ML20083L514

Forwards Info Re Impact of Mount St Helens Eruptions on Facilities,For Use by SALP Review Board.Comments Prepared by He Lefevre,Geologist

ML20083L514
Person / Time
Site:	05000000, Satsop
Issue date:	06/23/1981
From:	Rolonda Jackson Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Miraglia F Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML082840625	List: GO2-82-642, Forwards Central Files Version of Revised Page to Revision 2 of Emergency Plan Adding Local Fire Depts within 20 Miles of Facility to Backup Fire Protection Svcs ML20083L109 ML20083L167 ML20083L170 ML20083L175 ML20083L178 ML20083L190 ML20083L256 ML20083L284 ML20083L310 ML20083L326 ML20083L335 ML20083L348 ML20083L368 ML20083L417 ML20083L432 ML20083L436 ML20083L494 ML20083L497 ML20083L501 ML20083L506 ML20083L510 ML20083L514 ML20083L517 ML20083L519 ML20083L529 ML20083L533 ML20083L536 ML20083L552 ML20083L556 ML20083L563 ML20083L565 ML20083L569 ML20083L573 ML20083L587 ML20083L596 ML20083L610 ML20083L618 ML20083L621 ML20083L625 ML20083L630 ML20083L632 ML20083L639 ML20083L641 ML20083L644 ML20083L654 ML20083L669 ML20083L699 ML20083L806 ML20083L880 ... further results
References
FOIA-83-575 NUDOCS 8107130581
Download: ML20083L514 (2)

Text

{{#Wiki_filter:l 4 D. 9 1STRIBUTIon: } DOCKET = FILL

/ 7 g s

r' T GSB RDG N 23 y p Docket hos. 50-508 50-509 i 'OCRMDLrt F04: F. J.-Niraglia, Acting Chlef Licensing Branch No. 3. DL l FROM: R. E. Jackson. Chief Geosciences Branch. DE I;

SUBJECT:

css INPUT To nP 1 Anu 5 SALP REVIEW COMO j t i Per your regaest (memorandum of' June 13, 1931) attached is the Geosciences (1-Brarr;h input for use by the WNP 3 and 5 SALP Feview Board. The carents f. .iere prepared by H.' E. Lefevre, Geologist. b' Originni S18ps4 b5 V~

c. Jacuan - '

p 56 R. E. Jackson, Chier b Geosciences Granch g;: 01visico of Encineertne: } ',

Attachment:

0 ~As stated tr O cc:. w/ attachment b J. Knight h['

s. arecean L.~Retter E

H. Lefevre le' L. Wheeler v p 4k s s' .,0 e

1. a W% sos

\\e-1. ys, 4, A i 4" s A l s, j 3?p i -== 3 XA Copy Hos Been Sent f5 PDR JM74l Biff f / y..,af'Lc m} Lp [ ~ } orAS 3 am m c M'L_unmL tnac nDeww i- - I- ^

M ^ .3 p.,. y;,;f [ +; m% Q;; a.-na n, m. 1 y / .r. iv ' o i.cility: _ x,;. 3,a c, Appraisal Pertod: _ _ ju ly 31, y,,,,. mct 3, t ([ 1. Performance Elerents g-Q a. Quality of responses to eicaests f or m'J i t i an: ! n a ur: 4t n a k Acceptable I i' n. i' S. Ef forts rc; aired to obtair, an au cctchie respt.nse or uMitt al inc udir.- l I;- (1) Darely acce;> table - all inf errat ion smu t ted t'

• /

aVallable to WPPZ at the tine of our tbret r- . st< ( ;i f 3 ![- (1) Timeliness 1980). WPPsi respenses were not provtaed ua-4t 'g 6

• (2)

Ef fort + I 4 f U (3) Responsiveness to staff request" - k erage L O.

• (4) Anticipates or reacts to liRC nee
• k V[

. c. Working Encwledge of regal: tic,ns, guic s. sterAr ds.-rd 9t neric issues. n [. d. Technical competence, tcceptab k ,I

• e.

Conduct of meetings with fiPR. p. [

• f.

Long-standing open itens. r [

• g.

Organization and management capabilities. E

• h.

Results of operator licensir.g examinations conducted during the appraisal ,I ' pe'ri od.

i

• 1.

Performance on specific issues (as selected by the Pro. ject Manager). n I o 2. -Observed trends in performance. p-

• 3.

Nptable Strengths and Weaknesses

• a.

Strengths

• b.

Weaknesses p

• 4.

Overall Sune.ary )- (Shall include overall rating - above average, m i m, hlc-w cCSB has no bases for coment on this iir b mso of to i.,t our RAl's. =_}}