ML20076H440
| ML20076H440 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Limerick  |
| Issue date: | 06/13/1983 |
| From: | Bradley E PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC |
| To: | Schwencer A Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8306160572 | |
| Download: ML20076H440 (73) | |
Text
. _ _
?
?
PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY 23O1 M ARKET STREET P.O. BOX 8699 PHILADELPHI A. PA.19101 EDW ARD G. B AUER, JR.
(215)041-4000
- ',::"::,',ti".'.u..s k cuGENE J. BR ADLEY assoctava sansmas cousesst DON ALD BLANMEN EUDOLPH A.CHILLEMI
- 2. C. Ml R K M ALL T. H. M AM ER CORN ELL PAUL AUERBACH assestant esusn AL counesL June 13, 1983 EDW ARD J. CULLEN, J R.
THOM AS H. MILLER. JR.
IZEN E A. McMENN A aSSO97 ANT COuNSob Mr.
A.
Schwencer, Chief Licensing Branch No. 2 Division of Licensing U.
S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555
Subject:
Limerick Generating Station, Units 162 Response to Procedures and Test Review f
Branch Draft Safety Evaluation Report (DSER)
Re fe rence :
A.
Schwencer to E.
G.
- Bauer, Jr.,
letter dated March II, 1983 File:
GOVT l-1 (NRC)
Dear Mr. Schwencer:
The. attached documents are FSAR page changes to Procedures and Test Review Branch (PTRB), Draft Sa fe ty Eva 5aa tion Report (DSER),Section II, " Test Review", Item 2.
The draft FSAR page changes will be formally incorporated into the FSAR revision scheduled for July, 1983.
Sincerely, Eugen J.
N d ey RJS/gra/13 h0C)/
Copy to:
See Attached Service List l l 8306160572 830613
~'
PDR ADOCK 05000352 E
3 fri t
cc: Judge Lawrence Brenner (w/o enclosure)
Judge Richard F. Cole (w/o enclosure)
Judge Peter A. Morris (w/o enclosure)
Troy B. Conner, Jr., Esq.
(w/o enclosure)
Ann P. Hodgdon (w/o enclosure)
Mr. Frank R. Romano (w/o enclosure)
Mr. Robert L. Anthony (w/o enclosure)
Mr. Marvin I. Lewis (w/o enclosure)
Judith A. Dorsey, Esq.
(w/o enclosure)
Charles W. Elliott, Esq.
(w/o enclosure)
Jacqueline I. Ruttenberg (w/o enclosure)
Thomas Y. Au, Esq.
(w/o enclosure)
Mr. Thomas Gerusky (w/o enclosure)
Director, Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency (w/o enclosure)
Mr. Steven P. Hershey (w/o enclosure) l Donald S. Bronstein, Esq.
(w/o enclosure)
Mr. Joseph H. White, III (w/o enclosure)
David Wersan, Esq.
(w/o enclosure)
Robert J. Sugarman, Esq.
(w/o enclosure)
Martha W. Bush, Esq.
(w/o enclosure)
Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board (w/o enclosure)
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel (w/o enclosure)
Docket and Service Section (w/o enclosure) i 0
e 8
e LGS FSAR RAFT 14.2.12 INDIVIDUAL TEST DESCRIPTIONS Individual abstracts for each preoperational test conducted during the preoperational test program arc presented in Table 14.2-4.
Individual abstracts for each startup test conducted during the subsequent startup test program are presented in Table 14.2-3.
These abstracts identify each test by title and number, describe the test objectives, identify the test summary description of the prerequisites, provide a
test method, and establish basic test acceptance criteria.
Presently known documents which provide sources of acceptance criteria are identified in parentheses in the acceptance criteria section of the individual abstracts.
Other documents or FSAR Sections referenced within the identified document may also serve as sources of acceptance criteria.
The test abstracts are not intended to be ongoing documents that are continuously changed as references are modified.
The identification of documents may be modified as specific acceptance criteria are developed and test procedures are written.
)
DRAFT LGS FSAK'
(*.
J (Page 1 of 63) s.
TABLE 14.2-4 PREOPERATIONA5 TEST PROCEDURE ABSTRACTS --
125 V de Safeauard Poser System (P-2.1)
J Test Obiective - The test objective is to demonstrate the ability of the 125 V de safeguard power system to provide anun panels.
'J Prerequisites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls areBa operable and calibrated.
to normal level, and 440 V ac power is available to provide power The load resistor bank is available to Battery room ventilation to the battery chargers.
support the battery load capacity test.
~
is available and operational.
I Test Method,
Performance test - The battery charger is disconne 8-he period.
Service test - The battery charger is disconnec period.
l Battery charger test - With the battery fully discharged, theThe larg l
battery charger is connected. load demand is applied to the battery l
Operate all de loads with the battery at minimum.term 6,3. 2) g j
voltage.
( F 5 A ft Acceptance Criteria l
The voltage of each battery cell is within specified limits.s l
a.
L, h b.
Design de loads will function. 4
'l The voltage of each battery cell i.s within specified limits.
l c.
The battery charger float charge is within specified limits.
d.
l The battery charges properly.#
l e.
f.
Deri;r t-Ic;d; f r"* M.
Rev. 10, 09/82 u
I 4
3
['
DRAFT
~
_S
,S.
TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Page 2 of 63)
(F5AR b s.12) g h g.
All de loads operate properly.
System battery chargers supply system batteriesand thj h.
normal system load. T System de electrical power is available to all s l
i.
distribution panels..
l j.
System alarms operate properly.
(P2.2) 125/250 V de Safecuard Power System Test Obiective - The test objective is to demonstrate the ability V de safeguard power system to provide an 125/250 V de motor control of the 125/250 uninterruptible source of power to the centers and to various 125 V de distribution panels.
dq
~
Prereaufsites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls 'are
(-
Batteries are filled with electrolyte operable and calibrated.to normal level, and 440 V ac power is available to p The load resistor bank is available to to the battery chargers.
Battery room ventilation support the battery load capacity test.
is available and operational.
Test Method - The load capacity of the batteries without theThe battery c battery chargers is measured.
operation and their performance characteristics are determined.
[
System alarms and tripping devices are actuated.
6.3. 2.)
I (FSAe Acceptance Criteria Battery load capacity is acceptable.
a.
System battery charges both char ystem batteries and b.
supply normal system load, s avtilable to all system.
System de electrical pow c.
I distribution panels.
, System alarms operate properly.
d.
4.#
Rev. 10, 09/82
l LGS FSAR TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Page 3 of 63) 1 1
(P-3.1) 13.2 kV Unit Auxiliary Power System Test Obiective - The test objective is to demonstrate the capability of the 13.2 kV unit auxiliary power system to provide reliable electrical service to the 13.2 kV buses, which include feeder breakers for the 4 kV safeguard power system.
~
Prereaufsites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are Offsite power is available from both operable and calibrated.
125 V de control power is l
l the 220 kV and the 500 kV substations.
available and operational.
i
[
Test Method - The 13.2 kV unit auxiliary buses are energized from both offsite power sources, and alarms and control devices are actuated.
g(,J (bb e
t a)
Acceptance Criteria
~
System breakers operate properl.#
C-a.
L-System bus voltages meet acceptable values, b.
P System auto.ransfer circuits, operate proper 1 t
c.
Feeder breaker interlocks operate properly.
d.
System alarms operate properly. F e.
(P-4.1) 4 kV Safecuard Power System Test Obiectivet - The test objective is to demonstrate the capability of the 4 kV safeguard power system to provide reliable electrical service to the 4 kV buses.
Prerecuisites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are operable and calibrated.
The 13.2 kV power and 125 V de control power are available and operational.
Test Method - The.4 kV buses are energized, and system alarms and control devices are actuated.
a B.3, /. /. 2)
Acceptance Criteria System breakers operate properly. (Fs 9 R a.
Rev. 10, 09/82
DRAFT l{
(Page 4 of 63)
TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
~
FSAg e.. c.3 System bus voltages meet acceptable values.
b.
--1".\\ "i System auto transfer circuits operate properly. (FS ARG.3,/./.1) c.
Feeder breaker interlocks operate properl d.
System alarms operate properly.,
+p-e.
(P-5.1) Safeauard 440 V Load Centers Test Obiective - The test objective is to demonstrate the capability of the 440 V system to provide reliable power to the 440 V load centers and motor control centers.
Prereaufsites - To the extent necessary to perform this Aest, 4h construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are The 4 kV buses are available for operable and calibrated.
The 125 V de control energization of the 440 V load centers.
power is available for operation of the 4 kV switchgear breakers.
Test Method - Breakers are operated to energize the 440 V load centers and moto'r control centers.
System alarms and controls, both manual and automatic, are actuated.
"8' (YSW Acceptance Criteria System breakers operate properly.
a.
voltages.
l b.
System bus voltages meet accepta f
System alarms are operable.
c.
ggy (P-6.1) Safeouard 440 V Motor Control Centers Test Obiectives - The test objective is to demonstrate the capability of the 440 V motor control centers to provide reliable l
power to the. motor control centers panels and loads.
j Prereaufsites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are t
The 440 V Class IE load centers are operable and calibrated.available for energization of the 440 V motor control 125 V de control power is available for operation of the switchgear breakers.
Rev. 10, 09/82
DRAFT m,,,,,
k TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Page 5 of 63)
Test Method - Breakers are operated to energize the 440 V motor System alarms and controls, both manual and control centers.
automatic, are actuated.
( p3 g ).b g, 3, /, /,2)
Acceptance Criteria System breakers operate properly.
a.
voltag System bus voltages meet acceptabl b.
System alarms operate properly.
y c.
l-(P-7.1) Standby DC Lichtina System Test Obiective - The test objective is to demonstrate the ability E<
of the 125 V de standby lighting system to provide emergency lighting on loss of normal lighting power.
Prereaufsites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are Offsite ac power and'125 V de power are operable and calibrated.
available.
Test Method - The standby de lighting panels are energized fromT their normal ac supply.
and 125 V power is verified as an emergency lighting powerA source.
l
( p sa R t. f. 3, 2. 2)
Acceptance Criteria' l
System breakers oper' ate properly,.
a.
l System supply voltages are within specified lim s
b.
[
System auto-transfer devices operate properly.
,l c.
Adequate illumination exists for safe plant operationI l
d.
i (P-13.1) Fire Protection Water System Test Obiectives - The test objective is to demonstrate that the fire protection water system operates as designed, to supply fire
~
water to required areas.
c, -
Rev. 10, 09/82
DRAFT mS PSA-c TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Page 6 of 63)
Prerecuisites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are
{
operable and calibrated.
Sufficient water is available in the cooling tower basins to conduct the test.
Test Method - The fire protection water system is placed in
)
operation, and performance data are obtained for the diesel and System controls and alarms are actuated, electric fire pumps.
The including auto and manual initiation of system sprinklers.
transformer deluge is activated and the system hose reel and hydrants are operated.
\\M ^^
i
(, F 5 A R 4.r.n Acceotance Criteria c
System pumps meet acceptable head and flow value
,f a.
System automatic and manual initiation are operable.
gl b.
System sprinklers are operable.
c.
System hydrants and '4ose reels are operable.
1 f..
d.
System deluge siat* erns are acceptable.
e.
5 (P-13.2) Fire Protection Carbon Dioxide System l
Test Obiectives - The test objective is to demonstrate the capability of the fire protection carbon dioxide system to initiate CO, release to designated areas, as designed.
Prerequisites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, j
f construction is completed and instrumentation and controls are operable and calibrated.
Sufficient CO, is available for the required discharge tests.
Test Method - Automatic and manual initiations of CO, discharge are simulated.
Operation of dampers by CO, is verified.
Acceotance Criteria pgg l
System automatic and manual initiation are ope a.
' Damper operation is proper.6 b.
System alarms operate properly.
c.
l Rev. 10, 09/82
DRAFT
(~..,
LGS FSAR TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Page 7 of 63)
(P-13.3) Fire Protection Air Foam System 4
Test Ob"ective - The test objective is to demonstrate that foam can be cielivered as designed.
Prereaufsites - To the extent necessary.to perform this test, I
construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are The fire protection water system is operable and calibrated.
operable and capable of supplying sufficient water to the foam eductor.
Test Method - The air foam system is manually initiated, and foam is produced.
{pgg9 h Acceptance Criteria Systemmanualinitiationoperatesproperlyj 9, f, /. 2. b d
a.
System foam production is acceptablef' b.
(P-13.4) Smoke Detection System Test Obiectives - The test objective is to demonstrate the proper operation of the smoke detection system.
Prereauisites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are operable and calibrated.
Test Method - Smoke, fire, and trouble conditions are simulated, and system local and remote alarms and indication are verified.
(pgg,).)k=_.9.f./.2.f5 Acceptance Criteria FP 4 # )-
-- 2. //.)
" System detectors operate properly.
a.
System alarms and indicators operate properly) b.
l (P-13.5) Fire Protection Halon System Test Obiective - The test objective is to demonstrate the capability of the fire protection halon system to initiate a release of Halon to all floor sections, as designed.
Rev. 10, 09/82
I LGS FSAR TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Page 8 of 63)
Prereduisite,jg - To the ext'ent necess'ary to perform th.is test,
~
construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are operable and calibrated.
Sufficient Halon is available for the required discharge tests.
Test Method - Smoke and heat detectors are activated, andSystem is man automatic initiation is simulated.
Trouble conditions and proper Halon distribution is verified.
are simulated, and proper alarm annunciation is verified. }4
' Acceptance Criteria (FS p f.f./.2.7) l Smoke detectors actuate early warning alarms.
a.
lowed by Heat detectors actuate predischarge alar b.
automatic discharge after a time delay l
System automatic and manual. initiation are operable.,
c.
in specified l
Halon distribution to all fl y et h..
is wi d.
(
limits F I
l Systemalarmsoperateproperly/
e.
e.
(P-14.1) Reactor Enclosure Coolina Water System Test Obiective - The test objective is to demonstrate that the reactor enclosure cooling water system functions as designed.
Prereaufsites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, I
construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are The service water system is available operable and calibrated.
to provide cooling water for the system.
Test Method - The reactor enclosure cooling water system is placed in operation, and pump performance data are obtained.
l System controls and alarms are actuated.
(FS A R Acceotance Criteria
- 9. 2.e.2 )
System pumps meet acceptable head and flow values.
(
a.
System head tank level controls maintain tank level b.
properly.
System pump auto-start features are operable.P c.
a Rev. 10, 09/82
DRAFT
~
mS,==
TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Page 9 of 63)
(
The reactor, recirculation pump seal and motor oil cooler loaic circuits operate d.'
isolation valves ana thair properly.^
-(FSARf.2.8.h Flow is verified to each sys component e.
f.
System alarms operate p perly.
^ 2 ' O
- Y (FShR System Residual Heat Removal Service Water (RHRSW)
(P-16.1)
Test Obiective The test objective is to demonstrate that under normal and emergency conditions, the RHRSW system supplies j
cooling water as designed.
Prerequisites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls areRe k
I operable and calibrated.
are operable, and the spray pond has water to operate the i
The ESW system is available to support the pumps.
path for the pumps.
flow verification test, as applicable.
Test Method - The RHRSW pumps and their controls m're operated, System and flow is, measured for normal system operation modes.
automatic valve alignment is initiated for high radiation and i
operations are conducted.
The spray networks are visually pump start.
inspected for evenly distributed flow.
System alarms are also w 9, 2. 3. 2.)
actuated.
(F5AR Acceotance Criteria low values for System pumps meet acceptable head and a.
different system modes of operation.
System pumps in the standby mode auto-star; properly.
b.
System logic circuits operate properly.
c.
ol room and the remote System is operable from both the co k~
shutdown panel.
Remote shutd anel instrumentation d.
operates properly.
RHRSW crossties to the cooling towers and to the ESW system e.
pump circuits operate properly.
- f. 2. 7. d System alarms operate properly. ( FS A e f.
Rev. 10, 09/82
)
DRAFT
~
mS,S-TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Page 10 of 63) l All keylocks and, automatic features operate properly.
g.
( F 5 a R (P-17.1)
Instrumentation AC Power System 1.a. s. 9 Test Obiectives - The test objective is to demonstrate the capability of the instrumentation ac power system to supply electrical power to the 120 V ac instrument panels.
Prerequisites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are The 440 V ac power is available for operable and calibrated.
energization of the instrumentation ac panels.
Test Method - Breakers are operated to energize the instrument ac panels, and system alarms and control devices are actuated.
Acceptance Criteria I
System 440 V ac breakers operate properly (,C a.
System bus voltages are acceptableh(Ff A R >?. 3. /. /.1)$
b.
(
System ac electrical power is available to all syst mg j j "
distributionpanelsandinstrumentpanels.(g--. on-)
c.
~
hl (P-18.1) Instrument Air System Test Obiectives - The test objectives are to demonstrate the capability of the instrument air system to provide dry compressed air at the rated capacity.
Prerequisites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are l
Air dryer chambers are filled with operable and calibrated. desiccant, and turbine enclosure cooling water is
~
Test Method - The system is placed in operation both automatically and manually, and performance data are obtained.
Proper air distribution is verified.
System control devices and alarms are actuated.
i
~. -
Rev. 10, 09/82
-(.
TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Page 11 of 63) l Acceptance Criteria
~
temperature, and System compressors discharge pressure a.
capacity are within specified limits, b.
Compressor trips, inter 1 CkSe automatic start logic are 2
operable.;
content is Airdryercyclesareproper,andajrmoist c.
maintained within specified limits.
l System supplies air to each major distribution area.
d.
System alarms operate. (F 5 A R b' ^" f 3 4/. r) l e.
(P-23.1)
Diesel Generator Fuel Oil System q,1 i
Test Obiective - The test objective is to demonstrate that the diesel generator fuel oil system is capable of supplying fuel oil f.
to the standby diesel generator day tanks.
Prereaufsites
- fo the extent necessary to perform this test, r
construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are available and operational.
Adequate fuel oil is present in the diesel oil storage tanks.
Test Method - The diesel oil transfer pumps are operated, and performance data are measured.
System alarms and control devices are also actuated.
(F5AR)'h-ff'#'A Acceptance Criteria System pumps meet acceptable delivery capability.
a.
Automatic operation of the diesel oil transfer mps is b.
proper.-
Each diesel oil transfer pump.is capabl f supplying l
c.
any of the four diesel oil day tanks.
N ^ ~ 9' T. 4. f
~
System alarms operate properly. ( F s A R hu
(
d.
~
~s i
Rev. 10, 09/82
L i
l j
+
e o
c 5'
LGS FSAR TABLE 14.2-4i(Cont'd)
(Page 12 of 63)
I
'f f
l f
(P-24.1)
Standby Diesel Generator System j
Test Obiective - The test objective is to demonstrate the capability of the standby diesel generator system to provide reliable electric power to Class 1E buses.
Prereaufsites - To the ex' tent'necessary to perform this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are Emergency service water, diesel operable and calibrated.
generator enclosure HVAC, 125 V/dc power, fuel oil, and fire ESF protection are available for' diesel generator operation.
systems are available for operation during accident. response testing.
i Test Method - The diesel generators are started.>oth manually and Starting times and repetitive starting capability
. automatically.
Diesel generator and auxiliary systems are determined.
System protection alarms and controls s
performance is measured. System response to accident conditions is/
are also actuated. Diesel generator. synchronization to offset power and verified.
load transfer is verified.
8.1/./.Y/
',(FsAR Acceptance Criteria Each diesel generator is automatica11h started on simulated a rated voltage and a.
automatic actuation signalsj and leac frequency within an acceptable time, Electrical interlocks between the diese generators and their b.
associated 4 kV buses operate properly.
N i
Each diesel generator is capable of b op ediand started c.
ocations, -
manually from both local and r r carries rated loads for<specified. time d.
Each diesel ge periods.
Each diesel generator air starting system, fuel oil-sys' tem, and exhaust !
e.
oillubricationsystem,anditsa(rg+uppl
..f C, f. f. $ f. r, 7 systems operate properly. (F s A* 2 j
Te M
Each system breaker operates properly. (,Yd?
h B.3././. N '
f.
System alarms and logics operate properlyh(FS AR g.
h.
Each diesel generator operates pro y during. automatic load shedding and loading sequence.
Rev. 10, 09/82
~ -
DRAF'i'
~
'"' '"^"
TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Page 13 of 63) j
' Load shedding of non-essential load s during. accident s ub-8. 3. /. / 3 )
/
i.
conditions is verified. (F5 AR j.
Diesel generat ynch ization and load transfer operate properly.
Each diesel generator operates properly at full load ]
conditions, and temperatures are within specified limits.
k.
t (P-25.1) Primary Containment Instrument Gas System Test'Obiective - The test objectives.are to demonstrate the Jcapability of the primary containment instrument gas syst i;
l tion
.for containment services, and to demonstrate system iso a following a primary containment isolation signal.
dr Prereauisites - To the extent necessary to perform this Test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are The service water system is available operable and calibrated.
to provide the cooling water requirements of the system, as applicable.
s_
Test Method - The system is placed in operation automatically and manually, and performance data are obtained.
System controls and alarms are actuated, including operation of the systems i
containment isolation valves upon a simulated primary containment
~'
isolation signal.
System valves are realigned to utilize the backup containment instrument gas supply from the plant
,/
instrument air system.
Acceptance Criteria Systemcompressorsmeetacceptg"lgvaluesof) discharge 9.3 /3 a.
pressure and capacityg(F5 A R interlocks, and start logic are operable.
b.
Compressor trips,
" c. 2.
System isolation valves operate properly. ( Fi A R c.
7 7 ' #* #
- System alarms operate properly. (F5 A R d.
maintained within Gas temperature and moist g content e.
specified limits (FsAR
- f. 3. /.
l Redundant system components fail independently.
f.
u' Rev. 10, 09/82
'~
(
TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Page 14 of 63)
(P-28.1) Diesel Generator Enclosure HVAC System Test Obiective - The test objective is to demonstrate the
~
capability of the standby diesel generator enclosure HVAC system and temperature control to support diesel-to provide air flow, generator operation.
Prerequisites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, construction is completed and instrumentation and controls are Diesel generators are available for operable and calibrated.
full load operation.
Test Method - The fans are started automatically and manually. Sys System alarms are also actuated.and recorded while the diesel gene Heat removal capability is determined.
g load.
9' #*
F5AR Acceptance Criteria te properly.2 Each diesel gener~ator cell's unit heaters ope
,a.
Each cell's exha,ust fans operate properly.
b.
operating logic, Enclosure cell exhaust fan and dam, and standby operation, c.
including auto start, auto operates properly.
System alarms operate properly. (F 5 A R l' d.
l System heat removal capacity is within specified limits.
e.
Spray Pond Pumo Structure HVAC System (P-28.2)
Test Obiective - The test objective is to demonstrate the capability of the spray pond pump structure HVAC system to provide air flow and to respond to simulated room temperature variations.
Prerequisites - To the e: tent necessary to perform th operable and calibrated.
Test Method - The spray pond pump structure HVAC system is placed Enclosure temperature variations are simulated and system response verified.
System controls, logics, and alarms in service.
Rev. 10, 09/82
('(.
TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Page 15 of 63) l are actuated.
System parameters are monitored and recorded.
I Heat removal capacity is calculated.
( F 5 Pt R
+ 9 #' 7)
Acceptance Criteria Each system unit heater operates properly.
a.
b.
Each system supply fan operates properly.
]
I Supply fan and damper logic operates properly. r c.
#' 7' #)
d.
System alarms operate properly (F5(+R System heat removal capacity is within specified limits.
l e.
l 1
(P-30.1)
Control Enclosure HVAC System g
i Test Obiective - The test objective is to demonstrate the f,
capability of the control enclosure HVAC system to provide air l
flow and temperature control in the structure.
w Prerecuisites - To the extent.necessary to perform this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are Demineralized water and electric power operable and calibrated.
are available to provide the water and power requirements of the -
system. _ North vent stack and battery room exhaust fans are available for system operation.
l Test Method - Control structure temperature variations are simulated and system response verified.
The auxiliary equipment enclosure is purged, and system alarms and control devices are actuated.
System parameters are monitored and recorded for Heat removal capacity is systems cooling ESF components.For Unit 2 testing, only the emergency switchgear calculated.
and battery compartment ventilation equipment is operated, as the remainder of the control structure H&V system includes equipment l,
contained in Unit 1, or common to Units 1 and 2.
'i' #*
(FS A fl A'cceptance Criteria Systemfansoperateproperly.4 a.
b..
System unit heaters operate properly.
System auto-start featur an interlocks operate c.
properly.e Rev. 10, 09/82
DRAFT mS,SA.
(',
TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Page 16 of 63) s System fan and damper logic operates properly rf #* ^ f)
)6kw=
d.
System alarms operate properly. (F5hR e.
are Heat removal capacity of systems cooling ESF compo f.
within specified limits.t
+ 9 #'/)
~
~ (FSAR Control Enclosure Chilled Water System (P-30.2)
Test Obiective - The test objective is to demonstrate the ability of the control enclosure chilled water system to provide chilled h
water flow for. cooling the air supply to the control room, t e auxiliary equipment compartment, the emergency auxiliary switchgear and battery compartments, and the standby gas,.
treatment area.
Prerequisites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls areThe dem operable and calibrated.are available to provide the water requirement of the sy
/~
N.
7 Test Method - Chiller operation, chilled water circulation Flow paths are verified.
System alarms are and manual signals.
also actuated.
- f. 2. /8.1)
(,F 5 A It
^ ~
Acceptance Criteria s meet acceptable head and System circulation a.
discharge values.
System water chillers operate properly).
b.
Flow is verified to each system component.),21__,. =., o. s c.
System alarms operate properly. ( FSA R d.
(p-31.1) Computer System Test Obiective - The ' test objective is to demonstrate the proper operation of computer input / output logic.
Prerequisites - To the extent necessary for performance o
- test, and software is debugged.
Rev. 10, 09/82
DRAFT me re-c TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Page 17 of 63)
~
Test Method - Computer inputs are simulated and output indicators, alarms, etc are verified.
Y I
-E' Acceptance Criteria Computer outputs are operable.'
~'
a.
Computer peripheral hardware operate properly.
b.
(P-32.1)
Control Room HVAC System Test Obiective - The test objective is to demonstrate the capability of the control room HVAC system to provide air flow and to control temperature.
dl c Prerequisites - To the extent necessary to perform this"Eest, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are operable and calibrated.
Control room Test Method - The fans are placed in operation.
temperature variations are simulated and system response is
- s..
Contrb1 devices are actuated to automatically align verified.
the system and to maintain positive pressure within the control Room air leakage is measured and system alarms are also room.
actuated.
7 4*/
Acceptance Criteria (FSAR on h C 4)
System fans operate properly.
a.
System fan auto-start features and interlocks reoperablel b.
System fan and damper logic operates p cly.
c.
d.
System alarms operate properly.
Air leakage from co'ntrol room does not exceed design.
e.
l f.
Results of in-place filter testing are satisfactory.
Rev. 10, 09/82
([~
TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Page 18 of 63)
(P-32.2) Control Room Isolation and Purce System Test Obiective - The test objective is to demonstrate the capability of the control room isolation and purge system to isolate the control room from radiation or chlorine entering through the control room ventilation system and to purge the control room of smoke.
Prerequisites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, construction is completed, and' instrumentation and controls areThe following operable and calibrated.the control room supply and return air system and the operation:
control room emergency fresh air supply system.
Test Method - High radiation and chlorine conditions are simulated to verify the automatic isolation-of the control room.
55c The control room purge system is actuated and system response verified.
System alarms are actuated.
A I*
- /
i*
(FSAR Acceptance Criteria nt at a po'sitive The control room is. isolated and tion.#
a.
pressure dur'ing a high radiation con The control room emergency fresh air supply system automatically starts during a high radiation condition.
b.
The control room is completely isolated during a hig c.
chlorine condition. e
/
System purge mode operates properly.
d.
System alarms operate properly.
e.
l (P-33.1) Turbine Enclosure HVAC System Test Obiectives - The test objective is to demonstrate the capability of the turbine enclosure HVAC system tc provide air flow and temperature control in the structure.
r Prerequisites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are The instrument air, drywell chilled operable and calibrated.
water, and plant heating steam systems are available.
Rev. 10, 09/82
I 9
~
~
DRAFT mS.S-TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)~
(Page 19 of 63)
Test Method - The turbine enclosure HVAC system is placed in Enclosure temperature variations are simulated, and operation.
system response is verified.
System controls, logics, and alarms are actuated.
Acceptance Criteria (pggg d 9, p, 4)
System fans operate properly, a.
- b. ~ System fan and damper lo
- operates proper 1 c.
System coolin ils an temperature control valves operate properly.
d.
System hea ng coils and temperature control valves operate
- properly, System filter units operate properly."
(
e.
^
- f # ' #' N System alarms operate properly. ( 1:5 & R f.
b (P-34.1)
Reactor' Enclosure HVAC System Test Obiective - The test objective is to demonstrate the capability of the reactor enclosure HVAC system to provide normal air flow and recirculation mode air flow.
Prerequisites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are operable and calibrated.
The turbine enclosure north and south The standby gas vent stacks are available to support this test.
treatment system (SGTS) is operational.
Control devices Test Method - The fans are placed in operation.
are actuated to isolate the reactor enclosure, and the system is System alarms are also operated in its recirculation mode. Containment nitrogen inerting flow paths and con actuated.
are tested.
- 'N Acceptance Criteria
( 5AR System fans operate properly.
a.
Therecirculationsystemauto-starg'suponreceiptofa l
b.
reactor enclosure isolation signal.
m Rev. 15, 12/82 J
DRAFT c..
TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Page 20 of 63)
U~ 9. 4 0
,(psnR System fan standby features, interloIks, permis'sives, and 1
c.
auto-start circuits operate prope systemissh$tdownand 1 at d.
The reactor enclosure isolated properly.
System unit heaters and coolers operate proper e.
System steam flooding damper operation is proper.f. #. 2. 2. h f.
System alarms operate properly. ( FSg R g.
Nitrogen inerting system operates properly. A h.
l Reactor enclosure isolation logic operates properly.
i.
f Iter System filter units operate properly, and in-plac 6.fi.3)
/
efficiencytestresultsaresatisfactory.(psaR j.
l (P-34.2) Refuelina Area HVAC System e
Test Obiective - The test objective is to demonstrate the capability.of the refueling area HVAC system,to provide normal air flow and fuel handling accident mode air flow.
Prereauisites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls areThe turb operable and calibrated. vent stacks are available to support this test.
The standby gas treatment system (SGTS) is operational.
Control devices Test Method - The fans are placed in operation.are actuated to is System alarms are operated in its fuel handling accident mode.
0 f(.gra e W e. <. :
also actuated.
l Acceptance Criteria l
System fans operate properly.'
. a.
i erlo 'cs, permissives, and b.
System fan standby features, roperly.1 auto-start circuits operate tem is shutdown and c.
The refueling area v ilatio isolated properly.
l System unit heaters and coolers operate properly.
+-
d.
Rev. 15, 12/82
(
i.
TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Page 20a of 63) l
.*T. f. 2. 2. d System alarms o'perate properly. (Fi4 g e.
f.
Refueling area isolation logic operates properly.-
l System filter units operate properly, and in-place filter g.
efficiency test results are satisfactory.J h N - 9.4. 2)
($$sR (P-35.1) Fuel Pool Coolina/ Cleanup System Test Obiective - The test objective is to demonstrate the operability of the fuel pool cooli'ng and cleanup system.
Prerequisites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are operable and calibrated.
Makeup water from the demineralized water tank is available.
The RHR system is capable of supplying 4L,
water to system diffusers.
Test Method - System pumps are placed in operation and system C,'
flow paths are verified.
System controls are verified.
System filter cycles are verified.
- f. /. b Acceptance Criteria (FSB R System pumps meet acceptable head and flow values.
a.
System controls operate properly. A b.
Filter hold, precoat, and back controls operate properly c.
d.
Siphon breaker h the system return lines operate properly.
from Fuel transfer canal gates prevent excessive water los e.
the spent fuel pool when adjacent cavities are empty.
Rev. 15, 12/82
LGS FSAR TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Page 21 of 63) f.
0 -
l System alarms operate properly. (F5AA
^
f.
l (P-37.1)
Demineralized Water Transfer System Test Obiective - The test objectives are to demonstrate the ability of the demineralized water-transfer system to transfer water to and from the condensate storage tanks and refueling water tanks to various systems.
Prereaufsites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are
~
Demineralized water, plant heating operable and calibrated.
steam, and instrument air systems are operable.
Test Method - System is operated, and power operated valves areFlow is directed t do cycled both automatically and manually. Tank levels and temperatures are simul each flow path.
control system operation is verified.
- f. 2. d g
(FShg Acceptance Criteria specified limits.
l System pump's head and capacity are a.
l Pump trips and control logic are operable.
b.
l Power operated valves operate properly.
c.
atu controls operate d.
Condensate and refueling water properly. q l
Flow is verified through each major flow path.
e.
- f. 2. 7. d l
System a'larms are operable. (p y a n f.
l l
(P-39.1f Condensate Demineralizer System t
I Test Obiective - The test objective is to demonstrate the ability
(
l of the condensate demineralizer system to maintain makeup water chemistry and the ability of the precoat and backwash systems to l
operate properly.
Prereaufsites - To the extent necessa y to support this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are The condensate system is operable and lined up to operable.
recirculate water to the hotwells via the feed pump bypass and Rev. 10, 09/82 1
DRAFT
" " " ^ "
r ~.
TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Page 22 of 63)
The instrument air system and start'up recirculati-on lines.
Ref ueling" water pumps process sampling systems are operational.are operational, a refueling water tank to support this test. blower 10k105 is operatio operational with sufficient volume to support this test.
Test Method - The filter /demineralizer units are placed in Effluent water operation, and their controls are operated. Flow rates, flow controls, and flow purity is verified.
Manual and automatic precoat cycle balancing system is verified.
operation is verified for each vessel.
d
--3)
Acceptance Criteria ly) W Vessel cleaning and precoat cycles operate pro a.
of the proper Each demineralizer produces effluent wa g
b.
r quality. i The system flow balancin emoperatesproperly$
c.
d.
The cation an on feeders supply r to the pre : oat
^
tank.
s properly.
The precoat pump and the system hold pumps oper e.
System pneumatic valves operate properly.
roperly./
f.
s operate System controls, interlocks, and ala (p g g g h, so. 4. C) g.
l (P-41.1) Coolina Tower System Test Obiective - The test objective is to demonstrate the operability of the cooling tower chlorination system, sulfuric acid injection system, icing control system, and makeup water flow control valves.
Prerequisites - To the extent necessary to perform this test,
, construction is completed, and instrumentation.and controls are operable and calibrated.
The service water system, circulating water system, Schuylkill river makeup water system, Perkiomen Creek makeup water system, instrument air system, circulating water pumphouse domestic water supply, and the circulating water pump structure power roof ventilators are operational as required to support the test.
Rev. 12, 10/82 l
L
DRAFT LGS FSAR TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Page 23 of 63) l Test Method - The cooling tower chlorination system, sulfuric icing control system, and makeup water acid injection system, Each systems flow control valves are placed in operation.
response to simulated cooling tower conditions is verified.
i System controls logics, and alarms are operated.
h_
10, 4 - (
- bl Acceptance Criteria C(,p s A A e
m operates properly.3 l
The cooling tower c'hlorination s a.
b.
The cooling tower e r e acid
- ction cystem operates l
~'~' - -
^^^
properly.
l The cooling tower icing control system operates properly c.
Thecoolingtowermgkeupwaterflowcontrolvalvesoperate d.
g 10.e.$.2.)
properly. ( F S A R 1m System alarms operate properly. (F 5 Ait \\
- 80 4 f
- I I )
l e.
(
(
l (v L t=g~_j\\}\\
(P-42.1) Circulatina Water System n _.
Test Obiective - The test objective is to demonstrate that the circulating water system delivers cooling water to the main condenser as designed.
Prerecuisites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls areThe co operable and calibrated.the circulating water system is filled sufficiently to op The, main condenser is available to the circulating water pumps.
receive cooling water.
Test Method - The circulating water pumps and their controls are System flows and flow paths are measured and verified.
The waterbox scavenging pumps ar.d their controls are operated.
operated.
The main condenser fill and drain system is operated.
h _
se, q, f,1) l Kcceptance Criteria (pg gg a.
Circulating w pumps h and flow are within specified j
limits.
l b.
System automatic valves o ate properly.
c.
System control erlocks, and permissives operate l
properly.
Rev. 10, 09/82
LGS FSAR TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Page 24 of 63)
.i (F5APbA
,38.+.fl) 3 l
Waterbox scavenging pumps operate p operly.
d.
Main condenser drain and fill system o es properly l
e.
f.
Circulating water ypass flow is within specified s o. 4. r. l. T )
i limits.=-
l System alarms ~ operate properly. (F SA R y.
l g.
t (P-43.1) Condenser and Air Removal System i
Test Obiective - The test objective is to demonstrate the ability of the main condenser air removal system to both pull and hold a
\\
vacuum in the main condenser.
SI-Prerecuisites - To the extent necessary to perform this" test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are The main turbine is on the turning gear, with steam calibrated.
seals established.
Test Method - With the turbine on turning gear and necessary e
support systems ' operating, the mechanical vacuum pumps are used The steam jet air to pull a vacuum in the main condenser.
ejectors, using auxiliary steam, are then cut in to maintain a vacuum.
(FSAR h-b+ /0.f.1)
Acceptance Criteria The mechanical vacuum pump. pulls an acceptable vacuum.
a.
e vacuum.
The steam jet air ejectors mai.ntain an ac
/o.4.2.f) b.
System logics and alarms operate prop rly. (FF A R )b E --
c.
l d., System offgas isolation operates properly.
l (P-44.1) Condensate System l
Test Obiective - The test objective is to demonstrate both the ability of the condensate pumps to supply water to the feed system, and the proper operation of system controls.
Prerequisites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are operable and calibrated.
Rev. 10, 09/82
LGS FSAR TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd).
(Page 25 of 63)
E The feed system is available to provide a flowpath ba k to theTh Turbine have sufficient water to operate the condensate pumps.
enclosure cooling water is available.
Test Method - The condensate pumps and their controls are System flows and flow paths are measured and verified.
1 h
Automatic-pump minimum flow control as well as the ability of t e
~ operated.
makeup and reject system to control hotwell level isMajor valves a demonstrated.
ability to isolate sections of the system.
so.4.7.2l.[);
(F5 A R Acceptance Criteria
_=ht alues.
Condensate pump head and flow meet acc a.
ss es operate b.
Pump controls, interlocks, an
,-r 4
properly. m d valves operate properly System motor-opera c.
ves and logics operate properly.
d.
System makeup v ump recirculation flow meets acceptable Condensate e.
values.
38'9'7' I)
System alarms operate properly. (Fs A R f.
(P-45.1) peedwater System Test Obiective - The test objectives are to demonstrate the operability of the reactor feedwater pumps, their turbine drivers, and the feedwater control system, and to verify that the feedwater system functions to the degree that is possible withThe test that all feedwater instrument impulse lines connected to the RPV the limited steam available.
d are clear and properly routed and that instrumentation associate d
with these lines p'roperly responds to changes in the monitore system parameters.
Prerecuisites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls areThe R operable and. calibrated.All RPV instrument tubing has been filled, all instrum A source of vented, and proper valve lineup is verified.
demineralized water is available to fill the reactor pressure The reactor pressure vessel head is removed of the vessel.
10, 09/82 Rev.
LGS FSAR TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Page 26 of 63)
The l
vessel is adequately vented to preve t pressurization.
condensate system is available.for supplying water t,o the The auxiliary steam system is able to supply feedwater pumps.
The main condenser steam to the feedwater pump turbine drivers.
The service water is available to receive the turbine exhaust.
system is available to satisfy the system's cooling wate,r requirements.
Test Method - The feedwater pump turbine drivers are first After coupling and with the operated uncoupled from the pumps.
condensate system running, each feedwater pump is operated System separately, recirculating water back to the condenser.
controls and alarms are actuated, including operation of the feedwater pump minimum flow valves and the feedwater pump turbine Raise and lower the reactor pressure vessel lube oil system.
water level through the range of the reactor pressure vessel levels necessary to verify the proper tracking of each r.eactor Oc Feedwater control system inputs are vessel connected instrument.
Various inputs are simulated and output response to verified.
small and large signal changes is checked.
IC.4.7 2 N Acceptance Criteria (psaR The reactor feed pumps and turbi operate properly using a.
the auxiliary steam supply.
3 y J' b.
Reactor feed pump recirculation valves operate p Reactor feed pump turbine lube oil systems ope te properly.
c.
d.
Reactor feed pump seals operate properly.
Feedwater control system inputs are operable.e e.
Feedwatercontrolsystemresponseisproper}ogimtlatpd f.
small and large signal changes. Q/ _ W 7.Y.l. O AA. 6:ShR System motor-operated and air-operated valves operate g.
- properly, b.
System instruments d alarms operate properly.
(FsAR I c. 4.7 7 1.
Each feed pump and its as ciated feedwater ter can be r
sur he system.
isolated for maintenance wi J
j.
Feedwater control sys puts are proper during simulat d operation.
10.4. 7.2.
():S A p Rev. 10, 09/82
g L
L-
.a n
4, DRAFT mS FS-7.
TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Page 27 of 63) l (P-46.1) Extraction Steam and Feedwater Heater System' Test Obiective - The test objective is to demonstrate operability of the extraction steam and feedwater heater level control and automatic isolation systems.
Prerequisites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are operable and calibrated.
Test Method - Turbine trip and pressure signals are simulated, and automatic isolation valve and bleeder trip check valve Feedwater heater level signals are operation are verified. simulated to verify proper response pf drain valves, du Feedwater bleeder trip valves, and extraction line drain valves. System a,larms are d
heater dump and drain flow paths are verified.
actuated.
io. 2.2. h l
Acceptance Criteria (FFAn 1
Bleeder trip check valve closing time and extraction line drain valve opening times are within specified limits.
a.
l Valve interlocks and logic are operable. ;
b.
l l
System alarms operate properly.
c.
f (P-49.1) Residual Heat Removal System i
Test ob'ective - The test objective is to demonstrate that the RHR system delivers cooling water for each of the following system f
shutdown cooling, low pressure coolant J
modes of operation: suppression pool cooling, and fuel pool cooling.
injection (LPCI),
Prerecuisites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are The reactor pressure vessel (RPV) is operable and calibrated.available and filled with water above the minimum The recirculation loops are to provide suction to the RHR pumps.
complete to the extent required for system operation in theThe eme shutdown cooling mode.
The available to provide cooling water to the RHR pumps.
suppression pool is available and filled above the low waterThe fuel pool and level to provide suction to the RHR pumps. fuel pool skimmer su fuel pool cooling mode operation.
f Rev. 10, 09/82
DRAa LGS FSAR TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Page 28 of 63)
~
Test Method - The operating modes of the RHR system re initiated manually from the control room and remote shutdown p,anel and, where applicable, automatically.
RHR pump performance is determined for each mode.
System flow paths are verified.
The containment spray flow path is demonstrated by an air flow test that overlaps with the pump water flow path.
Adequate NPSH and absence of vortexing is verified over a range of suppression pool level from maximum to minimum calculated for 30 days after a LOCA.
System controls and alarms are actuated.
Watertight door gaskets and dogs are inspected and operated.
Room flood detectors are operated.
Acceptance Criteria (FSAp W. 7. 2. 2. k d v. 4. 7 a.
RHR pumps meet ac eptable valves of head and flow for system operating modes.
b.
System valves are operab e rom the control room, add all 4
keylocks operate prope y.
The system operat properly to provide supplemental fuel Ci pool cooling.
d.
The system operates properly in the shutdown cooling mode, I
The system operates properly in the suppression pool cooling e.
mode. (,ps A 8 3.#
r.1.1. l. f)
Lf.
The system operates properly in the LPCI mode. (FS A R
/
- 7...,.. N Head spray valves and logic operate prc,perly.
g.
h.
Steam condensing valves and logic oper te properl.
l i.
Containment spray valves and logic erate properly. ( F S A R
.r. 2. u. s. 4 j.
The RHR room flood detector oper es properly k.
System alarms operate properly.
1.
The condensate transfer system and he safeguard piping fill pumps are each ag.bleofmaintinigfullRHRpumpdischarge
. d. 7. 2. 2. 6 lines. (,ps* R a
m.
Remote shutdown pan
. mentation and controls operate properly.
k System overpressure protection interlocks operate properly.
l n.
Rev. 10, 09/82
(gs
[
TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Page 29 of 63) l NPSH is within specified limits, and no vortexing is presen o.
( d L'.J 3l]
Watertight doors exhibit a full seal when dogged d g
p.
l (P-50.1) Reactor Core Isolation Coolino System Test Obiective - The test objective is to demonstrate the operability of the RCIC system.in delivering water to the reactor vessel and to verify proper separation of the RCIC DC components by observing the effect of disconnecting the RCIC DC bus on RCIC operation.
Prereaufsites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are The condensate storage tank and g'
operable and calibrated. suppression pool are filled above the low water level to and auxiliary steam is available to supply suction to the pump, steam to the RCIC pump turbine driver.
Test Method - RCIC system operation is initiated from'the control room and remote shutdown panel by manual and automatic start signals.
Pump and turbine performance is. verified.
System controls and alarms are actuated.
During system operation, disconnect the RCIC DC bus and verify inoperability of the RCIC Adequate NPSH and absence of vortexing is verified over system.
a range of suppression pool levels from maximum to minimumWatertight door gaskets a calculated for 30 days after a LOCA.
dogs are inspected and operated.
Room flood detectors are operated.
(PSA R )
- a I. 4 4 d 7. % /. h Acceptance Criteria The RCIC turbine controls and logic operate properly.
a.
eir The RCIC pump and turbine operate properly usi-b.
auxiliary steam supply. 7 matic initia ion logic.o erate c.
System manual an properly.
properly.M b d.
The RCIC room flood detector ope t
System alarms operate properly.
e.
s results in inoperability of the f.
Securing of the RCIr RCIC system. #
Rev. 10, 09/82
TABLE'14.2-4 (Cont'd)
" 4. 4. 4 M 7. 4. /. /)
_(y:3gn nel instrumentation and control operate g.
Remote shutdo properly.
resent.
l NPSH is within specified limits, and no vortexing is h.
own
(
Watertight doors exhibit a full seal when dogged
\\
i.
Full flow and minimum start time criteria are not demonstrated until nuclear steam it available during the power test program.
(P-51.1)
Core Spray System l
Test Obiectives - The test objective is to demonstrate that the core spray system delivers water spray to the reactor core.
d4
~
Prereaufsites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, f
construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are The condensate storage tank and the operable and calibrated.
The RPV suppression pool are filled above the low water level.
- i. -
head is off, and,the vessel is available to receive water from the core spray system.
Test Method - Core spray system operation is initiated and pump flow rates are measured in the various design modes of operation.
System controls and alarms are System performance is verified.The safeguard piping fill system is operated an actuated.
Adequate NPSH and absence safeguard piping leakage is monitored.of vortexing is verified over a ra from maximum to minimum calculated to 30 days after a LOCA.
- 7. 3. 3. I - }.
Acceptance Criteria (FSR R U r-6. 3. 2. 2. 3 The core spray pumps meet acceptable head and flow val s.
a.
b.
System manual and automatic initiation is proper.
System motor-operated valvas operate properly, c.
d.
The core spray room flood detector ope properly.
f Systems" alarms operate properly.
e.
f.
Safeguard piping fill pumps opera properly and keep core spray discharge piping full.
l Rev. 10, 09/82
DRAFT LGS FSAR TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Page 31 of 63)
(py gg & g, y, 1, 2,3 4 7. 3. /. /. l. 3 )
g.
The condensate transfer s em is capable of maintaining full core spray discharge 1 es.
h.
Total leakage fr all feguard piping fed by the safeguard piping fil
.ps does not eed the capability of the fill
- pumps, i.
Core spray flow rates from the suppression pool to the reactor vessel are set to meet acceptance criteria by adjusting the size of the spray line discharge orifice.
l j.
System overpressure protection interlocks operate properly.
l k.
NPSH is within specified limits, and no vortexing is present l
(P-52.1)
Hioh Pressure Coolant Iniection System Q
Test Obiective - The test objective is to demonstrate that the HPCI system delivers cooling water to the RPV as designed.
Prerecuisites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are' operable and calibrated.
The condensate storage tank and the suppression pool are filled above the low water level to provide suction to the pump.
The auxiliary boiler is available to provide steam to the HPCI pump turbine driver.
Test Method - With the HPCI pumps uncoupled, performance of the turbine driver is measured, including operation of the turbine control and trip system.
Limited pump operation (coupled) is conducted for all modes of operation (to the extent possible using auxiliary steam).
System performance is determined.
System controls and alarms are actuated.
Adequate NPSH and absence of vortering is verified over a range of suppression pool levels from maximum to minimum calculated for 30 days after a LOCA.
Watertight door gaskets and dogs are inspected and operated.
Room flood detectors' are operated.
Acceptance Criteria (FMR C.1. /. 2. /
eA*t.1././././)
a.
The HPCI turbine controls and logic operate properly.
b.
The HPCI pump and turbine operate properly using th auxiliary steam supply.e i
c.
System auto-start, shutdown, and restart occur properly.
d.
Manual operation of system components is acceptable.
Rev. 10, 09/82
_ _ _. ~.
~ _ _
~
DRAFT mS
,S.
TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Page 32 of 63) g, 3, t. 2. } & 1,0. l.1 L lh
- gg9, Controls affecting the transfe of HPCI pump suction water e.
supplies operate properly.
The HPCI room flood detector ope ates properly f.
System alarms operate properly.
g.
m and a safeguard piping fill h.
The condensate transfer s pump are each capabl maintaining a full H (V
g l{
mp discharge line.
l is presen.
l NPSH is within specified limits, and no vortext i.
l Watertirjht doors exhibit a full seal when dogged do i
k j.
nstrated Full flow and minimum start time criteria are not until nuclear steam is available during the st up test-program.
g,
.\\"
(F5 A R g,, 2. 2., a. /. / d 99 (P-53.1)
Standby Liould Control System d.3.2,2./.1)
Test Obiective
.The test objective is to demonstrate the operation of the standby liquid control system.
l Prerequisites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are 3
The reactor pressure vessel is operable and calibrated.
The standby liquid available for demineralized water injection.
control tank is filled with demineralized water.
Test Method - The standby liquid control system is manually placed in operation to the reactor in conjunction with the test System performance is firing of each squib operated valve. including pump flow rates and tank heater determined, System controls and alarms are actuated.
Acceptance Criteria The standby liquid pumps meye ceptable valyes of flow and gc M. J, /. /A).
a.
discharge pressure. (y 5 RR The standby liquid control tank temperature is controlled b.
properly.
System manual initiation, both local and remote, operates c.
properly.
d.
System al ms op e properly.
psea W u.n Rev. 10, 09/82
DRAFT
~
mS,SA.
TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Page 33 of 63)
- e.
For each train, the connected explosive valve ope s and the simulatedsquibfuseblowsintheunconnectedvalvecircui,tQ b (F5AW (P-54.1)
Emeroency Service Water System g,y,f)
Test Obiective - The test objective is to demonstrate that the ESW system supplies cooling water to safeguard equipment as designed.
Prerequisites - To the extent necessary for performance of this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls f
are operable and calibrated.
The cooling tower basin is operable, and the spray pond is at its normal operating level to provide water for the ESW pumps.
The heat exchangers served by this system are available to provide a flow path for the pumps.
Applicable portions of the RHRSW system are operable to support g-the flow verification test.
(
Test Method - The ESW system pumps are started manually and l~
automatically.
System controls in the control room and the remote shutdown station are operated and pump flow rates are measured.
System alarms are also actuated.
- 7. 2, 2 d I(,FSAW7.3./. A #)
Acceptance Criteria System pumps meet acceptablg ' head and flow values for the a.
various design flow paths. r System pump auto-start features operate properly.)
b.
c.
System valves, controls and instru' mentation are c able f om both the control roo~m and the remote shutdown el; all keylocks and valve automatic features oper properly.
d.
System alarms operate properly.
(P-55.1)
Control Rod Drive Hydraulic System Test Obiective - The test objective is to demonstrate that the control rod drive (CRD) hydraulic system, inc1,uding CRD mechanisms, hydraulic control units, power supply, instrumentation, and controls, meet acceptance requirements.
f Prerequisi.tes - To the extent necessary to perform this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are operable and calibrated.
The condensate transfer and storage Rev. 10, 09/82 l
TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Page 34 of 63)
~
)
system, and the reactor manual' control system are a'vailable and The turbine enclosure operational to support the system test. cooling water system is availa The cooling water requirement of the drive water pumps.
compressed air system is available and operational to provide the instrument air requirements of the system.
Test Method - The CRD hydraulic system is placed in operationPump controls utilizing the flow and pressure control stations.
Control rod drives are are operated and flow rates measured. exercised to verify latching, po Scram times are measured for each control rod.
. speeds.
(FSAR N w
- ' d ##3 Acceptance Criteria ply and discharge sections supply water ow and pressure to the hydraulic control 4
/
a.
The CRD hydrauli 1
at acceptab units.
Each hydraulic control unit op rates properly to drive its b.
control rod at proper speeds.
3
]
J Position-indication and latching o erate properly.7 c.
i d.
System alarms operate properly.
(P-56.1)
Reactor Manual Control System Test Obiective - The test objective is to demonstrates proper operation of the reactor manual control system, including relays, I
indicating lights, and control circuitry; switches, rod blocks, control valves; and proper operation of the rod worth minimizer and the rod sequence control system.
Prereauisites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls.are operable and calibrated.
Test Method - System integrated operation is initiated manually.
Controls are operated, and simulated signals are applied to rod blocks; alarms and interlocks and control functions verify:
of the reactor mode switch; operation of the rod positionand directional information system and rod drift alarm circuit; control valve time sequence for insert and withdraw commands.
Proper operation of the rod worth minimizer and rod sequence control system are verified utilizing actual control rod manipulations.
Rev. 10, 09/82
~
DRAFT mS TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Page 35 of 63) hI A
^
~
Acceptance Criteria The system operates I; operly during both insert and a.
withdrawal cycles. r b.
Rod block functions interlocks, bypasses, and indications meet design intent.
c.
Rod position indication is operab e.
d.
System alarms operate properly.
(P-57.1)
Uninterruptible ac Power System '
Test Obiective - The test objective is to demonstrate the proper Q
(
operation of the uninterruptible ac power system.
l Prerequisites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, construction is completed and instrumentation and controls are operable and calibrated.
The 125/250 V de and 440 V motor control center buses are available for energization of the 120 V uninterruptible ac distribution panel.
Test Method - The 120 V uninterruptible ac ciistribution panels are energized from the 440 V ac power system and transfer to the 125/250 V de power system is initiated.
Other system controls and alarms are also actuated.
(V b 74 Acceptance Criteria g,.,
System static inverters 6 properly while supplying a a.
design value of load.
b.
System static inverter tr nsfer time betgey-alternate and preferred sources is acce table. (,FS A R - --
"T2.l.I3) c.
System 440 V ac and 125/25 breakers operate prope System bus voltages are acceptable /.
d.
e.
System ac electrical p e
is il le to all system distribution panels. ( _ y _.g 7eyp) l l
l Rev. 10, 09/82
DRAFT
\\
i TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Page 36 of 63)
(P-58.1)
~
(
i Test Obiective - The test objective is to demonstrate that the j
reactor protection system (RPS) operates properly during integrated system functions.
Prerecuisites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are operable and calibrated.
Test Method - The various RPS sensors, sensor relays and devices will be actuated and timed to designated points along the scram RPS response measurements will be run twice for chain logic.
each channel.
The plant operating technical specification trip set points will be demonstrated at least one time by actual 1
application of an input to the sensor / device or stroking an at '
associated value to actuate position switches as appropriate.
(ps g g ) k, 7,s)
Acceptance Criteria am function signals cause trips within design
~
a.
System inpu values.
b Systemactuatedlogicsoperateproperly.Ei b.
Scram modes and bypasses operate.pr rly.'
c.
rom sensor actuation d.
Response time of the scram c through initiating logi 90% r insertion is within design values.
System indicators and alarms operate properly.
e.
(P-58.2) Redundant Reactivity Control System for ATWS Test Obiective - The test objective is to demonstrate proper i
I operation of the redundant reactivity control system logic and to verify proper response in those systems it affects.
J Prerequisites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are The following systems are available for calibrated and operable.
standby liquid control; RCIC; control rod drive; operation:
reactor recirculation; average power range monitors; feedwater; The reactor vessel, condensate storage tank, and HPCI and RHR.
suppression pool are filled with demineralized water.
Rev. 10, 09/82
DRAFT
~
LGS FSAR TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Page 37 of 63)
Test Method - The ATWS logic is operated manually and also automatically by using simulated reactor vessel water level and steam dome pressure signals.
APRM power level will also be Where appropriate, signals from the RPS will be simulated.
inhibited to allow independent demonstration and redundancy Resultant actions of verification of ATWS logic and results.
recirculation pump trip, alternate rod insertion, and standby liquid control start will be verified.
Manual operation or operating limit reset of a system while under the influence of an ATWS logic signal will be demonstrated as appropriate.
\\k 'I' d * #* O Acceptance Criteria F54#
System sensing devices, t systems.r-egd actuator logics a.
operate and trip within design limits. r b.
System alarms and indications operate erly.
g c.
System' logic and its a n other systems is independent and redundant.
4 fP-5L 1)
Containment Isolation and Nuclear Steam Supply yhutoff System Test Obiective - The test objective is to demonstrate that the primary containment isolation and nuclear steam supply shutoff system actuates the isolation valves following simulated primary containment isolation signals.
Prereaufsites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, construction is completed and instrumentation and controls are operable and calibrated.
Isolation valves actuator trip relays are placed in untripped condition.
Primary containment isolation valves are operable.
Test Method a The actuator trip relay for each isolation valve is operated using simulated signals as necessary to create a trip condition.
The actuator trip relay then operates the corresponding isolation valve.
System alarms are also actuated.
e 7. 3. /. /. 2)
.l(FS&R Acceptance Criteria System sensing devices, trip syste and actuator logics a.
operate and trip within design limits.
Closing times for valves c1 sed by this system are within b.
acceptable values. ( F S A R
_-bs G.2.4[)
Rev. 10, 09/82
4 r
LGS FSAR TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Page 38 of 63)
" 7-E /*
System alarms operate properly.(F S A 8t c.
Primary Containment Inteorated Leak Rate Test l
'\\
(P-59.2) pm Test Obiective - The test objective is to determine the leakage rate in the primary containment at the peak calculated accident pressure and to determine the-bypass leakage from the drywell to the containment at the peak drywell to wetwell differential In addition, the l
pressure and reduced differential pressure. test will verify the proper con L
containment pressure instruments.
Prereaufsites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, l
construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are
[
The Type B and C testing has been gg
- operable and calibrated.
The integrated completed in accordance with Chapters 6 and 16. leakage rate All containment pressure instruments have been calibrated and are I
valved into service.-
Test Method - The containment is pressurized, and the absolute pressure, dry bulb temperature, and dew point temperature (water vapor pressure) within the containment and the drywell are The containment is recorded to determine the leak rate.
depressurized, the drywell is pressurized to reduced test pressure, and data are taken to determine the drywell bypassAs co leakage rate.
containment integrated leak rate test, proper tracking of all containment pressure instruments is verified.
-' G. 2, 6 )
l Acceptance Criteria (FS A R e
The primary containment d drywell bypass leakage rates are
,j All within acceptable limits, in
- rf;r.;;....
s...y containment instruments track properly, and all affected instrument lines are clear of obstructions.
- (P-59.3) Suppression Pool, Pool Cleanup and Vacu'um Relief Test Obiectives - The test objective is to demonstrate the operability of the suppression pool cleanup and vacuum relief system, the suppression pool level instruments, and system valves.
Rev. 10, 09/82
~
DRAF:T mS,s^"
TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Page 39 of 63)
Prequisites - To the extent.necessary to perform this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are operable and calibrated.
The suppression pool is sufficiently full of water and the condenser hotwell is available.
Test Method - The suppression pool cleanup system is operated, and the pump flowrate measured.
The suppression pool level is varied, and the operability of the pool level instruments is verified.
Primary containment vacuum relief valves and pressure instruments are also operated.
Acceptance Criteria a.
The suppression pool cleanup pump meets acceptable head and flow values.(\\/e4 spedifica-tios) b.
Primary c ntainment vacuum relief valves operate properly.
's F5AR secTay3 '7 3. 2.6. l. Q c.
System mo or-operated valves operahe properly.
(FsaR MCnord to 4.2.')
(
d.
Suppressionpoollevel.instrumentsoperateproperly.(
System alarms,operateiproperly.(FsR(t S ECT1ord G. 3. 2. 2. M e.
f.
Containment pressure indicators used to track accident conditions operate properly.( p39, sec_7io,3 g,5,j,f,2.,,j}
l (P-60.1)
Drywell HVAC System l*
Test Obiective - The test objective ir to demo'nstrate the operability;of the primary containment ventilation system.
Prerequisites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are l
operable and calibrated.
Chilled water flow balancing is complete.
Drywell air balancing is complete.
Test Method - The ventilation system fans and chillers are operated.
Controls and alarms are actuated.
Acceptance Criteria Drywell unit coolers and fans operate properly. (F5GR
- f. #. f.1 a.
(,
b.
Drywellichilled water circulation pumps operate properlyj Drywell water chillers operate properly. (FS A R w f.2./0.
c.
U
/
Rev. 10, 09/82
a DRAFT mS,S.
~
TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Page 40 of 63) d.
System isolation and control valves operate pr
' System alarms operate properly.
N h n 9. 2. /O. /
e.
(p$gg M T*
- I' N (P-61.1) Reactor Water Cleanup System Test Obiective - The test objectives,are to demonstrate the operability of the reactor water cleanup (RWCU) system and to verify that the system functions properly.
Prerequisites - To the extent necessary for performance of this construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls 1
- test, are operable and calibrated.
The demineralizers are precoated, The reactor as required, and ready to process system flow.
enclosure cool.ing water system is available to satisfy the g
system's cooling requirements.
Test Method - The recirculation pumps are operated and their Data are obtained performance characteristics are determihed.
during demineralizer cleanup, backwash, and precoat operations.
j System controls and alarms are actuated, including operation of the system isolation valves.
Simulated signals are used as required.
(preR kAa f#8)
Acceptance Criteria System pumps meet acceptable values of head and fl a.
b.
Filter precoat and backwash cycles operate pr erly.
Systemisolationvalvesoperateproperlyf)
}
p1m c.
d.
System flow circuits operate properly, h;_d System alarms operate properly, e.
(P-62.1) Reactor Vessel and Auxiliaries y
L' Test Obiective - The test objective is to detect damage,
' excessive wear, loose parts, or other evidence of unacceptable vibration which could result from assembly errors or undesirable t,
deviations from the previously qualified. prototype plant construction.
l
~
l f
DRAFT m,,,A, TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Page 41 of 63)
This t'est is a quality assurance-measure which experimentally confirms the absence of excessive vibration of core s.upport structures, jet pumps, lower plenum components, and other major The test is conducted without fuel, and is internal structures.
not intended to be a test of fuel or incore instrument vibration.
However, the specified test conditions, without fuel present, provide a level of vibration excitation of major internal structures which is at least as high as that measured in normal power operation.
To the extent necessary to perform this test, all Prerequisites:
l reactor internals components are installed, except:
The core matrix is empty; there are no fuel assemblies, a.
incore instrumentation tubes, or neutron source rods.
Fuel Control blades are withdrawn or not installed.
support castings are installed.
k<
b.
The dryer assembly need not be installed.
One of the access hole covers on the shroud support c.
plate must remain unwelded until after the test to l
provide access for inspection.
A temporary closure must be provided.
The reactor vessel is closed, filled, and ready for The recirculation pumps are operable.
RHR pressurization.
system pumps are operable to provide necessary temperature rise.
The CRD system is operable to control reactor vessel pressure.
Clean-up system heat exchangers are' operable for temperature l
control.
Test Method - A visual inspection is made before and after the These flow runs include 35 hours4.050926e-4 days <br />0.00972 hours <br />5.787037e-5 weeks <br />1.33175e-5 months <br /> required 100% speed pump runs.
The of two-loop operation and 14 hours1.62037e-4 days <br />0.00389 hours <br />2.314815e-5 weeks <br />5.327e-6 months <br /> each for loops A and B.
total run time is 63 hours7.291667e-4 days <br />0.0175 hours <br />1.041667e-4 weeks <br />2.39715e-5 months <br />.
These hours may not be sequential, but they must be between the initial and final inspections.
Acceptance Criteria Initial and final inspection results are acceptable. ( FS A R l
3.T. 2. 4 (P-64.1) Reactor Recirculation Syste'm Test Obiective - The test objectives are to demonstrate that the reactor recirculation system components function properly, and to Rev. 10, 09/82
A 9
DRAFT
~
seS t'^"
TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Page 42 of 63) demonstrate the flow performance of the system to the degree possible prior to fuel loading.
Prereaufsites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, l
construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are The RPV is available and filled with l
operable and calibrated.
demineralized water above the minimum level required for reactor recirculation pumps operation.
The reactor building cooling water system and drywell chilled water system are available to provide the cooling water requirements of the pumps.
Test Method - The recirculation pumps are operated at various speeds while corresponding pump flow rate.and head The system is tested by characteristics are determined.
individual and group operation of the pumps, motor-generato~r (MG) sets, valves and controls.
System interlocks and alarms are actuated, using simulated signals as required.
j
), k.,4f. #,
Acceptance Criteria (p3gg Q r;'7,1.3)
Recirculation pumps meet acceptable value of head and a,
flow for various motor input freque'ncies.
System flow instrumentation operates properly.
b.
Recirculation pump isolation valves ope properly.
c.
System alarms are operable. #'"
d.
System control logic operates pr rly..
S e.
l f.
MG sets operate properly.
MG sets' lube oil system operates properly.
g.
l (P-65.1) Radwaste Enclosure HVAC System i
Test Obiective - The test objective is to demonstrate the ability of the radwaste enclosure HVAC system to provide' air flow and equipment maintain temperature control in the radwaste enclosure, compartment, service and control, and fume hood areas.
Additional objectives are to demonstrate the ability of the l
charcoal vault cooling system to maintain temperature control in 2, and 3, and the ability of the radwaste charcoal vaults 1, enclosure HVAC system to maintain positive air flow from clean areas to areas of increasing potential contamination.
Rev. 10, 09/82
a O
DRAFT TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Page 43 of 63)
Prerequisites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are The plant heating steam system, operable and calibrated.
instrument air system, and drywell chilled water system are operational.
Test Method - System fans and filter units are placed in The
. System controls and interlocks are operated.
operation.
charcoal vault cooling system and controls are operated.
System temperature control valves response to temperature controls are verified.
System alarms are activated.
f* N l
Acceptance Criteria (95 AR System supply and exhaust f ans ope ate [ ly.}
l l
a.
b.
System temperature cont es respond to temperature d-contcols.,
c.
System filter units opera properly.
l d.
Supply and exh an controls and interlocks operate properly. V l
The charcoal vault cooling system operates proper y.
j e.
Compartment differential pressures are maintained.I
-l f.
~ M. 'J. f )
l' System alarms operate properly. (, F s A R g.
(P-66.1) Reactor Enclosure Unit Coolers Test Obiective - The test objective is to demonstrate the capability of the reactor enclosure unit coolers to provide cooling air flow to the reactor core isolation cooling (RCIC),
residual heat removal (RHR), and high pressure core spray (CS),
coolant injection (HPCI) safeguard pump compartments.
i Prerequisites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are The emergency service water system is operable and calibrated. Applicable portions of the HVAC air balancing test operational.
I are completed.
Test Method - The unit coolers are placed in operation.
Pump compartment temperature variations are simulated and system response is verified.
Unit cooler component interlocks are l
t Rev. 10, 09/82 l
DRAFT
'"" '"^"
TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Page 44 of 63)
The emergency service water system is operated verified.
throughout the test, and automatic initiation of cooling water flow to the unit coolers is verified.
System alarms are verified under actual or simulated conditions as practicable.
System parameters are monitored and recorded for systems cooling ECCS i
equipment.
Heat removal capacity is calculated.
)da 9. #.2 )
Acceptance Criteria (p$
a.
The unit coolers operate proper
./
b.
The unit coolers aut rt' features and interlocks
~
both the automatic and standby operate prope modes.
t The unit coolers respond properly to tempera re c.
variations within the respective pump co rtments.
QL,
l f
d.
Cooling water flow is initiated w ver the applicable I
unit cooler is energized.
System alarms operate properly.
e.
(P-66.2) - Control Enclosure Unit Coolers Test Obiective - The test objective is to demonstrate the capability of the control enclosure unit coolers to provide cooling air flow to the standby gas treatment system (SGTS) room and access.
Prereaufsites - To'the extent necessary to perform this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are operable and calibrated.
The control structure chilled water system is operational.
Applicable portions of the HVAC air balancing test are completed.
Test Method - The unit coolers are placed in operation.
SGTS r.oom and access temperature variations are simulated and system Unit cooler component interlocks are response is verified.
verified.
The control structure chilled water system is operated and automatic initiation of chilled water flow to the unit coolers is verified.
System parameters are-recorded, and heat removal capacity is calculated.
l l
Rev. 10, 09/82 l
/
a LGS FSAR TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Page 45 of 63) f Y' Acceptance Criteria (fg3R operateproperlyintheRUN,AbTO,andSTBY a.
The unit coo modes.
Chill water inlet v Ives open when their associated unit b.
cooler fan starts.r Chill water pumps start whene er one of the unit are operable from both the control room a the remote shutdown panel; c.
coolers they supply starts.
n their associated. unit cooler d.
SGTS access dampers open fan starts. su-er heat removal capacity is within specified e.
SGTS unit co limits.
gg,
c (P-68.1) Solid Radwaste System Test Obiective -,The test objective is to demonstrate the operability of the solid radwaste system including the radwaste solidification system.
Prerequisite - To the extent necessary to perform this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are operable and calibrated.
Demineralized water is available.
~
Test Method - The solid radwaste system is teste8 with actual, nonradioactive, representative waste streams, which include backwash resins from reactor water cleanup, fuel pool cleanup, The system is tested to ensure that i
and condensate cleanup.
these representative waste streams can be processed from their l
respective collection tanks through the phase separators, Major operations verified in centrifuges and drumming process.
the test include the ability to mix sludge / resins and water in the backwash and sludge tanks to produce transportable mixtures, use of the phase separator tanks to concentrate sludge and resins by the decanting process prior to discharging to the centri.fuges
~
and high integrity containers.
.hsgq hkm //. d Acceptance Criteria System pumps' operate properly an&' arc able tn = %.e a.
contents of tanks and to transport slurry mixtu es.r
[
b.
System alarms and controls operate properly.
Rev. 10, 09/82
4 4
1SPSA.
DRAFT 4'
TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Page 46 of 63)
System components (e.g., centrifuges, tank agitators, c.
transfer carts, radwaste crane, etc,) operate proper 1 rements as d.
System discharge' product meets chemical re
' identified in Chapter 11. M ff u-
~
l (5s h R
// #)
i (P-69.1) Equipment Drain Collection and Storace System l
Test Obiective - The test objective is to demonstrate the ability of the equipment drain system to collect, store, and transfer potentially contaminated low conductivity liquid wastes.
l Prereaufsites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are i
operable and calibrated.
EE.
3 Test Method - System pumps are operated in' both manual ind i
automatic modes.
Power operated valves are cycled in both manual and automatic modes.
System alarms are verified by using actual or simulated conditions, as practical.
Containment isolation signals are initiated to verify valve interlocks.
Sumps fitted with positive ex,haust connections are smoke-tested.
a 9. 3. 3)
//.2)
Acceptance Criteria 4e System pumps operate satisfactorily.f a.
b.
System pumps operate in b'oth manu nd automatic modes.
System power operated operate in both manual and c.
automatic modes.
d.
Containment isolation valve interlocks o erate Sump exhausts draw room air into sump.
l e.
l f.
System alarms operate. A" I
(P-69.3) Liould Radwaste System l
Test Obiectives - The test objectives are to demonstrat'e the ability of:
The equipment drain subsystem to transfer and process a.
potentially contaminated low conductivity liquid wastes.
Rev. 10, 09/82
DRAFT mS, -
TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Page 47 of 63) b.
The flow drain subsystem to collect, transfer, and process potentially contaminated high conductivity liquid wastes.
The fuel pool filter precoat and backwash system to clean and c.
precoat both the equipment drain and floor drain filters.
d.
The chemical waste subsystem to collect and transfer corrosive liquid wastes.
The laundry drain subsystem to collect, transfer, and process e.
liquid detergent wastes.
Prerequisites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are operable and calibrated.
System filters have been precoated and system demineralizers have been loaded with resin.
ik e Test Method - The liquid radwaste system is operated with representative nonradioactive waste influent.
Equipment and subsystems to be tested include equipment and floor. drain System pumps are processing, chemical waste, and laundry drains.
operated in both manual and automatic modes.
The fuel pool l
precoat and backwash syster. is operated to clean and precoat both the equipment drain and the floor drain filters.
System alarms are verified by using actual or simulated conditions where practical.
The effluent of each filter and demineralizer is Power sampled to ensure'that it is of acceptable quality.
operated valves are cyc. led in both manual and automatic modes.
/41) dl(F5AR
"'1" Acceptance Criteria System pumps operate satisfactorily.r a.
modes b.
System pumps operate in both manual and automat eans and Fuel pool filter precoat and backwash syst c.
oor drain filters.
precoats both the equipment drain ves operate in both manual automatic d.
System power opera modes.
l e.
The equipment (d floor drain subsystems produce condensate quality water.
f.
The laundry drain subsystem produces wate cceptable quality to discharge to the environment, Contents of the chemical waste tank can be mixed and g.
neutralized prior to discharge for processing.
i Rev. 10, 09/82
~ DRAFT TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Page 48 of 63)
System alarms operate. ( F 5 A I
--BN h.
(P-70.1)
Standby Gas Treatment System (SGTS)
Test Obiective - The test objective is to demonstrate the capability of the SGTS to function properly.
Prerequisites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are The reactor enclosure H&V system and operable and calibrated.
the turbine enclosure vent north stack are available and j
operational to support the system test.
l Test Method - The secondary containment is isolated, and the SGTS is started automatically by a simulated refueling atea or reactor enclosure isolation signal.
The SGTS and secondary containment QL
- isolation performance is determined by measuring secondary containment pressures, system pressures, and fan air flow rates.
System controls and alarms are actuated.
-- 4 e f*. /. / A 7' 3 * #* /* 7
(_( 1: 5 A R \\-
Acceptance Criteria System fans, both singularly and in combina
- ons, rovide a.
acceptable values of flow thru the syst
- 11ters, b.
Fan interlocks, auto-start utdown features, and damper logic operate properly.
System filter units operate pr<
erly, and in-place efficiency c.
test results are satisfactory.'l d.
System alarms operate properly.
(P-72.1) Gaseous Radwaste Recombiners and Filters Test Obiective - The test objective is to demonstrate the
, operability of the gaseous radwaste system.
I Prerequisites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are operable and calibrated.
Nitrogen and auxiliary steam are
(
available as required.
Service water and reactor enclosure 1
cooling water are operable, and the turbine enclosure ventilation stack is available for discharges.
i 5
Rev. 15, 12/82 I
~
TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Page 49 of 63)
Test Method - System recombiner and charcoal treatment trains are operated and their performance is verified.
N. 3 )
Acceptance Criteria (psag
~
iner and charcoal treatment trains operate a.
System reco properly.
b.
System controls and alarms operate prop (P-73.1)
Containment Atmosphere Control System Test Obiective~- The test objectives are to demonstrate the ability of the contais. ment atmosphere control system to provide accurate analysis of containment oxygen and hydrogen content and g-to demonstrate the operability of the hydrogen recombiner The actual hydrogen-oxygen recombination process is packages.
not demonstrated at this time.
Prereaufsites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are operable and calibrated.
Test Method - The combustible gas analyzer packages are operated and system flow rates determined.
Gas samples containing known concentrations of oxygen and hydrogen are introduced into the system to verify proper response of the gas concentration indicating and recording equipment.
The hydrogen recombiner system is operated, and system flow rates determined.
Sy' stem controls and alarms are actuated.
, k, _. 9, y, n /)
Acceptance Criteria p
a.
System atm control isolation valves operate properly.
Containment hydrogen recom iners meet acceptable values b.
of flow and temperature.
System hydrogen / oxygen analyzers o erate properly.
c.
d.
System alarms operate properly.
Rev. 10, 09/82
F
~
A LGS FSAR TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Page 50 of 63) l (P-76.1) Process Samplino System
\\
Test Obiective - The test objective is to demonstrate the ability of the process sampling system to provide various process samples with adequate flow indication to installed analytical monitoring equipment and grab samples stations.
Prerecuisites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, f
construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are operable and calibrated.
Test Method - Each sample station is operated and grab samples Chemical fume hoods and the turbine are drawn as available.
enclosure sample station drain recovery tank pumps are operated.
System alarms are actuated.
0-e // d l
~
Acceptance Criteria (FSAR l
c Sample lines are unobstructed.
~
a.
j l
b.
Grab' sample valves operate prope y.
c.
The turbine enclosure sam station drain recovery tank pumps operate properly.
l d.
The chemical fume-hoods operate prop ly.
l I
l System alarms operat'e properly.
l e.
(P-78.1)
Startup Rance Detector Drive Control and Neutron Monitorino System
. Test Obiective - The test objective is to demonstrate the operability of the startup range neutron monitoring (SRM) system which includes both source and intermediate range neutron monitoring equipment.
Prerequisites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, f
construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are operable and calibrated.
l Test Method - Each source and intermediate range detector is f
positioned from its fully inserted position to its fully retracted position to demonstrate the operability of the l
insert / retract mechanisms.
Using simulated input signals, each source and intermediate range detector loop is tested to Rev. 10, 09/82
~
LGS FSAR TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Page 51 of 63) j demonstrate meter indication, trip circuit operation, retract and insert permissives, associated rod block signals, and alarm operation.
((FsnR
-- 7.7.2.4)
Acceptance Criteria The startup range drive system is capable po]stioning a.
each detector through its full length ravel.r l
l b.
Startup range neutron flu el and rate circuits indicate properly.
Startuprangetripsignalsoperateproperly].
c.
d.
Startup range selector switch.1 ic and insert / retract permissives operate properly.
e.
Startup range rod o
als are generated per design. r
(
f.
System alarms operate properly.
(P-78.2)
Power Rance Neutron Monitorina System l
Test Obiective - The test objective is to demonstrate the i
operability of local power range neutron monitoring (LPRM) and the average power range neutron monitoring (APRM) systems.
Prerequisites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are operable and calibrated.
Test Method - Each LPRM channel is tested using simulated signals to its tripping, alarm, or indicating function.
Each APRM channel is tested for its tripping, alarm, or indicating function using simulated signals from the LPRM.
Simulated recirculation flow signals are also utilized to provide the bias for varying the rod block and trip set points.
Simulated signals are used to t'est the rod block monitor outputs.
Acceptance Criteria
(,F 5 A R
- 7. C. /-
a.
The local power range eutron flux circuits operate properly and are capabl of providing signals to the APRM system, the rod bl ek monitor subsystem, the l
process computer, and LPRM system indicating meters and auxiliary devices.
Rev. 10, 09/82
mS ;S R DRAFT TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Page 52 of 63) b.
LPRM and APRM system trip signals operate properly.
Average power range power level circuits o e c.
properly.t d.
System alarms operate properly.
I e.
Rod block monitor outputs operate.
7* s A N C(p5AR
__a-l P-78.3)
Traversing Incore Probes (TIP) Calibration System Test Obiective - The test objective is to demonstrate the operability of the traversing incore probes (TIP) calibration system and to verify the system functions properly.
~
EL.
l Prerequisites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are l
operable and calibrated.
The primary containment instrument gas is available, as required, for purging the system.
Test Method - Verification that the system operates in the manual, automatic, and hand crank modes.
Indexer cross-calibration interlock, shear valve control monitor, TIP automatic detector withdrawal, containment secure and squib circuits verification, ball valve control, ball valve-open interlock, and purging operations are conducted.
System manual and automatic controls and alarms are actuated and the ability to override automatic functions is demonstrated.
[ 7. / 6. 3 )
Acceptance Criteria (FSAR La Le a.
The automatic and nual modes function in the correct designed sequence.
b.
System drive mecha 'sms, including position indication, and the drive i clocks and time delays operate properly.
s-c.
System signal channel, yadicators, recorders, and alarms operate prop ly.f d.
The system i ing mechanism and its interlocks operate properly.
7 The system automatically withdraws th4 detectors on a e.
containment isolation signal, after which the containment isolation valves close. /
l l
Rev. 10g 09/82
TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Page 53 of 63)
(P-79.1) Area Radiation Monitorino System Test Ob"ective - The test objectives are to demonstrate that the area racliation monitoring system is operable and has correct high and low and alarm settings.
Prerecuisites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are operable and calibrated.
Test Method - Verification of the area radiation monitoring I
system capability is demonstrated by the integrated operation of the channel trip units, local and remote alarm annunciators, lights,'and recorders.
The site-environ radiation monitoring stations are tested for Unit 1 only, as this equipment is common to both Unit 1 and Unit 2.
b - 7.7.l.10)
Acceptance Criteria (pggg
~
a.
Each area ra tion monitoring channel 6perates properly.
s b.
Each arda radiation nito ing channel high and low trip set point is set perly.s c.
Each monit responds properly to its internal check source.
~$
d.
The indicator and trip units properly in t iate their respective indicators, alarms, and horn.f Each trip circuit produces an alarm on interruption or e.
failure of the ac power supply.
(P-79.2) - Process Radiation Monitorina System Test Obiective - The test objectives are to demonstrate that the process radiation monitoring system is operable and has the capability to detect a gross release of fission products from the fuel.
Prerequisites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are operable and calibrated.
Rev. 10, 09/82
LGS FSAR TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Page 54 of 63)
Test Method - Verification of the process radiation monitoring system's capability is demonstrated by the integrated operation of the channel trip units, alar = annunciators, and lights and recorders.
Test signals are fed into the monitors at the control modules.
7' 7* I * '
)
Acceptance Criteria (FiAR
^1 Each process radiation monitoring channel operates prop rly.
a.
b.
The indicator and trip units properly operate their respective indicators and alarms.,
c.
As applicable, each monitor nds properly to its secondary check source.
d.
Provides trip signals to initiat<e a reactor shutdown and EE -
containment isolation on detectipn of a gross release of fission products from the fuel.T
' (P-80.1) Reactor Vessel Instrumentation System Test.Obiective - The test objective is to demonstrate that the reactor nonnuclear instrumentation and loose parts monitoring systems operate properly to provide trip, indication, and alarm information.
Prerequisites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are operable and calibrated.
Relays that are initiated from the
' reactor vessel level and presssure sensors are placed in untripped condition.
Test Method - Simulated signals are introduced into the reactor nonnuclear instrument loops and proper trip, alarm, and indication outputs are verified.
Loose parts monitoring sensors are actuated, and system response is verified.
Acceptance Criteria a.
System indications and trips operate properl.
b.
System alarms operate properly.
G( s s e W_ -4 4. c. \\ J 77.l.1)
Rev. 10, 09/82
~
DRAFT
~
" ' ' ' ^ "
TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Page 55 of 63)
(P-81.1) Fuel Handlino System Test Obiective - The test objective is to demonstrate that the refueling platform and the various servicing tools can be used for their intended operations.
Prerequisites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are operable and calibrated.
The reactor manual control system, fuel
~
pool, and the reactor cavity and core structure are available for testing.
Dynamic and static load tests of fuel handling equipment are completed.
Test Method - The fuel servicing equipment, refueling equipment, j
and servicing aids are operated.
Their associated controls and alarms are actuated.
(,PSGR )
S /* 4 }
Acceptance Criteria a.
The fuel preparation machines operate proper
.2 b.
The refueling platform operates properly./$
hk" Refueling interlocks and logic operate prop rly.(FI A R,,r.i.<)
c.
d.
Fuel position indicators operate properly.
(P-83.1) Main Steam System Test Obiective - The test objective is to demonstrate th'e proper operation of the main steam system, including the main steam isolation valves (MSIVs), the leakage control system, and the automatic depressurization system.
Prerequisites - To.the extent necessary to perform this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are operable and calibrated.
Primary containment instrument gas and instrument air are available to operate the main steam line isolation valves and safety / relief valves.
Test Method - The main steam isolation valve leakage control system's valves, blowers, heaters, and controls are operated.
System logic, valve times, and flows are verified and measured.
The HSIVs are stroked and timed in their various modes.
The automatic depressurization system is functionally checked without Rev. 10, 09/82
LGS FSAR TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Page 56 of 63) lifting pressure relief valves.
Other main steam' system controls and alarms are actuated.
f Acceptance Criteria
_(pgag h \\- h s,W,f) a.
The MSIVs s operly in the manual mode (fast and f
slow).
j 1
i b.
The MSIVs' automatic closure is within acceptable times.
properly. (FS &ft
_- h ications, aqd alarms operate MSIV control logi ind l
c.
T 3, 1,1, b)
The MSIV leakage control system operates properly, valve d.
times are as specified and system flows are acceptable. (,F{ 94 ntrol circuits f,7g -
Nuclearsystempressurer{1gefvalves e.
operate properly.(Fs a R. --
- f. 3. 3.
am line flow ponitors operate properly.
M f.
The mai s
(FsAP
~ 7. 2. /, /. 2. )
7.1, /. /. 7 (P-83.2) Automatic Depressurization System Test Obiective - The test objectives are to demonstrate the operability of the automatic depressurization system' and to verify system response to signals from the logic channels.
Prerecuisites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are operable and c'alibrated.
Test Method - High drywell pressure and low reactor water level l
signals are simulated and system response to the logic channels is verified.
7* 'I' /* /* /*
Acceptance Criteria FSAR a.
ADS channel A respyds properly to signals from logic channels A and E. /
T
.b.
ADS channel C respo ds erly to signals from logic channels C and G. f The core spray and residual h at removal pump permissive c.
interlocks function properly.
J'. 2.1 d.
ADS valves operate properly. (FS& A
--u-Rev. 10, 09/82
LGS FSAR TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Page 57 of 63)
Systeminstrumentsandalarmsoperateproperly.(FSAR e.
9, 3. l.l. l. L (P-83.3) Steam Leak Detection System Test Obiective - The test objective is to demonstrate that the steam leak detection system is operable and that system instruments have the correct trip and alarm net points.
I Prereaufsites - To the extent necessary to co.nplete this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are operable and calibrated.
Test Method - System temperature changes are simulated at the system control sensors.
Capability of system instrumentation to respond to temperature changes and alarm set points is verified.
qt The generation of isolation signals to the channel trip units is verified.
Acceptance Criteria FKAR
- le 2.
A
- r. 4.1. 3) a.
System temperature monitors operate properly.
b.
System alarms and indicators operate pr y.
c.
Isolation signals are genera y the applicable circuitry to the nucle eam supply shutoff system (NSSSS), the hig ssure coolant injection (HPCI)
I system, and reactor core isolation cooling (RCIC) system.
'(P-85.1) Cathodic Protection System l
Test Obiective - The test objective is to demonstrate the capability of the cathodic protection system to maintain buried steel piping and structures at the design electrical potential.
Prereaufsite - To th'e extent necessary to perform'this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are operable and calibrated.
Test Method - The cathodic rectifiers are operated and voltage, current, and resistance measurements are made.
1 l
_ _ _._ _.._ _ ___ _ _ _ _..___ _ _ _ _ Rksm_ jU56_f@/[flfL_
I e
LGS FSAR ua TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Page 58 of 63) l Acceptance Criteria l
The electrical potential of buried steel piping and a.
structures is maintained within specified limita d b.
The cathodic rectifiers operate properly.
7 l
l v
m, 2)
(P-85.2) Freeze Protection and Heat Trace Systems l
Test Objective - The test objective is to demonstrate the operability of the freeze protection and heat trace systems.
Prerequisites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are operable and calibrated.
g, Test Method - Each freeze protection and heat trace system is operated.
Control setpoints are varied, and system response is verified.
System alarms are actuated.
Acceptance Criteria l
The freeze protection and heat trace systems energize and a.
de-energize in response to the thermostatic contro1p b.
System alarms operate properl l
T l
(P-91.1) Plant Annunciator Systems Test Obiective - The test objective is to demonstrate the ability of the plant annunciator systems to provide both audible and visual indications of an alarm condition.
Prerecuisites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, construction is completed and plant annunciator panels are operable.
Test Method - Annunciator panel test devices are operated.
Alarm contacts are jumpered to demonstrate annunciator perability.
hd m --b
\\-
l Acceptance Criteria a.
The main control room annunciators opera roperl l
b.
The radwaste control room annunciators operate properly.'
l Rev. 10, 09/82
4 w
mS,SJ DRAFT TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Page 59 of 63)
(P-93.2) Main Turbine Control System l
Test Obiective - The test objective is to demonstrate the ability of the electrical-hydraulic control (EHC) system to operate che turbine-generator.
Prerequisites - To the extent necessary.to perform this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are i
operable and calibrated.
The hydraulic fluid reservoir is filled with EHC fluid.
~
Test Method - The hydraulic system is placed in operation and alarms, trips, and control devices are actuated.
(psg h hm 7 7. l.I
- 88. N l
Acceptance Criterla
- c. ',
a.
Hydraulic' system pressur ets acceptable values. (V. s M l
~
U h.
q- - ' -
~
b.
Valves operate properly.r l
~
h c.
System alarms operate properly.
l d.
System trips operate properly.
l (P-93.3) Main Turbine Supervisory System l
t Test Obiective - The test objective,is to demonstrate the ability of the turbine supervisory system to monitor the operation of the main turbine and the reactor feedpump turbines.
Prereauisites - To the-extent necessary to perform this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation is operable and calibrated.
Test Method - Signal inputs are simulated in the turbine supervisory system, and recording equipment and alarms are actuated.
Acceptance Criteria l
Instrumentationoperatesproperly.(V IE m J )'
l
^^
a.
b.
System alarms operate properly.
l (Fsn R N= M h Rev. 10, 09/82
e
~
DRAFT mS
,S.
TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Page 60 of 63) i (P-99.1)
Reactor Enclosure Crane Test Obiective - The test objective is to demonstrate the capability of the reactor enclosure crane to safely move expected loads within the reactor enclosure.
Prereauisites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, l
construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are operable and calibrated.
Construction proof testing as identified in Section 9.1.5 has been completed.
Test Method - The crane is used to maintain its nominal rated load in a static position.
Test loads are lifted and travel limits, as well as hoist, trolley, and bridge travel speeds, are measured.
System controls and alarms are actuated.
- f. /. f Acceptance Criteria (FSA#
m The crane load capacity is within specified limits.
l a.
b.
Crane controls, a s, ( limits operate properly. _-
,I Crane protective devices and interlocks operat roperly.1 l
c.
d.
Equipment safety devices operate properly.
l (P-99.2) Seismocraphical Monitorina Svstem l
Test Obiective - The test objective is to demohstrate the ability of the seismographical monitoring system to measure and record seismic data.
Prereaufsites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, i
construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are J
operable and calibrated.
T'est Method - Earthquake conditions are simulated by applying a physical force to the seismic sensors.
Automatic system operation is verified.
Acceptance Criteria l
T -- ^
Peak acceleration recorders operate properl.h W.J } l a.
b.
Strong motion accelerographs operate properly l
Rev. 10, 09/82
c.
TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Pa
.1. *7. 4)
(C R
Seismictriggersoperateproperly.\\,sh l
c.
v d.
Magnetic tape playback system operates roperly.
l e.
Response spectrum analyzer operate properly.
l i
f.
System alarms operate properly.
l (P-99.3) Public Address and Evacuation System l
Test Obiective - The test objective is to demonstrate the ability of the public address and plant maintenance / test jack systems to 1
transmit voice comr..unication and the plant evacuation alarm and river warning systems to broadcast various alarms and prerecorded messages to selected areas.
g Prerequisites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, construction is completed, and equipment is operational.
i Test Method - Each public address station is operated in both the page and party line modes.
Station-to-station voice transmittals are made from each station in the plant maintenance / test jack 1
system.
Evacuation alarm and river warning signals are simulated, and system operation is verified.
(,F S A 2 1-f* #'
l Acceptance Criteria a.
The public address system is erable from all stations in the page and party line modes.=
3 All public address speakers operate properly I l
b.
c.
The plant maintenance / test jack system operates properly.
l d.
The evacuation alarm system operates properly.
l e.
The river warning system operates proper l
f '.
The evacuation alarm system auto tran er power swi ch operates properly.-
,ggg,g (P-100.1)
Loss of Offsite Power Test Test Obiective - The test objective is to demonstrate that the plant systems are capable of operating as expected on an Rev. 10, 09/82
Y e
I.
' '.11.
0MMl'f' LGS'FSAR TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Page 62 of 63) integrated basis in normal, surveillance, and emergency modes, and thus are ready for fuel loading.
Prerequisites - Selected preoperational tests are performed prior to or concurrent with operation of equipment for the cold functional test.
Test Method - Plant operating procedures are utilised, to the extent practicable, to place plant systems in service on an integrated basis for normal, surveillance, and emergency modes.
The standby diesel generators are operated in all possible combinations, in response to simulated loss of power, and loss-of-coolant accident conditions.
d Equipment patameters are allowed to stabilize for each operational combination, and any abnormal conditions are investigated.
Equipment not under test is monitored to. verify 4-the absence of voltage.
l Acceptance Criteria a.
Integrated system performance, h
tgntpassplyduring the test, is,satisfactor.
(
b.
System electrical and mechanical issatisfactoryf l
(P-100.2) Loss of Instrument Air l
Test Obiective - The test objective is to demonstrate the design response to a loss-of-instrument-air accident of components supplied by the system.
Prerecuisites - To the extent necessary to perform this test, construction is completed, and instrumentation and controls are operable and calibrated.
Cooling water is available to meet the requirements of the system.
There are no essential plant systems operating that will be affected by performance of this test.
Test Method - The system is placed in operation, and components to be tested are placed in a position other than the failed position.
Instrument air is shut off in a manner that would simulate an instrument air pipe break and the loss of instrument air by moisture freezing and plugging the main supply line.
Movements of the affected components and adequacy of feeders to i
share the decaying air supply are verified.
The test is rerun with the components in their normal operating position.
1 Rev. 10, 09/82
LGS FSAR TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)
(Page 63 of 63)
I. h P 'T I Y,
T Acceptance Criteria l
Proper movement of affected components is verified.
a.
l b.
Feeders or branches sustain an adequate share of e decaying air supply as required by the operational mode.
(P-100.3) Mechanical Snubber Testino l
Test Obiective l
l l
1 The test objective is to verify adequate pre-service examination i
to mechanical snubbers on all safety-related systems.
Prerequisites l
All pre-installation, installation, and post-installation inspections have been performed on mechanical snubbers by g'
designated inspection organizations.
Test Method l
.l l
Verify through document review that all inspection activities have been completed, verified, and signed.
Reviews will be made by system, and additional visual inspections will be made if original inspections are performed more than 6 months prior to initial heatup of the system.
--' I
- f* 2 M 3) l Acceptance Criterie
():5AR a.
There are no visib signs of damage.or impaired operability as a result of stora
, h=adling, or installation. D w
b.
Location, orientation, position setting, nd configuration are according to design drawings and spe fications c.
Snubbers are not seized, froz Jammed.#
l d.
Adequate swin arance is provided to allow snubber movement.
e.
Structural connections such pins, fasteners, and other
~
connecting hardware such as lo k nuts, tabs, wire, cotter.
pins are installed correctly.
If inspections for items a and d are performed more than 6 months i
l prior to initial system heatup, reverify and document.
Rev. 17, 02/83
f i
~,.
DRAFT j(,
LGS FSAR TABLE 14.2-3 (Cont'd)
(Page 12 of 24)
(SUT-16) Core Power Distribution Test Obiectives - The test objectives are: to demonstrate the reproducibility of the traversing incore probes (TIP) system readings, to determine the core power distribution in three dimensions, and to determine core power symmetry.
Prerequisites - The core is at' steady-state power level with equilibrium xenon.
It remains in this condition with no control rod motion or change in core flow until completion of the TIP j
traces.
Test Method - The rod pattern and all APRM system and LPRM system readings are recorded.
TIP reproducibility is checked with the plant at steady-state condition by producing several TIP traces in the same location, with each TIP machine.
The traces are evaluated to determine the extent of deviations between-traces Q
from the same TIP machine.
Core power distribution, including power symmetry, is obtained during the power ascension program.
Axial power traces are obtained at each of the TIP locations.
Several TIP systems have been provided to.obtain these traces.
A common location can be traversed by each TIP chamber to permit intercalibration.
The results of the complete set of TIP traces are evaluated to determine core power symmetry'.
l I
Acceptance Criteria - The TIP system error level is within the specified limits.
Core power distribution in these dimensions and core power symmetry are within specified lim'itsy (SUT-17) Core Performance Ye=
T Y'
^
Test Obiective - The test objective is to evaluate the principal thermal and hydraulic parameters associated with core behavior.
Prerequisites - The plant is operating in an essentially steady-j s, tate condition.
Test Method - With the core operating in a steady-state condition, the core performance evaluation is used to determine the principal triermal and hydraulic parameters associated with core behavior.
These parameters are: core flow rate, core thermal power level, MAPLHGR, maximum local linear heat i !-
generation rate (MLHGR), core minimum critical power ratio (MCPR), and MFLPD.
I Rev. 10, 09/82
e y p g p: e a bP
(
TABLE 14.2-3 (Cont'd)
(Page 13 of 24) l(
Acceptance Criteria - The principal thermal and hydraulic parameters associated wi h core ebaviqr meet appe ria el V
T
- 1. 11 11 1 -
1) calculated limits.( A d m
'TM h-r' b (SUT-18) Flux Response to Rods Test Obiective - The test objective is to demonstrate the stability of the core local power-reactivity feedback mechanism l
with regard to small perturbations in reactivity caused by rod movement.
Prerequisites - The core is maintained in a steady-state condition prior to starting of this test.
Test Method - The control rod and LPRM systems are selected.
Rod I
movement tests are made at chosen power levels, and LPRM response data are gathered.
These empirical data are evaluated to determine the local core dynamic effects, resulting from. rod q-movement.
.I-Acceptance Criteria - The decay ratio must be within acceptable tolerance for each process variable that exhibits oscillatory response to control rod movement.
(SUT-19) Pressure Reculator Response Test Obiectives - The test objectives are:
to demonstrate the l
reactor pressure control system responses to pressure regulator set point changes, the stability of the reactivity-void feedback loop to pressure perturbation, the control characteristics of the bypass and control valves, and the takeover capabilities of the i
backup pressure regulator; and to optimize the pressure regulator c
settings to give the best combination of fast response and small I
overshoot.
Prerequisites - Fuel loading is completed and nuclear steam is available.
Test Method - The pressure set point is decreased rapidly and then increased rapidly by about 10 psi.
The response of the system is measured in each case.
The backup regulator is tested by increasing the operating pressure regulator setpoint rapidly, until the backup regulator takes over control.
The load l
reference set point is reduced, and the test is repeated with the j;
bypass valve having control.
The response of the system is measured and evaluated, and'the regulator settings are optimized.
Rev. 10, 09/82
DRAFT
~
TABLE 14.2-3 (Cont'd)
(Page 15 of 24) water level scram following the trip of oni feedwater" pump.
The feedwater pumps and urkine driyer perform within specified -
limits. G Q T
)
.'LLN (SUT-21) Main Steam Isolation Valves (MSIVs) Performance Verification Test Obiectives - The test objectives are: to functionally check the MSIVs for proper operation at selected power levels; to
)
determine reactor transient behavior during and following simultaneous full closure of all MSIVs, and following closure of one valve; and to determine isolation valve closure time.
Prerequisites - Fuel loading is c'ompleted, and nuclear steam is available.
4-
~
Test Method - Functional checks (10% closure) of each isolation valve are performed at selected reactor power levels.
A test of simultaneous full closure of all MSIVs is performed at about 100%
,(~
of rated thermal power.
Operation of the RCIC and safety / relief valves is shown.
Reactor process variables are monitored to l
determine the transient behavior of the system during'and l
following full isolation.
The MSIVs closure times are determined.
Acceptance Criteria - MSIV closure times are within applicable limits.
Reactor pressure is maintained below specified values during the transient following full closure of all MSIVs.
-(SUT-22) Main Steam Relief Valves (MSRVs) Performance Test Obiectives - The test objectives are to demonstrate proper I
operation of the dual purpose MSRVs; to determine their capacity; and to demonstrate their leaktightness following operation.
i Prerequisites - Factory calibration data are verified, and j
setting adjustment mechanism factory seals, if applicable, are intact.
The reactor is on pressure control with adequate bypass or main steam flow.
Test Method - The MSRVs are opened manually so that only one is opened at any time.
The capacity of each MSRV is determined by the amount the bypass or control valves close, to maintain
.('
reactor pressure.
Proper resetting of each MSRV is verified by l
observing temperatures in the MSRV discharge piping.
Rev. 10, 09/82
n,.
~
TABLE 14.2-3'(Cont'd)
(Page 16 of 24) l Acceptance Criteria Each NSRV compdres favorably wi'th the italue assumed in the accident analysis at design reactor pressure.
Following the capacity test,' the*1eakage of each MSRV is low enough to allow the temperature noasured by the thermocouples, in the discharge side of the valves, to fall within an acceptable j
margin of the temperature recorded, before the valve was opened.
\\
a.
(SUT-23) Main Turbine Valves' Surveillance Test j
l Test Obiective - The test objective.is to demonstrate acceptable procedures for routine surveillance testing of the turbine stop, control, and bypass valves at a power level as high as possible, without producing a reactor scram.
Prerequisites - The main turbine is operational, and the power testing program is.in progress.
g Test Method - The individual turbine valves are closed at several points along the 100% power flow control line, to establish the
(.
maximum possible power level for performance of this test, without producing a reactor scram.
Turbine bypass valves are l
opened and flow is measured.
~
Acceptance Criteria - With the plant at power anC testing in progress, peak neutron flux, is at a value below the scram setting.
Peak reactor pressure is at a value below the high-pressure scram setting.
Peak steam flow in tha main steam i
lines remains at values below the high flow ' isolation trip setting.
Turbine bypass valve flow capacity compares favora ly withthevalueassumedin.the'accidentanalysis.g 1-
)
s.Ap)
(SUT-24) Shutdown from Outside the Main Control Room Demonstration l
i Test Obiective - The test objective is-to demonstrate that'the l
' power plant can be safely shut down from outside the control 1
l room, to demonstrate that the power plant can be maintained in a hot standby condition from outside the control room, and to demonstrate that the power plant can be safely cooled from hot standby to cold shutdown conditions from outside the control room.
l l.
Prerequisities - P,reoperational testing of plant instrumentation, i
controls, and systems to be used at the remote shutdown station have been completed.
Fuel loading is completed, and the power l
ascension testing _ program is in progress.
1 Rev. 10, 09/82
7; 1
{'
TABLE 14.2-3 (Cont'd)
(Page 18 of 24)
Acceptance Criteria - The turbine control. Valves and The stop valves close during the stop valve fast closure test.
Feedwater settings prevent flooding of the steam lines following these transients.
The measurement of simulated heat flux is not.
significantly greater than pre-analysis.
The trip at 25% power does not cause a scram.
The pressure regulator regains control before a low-pressure reactor isolation occurs.
1 (SUT-26) Recirculation Flow Control Demonstration Test Obiective - The test objective is to determine the plant S
response:to a change in recirculation flow, to optimize the setting of the master flow controller, and to demonstrate the plant loading capability in master manual flow control mode.
Prerequisites - The reactor is in a steady-state condition and g-the feedwater system is operating in three-element control.
(-
Test Method - Data are recorded during the step and ramp changes.
The final controller settings for both the master flow controller and the individual loop speed controllers are determined.
Acceptance Crite'ria - The decay ratio for each process variable l
that exhibits oscillatory response to flow control changes is acceptable.
The plant response to a change in recirculation flow l
is acceptable.
The plant loading capability Jn thegmas(er anual s
l flow control mode is acceptable, p d "T J ),i,.u u a l
T (SUT-27) Recirculation System Trip Demonstration M
Test Obiectives - The test objectives are:
to determine transient responses and steady-state conditions following recirculation pump trips at selected power levels; to obtain jet pump performance data; and to demonstrate that no recirculation system cavitation occurs in the operation region of the power -
flow map.
Prerequisites - The recirculation system preoperational test is completed; the process computer is available; and power testing
,is in progress.
l Test Method - Single-pump and two-pump trips are performed from full specified power levels.
The single-pump trips are initiated
(
by opening the generator field breaker on the applicable motor generator.
The two-pump trips are initiated by tripping the motor-generator set drive motors.
Reactor pressure, reactor l
l Rev. 10, 09/82