY DETAILS (Paragraphs Correspond to Items in Section !!)
)
A.
CIO overviewed'the CCP actlytty underway in each active module during this reporting period. In conducting this overview, CIO continued our-l previously reported practice of reviewing planning efforts, working documents and personnel qualifications, witnessing work in progress and following the processing of resultant documentation.
During this period, the activities overviewed by CIO continued to be performed in j
a satisfactory manner. Overall, CIO concludes that the personnel l
performing CCP activity are conscientiously and rigorously following s
I
- j
- 400-001A
=L
- - --- - : a a
Page 3 of 6 procedural requirements in executing their assigned tasks.
CIO continues to follow the program integration efforts of CPCo and BPCo.
These include the updating of the Material, Labor, Cost and Schedule (MLCS) data base, identification of work scopes and statusing of work completion.
Progress in each of these areas has been noted and resolution of CIO concerns is attainable.
CI0'will continue to monitor this activity closely as it is an important element of the transition from Phase I to Phase II.
B.
During this period, CIO initiated an evaluation of document control
~
activities at the Field Document Control Center (FDCC) and at those stations which are being prepared ~ for future activation as reported in CIO Report Number 37.
Thesa are presently identified as stations numbered 209, 219, 309, 501 and 503.
This evaluation is being conducted as an-in-process. review of the short and long term corrective actions provided to CIO in response to CIO Item Number 043.
Additionally, the document can'rol concerns expressed to CIO by a CPCo employee are encompassed.
Discrepancies identified during this reporting ceriod are detailed on CIO NIR's 022, 023 and 024.
Completion of the evaluation and final results are expected next week.
C.
CIO attended and evaluated the following training classes:
Verification of Electrical Raceways and Supports (FIE-9.009)
' Field Fabrication, Repair and Erection of Structural Steel and l-Miscellaneous Material (Specification C-304C)
-l i
400-001A p
h g
4 W
1 Paga 4 of 6 j
1 Identification and Marking of Embed 3 Affected by Anchor Bolt Proximity Requirements (FIC-7.000)
The training was conducted in an effective manner and in accordance with Procedure FPG-2.000 (Re: Checklists numbered MP-MIS-035E-020, 021 and 022).
Additionally, CIO reviewed, evaluated and accepted the CPCo response to CIO Item Number 056 and subsequently closed this item.
D.
CIO is continuing to follow progress in the Diesel Generator Installation Program.
Activities in this area continue to be performed satisfactorily. One area has been identified.as a potential problem.
The description of the interrelationship between MPQAD and BPCo for QA/QC activities or ASME related work needs to be clearly defined with respect to procedural control and code responsibility and atthority. This will be documented in CIO Item Number 069.
E.
CIO initiated evaluations of the Zack welding program in the control room during this period.
In-process work in the control room was I
observed as well as related activities. This evaluation will continue and should be completed in 2 to 3 weeks.
No discrepancies have been identified to date.
}
F.
During this reporting period, CIO continued monitoring the SSIP.
l Currently, MTC has completed the initial system walkdowns and is engaged in evaluation of the Interaction Identification Sheets (IIS) 400-001A O
Page 5 of 6 which were prepared during the walkdowns.
Final walkdowns are not scheduled to begin until 1985.
CIO has minor procedural questions remalqing relative to the SSIP which will be addressed and resolved during April, 1984.
With the resolution of these items, C10's evaluation is that the initial phase of the SSIP was conducted satisfactorily' in a thorough manner and in accordance with requirements.
Once resolution is obtained, CIO intends to close out SSIP related activity until the f~1nal walkdown program commences.
G.
.CIO is continuing our evaluation of the B&W ASME III Installation Program.
One CIO Item (Number 068) has been forwarded to CPCo as of this date. This item requests resolution of an apparent inconsistency
-in ASME code effective editions and addenda relative to installation of ASME component supports.
No new items have been identified as concerns beyond those reported in CIO Report Number 40.
Further review of those concerns and further evaluation of other program documents and activities are progressing.
H.
CIO continued to monitor progress in the consolidation of NRC commitments into the Correspondence and Commitment Management System.
CPCo Site Management Office has validated their portion of CCP related commitments and forwarded them to CPCo Licensing for incorporation in the overall program. Overall progress is continuing satisfactorily.
4 I.
CIO attended those site meetings summarized in Attachment D to this report.
400-001A
+
w e
W hy
Page 6 of 6 J.
Activity related to CIO Items, Hold Points and NIR's is summarized in Attachments A, B and C respectively.
IV. GENERAL A.
CIO staffing remained at 33 during this reporting period.
V.
ATTACHMENTS A.
CIO Item Summary B.
CIO Hold Point Sumary C.
CIO NIR Summary D.
Meeting Summary
^
a S
4 E
l l
l i
- 400-001A i
' l' ^.
,; 'N-,
4
x STONE & WEBSTER MICHIGAN, INC.
NOTES:
1.
<( Identifies changes from previous report C0ttSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW 2.
Closed items will be identified in the report for the MIDLAND NUCLEAR C0 GENERATION PLANT week of closure and dropped from further reporting CIO ITEM
SUMMARY
Classifi-Open CPCo Response Closed cation Description Remarks iDocument/Date Document /Date Document /Date l
030 Tracked Need to review Vendor Equipment Report No. 5 Action Verification Program - MPQAD/SMO 7/18/83
/
037 Tracked CIO observed that two boards with Report No. 24 Partial response 'ss Action protruding nails lying in Cable Tray 11/29/83 (CSC 7244 dated 1AKA019 (Q Tray) had punctured the 1/27/84) accept-cable jacket of a "Q" cable. The j
ed via CIO let-cable is Q-Channel A. 480V, MCC.
ter SWMCP-024 NCR 000925 was issued by MPQAD on dated 2/3/84.
November 22, 1983. CIO will track Closure pending
~ 1
~
this item to assure that corrective cable repair action (repair) has been performed during CCP to approved procedures.
Phase II.
043 Tracked CIO Phase III evaluation of archi-Item Notifi-Item Notifi-Ref. CPCo Action techtural/ civil document control cation Report cation Report letter measures resulted in findings listed 1/6/84 1/17/84 CSM-0719 In the Item Notification (similar 1/16/84 conditions are identified in MPQAD l
MQAR-DAT-1). CIO requests CPCo's plan for addressing the problems noted and for implementing and verifying corrective action on both MQAR-DAT-1 and this item.
3%
4 ?:
ii*
o=b 5
400-001 9
Q
e,
.-.a.
i CIO ITEM SlM(ARY - CONTINUATION SHEET Classifi-Open CPCo Response Closed No.
cation Description Document /Date Document /Date Document /Date Remarks 046 Tracked CIO requests placement on distribu-Item Notifi-Item Notifi-Partial CPCo Infor-tion for documentatiori and proce-cation Report cation Report response -
mation dures pertinent to the NRC Project 1/18/84 2/8/84 Implementation Commitment Tracking Program, advance to take 8 to notice of related meeting and a 12 months.
schedule which addresses completion of these events.
049 Tracked A CIO review of document control Item Notifi-Item Notifi-CIO awaiting Infor-methods resulted in the following cation Report cation Report completion of mation observations: (1) Some uncontrolled 1/26/84 2/3/84 CPCo correc-specs contained controlled copies of tive action.
FCRs, FCNs and SCNs; (2) Controlled documents are being " decontrolled" via a line-out method which is not procedurallized; and (3) CPCo DCC personnel are unaware of the Bechtel Ann Arbor method of identifying document transmittals as either controlled or uncontrolled.
l 051.
Tracked CIO requests to be informed of meet-Item Notifi-Partial respons o Action Ings regarding the proposed plan cation Report provided via of action to address deficiencies 2/3/84 CSC-7423 dated identified in MPQAD Audit Report No.
3/6/84. CIO MSA-83-7 as well as a copy of the awaiting further proposed plan one week prior to its CPCo action.
implementation.
x 052 Tracked.
CIO requests copies of audit Item Notifi-Ites Notifi-Item Notifi-A total of 40 ( h Infor-reports for audits performed cation Report cation Report cation Report audit reports
,q mation by the NRC, CPCo and BPCo of 2/3/84 3/12/84 3/19/84 have been pro-gm i
site activities / organizations which vided by CPCo lp;g addressed Criteria XVIII of 10CFR50 between 3/12/84 :r o A
Appendix B.
and 3/15/84.
"E 400-001 b
__________ _ _ __~_.
...-.a..
CIO ITEM
SUMMARY
- CONTINUATION SHEET Classifi-Open CPCo Response Closed No.
cation Description Document /Date Document /Date Document /Date Remarks 053 Tracked As described in Section 4.2 of the Item Notifi-Item Notifi-Action CCP, CIO requests that CPCo provide cation Report cation Report a listing of all status assessment 2/16/84 2/23/84 teams, the respective team's scope and their working schedule.
055 Tracked Clarification is required regarding Item Notifi-Item Notiff-Infor-training requirements for area team cation Report cation Report mation
- 23/24 personnel performing status 2/17/84 3/15/84 assessment of raceway completion.
056 Tracked During a training evaluation for Item Notifi-Item Notifi-Item Notifi-Infor-PQCI C-1.50, CIO observed discrep-cation Report cation Report cation Report s,
s mation ancies in the lesson plan. CIO 2/17/84 2/29/84 3/19/84 requests a review to determine what impact these items have en the training provided. CIO further requests information on how MPQAD assures that document changes are referenced on the lesson plan.
058 Tracked CPCo should review past audits to Item Notifi-Item Notifi-Infor-ass'are that applicable 10CFR50, cation Report cation Report mation Appendix B criteria were adequately 2/18/84 3/13/84 addressed.
059 Tracked CPCo should review audits performed Item Notifi-Item Notifi-Infor-prior to June 1983 to assure adequacy cation Report cation Report
>x mation of auditing, proper closecut, 10CFR50 2/18/84 3/13/84
- g Appendix B compliance, and objective p; EE evidence as to adequacy of the audits.
((*c
'*E "A
.E 400-001 ft
CIO ITEM SlMtARY - CONTINUATION SHEET Classifi-Open CPCo Response Closed No.
cation Description Document /Jate Document /Date
' Document /Date Remarks 4
060 Tracked CIO provides a series of recommen-Item Notifi-Item Notifi-Recommen-dations in the following categories:
cation Report cation Report i
dation
- 1) Management Involvement; 2) Track-2/17/84 3/13/84 Ing Audits / Audit findings; and 3) i Audit Personnel Training and Certif-cation Records.
i
{
061 Tracked CIO recommends that the receipt Item Notifi-i.
Recommen-acknowledgement copy of the Bechtel cation Report l
dation transmittal form be revised to pro-3/2/84 i
vide for a signature /date by the l
recipient.
062 Tracked CIO has determined that status Item Notifi-CPCo has re-Action assessment is being performed on cation Report quested BPCo pipe supports by personnel who have 3/6/84 (Ref. CSC-7424 not completed required training. All dated 3/7/84) personnel performing hanger support to perform status assessment should be checked corrective to assure they are properly quallfled.
action and Any previous supports that were respond by assessed by unqualified personnel 3/12/84.
should be reassessed.
063 Tracked During a review of referenced draw-Item Notifi-Action ings being used for status assess-cation Report ment, CIO identified a number of 3/15/84 l
drawing identification and revision control discrepancies.
gg 4
- m 064 Tracked CIO recommends implementation of Item Notifi-
%5 Recommen-MPQAD plan to consolidate welding cation Report
{E dation-inspection requirements for electri-3/16/84
- s cal / instrumentation equipment and "E
supports into PQCI's CW-1.00 and-
- A EW-1.00.
2
?
400-001 L
...g
..Z.,
,...s.,.
..~
w -w
=w CIO ITEM SlM4ARY'- CONTINUATION SHEET l
Classifi-Open CPCo Response Closed No.
cation Description Document /Date Document /Date Document /Date Remarks 065 Tracked CIO recommends that Zack Procedure Item Notifi-i Infor-MB-FP-7C be revised to reflect the cation Report mation BPCo requirement that notification 3/16/84 1
of addenda retirement information for BPCo documents is provided via a Subcontractor Change Notice (SCCN).
066 Tracked CIO recommends that Zack revise Item Notifi-Infor-either Procedure MP-FP-18 or Pro-cation Report mation cedure MP-FP-23 in order that the 3/16/84 i,
method used to update the welder qualification matrix be properly addressed.
~
067 Tracked CIO recommends that Zack Pro-Item Notifi-Infor-cedure MB-FP-5 be revised to address cation Report mation required actions for incomplete 3/20/84 and damaged items.
068 Tracked The Midland Plant FSAR (Table 3.2-4)
Item Notifi-Action specifies use of the 1974 Edition cation Report (no addenda) of-the ASME III, 3/23/84 y
Division 1 Code, Subsection.NF (i.e.,
s installation of hangers and supports for nuclear piping). A BPCo specifi-cation, as well as the B&W QA Program Manual, reference an earlier code edition in violation of ASME III,
> m-Division I, Article NA-1000 (1974 4%
Edition). CIO requests the cau;3, RE resolution, and corrective / preven-
{E tative action for this condition, a
as well as any potential impacts on
- E i
site installations.
>?
- o 400-.001' f
~
STONE & WEDSTER MICllIGAN, INC.
NOTES:
- 1. ( Identifies changes from previous report CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW
- 2. Closed lloid Points will be identified in the Report for MIDLAND NUCLEAR C0 GENERATION PLANT the week of closure and dropped from further reporting CIO Il0LD POINT
SUMMARY
Established CPCo Response lifted NO.
Description Remarks Document /Date Document /Date Document /Date 005 CPCo has committed to develop a Vendor Report No. 18 Equipment Verification Program. Program 10/17/83 is required before implementation of Phase II.
007 Evaluation of Management. Review of Report No. 19 results of Phase I activities. Evalua-10/26/83 tion is required before implementation of Phase II.
015 CIO has requested that the requirements Hold Point Hold Point for the exclusive use of chrome.1-alumel Notification Notification thermocouples and extension wires for Report 2/1/84 Report 2/10/84 PWHT and certification of the accuracy-of the thermocouples via a C of C be reinstated in PQCI PW-1.00.
Release is contingent upon CIO review and acceptance of the calibration certification.
Rf
- C x
!E m,
C+
5
~
100-001
'E i
h.'
+
i STONE & WEBSTER MICllIGAN, INC.
NOTES:
1.
(identifieschangesfrompreviousreport CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW 2.
Closed NIRs will be identified in the report for the MIDLAND NUCLEAR C0 GENERATION PLANT week of closure and dropped from further reporting i
N0HCONFORMANCE IDENTIFICATION REPORT SumARY No.
Description Issue Date Response Date Closure Date Remarks I
7 014 As documented on CIO Evaluation No. MP-MIS-01/27/84
\\
074-0001, FPD 1.000 requirement that a copy of all transmittals for "Q" listed items be
~
transmitted to MPQAD and the Project Supplier Quality Representative was not being satisfied.
~.
01S In violation of PSP G-7.1, correction fluid 02/17/84 was used on MPQAD Audit Report No. M01-346-02.
~
016 Contrary to their MPQAD Procedure F-1M deft-02/17/84 nitions, "nonconformances" were documented '
as " observations" in Audit No. M01-346-02.
017 The recommended corrective action for Audit 02/17/84 finding 01F, Audit No. M01-346-02 was not implemented, yet the audit was closed out.
019 As documented on CIO Evaluation No. MP-MIS-02/29/84 082-0001, several discrepancies were identi-fled on the FDDL.
020 As documented on CIO Evaluation No. MP-MIS-03/02/84
>g 082-0001, 4 out of 25 Distribution Change 4m Request Forms were not properly signed in M5 violation of FPZ-1.000.
,K]
SO n%.
i
.E.
400-001
=
~ m.
CIO NONCONFORMANCE IDENTIFICATION REPORT
SUMMARY
- CONTINUATION SilEET No.
Description Issue Date Response Date Closure Date Remarks 021 During a resampling/ evaluation of the 03/12/84 Corrective action Construction Training Matrix in conjunction was initiated at the with the closure of NIR 008, two nonconfor-time of the evalua-mances were identified regarding requirements tion in the form of for training to BPCo field procedures, changes to the appro-priate matrices.
022 At work Print Station 219, CIO reviewed 80 03/23/84 out of 1116 documents. 20 documents were found discrepant, as described in the NIR.
023 At Work Print Station 209, CIO reviewed 03/23/84 80 out of 1116 documents. 23 documents contcined discrepancies, as decribed in the NIR.
024 At Document Control Station 501, CIO 03/23/84 reviewed 200 out of 5533 drawings. A total of 13 discrepancies were identified, as described in the NIR.
m Nh na n
E" 8 a?
"E "a
i E
400-c01 t
- n. - -.
STONE & WEBSTER MICHIGAN, INC.
CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW MIDLAND NUCLEAR C0 GENERATION PLANT WEEKLY MEETING St# NARY
,"9 Attendees Discussion Topic CIO Comments Date March 20, HRP Status MPQAD
- 1) MLCS being updated to reflect hangers in No CIO concerns identified.
1984 Meeting CIO each module March 20, Area Team CPCo
- 1) Requesting more Ann Arbor support for
\\ No CIO concerns identified.
1984 Staff Meeting MPQAD large "Q" items l
BPCo CIO March 20, Group Staff CPCo
- 1) Training updates continuing No CIO concerns identified.
1984 Meeting AD
- 2) MLCS being updated 9
CIO
- 3) Discussed possible release of additional modules for CCP Phase I i
March 21, CCP CPCo
- 1) Discussed concerns expressed by CIO relative CIO is contin ~uing to follow 1984 BPCo to integration of CCP Phase I activities, this topic.
CIO training and documentation' March 21 Team Meetings CPCo
- 1) Raceway MLCS update ahead of other CIO is evaluating Document March 22, MPQAD disciplines Control at this time.
RF
- 2) Document Control Station 501 is usable for No CIO concerns identified.
{*
ch 23 1984 all electrical & main station for area teams g}<
- 3) Training is being completed expeditiously gg
- 4) Teams to get all 'Q Lists' back from MPQAD of!
by 6-84 2:
(continued)
?
+
-.. ~. -.
i WEEKLY MEETING StM4ARY - CONTINUATION SHEET
[
Attendees Discussion Topic CIO Comments Date March 21 Team Meetings CPCo (continued) i March 22, MPQAD
- 5) MLCS is being updated
- 6) S/A to begin in Control Room first week rch 23 in April if release is approved by the NRC 1984
- 7) Diesel Generator work may start on 5-1-84.
S/A should start 4-1-84 b
March 21, CCP Overview NRC
- 1) Discussed general CIO evaluation of CCP No CIO concerns identified.
1%4 CIO progress to date I-
- 2) Agreed to meet bimonthly for coordination and information exchange i
March 23, QVP Assess-MPQAD
- 1) Discussed status and progress of QVP No CIO concerns identified.
1984 ment Meeting CIO 2);QVP is performing satisfactorily to date 3)' Number of drawing revisions is high
[,
- 4) Craft cooperation for QVP is good
[
March 23, Subcontracts CPCo B&W - May remove up to 28 snubbers No CIO concerns identified.
~
1984 Meeting BPCo
- Unit 1 upgrade to begin by 4-6-84 t
- Hanger reinspections are ongoing, Zack 7 are complete
- Will have 4 inspectors qualified by 3-29-84 g[
a, w Zack - Drawing issue process is slow f
- Closed 4 NCR's, opened 0 gg
'*E og I
e
Weekly Report No. 41 Exhibit 1 CCP PHASE I ACTIVITY March 19 - March 23, 1984 MODULE S/A QVP HRP 102 Hangers Instrumentation Mechanical East Pipeway to Mechanical Mechanical Elevation 630 I&C Electrical Electrical 120 Mechanical Mechanical Mechanical I&C Electrical Auxiliary Building Electrical Elevation 584 180 Auxiliary Building Mechanical Mechanical Elevatior. 704 &
above 200 Control-Tower &
As dd La Lur ai -
~
Electrical Penetrations 340 Civil Hangers Electrical Civil Mechanical Architectural I&C Mechanical Electrical Instrumentation 410 Turbine Building Elevation 614 420 Turbine Building Civil Elevation 634 430 Turbine Building Civil l
Elevation 659 t
i l
i 620 Turbine Building Civil
,.j Elevation 634 630 Turbine Building Civil Elevation 659 l
800 Civil Electrical Service Water Electrical Mechanical Pump House Whip Restraints Instrumentation
'l
'* Released for partial systems only
- HRP is also active in modules 130,140 and 150 400-001 4~.
s
-,---v,,,--,.m--
,,--r-a_
D
}
}JGG >,&a/c.)
f,,m d%~ikj 1
.