ML20090B050
Text
...e\\
..x,%, C,. s..(*
(
h3 s
. s.
a
- m AUG II El
, - (;.t.,*
{'(0
/
RLb.UI.VD1
("
~
o
/
2'
- .2.171981 m
- -8 t~
v.s. iau. -me MEMORANDUM FOR:
Distribution FROM:
Darl S. Hood, Project, Manager, g,, (
Licensing Branch #4, D~L
SUBJECT:
MONTHLY PROJECT MEETING NOTIFICATION - MIDLAND UNITS 1 AND 2 In accordance with D. G. Eisenhut's memo of June 24, 1981, monthly project meetings have been initiated by the Division of Licensing for certain plants with active OL applications.
The second such meeting for the Midland facility will be held on Friday, August 21 at 10:30 A.l in conference room P-ll4.
Tne purpose of these meetings is to provide overall project coordination on schedules, technical issues and status, rev.iew of interfaces and early identification of problem areas.
Each reviewer assigned to Midland 1/2 or the cognizant section leader is requested to attend t'11s meating. Following the meeting, a sunanary report on the results of this meeting will be issued by this office.
The attached status sheet and reviewer input sheet are intended to assist you in preparation for the U20 tin 3 or(A O
'[
GLe u u h m k& nager MN[o Da 1 S Hood, Project sing Branch #4 c/ Division of Licensing l
Attachments:
I As stated l
i l
i
- See previous white N'ef
..........k42........................................................................................................,!................
g
..............o. mone
,emme n...... nem.....o.mmmmm me
.oommmemn..o.m
..* A
(
u r
- \\,k i
.i 1
MEIOPJdiDUI! FOR:
Distribution FROH:
Darl S. Hood, Project flanager, b
Licensing Branch #4, DL
SUBJECT:
10HTHLY PROJECT HEETIllG NOTIFICATI0tl - MIDLAND 4
Ut!ITS 1 Aa0 2 In accordance with D. G. Eisenhut's meno of June 24, 1981, monthly project 1
r.eetings have been initiated by the Division of Licensing for certain plants with active OL applications. The second such meeting for the itidland facility will be held on Friday, August 21 at 8:30 AM in conference room P-114.
Tne purpose of these meetings is to provide overall project coordination on senedules, tecnnical issues and status, review of interfaces and early 1
icentification of proble:.1 areas.
Each rt:vicuer assigned to 'lidland 1/2 or the cogni:: ant section leader is requested to attend tais rieeting. Following the rneeting, a sumary report on the results of this meeting will be issued by this office.
The attsched status sheet and revie.scr input sneet are intended to assist you in preparation for the meeting.
Darl S. Hood, Project Manager Licensing Sranch #4 j
Division of Licensing Attachments:
As stated 1
l l
l l
n 1
A Y:.Lasa......QILB(
.mco m.m.= > 0.D..H. o.od :.e..b..',....E.M. elsam,,,
3
.. Al..6.tl.A1.
ALd1.A1
,1
-==>
pc~mpe. enc ~cco
.OFFICtAL. RECORD CGFY wee m wei ms.mo
h-h g
~
2-DISTRIBUTION:
D. Eisenhut F. Rosa, ICSB R. Tedesco S. MacKay, PTRB D. Hood, LBf4 K. Baker, OIE R III E. Adensam, LB#4 '
M. Srinivasan, PSB P. Leech, LBf4 T. Spets, RSB R. Houston, AEB i
A. Cappucci, MEB J. Kimball, GSB W. Gamill, ETSB l
F. Rinaldi, SEB W. Kreger, RAB T. Ca'rdone, GSB W. Butler, CSB R. Gonzales, HGEB Y. Moore, HFEB J. Kane, HGEB D. Vassallo, LQB W. Hazelton, MTEB D. Ziemann, PRTB G. Johnson, MTEB D. Skovholt, LGB R. Amand, CHEB H. Wong OIE G. Bagchi, EQB C. McCracken, CMEB P. DiBenedetto, EQB B. Turovlin, CMEB J. Gilray, Q AB P. Psomas, EPLB G. Gears, EEB S. Kirslis, CMEB C. Billups, EEB J. Halapatz, MTEB M. Kaltman, SAB M. Hum, MTEB K. Campe, SAB C. Gaskin, NMSS E. Sullivan, ASB B. Elliot, MTEB H. Li, ICSB
- 0. Chopra, PSB R. Giardina, PSB W. Jensen, RSB B. Sheron,, RSB A. Chu, AEB C. Patel, ETSB C. Hinson, RAB W. Meinke, RAB P. Hearn, CSB W. Brooks, CPB D. Powers, CPB J. Holonich, CPB R. Froelich, HFEB W. Kennedy, PTRB M. Virgilio, LGB R. Bosnak, MEB F. Schauer, SEB
+
R. Jackson, GSB G. Lear, HGEB S. Pawlicki, MTEB V. Benaroya, CHeb -
Z. Rosztoczy, EQB W. Haass, QAB R. Ballard, EEB W. Regan, SAB
- 0. Parr, ASB
\\
e
~
,c 4
PROJECT STATUS SHEET
[
PR061ECT:
MIDLAND 1/2 DATE OF PR061ECT MEETING 8/21/81 4
PURPOSE OF MEETING:
To provide coordination among tiie reviewing organizations with regard to schedules, status of reviews and technical issues, review interfaces and to identify problems.
KEY DATES:
FSAR docketed:
11/18/78 Final questions due to LPM for evaluation and action:
8/1/81 l
10/1/81
~
Applicant responses due:
Draft SER input due to LPM (including staff positions 12/6/81 and open items):
4 l
Meetings with applicant to resolve open issues (range 9/81 - 2/82 of dates):
Final SER input due to LPM:
6/6/82 B
~
7/6/82 B
sen. issue date:
NOTE:
"B" indicates a Bevill Report date.
j
, ESTIMATE OF APPLICANT'S ABILITY TO MEET THE ABOVE SCHEDULE:
Applicant has requested advancing SER issue date 2 - 3 months and has taken measures to ensure dates can be met from the standpoint of the applicant's responses.
f HEARINGS SCHEDULED OR IN PROGRESS (include dates):
Soilssettlement and related issues August 3-14, October.
PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED PROBLEM AREAS:
l'
-HGEB - find design on soils issues likely to delay responses and reviews.,d.
ICSB - late assignment of reviewers may cause draft SER input to be delaye PTRB - emergency procedure issue (long-term vs short-term. plans) needs. resolution.
NON: "Thks"fgSpEp gphiNrhPf8E Ne"TN$rNthn wye' yen" wen." Neg1pgte.
s this form and fill out and return the attacned reviewer input sheet to the l-cognizant LPM.
t e
.n
.i f'
.( ~
PROJ ECT: MIDLAND 1/2
~
~'
LPM:
- u. Hooo LPM PH0'NF.:
28402 LP!! MAIL STOPT 416 LPM OFFICE:
116A NRR MONTHLY PROJECT MEETING REVIEWER INPUT SHEET INSTRUCTIONS:
This sheet is intended to streamline 'the necessary flow of informa. tion from the reviewers to the LPM's during and subsequent to the monthly project meetings.
Please fill out al's blanks and return to the LPM during (or within two working days of) the meeting:
1.
REVIEWER (S):
BRANCH:
PHONE:
MAIL STOP:
2.
REVIEWER's SUPERVISOR:
PHONE:
3.
SRP Sections for which reviewer has lead responsibility:
4.
What is the approximate status of your review?
- complete 5.
Can you submit all questions by the scheduled date?
YES NO N/A If Not, by when?
Coments:
6.
Is contractor support needed to complete the review in your area?
YES NO If yes, explain:
Comments:
7.
Can you provide your draft and final SER inputs foN the above sections by the scht.duled dates:1 lYESI INO If Not, by when?
Comments:
8.
The following meetings or confersnce calls (state which)-should be (or have been) scheduled:
~
Date(s)
Subject Participants M or CC
.