ML20057A711
| ML20057A711 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 03/06/1992 |
| From: | Stohr J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | Cunningham R NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20055C202 | List:
|
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9309150189 | |
| Download: ML20057A711 (48) | |
Text
..
.~.
~,
n -
~
~
~
't.
kY/l
/N C *1 A
g gg%jo UNITED STATES g
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[.
REGION 11 o
101 MARIETTA STRE ET, N.W.
f ATLANTA, G EORGI A 30323
%...../
MAR 061992 MEMORANDUM FOR:
Richard E. Cunningham, Director Division of Industrial and Medical Nuclear Safety, NMSS FROM:
J. Philip Stohr, Director Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards P
SUBJECT:
1992 NATIONAL PROGRAM REVIEW QUESTIONNAIRE Enclosed is our response to the questionnaire submitted to us with your February 11, 1992 memorandum.
We agree with the changes you have made to improve the National Program Review (NPR)iprocess as described in your memorandum.
If you have any questions, please contact Bruce Mallett of my i
staff.
r J.
Philip Stoh Enclosure l
Response to 1992 NPR Questionnaire cc w/ encl:
S. Ebneter J. Milhoan
]
I w
i 9309150189 930830 PDR STPRC ESGGEN
' ff
NMSS 1992 NATIONAL PROGRAM REVIEW QUESTIONNAIRE REGION II A.
GENERAL OUESTION 1.
Submit a current staffing plan for the Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards ANSWER 1.
Enclosed is a current organization chart showing the staffing plan for DRSS.
We have also enclosed a table comparing the FTE budgeted in the NMSS portion of the Regional Operating Plan to the staff allocated in the regional staffing plan.
Some key changes in the staffing plan that affect the NMSS program in the region since the 1991 program review are 1).
Rotation of the Branch Chiefs 2).
Establishment of the Resident Inspector position at NFS (unbudgeted) 3).
Pursuing an upward mobility position in the safeguards section to replace an inspector who left the NRC 4).
Pursuing employment of a secretary for the NFS resident 5).
Moving an individual with environmental expertise to the Radiological Effluents and Chemistry Section to help with site contamination issues 6).
Establishment of another fuel facility inspector position in the Radiation Safety Projects Section We are also participating in rotational assignments.
In October 1991, we rotated a materials licensing reviewer to the Office of Enforcement.
In March - April 1992, we are mentoring an intern from NMSS and one from NRR.
In March -
May 1992, we are providing a senior materials inspector to handle the State Agreements Officer position in Region II while the State Agreements Officer is on rotational assignment in Headquarters.
I i
)
DIVISION OF RADIATION SAFETY AND SAFEGUARDS Director P.
Stohr Dep. Director B. Mallett Secretary P. Miles Radiological Protection and Nuclear Materials Safety and Emergency Preparedness Branch Safeguards Branch Chief W.
Cline Chief D. Collins Facilities Radiation Nuclear Materials Protection Branch Safety Section Chief J. Potter Chief C. Hosey Radiological Effluents Radiation Safety and Chemistry Section Projects Section Chief T. Decker Chief E. McAlpine Emergency Preparedness Safeguards Section Section Chief W. Rankin Chief D. McGuire i
March 5, 1992 i
i
NUCLEAR MATERIALS SAFETY AND SAFEGUARDS BRANCH Chief D. Collins Secretary K. McCallie Safeguards Off. Asst.
J.
Childs Office Assistant N. Witt i
I Nuclear Materials Safety Section Radiation Safety Projects Section
' Safeguards Section Chief C. Hosey Chief E. McAlpine Chief D. McGuire Sr. Radiation Spec. HP - Licensing Senior Radiation Specialist Physical Security Specialist E.
Wright C. Bassett O. Masnyk W. Stansberry Radiation Specialist HP - Licensing Fuel Facilities Resident D. Thompson D.
Colline Inspectors (Nuc. Engr. )
A. Tillman J.
Pelchat M.
Elliott (B&W)
W. Tobin S. Waldron (Sec. S. Burke)
G. Todd S. Burris (NPS)
Sr. Radiation Spec. HP - Inspection (Sec.*)
Safeguards Assistant C.
Connell J. Kirby Senior Fuel Facilities Projects Radiation Specialist HP - Inspection Manager / Inspector W.
Loo G. Troup M.
Fuller J. Henson Fuel Facilities Inspector J.
Ennis D. Kasnicki H. Bermudez (Vacancy)
L.
Franklin Licensing Assistant D. Heim i
EOD 4/92 i
March 5, 1992 i
RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS BRANCH Chief W.
Cline Secretary L.
Stratton Office Assistant D. Berean I
Facilities Radiation Radiological Effluents and Protection Section Chemistry Section Emergency Preparedness Section Chief J. Potter Chief T. Decker Chief W. Rankin Senior Radiation Specialist Senior Radiation Specialist (HP) hienior Radiation Specialist (EP)
E. Testa W. Gloersen F. Wright R.
Shortridge D. Jones W. Sartor
- G.
Kuzo Radiation Specialist (HP)
Radiation Specilist (HP)
Radiation Specialist (EP)
A. Boland R. Carrion A. Gooden
- D.
Forbes N. McNeill J.
Kreh B.
Parker D.
Seymour Emergency Preparedness Coord.
B.
Pharr (Vacancy)
Physical Science Technician J. Hufham T. Volk Emergency Preparedness Specialist G.
Salyers Emergency Preparedness Assistant C. Banks EOD 4/32 (In process of hiring.)
EOD 5/92 March 5, 1992
DRSS BUDGETED FTE FROM P0fSE PROGRAM BUDGETED FTE I.
Materials licensing 3.0 (licensing casework, master lic, tech to Agreement State)
II.
Materials inspection 7.1 (broadscope safety, routine, military, med improvement, NPR, general)
III. Event evaluation 1.6 (allegations, PEF, enforcement, reactive)
IV.
Low level waste Materials lic decommissioning 0.2 Materials inspections 0.1 Reactor facility inspections 0.3 V.
Fuel facility inspection Enhanced OSA 0.4 Routine 5.0 VI.
Fuel facility safeguards Licensing 0.2 Route surveys 0.15 Routine 1.6 Transportation 0.5 TOTAL 19.85
4 DRSS POSITIONS ALI4CATED TO NMSS PROGRAMS NMSS SECTION NMS/Sr. lic rev 1
NMS/lic revs 3
NHS/lic assist 1
NMS/Sr insp 1
NMS/insps 6
RSP SECTION RSP/Sr rad spec 0.5 RSP/ resident 2.0 RSP/Sr proj insp 1
RSP/insps 2
SFGDS SECTION SFGDS/rev 0.2 SFGDS/insp 1.65 REC SECTION REC /insp 0.8 EP SECTION EP/insp O.4 FRP SECTION FRP/insp 0.6 I
4
~
A.
GENERAL OUESTION 2.
Provide any comments and recommended changes regarding the effectiveness of Headquarters support to regional activities and the Region / Headquarters interface.
Identify any regional interactions with Headquarters and licensees to improve the quality of your licensing and/or inspection programs.
(Safety and Safeguards)
ANSWER In general, the interfaces between the Region and Headquarters are excellent.
Especially useful are the counterpart phone calls and interactions between regional and headquarters supervisors and managers in issues that require immediate attention.
Areas where interactions with Headquarters and licensees have resulted in improvements in the quality of inspections and or licensing include:
Interactions with SGTR regarding implementation of the Force-On-Force Exercise inspection program, resulting in inspections of such exercises to review performance and the suitability of regulatory requirements.
Meeting held between SGTR, Region II, and category I licensees to discuss issues and performance.
Issuance by Region II of a request to Category I licensees to provide Force-On-Force Exercise objectives and scenarios ahead of exercises to assure proper exercise development.
Region II working with NMSS promoted close working relations between licensee organizations and State regulatory authorities by holding joint periodic status / review meetings to discuss environment protection / site decontamination efforts.
Sites and States involved were GE/ State of North Carolina and NFS/ State of Tennessee.
Region II, NMSS, and Region I worked together to assure coordinated action and problem resolution for the sewer system contamination from INS.
This is ongoing.
Region II has invited NMSS to all Enforcement Conferences and Management meetings with fuel facility licensees.
NMSS has also invited Region II to participate in meetings with licensees on safeguards and/or licensing issues.
Region II met with General Electric (GE) and the State of North Carolina officials to resolve issues surfaced
during the C IIT relative to emergency preparedness and in particular incident classification, initial and followup notification.
Region II developed proposed field notes for LLW inspections and provided them to NMSS.
Region II added a section to field notes regarding waste storage and disposal for licensees in Puerto Rico.
As a result of identification of problems in this area and in response to the 1991 NMSS National Program Review.
Region II implemented team inspections at large licensees, such as the University of Virginia, that included inspection support from NMSS.
Region II developed, drafted and followed up with headquarters on the issuance of Information Notices such as:
July 8, 1991, " Improper Control of Chemicals in Nuclear Fuel Fabrication," 91-60; September 24, 1991, " False Alarms of Alarm Ratemeters Because of Radiofrequency Interference," 91-84; December 26, 1991
" Problems with Criticality Alarm Components / Systems,"
91-84.
Region II is developing a procedure for inspection of Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations to address an identified need to better focus on this area.
This has been discussed with NMSS.
Region II has surfaced problems with 10 CFR 150.20 relative to agreement State jurisdiction in offshore waters and prepared an Information Notice explaining 10 CFR 150.20 requirements and applicability.
Region II coordinated this issue with NMSS and State Programs.
Region II initiated action to construct a new regional incident response center and update it with reference documents and procedures on fuel facilities.
Region II submitted these referenced documents to AEOD for placement in the operations center.
Region II worked with NMSS to develop a coordinated approach to enforcement for Master Materials Licenses.
Region II is planning to participate with GE during their emergency exercise on October 8, 1992.
Region II revised the overall resident inspector procedures in April 1991.
They were provided to NMSS.
In an effort to focus on the current safety issues at these sites, at the end of FY91, Region II revised the
assigned resident inspector procedures to focus the residents efforts on operational safety, criticality safety, maintenance, surveillance and modifications.
This revised focus was implemented on a trial basis and NMSS was informed.
We plan in April 1992, to review this approach, based on our experience, and to meet with NMSS to discuss formalization of this approach for future resident efforts.
As part of the routine criticality safety inspections, we have prioritized plant systems for inspection at each facility, and inspection effort has been directed to those systems.
NMSS was informed of this initiative.
Region II continues to implement a project management function for fuel facilities which includes issuance of comprehensive fuel facility status reports which identify inspection findings and are used as a source of information on licensee performance and inspection program direction by both the Region and Headquarters.
Region II continues to closely monitor the Nuclear Fuel Services (NFS) and GE Performance Improvement Programs in the nuclear criticality safety area.
These are extensive programs that have resulted in substantial safety improvements at these facilities.
Region II continues to monitor closely the NFS pond and plutonium building decontamination and decommissioning.
The Region participates in meetings with the licensee and State officials on a routine basis.
The Region coordinates response to significant safety issues and events with headquarters.
For example, Region II monitored the corrective actions implemented by GE after the May event, including close monitoring of the startup of shutdown facilities and coordinated with NMSS.
Region II continues to work with NMSS on the NFS license renewal application.
This is a very important license renewal as it is the first opportunity to address, as license requirements, the shortcomings identified by the GE IIT and the Special Task Force Report, etc.
This will require more than the usual amount of effort by both NMSS and Region II.
Region II continues to work with NMSS on the remediation work at GE for the contamination found i
under the EMOX Building.
Region II met with senior management of each fuel facility (except GE which will be done this year) last
year to review overall performance.
We intend to continue to meet with these licensees every 18 months to continue this dialogue.
In addition, Region II staff meets at the 18 month mid-point to review overall performance to determine if any issues should be brought to licensee management's attention at that time.
NMSS is included in these meetings.
Region II plans a materials licensing and inspection workshop in Puerto Rico in mid-summer to review NRC criteria for research and development programs.
Region II established a second resident at the NFS facility, resulting in resident inspectors at both high enriched uranium facilities in the Region.
Headquarters has been supportive and responsive to key safety issues and events.
Examples include sending of staff as team members to respond to the GE event, materials licensing technical assistance requests, and agency response to contamination issues at GE and Westinghouse.
The following are areas where we believe continued support will improve the quality of the NMSS and Region II licensing and inspection programs.
1.
Guidance is needed for fuel cycle licensees for the proposed Branch Technical Positions for fuel cycle facilities (published in the Federal Register on March 21, 1989) 1.e.,
issuance of any additional necessary guidance on the positions (such as Regulatory Guides), and requiring implementation of these positions by licensees through appropriate license conditions and updates to the demonstration sections of licenses.
(This should probably be contracted out.)
2.
Guidance is needed in the form of an update of the inspection procedures used at fuel facilities for safety inspections (most have not been updated since 1984) to incorporate lessons learned in recent years, to emphasize the areas of criticality safety, operations, maintenance, surveillance, establishment and maintenance of a sound safety base, and environmental and site contamination control and cleanup.
This updated guidance should also include revision of the resident inspection procedures.
3.
Guidance is needed in the form of a consolidated and updated new version of the " standard" license conditions for material *. licensing.
There have been many new " standard" cond'.tions developed by the different regions in ret t years, and it would be helpful if a new versio on a wordperfect disk, could be issued.
I
1 4.
Guidance is needed in the form of a policy regarding the need for cleanup of contamination on sites, inside restricted areas but not controlled inside buildings or other containment structures.
There are many power reactor, fuel facility, and materials licensee sites that have contamination on the sites, and the cleanup /remediation is being handled on a case by case basis at present.
5.
NMSS should consider "regionalizing" the review of Emergency Plan changes.
Such a practice would be consistent with that currently used for power reactor licensees.
This approach would have the advantage of regional-based inspector familiarity with the licensee's emergency organization, plans, procedures, more timely updating of licensee emergency plans and would allow the headquarters staff to focus on higher priority issues.
6.
Consideration should be given to dissementating guidance regarding fuel facilities with a monthly counterpart call at the Branch Chief /Section " Chief level.
7.
Consideration should be given to NMSS contracting for the development of a computerized system for NMSS positions on materials issues, similar to the HP l
Position Paper system developed by NRR.
8.
We continue to experience problems with the review of licensee responses to our questions regarding financial assurances in their decommissioning funding plans.
The i
region does not have adequate expertise to complete these reviews, as well as, respond to telephone j
inquiries.
We recommend Headquarters continue to l
provide support to review these responses and determine adequacy utilizing a contractor for the reviews as was done for the initial reviews.
A point of contact for questions and answers distributed to the regions would i
aid in responding to telephone inquiries.
j
4 A.
GENERAL OUESTION 3.
Provide a summary of actual expenditures and accomplishments as compared to operating plan / budgeted expenditures and accomplishments for FY92 to date.
Discuss reprogramming changes or diversion of resources for items unbudgeted.
(Provide a copy of end-of-year expenditures / accomplishments for FY91, if already available.
If not already available, dg not prepare).
ANSWER 3.
The following is a list of tables and graphs, which are enclosed and indicate the DRSS accomplishments and expenditures versus the operating plan for Fiscal Years 1991 and 1992.
Graphs of Materials Licensing Cases (Total and Core) completed for FY91 and FY92 (4 graphs).
Graphs of materials inspections (Total and Core) completed for FY91 and FY92 (4 graphs).
Tables of overdue materials inspections for FY91 and FY92 (2 tables).
Graphs of safeguards licensing cases completed for fuel facilities for FY91 and FY92 (2 graphs).
Graphs of DRSS inspection report timeliness for routine cases for FY92.
Table of timeliness of materials licensing actions as of February 28, 1992 (2 pages).
Tables of FTE expended versus budget for FY91 and FY92 (2 tables).
In addition to the data presented in the tables and graphs, i
the Region has also accomplished the following operating plan goals in Fiscal Years 1991 and 1992, since the 1991 NMSS National Program Review:
Completed the fuel facility inspection program for FY91 j
for operations, health physics, emergency preparedness and security.
On target for completing this program for FY92.
(Completion of this program is tracked in the Region II Fuel Facility Status Report issued quarterly).
Assured early identification of potential safety and safeguards problems and adequate corrective actions by i
having inspectors promptly inform supervisors of safety i
issues via telephone call prior to the end of the i
inspection and debriefings upon return to the Region II office.
Also, held management assessment meetings with fuel facilities (for example Westinghouse and B&W in July and August 1991) to review licensee performance and identify potential safety issues.
Performed numerous followup inspections to evaluate whether licensees adequately assessed all safety issues in response to reported events.
Examples include:
followup to B&W report of moderator in moderator controlled glove box area, which identified a need for further area nuclear criticality safety analyses and injection of an individual with a radiopharmaceutical to investigate the percentage tag at a Navy Hospital.
Documented review of all fuel facility safeguards plan change submittals to indicate that approved changes did not diminish required level of protection.
Held prepanels between DRSS, regional and headquarters enforcement staff, and in some cases, NMSS staff to review results of inspections prior to taking all enforcement actions.
The purpose was to ensure proposed enforcement sanctions were appropriate to the noncompliance circumstances.
In FY91 and FY92 to date, have maintained materials inspection and licensing focus on completing the core program as a priority.
Have identified generic issues as a result of review of inspection results and drafted information notices and routed to NMSS for issuance to licensees.
Issued qualifications journals to all new inspectors and developed training programs to assure they receive appropriate training in a timely manner.
Provided special training opportunities to inspectors and reviewers as a method of increasing knowledge in areas that should aid in identifying safety issues and representing the NRC.
Examples include special sessions in the Fundamentals of Inspection course on responding to events, report writing and interactions with the media.
Continued Peer Review process to review quality of inspection reports at the Division level.
e Continued Regional Headquarters interface by participating in monthly conference calls, counterpart meetings and timely briefings of NMSS and EDO staff in response to reported events or significant inspection findings.
Resources have been reprogrammed in both fiscal years to complete the materials licensing casework, oversee the Navy military broad license, review decommissioning casework, respond to fuel facility events, establish a resident inspector at Nuclear Fuel Services, Inc. (NFS), and decommissioning activities at NFS.
Even with this reprogramming, the Region hhs completed all the total and core budgeted casework for these areas.
i
)
i
MATERIALS LICENSING CASES (TOTAL)
(October 1,1990 - September 30,1991 N
700 600 e
500 400 Y
300 c
200 100 I
O Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Budget 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 Completed 23 81 117 17 3 231 257 325 375 434 479 531 602 Receipts 58 10 4 145 199 241 288 3 41 376 418 499 586 606 l
Month Budget Completed Receipts September 30,1991 l
(Revised to reflect OpPlan changes)
s MATERIALS LICENSING CASES (CORE)
(October 1,1990 - September 30,1991) 500 y
u m
400 e
r 300 o
f 200 100 a
O Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Budget 38 76 11 4 152 190 228 266 304 342 379 416 453 Completed 20 62 95 14 3 186 205 255 290 335 371 413 476 Month Budget Completed September 30,1991 (Revised to reflect OpPlan changes)
MATERIALS LICENSING CASES (TOTAL)
(October 1,1991 - September 30,1992) 700 N
600 I
500 r
400 i
300
-~
c 200 8
100 e
i i
i i
i i
i i
i i
i i
o Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Budget 50 98 147 196 245 294 343 392 441 490 539 590 Completed 65 127 171 226 265 Receipts 61 98 137 184 216 Month Budget Completed Receipts
=
March 2,1992
MATERIALS LICENSING CASES (CORE)
(October 1,1991 - September 30,1992) 500 N
m 400 b
e r
300 o
I 200 c
100 e
O Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Budget 37 74 111 148 185 222 259 296 333 370 407 440 Completed 57 10 5 141 188 214 Month Budget Completed March 2,1992
MATERIALS INSPECTIONS (Total)
(October 1,1990 - September 30,1991) y 500 l
g 400 E
300 l
I f
200 E
?
100 0
Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep BUDGET 34 68 102 136 17 0 204 238 272 306 341 376 4 11 ACTUAL 35 60 91 157 192 237 269 299 326 360 380 440 MONTH BUDGET ACTUAL September 30,1991 l
(Revised to reflect OpPlan changes) 9 i
e
_____________._____m____
MATERIALS INSPECTIONS (Core)
(October 1,1990 - September 30,1991)
N 250 200 Y
150 I
100 i
50 E
O Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Budget 16 32 48 64 81 98 115 132 149 166 183 200 Completed 9
15 27 51 67 90 110 134 144 157 172 202 Month Budget Completed
^
September 30,1991 (Revised to reflect OpPlan changes) 1
MATERIALS INSPECTIONS (Total)
(October 1,1991 - September 30,1992) 500 y
0 E
400 R
E 300 200 5
J 100 a
s 0
Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep BUDGET 34 68 102 136 -17 0 204 238 272 306 3 41 376 413 ACTUAL 22 46 95 123 172 MONTH BUDGET ACTUAL March 2,1992
MATERIALS INSPECTIONS (Core)
(October 1,1991 - September 30,1992) 250 200 i
150 100 l
50 I
0 Oct Nov Dec Jan 'Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Budget 17 33 50 66 83 99 11 6 132 149 165 182 198 Completed 9
21 45 58 80 Month Budget Completed March 2,1992 (Revised 1/23/92 to reflect goals in FY-92 Operating Plan)
l 1
SUMMARY
OF OVERDUE MATERIALS INSPECTIONS (July 1,1990 - Sept 30,1991) l Priority Number of Overdue Inspections Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep 1
O O
O
- 1
- 1
- 1 O
O O
O O
O O
20 20 i
2 O
O O
O O
O O
O 1#
1#
0 0
0 0
0 3
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Others O
O O
- 4
- 2
- 2
- 1
- 1 O
O O
O O
O O
Total O
O O
- 5
- 3
- 3
- 1
- 1 l#
18 0
0 0
20 20 Overdue inspections were identified during a check of LMS data base.
During the check it was noted that a number of licensees did not have the "date of next inspection" entered in the data base; therefore, when a inspection due list was run these licensees did not appear on the list.
NMS Section will correct the data base prior to 12/15/90.
The priority 1 licensee is a radiography license issued to NASA Wallops Island, Va.
The licensee has indicated that the source has been storage for several years and not been used.
The license was lasted inspected 9/87.
A clear 591 was issued for that inspection.
Inspections of these licensee will be conducted on a priority basis.
Center for Disease Control, Atlanta.
Initially scheduled for inspection in March, 1
rescheduled to April because CDC RSO was relocating office and records were not accessible.
l Prior notice was given to ensure that the RSO was available. Inspection rescheduled to May after the CD
{
0 University of Virginia.
Scheduled for team inspection begining October 21, 1991
SUMMARY
OF OVERDUE MATERIALS INSPECTIONS (October 1, 1991 - September 30, 1992)
Priority Number of Overdue Inspections Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep 1
0 1*
O O
O 2
0 0
0 0
0 3
0 0
0 0
0 Others 0
0 0
0 0
Total 0
1*
O O
O
- VA Tampa (Due 8/91, Overdue 12/1/91, Inspected 12/6/91) i i
i l
SAFEGUARDS LICENSING ACTIONS FUEL FACILITIES N
20 U
M B
E 15 R
O F
10 A
C T
6 l
1 O
O' I
I JUL SEP NOV JAN MAR MAY JUL SEP MONTH BUDGET PROCESSED PENDING JULY 1,1990 - SEPTEMBER 30,1991
SAFEGUARDS LICENSING ACTIONS FUEL FACILIT!ES N
12 U
10 E
R 8
O F
6
~
A
~
C A
^*
T
_/'
[
2 0:
OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP MONTH BUDGET PROCESSED
~
PENDING l
October 1991 - February 1992 l-
REPORT TIMELINESS NON-ESCALATED REPORTS ISSUED REGION WIDE DRP
.. -o a
...c
=
=
=
.e, DRS DRSS
- - - M h N-
~
a-o
.. -o a
!.. -y E
F j
- -........... =.......<......
t i
l l-AS OF JAN. 31, 1992 AVG DAYS
-e-STANDARD e
~
s y
Materials IJcensing Cases ihneliness Data Date 03/02/92 Report Date 02/28/92 New Applications and Amendments Goal No of Cases > 90 Days <= 20%
No of Cases > 180 Days <= 2 Data-New Amendments Total Pending i1 48 59
> 90 Days 1
13 14
> 180 Days 0
0 0
Total 59 Total > 180 Days 0
20% of Total 12 Less 2
No. > 90 Days 14 Backlog 0
Backlog 2
Licensee Docket Days Since Status No.
Receipt None i
1
Renewals Goal - No of Cases > 180 Day 8 <= 20%
No of Cases > 365 Days <= 2 I
Data:
Pending 54
> 180 Days 18
> 365 Days 8
Total 54 Total > 365 Days 8
20% of Total 11 Less 2
No. > 180 Days 18 Backlog 6
Backlog 7
i Licensee Docket Days Status No.
Since Receipt VA Durham, NC 30-01134 383 Technical Review in Prognes. Estimate hoeval wul be laeued by April 3,1992 Westinghouse de PR 30 17451 437 Technical hview in Progrees. Awaiting HQ resolution on need for financial aneurance J
Dept of Commerce 30-11011 5o8 hview comaleted. Licanae is in final e encurrence Dept of H & HS 30-04001 521 Technical review completed. Deficier cy letter in properation.
NASA 30-14904 513 Response to deficiency letter corr pieted. Licensing.
visit required. Will perform vis prior to April 3, 1992 Universidad Central 30-20225 871 Technical review completed. Aw.tmg response trous HQ on TAR related to incineration of waste EPA 30-04004 879 Technical review completed. Licensing visit will be performed 3/6/92. bnewal will be issued 3/9/92 Applied Radiant Energy 30-07099 1449 Awaiting boolution of WESF Capsule issue 2
i
- -A
i I
e l
I i
1 l
1 1
~
)
e e
o e
a e
e e
e e
e t
8 9
N G
m e
M N@
P@M NO N
e e>d MND N
O MO NM M
O e
O m
e e e s e e e e
e e o e e o e e
e e e e e e
e e
WW me mNe Op e
O eme che a
e Nm me e
O d
M@
een de m
mNm SCO
- M N
N M
mm em mm e
em ee N
=
M%
g e
O m
9 NN NON m
M
- >o edm o
e de ee e >
0 E
G eNM oc d
n eeO Ome e
e De
>> > e e a m m
JS OO Nee FO N
d mOe NNa O
N NN ee N
ww ed e e e e o e e o
e e e e e e e e
e e e e e e
e e
W H 04m mm 9
N e00 mon m
O DO mn m
O N
N Me e
OH m
o
&O w
WW w
0 m
3 e
O a
6 O
w e 9 mm eeN NN
> e med ded O
4 mm MM e
m e a
e EG mm men MM e
N mme mem e
N mm oe e
m e
O ma me emo mm o
N eee ene e O
Oe ao e e e E
kW e o e e o e e e
e o e e e o e e
o e o e o e
e e
eM De 909 09 m
e eOO OOO O
e ce Oe o O
m we FM O $
e mme de N
e OeM mMN m
e NN mm M
m e
WG mm WMO e
>>9 dmN m
M 99 MM N
e e um NN ON4
>> e m
mee
>Nm O
N
- Oo N
m e
me e e a e e e e o
e e e a e e e o
e e e e o e
e e
eM ee 94e em N
003 MO=
m O
9e mm o
e o N
un m
OM e
i m
m E
3 Mu m
mom I
DOde G
pp pop pp O
Dee P@ p e e
- P e e M
m em Me MM eee mm N
e eMe hem a
e MM mm e
e e
emew OM e e e e e o e o
e o e e e
- e e
e e
- e * * *
- Ewww>
ew em eme
== e o OOO nom N
e ON 00 e
O Pe O
em te o
mEE J
M emete 4
d>wsu me 4M Em@>m RdEWE EM O
m wW OO SOO se o e See ese O
e OO ee e e e u@eEE ed 4e Mme NN M
O ed e
- Ne e e de MN e
O Summ en e e e e e e e e
e e e e e e e e
e e e e e a
e e
> mew 33 me pMe mm e
o mee mom M
O 90 OO O
e
- m Mee m
un a
Ouppe
>e e%N w
emEdm EM J>OENE mW 3
mE%D Je 09 ese se e e OOe see e e Se ce e e e dSp 3em eG es ese me e e Owe ese e e se se e e e WOudO@
m3 e o e e o e o e
e o e e o e e e
e
- *
- e e
e e
ame w
em em Dee ee*e e
OOO eeO e e Go se e e G
wm e e
meud5 GEmed weO33 JO3OO O
um em e
3EOwE e
EMEm>
g l
8 e
em me g
Mewbe a
m e
M Qum%
e J
d
- e>M i
e 1
4 e
m De23N 4
m i
m
=
JOu%
4 3
e e d
u W
@ wee e
J m O
e I
3dem 4
m m
s a > >
m
' E E
g WWW wew 4
e m
a m
M
=
m 3
nw.
m i
e O
E E
e N
E a
m ms on a
m O
O 4
W mm m >
w eke Euw w
w n
e J
M m >
m s
emm Ogm O
m 3 m em e >
4 w>w w
e m
w W
Em E
u' W
Jm WWm E
E e
w M
gm e
uke WE>
. E O
e J
> an d
Dum eum N
Gm EWE mem
&MM O
u M
M WMO E
> WEu E
Em w
O U
49 J>m O
&*w Ewe m
ON D
e M
se ump W
m OEp mu E
MW e
ta O
3DU e m
gm mW O
>W 3
4
>E Emw e
g
>J>
OJE m
ut
> meu I
O M
WW Em WO m
w G
m Lum e
O e enu 6E eJ E
W Jw DeE m
O Om m
dm em e
5 wu m
wm3 deu E
E ou W
M 3m u
E e
3 O
Ese E
E MM Og E
e WSW 4
O E
e>=
M3m O
O E
SE O
d J
w e
Wmw w
g es>
W@m m
u Ow M
e E
&mm EE m e
>Ou ewe n
w EE J
m 0
4 Em
- RE OO m >
&W ehm m
O GW
@w m
0 M
W Eww mm met og J
33 w
4
> muu >>
e e EEm me>
e d
mm a
J E
G J
Ok mm 44 W
J M4R J
w EE E
w 4
e 0
4 Em DJJ 33 e
em
>m W
mm DJ W
9 m
44 E
JJ 3
m dp W>J 3
d a
3 O
e m
en$
4 4 J
w e E
OmM J
n
- 3d J
I w
uu JJ 4
w mwe edu 4
a e
mJ 4
d m
e 0
g e wee we 3
wwo eme E
E ut me E
E e
m 4
e at dem O
O e
4ma Dum O
O MO Em O
O 4
e o
e S
Bee e
w E
JE*
4e m
J JJ E e >
m e
I e
w i
JJ www E3 e >
DwR msJ 9
w w
Ow 6
W m
0 m
we up>
we e
u e Gue a
e e U
E>
up e
u O
P e
t 4
33 wee 3
e e
wme eu2 3
w w
Jw we 3
w e
E w
at JEE ww e e w
eJ>
dme J
JO DE m
e a
n J
J m
a N
Y u
3 N
e 1
3 3
O m
w d
E N
mm a
E NM m*
J d
N O
J M
mm NNN MM mm m NNN mm mm u
Q 4
ma emm en NNN NNN mm mm a
3 M
m m*
mmM mm N
Mm m mmM m
mm Mm E
E m
o
e e.
)
0 e
e e
4 4
9 e
O N
m e a me MOM Nm N
O em d>d m
o ed ON d
O N
O
% M e e e e e e e e
e e e e e e e
e e e e e o
e e
u NN me OON mN 4
O 4m 40m o
O em Om m
O 4
m
% ag em
@ me 44 m
Odm 4
mm em m
N m
M mm m
mm m
m o
mm o
e M%
9 N
O O
e mm eme me e
e NN mer e
e de 44 N
d e
X O
ndN p p d
00 men m
e wm M
M sa w M
J3 mm 4 de me e
DO
>Og O
OO NN N
O wm 4M e e e e e e e e
e e e e e e e
e e e e e e
e e
4>
M WN MM mmN OO O
DO D00 O
O 00 90 O
O O
4 4 d
On
&O H
WM w
6 B
w O
O w
w g ed mmN mm O
e De med e
e eg me e
N p
E e
EQ dMN NN e
4 90 OOO O
O DO DO m
O m
O MM mm mom OO M
O GO 000 O
O OO OO O
O m
2
>M e e a e e e e e
o e e e e e e
e a e e e e
e e
wM OO OOO 90 O
O DO OOO O
O DO DO O
O O
wM 94 0 0 e
9e emm em m
N NN ed4 O
N 00 en e N
m MG NMn O
m OO OWN m
e OO m
e um PP Mdp em M
e De
>Oe O
OO NN N
O m
oM e e e e e e e a
e e e e e e e
e e
e au NN m**
OO O
90 eDO O
O De DO O
O e
MH OM E
t w
N E
3 P
mu m
mom 4
>OMM G
de eMm em O
O kNm d
O mm de e O
m M
m4
%D em oOd O
mm eme e
O mm OO m
O 9
wm4w OM e o e e e e o e
o e e e o e e
e e e o e o
e o
Rwkwk eW mm mmN De e O
OC 000 O
O 90 00 O
O e
Q 4>
&M MtE J
d Mwe6 4 Mwwt u MM 4M EW @pM k
EMEME EM O
M wd OO OOO OO O
O 00 eme e O
OO OO O
O m
udWEN W CW d d mom de m
O me eme 4
O d e NN e
O m
EUMM WG e e e e e e a e
e e e e e e o
e e e e e e
e e
>M 4 w 33 me Om>
mm
> e OO mom N
O 90 OO O
O O
M45 N
uO m
m N
Quwp@
M4 m%N W
4624 M EH JW OENE MM 3
M E%D J %9 OO OOO DO O
O SO OOO O
O GO GO O
O O
e92>3mM wG OO OOO 90 O
O DO OOO O
O 90 GO O
O O
wouMOG m3 e *
- e e e e e
o e e o e e o
e e e e e e
e e
WM4 m
WW OO OOO OO O
O 90 OOO O
O OO 09 O
O O
w ee a e
adduK WENWO wh O33 JOBOO O
ut Me 330wE 4
XM Es>
0 4
1 wm Mmw>m g
M Me OUMN e
a JG t
e>W>N 9
w eM M
34 3DN l
M m
W JOu%
0 3
M m e, M
SMwe M
O w
a R
@wM O J
w S
M M
wM w Q
b 4
M 4
4>
t t
l e
=
W M
M 3
Em M
\\4 O
2 E
E 2
W M
G kW W
M O
O 4
M MM w
w S4 Buw W
M M
W J
w >
M WM Dem O
M W
3 OM 4
4 ww M
a M
w SW E
u M
J WOM E
e w H 4M 4
ud USD E
a J
MM d
3e wMM E
O M
wM MwE EM G
O u
M M
dp wMO X
MWu 2
2 w
O'M O
G 4 W JkW M
O
&M swd M
O m
J w4 uM>
w M
O>c Mu 3
Mu 4
O 3 > u-M M
MM O
ww 3
k W EMw 4
OJ2 M
U&
W MO kh M
Eu 2
O M
wM EM i
w G
M Eud 04 4MM M
kN 4 J M
JW G42 M
G 4
Om M
MM EM i
4 2
wu M
b MI GMu E
E
@u e m 3w pd u
2 M
20 24w 2
E Mk D4 W
d UZm 4
O N
WM M3h O
O E
WE O
J A
w M
wMw M
4 mm MdM M
u D e.
6 M
M W I
&MM RE M
E pu EW2 M
w 25 J
M 4
&M M SX OO M
w w&M M
O em GW M
M M
2wW MM w &'
ud J
23 W
> Muu >>
e M
EM MMk B
J G&
M&
J J
O>
MM 4 4 m
J
>R J
w EE E
w 4
4 4
EM DJJ 33 g
M
>M W
Mm Od M
M 4J E
JJ 3
M d
Wp J 3
M M
3 O
l E
M 4MM 4 4 J
M M
Ek OMM J
M M
2d MM J
W J
e w
uu JJ 4
w ME N Ju 4
4 W
MJ 4
4 4
4 4 WWW ww >
2 WO eM4 F
3 uh M 4 2
E O
M 4
MMM O
O 4
4E pub O
O MO EM O
O 4
o a
E 3WW M
E JM d4 M
J JJ f a M
G w
1 JJ www EF 0
m SE wt J e
w w
Ow SI M
0 m
mW uk>
ww e u a
04 w
e u >
3D um e u O
O 4
0 4
33 m ee 3
w 4
we 4W3 3
w w
sw we 3
w a
E W
JE E WW M
M w
WW M&&
M M
J JO OE M
M M
J J
m M
w u
u 3
N 4
0 3
3 O
m w
4 X
N
- N m
R m
mm 4
d M
3 J
H mm NNN mm mm NNN mm MM u
u H
mm amm mm NN NNN mm em
)
e 3
m m
mm mmm em N
mm emm m
mm mm i
F F
M M
M V
e
B.
Fuel Cycle and Nuclear Materials:
QUESTION 1.
Describe any changes you currently anticipate making in licensing and inspection program completion goals and the basis for those changes.
ANSWER The inspection and licensing program goals are established in the Region Operating Plan, and are outlined in more detail and implemented in the DRSS Division and each section's operating plan.
We are currently on track to meet-FY-92 goals and anticipate no changes (see tables and graphs in response to Question A.3).
The fuel facility resident inspections being done are not those listed in the Manual Chapter, since these procedures were developed several years ago.
As we noted to NMSS in our memorandum dated December 4, 1991, we are implementing, on a trial basis, inspection procedures that focus on criticality safety, maintenance, surveillance, configuration control, safety assessments, and modifications.
The Operating Plan indicates Region II will complete 12 transportation safeguards inspections for FY92.
However, we have only completed one inspection to date, due to the unavailability of shipments to inspect.
We are monitoring the upcoming shipments (2 expected in near future) and will modify the Operating Plan if necessary.
l 1
B.
Fuel Cycle and Nuclear Materials OUESTION 2.
Describe any initiatives your region has made to improve the safety of licensed programs and effectiveness of the regional program.
ENSWER As discussed previously, have directed the resident inspector activities to focus their efforts on operational safety, criticality safety, maintenance, surveillance and modifications.
This revised focus was implemented on a trial basis.
We plan in April, to evaluate our experience with this approach and will meet with NMSS to discuss the merits.
As part of the routine criticality safety inspections, we have prioritized plant systems on a relative risk basis for inspection at each facility, and inspection effort has been directed to those systems.
We continued implementation of a project management function for fuel facilities which includes issuance of comprehensive fuel facility status reports which identify inspection findings and are used as a source of information on licensee performance and inspection program direction.
We continue to closely monitor the Nuclear Fuel Services (NFS) and General Electric (GE) Performance Improvement Programs (PIPS) in nuclear criticality safety we have in place.
These programs have significantly enhanced safety at these facilities.
We continue to monitor closely the NFS pond and plutonium building decontamination and decommissioning.~
We monitored the corrective actions implemented by GE after the May event, including close monitoring of the startup of l
shutdown facilities.
We initiated an onsite team and inspection plan to review safety issues and assure they were resolved before restart.
We continue to work with NMSS on the NFS license renewal application.
We also continue to work with NMSS on the remediation work at GE for the contamination found under the FMOX Building.
Both of these require extra effort.
We developed and sent to AEOD background information books on each Region II fuel facility to be used in the HQ Operations Center as a reference during response to events.
m.
We met with senior management of each fuel facility (except GE which will be done this year) last year to review overall performance.
We intend to continue to meet with these licensees every 18 months to continue this dialogue.
In addition, Region II staff meets at the 18 month mid-point to review overall performance to determine if any issues should be brought to licensee management's attention at that time.
We plan a licensing and inspection workshop in Puerto Rico in mid-summer to review NRC criteria for research and development programs.
This was in response to identification of safety and waste disposal issues there.
Region II established a second resident, resulting in resident inspectors at both high enriched uranium facilities.
We have also pursued hiring an individual in the fuel facility area in addition to that budgeted to increase focus in this area.
Based on experience in exercises at NFS, Region II requested all Category I licensees in Region II to provide Force-on-Force Exercise objectives and scenarios ahead of exercises to assure proper exercise development.
Initiated confirmatory action letters at several facilities in response to identified issues and to resolve safety issues.
For example, one was issued to INS concerning reconcentration of radioactive material in the sewer system.
Region II developed proposed field notes for LLW inspections and routed to NMSS.
Region II added a section to the field notes regarding waste storage and disposal for licensees in Puerto Rico to focus on issues identified as problems at facilities in that territory.
Region II implemented team inspections at large licensees, such as the University of Virginia, that included inspection support from NMSS.
Region II developed several draft Information Notices as described in the response to A.2.
Region II has developed a procedure for inspection of Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations to assure these facilities are inspected appropriately.
Region II has initiated training sessions to enhance inspector's performance.
For example, the Region has conducted the Fundamentals of Inspection Course in November 1991 and March 1992, with a modified list of subjects to include Ethics, Principles of Good Regulation, Breakout Sessions on Incident Response and Report Writing, and
Interactions with the Media.
DRSS has also conducted special training sessions such as one on Allegations.
DRSS initiated special inspection effort to review transportation packaging and procedures conducted at nuclear power reactors during FY92 inspections as a result of the 1991 Surry transportation event.
DRSS initiated special inspection efforts to review low-level waste storage contingencies at nuclear power reactors for FY92 inspections.
d c.
Transportation OUESTION C.1 Please verify the inspection information in Table 1,
" Transportation Safety Inspections - FY 1992" (Source:
766 System Data Only).
Inspection information for FY 1990 is provided for reference in Table 2.
Table 2 is based on 766 system data as revised by the regions.
ANSWER We have reviewed the 766 database information, and the information you have provided appears correct for materials licensees.
However, the number of inspections for fuel faciities should be 7 instead of the 4 listed.
We note that some inspectors have been coding the use IP 86740B, which is no longer used.
We have informed our staff that the "B,"
used some time ago when coding 86740, is no longer needed.
The Region responded to two key transportation evdnts, along with the State who had the lead in 1991 and 1992 - Surry reactor coolant pump and Browns Ferry radwaste shipment.
C.
Transportation OUESTION C.2 Please provide number of inspectors who conducted transportation Safety Inspections in FY-1991; the number of inspectors who have taken NRC Technical Training Center Course H-308, " Transportation of Radioactive Material" and estimate the number of inspectors who will need to take H-308 in FY 1993.
ANSWER The enclosed Table indicates the name of the inspector, the inspector's section and the date the inspector completed Course H-308.
R. Carrion, N. McNeill and W.
Loo are scheduled to take the course in March 1992.
We pursued training for all inspectors performing transportation inspections (NMSS and REC sections) in 1991.
In addition, Region II provided instructors for two H-308 Courses taught in 1991.
The inspectors who conducted transportation safety inspections in fiscal year 1991 in the NMS section were H.
- Bermudez, D.
Collins, J.
- Ennis, L.
Franklin, M.
- Fuller, C.
Connell and J. Henson.
The key inspectors who conducted transportation safety inspections in fiscal year 1991 in the RPEP Branch were G.
- Kuzo, E. Testa, R. Shortridge, W.
Gloerson, D. Jones and D. Seymour.
C.
Bassett conducted transportation inspections of non-power reactors for the RSP section.
The Region has designated D. Jones in REC section as lead inspector on transportation issues.
h TRANSPORTATION OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS COURSE (H-308)
INSPECTOR / REVIEWER NAME SECTION DATE COMPLETED Bermudez, H.
NMS 1987
- Collins, D.
NMS 1988
- Connell, C.
NMS 1985 Ennis, J.
NMS 1988
- Franklin, L.
NMS 1985 Fuller, M.
NMS 1991 Henson, J.
NMS 1991 Pelchat, J.
NMS 1987 Waldron, S.
NMS 1987 Wright, E.
NMS 1987
- Bassett, C.
RPS 1986 Elliott, M.
RPS 1986
- Kasnicki, D.
RPS 1987
- Troup, G.
RPS 1985 Gloerson, W.
REC 1988
- Jones, D.
REC 1990
- Kuzo, G.
REC 1987
- Seymour, D.
REC 1991-Volk, T.
REC 1991
- Parker, B.
FRP 1989
- Pharr, B.
FRP 1991 Shortridge, R.
FRP 1987
- Testa, E.
FRP 1987 Kreh, J.
EP 1985 Wright, F.
EP 1986 l
C.
Transportation OUESTION C.3 Please provide a copy of any regionally-generated field notes for conducting transportation safety inspections.
ANSWER Region II uses the standard field notes from the Manual Chapter.
b V
a 9
-r w
OUESTlQ.E C.4 Please provide status of findings concerning radiographer transportation quality assurance program approvals (see memo from Robert F.
Burnett to Directors, Divisions of Radiation Safety and Safeguards, Regions I-V, dated September 26, 1991).
ANSWER Burnett's memo requested that regions determine, during the next inspection, whether named licensees are required to have an approved QA plan.
Radiography Licensees listed in Burnett Ltr - 10 Licenses Terminated 3
Inspections Performed 3
QA Plan Not Required 2
Had Approved QA Program 1
Inspections Not yet performed 4
I i
D.
Low-Level Waste OUESTION D.1 What problems in licensee waste form and waste classification programs have been identified during low-level waste inspections?
ANSWER Although not originally identified by the inspection program, regional staff continues to inspect the low-level waste forms of boric acid wastes produced by the bitumen process at Surry to assure that waste form would meet the stability requirements of 10 CFR 61 for waste characteristics.
Because of limited or incomplete data, an interim, one-year approval was granted for these waste forms and additional verification testing was requested by NMSS for acceptance of the Topical Report.
D.
Low-Level Waste OCTESTION D.2 What steps are being taken to identify problems associated with low-level waste generator storage?
ANSWER Radwaste storage is reviewed during routine inspections of licensees that store waste using the guidance in MC 84900.
Special attention has been given to licensees in Puerto Rico who store waste using the guidance in TI 2800/020.
A special section in field notes has been added to address this area in Puerto Rico. Waste storage was a specific concern identified during an inspection at the University of I
Puerto Rico June 17-21,1991.
l The REC Section has also' initiated review of this area during inspections at nuclear power reactors and documents these in the inspection reports, i
1 I
I l
1
)
E.
Domestic Safeguards OUESTION E.1 Identify any revisions or modifications necessary to improve the safeguards inspection program at Category I fuel facilities.
ANSWER It would be helpful if NMSS would address copies of the MC&A inspection reports to the Section Chief (E. McAlpine).
NMSS needs to communicate any violations of MC&A requirements to region so an evaluation can be made with regards to impact on security prior to the issuance of the inspection report.
Continue to hold quarterly meetings with licensees.
At least once each FY one of the meetings at the licensees site.
m
1 i
e E.
Domestic Safeguards OUESTION E.2. Provide a summary of your FY-91 inspection efforts to include regional initiatives and training provided to the inspectors.
ANSWER Initiatives include:
All Force-On-Force inspections are coordinated with NMSS.
Provided regional inspector to assist NMSS MC&A inspection at NFS.
Provided regional inspector to assist NMSS contractor (Los Alamos) in accomplishing a diversion path analysis study at NFS.
All Force-On-Force exercises which we plan to inspect are reviewed in the region prior to the inspection.
Perform a Part 26 inspection program at NFS to ascertain any variance in their non-regulated program and the new Part 26.
A summary of inspections, licensing and training are listed below.
SAFEGUARDS INSPECTIONS FOR FY-91 B&W/NNFD DATES INSPECTORS 70-27/90-25 12/10-14/90 THOMPSON /MASNYK/STANSBERRY 70-27/91-03 2/11-15/91 THOMPSON /TILLMAN +CASTAVERA-HQ 70-27/91-07 3/24-28/91 THOMPSON /STANSBERRY 70-27/91-12 5/19-23/91 THOMPSON /MASNYK/TILLMAN/
STANSBERRY 70-27/91-15 8/12-16/91 THOMPSON /TILLMAN TOTAL =
5 inspections (13 inspectors)
HEE DATIE INSPECTORS 70-143/90-25 11/5-9/90 MASNYK/TOBIN/ CLAY 70-143/91-01 1/14-18/91 TOBIN 70-143/91-08 3/11-15/91 MASNYK/STANSBERRY
Efl DATES INSPECTORS 70-143/91-14 5/6-10/91 MASNYK/TILIMAN 70-143/91-16 6/25-26/91 TOBIN(FFD) 70-143/91-17 6/9-13/91 CLAY (MCA) 70-143/91-20 6/17-21/91 MASNYK/STANSBERRY 70-143/91-27 9/23-27/91 MASNYK/ THOMPSON TOTAL = 8 inspections (12 inspectors)
v TRANSPORTATION INSPECTIONS PLANNED ACCOMPLISHED 8
6 RPT. NOS.
DATE FACILITY TYPE 50-325/90-46 10/17/90 Brunswick Domestic Rail to Robinson 70-1426/90-01 10/17/90 Transnuclear Import / Export 70-1426/90-02 11/7/90 Transnuclear Import / Export 50-325/91-19 6/11-12 Brunswick Rail Shipment 70-1252/91-01 1/2-3/91 Edlow Shipment / Import SPECIAL 9/6/91 McGill Weapons T&Q
~
EQUTE SURVEYS 1/3/91 1/3/91 1/15-17 4/2-4/91 Total = 4 PHYSICAL SECURITY PLAN REVIEWS RECEIVED COMPLETED TRANSFERRED PENDING AS OF 10/91 11 8
1 2
2 Pending were closed 10/91 TRAINING IN FY91 A. Tillman - NSA INFOSEC Seminar W.
Stansberry - Management of Intrusion Detection System W. Stansberry - ASIS Workshop
- 0. Masnyk - GE Technology (BWR), Westinghouse Design (PWR) 1 i
L.4 C'
Section Chief Accomoaniments of Insoectorm D. McGuire-Accompaniments / trips Da t e ( s_),
Location (s)
Reason Insoector(s) 11/14/90 HQ NMSS NRR MTG Masynk/ Thompson 1/9-10/90 HQ NMSS NRR MTG 2/13-15/91 B&W NNFD Inspection Thompson /Tobin 3/20-22/91 HQ NMSS MTG Thompson /Masynk 7/11/91 HQ NMSS MTG Thompson 10/23-25/91 NFS TRT Drill 11/20-21/91 HQ NMSS MTG 12/10-13/91 B&W NNFD TRT Drill 1/15-17/92 NFS TRT Drill Thompson /Tillman/Tobin 2/10/92 HQ NMSS MTG Masynk l
I
.