ML20083L519
Text
[a,_ l j ' ',
'~'
ElrkM I.
i,,tip!,lAtts
+
i fitICI i Ali I'l CtIL A10H Y COMMISSI07
~s
.o
, t o'. D r zov '.
?
1
-(.l g
JUN J 3 1331 bocket hos.50-50S 50-509 MEMORANDUM TOR:
- f. J. Hiraglia, Acting Chief Lteensing Branch No. 3 DL FROM:
R. E. Jackson, Chief Geosciences Branch, DE
SUBJECT:
GSB IflPUT TO WNP 3 AND 5 SALP REVIEW BOARD Per your request (memorandum of June 18,1981) attached is the Geostic.R.
Sranch input for use by the WNP 3 and 5 SALP Review Board. The corrnents were prepared by H. C. Lefevre, Geologist.
t WS R.
acks Chief Geosciency( ranch Division b Engineering
Attachment:
As stated cc: w/ attachment J. Knight
- s. srocom L. netter M Lefevre
. Wheeler i
l
\\
XA Copy Has Been sent to pga
" $ 5
?
mastigj:s r.'
. w.t w
's
~
- T.,: ' to im r,*.i u *:1 H
+
)
',i; 5 F iu i t.' r y Projo::
p
'iottlity:
- u 3w :
Appraisal Period:
Ju ly 31.1951L - Oct. 6 1930 L
1.
Performance Elements a
Quality of responses to requests f or additional inf ormat ten.
{
a.
Acceptable L
II 't'
- b.. Efforts required to obtain an acceptable response or submittal including
(
(1) Barely acceptable - all infeer.ation subu tted to MC was available to WPP55 at the tice of our three requests (Jalj 3 g {.,.
i (1) TI-.eliness 1980). WPPSS responses were not provided until October A,
C
- (2)
Effort j
'(3)
Responsiveness to staf f requests
- Average
- (4)
Anticipates or reacts to NRC needs 1
tc -
I
. c.
Working knowledge of regulations, guides, standards and generic issues.
i^
d.
Technicil competence.
Acceptable I
p.
- e; - Conduct of neetings with NRR.
l 2
- f.
Long-standing open items.
~
- g.
Deganization and management capabilities.
y>
- h.
Results of operator licensing examinations conducted during the appraisal
=
9 s
f';
Period.-
I
[
j 1.
Performance on specific issues (as selected by the Project Manager).
E Y
2.
Observed trends in performance.
k
?
f;
.5.
Ngtable Strengths and Weaknesses
[
t
[
- a.- Strengths
!b e b.
Weaknesses y
O 4.
Overall Susnary c
l (Shall include overall rating - above average. average, below. verage).
~
lI i *Sie has ne vases for connent on this item because of tne short term nature of
] #wr RAl's,.
p--
ira m p'.
p t
W Q i : s* f QV,* *,:[
lI.
i-
{. '
f:
facility:
WNP 3/5 Projeri Mon a r- _.i 'a"- 9 '
1 M raisal Period:
9-1-80 thru 6-3D.31 1
1.
Perfonnance Elements 1
t Quahty of responses and sut.nittals (such as W amenc ents, ic chn u :i a.
specificatien changes, generic letter responte, and re":.:n m to g
F requests fcr additioral informatinn).
s g:
Satisfactory.
No major shottromings noted.
[
- b. _ Efforts required to obtain an acceptable response er sure.ittal includin;-
I Fair. Rating will became unsatisfactory if no mprovement is nade.
fL (1)' T heliness WNP 3/5 management attention should
}(
p }. Eff M f cus n impr ving these areas.
Major prob are likely to develop during the GL review N
-(3)
Responsiveness; to-staf f requests present standards of performance are no (4) AnticipatesorreactstoNRCneedN"**d' 1
?.
I c.
k'orking knowledge of regulations, guides, standards and generic issues. Sati rory
+
k d.
Technical co v tence. Satisfactory p
(
e..
Conduct of meetings ~with NRR.
Not evaluated.
I fl. LongkStanding open: items.
Not evaluated.
g.
Organization and management capabilities.
Seeiibelow.
[
h '.
Aesults of operator licensing examinations conducted during the appraisal p
- period./ Net evolmated
~
q
- 1. - performance on* specific issues (as selected by the Project Manager).
l l
Petesstag of' correspondence (rowthg for signaturas and concurrences) is too si
. Cuele(Mays ~., Stoff properation of correspondence is satisfactory.
2.
Obsereed treads in~ perforinance.-
Est evolueted.
3.
NptaMe Strengths' and Weaknesses r
P Name observed that are considered " notable."
a.- Strengths be Meetnesses 4.
Overs 11 Summary - Tre licensee's perfonnance in tne very limited interaction with the IK has been average.
!!owever, when the level of inter 6ction increases 4 the licensee's quality of perfonnance ray change signi.
ficantly.
Areas identified during this apprassai perico as havin<
significant potential for causing problem in the future ~ are the '
a L.
~. routing'and review procedures for documents that have been EO
.. CentMii,by the staff and aGD am6h Overall rating
.