ML20063J695

Third Set of Interrogatories.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence

ML20063J695
Person / Time
Site:	Perry
Issue date:	08/30/1982
From:	Hiatt S OHIO CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBLE ENERGY
To:	CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO.
References
NUDOCS 8209020517
Download: ML20063J695 (5)

Text

,

~ .-

,.c ,u REIATED CORRESPONDN August 3@gg}$g2 s UNITED STATES OF AMERICA USNRC NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Blkrdhh -1 20:50 9

'In the Matter of .

FF C FM CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING ) DocketNos.50$hNks --

COMPANY, Et A1. ) 50-441

) (Operating License)

(Perry Nuclear Power Plant, )

Units 1 and 2) )

)

OHIO CITIZEUS FOR RESPONSIBLE ENERGY THIRD SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO APPLICANTS Ohio. Citizens for Responsible Energy ("0CRE") hereby propounds its third set of interrogatories to Applicants, pursuant to the Licensing Board's Memorandum and Order of July 28, 1981 (LBP-81-24, 14 NRC 175).

ISSUE #5 Statement of

Purpose:

The interrogatories below concerning Issue #5 are designed to ascertain the susceptibility of the Applicants' facility to the LOCA scenario resulting from a l

pipe break to the scram discharge volume postulated in NUREG-l 0785. ,

3-1. A,re the drawings referred to in " Applicants' Answer to Ohio Citizens for hesponsible Energy Second Set of Inter-rogatories to Applicants" as-built drawings or as-designed drawings? If Applicants anticipate any substantial differences l

between design and actual construction, please describe these differences.

3-2. How accessible are the manual SDV isolation valves, HCU -

valves 102 and 112? Describe in detail the exact location 8209020517 820030 pSy PDRADOCK05000g

s -

of these valves in the HCU or its piping and any panels, covers, or other obstructions which must be removed to gain access to the valves. Are any special tools required to gain access to or to close the valves? Would the environment expected in the vicinity of an SDV pipe break (heat, steam, radiation) prevent personnel from closing the valves?

3-3. Does the SDV vent line have any interconnections with any other systems? If so, specify these connections. Has the SDV vent line been designed to ensure that there can be no loop seals in the line that could prevent or slow the draining of the SDV?

Issue #9 Statement of

Purpose:

The interrogatories below concerning Issue #9 are designed to ascertain the degree to which' polymers-used at PHPP will be subject to radiation-induced degradation and whether Applicants' environmental qualification program i

has given due consideration to dose-rate and synergistic factors.-

3-4. List every polymeric material located in a radiation environment at PNPP, Units 1 and 2; for every such material listed, specify the following:

(a) trade or common name of the polymer; (b) chemical formula and structure of the polymer; (c) function of the polymer, e.g., coating, electrical insulation, or mechanical / structural component; (d) name of the equipment or component in which the polymer is used;

o w

(e) function of the equipment or component listed in and (d) above, including the general system in the plant, whether it is safety-related or non-safety-related; (f) for electrical equipment, is the system Class lE or non-Class 1E; if Class lE, is it Division 1, 2,.or 3?

(g) for electrical insulation, give the AWG of the wire, rated maximum voltaEe, current, and ambient temperature, expected voltage , current, and ambient temperature, and thickness of the insulation; (h) exact location within the plant of the polymeric material; (1) radiation exposure. rate expected during normal plant operation, in Rad /hr; also give type (alpha, beta, gamma, or neutron) of radiation and its energy, in MeV; (j) dose and dose rate expected from the most severe design basis event during or following which the equipment is required to remain functional;

(k) temperature and humidity expected during normal 2

operation, and during or following the most severe

- design basis event; (1) type and duration of the design basis event referred to above; (m) whether the equipment is located in an oxidizing or an inert atmosphere (normally and under accident conditions);

(n) method by which the polymer or component was qualified

• _4 5

for use in a radiation environment, including any analyses of synergistic effects; (o) the results of any qualification tests for the polymer was any degradation observed?

or component; e.g.,

(p) expected lifetime of the component in which the polymer is used; e.g. , is it to be routinely replaced at any If so, at time in the operating lifetime of PNPP7 what intervals?

Respectfully submitted,

-w 2 -

Susan L. Hiatt OCRE Representative 8275 Munson Rd.

Mentor, OH 44060 (216) 255-3158 1

1 l

I 9

' CERTIFICATE OF SEhVICE UhfMRC This is to certify that copies of the foregoinggI g .) N050 CITIZENS Fox HESPONSIBLE ENERGY THIRD SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO APPLICANTS were served by deposit in the U.S. Mai Y ICE class, postage prepaid, this 30th day of August,198 BRAN on the service list below.

tm W 00 Susan L. Hiatt

• SERVICE LIST Peter B. Bloch, Chairman Daniel D. Wilt, Esq.

Atomic Safety and Licensing Board P.O. Bo'x 08159 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm'n Clev' eland, OH 44108 Washington, D. C. 20555 Dr. Jerry R. Kline Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm'n Washington, D. C. 20555 Frederick J. Shon Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commin Washington, D.C. 20555 Docketing and Service Section Office of the Secretary U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commin Washington, D.C. 20555 Stephen H. Lewis, Esq.

Office of the Executive Legal Director U.S. Nucl. ear Regulatory Comm'n Washington, D.C. 20555 Jay Silberg, Esq.

1800 M Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20036 Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555

. . _ _ .