ML20083L806
Text
_
y v
g
~
f
@W
? :~ <
DISTRIBllTION Doet)t Kos.: 50-460/513 3. ggz LBf4 r/f 3
,,y R
RHernan EAdensam
?,.
o DHood j
"i M0uncan k dociet IMs.: 50 460 DEisenhut/RPurrie
?"
and W Y,13 73p
.y "1'
4 N.%3DuM 700:
Carrell c.i E150nhut. Director 01visien of L1 censing A.a
$R %
- THws ~ -
7'
^
Thesies l'. Nevak, Assistant Director for Licensing 9
Otvisten~ef Lciensing 14.._.
y m_
- g -
-.n.
p__
'Elfepr G.;Aeonsa N Chief y
L 30msed. No. 4 4c l 01 of: Licensing A
w a
w
?/N4 F39*
Q'W.[Mernan, Pro.}ect t'anager 4
c ',
-L Branch tio. 4 c
of Licensing 1
-qq.
n m F SSJECTra
. WR 5Al? D!PUT F0it WP-1/4 3.; <
^
7. ;
,?
M J B M owfth, for forwereing to Region.V is the MkR input to the Cycle 3
'.[
$satten ef adeshtegten?. Nuclear Project. Units 1 ead 4.
This input tas ite[
- wlth_ NRC Manuel Chapter 0516 and in-response to Ef
&l%
free Reston V-(T. % Mishop).
1 it
- p *
- ~% ~ >
i tfonits; July ?l,1981. through July 30.1Y2.
ts were in the post *.sostruction Mmit g.t t esserred in' thf s time frase'were M
- 139-1 and cancellation-of, ep-4 by the w
tes betecen ett and the applicant-M
,.1 4 other activities M Lleenstag$195. Three. of /these meetings W
Manager and _thrwJmeetings
.ffte d e et p%
aprltte puepose er, resolving setters related f
I fleast fesolveneet by other 44R divisions existed levelestice~
jenly; DLEtaput has been provfded in the attached.
- 9...g % m
.a JN QV{\\p,.YthQ, 5.3 y wcy in]T Ca 32 f
- yag o
s, 3"""'
YMc Been $cnil$IOR m-
~
fA Ronala W' Hernan Project ;tenal-r Licensing Branch No. 4 gc wmqy
.u n,,
rp ld.<
l $;
a._.... a... maatuw..
@ m. g ic...,_i..l MAJat.... 4.St.@.c./42.i p/:M...
....... - ~.. - -
-.. - ~. - -
I k
El
=
+;
s
[
^
e 1
(
g E
]
I Facili ty ume:
Washingtor Nuc lear P ro.)et t,
nits t
and k
Applicant:
Washington Public Power Supply 5f, *em ;e j
m l
NRR project Manager:
Ronald W. Hernan E-1, 1_ntroduc tion E
i This report presents an evaluation by NRR of the Washington Public Pow-i Supply System insofar as its licensing activities of Wasnington Nuclee hd j
Project, tinits 1 and 41 It is intended to provide the NRR input to the
=
g L~
SALP_ review process,as_ described in HRC Manual Chapter 0516.
The rew m e
i i
covers the period July ;l,1981 *hrough July 31, 1982, f
b i
[
h The basic approach used,for this evaluation was for the Project Manager to J
p conduct a review #fvtll? records of meetings and correspondence with the
]
f p
facili.ty. The:ProjectiManager was personnaly involved in all meetings an ;
- j j
y NRR1 correspondence except Generic Letters.
Other NRR Divisioni did not 5aw
(
b
' sufficient interaction with the 9roject to provide any basis for input to 4
this; evaluation. Therefore, the input is based entirely on the Project r
Manager _'s review. To?the limited extent practicat, a matrix was developed p:
3 U
j L
to facilitate an overall evaluation of the facility's performance.
T he ma t <
R 0
is Lbased more on specific license-related areas than on functional areas.
F
~
W fe During ;the review period, both units are essentially in a post-construction b.
- permit status. However, from a licensing standpoint, four significant y
h
' events occurred as'descr.ibed below:
d 6
fa p
1.
The applicantttendered an application for an operating license for 5
'g WNP-1 on;Novesber"25, 198'.
j f
2.
On January.D;/91982, the applicant announced termination of WNP-4
?
(as well'as)WNP-5)O. Although 411 further construction so.-k was 3
3 1
teminatedEWPPS$wintends to mairtain WW-4 'in a licensable cond? -
1 E
1 tion'pendisfa" decision on ultimate disposition of the assets a
F I
involved.Mherefope, the construction permit has not been revoked
- i F
3.
On April 2921982, WPPSS announced a decision to defer further 3
[-
construction work on WW-1 for up to five years for financial j
A reasons.
5 4.
The staff docketed the WW 1 OL application on July 16, 198.
2 i
NRR's (>ecision to docket the application even ;. hough construt t:o'
]
1 i
us been halted was made only after 2 detailed evaluation of the
[
merits of docketing and only af ter the applicant agreed te : erta -
d s
conditions regarding future licensing rulemaking.
3 p
Overall NRR involvement with WNP-1 and WNP-4 during the review perio4 ha t j
ninimal relative to other post. construction permit projects.
There N ye b,,
w three visits to the site by the Licensing Project Nanager ( 3 nc i uding
- he ( *
=
E SALP meeting) and three meetings wita the staf f in Bethesda on techni cal or s
]
u the apot-mi E
licensing issues. The three meetings were held at the request F
)
a i
a 2
-- 1 u...... - smg
, i.
- s; u
"k I
2 p
II. Summary of Results NAC~ Manuel Chapter 0516 specifies that each functional area evaluated will be assigned a performance category based on a composite of a numt,er
- af attributes. The single final rating was tempered with judgemert as L
to the: significance cf the individual elements.
s glased on *his approach,2the performance of the Washington Public Power
_.$epply; 5yrtem:in-the functional area of licensing activities is <ated
- category 2 by MRR.
' ~ [
' 111. ' Criteria -
@E
.Evolvation criteria, as given in HP.c Manual Chapter Appendix 0516 p
" Table:1fwere:esedfor:thisevaluation.
m C*.
- IV.,PerfereenciAne13 sis.
m s
i.'The" app'llcashsTperfbe evaluation is based on a consideration of 6
.seven:sttritsggg:asl glwen in the NRC Manual Chapter. For most of the J:
1lcenslag:sttfees" considered in this evaluation, only four of the attributes h;[,
were of'tignificancet flherefore, the composite rating is heavily based on lthe following attributes:
c' hf Management involvement in assuring quality
[
tr4 to resolution of techni:a1 issues pi w
- _Aesponsiveness to NRC initiatives
[fpft Steffing 4-<...
The remaining attributes of.
~
kg jG Reporting and analysts of reportable events
?
Enforcement h,istory h
lTreining y _
mere generally; judged to not apply to any 11 cent 19 activities for this b
sealuaties period.
=
The evdination.was bened upon our assessment of the applicant's performa ice y
related to the foltooing. functional areas and events:
1.
Responses to NUREG-0737 requiremenn 2.
Human-factors planning 3.
WNP-1 OL application 4.
WNP-4 termination 5.
Emergency planning 5
m_
Li__
fg;,
,1 W va m -
~
R m.
~
~
s
- f. I c
Specific observations relative to each of the applicable attributes are V
et follows:
L L
A.. Management involvement is assuring quality
(
7 _
mesiegted setegory 1 insofar as it pertains to licensing
'This
{;'
activt 1efflert~put ferth by kPFSS management in pursuing
,6 propDeing an: independent design review program J
- tel$8 f.1 gestrol rees: design;(human factors)
G rthe site emergency preparedness plan was se'
- sFL
$$2 concern for quality.in the licensing-b.
~ / 'Leenjunction with, tendering the IMP-1 FSAR, 9,
ifpK ipersonnel:mede:a presentation to. the Staff r in'which the accueent was. developed
- - n'
' f an4#
linterest to:the s'taff. With' regard to s
?
it 1took-the lead in proposing a design for dich; gained conceptual' approval by the staff.
F,-
"IG<
dicated an entire chapter..to: discussion of l
e land ner-1 responses.. A significant ef fort l
m
. hes 55 to maintain the licensability of )NP-1 g.%y
{
', 3 '-
' der lon: deferral status and of WF-4 during the first y f c.
~
phase' en
= -q u r.. : (,..n.
w kQ;,
~
B.
Aargsch+to resolution of tecnnical issues p4 e
QJr.
J IfPPS$ agnagement has been aggressive in the pursuit of technical GQ reseletSten ;Iierticularly those NUREG-0737 items unique to Babcock 4 W118& plants 2The epp11 cant has been very active in the B8W y4,je r
I-
- OsamWJaissacking resolutions acceptable to the staff. ~An g tv. 4D -
'overalk rattaglef;231sithis attribute indicates that the degree of (4m ~
c,
<appligestfand:
' tion which has prevailed'in the past F'!J
- sheeM y the future phases of the licensing
?processW P l5, ' 2 :
Wide
~
\\
l WL ~
E., f,Q ; ' '
G;;; %~
. C.
RossenstsamessitetIE 1nltia tives n
ga-3 m
v
,v-m 7
p'
~)fPP55 site the itaff's requests have generally been i
W
,veey appsiepriate. M example of thair performance in O
ithist
'ussM fen 7Jf.a section on class 9 accidents into gi %
. the E
,pgert submitted at the tint of docketing. This P'
requifig$.5 lef$9camamme of effort with a minimal amount of guidar.ce 4'.
f
- free tSit staff,C A reting of 2 indicates that this degree of irespenstveness should be continued in the future.
g' e 5
, gg ir e
p,3.,@
O. ' Enforcement History s
f4 This attribute.is not considered to be applicable from the standpoint 7
fC of licensing activities.
mn s ' 1 n, w
,.a p.
- u..
re..
m
~
t n-n N'w[% f -
f.
lc.
ii 4
J t
r y
tR 13 Jvegh
~
1 2
j'
-(F t of eurne*Alconsing activities, the only even:
le uns cancellation of WP-4.
The manner b_
le
$1 ast*fication was accet',able, However,.
not' applicable end an overail rating by t>
6 w.
(
v j c;,jgz
.e fl(,
w ;3t;
.a f
e d
k
<W is project have been' predominated by i
&n.(4 ', v l;(i@M.
deferral of Unit 16 Within these con-i
[ @g
'N. f j tlts staffisg, levels.haveigenerally been i
s n
jf,
, :.y cMW
.esassres such'as'manegenent reorganiza-T
~^
Ei itt11 ties and:perseit. of ; highly 8
5
'.fy m 1 7 ' p p. D,y.
I,wecancies: indicate-an-aggressive approach 1
%)y j
i 34Jg ng with potentfal or actual problem '
1 :
Q %
7 4 q~.
- given a rating of category li -
7 m
x 4. x,
,j h[y.?yR
]
lW $,W &u..,-
yc-wy~
3 7GFrwijfdenst(sten $eint,:NIit does not consider this to be an E
im
- s.,fppgapptteetbe -attMbete ;dering the period considered, j.
q
]
cs ;:~r -1~wx e
=
m a,.
.u p>a m;c 4 %, m j
y
' s.,
x
'l i g h t y. f,
l$ :f ? l},
-m%
W@M( *
% t' See WPS$'.s performance for the-si!mificant
'i t
of ifcensing,Lan overal' performance rating
)
f i
EN icallyistrong management involvement -
i V R9 sand satisfactory perforesace characterize
~ 3
& W d.
i cal-1ssues, responsiveness and staffing.
l 4
wr, y
e-1 ey) ng g 7,m
- w,.,,.
j g
e. % -j: % 'n t,
vt
.y 4
sm
%.cc A.
h I.
..,f
,- y.
r
,r"q
?'
P
.}
y y[pp
'N '7 y,
l 1
4
~
,m
- -Y;._ x [- ',
w y
e_
a-
+
1 R
e.
c y f-y y
+
a K
w i
- l'y
- ,
~
a'
}i l ',
~
c
+
=
o r
'A
+
~
5 il g.
g J
i h.
,S
- _s q
1, M
?
M m
f 4
h% p egd,u&,%ai."4,odyI'
- 7,"'
$f i
. : 4 m'3 e' 3 i 4
,"~
Q 4
q > E *" -
J g9 s* =4Kc**~E BY t
~%,5-n>
lac s
e i
nt v
)
hn i
t ci t
n eo a
e 3
t p i
m 4
d t
e n
y n
f n
,s f
g o
=
i oa l y:
=n o
a i
t ci
=
n t
t ns C
s a
a n
o m
c i
y Y s
i e
f$p[
i ec m
tt N
y y
g f
j e
ue r
l n
l v
lf o
o as i
l l
y oa t
t nt d
a j9q ot ss s
an u
u vi e
s i
e l
q y}
nl ra s
h dv c
s p
W<
i a e
ne n
d s u
om n
t a
i ne t q t o e
n e
(
an y
se n
r v
e gl e
, u eg hf m
nb g
gv i
mn c
s e
ia n
ni
. g ei as n
c tt i
i t a
3 ;.,. :
G 9r To e o
r rr f
nc 4[
au u
p o
oo f
i e x
ns ps s
f pp a
af q*mgy" as Js e
n ee t
rf Ha Ai R
E Rr S
T e a~' e&w4y' j
a,,:$gwn g
i l
l T> g>
g zs>
}
T
- [
~
ma.n a %,. u S ;.pQ M", 6w Q y' Q
s)g, i.
QL1+ c m
R> g>
xs>
s j i i
g j *s ),j
- i cie ;%w dww,,.. ' 2 o$
'S;r w
1 g
r
':9 s :
f
- m.4p
~
(' > g>
g
=s>
q f
g:+wyigm :,.;- Ewc, sh.P,
~,
V
~
A. l k:> E
- A
?lj.
.3 m
g> R> g>
2s>
r 4T' '
g4 l pp p.;
n>
~
=;
C'> g>
g
=s>
,4
'j, -
N!.
~.
~
I[
l kg
. w;a(.
YG@
o,. g.y Qr4lg.g $g en
,p v.
m 4>
g>
x w
,F i
7 1,
f gjw % m g.
Q*
4 M.-
l
.'s.
k eQI l
g*~.go$o.ge.gI.g%:f7.E, Tp -
R <**f ; e i
p s~
5 Fw
. $.a ad.
,.g
=*
fl Qd'?
?-
e%
l
[$
y 3
-}
y f
i
,}K4 l
-