ML20063N251

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Answer to 820830 Third Set of Interrogatories.Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20063N251
Person / Time
Site: Perry  FirstEnergy icon.png
Issue date: 09/14/1982
From: Willmore R
CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO., SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE
To:
OHIO CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBLE ENERGY
References
NUDOCS 8209200131
Download: ML20063N251 (10)


Text

.-

o . t IRC N2 Siis ab69 September 14, ,

{pp}b hr,4 00CM UHAttc

)(Y k

~

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board In the Matter of )

)

THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ) Docket Nos. 50-440 ILLUMINATING COMPANY, ET AL. ) 50-441

)

(Perry Nuclear Power Plant, )

Units,1 and 2) )

APPLICANTS' ANSWER TO OHIO CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBLE ENERGY THIRD SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO APPLICANTS Applicants for their answers to Ohio Citizens for Responsible Energy ("OCRE") Third Set of Interrogatories, dated August 30, 1982, state as follows:

All documents supplied to OCRE for inspection will be produced at Perry Nuclear Power Plant ("PNPP"). Arrangements to examine the documents can be made by contacting Mr. Ronald Wiley of The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company at (216) 259-3737. Applicants will provide copies of any of the produced documents, or portions thereof, which OCRE requests, at Applicants' cost of duplication. Arrangements for obtaining copies can be made with Mr. Wiley.

8209200131 820914 U PDR ADOCK 05000440 0 PDR

RESPONSES 3-1. Are the drawings referred to in " Applicants' Answer to Ohio Citizens for Responsible Energy Second Set of Interroga-tories to Applicants" as-built drawings or as-designed draw-ings? If Applicants anticipate any substantial differences between design and actual construction, please describe these differences.

Response

The referenced drawings are "as designed." It is not anticipated that there will be any substantial differences between the design and actual construction.

3-2. How accessible are the manual SDV isolation valves, HCU valves 102 and 112? Describe in detail the exact location of these valves in the HCU or its piping and any panels, covers, or other obstructions which must be removed to gain access to the valves. Are any special tools required to gain access to or to close the valves? Would the environment expected in the vicinity of an SDV pipe break (heat, steam, radiation) prevent perstinnel from closing the valves?

Response

The manual SDV isolation valves are located on top of each HCU, less than eight and one-half feet above the grating level.

HCU valve 102 is sixteen and seven-eighth inches from the HCU front face and two and one-half inches inboard of the right side. HCU valve 112 is sixteen.and three-quarters inches from the HCU front face and ten and three-quarters inches from the HCU right side. Access to these valves is not restricted, and the valves are operated by a standard type handwheel. No special tools are required to gain access to or to close the valves. The environment in the area of a SDV pipe break would prevent personnel from operating the valve while the reactor coolant is at an elevated temperature. Operation of the valves, however, is not required under these conditions because the SDV pipe break would not threaten the shutdown and cooldown of the reactor. When reactor cooldown has been accomplished, the valves can be operated.

3-3. Does the SDV vent line have any interconnections with any other systems? If so, specify these connections. Has the SDV vent line been designed to ensure that there can be no loop seals in the line that could prevent or slow the draining of the SDV?

Response

The SDV vent line does not interconnect with any other systems. The SDV vent line is installed with a continuous slope towards the SDV to promote drainage and eliminate loop seals. -

3-4. List every polymeric material located in a radiation environment at PNPP, Units 1 and 2; for every such material listed, specify the following:

I (a) trade or common name of the polymer; (b) chemical formula and structure of the polymer; (c) function of the polymer, e.g., coating, electrical insulation, or mechanical / structural component; (d) name of the equipment or component in which the polymer is used; (e) function of the equipment or component listed in (d) above, including the general system in the plant, and whether it is safety-related or non-safety-related; (f) for electrical equipment, is the system Class 1E or non-Class 1E; if Class 1E, is it Division 1, 2, or 3?

(g) for electrical insulation, give the AWG of the wire, rated maximum voltage, current, and ambient tempera-ture, expected voltage, current, and ambient tempera-ture, and thickness of the insulation; (h) exact location within the plant of the polymeric material; (i) radiation exposure rate expected during normal plant operation, in Rad /hr; also give type (alpha, beta, gamma, or neutron) of radiation and its energy, in MeV; (j) dose and dose rate expected from the most severe design basis event during or following which the equipment is required to remain functional; l (k) temperature and humidity expected during normal operation, and during or following the most severe design basis event; (1) type and duration of the design basis event referred I

to above; (m) whether the equipment is located in an oxidizing or an inert atmosphere (normally and under accident conditions);

! (n) method by which the polymer or component was quali-l fied for use in a radiation environment, including any analyses of synergistic effects; (o) the results of any qualification tests for the polymer or component; e.g., was any degradation observed?

l i

(p) expected lifetime of the component in which the polymer is used; e.g., is it to be routinely replaced at any time in the operating lifetime of PNPP? If so, at what intervals?

Response

Applicants have identified the major polymers located in the radiation environments at PNPP, Units 1 and 2. The identified polymers are listed in part (a) below, and the remainder of the Interrogatory is answered as to those polymers. Should additional relevant polymers be identified, Applicants will supplement their Response accordingly.

(a) The following polymers have been identified as having safety-related functions and as being located in a radiation environment at PNPP, Units 1 and 2: cross-linked polyolefin, cross-linked polyethylene and ethylene-propylene rubber.

(b) Applicants do not know the precise chemical formula and structure of the identified polymers. These polymers are supplied by several vendors, and the exact compounding of each is considered proprietary information and not disclosed to Applicants.

(c) The identified polymers are used for electrical cable and wire insulation.

(d) The identified polymers are used on safety-related electrical cable and wire.

(e) The components of which the identified polymers are part of are used to transmit power, instrumentation and control signals in many safety-related systems.

(f) The systems are Class lE, and include all Divisions.

(g) The AWG of the wire, rated maximum voltage, current and ambient temperature, and the thickness of the insulation can be obtained from the safety-related specifications for the relevant components. The expected voltage and current can be obtained from the cable pull slips, electrical load lists and related documents for the relevant components. These documents will be supplied for examination at PNPP.

The expected ambient temperature data is addressed in the amendment to S 3.11 of the PNPP FSAR. See parts (i)-(l) below.

(h) While Class lE cable and wire is located throughout most plant areas, the routing of the principal cables is shown in, Figures 8.3-14 through 8.3-18 of the PNPP FSAR.

(i)-(l) Applicants presently are preparing an amendment to S 3.11 of the PNPP FSAR, which will provide the requested information. The amendment will be submitted shortly, and will be supplied for examina-tion at PNPP when it is in final form.

(m) All relevant equipment is located in an oxidizing atmosphere. Atmospheric inerting is not used at PNPP.

(n) The environmental qualification program for safety-related equipment is designed to meet the intent of NUREG-0588, IEEE 323, IEEE 383, and Regulatory Guide 1.131. The Program is described in detail in the amendment to S 3.11 of the PNPP FSAR to be submitted shortly.

(o) The relevant components have not yet been qualified for a radiation environment using post TMI-2 source terms.

(p) The precise lifetimes of the relevant components cannot be determined until they have been qualified for a radiation environment using post TMI-2 source l

terms. As noted, that qualification has not yet been 1 made.

Respectfully submitted, SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE By:

Jay E. Silberg, P.C.

l Robert L. Willmore 1

Counsel for Applicants 1800 M Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 822-1000 Dated: September 14, 1982

CLEVEL AND ELECTRIC ILLUl.11N ATL% COMI .'sN)

CLEt ELAND, OHlO Dave R. Green, being duly sworn acce.-dmg to law, deposes that he is ,

Senior Project Engineer, Nuclear Erigineering Department of Cleveland Electric illuminating Company and t%t the f acts set f orth in the foregoing ,

i i

Applicants' Answer: to Ohio Citizens for Responsible Energy Interrogatories  !

3-1, 3-2, 3-3, and 3-4 dated August 30, 1982, are true and correct to the best of his knowledge, info.rnation and belief. ^

(f.. 1.. . f  ?'^

/Y./ ,

Sworn to and subscribed tA before me this // day

- of . 'ILb'G l 2 /$5 L

~D

.L .

CAROLINE.M.WitDE Rotary Public. State or chio l

My Commiuion tspires April 17.1985 l

(Recorded in Lake County)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board In the Matter of )

)

THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ) Docket Nos. 50-440 ILLUMINATING COMPANY, ET AL. ) 50-441

)

(Perry Nuclear Power Plant, )

Units 1 and 2) )

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE This is to certify that copies of the foregoing " Applicants' Answer to Ohio Citizens For Responsible Energy Third Set of Interrogatories to Applicants," were served by deposit in the U.S.

Mail, First Class, postage prepaid, this 14th day of September 1982, to all those on the attached Service List.

Robert L. Willmore Dated: Se'ptember 14, 1982 P

. -- " ~ ~ ^

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA" NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board I

In the Matter of )

)

4 THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ) Docket'Nos. 50-440

' ILLUMINATING COMPANY, et al. ) -

. 50-441

)

(Perry Nuclear Power Plant, )

Units 1 and 2 )

i SERVICE LIST .

Atomic Safety and Licensing Peter B. Bloch, Chairman Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Appeal Board Panel i U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Washington, D.C. 20555 ,

> Dr. Jerry R. Kline Docketing and Service Section Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Office'of the Secretary >

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U'. S . Nuclear Regulatory Commission

. Washington, D.C. 20555 Washington, D.C. 20555

...a_ . - . .

F "

Stephen H. Lewis,,Escuire ~

I Mr. Frederick J. Shon "

~~^

Office of the Executive-4 Atomic Safety and Licens,ing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Legal Director U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

-Wahsington, D.C. 20555 I

Washington, D.C. 20555

^

I Christine N. Kohl, Chairman Atomic Safety and Licensing Ms. Sue Hiatt Appea'l Board OCRE Interim Representative t

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 8275 Munson Avenue Washington, D.C. 20555 Mentor, Ohio 44060 Daniel D. Wilt, Esquire Dr. John H. Buck Atomic Safety and Licensing P. O. Box 08159 Cleveland, Ohio 44108 J Appeal Board

! U .' S . Nuclear Regulatory Commission f .W ashington, D.C. 20555 Donald T. Ezzone, Esquire Assistant Prosecuting Attorney i

Gary J. Edles, , Esquire Lake County Administration Center Atomic Safety and Licensin9 105 Center Street Appeal Board Painesville, Ohio 44077 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Washington, D.C. 20555 John G. Cardinal, Esquire

! Prosecuting Attorney Atomic Safety and Licensing Ashtabula County Courthouse Board Panel Jefferson, Ohio 44047

! U.S. Suclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Terry Lodge, Esquire 915 Spitzer Building 1

' Toledo, Ohio 43604

. . - - = - . , - , . , . . . - . - , , , - , - ,, , , , . - - _ . - . - , , . , . - - . _ , - , - - . .

  • - - , - ,,, -