ML20083L644

Informs That Sufficient Info Provided to Begin Meteorology Review.Inappropriate Models & Diffusion Parameters Used in Section 6.1.3.2 & Accident Evaluations

ML20083L644
Person / Time
Site:	05000000, Washington Public Power Supply System
Issue date:	03/16/1982
From:	Hulman L Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Adensam E Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML082840625	List: GO2-82-642, Forwards Central Files Version of Revised Page to Revision 2 of Emergency Plan Adding Local Fire Depts within 20 Miles of Facility to Backup Fire Protection Svcs ML20083L109 ML20083L167 ML20083L170 ML20083L175 ML20083L178 ML20083L190 ML20083L256 ML20083L284 ML20083L310 ML20083L326 ML20083L335 ML20083L348 ML20083L368 ML20083L417 ML20083L432 ML20083L436 ML20083L494 ML20083L497 ML20083L501 ML20083L506 ML20083L510 ML20083L514 ML20083L517 ML20083L519 ML20083L529 ML20083L533 ML20083L536 ML20083L552 ML20083L556 ML20083L563 ML20083L565 ML20083L569 ML20083L573 ML20083L587 ML20083L596 ML20083L610 ML20083L618 ML20083L621 ML20083L625 ML20083L630 ML20083L632 ML20083L639 ML20083L641 ML20083L644 ML20083L654 ML20083L669 ML20083L699 ML20083L806 ML20083L880 ... further results
References
FOIA-83-575 NUDOCS 8204090099
Download: ML20083L644 (2)

Text

.- m m u

+

A u

,n

.,, y*

e

,e.g a

s! mJilu'.

l V7 W r Af e - 0 y

,pi..ler As, b.,.

%*& i 1 MiM8 ML10Rt m i Fult: Elinor Adonsan, Chief, !.B #4, A FRtsta L. G. Italaien, Chief. Accident Evelvation Jranco, AI SuhECit ACCEPTAM REVIEW OF WPP55-1 ENVIRG.T tE' T4. EP AT

.o o

...z J.18.4WlM 9f he.itenneroley 50Ctton has reviewed the 'PP55-1 & 4 Environ-R gert % aggardanes,wlth yeur February 10, 1932 request.

In the e

less 6.1.3.2 and 7. the applicant ut111zeo r,,

"' 4 0 models and alffusion parareters. Notwith-

.+hlE-

' West taufficient Infon.iation has been supplied to f,.g y n.,_p o. %,

o y,

a[9' k T8e4 M Ie9ed M. F2present the resielt of t:

r vte.

s&

cr. 'J

l 7

ya;<

g g Vt L. i.. qui,an, Chief 9

<clemt tveluation dranch kg g-7.

Jiriston of Systen Integration k7a g QlN[([

g lfl{ns3sseed wll. %?,s:te l e ccchee FW k.:!!)g i 4.L ".9q s

y.

3,,b y

N-i

,s, ij h,#p ;[;j RECEWED l

r

'p -:

p$ + Ki pgggg h

• N{ 7

,,p f

&(l[h?

[mpen m

s emMk{ coy Hos Eeen %.,o

. regg gh wf

<IEEmmeent) is g

+..

..h g.

,^

hx3 gf

+

+

-1 1

I N$W '

s

1. ~

MM l,

i

sw wa ex R G ~

~

7 l

y! qr-v a., y; gem.

j s

i l

jl l t

ffTEOROLOGY ACCEPTANCE REVIEW OF WPPSS-1 & 4 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT I

k The meteorology information provided in the +nvirorrnentsi report has considered

(.

l

., 1 l

the inesct of the environment on the plant and the possible impact of the plant 8

on. the environment. The'_ meteorology information provided is responsive to 9

9uldence given in NUREG-0555 (2/79) and is acceptable. However, in section 6.1.3.2. the short tem diffusion estimates followed Regulatory Guide 1.4 l

1 which.is inappropriate, he0.ing been replaced by Regulatory cuide 1.145.

In a

b section 7.1.2, met [ mis called for in a June 13, 1980 Federal Register notice, ll

1j m

.1 1.e. probab111stic' risk'essessment of a plant accident were not used.

Instead, at h

.L l

Regelatory Guide-Id45 'ies,used instead of a CRAC type analysis, with standard

})

i j

1 Pasgeill-Gifford dispersten values, o o

y z.

e Field tests at th Menford site have shown modifications to the o's are needed

?I to account for poorer dispersion condi,tions in this desert region.

i i

4 k'

Thos the accident evaluations should use a probabilistic method in Chapter 7 4

L t

and Regulatory Guide.l.145 for Chapter 6.

In both cases, modified o's should he used.

3 a

=Jl i

i s\\

D r

r, y

1a i.

i i 5

I-41 s

t_J