ML20090L724
| ML20090L724 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Midland |
| Issue date: | 08/17/1979 |
| From: | BECHTEL GROUP, INC. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17198A223 | List:
|
| References | |
| CON-BOX-04, CON-BOX-4, FOIA-84-96 NUDOCS 8405260034 | |
| Download: ML20090L724 (76) | |
Text
...
8l bb*
IN,5 f. A.T Ao - A -
ra F% ro e s 43 L-A h E **~g"'#
Ls'sk QF:1w;:
t u m: _ a-y c
SUBJECT:
MCAR 24 tissued 9/7/78) i)2C
g1 p' 's Settlement of the Diesel Generator Foundations and Building l
y WW g
(Insufficient Compaction in Plant Area Fill Related to f
g.
p' Seismic Category I Structures and Facilities) bh
)c INTERIM REPORT 7 pLE.ASE F1T W T ae vwra Yo u d-DATE:
August 17, 1979 Q g AA. % d T $
WM A\\A6. G,M 1't i
PROJECT:
Consumers Power Company 2.DD f X.
Tk_%! 2 I
Midland Plant Units 1 & 2 Bechtel Job 7220 i
-X-8l 5' T 7 7DC Introduction This report summarizes activities related to Seismic Category I structures and utilities founded on plant area fill. It also includes modifications of planned remedial actions for portions of the auxiliary building, j
feedwater isolation valve pits, and diesel generator building and foundations reported in Interim Report 6 of MCAR 24. Results of soil investigations made in the above-mentioned areas have been reported in previous interim i
reports of MCAR 24.
1 8405260034 840517 1
l 1
J l
Description of Deficiency i
A)
Diesel Generator Building and Foundations This has been described in detail in previous Interim Reports 1, 2, 1.r>,C I e!
j "' Ec r*
- I'-
3, 4, and 5 of HCAR 24.
C s
- i B)
Auxiliary Buildfug Electrical Penetration Areas and Feedwater Isolation Valve Pits The extent of inadequacy of fill material under the auxiliary building electrical penetration areas and feedwater isolation valve pits has been described in Interim Report 6 of HCAR 24.
C)
Auxiliary Building Railroad Bay Interim Report 6 of HCAR 24 stated that, based on boring records, the upper 18 feet of sand backfill say have liquefaction potential.
However, further evaluation of : oil investigation indicates liquefaction
- "' - - - " ' :::d he potential is unlikely in the railroad bay area. L r,: > <
- H
-- fw.
A. te.A.
s is being reviewed by the 2a,,... a,
- .._2__
._....t_.-'-
A soil consultants, I
dd,i, e e,.1 C, b.:.
3 s
t l
2 L
'D)
Service Water Pump Structurr
+
l The deficiency in this area has been reported in Interim Report 6 of !! CAR 24.
Corrective Action Q..
A)
General Plant Area J,
y awedr-1)
Reason for choosing) plant ares dewatering i
A permanent exterior dewatering system espable of lowering the water level to an approximate elevation of 600 feet will be installed which will enclose the Q-listed area of the plant site. The option of permanent area dewatering has the advantage of being a positive solution to the liquefaction problem in any part of the fill within the perimeter enclosed by the dewatering system. Furthermore, i
l permanent ares dewatering can be simply and effectively monitored, primarily througu the use of piezometers. One of the greatest advantages, according to soil consultant R. Peck, is the margin of l
safety inherent in the time lag that would be required for recharge of the dewatered zone if the pumps fa ing system failure as i
the result of an earthquake therefore,;not destroy the protection achieved by the dewatering.
/
s i
In addition to being a positi solution to the liquefaction problem,
/
l wherever such a orobles exists in dewatered area of the plant
/
9 l
...t4ement-that mght
]
site, the drainage will substantially ___
l 3
l 1
i c
n..
+-
./
~
m.
I\\
~
/
/
h4dur:d L, w y.uion e. t?
y.4. d..isg n :::"^,"-k. The dewatering system will essentia y eliminate p::sti:1 p-41-- of seismic shakedown. '
/
\\,g.
t t,
t f
- 2)
Description.of permindat dewatering l
8 I
s t-I g
y.:. m.
i
- -- The present concetit is to enclose the.Q.&%d.... with a permanent,
exterior dewatering system. The dentering system would consist of submersible deepwells that would ertend to the original clay till. Approximately 200 to 300 deepwells voald s
W be installed. The number required to odintain' the grousiwars, i
at the desired level would be operated ud 0.2,;l_ %-"*"id
^ ~..*'-
5: = &edant. There would be sufficient redundancy to provide
,h !;.
p.
for interruptica of parts of the system. In addition,100%
standby diesel;gestei.atorsjould be provided., - - - -
^
c r
The pumps'wo'ild be' wised electrically d E.- f f ace.
d, P
stagge?cd and nectioned so that one interentiera do?s not l
affeG. continuoua length of the dewatiring s'ystem.'
.s.
w, '.
s s
l The pernauent interior dewater.ag nystem would be used to a
, N.,
5.f
~
f L
\\'
resove groundwater remaining within O c' Art.s-enclosed by the xg
- ~~m,,
' /
~
perimeter' dewatering system. The wells would be pumped as requirek'to remove groundwater that collects'within the exterior $
l I
I i
e e
7
'.j l
4
~
4 e
~
. ~.
e y
m e
l w*
/,, k a
-(3-
+,
J.
1 l
~
perimeter system because of the recharge from rain, shutdown, I
e etc.
6 i
The groundwater removed would be monitored to ensure that no fines are being removed from the soil.
C After an initial pumping period of approximately 6_montks, tim
.;. ;1 Q
w..n i. ;r Mgh that the permanent dewatering 2 -.12 u
system could be shut,down completely from 1 to 2 weeks before a significant rise in the water level within the dewatered
\\
area would occur. The principal source of recharge is the !
5*
cooling pond and the rate the groundwater flows through the soil from the pond is low.
I Piezometers would be located at key points to monitor the groundwater level and alert the plant when the groundwater has e
risen above a predetermined elevation.
41,.
A c.J c. m?
l R. Loughney, Bechtel consultant, is currently preparing a
)
preliminary plant dewatering scheme. It should be available s'
for review by August 20, 1979.
L l
B)
Diesel Generator Building and Foundations As mentioned in Interim Report 6, the soil investigations at the diesel generator building showed the presence of zones of sand, 5
\\
\\.
g.
w/
g 6
I s
c
~
including some portions with loose sand. This finding indicated a Potential for liquefaction under severe earthquakes, and possibility of settlement originating in the sand due to shakadsn under seismic conditions. Interim Report 6 included a suggestion to chemically 4
.s 7
grout the sand having liquefaction potential. Grouting, using proper chemicals, would be feasible. Nevertheless, it vouldjbe difficult to ensure that all injected materials had been successfully.
treated, or that all loose sand zoces had actuall'7 been injected.
Thus,,it.would be difficult.to positively state whether all
' significzat zones with liquefaction potential had been identified s
and treated.
General permanent dowatering of.a large portion of the' plant site has been selected as the alternative to grouting. Reasons for av selecting pemanent area dewatering have been described under corrective action for.the general plant area.
1' s
C)
Auxiliary Building Penetration Areas and feedwater Isolation Valve h
^2its,
.b
- Plans for corrective : actions for the auxiliary buildi:2g electrical 7
-r w,, ;
pene'tration areas and the feedvater isolation valve pits, as described r
s in Interim Report 6'oi MCAR.14, have been~aedified. Unsuitable fill l
material beneath the feedwater isolation valve pita will be excavated and r4placed by lean concrete. However,cfill beneath the p
3 auxiliary building electrical penetration areap will not be removed,
~
e ::%
,a
..r
[
6
<o
-2 y,
lq
.,Y
- A) f f
y[
a',.
d R/
i-
.g.
n.,..
.. ::/ w a
nn
" +
,,r j
'T 4:
y;*
except for excavation necessary to construct the caissons underneath the cantilever ends of the electrical penetration areas. These caissons, which will be founded on undi-turbed till, will provide t
Permanent and positive support for the electrical penetration areas,
f 111 iced w sas,f.c:;g results-rrre1grEctive 6f% nature-of.
fill k---
- - * = - -
. di fe I (o 4 (
G x
('
Phases of the modified corrective actions for the auxiliary building electrical penetration areas and the feedwater isolation valve pits are as follows.
1)
Preparatory work a)
Temporary external supports de D"k'p**y T' v
Prior to underpinning operations, a temporary support for the feedwater isolation valve pits will be provided as described in Interim Report 6 of MCAR 24. For the auxiliary building electrical penetration areas, resulta of a staticstructuralanalysisindicatedthatnootherexternal-hgor
~ ' '
support is needed in addition to the support to be provided by underpinning.
{,-
i i
4 1
7
b' WM m.:
-*um-EB5->
1 Caissons consisting of concrete-filled steel pipes will be used to underpin the anviliary building electrical penetration areas. For each of the electrical penetration areas, caissons will provida permanant support having a vertical resistance capacity sufficient to produce a moment equal to or greater m
A.. than 325,000 foot kips at Column Rows 5.3 for Unit 1 and 7.8 '
cN for Unit 2, respectively. The approximate installed caisson
}\\
capacity is 4,000 kips for each of the electrical penetration areas. Caissons will extend at least 4.0 feet into the till or natural dense sand strata.
Piles or caissons consisting of concrete-fillad steel pipes will be used to underpin the turbine building along the K line n
adjacent to the valve pit structure. These permanent underpinning
\\
10 supports for the turbine building will be capable of safely resisting colunm loads plus half the base slab pressure within the zone of influence, as de' fined in Figures 91 and 92.
Design of the permanent underpinning support for the turbine building will take into account the reaction from the tempcrary external support of the valve pit structure.
B i
l Caissons and piles to be used as permanent underpinning support
}
j for the anviliary building penetration areas and the turbine I
building will be load tested for a mini== of 1.5 times the design load. Caissons selected for testing will be representative of the majority of caissons to be installed. For every group of caissons which constitute 500 design tons of underpinning resistance, one caisson will be load tested.
,N..
9 f
_-_--_____-__________________-___-___________A
.I
~
A'J permanent underpinning supports to be provided under the auxiliary and turbine buildings win be encased in lean concrete.
s Soldier piles, caissons, or concrete piers with nondeteriorating lagging material win be used to secure the soil under the turbine building.
This lateral support will prevent soil movement under the adjacent turbine and control buildings during underpinning operations. The lateral support will ha designed for a hydrostatic head from elevation 627' to the bottom of mass excavation under the structures. The lateral support win also be designed for earth pressure loads from soil beneath these buildings. The depth of the initial excavation where the earth is not supported will not exceed 4 feet if it is within 6 feet of the K line (Figures 91 and 92). Otherwise, a maw 4== depth of 7 feet will be used. After the initial excavation, lagging win be installed and back-packed. The lagging along the K line located below elevation 600' will be grouted.
The existing unsuitable backfin material under the fe-dwater isolation valve pits will be excavated and removed down to t d l
tin if required. The extent of backfill removal will be i
determined on the basis of soil tests of the exposed fill i
f material and available boring information. Manual or mechanical means will be used to excavate and remove unsuitable material.
-Conventional tools, such as rock splitters and demolition tools, win be used to dislocate and/or remove hardened material during excavation. Excavation will not proceed to a depth 10
_,,e
-.r
greater than 3 feet below the previously grouted lagging.
Proper precautionary measures will be taken to prevent movement of foundation material outside the excavation area.
After removal of all inadequate fill material, the excavated area will be backfilled with lean concrete having a miniana strength of 2,000 psi. Concrete will be poured in lift thicknesses of 5 feet maximum, except the first lift, which will be no more than 2 feet thick. Successive lifts will be doweled into the preceding lift. The topmost lift will be within 6 inches of the bottom of the existing slab. The remaining void between the lean concrete backfill and the foundation slab will be either dry packed or pressure-grouted. A 2-inch gap will be provided between the lean concrete backfill and the adjacent structures (the containment and turbine buildings) by using ethafoam or similar joint separation materials.
D)
Auxiliary Building Railroad Bay The permanent dewatering for the general plant discussed earlier in this report, will eliminate the possibility of liquefaction in this area. No other corrective action is required in this area.
l 11 l
E)
Service Water Pump Structure Corrective action for the service water pump structure has been reported in Interim Report 6 of MCAR 24.
Activities Related to Plant Fill and Settlement A)
Diesel Generator Building and Foundations 1)
Building settlement and preload operation Figures 13, 14-1, 43, and 44 have been revised to show the settlement data for the diesel generator building and foundations as of August 3, 1979.
t a
l The results of the preload operation are being reviewed by the i
consultants. The observed pore water pressures were small and dissipated very rapidly. Currently, the water levels in the piezometers in the the diesel gen n ator building area are relatively stable. This observation suggests that the primary consolidation was accomplished quickly and the plotted data of the settlement as a function of the logarithm of time became linear shortly after completion of the r- '- g p. led -
Therefore, it'is possible to forecast the future secondary compression by simple extrapolation, assuming the err ' e yv& b M 12
will remain in place. Although even this amount of settlement would be acceptable, the projected settlement determined on yr M this basis is an upper bound because the easehooge will be removed and the real settlement will certainly be smaller.
To predict more precise furture secondary compression based on the linear portion of the settlement curve, the existing '
borros anchors were modified to enable more accurate settlement measurement. In addition, four deep borros anchors, with tip elevations at 535 feet, were installed. When read using the modified system of measurement, these deep borros anchors will provide the magnitude of absolute building settlement. Refer to Figure 88 for the locations of deep borros anchors.
The acdification of the borros anchors passing through the mezzanine floor with the five settlement rods on each of the diesel generator pedestals consisted of reducing the stickup rod engths above l
the flow as necessary, attaching a flat metal reference surface to the floor beside each rod, and attaching a reference surface on each rod. A portable mechanical-dial indicator l
j height gage has been used to determine the elevation difference l
between each pair of referance surfaces. Similarly, the reference brackets were attached to the building wall and pedestal floor at each deep borros anchor. With this modification, j
measurement accuracy is expected to be approximatey 0.01 l
aa.
l l
l l-13 l
r m
_ _~
Together with modifying the borros anchors, settlement readings 1
of the borros anchors using optical survey technique has continued as before. Settlement observations under the 20-foot uniform surcharge are in progress. Evaluation of current settlement data and a future settlement forecast are underway. When an g,
J h.
accurate and acceptable forecast c? building settlements is
,\\ /
' produced, the :x;p esta m. L;b_e 1M will be removed 'and rebound measurements
~*
.during and after surcharge removal will be taken. It is anticipated that the preload will be removed by August 1979.
\\
7 ggG~g.
Fiv Sondex, systems were installed at the location.shown in Figure 88 to monitor the rebound during and after surcharge removal. The Sondex systems consist of a corrugated plastic tube with wire detector rings attached to the outside at approximately 5-foot intervals. The five tubes were installed in borings drilled to elevation 535'.
A probe containing an electrical coil will be lowered down the tube on the end of a survey tape, with an electrical cable connecting the coil to a power source and irdicator at the surface. Through the principle of induction, the probe will detect the location of the metal rings; the indicator will peak whenever the probe is centered in the cross axis of a detector ring. Messurement accuracy is ru n d will be --e#-'-
y using a winding mechanism and dial indicator S
at the surface, referenced either to a bracket on the outside of the building or to the mezzanine floor.
( ? '( l M _ O N h W
3 pp_ w"1h >..? )
s F
I 14
~-
. ~.
2)
Seismic analysis The seismic analysis, as discussed in Interim Report 5 of
=, gu.>
HCAR 24, is complete. An evaluation of the impact on
} u.-* 7, systems, components, and the structure is in progress.
Preliminary review indicates that the impact may be min 4==1.
Upon completion of'the prel d program, field tests will be conducted to verify that actual soil parameters 4,
g, g y
W,
(
are within the range of the analysis.
43
/*_
\\ /
B)
Auxiliary Building Electrical Penetration Areas, Control Tower, and i.
Feedwater Isolation Valve Pits 1)
Settlement monitoring Figure 2 has been revised to include settlements for the auxiliary building and the feedwater isolation valve pits as of August 3,1979.
I 4
i 2)
Crack mapping I.
I
{
Crack maps for these areas are shown in Figures through 87.
I 15 1
3)
Seismic analysis
- l The remedial action for the electrical penetration areas and the feedvater isolation valve pits will modify the existing mathematical model used for seismic analysis. A seismic analysis will be performed to evaluate the degree of change.
Upon completion of the analysis, the impact on syst[ms, components, and the structure will be evaluated.
4)
Struccural (stress) analysis
(.*.
f.
The cantilever p el for the auxiliary building electrical penetration areas described in Interim Report 6 of MCAR 24 will be revised and reanalyzed to take into account that the free ends of the aux 11 airy building electrical penetration areas will be supported by caissons and soil beneath the structure will not be removed. The permanent condition of the auxiliary building electrical penetration areas will be simulated l
by providing springs at the free ends of the cantilever model.
Vertical and horizontal seismic effect, pipe break, and live I
load will be included. Bechtel Stress Analysis Program (BSAP1. Pest) will be used to combine the results. --
1-U' I'
16 l
l I
I l
-\\/
l.
5)
Local dewatering Loughney Dewatering Inc. was awarded a contract for local construction dewatering on July 13, 1979. The eductor wells 4
will be installed to elevation 580' or to the top of the lower clay, whichever is higher. The wells will be placed around w
k the proposed underpinning excavations for Units 1 and 2.
d Educator wells will be placed through the turbine building
-(y floor at elevation 614' to complete the system. To date, the subcontractor has mobilized this equipment and jetted in these
'J '
s g
wells on the east side of the Unit 2 auxiliary building. Work m-u
~
Q has been stopped pending submittal of the subcontractor's procedures for Bechtel approval.
C)
Auxiliary Building Railroad Bay 1)
Settlement monitoring i
Figure 2 has been revised to include settlemnets in this area as l.
of August 3, 1979.
2)
Crack aspping i
i Crack maps for the railroad bay are shown in Figures 84 and 86.
(
i 17 I
3)
Structural analysis The auxiliary building railroad bay will be analyzed for
~E differential settlement.
w p,
D)
Service Water Pump Structure 1)
Shear-wave velocity measurementa To accurately determine the dynamic vertical stiffness of piles which will be used to support the portion of the structure on fill, three sets of cross-hole shear-wave velocity measurements have been ande at the locations shown in Figure 67. These locations correspond to the proposed pile locations. When measurement results have been obtained, tim dynamic vertical stiffness of the piles will be used for modeling soil-structure interaction for seismic analysis.
2)
Settlement monitoring Figure 2 has been revised to include settleent data for this structure as of August 3, 1979. There has been no detectable settleentforthisstructure[todate.
l l
I 18
4 1
3)
Structural (stress) analysis A new analysis will be made for the service water pump structure using conventional techniques and considering walls and slabs with piling that will be used to support the portion of the structure on top of fill.
4)
Seismic analysis 1
A modified. seismic analysis is in progress. The seismic l
.~.
analysis technique and criteria, and the mathematical model are discussed in Interim Report 6 of MCAR 24. The mathematical model is shown in Figure 93. Upon completion of the analysis, the impact on systems, components, and the structure will be evaluated. Preliminary resul"ts indicate that the i g may ky be minimal.
(
E)
Borated Water Storage Tanks and Tank Fara Area 1)
Settlement monitoring a
i As reported in Interim Report 6 of MCAR 24, the borated water storage tanks will be constructed, filled with water, and monitored for settlement.
19
(??Any comments regarding startup and hydrostatic testing??)
2)
Tank farm investigation for air line leak SEE IN $ cgT 2o A
'T; i; ;_ _ ;' f;f M "-- :d) 3)
Crack mapping i
Crack maps for this area are shown in Figure 87.
F)
Emergency Diesel Fuel Oil Storage Tanks i
The diesel fuel oil storage tanks are buried structures that have already been subjected to a full-scale loading by filling with water. -
Settlements under these test conditions were minimal. Actual settiment of the tanks will be associated primarily with settiment of the underlying and surrounding fill under its own weight. Because the tanks will be settling with the fill, the differential movements between the tanks and the surrounding soil and piping will be minimal, and the connections can be expected to settle approximately equally with the tanks. Details prov_iding reasonable flexibility will be developed to satisfy all equirements.
i l
' ')
s i
- v. -
e i
3 t
20
d G)
Underground Utilities 1)
Piping in fill For the borated water lines, service water lines, and condensate lines, profiling and stress analysis have been discussed in Revision 2 of the response to Question 17 and in the response
\\
,o deadbent, 2eono,and Dunnie/if.iFigure 6Y
,a to Question 19 of the NRC 10 CFR 50.54(f) yequest.
74 shows the pipe profiles done by GilBp addition to the profiles given in Figure 60 of Interim Report 5 of MCAR 24.
\\
2)
Duct banks and conduit in fill h( '.* ' #
l Monitoring programs for the Seismic Category I duct banks and 6
conduit in fill have been discussed in the response to the a
NRC's Question regarding 10 CFR 50.54(f), Revision 1.
Stress analysis has been discussed in the response to the NRC's Question 13 of the 10 CFR 50.54(f) request.
\\
3)
Future settiment l
(To be provided by Geotech) 4 l
l 21 i
l l
l l
l m.
i Quality Assurance and Quality Control Work Related to Plant Area Fill A)
Resumption of Q-Listed Backfill Operation Prerequisites for the resumption of Q-listed backfill operations have been met. These prerequisites were described in the summary report of the July 18, 1979, presentation to the NRC (Presentation to NRC:
10 CFR 50.55(e) report, ??date?j). Q-listed backfill work resumed the week of August 6, 1979, in the tank farm area inside the ring foundation of the primary makeup water storage tanka.
i B)
Quality Assurance Program Related to Remedial Work in the Plant Area Fill
- Development of the quality assurance (QA) program for all remedial work (i.e., permanent plant ares dewatering; local dewatering required for underpinning; underpinning, piling and grouting works) in the plant fill area is in progress.
QA requirement 6for the excavation, underpinning, and concrete backfill Mor the auxiliary buildfJag electrical penetratior. areas i
and feedwater isolation valve pits have been developed. The following l
operations will be controlled by the QA program.
1)
The design, materials, installation, testing, concreting, grouting, and other incidentals for the permanent underpinning (with caissons) of the auxiliary building penetration areas
. I
2)
The excavation, mass concreting, and grouting under the feedwater isolation valve pit structures i
Effect on Project Schedule f
(To be provided by cost and scheduling) e.ma %
Approved b'y:
I 9
I Concurrence by:
l l
9 S
i 23
i n em.
..f..
2&akhd e
/
I c
- W - a,.
JN sr.: \\
- O A
%'d
/F q,';' T//:K Ftn't U:'!:T-f c!!rTmt The purpose of this invest 1Catton is two fold:
M1. To further invenci<;ste soil conditions of the Tank Farm area.
To investigate concerns over air bubbles observed i.. "s in
'o/
the southern part of the Tank Fart"tYst 9 generated by a i
fas/M7 construction air line,.theet iFpeaM to bf1.di :-
tf Order of Events b,:~ i 60W5
' or,has concern May 16, 1979 ever ir bubbles I T.
NRC t
'\\
obscimie ing inspection.
y 2.
Project tr.anager and superintendent ci ;'.'.f observed this condition and concurrred with NRC inspector that a problem may have
/
N.,
i occured.
p,
- 3.
May 19, 1979 Geotech and survey identified air leak locations on survey sketch. See attached sketch and explanation.
~
F/
4.
Air line has been disconnectitd. uMn.'
vahre Yy l,
- 1. h t r-m., tu s.9 W 5.
Week of May 21, 1979 Geotech agai:v, checked area and mm.11, y
could see no damage to _sita_as result of air bubbles.
~L SA,sw 7
i g,,,I,,,.,. vl{ 6.
Test pit 1A shown.in sketch attached was started 5-21-79 and cocpleted 5-23-79.
)
f,b e a.
N (?
Plate load test #1 was started 6-27-79 and coupleted 6-28-79.
l vill a.x 8.
Plate load test #2 was started 7-3-79 and completed 7-4-79.
py
} *y"' 'e c.L f
9.I' And inspection pit was dug on July 13, 1979. See attached sketch.
9,, F, sts
- 10.. Dr. Peck's presentation July 18, 1979 t'o the NRC also addressed j
cu\\
these concerns.
xi11. Pive additional borings were at locations shown on the attached sketch, borings are also attached fron July 19 chrough July 23, 1979.
'Mt 12. All material incide ring walls was recoved to clevation 629.0 and will be replaced and recompacted.
i l
1 I
~
lNSN f $# b St. I, l c' $* )
Yai Item L Tank Farm Investigation Location of Air Bubbles May 19th 1979 Located by Field Survey and l
@f Inspected by Geotech See SketcW f.,
r <.
d is a small water-filled depression with a lesser amount of exiting bubbles.
d is an observation well with water bubbling out.
f d is a small water-filled depression with sufficient bubble activity to agitate sand in the water.
8 is an excavated area 4' + in depth exhibiting the most intensive bubble activity.
d is an area of standing water with several streams of bubbles appearing; no sand ar;itation.
l d is an observation well with slight bubbling water in the casing, d is a cluster of 3 water-filled depressions with a lesser amount of exiting bubbles.
I Ob M#
(P v f f $
(%n O$
$4 j
- f. j
'W r t-y e
Lw..
i I
i I
e
,m.-..
.. _. J :...
~
b lW/01 IC 0
(
- c r.! 1 c} \\' )
.tF Item 2 Tank Farm Investigation On July 13, 1979, J. O. Wanzeck of Bachtel/Caotech along with ~
bC g
M. Peterson of Bechtel/ Field and D. Sibbald of Consumers Power
^ ' ' T' #, l )*
J witnessed an inspection pit at S 4628 to S 4641 and East 251 to East 273 in the tank farm area. The pit was excavated from NMI Elevation 628.0+ 6" to Elevation 616.01 6".
The top 4.0' was wet and disturbed material and all soil of this type will be removed before any fill can be replaced. The next 2.0' will be inspected carefully and replaced if necessary. From Elevation 622.0 to 616.0, the material was compacted gray and brown clay with some sand and sand pockets. There was no evidence of any underminin's fron air bubbles. Four borings also will be started July 16, 1979 to investigate other areas of concern.
l 1
l I
t i
i m
y
f f ()
l t,,4 l '{
<<
- P
'~lr. lI
(
Y I tem 2,0",
Tank Farm IMventination From Dr. Peck's pecuentation to NI:C on July la,1979
..----,,,d 4
Hencath One such-*ree-in-timiucation af.t.ha. Dorsted (later Tanks.
-thene. tanka.the invencications have indicated better and more consistent subsurf ace conditions than beneath the Diosci Cencrator Building.
It is proposud to fill the tanks with water as a test t/
load. The filling will constituto full-scale proof tests with
[f[,f respect to the bearing capacity of the subsoil.
It is anticipated that the t anks will settle under the tests load, and thic settle-i I
mont will increase the bearing capacity. Furthermore, by making settlement observations at various depths in the subsoil during pf /
and after the test loading and by cocbining this information with d
/pr stress calculations and theory, it will be possible to make reasonable A[f f j sectiecent predictions that take into account the accusi subsurf
/>
4conditionsunderrealisticloadings.
M 1
,[
i, s'
,.,,a XI Item dl, Tank Farm Investigation 1
i j
Boring Logs t-22. T-23 T-24. T-25 and T-26 attached.
t 1
]
)
i l
\\
l c c b ( r,' Y ltvV j '( )C f o
.s Q r rp., ret C.:, y r ot..* t. \\ b.e t 's.
Conclunions and Recor.r.endaticg I
Af ter revicw of availabic data it was concluded that the air bubbles f caused no problec:s. The soil conditiccs within the Tank Farm as A
shown by plate load ecces, test pits and borings show consistently j
f Abetter conditions than under the Diesel Cecerator Building.
4 A careful cican up of the Tank Tarc area vill renova any questionable material. This will vary in depth from 0.5' to approximately 5.0'.
1' /, 4 7, The structure sand within the ring valls of the tanks has been P
4 removed or will be recoved and reco=pacted to 85% relative density.
The tanks upon completion will then he filled s-ith water and tested for settlement.
t t* * '
4 We feel thac h the work that has been done and that which will be done should insure that this area vill cast all requirements.
i \\ o l,,,, i,,
y ec f
- )
i
- f. t. '
- 4 I
a i
i l
4 l.
m y.._.-
.~
o e.
O o
o o
O O
o o
o N
M
~
~
N sv b].
w w
w w
I S 4538 '
j WO T
28*o uTILIT Y g3g 1435J/ PLATE S 4553-WATER TANK g 305 P TE 4
'i59
[h E 148 LOAD t
-l l
TEST U
S 4572 S 4573
[E 159 W2 1
i! 30$'
d ~323 572 f
, 3 D
633'
,41*$* PRIM AR Y 8d AKE-
/
UP H O STORAGE 5
2 E 95 T Ar!K s qsoc I *E32
$12
- -~V M 682 S46039 E 232 S S46 S6 E89 EISO S E283 T-24 E 57.Y i TEST PIT l
WIA
/ S 4628. S d S4624 6R
- fl E 626*A E99 E426 M
l 0 INSPECTsON a
b a
pay eT-25 6,T-26 54645 E m2
_ {__[, 62 P-629.* <
S 4645 j
E 286! _.S j
O
_ g _,_ _
' Tg S46415 S~-~~
~-~
~
f5$65Q 14641 S2*@ BOR AT ED - -
-. s H O STORAGE TANK E 837 2
E802 j
S4660Ss edOTE:
FsII elevation varies throughout Tonk Ferm.
Limits of fill eer.ovel weII very from 0 S* to l
- -.. - -bEChlEL g
S.O'et time of removal with the Geelech Engineer determieing what flit is to be temoved.
d-Fee EMPLAlsafl008 SEE TASLE ATTacteED 7
....,t TANK F ARM st:VESTIGATiOt.'
~
f,L
% s.
Li 91 *
.I.,
8 4
O
l
/dc&
h MCAR 24:
INTERD1 RLTORT #7 EFFECT ON PROJECT SCl!EDULE i
The reacdial actions addressed in this report are not anticipated to cause a delay in the fuel load or operation of cicher Unit. Those actionswhichdirectlyrest4nthecompletionofsysteminstallations have been scheduled to include appropriate work-around or changes in the testing sequence so that no delay in the pre-operational testing and startup activity is necessary.
The milestone schedale for major remedial actions is as follows:
l Diesel Generator Buildins and Foundations
}
Aug. 15, 1979 Start surcharge removal Oct. 01, 1979 Start structural completion and system installation June 01, 1980 Complete Unit 2 Diesel-Generator Systems Aug. 01, 1980 Cosplete Unit 1 Diesel-Generator Systems Auxiliary Buildinz Penetration Ares and Feedwater Isolation Valve Pits Oct. 01, 1979 Sta.rt temporary dewatering & underpinning access shafts l
Apr. 01, 1980 Complete installation of bearing cassions June 15, 1980 complete removal of temporary devatoring system Service Water Puco Structure i
Oct. 01, 1979 Start piling testing program j
Dec. 01, 1979 Start installation of permanent piles Har. 01, 1980 Complete tie-in of piles to building i
Seismic Category 1 Tanks (BUST)
Dec. 15, 1979 Start pre-op testing using Unit 2 BWST Dec. 1979 Perform preloading of the Unit 1 BWST thru i
June 1980 i
i Sep. 01, 1980 start pre-op testing using Unit 1 BWST
{
Sep. 1980 Perform preloading of the Unit 2 BWST thru Mar. 1981 Hay 1981 Return the Unit 2 LWST for plant startup
)PlantDevatorinaSystem j
i i
Oct. 15, 1979 Finaliza design critoria Dec. 15, 1979 Issue specification and drawings i
Har. 15, 1980 Award subcontract for installation l
Oct. 01, 1980 Begin devatoring Apr. 01, 1981 start rocharge rato testing June 01, 1981 Place syntem in permanent operation t
l
/I=
?
DRAWING
SUMMARY
Figures Included in MCAR 24 Submitted with Figure Title Interim Report 1
Diesel Generator Building 1, 2 (Replaced by Settlement Data Figures 43 and 44) 1 Foundation Settisment Monitoring 3,4,5 1
2 Settlement Record Table 3,4,5 2-1 Sectiement Record Table, Sheet 2 7
1 3
Settlement Data 3 (Replaced by Figure 13) 4 Sectiement Data 3 (Replaced by Figure 14) 5 Seismic Category I Structures 3
Sa Seisade category II Structures 3
)
6 Diesel Generator Building 3
7 Bechtel Borings, Dutch Cone Penetrations, and Test Pit Locations in Main Plant Area (1978) 3, 4 4
l 8
Diesel Generator Building Boring Plan, 3, 4 9
Diesel Generator Building i
Underground Utilities Plan 3
10 Diesel Generator Building Underground Utilities Section 3
11 Diesel Generator Building Proposed Surcharge Requirements Plan and Sections 3,4,5 4
D l
1
- ~. -
s e
12 Diesel Generator Building Proposed Surcharge Requirements Sections and Details 4, 5 QJ Diesel Generator Building Settlement Data 4, 5, 6, 7 14 Diesel Generator Building Settlement Data, Sheet 1 4, 5 r
.14-1 Diesel Generator Building Settlement Data, Sheet 2 5,6,7 15 Diesel Generator Building 4 (Replaced by Settlement Data Time Rate Figure 43)
I 16 Diesel Generator Pedestal 4 4 (Replaced by Settlement Data Time Rate Figure 44) 17 Instrument Location Plan 4
18 Diesel Generator Building Crack Monitoring 4
1 19 Designations and Locations of Surveyed Pipelines, January 1979 4
20 Tank Farm Boring Plan 4, 7 21 Cross Section A-A Tank Fara 4
22 Cross Section B-B Tank Fara 4
23 Cross Section D-D Diesel Generator Building 4
24 Cross Section E-E Diesel Generator Building 4
j 25 Cross Section F-F Diesel Generator Building 4
i i
26 Cross Section G-G Diesel l
Generator Building 4
l 27 Cross Section N-H Diesel l
Generator Building 4
28 Cross Section I-I Diesel Generator Building 4
2
~,. -
. b.,
N
,r.
A.
s I'
- w s
^
s
(,y N,
,. su
~
- ~ ~ -
29.
.,['i
'\\
Ffnetrometer Readings Test Pit 1
\\,m ' 3outh Wall Diesel Generator Building 4 :,
~.
s a
~
30
(
Penetrometer Readings Test Pit 3
,t
.. - North Wall Tank Fara Ar u. -
,4 s,,.
vs y
'is y
~
31
~ - T' Penetrometer Readings East' Wall of
.s, i
,s,
Test Pit 2 Condensate Water Tank i
N N-
.i v.
/
Area, Sheet 1 of 2
.V Ai s
. (
.s s.\\ \\
,s o
32 s,
- Penetrometer Readings EastDs11 of N
Test Pit 2 Condensatt Water Tank
},~,'i
~ d '
s Area, Sheet 2 of 2
'1 k s Nb 4 4
'\\
y.
33 4
l
~
FieldDensityTestResults(
g x.
.,4 34 Plasticity Charc
'(
',4
,s.,
s t
35
-' M Water contene Versus Elevation 4
J N
35 Dry Unic Weigh,th7ersus Elevation 4
,,s N
,1 y
f s
' \\, Total Unit Weight Versus Elevation-37.
s,,
4 o,N.
~)
i-38 d j; Shear Strarac V6rsus ElevationM ~ 2 3 g.
T -. p A, 4
s
\\.
.T.Xs sQ"s' N,
s3, 39 s N\\
f s.
s s.-.
Sheat Ottsatch 1(trat!v 1.'oisture 'wontmic '...T
e g
- y Die'sel Centator(hulMing
--,\\'..,,
7.4
^
s
,3 pj s
' y %'s - )' p*;.4
,m 40 s
Test Pit Boring Logs, v;,yg.
y 41 Diesel Genen. tor Buildina S <"
~
Y, ~ g Preload Plan'
<\\
4% ',,
1 s.
,t i
s l
s, 42 Diesel Gecerator Building
/ 'm
';\\
. s-
- ~ 's g
. Additional Boring Locations '!-
j Sj(Replaced by t
and Details 3
N', gure '67)j -
fi g'
l I'],
lt n3 (43, Diesel Generator Building '
y
~
s l
Is,,,N,. settlement Data - Building Markers Q*
5, 6 TT 1
s :. r -
.\\s c
r-I l
J44
-' s 3,' 1 Diesel Generator Building y
,y 5', 8, %
s -
s t
N-Settlement Data - Pedestal Markers j
,' 7 Q
N bj 5
- 'o 45 Crs.ek Mapping'DieselJCenerator,i < )
3m*-
'M 5,t
- f R 0dta
^
i
, s y ( ' g
'4T g,g,, I,
\\
\\
45 rl.
h DieselGehertot+Buildingsettlenent h
~
,,,.3. (
Daca. Borps[ Anchors and Surface e, (',
i y..; e Plah,ea' Area, ind cluster Plan I h,
'y 5, [ l!.
v.
s l;, s\\
,\\
c,
's i
\\
N l
f, s
, i s
\\
l? A, I.
l r
I t
')
l
\\
n.S
\\
(;
3 i
(
,4 o
h
i 47 Diesel Generator Building Settlement Data, Borros Anchors and Surface Plates, Area A 5, 7 48 Diesel Generator Building Settlement Data, Borros Anchors and Surface Places, Area A 5, 7 t
i 49 Diesel Generator Building Settlement Data, Borros Anchors and Surface Plates, Area B 5, 7 50 Diesel Generator Building Settlement Data, Borros Anchors and Surface Places, Areas B and C 5, 7
\\
51 Diesel Generator Building Settlement Data, Borros Anchors and Surface Plates, Area G 5, 7 1
52 Diesel Generator Building Settlement Data, Borros Anchors and Surface Plates, Areas C and D 5, 7
~
53 Diesel Generator Building Settlement Data, Borros Anchors and Surface Plates, Area D 5, 7 i
54 Diessi Generator Building Settlement Data, Borros Anchors and Surface Plates,
+'
Area E 5, 7
'/
55 Diesel Generator Building Settlement l
Data, Borros Anchors and Surface Plates 5, 7 56 Diesel Generator Building Settlement Data, Borros Anchors and Su,rface Plates, Areas A, B, D, and South of Building 5, 7 i
s i
l Q7 Diesel Generator Building Settlement Data Piezometers and Cooling Pond 5, 7 58 Diesel Generator Building Settlement Data Piesometers - Sheet 1 5, 7 i
'59 Diesel Generator Building Settlement Data Fiesometers - Sheet 2 5, 7 60 Diesel Generator Building Surveyed l
Pipelines Profiles by CZD 5
i60-1)
Diesel Generator Building Surveyed 7
l p/
Pipelines Profiles by CZD - Sheet 2 Y
3, i'
,3 l'
r 4
h%'
.k;?l. &.,.' ] < J fl;h f,k g;
e F
r L
61 Di;.sc1 Generatot Building Plan h
c: Pipe P ofiling Location >
62 Crack Ursping Service Warar Pump i
Structure 5
63 Auxiliary Bs.ilq1ng Plan 6
t
[
64 Auxiliarf Buildittg - Typical Sectica 6
65 Excavat!On Plst 6
%(
r 66 Excsvation Cros. Soction 6
h I67 Plant Area Boring Pl.'u 6, 7 68 Cross Section H-H
[
Auxiliary Building - North 6
=,
E 69 Cress Siction F-P
{
Auxiliary Building - South 6
70 Peedwater Isolation Valve Pit Units 1 and ? Tenporary Support for Underpinning 6
'l Auxiliary Building Electrical Per<etration Area (Looking West)
F1 tite Element Model 6
{
72 Auxi!.tary Building Electrical te z P'enn ration Area (Looking SoutM Finita Elemeat Model 6
=
e
[
13 Auxiliary Building Unit 1 Electrical Penetration Area E
Temporary External Support -
[
Plans and Sections 6
e 74 Auxiliary Building and Feedwater (Replaced by Isolation Valve Pit Units 1 and 2 Figures 89 and 50)
Dewatering Plans and Details 6
[
75 Auxiliary Building and Feedwater (Replaced by Isolation Valve Pit Units 1 and 2 Figuras 91 and 92)
Excavation and Ccncrete Backfill -
Plans and Details 6
E 75 Auxiliary Building Walls, Ei Crack Mapping, Sh 1 6
k QE F
E
[F
)
s e
e w
77 Auxiliary Building Walls, crack Mapping, Sh 2 6
78 Auxiliary Building Floors, Crack Mapping, Sh 1 6
79 Auxiliary Building Floors, Crack Mapping, Sh 2 6
80 Service Water Pump Structure Concrete Floor Plans 6
81 Service Water Pump Structure Typical Section 6
82 Cross Section I-I Service Water Pump Structure 6
83 Service Water Pump Structure Structurni Pile Locations and Details 6
84 Auxiliary Building Crack Mapping Railroad Bay Walls 7
/
/
85' Auxiliary Building Crack Mapping Control Tower Walls 7
4 86 Auxiliary Building Crack Mapping
+
Control Tower and Railroad Bay 7
i 87 Borated Water Storage Tanks and
/j Feedwater Isolation Valve Chambers l,
Crack Mapping 7
88 Diesel Generator Building Location of Deep Borros Anchors and Sondex 7
i 89 Auxiliary Building Unit 1 i
Plant Area Dawatering 7
90 Auxiliary Building Unit 2 Pland Area Dewatering 7
91 Auxiliary Building and Feedwater Isolation Valve Chamber, Unit 1 Excavation, Underpinning, Backfilli g Plan, Sections and Details 7
4 6
92 Auxiliary Building and Feedwater Isolation Valve Chamber, Unit 2 Excavation, Underpinning, Backfilling Plan, Sections and Details 7
93 Mathematical Model for Service Water Pump Structure Modified Seismic Analysis 7
' 94 Tank Farm Investigation 7
i l
l:.
7
l b
m mW4 6
~
w..
t
/
i e-
f., --
DEC 0 h 1979 SECHTCL ASSOC.PROFL40:.
~
.,,,i SUPPL!!A DOCINJ.. S n.*. 7
% 75*esta w? r.
Ja tD.
&CM 4:4 PM PWCC:10. SUF4MT FWW Limivf.
& C '.*4; 8! '...AT. 4 C7 :
'. ** 4.0 Mf::;7m f..* @N M* P&P**IO S'.lCT TO w
1 F.A...i"..!;".. M.%.
l r o u.:a:s:.o rwas ur. u:e : vr. :.:
- y:12.
I L C m!.I: :.0? Prr.mtG. ?i:M L:n M:0123.
- *..,... y.
. r.._e t
....,.;g.... ;
, 7
.,5:.
,-s l.
l
- .* e.
....si.w l A l C l C l J l V f :4 P l Ch Q
R3IIe'V de.a
,,"Ap wn e... par 0,
/ J jn
/ /
q m' *
- n - e.-
mp;r,.;.~o.x u,0 -
_r.. s ~
i i
TRAINING 4 QUAUFIG9710N OF INSPECTIoK TEST 4. BublT PERSONNEL 722.0 - CR09-17 -l RIof3
-......<.......~.....m...,....
CHANGE NOTICE Contrailed CCpy No.
/O
- 1. The.followw eseument la enanged as comenbad beiow.
CCCuMENT NC.
CHANGE NOTIC2 NC.
CCCuuahTim.E:
ppo c.a og. 74 _ j. c g,>. j UST-TQ-1 1
TRAINING AND QUALIFICATION OF INSPECTION TEST AND AUDIT PERSONNEL CCCUMENT
. CHANGE NOTICE !
AEVISICN NC.
STATUS 9
FA-I
- 2. The anense noese is anodesase to me fonowing seoies: (sh ALL PROJECTS 4 sgn ane rveuen Tnnerrettes 3 acmeoge your receier of tnie Change Nonce Also sencn this Change Nocca on too of trw cover snese of your cooy (anosed of tne roterenced encumems.
PAGE PA R.
NO.
No.
5.
DESCRIPT!CN OF CHANGE -
Form USTF-TQ-1.4," Document Of Qualification", revised as follows:
DELETED: Datel INSERTED: Effective Period of Certification:
/
/
Thru
/
/
REVISED FORM NUMBER TO READ: Form USTF-TQ-1.4 (11/79)
I l
I i
l l
t 1
& Desanocon of change le condnued on
==tenned sherie.
WITHORAWA1.
p p
j APPRCVAL:
Osts:
Reviewed!g"'
Approved @,fM Cate:
7.
I howe ressmed end read this Change Nodes and fuity understens he k_ -..Iae IIperisine to my responnbilities (sign only ween cocy l
b
- Y'"I SIGNATURE -
CATE I
y
.7 2.2 o - c -p ar i - c u -,
United States Testing Company, Inc.
DOCUMENT OF QUALIFICATION (ANSI N45 - 2.6)
This is to certify that has been and is qualified to perform inspection and testing services in the following' areas:
His capability in th'ese areas is Level Basis for Certification:
Formal Education Related Training Related Experience
/'
\\
l l
Effective Period of Certification:
/
/
Thru
/
/
By:
Designated Representative l
United States Testing Company, Inc.
Form USTF TO - 1.4 (11/79)
"9=
s-UNITED STATES TESTING COMPANY. INC.
,(
POWER GENERATION SERVICES Cantrolled Caay No.
- -,,3 PMCCID UM i NC.
TRAINING AND OUALIFICAT!CN OF INSFECTICN, UST-TQ-l' TEST AND AUDIT PERSONNEL g ao, c. Ao8 I
'//
navision uc.
navis;Cu svar,.,s a Fh7_m-crem - osr-Ten - t ct SCOPE CF M avtsiCNs:
Revision No.9 INCORPORATED C4ANGE NOTICE NO.2, WHICi IS WITriDRAWN INCORPORATED CHANGE NOTICE NO.3, WHICH IS WITdQRAWN INCORPORATED PERMANENT CHANGE NOTICE NO.1, (WHICM HAD SEEN APPLICABLE TO TdE CLINTON SITE ONLY)
Pace 1. See-ion II Secoe: added last 2 sentences concerning car.ification of NDE Testing Personnel.
Pace 1.Section III Recuirementst2nd and 3rd santancas deletad.
Face 3. Section D: caragracn 2.4.2 added.
Reclaceo For-i USTT-TQ-1.1 Rev. S with For.n USTF-TQ-1.1 Rev.9, :nis Revision of the Form was made by Change Notica No.2.
l xu v.t.
ascMW. Assoc.Pacrisec :ALcens.l ma st.PPura occ: w sm:7 s or = = au.
e
- 7. c g] y 3,,
o
. -,.o
(
- c ::====:=e-u
- 4. O aevies ano asser. oas m r.or..oeten.
gg 3,gg 6 o nevisa nctn m.s=.c.o = a n. ecto.
WER CO7P.
%... myn g.
- gg, g',gyggg lgg.,g.f;js, 7220
~ ~uen nMnif30",",5%,;I P=%?,"a" wa~ra
,a y o
Q name, A ' cja,a,u,n p
[4@@
a ufy,
- n. ag -.
s i Havt aseo mis Paocacuna Aao Puu.y unosastaao in macuin v
^8 57 PSammTe.=v aas>casissurias co,.,,
w.%gg,.,
_ g=. -
APR 1 11919
)
g l
l msvis:CN NO.
=c.caswests y
anarAaso av J. Bashian I
maviewee av 5' (
V'n ['Ng Ar =cvsc av
) 14 e.
k.
y' CATS CP issut 4 arch 23, 1979
- t. 3*A**4s c c EI.
- A. *C
- APPectat: A.apeqCVE3 l
us"P.8wC.1.1 AEV.2 ML2. OC '4C
-?.1P IME.N?
- -MP 1 MENT
@(
UNITED STATES TESTING COMPANY, INC.
FOWER GENERATION SERVICES 3
Centrc6 fed Cacy No.
m.
MCCEDU A E NC.
TRAINING AND CUALIFICATICN OF INSPECTICN, UST-TQ-1 TEST AND AUDIT 'ERSONNEL REVISICN NC.
MEVI5iCN 57AT65 L F02ee-cm e-osx-.re _ i se SCOPE CF REVISICNS:
Revision.'lo.9 INCORPORATED CHANGE NOTICE NO.2, WHICH IS WITHORAWN INCORPORATED CHANGE NOTICE NO.3, WHICH IS WITHQRAWN INCORPCJLATED PERMANENT CHANGE NOTICE NO.1, (WHICH HAD SEI't APPLICABLE TO THE CLINTON SITE ONLY)
Pace 1.Section II Sc:ce; added last I santencas concarning car.ification of NDE Tes:1ng Personnel.
Page 1.Section III Recuirements:2nd and 3rd sentancas de*etad.
Page 3, see: en EV: caragrapn L.4.2 added.
Rec t acec Fem USTF-TQ-1.1 Rev. 8 with Fem USTF-TQ-1.1 Rev.9, this Revision of the Fom was made my Change Notica No.2.
l t
l l
t MAVE AEAC WIS MCCICUR$ AND PUI.t.Y UNCGAS"ANQ IT5 RECutMEMENTS AC.T P1RTAl%E TO MY RESPCN818tl.1 TIES. lCnty egn venen sesy is emed to ye#
Signette & Oate MIVISICN NC.
9 l
l l
1 NC.CP SHEf*3 34 l J. Sashian Mapanas av k
N' / '
naviewss sY t~ it!Of b/Wh AP**0VI: SY
'[
W' CATI CP iS3US arch 23, 137,9 l
l
- 3 A-*J3 00 cts. 8 A. 2C P A7**C'tas A.4789CVI3
- 3?s JvtC t.1 agv.
Mt.3. :C '4C?.M8'.2 MENT
-W*.IMENY
(
UN.'TE STA i =a i== uNG COMPANY, INC.
PCWER GENERATION SERVICES Carttrellee Cscy No.
- r;.,,g PMCCaCUM E NC.
Training and Qualification of Inscaction, Test and Audit Personnel g37,79,3 REV:31CN NC.
AEVISICN 5"Nl"63.-
a M tto. c.7.cA-u sir ro - r -9 sCCP1 CF R EVISICNS.
Revision 3 Table of Contents. Reeved Qualification Reccrds Sumary For : iio.
USTF-TQ-1.3 and added new paragrapns.
Page 1. Para. III Changed documentation requirements for NOT Personnel and training record triaintenanca requirements.
Page 2. Para. IV.2.1 Removed reference to Qualification Records Sumary and revised Project Manager responsicilities.
Para. I.V.l.4 Revised Manager's Cartification responsibilities..
Page 3. Para. IV.2.4.1 Provided an alternate method of maintsining l
group training documentation and revisec rec rd retantion recuirements.
1 Para. IV.2.2.3 and IV.2.4.2 Oeleted (Oualification Rec:rds Sumar/)
Para. IV.2c3. Deleted Ocerations Managers Restensibilities Page 3A. Parag..IV.2.4.3.Deletac (Qualification Records Sumary)
Added Para. IV.2.4.5 ano 2.4.6 Per aining to tne transfer anc retention of rec:rds.
Page 4. Para. IV.2.4.4 Celeted (Qualification Rec:rds Sumary)
Para. IV.2.5.2 Removed reference to Cualification Rec:rts Sumary and Training Records. Para. IV.2.5.3 Oeleted (Transfer of Recorcs)
Page 5. Para.1.4 Revised training record requirements.
Para. 1.4.3 Title of Form USTF'TQ-1.7 correctac.
CHANGE NOTICE h0. 1 WITHORAWN.
Page 9. Para. V.4.1 Clarified to include testing work area.
Page 11. Para. 6.2.3 Celeted (Training Rec:rds)
Page 11 & ll A - Added paragraphs 1.V.6.3 and I.V.6.4 c:ncerning certification records.
Page 118. Para. V.7.0 Revised to clarify the recertification process.
Page 11C. Added para. V.8.0 which defines how incretsac capacilities are to be documented.
i wave snac wis **cencens ANo Fut.LY U Q
A C1 -
_AS IT PtMTAINS *Q MY MESPCNSi.81 TIES.,(0,h kWhjs Q((eva}
SW 4 2em l
8 f
f nevisiclT NC.
~ u m x.
33 l,
PSe7ARED 3Y p
1(7.L: '
- o.'
AP'9ove3 8Y
- A "I CF 435ct g 77
- 1. 5'"A**63 000U.
7A.. ace A p eC W L.
a.aM*CVE:
OUM "I U b
- I USTP 8WC. f.19eV.2
~
N.- -
l UNITE STA i== i ccTING COMPANY. INC.
POWER GENERATION SERVICES
.e.
Carttrellac Ccoy No.
7Tu MCC2 CUR E.NC.
Training and Qualificatien cf Inspection USI-IQ-1 Test and Audit Personnel agviciCN NQ.
REVISICN STA1LS ;-
bD e COS. CST-7"Q-l -9 SCCPE CF R EVISICNS:
Rev. 8 continued Page 13 - Para. 3.1.2 changed "cre" to "cr a Page 15 - Para. L.1 added " ANSI" Page 15 - Deleted redundant para. VI.S.3 Forn USTF-TC-1.1 Rev. 6 reolaced by Form USTF-TQ-1.1 Rev. 3 CHAfEE NOTICE NO. 2 WITHORAWN Removed For::: USTF-TQ-1.3 " Qualification Records Sumary".
I e
a wave maae nns raoC =uns Amo acu.Y uN0GRSTANo 173 MEQutREMEND W'T Amms.ICI.uff@iss.uyas. jem, y,,
,4 My,tas, swi - a sa.
meum No.
l l
%_ s spenTs.
PREPAAEQ SY l
4EVIEWE3SY AP**CVE3SY ATE CF ' SELE
- 1. 3*A?b3 bi: ES. 8 A 8CM Ab'Ct44(. ' A.47'*Cvt ~
W3"F 8WC.1.1 98V 3
$9 Oc.gCT iMob2Mt.NT.
.-Met 2 MEN" l
l
g.._._
UNIT ~=D STA 1==.== TING CCMPANY, INC.
POWER GENERATICN SERVICES Coritrolled C.:cv No.
E'ICCIC V8 I NC.
TITLa 1
U3I~E *I Training and Qualification of Ins:ection, Tes: and Audit Persennel Revis:CN NC.
m i3 ION 5TATUS l
Fo vve - czo o u tr _ves -i-w I
SCOPE CF AEVISICNS; Revision No. 4:
Soci:icn IV Para. 2.4.2 changed to state " Form USTF-UST-TQ-1.8" Revision No. S.
Revised Section IV, para. 2.0 and 2.2.2 Revised Sec.icn V, para. 7.l(1) and added para. 7.3 Revised Section VI, para. 6.2 Revised Section VII Revision l'o. 5:
I Revised Section IV, cara. 2.4.1 Revised Section VI, cara. 5.2 Revised Pnficiency Euluation Record Fer t USTF-70-1.1 e
Revision No. 7:
Editorial changes thrighout procedure Revised Section V, par,a. 2.2 (3)
I MAVE READ THt: 8*CC20VRE ANO FULLY UNCERSTANC !"5.4EcVIREVfMT3 A5 IT PER? Alt,S To 9tY R13PCNS18tLtTIE5. (Cruy +iwnen cooy.sissues to yous signatun & Care f
}
l g
l g
REVIS!CN NC.
a g
NC.073HEI"5 l
,[.h 29 38 30 l
h[i d, /
f"1.')th.
d.
h' f
Ul % $~.*
f1, f b.'~hL.- W w '
" 'v =~ "
rT7, /.
/ :' x./.
di A
r0, A i
l
> ~ ' = "
4 I
J l
(
jjjjgj73 f, j. ;,
9 [y;f 7 7,
- / c, p c cAn ce
- ssus US*P. 8.4C 1.1 41V.
.~
8 d
POWER GENERATION SERVICES CONTRCLLID COPY.';0.
m tf PacCacuasNc.
1 Training and Oualification of Inspection, 237'IO-1 Test and Audit.2ersonnel
{.5E'/15iOi4 57ATU5 REVISION NQ.
Fozzo-c.2es_ uer_vv3_i-9 sCCPE QF AEVISiCNS:
Revi sion t!c. 1:
Added Table of Contents.
Changed and added responsibilities in Section IV.
Relocated resconsibilities fract other sections to this section.
Modified training and training record reoufrements.
Revised forms USTF-TO-1.2 and 1.3 and added forms UST-TO-1.5, 1.7 anc 1.3.
Revision :10. ?:
r Redefined responsibilities in Section IV.
Revisien.'io. 3:
Added additional requirements to section V item 1.4 and inserted section VI item 3.1 I HAVE READ TNi$ PRrCEcuRE ANo FULLY UNoERSTANo IT3 RECutREMENTs toney w anon asey e mess to youl S'N & cete l
l REVIS!CN NO.
QRIGINAL 1
2 3
i NC.of $NEI"5 ATTAcxEo N.A.
26 16 26 A W.Ju H f)f4 Qld~-h.$k.;,)
- c"
.g,
h-REVIEWlo SY N.A.
A // C op[.
.k cATEop133CE 9/2./74 6/20/75 3/12/75 5N20/75 U5TF. P.*dC.1.1 REV. !
l UST-TQ-1 r 9220-Cze8-usr-TQ - r-9 Rev. 3 TABLE CF C0tlTENTS Purpose of Procedure Section I Scope of Procedure Section II Requi remen tsSection II ResponsibilitiesSection I'l Certification Resoonsibilities Par. 1.0 Administration Responsibilities Par. 2.0 Training & Qualification of In-spection and Test Personnel Section V Training Par. 1.0 Levels of Capability Par. 2.0 Education and Experience Par. 3.0 Proficiency Evaluation Par. 4.0 Physical Examinations Par. 5.0 Certification Par. 6.0 Recertification Par. 7.0 Certification of Increased Capacilities Par. 3.0 Training 1 Qualification of Audit Personnel Section VI D efi ni ti on s Par. 1.0 Qualification of Auditors Par. 2.0 Qualification of Lead Auditors Par. 3.0 Evaluation of Lead Auditors Qualifications Par. 4.0 Maintenance of Qualifications Par. 5.0 Qualification Records Par. 6.0 Audi tsSection VII Forms Attached Form
- umber Proficiency Evaluation Record U S TF -TQ -1.1 Physical Examination Record USTF-TQ-i.2 Training Record - Individual Instruction USTF-TQ-1.3 i
Occument of Qualification USTF-TQ-1.1 Record of Lead Auditor Qualification USTF-TQ-1.5 Training Record-Qroup Instruc-tion USTF-TQ-1.6 Training Record-Group Self Instruction USTF-TQ.1.7 1
r
~.
~
u57-70 '
Rev. 9 Page 1 7n'~no CT.D 8 U%T-To - t -9 PURPOSE This crocedura was written to provide assuranca enat United States Testing Comoany personnel assigned to perform inscoc-tions, tests, and audits are fully trainec and qualified as required for their work on eacn project.
II. SCCPE This procedure is intended to meet the intent of ANSI N45.2.5,
" Qualification of Inspectien, Examination and Test Personnel for Nuclear Facilities and Equipment", and ANSI N45.2.23
" Qualification of Quality Assuranca Audit Personnel" standards as applicable to the work performee.
The procedure is inerefore broken dcwn into two main sections so tne recuirements of eacn standard may be completely covered.
Nondestructive testing personnel will be trained and cartified in accorcanca wita UST-TC-LA.
Training and Physical Examination cocumenta-T tion for NOT personnel shall, hcwever, te in acc:rdanca witn this precadure.
III. RECUIREMENTS The United Statas Testing Comoany will assign :nly taase :ersennel who are properly trained and quaif fied to cerform tne recuired servica. Qualification rec:rds of United Statas Testing cersonnel will be maintainec both in the HobcKen and site office wnen so specified in the Project's Q.A. Manual. Training records snail be maintained at the United States Testing location wnere tne
,e training was administered. Training and Qualification records of any personnel performing work for a client will be availacle to that client.
IV. RESPONSIBILITIES 1.0 Certification Rescensibfii ies t
1.1 Vice President of Power Generatien Services i
The Vice President er his designet shall cartify the cuaif ff-cations of Lead Auditors.
The Vice President er his designee are also authcrized to evaluate and certify all Level III Inspection and Test personnel, as well as Levels I & II Inspection and Test personnel.
j 1.2 'tica President of Nuclear Ccnstructicn Ins;ec-icn The Vice President or his designee are autacrizac o evalua e and certify Level III, II and I Inspecticn anc Test sersonnel in his area of.res:ensibility.
i l
i l
UST-TQ-1 Rev. 3 b7-TC-C.?aD8 - UST ) q Page 2.
I7 Con tinued 1.3 Vice President of Nondestructive Testing The Vica President is authorized to evaluata and certify Level III Inspection and Test per-sonnel in nis area of responsibility.
1.4 Managers Project Managers, the Audit Manager and the Manager of Special. ?roj ects are authroized to evaluate and certify Lerd Auditors and Level II and
.i other than Nondestructive Testing personnel,I personnel, in their areas of responsibility.
1.5 Level III Personnel Level III personnel are authorized to evaluate and certify Level II and I personnel.
1.5 Level II Personnel Level II personnel are authorized to evaluate and certify Level I perscnnel.
2.0 Administrative Resconsibflities I
2.1 Project Managers i
e 2.1.1 Project Managers shall assure that personnel assigned to perform work on their projects are certified and recertified in accordance with the requirements of this procedure.
They shall also be responsible for establishing train-ing requirements for their personnel.
2.1.2 They shall assure that records are current and that they are transmitted to the Personnel Records Controllers for retention.
2.1.3 They shall be responsible to tne establisnmen:
!4 i
and maintenance of the Moboken personnel files for their projects and shall designate the Hoboken e
Personnel Records Controllers.
2.2 Site Project Supervisors 1
2.2.1 Site Projett Supervisors shall assure.that their personnal are cartified ano racertified in accord-ance witn the requirements of :nis procedure.
i 1
l wa -
UST-TQ-1 hT2.s -c2ea us7 _ g, _P ge 3 Rev. 9 4
IV Co n ti nu ed 2.2.2 Site Project Supervisors shall assign a person to serve as the Site Personnel Records Controller.
y 2.2.3 Deleted 2.3 Deleted 2.3.1 Deleted 2.4 Site Personnel Records Controllers 2.4.1 Site Records Controllers shall estaolish and maintain a central file which contains a personnel file for each amoloyee requiring certification.
Each personnel file will contain the certification records identified paras. 6,715 and Section VI, cara. 5, andin Section V.
ing records identified in Section V Par. 1.4 and the train-e Section VI para. 3.3.5 as applicable to the individual.
Copies of. qualification records shall be transmitted to the Hoboken Records Controller as they are deveico-ed and updated.
2.1.1.1 When Form USTF-TQ-1.5 " Training Record-Group Instruction" is used, a cooy of :nis
- r record shall be placed in the file of eacn individual who participated An alternate acceptable practice is toin the training.
assign a un'que number to each Training Record Group Instruction, reference this unique number on the Training Record Indivi-dual Instruction Form USTF-TQ-1.3 for each participant, and maintaining a file folder of the Training Record Group Instruction Form USTF-TQ-1.6.
2.2.1.2 When Fo rm USTF-TQ-1.7 " Training Record-Group Self Instruction" is used, the same require-
{
ments as specified for Form USTF-TQ-1.6 above l
shall apply.
2.4.2 When so assigned by the Si a Project Suoersisor, the Site Personnel Records Controller shall be rasconsic'le to the Site Project Sucertisor for establishing a metnod of timely noti-fication for review and racertificatien cf cersennel, and
!?
review of training docueentation.
l l
'J S T-7Q.1 Rev. a I'l Con tinued
~ cob-UST-T
- g, 2.4.3 3,1,:,e, 2.4.4 3,1,
,q, 2.4.5 When personnel are transferred the Si.ta Records Controller shallto other locations, of the certification records identifiedtransmit copies y
to the new location.
i n pa ra.
't. S. 3 2.4.6 The personnel file of persons no longer stationeo at the location snail be placed in an inactive section of the central life of the project.
file, and retained for tne l
k i
e
UST-70-1 Rev. 3 Page 4 b"2 70-CTd$- UST"TQ - t -9 IV Continued 2.5 Hoooken Personnei Records Controller 2.5.1 The Hoboken Records Controller shall all of the duties specified cerform in Par.
section for Hoboken and Branch Office 2.4 of this and for pro eersonnel Controller.j ects where there is no Site Records 2.5.2 The Hoboken Records Controller shall also main-tain a central personnel file for all employees This file snail contain the employees qualifica-tion records.
2.5.3 Deleted.
1 V.
_ TRAINING AND OUALIFICATION OF INSPECTION AND TEST PERSONNEL ~
l.0 Tr a i n f _n o _
1.1 t
Training programs, will be established jacts.
The exact forma t of for site pro-establishec in a Project Q.C. Procedure.this program will be 1.2 be establisnad on a individual basis following evaluation of their qualifications by the Project Manager.
used whenever possible.On the job training will be stressed and 1.3 orientation training. Personnel newly a; signed to a project w All information required by an individual to familiarize himself with the project will be provided.
l
\\
UST-TQ-1 Rev. 9 F022e - cze8 wr rw-4'M 5 1.4 Training Records - All training whetner it be orientation / indoctrination, group
!?
lectures, one-to-one training, self-instruction or on-tne-job training, shall be recorded.
in the preparation of a proficiency Evaluation RecordWhe a training record is not necessary Training records if shall identify the person or person.
the topic the instruc s undergoing training, the person,'s own name) tor's name (if sel f-taugnt,
, and the date the training was completed.
pose or special forms may be developed.The below forms may 1.4.1 Form USTF-TQ-1.3 " Training Record Individual Instruction" is intended for recording specific training given to an individual by an instructor or self-instruction.
1.4.2 Form USTF-TQ-1,6 " Training Record Instruction" is intended
- Group given to a grouc of cecole bv an instructor.for recording training j?
1.4.3 Form USTF-TQ-1.7 " Training Record
-Group 3eif
,f given to a groupInstruction" 'is intended for recording training of oecola oy cirtulating written material for self-instruction.
(9 2.0 (evel s of Oaoabi11tv 2.1 There are three levels of capability (I,II and quality personnel performing inspection and testing III) for activities.
2.2 The duties and responsibilites for eacn level of capa-bility shall be 7.s follows:
8
- 1) Level I:
a) Performance of designated inspections and tests i
and specifications.as specified in applicable standards, procedures t
b) Use of the necessary inspection, measuring and testing equipment required for performance of the designated inspections and tests referred to in (a) above, c) Calibration of thspection, measuring and ing equipment as specified test-in procedures,
)
l l
\\
l l
n
UST-70-1 Rev. 9
% "Z'20 - CZO$- A T - q. g q a g e 7 V. C o n ti nu ed p
3.1.2 The education and excerience requirements specified below shall not be treated as aosolute wnen other factors ;;rovide reasonacle' assur-ance that a person can comoetently perfern a particu'.ar y
task. Other fac ces may be demcnstrated capability in a given feb througn previous performanca or satisfactory comoletion of proficiancy evaluation as specified in par. 4.0 talow.
3.2 Level I Recuirements To be considered for certification, a candidate must
(:ubject to the conditions of 3.1.2) satisfy n of :ne l?
following reouirements:
( 1. )
Two years of relatec experience in equivalen testing, examination or inspection activities at power plants, heavy industrial f a ci l i ti e's or other similar facilities, or (2)
High school graduate plus six mon:hs of ret a:ed experience in equivalent testing, examina: ion or insoection activities at power plants, heavy industrial f acilities or other similar f acil-ities, or (3)
Comoletion of college level work leading to an l
Associate Degree in a related discipline clus three months of related experience in equiva-i lent testing, examination or inspection ac-tivities at power plants, heavy industrial facilities or other similar facilities.
.{
3.3 t.evel II Reouirements
{
To be considered for certifica:fon, a candidate must l
( subj ect to the conditions of 3.1.2) satisfy one of he following requirements:
(1)
One year of satisfactory cerformance as Level I, or (2)
High school graduate clus tnree years of related I
experience in ecuivalent testing, exam 19ation or inscection activities at power clants, heavy in-dustrial facilities or e-her similar facilities, or
4
% g - C206 - UST'-TO- \\- 9 1
V. o cn ti nu ed Page 3 (3)
Comoletion of college level work Teading to i
an Associates degree in a related discipline plus.one year or related experience in e lent testing examination or inspection ac quiva-tivities at cower plants, heavy industrial facilities or other similar facilities, or (4)
Four-year college degree plus six mon:ns of related experience in equivalent
- testing, plants, heavy industrialexamination or inspection activities at p similar facilities.
facilities or other 3.4 Level III Recuirements To be considered for certification, a candidate must (subject to the conditions of 3.1.2) the following reoufrements:
satisfy one of (1)
Six years of satisfactory cerformance as a Level 11, or (2) r High school graduate plus ten years of related experience in eouivalent inspection activities at testing, examination or dustrial facilities or other similar f acilities,:ower plants, neavy in or high school fence in equivalentgraduate plus eight years exper-testing, examination or in-spection activities at power plants, neavy in-dustrial with at.leastfacilities or other similar facilities, two years as Level II.
At least with nuclear facilities; or if not,two years of this experi i
shall have training sufficient'to be acquaintad-the individual thoroughly with the quality assurance aspects of 1
a nuclear facility, or (3)
Associate Degree and seven years of related ex-perience in equivalent testing, examination or inspection activities at power clants, heavy in-dustrial facilities or other similar facilities.
i At least two years of this experience should be l
associated with nuclear facilities; or if not, the individual shall have training sufficient t
to be acquainted thoroughly with the cuaifty assurance aspects of a nuclear facility, or (4)
Four-year college degree of us five years of re.
lated experience in eouivalent testing, examina-tion or insoection activities at power clants, heavy industrial cilities.
facilities or other similar fa-
Y.
Con ti nu ed UST-Tg.1 3'UW~~IQ'l 9
~
a.0
% cfency tv iuatre, 4.1 General Recuirements_
The qualifications of personnel accordance with this procedure shall be determin d to be certified in by oral interview and practical demonstration to evaluate the candidate's proficiency for each le e
of qualification in each major area of inspectio which he is P.equired to perform.
vel be recorded on form number USTF-TO-1 1the oral in n
s rations shall 4.2 Level I Recufrements a)
The candidate for Level factorily perform the insoection orrequired to demon se be certified.in the major area or speciality for which s-testing with-interview and practical demonstrationThe dem he is to be by oral b)
The oral interview shall cover the following suo jacts for each inspection or test crocedure used to evaluate the candidate's profici ency:
1)
An understanding of the designated wo k tivities and tasks.
r ac-2)
The referenced inspection criteria 3)
The acceptance standards.
I a)
The recording of inspection or test res l 5) u ts.
Treatment of nonconformances.
6)
An understanding of
- spection, the designated t i
t and Test. f.e., Hold poin ts, Review,ytes of in-Inspect 7)
Technician's responsiefifties, i
\\
8)
Applicable Code requirements.
9)
The use and calibration control insoection and. testing tools and recuirements for instruments.
i 4
t UST-70-1 Rev. 7 Y. Continued Page 10 ftlZto CZCS-usP-TQ - t ct c) The practical demonstration shall be concuctac in sucn a manner as to allow the examiner o i
evaluate the Level I candicatas performance cur-ing the actual imoiementation of inspection or testing procedures. The check points described in 4.2b above shall be used to evaluate the canci-date's proficiency during the practical demenJtra-tions.
4.3 Level II Recuirements a) The proficiency of candidates for Level II certi-fication shall be evaluated in the same manner as specified for Level I personnel except that the re-quirements for evaluation and reporting of ins;ec-tion and test results shall be given greater enona-sis than the requirements for methods of implementa-tion.
b) Candidates for Level II cer*/ * ;-tion who are recuired to prepare inspection or tes-procedures snall be required to demonstrate thr - P Jficiency in enis ac-tivity. The candidata for ta-P fication shall be given t
the appitcable engineerins.re 'ff cations, drawings, ANSI Standards, anc refert. 4
- oces necessary for preparation of inspection anc testing procacures.
l-Candidates for Level II certification shall also demons rate proficiency in supervising of Level I personnel, a.4 Level III Recuirements a) The proficiency of tandidates for Level III certifica-tion shall be evaluated in the same manner as speci-fied in 4.3b above for precaring inspection or testing 3
procedures.
b) In addition to the requirement for demonstrating pro-ficiency in the precaration of inspection plans or pro-cedures, the Level III candidate shall be recuired to demonstrate a full understanding of the construction 1
quality control program requirements contained in the applicable client project documents. A Level III person shall also be capable of reviewing and approving inspect-ion, examination and testing procudures, evaluating the 3
adequacy of activities to accomplisn the inspection, examination and test objectives and organizing and reporting ins;ectien'and test results. This demonstration 1
of proficiency shall be by oral examinatien.
l i
UST-TQ-1 Rev.8 P?no-czes-us.r rq I'i _g 2-c a t' a"*
5.0 physical Exami n ati on s 5.1 For Level III, II or I personnel, an eye examination for visual acuity and color y
vision shall be required as specifiec below.
Personnel shall be capable of reading with natural or corrected vision the J-I let ars on l7 5.2 a standard Jaeger's or equivalent type test -
chart'for near distance vision.
5.3 The Concrete Reactor Vessel and Containment 7
personnel qualified to ASME Section III, Division 2, shall have natural or corrected far distance vision of 20-40 by the Linear Snellen Scal e.
5.4 The personnel shall be capable of distinguishing the difference between the primary colors.
5.5 Results of these examinations shall be recorded on form No. USTF-TQ l.2.
5.0 Certification 5.1 Certificati on records f or Level III, II and I per-sonnel shall be maintained on file both at the site where the person is employed and in Hoboken home
' office.
6.2 Level III, II and I certification records shall contain the following:
- 1) A Proficiency Evaluation Record Form No. USTF-TQ-1.1.
- 2) A Physical Examination Record, Form No. USTF-TQ-1.2.
I'
- 3) Deleted.
7 l
i t
- 4) A completed Document of Qualifications, Form No. USTF-TQ-1.4.
6.3 Level III, II, and I certification records for d$
personne1 transferred from another site:
l l
i
~
l UST-TQ-1 Rev. 3-Page 11A
'I. Continued
/
- 2 '210- CTOS' ULT - TQ - (
g 6.3(Cont'd)
- 1) A new Proficiency Evaluation Form No. USTF-TQ-1.1. prepared by the new site.
- 2) An up to date Physical Examination Record Form No. USTF-TQ-1.2.
- 3) A completed Occument of Qualification Form No. USTF-1.4, updated, if required my the previous site.
(Note: Past training records are not required since the results of past t
training is reflected in the Document of Qualification.)
6.4 Level III, II and I certification records for personnel temporarily assigned td the site:
- 1) A new Proficiency Evaluation Form No. USTF.
70-1.1 prepared by the site he is temporarily assigned to or the Hoboken staff.
- 2) An up to date Physical Exmaniation Record Form No. USTF-TQ-1.2.
- 3) An up to date Completed Document of Qualifi-cation Form No. USTF-1.4.
(Note: Past training records are not required since the results of past training is reflect-ed in the Document of Qualification.)
T
- ~ - -
- - - ~
e
ll v"
^ ~
]
\\
~%
l iC/-
)
\\
I t
f t};
r f
it g (.
4 1
I
\\
s,
?
U S T-)T>)- 1 1
Rei. 8 i
3
~Page 113 Y. Con tinueo N T.f?.C - C.'*Z.C$ - V t
- T-Q- \\ @N f
T i
s 7.0 Recertification g
,\\
4 7.1 All Level III, It and I perscntei shall )he I,
)
rccertified every two vears in accordance witn one of the following criteria:
't o
- 1) Recertification of continuing sat /sf$chory performance in inspection and testing
.- l !
activities c, overed by the original PrJficiency i
Evaluation or...
'r i
?
I,
- 2) Re-evaluation in accordance witn Par. V.4.0
)
\\
3,,
Proficiency Evaluation.
lr
.ej R
7.2 The examination specified in Par.V.5.0 Y,
Examination shall be repeated annually. Physical l?
'u g
- 7. 3 The Document o f Qual i fi ca ti ons Form.'lo. UST-shall be updated every two years.
t'g New areas of inspection and test quait f t cat;ons and additional i
experience cotained sinc'e the previous certification shall be added.
The original Occument of f
Qualifications Form shall be coun:arsigned s
dated beneath tne original and signature and data or a new Occument of Qualifications Form shall be-preparkd, signed and dated.
\\
7.4 Level III II and I racertification records shall, cons,ist of the following:
0
?.
- \\
i
- 1) A racertified'or new Proficiency Evaluation
' w.
Record, Form No. USTF-TQ-1.1.
i V
i a) The recertificattitt of the original Proficiency +
L].
Evluation Racord, based u i
satisf actory, performance,pon continuing per para. Y.7.1 (1),
shall be documented on the bottom of tnis record.
i tj b) The documentatifr.ibf a re-evaluatiord ber 3
s 4 s para. V.7.1-
? '
made on a new(2),'for recertificattor.) O!be J'
.411 be form.
The new form st,s s,
completed as specified in para. Y.4.0.
i l
- 2) A Physical Examination Record Form No. USTF-T0 -1. 2..
- 3) An u; dated Occument of dualifications, Formi Ho. USTF-TQ-1.4
/ /q fi,
ll N,
g.'
J
- k <l, 5
(
i s
S
{
3
/q
,1
\\
r
,.j x
A.. t
i.
. l 'f l
3'
,i
((! A ll
-[ -
\\
U ST -TQ -i
'/.
Rev. 3 Page 11C t
t "Z"2O ~
-QST -K (_]
g i 8.0 Certification of Increated Caca bii t ti es I
l -
8.1 When personnel gain sufficient increased a
t capabilities to qua ify them to perform i
additional mafo areas of inspection or test, these nev qualific.ations shall be certified in'accordance with one of the following methods.
- 1) Recertify the person as specified in Par. V.7.0 tion) or...(exc,luding physical examina-
- 2) Supplement the existing certification
[
records by completing a new Froficiency Il EvaluptionRecorriFormNo.UST-TQ-1.1.
This record stal T id'enti fy ne new f
p' areas of qualification.
,?t f
f i
s k
/\\
u\\
i 1
(,. <
l N
f t
- s {.,,f
~
o kkt 1
l
UST-TQ-1 Rev. O b'7'ZO-C20$- L.;T.T "T"Q - ) - $
't !.
TRAINING AND OVALIFICATION OF AUDIT PERSONNEL 1.0 Definitions 1.1 Auditor - Any individual who participatas in an aucit, including Lead Auditors, technic &i specialists and others such as management reoresentatives and auditors-in-training.
1.2 Lead Auditor - An individual whose experience anc training qualifies him to organize and di-rect an aud't, report audit findings and eval-aate corrective action.
1.3 Audit - A documented activity performed in ac-coroance with written procedures or checklists to verify, by examination and evaluation of ob-jactive evidence, that apolicable elements of the quality assurance program have been devel-oped, documented and effectively imclemented in accordance with specified reouirements.,
2.0 Qualification of Auditors Auditors assigned by United States Testing Comoany to perform audits shall possess proficiency commen-surate with the scope, complexity or special nature of the activities they will be auditing.
The Lead Auditor is resoonsible for assuring that the audits are conducted by personnel who collectively have the skills necessary for the type of audit that is to be performed.
3" Oualification of lead Auditors 1
i All of tne requirements of paragraph 3.1 through 3.4 shall be met prior to being considered a United States Testing Company Lead Auditor.
3.1 Education and Exoerience - The crospective-Lead Auditor sqall nave verifiable evicence that minimum of ten.(10) points under the following scoring system have been accumulated.
3.1.1 Ecucation (a points. maximum)
Associate degree from an accredited in-stitution score one (1) coint or if the degree is in engineering, chysical sci-ences, mathematics, or cuality assurance score two (2) ootnts or,
l UST-70-1 VI Continued Rev.8 FrT27.o -cres-vsT.ro-i-3 a bachelors degree from an accredited institu-tion score two (2) points or if the degree is in engineering, physical sciences, mathematics, or quality assurance score three (3) points plus an additional one (1) point for a masters degree in engineering, physical sciences, business man.
agement or quality assurance from an accredited institution.
3.1.2 Experience (9 points maximum)
Technical experience in engineering, manufacturing, construction, operation, or maintenance, score one
- 1) point for eacn full year with.a maximum of five
- 5) points for this aspect of experience.
If two (2) or more years of this excerfence were in the nuclear field score one (1) additional point, or, if two (2) or more cuality assurance, years of this experience wer,e in score two (2) additional points, or, if two (2) or more years of this experience were in auditing, score three (3) additional points, or, if two (2) or more years of this excertence were in nuclear quality assurance, score three (3) addi-tional points, or, if two (2) or more years of this experience were in 6
nuclear quality assuranca auditing, score four (4) additional points.
3.1.3 Other Credentials of Professional Competence (2 points maximum)
)
Certification of competency in engineering, science or quality assurance specialties issued and apcroved by a State Agency, or National Professional Society, score two (2) points.
3.1.4 Rights of Management (2 points maximum)
The Lead Auditor's emoloyer retains the crerogative to evaluate and, validate other performance factors t
applicable to auditng-which may not be explicitly called out in this standard.
i UST-TQ-1 b"ZZC' C208 - UST~-TQ - i 9 R ev.
7
,/ t Continued page la j
Examples of these factors are leadership, sound judgenent, maturity, analytical ability, tenacity, past performance, etc.
3.2 Communications Skill The prospective Lead Auditors shall have the cap-ability to communicate effectively in the English languags, both written and oral.
These skills shall be demonstrated by participation in audit conferences and audit resort writing.
3.3 Training Prospective Lead Auditors shall have training to the extent necessary to assure their comoetence in audit-ing skills reouired for assigned tasks.
Training fr.
the following areas shall be given based ucon the particular needs of eacn prospective Lead Auditor.
i7 r
3.3.1 Xnowledge and understanding of nuclear-related codes, standaros, regulations and regulatory guides.
3.3.2 General structure of quality assurance programs as a whole and applicable elements such as or-ganization; design control; procurement docu-me.nt control; instructions, procedures and draw-ings; document control; control of, purchase ma-terial equipment and services; idantification and control of materials, parts and components; control of special processes; insoection'; test control: control of measuring and test eouip-ment; handling, storage and shipping; inspec-tion, test, and opera ting. status ; nonconforming materials, parts, or components; corrective ac-l tion; quality assurance records; audits; cost of quality; and quality information feedback.
3.3.3 Auditing techniques of examining, questioning, evaluating ar.d report <ng; methods of identify-l ing and following up on co.'rective action items; i
and closing out audit f i n d i r.g s.
3.3.4 Audit planning in the quality-related functions for the following activities: : design, purchasing, fabrication, handling, shipping, storage, clean-ing, erection, installation, insoaction, test-ing, statistics, nondestru:tive examination, maintenance, recafe, operation, modification of nuclear oower plants or 'associatsd comcone9ts and sade:y assects of.the nuclear facility.
M
UST-Ta-1 Rev. 8 U Oon tinued I
E, C7c$ - UT-TQ-t Cr 3.3.5 On-the-feb training to incluce the eie-ments of audit activity as described in N45.2.12.
3'.3.5 A record of all training receivec shall be recorded on Form No's.
USTF-TC-1.3, USTF-TQ-1.5 and USTF-TQ-1.7.
3.4 Audit particication The prospective Lead Auditor shall have participated in nuclear quality assurance audits within a peried of time not to exceed three (3) years prior to the 3
date of qualification, one audit of whien has to be within the year prior to his qualification.
4.0 Evaluation of a Lead Auditors cualifications 3.1 Prospective Lead Auditert shall be qualified by testing or evaluation of their proficiency.
1 Qualification testing shall be perfcrmed in accord-i ance with ANSI N45.2.23.
l6 4.2 United States Testing Ccmpany may accest, as Lead Auditor, new personnel on th? basis i
of their prior experienco. Cocumentation
, attesting to this action shall be estaolf shed and it shall ifst those qualifications tnat were accected.
5.0.Vaintenance of Cualifications 5.1 Lead Auditors shall maintain their proficiency
~
througn regular and active participation in the auditing process, including. the performance of audits, review and study of codes, standards, procedures, instructions and other documents related to quality assurance programs and program auditing. Based on management annual assessment, management may extend the qualification, 1
require retraining, or require recualification.
These evaluatiens shall be documented.
5.2 Any Lead Auditor who fatis to participate in the quality assurance auditing process for a period of two years or more shall require
}
requalification. Recualification shall include l
retraining in accordance with the recuirements of paragrach 3.3 and participation as an auditor in at least one qu.alfty assurance audit.
I l
i
T UST-TQ-1 Rev. 3 Page 15 hT'ZC-C24 TQ -l-$
VI Continued 6.0 Qualification Records 6.1 The " Record of Lead Auditors Qualifications",
Form No. USTF-TQ-1.5, shall be used to record the required personnel data, evaluations, certification and annual evaluations.
6.2 In lieu of recording details of the recuired personnel data on Form No. USTF-TQ-1.5, the individual's United States Testing Company Protessional Record may be referenced on the form and included in the personnel file.
r 6.3 D el e t ed.
'l I I.
AUDITS Conformance to this procedure shall be estaolisned by Audit.
Audi ts will be conducted at the interval specified in, and I
in accordance with, the requirements of the Project Q.A.
Manual.
t 1
i PROFICIENCY EVALUATION RECCR0 Mame (Last; (First)
(ini:1al; Evaluatad For Level Oate Location Inscoction and Test Activity QC Precacure or Tes: Standard RESULTS*
CHECX POINTS Fh 2.to-c tes um-Ttp-i-9 orai tnterv4ewi arace,cai 1.
Worx Activities / Tasks l
2.
Inspection / Test Critaria l
l 3.
Accaotance Standards l
4.
Rec:rding of Inscoction/ Test Results l
5.
Nonconformancas l
5.
Designated Tyces of Inspections I
7.
Technician Resconsibilities I
I i
l 3.
ASME Ccdes, ASTM Stds, etc., Recuirecents as Acplicaole 3.
Usa and Calibration Centrol of Inspection, I
l Examination and Testing Equipment I
- 10. Evaluation of Inscoction Tes: Results I
i
- 11. Proficiency in Supervision of L.we; Level Persennel
- 12. Preparation of Inspection and Test Procedures I
i
- 13. Understanding of Construction Quality l
Centrol Program Requirements i
- 14. Capacility for Reviewing and Approving l
Inspection. Examination ard Testing i
Precadures l
l t
- 15. Cacamility for Evaluating the Adecuacy of.
i Activities to Accomplish the Inspection, i
exami tation and Test Objectives l
- Use "S" for Satisfactory "U" for Unsatisfactory, 'NA" fer Mot Acciicable.
Check Points Acolicable For Each Level:
Level I: 1 tnru 9; Level II: 1 cnru 11 (12 is optional); Level *II: 1 thru 15 REMARKS Signature Level Examiner Biennial Racartification, St;na:ure jCata Fe
'JSTF-70-1.1, Rev. g
PHYSICAL EXAMINATION RECOR3 ANSI MA5.2.5
~
1 i
i Name Employee Mc.
l (Last)
(.lest)
(initial)
M"270- C7b A - UW "Mb- \\ -9 How do you' rate your general health?
Excellent Good Fair Do you feel that you are physically capable of aerforming your assigned inspection ac-ti.v i ti es ?
Use this space for exalanation of
".*to" answer.
f I certify tha: :ne above statements are true and comole a to the best of my knowledge.
loatel (signa:ure) i
(
VISION Require-ments Rich:
Left
- 1. Snellen Far Distance Vision 20 40 (Concre:a Reactor Vessels and Containment Inspectors Only) a) Uncorrected b) Corrected
- 2. Jaeger Near Distance vision J-1 Ltes.
a) Uncorrected b) Corrected
- 3. Distinguish Primary Colors t;a:ej (5 gr.a ure Eye Exar ner
- orm 257?-7C-L.2 Rev. ;
l.
1 TRAINING RECORO INDIVIOUAL I !STR' JCT:0N NAME PP038C Of Location R't'26 - C?o A OST-TG - -l - 9 No.
Training Description Ins true:o r Date i
i 1
r i
l l
i l
I 1
\\
I i
i I
i l
1 i
Tcr= USTF-20-2. 3 R*V.
1
4 l'
CCCUMENT CT QUALIFICATION (ANSI.H5-2.61 This is to certify that has been and is qualified :c peric = sspectaca anc :ss ng services in the following areas:
1 His cahabiliev in these areas is Level Basis for Certification:
For=al Education kf)770-c2 M - M T"o t-9 Related Training Related Experience 2
i l
1 I
I s
Cate:
Sy:
Designated Representa ave United States Testing Co.
Fo rm 'JSTF-TQ-1. A t
I
.. - ~.. -
1 RECORO CF L!AO AUCl?CR CUALIFfCA?tCNS 3ag gan UNITED STATES TESTING CCMPANY. INC.
i A.
QUAUFICATICN MOblREMENTS PCINTS EDUCATICN -UniversityiCeyeescats -
8
- 1. Unceryacuate Laves
- 4 Pts. Max.
- 2. Graduate Level C
EXPtRf tNCE
2meanv. Cates
' -4 **s. M a x.
ladustry (5sts. max.) ano Nuefest industry (NI). or Cuality Amurancs (CA), or Auditing (AU) or Comtuned N1, CA. AU
.'- MTT o-c7e9. USP-Te %
P D
PMCFESSICNAI. ACCCMPUSHMENT - Cartificatsicate
- 1. P.E.
- 2 Pts. Max.
- 2. Socsety i
E.-
MANAGEMENT.'usuficationeEvaluationicate Exclain;
- 2 Pts. Max.
l Evesuatee ev: (Name & Tittel i
Cata Total Poiets l
l F.
AUDIT CCMMUNICATICN SX1LL3 I
i Evaluated ty: (Name & Titfa)
Date G.
AUQlT TRAINING CCURSE3 Course Title or Toeic 1
Oate 2.
H.
AUDIT PARTICIPATICN
\\
Location j
x AMt 1.
Date 2.
3.
i 4
l t,
i EXAMINATION Ps w.f AUClTOR QUAllFICATICN CERTIFIED SY Date 4
(synoture and Titlet Qate Cartified AP NUAL EVALUATICN
\\
65 % 'ureatt Cate) i l
1 Form Us77 70 1,5
I TRAINING RECORD GROUP INSTRUCTION l
i I
Project or Location Instructor Date Subject Descriotion of Trainino:
Pz zo-cze8-uT-T4-t *t I
htendves:
l 1
i l
Form USTF-70 L.6
d TRAINING RECORD GROUP SE!.? I::STRUCTION 1
From:
Project or To: Names Checked Off Selow
Subject:
Procedure & Ravision No.
Other 1.
The subjset document is: C Attachid C kvailable in our filas
~
~
2.
See sack of this sheet for instructions.
3.
Route to only those whose name is checked below.
l Read for' Read for l
lName l Awa ren es s ISiena ure lOtte ITrainino I
l l
l i
l i
l l
I Fws-eun ue-- res -\\ - 8 l
l 3
i.
i l
l
+
g l'~
I I
l I
i-i i
i i
I i
l i
i I.
i i
t t
l l
i i
t I
i l
i g
1 i
l 4
Return this recor'd to for filing.
e
~
to
'f5"fdInf.
~.
P.s tu rn the attached document
~
nt- 'js; 7 79 1,7
~~
.~.s.e _
~
- CW-T~4- \\ '$
1.
If a check appears next to your name in the READ f0R TRAINING column, you are required to read and understand this document for the performance of your present or future work.
If you do not under-stand something in the document, obtain clarifica-tion from your supervisor.
Indicate satisfactory completion of this training by signing and dating next to your name.
2.
If a check appears next to your name in the READ FOR AWARENESS column, you are required to review the document to the extent enat you will be aware t
of the existence of the document and its general content.
Indicate your completion of this review l
by signing and dating next to your name.
l f
f I
?
Dack of Form UST.:-TC-1.7 O
r e