ML20091F209
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:, o,, UNITED STATES 8 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g 7. E WASHINGTON, D. C. 20556 %,*****/[ S FY9 I 4 34 Docket Nos.: 50-329 OM, OL { and 50-330 OM, OL j i l APPLICANT: Consumers Power Company [ FACILITY: Midland Plant, Units 1 and 2
SUBJECT:
SUM 4ARY OF OCTOBER 27, 1983 EETING ON MIDLAND HEATING, VENTILATION AND AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEMS i On October 27, 1983, NRC staff members from NRR and Region I I met with Consumers Power Company, Bechtel and Zack to discuss the design of the Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning ( HVAC) System for Midland Plant, Units 1 and 2. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss four open items from an NRC design audit held on October 4 - 7, 1983. is a summary of the meeting. Staff conclusions resulting from this audit and the earlier audit of October 4 - 7, 1983 will be provided by a separate report to be issued in early 1984. t Darl Hood, Project Manager Licensing Branch No. 4 Division of Licensing
Enclosure:
As stated cc: See next page 4 i l e. l ~ l 8406020063 840517 J: PDR FOIA l RICE 84-96 PDR y I s [ '5 ~ a, ,a
) MIDLAND Mr. J. W. Cook t Vice President Consumers Power Company 1945 West Parnall Road 4 l Jackson, Michigan 49201 i i cc: Michael I. Miller, Esq. Mr. Don van Farrowe, Chief i Rooald G. Zamarin, Esq. Division of Radiological Health Alan S. Farnell, Esq. Department of Public Health Isham, Lincoln & Beale P. O. Box 33035 Three First National Plaza, tansing, Michigan 48909 Sist floor Chicago, Illinois 60602 Mr. Steve Gadler 2120 Carter Avenue James E. Brunner, Esq. St. Paul, Minnesota 55108 Consumers Power Company 212 West Michigan Avenue U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Jackson, Michigan 49201 Resident Inspector's Office Route 7 Ms. Mary Sinclair Midland, Michigan 48640 j 5711 Sumerset Drive Midland, Michigan 48640 Ms. Barbara Stamiris i 1 5795 N. River i Stewart H. Freeman Freeland, Michigan 48623 Assistant Attorney General 1 State of Michigan Environmental Mr. Paul A. Perry, Secretary Protection Division Consumers Power Company 720 Law Building 212 W. Michigan Avenue Lansing, Michigan 48913 Jackson, Michigan 49201 Mr. Wendell Marshall Mr. Walt Apley Route 10 c/o Mr. Max Clausen Midland, Michigan 48640 Battelle Pacific North West Labs (PNWL) Mr. R. B. Borsum SIGMA IV Building Nuclear Power Generation Division Battelle Blvd. Babcock & Wilcox Richland, Washington 99352 7910 Woodmont Avenue, Suite 220 Bethesda, Maryland 20814 Mr. I. Charak, Manager NRC Assistance Project Cherry & Flynn Argonne National Laboratory Suite 3700 9700 South Cass Avenue Three First National Plaza Argonne, Illinois 60439 Chicago, Illinois 60602 James G. Keppler, Regional Admin. U.S. Nuclear-Regulatory Comission, Region III 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 I e '?-- -wg-
Mr. J. W. Cook. cc: Mr. Ron Callen Michigan Public Service Commission 6545 Mercantile Way P. O. Box 30721 Lansing, Michigan 48909 i i Ms. Julie Morrison i Midland Daily News 124' Mcdonald Street Midland, Michigan 48640 Billic Pirner Garde Director, Citizens Clinic for Accountable Government Government Accountability Project l'o itute for Policy Studies 15t; Oue Street, N.W. Washington, D. C. 20009 Mr. Howard Levin, Pro.iect Manager TERA Corporation 7101 Wisconsin Avenue 1 Bethesda, Maryland 20814 } Ms. Lynne Bernabei Government Accountability Project 1901 Q Street, N.W. Washington, D. C. 20009 N l 1 / \\.. i i o s ' x;;;g[{ - g;; ).i.; _. 7:p w ~ g . (y g w
Supplemental page to the Midland UM, OL Service List Mr. J. W. Cook l 3 cc: Coninander, Naval Surface Weapons Center r ATTN: P. C. Huang i l White Oak i: i Silver Spring, Maryland 20910 Mr. L. J. Auge, Manager Fac'ility Design Engineering Energy Technology Engineering Center P. O. Box 1449 Canoga Park, California 91304 Mr. Ne 1 Gehring U.S. Corps of Engineers NCEED - T 7th Floor 477 MicMgen Avenus ~ Detroit, Michigan 48226 Charles Bechhoefer, Esq. Atomic Safety & Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Washington, D. C. 20555 Dr. Frederick P. Cowan Apt. B-125 6125 N. Verde Trail Boca Raton, Florida 33433 Jerry Harbour, Esq. Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Washington, D. C. 20555 Geotechnical Engineers, Inc. ATTN: Dr. Steve J. Paulos 1017 Main Street Winchester, Massachusetts 01890 ATTN: Clyde Herrick Franklin Research Center 20th & Race Streets Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103 Mr. Patrick Bassett Energy Division Norwest Bank Minneapolis, N.A. 8th and Marquette Minneapolis, Minresota 55479 'I
- I l-Y k
- a.
- +nps y. ; ;,,
~. ENCLOSURE 1 Staff Design Review and Audit of the MidTand HVAC System On October 27, 1983, the staff from RIII and NRR met with representatives from Consumers Power Company (the applicant) and Bechtel Power Corporation at the Midland Plant site to discuss the design of the Midland HVAC system. A list of meeting attendees is I included in Attachment A to this' report. The purpose of this meeting was to further discuss four unresolved items from a previous HVAC system design audit held on October 4-7, 1983. The four unresolved l items were: u (1) It was not evident that Bechtel has properly used the design guide for HVAC ductwork to qualify the ductwork when the span between { supports exceeded eight feet. l-(2)7TheseismicallysupportedroundHVACductworkwhicharenotsafety-related that are routed vertically along the containment will, appeared to have duct spans exceeding the eigt.,, Toot critefion. l (3) The expansion anchor bolts in the HVAC support baseplates appeared to be the most limiting component in the HVAC structural design. Prying action of the baseplate on the bolts had been ignored according to the design guide for HVAC supports. (4) The qualification of the HVAC duct flange bolts-(3/8" diameter) had not been properly documented for the applicable loadings. 3 The resolution of these four items are Biscussed in the-following paragraphs: 11 Use of HVAC Design Guide for Ductwork The design procedure entitled, " Design Guide for Nuclear Power Plant Seismic Category I Rectangular HVAC DJcts (DRAFT)," dated April 15, 1978, states-that the minimum yield strength of the HVAC ductwork material (A526 or A527) should be 36 ksi. The design guide provides an empirical formula for the caiculation of the required duct sheet thickness, t, in its Equation 7.3. The equation is as follows: f E_M (a)(c) t = 2.5 fyi,(Fa (a + c) where: t = sheet thickness E = modulus of elasticity fy = material yield stress P = design pressure Fa = allowable stress a = duct width c = stiffener spacing i a.
- y
- \\
-[ O * [ ? s s ~
- ~
[. [. Furthermore, generic design tables provided in the design guide were l based on a material yield stress of 36 ksi. The staff's concern from the earlier audit was that for Midland, the design specification j (7220-M-151A) for HVAC installation specifies that the HVAC duct { matarial A526 and A527 be provided with a minimum yield stress of 1 30 ksi. It should be noted that the ASTM material specification for A526 and A527 does not require a minimum yield strength. Thus, the staff had requested that the applicant demonstrate that, for Midland, i the empirical formula had been used with a materihl yield strength of j 30 ksi and that the generic design guide tables.had not been used for Midland. n The applicant provided the staff with several randomly selected calculations which used the design guide to calculate the HVAC duct i stresses. These calculations were sele.cted from the.approximately 170 duct spans which exceeded the eight.f00t_criterjon_and.are listed in i i } Attachment B to this report. The staff noted that the spans for. .j. i rectangular ducts varied between 8.83 feet and 11.08 feet and a n j calculation for a circular duct qualified a span et 16 feet. All the calculations used a yield stress of 30 ksi for the duct material. Thus, e j based on our review of the calculations, the staff concluded that the applicant has used the appropriate yield stress (30 ksi) for the duct i material which is in accordance with the Midland design specification (M-151A) and that the ' generic design guide tables were not used. This l Item is, therefore, resolved.
- 2) Review of Calculation for HVAC Duct Inside Containment During the previous visit, the staff,had noted that two large diameter circular ductwork were routed vertically along the inside of the apex of the containment)g an inverted U-shape and criss-crossing at the containment wall (formin The staff expressed concern about the
. structural integrity of the duct and supports where the eight foot span criterionappeared to have been exceeded. The containment spray lines i wei. routed in front of the ductwork and failure of the ductwork or supports could nave impacted the containment spray lines. The HVAC system noted by the staff is known as the dome air mixing system. The maximum diameter of the circular duct is 28 inches. The duct span between supports is 9' - 6". i After the staff's previous visit, the applicant discovered that they could not find the original support calculations for the HVAC dome air l' mixing system. The applicant did find a copy of the original calc'ulation which had not been fonnally issued. However, the calculation was based on old (superseded) seismic building response spectra. ' As a result, the applicant performed new calculations to supersede the. original calculations. The calculations were based on the revised seismic L response spectra. The new calculations used an SSE peak acceleration of 1 5.85 g. The calculation verified that the stresses in the ductwork and i-supports are acceptable. This item is, therefore, resolved. l. L . 3 + _f I " N1Ni T T ,i: i f[ u
[ 3) Expansion Anchor Bolts for HVAC Supports In the procedure, " Design Guide for HVAC Supports (DRAFT)," Calculation No. 3471(Q), it was stated that for expansion anchor bolts, the prying action of the baseplate was to be ignored. This item was identified in an internal audit conducted by the applicant on February 21, 1983 and was considered an unresolved item. Bechtel explained that the civil / structural criteria of AISC are used for Expansi'n anchor boit capacity is based on HVAC support design. o manufacturer's data and testing. A safety factor of four or five is added to the bolt allowable to account for slippage. Bechtel does not use ASME Subsection NF for HVAC support design. Many HVAC expansion 4 j anchors were installed prior to the issuance of IE Bulletin 79-02. l Ho m e A LE_ Bulletin 79-02 a_ddressed only oice suoports (not building steel). Consequently, no redesign of other (non-piping) supports which were designed to building steel criteria was undertaken. The AISC, ACI-318 and ACI-349 criteria do not address prying action of baseplate on bolt loads. However, Bechtel noted that ACI does address prying action of steel-to-steel connections. The steel-to-steel prying action is also addressed in the AISC Code (8th Edition). Bechtel contacted other engineering offices and found that no one is considering prying action for embedded, anchor bolts for non-piping supports. Bechtel further gave the staff a copy of a letter from the AISC which states that the effect of any prying action with a steel-concrete connection would be small (see Attachment C). Bechtel referred to testing performed by TVA on expansion anchor bolts. The testing concluded that the ultimate strength of the anchor is not reduced with the effects of baseplate prying included. Thus, Bechtel concluded that because the concrete is relatively sof t compared to steel, che effects 7 of the baseplate prying action will be small. In addition, the slippage of the bolt does not degrade the ultimate anchorage capacity even though preload might be lost. The staff asked the applicant what type of anchor bolts are used for the Midland plant. Bechtel stated that only Hilti and Redheads are used. For Redheads, only a 7/8" diameter bolt is used because Hilti does not make a 7/8" diameter bolt. All other bolt sizes are supplied by Hilti. Bechtel noted that Hilti has provided an end designator on their bolts. A stamped letter designates the length of the bolt. (e.g. an "0" designation is used for an 8t" long bolt). Consequently, use of incerrect or substitute bolts can be verified. Additionally, if a low-strength bolt were substituted for the high-strength anchor bolt, the torque requirements 3pecified in Specification C-305 (see Attachment D) would assure an initial preload stress in the bolts of app 9ximately 30 ksi. Thus, the allowable design load in the bolt is assured in the preload. e l I
6 'o f i [ 1 i The staff noted that it has not yet detennined what the significance of the prying action would be for expansion anchor bolts in baseplates other ( than piping supports. This item remains unresolved pending further review i by the staff of the prying action and the adequacy of the expansion anchor l bolts. 1 .4) Calculation for Duct Flange Bolts i The 3/8" bolts used in the companion flange connections of the HVAC ductwork were qualified by Bechtel in Calculation No. 34-323(Q) revision 0 dated October 14, 1983. The calculation. concluded that assuming one i bolt is effective in each corner of the flange, the bolt has adequate l strength to acconinodate the applicable loads and load combinations. The staff found the calculation to be based on conservative assumptions and the results appeared to show an adequate design margin. It should be noted that prying action (steel-to-steel) was considered in the i calculation per AISC (8th Edition). A sununary of the design margin for the maximum bolt loads for several duct sizes are shown in Attachment E. l I' e L l-,
- 4
~ o n. ' -n f _ v: - g g;f,g.,.;.,j1: ~ >+ }
ATTACHitENT A Ii/A 7/82, b)h!9E Cd)A9A99 _ ho**Yb. ux; Ck h d. g i 3.s e //ei73en6En 97PQ4D ch,/e fr%af CP C. - Gs n / bb dea.1 ate. AH'04D ~ AguM A m e*J PA!:curaw AAo e.aei.. .L. ). bro bm v. Sec.b e f.Y. M4'uPArNy 8FcHyn. Jkts fed. $ce bu.R G hacMTEl. bicsN9h6 pig-(sagYe.e h.k.u\\ C.6n Res' dent l I) A V e. 9e c.a.x C Pco E.Oc-:4 e e.de A.Jc icharc! $cdlan be % Debs}er CIO' STeUE Smsr$ ZAc.K c.c. %~ s %%o C.P G w. L.<_. Trdud 3 Lc:,anh , $%bec-hvAc,A 3 eu A~osa sau 6eemeu (kr. enc,. f~t/~/,k urec Dii-ViD To:A-o NRC /inea 6m Q
- c. P Ce s'M O J. 3. %Ilivm (bPc - Hyac
.l ~. _ -f pp :+ - u
. s s-l l ( ( i { ATTACHMENT B l List of Documents Reviewed at 10/17/83 Meeting
- 1) Calculations for HVAC duct with span exceeding 8 feet.
Calculation No. Revision 34-309 0 34-300 0 34-299 0 34-293 0 i 34-292 0 34-256 0 34-250 0 p. 34-241(Q) 0 34-212(Q) 0
- 2) Calculation for Dome Air Mixing Supports and Ductwork Calc. No. Q218 (5.137)(Q), Revision 1, dated 10/27/83.
l
- 3) Calculation for Companion Flange Bolt Load Calc. No. 34-323(Q), Revision 0, dated 10/14/83 I
's e e 't s n a G p& y
g-1 c C ATTACHMENT C ~ i N!r.,, o AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF STEEI CONSTRUCTION INC. f The Wrigley Buitding / 400 North Michigan Avenue / Chicago, lilinois 606114185 / 312
- 670 2400 j
me
- a k
l i i 1 i ~ t September 22,' 1983 Mr. Theodore E. Johnson Bechtel Associates Professional Corporation P. v. Box 1000 Ann Arbor, MI 48106
Dear Mr. Johnson:
l I have your letter of suly 20, 1983 addressed to Mr. Milek. Mr. Milek l has retired from AISC. l You are correct that AISC does not address the possibility of prying l.' action on anchor bolts. The only tests that I am aware of have been with steel-to steel connections. It seems to me that any prying action with a steel-concrete connection would be small, if indeed, it exists. The concrete is quite soft compared to steel and would probably yield before significant prying forces developed. I have never heard of any problem traceable to prying action dith anchor bolts. Sincerely, o '[ CIV:1. ENGin!ER:NG FC'.*t2R M ANN aA50R Robert O. Disque ,N a..e. c ; t :. s Assistant Director Jonh-M. 7 E. /I ' Ip l ! s:....-ec. o. . t,,11 Technical Publications ~ i ensee.w. i ~~ i ! c sen J ! cor ni L j ROD /jf 3 ,sigayj. #A. e ,.cnis.n. w. I I I ' tJ.ntas. G. I I I Newat.W. I I I Rotz, J. I I l Snuar uqavel. P. 1 l l Twesen. G. I varca. J. l l Patti l s,. r.'s 3?2 l l I ~l s. v.
.-.i,..-.
r -w b. .., -. -. - ~. m y WEDGE AND GTUD TTt'E ANCllONS IN Nt.lNFOHCED CONCMETE' Mlalaum clear Distance Mlaimum Hlnlaum e Snetallation Test Torques Embedment Emisedmont Minimum Minlaum - from the Torque at Author Threads Not (After Hefore After C/C* Edge Edge et Diameter 1.ubricated(1) Installation). Torquing Torquing Spacing Distanca Embedment __{l h L f Mk.).,,,,, f i t - l hj_ - _ fin.) fin.) J n.]_ _ fin.1 _ fin.1 l t/4 5 - 10 5 1-1/8 L 3 1-1/2 3/8 25 - 35 20 1-5/s 1 3/s 4 2 I/2 35 - 55 30 2-1/4 2 5 3 5/8 130 - 160 to 2-3/4 2-1/2 6 3-1/2 r 130 - 160 so 4 13/4* 6 3-1/2 S/S 240 - 270 135 3 1/4 2-7/e '7-1/2 4 3/4 240 - 270 135 4 3-5/8 ,7-1/2 4 3/4 135 5 4-5/8 !7-1/2 4 !9 5 3/4 240 - 270 7/8 21% - 355 165 4 3-1/2 7/8 215 325 165 5-l/2 5 9 5 1 425 - 475 240 4-1/2 4 10 6 1 425 - 475 240 6 5-l/2 10 6
- See Table 4.3 for blockwa'lle N
n
- see Table 4.2
~ i C
- "setroactive from April 23 1976 n
- g e
rry 2d NOTES: for the dittecent concrete These values give a torque range which was determined by testing anchors c1 strengthe used on the job (for 1/2*. 5/8". 3/4*. and 1* expsnelon anchor s only). Il vu
- 2) Deleted ith prior approval of project y*.
l The minlaum spacing and alnlaus edge distance may be reduced up to 505 w un-on es ([ 3) engineering. E ea n length for lastallatt n. unless hated otherwise on n ", For a given diameter. use longer annimum embedmont Embedmonte show in the design drawings 4) the design documente or as approved by project engineering. 7 n are embedmonts before torquing. -s ement length (In.) from the "* Minlaum embedmonte af ter torquing can be obtained by subtcactlag dleplac U l o lengths shown on the deelga drawing: Rott Diameter (In.) t/4 3/8 1/2 5/1 3/4 7/4 1 g h embedment w a Displacement Length (in.) 0.125 0.25 0.25 0.; 5 0.375 0.50 0.50 has been loosened and then retighteni.4, the torque at Installation shalt When an Installed expansion anchot length after torquing 1 hall be verttled. E 5) apply for rettghtening the anchor. and embedmont 4 U .s 086tn 1-
- e.; e; > *.,
~ .$,. n. - .. w.nWe*E1WQFM'
- W " W *
.1
e o e e. ATTACHMENT E To lz ch } -lU h C. 'D u c-$' Yl% So t Lo< /.r Q e-c j I Force s tN B O L.T .I @.s.AF e.'~ss OT DO W N ~ E A RTH 'QO At i SMEET OPERATIPXr (nAW.T MM W ALLOWA6LE N. Cnt e iew c+ ; t p g Q7.S.,Z E T*H ICkNESS P RE SSEE IN go,Llog NSioN ~4 o---w w m w.e. yJ%g I' -.. Go" X Z G" _ 16 G AGE .. j S"..L ./,7.,80 lb Z34b Ib. g, f') t s . Go$ A. 60 14 G A G E.. . 'I S" lb 2340 lb g,g l f900 SC.. X '3 0".. 1O GAGE l*" 585 lb- *?,4
- o. 2 f
'b t 4 ,Go"X Go" 16._G A GN M. {L/c Ib. 2.64 o Ib-p, g (, i i e I b i f I t l l l r l i { l l I 4 I h* -===-*-t .ms _e .ff-1/r', ,y,,' .4 4- .g.
- g,y, _.
f . i k PasE I REGION III TRACKING SYSTEM 92/28/84 C10 LAND - ALLEGATIONSe INDIVISUALS Co Fe Me Me Ne Oe me Ke Ye Ze AND CCe ONE COPT FOR P. SPESSARO UPDATED 2/te/e4' COMPLETE LISTING ITEM MSOLUTION l.. ITEse No./ INSPECTOR / ITEse TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIN INSPECTOR CLOSE0UT + MESPONSE OUE, NODULE NO. DNIEF DESCRIPTION DESleNATED No. ?NSPECTION ASSIGNED REPORT No. 329/02803 01 INDIVIOUAL C ALLEGAT!ON MIDLANO I MAWWINS e3 43 I SAW MEAVY ORINnING AROUSE 0 THE MOLDIAYS AT THE POSEY'VILLE LAf00WN AREA. ROUTINELY WORKERS 60. 00eN TO OWENS PARTY STORE AT LUNCH AND SET eEER. AT LUseCM SOME WORKERS ALSO See0KE0 GRASS. l THIS ITEN CLOSED SASED ON AU6UST 4e 1943 SWORN STATENENT OF INDIVIOUAL C (PAGES T=el. INDIVIOUAL C*S SWORN STATENENT 4 SENT TO DI ON AUGUST 38,1083. TME Ise0IVIOUAL WAS UNASLE TO PROVIDE DETAILS OF NOW THE CONCERN INPACTED SAFETY RELATED CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 2 m -329/82803-42 INDIVISUAL C ALLEGATION MIOLANO 1 844WMINS e3 08 PIPEFITTERS MAD DELTeUCKLES CONSTRUCTED FR0ae STAINLESS STEEL PIPE ANO MELDING A005. 5088E WERE MAse8FACTURE0 IN THE C0seSO SMOP. i A w0RRER FROM THE AURILIARY WUILDING MADE BARGECUE SEEWERS. YOU .COULO SET ALNOST ANYTHING YOU WAeriiO IF YOU ENEW THE RISMT PEOPLE. THIS ITEse CLOSED MASE0 See AUGUST 4e1983 SWORN STATENENT OF INDIVIOUAL C IPASE tel. 1 .THE INDIVISUAL WAS UseASLE TO PROVIDE DETAILS OF NOW THE I CoseCEnes IsePACTED SAFETY RELATEO CONS (RUCT304 ACiIVITIES. 329/ese03-43 Ise0!WISUAL C ALLES8',308 NIOLAND I HAWu!NS 83 48 1 MERE WAS A LOT OF S00Flese OFF SV WORMERS AT THE PLANT. WORMERS WERE SLEEPIsee 04 THE Joe. I MEARG Ruse 0RS THAT SoseE WORMERS WOULO WALK A400000 WITH THE SAseE P' Aaset ALL DAY LONS IN ORDER TO Leon GUSY. THIS ITEN CLOSED SASED 080 AUGUST 4,1983 j i-sworn STATEseENT OF Ise0IVIOUAL C (PaeE ID. Test Ise0IVIOUAL was useAWLE TO PROVIDE DETAILS OF M&W THE l CONCE#ee IsePACTED SAFETY RELATED C0seSTRUCTION ACTIlITIES. I + 9 lb j.
- '4"+'
- s-e..
J ~ ~ a -- . w__ _ ~ PAGE 2 REGION III^THACKING SYSTEM et/2s/e4 a NISLAND - ALLEGATIONSe INDIVIOUAL5 Ce F He Me me ce No Xe Ye Ze AND CCe ONE COPY FOR R. SPES$4RO UPDATED 2/2s/s4 CosePLETE LISTING 1 TEN M50LUTION l ITEN No./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPE / FACILITY NAset LICENSEE INTER 1N INSPECTOR CLOSEOUT AESPOWsE JUC N00ULE NO. e#IEF DESCRIPTION DEsteesATED sec. INSPECTION ASSIGNE0 REPORT 000. 329/Ste43-GA INDIVIOUAL C -ALLEGAT!ose MIDLANO 1 MAWWINS 83-06 .I IN 1979 THE ZACE BLUEPRINTS Ase0 DRAWIssGS WERE IN NORRIDLE CONDITION. MOST OF TME ZACM OUALIT.Y CONTROL PROCEDURES FOR i CoseTROLLING DRAWINGS WERE se0T FOLLOWEO. ORAWIseSS AND ORAWINS + REVISIcess seERE se0T PROPERLY CoseTROLLEO. REFER TO SWORN STATEseENT OF INDIVIOUAL C (PAGE 12-293 AN0 SECTI0es5 II AND 't III'0F REPORT 83-04. (Oost VIOLATIONI. THIS ALLEGATI0es WAS CATESORIZE0 AS AN Use0EFleIED C080CERN i* (I.E. LACK OF SPECIFICITYI Asse WAS A00RE55E0 UNDER THE FIVE ' ~ -PNASE PROGRAN Ise REPORT 83-98. IY I 329/82803-0$ IseBIVIOUAL C ALLEGATION MIOLAsso 1 MAWWINS 33-06 .I ?: I se0TICEO THAT 50seE CostSTRUCTION 0000!FICATI0805 WERE -00seE SEFORE TeeE CMasesES MAD H EN APPROVED. THIS OFTEN IseWOLVED HAse0ER DE5Iese Cetamets. REFER To swomes STAftteeENT OF Ise0IVIOUAL C i IPAGES 29-333. l THIS ALLE64TIose WAS CATEGORIZED AS Ase use0EFIseEO CoseCEnos II.E. LACK OF SPECIFICITY 3 Asse WAS ADDRESSEO Wes0ER THE FIVE PHASE PROGRAN IN. REPORT 83-48. s 329/etee3-46 IssolV100AL C_ ALLEGATION MIDLAeso 1 NAWWINS 83-98 PR0eLEN WAS IDENTIFIED IN 1979 CoseCEeWeless NATERIAL TRACEASILITY. I WAS REVIEWING A SLUEPRINT Ase0 SAW THAT A DUCT REQUIRED A PIITSOURGH SEAN. NE11HER THE ZACE PROJECT MaesAGER 000R THE FOREstAse stesEW WHAT A PITT58UsteH SEAse WAS. IT WA5seef SElsee USEO. THE i F0NEMAN AseO THE PROJECT NAseAGER TOLO IEE 10 Omer TME:50 EJECT SECAUSE THEY WOULO TAKE CARE OF IT. IT 00Nei Mee0W IF THEY EVER DIO. TM15 ITEN CLOSE0 e5ASED ON AUGUST Ae19e3 SWORse STATENENT 0F INDIVIOUAL C IPAGES 33-378. PITT500RS SEAN WAS 800T USED i Ice SAFETY RELATED APPLICATI0ess. i {I
- f r
I I I t i i 1 ^
- e ;ni '.
.., = _ _ __ i a-N feet 3
- ESIGN III TRACMING SYSTEst 02/28/84 CleLAND - ALLEGATIONS. INDIVIDUALS Ce Fe He Me No Os ne se Ye Zo AND CCo ONE COPY FOR R. SPESSARO UPOATED 2/20/s4 COMPLETE LISTING ITEN MSOLUTION ITEse No./
IseSPECTOR/ ITEN TYPE / FACILITY NAseE LICEleSEE IseTERIN INSPECTOR CLOSEOUT MSposeSE OUE se000LE NO. e#IEF OESCRIPTION DESISee4TED 800. IstSPECTI0es AS$leNEa) REPORT NO. j 329/s2003-47 INDIVIDUAL C ALLEGATI0es MIDLAND I MAwKINS 33-44 4 p ~ OC WAS SUPPOSED 10 C0es0UCT INDEPENDENT INSPECTI0eeS OF INSTALLE0 MVAC UNITS 10 VERIFY THAT UNITS NOT YET INSTALLED MRE KEPT i COVERED AND CLEase AS MOUIRED. INSTEA0 wt JUST COPIED THE seAINTENANCE SUPERvISOReS RECORDS wITMOUT PERFOReeING INSPECTIONS. i THES ITEN CLOSED EASED ON AUGUST Ae19s3 sworn ST4TEseENT OF INGIVIDUAL C ePAGES 37-50). THIS ALLEGATION WAS CATE60RIZE0 AS A8e UNDEFINED CeseCERN I l II.E. LACK OF SPECIFICITV) ANO WAS A00RESSED UNDER THE FIVE PMASE Pes 0GRAes IN REPORT 83-06. t: 329#e2s03-08 INSIVISUAL C ; ALLEGATION MIOLANO I M4WNINS 33-03 24CE WELM RS STARTED DOIsee ARC-SRAZING wtLOS M FOM A PROCEDURE .WAS DEVELOPED TO COVER SRAZING REGUIREMENTS ON W8 ELDER SUALIFICATION REOUIRNENTS FOR BRAZING. SC DID STOP THE WORE AND PUI MOLDS ON ALL WORM ALMA 0Y 00esE. FINALLY ZACE CAME UP WITH A PROCEDUK'Asso NAS THE mELSENS TESTED a. OUALIFIEO. THIS ITEM CLOSED SASEO Det AUGUST A,1983 sworn STATEsegeef 0F INDIVIOUAL C ePAGES 50-55) A8e0,MPORT 83-88 SECTIONS I Asse IIe l 329/02803-09 INDIVIOUAL C ALLEGATI0se MIOLANO I MAugINS 33 es THERE M M NANY B40 WELDS IN THE CONTROL ROON CLASS I HVAC DUCTwoRK w!TH OEFECTS SUCH AS WLOW HOLES Asse EXCESSIVE POROSITYe SOME esELOS WEM SARELY ACCESSISLE. IF AT ALL. I 80esef Kee0W IFe Dee Howe TMEY WERE ALL RECHECKEO. SC INSPECTORS FOUseD FIVE OR SIR BAO wtLOS Ose OceE PIECE OF DOCTwoRE. THE FOREseA80 OIONef WANT TO CUT THE PART OUT Ateo REPLACE IT SECAUSE THAT wo0LO M Too MUCH wuMK. I Deceef simow IF THE PIECE WAS EVER MPAIRED OR REPLACEO. l MFER TO Sw00ese SIATE8eENT OF Ise0!v! DUAL C IPAGES 55-623 AND MP0eef 33-00 SECTI0h5 I Au0 II. THIS ALLEGATION WAS CATEGORIZEO AS AN UDIOEFIssE0 C000CERN ~ (I.E. LACE OF SPECIFICITY 3 A880 WAS ADDRESSEO use0ER THE FIVE PMASE Pee 0 grate IN REPORT.43-eS. ~ v W G -. : e.;".' ~
_m m- _ y. t, y : y... .;n, r ; g g... e .g r. . ; p __f zy. o'.g ,._..c n. [ ~~. ~ ) Ir"...
- '[,,.[7D%
.I _. f$.' 'Is i.Y :fhl f . ". -i h 3 [,5 .f 5 n_ REGION III TRACKING SYSTEM 02/28/84 PAGE A NIOLAND - ALLEGATIONS, IN0!v! DUALS Ce Fe He Me No Oe Re Ao Ye Ze AND CCe ONE COPY FOR R. SPE55ARD UPDATED 2/28/84 COMPLETE LISTING RESOLUTION ITEN ITEN No./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIM INSPECTOR CLOSE0UT RESPONSE DUE N00ULE NO. BRIEF DESCRIPTION DE516 MATED NO. INSPECTION ASSIGNED REPORT NO. 329/61883*IS IN0!VIDUAL C ALLEGATION MIDLAND I MAWKINS 83-08 IN TPE EARLY SUMMER OF 1979 THERE WAS NO CONTROL OVER THE USE .OF WELO ROOS. WORetERS JUST SRASSED AS MANY 4005 A5 THEY WANTED BY THE HANOFUL AND OROPPED THEM OFF LATER. THERE WERE NO SISM-INS OR SISM-0UT5. INSPECTORS WOULD FING THE ROOS LYING IN THE FIELO ALONS WITH THE ROD STUSS AND HALF USED PIECES. THE 4 WELO ROO CONTROL PROCEDURE WAS SUBSEQUENTLY REVISE 0 ANO ENFOMCED. REFER TO SWORN ST6TEMENT OF INDIVIOUAL C (PAGES 62-66) ANO REPORT 83-98 SECTIONS II, IIIe ANO V. THIS ALLEGATION WAS CATE60RIZED AS AN UNDEFINED CONCERN II.E. LACK OF SPECIFICITYI ANO WAS A00RE55E0 Uas0ER THE FIVE PHASE PROGRAM IN REPORT 83-88. 329/82803-I! IMOIVIDUAL C ALLEGATION MIDLANC I HAWKINS 83-08 IN SOME CASES THE GC INSPECTORS SAID THERE WAS NO DOCUMENTATION THAT THE ANCHOR SOLT5 FOR THE HVAC SYSTEM WERE EITHER TOROUED AT ALL OR TOROUED WITH A CALIBRATION TORQUE WRENCH. SOME OF THE BOLT 5 IN OUESTION WERE NO LONSER ACCESSISLE. OC WENT SACK AND TOROUED ANO DOCUMENTED AS MANY AS THEY COULD REACH SUT I DON'T KNOW WHAT HAPPENED TO THE REST. REFER TO Sh0RN STATEMENT OF IMOIVIDUAL C (PAGES 66-TAI AND REPORT a3-es SECTIONS I & II. 329/82803-12 INOIVIOUAL C ALLESATION MIDLAND I HAW:" INS 83-08 A UC NANUAL WAS 50 VAGUE IT WAS USELESS. THE MANUAL WAS REVISED IN OCTO#ER 19T9. I 00 NOT KNOW IF THE PREV 1005 INSPECTION PEPORTs DONE UNOER UNRELIABLE GC INSPECT 10N STANDARDS WERE RECNECNED TO SEE IF THE EAWLIER TESTS HAO MISSED PROSLEMS. REFER TO SWORN STATEMENT OF IMOIVIDUAL C (PAGES T4=TT) AND REP 0MT 83-86 SECTIONS IIe III AND V. THIS ALLEGATION WAS CATEGORIZED AS AN UNDEFINED CONCERN (I.E. LACK OF SPECIFICITY) AND WAS ADORE 55ED UNDER THE FIVE ~ PHASE PROGRAM IN REPORT 83-08. 4 ! e.;*y.. *., , ' 3 ] T - f - Q. j l =..' ' ' %-) l g V '* V l N,~}.. ;' Q-R.. g g;i. %.- [.. _, _ ;>.',,.T. .f t L A F ;' _ \\, :ggG._._p m, y.,f 3.. l, '.,,_.>..,.c, '~ ~ ^ ll .~ .t r g .g ,u
.....-.a
- u...
e PAGE b REGION III TNACKING SYSTEM 92/20/84 CIOLAND - ALLEGATIONS INDIVIOUAL5 Ce Fo No Me Me De Re Re Yo Zo AND CCe ONE COPY FOR R. SPESSARO UPDATED 2/28/44 COMPLETE LISTING i I ITEM MSOLUTION ITEM No./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIM INSPECTOR CLOSE00T i MSPONSE OUE MODULE No. e#IEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED NO. INSPECTION ASSIsosEO REPORT NO. j 329/etes3-13 INDIVISUAL C ALLEGATI000 Nice.AND I MAdu1NS 83=ce I WAS INIORMEO'TMAT THE TESTING PROCEDURES UNDER WHICH INSPECTORS WERE GUALIFIED WERE NOT,6000 EN004M TO COVER Test MET i-SKILLS. I UNDERSTAsee THAT THE M OUIRENENTS MAWE SEEN M VI5EO, OUT AGAINe UNUUALIFIE0 INSPECTORS MAY MAVE WISSE0 OUALITY FLAWS F0F A LONS TIseE. REFER TO Sw0RN STATEstEasi 0F INDIVIOUAL C IPAMS TT-eAl AND REPORT 83-ee SECTIONS Ile IIIe AND v. i THIS ALLEGATION was CATESORIZED A5 AN 0800EFINED CONCERN t!.E. LACK OF SPECIFICITYI Ass 0 WAS A00RE55E0 UNDER THE FIVE PMASE PROGRAM.IN REPORT 83-0s. i l' 349/82003-84 INDIVISUAL C ALLEGATION MIOLAND I MAugINS G3-00 00E TO SCHEDULING PRE 55UMS NONCONFOneelsee MWAC DUCTucan WAS [l IseSTALLED IN THE PLaseT. THE 2ACK CMICAec 04 MANAMA ?NO VICE PMSIDEsef SAW THE OUCTwoRE Ats0 LET IT SO TO THE FIELO. REFER TO 50mmes STATENENT OF INDIVIOUAL C (PAGES G4-94) ANO l MPORT e3-ese SECTIONS Ie IIe IIIe IVe W. + THIS ALLEGATION WAS CATEGORIZED AS AN Use0EFINED CONCERet (I.E. LACE OF SPECIFICITY) Asse WAS 400# ESSE 0 Wes0ER TF. FIVE t' 'l PMASE PROGRAM IN MPORT 83-08. l t *' j 329/s2803-15 Issolv! DUAL C ALLEGATION NIOLAce0 I MAWWINS 03-00 THERE IS STRoose RESENisetter AtaiseST KCMTEL A800 2ACK GC AT MIOLAce0. INSPECTOR 5 ARE REFERRE0 TO AS TROUsLEMANERS' OR AS A l Joat. eC SUPERVISOR FONCEO OUT AFTER TRYItes TO MAKE et STR0800ER. t M FER TO sworn STATEseENT OF INDIVIOUAL C (PAGES 94-973. THIS ALLEGATION WAS CATEGORIZED A5 AN use0EFIseEO C000CEnte II.E. LACE OF SPECIFICITY) Asso WAS ADDRESSED Use0ER THE FIVE PetASE PaceRAM Ice MPORT 83-es. 1], c i)? >i Y.e (%f* N D
- PAGE 6
88ESION III TNACK!t06 SYSTEN 92/23/34 CISLAND - ALLEGATIONS. INDIVIOUALS Ce Fe Me Me No Oe le e Re Ye Ze ANO CCe Oest COPY FOR R. SPE554RO UPDATED 2/28/84 i COMPLETE LISTING ITEN RESOLUTION { ITEN ese./ INSPECTOR / ' ITEN TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIN INSPECTOR CLO5EOUT RESPONSE DUE se000LE NO. eMeIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED 800. Ite5PECTION ASSIGNED REPORT No. 329/02006-41 Ise0IVIOUAL F ALLEGATION NIOLAse0 I MAWWINS E3-04 j IN THE 18ef-000CTIcos To THE INVESTI6ATIose INRC Ise5PECTIces REPORT Oss ZACK) Test. LIST OF 00CustENTS APPLICASLE TO THE '.VAC t ACTIVITIES FAILE0 TO INCLUDE THE A8eERICA8e WELOING SOCIETY 1AW53 ?' D-19 C00E5 REFEleENCING THE WELDIses 0F 64LVAleIZE0 STEEL. HE 2-aELIEVES THAT THIS &#e00LO MAVE BEEN CHECKED SECAUSE THE AWS C00E5 PROVIDE 18eE 84LVANIZE0 STEEL WEL0 tees REeUIREseENTS THAT e See00LO MAVE SEEN EteFORCEO. CLO3E0 IN REPORT E3-08 (REFERENCE INTR 000CT30se SECTI000 Ate 0 SECTION II IMO. F. WAS NOT SATISFIED WITH THE RESULT 5 OF S0-108 se-IIe CLOSEOUT 4 tee PE50LUTION OF CoveCEmee5 ARE 00CuesENTE0 18e REPo#15 e4-21 00-228 e4-22, 84-238 84-23e 84-248 84-26e Se=2FI ANO 82-15e 82-15. Ise0EVIOUAL J Fe5 AFFIDAVIT SENT TO 014 ON AUGUST 9e1983. s 329/02806-02 38selvtDUAL F ALLEGATION MIOLA8e9 I MAWWIIe5 83-88 2 NE-BELIEVES THAT THERE IS 508eETHises SI68eIFICANTLY MI55tNS IN THE DISCUSSI0es OF ALLEGATI0ee Oast teeRC INSPECTI0ae REPORT Oes ZACut Ae0UT THE TRAVELERS FNose CMICA60 NOT MEless Asses 0TATED TO 56e0W WetETHER OR NOT TeeEY WERE SCRAP. ME DISCOVERED THAT ALL SCRAPPED 42 Pa#TS WERE NOT ACTUALLY DISCAROEO. ME BELIEVES THAT peEA8eT THAT Df EVkN DEFECTIVE PARTS WERE #Elles USED TO SUILO THE PLAteT. RE50LUTIO8e 548eE A5 State-9!. 329/02806-43 Ise0IVIOUAL F ALLEGATION NIOL4800 I HAWWINS 83-98 IN THE FIaselses OF ALLEs4TIO8e 000E ME NAS SIStelFIchasi 015CaeEPA8eCIES WITH THE INVESTIGAT0sts. TO THE SEST OF HIS Mes00eLEDGE THE INITIALItse OF THE LEFT-SIDE OF THE TRAVELER WAS NEVER A PART OF THE SC PROCEDURE UNTIL AFTER HE IIGITIATED THE ORISIteAL ALLEGATI0 pes. etE GELIEVES THE POST-INITIALIIe6 0F TMC i TRAVELEte$ 00E5 NOT C08e5TITUTE A CONFIRNATIose OF CUstRENT ACCustACY IN TeeE TRASELERS. RESOLUTION SA8eE A5 82#86-01. I ] _ _ ; e.; * */ *. * *. .m.
~~ ~ PAGE T NEGION III TRACKING SYSTEN 32/2e/34 WIOLANO - ALLEGATIONS. INDIVIOUALS C. Fe Me Me Ne ce Re se Ye Ze ANO CCe ONE COPY FOR R. SPE55490 UPDATED 2/28/84 k COMPLETE LISTING c y ~ ITEN RESOLUTION q, ITEM No./ INSPECTOR / ITEse TYPE / FACILITY NAhE LICENSEE INTERIN INSPECTOR CLOSE0GT
- ESPONSE DUE MODULE NO.
BRIEF DESCRIFTION DESIGesATED No. INSPECTION ASSIGNE0 REPORT NO. Q( t 1 .389/s2896-94 INDIVISUAL F ALLESATION MIOLANO 1 MAWKINS 33-03 r HE DELIEVE5 THAT CONTRARY TO THE NRC INSPECTION REPOPT ON ZACNe J CMICA40 PAI86TED WELDS WERE COMPLETELY COVEREO WITH THICK PAINT -i Asse THAT THE PAINT OR LACK OF IT WA5 A RELIASLE FACTOR IN OETERMINIsee THE SITE OF FAeRICATION AND OUEstI0as4GLE OUCT PIECES. ME SELIEVES THIS MEAses TMAT ZACK MAS ASLE TO MAKE PIECES AT THEIR LEISURE WITMOUT TRACEASILITY 04 GC Ise5PECTIONS. g RESOLUTION SAME A 82s46-91. { e i I,* 389/02894-95 Ise0! VISUAL F ALLESATION MIOLA800 I HAWKINS 33-98 I~ ME DELIEVES THAT ANOTHER SPECIFIC EXA8ePLE OF OVERSIGHT IN THE seRC Ise5PECTION REPORT ON 2ACK 13 YME LACK OF. fit 00Ises FeR m TRAVELER NUsseER We3-429-F191TI. ME CONTENDS THAT IT IS OIFFICULT 3 t t TO UNDERSTANO WHY THE NRC WOULO ACCEPT THE WORO OF ZACK OVER ' J t THE OLACK AaIO WHITE 00CUMEteT PROVIDEO OT THEM. HE ALSO QUESTIONS WHEfteER THE ITEM ve3-5H2-249437 was ACTUALLY PHYSICALLY 4 SCRAPPE0'AND THE DATE IT sAs SCRAPPEO. RESOLUTION SAME A5 e2806-01. j j if 389/82806-96 INDIVIOUAL F ALLEGATION MIOLA800 1 MAwRINS 33-93 i !Di C08eCEReeless THE' Flee 03006 ON ALLEGATION NUMSER 4 PERTAINIle6 70 TRAVELER NUMeER V27-SM34-29-F4410 tesRC INSPECT 0ae REPORT ON ZACK) ME C0esTENOS THAT IN THE LISMT OF ZACKe5 RAlePA8eT MISLEADING t l> i ST ATEseENTS To THE seRC AND Cose5UseERS PCWER CO.e IT 15 CURIOUS 70 esof t THAT NO FURTHER VERIFICATIO86 WAS MADEe OTHER THAN A PAPERWORM REVIEue To INSURE THAT THE ITEM WAS IN FACT RETUmseEO. stE M800W5 PER508eALLY THAT THE ITEM WAS NOT RETURedEO. RESOLUTION ( l SAlet AS a2806-01. a s k i y 4 e 4 + i s.:'V
. - - ~ ~ - -~-.. ~ 82/23/84 i REGION III TRACKING SYSTEN KIDLAND = ALLEGATION 5e INDIVIOUAL5 Ce Fe He Me Ne Os No Xe Ye le AND CCe ONE COPT FOR R. SPESSARD UPDATED 2/28/04 PAGE e CONPLETE LISTINS RESOLUTION ETEN FACILITT NAME LICENSEE INTERIN INSPECTOR CLOSEOUT I*IN NO./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPE / DESIGNATED No. INSPECTION ASSIGNED REPORT NO. RE;iP0NSE DUE, MODULE NO. SRIEF DESCRIPTION HAWMINS 83-08 MIOLANO 1 I 329/s2006-07 IN0!VIOUAL F ALLEGATION IT IS NIS UNDER5TANDING THAT CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY MAD DECIDED TO FORGET OR IGNORE THE UNNE50LVED ITEMS REFERENCEO IN (NRC INSPECT 10N REPORT 04 ZACKl. HE SELIEVES THAT A NCAR N0al LETTER SENT TO LACK FRON CPCO IN MIO-FEBRUARY CONeRATULATING TM N ON A CLEAN SILL OF MEALTH AND AUTHORIZING ZACK TO CONTINUE ME REMAINS UNCONVINCEO UNFETTEREO WITH THEIR OWN REPAIR PROGRAM. THAT lett OF ALL ZACK WELOS WERE REINSPECTED. RESOLUTION 9 SAME AS 82884-01. i HAWWINS 53*48 MIOLANO 1 t-329/s2e96-40.IMOIVIOUAL F ALLEGATION TRAVELER NUNDER V26-5N25-44.1-P1515 HE DOES NOT SEE WNERE ( ON THE DEEPER PR08 TEN EVIDENT FRON THE NRC FINOING IS A00RE55EO SY t ME SAYS THAT IT APPEARS THAT THE NRC INSPECTION NEPORT ON ZACK. ZACK OPERATE 0 UNDER THE ASSUMPTION THAT FIELO TESTING FOR SA5 TI6HTNE55 WOULO PRECLUDE W15UAL INSPECTION. NE SATS TNIS IS NOT ALLOWEO PER APPLICASLE C00E5 ANO IT 15 IMPOSSISLE TO PERFORN ~ 1999 INSPECTION AFTER INSTALLATION. RESOLUTION SAMEiAS I ease 6-e1. HAWKINS 33 03 MIOLANO 1 329/s2006-09 INDIVIOUAL F ALLEsATION HE MAS A SIGNIFICANT DISCREPANCY WITH ITEM 5tAl IALLEGATION 53 IN NRC INSPECTION REPORT ON ZACK. II IS PRACTICALLY IMPOSSIBLE TO NAVE THE IDENTICAL 5ANE MATERIAL AVAILASLE FOR ONSITE REPAIR } _AS FOR THE ONIGINATION OF THE ITEM. EVEN IF REPAIRS WERE EXACTLY ACCORDINe 70 PROCEDUNE A OIFFERENCE WOULO COME WITH INDIVIOUAL WELDER $ DOING THE REPAIRS. NATERIAL TRACEASILITY AND REQUIRENENT FOR RESULAR INSPECTOR $ AFTER CERTAIN PHASES OF REPAIR IS LOST. RESOLUTION SANE AS 42896-91 HAWWINS 83 08 MIOLAND I 329/82e64-10 IMOIVIOUAL F ALLEGAfION HE SAYS THAT IN ITS CONCLUSION OF FINDING FOR ALLEGATION le THE NRC DLATENTLY OI5AESAN05 THE REGUIRENENTS FOR MATERIAL j ' THACEASILITY ANO DOCUMENTATION. (NRC INSPECTION REPORT ON ZACE). ( RESOLUTION SANE AS S2806-01. a D { i p.;'V _a
RESION III TRACKINS SYSTEN 82/28/e4 PAGE 9 MIOLANO = ALLEGATION $e IMOIVIOUALS C, F, He Me Ne 0, Re Xe Ye le AND CCe ONE COPT FOR R. SPESSARO UPDATED 2/28/44 COMPLETE LISTING RESOLUTION ITEs4 ITEN No./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIM INSPECTOR CLOSEOUT RESPONSE OUE MODULE NO. SRIEF DESCRIPTION OESIGNATED NO. INSPECTION ASSIGNE0 REPORT NO.
- a..
329/02806-11 IN0!v! DUAL F ALLEGATION MIOLANO 1 NAWRINS 83-08 4 + t HE SAYS THAT THE NRC WAS INCORRECT IN THE FINDINS ON ALLEGATION Stol FOR WHICH CPCO PAID 3500 00LI,AR5 FOR NOT HAVING CARSON DIOEIDE AVAILASLE FOR USE A5 A SHIEL0E0 SAS. HE BELIEVES THAT CARSON DIONIDE WA5 ALWAYS AVAILASLE ON THE SITE. RESOLUTION / SAME AS 82806-01. 329/82006-12 INDIVIOUAL F ALLEGATION MIOLANO 1 MAWWINS 83-08 RESARDING ALLEGATION 13 (NRC REPORT ON ZACK) ME SAYS THE NRC COMPLETELY FAIL 5 TO A00RE55 THE FACT THAT ALL ASPECTS OF REPAIR ARE NOT 00CupeENTED WITH RESPECT TO INDIVIOUAL TRAVELERS. HE SAYS i THAT A NONCONFORMANCE REPONT OR HOLO REPORT IN NO WAY SUWSTITUTES TME REOUIREMENT FOR NOTATION OF REPAIRS ON EACH COMPONENTe5 DOCUMENT. RESOLUTION SAME AS 82506-01. 329/42806-13 INDIVIOUAL F ALLEGATION HIOLANO 1 HAWKINS 63-08 RESARDING ALLEGATION 15 HE HA5 CONCERN 5 WITN STATEMENTS AS0UT Tp*C WELUING ROD ISSUE ROOM (NRC REPORT ON ZACKl. HE SAYS THAT THE ROON WAS NOT LOCKED 00 RING THE MAJORITY OF THE TIME HE WORKED THERE. WELDING ROOS WERE TASSE0 ONLY AFTER NRC CAME TO INVESTIGATE HIS ALLE8ATIONS. HE SEES OSVIOUS CONTRADICTION 5 SETWEEN THE NNCoS OWN FINOING ASOUT THE WELOING ROO $1TUATION, HIS PERSONAL OSSERVATIONSe ANO WITH LATER NRC REPORT STATEMENTS. RESOLUTION SAME A5 82806-01 5 329/92804-16 IN0!VIOUAL F ALLEGATION MIDLANO 1 HAWWINS 33-08 HE SAYS THAT THE NRC REPORT FAILED TO MENTION R04 C00Kes STATENENT TO ME THAT APPROXIMATELY 10e909 P00N05 0F NONCONFORMING T0-18 #00 MAD SEEN RECEIVED ANO THAT THE ONLY EAPLANATION OFFERED SY ZACK WAS THAT THE N00 MAO ALL SEEN THROWN AWAY. HE DOES NOT CONSIDER THIS AN ACCEPTAGLE RESPONSE TO ALLEGATION 15. RESOLUTION SAME A5 82896-01.
- 8 6e*
..c- ~ '._ '5 .p PAGE Ig HESION III TRACKING SYSTEM 32/23/86 ~ j ^ MIOLANO - ALLEGATIONSe INDIVIOUALS Ce Fe He Me No Oe Re No Ye Zo ANO CCe ONE COPY FOR R. SPE55ARD UPDATED 2/20/06 CONPLETE LISTINS ITEM RESOLUTION 4 ITEN No./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERI6e INSPECTOR CLOSEGUT RESPONSE OUE MODULE NO. BRIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED NO. INSPECTION ASSIGNED REPORT NO. 4 'L 329/82806-15 INDIVIOUAL F ALLEGATION NIOLANO 1 MAWWINS 83-98 j HE SAYS THAT THE NRCe IN THE PROSLEN SURROUNOINS RUSMIN FIRE OAMPERS (ALLEGATION leie FAILEO TO REALIZE THaf-AEGUIRED INDIVIOUAL SERIAL NUMWERS ARE NON-EMISTENT ON THE ACTUAL FIRE OAMPERS. RESOLUTION 5AME A5 82806-01. 5 ,t i 329/82006-16 INDIVIOUAL F ALLEGATION MIOLAND 1 MAWMINS 33 08 IN RESAROS TO ALLEGATION to HE FOUND NOTHIMS IN THE FINDING (NRC REPORT ON ZACK) FOR THIS ALLEGATION TO INDICATE THAT A < ~ CHECM WAS NADE TO ASSURE INACCURATE TRAVELERS WERE NOT SEING REPLACE 0 ASIDE FROM ASKING THREE MENTIONEO INSPECTOR $. HE DELIEVE5 A SIMPLE REVIEW WOULO REVEAL THE CONTRARY. HE IS ALSO CONCERNED ASOUT MATERIAL TRACEASILITY OF NEW MATERIAL ANO WELDER IDENTIFICATION. RESOLUTION SAME AS 82896-01. ,v,. =; 329/82ee6-1T INDIVIOUAL F ALLEGATION NIOLANO 1 NAWKIN5 33=es. L,; : RESARDING ALLEGATION 21, CONCERNINS PORTASLE WELO ROO CARRIER L ' 2 CALISRATION STICKERS. HE SELIEVES THAT THE FINDING INRC REPORT ON ZACN) UID NOT REVEAL THE FACT THAT THE EOUIPMENT FOR p_' CALIBRATION ANY OF THE CARRIERS WA5 INSUFFICIENT. HE CONSIDERS E, ANY AND ALL SUCH UNIT 5 TO THUS SE OUT OF CALISRATION. RESOLUTION SAME AS State-el. 329/82806-18 INDIVIOUAL F ALLEGATION MIOLANO 1 HAWKINS 83-08 HE SAYS THAT THE NRC REPORT ON ZACK 00E5 NOT MENTION HOW OR IF THE.ANSLE IRON DIMENSICN 0!$CREPANCIES FOR PART NUMSER F=916e VI-3 HAVE SEEN RESOLVED. RESOLUTION SAME A5 82896-01. ~ 329/82806-19 INDIVIOUAL F, ALLEGATION MIOLAND 1 MAWu!NS 33-08 NE SAYS THAT IN RESARDS TO ALLEGATION 1R THE NRC OVERLOOKED THE FACT THAT A COPY OF THE AUDIT TO DE PERFORMED WAS SENT TO MIOLANO SEVERAL DAYS #EFORE THE ACTUAL AUOIT TOOK PLACE. (NRC REPONT ON ZACKl. RESOLUTION SAME A5 82896-01. .. ; e.;'y
'm, i i -_,-G_. - ~ - 1a 4 PAGE II REGION III TRACKING SYSTEM 92/2e/04 MIDLANO - ALLEGATIONSe INDIVIDUALS Ce Fe He Me No Oe He Re Ye Ze AND CCo ONE COPT FOR R. SPE55ARD DPOATED 2/20/04 COMPLETE LISTING ITEM RESOLUTION i;' i ITEM No./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIM INSPECTOR CLOSEGUT RE5PONSE DUE MODULE No. SRIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED NO. INSPECTION ASSIGNED REPORT No. 329/02806-91 IN0!VIDUAL M ALLEGATION MIDLANO 1 NANKINS 83-03 CONSUMERS POWER 18ECHTELI WAS NOTIFIED OF ZACK INCONSISTENCIES -SY LETTER OATED AUGUST 20e 1981 IT220-M-1513e CALKINS TO DAVIS. i REFs CORRECTIVE ACTION RE00EST (CAR) 014. (EXHIeIT 25. SEE REPORT 83-98 SECTION I FOR RESOLUTION 850.55tEl VIOLATIONI. INOIVIDUAL N'S AFFIDAVIT ANO SWONN STATEMENT SENT TO OIA ANO O! ON AUG. 9/31 ANO AUS. 30,1983e RESPECTIVELV. j 329/02000-92 INDIVIDUAL M ALLEGATION MIDLANO 1 RIV S2-02 MIDLANO 04 CONTRACT EMPL0 FEE DIRECTED PERSONNEL TO SIGN TRAINING FORM. PERSONNEL CLAIMED THEY RECEIVED NO TRAINING. (EAHISIT SI (CNECK APPLICASILITY OF TH15 To ZACK SITE PERSONNELI. IENHIBIT 53. SEE REPORT C99900Te5/e2-02 (RIvl ALLEGATIONS 2 ANO 4 FOR RESOLUTION. REP 0MT 63-00 PROVIDC5 ASSURANCE TNAT HVAC SYSTEMS ANO COMPONENTS A3E ADEGUATELY DESIGNE0 AND CONSTRUCTE08 THAT MATERIALS AND THE 04 PROGRAM UTILIZED WERE ADEGUATE. ~ ), 329/62ste-93 IN0!VIDUAL M ALLEGATION MIDLANO 1 HAWKINS 83-98 1 l CATESORIZATION OF MAJOR DISCREPANCIES IN INTERIN REPORT t f 19-02-e1 TO SECHTEL IT220-N-151-C/e-54el ON 10-09-81 (EAHISIT 4.Al AND (ERHISIT T3. RESOLUTION SAME A5 82000-91. I i 'i 329/82003-04 INDIVIDUAL M ALLEGATION MIOLANO 1 HAWKINS 83-98 THIRO INTERIM REPORT ON DISCREPANCIES 110-23-ell SENT 70 f BECHTEL 18-23-01 (7220-4-151-C/e-5521. (ERH! SIT el PSS. 3e 6e to 12e ANO 15. RESOLUTION SAWE AS 42800-91. a 329/02404-05 INDIVIDUAL M ALLEGATION MIDLANO 1 HAWKINS 83-08 00ESTIONADLE SECHTEL ENGINEERING ANALYSIS OF ZACX OISCREPANCIE5e LETTER DAVIS TO GREUNEe 12-21-01. IENHISIT 113. RESOLUTION - i SAME AS e280s-01. P u ? -- ~ --
r ~' wa.- 4 4 ww.. %y,,, I i i 1 PAGE 12 REGION !!! TRACKING SYSTEN 82/28/e4 MIOLANO - ALLEGATIONSe IN0!VIOUAL5 Ce Fe Me Me No Oe Re X, Ye Ze ANO CCe On8E COPY FOR R. SPE55ARO UPDATED 2/20/04 COMPLETE LISTING ITEM RESOLUTItag ITEM No./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIM INSPECTOR CLOSEOUT CESPON5E DUE, MODULE NO. SRIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED NO. INSPECTION ASSIGNEO REPORT 880. j I. 329/82800-06 IMOIVIOUAL M ALLEf4 TION MIDLANO 1 HAWKINS 53-08 l i IMOIVIOUAL STATED THAT CALKINS MAD CALLED H. LEONARD AT MIDLANO (PS 14 0F AFFIDAVITI. RESOLUTION S.AME A5 82000-41. 7 ? I 329/82808-97 IMOIVIOUAL M ALLEGATION MIOLANO 1 NAWRINS 33 03 J l SECHTEL MAD KNOWLEDGE OF ZACK MATERIAL BEING SMIPPEO TO THE 4' SITE IN NONCONFORMING CON 0! TION. LETTER DAVIS TO EXCHSTAE0ie ). 11-05-R4 (EAMIsli IS). RESOLUTION SAME AS 82s05-01. i 329/s2898 *? INDIVIOUAL M ALLEGATION MIOLANO 1 RIV 82-42 ? EzAMPLES OF FALSIFIED TEST REPORT $e ONE COPY PRIOR TO FALSIFICATIONe ONE COPY AFTER. STICKERS WERE DATED 11-06-88 BUT REGUEST FOR U.S. STEEL TO UPGRADE TEST REPORT 5 NOT MADE SEFORE 01-23 81. EEAMis!T 171 EEAMIeIT 163. SEE REPORT C9990GTeS/82-02 (RIVI ALLEGATIONS 8 9e AND 14 FOR 6, RESOLUTION. ALSO 01 REPORT 3-83-925. REPORT e3-te PROVIDES ASSURANCE TMt.T MWAC SYSTEMS ANO COMPONENTS ARE ADEGUATELY DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTEOS THAT I. MAIERIALS AND THE GA PROGRAM UTILIZE 0 WERE ADEGUATE. 329/82s00-09 INDIVIOUAL M ALLEGATION MIDLAND 1 RIV S2-02 i U. S. STEEL LETTER PETERS TO MAGENs 89-21-ele IDENTIFYINS 26 Po's TMAT WERE NOT ORIGINALLY ORDERED asAFETY-RELATE 9". GEMMIBIT 203. SEE REPORT C99900Te5/82-02 (RIVI ALLEGATION 11 ANO RIII REPORT 83-08 SECTIONS IV ANO V FOR RESOLUTION. NRC MATERIAL TESTING INCLUDED SIX SAMPLES OF U.S. STEEL MATERIAL. REPORT 83-90 PROVIDES ASSURANCE TMAT MVAC SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS ARE ADEeUATELY DESIGNED AND CONSIRUCTEOS THAT e MATERIALS ANO YME GA PROGRAM UTILIZED WERE ADEQUATE. ) k .p 9 s ~ i h.gv
c . _ n.. 4 PAGE 13 REGION III TRACKING SYSTE4 02/2s/84 MIDLAND - ALLE84 TION $e INDIVIOUALS Ce Fe He Me No Oe Re As Yo 2e ANO CCe ONE COPY F0W R. SPESSARO UPDATED 2/28/84 COMPLETE LISTING } ITEM RESOLUTION i ITEM NO./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIts INSPECTOR CLOSEOUT RESPONSE DUE MODULE NO. BRIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATE 0 NO. INSPECTION ASSIGNED REPORT NO. i n,/.28..-l. IN0ivl0UAt n =LE.ATION MIDLAND i nAvnINS .3-.. ZACK AUDIT OF EOGECOMS METALS IDENTIFIES UNACCEPTASLE GA PROGRAM i (EAHIBIT III. DETERMINE IF.E06ECOMs PRODUCTS WERE USED AT j MIDLANO. SEE ALSO ERMIBITS 43 NRC 1002. SEE REPORT 83-03 l SECTIONS IV ANO v. NRC MATERIAL TESTING INCLUDED It i SAMPLES OF EDGECOMs teATERIAL. 1 REPORT 83-04 PROVIDES ASSURANCE THAT MWAC Sf5fEMS AND COMP 0esENTS ARE ADEGUATELY DESIGNE0 ANO C0005TRUCTE06 THAT l: MATERIALS AND THE GA PROGRAM UTILIZED WERE ADEGUATE. i 329/82800-11 INDIVIDUAL M ALLEGATI0es MIDLANO I RIV $2-02 d' f ZACR REMOVES DELTA SCREW (D5I COMPANY FROM APPROVE 0 WEN 00R LIST 4 ON 10-20-81 EEAMISIT 2438 MOWEVER, 3e PO*5 SENT TO 05 0043006 THE TIME THEY WERE SUPPOSEDLY REMOVED FROM LIST. (EANIBIT 251. ~,l DETER 8eINE IF 05 MATERIAL WAS USED AT MIDLate0. SEE REPORT C99900T85/82-02 (RIVI ALLEGATIONS T Ase0 13 FOR RESOLUTION. REPORT 83-ee Prow!DE5 455URAseCE THAT Hvac SYSTEMS ANO -I CosePONENTS ARE ADEGUATELY DESIGedED AND CONSTRUCTEDI THAT MATERIALS AND THE GA PROGRAM UTILI2ED WERE ADEGUATE. , rg; , ?. 4 '? 329/s2004-12 Ite0IVIDUAL M ALLEGATION MIOLAND I RIV S2-02 GUALIFICATIONS OF ZACK 04/ec PERSONNEL SUESTIONASLE (ERHISIT 261. N-DETERMIseE IF 2ACK PER$00eNEL AT MIOLAND ARE GUALIFIEO. SEE l . REP 08tf C9990eT85/s2-02 ERIVI ALLEGATI0005 2 Ane0 A FOR RESOLUTION. AL50 REPORT 83-08 SECTIONS II A800 III. REPORT 83-08 PROVIDEb ASSURAseCE THAT HVAC SYSTEMS ANO e a COMPoseEfeT5 ARE ADEeUATELY DESIsseE0 Asso CONSTRUCTEDI THAT MATERIALS Also THE GA PROGRAM UTILIZED WERE ADEGUATE. i=, l+. 4
- 8.;
- V *.
5 I c..__. ~ PAGE I4 REeION III TRACKING SYSTEM 02/28/84 4 l' MIOLANO - ALLEGATION 5e INDIVIDUAL 5 Ce F, He Me No Os He Ao Ve Ze ANO CCe ONE CDPV FOR R. SPE554RO UPDATED 2/2e/04 COMPLETE LISTIN6 4 ITEM RESOLUTION ib ! ITEM No./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIM INSPECTOR CLOSEOUT RESPONSE 00E MODULE NO. SRIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED NO. INSPECTION A5536MEO REPORT NO. { '9 l 329/020e8-13 IN0gytr JAL M ALLEGATION MIDLANO 1 RIV S2-02 l l CERTIFICATION OF TEST REspLTS (ERHIGIT 2T4) ENSWRES MATERIAL i ORDERED ON P0 C-1253 WAS SURJECT TO TES;1NG. P0 C-1253 IS ON
- f i U.S.5. LIST AS NON SR (EXHISIT 203'. SEE REPORT C99900fe5/
~ Js 82-02 (RIVI ALLEGATION 11 FOR RESOLUTION. I '} REPORT 83=ce PROVIDES A550RANCE THAT HWAC SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS ARE ADEGUATELY DESIGNE0 AND CONSTRUCTEDI THAT r ,l MATERI ALS ANO THE GA PROGRAM UTILIZED WERE ADEGUATE. . Je : 4 - t P 329/0200e-14 IN0!v! DUAL M ALLEGATION MIDLANO 1 RIV 82-02 il ZACK PRESIDENT DOES GA REVIEW IEXHISIT 27A ANO el 02-23-81. NOT TRAINED UNTIL 04-31-81 (EAHIu!T 2el. SEE REPORT C99900TS5/ 1 82-02 ERIVI ALLEGATION 4 FOR RESOLUTION. REPORT e3-0e PROVIDES ASSURANCE THAT HVAC SYSTEMS ANO j. COMPONENTS ARE ADE004TELY DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTEDI THAT MATERIALS AND TNE GA PROGRAM UTILIZEO wtRE ADE00 ATE. a J i-329/02004-15 IMOIVIDUAL M ALLEGATION MIDLANO 1 MAWWINS e3-Se M l MIDLANO MEETING NOTES OF 11-03-e1 IEXHIGIT 291. DETERMINE IF ALL 't COMMITMENT 5 WERE NET. RESOLUTION SANE A5 82ees-e1. , C+
- bf 329/02808-16 INDIVIDUAL M ALLEGATIDW MIDLANO 1 RIV S2-02 DELTA SCREW MATERI AL IDENTIFIED AS NONCONFORRING C4286-NCR 0-112e C4444-NCR-M-110. NO MARK 5 ON $0LTHE405 TO IDENTIFV
/! NN MANUFACTURER. SECHTEL CLEAREO FOR USE WITNOUT GASIS (ERNieIT 2eae '7: se Cle IEAdleli 313e AND IEFHISIT 328. SEE REPORT C9990efe5/ 32-02 IRIVI ALLEGATION 7 FOR RESOLUTION.' REPORT e3-88 PROVIDES A550RANCE THAT MWAC Sf5TEMS ANO p COMPONENTS ARE ADE00ATELY DESIGNEO AND CONSTRUCTEOS THAT MATEAtaLS AND THE GA PROGRAM UTILIZE 0 WERE ADEGUATE. 9
- c
~ ; '. ; * *.' *'*.
i 4 ? o 02/28/s4 HESION III THACKING SYSTEN l-MIOLAND = ALLEGATIONSo INDIVIOUALS Ce Fe No No No Os Re No Yo 2e ANO CCe ONE COPY FOR R. SPESSARD UPDATED 2/28/04 PAGE IS CONPLETE LISTING b,. RESOLUTION V 4 ITEN f ITEM NO./ INSPECTo#/ ITEN TYPE / FACILITY NANE LICENSEE INTERIN INSPECTOR CLOSEOUT i DESIGNATED NO. INSPECTION ASSISM O REPORT NO. i NODULE No. SRIEF OESCRIPTION RESPONSE OUE' bj' NAWKINS 03-08 329/82006-17 INDIVIOUAL M ALLEGATION NIOLANO 1 b REVIEW CPCO INVESTISATION fAPRIL 15e 19 eel 0F ALLEGERSe '. ^P ALLEGATIONS FOR CREDIGILITY. SEE REPORT 83-08 (84CupAOUNO ANO M TM000 LOGY SECTIONS AND AU60ST 30 1983 LETTER TO DI FROM y DE. THIS ITEM 15 RELATED TO OI INVESTIGATIONS OF IISIIVIOUALS t WRONGFUL FIRINS (3-02-0ST). < - ::i RIV 02-02 NIOLANO 1 329/62800-18 INDIVIOUAL M ALLEGATION 1;cEt DETERMINE IF WELOSTAR WAS INVOLVED IN SUPPLTING WELO NATERIAL T 70 NIOLAN0o (ERHIBIT All. IF S0e OETERNIM IF CERT 5 EXIST FOR NATERIAL PURCHASED IN 19T8 OR PRIOR TO THAT DATE. SEE REPORT a C99998785/82-02 (RIWS ALLEGATION IS FOR RESOLUTION. REP 0HT 83-98 PROVIDES ASSURANCE THAT MWAC SYSTEMS ANO -!L !U COMPONENTS ARE ADEG'JATELY DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTEDI THAT NATERI ALS AND THE GA PROGRAN UTILI2ED WERE ADEGUATE h l 329/82800-19 IMO!VID'JAL M ALLEGATION NIOLAND 1 HAWWINS 33=88 i ZACM AUDIT 12C/en T (09-19-81) IDENTIFIES SIGNIFICANT GA l-SREAWOOWN (EAM1 WIT A23. DETERMINE APPLICASILITT To N10 LAND. RESOLUTION SANE AS 82800-91. ISASIS FOR 2ACEe$ ALM.2Se t 1981 LETTER TO NIOLAND ON CERTIFICATION DEFICIENCIESI. F I i RIV $2=92 f, 329/82 set =20 INDIVIOUAL M ALLEGATION NIOLAND 1 ll REVIEW NRC 0111 WRITTEN 04 CAA06 FOR POSSISLE FALS: FICATION ANO i 1) APPLICASILITY TO N10LANO (ERMIBIT A3e NRC 10 Gil. 1 EE REPORT C99996TOS/82-02 (RIVI ALLEGATION T FOR RESOLUTION. REP 0r.y 33.g3 pRoyIDES ASSUNANCE THAT NVAC SYSTENS ibMO 4 l. CONE *0NENTS ARE ADE00ATELY DESISMO AND CONSTRUCTED THAT !~ 'i NATERIALS ANO THE GA PROGRAM UTILI2ED WERE ADEGUATI:. - f. i t t .2
- s.;'V
V ...,-._3 m ~ 6 4 i. PAGE IS REGION III TRACKING SYSTEN 82/28/e4 NIOLAND = ALLEGATION 5e IMOIVIOUALS C, Fe He Me Ne De He X, Ye Ze Aeso CCe ONE COPY FOR R. SPESSARD UPDATED 2/28/84 COMPLETE LISTING y RESOLUTION ITEN t f ITEN NO./ . INSPECTOR / ! TEN TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIN INSPECTOR CLO5EOUT f RESPONSE OUE N000LE NO. BRIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED NO. INSPECTION ASSIGNEO REPURT NO. g J 329/83803-01 INDIVIOUAL M ALLEGATION MIOLANO I RIV 32-02 CMTRS WERE ALTERED TO RESOLVE THE LACK OF PROPERLY REFERENCEO STANGAROS AND MISSING AUTMENTICATION SIGNATURE. THESE DOCUMENT 1 A!,IERATI0ess MERE IDENTIFIED IN THE INTERIN REPORTS ZACK $LPPLIED TO TME UTILITIES FOR A SIGNIFICANT EVENT DISCLOSURE. i' HE woGLO RATHER CLASSIFY THE ALTERATIONS A5 FOReERIES. SEE rep 0df C99900Te5/82-02 (RIVI ALLEGATIONS e AND 9 ANO 01 REPORT 3-62-425 FOR RESOLUTION. REP 0NT e3-03 PROVIDES ASSURANCE THAT HVAC SYSTEMS AND ' ~ C09PONEMTS ARE ADEeUATELY DESItseEO AND CONSTRUCTE06 THAT MATENIALS AND THE e4 PROGRAN UTILIZED WERE 40EGUATE. j. r. 'h 329/43803-02 INDIVISUAL M ALLEGATION MIOLAND I RIV 32-02 s: SCATTERED AND MISSING PURCHASE ORDERS ANO RELATED 00CUNENTATION wt#E CONTINUALLY INCLUDED IN THE PURCHASE 040ER FOLDERS WITHOUT I-et,ING LOSSED INTO THE DOCUMENT CONTROL LOS 5004 AS REOUIREO. SEE REPORT C99900TSS/82-02 t#IVI ALLEGATION 5 FOR RESOLUTION. I REPORT 83-04 PROVIDES ASSURAseCE THAT NWAC SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS ARE ADEeUATELY DESIGNEO AND CONSTRUCTEDI THAT j MATERIALS AND THE SA PROGRAM UTILIZED W RE ADEeUATE. 329/03ee3-93 INDIVISUAL N ALLEGATION MIOLAse0 I RIV st-92 PURCHASE ORDERS WERE INCOMPLETE. SEE REPORT C99994Te5/st=02 C J tRIVI ALLESATION II FOR RESOLUTIOes.
- i:
REP 0e:T e3-06 PROVI..ES ASSURANCE TMAT HV 4C SYSTEMS Aeso j 2 !+'l COMPONENT 5 ARE ADEeUATELY DESIsacEO..sp C0ee5TRUCTEDI TMAT NATERIALS AND THE SA PROGRAM UTILIZE 0 WERE AGEGUATE. f ^. 329/83e03-94 IMOIVIOUAL M ALLEGATION MIOLAND I RIV st-82 A INASILITY OF SueTIER VENDORS TO SUPPLY NISSING INFORNATION. 1 I SEE NEPORT C99944Te5/82-42 (RIVI ALLEGATIDses 6efelt Asso 11 FOR RESOLUTIcos. i REPORT 83-06 PROVIDES ASSURANCE THAT NWAC SYSTEs5 ANO 1 I COMPONENTS ARE ADEeUATELY DESIGNED Aase CONSTRUCTEDI THAT NATERIALS Ase0 THE e4 PROGRAM UTILIZED WERE ADEGUATE. ' ~ ~
- ; ec
. -~ .,3 - ~ ~. - i 82/2e/84 REGION III TRACKING SYSTEN CIOLANO - ALLEGATI0seSe INDIVIOUAL5 C Fe Me No N. Os Re Ao Ye Ze ANO CCe DeeE COPY FOR R. SPESSARO UPDATED 2/28/84 PAGE IT COMPLETE LISTING RESOLUTION ITEN ITEM NO./ INSPECTOR / ITEN TYPE / FACILITY NANE LICENSEE INTERIN INSPECTOR CLOSEOUT DESI6 MATED No. INSPECTION ASSISNEO REPORT NO. RE5 pose 5E DUE NODULE sec. SRIEF DESCRIPTION RIV S2-02 329/83803-05 INDIVISUAL M ALLEGATION MIOLANO 1 Aos APPROVE 0 WEN 00R5 LIST THAT FAILE0 TO MFLECT 2ACKes PURCHASING PRACTICES. SEE REPORT C9990efe5/02-02 (Rivl ALLEGATIONS 12 ANO 13 FOR RE50LUTIose. MPORT 83-08 PROVIDES A5502AseCE THAT NWAC SYSTEMS ANO C0seP08eENT5 ARE ADEeUATELY DESIsasEO Aseo cose5TRUCTEDs THAT 9 NATERIALS A880 THE GA PR0e# Ate UTILilEO WERE 40EGUATE. S HAe8 KINS ,33-03 329/03e03-06 Ise0IVIOUAL M ALLEGATI0ee NIOLAeso I THE PURCHA5E ORDER FOR MATERI AL SUPPLIED TO MIOLAND WOULO MAD LA5ALLE. SEE LASALLE REPCHT5 373/s2-511374/02-18 FOR RE50LUTIONe MPORT 83-ee PROVIDES A550RAseCE THAT NWAC SYSTEMS ANO ~ CosePeteENTS ARE ADEeUATELY DESIsosEO Ams0 Cose5TRUCTE05 THAT NATERIALS Aeso THE GA PROGRAes UTILIKED teERE ASE004TE. RIV 32-02 329/83003-07 INDIVIOUAL M ALLEGAT10se NIOLAND I Ace OCTOSER 9e 1981 REPORT IDEseTIFIED (Il ALTERED CERTIFICAT108858 823 WHITE-0UT USED Asso RETYPE 05 ANO t31 NEAT NUseeERS ALTERED TO AGREE WITH CERTIFICATI08es. REFER 10 MPORTS 83-48 SECTION 1e C9990GTe5/82-02 (RIWS ALLEGATIONS S ANO to Asse 01 3-82-025 FOR RE50LUTIOes. REPORT 03-40 PROVIDE 5 4550RAseCE THAT NWAC SYSTEMS Asso CosepostENTS &#E ADESUATELY DESISeeEO AND C0ee5TRUCTE08 THAT NATERIALS ANO THE SA PROGRAM UTILIIE0 teERE ADEGUATE. 329/83ee3-ee Ise0IVIOUAL M ALLEGATI0*e NIOLAsso 1 RIV 82-02 i Te*E 00CUetENT CONTROL WAS 50 POOR TRADITI000 ALLY THAT THE RECORDS MAD 8BEEN PILEO Oct FLOORS Ise SONES. EVEN AFTER THE 00CueeENT Coset 20L CENTER MAD DEEN ESTABLISME0e UNAUTHORIZED PER50esseEL WERE REse0vlees GUALITY 00CUseENT5 ulise0UT SI6eelsee ToeEN OUT. REFER TO REPONT C99900Te5/82-02 (RIvl ALLEGATIONS I 48e0 5 FOR RESOLUTION. REPORT 83-08 P90 VIDE 5 A55UNAseCE THAT MWAC 5V5 ten 5 Aeso C0aPONENTS ARE ADEeUATELY DESIGNED Asso Cose5TRUCTEDs THAT seATERIALS Ate 0 THE GA PR062AN UTILIZE 0 WERE A0 EQUATE. ~_:*.'".'.*..
PAGE Is REGION III TRACKING SYSTEM 02/2e/84 MIDLANO = ALLESATION5e IN0!v! DUAL 5 Ce Fe He Me No Oe Re A. Y, Ze AND CCe ONE COPY FOR R. SPESSARD UPDATED 2/28/04 COMPLETE LISTING ITEM RESOLUTION ITEM N0./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIN INSPECTOR CLOSE0UT RESPONSE DUE MODULE NO. BRIEF DESCRIPTION DESISNATED NO. INSPECTION ASSIGNED REPORT NO. 329/83803-09 IN0!VIDUAL M ALLEeATION MIOLANO I RIV 82-02 INTERIM REPORTS WERE PR000CEO 04 A RUSH SASIS IN ORDER TO SHOW s DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE THAT ZACK WAS IMPLEMENTING CORRECTIVE ACTION AND THAT THE UTILITIES COUL'O PROCEED WITH CONSTRUCTION. THESE INTERIM REPORT 5 MERE INACCURATE ANO 5400LO HAVE SEEN CONTINUALLY REVISED TO REFLECT AN ACCURATE STATUS REPORT. SEE REPORTS C99900Te5/82-82 (RIVI ALLEGATION I6 ANO 83-08 ' 'g SECTION I (50.55tEll FOR REs0LUTION. REPORT 83-08 PROVIDES ASSUNANCE THAT HWAC SYSTEMS ANO COMPONENTS ARE ADEGUATELY DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTEDI THAT 4 MATERIALS AND THE GA PROGRAM UTILIZED WERE ADEGUATE. i 329/03e03*It INDIVIDUAL M ALLEs4 TION MIDLAND 1 HAWKINS 33*08 AN OCT08ER 23e 190I REPORT ACCURATELY IDENTIFIED PRosLEMS WITH MATERIAL CERTIFICATIONS, IMPROPER ACCESS TO 00CUMENT5e ANO UNAUTHORIZED DOCUMENT ALTERATIONS. RESOLUTION SAME A5 82808-01. l 329/83804-91 IMOIVIDUAL M ALLEGATION MIDLAND I RIV 82-02 I HAD VIRTUALLY NO FORMAL TRAININS FOR MY WORK. SEE REPORT C99900Te5/02-02 (RIVI ALLEGATION 4 FOR RESOLUTION REPORT 83-94 PROVIDES ASSURANCE THAT HVAC SYSTEMS AND ^ ~ ' COMPONENT 5 ARE ADEBUATELY DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTEDI THAT k MATERIALS AND THE GA PROGRAM UTILIZED WERE ADEGUATE. Je. j 329/s3e04-02 IMOIVIDUAL M ALLEGATION MIDLANO I RIV 82-02 REPRODUCED COPIES WERE NOT IDENTICAL TO THE ORISINAL P0. DISCREPANCIES INCLUDED FREQUENT SPACES ON THE REPRDOUCTIONS WHICH MAD SEEN WHITED-0UT AND SOMETIMES FILLED IN OVER ASAIN. SEE REPORT C99900745/s2-02 IRivl ALLEGATIONS S ANO 9 AND OI REPONT 3-82-025 F OR RESOLUTION. REPORT 83-0e PROVIDES ASSURANCE THAT HVAC SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS ARE ADEGUATELY DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTEDI THAT MATERI ALS AND THE GA PH0 GRAM UTILIZED WERE ADEQUATE. a. w
~ - a f PAGE 19 REGION III TNACKING SYSTFM 02/28/84 MIOLANO = ALLEGATIONS. INDIVIOUAL5 C, Fe Me Me No Oe Re As Ye 2, AND CCe 04E COPY FOR R. SPE55ARO UPDATED 2/28/s4 COMPLETE LISTING i, ITEM RESOLUTION i } ITEte No./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPE / FACILITY NAtet LICENSEE INTERIN INSPECTOR CLOSE0GT RESPONSE DUE N00ULE NO. 3RIEF DESCRIPTION DESI68eATED NO. INSPECTION AS$16MEO REPORT see. [ 329/e3ee4=e3 IMOIVIOUAL M ALLEGATION MIDLAND 1 RIV e2-02 seANUFACTURERS DIO 800T SEEN E5PECIALLY CAREFUL IN MONITORING THE 'y EQUIPMENT PAPERw0RE. OceE MANUFACTURER SENT US A TVPICAL CERTIFICATION FORM FOR SEVERAL LOTS OF ufLDItes MATERIALe ALONS WITH A LETTER IN01CATIses THAT WE COULO FILL IN THE SPECIFICATIO8e5 ANO MATCH THEN UP w!TH THE P085 THEMSELVES. e SEE REPORT C99900Te5/st-42 (RIVI ALLEGATI0es le FOR RESOLUTION. 8EPORT 83-04 PROVIDES ASSURANC THAT MWAC SYSTEMS ANO l '- Comp 00 stasis ARE ADE00ATELY DE51 steed Aeso CONSTRUCTEDI THAT seATENIALS Asso Test GA PRoom&M UTILIZED WERE 40E004TE. O 329/83804=44 18s0!VIOUAL M ALLEGATION MIOLA880 1 RIV e2-02 C0seseENTS C08eCERNIce6 POOR 00CuseENT CoseTROL. REFER TO REPORT i-C9990eTe5/s2-02 tRIVI ALLE64TI0005 1 Atto 5 Ase0 OI REPORT 3-42-025 FOR RESOLUTION. l-REPo#T 83-04 PROVIDES 4550RAseCE THAT MVAC SYSTEMS Asso C0sePoseEseT5 ARE ADEeUATELY DESISteEO AteO C000STRUCTE06 THAT MATERIALS Ate 0 TME GA PROGRAse UTILIZED WERE ADEGUATE. 329/83ee4=e5 Its0IVIOUAL M ALLEGATION MIOL4000 1 MAWMINS e3-04 DURIses THE TIset I WORMEO FOR ZACue THE 80RC OIO NOTHING THAT I Am AWARE OF 70 INSPECT 2ACK PROCEDURE 5 OR MoseITOR THEIR 04 PR0eRAM. SEE LETTERS FROM RIII wHICH REFER THIS ISSUE TO CIA (DATED AUS.9eAND 31, 1983) FOR APPROPRIATE ACTION. THE LETTERS F0WAROED Ite0. N'S AFFIDAVIT Atto Sw0RN STATE 4ENT 4880 Isoc. Oss AFFIOAVIT RESAROIIe6 SAeet 1550E. REPONT 83-04 REFERS TO IS5UES SENT TO 014. 32?/s3ee5-el Ise0IVIOUAL 0 ALLEGATIces MIDLAse0 1 RIV e2-02
- ComeeENTS RESAR0!Ie6 POOR 00CueeENT CONTROL. SEE REPORT C999eefe5/42-02 (RIV) ALLEGATI0*e5 1 Ate 0 2 aneO O! REPORT i
3-02-025 FOR RE50LUTIOes. Ise01WIOUAL 085 AFFISAVIT j F0 SAM 0E0 TO OIA IN LETTER DATED AU6UST 9 1982. RtPoaf e3-se PROVIDES A550RAseCE THAT HVAC SV5fEMS Asso l ComposetesT5 ARE ADEeUATELY DESI6 teed AND CONSTRUCTEDI THAT I MATERIALS Aase THE GA PMOGRAM UTILIZED wERE AGE 004TE.
- rv
,a_ .p ~~ - -. ~. PAeE 2e REGION III TRACKING SfSTEM 92/te/e4 l-MIOLAND - ALLEGATI0eeSe INDIVISUALS Ce Fe He No No Oe Re se Ye 2e ANO CCe On8E COPT FOR R. SPESSARO UPDATED 2/R8/s4 CONPLETE LISTING p ITEM MSOLUTION ITEN No./ IseSPECTOR/ ITEN TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTEAIN INSPECTOR CLOSEOUT RESPONSE OUE_ NODULE NO. ORIEF DESCRIPTI0se DESIGNATED No. INSPECTION ASSteNEO REPORT NO. 329/43005-42 INDIVIOUAL 0 ALLEGATION MIOLAND I RIV 33-03 4 2 ? i TetERE WAS NO C00eTROL OVER seuCLEAR PURCMASE OR0ERS. AFTER I WAS FIRED I LEAseesED THAT 50seEONE MAD SONE INTO SeseE OF TME FILES TO FIR OR CORRECT THE WARIOUS PO's. SEE REPORT C999eeTeS/02-et eRIV) ALLEGATI0eeS e Asse 9 ANO DI REPORT 3-62-0R$ FOR RESOLUTION. f REPORT 43-ee PROVIDES ASSue84NCE THAT NWAC SYSTEMS AND j COMPONEseTS ARE AGEeUATELY DESIGNE0 AND CoseSTRUCTEO8 THAT NATERIALS.AND THE GA PROGRase UTILI2ED WERE ADEGUATE. 329/83805-93 INDIVIOUAL 0 ALLEGATIcos MIDLAND I RIV 32-02 i 4 il CONMEseTS RESARelsee LACK OF FORNAL TRAINING. SEE REPORT C99900TSSte2-82 eRIWS ALLEGATION A FOR seESOLUTION REPORT 83-05 PROVIDES ASSURAseCE TetAT NVAC Sv5TEseS AseO COMPONENTS ARE AGEGUATELY DEsteseEO Asse CoseSTRUCTEDI THAT MATERI ALS AND TME e4 PROGRace UTILIZED seERE 40E00AIE. 3,9/. IsspiviOUAL e Aiu.ATIose NmAsee i Riv e..., l To TME DEST OF NY PERSeesAL ReopeLEDGE A COMPLETE AUDIT IS 5TILL NOT FINISNED AT 2ACet. IGA 00CUseENTAT304). SEE REPORT C9990efeS/s2-C2 (RIvl ALLEGATI0se 16 FOR RESOLUTION. REPORT 83-94 PROVIDES ASSURAseCE 1844T NWAC SYSTEsos AseO COMP 0esENTS ARE ADEeUATELY DESleseEO Ase0 CaseSTRUCTE05 THAT seATERIALS Ase0 TME GA PROGRAse UTILIZED seERE ADEGUATE. l 329/83e05-45 Ise01VIOUAL e ALLEGATI0se NIOLAseO I RIV 32-02 i. A seusseER OF TeeE CoeTR'S I IseSPECTED esERE ALTERED. SEE REPORT C99900TSS/82-92 eRIWS ALLEGATI0e:S e Ase0 9 AND OI REPORT 3-82-025 FOR RESOLUTION. t REPORT 83-04 PROWIDES ASSUR4eeCE Totaf NWAC SYSTEMS AseO COMP 90sENTS ARE 40EeUATELY DESIesetO Ase0 CONSTRUCTEOI TNAT seATERI ALS A880 THE en PROGRAse UTILI2ED WERE ADEGUATE. a [
- ; v '..
1 i 5 1 4. PAGE 21 MSION III THACKING Sv5 TEM 02/28/84 i seIOLAND - ALLEGATIONSe INDIVIOUALS C, Fo Me No N, ce Re Re Ye Ze A880 CCe ONE COPY FOR R. SPESSARO UPDATED 2/20/04 COMPLETE LISTING ITEN MSOLUTION i. i { ITE86 NO./ IseSPECTOR/ ITEN TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE IseTERIN INSPECTOR CLOSEOUT REsposeSE DUE N000LE No. ORIEF DESCRIPTION DESIssetATED NO. INSPECTI0es ASSIGNE0
- EPORT 880.
l p j 329/s3eeS-ee INDIVISUAL 0 ALLEGATION MIOLA8eD I RIV 02-02 I WAS te0T GUALIFIED 10 se4KE A RESOLUTION OR EXCUSE FOR PROOLENS i' LIKE MISSlese CERTIFICATI0*el (CoseCERNIset 4CRS SNE WAS FORCED TO WRITEl. SEE MPORT C99998TeS/s2-82 ERIVS ALLEGATI0s4 4 4 i FOR MSOLUTi0es. l' MP08ef 83-04 PROVIDES ASSURAseCE TNAT NVAC SYSTEMS 4800 l-C088P0esENTS ARE 40E004TELY DESI6eeED Asse C0seSTRUCTE06 TNAT 2 NAIERIALS Asse THE 04 PROGRAM UTILIZE 0 NE M ADE00 ATE. J - i 329/83eeS-ef Ise0!v300AL 0 ALLEGATIcos NIOL4eep I RIV 82-e2 I IN LETTER FROM A Sue-TIER WEes004 CoseCEReelset MISSIsse q. CEteTIFICATIcess OR SPECIFICATI0ess THE VENDOR TOLO IACK TO JUST j FILL Ice THE StaseES. SEE REPORT C99900ftS/82-02 (RIVI ALLEGATIO84 It FOR RESOLUTIces. J MPesef 83-04 PRovIDES AS$useaseCE TNAT NVAC SYSTEMS 4800 CoseP0setseTS ARE ADEeUATELY DESIsosED Asep CoseSTRUCTE08 THAT s etATERIALS A000 THE e4 PROGRAes UTILIZED WE M AGEeUATE. .i I 329/83e45-48 18eOIVISUAL 0 ALLEGATIces MIOLA880 I NAWWIses 43-03 TO Test SEST OF NY use0eLEDGE THERE WAS 8eEVER Ace seRC 18ewtSTIGATIcos AT THE ZACK SITE DURIseS NY EsePLovetEteT THERE. REPORT 83-88 MFERS TO AFFIDAVITS Asse STATEstENTS WHICt: WERE + SEsef TO OIA. REFER TO AUGUST 901903 LETTER FR0st RESION III TO OIA. 4 k 329/s3eeS-09 Ise0!VIOUAL 9 ALLEGATI004 MIOLANO I RIV 02-02 1
- s I ALSO DELIEVE THERE SHOULO GE A REVIEW OF ZACK WELDER euALIFICATI00s RECORDS. SEE REPORT C9990efeS/st-92 (RIV)
ALLEGATI0ee 3 Asso RIII REPORTS 83-13Oe3-14e tC0006 RELEASE OF L 2ACK WORE) FOR RESOLUTI0es. MPosef e3-ee PROVIDES ASSURaseCE TNAT NVAC SYSTEse$ Ase0 f CoseP00eENT$ Asef ADEeUATELY DE$ISesED A800 CeceSTRUCTED8 iNAT etATERI ALS A880 THE GA PROGRAM UTILIZED WERE ADE004TE. f.' 4 i j
- .; v *..
- _ - - _.... -.. - _.. _ -. - -. _...... - ~. 5
- ~~~-
t ] PaeE 22 REGION III TRACKING SYSTEN 02/28/84 i - NIOLAND - ALLEGATIONS, INDIVIOUALS C Fe No No Ne De Re 4e Ye Ze AND CC, ONE COPY FOR R. SPESSARD UPDATED 2/28/84 COMPLETE LISTING i ITEM MSOLUTION j-ITEN NO./ INSPECTOR / ITEN TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIN INSPECTOR CLOSEOUT MSPONSE DUE M00MLE No. BRIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED NO. INSPECTION A551SNED REPORT NO. 4 F 329/83004-08 INDIVISUAL R ALLEGATION MIOLANO 1 COOK S3-11 ^ UNOUALIFIED PERSONNEL AT MIOLAND INCLUDE LEO DAVIS, DICK -500ERNOLue CLARE ASNe AND EO ENTROMIN. REFER TO JUNE ETe 1983 LEITER TO SINCLAIR FROM KEPPLER.- 2 MPodi 83-08 PROVIDES ASSURANCE TNAT NWAC SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS ARE ADEeUATELY DESIGNE0 AND CONSTRUCTE04 THAT MATERIALS AND THE SA PROGRAM UTILI2ED M M ADEGUATE.
- 2 349/83004-02 INDIVIOUAL R ALLEGATION MIOLAND 1 NAWWINS 83=ce f-2ACK ALSO DIO NOT HAVE SUALIFIED PEOPLE FOR MSIM WORE THEY A
WRE 00lms. SEE REPORT 83 04 SECTION I FOR RESOLUTION Qj. IATTACHNENT E 10 REPORT 830s) j .n I~ 349/83098-43 IMOIVIOUAL R ALLEGAT104 MIOLANO 1 C00m 33-11 [$- NE CLAINS THAT ALL We#E ON ANY CONTRUCTION PROJECT M YONO A (7 ' ' CERTAIN LIMITED SIZE NUST M DONE. AS A NICHISAN REGISTEREO ~. ENGINEER OR ARCNITECT. ALSO SEE MPo#T 83-00 SECTION I AND ( JUNE 2To 1943 LETTER TO SINCLAIR FROM NEPPLER FOR RESOLUTION. REPoeT a3-ee Prowl 0E5 ASSURANCE THAT NVAC SfSTEMS ANO COMPONENTS ARE AGEWATELY DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTEOs THAT ]l NafERIALS AND THE GA PROGRAM UTILITES utRE AM OUATE. i. gj 329/83ece-04 INDIVIOUAL R ALLEsATION NIOLAND 1 C00n 83-11 NE YOLO NE TNAT A VERY S000 WLDER eUIT THE PROJECT RECENTLY DECAUSE TNE SCNEDULING WA5 50 ERNATIC. SEE JUNE 27e1983 LETTER TO SINCLAIR FROM NEPPLER FOR MSOLUTION. REPORT 83-08 PROVIDES ASSURANCE THAT MVAC Sf5TEMS AND l COMPONENTS ARE AOEeUATELY DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTEOS THAT MATERIALS AND THE GA PROGRAM UTILIZED WERE ADEeUATE. t' l 9.. 0 l q~}e $?.vv...
a f. PAGE 23 REGION III TNACNING SYSTEM e2/28/84 . ^. MIOLANO - ALLEGATION 5e INDIVIOUAL5 Ce Fe Me No No Os He Re Ye Ze AND CCe ONE COPY FOR R. SPESSARO -UPDATED 2/28/04 ~ COMPLETE L15iING >~ 4 ? ITEN MSOLUTION b il - ITEN No./ INSPECTOR / ITEN TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIN INSPECTOR CLOSEOUT MSPONSE OUE, N000LE NO. SRIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED NO. INSPECTION ASSIGNEO REPORT NO. f'. 329/83814-el INDIVIOUAL A ALLEGATION MIOLANO 1 RIV 32.e2 TRAINING WAS INA0EeueTE IN PREPARARING HIN TO PERFORN MIS Jf3 )*. WITH ZACK. SEE MPORT C99ee8745/s2-e2 (RIV) ALLEGATION 4 ANO 33*es SECTION I FOR RESOLUTION. T' -aG;;7 ;M; M::*t:0 ! 9"1*aasti THAT MVAC Sf5 FENS ANO COcePessENT5 AM ADEeUATELY DESIGNEO AND coseeiAJ;iC0! ?*eaY NATERIALS AND THE e4 PROGRAN UTILIZEO W RE ADEGUATE. p ; i ,? 329/83el4-42 INDIVIOUAL A ALLEGATION MIOLANO 1 MAWWINS 33.e3 UPPER LEVEL ZACE MANAGEMENT PRES 5URES HAVE AFFECTED THE GUALITY OF wore. SEE MPORT 83-es SECTION I AND OI REPORT 3-62-05T ,2-FOR RESOLUTION. i -REPORT 83-ee PROVIDES ASSURAseCE THAT MVAC afSTEMS ANO ?& COMPONENTS AM ADEeUATELY DESIsaIE0 AND CONSTRUCTE05 TNAT SJ NATERIALS AND THE ea PRosRAN UTILIZED M RE 40EeUATE. q.., t M 329/83e14-03 INDIVISUAL A ALLEGATION NIOLANO 1 RIV s2-e2 m li M NE FREeUENTLY SAw DOCUMENTS NAVING EVIDENCE OF SIGNATURES OF C3 eUESTIONASLE AUTHENTICITYe WHITE OUTS AND MEAT Muse #ER J 2' ALIERATIONS. SEE 01 MPORTS 3-82-025e RIII REPORT 83=ce IJdf SECTION to Asso RIV #EPORT C9990 efts /82-02 RIV ALLEGATION e AND 9 R FOR NESOLUTION. y REPORT 83-se PROVIDES ASSURAseCE THAT MVAC SYSTEMS ANO . !' { COMPONENTS AM Aw(GUATELY DESIsseEO Atee C0se5TRUCTE0B THAT i
- ~l NATERIALS AseO TNE 94 PROGRAN UTILIZEO WERE ADEGUATE.
i+l 329/83e15-61 INDIVIOUAL Y ALLEGATION MIOLAND 1 MAWWINS 33-43 DUE To THE FAILURE OF CPCO TO POST X-RAY SIGN 5e NE WAS EXPOSED TO #40IATIose PRODUCEO NY E-RAY EeUIPMENT. SEE REPORT 83-ee SECTIOes I FOR RE50LUTI0es. TNE Ite0IVIOUAL DIO NOT WISH TO PURSUE TNIS ISSUE WITH THE seRC. L <;1 ] 1
- "i '..
. a..
. _.. ___.~._... _ -. - 4-s l x, PAeE 2A' NEGION III TRACEltee SfSTEN 82/2e/94 i' MIOLAND = ALLEGATIONSe Ise0EVIOUALS C, Fe Me No Ne De No Re Yo le AND CC, 08eE COPY FOR R. SPESSARO UPDATED 2/28/84 C0sIPLETE LISTIses ITEM M SOLUTION
- U.
1 ITEN 800./ IseSPECTOR/ ITEN TYPE / FACILITY NAseE LICE 8eSEE INTERIN INSPECTOR CLOSEOUT %f RESP 08eSE DUE se000LE NO. e#IEF DESCRIPTIces DESleseATED 800. INSPECTIces ASSI68eE0 REPORT No. m Y 329/eSel eet Ise0IVIOUAL Z ALLEGATION MIOL48e9 1 MAWWINS 83-04 1 24 - IsePROPER DEFICIENCY TREseDIsee TECHNIeUES AT IACE. SEE MPORT y?.' ' ~ INDIVIOUAL Ze5 SWORN S3*e8 SECTION I Ass 0 III FOR RESOLUTION. STATEseENT SENT TO O! ON 31-3-83. hr 349/83el het Ise0!v! DUAL Z ALLEGATI0ee MIOLAsse 1 SARONER [ )f UsseUALIFIED CONSTOCK PERSON 8 EEL PERFORMIsse ENelesEERItes A8e0 4 SUALITY FUseCTI0seS. i ,i 329/83elhe3 Ise01VIOUAL Z ALLEGATION MIDLAse0 1 C00st 83-21 INADE00 ATE DESIsse asse CoseSTRuCTIces OF INSTauseENT Tuelsee ANO SUPPORTS SY BECHIEL A880 Coe: STOCK. SEE REPORT 83-ee SECTIcos I FOR OEIAIL OF M SOLUTION. 349/63819-01 Its0IVIOUAL CC ALLEGATI0se MIOLAse0 I Naustless e3-44 [ It'. PROPER USE OF 5esSITE DEStees CN48eeE NETM005. SEE stEPORT 83-04 SECTIces I FOR RE50LUTIces.
- EP0eef 53-04 PROVIDES ASSURANCE THAT MVAC SYSTEseS A880 CoasP0esENTS ARE AGEeUATELY DESI48eED Ase0 teseSTRUCTE08 THAT NATERIALS Ase0 TNE e4 PROGRAss UTILIZE 0 WERE A0E004TE.
l 1 329/83e19-42 INDIVIOUAL CC ALLEGATI0es MIDLate0 1 NAtestIse$ e3-04 IseCoRRECT IseSTALLATIces OF AseCHOR 80LTS FOR SURFACE se00seTED PLATES. SEE MPORT 83-4e SECTIces I A800 II FOR RESOLUTION. j f 329/83-19-43 IIIDIVIOUAL CC ALLEGATI0se MIOL Ase0 1 MAmettets 83 93 EXTENSIVE PROPOMO C0eside0L Roost NWAC REGIStese. SEE MPORT 83-0e SECTION I FOR RE!OLUTIOes. REFERRED To TERA F0st IteCORPORATIO8e INTO TNE CessTROL roost NWAC DESIsee REVIEW. 6 {.: Y d L: s.;'V
1_ r: - 1: -:..~~_- m P40E 25 REGION III TRACKING SYSTEM 92/28/84 NIOLAND - ALLEGATIsosse INDIVIDUALS Ce Fe He Me Ne De Re Me Ye Zo ANO CCe OseE COPY FOR R. SPESSA40 UPDATED 2/28/84 COMPLETE LISTINS i 4 s ITEM MSOLUTION ITEM NO./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIM IseSPECT04 CLOSEOUT MSPONSE DUE MODULE NGs. SAIEF DESCRIPTION M Stese4TED No. INSPECTIces ASSteseE0 mEPomT No. 329/s3e39-64 IseDIVIOUAL CC ALLEGATION MIDLAND I MAWWINS 83-88 EECESSIVE SLeeN0LES IN THE CONTROL ROOM DUCTWORE. SEE MPenT 83-es SECT!0se I AND II FOR RESOLUTIces. ~ + s t 3ts/03eI9-et INSITIOUAL CC ALLEsaTION MIOLAND I waneISees e3-30 SECNTELS USE OF NONDISCLUSUAE STATEMENTS. ALs0 SEE MPomT 83-98 SECTION I. 336/02803-43 INSIv!SUAL C ALLEGATI0se MIOLAsep 2 MAuw3NS 33-0e I Sam estavY DRIseKING A400see THE NOLDIAYS AT Test POMYvtLLE LAVDOWes a#EA. ROUTIseELY WORWERS 60 00ues TO GsENS PARTY ST0eE AT LUseCN AseD M T BEER. AT LUesCM SeesE weeuERS ALSO See0EED enASS. TNIS ITEM CLOSED sASES ON AUGUST 4e 1983 Swe#4 STATEseEssi 0F IsseIVISUAL C IPAGES T-el. IMOIvl004L Ces Sece4 STATENENT SENT To et ose AUGUST 30eI983. Tset lessIyleUAL eAS UseaeLE TO PeevIDE DETAILS er sees TME CeseCEnse IcePACTES. SAFETY MLATED CoseSTRUCTIe9 ACTIVITIES. [ 330/S2803-02 lesSIvt004L C ALLEGATI0es MIDLAseD E NAWuttes 83-00 l PIPEFITTERS NA0 SELieuCKLES CONSTRUCTED FA04 STAlesLESS STEEL PIPE asse mELDise6 2005. SeseE uget seassuFACIUSES IN TeeE C0sese SNOP. A secenta FRese TesE AURILIa4Y sWILDItes etASE SAAGECUE SEEleERS. YOU COULs SET ALeeOST AseTINIIes YOU waseTED IF YOU mesEW THE atesef PEOPLE. TMIS ITEM CLOSED BASED Oss AUGUST 4eI983 Seemes STATEsegesi I 0F Ise0IVIOUAL C (Paet tel. Test IsostyleuaL wAS UseaeLE TO Peew!OE BETAILS er sees THE Cosettese InPacTED SAFETY MLATfD CesesTRUCT309 ACTIyITIE5. i i i l r
- s.; V. *..
______.__ ~- .- f f* ~. ~ ^. _. _.. ~.. _. _ _ _ _ _ _. P40E 26 REGION III TRACWING STSigst 92/28/84 t seleLams - ALLEseTIOgSe IseDIVIDuaLS Ce Fe Me Me Me De me ao ve Ze ANO CCe Det COPY FOR R. SPESSa80 UPDATED 2/28/04 CenPLETE LISTIses ITEse MSOLUTIow ITEse ase.# IseSPECTOA/ ITEse TYM/ FACILITT maset LICENME IseTERIN INSPECTOR CLOM0UT
- ESpeseSE SWE see0MLE 800.
SeeIEF DEscaIPTIcos MSI6 MATES 800. IseSPECTItet ASbleNES REPORT 000. i 330/s2003-03 INSITItueL C ALLEGATI0es MISLasse 2 NAIowless 33-ee Teetet was A LOT OF 000FIsoe OFF ST seceEERS af THE PLANT. Isoestes mENE SLEEPlee6 Des THE Joe. I setaae musees Twai Seset .l t seenERS wouLD WALK Aeousse WITM TeeE SassE PLases ALL pay Leses Im ?, Oeute TO LOOK suSV. THIS ITEse CLOSED SAMD sal AueuST 4,1983 [ Secese STATEeIEssi 0F Issolvleual C (Poet III. Test 'IsosIVItual wAS useaeLE TO Peev!M MTAILS er Meal TME i CeseCEmes INPACTED SAFETY RELaTED CoseSTRUCTIOes ACTIVITIES. p;, 330#efes3*G4 leISITISUAL C ALLEeATItos MISLAese 2 naaewIsss g3.gg IN 19T9 Test rack SLutpeIIeTS Ases pesaelsees meat 34 MonateLE C0eseITIoss. seOST OF int 2 ACE euaLITY Ceesteet Ple0CEcumES FOR Cossim0LLIses Detaelsess esEM se0T FeLLeute. DeseIIsos$ Asso DeaWIsse Mv!SIcess mEst se0T P90PERLY CeseT40LLES. leEFER TO Sw0 Ret l STATEseENT OF IseDIVItuaL C (PaeE 32-293 Asse MCTIoseS II Asse III I 0F REP 0mi e3-08 80seE VIOLATIcesa. TMIS ALLEGATI0se WAS CATEe0RIZE0 AS ase UseBEFleIES CeseCEmes (I.E. LACK OF SPECIFICITV) aseo esa5 ASSAESMB Use0ER THE FIvt PeeaSE Peccesse IN REPesef 83-40. 336#e2803-05 _IseSITIDuel C ALLEsaTIcos mIttases 2 HametteeS 33 es I se0TICED Totai Seset CeseSTAUCTItas soo0IFICATItseS teERE 00 set SEFORE THE CNesseES esas Meas APPROVEO. TMIS OFTEN InevolvtD Mase6ER M Sless CMasetES. seEFER To Swenes STATEsetesi 0F Ise01TIDUAL C traGES 29-333. THIS ALLEtaTIose wa5 CATEGOSIMD AS Ass ungEFIseES C080CEmes II.E. LACE OF SPECIFICITY) Asse WAS aceseESM S tese0ER TeeE FIVE Poe4M Paoesase Im REPORT G3-44. l i + b r.- -.- m
^ i PaeE af AESION III TeaCElse Sv5Mee 82/26/04 i.
- iaLame - E LEtaT3ense ImelvlegeLS Ce Fe No Me es, Se me As Ye 2e ame CCe sesE COPY Fee e. SPESSame speaMS 2/28/84 CeNFLETE L35TI888 4
ITEM ~ AESeLUTIeu IMm me./ InSatCTee/ ITEM TYPE / FaCILITV seasit LICENSEE INTEelle INEMCTea CLOSEGUT MSpenet euE steeULE see. seIEF KSceIPflees MSleseaTES see. IseSMCTIces ASStessES streef est. t 336/e4e03-06 3eselvtettaL C ALLisaT30es seleL asse 2 MassatseS 83-ee PeteLEts was IMacTIFIES Ise leTe CeseCEA8 elses seaMAIE TeactaSILITY. \\ I asas mEvgEugees a eLesEpeleT asse Sam Teeaf a euCT etetelete a PITTseusess Stase. asEITeste TeeE 2 ACE PeeJECT Ne 8804 TseE Feefsenes maste useaf a PITTSeusese Mass esaS. IT wasseef MIase USte. TesE Feetenese 48se Test reseJECT seassaGEe TOLS seE Te seep TesE SueJECT MCauSE TesEY totuLe Tant Cast GF IT. IT SC'e f Asesef IF TesEY EVEe e ele. Tests ITEM CLeEES Baste ese assuST aotes3 Seemas STATEMai SF 3eeIVIStIAL C ePaeES 33-373. PITTseases Mag mas 1897 USES i
- i Ice SAFETY BEtaTES APPLICatlessS.
J' l 330/92803=ef SeGIVIsteaL C MLEtaTIces MIeLasse 2 MassEless 83-Se I et Isas Suppeste Te CenSUCT IssKPEasetesi IssePECT30eeS OF IceSfaLLES [ seeaC toseliS To wEmIFV 1seeT ussiTS eseT YET E8e5TELES afElst sIEPT i Costate asse CLEass AS AEstegets. Ie: Sites IIE Jefei CerIES flee t sealmTEaseseCE SeptevlSemes AECeeSS WITeestfi McFeeseles IseSPECTIcess. TseIS ITEse CLOSES EASES ese ausefST 4eles3 Secte SfaM8EEasi er ameIVIsteaL C IPaeES 37-948. 72 78845 ALLEtaTIose was CATEtemIZE8 as aas gegEFIgG CeseCEmes II.E. LACE 0F SMCIFICITV) asse was assAESSES useste Test F3vt I [ Poea M Pesemase les AEpeseT 83-64. 338#eRe03=ce ImelvlettaL C ALLEtaTIene seleLasse 2 seatsettees 83-44 ~' IaCE urLMes Sta#TES 301888 &#C.gea2tase a ELSS SEFeet a PeeCEeumE N sa5 MwtLerES Te CovEm esea23ess atteleEngels est esELete t gesaLIFICaTIass AteusessgesTS Fest umaZIsos. SC ele Step Iset uses asse L Ptif eseL85 ese aLL uses aLMaev seesE. FleeELY ZACE CAM up WITN a PeeCEeumE asse sees Test utLeteS TESTES ase suaLIFIES. TNIS IMu CLOSES saSES See A4884f5T neles3 Secess StaIEeutet er Isolygeuel C E Ireets 50-999 ase MPeef 83-04 SECT 3 eses I asse II. [ i 4 I e i s t i~ j L a O* -
i Ii -l 3 g 4 a 11 er i 3 5 A = 4 a j CI d li i I I i = I i a5 F [ II = vli"8ll! g9 5I:
- l!gI*.:
I i e igl3,1,- i 4 II ~ !,ssatslv -Ilsl I 1 II IlIlglg;Iv r, ! lr lyllyIu e59'12, s r.:grr. 1 na i .8 38 8 itigiy !llIliI
- ~
i ig I grgurly i = 5 i-l sivu ei ~jei;e5 rf l i ~ sis.l-! l 1 !s I ~ g=1,g; ;;; Iil I 8: :l1=t l 4 t 8 ll-l 81 i eI I.s I-Iv-r, i i
- I Is t
i i y e"jja 82 sagI:glar: 81 4 88.a 5!'~f ! !!* ^ ' 3 ["I!!!!( 'ir1[jt i = l ag_f 3: Ig .sv e- -s i 8181*[!v.:rE: 24 rllIr58 I!ars!f 88 t v.s s.v sut s. -n : sus !!aig59 gj[#El~! g5r liI"f! 8 88 - Il)~!l! la!!i"~s ,[Il8"85r!.:s 8 I5 I5 d I- ,v:!,,11jlenEig a w-e n u I.3!51I l 1-i si 5 -8 =II! gal lIg l t 18 av.ligrE8s 5 Isegl! v s 1 si i!1I IIIEl!=qu )stastaII:t 3 .es n a a jg, sist-1 -s -u u u u i i .I,I s 4 j 1 g = l s 4 1. 5 ~ 4 t. ,y_~, --+ -m,,-..,,,,,.,.__._~.-y -y-
s _i lE i. en a n = s. i e l CI C l 5 = I! I I I I. s 55 I $.I. ,"a,s K i i{il E IE;' E Iu551 E e .E s 11 15 ": 8 g*=l(3-s 38 lI4 8 r r -.ef Uv 8 U us _I ti. 5 lIn 8 5.: 5 a as y es 5-3"3: 1 !:I.!.I s- !c:ef !. li,iv*:! El fe !s I ares Iy gi,ii"Il z Ily =s - .l. 1 ,1.IEle! g1!,!i!I! ~ Ig:158! l E jE! 8 8 I t% e . v.gl.::* rf:8:8 =- =~ v 4 1o"!=.=.! ,,!{s:j=i. 3 p =,, 3: E* 8:
==ffa:[A I !ssrE* 'El 8 rE" IgInj' i: 13* rE
- ,[=slseg
!s-ssisa 1 r grig:gi;si
- giss=
f11ggsug isa
- ,i
,rs Irras,ian 2= i.gis5 ! l_i_!s.liirs rs .!.iv.le_!g!! 15 =
==> s_!,!!! _ir.!.-i,!.!=!! = ^ 5 r'l l s! h ! ~g !!c48 3 ! vWIX!! i* !i[d![s=48 "e t 5 i gg gs y.svrras=1 g as 1 g I!!rrs=1 -s
- W W
W W i i-i n s s s c I) 1 I 9 3 g 3 2 e s A A A i-5: i i t 1i. .s. I' ? 1 i
-s E 55 { { er 8 s 2 = x. 2 3 l l [1 = I I I e I i i 3:i [ s ~~
- lvi!!**x isi[i II i
.I - gj g: a !,EJ st8;Ii I'Ne! iris.cl Il 58siw 8 v g-rie-e !{I*t-.I" n s"I!Ssui ansigI=- =_E.i!v ,.8 38 s sus.-es I.. !. e!. s-f g.g::8 - eI,g-v n e-[:ovs y ,ggs l.a. arf ,e il3g ] a 1 er.j]s[ n
- s g-
~ -g geri . s.: 1 t v. gis.: I syiav. 1 vg 3 e I,I,sa =d_=q- _ Vdy e s rg.s,=1.3.31l I g s v.3: 4 1-1],-[i.: se 5 *ned:i*3 v r ig8;~I. Isgx s' f viv.l*:::.s r .:3 sr Ic. !gIjiG1
- 1 i.j !! s.: '
- !!**I 1is65 83
~
- gg
- . :
s* v. !gsg. a
- cr
~5iE!!3E:lll i*s":EI 1 i r ~~Il3*t!::513" In:ri!'!gi5 i i I l s i
- !88 i:E*
il g,vsl
- {lgsvgg
!'i ,g::I;r[n-l!I-e .s a ,. 5 jv!!re:.g s l jg !! jIIIt!si j siIiE ligit a --.z-av e.ew Illa .s
- s
~w u 6 6 n! e s s s I s s a g h g' A 3 ,I I h [,a g j w ') t f
-L-m PeeE 31 mEGlen III Ta4CEING SYSTEse 02/28/0a mIeLams. mLLEtaTIeus InselvleveL5 Ce Fe No me me se se Be to Io age CCe ed CEPT Fee e. SPE55ame UPeaTES 2/24/8a CessPLETE LISTIe6 ITEse mESOLUTIose ITEM me./ Ie5MCient ITEse TvPEI FACILITY Isad LICEseSEE IeTERIm Iss5PECTee CLe5EeUT mE3Penst eut moeutt sea. setEF MSceIPTIsas M 53emaTES me. INSPECTIese A55tessEs agroef Ise. 336/etee6-43 IuSITIeWL F ALLEsaTIose seleLame 2 8ee8EIns 03-e4 j Im Tut FIsosteeS OF ALLEsaTIsas emE esE was SISgIFICasef SISCeEPassCIES WITm inE IwM5f tsafees. TO INE KST es MIS secuLEseE TME IseITiaLIsss et TesE LEFT-SI M OF iset Tee WLEn was IstufM A Paef eF TesE SC PeeCEeust useTIL aFTEe seE ImIIIATES TME i selslanaL aLLEseTItas5. esE eELIEvts TseE POST-ImITIaLles GF Test TeavELEe5 seE5 seef Cass5TITUTE a CassFlesesTIsse er CuneENT ~ aCCueeCY Im Test TaavtLEas. mESOLUTIsse Saseg as et I. 338#eese6-0a Isselvlegac F aLLEsaTIess mIsLasse 2 semeswIess 83.ge seE eELIEVES Twat CamTeast Te T4 aseC IssGMCTIsse EEpeni See ZaCNe CmICa44 PalesTES WELes steE CeseptETELY CeWeEs e!Tet iteICK PAINT ame Tseaf TseE Palast se LaCa SF IT ses a mELIacLE FACite Im stigassgegens TesE SITE er FaemICaTIsee asse GutSTIessacLg SUCT PIECES. est eELIEWS TmIS mEass5 feeaf IaCK esas aeLE Te seest PIECES af Testle LEI 5est u!Twouf TeaCEmeILITY en SC IuSMCTless5. M5eLUTIoss Sane a 82 06-41. 330/etee6*e5 lesolvIsepaL F ALLEgefles mieLa8se 2 temeIKIIst 03-30 asE SELIEvts imeT asseisste SPECIFIC EEanPLE SF evEe5Itsef In Test eseC IsosMCTIoss etPeef ese lace IS TesE LACE OF FImeles0 Fee TaavfLEe sepsete ve3. ate-FleITI. est CessTEases feest IT 15 SIFFICULT ~'- Te sputtesiasse sur TesE aseC meuLe ACCEPT TesE 8ees eF JACE evEm inE eLaCE asse useITE secasutui PeewIste ei Toegse. set a4,58 euESTItses useffecte TME ITEen ve5-5 set.2-Fea37 seas aCTueLLv Peev53(ALLY SCeaPPts asse Tset seTE IT sa5 SCeapets, mE5eLUTIsas 54est as 62006.eI. l O wys
s
- r E.
I. I. or r a A = s. j "I ~ I I I r I s is I II a.vi ~; != 4 si.i -I 8 83 [: V!s5 r Is~g a. 4 !g!*!lg, I[;;n i8i!.gi 3 .9 y r, gi'g-r l Il i!ggy ___e5 g =r --y, s g Eg isl~in luf5~jr 'i~E81 i ~l!ejig{g ~*W~di"I ig!"!3! sv!,3
- n ir 19 v:ic!!
!I I r=I!v !,s ~ =V i I S r! = n 1((sr!{ I~g!~l,I:g I 5 8!8 183lI!!3li! i s v. j!: I51j:_i sj E I _s;) 81!"! i rg'vs, 8: I4 "l3I!I iElsIY IEi! I I' !I5!!~. gI.5; n .:.-e 4 ..iv..- I !E'!! rg-~,,gy ll; gal {.3 ,sia!;y-l ni j i-1:!;a, s y=:!r.sE!g ,.-,.'s ,,,r-3,rI. J gulv -
- 56 r
= ivi!lI t E8 = 1 I5!!!! g s,,g3, 3 ijfr "r 'l ~ 1- -~ss v gg 5: g ,s 6 6 6 Y! 1 1 1 l li-l 1 s s = I e ~ j I 3( ,I I E f. c f* 1 ), ' * ?;4 ' .s
i 3 i-s 11 I er s l j a. i ut i i li I I I I i = l s i IE [ II i ~, a;!!I! !i 11 i s us ! =~ !s Vrv g .9
- ,,!r;
,s Ig.:g -a I,g.. !_Iv ,l
- ass, en g
..p su 8K..gs,2 na .h ~* -1 55 9 ~** vi8 , as-,gt se s -
- 8s
-a vr r !gg,g'! a !!E li.:" sr I~gril l:I .1g*I. I !I ~ !!*I !s I s i'st 4 a s ~gV I~ a !I. e 3 !. il'rEr.-s 1 *s-g l lIs"ljl i 1 ? v e p! 5 I-s g = ~. .s 1 e . rves - e =ss = 's'!!'.il l. *sj*p'li _l83 33 Vil'!j)r Els!!il,l= I*t= i s
- li i.;r v !<
4 !_ sin 1v i1 s in .: 1
- 1_s v
is. I sl g5I!'I'! : Il I irgg,E gEI'll I:l~ 1 Ig iviill ]il11Il I! 3 ~II iIII!I' iIE' hv1vl ivass!!!lr l 3 jg, it l i, -3 "v s s e 4 i j !I ~ l ,y . :l I il i 1
i I lI I I a 1 j !! a a a i li I I i I 8 = i 30 I il_ i i t i, lii r!
- rI l
l1l*Ij! rl!i. ir li "I r;,"t's. i i yi gi -i i,ei'l 1,!=i! , -v = ii t i
- !gg-r i
i_
== io1l n !l;a i sr !si!I -1!gr ~lirl! ~lil;g Il!,lri' is 1 i=r a ! lg!.h fi,II..sl i 1, I s IV -o I iv,sgaj f!!isi g 3 ..s vgn" si i rgr. 1;!lI;11 ,j,i,!l ;!il
- ig!
ie ._,i!" i r I !!lt = !!lI!i, 11: . vi,, il= a!,IlIii.ti i='ii, ring i g i 1.=t g r, i 8 !!=- i Iri iri I ili g ilil.l }ig=iii.isa
- ail, il
]s i, .i i rrl sur va jvi! jai 1 gg ga tg gs 1 g g g .x 11 i i i i 5 g I .J ~
I ll l' i l' I i l i IJ fl I I I d I 1 1 I I I i l. i 4 ali I 5 i i: I i g 4 i i: =! 1.y I!si! 13 I 8! lIEi -= ll' l3!. i!!il l'j I 5! !y! I ll IIil 1 !li s'illi is 1 liijl si,.!j 8i i!lil i i ! i!iln slsll;i !.. i l i =1-i se e ii'. s>g!g!g ,i 1 si s'v!i~t 188 all! i.4:g: 8 s8 lgl5=11lii!!i 'a !ig[ 1g bl1tig 11 al liii!! lii !is l1:li ll!ili! i i nj 8llgS i i l j! !i lll!!'l li!!! lill l L gl li l I I I i i ll l ll l l '. + :.
n $j 'S.- u- .a ~~~ f t et/23/84 REGION !!! TRACKING SYSTEN CIOLAND - ALLEGATIONS, INDIVIOUALS C, Fe Ho N. No Os Re A, Ye Ze AND CCe ONE COPY FOR R. SPESSARG UPDATED 2/2e/e4 PAGE 34 Co#PLETE LISTING RESOLUTION ITEM
- q..
- D.
ITEM No./ INSPECTOd/ ITEN TYPE / FACILITY MAME LICENSEE INTERIN INSPECTOR CLOSEOUT DESIGNATED NO. INSPECTION ASSteNED REPORT NO. f CESPONSE DUE, N000LE.NO./ - GRJEF DESCRIPTION Riv e2-02 I41VISUALn .LtE.ATiON .iDi. A 0 2 n i N n./.20s.-e2. i j D eA CONTRACT EMPLOYEE DIRECTED PERSONNEL TO SISM TRAINIWo.FORN. PERSONNEL CLAINED THEY RECEIVED NO TRAINING. ,G ? -MIOLAP . A JF'h -/,g "q ,'tEAHISIT SI (CHECK APPLICA#ILITY OF THIS To LACE SITE / /,,PC4SONhELI. (EXHISIT 53. SEE REPORT C999eeTSS/02*e2 (RIVI A if- ; ALLEGATIONS 2 ANO 4 FOR RESOLUTION. /> ", j, ,./ ./ < REPORT 13-ee.PROVIDES ASSURANCE TNAT HVAC SYSTEMS ANO v..' ,1' COMPONENTS ARE ADEeUATELY DESIGNED ANO CONSTRUCTEOS THAT
- t }k
-4 MATERIALS AND THE GA PROGRAM UTILIZE 0 DERE A0E004TE. r u v HAWWINS e3-se 338/SteGE-e3 INDIVIOUAL M ALLEGATION MIDLANO 2 ( CATESORIZATION OF NAJOR DISCREPANCIES IN INTERIN REPORT " '[3 le=02=R1 10 SECHTEL tT220-N-151-C/u '54el DN 10-09-81 s (EAHISIT 4.Al ANO (ERMISIT 78. REs0LUTION SAME 45 02694-01. 8 MAWNINS 83-04 ) 33e/82000-e4.. INDIVIOUAL M ALLEGATION } NIOLAND 2 / THIRO INTERIN REPORT ON DISCREPANCIES t1e*23-ell SENT TO SECHTEL 18-23-81 (T228-N-151-C/8-5528. (EAMISIT el Pes. 3e 6e to oWi y -' IIIe ANO 15. RESOLUTION SAME.AS 52008-01. L '; 0
- tr
( HAwnINS es-se t , [ 33e/etese-es IMOIVIOUAL M ALLE6eTION MIOLAND 2 -eUESTIONASLE SECHTEL ENGINEERING ANALYSIS OF ZACM OISCREPANCIES, Vf' 1.ETTER DAVIS TO GREUNEe 12-21-81. (ENHieff III. RESOt.UTION if i a s R 9 SAME As s2 sea-81. 3 + f HAWKINS 83-88 INDIVI3UAL M ALLEGATION MIOLAND 2 33e/stsee-06 INDIVIOUAL STATED THAT CALKINS NA0 CALLEO H. LEONARD AT MIDLANO (PS 14 0F AFFIDAVIT). RESOLUTION SAME AS 82506-01. II Y -~ w e : *. W ..'s.
.j f u_ ._m_ -._.,_,___._,......_..,_y.___._,. t ' ;.Q 4. PAGE 37 REGION III THACNING SYSTEN 02/2e/e4 KIOLANO - ALLEGATIONSe IN0!VIOUALS Ce Fe He Me N, De Re Xe Ye 2e AND CCe ONE COPY FOR R. SPE554RO ~ UPDATED 2/28/44 ' ~" COMPLETE LISTING
- n ITEM RESOLUTION ITEM NO./
INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIM INSPECTOR OLOSEOUT !~ RESPONSE OUE MODULE NO. BRIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED NO. INSPECTION ASSIGNE0 REPORT No. 330/82900-97 INDIVIOUAL M ALLEGATION MIOLAND 2 HAWKINS 83-48 BECHTEL HAD NNOWLEDGE OF 2ACK MATERIAL SEING SHIPPE0 TO THE ? SITE IN NONCONFORMING CONDITION. LETTER DAVIS TO EICHSTAE0fe i 11-05-30 (EXHISIT 15). RE50LUTIOes SAME AS s2808-01.
- .v.
330/82808-48 It00tv100AL M ALLEGATION MIOLANO 1; RIV 32-82 EAAMPLES OF FALSIFIED TEST REPORT 5e ONE COPY PRIOR To FALSIFICATIONe ONE COPY AFTER. STICFERS WERE DATED 11-06-80 SUT RE00EST FOR U.S. STEEL To UP6RADE IEST REPORTS NOT seADE ' 5:; BEFORE 01-23-81. (ENHisIT IT) (EXH'.eIT 168. SEE REPORT l C99900705/02-02 (RIV) ALLEGATIONS Sete ANO IS FOR RESOLUTION. ALSO O! REPORT 3-s3-A25. '1 REPORT 83-04 PROVIDES ASSURANCE THAT HVAC Sf5TEMS AND C0eePONENTS ARE ADEuuATELY DESIGNEO ANU CONSTRUCTE06 THAT i NATERIALS AND THE GA PROGRAM UTILIZED WERE ADE00 ATE. ~,. 4 l e >>./.2.... i,s0iviOUAL - auf.AT:0 8 iOLAND 2 Riv .2=.4 i t U. S. STEEL LETTER PETERS TO HAGEMe 09-21-01, IDENTIFYING 26 P005 THAT WERE NOT ORIGINALLY ORDERED #5AFETY-RELATE 0s, gENHISIT 208. SEE REPONT C99900785/82-02 (RIV) ALLEGATION 11 ANO RIII REPORT e3-ee SECTIONS IV A800 V FOR RESOLUTION. NRC 80ATERI AL TESTINS INCLUDEO SIX SAMPLES OF U.S. STEEL MaiTERIAL. REPOMT 83-08 PROVIDES ASSURANCE THAT HWAC Sf5TEMS AND i COMPONENTS ARE ADEGUATELY DESI68eED AND CONSTRUCTE04 THAT NATENIALS AND THE GA PHOGRAM UTILIZED WERE 40EOUATE. 330/02848-10 IMOIVIOUAL M ALLEGATION MIDLAND 2 HAWKINS 33-03 1 -t 2ACK AUDIT OF EDGEC0eet METALS IDEseTIFIES UNACCEPTABLE DA PROGRAM (ENHIRIT 213. DETERMINE IF E06EC04e PRODUCTS WERE USED AT MIOLAfe0. SEE ALSO EXHIMITS 43e NHC 1002. SEE REPORT 83-08 SECTI0ess IV A8e9 v. eenc MinTERI AL TESTING INCLUDEO le SAMPLES OF E06ECOese MATERIAL. REPORT 83-9e PROVIDES ASSURANCE THAT HWAC Sf5TEMS ANO 4 COMPONENTS ARE ADE00ATELY DE5168eEO AND Cose51RUCTE06 THAT MATERI ALS A880 THE GA PROGRAM UTILIZED WERE ADEGUATE. i ,.. : e.W
A. .,? ~ l _t ~- ..,, + - -.. -.. ^^' ~ L :,--. - 6 1 92/28/84 REGION III TRACKING Sf5 FEM KIDLAND = ALLEGATION 5e INDIVIOUALS C, Fo Me Me N, 0, R e As Y. Ze AND CCe ONE COPY FOR R. SPE55ARO UPDATED 2/29/04 ^; PAGE 3e COMPLETE LISTING RESOLUTION ITEM M ITEM NO./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIM INSPECTOR CLOSE0UT DESIGNATED NO. INSPECTION A55IeNED REPORT NO. RESPONSE DUE. MODULE NO. SRIEF OESCRIPTION 330/stete-11 INDIVIOUAL M ALLEGATI0st MIOLANO 2 RIV S2-02 ZACK REMOVES DELTA SCREW 105) C0cePANY FROM APPROVED WEN 00R LIST ON 19-20-81 (EMNISIT 249 8 HowEVER. 3e Poe5 SENT TO 05 OURING THE-TIME THEY WERE EUPPOSEOLY REMOVED FROM LIST. IERHISIT 253. OETERMINE IF D5 se4TERIAL WA5 USEO AT MIOLANO. SEE REPORT C99900T85/s2-82 (RIVI ALLEGATIONS T ANO 13 FOR RESOLUTION. + i REPORT 83-08 PROVIDES ASSURANCE THAT HVAC SYSTEMS ANO CosePoseENTS ARE ADEGUATELY DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTE06 THAT NATERIALS AND THE GA PROGRAM UTILIZE 0 WERE AGEGUATE. 330/s2ets-12 IMOIVIOUAL M ALLEGATION MI(d.ANO 2 RIV 33 42 oWALIFICATIONS OF ZACK GA/0C PERSONNEL 00ESTIONASLE (ERMIDIT 26). h OETERetINE IF ZACK PERSONNEL AT MIOLAND ARE GUALIFIEO. SEE ,ki REPORT C9990tTe5/s2-02 (RIV) ALLEGATIONS 2 ANO 4 FOR RESOLUTION. '? ALSO REPORT 83-00 SECTIONS II Ase0 III. I REPORT 83-98 PROVIDES ASSURAseCE THAT HVAC Sv5TE45 AND COMPoseENTS ARE ADEGUATELY DESIGesED Ase0 Crse5TRUCTEOS THAT MATERIALS Ase0 THE GA PR06AAM UTILIZED WERE AGE 004TE. 7 330/s2808-13 INDIVIOUAL M ALLEGATION MIOLAse0 2 RIV 32=82 CERTIFICATI0ee OF TEST RESULT 5 ! EXHIBIT ITA) ENSURES MATERIAL ORDEREO ON P0 C-1253 WAS SUSJECT TO TESTING. PS C-1253 15 ON U.S.5. LIST A5 NON 54 (ERHISIT 208. SEE REPORT C9990eTe5/ S2-02 (HIvi ALLEGATION 11 FOR RESOLUTION. ]f > REPORT 83-0e PROVIDES A550RaseCE T' EAT MWAC SYSTEMS Asso Co#PoseENTS ARE ADEGUATELY DESISesEO A880 CONSTRUCTEDI THAT 4. etATERIALS AND THE GA PROGRAM UTILIZE 0 WERE ADEGUATE. A' '3.- W 3' 330/s2000-14 INDIVIOUAL M ALLEGATION MIOLApe0 2 RIV S2-02 f'. I 2ACet PRESIDENT 00E5 GA REVIEW (ERMISIT ITA 4000 el 02-23-81. NOT TRAINED UNTIL 0s-31-31 IEAHISIT 283. SEE REPORT C99900TS5/ 82-02 (blIV) ALLEGATIDee 4 FOR RESOLUTION, REPORT 83-08 PROVIDES ASSURANCE THAT HVAC SYSTEMS Apeo COMP 0 STENTS ARE ADEGUATELY DESI6NEO AND CONSTRUCTEDI THAT MATERIALS Ate 0 THE GA PROGRAM UTILIZE 0 WERE ADEGUATE. e y A: 8.;**( .es.
~. ' i _.. _. _....-~,_ _. _ PAGE 39 REGION III TRACKING SYSTEN 02/28/84 r WIOLANO - ALLEGATIONSe INDIVIOUAL5 Ce Fe Me Die No Os Re Me Ye Ze A880 CCe ONE COPY FOR Re SPESSARO UPDATED 2/24/04 COPPLETE LISTING r ' ITEM RESOLUTION ITEM NO./ INSPECTOR / ITEN TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIN IN5PECTOR CLOSEGUT i RESP 0805E DUE N000LE NO. BRIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED 000. INSPECTION A55ItseE0 REPORT 880. 330/82898-15 IMOIVIOUAL M ALLEGATION MIOLANO 2 MAW 8(INS 83-84 MIOLAND MEETING NOTES OF 11-83-81 (EMNISIT Rel. OETERMINE IF ALL. ,,q COMMITMENTS WERE BEET. RESOLUTION SAstE As state-41. 2 339/02800-16 INDIVIOUAL M ALLESATION MIOLANO 2 RIV 32-02 f 4 DELTA SCREW MATERIAL IDENTIFIES AS NONCONFORMI884 C4286-NCR 0 112e CA484-NCR-M-Ile. NO MARKS ON BOLTNEA05 TO IDENTIFY teAaeUFACTURER. BECHTEL CLEARED FOR USE WITHOUT SASIS GERMIGIT 204, se Cie (ENNIsIT 31)e ANO (EAMIBIT 321. SEE REPORT C99900Te5/ (. 82-02 (RIV) ALLEGATION T FOR RE50LUTIO48 .T ' REP 0NT 33-se PROVIDES ASSUNANCE THAT MWAC SY5it 93 A880 Wy' C0cePONENTS ARE ADEGUATELY DESISNED A800 CONSTRUC LOO THAT MATERI ALS 4800 THE eA PRotRAM UTILIZE 0 WERE ADEeU41E.
- j.,
jI .330/stees=1T INDIVIOUAL M ALLEGATION MIOLAND 2 Newn!NS 83-88 REVIEW CPC0 INVESTISATION (APRIL 15e 1989) DF ALLEGERSe ~,.'h j ALLEGATIONS FOR CREDIGILITY. SEE REPORT 03-st ISACKGROUNO A800 m; - METH000 LOGY SECTIONS AND AUGUST 3ee 1983 LETTER TO OI FROM d1' OE. THIS ITEM 35 # ELATED TO OI INVESTI64TI0 ass 0F INDIVIOUALS 7]f j wR0000FUL FIRItse. 43-82-05TI. u,,K-. ik 339/82800-10 3800lVIOUAL M ALLEGATION MIOLA800 2 RIV 32-02 'a a i 4 [#.. -TO MIOLAND. IERMIeIT 41). IF 50 DETERMIteC IF CESTS EEIST FOR DETERMI8sE IF WELD 5fAR WAS INVOLVED IN SUPPLYIsee WELO MATERIAL t 3 MATERIAL PURCHA5ED Ise 19T0 04 PRIOR TO THAT DATE. SEE REPORT C99900T45/s2-92 (RIV) ALLEGATI084 le FOR RESOLUTION. [ _). REPONT s3-se PROVIDES ASSURANCE TMAT HVAC Sf 5 fetes 4800 I r., COMPONENTS ARE A0EeUATELY DESI68eED A8so Cose5TRUCTEGI THAT y MATERI ALS Afee THE e4 PROGRAM UTILIZE 0 WERE ADE004TE.
- j. 2 s f
4Q: d$. y j. <in b; i; '. ;"/ *.' *. e
PAGE AS REGION III TRACKING SYSTEM 92/2e/44 CIDLANO = ALLEGATION 5e IMOIVIDUAL5 Ce F He Me Ne Oe No Re Ye 2, AND CCe ONE COPY FOR R. SPE55ARO UPDATES 2/20/04 "4 COMPLETE LISTING _?# ITEM RESOLUTION l ITEM NO./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TVPE/ FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIN INSPECTOR CLO5EDUT CESPONSE DUE MODULE NO. BRIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED N0. INSPECTION A55tGNED REPORT NO. 330/8280s-19 INDIVIDUAL M ALLEGATION MIDLAND 2 RIV 32 02 2ACM AUDIT I2C/81=T (09-19-81) IDENTIFIES SIGNIFICANT 04 SREAMDOWN (ERHISIT 423. UETENNINE APPLICASILITY TO MIDLANO.
- !r RESOLUTION SANE AS 52800-01.154535 FOR 24C4e5 AUG. 28, 1981 LETTER TO MIDLANO DN CERTIFICATION DEFICIENCIES).
X! 330/etete=20 INDIVIDUAL M ALLEGATION MIDLANO 2 RIV S2-02 s REVIEW NRC 0111 WRITTEN ON C6406 FOR POSSISLE FALSIFICATION ANO i APPLICAu!LITY TO MIOLANO IEXHIu!T A3, NRC 10 01). SEE REPORT f t C99900Te5/02-02 (RIV) ALLEGATION T FOR RESOLUTION. ' REPORT 03-98 PROVIDES ASSURANCE THAT HVAC SYSTEMS ANO l' COMPONENTS ARE ADEGUATELY DESIGNED ANO CONSTRUCTEDI JMAT a 4 MATERIALS AND THE GA PROGRAM UTILIZED WERE ADEGUATE., 4 2 ?iG " lifJ l gj i 330/83803-01 IMOIVIDUAL M ALLEGATION MIDLANO 2 RIV 02-02 f":I ; CMTRS WERE ALTERED TO RE5oLVE THE LACK OF PROPERLY REFERENCE 0 i?? ! STANDAR05 AND MISSING AUTNENTICATION SIGNATURE. THE5E DOCUMENT ' 58 ALIEMATIONS WERE IDENTIFIED IN THE INTERIM REPORTS 2ACK I.! SUPPLIED TO THE UTILITIES FOR A SIGNIFICANT EVENT DISCLOSURE. 75 d HE WOULO NATHER CLASSIFY THE ALTERATIONS A5 FORSERIES. I I. ' E SEE REPORT C99900Te5/02-02 (RIVI ALLEGATIONS 8 ANO 9 ANO O! REPORT 3-02-025 FOR RESOLUTION. ^ <.S REPONT 83 00 PROV: DES ASSUHANCE THAT HVAC SYSTEMS ANO d s' ' [. s. COMPONENTS ARE ADEGUATELY DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTEDI THAT j MATERIALS ANO THE GA PR08AAM UTILIZED WERE 40E004TE. 330/03803-02 IMOIVIDUAL M ALLEGATION MIDLANO 2 RIV 82-02 i: SCATTERED AND MISSING PURCHASE ORDERS ANO RELATED DOCUMENTATION WERE CONTINUALLY INCLUDED IN THE PURCHASE ORDER FOLDERS WITN00T SEING LOG 6EU INTO THE DOCUMENT CONTROL LOS 800k AS REOUIRED. SEE REPORT C99900Te5/02-02 (RIV) ALLEGATION 5 FOR RESOLUTION. REPORT $3=68 PROVIDES ASSURANCE THAT HVAC SYSTEMS ANO t COMPONENTS ARE ADEuuaTELY DE51GNEO ANO CONSTRUCTEGI THAT MAIENIALS AND THE GA PROGRAM UTILIZE 0 WERE ADEGUATE. 3-1 e i 'n P 8[ %'
- e
~ I 4 t PAGE 41 REGION III TRACKING SYSTEM 92/28/e4 i MIOLANO - ALLEGATIONS, IN0!VIOUAL5 Ce Fe Ho No No 0, Re X, Y, Ze AND CCe ONE COPY FOR R. SPE55ARD , UPDATED 2/28/04 COMPLETE LISTING I 4 W ITEM RESOLUTION ~@ ] ITEN NO./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPE / FACILITY NAseE LICENSEE INTERIM INSPECTOR CLO5EOUT RESPONSE OUE N000LE NO. BRIEF OESCRIPTION DESIGNATED NO. INSPECTION ASSISNEO REPORT NO. Wl <?. gf 330/s3es3-03 IN0!VIOUAL M ALLEGATION MIOLAle0 2 RIV 82-02 k n T, PURCHASE ORDERS NERE INCOMPLETE. SEE REPORT C99994T85/82-82 j@ IRIV) ALLEGATION II FOR RE50LUTIO84 4A. REPORT 83-08 PROVI4ES ASSURANCE THAT HVAC SYSTEMS ANO t COMPONENTS ARE ADE00ATELY DE$leNED ANO CONSTRUCTE06,THAT i S. MATERIALS AND THE GA PROGRAM UTILIZE 0 WERE ADEGUATE4
- n,
k 334/83803-04 IMOIVIOUAL M ALLEGATION MIOLAND 2 RIV S2-02 O INAeILITY OF SueTIER VENDORS To SUPPLY MISSING INF0$ NATION. -) SEE REPORT C99900Te5/02-02 (RIW3 ALLEGATIONS 6efelt ANO II l FOR RESOLUTION. i REPORT 83-9e PROVIDES ASSURANCE THAT MVAC SYSTEMS Als . [f COMPONENTS ARE A0EGUATELY DESIGNEO AND CONSTRUCTEDI THAT c., MATERIALS AND THE GA PROGRAM UTILIZE 0 WERE 40E004TEo 6 .} l 330/83883-05 INDIVIOUAL M ALLEGATI0ie MIOLANO 2 RIV 82-92 j I$ AN APPROVED VENDOR $ LIST THAT FAILE0 TO REFLECT ZACll85 PURCHASING PRACTICES. SEE REPORT C99900Te5/s2-42 IRl;VI ALLEGATIONS 12 ANO 13 FOR RESOLUTION. i REPORT 83-04 PROVIDE 5 ASSURANCE THAT HVAC SYSTEMS AIS v'" COMPONENTS ARE ADEGUATELY DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTEOS THAT NATERIALS AND THE GA PROGRAM UTILIZEO WERE 40E904TEo l\\ i ,b 330/03003-06 Is00!VIOUAL M ALLEGATION MIL" W2 HAlfMINS 83-04 ,;c e THE PURCHASE ORDER FOR MATERIAL SUPPLIED TO MIOLANO WOULO READ LASALLE. SEE LA5ALLE REPORTS 373/02-5183T4/s2-18 F0El RESOLUTION. REPORT 83-04 PROVIDES ASSURANCE THAT HWAC SYSTEMS AfD COMPONENTS ARE ADEGUATELY DESIGNE0 ANO CONSTRUCTEOS THAT MATERIALS AND THE GA PROGRAM UTILIIED WERE ADEeUATEo ( a u., b 8. $ ' '[ J.,
'"w y.- ~*, _a...,_____ ~ m REGION III TRACKING SYSTEM 02/28/84 PAGE 42 CIDLANO - ALLEGATION 5e INDIVIDUAL 5 C Fe He Me No Os Re Re Ye Ze AND CCe ONE CDPf FOR R. SPE55ARD UPDATED 2/28/04 I } COMPLETE LISTING i RESOLUTION ITEM ITEM NO./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIM INSPECTOR CLOSEGUT DESIGNATED No. INSPECTION A55IeNED REPORT NO. i .J CESPONSE DUE N0DULE No. BRIEF DESCRIPTION j 330/83803-07 IMOIVIDUAL M ALLEGATION MIDLAND 2 RIV 02-02 1 9 AN OCTOGER 9, 1981 REPORT IDENTIFIED 113 ALTERED l' ] CERTIFICATION 58 12) WHITE-0UT USED ANO RETYPEDI ANO 13) HEAT f NUNGERS ALTERED TO AGREE WITH CERTIFICATIONS. REFER TO REPORTS 1' e3-04 SECTION Io C9990eT85/s2-02 IRIV) ALLEGATIONS S ANO 9e ANO OI 3-82-025 FOR RE50LUTION. i REPORT 83-06 PROVIDES ASSURANCE THAT HVAC SYSTEMS ANO t I COMPUNENTS ARE ADEGUATELY DESIGNE0 AND CONSTRUCTEDI THAT MATERIALS AND THE GA PR06 RAM UTILIZE 0 WERE ADEGUATE. i 'i \\ ( l 330/03893-08 IMOIVIDUAL M ALLEGATION MIDLANO 2 RIV 02-02 l THE DOCUMENT CONTROL WAS 50 POOR TRADITIONALLY TNAT THE RECOR05 'i ' 5 l MAD BEEN PILED ON FLOORS IN SORES. EVEN AFTER THE DOCUMENT i,Q ' - REMOVING GUALITY 00CuMENTS WITHOUT SIGNING THEM OUT. REFER TO CONTROL CENTER HAD SEEN ESTABLI5HED, UNAUTHORIZED PER50NNEL WERE ,1*'l ~ j REPORT C999ecTSS/82-82 IRIVI ALLEGATIONS 1 440 5 FOR RESOLUTION. .'4d REPORT 83-08 PROVIDES 4550RANCE THAT HVAC SYSTEMS ANO COMPONENTS ARE ADEGUATELY DESIGNED ANO CONSTRUCTEOS THAT MATERIALS AND THE GA PROGRAM UTILIZED WERE ADEGUATE. , Ej ;;
- >f. i:
'A., '{ 330/s3ee3-09 INDIVIDUAL M ALLEGATION MIDLANO 2 RIV S2-02 j INTERIM REPORT 5 WERE PR000CED ON 4 RUSH GASIS IN DPDER TO SHOW DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE THAT ZACK WAS IMPLEMENTING CORRECTIVE ACTION ANO THAT THE UTILITIES COULD PROCEED WITH CONSTRUCTION. l THE5E INTERIM REPORT 5 WERE INACCURATE ANO 5HOULO HAVE BEEN CONTINUALLY REVISED To REFLECT AN ACCURATE STATUS REPORT. f. SEE NEPORTS C9990eTS5/42-02 IRIVI ALLEGATI04 16 AND 83-08 SECTION I 150 55tEl a FOR RESOLUTION. REPORT 83-04 PROVIDES A550RANCE THAT HVAC Sv5 FENS AND COMPONENTS ARE ADE00ATELY DESIGNED ANO CONSTRUCTE06 THAT MATENIALS ANO THE GA PROGRAM UTILIZED WERE 40EeUATE. b,, 4.. 330/03803-10 INDIVIDUAL M ALLEGATION MIDLANO 2 HAWKINS 83-e8 AN OCTOBER 23, 1981 REPORT ACCURATELY IDENTIFIE0 PROBLEMS WITH i-MATERIAL CENTIFICATION5e IMPHOPER ACCESS TO DOCUMENTS, ANO UNAUTHORIZED DOCUMENT ALTERATIONS. RESOLUTION SAME A5 82808-e1. 4 id L: n.n .o.
1 s On 'p .w ' ~' - r PAGE 43 REGION 111 TRACKING SYSTEM 92/28/04 NIOLAND = ALLEGATIONS, IN0!v! DUAL 5 Ce Fe He Me No Oe Re Ke Ye Zo ANO CCe ONE COPY FOR R. SPE554RD UPDATED 2/28/84 + COMPLETE LISTING t i RESOLUTION ITEM I ITEN NO./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICEN5EE INTERIM INSPECTOR CLOSEGUT 'i RESPONSE DUE MODULE NO. BRIEF DESCRIPTION DESISMATED NO. INSPECTION ASSIGNED REPORT No. "t 33e/ esse 4-el IMOIVIDuAL M ALLEeATION M10LANO 2 i RIV st-e2 Y: 5-l I HAO VIRTUALLY NO FORMAL TRAINING FOR MY WDRE. SEE REPORT l C99906Te5/s2-02 tRIVI ALLEGATION 4 FOR RESOLUTION. i REPORT e3-ee PROVIDES ASSURANCE THAT HVAC SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS ARE ADEGUATELY DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTEOS.THAT MATERIALS AN0 THE GA PROGRAM UTILIIED WERE ADEGUATE.' l-330/03#44-02 INDIVIOUAL M ALLEGATION MIOLANO K RIV S2-02 REPRODUCEO COPIES WERE NOT IDENTICAL TO THE ORISINAL P0. }. DISCREPANCIES INCLUDED FREQUENT SPACE 5 ON THE REPRODUCTIONS WHICH HAD BEEN WHITED-0UT AND 50METINE5 FILLE 0 IN OVER AGAIN. SEE REPORT C9999eT85/s2-e2 (RIV) ALLEGATION 5 e AND 9 AND OI i - REPORT 3-82-025 FOR RESOLUTION. REPORT 33-98 PROVIDES ASSURANCE THAT HWAC SYSTEMS ANO COMPONENTS ARE ADEGUATELY DESIGNEO ANO CONSTRUCTE06 THAT ji MATERIALS AND THE GA PROGRAM UTILI2E0 WERE ADEeUATE. i t' i ' 330/83044-93 INOIVIOUAL M ALLESATION MIDLANO 2 RIV 42-02 l4 NANUFACTURERS DIO NOT SEEN E5PECIALLY CAREFUL IN NONITORING THE EQUIPMENT PAPERWORM. ONE MANUFACTURER SENT US A TYPICAL i, CERTIFICATION FORM FON SEVERAL LOTS OF WELDING MATERIALe ALONS WITH A LETTER INDICATING THAT WE COULO FILL IN THE SPECIFICATIONS ANO MATCH THEM UP WITH THE Poes THEMSELVES. SEE REPORT C999eefe5/s2-82 IRIV) ALLEGATION Is FOR RESOLUTION.
- 'y REPORT 83-08 PROVIDES ASSURANCE THAT HVAC Sf 5TEMS AND COMPONENTS ARE ADEGUATELY DESIGNED ANO CONSTRUCTEOS THAT l
MATERIALS AND THE GA PR0 GRAM UTILIZED WERE ADEGUATE. 9 ( 339/83894*04 IMOIVIOUAL N ALLEGATION MIOLANO 2 RIV 32 02 COMMENTS CONCERMING POOR DOCUMENT CONTROL. REFER TO REPORT C9990eTSS/82-e2 (RIV) ALLEGATIONS I AND 5 AND OI REPORT 3-02-025 w F04 NESOLUITON. REPORT 83-ee PROVIDES ASSURANCE THAT HVAC SYSTEMS ANO
- 33 '
~ i' COMPONENTS ARE ADEGUATELY DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTE08 THAT MATEMIALS AND THE GA PROGRAM UTILIZED WERE ADEeUATE. s I .i -
- f.;"#
^ ~1 3 i PAGE A4 REGION III TRACKING SYSTEM 02/28/04' MIDLAND - ALLEGATIONSe INDIVIDUALS Ce Fo He Me Ne De Re X, Ye le AND CCe DNE COPY FOR R. SPE55ARO UPDATED 2/20/84 CONPLETE LISTING i l ITEM RESOLUTION i 4 ITEM NO./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIN INSPECTOR CLOSEOUT CESPONSE OUE M000LE NO. SRIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED NO. INSPECTION A55I6mE0 REPORT NO.
- l. -
e 330/83804-05 INDIVIDUAL N ALLEGATION MIDLANO 2 HAWKINS 83-0e i 00 RING THE TIME I WORMED FOR ZACKe THE NRC OIO NOTHING THAT I AM AWARE OF TO INSPECT 2ACK PROCEDURES OR NONITOR THEIR OA i e PRoe#AM. SEE LETTERS FROM RIII WHICH REFER THIS ISSUE TO OIA IDATED AUG.9eANO JIe 19831 FOR APPROPRIATE ACTION. THE LETTERS F0 WARDED IMO. N'S AFFIDAVIT AND SWORN STATE *ENT AND IMO. O'S AFFIDAVIT RESARDING SAME ISSUE. REPORT 83-08 REFERS TO ISSUES SENT TO OIA. \\- 330/83805-et INDIVIDUAL 0 ALLEGATION MIDLANO 2 RIV 02*02 , J. CONNENTS RESARDING POOR 00CONENT CONTROL. SEE REPORT h, C99900Te5/82-02 ERIV) ALLEGATIONS I AND 2 AND 0E REPORT ' h;i. 3-02-025 FOR RESOLUTION. IN0IVIOUAL 085 AFFIDAVIT [y ! F0 WARDED To OIA IN LETTER DATED AUsuST 9 1982. ';;.8 REPONT 83-08 PROVIDES A550 NANCE TNAT HVAC SYSTENS AND I COMPONENTS ARE ADEGUATELY DESIGNE0 AND CONSTRUCTEDI THAT 173 + MATERIALS AND THE en PROGRAM UTILI2ED WERE ADE00 ATE. I g i t -) lm' 330/83805-02 IMOIVIDUAL 0 ALLEGATION MIDLANO 2 RIV 82-52 THERE WAS NO CONTROL OVER NUCLEAR PURCHASE ORDERS. AFTER I WAS g FIREO I LEARNED THAT 50NEONE MAD SONE INTO SONE OF THE FILES TO FIX 04 CORRECT THE WARIOUS P085. SEE REPORT C99980Te5/82-02 t/- (RIV) ALLEGATIONS e AND 9 ANO OI REP 0HT 3-02-525 FOR RESOLUTION. it' REPORT 83-0e PROVIDES ASSURANCE TNAT HVAC SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS ARE ADEGUATELY DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTEGI THAT MATERI ALS AND THE GA PROGRAN UTILI2ED WERE ADEGUATE. ~ l l - 330/e3405-53 IN0!VIDUAL 0 ALLEGATION MIDLANO 2 RIV 82-02 CONNENT5 REs4ROING LACK OF FORNAL TRAININS. SEE REPORT C99900Te5/s2-02 ERIVI ALLEGATION A FOR RESOLUTION I COMPONENTS ARE ADEGUATELY DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTEDI THAT REPONT 83-08 PROVIDES ASSURANCE THAT HVAC SYSTENS ANO i NATENIALS AND THE GA PROGRAN UTILI2E0 WERE ADEGUATE. [ 1. t .i
- 8.. ".* *. '..
e PAGE 45 REGION !!! TRACKING Sf5 FEM 02/28/84 l MIDLANO = ALLEGATIONS, INDIVIDUALS Ce F, He Me N, Se Re Xe Ye Zo A40 CCe ONE CDPy FOR R. SPE554RO UPDATED 2?28/84 COMPLETE LISTING l l RESOLUTION ITEM 'bj ITEN No./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIM INSPECTOR CLOSE0GT ( RESPONSE DUE, NODULE NO. 3RIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED NO. INSPECTION ASSIGNED REPORT NO. l5{ 330/83005-64 IMOIVIDUAL 0 ALLEGATION MIDLAND 2 RIV $2-02 TO THE BEST OF MY PERSONAL KNOWLED6C A COMPLETE AUDIT IS STILL NOT FINISHED AT ZACK. (OA DOCUMENTATI04). SEE REPORT C9990eTe5/82-02 (RIVI ALLEGATION 16 FOR RESOLUTION. REPORT 83-08 PROVIDE 5 ASSURANCE THAT HVAC SYSTEMS ANO COMPONENTS ARE ADEGUATELY DESIGNED ANO CONSTRUCTEDI THAT MATERIALS ANO THE GA PR06RAN UTILIZED WERE ADEGUATE. 330/83805-05 INDIVIDUAL 0 ALLE6ATION MIDLANO 2 RIV 32-02 A NUNSER OF THE CMTRe5 I INSPECTED WCRE ALTERE0.5EE REPORT ~ C9990GTe5/82-02 (RIWS ALLEGATION 5 8 ANO 9 A40 OI REPORT 3-82-025 FOR RESOLUTION. REPORT 83-08 PROVIDES ASSURANCE THAT HVAC SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS ARE ADEGUATELY DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTE06 THAT MATERIALS ANO THE GA PROGRAM UTILIZED WERE ADEGUATE. 330/83e95-06 INDIVIDUAL 0 ALLEGATION MIDLANO 2 RIV 82-02 IWASNOTGUALIFkEDTOMAKEARESOLUTIONOREXCUSEFORPROSLEMS LIKE MIS $1NG CERTIFICATIONS (CONCERNING NCRS SHE WAS FORCED To WRITEl. SEE REPORT C99900Te5/s2-02 (RIVI ALLEGATION 4 FOR RESOLUTION. REPORT 83-98 PROVIDES ASSURANCE THAT HVAC SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS ARE ADEGUATELY DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTEDI THAT MATERIALS AND THE GA PROGRAM UTILIZE 0 WERE ADEGUATE. l 330/03005-ST IMSIVIDUAL 0 ALLEGATION MIDLANO 2 RIV S2-02 IN LETTER FROM A Sue-TIER VENDOR CONCERNING MISSING CERTIFICATIONS OR SPECIFICATIONS THE VENDOR TOLD ZACK TO JUST FILL IN THE BLANK 5. SEE REPORT C99990Te5/02-02 (RIV) ALLEGATION 10 FOR RESOLUTION. REPORT 83-98 PROVIDES ASSUHANCE THAT HVAC SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS ARE ADEGUATELY DE516MED AND CONSTRUCTEDI THAT MATERIALS AND THE GA PROGRAM UTILIZED WERE ADEGUATE.
- e. ? v '..
- >s s.
4 s ',y ~ s d ( PAGE 46 RESION III TRACKING SfSTEN et/2e/e4 C10 LAND - ALLEGATIONSe INO1VIOUALS Ce Fe He Ms Me Ce Re Ao Ye Ze AND CCe ONE COPY FOR R. SPESSARD UPDATED 2/28/8A COMPLETZ LISTING ~ w ITEN RESOLUTION ITEN NO./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIN INSPECTOR CLOSEOUT RESPONSE OUE MODULE NO. SRIEF DESCRIPTION DES 16NATED NO. INSPECTION ASSIGNED REPORT NO. 330/03ee5-08 IN0!v! DUAL 0 ALLEGATION MIOLAND 2 NAWNINS 63-03 TO THE DEST OF MY MNewLEDGE THERE WAS NEVER AN NRC INVESTIGATION AT THE ZACK SITE OURING MY EMPLOYMENT THERE. REPORT 83-08 REFC45 TO AFFIOAVITS AND STATENENTS WHICH WERE SENT TO OIA. REFER TO AUGUST 9,1983 LETTER FROM REGION III To OIA. 4 330/03805-09 INDIVIOUAL 0 ALLEGATION MIOLANO 2 RIV 33-02 I ALSO SELIEV: THERE SHOULO DE A REVIEW OF ZACE WELDER OUALIFICATION RECORDS. SEE REPORT C99900TS5/02-02 (RIV) ALLEGATION 3 ANO RIII REPORTS 83-13Ie3=I4e(C004 RELEASE OF i ZACE WORM) FOR RESOLUTION. REPORT 83-44 PROVIDES ASSURANCE TNAT HVAC SYSTEMS AND CosePONENTS ARE ADEeUATELY DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTEDI THAT NATERIALS AND THE GA PROGRAM UTILIZED WERE 40E00 ATE. 4 330/83800-01 IMOIVIOUAL R ALLEGATION MIOLAND 2 C00M 03-11 UNGUALIFIED PER30NNEL AT MIDLANO INCLUDE LEO DAVISe DICK S00ERMOLMe CLARE ASH, AND ED ENTROKIN. REFER TO JUNE 2To 1983 LETTER TO SINCLAIR FROM KEPPLER. i REPORT 83-ee PROVIDES ASSURANCE THAT HVAC SfSTEn$ AND ~ l COMPONENTS ARE ADEeUATELY DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTE08 THAT NATERIALS ANO THE GA PROGRAM UTILIZED WERE ADEQUATE. 330/03e00-92 IMOIVIOUAL R ALLEGATION MIOLAND 2 NAWWINS 33-08 1 ZACK As.50 OIO NOT HAVE 90ALIFIED PEOPLE FOR DESIGN WORK THEY WERE DOING. SEE REPORT 83-08 SECTION I FOR RESOLUTION i (AT1TACHMENT E TO REP 09T 83-981 I l I i; ' ; d*, r t __ :e.; v =., ,as.
k... J -n-i Paet AT REGION III TRACKING STSTEN 82/24/84 MIOLAND - ALLEGATIONS IN0!VIOUALS C, Fe Me Me No 0, He Ac Ye Zo ANO CCe SNE COPY FOR R. SPESSARO UPDATED 2/28/04 j COMPLETE LISTINs a 1. ? RESOLUTION ITEM l i ITEN NO./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIM INSPECTOR CLOSE0UT MSPONSE DUE MODULE N0. SRIEF OESCRIPTION DESIGNATED NO. INSPECTION ASSIGNED REPORT NO. e I-f h 33e/ esses-e3 INDIVIOUAL R ALLEGATION MIOLANO 2 COOK S3-11 HE CLAIMS THAT ALL WORE ON ANY CONTRUCTION PROJECT SEYONO A l CERTAIN LIMITED SIZE MUST SE DONE AS A MICHISAN REsISTERE0 ENsIMER 04 ARCHITECT. ALSO SEE REPORT 83-98 SECTION I AND JUNE 2To 1943 LETTER TO SINCLAIR FROM REPPLER FOR RESOLUTION. l I REPORT 83-08 FROVIDES ASSURANCE THAT HVAC SYSTEMS AND r COMPONENTE ARE ADEGUATELY DESIGNEO AND CONSTRUCTE06 THAT i j NATERIALS AND THE SA PN0s#AM UTILIZE 0 WERE AGEGUATE. l 334/03ees*e4 INDIVIOUAL R ALLEGATION MIOLAND 2 COOK 33-11 't HE TOLD ME THAT A VERY S000 WELDER SUIT THE PROJECT RECENTLY i i M CAUSE THE SCNEDULING WAS So ERRATIC. SEE JUNE 2Te19s3 t LETTER FROM REPPLER FOR MSOLUTION. 4 J M PORT 83-98 PROVIDES ASSURANCE THAT HVAC SYSTEMS AND i< l COMPONENTS ARE ADEeUATELY DESteNED ANO CONSTRUCTE08 THAT i MATERIALS AND THE GA PR0sRAM UTILIZED WERE ADEeUATE. ~ 1 334/83814-08 INDIVIOUAL X ALLEGATION MIOLANO 2 RIV 32-e2 1' TRAINING WAS'INAGEGUATE IN PREPARARINs HIM TO PERFORM HIS JOS WITH ZACK. SEE REPORT C990eeisstet-02 (RIV) ALLEGATION 4 ANO ) e3-se SECTION I FOR RESOLUTION. } MPORT 83-08 PROVIDES ASSURANCE THAT HVAC SfSTEMS ANO COMPONENTS ARE ADEeUATELY DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTE06 THAT MATERIALS AND THE GA PR0e#AM UTILIZED WERE ADEGUATE. l f. ^ ,i h 330/83814-02 INDIVIOUAL X ALLEGATION MIOLANO 2 HAWKINS 83-es UPPER LEVEL ZACK MANAGEMENT PMSSURES HAVE AFFECTED THE 00ALITY s' OF WORE. SEE REPORT 83-98 SECTION I AND 01 REPORT 3-82-85T
- ,e FOR RESOLUTION.
REPORT 83-ee PROVIDES ASSURANCE THAT HVAC SVSTEMS ANO W COMPONENTS ARE ADEGUATELY DESIGNEO AND CONSTRUCTEDI THAT i MATERIALS AND THE GA PROGRAM UTILIZED WERE 40E004TE. i 1 i l' ' : a.; v '.. . <Xb. ~
- L-p PAGE 43 REGION III TRACKING SYSTEM 92/28/04 NIOL48ee = ALLEGATIONSe INDIVIOUALS Ce Fe Me No Ne De Re As Ye le ANO CCe Oest COPY FOR R. SPESSARO UPDATED 2/28/04 COMPLETE LISTING 1 ITEM RESOLUTION ITEse 800./ INSPECTOR / ITEN TYPE / FACILITY NAsef LICENSEE INTERI6e INSPECTOR CLOSEOUT MSP008SE DUE N0DULE see. DRIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED NO. INSPECTION ASSteedE0 REPORT 800. f. .g, 33.,83.i4-.3 IceDiviOU.. =u.AT I. Ni OL Ate 0 2 Riv .2-.2 seE FKeUENTLY SAW 00CueeENTS MAVING EVl0ENCE OF SIsasATURES OF 4 1 OUESTIcesASLE AufstENTICITYe WHITE OUTS 4000 MEAT NUNsER ALTERATIONS. SEE OI REPORTS 3-82-025e RIII REPORT 83-04 { SECTIces le Asso RIV REPORT C9990eisS/s2-02 RIV ALLEGATION 8 AND 9 FOR petSOLUTION. REPoesi s3-8e PROVIDES ASSURAseCE THAT MVAC SYSTEMS ANO COMP 000ENTS ARE ADEGUATELY DESISe8E0 4000 CONSTRUCTEDI THAT NATERIALS Asso THE GA PROSRAM UTILI2E0 WERE ADEGUATE. 9 R ,j. 334/83e15-91 IsseIVIOUAL Y 4 LEGATION NIOLAND 2 HAWKINS $3=44 OUE TO THE FAILURE OF CPC0 TO POST X-ray SIsseSe ME WAS EAPOSED TO R40!ATI080 PRODUCEO SV X-RAY EQUIPseENT. SEE REPORT 83-es R' SECTIcos I FOR RESOLUTION. THE Ise0!VIOUAL DIO NOT WISM TO 7 PURSUE THIS ISSUE WITH THE peRC. y ' ~. i 330/83816-41 IsseIVIOUAL I ALLEGATI000 NIOLAND 2 MAWWINS 83-08 i 4: IsePROPER DEFICIEedCY TRENDIssG TECHNIQUES AT 2 ACE. SEE REPORT 33-00 SECT 3080 I Ase0 III FOR RESOLUTION. INDIWIOUAL 2eS SWORN STATEseENT SENT TO 01 04 11-3-83. L 330/83016*02 Ise0IVIOUAL I ALLE84TIOos NIOLAse0 2 6AR08 DER Use004LIFIE0 CONSTOCN PER50seNEL PERFOReeless ENelsetERIns AseO OUaLITY FuseCTIONS. ^? 330/83816-43 Ise0!v300AL Z ALLEGATION MIOLANO 2 i COOK S3-22 I IMADEGUATE DEStees AND CoseSTRUCTION OF INSTRUseENT Tus'see Aeso I l-SUPPORTS SY SECMTEL Aedo CONSTOCK. SEE REPORT 83-94 SECTION I FOR OETAIL OF RESOLuiION. (
- e l
}s SS ~. {
- w..
W.c
h, .\\ 1 s l PAGE 49 REGIOct III TRACKING Sv5 TEM S2/28/44 KIDLANO - ALLE6ATION5e INDIVIOUALS Ce Fe He Me No 0, Re se Ye 2e ANO CCe OME COPY FOR R. SPE554RO Up0ATED 2/28/s4 l '.j ConPLETE LISTIsee en ITEN RESOLUTION 1 t 'm i ! ITEM NO./ Ite5PECT04/ ITEM TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICGesEE INTENIN INSPECTOR CLOSEOUT - 7, MSP0esM OUE MODULE NO. SAIEF DESCRIPTION DESIONATED No. INSPECTION ASSIsteED REP 0af NO. t.' 3 g g 334/83#19-41 INDIVIOUAL CC ALLEGATION MIOLAND 2 MAmulNS 33-se l e u IsePROPER USE OF ONSITE DESItse CNANGE METH005. SEE MPenf 83-08 N~ SECTION I FOR RESOLUTION.
- EPORT 83-04 PROVIDES ASSURAseCE THAT MVAC SYSTENE Ates q
C0seP000ENTS ARE ADEOUATELY OESIGNED AND CONETRUCTEDB TNAT t: MATERIALS Ase0 THE 04 PROSAAM UTILIZED MERE ADEOUATE. G ~ 4 1 330/83eI9-42 Ise0IVIOUAL CC ALLEGATION MIOLAND 2 HAugINS 33-43 g ..g. ! J:' ; INC0anECT INSTALLATION OF AseCHOR SOLTS FOR SueFACE MOUNTED e i PLATES. SEE REPORT 83-06 SECTION I AND II Foa RESOLUTION. s 4 g [ 33e/s3-19-43 Ise0!vl0UAL CC ALLEsATION MIOLAND 2 MAunINS 33-43 4 EXTENSIVE PROPOSED CONTROL moose NWAC REDI5Isse. SEE Mpeaf 83-se SECTIcos I FOR RESOLUTION. REFERRED TO TERA FOR IseCORPotATIcos INTO Test CONTROL n000s NWAC OESIGN REVIEW. g 3 330/03e19-04 Ite93 VISUAL CC ALLEGATION MIOLAse0 2 MAWWINS 83-04 g [ l EXCESSIVE SLOWHOLES IN THE C0esTROL ROON OUCTW0aE. SEE REPORT 83-48 .gj SECTIces I Asse II FOR MSOLUTION. ( t 7:l 33e/03e19-45 Ise0IVIOUAL CC ALLEGATI0es MIOLAse0 2 HARRISON 83-10 ( j -E * % }; ?. eECNTELS USE OF te0se035 CLOSURE STATEstENTS. ALSO SEE MPORT 43-04 ij f SECTIcos I. g Y;' h '?,i 4 l" ) t Y j -. ', 4 [ ;i I e Q, '(. n ': i = o
l 6 Document Name: HVAC EXIT MEETING OUTLINE - Requestor's ID: l l LAURIE i Author's Name: t Hawkins j 1, Document Comments: j Outline for Midlan.d HVAC Exit Meeting in RIII 02/29/84 i l i a j e l I-t i i i. f 5 1 9 e I i I
- t i
e e .1 4. e + = * +, = - , of" s g-e s 4 - +.- -e -e-
7 j-l 'IVAC EXIT MEETING FEBRUARY 29,1984 I f i j Report 83-08; 83-08 I l! A. Special Inspection to address the allegations from 11 individuals ,f regarding the design and construction of the Midland HVAC system. t .1 Began May 10, 1983, t B. The inspection involved a total of 1142 hours by five Region III and three NRR representatives. t C. The primary objective of the inspection was to provide us confidence that i .]
- 1) the HVAC systems and components are properly constructed and 2) that an i
adequate QA Program is being implemented with regard to ongoing HVAC activities. D. To accomplish the objective we developed a five phase program which consisted of: 4 . ') (1) Followup of allegations (2) Construction inspection (3) QA Program review (4) NRR design review (5) Materials sampling and testing program ~ ll O -~ ..g
s I l E. Results: Nine items of noncompliance 1 i (1) 10 CFR 50.55(e) (Level IV) - Failure to report the Zack 1 documentation deficiencies in accordance with 55(e). i i j (2) Criterion 10 " Inspection" (Level IV) - the spec. governing HVAC activities did not include provisions or requirements i for assuring fit-up conformance to AWS D1.1 for structural l welding. l l l (3) Criterion 18 - Audits (Level 'IV) - Examples of six instances i where audits were not conducted in accordance with MPQAD Procedure F-1M. t (4) Criterion 2 - Quality Assurance Program (Level V) - Failure to establish a training program to ensure that HVAC quality control inspectors are trained in changes to HVAC Spec. 151, when these changes affected the acceptance criteria or inspection requirements. (5) Criterion 2 - QA Program (Level V) - Examples of three instances where quality inspection personnel were not properly qualified and/or certified. (6) Criterion 5 - Instructions, Procedures, and Drawings (Level V) - Examples of three instances where design change notices were not incorporated into the design documents as required by Bechtel Procedure PEP 4.46.1. .l l 9a
t l (7) Criterion 16 - Corrective Action (Level V) - Appropriate corrective action was not taken in the case of 42 HVAC shop I l travelers which documented that welding was performed by I unqualified welders. Specifically, the corrective action i i did not address the acceptability of welds performed during f the period when the welders were not properly qualified in accordance with AWS. l I t j (8) Criterion 5 - Instructions, Procedures, and Drawings (Level V) - 1 Examples of two instances where the Zack procedure for Trend 4 1 l Analysis (PQCP-20) was not followed. l (9) Criterion 5 - Instructions, Procedures, and Drawings (Level V) - l After Bechtel's discontinuation of Zack's use of the SDDR, there s i was no approved vehicle at Zack's disposal to submit nonconforming I conditions to Bechtel for disposition. I F. Noncompliances 2, 4, 5, and 7 are programmatic in nature and may impact completed HVAC system construction. Consequently, your evaluation of this potential impact on completed work should be included-in your written response to those items. U$( G. (culos ek : As u hl-{- Q tW.e p-f -fL sbg get teash4.bd %dd is grlon %( % olu d p p EY M IW/ & k qQ nWntL. q ~ i '}}