ML20090G588
Text
'
..a'
.C~
- =\\
"}"' -
M*-9 ' I".:IM.ra:,e a e.-w.JUCLEARI
- -g~m -m #. r.m~ w m~v ~ ~~-m,-Q.*jW,*.~ (p:
EGU,L_A10;Y COr.*.132SIOft-
,jz..
n,
-T '
- '.N
- =. 2-~u m ww.,e--,
y q g ;g y g :m m~~~~~.,...w
~
- A.) ' '
' p'-
,e
+.
Q., /r-A.. _, - - - -
c. E *. E. ' %, l. L t *. c t h 6 0 ;T -
-- -
- N: 's.
.~
f
.(('I if,7 i t
~
k'.Novak,AssistantDirectorforLicensing, Division MEMORANDUM FOR:
^
of Licensing Th0M:
R. F. Warnick, Director, Office of Special Cases
SUBJECT:
NRR ASSISTANCE IN RESOLVING MIDLAND SOILS ISSUE Region III has assu=ed all responsibility for reviewing the re=edial
.cils work at the Midland site. However, we expect the licensee to pariodically request relief from co=mitments made in the SSER. NRR's casistance will be requested when this occurs.
The expertise of NRR will also be required from time to time for consultation with Mr. Ross Lands =an during his review of the remedial coils activities. A schedule cannot be defined at this time.
NRR's assistance vill be requested on a case by case basis as the need arises.
We also reco= end that periodic site visits be made,in order for your parsonnel to caintain their auareness of th'e underpinning effort.
These visits could be li=ited to observations of critical work activities cuch as the pier 11 load tests and the drift work to the control tower.
The schedule for these activities can be obtained fror. Ross Lands._an.
NC Sheuld you have any questions pl, ease contact Wayne Shafer (FTS 3S4-2656).
ar tuu~a R. F. Warnick, Director Office of Special Cases cc:
A. B. Davis J. H. Sniezek IE J. C. Stone, II v6. Hood, NRR I
N/s -//4, f
D e
/
8309300021g000 30909
~
S O
e :i..:
% Nc TJPN.gr.3.*.,,i. i A_.:...C... ;,..
.,_. tat NucttAR ElG.JL A.T'. M,,.%_ +:5',N.*i n.s:.wTi.a*..... r ~~h I'..,'
'u
. O s
oav
.:n
- .. :. n..em
~'e TECHNICAL ASS.dNMENT CONTROL EOR.'."
~ ~ - '
'I
- a G*f 'j'~,,~t2,
- I.-
f..
-,.:- r *'%
( Yl %ta at$ 3%vt%?
[ j' l Nt n.Na onwaT ov
/
lt cts * *4 8 ElObf ST D ATA k
j
- ipaAEC ev 11 ff sacs j uo gav vm cMr[/A DATF
/6 iee j-t1Isc o-ih ct.cS1 TsT64 ot hs m ak Ctscan*TIOmit<aue re 870ca screkse e
ta2s *LaNNED ACCOMPLI $MMENT f f kh f&es..) h
.* 2 ** *4
.act me 36tST CONT ACT*
tam. mtQutST t m S aNiTeaLS easa n t out Sto.c o ma,a%::st.ON*
/
- > \\
lam 8 I Mo. Dav v f.D oE
/
Q 1.n i % )
M /\\ /T /4 / L. e'*l O p 1 81-
'/
n Mt S Tik o
?
/. e i
Taa o
..a.
, u i3 C. 4 aa AN C E O. (S T,% c a t v a m ESi&d'=e re FJo e ne tre<ss 6AL8 MwLTs PLAN 1 ACTION Nupsta e
IE CTa# N tr. SYSTf v5 CO*.TmOL D ATA
~
l A CPER ATING m E ACTC A ACT40NS (uses =49 4ttee.tv Code JIA aCwTvNavt
.aanco;aET*
/
psw s fia a50 L
.. - s -=s =1 n =
f
.as l
Wo. Cav v m.
- Ve autNOvtNT 7 88 CLASS
[EEs
- Y, II : O iC up
,,i G ivR vR viC i
f S TOPICa L R E PCRT RE Vi[WS fused ar t* Act.e fr "Opf III k tN302 5 Nawt s t oom* e:t NTesitatsCN S vvt3L 4:al PmQematTany {P)
+ &%t l
WQ Q a v Y A.
t al' l
- 0. D a t vm
- t a*NON PaoPastTan y v t p s'CNINP.
LEPCRT Catt a:3it,CNat issCavate0% mtoutST Daf t l
l f
l 1
l laTt
&~
Day vm aus I wO =av vm savp a:cteTgg e as NoN emcemittaa, mioom?
L.tutt C ATE itTTt m To vtN:sm CATE NOT ACCEPT 40 t
t I
g 9
W'Tre m an g E CTIC*d Ill R E V:EW OATA
.:. A:* 1v:=w c i :,l ' ?. * *r ra so e.. e ree e. ~f" e te. e =. e.e e.e
'eM **es e*, a c=er* me*e *
. g m at ; et a * *
- a;*.0%S (31'l lCthtm.: ACTA v. Tit S
- ss.
- S* t '.*at.C E s a iw A*.:s a p os mau e43il uNatSQLvtcSa8t?vissutS
'8 11 e :aL S I P:* 6 *
- e..t n $
t a l.
l Co m p t Se cenc t Net gN at
- ES GNatt: ct%8m.C IST.
l iCa' tC at CouwLtTiCNQAft stVitelp S SymNaut ptvitat m 3 tSTiuatto eNitiaLS-MOums
'CCI ESTiwatt O ICotaCTUal a
.g wo. Qav vm.
po. Qav vm 1
li n 4
- 2) /,8
,1,5,0 L
,.7 M y
- 7.
(o.. _<_
I, X, :(
,2,5,c
',,r'Bs'
'7
' L L. A d
?,Y,8
,1;c,c y',"
I I
I I f i
f f
f I
I f
f f f
l 1
i f
.1_
L.1 f
.l.. - f-
__1. _ f.
i i
i e
e I
_1 8
' f f f
i__
,,,. 1.._
a e
= - -
~
.:' 3a.
e n _-
- 3. m. -. - -- - -
w..n p
. M.y [T Nh, NN,=. m n..; +.
.~.
,z.u _n
-_ m u
S
& d 3 3 Y b.i. N A :.0. 0 /. n f f' Y _
. e.'
.g
.___,,,,_,_.,.,_ 3 G y::...
_ ~'
[ J:~':- My.v n;~ :n.~-m n :. m.-. 2...
4 l IO.:1.==.m..m
- ~,.;:.a.w o - ~ ~--~ ~.- ~-~ ~ -- Q, ~ / " ~,* ' ' #
- W. L m.~..
] ::
-& j,-
~
SEP 23 9 3 l
t MDIORANDUM FOR: Richard H. Vollmer, Director i
Division of Engineering FROM:
James P. Knight, Assistant Director for Components & Structures Engineering Division of Engineering
SUBJECT:
MIDLAND This is in response to your note of August 15, 1983 asking if any members of my staff, or our consultants, share R. Landsman's concerns that the Midland diesel generator building is inadequate for its intended service and whether they share any of his specific technical concerns.
A task grcup, including consultants from Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), was formed under the supervision of Dr. P. T. Kuo of the NRC staff to conduct a resvaluation of the staff's position with regard to acceptance of the 111diand diesel generator building. Upon receiving Dr.
Landsman's statement of concerns, dated July 19, 1983, members of the Midland review staff, and consultants named below, were given copies of Dr. Landsman's memo. Their initial reactions were that Dr. Landsman's statement contained no new infomation arid that their previous sentiments, as discussed further below, remained unchanged.
On September 8,1983, the task group consisting of Dr. Kuo Dr. C. P. Tan and Mr. N. Romney of the NRC staff, with the assistance of Drs..C. A.
Miller, C. J. Constantino and A. J. Philippacopoulos of BNL, conducted individual interviews with fir. J. Kane, !;RC staff. Dr. L. Heller, NRC i
staff, and Mr. H. Singh, Corps of Enginocrs, and a group interview with Mr. F. Rinaldi of the NRC staff, Mr. J. Hatra of the Naval Ordinance Laboratory and Dr. G. Harstead of Harstead Associates. These individual; represent to the best of our knowledge all members of the NRC staff and our consultants wha were principally involved in the review activities associated with the Midlar.d diesel generator buildirg.
As you know, the task group solicited all infonnation and opinions related to the diesel generator building in addition to conuntnts on Dr.
Landsman's statement.
The results of all interviews' conducted in this effort are being compiled as a part of the overall task group report which is scheduled to be completed in October,1983. It is my understandinq that the sentiments expressed by these individuals were essentia'ly the'same sentiments contained in the staff and consultant testimony before the Atomic Safety 8 Licensing Board; Mr. Rinaldi, Mr. Matra, Dr. Harstead, Mr. Kane and Mr. Singh were among the staff and consultant witnesses on.
this matter. Although Dr.- Heller, Mr. Kane and Mr. Singh were'not' satisfied with certain aspects of t.he analyses corformed by tlw
.......p..g1...3 9
.........f.......
ppgggg g........................................................_....1
.... e. '. w... +
2;.f.ff,, lLT
^
.7 C%Yp=5 5 W A V:P'=G-
. 4 5 : % @ $ O,,-.-E 9 E V Q & Q Q,.
9
%Eldchhrd tr.c.V6116C2' N e.-br "W..-ew.:.
~ ~'. ". -. m.
^
SEP P 31933 h,-
l applicant, and some of these same aspects were echoed by Dr. Landsman in l
his July 19, 1983 statement, none of these individuals have made'a final assessment as to..
acceptability of the diesel generator building for its intended strvice because they feel that the basis for such a judgement is incomplete.
Consistent with the hearing record, Dr. Harstead,' Hr. flatra and Mr.
Rinaldi reiterated their judgement that the diesel generator building was structurally acceptable for service, i.e., would rer.nin structurally 1*
functional under design loading conditions.
The task group met with representatives of the applicant at the offices of Bechtel Corporation in Ann Arbor, litchigan and went to the site on August 24 & 25, 1983. The task group returned to the Bechtel offices in Ann Arbor on September 12 & 13, 1983 for a further audit of the calculations employed to investigate the predicted perfomance of the diesel generator building. Both of these meetings were preannon ced public meetings, howeve:, there was no attendance by members of the public. Dr. Landsman was also interviewed by the task group on September 13, 1983.
bd ME"ed by GE' L**
James P. Knight, Assistant Director-for Components & Structures Engineering Division of Engineering
Enclosure:
R. Vollmer's Note to J. Knight dated August 15, 1983 cc w/ enc 1:
H. Denton D. Eisenhut T. Novak E. Adensam G. Lear D. Hood L. Heller P. T. Kuo F. Rinaldi i
J. Kane 1
1 Is
/
m
.&ny_ w*ax.u a
a
- p...u u....... w,,,,,....,,,,.....
k),P,Migh,t,,,
ufAE
.E ina.14.i...s.T.pa..........G,E,(gr,,,,,,,1 9.23.3 JYM
. 9# YA3.... 9723'83....... 2/AU.?..:... 2 f f.L......
N-A& $yLG sq,2.h?
--= 4,,.* -~., ~ Q b/ h hag..
- 5 "E f h M ir Y :
~ W=g', - _ _ - z __
m __.
r
,w. q.* y y 1 + g g.
. a.:w WMW Q-f. hw: fP ;
's ~:
mwe. ;peme.e%.
n.=u :.__... _ _ U$ITED STATES 4
c mmyg.
- .4. pew -=- ~ -
' w-z.yy-- /3r,m--:.m mr
~ - - -
.a
~ -~; W - P ;" 9 ?d b r w
-s.
7h,g, jn.j _.
,c
.- - NUCt. EAR' REGULATORY COMMISSION y
j
.~w.. WASHINGTON. D. C.' 205SS -"*--" - -
Ykh,[ _ ' '
'3, j
.p.
.... 7 :
~
e
- g. _
~,, g. 2 v,. ~~ s ;.e,
August 15, 1963 f!OTE T0:
Jim Knight With respect to the Landsman issue, I would like to know if any of your staff or consultants share Landsman's concerns that the Midland Diesel Generator Building is inadequate to return to service from a safety point of view, i.e., inability to meet design requirements.-
I would also like an answer to the broader question: do they share any of his specific technical concerns even though their bottom line judgment would be that the building is safe for operation.
I would like to discuss this with you on August 22nd.
+j&'cAg~
.=
.. ~.... _...
s
- n..vonmec 1 %
U
^
^
A su D al. 9 U V <- j
.v s
.