ML20083L501
Text
k{Ab
[
h MAY l 5 MG) k
.m l
gf 3 7-f.p'iLL '/,x/ 7' Decket Mot. 50-460 513 O
c y>
's
. e g',J I
LO y
.~n MEMORANDUM FOR: Elinor G. Adansas Acting Chief t/
LicensingtranchI4 J
M/g 19 gg;, y Division of Licensing
-/
(3 m,7p f3 FROM:
Robert E. Jackson. Chief A
-/
Geosciences trench i'
}-
Division of Engineering
' Cr,g),-
{
1NRU:
James P. Kni$t. Assistant 0 irector for Strusteres and Coconents Engineering
[c Division ~of Begineering L[
$UBJECT:
RESIEST FOR TECHNICAL ASSISTA!!CE WP NO S.1 A':D 4 fy
. DOCKET N05. 50-460 AND 50-513
[,
b As regisested inleur neuerendum of May 12. 1981 we have reviewed i'
the esplicast's I for referencing section L5.1 throuch b
'2.5.3 et the W -2 in the WP-1/4 FSAP.since both projects t
[
are located in close proximity on the Hanforo reservation.
t-L We agree in~ principal and concur wi th this approach.
It will sese staff ressurses and avoid dup'* cation o the review effort.
[
p-This should be done, homever, in.sognition(of the following aweafs editch the epplicent should be nade aware of.
k J
b 1.
Sines the'ismediate site lesations (excavattons) are located I
apprestustely ese titeester/ apart, ar,alysis of site surface L
fenittag potestfat'tstWe ing mapping, drilling. etc.
(2.5.3)'end arg eens of neerfield cround notion (b
(tfpeessery)useldhosetobetreateddifferentlyforeach s
site.11his mW regelre seen modificati@n or differences in F$Nt sections 2.4.Z and 2.5.3.
n
?
2.'
Stess the Montwd area is in an area where larg.e amounts or b
investigettens are underusy, any significant time delay N
betunge.tessaece of _4L, Safety Evaluation Report for WP-2 f
and W.1/4 decketing and staff review would probably lead F
to requirements for additional information.
Ii 3.
The W-2 apellcant has veoertaken substantial investigations t
since the FSAR submittal.
It the present time. I am not aware
[
as to how such of this new information has been actually i
sahmitted as'eneneunts to the W-2 FSAR. sections 2.5.1 throu p 2.5.3 If this information has been anended, then it would be adeguate.
If it has not ':een amnded to WP-7 ttwn
[
- 71b*
it is poeded in the W -1/4 FSAR.
^*
?
__A Copp Has ac<en sd io Mf'
~'
~ ~ ~
~
4"o-s p!
j
~$
...kh 2[*" % 1 8 3 0 5 2 1 0 l L d M, l" j - g g k r
,e.
3,....
...T
+.3
- 4., y;. :
4 ' 'l,
'WM.[ ' ] '.t.4.g q.
p Lgjgg;},f 3.+,.
~
~,
ii 1.<
'p 1
~
)
l l
~
l Elinor G. Adensen 1 We agree, therefore, that for acceptance review purposes that tr. corporation, by reference, of the WNP-2 FSAR and later anend-monts is adequate for s mtion 2.5.1 and 2.5.2.
Section 2.5.3 should be modified, as necessary, to account for specific site differences.
%ert E. Jackson. Chief l
Geosciences Granch I
t:1vis toc of Engineering i
cC:
R. H. Vollmer D. G. Eisenhut g
R. A. Purple H. A. Levin R. A. Hemann R. AuLuck
[
L. Reiter i
R. Mc Mullen i
P. Justus J. Kirnball r
e e
a 5
+
e
/
g.--..
_ 't jgP ',,,,
4 Y:65U
- r53
?.' :.k g
s A C A___I l
_