ML20090B062
Text
?
l sn ctz j
4,,
UNITED STATES
[
g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[
l g
,E WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 I
"%,*****/
A S'
N l
}
5MW MEMORANDUM FOR:
Those on Attached List FROM:
Darl S. Hood, Project Manager 9
Lic,ensing Branch #4 y
Division of Licensing,
e
SUBJECT:
MONTHLY PROJECT MEETING NOTIFICATION - MIDLAND UNITS 1 & 2 In accordance with D. G. Eisenhut's memo of June 24, 1981, monthly project meetings are held by the Division of Licensing for certain plants with active OL applications. The third such meeting for the Midland facility will be held on Friday, September 18,1981, at 10:30 AM in conference room P-114.
The purpose of these meetings is to provide overall project coordination on schedules, technical issues and status, review of interfaces and early identification of problem areas.
Each reviewer assigned to Midland 1/2 or the cognizant section leader is requested to attend this meeting.
Following the meeting, a summary report on the results of this meeting will be issued by this office. The attached status sheet and reviewer input sheet are intended to assist you in preparation for the meeting.
Please be prepared to turn in the " Reviewer Input Sheet" with the appropriate sections filled in at the conclusion of the meeting.
I I
Please note that the most recent Bevill Report (issued on August 28) shows an SER issue date of May 6,1982, two months earlier than the previous Bevill Report.
The SER date for Seabrook was changed from 06/07/82 to 09/07/82 in gg//0 order to accomodate the accelerated schedule for Midland.
Your input should
,/
reflect those changes.
'l bt-Darl S. Hood, Project Manager Licensing Branch #4 Division of Licensing Attachments:
As stated j
i[C109230443 u
-}
l g
c-c
~
PROJECT STATUS SHEET PROJECT:
Midland DATE OF PROJECT MEETING 09/18/81 PURPOSE OF MEETING:
To provide coordination among tiie reviewing organizations with regard to schedules, status of reviews and technical issues, review interfaces and to identify problems.
' KEY DATES:
FSAR docketed: November 1978 Final questions due to LPM for evaluation and action:
08/01/81 overdue
~
Applicant responses ~due:
~
10/01/81 Draf t SER input due to LPM (including staff positions 11/02/81 and open items):
Meetings with applicant to resolve open issues (range 39/16-10/30/81' of dates):
/
. Final SER input due to LPM:
34/06/82 B
SFD issue date:
35/06/82 B
NOTE:
"B" indic '.tes a Bevill Report' date.
E5TIMATE OF APPLICA!!T'S ABILITY TO MEET THE ABOVE SCHEDULE:
Meetings & recent experience with Consumers Power (derstand the importance 'of rapid including a caseload forecas't panel visit) during the post month indicate that they un responses and will meet the' dates.
HEARINGS SCHEDULED OR IN PROGRESS (include dates):
10/13-10/1/
Site Specific Response Spectra 11/02-11/06 Diesel Generator Building 11/16-11/20 Service Water Intake Structure 11/30-1.2/04 Auxiliary Building & BWST 12/14-12/18 Underground Piping & Permanent Dewatering PREVIOUSLY 1DENTIFIED PROBLEM AREAS:
Soils settlement and related problems Expedited review schedule Inabilility of some branches to meet the draft SER dates Resolution of TMI-related open items NOTEi This sheet is primarily for the information of the reviewers.
Please retain this form and fill out anc return the attacneo reviewer input sheet to the cognizant LPM prior to or,at the ineeting.
s 6
l
(-
b
~
PROJECT:
Midland LPM:
D. Hood LPM PHONE:
28402 LP!i MAIL STOP:
416
- LPM OFFICE:
116 NRR MONTHLY PROJECT MEETING REVIEWER INPUT SHEET INSTRUCTIONS:
This sheet is intended to streamline the necessary flow of information from the reviewers to the LPM's during and subsequent to the monthly project. meetings.
Please fill out all blanks and return to the LPM during (or within two working days of) the
'- ~
meeting:
3 1.
REVIEWER (S):
BRANCH:
PHONE:
MAIL STOP:
- 2.
- REYlEWER's SUPERVISOR:
PHONE:
3.
SRP Sections for which reviewer has lead responsibility:
4.
What is the approximate status of your review?
% complete
,5., Can you submit all questions by the sched' led date?
YES NO N/A u
If Not, by when?
Comme.nts :
6.
Is contractor support needed to complete the review in your area?
YES
'N0 If yes, explain:
Com7ents:
7.
Can you provide your draft and final SER inputs for.the above section's by the scheduled dates:1 lYESI-lNO If Not, by when?
Comments:
S.
The following meetings or conference calls (state which) should be -(or have
'been) scheduled:
Date(s)-
Subject Participants..
M or:CC
o
(. '
(~
Att' ached List -
D. G. Eisenhut Enyf ronmental Engineering Branch R. L. Tedesco R. Ballara Licensing Branch #4 G. Gears C. Billups E. Adensam D. Hood Siting Analysis Branch R. Hernan W...Regan Mechanical Engineering Branch K. Campe M. Kaltman A. Cappucci R. Bosnak Utility Finance Branch Structural Engineering Branch A. Toalston M. Messier F. Rinaldi S. Feld F. Schauer Auxiliary Systems Branch Geosciences Branch O. Parr R. E. Jackson E. Sullivan T. Cardone Reactor Systems Branch Materials Engineering Branch T. Speis S. Pawlicki W. Jensen D. Smith B. Sheron G. Johnson B. Elliott Instrusentation & Co rturol Systems Branch, M. Hum e
J. Halapatz F. Rosa H. Li Quality Assurance Branch Power Systems Branch W. Haass J. Gilray M. Srinivasan J. Conway O. Chopra R. Giardina Equipment Qualification Branch Accident Evaluation Branch Z. Rosztoczy R. LaGrange R. W. Houston T. Lee A. Chu Chemical Engineering Branch Efluent Treatment Systems Branc'h
- V. Benaroya W.'Gammill R. Anand C. Patel C. McCracken B. Turovlin -
S. Kirslis
~ ~
'i Attachedi.ist 3-(continued)
Radiological Assessment Branch Licensee Qualifications Branch F. Congel D. Vassallo C. Hinson F. Allenspach
- u. Meinke Physical Security Licensing Branch /NMSS Centainment 3ystems Branch C. Gaskin
% Butler
~~
~
P. Hearn Core
. Core Performance Branch
^
W. Brooks D. Powers J. Holonich Operator Licensing Branch P. Collins V. Deliso Human Factors Engineering Branch V. Moore R. Froelich Procedur s and Test Review Branch D. Ziemann W. Kennedy S. MacKay '
Hydrologic, & Geotechnical Engineering Branch G. Lear
-R.-Gonzales J. Kane i
- . Licensing Guidance Branch D. Skovholt M. Virgilio Reliability & Risk Assessment Branch
(
A. Lakner
~A.~Thadani O
9, 8
k
- --e e